Newly emerging viruses, primarily zoonotic or vector-borne, pose a persistent threat to public health and have led to outbreaks of global concern. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on the world’s healthcare system and the global economy [1]. Flaviviruses and alphaviruses are single-stranded RNA viruses and are transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, and they have the ability to unexpectedly (re)-emerge and cause severe viral infections in humans [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These flaviviruses and alphaviruses belong to the broader family of arboviruses. Over the past century, they have caused considerable disease loads and public health issues due to their global spread and transmission [6,7,8,9,10]. The present Special Issue focuses on disseminating the latest advancements in research on alphaviruses and flaviviruses. The articles featured in this Special Issue are categorised into three different topics related to the study of these viruses.
The first section consists of 11 research articles contributed by different research groups. Nissly et al. investigated the susceptibility of chickens to experimental Zika (ZIKV) infection to show that chickens are not susceptible to ZIKV infection [11]. Through their study, they showed that ZIKV did not cause clinical signs in chickens of all age groups tested, and there was rapid clearance of ZIKV in older chickens, which coincided with an effective innate immune response, highlighting age-dependent susceptibility.
Kizu et al. performed ELISA and neutralisation assays to show that there is potential serological misdiagnosis of Barmah Forest virus (BFV) and Ross River virus (RRV) as Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infections in Australia [12]. This particular study highlights the need for diagnostic laboratory tests capable of distinguishing between CHIKV infections and actively co-circulating RRV and BFV.
Souza et al. sequenced DENV-1 samples from 2015 to 2022 in Araraquara, Brazil, and studied the evolutionary history of DENV-1 in Araraquara using Brazilian and worldwide DENV-1 sequences [13]. They showed through their study that there have been at least three introductions of genotype V in Araraquara, distributed in two main lineages (L Ia and L Ib and L II), within the last ten years.
Rainey et al. used the reporters for Semliki Forest virus (SFV) in Aedes albopictus cells to show that Wolbachia strains wMel, wAu, and wAlbB blocked viral replication and translation during the early stages of infection and that the storage of cholesterol in lipid droplets is not key to this inhibition [14]. Furthermore, these Wolbachia strains showed strong antiviral activity against another alphavirus, o’nyong nyong virus (ONNV), suggesting that there may be differences in how alphaviruses are inhibited by Wolbachia in comparison to flaviviruses.
Michie et al. conducted whole-genome sequencing of Sindbis virus (SINV) isolates sampled between 1960 and 2014 from countries in the Australasian region and found that G2 viruses were the most frequently and widely sampled, with three distinct sub-lineages defined and no new G6 SINV identified, confirming the geographic restriction of these viruses to south-western Australia [15]. As G2/G3 are collectively a single distinct alphavirus species and G6 is a distinct alphavirus species, it was proposed that they be named Argyle virus and Thomson’s Lake virus, respectively.
Liu et al. provide insights into the pathogenesis and potential risk of Tembusu virus (TMUV) to mammals [16]. Through their study, they showed that the TMUV HB strain isolated from diseased ducks demonstrated high virulence in BALB/c mice compared with the reference duck TMUV strain and that the 326K at E protein is critical for the mammalian adaption of TMUV.
Burke et al. define the cynomolgus macaque animal model for aerosolised Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) and demonstrate the importance of challenge dose and viral subtype [17]. They proposed the use of a lower challenge dose (1.0 × 103 PFU) in the aerosol CM model of VEEV disease as NHPs at this dose showed the highest level of viremia, a fever response, and a measurable reduction in complete lymphocyte counts (biomarkers that can demonstrate MCM efficacy).
Wu et al. engineered the ZIKV replicon as mammalian expression vectors and evaluated the potential of ZIKV mini-replicon-based SRIPs as delivery vehicles for heterologous gene expression in vitro and in vivo. This particular study highlights the potential of ZIKV mini-replicon-based SRIPs as promising vehicles for gene delivery applications [18].
Crawford et al. performed an RNA-sequencing analysis of the transcriptional response of HEK-293 cells to infection with either mosquito- or mammalian-derived Sindbis virus (SINV), and it was shown that mosquito-derived virus infection leads to a more robust transcriptional response in HEK-293s compared to infection with the BHK-derived virus [19]. They also identified a potential mechanism leading to the more rapid shut-off of host translation and suggested that this mechanism acts to counter the IFN-β-stimulated transcriptional response.
Liang et al. show that hTIM-1 protein can directly interact with Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) E protein and mediates JEV infection and that this interaction was found to be on specific binding sites between ND114115 in the hTIM-1 IgV domain and K38 of the E protein [20].
Osuna-Ramos et al. investigated the antiviral potential of the cholesterol-lowering drugs atorvastatin and ezetimibe in monotherapy and combination against DENV, ZIKV, and YFV [21]. They demonstrated the potential of atorvastatin and ezetimibe as antiviral agents against flaviviruses in vitro, and their potential was also demonstrated in vivo using AG129 mice infected with DENV 2.
The second section of this Special Issue consists of two review articles by Kuno [22] and Taylor and Rayner [23]. In Kuno’s review article, the author investigates the mechanisms of yellow fever virus (YFV) and the process leading to outbreak occurrence, environmental factors, dispersal, and viral persistence in nature [22]. In Taylor and Rayner’s review article, the authors investigate the immune responses to CHIKV and, in particular, the importance of studying sex as a biological variable by introducing epidemiological studies covering previous CHIKV outbreaks [23]. In their study, it is suggested that while the female sex appears to be a risk factor for chronic CHIKV disease, the male sex is suggested as a risk factor for CHIKV-associated death.
The third and final section of this Special Issue consists of two brief reports on DENV research by Zuckerman et al. and Wilken et al. [24,25]. Zuckerman et al. performed a phylogenetic analysis of DENV serotypes 1 and 3, which were diagnosed in travelers and Nepalese infected in Kathmandu, Nepal, during the October 2022 outbreak, which suggested that both serotypes may have originated in India [24]. Wilken et al. developed a transiently immunocompromised DENV2 mouse infection model for vaccine testing by treating adult wild-type mice with an IFNAR1-blocking non-cell-depleting antibody (MAR1-5A3) prior to DENV2 infection, and it was shown that these mice seroconverted, with high levels of viral RNA detected in the mice, indicating productive viral replication [25].
In summary, the collection of articles included in this Special Issue provides new insights into previously unexplored areas of alphavirus and flavivirus research.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all contributors and reviewers who dedicated their valuable time and expertise to developing our Special Issue.
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation: Y.C.K. and A.R.-S.; writing—original draft: Y.C.K.; writing—review and editing: Y.C.K. and A.R.-S.; funding acquisition: Y.C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Y.C.K. was supported by a Wellcome Trust grant (224117/Z/21/Z).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Kaye A.D., Okeagu C.N., Pham A.D., Silva R.A., Hurley J.J., Arron B.L., Sarfraz N., Lee H.N., Ghali G.E., Gamble J.W., et al. Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Facilities and Systems: International Perspectives. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2021;35:293–306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chambers T.J., Hahn C.S., Galler R., Rice C.M. Flavivirus Genome Organization, Expression, and Replication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1990;44:649–688. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.44.100190.003245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chambers T.J., Rice C.M. Molecular Biology of the Flaviviruses. Microbiol. Sci. 1987;4:219–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strauss J.H., Strauss E.G. The Alphaviruses: Gene Expression, Replication, and Evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 1994;58:491–562. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.3.491-562.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weaver S.C., Winegar R., Manger I.D., Forrester N.L. Alphaviruses: Population Genetics and Determinants of Emergence. Antivir. Res. 2012;94:242–257. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weaver S.C. Urbanization and Geographic Expansion of Zoonotic Arboviral Diseases: Mechanisms and Potential Strategies for Prevention. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:360–363. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weaver S.C., Reisen W.K. Present and Future Arboviral Threats. Antivir. Res. 2010;85:328–345. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weaver S.C., Charlier C., Vasilakis N., Lecuit M. Zika, Chikungunya, and Other Emerging Vector-Borne Viral Diseases. Annu. Rev. Med. 2018;69:395–408. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050715-105122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weaver S.C. Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014;8:e2921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weaver S.C., Lecuit M. Chikungunya Virus and the Global Spread of a Mosquito-Borne Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1231–1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1406035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nissly R.H., Lim L., Keller M.R., Bird I.M., Bhushan G., Misra S., Chothe S.K., Sill M.C., Kumar N.V., Sivakumar A.V.N., et al. The Susceptibility of Chickens to Zika Virus: A Comprehensive Study on Age-Dependent Infection Dynamics and Host Responses. Viruses. 2024;16:569. doi: 10.3390/v16040569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kizu J., Graham M., Liu W. Potential Serological Misdiagnosis of Barmah Forest Virus and Ross River Virus Diseases as Chikungunya Virus Infections in Australia: Comparison of ELISA with Neutralization Assay Results. Viruses. 2024;16:384. doi: 10.3390/v16030384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Souza C.S., Caleiro G.S., Claro I.M., de Jesus J.G., Coletti T.M., da Silva C.A.M., Costa Â.A., Inenami M., Ribeiro A.C., Felix A.C., et al. Phylogenetics, Epidemiology and Temporal Patterns of Dengue Virus in Araraquara, São Paulo State. Viruses. 2024;16:274. doi: 10.3390/v16020274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rainey S.M., Lefteri D.A., Darby C., Kohl A., Merits A., Sinkins S.P. Evidence of Differences in Cellular Regulation of Wolbachia-Mediated Viral Inhibition between Alphaviruses and Flaviviruses. Viruses. 2024;16:115. doi: 10.3390/v16010115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Michie A., Ernst T., Pyke A.T., Nicholson J., Mackenzie J.S., Smith D.W., Imrie A. Genomic Analysis of Sindbis Virus Reveals Uncharacterized Diversity within the Australasian Region, and Support for Revised SINV Taxonomy. Viruses. 2023;16:7. doi: 10.3390/v16010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu X., Yan D., Peng S., Zhang Y., Xu B., Li L., Shi X., Ma T., Li X., Teng Q., et al. 326K at E Protein Is Critical for Mammalian Adaption of TMUV. Viruses. 2023;15:2376. doi: 10.3390/v15122376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Burke C.W., Gardner C.L., Goodson A.I., Piper A.E., Erwin-Cohen R.A., White C.E., Glass P.J. Defining the Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Animal Model for Aerosolized Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis: Importance of Challenge Dose and Viral Subtype. Viruses. 2023;15:2351. doi: 10.3390/v15122351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu J.-S., Kan J.-Y., Lai H.-C., Lin C.-W. Development of Zika Virus Mini-Replicon Based Single-Round Infectious Particles as Gene Delivery Vehicles. Viruses. 2023;15:1762. doi: 10.3390/v15081762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crawford J.M., Buechlein A.M., Moline D.A., Rusch D.B., Hardy R.W. Host Derivation of Sindbis Virus Influences Mammalian Type I Interferon Response to Infection. Viruses. 2023;15:1685. doi: 10.3390/v15081685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liang Z., Pan J., Xie S., Yang X., Cao R. Interaction between hTIM-1 and Envelope Protein Is Important for JEV Infection. Viruses. 2023;15:1589. doi: 10.3390/v15071589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Osuna-Ramos J.F., Farfan-Morales C.N., Cordero-Rivera C.D., De Jesús-González L.A., Reyes-Ruiz J.M., Hurtado-Monzón A.M., Palacios-Rápalo S.N., Jiménez-Camacho R., Meraz-Ríos M.A., Del Ángel R.M. Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs as Potential Antivirals: A Repurposing Approach against Flavivirus Infections. Viruses. 2023;15:1465. doi: 10.3390/v15071465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuno G. Mechanisms of Yellow Fever Transmission: Gleaning the Overlooked Records of Importance and Identifying Problems, Puzzles, Serious Issues, Surprises and Research Questions. Viruses. 2024;16:84. doi: 10.3390/v16010084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taylor M., Rayner J.O. Immune Response to Chikungunya Virus: Sex as a Biological Variable and Implications for Natural Delivery via the Mosquito. Viruses. 2023;15:1869. doi: 10.3390/v15091869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zuckerman N.S., Schwartz E., Pandey P., Erster O., Halpern O., Bucris E., Morad-Eliyahu H., Wax M., Lustig Y. Dengue Types 1 and 3 Identified in Travelers Returning from Kathmandu, Nepal, during the October 2022 Outbreak Are Related to Strains Recently Identified in India. Viruses. 2023;15:2334. doi: 10.3390/v15122334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilken L., Stelz S., Prajeeth C.K., Rimmelzwaan G.F. Transient Blockade of Type I Interferon Signalling Promotes Replication of Dengue Virus Strain D2Y98P in Adult Wild-Type Mice. Viruses. 2023;15:814. doi: 10.3390/v15040814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]