Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2000 Jul;74(13):6193–6197. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.13.6193-6197.2000

Resistance to Friend Murine Leukemia Virus Infection Conferred by the Fv-4 Gene Is Recessive but Appears Dominant from the Effect of the Immune System

Fengmin Zhang 1,2, Lamin Ta Ya 1, Yasumasa Iwatani 1, Kyoko Higo 1, Yasunori Suzuki 1, Masakazu Tanaka 1, Tomomi Nakahara 1, Takeshi Ono 1, Hiroyuki Sakai 1, Kagemasa Kuribayashi 3, Akinori Ishimoto 1,*
PMCID: PMC112120  PMID: 10846105

Abstract

Fv-4 is a mouse gene that dominantly confers resistance to infection with Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) (S. Suzuki, Jpn. J. Exp. Med. 45:473–478, 1975). However, the resistance caused by Fv-4 is recessive in nude mice, which suggests that immunological effects play important roles in this resistance in vivo (K. Higo, Y. Kubo, Y. Iwatani, T. Ono, M. Maeda, H. Hiai, T. Masuda, K. Kuribayashi, F. Zhang, T. Lamin, A. Adachi, and A. Ishimoto, J. Virol. 71:750–754, 1997). To determine the immunological effect on the resistance in vivo, we infected immunologically immature newborn mice homozygous (Fv-4r/r) and heterozygous (Fv-4r/−) for Fv-4. Although the Fv-4r/r mice showed complete resistance to F-MuLV whether infected neonatally or as adolescents, the Fv-4r/− mice showed high sensitivity to viral proliferation and disease induction when infected as newborns but complete resistance when infected as adolescent mice. To confirm the immunological effect on the resistance in adolescent mice with the Fv-4r/r and Fv-4r/− genotypes, we examined the effect of an immunosuppressant drug, FK506, on the resistance. The mice with the Fv-4r/r genotype treated with FK506 still showed resistance, but the mice with the Fv-4r/− genotype became highly sensitive to F-MuLV infection. Flow cytometric analysis to detect the Fv-4 gene product showed that the Fv-4 gene product was expressed on the cells from newborn and adolescent mice. The Fv-4 gene product was also detected on the cells from the FK506-treated mice as well as on those from untreated mice. However, a quantitative difference in the gene product between the cells with the Fv-4r/r and Fv-4r/− genotypes was detected by indirect staining for flow cytometry. These results show that the resistance to F-MuLV infection conferred by the Fv-4 gene is originally recessive, but it looks dominant in adolescent mice mainly because of the effect of the immune system.


Susceptibility to retroviral infection is influenced by the genetic background of the host (2, 3, 4). Among many genes influencing Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) infection (5), Fv-1, Fv-2, and Fv-4 have been extensively studied. Fv-4 was molecularly cloned much earlier than the others (1, 18, 19, 20, 26). However, much about the Fv-4 gene is poorly understood. Fv-4 is located on chromosome 12, and resistance to exogenous infection with ecotropic MuLV is reported to be inherited as a simple Mendelian dominant gene (12, 25, 31). We previously reported that transplantation of bone marrow cells from BALB/Fv-4 mice, i.e., Fv-4 congenic BALB/c mice (Fv-4r/r) established by breeding wild-type mice carrying the Fv-4 resistance gene with susceptible (Fv-4−/−) BALB/c mice (done by Odaka et al. [25]), can prevent the development of murine AIDS in susceptible mice infected with the murine AIDS virus (22). The resistant mice were found to have a glycoprotein equivalent to the exogenous ecotropic MuLV envelope on their lymphocytes, while mice with the Fv-4−/− genotype did not (10, 11, 14, 32), and sequence analysis characterized the Fv-4 gene as a truncated MuLV sequence containing the 3′ portion of the pol region, the entire env gene, and the 3′ long terminal repeat (9, 13), so that viral interference by competitive blocking of the virus receptor became a prime candidate for the Fv-4 restriction mechanism. However, there is no direct evidence that the Fv-4 gene product binds directly to the receptor. Despite the complete expression of Fv-4 resistance in vivo described above, cells carrying the Fv-4 gene are partially permissive to virus infection in vitro (22, 30, 31), and some reports have suggested a more complex mechanism of Fv-4-mediated resistance in vivo (7).

Studies on the susceptibility of nude mice to MuLV infection suggested that immunological effects play important roles in the resistance to F-MuLV infection caused by Fv-4 in nude mice (7, 16). To better understand the role of the immune system in the resistance, we investigated the gene dosage effect of the Fv-4 gene product under immune-deficient conditions. In this study, two inbred strains of mice with the Fv-4 resistance gene, FRG and BALB/Fv-4 mice, were used. The FRG mouse, formerly called the G mouse and supplied by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., is the first laboratory strain shown to be resistant to F-MuLV by virtue of carrying the Fv-4 gene (28, 29).

Newborn (younger-than-24-h-old) and adolescent (4-week-old) BALB/c, BALB/Fv-4, FRG, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1, and (BALB/c × FRG)F1 mice were infected with 0.1 and 0.5 ml, respectively, of NB-tropic F-MuLV (about 5.2 log focus-forming units [FFU]/0.2 ml by the UV-XC test [27] on SC-1 cells [6]) intraperitoneally to compare the susceptibilities of mice with immature and mature immune systems to F-MuLV infection (Table 1). Among the adolescent mice, only the BALB/c mice without Fv-4 that were inoculated with the virus developed the disease and were susceptible to viral proliferation. No proliferation of virus was detected 10 or 25 days after inoculation in the mice with the Fv-4r/r genotype or the Fv-4r/− genotype when they were inoculated as adolescents. However, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 and (BALB/c × FRG)F1 mice with the Fv-4r/− genotype developed the disease within 10 days when inoculated neonatally. Viral proliferation was also detected in the spleens of the mice with Fv-4r/− genotype 10 days after inoculation. Many mice with the Fv-4−/− and Fv-4r/− genotypes inoculated neonatally started to die at around 2 weeks after infection. It was thus confirmed that the F-MuLV resistance phenotype of BALB/Fv-4 and FRG mice appeared to be inherited as a dominant trait when the mice were infected as adolescents but as a recessive trait when they were infected neonatally.

TABLE 1.

Susceptibility of mice with the Fv-4 gene to F-MuLV

Mice
Mice inoculated with F-MuLV as newborns
Mice inoculated with F-MuLV as adolescents
Strain Fv-4 genotype No. of mice with splenomegaly (>200 mg)/totala Virus titer (log FFU/0.2 ml)b at postinoculation day:
No. of mice with splenomegaly (>350 mg)/total Virus titer (log FFU/0.2 ml) at postinoculation day:
10 25 10 25
BALB/c −/− 7/7 4.2 5.0 10/10 5.2 5.6
BALB/Fv-4 r/r 0/14 Negative Negative 0/10 Negative Negative
(BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 r/− 9/9 3.4 4.8 0/13 Negative Negative
FRG r/r 0/7 Negative Negative 0/10 Negative Negative
(BALB/c × FRG)F1 r/− 12/12 4.0 4.5 0/19 Negative Negative
a

Mice were killed 3 weeks after infection. 

b

Titer of 5% spleen homogenate detected by the UV-XC test (27) on SC-1 cells (6). 

To determine whether the Fv-4 gene was expressed in newborn as well as in adolescent mice, cells from thymus and spleen were stained directly with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-Fv-4 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and indirectly with anti-Fv-4 mouse serum and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG for flow cytometry analysis. The anti-Fv-4 IgG was purified from the sera of BALB/c mice (Fv-4−/−) immunized with spleen cells from BALB/Fv-4 mice (Fv-4r/r) by using a protein A-Sepharose column and labeled with FITC, and FITC-conjugated anti-Fv-4 IgG was prepared. FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was purchased from MBL Co. Ltd. (Nagoya, Japan).

As shown in Fig. 1, the specificity of the anti-Fv-4 antibody was confirmed by staining of thymic cells from adult BALB/c, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1, and BALB/Fv-4 mice, because it was blocked by anti-Fv-4 serum but not by normal BALB/c serum in direct staining. Blocking with anti-Fv-4 BALB/c serum (Fig. 1C) showed an increased size of the negative peak in heterozygous (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 and homozygous BALB/Fv-4 mice accompanied by loss of population with at least greater than 1 log unit staining intensity compared with blocking with normal serum (Fig. 1B). The expression of the Fv-4 gene was clearly detected on thymic cells from newborn BALB/Fv-4 and (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 mice by both direct and indirect methods (Fig. 2) (10). Although only the expression of Fv-4 on thymus cells is shown in this paper, fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of the fluorescence detected on spleen cells was shown in our previous paper (7). The level of fluorescence detected on the spleen cells was almost the same as that detected on the thymic cells, except for the staining of B cells among spleen cells by FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG goat serum (data not shown). However, the indirect staining, which may be low in specificity but high in sensitivity, was interesting. By the indirect staining, some difference between the Fv-4r/r and Fv-4r/− genotypes in the intensity of fluorescence showing Fv-4 gene expression was observed on cells from both adolescent (Fig. 1) and newborn (Fig. 2) mice.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Fv-4 expression on thymic cells from 4-week-old BALB/c, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1, and BALB/Fv-4 mice detected by flow cytometry with direct (A to C) and indirect (D and E) staining. After the Fc receptor was blocked with rat anti-mouse CD16-CD32 monoclonal antibody, cells were treated with FITC-conjugated anti-Fv-4 antibody (A). As a blocking test, cells were blocked with serum from normal BALB/c mice (B) or with anti-Fv-4 BALB/c serum (C) and were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-Fv-4 antibody. For indirect staining, cells were first treated with normal BALB/c serum (D) or anti-Fv-4 BALB/c serum (E) and were then stained with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Fv-4 expression on thymic cells from newborn BALB/c, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1, and BALB/Fv-4 mice detected by flow cytometry with direct (A) and indirect (B) staining.

To confirm the immunological effects on the susceptibility of mice with the Fv-4 gene to F-MuLV infection, we examined the susceptibility of mice treated with the immune-suppressant drug FK506. FK506, an antibiotic isolated from the fermentation broth of Streptomyces tukubaenis and reported to be a potent immunosuppressant (8, 15, 21), was supplied by Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. The 4-week-old mice were treated with FK506 at 5.0 mg/kg/day subcutaneously every other day. The mice were infected with 0.5 ml of F-MuLV intraperitoneally on the day after the third administration of FK506. From the next day of virus infection, mice continued to be treated with FK506 every other day for an additional 7 and 12 times. After infection for 16 and 26 days, mice were killed to examine the effects of the immunosuppressant on resistance to viral replication and disease development (Table 2). Although there were no prominent effects of FK506 on the susceptibility of BALB/c (Fv-4−/−) and BALB/Fv-4 (Fv-4r/r) mice to F-MuLV infection, (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 (Fv-4r/−) mice were rendered susceptible to F-MuLV infection by the treatment. Viral proliferation in the spleen was detected in all FK506-treated mice with the Fv-4r/− genotype, even when splenomegaly was not detected. The reason why the spleen weights for the FK506-treated virus-infected (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 (Fv-4r/−) mice are not equivalent to those for virus-infected BALB/c (Fv-4−/−) mice may depend on the effect of heterozygously coded Fv-4 gene expression. As a prominent side effect of FK506 treatment, growth disorders, such as loss of body weight or interruption of increase of body weight, including spleen weight, was often observed in both infected and uninfected mice. The effect of FK506 on Fv-4 gene expression in cells from thymuses and spleens of FK506-treated mice was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 3). Expression of Fv-4 was detected on the cells from the mice with the Fv-4r/− genotype treated with FK506 every other day for a total of 3 or 10 times, as well as on the cells from untreated mice (Fig. 3). The data obtained by flow cytometry suggested that conversion from resistance to sensitivity does not depend on the decrease of Fv-4 gene expression but depends on other factors, such as suppression of the immune reaction by FK506.

TABLE 2.

Effect of the immunosuppressant drug FK506 on the susceptibility of mice with the Fv-4 gene to F-MuLV infection

Mice
Treatment with:
Spleen wt in mg (virus titera)b at postinfection day:
Strain Fv-4 genotype FK506 F-MuLV infection 16 26
BALB/c −/− 105 (Nc), 110 (N) 110 (N), 115 (N)
+ 450 (4.0), 650 (3.9) 935 (4.9), 1,050 (5.0)
+  95 (N), 110 (N) 120 (N), 120 (N)
+ + 650 (5.0), 700 (5.3) 850 (5.3), 1,100 (5.0)
BALB/Fv-4 r/r 100 (N), 110 (N)  95 (N), 120 (N)
+  90 (N), 115 (N) 105 (N), 110 (N)
+  85 (N), 110 (N) 100 (N), 110 (N)
+ +  90 (N), 110 (N) 105 (N), 120 (N), 125 (N)
(BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 r/−  95 (N), 115 (N) 105 (N), 120 (N)
+ 100 (N), 120 (N) 105 (N), 110 (N)
+  80 (N), 105 (N), 125 (N) 110 (N), 115 (N)
+ + 170 (N), 275 (3.0), 422 (3.3), 650 (4.3) 212 (2.0), 350 (3.0), 540 (3.5)
a

Titer (log FFU/0.2 ml) of 5% spleen homogenate detected by the UV-XC test (27) on SC-1 cells (6). 

b

Individual results for groups of two, three, or four mice are shown. 

c

N, negative. 

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Fv-4 expression on thymic cells from FK506-treated mice detected by flow cytometry with direct (A) and indirect (B) staining. The thymic cells were prepared from the mice treated with FK506 every other day for a total of 10 times.

Newborn mice are more sensitive than adolescent mice to MuLV in general (5, 16). Although it has been known for F-MuLV infection to develop into erythoroid leukemia even in mice infected as adolescents (7), the adolescent (BALB/c × BALB/Fv-4)F1 mice were resistant to F-MuLV infection. That flow cytometry for Fv-4 gene expression did not detect clear differences between the cells from adolescent and newborn mice suggests that the immunological immaturity of newborn F1 mice is an important factor in their susceptibility to F-MuLV infection.

It has been reported that the Fv-1 locus has two codominant alleles, Fv-1n and Fv-1b. Cells carrying the Fv-1n allele are susceptible to N-tropic MuLVs, whereas cells carrying the Fv-1b allele are susceptible to B-tropic viruses (17, 23). The Fv-2 locus encodes a dominant host factor that confers susceptibility to F-MuLV-induced erythroleukemia (18, 24). Our observations about the susceptibilities of newborn mice and mice treated with the immunosuppressant FK506 to F-MuLV infection suggest that Fv-4 is essentially a recessive gene that looks dominant because it acts in cooperation with other factors. The difference in susceptibility between the homozygous (Fv-4r/r) and heterozygous (Fv-4r/−) mice under immune-deficient conditions may depend on a quantitative difference in the Fv-4 gene product due to the gene dosage effect detected by indirect staining.

Homozygotes (Fv-4r/r) showed complete resistance even under the immune-deficient conditions in vivo, but tissue culture cells from these mice are susceptible to viral infection in vitro. This discrepancy in susceptibility to F-MuLV in vivo and in vitro suggests the presence of other mechanisms influencing resistance conferred by Fv-4 in vivo in addition to immune response.

Acknowledgments

Fengmin Zhang and Lamin Ta Ya contributed equally to this work.

We thank Toshio Hattori and Hiroshi Hiai for useful technical advice. We also thank Yuki Sato, Chiemi Tajima, Masako Saka, and Yumi Inukai for animal care.

This work was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Science Research and Cancer Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and by Grants-in-Aid for AIDS research from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan to Akinori Ishimoto and Hiroyuki Sakai.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Best S, Le Tissier P, Towers G, Stoye J P. Positional cloning of the mouse retrovirus restriction gene Fv1. Nature. 1996;382:826–829. doi: 10.1038/382826a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chesebro B, Miyazawa M, Britt W J. Host genetic control of spontaneous and induced immunity to Friend murine retrovirus infection. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:477–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chesebro B, Wehrly K. Rfv-1 and Rfv-2, two H-2-associated genes that influence recovery from Friend leukemia virus-induced splenomegaly. J Immunol. 1978;120:1081–1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chesebro B, Wehrly K, Doig D, Nishio J. Antibody-induced modulation of Friend virus cell surface antigens decreases virus production by persistent erythroleukemia cells: influence of the Rfv-3 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:5784–5788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Friend C. Cell-free transmission in adult Swiss mice of a disease having the character of a leukemia. J Exp Med. 1956;105:307–318. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.4.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hartley J W, Rowe W P. Clonal cell lines from a feral mouse embryo which lack host-range restrictions for murine leukemia viruses. Virology. 1975;65:128–134. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Higo K, Kubo Y, Iwatani Y, Ono T, Maeda M, Hiai H, Masuda T, Kuribayashi K, Zhang F, Lamin T, Adachi A, Ishimoto A. Susceptibility of nude mice carrying the Fv-4 gene to Friend murine leukemia virus infection. J Virol. 1997;71:750–754. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.1.750-754.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hiraoka Y, Kishimoto C, Kurokawa M, Ochiai H, Sasayama S. The effects of FK-506, a novel and potent immunosuppressant, upon murine coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis. J Pharm Exp Ther. 1992;260:1386–1391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ikeda H, Laigret F, Martin M A, Repaske R. Characterization of a molecularly cloned retroviral sequence associated with Fv-4 resistance. J Virol. 1985;55:768–777. doi: 10.1128/jvi.55.3.768-777.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ikeda H, Odaka T. Cellular expression of murine leukemia virus gp70-related antigen on thymocytes of uninfected mice corelates with Fv-4 gene-controlled resistance to Friend leukemia virus infection. Virology. 1983;128:127–139. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ikeda H, Odaka T. A cell membrane “gp70” associated with Fv-4 gene: immunological characterization, and tissue and strain distribution. Virology. 1984;133:65–76. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90426-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ikeda H, Sato H, Odaka T. Mapping of the Fv-4 mouse gene controlling resistance to murine leukemia viruses. Int J Cancer. 1981;28:237–240. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910280218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ikeda H, Sugimura H. Fv-4 resistant gene: a truncated endogenous murine leukemia virus with ecotropic interference properties. J Virol. 1989;63:5405–5412. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.5405-5412.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kai K, Sato H, Odaka T. Relationship between the cellular resistance to Friend murine leukemia virus infection and the expression of murine leukemia virus-gp70-related glycoprotein on cell surface of BALB/c-Fv-4wr mice. Virology. 1986;150:509–512. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(86)90315-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kennedy A P, Sekulic A, Irvin B J, Niison A E, Dilworth S M, Abraham R T. Polyomavirus middle T antigen as a probe for T cell antigen receptor-coupled signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:11505–11513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.19.11505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lamin T, Higo K, Kubo Y, Wang Y, Lu L-M, Zhang F, Iwatani Y, Wang L, Ono T, Maeda M, Sakai H, Ishimoto A. Induction of B-cell lymphoma in BALB/c nude mice with an ecotropic, B-tropic helper virus present in the murine AIDS virus stock. J Virol. 1999;73:1640–1644. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.2.1640-1644.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lilly F. Susceptibility to two strains of Friend leukemia virus in mice. Science. 1967;155:461–462. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3761.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lilly F. Fv2: identification and location of a second gene governing the spleen focus response to Friend leukemia virus in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970;45:163–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Limjoco T I, Dickie P, Ikeda H, Silver J. Transgenic Fv-4 mice resistant to Friend virus. J Virol. 1993;67:4163–4168. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.7.4163-4168.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Limjoco T, Nihrane A, Silver J. Resistance to retroviral infection in transgenic and bone marrow chimeric mice containing Fv-4-env expressing hematopoietic cells. Virology. 1995;208:75–83. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mistrikova J, Furdikova D, Oravcova I, Rajcani J. Effect of immunosuppression on BALB/c mice infected with murine herpesvirus. Acta Virol. 1996;40:41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nakagawa Y, Kakimi K, Ling W, Kubo Y, Higo K, Masuda T, Kuribayashi K, Iwashiro M, Komatz Y, Hirama T, Adachi A, Ishimoto A. Inhibition of murine AIDS (MAIDS) development by the transplantation of bone marrow cells carrying the Fv-4 resistance gene to MAIDS virus-infected mice. J Virol. 1994;68:1438–1441. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.3.1438-1441.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Odaka T. Inheritance of susceptibility to Friend mouse leukemia virus. Int J Cancer. 1970;6:18–23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910060104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Odaka T, Yamamoto T. Inheritance of susceptibility to Friend mouse leukemia virus. II. Spleen foci method applied to test the susceptibility of crossbred progeny between a sensitive and a resistant strain. Jpn J Exp Med. 1965;35:311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Odaka T, Ikeda H, Yoshikura H, Moriwaki K, Suzuki S. Fv-4: gene controlling resistance to NB-tropic Friend murine leukemia virus. Distribution in wild mice, introduction into genetic background of BALB/c mice, and mapping of chromosomes. JNCI. 1981;67:1123–1127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Persons D A, Paulson R F, Loyd M R, Herley M T, Bodner S M, Bernstein A, Correll P H, Ney P A. Fv2 encodes a truncated form of the Stk receptor tyrosine kinase. Nat Genet. 1999;23:159–165. doi: 10.1038/13787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rowe W P, Pugh W E, Hartley J W. Plaque assay technique for murine leukemia viruses. Virology. 1970;42:1136–1139. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(70)90362-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Suzuki S. Fv-4; a new gene affecting the splenomegaly induction by Friend leukemia virus. Jpn J Exp Med. 1975;45:473–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Suzuki S, Matsubara S. Isolation of Friend leukemia virus resistant line from non-inbred mouse colony. Jpn J Exp Med. 1975;45:467–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yoshikura H, Naito Y, Moriwaki K. Unstable resistance of G mouse fibroblasts to ecotropic murine leukemia virus infection. J Virol. 1979;29:1078–1086. doi: 10.1128/jvi.29.3.1078-1086.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yoshikura H, Odaka T. Resistance of G mice to murine leukemia virus infection: apparent disparity in in vivo and in vitro resistances. JNCI. 1978;61:461–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoshikura H, Odaka T. Surface antigen expressed in hematopoietic cells derived from Fv-4r mouse strains. JNCI. 1982;68:1005–1009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES