Skip to main content
Molecular Imaging logoLink to Molecular Imaging
. 2024 Jun 11;23:15353508241261583. doi: 10.1177/15353508241261583

Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management

Jing Li 1, Jingtao Sun 1,, Ning Wang 2, Yan Zhang 3
PMCID: PMC11208885  PMID: 38952400

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the performance of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) parameters in predicting the immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers of glioma.

Methods

Patients with glioma confirmed by pathology from March 2015 to September 2019 were analyzed, the preoperative DTI and 1H-MRS images were collected, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA), in the lesion area were measured, the relative values relative ADC (rADC) and relative FA (rFA) were obtained by the ratio of them in the lesion area to the contralateral normal area. The peak of each metabolite in the lesion area of 1H-MRS image: N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and creatine (Cr), and metabolite ratio: NAA/Cho, NAA/(Cho + Cr) were selected and calculated. The preoperative IHC data were collected including CD34, Ki-67, p53, S-100, syn, vimentin, NeuN, Nestin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein.

Results

One predicting parameter of DTI was screened, the rADC of the Ki-67 positive group was lower than that of the negative group. Two parameters of 1H-MRS were found to have significant reference values for glioma grades, the NAA and Cr decreased as the grade of glioma increased, moreover, Ki-67 Li was negatively correlated with NAA and Cr.

Conclusion

NAA and Cr have potential application value in predicting glioma grades and tumor proliferation activity. Only rADC has predictive value for Ki-67 expression among DTI parameters.

Keywords: glioma, immunohistochemistry, diffusion tensor imaging, hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, biomarker

Introduction

Glioma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis and low survival. 1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system, it is divided into 4 pathological grades (I-IV), 2 namely, grades I and II are low-grade gliomas (LGGs), and grades III and IV are high-grade gliomas (HGGs). In 2016 and 2021, WHO updated the classification of glioma by combining molecular markers with histopathology, emphasizing the importance of molecular detection.2,3 The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of central nervous system tumors (WHO CNS 5), published in 2021, has achieved substantial changes by further promoting the role of molecular diagnosis in CNS tumor classification but still rooted in other established methods of tumor characterization, including histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). 3 Among them, the expression of Ki-67, vimentin, CD34, S-100, p53, syn, and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) are important factors in judging and predicting the biological behavior of tumor cells.48 Recently, molecular biomarkers have become increasingly important in providing assistance and defining diagnostic information.

Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) is an in vivo functional imaging technology developed on the basis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). It can comprehensively evaluate the diffusion movement of water molecules, the degree of compression, infiltration, and destruction of surrounding white matter fiber bundles from the microscopic perspective. Studies have shown that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the tumor have high application value in the differential diagnosis, grades, and the degree of white matter infiltration of glioma.9,10

According to WHO CNS 5, in addition to major changes in the classification of glioma, it is important to provide information on the role of Hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in glioma diagnosis, follow-up, and research. 11 1H-MRS is a proven technique for glioma diagnosis and follow-up in clinical practice. Tumor metabolite levels can be assessed, the main metabolites are N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and creatine (Cr), NAA is a marker of neuronal activity, Cr is a cue for energy metabolism in brain tissue, and Cho is a marker of cell membrane synthesis. In glioma, the general rule is that NAA and Cr decrease with increasing tumor grade, while other metabolites increase. Cho/NAA quantitatively reflects tumor cell proliferation and local neuronal destruction without complex transitions. 12

At present, only DTI and MRS parameters predicting Ki-67 Labeling Index (Ki-67 Li) tumor proliferation activity studies can be detected, 13 while vimentin, CD34, S-100, p53, Syn, and GFAP have not been discussed yet. Therefore, this study was based on the predictive efficacy of 3 T 1H-MRS and DTI parameters on glioma grades and IHC characteristics, in order to preliminarily explore the feasibility of 1H-MRS and DTI parameters in predicting molecular typing of glioma.

Materials and Method

This retrospective study was according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki statement for research involving human subjects and was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the hospital (Research Ethics Committee of our Hospital. Approval No.2021-001-01) on March 8, 2021. All patients signed informed consent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety examination before the MRI examination. All data were fully anonymized before we accessed them.

Population

WHO CNS 5 has changed all CNS WHO tumor grades to Arabic numerals: (1-4). Because CNS tumor grades correlate with overall expected clinical biological behavior, the WHO CNS 5 generally retains the grade ranges used for tumor types in previous versions, so in our study, the glioma grades I to IV promulgated by WHO in 2016 were still used.

A total of 77 patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas from March 2015 to September 2019 in the PACS system were retrospectively included. Among them, 57 cases had complete DTI parameters, including 31 males and 26 females, with an average age of (49.70 ± 14.05) years from 7 to 72 years. In the 57 patients, there were 57 Ki-67 IHC cases, 48 CD34 IHC cases, 48 S-100 IHC cases, 48 vimentin IHC cases, 36 syn IHC cases, and 29 p53 IHC cases, respectively. 28 cases had the nestin IHC test and 57 cases had the GFAP IHC test, they were all positive expressions, so nestin and GFAP were not included in the study. A total of 31 patients were tested for NeuN IHC (label 0-29 cases and label 1-2 cases), since the total weight of each case was < 5, the significance could not be calculated, so NeuN was not included. All IHC indicators were divided into label 0 group (negative expression ones) and label 1 group (positive expression ones). More information is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients.

Characteristics DTI group (n = 57) MRS group (n = 42)
Age(mean ± SD, years) 49.70 ± 14.05 47.45 ± 13.96
Sex
 Male 31 (54%) 25 (60%)
 Female 26 (46%) 17 (40%)
Grade
 WHO II 17 (30%) 17 (40%)
 WHO III 22 (39%) 15 (36%)
 WHO IV 18 (31%) 10 (24%)
Histologic characteristic
 Oligodendroglioma 10 (17.6%) 11 (26.2%)
 Astrocytoma 3 (5.3%) 1 (2.4%)
 Diffuse astrocytoma 2 (3.5%) 3 (7.1%)
 Ganglioglioma 2 (3.5%) 2 (4.8%)
 Anaplastic oligodendroglioma 6 (10.5%) 6 (14.3%)
 Anaplastic astrocytoma 8 (14%) 5 (11.9%)
 Anaplastic ependymoma 6 (10.5%) 3 (7.1%)
 Anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma 2 (3.5%) 1 (2.4%)
 Glioblastoma 18 (31.6%) 10 (23.8%)
 Lesion location
 Frontal lobe 25 15
 Temporal lobe 27 24
 Parietal lobe 12 7
 Occipital lobe 8 5
 Insular lobe 7 7
 Basal ganglia 2 2
 Thalamus 2 1
 Lateral ventricle 2 1
 Corpus callosum 1 0
Ki-67
 Label 0 19 (33.3%) 17 (40.5%)
 Label 1 38 (66.7%) 25 (59.5%)
CD34
 Label 0 24 (50%) 21 (60%)
 Label 1 24 (50%) 14 (40%)
S-100
 Label 0 7 (14.6%) 6 (16.7%)
 Label 1 41 (85.4%) 30 (83.3%)
vimentin
 Label 0 7 (14.6%) 9 (25%)
 Label 1 41 (85.4%) 27 (75%)
p53
 Label 0 12 (41.4%) 7 (35%)
 Label 1 17 (58.6%) 13 (65%)
syn
 Label 0 17 (47.2%) 15 (51.7%)
 Label 1 19 (52.8%) 14 (48.3%)

Abbreviations: DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; WHO, World Health Organization.

Among the above 57 cases, 42 cases had complete MRS parameters, including 25 males and 17 females, with an average age of (47.45 ± 13.96) from 7 to 71 years. In the 42 patients, there were 42 Ki-67 IHC cases, 35 CD34 IHC cases, 36 S-100 IHC cases, 36 vimentin IHC cases, 29 syn IHC cases, and 20 p53 IHC cases, respectively. All 42 patients underwent the GFAP IHC test, and as all of them were positive, it was not analyzed. A total of 22 cases underwent the Nestin IHC test(label 0-2 cases and label 1-20 cases), and 23 patients were tested for NeuN IHC (label 0-20 cases and label 1-3 cases), since the total weight of Nestin and NeuN was < 5, the significance could not be calculated, so no analysis was made. More information is listed in Table 1.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with glioma were diagnosed by histopathologic examination through surgery. Exclusion criteria: Intracranial decompression, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were performed before the MRI examination. Artifacts appeared in the MRI images.

MRI Protocol

Philips 3.0 T MRI system and 8-channel orthogonal head coil were used. SE-EPI sequence was performed for DTI, and the scanning parameters were as follows: TR: 10 000 ms, TE was the smallest. 1H-MRS acquisition parameters: Chemical shift imaging (CSI) point resolved spectrum (2d_press_144 fast sense), TR = 1500 ms TE = 144 ms Voxel size = 10 mm × 10 mm, FOV = 80 mm × 110 mm.

Immunohistochemical status

All patients in this study underwent surgical resection of glioma. IHC staining was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections of brain tumor resected specimens. The expressions of Ki-67, vimentin, CD34, S-100, p53, syn, and GFAP in glioma were detected by SP staining with benchmark GX automatic IHC (Figure 1). The rate of Ki-67 Li < 20% was classified as negative and ≥ 20% as positive, 14 and the cell proliferation index was measured with IHC analysis by using the rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody against the Ki-67 protein. IHC indicators were classified as negative and positive which were represented by 0, 1. IHC staining results were evaluated by 2 pathologists.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Immunohistochemistry of positive and negative staining (100 ×).

Data Labeling and Measurement

DTI parameter measurement (Figure 2): DTI used the continuous fiber tract tracing method. In the lesion area, the ADC, FA, and fiber bundle length were measured, and the relative values rADC, rFA, and rlength were obtained by the ratio of ADC, and FA values in the lesion area to the contralateral normal brain area.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Collection of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) patients.

The lesion area of the MRS image was selected, and the metabolite peak and the metabolite ratio were calculated (Figure 3). Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on the solid parts of each tumor center, ROIs on necrotic areas, cystic intertumoral areas, and areas of presumed perilesional vasogenic edema were excluded from the analysis. We selected NAA, Cho, Cr, NAA/Cho, and NAA/(Cho + Cr).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Collection of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) patients.

Among all participants, a consensus was reached between a radiologist (with 10 years of experience in radiology) and a technologist (with 5 + years of experience in MRI procedures).

Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics.22 was used for statistical analysis. It was used to test the normality (Kolmogorov Smirnov, P > .05) and the homogeneity of variance (Levene test, P > .05) of continuous variables in the clinic, 2-independent sample t-test (meeting the normality and homogeneity of variance test) was conducted to compare the distribution differences between the 2 groups, approximate t-test was applied when equal variances not assumed, rank sum test (Mann-Whitney nonparametric test) was performed when the quantitative data were skewed. Analysis of variance (F-test) was selected to compare the mean of 3 sample groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis Test (χ2) was used for unequal variances. The correlation between the Ki-67 Li and DTI, MRS parameters were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Spearman correlation coefficient was selected as the data with bivariate non-normal distribution. P < .05 was statistically significant.

Results

The Relationship Between DTI Parameters and the Negative and Positive of IHC Indicators

The relationship between DTI-specific parameters ADC, AA, rADC, rFA, rlength, and Ki-67, CD34, S-100, vimentin, p53, and syn was selected, respectively, only the rADC of the Ki-67 positive group was lower than that in negative ones (Z = −1.947, P = .052), this indicates that increased cell density tends to occur in voxels with lower ADC values. The rlength in Ki-67, CD34, S-100, and p53 positive groups were lower than those in negative ones, it shows that the damage of fiber bundles in Ki-67, CD34, S-100, and p53 positive cases is slightly more serious than that in negative ones however, there were no statistical differences. Although the ADC in the p53 positive group was higher than that in negative ones, the difference was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Table 2.

The Relationship Between DTI Parameters and the Negative and Positive of IHC Indicators.

ABADC (103 mm2/s) ABFA rADC (103 mm2/s) rFA rlength (mm)
Ki-67 Label 0 (n = 19) 1.102 ± 0.087 0.322 ± 0.044 1.281 ± 0.145 0.753 ± 0.086 0.759 ± 0.183
Label 1 (n = 38) 1.083 ± 0.155 0.326 ± 0.070 1.222 ± 0.184 0.768 ± 0.129 0.733 ± 0.191
F = 8.307, P = .006 F = 4.161, P = .046 Z = −1.947, P = .052 F = 5.102, P = .028 F = 0.011, P = .918
t = 0.585, P = .561 t = −0.296, P = .768 t = −0.526, P = .601 t = 0.493, P = .624
CD34 Label 0 (n = 24) 1.078 ± 0.142 0.315 ± 0.061 1.244 ± 0.178 0.750 ± 0.112 0.774 ± 0.171
Label 1 (n = 24) 1.122 ± 0.121 0.324 ± 0.062 1.267 ± 0.163 0.754 ± 0.124 0.685 ± 0.187
F = 0.143, P = .707 F = 0.004, P = .952 Z = −0.474, P = .635 F = 1.185, P = .282 F = 0.73, P = .397
t = −1.145, P = .258 t = −0.562, P = .577 t = −0.143, P = .887 t = 1.729, P = .091
S-100 Label 0 (n = 7) 1.072 ± 0.158 0.312 ± 0.049 1.265 ± 0.195 0.751 ± 0.123 0.789 ± 0.204
Label 1 (n = 41) 1.102 ± 0.130 0.317 ± 0.056 1.263 ± 0.171 0.752 ± 0.118 0.721 ± 0.187
F = 0.001, P = .975 F = 0.043, P = .836 F = 0.017, P = 0.898 F = 0.044, P = 0.835 F = 0.283, P = 0.597
t = −0.484, P = .643 t = −0.229, P = .820 t = 0.034, P = .973 t = −0.015, P = .988 t = 0.882, P = .383
vimentin Label 0 (n = 7) 1.101 ± 0.100 0.308 ± 0.035 1.216 ± 0.071 0.777 ± 0.084 0.722 ± 0.186
Label 1 (n = 41) 1.087 ± 0.143 0.323 ± 0.063 1.248 ± 0.191 0.760 ± 0.123 0.734 ± 0.176
F = 1.006, P = .321 F = 1.757, P = .191 F = 3.943, P = .053 Z = −0.453, P = .668 F = 0.004, P = .949
t = 0.247, P = .806 t = −0.607, P = .547 t = −0.425, P = .673 t = −0.164, P = .871
p53 Label 0 (n = 12) 1.051 ± 0.134 0.343 ± 0.073 1.234 ± 0.175 0.791 ± 0.118 0.764 ± 0.213
Label 1 (n = 17) 1.145 ± 0.138 0.316 ± 0.065 1.302 ± 0.203 0.748 ± 0.134 0.721 ± 0.187
F = 0.134, P = .717 F = 0.030, P = .865 F = 0.432, P = .517 F = 0.116, P = .736 F = 0.294, P = .592
t = −1.825, P = .079 t = 1.065, P = .296 t = −0.937, P = .357 t = 0.901, P = .376 t = 0.569, P = .574
syn Label 0 (n = 17) 1.094 ± 0.146 0.329 ± 0.070 1.247 ± 0.176 0.777 ± 0.124 0.716 ± 0.166
Label 1 (n = 19) 1.108 ± 0.106 0.314 ± 0.053 1.275 ± 0.148 0.748 ± 0.096 0.726 ± 0.188
F = 1.872, P = .180 F = 1.390, P = .247 F = 0.482, P = .492 F = 1.794, P = .189 F = 0.250, P = .620
t = −0.317, P = .753 t = 0.749, P = .459 t = −0.532, P = .598 t = 0.801, P = .428 t = −0.172, P = .864

Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; rFA, relative fractional anisotropy; rlength, relative length.

The Relationship among DTI Parameters and Glioma Grades

There was no significant difference among DTI-specific parameters ADC, FA, rADC, rFA, rlength, and glioma grades (Table 3).

Table 3.

The Relationship Among DTI Parameters and Glioma Grade.

ABADC (103 mm2/s) ABFA rADC rFA rlength (mm)
WHO II (n = 17) 1.111 ± 0.090 0.309 ± 0.035 1.279 ± 0.145 0.747 ± 0.076 0.734 ± 0.197
WHO III (n = 22) 1.058 ± 0.149 0.349 ± 0.071 1.197 ± 0.169 0.777 ± 0.125 0.742 ± 0.195
WHO IV (n = 18) 1.108 ± 0.154 0.310 ± 0.064 1.261 ± 0.198 0.762 ± 0.137 0.747 ± 0.179
F = 0.986, P = .380 χ2 = 4.697, P = .095 χ2 = 2.596, P = .273 χ2 = 0.833, P = .659 F = 0.020, P = .981

Abbreviations: WHO, World Health Organization; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; rFA, relative fractional anisotropy; rlength, relative length.

Correlation Between Glioma Proliferation Index Ki67 Li and DTI Parameters

There was no correlation between Ki-67 Li and DTI parameters FA, ADC, rFA, rADC, but rADC decreased with Ki-67 Li increasing (r = −0.239, P = .073), and rFA increased while Ki-67 Li increasing (r = 0.230, P = .086) (Figure 3).

MRS Parameter Kurtosis in Differentiating Negative to Positive IHC Indicators

The MRS parameters NAA, Cho, Cr, NAA/Cho, and NAA/(Cho + Cr) were not related to Ki-67, CD34, S-100, vimentin, p53, and syn (Table 4).

Table 4.

MRS Parameter Kurtosis in Differentiating Negative to Positive of IHC Indicators.

NAA Cho Cr NAA/Cho NAA/(Cho + Cr)
Ki-67 Label 0 (n = 17) 514.735 ± 249.353 2067.794 ± 969.803 834.524 ± 442.816 0.289 ± 0.160 0.200 ± 0.104
Label 1 (n = 25) 404.532 ± 285.166 1604.636 ± 1033.605 532.812 ± 426.892 0.297 ± 0.210 0.210 ± 0.118
Z = −1.602, P = .109 Z = −1.794, P = .073 Z = −2.601, P = .009 Z = −0.218, P = .828 F = 0.078, P = .782
t = −0.270, P = .788
CD34 Label 0 (n = 21) 419.091 ± 301.474 1611.390 ± 880.278 560.976 ± 422.250 0.310 ± 0.237 0.214 ± 0.132
Label 1 (n = 14) 422.093 ± 259.754 1476.343 ± 920.707 507.521 ± 273.773 0.302 ± 0.131 0.218 ± 0.089
Z = −0.168, P = .866 F = 0.498, P = .485 Z = 0.000, P = 1.000 Z = −0.455, P = .649 F = 1.420, P = .242
t = −0.437, P = .665 t = −0.075, P = .941
S-100 Label 0 (n = 6) 593.067 ± 496.776 1900.283 ± 1123.017 889.367 ± 627.581 0.311 ± 0.177 0.209 ± 0.103
Label 1 (n = 30) 399.073 ± 211.597 1696.937 ± 1006.301 576.763 ± 369.620 0.286 ± 0.199 0.199 ± 0.112
F = 8.766, P = 0.006 F = 0.155, P = .696 F = 2.657, P = .112 Z = −0.552, P = .581 Z = −0.340, P = .734
t = 0.940, P = .388 t = 0.444, P = .660 t = 1.674 P = 0.103
vimentin Label 0 (n = 9) 508.733 ± 277.633 1700.133 ± 1191.682 739.111 ± 446.792 0.393 ± 0.309 0.252 ± 0.159
Label 1 (n = 27) 467.022 ± 288.589 1757.144 ± 965.264 631.415 ± 420.278 0.289 ± 0.135 0.208 ± 0.094
F = 0.111, P = .741 F = 1.144, P = .292 F = 0.026, P = .873 F = 3.795, P = .060 F = 1.761, P = .193
t = 0.379, P = .707 t = -0.145, P = .886 t = −0.656, P = .516 t = 1.427, P = .163 t = 1.028, P = .311
p53 Label 0 (n = 7) 439.857 ± 228.568 1527.029 ± 795.185 670.014 ± 375.729 0.307 ± 0.148 0.212 ± 0.099
Label 1 (n = 13) 353.977 ± 204.027 1682.946 ± 984.366 518.485 ± 318.558 0.250 ± 0.112 0.186 ± 0.089
F = 0.187, P = .670 F = 0.828, P = .375 F = 0.429, P = .521 F = 0.033, P = .859 F = 0.059, P = .811
t = 0.862, P = .400 t = −0.359, P = .724 t = −0.954, P = .353 t = 0.984, P = .338 t = 0.602, P = .555
syn Label 0 (n = 15) 349.513 ± 182.103 1760.220 ± 1016.922 573.493 ± 383.873 0.268 ± 0.256 0.181 ± 0.134
Label 1 (n = 14) 567.157 ± 361.450 1748.179 ± 1052.868 791.493 ± 543.956 0.358 ± 0.160 0.249 ± 0.109
F = 5.496, P = .027 F = 0.008, P = .929 F = 1.037, P = .318 Z = −2.313, P = .021 Z = −2.096, P = .036
t = −2.026, P = .057 t = 0.031, P = .975 t = −1.254, P = .221

Abbreviations: MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Cr, creatine; NAA, N-acetylaspartate; Cho, choline.

The Relationship Between MRS Parameters and Glioma Grades

The difference in NAA among WHO II, III, and IV grades of glioma was statistically significant (F = 3.257, P = .049), and the NAA decreased with the increased glioma grades. The difference in Cr among WHO II, III, and IV grades of glioma was statistically significant (F = 4.948, P = 0.012), with the increased grades, the value of Cr decreased. However, there was no significant difference between Cho, NAA/Cho, NAA/(Cho + Cr), and glioma grades (Table 5).

Table 5.

The Relationship Between MRS Parameters and Glioma Grades.

NAA Cho Cr NAA/Cho NAA/(Cho + Cr)
WHO II (n = 17) 558.400 ± 334.509 1986.235 ± 1107.085 871.253 ± 521.838 0.351 ± 0.255 0.230 ± 0.140
WHO III (n = 15) 426.060 ± 210.713 1895.687 ± 967.079 607.187 ± 341.243 0.251 ± 0.129 0.186 ± 0.089
WHO IV (n = 10) 298.010 ± 155.676 1306.710 ± 881.782 358.810 ± 286.419 0.259 ± 0.105 0.196 ± 0.087
F = 3.257, P = .049 χ2 = 3.916, P = .141 F = 4.948, P = .012 F = 1.353, P = .270 F = 0.646, P = .529

Abbreviations: MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; WHO, World Health Organization; Cr, creatine; NAA, N-acetylaspartate; Cho, choline.

We selected the average value of Cr in WHO III as the reference value and calculated the specificity and sensitivity in predicting the grade of glioma, they are 75.0% and 61.1%, respectively, Cr has a relatively high specificity and low sensitivity in distinguishing the glioma grades. The selection of the cut-off point of Cr was related to it (Table 6).

Table 6.

The Relationship Between MRS Parameter Cr and Glioma Grades.

MRS parameter WHO II (n) True positive (n) False positive (n) WHO III and IV (n) True negative (n) False negative (n) Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%)
Cr ≥ 607 17 11 6 25 19 6 75.0 61.1

Abbreviations: MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Cr, creatine; WHO, World Health Organization.

Correlation Between Ki-67 Li and MRS Parameters

Ki-67 Li was negatively correlated with NAA (r = −0.322, P = .037), and the NAA decreased with Ki-67 Li increasing. Ki-67 Li was negatively correlated with Cr (r = −0.305, P = .050), and the Cr decreased with the increased Ki-67 Li. There was no correlation between Ki-67 Li and Cho, NAA/Cho, and NAA/(Cho + Cr) (Figure 4). This suggests that the proposed parameters NAA, and Cr may provide an effective tool to identify tumors with high proliferative activity (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A scatter plot of the relationship between Ki-67 Li and DTI parameters.

Abbreviations: DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; Ki-67 Li, Ki-67 labeling index.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A scatter plot of the relationship between Ki-67 Li and MRS parameters.

Abbreviations: MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Ki-67 Li, Ki-67 labeling index.

Discussion

At present, there are sufficient studies showing that gliomas with the same or similar histological features may carry different molecular or genetic information. 3 As a biomarker of cell proliferation, Ki-67 has been incorporated into the grade and prognosis prediction of CNS tumors. 15 CD34 is a transmembrane phosphoglycoprotein, first discovered in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, it is known as the best marker for microvessel density studies and plays a crucial role in the regulation of glioma angiogenesis, CD34 overexpression is associated with higher-grade gliomas and can serve as a potential glioma diagnostic and prognostic marker, as well as a useful therapeutic target. 16 Pleomorphic low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY) is a glioma associated with a history of epilepsy in youth, a diffuse growth pattern, frequent oligodendroglioma-like components, calcification, CD34 immunoreactivity, and the MAPK pathway, CD34 immunostaining was often intense and diffuse in the tumor. 3 Vimentin is an intermediate filament family protein that maintains cell integrity and participates in multiple cell signaling pathways to regulate cancer cell motility and invasion, and it is an independent important prognostic factor in patients with high-grade gliomas. 17 S-100 protein 18 named for its solubility in saturated ammonium sulfate, is derived from brain tissue, is a dimer, and belongs to the thermolabile acidic calcium-binding protein. It is present in gliomas, but its amount varies with the histological type of the tumor, mostly in ependymomas, it is also present in schwannomas and neurofibromas, but not in neuronal-derived in tumors such as medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma. A recent study showed 19 that p53-IHC should be used as a complement to the morphological diagnosis of H&E and that p53-IHC diffuse or strong positivity is sufficient to diagnose astrocytoma without 1p/19q testing, and the mutational status of p53 is correlated with IHC, there appears to be an incomplete parallel between the results. Syn is synaptophysin, mainly present in neuron neuroendocrine cells in presynaptic vesicles of neurons, and this antibody is mainly used to label neuroendocrine cells and their tumors. 20 GFAP is almost exclusively expressed in astrocytes, 21 and all cases in this study were positive for GFAP, so it could not be used for dichotomous studies. Therefore, fully considering the molecular pathological characteristics of glioma can help to determine the heterogeneity and prognosis of glioma. 22

In the research of Figini et al, 23 they pointed out that diffusion MRI has the potential to provide such in vivo indicators. It provides easy access to the microstructure of the whole tumor at a rather high spatial resolution. DTI is the most often utilized approach nowadays. 24 ADC and FA are DTI indices that correspond with changes in cellular density and extracellular matrix characteristics caused by glioma invasion and proliferation. FA was substantially greater in grade II and III isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas than in IDH mutant gliomas. 23 The present study demonstrates that the DTI parameter rADC has a predictive value for the negative and positive of IHC marker Ki-67, although the rlength value in Ki-67, CD34, S-100, and p53 positive groups was lower than in negative ones, the ABADC value of p53-positive cases was higher than that of negative ones, but unfortunately the difference was not statistically significant. The interpretation of DTI results in clinical work was divided into 2 aspects. On the one hand, the lesions were directly observed through the ADC map and FA map calculated by DTI. On the other hand, the lesions were quantitatively evaluated by measuring parameters such as ADC and FA values of different grades of glioma, and the overall ADC and FA values were obtained by the fiber tract tracing method, which reflected the destruction of the fiber bundles in the brain tissue by the tumor. But there is disagreement about the interpretation of ADC changes in DWI-derived brain tumors, it has been reported that restricted spread was affected not only by tumor cell density and metabolic activity, but also by other factors, such as ischemia or compression, in addition, DWI-derived ADCs were sensitive to other tissue characteristics, including due to vasogenic edema or extracellular fluid arising from the tumor-induced disruption of extracellular structures. 25 Due to the poor display of glioma lesions on the ADC and FA maps, our study did not choose to outline the lesion contour on the ADC and FA maps to extract image features. Instead, DTI used a continuous fiber tract tracing method, and quantitative indicators such as ADC, FA, and other values of the target lesion were measured. The results of this study showed that the measurement of DTI quantitative indicators only rADC could be used for the prediction of glioma IHC, this indicates that increased cell density tends to occur in voxels with lower ADC values. A recent retrospective DTI study has stratified LGG according to IDH and 1p/19q status. They reported that IDH wild-type astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma had lower ADC and higher FA, but there was no significant difference between glioma with and without 1p/19q deletion.2628

In our study, DTI parameters failed to predict the grade of glioma. No correlation was found between Ki-67 Li and DTI parameters such as ABFA, ABADC, rFA, and rADC, but rADC decreased with the increased Ki-67 Li, and rFA increased with the increased Ki-67 Li. Similar studies suggested that some features of FA may be helpful in distinguishing LGG from HGG.29,30 There were also studies that showed that FA played no role in differentiating glioma grades. 31

Preoperative grade of glioma based on conventional MRI can be difficult, especially in the absence of significant edema and/or contrast enhancement. This is a common diagnostic challenge, even in high-grade tumors. In cases of uncertain diagnosis, more information can be obtained with MRS. 32 Currently, optimized 1H-MRS can noninvasively detect 2-hydroxyglutarate, a specific metabolite of IDH gene mutation. 12 Our results did not find that the MRS parameters NAA, Cho, Cr, NAA/Cho, NAA/(Cho + Cr) could differentiate Ki-67, CD34, S-100, vimentin, p53, and syn negative to positive. However, our study showed that NAA and Cr could provide a better differentiation between grades of glioma by the estimation of tumor cellularity. Correlation of Ki-67 Li with MRS parameters using Pearson's correlations in order to assess which parameters could predict tumor proliferative activity, Ki-67 Li was negatively correlated with NAA and Cr, this suggests that NAA, Cr may provide an effective tool to identify tumors with high proliferative activity. Our study demonstrated that NAA and Cr were promising imaging modalities for the noninvasive estimation of glioma grades and proliferative activity. Moreover, we selected the average value of Cr in WHO III as the reference value, Cr has a relatively high specificity in distinguishing the glioma grades. It has been reported that the most important metabolite that differentiated tumor progression (TP) from radiation-induced pseudoprogression (PSP) was Cho, however, Cr was not considered to be affected by radiation damage. Thus, in brain tissue undergoing radiation necrosis, an increased Cho/Cr ratio was observed. 33 It would be fascinating to investigate the potential of 1H-MRS in the preoperative assessment of several molecular markers, as well as the ability of this approach to predict progression. The approach might be useful in differentiating distinct subtypes of glioma regarding the 2021 WHO Classification of CNS tumors.

There are several potential limitations in this study. The main limitation of this study is the small sample size and not doing power analysis for sample size calculation. Secondly, since DTI and MRS characterize different tumor characteristics, the 2 imaging modalities may also provide complementary information in the pretreatment evaluation of gliomas, in the current study, we focused on evaluating IHC protein markers, and further research could assess genotyping to determine whether they would provide additional clinically useful information in glioma evaluation. In addition, not all patients were tested for all of the above IHC indicators. Therefore, future studies should validate the findings of this study in a larger cohort with detailed pathology. An innovation of our study is that it combined the quantitative parameters of DTI and MRS to identify or predict IHC indicators, and maximized the value of MR research for preoperative pathological grading of gliomas.

Conclusions

Overall, the present study demonstrates that the DTI parameter rADC has predictive value for the negative and positive of Ki-67 in glioma, and the MRS parameters NAA and Cr have potential application value for predicting the grade of glioma and tumor proliferative activity. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the other DTI parameters as well as all MRS parameters and the multiple IHC features of glioma. Meanwhile, DTI parameters could not predict the glioma grades in our study.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-mix-10.1177_15353508241261583 - Supplemental material for Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mix-10.1177_15353508241261583 for Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management by Jing Li, Jingtao Sun, Ning Wang and Yan Zhang in Molecular Imaging

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Professor Huaijun Liu's guidance and help.

Abbreviations

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

LGG

low-grade gliomas

HGG

high-grade glioma

WHO

World Health Organization

CNS

central nervous system

IHC

immunohistochemistry

DTI

diffusion tensor imaging

DWI

diffusion weighted imaging

ADC

apparent diffusion coefficient

FA

fractional anisotropy

1H-MRS

hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

NAA

N-acetylaspartate

Cho

choline

Cr

creatine

Ki-67 Li

Ki-67 labeling index

GFAP

glial fibrillary acidic protein

rADC

relative ADC

rFA

relative FA

rlength

relative length

CSI

chemical shift imaging

ROIs

regions of interest

PLNTY

pleomorphic low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young

IDH

isocitrate dehydrogenase

TP

tumor progression

PSP

radiation-induced pseudoprogression

Footnotes

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the hospital (Research Ethics Committee of our Hospital. Approval No. 2021-001-01) on March 8, 2021. All patients signed informed consent for an MRI safety examination before the MRI examination. All data were fully anonymized before we accessed them.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1.Vamvakas A, Williams SC, Theodorou K, et al. Imaging biomarker analysis of advanced multiparametric MRI for glioma grading. Phys Med. 2019;60:188–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.014 PMID: 30910431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 PMID:27157931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106 PMID:34185076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin L, Wang G, Ming J, et al. Analysis of expression and prognostic significance of vimentin and the response to temozolomide in glioma patients. Tumor Biol. 2016;37(11):15333–15339. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5462-7 PMID:27704357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagaishi M, Yokoo H, Nobusawa S, et al. A distinctive pediatric case of low-grade glioma with extensive expression of CD34. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016;33(1):71–74. doi: 10.1007/s10014-015-0236-2 PMID:26496909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gates EDH, Lin JS, Weinberg JS, et al. Guiding the first biopsy in glioma patients using estimated Ki67 maps derived from MRI: conventional versus advanced imaging. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(4):527–536. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz004 PMID:30657997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Van Eldik LJ, Zimmer DB. Secretion of S-100 from rat C6 glioma cells. Brain Res. 1987;436(2):367–370. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91681-7 PMID:3435834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gillet E, Alentorn A, Doukouré B, et al. TP53 and p53 statuses and their clinical impact in diffuse low grade gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2014;118(1):131–139. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1407-4 PMID:24590827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Z, Xiao J, Wu S, et al. Deep convolutional radiomic features on diffusion tensor images for classification of glioma grades. J Digit Imaging. 2020;33(4):826–837. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00322-4 PMID:32040669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Figini M, Riva M, Graham M, et al. Prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype in brain gliomas with MRI: single-shell versus multishell diffusion models. Radiology. 2018;289(3):788–796. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180054 PMID:30277427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galijasevic M, Steiger R, Mangesius S, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosis and follow-up of gliomas: state-of-the-art. Cancers. 2022;14(13):3197. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin K, Cidan W, Qi Y, Wang X. Glioma grading prediction using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics combined with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging. Med Phys. 2022;49(7):4419–4429. doi: 10.1002/mp.15648 PMID:35366379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alexiou GA, Zikou A, Tsiouris S, et al. Correlation of diffusion tensor, dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and (99 m)Tc-tetrofosmin brain SPECT with tumour grade and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in glioma. Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2014;116:41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.11.003 PMID:24309151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Panzuto F, Boninsegna L, Fazio N, et al. Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(17):2372–2377. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0688 PMID:21555696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen WJ, He DS, Tang RX, Ren FH, Chen G. Ki-67 is a valuable prognostic factor in gliomas: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(2):411–420. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.2.411 PMID:25684464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kong X, Guan J, Ma W, et al. CD34 over-expression is associated with gliomas’ higher WHO grade. Medicine. 2016;95(7):e2830. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002830 PMID:26886640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim SI, Lee K, Bae J, et al. Revisiting vimentin: a negative surrogate marker of molecularly defined oligodendroglioma in adult type diffuse glioma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2021;38(4):271–282. doi: 10.1007/s10014-021-00411-4 PMID:34338912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cochran AJ, Wen DR. S-100 protein as a marker for melanocytic and other tumours. Pathology. 1985;17(2):340–345. doi: 10.3109/00313028509063777 PMID:2995906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nishikawa T, Watanabe R, Kitano Y, et al. Reliability of IDH1-R132H and ATRX and/or p53 immunohistochemistry for molecular subclassification of Grade 2/3 gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2022;39(1):14–24. doi: 10.1007/s10014-021-00418-x PMID:34826036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dong Y, Li Y, Liu R, et al. Secretagogin, a marker for neuroendocrine cells, is more sensitive and specific in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma compared with the markers CD56, CgA, syn and Napsin A. Oncol Lett. 2020;19(3):2223–2230. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11336 PMID:32194720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kiviniemi A, Gardberg M, Frantzén J, et al. Serum levels of GFAP and EGFR in primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas: correlation to tumor volume, molecular markers, and progression-free survival. J Neurooncol. 2015;124(2):237–245. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1829-7 PMID:26033547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li J, Liu SY, Qin Y, et al. High-order radiomics features based on T2 FLAIR MRI predict multiple glioma immunohistochemical features: a more precise and personalized gliomas management. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Figini M, Riva M, Graham M, et al. Prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype in brain gliomas with MRI: single-shell versus multishell diffusion models. Radiology. 2018;289(3):788–796. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180054 PMID:30277427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J. 1994;66(1):259–267. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 PMID:8130344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jeong JW, Juhász C, Mittal S, et al. Multi-modal imaging of tumor cellularity and tryptophan metabolism in human gliomas. Cancer Imaging. 2015;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40644-015-0045-1 PMID:26245742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tan WL, Huang WY, Yin B, Xiong J, Wu JS, Geng DY. Can diffusion tensor imaging noninvasively detect IDH1 gene mutations in astrogliomas? A retrospective study of 112 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(5):920–927. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3803 PMID:24557705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiong J, Tan WL, Pan JW, et al. Detecting isocitrate dehydrogenase gene mutations in oligodendroglial tumors using diffusion tensor imaging metrics and their correlations with proliferation and microvascular density. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(1):45–54. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24958 PMID:26016619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xiong J, Tan W, Wen J, et al. Combination of diffusion tensor imaging and conventional MRI correlates with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutations but not 1p/19q genotyping in oligodendroglial tumours. Eur Radiol . 2016;26(6):1705–1715. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4025-4 PMID:26396108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.White ML, Zhang Y, Yu F, Jaffar Kazmi SA. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of cerebral gliomas: evaluating fractional anisotropy characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(2):374–381. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu X, Tian W, Kolar B, et al. MR diffusion tensor and perfusion-weighted imaging in preoperative grading of supratentorial nonenhancing gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13(4):447–455. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang Q, Zhang J, Xu X, Chen X, Xu B. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient parameters for glioma grading. J Neurooncol. 2018;139(1):61–68. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2841-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shakir T, Fengli L, Chenguang G, Chen N, Zhang M, Shaohui M. 1H-MR Spectroscopy in grading of cerebral glioma: a new view point, MRS image quality assessment. Acta Radiol Open. 2022;11(2):20584601221077068. doi: 10.1177/20584601221077068 PMID:35237448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barajas RF, Chang JS, Segal MR, et al. Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;253(2):486–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-mix-10.1177_15353508241261583 - Supplemental material for Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mix-10.1177_15353508241261583 for Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management by Jing Li, Jingtao Sun, Ning Wang and Yan Zhang in Molecular Imaging


Articles from Molecular Imaging are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES