Abstract
Background
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by its high metastatic potential, which results in poor patient survival. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are crucial in facilitating TNBC metastasis via induction of mitochondrial biogenesis. However, how to inhibit CAF-conferred mitochondrial biogenesis is still needed to explore.
Methods
We investigated metastasis using wound healing and cell invasion assays, 3D-culture, anoikis detection, and NOD/SCID mice. Mitochondrial biogenesis was detected by MitoTracker green FM staining, quantification of mitochondrial DNA levels, and blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The expression, transcription, and phosphorylation of peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) were detected by western blotting, chromatin immunoprecipitation, dual-luciferase reporter assay, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunoprecipitation, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The prognostic role of PGC-1α in TNBC was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier plotter database and clinical breast cancer tissue samples.
Results
We demonstrated that PGC-1α indicated lymph node metastasis, tumor thrombus formation, and poor survival in TNBC patients, and it was induced by CAFs, which functioned as an inducer of mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis in TNBC. Shikonin impeded the CAF-induced PGC-1α expression, nuclear localization, and interaction with estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα), thereby inhibiting PGC-1α/ERRα-targeted mitochondrial genes. Mechanistically, the downregulation of PGC-1α was mediated by synthase kinase 3β-induced phosphorylation of PGC-1α at Thr295, which associated with neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 4e1 recognition and subsequent degradation by ubiquitin proteolysis. Mutation of PGC-1α at Thr295 negated the suppressive effects of shikonin on CAF-stimulated TNBC mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that PGC-1α is a viable target for blocking TNBC metastasis by disrupting mitochondrial biogenesis, and that shikonin merits potential for treatment of TNBC metastasis as an inhibitor of mitochondrial biogenesis through targeting PGC-1α.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-024-03101-z.
Keywords: Mitochondrial biogenesis, Metastasis, Peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor coactivator 1α, Cancer-associated fibroblast, Triple-negative breast cancer
Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is widely recognized as the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by high metastatic risk and low overall survival [1]. Owing to the absence of specific molecular targets, TNBC is unresponsive to endocrine therapy or anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapy [2]. Current clinical trials are investigating new treatment for TNBC, including targeted therapies such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, alongside immunotherapies [3]. Despite chemotherapy being the mainstay of systemic treatment, it often results in unsatisfactory outcomes due to high recurrence rates and poor prognosis [4], highlighting the critical need for novel therapeutic strategies and agents to combat TNBC. Research has shown that during metastasis, TNBC cells increasingly rely on mitochondrial metabolism [5]. Invasive TNBC cells display enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and ATP production when colonizing distant organs [6]. Consequently, targeting mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism has emerged as an effective approach to limit TNBC metastasis [6], offering a potential avenue to address treatment challenges in TNBC.
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), playing vital roles in supporting tumor growth, remodeling the extracellular matrix, creating metastatic niches, and shielding tumor cells from the immune system, which are significant contributors to tumor metastasis [7, 8]. Specifically, in TNBC, CAFs engage in metabolic symbiosis with cancer cells, referred to as the “reverse Warburg effect” [9], which is linked to poor clinical outcomes [10]. In this process, cancer cells prompt mitochondrial dysfunction and a shift towards aerobic glycolysis in CAFs. As a result, CAFs generate energy-rich products, such as L-lactate, glutamine, ketones, and fatty acids, which then supply cancer cells for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [11]. Additionally, metabolites from glycolytic CAFs drive mitochondrial biogenesis and activity in breast cancer cells by boosting mitochondrial proteins and chaperones, thus enhancing their anabolic capabilities, biomass, and invasiveness [12]. Therefore, CAFs play indispensable roles in mitochondrial biogenesis in breast cancer cells, facilitating their metastatic potential.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) serves as a central regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and energy sensing [13, 14]. As a transcriptional coactivator, PGC-1α partners with nuclear transcription factors to bind promoters and activate transcription of their target genes [15]. Among these factors, estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα) is a key modulator of cellular metabolism in breast cancer [16]. In TNBC tissues, elevated nuclear ERRα expression has been associated with shorter survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in TNBC patients [17]. ERRα regulates genes involved in mitochondrial proteins and enzymes crucial for the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and OXPHOS pathways in TNBC cells [18, 19]. Therefore, the PGC-1α/ERRα axis may play a pivotal role in mitochondrial biogenesis in TNBC cells.
Shikonin, a bioactive compound extracted from the roots of Lithospermum erythrorhizon Siebold & Zucc., has demonstrated a spectrum of pharmacological properties, including anti-oxidative stress, anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and immunomodulatory effects [20]. Moreover, shikonin has shown potent inhibitory effects against multiple types of cancer [21, 22]. However, its impact on the TME, particularly on CAF-stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis in TNBC, remains unexplored. In the present study, we investigate the effects of shikonin on CAF-stimulated metastasis of TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo, and explored the underlying mechanisms on the inhibition of mitochondrial biogenesis. Our results suggested that shikonin is a promising candidate as an inhibitor of CAF-induced mitochondrial biogenesis and TNBC metastasis treatment, which offers new insights of mitochondrial biogenesis as a target for developing drug against TNBC.
Materials and methods
Materials
Detailed information regarding the materials is provided in the supplementary material.
Cell culture
MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7, T-47D, SK-BR-3 (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China), MCF-10A, MCF-12A, and WI-38 cell lines (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA), and immortalized primary CAFs from TNBC tissues (BeNa Culture Collection, Beijing, China) were cultured as described in the Supplementary Material. The patient provided consent for use of the tissue and had not received any prior therapy. All cell lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination and authenticated using short tandem repeat profiling. CAFs were identified using the CAF-related biomarkers alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and fibronectin, confirming a purity of > 99% (Fig. S1) and utilized at 3–15 passages. CAFs were cultured to approximately 70% confluence and then subjected to serum-free medium treatment for 48 h. The conditioned medium (CM) was then collected and filtered for subsequent investigation. WI-38 cells were transformed into CAFs by culturing in medium from various subtypes of breast cancer cells for 48 h, as described previously [23, 24]. Subsequently, CAF-CM from activated WI-38 cells was then used to stimulate breast cancer cells for an additional 48 h.
Wound healing assay
TNBC cells were stained with CellTracker™ Green dye for 30 min at 37 ℃, digested, and co-cultured with CAFs at a ratio of 2:1 in 6-well plates. Once the cells reached approximately 90% confluence, the cell monolayers were scraped using a micropipette tip and treated with or without shikonin in serum-free medium. Alternatively, TNBC cells were seeded in 6-well plates, scraped, and treated with or without CAF-CM. The scratches in the cell monolayers were photographed under a microscope (DMI8; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at 0 and 48 h after treatment.
Cell invasion assay
Transwell chambers, pre-coated with Matrigel (8-μm pore size) and placed in 24-well plates, were used to assess cell invasion. TNBC cells, pre-treated with or without shikonin for 6 h, were seeded in the upper compartment with serum-free media, and CAFs in serum-free medium were included in the lower compartment. Alternatively, TNBC cells were treated with CAF-CM with or without shikonin for 48 h, then suspended with serum-free media in the upper compartment, while media containing 10% FBS was added into the lower compartment. The Transwell systems were placed in a humidified incubator for 24 h (5% CO2, 37 ℃). The infiltrated cells were fixed with methanol, stained with hematoxylin/eosin, and photographed using an inverted microscope (DMI1; Leica) followed by quantification with ImageJ software (v.1.8.0).
Detection of filamentous actin (F-actin)
TNBC cells and CAFs (total 9 × 103 cells per well, at a ratio of 2:1) were seeded into 96-well black plates. The cells were fixed (4%, paraformaldehyde, 25 ℃, 10 min), permeabilized (0.2% Triton X-100, 4 ℃, 10 min), blocked (5%, goat serum, 25 ℃, 30 min), and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488™ phalloidin (1:50, 37 ℃, 30 min) for F-actin staining. The cells were then incubated with anti-EpCAM antibody (1:500, 4 ℃, overnight) followed by Alexa Fluor 647 secondary antibody (1:250, 25 ℃, 1.5 h), and stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1 μg/mL, 25 ℃, 30 min) for nuclear staining. Fluorescence signals were detected using a high-content imaging system.
3D-culture assay
The 24-well plates were pre-coated with Matrigel (growth factor reduced, GFR, 300 μL/well). TNBC cells were collected and resuspended in media containing 2% GFR Matrigel, and then located in the Matrigel-coated plates. The cells were then treated with CAF-CM with or without shikonin, and the treatment medium was replaced every day for 3 days. The cells were photographed under a DMI1 microscope (Leica).
Detection of anoikis
TNBC cells were inoculated in poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate coated (anchorage-resistant) plates for 24 h, incubated with propidium iodide (1:100) and Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:100) reagents at 25℃ for 15 min, and then analyzed using flow cytometry (NovoCyte; Ex/Em = 488/630; 488/530 nm) with NovoExpress software (ACEA Biosciences). Alternatively, TNBC cells were incubated with calcein AM (1:5) and ethidium homodimer (EthD-1, 1:5) from a CytoSelect™ 96-Well Anoikis Assay kit for 30 min at 37 ℃. The fluorescence intensities of Calcein AM and EthD-1 were measured using a high-content analysis system at Ex/Em = 485/515 and 525/590 nm, respectively, with Harmony Software (v.4.9; PerkinElmer, Berlin, Germany).
Detection of mitochondrial numbers and distribution
Mitochondrial numbers were assessed by staining the cells with MitoTracker Green FM (100 nM, 37 ℃, 30 min), followed by flow cytometry (NovoCyte; Ex/Em = 488/530 nm). Mitochondrial distribution was determined by staining the cells with Alexa Fluor 488™ phalloidin (1:50, 37 ℃, 30 min), MitoTracker Red (50 nM, 37 ℃, 30 min), and Hoechst 33342 (1:100, 25 ℃, 30 min) after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (25 ℃, 10 min). Images were captured using the high-content analysis system.
Quantification of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels
This experiment was performed using a genomic DNA extraction kit, TB Green Premix, and Human Mitochondrial DNA Primer kit, as described previously [25].
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (4 ℃, overnight), incubated in 1% osmium tetroxide (25 ℃, 2 h), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and then embedded with Epon 812. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were obtained using an EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica) and counterstained with 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 15 min. The sections were viewed using a compact digital transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (HT7800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Mitochondrial morphology was classified into three types based on the ratio of length to width using ImageJ software: ≤1.5: round; 1.5–3.0: intermediate; >3.0: elongated.
Blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis
Blue-native PAGE analysis was conducted as described previously [26]. Cells were collected and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with digitalis glycoside (8 mg/mL), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, 1 mM), and protease inhibitor cocktail (PIC, 1%) at 4 ℃ for 15 min, followed by centrifugation (21,130 × g, 4 ℃, 20 min). The resulting pellets were resuspended in native PAGE sample buffer (containing 5% digitalis glycoside, 1 mM PMSF, and 1% PIC), vortexed (every 5 min for 30 min), and centrifuged (21,130 × g, 4 ℃, 30 min). The protein complexes were quantified using a BCA protein assay kit, separated using a native PAGE 4–16% gel, 10-well kit, and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. After blocking with 5% nonfat-dried milk (4 ℃, 1 h), they were incubated with OXPHOS Rodent WB antibody cocktail (1:1000, 4 ℃, overnight) and secondary antibody. The results were imaged using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit in a ChemiDoc system (v.5.2 Image Lab Software; XRS+; Bio-Rad).
Determination of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) level
Mitochondrial ROS levels were assessed by staining cells with MitoSOX (4 μM) in serum-free medium (37 ℃, 30 min). The fluorescence intensities of MitoSOX (Ex/Em = 488/572 nm) were measured using flow cytometry with NovoExpress software (ACEA Biosciences).
Detection of ATP levels
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer supplemented with 1 mM PMSF and 1% PIC. ATP levels were measured using an ATP determination kit and quantified with a microplate spectrophotometer (Varioskan, Thermo) at 560 nm. The ATP content was normalized to the cell protein concentration.
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation assay
Total, nuclear, and mitochondrial proteins were extracted using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer, a nuclear/cytoplasmic protein kit, and cell mitochondria isolation kit, respectively. The lysis buffer was supplemented with 1 mM PMSF and 1% PIC. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an immunoprecipitation kit. Western blotting was performed as described previously [25]. Immunoblots were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit and a ChemiDoc system.
Immunofluorescence staining
TNBC cells (6 × 103 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well black plates, fixed (paraformaldehyde, 4%, 25 ℃, 10 min), permeabilized (Triton X-100, 0.2%, 4 ℃, 10 min), and blocked with 5% goat serum (25 ℃, 30 min). The cells were then incubated with anti-PGC-1α antibody (1:300, 4 ℃, overnight), followed by Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (1:500, 25 ℃, 1.5 h), anti-ERRα antibody (1:200, 4 ℃, overnight), Alexa Fluor 647 secondary antibody (1:250, 25 ℃, 1.5 h), and DAPI (1 μg/mL, 25 ℃, 30 min). The results were detected using a high-content system.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
Cells were inoculated into 12-well plates and transfected with pRL Renilla luciferase control reporter vectors (pRL-TK) and ERRE-luciferase reporter plasmids (pGL3-3×ERRE) at a ratio of 1:10 using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent. After treatment, ERRE-luciferase activity was detected using a dual-luciferase reporter system and normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assay was conducted with 2 × 107 cells per group using a ChIP kit and anti-PGC-1α (5 μg) antibody according to the standard protocol. Quantification of PGC-1α ChIP enrichment was performed using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) detection system (Bio-Rad) and specific primers for the ERRSA promoter (Table S1). ChIP enrichment was calculated against the IgG group and subsequently normalized against the control group.
Q-PCR
Q-PCR was performed using an RNA extraction kit, cDNA synthesis kit, and TB Green Premix in a CFX96 RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad), as described previously [25]. The primer sequences are listed in Table S1.
Phosphorylation site and binding partners of PGC-1α
Cells were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) assays were performed. PGC-1α was immunoprecipitated from cellular extracts using an anti-PGC-1α antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE. The indicated protein was excised, digested with trypsin, fractionated, and then analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using Easy-nLC 1000 and LTQ Orbitrap ETD (Thermo). Mass spectrometric data were identified using Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo; v1.4) and the NCBI database.
Plasmid transfection
Lentiviruses harboring pGPU6/GFP/Neo-shRNA-LDHA vector (LDHA shRNA: 5′- CTCTGGCAAAGACTATAATGT-3′), pGPU6/GFP/Neo-shRNA-NC vector (5′- TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′), LV2 (U6/Puro)-shRNA-PGC-1α vector (PGC-1α shRNA: 5′- GGTGCAGTGACCAATCAGAAA-3′), LV2-shRNA-NC vector (5′- TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′), and pcDNA3.1 plasmids containing PGC-1αWT or PGC-1αA295 were purchased form GenePharma (Shanghai, China). All transfection procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TNBC cells were transfected with shRNA-PGC-1α to knockdown PGC-1α and then transfected with pc DNA3.1 (+) (CMV/MCS/AmpR) plasmids to express PGC-1αWT- or PGC-1αA295. Cells with stable knockdown of PGC-1α and expression of PGC-1αWT or PGC-1αA295 were selected by incubation with 0.2 μg/mL puromycin and 100 μg/mL ampicillin for 21 days.
Animals and treatment
Female NOD/SCID mice (6–8 weeks old, 18–22 g, Charles River, Beijing, China) were raised in 12:12 h light/dark-cycle standard conditions and assigned randomly to different groups. MDA-MB-231 cells (MDA-MB-231/PGC-1αWT, MDA-MB-231/PGC-1αA295, 1 × 106 cells/mouse) and CAF cells (0.5 × 106 cells/mouse) were co-injected into the left fourth inguinal mammary fat pads (n = 10/group). After 4 weeks, tumors were removed by mammary gland lumpectomy. The following day, the mice were treated intragastrically with shikonin (10 mg/kg/2 days) or vehicle (olive oil) for 30 days. After the experiment, the mice were sacrificed under anesthesia using CO2 inhalation.
Tissues (5-μm sections) were stained with hematoxylin/eosin. TOM20 was detected in lung tissues by immunofluorescence using a fluorescence staining kit, anti-TOM20 antibody (1:200), and DAPI (1 μg/mL). Immunohistochemistry staining of lung tissues was conducted using a Biotin-Streptavidin HRP Detection kit with anti-PGC-1α (1:200), anti-ERRα (1:200), and anti-COXIV (1:200) antibodies. Tissue images were photographed using a DMI8 microscope and analyzed with ImageJ software. The investigators were blinded to the assignments and outcomes.
Multiplex immunofluorescence staining
We carried out multiplex immunofluorescence staining of breast cancer (n = 230) and TNBC (n = 38) [27] tissue microarrays from patients with primary cancer (Shanghai Outdo Biotech, Shanghai, China). The clinicopathological parameters of these specimens are listed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. PGC-1α and ERRα expression in tumor tissues were evaluated using a PANO 7-plex immunohistochemistry kit, anti-PGC-1α, anti-ERRα, and anti-pan-cytokeratin (Pan-CK) antibodies, and DAPI. Fluorescence signals were captured using a Mantra System (PerkinElmer). PGC-1α and ERRα expression levels in breast cancer tissues were calculated by mean cell intensity, and PGC-1α expression in TNBC tissues was calculated by H-score using inForm image software. The pathologists who collated and analyzed the clinical parameters were blinded to the study results. The results were analyzed and represented using R script (v.4.0.2) and ggplot2 package.
Kaplan–Meier plot analysis
The correlations between PPARGC1A, ESRRA, and PPARGC1A/ESSRA mRNA levels and RFS in patients with different breast cancer subtypes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier plotter database (http://kmplot.com, ER-positive/HER2-negative patients: n = 2301; HER-2-positive/ER-negative patients: n = 323; TNBC patients: n = 534) [28]. PPARGC1A and ESRRA mRNA levels were analyzed using the autoselect best cutoff mode, while PPARGC1A/ESSRA mRNA levels were analyzed using the mean expression levels of the selected genes. Statistical significance was calculated by log-rank test and indicated as p < 0.05. The correlations of PPARGC1A mRNA levels and mRNA levels of ERRα-targeted mitochondrial genes were evaluated using R- and p-values, calculated by Pearson’s correlation analysis. The results were represented using R script (v.4.0.2) and the ggplot2 package.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences among multiple groups were analyzed by one way-ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc test, while differences between two groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test. Differences in Kaplan–Meier survival curves were evaluated using the log-rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests conducted in this study.
Results
Shikonin suppresses CAF-enhanced metastatic ability in TNBC cells
The inhibitory effects of shikonin on CAF-promoted metastasis in TNBC cells were assessed using a coculture of TNBC cells and CAFs, and stimulated by CAF-CM. TNBC cells (MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells) were labeled with CellTracker™ Green. Cell migration was assessed and the results showed that TNBC cells cocultured with CAFs (at a ratio of 2:1) and stimulated with CAF-CM displayed enhanced migration ability (Fig. 1A, B). Cell invasion assay using a Matrigel-coated Transwell system indicated that coculture with CAFs and CAF-CM promoted invasion of TNBC cells (Fig. 1C, D). CAF-enhanced migration and invasion were notably diminished by shikonin (Fig. 1A–D). Moreover, TNBC cells treated with CAF-CM exhibited a more spherical and immotile morphology and formed more protrusions in 3D Matrigel cultures. These protrusions interacted with each other, attracting more clusters and thus resulting in larger cell clusters, which were also reversed by shikonin treatment (Fig. 1E). TNBC cells stimulated by CAFs exhibited cytoskeletal remodeling, marked by the formation of filopodia and lamellipodia. In contrast, shikonin inhibited these CAF-induced morphological changes in TNBC cells (Fig. 1F). In addition to increased migration and invasion, we also examined anoikis resistance, as an important characteristic of cancer cells during metastasis [29]. Stimulation with CAF-CM reduced anoikis while shikonin increased anoikis in TNBC cells (Fig. 1G, H). Collectively, these data indicate that shikonin suppressed CAF-enhanced metastatic capabilities in TNBC cells.
Shikonin attenuates CAF-stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis and energetics
TNBC cells demonstrate a predilection for mitochondrial metabolism during metastasis [5, 10, 30]. We therefore explored if shikonin influenced mitochondrial biogenesis in CAF-stimulated TNBC cells by examining the number of mitochondria and mtDNA content. CAF-CM stimulation increased the mitochondria count and mtDNA content in TNBC cells, which were inhibited by shikonin treatment (Fig. 2A, B). Regarding mitochondrial morphology, which is indicative of metabolic pathway alterations [31], CAF-stimulated TNBC cells displayed elongated and larger mitochondria with numerous cristae, signifying heightened electron transport chain performance and energy production [32], which were countered by shikonin treatment (Fig. 2C). In addition, CAF-CM treatment upregulated mitochondrial respiratory complexes III, IV, and V in MDA-MB-231 cells and complexes III and IV in MDA-MB-468 cells, and these were reduced by shikonin (Fig. 2D). CAF-CM also prompted the localization of more mitochondria to the plasma membrane in TNBC cells to support ATP production necessary for actin filament polymerization and lamellipodia formation during cell migration [33], while shikonin treatment resulted in a predominant mitochondrial distribution near the nucleus (Fig. 2E). Activation of mitochondrial respiration typically increases mitochondrial ROS formation and cellular ATP production [34]. Consistently, elevated mitochondrial ROS and ATP levels were observed in CAF-CM-stimulated TNBC cells, which were suppressed by shikonin (Fig. 2F, G). Lactate, a crucial metabolite produced by CAFs [12], is synthesized from pyruvate by lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), a key component of the glycolytic pathway that also generates ATP [35]. To investigate the role of lactate from CAFs in mitochondrial biogenesis, we employed shRNA to knock down LDHA and subsequently reduce L-Lactate level in CAF-CM (Fig. S2A and 2B), and investigated the role of lactate from CAFs in mitochondria biogenesis. LDHA knockdown significantly limited the effect of CAF-CM on mitochondrial biogenesis (Fig. S2C-F), indicating that lactate was required for CAF-induced mitochondrial biogenesis in TNBC cells. Furthermore, we found that shikonin reduced CAF-CM-induced mitochondrial biogenesis from shNC-transfected CAFs, but not shLDHA-transfected CAFs (Fig. S2C-F). Shikonin also diminished the lactate-upregulated mitochondria contents, mtDNA levels, mitochondrial ROS, and ATP production in TNBC cells (Fig. S2G-J). However, the impact of shikonin alone on mitochondrial biogenesis in TNBC cells were minimal (Fig. S3A–D). These data indicate that the CAF-induced mitochondrial biogenesis and energetics can be suppressed by shikonin in TNBC cells.
Shikonin represses CAF-induced PGC-1α expression and activation in TNBC cells
It has been revealed that PGC-1α/ERRα axis regulates mitochondrial biogenesis in cancer cells [36]. We therefore investigated the regulation of the PGC-1α/ERRα axis in CAF-induced TNBC cells and assessed the impact of shikonin on this pathway. PGC-1α expression was more elevated in TNBC cell lines compared with other breast cancer subtypes and normal breast epithelial cells (Fig. 3A). ERRα expression was higher in ER-positive and HER-2-positive breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 3A). We utilized various types of breast cancer cells to stimulate WI-38 cells to undergo their transformation into CAFs (Fig. S4A). PGC-1α levels were significantly increased in CAF-stimulated TNBC cells compared with CAF-stimulated ER-positive and HER-2-positive cells (Fig. 3B), but ERRα expression did not exhibit a notable change in these cells following CAF stimulation (Fig. 3B). PGC-1α was suggested to be specifically upregulated in TNBC cells in response to CAF-stimulation. Consistently, we observed that PGC-1α levels increased in CAF-induced TNBC cells, whereas ERRα levels did not change (Fig. 3C). Additionally, the levels of PGC-1α in TNBC cells were also upregulated by CAF-derived lactate (Fig. S4B), and the migration, invasion and protrusion formation promoted by CAFs in TNBC cells were reversed upon PGC-1α knockdown (Fig. S4C-F). Western blot and immunofluorescence staining revealed that ERRα was predominantly localized in the nucleus (indicated by purple fluorescence) and remained unchanged following CAF-CM treatment (Fig. 3D, E). In contrast, PGC-1α, typically localized in the cytoplasm, and the nuclear localization of both PGC-1α and ERRα increased (shown by light-yellow fluorescence) after exposure to CAF-CM (Fig. 3D, E). Shikonin did not alter ERRα expression or its subcellular distribution; however, it significantly reduced CAF-CM-induced increase in PGC-1α expression and its nuclear localization in TNBC cells (Fig. 3C–E). Luciferase reporter results showed that CAF-CM enhanced the ERRα transcriptional activity, which was diminished by cotreatment with shikonin (Fig. 3F). Furthermore, ChIP assay confirmed that shikonin counteracted the CAF-induced promotion of PGC-1α binding to the ERRα promoter, suggesting shikonin inhibits the transcriptional activity of the PGC-1α/ERRα complex induced by CAFs (Fig. 3G).
To further evaluate the inhibitory effects of shikonin on PGC-1α/ERRα axis-targeted mitochondrial gene, we firstly established the positive correlations between PPARGC1A mRNA levels and ERRα-targeted mitochondrial genes mRNA levels, including IDH3A (isocitrate dehydrogenase 3 (NAD+) α, IDH3A), ATP5F1B (ATP synthase β, ATPsynβ), COX4I1 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4I1, COX IV), and CYCS (cytochrome c, Cyt c), which are involved in the TCA cycle and respiratory chain components, respectively, in TNBC breast cancer tissues rather than ER-positive or HER-2-positive breast cancer tissues, using Kaplan–Meier plot database (Fig. 3H). Data showed that CAF-CM treatment led to elevated levels of these mitochondrial genes (Fig. 3I). Correspondingly, the total and mitochondrial protein levels of IDH3A, ATPsynβ, COX IV, and Cyt c were also increased following CAF-CM treatment (Fig. 3J). These results suggest that CAFs upregulate and activate PGC-1α, which in turn boosts ERRα transcriptional activity in TNBC cells. Conversely, shikonin suppresses PGC-1α expression and function, leading to repression of the transcriptional activities of the PGC-1α/ERRα axis.
Shikonin promotes PGC-1α phosphorylation facilitating its ubiquitination-mediated degradation
To investigate the mechanism by which shikonin suppresses PGC-1α expression, a protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) and a proteasome inhibitor MG132 were firstly employed. Data revealed that MG132, but not CHX, reversed the inhibitory effects of shikonin on CAF-CM-induced PGC-1α expression (Fig. 4A). However, PPARGC1A mRNA levels remained unchanged with or without shikonin treatment in the presence of CAF-CM (Fig. S5). Shikonin shortened the extended half-life of PGC-1α caused by CAF-CM in CHX-treated TNBC cells (Fig. 4B). Additionally, CAF-CM decreased, while shikonin enhanced, the ubiquitination of PGC-1α in both TNBC cell lines (Fig. 4C).
Since ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic degradation of PGC-1α is phosphorylation-dependent [37], we immunoprecipitated TNBC cell lysates using an anti-PGC-1α antibody and subjected them to LC-MS/MS. We highlighted the most enriched phosphorylation site in each group (Fig. S6). Shikonin increased PGC-1α phosphorylation on threonine 295 (Thr295) in CAF-CM-treated TNBC cells (Fig. 4D). Continuing with IP-MS, we screened out 205 proteins potentially associated with PGC-1α in the pulldown samples from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells treated with shikonin under CAF stimulation (Fig. S7A, Table S4). Among these proteins, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), known for phosphorylating PGC-1α on Thr295 [38], and neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 4e1 (NEDD4-1, or NEDD4), an E3 ubiquitin ligase with a poly-proline rich (PPR) binding domain recognizing PPR motifs in substrates [39], may mediate shikonin-induced ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of PGC-1α that contains a PPR motif (Fig. S7A and Fig. 4D), and which is conserved among species (Fig. 4E).
To validate this hypothesis, we confirmed that shikonin increased the interaction between PGC-1α and GSK-3β or NEDD4-1 in TNBC cells, under CAF-CM stimulation (Fig. 4F). Additionally, GSK-3β and NEDD4-1 were upregulated in TNBC cells following shikonin treatment, with or without CAF-CM incubation (Fig. S7B). To confirm the effects of shikonin on PGC-1α phosphorylation at Thr295 which is responsible for its degradation, we generated an unphosphorylated mutant PGC-1α, replacing Thr295 with alanine (Ala295). Cells were transfected with shPGC-1α to knockdown endogenous PGC-1α, followed by transfection with plasmid expressing either wild-type (PGC-1αWT) or mutant PGC-1α (PGC-1αA295) (Fig. 4G). Shikonin reduced CAF-CM-enhanced PGC-1α levels in PGC-1αWT cells, but had no effect in PGC-1αA295 cells (Fig. 4H). Similarly, the half-life of PGC-1αWT was shortened by shikonin; however, the half-life of PGC-1αA295 were unaffected by CAF-CM with or without shikonin treatment (Fig. S7C). Furthermore, the Ala295 mutation reduced the interaction of PGC-1α with GSK-3β and NEDD4-1 in TNBC cells (Fig. 4I). Shikonin thus promoted the association of PGC-1α with GSK-3β and NEDD4-1, as well as PGC-1α ubiquitination in PGC-1αWT- but not in PGC-1αA295-expressing cells (Fig. 4I, Fig. S7D). These results indicate that shikonin promotes PGC-1α phosphorylation at Thr295 by GSK-3β, which strengthens its interaction with NEDD4-1, leading to increased PGC-1α ubiquitination and degradation.
Shikonin inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis via phosphorylation-dependent PGC-1α degradation in TNBC cells
To elucidate the role of phosphorylation-mediated degradation of PGC-1α in the inhibitory activity of shikonin, we reintroduced PGC-1αWT or PGC-1αA295 plasmids into PGC-1α-deficient MDA-MB-231 cells. After priming with CAF-CM, shikonin treatment resulted in decreased mitochondrial numbers, mtDNA levels, and ATP production in PGC-1αWT cells. However, it failed to reduce mitochondrial biogenesis in PGC-1αA295 cells (Fig. 5A–C). Moreover, CAF-coculture- or CAF-CM-enhanced migration and invasion were reduced by shikonin in PGC-1αWT cells, but not in PGC-1αA295 cells (Fig. 5D–G). Moreover, shikonin also impaired the formation of invasive outward projections in PGC-1αWT cells under a 3D-culture system stimulated with CAF-CM (Fig. 5H). Thus, mutating PGC-1α at the Thr295 phosphorylation site abolished the effects of shikonin.
To further explore the role of PGC-1α phosphorylation at Thr295 in the response of TNBC cells to shikonin in vivo, we implanted PGC-1αWT or PGC-1αA295 cells along with CAFs (at a 2:1 ratio) into the mammary fat pads of NOD/SCID female mice. After removing the primary tumors, the mice were treated with or without shikonin for 30 days. Both cell types formed noticeable lung metastases under CAF stimulation (Fig. 6A). Shikonin treatment significantly reduced lung metastases in mice implanted with PGC-1αWT-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells, as evidenced by a marked decrease in metastatic lesions and lung metastatic foci area (Fig. 6B). Notably, shikonin did not cause significant loss of body weight or damage to the hematological system and visceral organs (Fig. S8A, B, Table S5, S6). However, the inhibitory effects of shikonin on lung metastasis were not observed in mice implanted with PGC-1αA295 MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 6A, B).
With the tissue sample, mitochondria were detected by immunofluorescent staining of TOM20. Shikonin treatment reduced mitochondria levels in lung metastases in PGC-1αWT, but not in those expressing PGC-1αA295 (Fig. 6C). Consistent with the in vitro findings, ERRα expression in lung tissues in mice transplanted with either PGC-1αWT- or PGC-1αA295 MDA-MB-231 cells remained unaffected after shikonin treatment (Fig. 6D). However, shikonin inhibited PGC-1α and COX IV expression in pulmonary metastases of PGC-1αWT cells but not in those expressing PGC-1αA295 (Fig. 6D). These results indicate that the inhibitory effects of shikonin on mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis in CAF-enhanced TNBC cells depend on inducing the phosphorylation of PGC-1α at Thr295, thereby promoting its ubiquitin-mediated degradation.
PGC-1α is a promising biomarker of poor prognosis and a potential target of TNBC
To determine the clinical significance of PGC-1α in TNBC treatment, we firstly examined the relationships between PGC-1α/ERRα levels and clinical outcomes in TNBC patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. High levels of PPARGC1A correlated with shorter RFS in TNBC patients and longer RFS in ER-positive breast cancer patients, with no significant correlation observed in HER-2-positive breast cancer patients (Fig. 7A). Elevated ESRRA levels were associated with shorter RFS in ER-positive and TNBC patients, but longer RFS in HER-2-positive patients (Fig. 7A). In addition, elevated PPARGC1/ESSRA levels were associated with poor RFS in TNBC patients and improved RFS in HER-2-positive patients, with no significant association in ER-positive breast cancer patients (Fig. 7A). We next utilized an anti-Pan-CK antibody to distinguish between stromal cells (Pan-CK−) and cancer cells (Pan-CK+), to evaluate the expression of PGC-1α and ERRα in tumor cells from different breast cancer subtypes. It was found that the expression of PGC-1α was higher in TNBC cells than in ER-positive or HER-2-positive subtypes (Fig. 7B). However, there was no significant difference in the expression of ERRα in the three subtypes (Fig. 7B). These data indicate that, regarding the two proteins of the PGC-1α/ERRα axis, PGC-1α is particularly correlated with the poor prognosis of TNBC, consistent with the finding that PGC-1α, but not ERRα, is upregulated in TNBC cells in response to CAF-stimulation (Fig. 3A, B).
Subsequently, we further delved deeper into the prognostic role of PGC-1α in TNBC (Fig. 7C). PGC-1α expression levels in TNBC cells were higher in patients with N1–N3 lymph node metastasis compared with those without lymph node metastasis (N0) (Fig. 7D, and 7F). Additionally, patients with tumor thrombus exhibited higher PGC-1α expression in TNBC cells compared to those without tumor thrombus (Fig. 7E). However, PGC-1α expression in TNBC cells was not associated with tumor invasion, clinical stages or other clinical characteristics in TNBC (Fig. 7F). Collectively, these results indicate that high PGC-1α expression predicts a poor prognosis and high risk of metastasis in TNBC patients, which is a potential target of TNBC.
Discussion
Cancer cells exhibit metabolic flexibility at various stages of the metastatic process [40]. In primary tumors, they predominantly rely on glycolytic metabolism for the swift production of ATP and the generation of cellular building blocks [41]. However, during invasive and metastasis, they prioritize survival over proliferation, shifting towards OXPHOS to produce ATP [42]. This mitochondrial metabolism is particularly advantageous for metastatic cancer cells, as it aids in overcoming challenges such as anoikis and metabolic defects due to the loss of matrix attachment [43], and facilitating their movement from hypoxic regions to distal tissues [5]. Active mitochondria also play a crucial role in enhancing cell motility [33]. Moreover, ATP from active mitochondria activates purinergic P2Y2 receptors in endothelial cells, leading to the opening of the endothelial barrier and enabling transendothelial migration of cancer cells, thus promoting extravasation [44]. Hence, targeting mitochondrial biogenesis presents a promising therapeutic approach to inhibit cell metastasis.
TNBC is the most challenging subtype due to its high rates of mitosis, migration, and invasion, leading to frequent metastasis [45]. Metastatic TNBC cells display increased mitochondrial biogenesis and function, characterized by elongated mitochondrial morphology and heightened expression of genes involved in oxidized metabolism [46]. CAFs are critical in promoting TNBC metastasis, inducing a shift to a mitochondrial metabolic phenotype in breast cancer cells, marked by increased TCA cycle activity [12]. Our study demonstrated that CAFs not only enhanced the migratory and invasive capabilities of TNBC cells but also increased mitochondrial biogenesis, resulting in a higher number of mitochondria with elongated shapes. Furthermore, CAFs contributed to the mitochondrial distribution of regional lamellipodia and the generation of ATP. However, shikonin effectively suppressed the mitochondrial biogenesis enhanced by CAFs, potentially blocking TNBC metastasis.
Mitochondria are recognized as a crucial target for drug discovery, with numerous drugs currently undergoing clinical trials, particularly for patients with metastatic cancer. Notable examples include electron transport chain inhibitor metformin, the TCA cycle inhibitor devimistat (CPI-613), and the glutaminolysis inhibitor telaglenastat (CB-839) [31, 47, 48]. However, these drugs often face challenges such as modest efficacy, insufficient accumulation in target tissues, and unexpected toxicity [47, 49]. Directly targeting mitochondria is controversial; hence, focusing on regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis seems promising. The PGC-1α/ERRα axis is a central regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, playing a key role in enhancing the respiratory chain components and TCA enzymes [50]. Our study reveals that PPARGCA1 mRNA levels positively correlated with ERRα-targeted genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, including IDH3A, ATP5F1B, COX4I1, and CYCS, in TNBC tissues rather than ER-positive or HER-2-positve subtypes; however, although these associations were significant (p < 0.05), the R-values of these correlations were low. Further investigations are therefore needed to explore the correlations between PPARGCA1 and ERRα-targeted genes. In addition, we found that PGC-1α/ERRα axis correlated with unfavorable clinical outcome in in patients with TNBC, with CAFs stimulating its transcriptional activity, making it a potential target for inhibiting mitochondrial biogenesis in TNBC cells. Previous studies showed that ERRα alone does not affect mitochondrial genes, and it functions through its coregulators [51]. Consistently, we observed higher PGC-1α levels in TNBC cells compared with other breast cancer subtypes. CAFs stimulated PGC-1α/ERRα axis in TNBC cells by increasing PGC-1α expression, increased nuclear localization, and its function as a transcriptional coactivator. When PGC-1α was knockdown, the invasive ability promoted by CAF in TNBC cells was reduced. Moreover, PGC-1α is upregulated in breast cancer cells that metastasize to the lung or bone, driving their enhanced metastatic phenotype [52]. In this study, high PGC-1α expression was found to predict lymph node metastasis and tumor thrombus formation in TNBC patients, suggesting its pro-metastatic effects. It was shown that high levels of PPARGC1/ERRSA indicated a better prognosis in patients with HER-2-positive tumors. However, these results were obtained by analyzing whole tumor tissues, and further confirmation is warranted, specifically focusing on breast cancer cells within tumor tissues. Therefore, targeting PGC-1α represents a novel strategy to inhibit TNBC metastasis by restricting mitochondrial biogenesis. We discovered that shikonin downregulated PGC-1α expression, suppressing the PGC-1α/ERRα axis-regulated transcription function and their targeted genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis.
PGC-1α is a short-lived protein, and its post-translational modification play a vital role in regulating its expression and activity [53]. Previous research has shown that its phosphorylation at Thr177 and Ser538 by AMP-activated protein kinase, or Thr262, Ser265, and Thr298 by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, enhances the activity and stability of PGC-1α [54, 55], while phosphorylation at Thr295 by GSK-3β promotes its degradation [38]. Consistently, our findings indicated that shikonin enhanced the phosphorylation of PGC-1α at Thr295 in CAF-stimulated TNBC cells by increasing the expression of GSK-3β and its interaction with PGC-1α. It has been demonstrated that GSK-3β mediated phosphorylation of PGC-1α leads to E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFCdc4-dependent ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation in primary embryonic mouse neurons [38]. However, in our study, NEDD4-1, but not SCFCdc4, was identified as a binding partner of PGC-1α in TNBC cells treated with shikonin. NEDD4 E3 ubiquitin ligase family members have specific structural features that facilitate substrate recognition [56]. PGC-1α contains PPR motifs along with threonine phosphorylation sites, potentially allowing interaction with NEDD4-1 via WW domains. Our results confirmed that shikonin facilitated the interaction of NEDD4-1 and PGC-1α. When Thr295 was mutated to Ala295, the shikonin-induced interaction of GSK-3β and NEDD4-1 with PGC-1α and the ubiquitylation of PGC-1α were almost reversed. The inhibitory effects of shikonin on TNBC mitochondrial biogenesis and metastasis were observed in cells expressing PGC-1αWT but not PGC-1αA295. This suggests that shikonin promotes the degradation of PGC-1α by increasing its phosphorylation at Thr295, leading to recognition by E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4-1 and subsequent ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. These findings provide an additional phosphorylation-dependent regulatory mechanism by which GSK-3β/NEDD4-1 regulates PGC-1α degradation, suggesting that Thr295 is a central phosphorylation site for its degradation, with varying forms of E3 ubiquitin ligase recognition in different cellular context. Further investigation is needed to explore the specific domain of PGC-1α that interacts with GSK3β and NEDD4-1, as well as to fully understand the regulatory role of PGC-1α in mitochondrial metabolism and its impact on TNBC metastasis. Furthermore, we noticed that the expression of PGC-1αA295 was not increased by CAF-CM stimulation. However, CAF-CM still promoted mitochondrial biogenesis and a metastatic phenotype in PGC-1αA295-expressing TNBC cells. This suggests that CAF-CM may induce other post-translational modification, such as methylation or acetylation, to modulate PGC-1α activity, which warrants further investigation. Although no commercial drugs specifically targeting PGC-1α in cancer are currently available in clinics, several candidate compounds have shown promise in preclinical studies by inhibiting PGC-1α in cancer therapy [57]. More clinical trials are needed to explore these potential treatments in the future.
Conclusions
Shikonin enhances the GSK-3β/NEDD4-1-mediated phosphorylation-depended ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of PGC-1α, thereby inhibiting PGC-1α/ERRα axis, which shows promise as a therapeutic strategy for inhibiting mitochondrial biogenesis and reducing TNBC metastasis (Fig. 8). Our study offers novel insights into therapeutic avenues for preventing TNBC metastasis through the inhibition of mitochondrial biogenesis. Additionally, we identified a novel mechanism of targeting PGC-1α for degradation through phosphorylated modification, which may provide opportunities for the discovery of new agents for TNBC therapy.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank professor Peng He (Guizhou University) for preparing luciferase reporter plasmids.
Abbreviations
- α-SMA
Alpha-smooth muscle actin
- ATPsynβ
ATP synthase β
- BCA
Bicinchoninic acid
- CAF
Cancer-associated fibroblast
- ChIP
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
- CHX
Cycloheximide
- CM
Conditioned medium
- COX
IV Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4I1
- Cyt c
Cytochrome c
- DAPI
6′ diamidino 2 phenylindole
- ERRα
Estrogen-related receptor alpha
- H&E
Hematoxylin and Eosin
- IDH3A
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 3 (NAD+) α
- IHC
Immunohistochemistry
- LC-MS/MS
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry
- NEDD4-1/NEDD4
Neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 4e1
- OXPHOS
Oxidative phosphorylation
- PAGE
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- Pan-CK
Pan-cytokeratin
- PGC-1α
Peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor coactivator 1α
- PIC
Protease inhibitor cocktail
- PMSF
Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride
- PPR
Poly-proline rich
- Q-PCR
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- RFS
Relapse-free survival
- RIPA
Radio immunoprecipitation assay
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- SDS
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- TCA
Tricarboxylic acid cycle
- TME
Tumor microenvironment
- TNBC
Triple-negative breast cancer
Author contributions
Shuangqin Fan, Xiaomin Yan, and Xiaoxia Hu: designed the protocols, performed the experiments and wrote the paper. Xing Liu and Shijie Zhao: performed the experiments. Yue Zhang and Xiaofeng Zhou: analyzed data. Xiangchun Shen, Qi Qi, and Yan Chen: funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing–review.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82273957, 81973341), the Excellent Young Talents Plan of Guizhou (QKHPTRC(2021)-5632), the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects (QKHJC-ZK(2021)-YB562, QKHJC-ZK(2023)ZD-034), the Excellent Young Talents Plan of Guizhou Medical University (2020-101), the Science Foundation of Guizhou Medical University (XBHJZ[2022]057), the Foundation for Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Guizhou Province (S202210660139), the the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024A1515013108), Medical Joint Fund of Jinan University (YXJC2022002), the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicines of Guizhou (QZYY-2022-025), the Guizhou Provincial Scientific and Technologic Innovation Base ([2023]003), the Key Laboratory of Guizhou Medical University (XZDSYS[2024]003), and the Foundation for Guizhou Provincial Health Commission (gzwkj2024-060).
Data availability
All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animal experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the national standards for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Guizhou Medical University (approval no. 2200112). The multiplex immunofluorescence staining of breast cancer tissues and the obtain of CAFs were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committees of Shanghai Outdo Biotech and Guizhou Medical University (No. 202008). All patients provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Shuangqin Fan, Xiaomin Yan and Xiaoxia Hu contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Xiangchun Shen, Email: shenxiangchun@126.com.
Qi Qi, Email: qiqikc@jnu.edu.cn.
Yan Chen, Email: s0710189@sina.com, Email: chenyan@gmc.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Kumar H, Gupta NV, Jain R, Madhunapantula SV, Babu CS, Kesharwani SS, et al. A review of biological targets and therapeutic approaches in the management of triple-negative breast cancer. J Adv Res. 2023;54:271–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lam T, Mastos C, Sloan EK, Halls ML. Pathological changes in GPCR signal organisation: opportunities for targeted therapies for triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2023;241:108331. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bianchini G, De Angelis C, Licata L, Gianni L. Treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer - expanded options, evolving needs. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(2):91–113. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00565-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhu Y, Hu Y, Tang C, Guan X, Zhang W. Platinum-based systematic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022;1877(1):188678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zacksenhaus E, Shrestha M, Liu JC, Vorobieva I, Chung PED, Ju Y, et al. Mitochondrial OXPHOS Induced by RB1 Deficiency in breast Cancer: implications for anabolic metabolism, stemness, and Metastasis. Trends Cancer. 2017;3(11):768–79. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.LeBleu VS, O’Connell JT, Gonzalez Herrera KN, Wikman H, Pantel K, Haigis MC, et al. PGC-1alpha mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(10):992–1003. doi: 10.1038/ncb3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu M, Zhang T, Xia R, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting the tumor stroma for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01670-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang M, Lin Y, Wang C, Deng L, Chen M, Assaraf YG, et al. New insights into antiangiogenic therapy resistance in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic aspects. Drug Resist Updat. 2022;64:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2022.100849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilde L, Roche M, Domingo-Vidal M, Tanson K, Philp N, Curry J, et al. Metabolic coupling and the Reverse Warburg Effect in cancer: implications for novel biomarker and anticancer agent development. Semin Oncol. 2017;44(3):198–203. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Witkiewicz AK, Whitaker-Menezes D, Dasgupta A, Philp NJ, Lin Z, Gandara R, et al. Using the reverse Warburg effect to identify high-risk breast cancer patients: stromal MCT4 predicts poor clinical outcome in triple-negative breast cancers. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(6):1108–17. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.6.19530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jia D, Park JH, Jung KH, Levine H, Kaipparettu BA. Elucidating the metabolic plasticity of cancer: mitochondrial reprogramming and hybrid metabolic states. Cells. 2018;7(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Sun K, Tang S, Hou Y, Xi L, Chen Y, Yin J, et al. Oxidized ATM-mediated glycolysis enhancement in breast cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to tumor invasion through lactate as metabolic coupling. EBioMedicine. 2019;41:370–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rubalcava-Gracia D, Garcia-Villegas R, Larsson NG. No role for nuclear transcription regulators in mammalian mitochondria? Mol Cell. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Jing M, Cen Y, Gao F, Wang T, Jiang J, Jian Q, et al. Nephroprotective effects of Tetramethylpyrazine Nitrone TBN in Diabetic kidney disease. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:680336. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.680336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mohammadi A, Higazy R, Gauda EB. PGC-1alpha activity and mitochondrial dysfunction in preterm infants. Front Physiol. 2022;13:997619. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.997619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deblois G, Giguere V. Oestrogen-related receptors in breast cancer: control of cellular metabolism and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(1):27–36. doi: 10.1038/nrc3396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manna S, Bostner J, Sun Y, Miller LD, Alayev A, Schwartz NS, et al. ERRalpha is a marker of tamoxifen response and survival in Triple-negative breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(6):1421–31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghanbari F, Fortier AM, Park M, Philip A. Cholesterol-induced metabolic reprogramming in breast cancer cells is mediated via the ERRalpha pathway. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Park S, Chang CY, Safi R, Liu X, Baldi R, Jasper JS, et al. ERRalpha-Regulated Lactate Metabolism contributes to resistance to targeted therapies in breast Cancer. Cell Rep. 2016;15(2):323–35. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guo Y, Zhou M, Mu Z, Guo J, Hou Y, Xu Y, et al. Recent advances in shikonin for the treatment of immune-related diseases: anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:115138. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang F, Yao X, Zhang Y, Tang J. Synthesis, biological function and evaluation of Shikonin in cancer therapy. Fitoterapia. 2019;134:329–39. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang F, Jin S, Mayca Pozo F, Tian D, Tang X, Dai Y, et al. Chemical screen identifies shikonin as a broad DNA damage response inhibitor that enhances chemotherapy through inhibiting ATM and ATR. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(3):1339–50. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Song J, Wang W, Wang Y, Qin Y, Wang Y, Zhou J, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers screened in a cell-based model and validated in lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5885-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.De Vincenzo A, Belli S, Franco P, Telesca M, Iaccarino I, Botti G, et al. Paracrine recruitment and activation of fibroblasts by c-Myc expressing breast epithelial cells through the IGFs/IGF-1R axis. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(10):2827–39. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang M, Song Y, Zhang Y, Fan S, et al. Baicalein resensitizes tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells by reducing aerobic glycolysis and reversing mitochondrial dysfunction via inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11(11):e577. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Diaz F, Barrientos A, Fontanesi F. Evaluation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and oxidative phosphorylation system using blue native gel electrophoresis. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009;Chap. 19:Unit19 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Peng J, Hu X, Fan S, Zhou J, Ren S, Sun R, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial biosynthesis using a right-side-out membrane-camouflaged Micelle to facilitate the Therapeutic effects of Shikonin on Triple-negative breast Cancer. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(18):e2200742. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gyorffy B. Survival analysis across the entire transcriptome identifies biomarkers with the highest prognostic power in breast cancer. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:4101–9. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fanfone D, Wu Z, Mammi J, Berthenet K, Neves D, Weber K et al. Confined migration promotes cancer metastasis through resistance to anoikis and increased invasiveness. Elife. 2022;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Kim MJ, Kim DH, Jung WH, Koo JS. Expression of metabolism-related proteins in triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(1):301–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gandhi N, Das GM. Metabolic reprogramming in breast Cancer and its therapeutic implications. Cells. 2019;8(2):89. doi: 10.3390/cells8020089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cogliati S, Enriquez JA, Scorrano L. Mitochondrial cristae: where Beauty meets functionality. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(3):261–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Caino MC, Ghosh JC, Chae YC, Vaira V, Rivadeneira DB, Faversani A, et al. PI3K therapy reprograms mitochondrial trafficking to fuel tumor cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(28):8638–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500722112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weiner-Gorzel K, Murphy M. Mitochondrial dynamics, a new therapeutic target for Triple negative breast Cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1875(2):188518. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sharma D, Singh M, Rani R. Role of LDH in tumor glycolysis: regulation of LDHA by small molecules for cancer therapeutics. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;87:184–95. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Audet-Walsh E, Papadopoli DJ, Gravel SP, Yee T, Bridon G, Caron M, et al. The PGC-1alpha/ERRalpha Axis represses one-Carbon Metabolism and promotes sensitivity to anti-folate therapy in breast Cancer. Cell Rep. 2016;14(4):920–31. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luo X, Liao C, Quan J, Cheng C, Zhao X, Bode AM, et al. Posttranslational regulation of PGC-1alpha and its implication in cancer metabolism. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(6):1475–83. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Olson BL, Hock MB, Ekholm-Reed S, Wohlschlegel JA, Dev KK, Kralli A, et al. SCFCdc4 acts antagonistically to the PGC-1alpha transcriptional coactivator by targeting it for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Genes Dev. 2008;22(2):252–64. doi: 10.1101/gad.1624208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sun L, Amraei R, Rahimi N. NEDD4 regulates ubiquitination and stability of the cell adhesion molecule IGPR-1 via lysosomal pathway. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00731-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Feeley KP, Bray AW, Westbrook DG, Johnson LW, Kesterson RA, Ballinger SW, et al. Mitochondrial Genetics regulate breast Cancer tumorigenicity and metastatic potential. Cancer Res. 2015;75(20):4429–36. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Danhier P, Banski P, Payen VL, Grasso D, Ippolito L, Sonveaux P, et al. Cancer metabolism in space and time: beyond the Warburg effect. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017;1858(8):556–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Simoes RV, Serganova IS, Kruchevsky N, Leftin A, Shestov AA, Thaler HT, et al. Metabolic plasticity of metastatic breast cancer cells: adaptation to changes in the microenvironment. Neoplasia. 2015;17(8):671–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teoh ST, Lunt SY. Metabolism in cancer metastasis: bioenergetics, biosynthesis, and beyond. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018;10(2). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Zhou YT, Yu YQ, Yang H, Yang H, Huo YF, Huang Y, et al. Extracellular ATP promotes angiogenesis and adhesion of TNBC cells to endothelial cells via upregulation of CTGF. Cancer Sci. 2022;113(7):2457–71. doi: 10.1111/cas.15375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakhjavani M, Samarasinghe RM, Shigdar S. Triple-negative breast cancer brain metastasis: an update on druggable targets, current clinical trials, and future treatment options. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27(5):1298–314. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Perez-Trevino P, Aguayo-Millan CD, Santuario-Facio SK, Vela-Guajardo JE, Salazar E, Camacho-Morales A, et al. Metastatic TNBC is closely associated with a fused mitochondrial morphology and a glycolytic and lipogenic metabolism. Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;99(4):447–56. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2020-0439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Park S, Safi R, Liu X, Baldi R, Liu W, Liu J, et al. Inhibition of ERRalpha prevents mitochondrial pyruvate uptake exposing NADPH-Generating pathways as targetable vulnerabilities in breast Cancer. Cell Rep. 2019;27(12):3587–601. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vasan K, Werner M, Chandel NS. Mitochondrial metabolism as a target for Cancer Therapy. Cell Metab. 2020;32(3):341–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cui L, Gouw AM, LaGory EL, Guo S, Attarwala N, Tang Y, et al. Mitochondrial copper depletion suppresses triple-negative breast cancer in mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(3):357–67. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0707-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schreiber SN, Emter R, Hock MB, Knutti D, Cardenas J, Podvinec M, et al. The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) functions in PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(17):6472–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308686101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ma JH, Qi J, Lin SQ, Zhang CY, Liu FY, Xie WD, et al. STAT3 targets ERR-alpha to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Migration, and Invasion in Triple-negative breast Cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2019;17(11):2184–95. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Andrzejewski S, Klimcakova E, Johnson RM, Tabaries S, Annis MG, McGuirk S, et al. PGC-1alpha promotes breast Cancer metastasis and confers Bioenergetic flexibility against metabolic drugs. Cell Metab. 2017;26(5):778–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fernandez-Marcos PJ, Auwerx J. Regulation of PGC-1alpha, a nodal regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(4):S884–90. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.001917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jager S, Handschin C, St-Pierre J, Spiegelman BM. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(29):12017–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705070104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Puigserver P, Rhee J, Lin J, Wu Z, Yoon JC, Zhang CY, et al. Cytokine stimulation of energy expenditure through p38 MAP kinase activation of PPARgamma coactivator-1. Mol Cell. 2001;8(5):971–82. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00390-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang X, Chen J, Cao W, Yang L, Chen Q, He J, et al. The many substrates and functions of NEDD4-1. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):904. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2142-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Qian L, Zhu Y, Deng C, Liang Z, Chen J, Chen Y, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) family in physiological and pathophysiological process and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01756-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.