SUMMARY
Pain that persists beyond the time required for tissue healing and pain that arises in the absence of tissue injury, collectively referred to as nociplastic pain, are poorly understood phenomena mediated by plasticity within the central nervous system. The parabrachial nucleus (PBN) is a hub that relays aversive sensory information and appears to play a role in nociplasticity. Here, by preventing PBN Calca neurons from releasing neurotransmitters, we demonstrate that activation of Calca neurons is necessary for the manifestation and maintenance of chronic pain. Additionally, by directly stimulating Calca neurons, we demonstrate that Calca neuron activity is sufficient to drive nociplasticity. Aversive stimuli of multiple sensory modalities, such as exposure to nitroglycerin, cisplatin, or lithium chloride, can drive nociplasticity in a Calca-neuron-dependent manner. Aversive events drive nociplasticity in Calca neurons in the form of increased activity and excitability; however, neuroplasticity also appears to occur in downstream circuitry.
Graphical abstract

In brief
Condon et al. demonstrate that activity within parabrachial Calca neurons is both necessary for the manifestation of chronic neuropathic pain and sufficient to induce nociplasticity. Chronic activation of parabrachial Calca neurons via aversive stimuli or direct exogenous stimulation increases the intrinsic excitability of Calca neurons.
INTRODUCTION
Pain is an evolutionarily adaptive sensory modality that signals tissue injury and triggers defensive behavioral responses. However, changes in the neural circuitry underlying pain sensation can drive pain in the absence of tissue injury, a debilitating condition referred to as nociplastic pain.1,2 While nociplastic pain can occur independently, it often presents as part of a mixed-pain pathophysiology, arising in parallel with chronic nociceptive or neuropathic pain.1–4 This suggests that persistent pain experience can drive changes in pain perception and produce a generalized pain state. Up to one in five people4–6 are affected by a chronic pain experience, and a nociplastic component is estimated to be present in 25%–75% of chronic pain cases.1,7 The neural circuitry and neuroplasticity underlying nociplastic pain are not well understood. Interrogating the pathophysiology of this widespread condition is necessary to develop therapeutic interventions that target the mechanistic underpinnings of nociplastic pain, not just the presenting symptoms.
Nociceptive signaling from the spinal cord, trigeminal and vagal nerves, and area postrema can activate parabrachial nucleus (PBN) neurons,8–11 which relay those signals to multiple forebrain regions.12–17 The PBN is composed of approximately a dozen molecularly defined glutamatergic neuron subtypes and a minor population of GABAergic neurons.12 Non-specific activation of the PBN glutamatergic neurons can elicit painful phenotypes, such as allodynia, while inhibition of those neurons or activation of the GABAergic neurons can inhibit painful phenotypes.14,18,19,20 The roles that molecularly defined subsets of PBN neurons contribute to pain sensation is also being explored. For example, chemogenetic activation of PBN Tac1-expressing neurons elicits escape-like behaviors,21,22 whereas chemogenetic or optogenetic activation of Tacr1-expressing neurons elicits coping responses to painful stimuli.13,22–24 We and others have shown that PBN Calca neurons are activated by aversive stimuli spanning several modalities, including some that are considered painful; e.g., foot shock, tail pinch, and formalin- or Freund adjuvant-induced inflammation.25–29
Chemogenetic activation of Calca neurons, which reside in the external lateral PBN (elPBN),12 promotes anorexia, adipsia, and escape-like behaviors,21,30 whereas more robust stimulation with optogenetics can induce freezing, bradycardia, and fear-like behaviors.28,31 Most assays have examined effects of transient activation, but chronic activation can promote severe anorexia,30 and the neurological effects of cancer cachexia have been shown to depend on activation of PBN Calca neurons.26 We show here that activation of Calca neurons is necessary to establish allodynia after nerve ligation. Additionally, chronic activation of these neurons is sufficient to instate chronic pain phenotypes, suggesting that the activity of Calca neurons drives nociplasticity.
RESULTS
Neuropathic pain activates parabrachial Calca neurons and drives persistent changes in their excitability
Chronic pain was modeled using unilateral, partial sciatic nerve ligation (pSNL),32 and the presence of neuropathic allodynia was confirmed using the von Frey tactile-sensitivity assay. pSNL produced a significant reduction in the paw withdrawal threshold both ipsilateral and contralateral to the site of nerve injury (Figure S1A), consistent with previous findings of bilateral tactile hypersensitivity after nerve injury.33–36 PBN Calca neurons are known to act as a primary relay for brief pain signals;25,28,37 however, it was not known whether they are involved in the experience of chronic pain. To determine whether they are activated in chronic pain, we performed RNA-scope in situ hybridization on sham- or pSNL-operated mice using probes for Calca, Cck, and the immediate-early gene Fos, a proxy for neuronal activity38 (Figure 1A). We included Cck because it has been shown to be reduced 30 days following pSNL39 and could serve as a positive control. Three days following pSNL, we observed a significant increase in the colocalization of Fos and Calca mRNA in the PBN of pSNL-treated animals in the middle region of the PBN (bregma, −5.15 to −5.35); however, this effect did not persist at 30 days post surgery (dps) (Figures 1B and 1F). There was no difference in the colocalization of Calca and Fos at either time point when comparing the ipsilateral and contralateral PBN or when comparing males and females (Figures S1B and S1C). Additionally, in the middle region of the PBN, there was a significant increase in the Fos induction of Calca-negative PBN neurons at 3 dps but not 30 dps (Figures 1C and 1G). There was no change in the expression level of Calca mRNA within the PBN when comparing sham- and pSNL-treated animals at either time point (Figures 1D and 1H). However, the percentage of Cck-positive neurons was significantly decreased at 30 dps in the rostral region of the PBN (bregma, −4.95 to −5.15) (Figures 1E and 1I), consistent with a previous finding.39 These data suggest that Calca neurons are activated by pSNL. The lack of Fos induction in Calca neurons at 30 dps does not necessarily mean that the pSNL-driven Calca neuron activity has waned, as Fos induction is a poor marker of chronic changes in neuronal activity.40
Figure 1. Neuropathic pain activates parabrachial Calca neurons and drives persistent changes in their excitability.

(A) Representative images from RNAscope in situ hybridization on tissue slices collected 3 or 30 days post sham or pSNL surgery with probes targeting Calca (green), Fos (red), and Cck (white). Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP); anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(B) pSNL increased Fos mRNA in Calca neurons in the middle, but not the rostral, PBN at 3 dps.
(C) pSNL increased Fos mRNA in non-Calca neurons in the middle, but not the rostral, PBN at 3 dps.
(D) pSNL did not change the number of Calca-positive neurons in the rostral or middle PBN at 3 dps.
(E) pSNL did not change the number of Cck-positive cells in the rostral or middle PBN at 3 dps.
(B–E) Rostral sham, n = 5; middle sham, n = 14; rostral pSNL, n = 11; middle pSNL, n = 10.
(F) pSNL did not drive an increase in the expression of Fos mRNA in Calca neurons at 30 dps.
(G) pSNL did not drive an increase in the expression of Fos mRNA in non-Calca neurons at 30 dps.
(H) pSNL did not change the number of Calca-positive neurons in the rostral or middle PBN at 30 dps.
(I) pSNL decreased the number of Cck-positive neurons in the rostral, but not the middle, PBN at 30 dps.
(F–I) Rostral sham, n = 5; middle sham, n = 5; rostral pSNL, n = 5; and middle pSNL, n = 7.
(B–I) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. Error bars, SEM.
(J) Representative traces showing regularly firing Calca neurons 3 and 30 days post sham or pSNL surgery.
(K) pSNL 3 days prior to electrophysiology did not change the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the regularly firing population. Sham, n = 3 animals, 7 neurons; pSNL treated, n = 3 animals, 13 neurons.
(L) pSNL 30 days prior to electrophysiology increased the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the regularly firing population. Sham, n = 4 animals, 9 neurons; pSNL treated, n = 4 animals, 9 neurons.
(K and L) 3 dps sham and pSNL biological replicates, n = 3. 3 dps sham technical replicates, n = 7 and pSNL technical replicates, n = 13. 30 dps sham and pSNL biological replicates, n = 4. 30 dps sham technical replicates, n = 9 and pSNL technical replicates, n = 9. Significance was measured by ANOVA. ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
(M) Representative traces showing late-firing Calca neurons 3 and 30 days post sham or pSNL surgery.
(N) pSNL 3 days prior to electrophysiology did not change the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the late-firing population. Sham, n = 3 animals, 15 neurons; pSNL treated, n = 3 animals, 13 neurons.
(O) pSNL 30 days prior to electrophysiology increased the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the late-firing population. Sham, n = 4 animals, 20 neurons; pSNL treated, n = 4 animals, 9 neurons.
(N and O) 3 dps sham and pSNL biological replicates, n = 3. 3 dps sham technical replicates, n = 15 and pSNL technical replicates, n = 13. 30 dps sham and pSNL biological replicates, n = 4. 30 dps sham technical replicates, n = 20 and pSNL technical replicates, n = 9. Significance was measured by ANOVA. ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
To determine whether the excitability of Calca neurons changes following pSNL, we performed patch-clamp electrophysiology. Brain slices from CalcatdTomato mice that included the PBN were prepared 3 and 30 days dps, and the Calca neurons were injected with 800-ms pulses of current ranging from 0 to 240 pA. Quantification of the elicited spikes revealed two distinct response patterns: regular and late firing (Figures 1J and 1M). No change in excitability was observed in the 3 dps neurons relative to neurons from sham-operated animals (Figures 1K and 1N); however, both the regular- and late-firing populations were significantly more responsive to current injection at 30 dps relative to neurons from sham-operated animals (Figures 1L and 1O). Taken together, the in situ hybridization data and the electrophysiological data reveal that Calca neurons are activated by pSNL and that this activity increases the intrinsic excitability of Calca neurons over time.
Parabrachial Calca neurons are necessary for the induction of neuropathic pain
Inhibition of PBN neurons prevents the manifestation of neuropathic injury-driven allodynia;19,20,34 however, this phenomenon has never been associated with molecularly defined neurons within the PBN. PBN Calca neurons were attractive candidates because they are activated by pSNL and many other aversive stimuli.25,29,37 To assess the necessity of Calca neurons in the manifestation pSNL-driven chronic pain, we injected an AAV expressing Cre-dependent tetanus toxin light chain (AAV-DIO-GFP:TeTx) bilaterally into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice (Figure 2A) before performing pSNL or sham surgeries. TeTx degrades synaptobrevin, part of the cellular machinery responsible for vesicle release, thereby preventing signaling to post-synaptic cells.41,42 Prior to pSNL, a baseline sensitivity to the von Frey (mechanical allodynia) assay was obtained. TeTx expression did not affect baseline paw withdrawal threshold relative to control animals injected with an AAV expressing Cre-dependent YFP; however, after pSNL, mice treated with TeTx did not develop tactile allodynia (Figure 2B). Control animals developed allodynia as expected (Figure 2B). These data suggest that Calca neurons are necessary for the manifestation of allodynia in this neuropathic pain model.
Figure 2. Parabrachial Calca neurons are necessary for the induction of neuropathic pain.

(A) Bilateral injections of AAV1-SYN-DIO-YFP or AAVDJ-Ef1a-DIO-GFP:TeTx into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of YFP and TeTx. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(B) TeTx expression in PBN Calca neurons prevents the development of pSNL-driven allodynia, measured by von Frey assay. CalcaCre/+:YFP, n = 5 and CalcaCre/+: TeTx, n = 5.
(C) Bilateral injections of AAV1-SYN-DIO-mCherry or AAV1-CBA-DIO-hM4Di:mCherry into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of mCherry and hM4Di:mCherry. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(D) hM4Di/CNO inhibition of PBN Calca neurons ameliorates pSNL-driven allodynia at 3 dps, measured by von Frey assay. CalcaCre/+:mCherry, n = 5 and CalcaCre/+: hM4Di, n = 5.
(E) hM4Di/CNO inhibition of PBN Calca neurons did not ameliorate pSNL-driven allodynia at 30 dps, measured by von Frey assay. CalcaCre/+:mCherry, n = 5 and CalcaCre/+:hM4Di, n = 5.
(F) Bilateral injections of AAV1-SYN-DIO-YFP or AAVDJ-Ef1a-DIO-GFP:TeTx into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice 14 days after pSNL ameliorated established allodynia, measured by von Frey assay. CalcaCre/+:YFP, n = 6 and CalcaCre/+:TeTx, n = 4.
(G) pSNL produced allodynia in Calca-null mice, measured by von Frey assay.
(B and D–G) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
We then asked whether there was a critical window following neuropathic injury during which the activity of Calca neurons is necessary for the manifestation of allodynia. We first bilaterally expressed Cre-dependent hM4Di (AAV-DIO-hM4Di:YFP), an inhibitory designer receptor activated by clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) ligand, in the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice (Figure 2C). Tactile sensitivity was assessed at baseline using the von Frey assay, and then all animals received unilateral pSNL. The same assay was repeated at 3 dps, first following saline injection (0.9%, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) and then following CNO injection (5 mg/kg, i.p.). This sequence was performed again at 30 dps. Three days following pSNL, all mice developed tactile allodynia, and CNO-mediated inhibition of Calca neuron returned paw withdrawal thresholds to baseline levels (Figure 2D). At 30 dps, the allodynia was still apparent, but readministering CNO did not ameliorate pSNL-driven allodynia (Figure 2E). After observing that this transient inhibition of Calca neurons became ineffective at 30 dps, we explored whether chronically silencing Calca neurons would impact established allodynia. This was accomplished by bilaterally injecting virally expressed Cre-dependent TeTx into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ animals 14 days after inducing allodynia via pSNL. At 3 dps, allodynia was present, and it persisted at 30 dps in the control mice (Figure 2F). However, at 30 dps, the paw withdrawal threshold of TeTx-treated animals had returned to the normal range (Figure 2F). Given that transient inhibition of Calca neurons did not ameliorate chronically established allodynia, but chronic silencing of Calca neurons did, it is likely that neuroplasticity occurs downstream of Calca neurons and that the activity of Calca neurons is necessary for the maintenance of this downstream pro-nociceptive neuroplasticity.
After observing that activation of PBN Calca neurons is necessary for the manifestation of chronic pain following neuropathic injury, we explored whether neuropeptide expression from the Calca gene is necessary for the development of allodynia following pSNL. For these experiments, we used homozygous CalcaCre/Cre mice because homozygosity precludes expression of calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP).27,43 pSNL-induced nerve injury in CalcaCre/Cre mice still produced persistent allodynia (Figure 2G). In line with previous findings demonstrating that the Calca gene is dispensable for acute pain sensation,44 these data indicate that CGRP is not necessary to drive allodynia in this neuropathic pain model. However, it is worth noting that loss of CGRP alleviates pain in arthritis, formalin, and bladder pain models.43,45,46
Activation of parabrachial Calca neurons is sufficient to drive nociplasticity
Chronic stimulation of all excitatory neurons in the PBN can produce a persistent state of allodynia in the absence of tissue injury,20 a nociplastic effect. About 85% of PBN neurons are glutamatergic,12,46 including molecularly defined neurons that mediate different and sometimes opposing behavioral effects.12,14,21,27,30,31,46 We repeated the experiment of Sun et al.20 by bilaterally injecting AAV carrying a Cre-dependent, excitatory designer receptor activated by CNO (AAV-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry) into the PBN of Slc17a6Cre/+ mice (Slc17a6 encodes Vglut2 [vesicular glutamate transporter 2]). Daily treatment with CNO (1 mg/kg, i.p., 7 days) produced allodynia that developed following the first CNO injection and lasted many days after the last CNO injection, a sign of nociplasticity (Figure S2A). We replicated the results of Sun et al.,20 who measured mechanical sensitivity 23 h after each CNO injection; however, when von Frey sensitivity was measured 2 h after each CNO injection, it produced a remarkable analgesic effect that dissipated by 23 h, revealing allodynia (Figures S2A and S2B). The hM3Dq/CNO-driven analgesia in Slc17a6Cre/+ mice is similar in both scale and transience to the effect of stimulating PBN Oprm1 neurons, a subset of the greater Slc17a6 population,12,21 using the same stimulation strategy (Figure S2C). Consistent with previous studies,47 these data show that the PBN Oprm1 subpopulation can mediate the analgesic effect of stimulating all PBN Slc17a6 neurons. These findings demonstrate the functional heterogeneity of excitatory neurons within the PBN and are consistent with the molecular heterogeneity of this brain region.12
Given that PBN Calca neurons are necessary for the manifestation of neuropathic injury-driven allodynia, we hypothesized that activation of PBN Calca neurons might be sufficient to produce nociplasticity. To test this idea, we injected an AAV carrying Cre-dependent hM3Dq:mCherry (or just mCherry as a control) bilaterally into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice (Figure 3A). After several weeks for viral expression, 3 consecutive days of CNO delivery (1 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in significant tactile allodynia 2 h and 23 h post injection that persisted for 10 days following the last CNO injection (Figures 3B and S2D). We noted a sexually dimorphic effect in the dissipation but not the development of allodynia (Figure S2E). Additionally, unilateral injection of AAV with Cre-dependent hM3Dq:mCherry and subsequent treatment with CNO produced bilateral allodynia (Figures S2F and S2G). To determine whether this persistent allodynic effect was, in fact, nociplasticity, not simply a learned association between the von Frey chamber and Calca-neuron-driven aversive sensation, we performed a set of pain assays before and after, but not during, 5 days of CNO administration (Figure 3C). Two days after the last CNO injection, we observed a significant decrease in von Frey paw withdrawal threshold, Hargreaves paw withdrawal latency, and the number of nocifensive behaviors on a hot plate (Figures 3D–3F). We also tested whether chronic activation of Calca neurons alters locomotor ability as well as anxiety and depression-related behaviors (Figure S3A). After 5 days of CNO or saline administration, CNO-treated animals exhibited elevated locomotor activity in the open field assay, elevated freezing in the tail suspension test relative to controls, and decreased paw withdrawal threshold (Figures S3B, S3E, and S3F). There was a trend toward a significant decrease in sucrose preference (p = 0.176; Figure S3G) and no significant effect in the open field center time or elevated plus maze assays (Figures S3C and S3D). The persistent allodynia and hyperalgesia observed in these assays support our conclusion that chronic activity in the PBN Calca population is sufficient to drive nociplasticity.
Figure 3. Activation of parabrachial Calca neurons is sufficient to drive nociplasticity.

(A) Bilateral injections of AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry or AAV1-hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry into the PBN of Calcacre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of mCherry and hM3Dq. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(B) 3 days of CNO injection (1 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in persistent allodynia, measured by von Frey assay. Calcacre/+:mCherry, n = 5 and Calcacre/+:hM3Dq, n = 7.
(C) Behavior timeline for von Frey (VF), Hargreave’s (HG), and hot plate (HP) assays before and after 5 consecutive days of CNO injection. CalcaCre/+:mCherry, n = 6 and Calcacre/+:hM3Dq, n = 6.
(D) 5 days of CNO injection decreased the paw withdrawal threshold, measured by VF assay, which persisted after the last CNO injection.
(E) 5 days of CNO injection decreased the paw withdrawal latency, measured by HG assay, which persisted after the last CNO injection.
(F) 5 days of CNO injection increased nocifensive behaviors, measured by HP assay, which persisted after the last CNO injection.
(G) 3 days of CNO injection (1 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in persistent allodynia in Calca-null mice, measured by VF assay. CalcaCre/Cre:mCherry, n = 6 and CalcaCre/Cre:hM3Dq, n = 6.
(B and D–G) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
(H) Bilateral injections of AAV1-SYN-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry into the PBN of Calcacre/+ mice followed by 3 days of CNO or saline injection and 48 h of no stimulation prior to electrophysiology.
(I) Representative traces showing regularly and late-firing Calca neurons.
(J) 3 days of CNO injection (i.p.) prior to electrophysiology resulted in an increase in the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the regularly firing population. Saline treated, n = 3 animals, 14 neurons; CNO treated, n = 3 animals, 11 neurons.
(K) 3 days of CNO injection (i.p.) prior to electrophysiology resulted in an increase in the number of spikes elicited by current injection in the late-firing population. Saline treated, n = 3 animals, 5 neurons; CNO treated, n = 3 animals, 11 neurons.
(J and K) Significance was measured by ANOVA. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
Given that activation of PBN Calca neurons is sufficient to drive nociplastic pain, we asked whether expression of the Calca gene is a necessary part of these phenomena. We performed 3 consecutive days of hM3Dq-mediated stimulation of PBN Calca neurons in CalcaCre/Cre mice. This manipulation produced allodynia that lasted 10 days after CNO cessation (Figure 3G), like the effect observed using heterozygous CalcaCre/+ mice (Figure 3B). These data indicate that, while activation of PBN Calca neurons is sufficient to drive nociplasticity, the Calca gene products, including CGRP, do not play a necessary role in this model of nociplastic pain.
We established that Calca neuron activity is sufficient to drive nociplasticity; however, the neuronal populations exhibiting neuroplastic changes were not yet established. We performed patch-clamp electrophysiology to assess the excitability of Calca neurons expressing hM3Dq:mCherry following 3 days of either CNO or saline injections (Figures 3H and 3I). Forty-eight hours following the final injection, at which point all injected CNO should be metabolized,48 Calca neurons in slices were injected with 800-ms pulses of current ranging from 0 to 240 pA. Quantification of the elicited spikes once again revealed two distinct response patterns: regular and late firing (Figure 3J). Both the regular- and late-firing populations were significantly more responsive to current injection when the mice were pretreated with CNO rather than saline (Figures 3K and 3L). These data demonstrate that this direct activation of Calca neurons produces a persistent increase in their intrinsic excitability.
Nociplastic allodynia scales with the duration of Calca neuron activation
Seven days of stimulating Slc17a6 neurons in the PBN produces persistent (>30 days) nociplasticity (Sun et al.20; Figure S2A), whereas 3 days of stimulating Calca neurons in the PBN produced a nociplastic effect that lasted 10 days (Figure 3B). These findings suggest that nociplasticity scales with the duration of Calca neuron stimulation. To further examine this phenomenon, we stimulated PBN Calca neurons expressing hM3Dq just once and assessed tactile allodynia until paw withdrawal thresholds returned to baseline. One day of CNO-driven stimulation of Calca neurons produced 4 days of allodynia (Figures 4A and 4B).
Figure 4. Nociplastic effect scales with the duration of Calca neuron activation.

(A) Bilateral injections of AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry or AAV1-hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry into the PBN of Calcacre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of mCherry and hM3Dq. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(B) 1 day of CNO injection (1 mg/kg, i.p.) produced allodynia, measured by VF assay. Calcacre/+:mCherry, n = 4 and Calcacre/+:hM3Dq, n = 7.
(C) Bilateral injections of AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry or AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-ChR2:mCherry into the PBN of Calcacre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of mCherry and ChR2. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(D) 20 min of 473-nm photostimulation (20 Hz, 2 s on, 2 s off) resulted in allodynia, measured by VF assay. Calcacre/+:mCherry, n = 6 and Calcacre/+:ChR2, n = 7.
(E) 5 min of 473-nm photostimulation (20 Hz, 2 s on, 2 s off) resulted in allodynia, measured by VF assay. Calcacre/+:mCherry, n = 4 and Calcacre/+:ChR2, n = 5.
(F) 5 days of 5-min, 473-nm photostimulation (20 Hz, 2 s on, 2 s off) resulted in allodynia, measured by VF assay. Calcacre/+:mCherry, n = 4 and Calcacre/+:ChR2, n = 4.
(B and D–F) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
Even more acute stimulation was achieved by bilateral photostimulation of channelrhodopsin (ChR2) that was targeted to the PBN Calca neurons. Twenty minutes of bilateral 473-nm (20 Hz, 10 mW, 2 s “on,” 2 s “off”) light application over the Calca cell bodies produced allodynia within an hour and persisted for 2 days after stimulus cessation (Figures 4C and 4D). Even 5 min of bilateral stimulation produced allodynia that was weaker but lasted 2 days (Figure 4E). Additionally, 5 min of stimulation performed daily for 5 days produced allodynia that lasted 15 days after the last stimulation (Figure 4F). A single 20-min unilateral stimulation using the same parameters also produced bilateral nociplasticity (Figure S4A). Together, these data suggest that the duration, and probably the intensity, of PBN Calca neuron stimulation dictates the duration of the resultant nociplasticity.
Chronic exposure to aversive stimuli drives nociplasticity across a range of sensory modalities
PBN Calca neurons respond to aversive stimuli spanning a range of sensory modalities.25,29,30 Given that stimulation of Calca neurons is sufficient to drive nociplasticity, we explored whether the induction of nociplasticity was agnostic to stimulus modality. Cisplatin chemotherapy,49,50 lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced visceral malaise,27,30 foot shock,25 and the threat of predation29 have all been shown to activate PBN Calca neurons. Chronic exposure to cisplatin,49 nitroglycerin (NTG; a model for migraine pain),51,52 and foot shock53 are known to produce persistent allodynia. Consistent with previous studies,51 we found that 5 days of NTG exposure (10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced persistent allodynia (Figure 5A). We also found that 3 days of injection with LiCl (0.2 M at 15 mL/kg, i.p.) produced persistent allodynia (Figure 5B). Even 3 days of exposure to a predatory threat (5-min chase daily for 3 days with a toy robotic bug) could promote mild nociplasticity, measured by the von Frey assay (Figure 5C).
Figure 5. Chronic exposure to all aversive stimuli tested drives nociplasticity regardless of sensory modality.

(A) 5 days of NTG exposure (10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced allodynia, measured by VF assay. Vehicle, n = 4 and NTG, n = 4.
(B) 3 days of LiCl exposure (0.2 M, 15 mL/kg, i.p.) produced allodynia, measured by VF assay. Vehicle, n = 6 and LiCl, n = 8.
(C) 3 days of robobug chase (10 min) produced allodynia, measured by VF assay. Vehicle, n = 5 and robobug, n = 5.
(D) Bilateral injections of AAV1-hSYN-DIO-YFP or AAVDJ-Ef1a-DIO-GFP:TeTx into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of YFP and TeTx. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(E) TeTx expression in PBN Calca neurons prevented the development of NTG-driven allodynia, measured by VF assay. CalcaCre/+:YFP, n = 6 and CalcaCre/+:TeTx, n = 5.
(F) TeTx expression in PBN Calca neurons prevented the development of cisplatin-driven allodynia, measured by VF assay. CalcaCre/+:YFP, n = 6 and CalcaCre/+:TeTx, n = 6.
(A–C, E, and F) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
NTG- and cisplatin-produced nociplasticity was prevented by prior expression of TeTx in Calca neurons (Figures 5D–5F). Interestingly, the photophobia that developed following NTG injection did not persist as long as the allodynia (Figure S5A). Additionally, despite pretreatment of the PBN Calca neurons with TeTx, photophobia still occurred following NTG injection (Figure S5B). These data suggest that chronic exposure to these aversive stimuli, spanning a range of sensory modalities, can induce nociplasticity via the activation of Calca neurons.
Calca neurons exhibit plasticity following activation
NTG administration induces Calca-neuron-dependent, persistent allodynia, like the effect of hM3Dq/CNO-mediated stimulation, so we hypothesized that it does so by increasing the activity of Calca neurons. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted Ca2+ imaging experiments in which we tracked the activity of individual Calca neurons across multiple days. To monitor the activity of Calca neurons in behaving animals, AAV-Ef1a-DIO-GCaMP6m was expressed, and a gradient refractive index (GRIN) lens was implanted over the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice. After 4 weeks of recovery, a microendoscope was attached to each mouse and left in place for 4 consecutive days. This strategy ensured a stable field of view for tracking individual neurons each day. On day 1, mice received an i.p. injection of vehicle, and on day 2 they received NTG (10 mg/kg, i.p.). After each injection, mice were placed in the von Frey testing apparatus for 35 min of acclimation, followed by 5 min of baseline neuronal activity measurement and then 10 min of von Frey testing (8 filament applications with a 1-min intertrial interval). On days 3 and 4, Calca neurons were imaged again without further injections to determine whether NTG treatment had residual effects that could drive persistent allodynia (Figure 6A).
Figure 6. Calca neuron activity during the development of mechanical allodynia.

(A) Schematic of Ca2+ imaging during NTG-induced mechanical allodynia.
(B) Multiday tracking of Calca neuron fluorescence activity. Top: field of view (FOV) of a representative animal for 4 days. Bottom: representative neural activities throughout 4 days of 3 neurons marked by arrows in FOVs. Scale bar, 50 μm.
(C) NTG injection increased unstimulated neuronal activity. Elevated neuronal activity persisted 24 and 48 h post injection. Individual neurons are aligned across days in the heatmap.
(D) Average calcium transient area under the curve increased following NTG injection. This increase in fluorescence activity remained elevated 24 and 48 h post injection.
(E) NTG injection increased the number of times of 8 applications that mice responded to a 0.4-g VF filament. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
(F) Representative traces of filament-evoked neural activities.
(G) The number of Calca neurons responsive to application of a 0.4-g VF filament increased after NTG injection. The increase in responsive neurons persisted 24 and 48 h after NTG injection.
(H) The percentage of Calca neurons responsive to application of a 0.4-g VF filament increased from 24% after vehicle injection to 49.5% after NTG injection. The percent of 0.4-g VF filament-responsive neurons remained elevated, at 40.5%, 24 and 48 h after NTG injection.
(I) The majority of neurons unresponsive to 0.4-g VF filament application following vehicle injection (i.p.) became responsive to the 0.4-g filament following NTG injection (i.p.).
(J) About half of the neurons responsive to 0.4-g VF filament application following vehicle injection (i.p.) became unresponsive to the 0.4-g filament following NTG injection (i.p.).
(A–J) n = 4 animals, 79 neurons. Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
We tracked the same 79 neurons throughout the experiment (Figure 6B). NTG administration dramatically increased the basal fluorescence level of most of the Calca neurons compared with vehicle administration (Figures 6B and 6C). Notably, this elevated fluorescence activity was sustained on the 2 days following NTG injection (Figures 6B and 6C); 60% of neurons continued to exhibit elevated basal fluorescence on days 3 and 4 (Figures 6C and S6A). The number and amplitude of Ca2+ transients did not change across days (Figures S6B and S6C). The averaged basal fluorescence level of all 79 neurons (4 mice) increased after NTG administration and remained elevated for 2 days (Figure 6D).
We also examined whether NTG administration was accompanied by an increase in the von Frey-elicited responses of individual neurons. NTG injection increased paw withdrawal responses of all mice to a low-threshold (0.4 g) von Frey filament (Figure 6E). Some neurons that exhibited increased activity following von Frey stimuli to vehicle injection showed similar activity after NTG injection (Figure 6F), while most Calca neurons displayed increased fluorescence only after NTG injection (Figures 6F and 6G). On the vehicle injection day, 24% of neurons were activated by the 0.4-g von Frey filament, whereas 49.4% were activated after NTG treatment, and 40.5% responded on days 3 and 4. (Figure 6H). Analysis of individual Calca neurons across experimental days revealed that 56.7% of the initially unresponsive neurons became responsive after NTG, with similar values on days 3 and 4 (Figure 6I). Of the von Frey-responsive neurons on the vehicle injection day, about half lost their responsiveness following NTG injection and across the subsequent imaging sessions (Figure 6J). There were no persistent changes in the area under the curve of calcium transients, the number of calcium transients, or the amplitude of calcium transients following 0.4-g von Frey stimulation (Figures S6D–S6F). These data suggest that the primary effect of NTG treatment is the recruitment of more Calca-responsive neurons rather than an increase in the frequency or magnitude of their responses.
Intrathecal injection of neuropeptide Y does not reverse hM3Dq/CNO-driven allodynia
How does manipulation of neurons in the brain result in tactile allodynia, allowing gentle touch to appear painful? The allodynia that develops after sciatic nerve injury has been shown to involve plasticity in spinal dorsal horn inhibitory neurons that normally prevent (gate) low-threshold, primary afferent Aβ activity from reaching the nociceptive spinoparabrachial projection neurons, thereby allowing gentle touch to the hindpaw to promote paw withdrawal as if it was painful.54–60 We hypothesized that chemogenetic activation of Calca neurons may activate descending circuits to the spinal cord, resulting in plasticity that resembles that induced by nerve injury. Pharmacological or genetic manipulation of several different populations of excitatory neurons in the spinal cord has been shown to reverse peripheral nerve injury-induced allodynia.54–56 For example, intrathecal injection of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptor 1 agonist NPYLeu,Pro has been shown to transiently reduce allodynia after sciatic nerve injury.55,60,61,62 Thus, we tested our hypothesis by intrathecal injection of NPYLeu,Pro into mice with pSNL (as a positive control) or mice that had developed tactile allodynia after 3 days of Calca neuron activation with hM3Dq/CNO (Figure 7A). NPYLeu,Pro injections ameliorated the allodynia produced by pSNL as expected but had no effect on the allodynia that developed after Calca neuron activation or on the paw withdrawal threshold of controls (Figures 7B–7D). This result indicates that the nociplastic allodynia that develops after Calca neuron activation does not rely on the same mechanism(s) as nociplasticity driven by pSNL.
Figure 7. Intrathecal NPY does not reverse hM3Dq/CNO-driven allodynia.

(A) pSNL or bilateral injections of AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry or AAV1-hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry into the PBN of Calcacre/+ mice. Representative images show expression of mCherry and hM3Dq. Scale bars, 100 μm. A dotted line marks the SCP; anterior-posterior bregma level = −5.1.
(B) Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of NPYLeu,Pro into pSNL animals reversed pSNL-driven allodynia.
(C) I.t. injection of NPYLeu,Pro into CalcaCre:hM3Dq animals treated with CNO for 3 days did not reverse allodynia.
(D) I.t. injection of NPYLeu,Pro into control CalcaCre:mCherry animals treated with CNO for 3 days did not affect the paw withdrawal threshold.
(B–D) Significance was tested by ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars, SEM.
DISCUSSION
We demonstrated that Calca neuron signaling is necessary for the induction of pSNL-induced allodynia and that daily chemogenetic or optogenetic stimulation of Calca neurons is sufficient to induce allodynia and hyperalgesia in naive mice that persists for many days beyond the stimulation period. These chronic pain symptoms are the result of a generalized nociplasticity and not a learned association between the assays and the aversion generated by Calca neuron activity. Although Calca neuron activity is both necessary and sufficient to generate chronic pain, Calca gene products (i.e., CGRP) do not play a significant role in this effect. This is unexpected because CGRP signaling has been shown to be important in other pain models.43,45,46 While the CalcaCre/Cre line that we used is a constitutive knockout of the Calca gene, the same line of mice was used in one of the previous studies.43 Therefore, it is unlikely that a compensatory developmental mechanism obscured the role that CGRP plays in neuropathic pain sensation or Calca neuron driven nociplastic pain.
Sun et al.20 reported that 7 days of chemogenetic activation of all glutamatergic neurons in the PBN could produce allodynia that lasted for many days after the final CNO injection. We obtained similar results when assaying von Frey sensitivity 23 h after each CNO injection, when CNO would have been cleared from the circulation. Remarkably, when we assayed allodynia 2 h after each CNO injection, when hM3Dq would still be activated, there was a dramatic analgesic effect. A similar effect was achieved with hM3Dq-mediated stimulation of Oprm1 neurons. In contrast, chemogenetic activation Calca neurons, which represent ~15% of the glutamatergic neurons,12 drives allodynia at both 2 and 23 h after CNO. This result suggests that the glutamatergic population includes neurons that promote allodynia (Calca neurons) and those that promote analgesia (Oprm1 neurons). Both genes are expressed in several molecularly defined clusters in the PBN.12 The activation of Oprm1 neurons is aversive,63 so it is likely that the analgesia we observed was stress induced.64
Calca-neuron-mediated nociplasticity scales with stimulus duration. Multiple rounds of chemogenetic stimulation produced allodynia that persisted longer than a single stimulation. Likewise, a brief optogenetic stimulation produced allodynia that was less persistent than after multiple stimulations. The stimulus scaling of nociplasticity that we observed is consistent with the conclusion that Calca neuron activity drives nociplasticity.
Several studies, ours included, have demonstrated that unilateral nerve injury can produce bilateral pain.26–33,65 This phenomenon indicates that persistent pain has the capacity to induce generalized nociplasticity. Because artificial activation of Calca neurons is sufficient to produce generalized pain, and a wide variety of aversive situations activate Calca neurons, some of which are not generally considered to be painful, we predicted that many aversive experiences, especially if repeated, would have the capacity to drive nociplasticity. Chronic exposure to NTG (a model of migraine) has been shown to produce persistent allodynia,51 an effect that we duplicated and went on to show was dependent on activation of Calca neurons. Similarly, cisplatin-induced chemotherapy can produce allodynia,49 activate Calca neurons,49,50,66 and produce persistent allodynia that, we show, depends on Calca neuron activation in the PBN. We also demonstrate that prolonged visceral malaise (nausea) induced by treatment with LiCl as well as predatory simulation are sufficient to induce allodynia that may persist for many days. These findings point to a mechanism by which diverse and polymodal aversive experiences can produce nociplastic pain phenotypes via the activation of PBN Calca neurons. An implication of this result is that nociplastic pain may be produced by adverse life events that are distinct from somatic nerve injury. This phenomenon has been observed epidemiologically. Individuals with adverse childhood experiences are significantly more likely to develop chronic pain.67,68 These findings may also explain the high degree of mixed pain pathophysiology in chronic pain patients.1 In this circumstance, it is possible that persistent nociceptive or neuropathic pain drives nociplastic pain via the chronic activation of Calca neurons.
Calca neurons exhibit plasticity in the form of increased intrinsic excitability following 3 days of CNO stimulation of hM3Dq and an increase in the number of neurons responsive to innocuous tactile stimulation for several days after NTG exposure. These effects appear to both initiate and maintain a persistent pain state. However, our data showing that hM4Di inhibition of Calca neurons does not reverse allodynia at 30 days suggest that Calca neurons are not the only site of pronociceptive neuroplasticity in this circuit. We suggest that long-lasting allodynia involves nociplastic changes in both Calca neurons and the circuitry downstream of Calca neurons,19,69–72 possibly including the spinal microcircuitry. Chronic pain after sciatic nerve injury changes the microcircuitry of the dorsal horn, allowing Aβ fibers to indirectly stimulate spinoparabrachial projection neurons via a neural circuit that is inhibited under non-painful conditions.54–60 Intrathecal injection of NPY can reverse neuropathic pain,55,61 a result that we confirmed in the pSNL model. However, NPY did not ameliorate the tactile allodynia that develops after hM3Dq/CNO activation of Calca neurons, suggesting that neuroplasticity that promotes allodynia after pSNL is distinct from what occurs after Calca-mediated allodynia.
In conclusion, our study highlights the critical role of Calca neurons in driving nociplasticity and persistent pain states. We have shown that activation of Calca neurons induces allodynia and hyperalgesia that persist beyond the stimulation period, implicating a generalized nociplasticity rather than learned associations. Furthermore, our findings suggest that diverse aversive experiences can activate Calca neurons and contribute to the development of nociplastic pain, shedding light on the potential mechanisms underlying chronic pain conditions that extend beyond somatic nerve injury. This research underscores the complexity of pain pathophysiology and offers insights into the interplay between neural circuits and aversive life events in shaping chronic pain phenotypes.
Limitations of the study
We identified PBN Calca neurons as being necessary for the manifestation of chronic neuropathic pain, and activating them was sufficient to induce physiologically and behaviorally observable nociplasticity. However, we did not identify the molecular mechanism(s) by which Calca neurons develop heightened excitability. The neurocircuitry leading to Calca neuron activation after pSNL is not established, and it is possible that non-Calca neurons in the PBN participate in the development of neuroplasticity. Additionally, we observed that transient inhibition of Calca neurons is not sufficient to ameliorate established allodynia, suggesting that pronociceptive neuroplasticity occurs downstream of Calca neurons that maintains nociplastic pain. Because intrathecal NPYLeu,Pro injections did not ameliorate Calca neuron-driven allodynia, the spinal cord circuitry by which light-touch information carried by Aβ fibers reaches the PBN remains unknown. Consequently, the neurocircuitry linking Calca neuron activity to allodynia needs to be established. Previous results demonstrating allodynia after CNS neurons activation suggest that the central nucleus of the amygdala, basal forebrain, and rostroventral medulla are likely involved.19,69–71,73 Finally, we demonstrated the lack of a sex difference in the induction of Fos by Calca neurons following pSNL and a modest sex difference in the recovery from allodynia following hM3Dq/CNO-mediated excitation of Calca neurons, but we did not assess sexually dimorphic behaviors in any other experiments.
STAR★METHODS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and request for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by Richard Palmiter (Palmiter@UW.edu), the lead contact.
Materials availability
This study did not generate any new reagents or behavioral systems.
Data and code availability
Data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
All original code has been deposited at GitHub and is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10725342.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in the manuscript is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS
Mice
All experiments followed protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Washington and were in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines for animal research. Experiments on wild-type animals used C57BL/6 mice. Most experiments used heterozygous CalcaCre/+ or homozygous CalcaCre/Cre mice on a C57BL/6 genetic background were generated and maintained as described.30 One set of experiments used Slc17a6Cre/+ or Oprm1 Cre/+ mice. Another set used CalcatdTomato mice, which have been validated.12 Male and female animals were 7–9 weeks of age at the onset of all experiments and no more than 18 weeks by their experimental endpoint. Prior to surgical manipulation, animals were group housed, had access to food and water ad libitum, and were kept on a 12-h, light-dark cycle at 22°C. After surgical manipulation animals were singly housed, all other housing parameters remained consistent. All experiments included 4–10 experimental animals (e.g., transduced with viruses allowing Cre-dependent expression of hM3Dq, hM4Di, ChR2, TeTx) and 4–7 control animals (e.g., transduced with mCherry or YFP) to account for potential variation between experimental sessions. Animals from the same litter were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. All experiments were performed blind, except the Oprm1Cre/+ experiment. Individual cohorts of mice were used for all experiments except those mentioned below. The same cohort of CalcaCre/+:TeTx animals was used in the NTG and cisplatin experiments with 1 week of recovery between NTG and cisplatin injections. The same cohort of CalcaCre/+:ChR2 animals was used for all ChR2 experiments with 1 week of recovery between the 1-day ChR2 stimulation and the 5-day ChR2 stimulation experiment. Viral transduction was assessed at the end of each experiment histologically and only mice with correct expression were included in data analysis.
METHOD DETAILS
Virus production
AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry and AAVDJ-SYN-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry DNA plasmids were provided by B. Roth (Addgene #50462 and #44361). AAV1-SYN-DIO-YFP and AAV1-Ef1a-DIO-ChR2:mCherry DNA plasmids were provided by K. Deisseroth (Stanford University). AAVDJ-Ef1a-DIO-GFP:TeTx and AAV1-CBA-DIO-hM4Di:YFP plasmids were constructed by R. Palmiter (University of Washington). AAV1-CBA-DIO-GCaMP6m DNA plasmid was provided by L. Zweifel. AAV refers to adeno-associated virus; DIO refers to double inverted orientation of loxP sites; YFP refers to yellow fluorescent protein. AAV1 serotype viruses were prepared in-house by transfecting HEK cells with each of these plasmids. Viruses were purified by sucrose and CsCl gradient centrifugation steps and re-suspended in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at about 1013 viral particles/mL. AAVDJ serotype viruses were prepared by Janelia Viral Tools lab.
Partial sciatic nerve ligation
Partial sciatic nerve ligation (pSNL) was performed as described.33 In brief, mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane at a flow rate of 1 L/min. Subsequently a 2-cm incision was made over the lateral aspect of the proximal third of the left hind leg. Blunt dissection was used to visualize the sciatic nerve, which was then exteriorized with hooked forceps. For sham surgeries the sciatic nerve was then immediately returned to its position. For nerve ligation surgeries, a 6-0 silk suture was passed through 30–50% of the nerve bundle, before being tightly ligated and crushed. The skin was then closed with 6-0 silk sutures.
Intrathecal injection of NPY
Intrathecal injection of [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY (TOCRIS) was performed as described.61 In brief, a 30G needle attached to a 25 μL syringe (Hamilton) was inserted between the L5/L6 vertebrae, puncturing the dura mater; 5 μL of vehicle (0.9% saline) or NPY was injected. Each mouse was injected twice, once with vehicle and once with NPY, with 48 h between injections.
Stereotaxic surgery
Mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane at a flow rate of 1 L/min. After anesthesia induction mice were placed on a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments). Stereotaxic coordinates in the anterior posterior plane were normalized using a correction factor (F = (bregma – Lambda)/4.21). Viral injections were performed bilaterally for all experiments into the PBN (anterior-posterior: −3.1, rostral-caudal: −4.8, medial-lateral: +/−1.3) at a rate of 0.2 μL/min for 2.5 min for a total of 0.5 μL. For optogenetic stimulation experiments, fiberoptic cables were implanted immediately posterior (anterior-posterior: −3.05, rostral-caudal: −4.8, medial-lateral: +/−1.3) to the viral injection site. To secure the lens to the skull, C&B Metabond (Parkell) and dental cement were used. At the end of each experiment animals were euthanized with phenobarbital and the brain was extracted for histological evaluation of viral placement and fiber optic placement.
For Ca2+ imaging experiments in vivo, viral injections were in the external lateral part of the parabrachial nucleus using the following coordinates relative to bregma at the skull surface: rostral-caudal: −4.90 mm; medial-lateral: ±1.35 mm; anterior-posterior: +3.40. Viruses were injected unilaterally (randomly assigned) 0.5 μL at 0.1 mL/min. A GRIN lens (Inscopix) was positioned above the target area (rostral-caudal: −4.80 mm; medial-lateral: ±1.7 mm; anterior-posterior: +3.65), and three tungsten wires protruding approximately 0.5 mm beyond the lens surface were attached to the lens to reduce motion artifacts during imaging. The lens was then lowered at a rate of 0.1 mm/min. To secure the lens to the skull, C&B Metabond (Parkell) and dental cement were used. After 4 weeks of recovery, mice were tested to ensure field of view (FOV). Animals with a stable FOV were used in the experiments for the subsequent 2–4 weeks.
Allodynia and hyperalgesia assays
The von Frey, tactile-sensitivity assay was performed using the ascending application method as described.33 Each animal was placed in a 11.5-cm by 7.5-cm chamber with a wire mesh floor. Animals were acclimated to the chamber for 30 min before the assay began. Filaments were applied to the plantar surface of each hind paw a total of 5 times. Filament application began with a 0.16-g filament and ended after two consecutive filaments elicit a paw-withdrawal on 3 or more out of 5 applications. The paw-withdrawal thresholds for each hind paw were measured and averaged because there was no significant difference in the left/right paw-withdrawal thresholds following any of the performed manipulations (pSNL, NTG, LiCl, etc.).
The Hargreaves thermal-sensitivity assay was performed as described.71 Each animal was placed in an 11.5-cm by 7.5-cm chamber with a wire mesh floor. Animals were acclimated to the chamber for 30 min before the assay began. Each animal received infrared thermal stimulation (Ugo Basil, model 37370) a total of 3 times on both hind paw plantar surfaces. Latency to paw-withdrawal was averaged across the 3 sessions. The paw-withdrawal latency for each paw was averaged as we did not see a difference in their response latency values.
The hot-plate assay was performed as described.55 Each animal was placed in a 16.5-cm by 16.5-cm chamber on a 55°C hot plate for 30 s. Each animal’s total number of nocifensive behaviors on the plate (paw flicks or licks, and jumps) was recorded.
Anxiety and depression assays
The open-field assay was performed as described.31 Each animal was placed in a 40-cm by 40-cm white plexiglass chamber for 10 min. The sessions were recorded using a USB camera attached to a personal computer. Locomotor and center time data were collected using Ethovision (Noldus).
The elevated-plus-maze assay was performed as described.31 The custom-made EPM consisted of two sets of crossed arms (two arms enclosed by 30 cm tall transparent plexiglass, two arms open), each 50-cm long, 8-cm wide, and set 65-cm above the floor. Mice were allowed to explore the arena for 10 min. The sessions were recorded by a USB camera attached to a personal computer and were analyzed using EthoVision (Noldus).
The tail-suspension test was performed by suspending each animal by the tail using laboratory tape for 1 min. The sessions were recorded by a USB camera attached to a personal computer and were manually scored for freezing behavior by a blinded experimenter.
The sucrose-preference test was performed by housing the animals in caging systems adapted to hold two sipper bottles. The animals were water restricted for 12 h prior to the experiment during the dark cycle. After water restriction, they were presented with two sipper bottles, one with water and one with 1% sucrose solution. The total fluid consumption from each sipper bottle over a 2-h access period was measured.
Pharmacological injections
Clozapine N-oxide, nitroglycerin, cisplatin and saline or vehicle controls were injected at 10 mL/kg body weight. CNO was administered at 1 mg/kg for hM3Dq experiments and 5 mg/kg for hM4Di experiments, nitroglycerin at 10 mg/kg, cisplatin at 2.3 mg/kg and saline at 0.9% sodium chloride; vehicle for nitroglycerin was 6% propylene glycol 6% ethanol and saline. Lithium chloride (Fisher Scientific) and the saline control for this condition were injected at 15 mL/kg. Lithium chloride was administered at 0.2 M and the saline was 0.9% sodium chloride. All paw-withdrawal measurements were made 2 h after each CNO injection and daily thereafter unless otherwise indicated.
Optogenetic stimulation
After recovery from surgery, mice were acclimated to fiber-optic cable attachment. For von Frey, allodynia assessment, light-pulse trains (20 Hz; 2 s “on”, 2 s “off”) were delivered for 5 or 20 min as described in the text. Stimulation paradigms were programmed using a Master8 (AMPI) pulse stimulator that controlled a blue-light laser (473 nm; LaserGlow). The power of light exiting each side of the branching fiber-optic cable was adjusted to 10 ± 1 mW. All paw-withdrawal measurements were made 2 h after each ChR2 stimulation and daily thereafter.
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were anesthetized with phenobarbitol (0.2 mL, i.p.) and perfused transcardially with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences) in PBS. Brains were post-fixed overnight in 4% PFA at 4°C, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, frozen in OCT compound and stored at −80°C. Coronal sections (30 μm) were cut on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems) and collected in cold PBS. For immunohistochemistry experiments, sections were washed three times in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 (PBST) for 5 min and incubated in blocking solution (3% normal donkey serum in PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C in PBS with primary antibodies including: chicken-anti-GFP (1:10000, Abcam, ab 13970) or rabbit-anti-dsRed (1:1000, Tacara, ab 632496). After 3 washes in PBS, sections were incubated for 1 h in PBS with secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-chicken or Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch). Tissue was washed 3 times in PBS, mounted onto glass slides, and coverslipped with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech). Fluorescent images were acquired using a Keyence BZ-X700 microscope. Images were minimally processed using ImageJ software (NIH) to enhance brightness and contrast for optimal representation of the data. All digital images were processed in the same way between experimental conditions to avoid artificial manipulation between different datasets.
RNAscope in situ hybridization
Mice were anesthetized with phenobarbital (0.2 mL, i.p.) then decapitated. Brains were rapidly frozen on crushed Dry Ice. Coronal sections (20 μm) were cut on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems), mounted onto glass slides, and stored at −80°C. RNAscope fluorescent multiplex assay was performed following the manufacturer’s protocols. Samples were taken from 2 males and 2 females in each group (3 and 30 day) and several levels of the PBN were imaged for each animal using a Keyence BZ-X710 microscope. Using the superior cerebellar peduncle (scp) as the center point, images were acquired at 20× in a 3 × 3 grid then stacked and stitched together using Fiji for an initial total of 116 PBNs. Images of probe staining within the four-channel sets were subtracted from one another using Fiji’s image calculator function to remove background autofluorescence and minimally processed to enhance brightness and contrast for optimal representation of the data. After image optimization, due to difficulty in getting precisely matching bregma levels during sectioning, PBN anatomy was evaluated using fiber-tract location and general structure to categorize the images into two groups. “Rostral” sections were defined by presence of the caudal part of the nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (NLL) and a more triangular shape of the lateral PBN (bregma −4.95 to −5.15), and “middle” sections were defined by presence of the longer central part of the ventral spinocerebellar tract (sctv) and narrower oval appearance of lateral PBN (bregma 5.15 to −5.35). Sections that were deemed to be further rostral and caudal of these two categories, and sections that had tissue damage in the PBN were removed for a final count of 89 PBN images. Images were imported into QuPath and a region of interest was drawn over the lateral PBN using the surrounding fiber tracts and brain structure as a guide. RNA expression was quantified by thresholding using the subcellular detection function in QuPath. Cells were deemed positive for Calca or Cck if they had 5 or more puncta and cells were deemed positive for Fos if they had 4 or more puncta because Calca and Cck had denser transcript labeling. An average of ~1700 DAPI-positive cells were analyzed for each section for a total of ~150,000 cells analyzed.
Electrophysiology
Mice were deeply anesthetized with Euthasol (i.p. 1 μL per 10 g body weight) and intracardially perfused with ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM): 92 N-methyl-D-glucamine, 25 D-glucose, 2.5 KCl, 10 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 30 NaHCO3, 0.5 CaCl2, 20 HEPES, 2 thiourea, 5 Na-ascorbate, 3 Na-pyruvate. Brains were quickly removed after perfusion and 250-μm coronal slices were prepared (Leica VT1200) in the same ice-cold solution. Brain slices were kept in the cutting solution at 33°C for 10 min and then transferred to a room temperature recovery solution containing (in mM): 13 D-glucose, 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 5 HEPES for at least 1 h. Slices were individually transferred to 33°C artificial cerebral spinal fluid containing (in mM): 11 D-glucose, 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2 for recording. All solutions were saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2 and adjusted to pH 7.3–7.4, 300–310 mOsm.
Epifluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS BX51WI) was used to visualize Calca neurons expressing AAV-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry and AAV-DIO-mCherry. A 3–5 MΩ glass pipet containing (in mM): 135 K-gluconate, 4 KCl, 10 HEPES, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP (pH 7.35, 280–300 mOsm) was used to record neuron activity. To record intrinsic firing frequencies, 800-ms current injections with 20-pA steps from −100 pA to 240 pA were applied in current clamp, with initial holding potential at −70 mV and repeated every 10 s. To record the efficiency of CNO application, cell-attached measurement was used to record action potential in voltage clamp with 0 pA holding current. CNO (3 μM) was bath applied after 3 min of action potential firing. All data were obtained using MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Data acquisition and analysis were done using pClamp 11 and Clampfit 11.0.3.
Calcium imaging
AAV-Ef1a-DIO-GCaMP6m was injected into the PBN of CalcaCre/+ mice. After 6 weeks of recovery, the nVista (Inscopix) microscope was attached and connected once a week to check the field of view. Recording was conducted using the IDAS program (Inscopix), and the best focus was determined through visual inspection. Occasionally, the mice received a brief air puff as an aversive stimulus. For multi-day imaging of Calca neurons, nVista was connected Ethovision (Noldus) via BNC cable to synchronize video recording and Ca2+ imaging to ensure that the onset and offset of the Ca2+ imaging session matched the video recording. The microendoscope was connected to a commutator (Inscopix) and attached to the baseplate on the mouse, which was then housed in an open-top cage for 4 days to maintain the same field of view throughout the experimental period.
On day 1, a vehicle solution (6% propylene glycol 6% ethanol and saline) was injected intraperitoneally, and the mouse was placed in the von Frey-stimulation chamber for a 45-min acclimation. The imaging session consisted of 5 min of basal activity and 10 min of von Frey stimulation. During the von Frey-stimulation sessions, the mouse was exposed to 8 stimulations of 0.4-g von Frey filament with 1-min, inter-trial intervals. After the imaging session, the LED was turned off, but the microendoscope remained connected, and the mouse was then returned to open-top cage until the start of the next day’s experiment. On day 2, NTG (10 mg/kg, dissolved in 6% propylene glycol 6% ethanol and saline) was injected intraperitoneally. The same imaging session as on day 1 was repeated. On days 3 and 4, the mice were placed in the von Frey-stimulation chamber for imaging as on previous days.
The imaging parameters had insignificant photobleaching, but sufficient fluorescence (LED power, 0.2–0.4; sampling rate 10 Hz). The raw data were processed using IDPS software (ver. 1.9.1, Inscopix). All images acquired over 4 days were concatenated for further analysis. After applying 4X spatial and 2X temporal downsampling, the data underwent spatial bandpass filtering to reduce background noise. Subsequently, motion correction was applied to the images based on a reference frame and region of interest (ROI) within the field of view (FOV). Using IDPS, ΔF/F movies were generated, then PCA/ICA analysis was performed to extract neuronal activities. In cases where there was significant motion or higher background noise, a manual ROI analysis method was employed. To do that, the maximum projection images were used as a reference for spatial information of the neurons, and ROIs were manually drawn based on the borders of the neurons. All neurons analyzed using PCA/ICA and manual ROI methods were visually inspected for each cell, taking into consideration their shape and dynamics, to ensure accuracy.
The outputs of PCA/ICA (ΔF/F) were processed using customized MATLAB code to calculate the Z score. In the case of manual ROI analysis, ΔF/F was calculated as ΔF/F=(F–Fmean)/Fmean. Fmean indicates mean fluorescent during day 1 baseline. For basal activity analysis, concatenated Ca2+ traces were used to calculate Z score, and the Z-scored data were compared across days using the formula: Z=(F–Fmean)/Fstd. Fstd indicates standard deviation of fluorescent during day 1 baseline. For the analysis of von Frey filament-elicited responses, the traces from −20 s to 20 s were extracted and used to calculate the Z-scores. To compare the fluorescent responses, all data points were calculated relative to the −20 s–0 s periods because the mice exhibited different basal activities every day due to intraperitoneal injections or allodynia.
Responsive neurons were identified through statistical analysis comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of pre- and post-stimulation. The AUCs were calculated for three time blocks (−5 to 0 s, 0 to 5 s, and 5 to 10 s) across 8 trials and compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-rank test. Neurons were classified as “increased” if there was a significant increase in the AUC in more than one post-stimulation block. If neither post-stimulation block showed statistical significance, neurons were classified as “unresponsive”. Neurons that exhibited a statistically significant decrease in activity across two blocks were classified as “decreased”.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 (Graphpad Software) by two-way ANOVA with Šidák post hoc correction; for longitudinal assays Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons correction was applied; p < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The asterisks in the figures represent the p values of post hoc tests corresponding to the following values *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Following histology and imaging, any mouse whose targeted injection site was wrong was excluded from experimental analysis. Biological and technical replicate n values can be found in figure legends. The assumptions required for our statistical analysis were accounted for in our experimental design, but not specifically tested for post-hoc.
Supplementary Material
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Rabbit-anti-dsRed | Takara | ab 632496; RRID: AB_10013483 |
| Chicken-anti-GFP | Abcam | ab 13970; RRID: AB_300798 |
| Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit | Jackson ImmunoResearch | #715-585-150; RRID: AB_2340854 |
| Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-chicken | Jackson ImmunoResearch | #703-545-155; RRID: AB_2340375 |
| RNAscope Probe Mm-Fos-C1 | ACD Biotechne | Ref #316921 |
| RNAscope Probe Mm-Calca-C2 | ACD Biotechne | Ref #578771-C2 |
| RNAscope Probe Mm-Cck-C2 | ACD Biotechne | Ref #402271-C3 |
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| pAAV1-SYN1-DIO-YFP | Karl Deisseroth | Like Addgene plasmid #27056 |
| pAAVDJ-Ef1a-DIO-GFP:TeTx | Janelia | N/A |
| pAAV1-Ef1a-DIO-ChR2:mCherry | Mattis et al.74 | Addgene #35508 |
| pAAVDJ-SYN1-DIO-hM3Dq:mCherry | Krashes et al.75 | Addgene #44361 |
| pAAV1-Ef1a-DIO-mCherry | Bryan Roth | Addgene #50462 |
| pAAV1-Ef1a-DIO-GCaMP6m | Larry Zweifel | N/A |
| pAAV1-hSyn-DIO-hM4:mCherry | Krashes et al.75 | Addgene #44362 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| Clozapine-N-Oxide | Fisher Scientific | Cat #L121, CAS 7447-41-8 |
| Nitroglycerin | American Regent, Inc. | NDC 0517-4810-25 |
| Lithium Chloride | Fisher Scientific | Cat #L121, CAS 7447-41-8 |
| Cisplatin | West-Ward | NDC 0143-9504-01 |
| Paraformaldehyde 32% Aqueous Solution | Electron Microscopy Sciences | Cat #15714-S |
| Phenobarbitol | Akorn | NDC 59399-185-90 |
| Normal donkey serum | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat #017-000-121, RRID: AB_2337258 |
| O.C.T. | Thermofisher | Cat #23-730-571 |
| DAPI Fluoromount-G | SouthernBiotechne | Cat #0100-20 |
| [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY | Tocris | Cat #1176 |
| C&B Metabond | Parkell | SKU: S380 |
| Euthasol | Virbac | Ref# 200-071 |
| Dental Cement | A-M Systems | Ref# 594845 |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay V1 | ACD Biotechne | Discontinued |
| Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
| Mouse: C57BL/6J | Jackson Laboratory | JAX:000664 |
| Mouse: CalcaCre | Jackson Laboratory | JAX:033168 |
| Mouse: Slc17a6Cre | Jackson Laboratory | JAX:016963 |
| Mouse: Oprm1Cre | Jackson Laboratory | JAX:035574 |
| Mouse: CalcatdTomato | Pauli et al.12 | N/A |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| QuPath | GitHub | https://qupath.github.io/ |
| Prism (v9.5.1) | GraphPad Software | www.graphpad.com |
| Fiji | Schindelin et al.76 | www.fiji.sc |
| ImageJ | Schneider et al.77 | www.imagej.net |
| pClamp 11 | Molecular Devices | www.moleculardevices.com |
| Clampfit 11.0.3 | Molecular Devices | www.moleculardevices.com |
| IDAS | Incsopix | www.inscopix.com |
| IDPS | Inscopix | www.inscopix.com |
| Original Code | This study | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10725342 |
| MATLAB | Mathworks | www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html |
| Ethovision | Noldus Technology | www.noldus.com |
| Other | ||
| Modular chambers and elevated mesh bottom stand | Bioseb | Ref #BIO-PVF |
| Plantar test for thermal stimulation | Ugo Basil | Product code: 37370 |
| Hot plate | Bioseb | Ref #BIO-CHP |
| GRIN Lens | Inscopix | www.inscopix.com |
| Cryostat | Leica | Ref# CM1950 |
| Fluorescence Microscope | Keyence | Ref# BZ-X700 |
| 473 nm Laser | LaserGlow | Ref# LRS-0473 |
| Epifluorescence Microscope | Olympus | Ref# BX51WI |
| Microelectrode Amplifier | Molecular Devices | SKU: MultiClamp 700B |
| 6-0 Silk Suture | ProAdvantage | SKU: PROA-P420683 |
| Stereotaxic Frame | David Kopf Instruments | Model 1900 |
| Master-8 Pulse Stimulator | A.M.P.I. | N/A |
| Keyence All-in-One Fluorescence Microscope | Keyence | Ref# BZ-X710 |
| Fiberoptic Cables | Doric Lenses | Ref# MFP_200 |
| Vibratome | Leica | Ref# VT1200 |
| nVista Microscope | Inscopix | www.inscopix.com |
| Commutator | Inscopix | www.inscopix.com |
Highlights.
Neuropathic injury chronically increases the intrinsic excitability of Calca neurons
Calca neurons are necessary for the manifestation and maintenance of chronic pain
Activity within Calca neurons is sufficient to induce nociplasticity
Aversive stimuli of many sensory modalities can induce chronic pain via Calca neurons
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Susan Phelps for maintaining the mice used in this study and our colleagues for their input during this study and preparation of the manuscript. L.C. was funded by NIH NIDA 1F30DA057845-01, and T.N. was funded by NIH NINDS K00NS124190.
Footnotes
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114057.
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fitzcharles MA, Cohen SP, Clauw DJ, Littlejohn G, Usui C, and Häuser W (2021). Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions. Lancet 397, 2098–2110. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00392-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nijs J, Lahousse A, Kapreli E, Bilika P, Saraçoğlu I, Malfliet A, Coppieters I, De Baets L, Leysen L, Roose E, et al. (2021). Nociplastic pain criteria or recognition of central sensitization? Pain phenotyping in the past, present and future. J. Clin. Med 10, 3203. 10.3390/jcm10153203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kosek E, Clauw D, Nijs J, Baron R, Gilron I, Harris RE, Mico JA, Rice ASC, and Sterling M (2021). Chronic nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system: clinical criteria and grading system. Pain 162, 2629–2634. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maixner W, Fillingim RB, Williams DA, Smith SB, and Slade GD (2016). Overlapping chronic pain conditions: implications for diagnosis and classification. J. Pain 17, T93–T107. 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, Nahin R, Mackey S, DeBar L, Kerns R, Von Korff M, Porter L, and Helmick C (2018). Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep 67, 1001–1006. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, and Smith BH (2019). Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br. J. Anaesth 123, e273–e283. 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dydyk AM, and Givler A (2023). Central Pain Syndrome. In StatPearls [Internet] (StatPearls Publishing; ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Choi S, Hachisuka J, Brett MA, Magee AR, Omori Y, Iqbal NUA, Zhang D, DeLisle MM, Wolfson RL, Bai L, et al. (2020). Parallel ascending spinal pathways for affective touch and pain. Nature 587, 258–263. 10.1038/s41586-020-2860-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rodriguez E, Sakurai K, Xu J, Chen Y, Toda K, Zhao S, Han BX, Ryu D, Yin H, Liedtke W, and Wang F (2017). A craniofacial-specific monosynaptic circuit enables heightened affective pain. Nat. Neurosci 20, 1734–1743. 10.1038/s41593-017-0012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hermann GE, and Rogers RC (1985). Convergence of vagal and gustatory afferent input within the parabrachial nucleus of the rat. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst 13, 1–17. 10.1016/0165-1838(85)90002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang C, Kaye JA, Cai Z, Wang Y, Prescott SL, and Liberles SD (2021). Area Postrema Cell Types that Mediate Nausea-Associated Behaviors. Neuron 109, 461–72.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pauli JL, Chen JY, Basiri ML, Park S, Carter ME, Sanz E, McKnight GS, Stuber GD, and Palmiter RD (2022). Molecular and anatomical characterization of parabrachial neurons and their axonal projections. Elife 11, e81868. 10.7554/eLife.81868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang D, Grady FS, Peltekian L, Laing JJ, and Geerling JC (2021). Efferent projections of CGRP/Calca-expressing parabrachial neurons in mice. J. Comp. Neurol 529, 2911–2957. 10.1002/cne.25136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chiang MC, Nguyen EK, Canto-Bustos M, Papale AE, Oswald, and Ross SE (2020). Divergent neural pathways emanating from the lateral parabrachial nucleus mediate distinct components of the pain response. Neuron 106, 927–939.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grady F, Peltekian L, Iverson G, and Geerling JC (2020). Direct parabrachial-cortical connectivity. Cerebr. Cortex 30, 4811–4833. 10.1093/cercor/bhaa072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saper CB, and Loewy AD (1980). Efferent connections ofthe parabrachial nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 197, 291–317. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gauriau C, and Bernard JF (2002). Pain pathways and parabrachial circuits in the rat. Exp. Physiol 87, 251–258. 10.1113/eph8702357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Torres-Rodriguez JM, Wilson TD, Singh S, Torruella-Suárez ML, Chaudhry S, Adke AP, Becker JJ, Neugebauer B, Lin JL, Martinez Gonzalez S, et al. (2024). The parabrachial to central amygdala pathway is critical to injury-induced pain sensitization in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 49, 508–520. 10.1038/s41386-023-01673-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhou H, Li M, Zhao R, Sun L, and Yang G (2023).A sleep-active basalocortical pathway crucial for generation and maintenance of chronic pain. Nat. Neurosci 26, 458–469. 10.1038/s41593-022-01250-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sun L, Liu R, Guo F, Wen MQ, Ma XL, Li KY, Sun H, Xu CL, Li YY, Wu MY, et al. (2020). Parabrachial nucleus circuit governs neuropathic pain-like behavior. Nat. Commun 11, 5974. 10.1038/s41467-020-19767-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arthurs JW, Pauli JL, and Palmiter RD (2023). Activation of parabrachial tachykinin 1 neurons counteracts some behaviors mediated by parabrachial calcitonin gene-related peptide neurons. Neuroscience 517, 105–116. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barik A, Sathyamurthy A, Thompson J, Seltzer M, Levine A, and Chesler A (2021). A spinoparabrachial circuit defined by Tacr1 expression drives pain. Elife 10, e61135. 10.7554/eLife.61135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Deng J, Zhou H, Lin JK, Shen ZX, Chen WZ, Wang LH, Li Q, Mu D, Wei YC, Xu XH, and Sun YG (2020). The parabrachial nucleus directly channels spinal nociceptive signals to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei, but not the amygdala. Neuron 107, 909–923.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ma Q (2022). A functional subdivision within the somatosensory system and its implications for pain research. Neuron 110, 749–769. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Campos CA, Bowen AJ, Roman CW, and Palmiter RD (2018). Encoding of danger by parabrachial CGRP neurons. Nature 555, 617–622. 10.1038/nature25511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Campos CA, Bowen AJ, Han S, Wisse BE, Palmiter RD, and Schwartz MW (2017). Cancer-induced anorexia and malaise are mediated by CGRP neurons in the parabrachial nucleus. Nat. Neurosci 20, 934–942. 10.1038/nn.4574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen JY, Campos CA, Jarvie BC, and Palmiter RD (2018). Parabrachial CGRP neurons establish and sustain aversive taste memories. Neuron 100, 891–899.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han S, Soleiman MT, Soden ME, Zweifel LS, and Palmiter RD (2015). Elucidating an affective pain circuit that creates a threat memory. Cell 162, 363–374. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kang SJ, Liu S, Ye M, Kim DI, Pao GM, Copits BA, Roberts BZ, Lee KF, Bruchas MR, and Han S (2022). A central alarm system that gates multi-sensory innate threat cues to the amygdala. Cell Rep. 40, 111222. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carter ME, Soden ME, Zweifel LS, and Palmiter RD (2013). Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite. Nature 503, 111–114. 10.1038/nature12596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bowen AJ, Chen JY, Huang YW, Baertsch NA, Park S, and Palmiter RD (2020). Dissociable control of unconditioned responses and associative fear learning by parabrachial CGRP neurons. Elife 9, e59799. 10.7554/eLife.59799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Malmberg AB, and Basbaum AI (1998). Partial sciatic nerve injury in the mouse as a model of neuropathic pain: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates. Pain 76, 215–222. 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abraham AD, Leung EJY, Wong BA, Rivera ZMG, Kruse LC, Clark JJ, and Land BB (2020). Orally consumed cannabinoids provide long-lasting relief of allodynia in a mouse model of chronic neuropathic pain. Neuropsychopharmacology 45, 1105–1114. 10.1038/s41386-019-0585-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Raver C, Uddin O, Ji Y, Li Y, Cramer N, Jenne C, Morales M, Masri R, and Keller A (2020). An amygdalo-parabrachial pathway regulates pain perception and chronic pain. J. Neurosci 40, 3424–3442. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0075-20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arguis MJ, Perez J, Martínez G, Ubre M, and Gomar C (2008). Contralateral neuropathic pain following a surgical model of unilateral nerve injury in rats. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med 33, 211–216. 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koltzenburg M, Wall PD, and McMahon SB (1999). Does the right side know what the left is doing? Trends Neurosci. 22, 122–127. 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01302-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Palmiter RD (2018). The parabrachial nucleus: CGRP neurons function as a general alarm. Trends Neurosci. 41, 280–293. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chung L (2015).A Brief Introduction to the Transduction of Neural Activity into Fos Signal. Dev. Reprod 19, 61–67. 10.12717/DR.2015.19.2.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu X, Sun L, Dong R, Chen JY, Silakit R, Condon LF, Lin Y, Lin S, Palmiter RD, and Gu L (2022). Polony gels enable amplifiable DNA stamping and spatial transcriptomics of chronic pain. Cell 185, 4621–4633.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nestler EJ, Barrot M, and Self DW (2001). DeltaFosB: a sustained molecular switch for addiction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11042–11046. 10.1073/pnas.191352698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim JC, Cook MN, Carey MR, Shen C, Regehr WG, and Dymecki SM (2009). Linking genetically defined neurons to behavior through a broadly applicable silencing allele. Neuron 63, 305–315. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schiavo G, Matteoli M, and Montecucco C (2000). Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol. Rev 80, 717–766. 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.2.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Allen HN, Chaudhry S, Hong VM, Lewter LA, Sinha GP, Carrasquillo Y, Taylor BK, and Kolber BJ (2023). A parabrachial-to-amygdala circuit that determines hemispheric lateralization of somatosensory processing. Biol. Psychiatr 93, 370–381. 10.1016/j.bio-psych.2022.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zajdel J, Sköld J, Jaarola M, Singh AK, and Engblom D (2021). Calcitonin gene related peptide α is dispensable for many danger-related motivational responses. Sci. Rep 11, 16204. 10.1038/s41598-021-95670-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shinohara K, Watabe AM, Nagase M, Okutsu Y, Takahashi Y, Kurihara H, and Kato F (2017). Essential role of endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide in pain-associated plasticity in the central amygdala. Eur. J. Neurosci 46, 2149–2160. 10.1111/ejn.13662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Han JS, Li W, and Neugebauer V (2005). Critical role of calcitonin gene-related peptide 1 receptors in the amygdala in synaptic plasticity and pain behavior. J. Neurosci 25, 10717–10728. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4112-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Huo J, Du F, Duan K, Yin G, Liu X, Ma Q, Dong D, Sun M, Hao M, Su D, et al. (2023). Identification of brain-to-spinal circuits controlling the laterality and duration of mechanical allodynia in mice. Cell Rep 42, 112300. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Raper J, Morrison RD, Daniels JS, Howell L, Bachevalier J, Wichmann T, and Galvan A (2017). Metabolism and distribution of clozapine-N-oxide: implications for nonhuman primate chemogenetics. ACS Chem. Neurosci 8, 1570–1576. 10.1021/acschem-neuro.7b00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Park HJ, Stokes JA, Pirie E, Skahen J, Shtaerman Y, and Yaksh TL (2013). Persistent hyperalgesia in the cisplatin-treated mouse as defined by threshold measures, the conditioned place preference paradigm, and changes in dorsal root ganglia activated transcription factor 3: the effects of gabapentin, ketorolac, and etanercept. Anesth. Analg 116, 224–231. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826e1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ta LE, Low PA, and Windebank AJ (2009). Mice with cisplatin and oxaliplatin-induced painful neuropathy develop distinct early responses to thermal stimuli. Mol. Pain 5, 9. 10.1186/1744-8069-5-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pradhan AA, Smith ML, McGuire B, Tarash I, Evans CJ, and Charles A (2014). Characterization of a novel model of chronic migraine. Pain 155, 269–274. 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bates EA, Nikai T, Brennan KC, Fu YH, Charles AC, Basbaum AI, Ptácek LJ, and Ahn AH (2010). Sumatriptan alleviates nitroglycerin-induced mechanical and thermal allodynia in mice. Cephalalgia 80, 170–178. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01864.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wu PY, Yang X, Wright DE, and Christianson JA (2020). Foot shock stress generates persistent widespread hypersensitivity and anhedonic behavior in an anxiety-prone strain of mice. Pain 161, 211–219. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cao B, Scherrer G, and Chen L (2022). Spinal cord retinoic acid receptor signaling gates mechanical hypersensitivity in neuropathic pain. Neuron 110, 4108–124.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nelson TS, Sinha GP, Santos DFS, Jukkola P, Prasoon P, Winter MK, McCarson KE, Smith BN, and Taylor BK (2022). Spinal neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-expressing neurons are a pharmacotherapeutic target for the alleviation of neuropathic pain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2204515119. 10.1073/pnas.2204515119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Peirs C, Williams SPG, Zhao X, Arokiaraj CM, Ferreira DW, Noh MC, Smith KM, Halder P, Corrigan KA, Gedeon JY, et al. (2021). Mechanical allodynia circuitry in the dorsal horn is defined by the nature of the injury. Neuron 109, 73–90.e7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boyle KA, Gradwell MA, Yasaka T, Dickie AC, Polgár E, Ganley RP, Orr DPH, Watanabe M, Abraira VE, Kuehn ED, et al. (2019). Defining a spinal microcircuit that gates myelinated afferent input: implications for tactile allodynia. Cell Rep 28, 526–540.e6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Petitjean H, Pawlowski SA, Fraine SL, Sharif B, Hamad D, Fatima T, Berg J, Brown CM, Jan LY, Ribeiro-da-Silva A, et al. (2015). Dorsal Horn Parvalbumin Neurons Are Gate-Keepers of Touch-Evoked Pain after Nerve Injury. Cell Rep 13, 1246–1257. 10.1016/j.cel-rep.2015.09.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lu Y, Dong H, Gao Y, Gong Y, Ren Y, Gu N, Zhou S, Xia N, Sun YY, Ji RR, and Xiong L (2013). A feed-forward spinal cord glycinergic neural circuit gates mechanical allodynia. J. Clin. Invest 123, 4050–4062. 10.1172/JCI70026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Todd AJ(2010). Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 11, 823–836. 10.1038/nrn2947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nelson TS, and Taylor BK (2021). Targeting spinal neuropeptide Y1 receptor-expressing interneurons to alleviate chronic pain and itch. Prog. Neurobiol 196, 101894. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Malet M, Leiguarda C, Gaston G, McCarthy C, and Brumovsky P (2017). Spinal activation of the NPY Y1 receptor reduces mechanical and cold allodynia in rats with chronic constriction injury. Peptides 92, 38–45. 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Liu S, Ye M, Pao GM, Song SM, Jhang J, Jiang H, Kim JH, Kang SJ, Kim DI, and Han S (2022). Divergent brainstem opioidergic pathways that coordinate breathing with pain and emotions. Neuron 110, 857–873.e9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Butler RK, and Finn DP (2009). Stress-induced analgesia. Prog. Neurobiol 88, 184–202. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sugimoto M, Takahashi Y, Sugimura YK, Tokunaga R, Yajima M, and Kato F (2021). Active role of the central amygdala in widespread mechanical sensitization in rats with facial inflammatory pain. Pain 162, 2273–2286. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Alhadeff AL, Su Z, Hernandez E, Klima ML, Phillips SZ, Holland RA, Guo C, Hantman AW, De Jonghe BC, and Betley JN (2018). A neural circuit for the suppression of pain by a competing need state. Cell 173, 140–152.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Groenewald CB, Murray CB, and Palermo TM (2020). Adverse childhood experiences and chronic pain among children and adolescents in the United States. Pain Rep 5, e839. 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sherman AL, Morris MC, Bruehl S, Westbrook TD, and Walker LS (2015). Heightened temporal summation of pain in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and history of trauma. Ann. Behav. Med 49, 785–792. 10.1007/s12160-015-9712-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Qi X, Cui K, Zhang Y, Wang L, Tong J, Sun W, Shao S, Wang J, Wang C, Sun X, et al. (2022). A nociceptive neuronal ensemble in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex underlies pain chronicity. Cell Rep 41, 111833. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cai YQ, Wang W, Hou YY, and Pan ZZ (2014). Optogenetic activation of brainstem serotonergic neurons induces persistent pain sensitization. Mol. Pain 10, 70. 10.1186/1744-8069-10-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wilson TD, Valdivia S, Khan A, Ahn HS, Adke AP, Martinez Gonzalez S, Sugimura YK, and Carrasquillo Y (2019). Dual and Opposing Functions of the Central Amygdala in the Modulation of Pain. Cell Rep 29, 332–346.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chen Q, Roeder Z, Li MH, Zhang Y, Ingram SL, and Heinricher MM (2017). Optogenetic evidence for a direct circuit linking nociceptive transmission through the parabrachial complex with pain-modulating neurons of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). eNeuro 4, ENEURO.0202-17.2017. 10.1523/ENEURO.0202-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chang YT, Chen WH, Shih HC, Min MY, Shyu BC, and Chen CC (2019). Anterior nucleus of paraventricular thalamus mediates chronic mechanical hyperalgesia. Pain 160, 1208–1223. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mattis J, Tye KM, Ferenczi EA, Ramakrishnan C, O’Shea DJ, Pra- kash R, Gunaydin LA, Hyun M, Fenno LE, Gradinaru V, et al. (2011). Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins. Nat. Methods 9,159–172. 10.1038/nmeth.1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Krashes MJ, Koda S, Ye C, Rogan SC, Adams AC, Cusher DS, Maratos-Flier E, Roth BL, and Lowell BB (2011). Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice. J. Clin. Invest 121, 1424–1428. 10.1172/JCI46229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, and Eliceiri KW (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
All original code has been deposited at GitHub and is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10725342.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in the manuscript is available from the lead contact upon request.
