Skip to main content
PMC home page
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2024 Jun 19;243:15–30. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.243.115991

Carexrecondita Muñoz-Schüler, Martín-Bravo & Jim.Mejías (Carex section Junciformes Kük., Cyperaceae), a new sedge species from the Andes of central Chile

Paulo Muñoz-Schüler 1,✉, Ana Morales-Alonso 2,3, José Ignacio Márquez-Corro 3,4, Mary T K Arroyo 5,6,7, Santiago Martín-Bravo 3, Pedro Jiménez-Mejías 3
PMCID: PMC11208778  PMID: 38938540

Abstract

CarexsectionJunciformes is one of the most diverse groups of the genus in South America, consisting of approximately 30 species. Here we describe a new species, Carexrecondita, belonging to this section. We studied its placement within a molecular phylogeny of the group and found it to constitute an independent lineage. The new species is morphologically very close to C.austroamericana, from southern Patagonia, despite being phylogenetically divergent to the rest of Patagonian species of sect. Junciformes. So far, this species is known only from a few specimens recently collected in its type locality, despite growing in a well-collected area in the Andes of Metropolitana Region of Santiago, the most populated administrative region of Chile. We provide a detailed morphological description, comments on its relationship with other Southern Cone species of sect. Junciformes and relevant ecological notes.

Key words: Andes, Carex , Chile, Cyperaceae, South America, taxonomy

Introduction

With about 96 species, Carex is among the three most biodiverse genera of the flora of Chile (Rodriguez et al. 2018; Muñoz-Schüler et al. 2023). However, the taxonomic knowledge of the genus in the country is fragmentary, as it is in the rest of South America. Recently, a series of works focusing on particular groups of Carex are shedding light on the taxonomic structure and systematic relationships of these understudied groups (e.g. Benítez-Benítez et al. 2021; Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2021a; García‐Moro et al. 2022). The relatively large number of new species that are being steadily described from the continent in the last few years (e.g., Jiménez-Mejías and Escudero 2016; Jiménez-Mejías and Roalson 2016; Poindexter et al. 2017; Jiménez-Mejías and Reznicek 2018; Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2020, 2021a, 2021b) depicts how much is still to be done before a comprehensive understanding of the genus in South America is reached.

CarexsectionJunciformes Kük (subgenusPsyllophorae), with over 25 species in the continent (Roalson et al. 2021; Morales-Alonso et al. in press), is one of the most diversified Carex groups of South America. It is almost entirely endemic to the continent, with only four species in the SW Pacific and a clear center of diversity in Patagonia (Barros 1935, 1969; Moore 1968, 1983). The evolutionary history of the group has been recently studied by Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021). They showed that the section includes two main lineages, namely “Junciformes clade” and “Aciculares clade” -as these were formerly considered independent sections due to several diagnostic morphological characters (Wheeler 1989)- plus three isolated lineages (C.camptoglochin V.I.Krecz., C.phalaroides Kunth s.l., and C.vallis-pulchrae Phil.). Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021) also showed that the ancestral area and diversification cradle of the group was centered in South America, with several migrations out of the Southern Cone to the Tropical Andes, Brazil, and the SW Pacific. However, the circumscription of this section is still under study, as a recent phylogenetic framework excluded the geographically isolated Pampean C.herteri G.A.Wheeler from sect. Junciformes (Morales-Alonso et al. in press).

During a fieldtrip in Chile in January 2023 we collected material of an undetermined acaulescent Carexsect.Junciformes taxon in the Andes of Metropolitana region of Santiago (see Taxonomic Treatment for details on the collection). In a preliminary assessment using the available identification keys (Barros 1969; Moore 1983; Wheeler 1986, 1988) the specimen was determined as C.austroamericana G.A. Wheeler, a Patagonian species belonging to the Junciformes clade (Benítez-Benítez et al. 2021). The strong disjunction of this undetermined specimen population regarding its tentative species distribution (>700 km north) raised the question of whether it could be a different species. Accordingly, we proceeded with a molecular phylogenetic and morphological study to resolve the taxonomic identity and systematic affinities of the problematic specimen, and to warrant its taxonomic recognition if required.

Materials and methods

Molecular analyses

Silica-dried leaves of the undetermined taxon collected on the field in January 2023 were used for DNA extraction and PCR amplification.

The DNA extraction was performed using a modified CTAB procedure (Doyle and Doyle 1987). We amplified the loci ETS and ITS (nuclear ribosomal DNA, nrDNA) and matK and rps16 (plastidial DNA, ptDNA) since these have been previously used for the study of the systematics of sect. Junciformes, following the protocols in Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021). The amplified products were externally sequenced by Macrogen (Madrid, Spain). The sequence chromatograms were edited and revised with Geneious v.2022.0.1 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). The resulting sequences were concatenated and included in the complete multiaccession matrix built by Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021). The alignment was made with MUSCLE v.3.8.425 (Edgar 2004), and the best substitution models for each DNA region were selected with JModelTest 2 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003; Darriba et al. 2012) as implemented in CIPRES Science Gateway v3.3 (www.phylo.org/portal2; Miller et al. 2010). The concatenated matrix contained 106 accessions, 96 belonging to species of subg. Psyllophorae of which 17 are representatives of the South American species of sect. Junciformes. Thus, all but five species -if C.phalaroides is considered in a broad sense (Morales-Alonso and Jiménez-Mejías 2021)- from the section were included in the study. The missing species are C.boelckeiana Barros, C.moorei G.A.Wheeler, and C.nelmesiana Barros, which are morphologically close to the Junciformes s.s. clade, and C.sanctae-marthae L.E.Mora & J.O.Rangel and C.transandina G.A.Wheeler, putatively belonging to the Aciculares clade. It is worth saying that the samples determined as C.nelmesiana and C.transandina in Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021) were re-identified here as C.austroamericana (P.J.-M., pers. obs.). Additionally, the former species named C.lateriflora Phil. has been here corrected to C.trichodes Steudel ex Boott (Penneckamp 2022).

The phylogenetic reconstructions analysis were run employing Maximum Likelihood (ML) in RAxML v.8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014), and Bayesian Inference (BI) using MrBayes v.3.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003; Ronquist et al. 2012) as implemented in the CIPRES Science Gateway v3.3 (Miller et al. 2010) and in the Scientific Computer Center of Andalucía supercomputing cluster (CICA). ML analysis was set with default parameters and 1000 replicates. BI analysis was set with 10 million generations and 4 simultaneous Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMC) runs, with a sample frequency of one tree every 1000 generations. After checking for the analysis to reach stationarity, a burn-in threshold of 25% was applied and the consensus tree was built using the 50% majority rule. Strong clade support was considered above 75% for bootstrap (BS) and above 0.90 for posterior probability (PP) (Gehrke et al. 2010).

Morphological study

Three collections of the undetermined taxon were located and studied: the original collection from the 2023 fieldwork campaign, a second collection by M.T.K.A. in 2022, and a last voucher located in CONC collection, determined as Carexandina Phil., and collected in 2007. These vouchers were determined using the available keys and thoroughly compared against descriptions (Barros 1969; Moore 1983; Wheeler 1986, 1988; see Results).

Direct comparisons were also carried out against material (including type material -herbarium specimens or high-resolution images of them-) belonging to the other three Junciformes clade acaulescent species: C.argentina Barros, C.austroamericana, and C.nelmesiana. In total, we studied 17 vouchers housed at BAB, CONC, SI, and UPOS.

Conservation status

Since our results showed that the undetermined taxon constitutes an undescribed species with a very restricted known distribution, a preliminary conservation status for it was assessed. We followed the criteria provided in the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 13 (IUCN 2017) manual.

Results

Molecular analyses

The multiaccession matrix consisted of 606 bp for ETS, 624 bp for ITS, 572 bp for matK, and 937 bp for rps16. The length of obtained sequences for the problematic specimen were 493 bp for ETS, 603 bp for ITS, 503 bp for matK, while for rps16 marker only 285 bp could be obtained. The obtained BI tree topology (Fig. 3) was highly in concordance with the one recovered in Benítez-Benítez et al. (2021) and Morales-Alonso et al. (unpublished results). The best resolved topology was obtained with BI with no indels coded. ML and BI analyses resulted in very similar topologies. The main incongruences were mostly minor and retrieved at shallow branch levels of the tree.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Phylogram resulting from BI analysis using MrBayes of the multiaccession matrix for Carexsubg.Psyllophorae. Branch support is not indicated when PP=1.00/BS = 100. Posterior probability (PP) support is given above branches while MLBS support is given below branches. Asterisks above branches indicate BI 100 > PP ≥ 0.95. Bold thick branches indicate nodes supported by MLBS ≥ 80 and/or BIPP ≥ 0.95. ML support BS ≤ 80 is given below branches. The newly sequenced voucher of C.recondita is displayed in bold red letters. Tip labels include the geographical origin of the specimen using TDWG level 3 regions abbreviations (“botanical countries”; Brummitt 2001).

The sample of the undetermined taxon (Fig. 3) was nested within the Junciformes clade with maximum BS and PP support. It was placed as sister to a well-supported clade containing the caulescent C.sorianoi Barros and the acaulescent C.austroamericana (BS = 100; PP = 1,00). The sample shared up to 98.6% pairwise nucleotide identity with C.austroamericana and C.sorianoi while 96.5% of identical sites were reached for this clade.

Morphological analyses

The samples of the undetermined specimen share a number of morphological affinities with C.austroamericana, such as an acaulescent growing habit, stiff leaves that surpass the entire inflorescence, and stipitate utricles. However, it can be distinguished from this and any other species of sect. Junciformes by having the following combination of characters: leaves up to 9 cm long, spikes ≤ 3.5 mm wide, and utricles ellipsoid, ovoid or sub-obovoid, glabrous to sparsely hispidulous, with -usually weakly- raised nerves on the faces and a stipitate base often flattened. A detailed morphological comparison between these problematic specimens, C.austroamericana and the other three acaulescent species of sect. Junciformes from the Southern Cone is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Variation in diagnostic morphological characters of C.recondita and morphologically related Patagonian species of sect. Junciformes. Characters listed for C.austroamericana and C.nelmesiana are based largely on Wheeler (1986) and complemented with personal observations and measurements. Given the low sampling sizes, the natural variation of these characters might be underestimated and could be wider.

Character Carexaustroamericana Carexnelmesiana Carexargentina Carexrecondita
Leaf length 0.5–5 cm 1–5 cm 8–12 cm 2.9–9 cm
Spike width 3.5–6 mm 5–6 mm 5 mm 2.8–3.5 mm
Number of female flowers/utricles Four to six Four to seven Five to seven Four to five
Utricle shape Obovoid Sub-globose Ovate to lanceolate Elliptical, sub-fusiform or sub-obovate
Utricle indurnenturn Glabrous, but scaberulent on the beak and the margins of the distal third of the body Puberulent, margins hispidulous Flocculent Glabrous to hispidulous, the margins scaberulent on the distal half of the body or beyond
Utricle venation Faintly or prominently veined, up to 6–8 prominent veins abaxially and 4–6 veined adaxially Faintly veined or with 4–7 prominent veins in the proximal third of the abaxial side Veinless Weakly 2–5 veined adaxially and 1–4 veined abaxially
Utricle base Stipitate, rounded or flattened in cross section Shortly stipitate Truncate to stipitate Stipitate and flattened in cross section
Utricle margins Rounded Rounded Rounded Flattened
Beak Conical, bidentate Shortly conical and obscurely bidentate Longly conical and strongly bidentate Conical, short and bidentate
Rachilla Subulate Ovate Lanceolate Linear
Open in a new tab

From the other three Junciformes clade species not included in the phylogeny (C.boelckeiana, C.moorei and C.nelmesiana) the undetermined taxon is readily distinguished because the two first species have well-developed stems, longer than leaves, as well as larger utricles (see Barros 1969, Wheeler 1988), and C.nelmesiana has utricles with faces entirely nerveless. The undetermined taxon is also readily distinguished from the closely related C.sorianoi (Fig. 3) because this latter has culms exceeding its leaves, that are usually flexuose, and also by having two stigmatic female flowers (instead of three; see the Description section below).

Discussion

The set of evidence presented here makes it clear that the studied specimens should be treated as a new species. Even though it is morphologically very similar to C.austroamericana, the molecular data by itself is compelling enough to support its status as a different taxon (Fig. 2). Moreover, the differences in key -but subtle- traits (such as rachilla shape and utricle venation; see Table 1) and its disjunct distribution with respect to the other three phylogenetically related species of southern South America (i.e., C.austroamericana, C.nelmesiana and C.sorianoi) reinforces treating the studied specimens as a new species. Morphologically similar species, such as the species here described, are prevalent within sect. Junciformes despite many of its lineages having deep times of divergence (dating back to Miocene; Benítez-Benítez et al. 2021). The relatively reduced diversification rate estimated for subgen. Psyllophorae suggests that its diversity stems from the progressive accumulation of morphological changes (disparification) and thus might have resulted in lower levels of morphological diversity than the expected by means of evolutionary radiations (Benítez-Benítez et al. 2021). This overall morphological resemblance has led to the misuse of names in quite a few cases for Patagonian taxa (Barros 1969, Wheeler and Muñoz-Schick 1990), a recurrent phenomenon in Carex that hinders its already problematic taxonomy (Jiménez‐Mejías et al. 2014). Likewise, Wheeler (1986) highlighted the resemblance of C.austroamericana with C.argentina and C.nelmesiana, but the morphological differences between those three species were clearer than that existing between the new species and C.austroamericana (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Detailed comparison between C.recondita and C.austroamericanaA spikes of C.recondita (Aa) and C.austroamericana (Ab) B utricles of C.recondita (Ba) and C.austroamericana (Bb) C glumes of C.reconditaD rachillas of C.recondita (Da) and C.austroamericana (Db). Note that the rachilla of C.recondita is attached to the utricle base E achenes of C.recondita (Ea) and C.austroamericana (Eb).

Wheeler (1986) described the phytogeography of C.austroamericana as growing primarily on Patagonian steppe, forming “small, dense tufts in moist depressions of the steppe, which is often dominated by Festuca gracillima”. For C.nelmesiana he said that it “grows on Patagonian steppe and occur primarily on moderate to steep slopes, where they form dense tufts in dry, exposed sites”. Currently, both species are known only from stepparian environments in southern Patagonia, ranging from Río Negro to Tierra del Fuego provinces (Argentina), and Magallanes region (Chile) for C.austroamericana, and Chubut to Santa Cruz provinces (Argentina), and Aysén region (Chile) for C.nelmesiana (Fig. 4). Another tuft-forming acaulescent species, C.argentina, also grows in the Patagonian steppe, but extends its distribution further north through the Andes, reaching the north of Mendoza province (Argentina) and Metropolitana region of Santiago (Chile), and being reported as south as Santa Cruz province (Argentina) and Araucanía region (Chile). The species here described, however, is only known from the Andes of Metropolitana region of Santiago, where it grows in a lower altitudinal vegetation belt than C.argentina (2750–2880 vs 3200 m; Fig. 4), and at least 1300 km north of the northernmost population of any of the two other Patagonian species (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Occurrence map of Carexsect.Junciformes species cited in this work A occurrence map of five Patagonian species of Carexsect.Junciformes. Species locations are depicted in colored circles and some cities are represented as black squares B detailed map of the area of occurrence of C.recondita (light-green circles). Another species occurring in the area, C.argentina, is depicted by red circles. The highlighted region corresponds to the Yerba Loca Nature Sanctuary. Altitude was represented by a color palette and contour lines, representing elevation every 200 meters. For orientation purposes, some landmarks were depicted on the map.

Andean-Patagonian disjunctions are not uncommon within and between closely related species of Carex (e.g. South American sect. Racemosae, Wheeler 1990, Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2021b; C.melanocystis É.Desv., Villaverde et al. 2017, Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2021a; Muñoz-Schüler et al. 2023; C.microglochin Wahlenb., Wheeler and Guaglianone 2003) and sect. Junciformes is not an exception (e.g. C.camptoglochin, C.phalaroides, C.vallis-pulchraevar.vallis-pulchrae; Wheeler and Guaglianone 2003; Wheeler 1989; Benítez-Benítez et al. 2021). This apparent gap might be either due to the lack of suitable environments in the territory between the two groups of known populations, or a reflection of the undersampling in Andean steppe-like environments in south-central Southern Cone in general, and of Carex species in particular.

Taxonomic treatment

. Carex recondita

Muñoz-Schüler, Martín-Bravo & Jim.Mejías sp. nov.

090BCA17-4F2A-5E80-82FD-3CEBA1C2D468

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77343736-1

Diagnosis.

Carexrecondita is similar to C.austroamericana, from which it is distinguished by its longer leaves up to 9 cm long (versus 5 cm long in C.austroamericana), narrower spikes up to 3.5 mm wide (versus 3.5–6 mm wide), and weakly veined ellipsoid, obovoid or suborbicular utricles, with a flattened stipitate base (versus strongly veined obovoid utricles, with a rounded or flattened stipitate base).

Type.

Chile. Región Metropolitana de Santiago: Provincia de Santiago, Farellones, camino al centro de ski Valle Nevado, Tres Puntas, 2750 m.a.s.l., 33°21.39183'S, 70°15.45538'W, 16 January 2023, P. Jiménez Mejías, J.I. Márquez Corro, S. Martín Bravo & P. Muñoz Schüler 12PJM-CL23 (holotype: CONC 193519; isotypes: EIF 17307, UPOS).

Description.

Plants low-growing, densely caespitose 3–10.2 cm tall from the base of the shoots to the tip of the leaves, acaulescent or nearly so. Leaves numerous, up to eight per shoot, much longer than the flowering shoots and concealing them, 2–8.2 cm long, canaliculate but flattish distally, stiff to slightly flexuose. Flowering shoots elevated on erect stalks of 1.2–4.4 cm long formed by the basal leaf sheaths, with the portion between the insertion of the distal-most leaf and the proximal-most bract inconspicuous, up to 1.2 mm long. Inflorescence a single, terminal, androgynous, subglobose spike, 4.3–6.2 mm long and 2.8–3.5 mm wide, subtended by an involucral bract, with a glumaceous base and prolonged into a 5.8–9.1 mm long antrorsely scabrid or smooth setaceous portion. Staminate part concealed by the pistillate portion, 2-flowered. Pistillate part 4–5 flowered, sometimes with an extra infertile flower borne by the involucral bract; glumes ovate to widely elliptical, 3.1–4.1 mm long and 1.4–2.3 mm wide, glabrous, with wide hyaline margins contrasting with a narrow green middle strip, veinless, attenuated distally into an awn, the 2-proximalmost glumes with a 1.9–3.3 mm long awned portion that usually surpasses the whole inflorescence, distalmost glumes with a 0.6–0.9 mm long mucronate apex. Utricles 2.4–3 mm long and 1.2–1.8 mm wide, ellipsoid, suborbicular, ovoid or sub-obovoid, obscurely trigonous in cross section, green to pale green, with 2 prominent lateral veins dark greenish, contrasting with the rest of the body, veinless or 2–5 weakly veined adaxially and 1–4 veined abaxially, glabrous to sparsely hispidulous on its distal half, with the lateral veins hispidulous to ciliolate on its distal ⅔ portion, attenuated or constricted proximally into a sub-stipitate base 0.4–0.8 mm long, often flattened in cross section, constricted distally into a short, bidentate, and pale beak 0.3–0.6 mm long. Achenes 1.9–2.2 long and 1.2–1.6 mm wide, broadly elliptical to sub-obovoid, obscurely trigonous, often flattened, greenish, more or less constricted proximally into a sub-stipitate base and attenuated distally into a short beak. Rachilla often absent, when present 0.6–0.9 mm long, linear, margins smooth. Stigmas 3. Anthers 3.

Phenology.

The phenology of this species is poorly understood. A fully flowering specimen with some ripe utricles was collected in mid-late December, while a specimen with entirely ripe utricles bearing some female flowers was collected in mid-January. According to these observations we infer that the flowering period for the new species is likely to range from mid-November to late December with mature individuals bearing ripe utricles from mid-late December onwards. This agrees with the plant community peak flowering period at 2935 m.a.s.l. (late-December to early-January) in an adjacent high Andean valley (Arroyo et al. 1981), thus our species should flower during the first half of the flowering season.

Etymology.

The specific epithet recondita (female) refers to the Latin word recondito (male), meaning something hidden or occult, apropos the acaulescent inflorescence and low-growing habit of this species.

Distribution and habitat.

Carexrecondita occurs in the area of La Parva and Farellones-Valle Nevado ski circuits, in the Andes of the Metropolitana region of Santiago (see Fig. 4), and has been reported to grow between 2750–2880 m.a.s.l. The new species occurs in the central Chilean Andes, in an area characterized by a semi-arid Mediterranean-type influence climate (Arroyo et al. 1981) and it grows in the alpine cushion plant belt (Cavieres et al. 2000), on steep slopes around 650 m of elevation above a climatically depressed Kageneckiaangustifolia D.Don treeline. Phytogeographically, this area and elevation in the high Andes falls in the Cuyano-Pikumche district of the Altoandean Province of the southern Andes (Biganzoli et al. 2022). Snow is received from May-June to October-November, depending on the year. Carexrecondita was growing on a south-facing slope next to an important road leading from Farellones mountain town to Valle Nevado ski resort, forming dense tufts in a habitat dominated by the cushion-forming umbellifer Azorellaruizii G.M. Plunkett & A.N. Nicolas (Fig. 1). Other common species in the area include Acaenapinnatifida Ruiz & Pav., Adesmiacorymbosa Clos, Anarthrophyllumcumingii (Hook. & Arn.) F. Phil., Chaetantheraeuphrasioides (DC.) F. Meigen, Haplopappusscrobiculatus (Nees) DC., Hypochaerisclarionoides (J. Remy) Reiche, Hordeumcomosum J. Presl, Noccaeamagellanica (Comm. ex Poir.) Holub, Pereziacarthamoides (D. Don) Hook. & Arn., Poaholciformis J. Presl, Quinchamaliumchilense Molina, Rytidospermapictum (Nees & Meyen) Nicora and Seneciopentaphyllus Phil. The exotic Taraxacumofficinale F.H. Wigg., an invasive Palearctic species at high elevations in the central Chilean Andes (Cavieres et al. 2008), can also be locally common. This plant is currently known from only three points. Two are located on two contiguous slopes, with approximately 280 meters of distance between each other, while the third point is located approximately 3 km Northwest in a straight line from the closest known point (Fig. 4). Further fieldwork might expand its known presence within the area by searching in environmentally similar localities.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Carexrecondita Muñoz-Schüler, Martín-Bravo & Jim.Mejías A, B aerial and frontal view of the plant and a spike C, D habit E two of the authors looking for more specimens of C.recondita on its habitat, the road can be seen at the upper-left portion of the picture F habitat of C.recondita, showing dominant Azorellaruizii (green cushions) and Anarthrophyllumcumingii (prostrate shrub with orange-yellow flowers). Photos by P M-S (A–E) and MTKA (F).

Vernacular name.

We propose the common name for this species to be “Carex de las nieves”.

Conservation status.

C.recondita has an area of occupancy (AOO) smaller than 10 km2, and only a single population (three subsets) of approximately < 200 individuals has been reported. Although the entire known individuals of this species are located in protected land (Yerba Loca Nature Sanctuary), the management of the area that is effectively being protected only includes the watershed of the La Yerba Loca stream, which is located 4 km west (in straight line) and approximately 1000 m below the area in which C.recondita grows. Notwithstanding this, the new species grows within one of the most crowded ski circuits of Chile (La Parva and Farellones-Valle Nevado circuit), on an area contiguous to one of its main roads, which has also been affected by exotic plant invasions (Cavieres et al. 2008). Road construction and maintenance works seem like a plausible threat to the future conservation of the population. The scarcity of observed individuals and the lack of previous reports or collections for this area suggests that C.recondita might be extremely rare and thus vulnerable to disturbances. The real extent of its natural distribution is unknown, and its area of occurrence might be greater than estimated by current data. However, and according to our data and observations, we propose that this species is better assessed as ‘Critically Endangered’ (CR; B2ab (ii-iv) + C2a (i)), according to the IUCN Red List criteria (IUCN 2017). Further searching of this species will contribute to expanding the knowledge about its presence and might help proposing a more robust assessment.

Notes.

C.recondita is a tuft-forming species with stiff leaves and an acaulescent spike burrowed between the leaves, a type of growth form shared with many other Patagonian species of sect. Junciformes and recurrent in South American Carex species (see Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2021b). This type of growth might be an adaptation to harsh environments such as the high Andes or the Patagonian steppe (Körner 2021, pp. 37–38). This made C.recondita remain unnoticed until now, despite growing just beside a busy road in a popular skiing holiday area barely over one hour by road from Santiago, the most populated city of Chile. Some of the studied material included inflorescences with involucral bracts bearing -apparently- infertile female flowers.

Additional specimens examined (paratypes).

Chile. Región Metropolitana de Santiago: Provincia de Santiago, camino entre Farellones y Valle Nevado, laderas por debajo de la curva 14, piso altoandino, 2853 m a.s.l., 33°21.46188'S, 70°15.32352'W, 20 December 2022, M.T.K. Arroyo, V. Robles, K. Robles, M. Acevedo & L. Retamal 29576 (CONC). Provincia de Santiago, Farellones, a 1 km de la Parva. 2674 m a.s.l., 33°20'S, 70°17'W, 1 March 2007, M. Mihoc 777 (CONC 178536).

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Carex recondita

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Alicia Marticorena, María Monsalvo and Manuel Belgrano, curators of CONC, BAB and SI, respectively, for their help in accessing the Carex collections of those herbaria. We would also like to acknowledge Sebastian Teillier and Aron Cádiz-Véliz for their help with the discussion on some elements of this work, such as the suggested vernacular name, the conservation assessment, and the epithet of the new species.

Citation

Muñoz-Schüler P, Morales-Alonso A, Márquez-Corro JI, Arroyo MTK, Martín-Bravo S, Jiménez-Mejías P (2024) Carex recondita Muñoz-Schüler, Martín-Bravo & Jim.Mejías (Carex section Junciformes Kük., Cyperaceae), a new sedge species from the Andes of central Chile. PhytoKeys 243: 15–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.243.115991

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was financially supported by DANZ Spanish Research Agency of the Ministry of Science and Innovation (DANZ, award# PID2020-113897GB-I00 to P.J.-M. and S.M-B.), the Ramón y Cajal program (award# RYC2021-031238-I) to P.J.-M, and the IAPT Research Grant 2022 awarded to JIM-C. Fieldwork made by MTKA was funded by Fondecyt 1221540, CHIC- ANID PIA/BASAL PFB 210018 and IEB- ANID PIA/BASAL 210006.

Author contributions

Methodology: AM-A, PJ-M, PM-S. Writing – original draft: PM-S, PJ-M. Review and editing: SM-B, PJ-M, JIM-C, AM-A, MTKA, PM-S.

Author ORCIDs

Paulo Muñoz-Schüler https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7070-4121

Ana Morales-Alonso https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1497-1070

José Ignacio Márquez-Corro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-2933

Mary T. K. Arroyo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-0426

Santiago Martín-Bravo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0770

Pedro Jiménez-Mejías https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-4477

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Villagran C. (1981) Plant phenological patterns in the high Andean cordillera of central Chile. Journal of Ecology 69(1): 205–223. 10.2307/2259826 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barros M. (1935) Ciperáceas Argentinas II, géneros Kyllinga Rottb., Scirpus L., y Carex L. Anales del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia 38: 133–264. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barros M. (1969) Cyperaceae. In: Correa MN. (Ed.) Flora Patagónica, Parte II.Typhaceae a Orchidaceae (excepto Graminae). Colección Científica Instituto de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 28–92.
  4. Benítez-Benítez C, Otero A, Ford KA, García-Moro P, Donadío S, Luceño M, Martín-Bravo S, Jiménez-Mejías P. (2021) An evolutionary study of Carexsubg.Psyllophorae (Cyperaceae) sheds light on a strikingly disjunct distribution in the Southern Hemisphere, with emphasis on its Patagonian diversification. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 735302. 10.3389/fpls.2021.735302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Biganzoli F, Oyarzabal M, Teillier S, Zuloaga FO. (2022) Fitogeografía de la provincia altoandina del Cono Sur de Sudamérica. Darwiniana 10(2): 537–574. 10.14522/darwiniana.2022.102.1043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brummitt RK. (2001) World geographic scheme for recording plant distributions. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh 2. http://rs.tdwg.org/wgsrpd/doc/data/
  7. Cavieres LA, Peñaloza A, Kalin Arroyo M. (2000) Altitudinal vegetation belts in the high-Andes of central Chile (33°S). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73(2): 331–344. 10.4067/S0716-078X2000000200008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cavieres LA, Quiroz CL, Molina-Montenegro MA. (2008) Facilitation of the non-native Taraxacumofficinale by native nurse cushion species in the high Andes of central Chile: Are there differences between nurses? Functional Ecology 22(1): 148–156. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01338.x [DOI]
  9. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012) JModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772. 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 28(2): 330–331. 10.2307/4119796 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edgar RC. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. García‐Moro P, Otero A, Benítez‐Benítez C, Costa L, Martín‐Bravo S, Naczi RFC, Reznicek AA, Roalson EH, Starr JR, Jiménez‐Mejías P. (2022) Biogeography and systematics of CarexsubgenusUncinia (Cyperaceae): A unique radiation for the genus Carex in the Southern Hemisphere. Taxon 71(3): 587–607. 10.1002/tax.12678 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gehrke B, Martín-Bravo S, Muasya M, Luceño M. (2010) Monophyly, phylogenetic position and the role of hybridization in Schoenoxiphium Nees (Cariceae, Cyperaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56(1): 380–392. 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guindon S, Gascuel O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52(1): 696–704. 10.1080/10635150390235520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. IUCN (2017) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria, version 13. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
  16. Jiménez-Mejías P, Escudero M. (2016) Notes on South American CarexsectionSchiedeanae and description of the new species Carexroalsoniana. Phytotaxa 260(2): 185–192. 10.11646/phytotaxa.260.2.8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiménez-Mejías P, Reznicek AA. (2018) Additional notes on South American Carexsect.Schiedeanae (Cyperaceae) and description of the new species Carexpachamamae. Phytotaxa 340(1): 055–062. 10.11646/phytotaxa.340.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiménez-Mejías P, Roalson EH. (2016) Two new species of Carex (Cyperaceae) from northern South America. Phytotaxa 266(1): 021–026. 10.11646/phytotaxa.266.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiménez‐Mejías P, Hilpold A, Frajman B, Pușcaș M, Koopman J, Mesterházy A, Grulich V, Lye KA, Martín‐Bravo S. (2014) Carexcespitosa: reappraisal of its distribution in Europe. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:84236065
  20. Jiménez-Mejías P, Fabbroni M, Haigh A. (2020) Chorological, nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from Bolivia and northern Argentina. Kew Bulletin 75(1): 24. 10.1007/s12225-020-9880-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiménez-Mejías P, Martín-Bravo S, Márquez-Corro JI, Donadío S, Roalson EH, Naczi RFC. (2021a) A synopsis of the androgynous species of CarexsubgenusVignea (Cyperaceae) in South America. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 196(2): 188–220. 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa100 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiménez-Mejías P, Saldivia P, Gebauer S, Martín-Bravo S. (2021b) A new remarkable dwarf sedge (Carexphylloscirpoides, Cyperaceae) from northern Chile, with insights on the evolution of austral CarexsectionRacemosae. Systematic Botany 46(1): 34–47. 10.1600/036364421X16128061189567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Körner C. (2021) Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems (3rd edition). Springer, 37−38. 10.1007/978-3-030-59538-8 [DOI]
  24. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, GCE 2010, New Orleans, 1–8. 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 [DOI]
  25. Moore DM. (1968) The vascular flora of the Falkland Islands. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports 60: 1–202. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore DM. (1983) Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Anthony Nelson Ltd. and Missouri Botanical Garden, Oswestry; St Louis, MO.
  27. Morales-Alonso A, Jiménez-Mejías P. (2021) Revisión del grupo Carexphalaroides (Cyperaceae): una aproximación morfométrica. First Spanish Botanical Congress-SEBOT, Toledo, Spain, 199.
  28. Morales-Alonso A, Muñoz-Schüler P, Pereira-Silva L, Donadío S, Martín-Bravo S, Jiménes-Mejías P. (in press) A synopsis of CarexsubgenusPsyllophorae, sect. Junciformes (Cyperaceae) in South America. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
  29. Muñoz-Schüler P, García-Moro P, Márquez-Corro JI, Penneckamp D, Sanz-Arnal M, Martín-Bravo S, Jiménez-Mejías P. (2023) The genus Carex (Cyperaceae) in Chile: A general update of its knowledge, with an identification key. Gayana. Botánica 80: 103–132. [Google Scholar]
  30. Penneckamp DN. (2022) Identity of Carextrichodes Steud. ex Boott and Carexlateriflora Phil. (subgen. Psyllophorae, sect. Junciformes, Cyperaceae) from southern South America. Phytotaxa 530(2): 230–236. 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.2.10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Poindexter DB, Escudero M, Jiménez-Mejías P. (2017) A clarification of the name Carexhypsipedos C.B.Clarke (Cyperaceae) and a new name for the South American CarexsectionAcrocystis taxon. Phytotaxa 291(4): 287–293. 10.11646/phytotaxa.291.4.6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Roalson EH, Jiménez-Mejías P, Hipp AL, Benítez-Benítez C, Bruederle LP, Chung K-S, Escudero M, Ford BA, Ford K, Gebauer S, Gehrke B, Hahn M, Hayat MQ, Hoffmann MH, Jin X-F, Kim S, Larridon I, Léveillé-Bourret É, Lu Y-F, Luceño M, Maguilla E, Márquez-Corro JI, Martín-Bravo S, Masaki T, Míguez M, Naczi RFC, Reznicek AA, Spalink D, Starr JR, Uzma Villaverde T, Waterway MJ, Wilson KL, Zhang S-R. (2021) A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(4): 726–762. 10.1111/jse.12722 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodriguez R, Marticorena C, Alarcón D, Baeza C, Cavieres L, Finot VL, Fuentes N, Kiessling A, Mihoc M, Pauchard A, Ruiz E, Sanchez P, Marticorena A. (2018) Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Chile. Gayana. Botánica 75(1): 1–430. 10.4067/S0717-66432018000100001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19(12): 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stamatakis A. (2014) RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30(9): 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Villaverde T, Escudero M, Martín‐Bravo S, Jiménez‐Mejías P, Sanmartín I, Vargas P, Luceño M. (2017) Bipolar distributions in vascular plants: A review. American Journal of Botany 104(11): 1680–1694. 10.3732/ajb.1700159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wheeler GA. (1986) Two new species of Carex (Cyperaceae) from austral South America and additional taxonomic and phytogeographical notes on the genus. Brittonia 38(4): 317–324. 10.2307/2807071 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wheeler GA. (1988) A new species of Carexsect.Junciformes (Cyperaceae) from austral South America and notes on the sectional placement of C.sorianoi. Systematic Botany 13(2): 202–206. 10.2307/2419098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wheeler GA. (1989) The taxonomy of Carexsect.Aciculares (Cyperaceae) in South America. Systematic Botany 14(2): 168–188. 10.2307/2418904 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wheeler GA. (1990) Taxonomy of the Carexatropicta Complex (Cyperaceae) in South America. Systematic Botany 15(4): 643–659. 10.2307/2419161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wheeler GA, Guaglianone ER. (2003) Notas sobre Carex (Cyperaceae) de Sud América: C.camptoglochin y C.microglochin. Darwiniana 41(1–4): 193–206. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wheeler GA, Muñoz-Schick M. (1990) Carexandina Philippi (Cyperaceae): Its taxonomy, distribution and lectotypification. Gayana. Botánica 47: 71–76. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Carex recondita
phytokeys.243.115991-treatment1.xml (38.6KB, xml)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES