Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Jun 22:2024.06.18.599137. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.06.18.599137

Decoupling shear stress and pressure effects in the biomechanics of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease using a perfused kidney-on-chip

Brice Lapin 1, Giacomo Gropplero 1, Jessica Vandensteen 1, Manal Mazloum 2, Frank Bienaimé 2,3, Stéphanie Descroix 1,*, Sylvie Coscoy 1,*
PMCID: PMC11212944  PMID: 38948811

Abstract

Kidney tubular cells are submitted to two distinct mechanical forces generated by the urine flow: shear stress and hydrostatic pressure. In addition, the mechanical properties of the surrounding extracellular matrix modulate tubule deformation under constraints. These mechanical factors likely play a role in the pathophysiology of kidney diseases as exemplified by autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, in which pressure, flow and matrix stiffness have been proposed to modulate the cystic dilation of tubules with PKD1 mutations. The lack of in vitro systems recapitulating the mechanical environment of kidney tubules impedes our ability to dissect the role of these mechanical factors. Here we describe a perfused kidney-on-chip with tunable extracellular matrix mechanical properties and hydrodynamic constraints, that allows a decoupling of shear stress and flow. We used this system to dissect how these mechanical cues affect Pkd1−/− tubule dilation. Our results show two distinct mechanisms leading to tubular dilation. For PCT cells (proximal tubule), overproliferation mechanically leads to tubular dilation, regardless of the mechanical context. For mIMCD-3 cells (collecting duct), tube dilation is associated with a squamous cell morphology but not with overproliferation and is highly sensitive to extracellular matrix properties and hydrodynamic constraints. Surprisingly, flow alone suppressed Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 tubule dilation observed in static conditions, while the addition of luminal pressure restored it. Our in vitro model emulating nephron geometrical and mechanical organization sheds light on the roles of mechanical constraints in ADPKD and demonstrates the importance of controlling intraluminal pressure in kidney tubule models.

Keywords: kidney-on-chip, pressure, shear stress, cyst formation, tube dilation, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Introduction

Tubule flow in the kidney results in the application of flow shear stress (FSS), leading to tangential stress on cells; the effect of which has been abundantly described in renal epithelial cell studies14. The flow rates in the nephron, which decrease in the different segments due to reabsorption events, result in shear stress in the order of 0.2–2 dyn/cm2 in renal cells 13. On renal epithelial cells, flow has been reported to reinforce the apical domain of F-actin cytoskeleton5, as well as adherens junctions and tight junctions between cells 2, to redistribute cytoskeletal tension and remodel focal adhesions 6, and to trigger the expression of specific genes, in particular associated with endocytosis and reabsorption7. Flow is also intrinsically associated with intraluminal (transmural) pressure, which triggers cell distension8 and activates mechanotransduction pathways that are potentially different to those triggered by shear stress. Epithelial renal cells are thus constantly submitted apically to hydrodynamic constraints, flow shear stress, and luminal pressure9. In addition, at their basal side they respond to the geometrical and mechanical properties of their underlying basement membrane10,11. It is now widely established that cell behavior is deeply influenced by 3D cues. More particularly, the high curvature experienced by cells in the tubule, of typical diameters of 50 μm in the proximal and distal parts, is also an important parameter governing the mechanical responses of renal cells12,13

Tubular geometry and mechanical cues are deeply affected in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). In this most common genetic kidney disease (incidence 1/1000–1/2500), mutations (mainly in PKD1 or PKD2 genes) inactivating a complex formed by polycystins 1 and 2, result in the development of thousands of kidney cysts in adulthood. This eventually leads to kidney failure, without curative therapies to date so that evolution largely leads to dialysis or transplantation14. Moreover, kidney tubules are characterized by their very dense packing, meaning that cyst expansion in ADPKD will lead to mechanical compression of the adjacent tubules. The nephron obstructions due to cyst formation result in altered flow shear stresses and luminal pressures in affected nephrons and their neighbors, which may account for the clustered and exponential propagation of cysts in the disease known as the snowball effect 15.

Polycystins 1 and 2 are respectively a large orphan receptor and a Transient Receptor Potential cation channel, coupled to numerous signaling pathways including GPCRs, mTOR, JAK-STAT or Wnt pathways16,17. Although the mechanism underlying the initial local tube dilation at the origin of cyst formation is currently thought to rely on perturbations in proliferation, apoptosis and/or planar cell polarity 1821, it remains to date poorly understood. Many aspects, however, point to an important contribution of mechanical factors in cystogenesis. Cells integrate the mechanical stimuli through several organelles, including primary cilia and cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesions, with mechanosensitive properties deeply perturbed in ADPKD10,22,23. Polycystins are present in the primary cilia, a sensor of the luminal flow, although their mechanisms of action remain elusive24,25. However, primary cilia ablation reverts the cystic phenotype in ADPKD, pointing to the primary involvement of this organelle in the disease26,27. Moreover, transcriptomic assays comparing the effect of FSS on WT or Pkd1−/− proximal cells found that several genes were slightly more induced in the latter condition, suggesting that Pkd1 here has a role in restraining FSS-regulated signaling 28.

In addition, polycystins intervene in the organization of integrin-based basal complexes as well, with overexpression of several integrins and their extracellular matrix ligands in ADPKD 29, along with a reversion of cystic phenotypes reported upon β1 integrin inactivation 30. Polycystins are also strongly involved in acto-myosin organization 10 and actin-based mechanotransduction 31, with RhoA-YAP-c-Myc axis identified as a key player in cystogenesis 32 that participates in stiffness sensing 10.

Studying biomechanical aspects of cyst formation in a mice model of ADPKD, we recently discovered that Pkd1 loss triggers the remodeling of the distal nephron basement membrane, leading to tubule distension, tubular cell stretching and increased tubule distensibility. In this context, ureteral obstruction, which increases intraluminal pressure resulted in an excessive dilation of the distal nephron followed by explosive cystogenesis suggesting that increased luminal pressure could be a biomechanical driver of ADPKD33. Few studies have addressed the specific effects of pressure dependence on polycystin expression or function3437, including mechanisms on renal cells relying on the inhibition of Piezo1-dependent stretch-activated channels35 by polycystin-2. But this electrophysiology work was not performed in the frame of a realistic tubule geometry. The influence of decoupling these contributions for tube dilation and cyst formation in ADPKD remains unknown, despite the importance of identifying their respective role in the elucidation of the mechanosensitive pathways involved and for future therapeutic applications.

A variety of 3D models reproducing realistic features of the kidney tubules, as well as some pertinent mechanical properties like perfusion or substrate elasticity, have been developed in the past few years. These models involve organoids 38,39, bioprinting tubules 40,41, or organs-on-chips based on wire molding techniques 42. However, the coupling of flow shear stress with hydraulic pressure in most experimental devices results in the fact that not only the relative contributions are not distinguished, but also that some effects observed can be attributed misleadingly to shear stress alone. In in vitro tubes, FSS and pressure contributions can however be decoupled by playing on the hydrodynamic properties of the system, like hydraulic resistance, diameter, or material mechanical properties, as described recently for endothelial cells 43.

In our past works, we developed a kidney-on-chip specifically dedicated to the study of ADPKD, by reproducing tightly packed tubes of physiological diameter in a biocompatible deformable collagen substrate, in which we observed a tube dilation specific for ADPKD proximal cells44. We recently implemented versatile possibilities of perfusion on our devices 45. In this paper, we develop an original system to decouple flow and luminal pressure in our kidney-on-chips. This allows us to dissect the effects of flow alone, flow with luminal pressure, and matrix stiffness on tubule dilation, proliferation, and multicellular morphology. We find contrasting mechanisms of tube dilation, driven or not by proliferation, depending on cell lines that originate either from proximal or distal parts of the nephron. Importantly, our results highlight the prominent role of luminal pressure for tube dilation in collecting duct cells, which is of paramount importance as cysts form first in this nephron part in ADPKD.

Methods

Kidney-on-chips.

As previously described 45, the chip consisted of a PDMS scaffold of 3 PDMS layers bonded to a glass slide. One part of the scaffold featured the microfluidic channels. For this part, a PDMS (Curing Agent to PDMS weight ratio of 1:10) was poured on a mold obtained with photolitography. This part laid on a flat PDMS membrane which elevated the channels from the glass slide. This flat PDMS layer was obtained by spincoating PDMS 1:10. On top, another flat 500 μm thick PDMS membrane closed the chip. The PDMS scaffold surface was activated by oxygen plasma and then treated with a 5% (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in methanol for 45 min, rinsed thoroughly in methanol in an ultrasonic bath then in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in ddH20 for 45min and rinsed thoroughly in ddH20 in an ultrasonic bath then at room temperature in ddh20 overnight. Then, 75 μm wide tungsten wires were inserted into the scaffold, which was sterilized with UV-Ozone. A 6mg /mL or 9 mg/mL collagen I gel was prepared on ice by neutralizing high concentration collagen gel from rat tail with NaOH and diluted in PBS with 10% of total volume with PBS 10X. The gel was injected in the collagen chambers, still on ice. The collagen was set at 37°C for 2h. Chips were then stored in PBS at 4°C up to 2 weeks before use.

Flow rate measurements.

5 μm fluorescent beads (Polysciences) in PBS were used. The flow of beads was imaged with a fluorescence microscope, and bead tracking was performed with ImageJ and the extension Trackmate. From this data, the average flow speed of beads within a channel was calculated. The flow rate corresponding to the channel was then computed. We then estimated the wall shear stress in an 80μm micron wide tubule with the same flow rate.

Cells.

Mouse PCT Pkd1+/− and Pkd1−/− cells (respectively PH2 and PN24 clones) were a kind gift of S. Somlo 46,47. These cells, containing the Immortomouse transgene for the interferon-inducible expression of a thermolabile large tumor antigen, were amplified in proliferation conditions (33°C, with γ-interferon) and differentiated in differentiation conditions (37°C, without γ-interferon). Proliferation conditions were 33°C, 5% CO2, in DMEM/HamF12 supplemented with 3% SVF, 7.5 nM Na selenite, 1.9 nM triiodo-L-thyronine, 5 mg/ml insulin, 5 mg/ml transferrin, 100 UI/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 5 mg/ml nystatin (all from Sigma), and 10UI/ml γ-interferon (Millipore). Cells were differentiated in the same media without γ-interferon, and with 1% SVF instead of 3% SVF, at 37°C, 5% CO2.

Edited mIMCD-3 cell line (immortalized cells from murine inner medullary collecting duct, deleted for Pkd1 gene using CRISPR-based genome editing or corresponding control (parental), were kindly provided by Michael Köttgen48 and cultivated in DMEM/HamF12 supplemented with 10% SVF at 37°C, 5% CO2.

Tube seeding and perfusion.

The day before seeding, wires were partially removed to form the channels, an anti-adhesion solution was perfused in the tubes during a few seconds followed by a 1-hour incubation at room temperature, and a laminin 50μg/mL solution was injected in the chip using a pressure controller and PTFE tubing followed by 1 hour-incubation at 37°C. Cells were detached from flask upon confluency with trypsin, counted and resuspended at 10 million cells /ml in complete medium. The cell suspension was then injected into collagen channels with a pressure controller via PTFE tubing until the channels were filled with cells. Then tungsten wires were inserted back into the channels to form a hollow tube. Chips were incubated in culture medium for 2 to 3 hours to let cells adhere, then tungsten wires were removed. Before perfusion, the chip channel was flushed with a pressure controller (Fluigent Flow E/Z) at 50 mbar with a 37°C PBS solution to remove unattached cells and put back in the culture medium. Chips were perfused with 3 ml TERUMO syringes attached to a microfluidic needle and maintained vertically by a homemade holder. Chips were then cultured in 6-well plates in humid atmosphere at 37°C for up to 1 week, with medium changed every two days.

Tube labeling.

Chips were washed with PBS twice before being fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 45 min. Chips were then rinsed twice in PBS and stored in PBS at 4°C before immunostaining according to our previous described procedure 45. Cells were permeabilized by submerging the chip into PBS + 0.3% TritonX100 for 30 minutes and rinsed three times for 30 minutes with PBS-BSA 2%. The chip was submerged in PBS-BSA 2% with 0.1% Tween20 and 2% Goat Serum for saturation. A 100–150 μL drop of 1/200 antibody, 2% BSA, 1% Tween20 in PBS is delicately placed on the chip so that it does not fall. Incubation is carried out for 24 hours in a humid environment at room temperature. The chip was rinsed 3 times for 30 minutes in PBS-BSA 2%. A 100 μL drop of a solution containing 1 μg/ml Hoechst, 0.25 μg/ml fluorescent phalloidin, primary antibody (rabbit anti-Ki67, Abcam, ab16667, 1:100), 2% BSA, 1% Tween-20 in PBS was delicately placed to prevent spilling. Incubation was carried out for 24 hours in a humid environment at room temperature. The secondary antibody was a 641 nm anti-rabbit highly cross-adsorbed antibody. Imaging was performed by confocal microscopy.

Quantifications.

Measurement and normalization of tube diameter was performed as previously described44. Nuclei segmentation and identification of Ki67 positive nuclei was performed in two steps, first presegmentation with the software Ilastik and construction of a training pool with each pixel assigned to nuclei, actin, or background, second segmentation, with a home-made Matlab algorithm. To compute the internuclear distance, for each nucleus, the 6 closest nuclei were determined. To filter out outliers due to border localization or isolated nuclei, we considered that the distances between nuclei and their 6 closest neighbors should follow a gaussian distribution, and only elements falling between the 1st and 3rd quartile of such distribution was kept. Then distances between nuclei and their 6 closest neighbors were averaged over each nucleus, and finally averaged over all the nuclei. To compute Ki67 positive ratio, Ki67 positive nuclei were automatically identified and counted. Then total number of Ki67 cells were divided by total number of nuclei.

Statistical analysis.

All statistical analyses were performed using the software Prism. Tubular dilation was analyzed with two tailed t-tests. Ki67 positive cell ratio were analyzed with separate two-tailed t-test between cell type for each day. Internuclear distances were analyzed with two-way ANOVA.

COMSOL simulation.

We used the COMSOL Multiphysics® software (version 5.5, COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden) to model fluid flow and luminal pressure in the kidney-on-chip. The simulations were conducted using a 3D model, which included the 5 rectangular serpentine channels followed by the round collagen channels. Each serpentine has a section with a width and height of 50 μm and were 6cm long in total. Each collagen channel had an 80μm diameter. A creeping flow was set along the channels with pressures in inlet 1 and 2 as boundary conditions. The inlet 1 pressure was set to 10 mbar in the flow configuration and 0 mbar in the flow and pressure configuration. The inlet 2 pressure was set to 0 mbar in the flow configuration and 10 mbar in the flow and pressure configuration. The computational mesh employed was the default fine physics-controlled mesh provided by COMSOL. For pressure, data were visualized with slice plots in the mid plan of the chip, extending to the total length of the microfluidic channels. For shear stress, data were visualized with slice plots showing the mid circular cross section of the collagen tubules.

Results

1. Decoupling flow and luminal pressure in kidney-on-chips.

To finely dissect the roles of flow shear stress and intraluminal pressure within the kidney tubule independently, we first optimized our previously developed kidney-on-chip system45 (Figure 1.A). Briefly, a gel of collagen type I was polymerized in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chip; this gel featured parallel 80μm hollow tubules where kidney cells of two mouse cell lines were seeded, PCT and mIMCD-3 cells. The chip not only integrated these collagen tubules but also highly resistive serpentine microfluidic channels in the PDMS bulk perfusing the tubules, which allowed to decouple flow shear stress from intraluminal pressure. Flow and pressure in chips were generated by a home-made system, consisting in medium-filled syringes controlling the hydrostatic pressure; these simple devices allowed to perform the experiments in many chips in parallel. The chips could be perfused using two different inlets (Figure 1.AB) and, depending on the inlet used and due to the important pressure drop downstream the serpentines, the intraluminal pressure in tubules was either negligible (inlet 1) or equivalent to the set inlet pressure (inlet 2). In both cases, the resulting flow shear stress would then in theory be the same, as was verified by a finite element simulation (Figure 1.C). We chose to perfuse the chip with an input of 10 mbar pressure as a typical intraluminal pressure in the kidney nephron. The serpentine geometry was set so that this pressure generates a flow shear stress in the tubules in the 0.1–1 dyn/cm², as confirmed by a finite element simulation (Figure 1.C).

Figure 1: A perfused kidney-on chip to decouple flow shear stress from intraluminal pressure.

Figure 1:

A 3D model of the chip pointing at its key features is shown in (A) with a zoom on the collagen microtubules. Depending on where the chip is perfused (B), either in the inlet 1 (top) or in the inlet 2 (bottom), we show with a finite element simulation (C) (COMSOL Multiphysics) that a pressure of 10 mbar will result in a negligible intraluminal pressure or in a 10-mbar intraluminal pressure respectively with the same flow shear stress in the tubules around 1 dyn/cm2. (D) Estimation of the intraluminal shear stress for 80μm wide tubules, calculated from measurements of the flow rates in confluent tubules of mIMCD-3 cells 1 day (n=27) and 8 days (n=20) after seeding. (Boxplots showing are 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartile, with whiskers showing extrema. Each dot represents a tubule.) (E) Impermeability of m-IMCD-3 (top) and PCT (bottom) tubules to FITC Dextran 10 kDa and 40 kDa respectively. Pictures show the temporal evolutions of one mIMCD-3 and one PCT tubule at the initial time point and after 180 min.

We experimentally measured the flow rates in tubules seeded with mIMCD-3 cells by particle tracking with 5μm fluorescent beads, to verify if the system was indeed in the expected range (Figure S1.A). From these measurements, we estimated the flow shear stress on cells lining an 80μm wide channel. We observed that 1 to 8 days after seeding, this flow shear stress remained within physiological range (Figure 1.D), although there was a notable drop in flow shear stress certainly due to cell clogging. For this reason, we restrained our study to 8 days after cell seeding. We also verified the tightness of the tubules obtained from mIMCD-3 cells and PCT cells. After perfusing confluent tubules with fluorescent dextran, looking at the fluorescence of the medium in and around the tubules, we demonstrated that mIMCD-3 cells formed a barrier for diffusion of molecules as small as 10 kDa. PCT tubules on the other hand appeared leaky for 10kDa dextran, but impermeable to 40 kDa dextran (Figure 1.E). This confirmed that the expected intraluminal pressure could build up within the tubules. Indeed, a perfusion in the flow and pressure configuration tubules lined with a confluent layer of kidney cells almost immediately led to a slight tubular dilation, not observed with naked collagen tubules (Figure S1.B).

2. Hydrodynamic constraints differentially affect the ability of Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 and PTC cells to dilate kidney tubule-on-chip.

We used cell lines generated from the proximal tubule (Pkd1+/− PCT cells) and from the collecting tubule (Pkd1+/+ mIMCD-3 cells), from which Pkd1−/− cells were generated. We previously reported the behavior of these cells in a similar tubular microenvironment but in static conditions44, where both Pkd1−/− cell lines dilated the tubules significantly more than their parental cells (Myram et al. 202144, Mazloum et al.33, Figure S2). After validation of our perfused system, we investigated the behavior of these cells submitted to a 1 dyn/cm² flow shear stress, combined or not with a 10-mbar intraluminal pressure. Parental PCT cells did not dilate tubules when subjected to flow shear stress only (Figure 2.A), while a significant dilation of Pkd1−/− tubules was observed 5 days after confluency, between 30 and 45% (95%CI). Interestingly, with flow shear stress only, the loss of Pkd1 in mIMCD-3 cells was no longer sufficient to trigger significant tubular dilation (Figure 2.B). Combining FSS with a 10-mbar intraluminal pressure led to rapid tubular dilation of both cell types after 1 day. At this early time, there was no significant difference between genotypes, with tubular diameter increasing by 26–40% and 32–58% for PCT parental and Pkd1−/− cells respectively (Figure S3.A), and by 70–92% and 70–99% for parental and Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 cells (Figure S3.B). Nevertheless, within 5 days, total dilation was clearly enhanced by the loss of Pkd1, with PCT tubules dilating by 49–75% for parental cells but 86–125% for Pkd1−/− cells (Figure 2.C, left). The combination of FSS with intraluminal pressure restored the excessive dilation of mIMCD-3 Pkd1−/− tubules, with dilation levels reaching 2.3–2.9 times (95% CI) - almost 4 times in extreme cases - the initial diameter after 5 days (Figure 2.D, left). These results suggested that dilation specific to the Pkd1 status occurred mostly between day 1 and day 5. Worthy of note, we also observed a different pattern between PCT and mIMCD-3 parental cells. If parental PCT tubules still dilated by 20% on average past the initial dilation, there was only little deformation of parental mIMCD-3 tubules with dilation levels after D1 well below 10% (Figure 2.CD right, D5/D1).

Figure 2: Under flow shear stress, loss of Pkd1 leads to increased enlargement of PCT tubules, but intraluminal pressure is necessary for increased enlargement of mIMCD-3 tubules.

Figure 2:

PCT (A,C) or mIMCD-3 (B, D) tubules were perfused after seeding without intraluminal pressure (A,B) or with intraluminal pressure (C,D). Representative tubules are shown in these configurations, on the day of confluency and one or several days after confluency. Mean diameters of the tubules 5 days after confluency normalized by their mean diameters at the day of confluency (D5/D0) are indicated. In the flow+pressure condition, characterized by Pkd1−/− dilation for both cell types, the evolution following the initial dilation is also quantified, with diameters at day 5 normalized by diameter at day 1 (D5/D1, right). Parental PCT cells (blue, A, flow n=29, C, flow+pressure n=39), PCT Pkd1−/− cells (green, A, flow n=41, C, flow+pressure n=30), parental mIMCD-3 cells (blue, B, flow n=41, D, flow+pressure n=25) and mIMCD-3 Pkd1−/− cells (green, B, flow n=47, D, flow+pressure n=19). Each dot represents a tubule (ns: p-value>0.05, *: p-value≤0.05, **: p-value≤0.01, ****: pvalue≤0.0001, actual p-values are indicated below the symbols). Scale bars: 100μm.

3. Pkd1-dependent tube dilation upon flow + pressure is prevented by increasing the collagen concentration for mIMCD-3 cells, but not for PCT cells.

As seen above, an intraluminal pressure of 10 mbar combined with FSS was sufficient to trigger tubular dilations, regardless of Pkd1 status or cell type, in a 6mg/mL collagen I matrix. As ex vivo perfusion experiments demonstrated49, the matrix surrounding kidney tubules, more specifically the basement membrane, constitutes the principal barrier preventing tubular dilation when intraluminal pressure increases. To assess the importance of the surrounding matrix properties in Pkd1-dependent tubular dilation mechanisms, we cultivated on-chip mIMCD-3 and PCT cells in scaffolds with increased collagen I concentration (9 mg/mL; Figure 3). We previously measured by tensile tests the Young modulus of 6 and 10 mg/mL collagen I gels employed in our study at 55±15 kPa to 86±47 kPa respectively (Bernheim-Dennery et al., unpublished data). The relative increase in Young modulus thus remains moderate and is corroborated by a comprehensive review of existing literature, where we observe a quadratic relationship between the gel’s Young’s modulus and its concentration5053.

Figure 3: Increase in pressure-driven tubular dilation due to loss of Pkd1 is mitigated by denser extracellular matrix in mIMCD-3 tubules but not in PCT tubules.

Figure 3:

To study the impact of matrix mechanical properties on pressure-driven dilation, PCT and mIMCD-3 cells were cultured under flow with intraluminal pressure in a denser 9 mg/mL collagen I matrix instead of 6 mg/mL Here representative PCT (A) and mIMCD-3 (B) tubules are shown in this configuration. On the right of these images are plotted the mean diameters of the tubules 5 days after confluency normalized by their mean diameters at the day of confluency (left, D5/D0) and 1 day after confluency (right, D5/D1). As reference, median and 95% confidence interval of analogous experiment in a 6mg/mL collagen gel are indicated by dark grey superimposed lines. (A) PCT tubules still display higher levels of dilation for Pkd1−/− cells (green, n=26) than parental ones (blue, n=28). (B) On contrary, for mIMCD-3 tubes there is no longer significant difference between the Pkd1−/− (green, n=25) and parental cells (blue, n=24). Boxplots shown are 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartile, with whiskers showing extrema. Each dot represents a tubule (ns: p-value>0.05, *: p-value≤0.05, ****: p-value≤0.0001, actual p-values are indicated below the symbols). Scale bars: 100μm.

This matrix modification limited tubular dilation under flow + pressure conditions for parental cells of both cell types, but more markedly for mIMCD-3 cells. Dilations at day 5 fell for PCT at 46–68%, compared to 49–79% at 6 mg/mL, and for mIMCD-3 cells at 43–71%, compared to 78–110% at 6 mg/mL (95% CI) (Figure 3.AB left, figure 2). Like for collagen 6 mg/mL, between day 1 and day 5, parental PCT tubules dilated by 20% on average when parental mIMCD-3 tubules exhibited levels of dilation way below 10%. The differences between PCT and mIMCD-3 cell lines were even more striking in the case of Pkd1−/− cells. No decrease in dilation between tubules in a 6 and 9 mg/mL collagen matrix could be observed for Pkd1−/− PCT, with diameter still increasing by 92–128% at day 5 (Figure 3.A). However, Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 cells displayed a behavior much more sensitive to the matrix properties. Not only dilation decreased noticeably compared to tubules in 6mg/mL, but the tubule diameter increases at day 5 (41–57%) was no longer significantly different to parental tubules. Past the initial dilation, the mean tubule diameter appeared to stall, increasing only around 12% between day 1 and day 5 (Figure 3.B).

4. Proliferation and morphology of the epithelium upon hydrodynamic stimulations suggest the existence of two dilation mechanisms due to loss of Pkd1.

The observed differences in tubular dilations as a function of hydrodynamic cues could be explained with differences either in net cell proliferation or/and with changes of cell morphology modulating the surface covered by the tissue. To unravel the cellular mechanisms involved in tubular dilation, we assessed levels of proliferation (KI67 labelling), as well as cell morphology. The mean internuclear distance within a tubule was used as a proxy for cell spreading.

In PCT tubules subjected to flow only (Figure 4.A), the levels of proliferation at day 1 were similar on average between parental and Pkd1−/− cells (Figure 4.B). At day 5, most Pkd1−/− tubules were still at least as proliferative as at day 1, with 5–9% Ki67 positive cells at day 1 and 9–16% (95%CI) at day 5 and were on average an order of magnitude more proliferative than parental cells tubules (Figure 4.B). Parental and Pkd1−/− cells were hard to tell apart in terms of morphology and organization within the tissue at day 1, with no significant difference in internuclear distance. Sustained proliferation levels in Pkd1−/− tubules resulted in denser tissues at day 5 as shown by cell morphology (Figure 4.A, S4-A) and was confirmed by a decrease in internuclear distance (Figure 4.C). Furthermore, in most instances we observed the formation of multilayers constituted of a few cells.

Figure 4: In PCT tubules, loss of Pkd1 leads to higher proliferation levels and denser tissues.

Figure 4:

PCT tubules left under flow without pressure (A) or under flow with pressure (D) were fixed 1 day and 5 days after confluency in 6 mg/mL collagen I matrix, 5 days after confluency in 9 mg/mL collagen, and stained for nuclei (blue), F-actin (green), and Ki-67 (red). Cell proliferation was quantified by computing the ratio of Ki67 positive nuclei over the total number of nuclei (B, E); comparisons between parental (blue) and Pkd1−/− cells (green) are shown. Cell morphology was assessed by measuring the average internuclear distance within each tubule (C, F) as a proxy for cell spreading. For internuclear distance, either parental (blue) or Pkd1−/− (green) values are shown side to side, to focus on the relative evolution in cell spreading related to time or matrix properties. (B-C) PCT tubes under flow, control Pkd1+/− at day 1 and day 5 (n=19 and n=39), and Pkd1−/− at day 1 and day 5 (n=17 and n=44), (E-F) PCT tubes under flow+pressure, control Pkd1+/ at day 1, day 5 and day 5 in 9mg/mL collagen (n=28, n=51 and n=19 respectively) and Pkd1−/− at day 1, day 5 and day 5 in 9mg/mL collagen (n=24, n=57 and n=23 respectively). Boxplots shown are 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartile, with whiskers showing extrema. Each dot represents a tubule, (ns: p-value>0.05, *: p-value≤0.05, ****: p-value≤0.0001, actual p-values are indicated below the symbols). Scale bars: 50μm. Overall, Pkd1−/− cells exhibit higher proliferation levels than the parental cells. This correlates with Pkd1−/− tubules that become denser over time under flow and often form multilayer in all conditions.

Applying intraluminal pressure initially increased PCT proliferation, irrespective of Pkd1 genotype (Figure 4.D). Overall, however, proliferation levels dropped drastically 5 days after confluency compared to experiments without intraluminal pressure. Nonetheless, Pkd1−/− tubules sustained higher proliferation levels than parental cells tubules, with a statistically significant difference of 4–7% vs. 2–4% Ki67-positive cells respectively (Figure 4.E). This result suggests that for these cells intraluminal pressure initially induces a high rate of proliferation, irrespective of Pkd1, but importantly, over the course of 5 days, Pkd1−/− cells are more proliferative than parental cells. Interestingly, this time, parental cells tubules became denser over time (Figure 4.F, S4.B). This coincides with these cells adopting a more cuboidal shape than with flow only, more reminiscent of in vivo proximal tubule cells. Pkd1−/− cell morphology and density remained stable over time and comparable to parental cells. However, Pkd1−/− cells still formed multilayers of a few cells. Increasing matrix density had no sizeable impact either on cell density or on proliferation (Figure 4EF, S4.B).

In mIMCD-3 tubules with flow only (Figure 5.A), we observed a similar increase in proliferation at late stages (day 5) linked to the loss of Pkd1. Initially at day1, the proportion of Ki-67 positive cells was 9–16% and 10–27% (95%CI) for Pkd1−/− and parental cells respectively, but it strongly increased to 21–29% for Pkd1−/− cells at day 5 compared to only 3–6% for parental cells (Figure 5.B). This increased proliferation also translated into an increased density for mIMCD-3 Pkd1−/− cells, shown by a decrease in internuclear distance (Figure 5.C). Contrary to PCT cells, this increased proliferation did not induce significant tubular dilation. It is worth noting that flow shear stress promoted for these cells a more cuboidal shape over time compared to our previous observations (Figure 5.A, S5-A).

Figure 5: In mIMCD-3 tubules, increased tubular dilation is not correlated to higher proliferation levels but to increased cell spreading.

Figure 5:

mIMCD-3 tubules left under flow without pressure (A) or under flow with pressure (D) were fixed 1 day and 5 days after confluency in 6 mg/mL collagen I matrix, 5 days after confluency in 9 mg/mL collagen, and stained for nuclei (blue), F-actin (green), and Ki-67 (red). Cell proliferation was quantified by computing the ratio of Ki67 positive nuclei over the total number of nuclei (B, E); comparisons between parental (blue) and Pkd1−/− cells (green) are shown. Cell morphology was assessed by measuring the average internuclear distance within each tubule (C, F) as a proxy for cell spreading. For internuclear distance, either parental (blue) or Pkd1−/− (green) values are shown side to side, to focus on the relative evolution in cell spreading related to time or matrix properties. (B-C) mIMCD-3 tubes under flow, control parental cells at day 1 and day 5 (n=14 and n=15), and Pkd1−/− cells at day 1 and day 5 (n=11 and n=18), (E-F) mIMCD-3 tubes under flow+pressure, control parental cells at day 1, day 5 and day 5 in 9mg/mL collagen (n=15, n=24, n=25 respectively) and Pkd1−/− cells at day 1, day 5 and day 5 in 9mg/mL collagen (n=15, n=26, n=25 respectively). Boxplots shown are 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartile, with whiskers showing extrema. Each dot represents a tubule (ns: p-value>0.05, *: p-value≤0.05, **: p-value≤0.01, **: p-value≤0.001 ***: p-value≤0.0001, actual p-values are indicated below the symbols). Scale bars: 50μm. Contrary to PCT tubules, higher proliferation levels are associated with Pkd1−/− tubules only under flow without intraluminal pressure that become denser over time. Under flow with luminal pressure, however, if parental cells get significantly denser over time, Pkd1−/− cells become significantly more spread. This intraluminal pressure effect is mitigated by a denser matrix.

Contrary to PCT, addition of intraluminal pressure (Figure 5.D) did not initially have a sizeable impact on mIMCD3 proliferation (Figure 5.E). Interestingly however, at day 5 the ratio of Pkd1−/− cells in the cell cycle appeared to have decreased by at least an order of magnitude and there was no longer a significant difference with parental cells. In contrast, the difference in cell morphology and density between Pkd1−/− and parental cells was striking (Figure 5.D, S5-B). Initially it was hard to distinguish between Pkd1−/− and parental cells based on appearance and by using the internuclear distance criteria (Figure 5DE, S5-B, day1). However, at day 5 Pkd1−/− cells adopted a squamous morphology and the tissue became less dense (Figure 5DE, S5-B, day5). Parental cells followed an opposite trend wherein the cells looked more cuboidal keeping a similar cell density. These results suggest that, for mIMCD-3, the excessive dilation of Pkd1 tubule does not originate from enhanced proliferation but is correlated with the acquisition of a squamous morphology in response to intraluminal pressure. Increasing the matrix concentration favored the formation of denser tissues in both parental and Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 tubes (Figure 5DE, S5-B, day5, 9mg/mL). For Pkd1−/− cells in particular, the cell morphology was similar to the initial morphology in a 6mg/mL matrix, which further suggests that Pkd1-dependent tubular dilation for mIMCD-3 and an abnormally squamous cell morphology are two intertwined events.

Discussion

In a kidney-on-chip with deformable tubes of physiological dimensions, formed in a scaffold with tunable mechanical properties, we developed a method to decouple flow and luminal pressure. We propose here an innovative solution to decouple two generally intricate mechanical stimuli, pressure, and flow shear stress, relying on classic microfabrication technics and perfusion with ubiquitous material. Our platform is modulable and allows to run in parallel a great number of different replicates for different mechanical conditions. We applied this system to specifically investigate how these mechanical parameters affect the shape and organization of tubules formed by kidney epithelial cell lines derived either from proximal (PCT) or distal (mIMCD-3) mouse nephron. In each of the cell lines, we further studied how these mechanical parameters affect the excessive tubule dilation caused by polycystin-1 inactivation.

Compared to the results that we obtained in static conditions (Myram et al44., Figure S2, Mazloum et al33), applying flow shear stress with negligible pressure helped to maintain a stable hollow tubular geometry, limiting epithelial multilayering and cell accumulation in tubule lumen. Irrespective of the cell line considered, further applying pressure led to a progressive increase in tubule diameter, suggesting that all the studied cell lines respond to pressure. This pressure-induced dilation appeared to be initially independent of genotype and can be most likely attributed to the mechanical stimuli induced by the elastic response of the confluent tubules. However, this initial response appeared to be followed by a cell-specific deformation of the tubules, indicating that different mechanisms more complex than a response to an elastic deformation under pressure are at play. Overall, cell responses to these mechanical parameters were contrasted, depending not only on Pkd1 status but also on the cell line considered. PCT expressing Pkd1 adopted a more physiological shape when exposed to pressure, becoming more cuboidal and forming denser tissues only when adding intraluminal pressure, a behavior not observed in mIMCD-3 cells. This differential response may be linked to the physiologic exposure to pressure of the nephron segments from which those cell lines originate, as pressure drops from the proximal tubule to the distal nephron.

Strikingly, while Pkd1 deletion in both PCT and mIMCD-3 led to excessive tubule dilation in static conditions, this phenotype was differentially affected by mechanical parameters across cell lines. Essentially, Pkd1-deficient PCT tubules underwent excessive dilation, increased proliferation and cell crowding, irrespective of pressure, flow or ECM stiffness conditions. This excessive proliferation of Pkd1−/− PCT further led to cell crowding and epithelial multilayering, suggesting defective contact inhibition.

In contrast, the ability of Pkd1-deficient mIMCD-3 cells to deform their scaffold was drastically impacted by the mechanical conditions applied. Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 cells dilated the ECM scaffold more than the parental line in static conditions in a 6 mg/mL collagen scaffold (Figure S2, Mazloum et al33). Applying shear stress alone prevented the excessive dilation of the tubule formed by Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 despite an increased proliferation. The absence of multilayering may suggest an enhanced regulation of the tissue homeostasis possibly through apical extrusion. Surprisingly, adding luminal pressure overcame the protective effect of flow shear stress and restored the ability of Pkd1−/− to distend the ECM scaffold. In contrast, wild-type mIMCD-3 cells lacked in most cases this ability to distend the ECM past a rapid initial dilation. Increasing ECM concentration prevented the excessive dilation of the tubules formed by Pkd1−/− mIMCD-3 under flow+pressure conditions. In addition, contrary to PCT cells, the excessive dilation of the tubule formed by Pkd1-deficient mIMCD-3 under pressure was not caused by increased cell proliferation but was associated with cell flattening, which was also prevented by an increase in ECM concentration. This suggests that cell flattening and tubule dilation for these cells are intertwined events in a tubule distension.

Interestingly, a discrepancy between the effect of ECM concentration over this distension and the associated matrix stiffening points to a nonlinear response of the tubule pertaining to an increase in matrix concentration. This nonlinear relationship between tissue mechanics and tubule response highlights how -cell matrix interactions play a critical role in shaping Pkd1−/− mICD3 tubule. Note that the basement membrane deposited by cells was not directly quantified here; nonetheless, in vivo parallel experiments demonstrated that early distal dilation were accompanied by a thinning of the basement membrane and the secretion of matrix softeners33. Furthermore, it has already been observed that loss of Pkd1 in other in vitro models with mIMCD-3 cells is accompanied by abnormal matrix deposition and cell-matrix interactions54.

Our results unveil two distinct mechanisms leading to tubular dilation due to the loss of Pkd1. For the PCT, over-proliferation mechanically leads to tubular dilation regardless of mechanical constraints, hydrodynamic or from the extracellular matrix properties. For mIMCD-3 cells, a squamous cell phenotype favors tubular dilation through a mechanism both sensitive to the matrix properties and intraluminal hydrodynamic constraints but not associated with increased proliferation. The surprising results obtained with mIMCD-3 remarkably recapitulates our parallel in-vivo results33 regarding the initial dilation of Pkd1-deficient distal tubule mice, which undergoes distension without a detectable increase in tubular cell proliferation index. The effect of pressure on tubule-on-chip dilation further echoes the effect of ureteral obstruction, which precipitates cyst formation specifically in the distended distal nephron. Importantly, the finding that the ability of Pkd1- deficient mIMCD-3 cells to dilate tube is not only impacted by flow shear stress but also by luminal pressure and matrix stiffness suggests that PC1 is connected to different mechanosensitive circuits responding to distinct physical parameters.

The results obtained with PCT only partially coincide with the behavior of Pkd1-deficient proximal tubule in vivo. Increased cell proliferation and relative insensitivity to increased pressure are notable similarities. However, cell crowding as well as the striking formation of a multilayered epithelial layers are not observed in most orthologous ADPKD mice models33,55. This phenotype is nonetheless reminiscent of the micro-polyp and cord-like hyperplasia features found in a few percent of human ADPKD cysts56.

In conclusion, with this work, we show the importance of a specific control of intraluminal pressure in kidney tubule models, more particularly in the context of polycystic kidney disease. Here, it allowed us to demonstrate that even moderate levels of hydrostatic pressures have specific effects on kidney cells in pathological and non-pathological contexts, with mechanisms that may differ depending on the nephron segment. Although there were recent studies in different systems (blood microvessels57) decoupling pressure from flow shear stress, tubular kidney models have not separately dissected the role of these two mechanical stresses arising from perfusion. Thus, with future in vitro kidney models, a specific control of the effects of flow and pressure could be pivotal to decipher the mechanisms underlying diseases such as ADPKD but also more generally, to improve the biomimicry of these systems.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements.

The authors acknowledge all the members of the MMBM and PBME groups for their precious support in the process development and in microfabrication. We are grateful to Sarah Myram, Sophie Demolombe, Eric Honoré, Bénédicte Delaval, Abdul Barakat, Jacques Fattacciolo, Pierre Ucla, Isabelle Bonnet, Pascal Silberzan and Axel Buguin for insightful discussions, and to Polina Rapoport and Lorraine Couteau for their participation in the experiments. We thank George M. O’Brien Kidney Center at Yale (NIH P30 DK079310) and Stefan Somlo for the kind gift of PCT Pkd1+/ and PCT Pkd1−/− cell lines and Michael Köttgen, Lukas Westermann and Tilman Busch, Freiburg University, for the kind gift of mIMCD-3 control and Pkd1-KO cell lines. This work benefited from the technical contribution of the joint service unit CNRS UAR 3750. The authors would like to thank the engineers of this unit (in particular Bertrand Cinquin) for their advice during the development of the experiments. The authors greatly acknowledge the Cell and Tissue Imaging core facility (PICT-IBiSA), Institut Curie, member of the French National Research Infrastructure France-BioImaging (ANR10-INBS-04).

Funding.

This work was supported by a doctoral grant from AMX (“Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement supérieur”, France) (recipient B. Lapin), and the ‘Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale’ (FRM, recipient B. Lapin, program FDT ; Fondation Durlach). It was supported by the European Commission grant FET Open program (FETOPEN-01–2016-2017). This work has received the support of ‘Association Polykystose France’, provided by the ‘Société Francophone de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation’ (SFNDT). This work has received the support of "Institut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes" laboratoire d’excellence, “Investissements d’avenir” program ANR-10-IDEX-0001–02. This work received support from the grants ANR-11-LABX-0038, ANR-10-IDEX-0001–02 (LabEx CelTisPhyBio - Cell(n)Scale). This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université and Institut Curie.

Footnotes

Disclosure statement. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  • 1.Essig M, Terzi F, Burtin M, Friedlander G. Mechanical strains induced by tubular flow affect the phenotype of proximal tubular cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281(4):F751–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duan Y, Gotoh N, Yan Q, et al. Shear-induced reorganization of renal proximal tubule cell actin cytoskeleton and apical junctional complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(32):11418–11423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verma D, Bajpai VK, Ye N, et al. Flow induced adherens junction remodeling driven by cytoskeletal forces. Exp Cell Res. 2017;359(2). doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kunnen SJ, Malas TB, Semeins CM, Bakker AD, Peters DJM. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of fluid shear stress altered gene expression in renal epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Essig M, Friedlander G. Tubular shear stress and phenotype of renal proximal tubular cells. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2003;14(SUPPL. 1). doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000067650.43083.df [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Verma D, Meng F, Sachs F, Hua SZ. Flow-induced focal adhesion remodeling mediated by local cytoskeletal stresses and reorganization. Cell Adh Migr. 2015;9(6):432–440. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1089379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ross EJ, Gordon ER, Sothers H, et al. Three dimensional modeling of biologically relevant fluid shear stress in human renal tubule cells mimics in vivo transcriptional profiles. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93570-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Della Corte M, Viggiano D. Wall Tension and Tubular Resistance in Kidney Cystic Conditions. Biomedicines. 2023;11(6). doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weimbs T. Polycystic kidney disease and renal injury repair: common pathways, fluid flow, and the function of polycystin-1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;293(5):F1423–32. doi:00275.2007 [pii] 10.1152/ajprenal.00275.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nigro EA, Distefano G, Chiaravalli M, et al. Polycystin-1 Regulates Actomyosin Contraction and the Cellular Response to Extracellular Stiffness. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53061-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee K, Boctor S, Barisoni LMC, Gusella GL. Inactivation of integrin-β1 prevents the development of polycystic kidney disease after the loss of polycystin-1. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2015;26(4):888–895. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013111179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xi W, Sonam S, Beng Saw T, Ladoux B, Teck Lim C. Emergent patterns of collective cell migration under tubular confinement. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01390-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Venzac B, Madoun R, Benarab T, et al. Engineering small tubes with changes in diameter for the study of kidney cell organization. Biomicrofluidics. 2018;12(2). doi: 10.1063/1.5025027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torres VE, Harris PC. Mechanisms of Disease: Autosomal dominant and recessive polycystic kidney diseases. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2(1):40–55. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leonhard WN, Zandbergen M, Veraar K, et al. Scattered Deletion of PKD1 in Kidneys Causes a Cystic Snowball Effect and Recapitulates Polycystic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(6):1322–1333. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013080864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cornec-Le Gall E, Audrezet MP, Le Meur Y, Chen JM, Ferec C. Genetics and pathogenesis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: 20 years on. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(12):1393–1406. doi: 10.1002/humu.22708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Douguet D, Patel A, Honoré E. Structure and function of polycystins: insights into polycystic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. Published online 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0143-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boca M, Distefano G, Qian F, Bhunia AK, Germino GG, Boletta A. Polycystin-1 induces resistance to apoptosis through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(3):637–647. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Castelli M, Boca M, Chiaravalli M, et al. Polycystin-1 binds Par3/aPKC and controls convergent extension during renal tubular morphogenesis. Nat Commun. 2013;4. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee EJ. Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in ADPKD. In: Cystogenesis. Vol 933. ; 2016:25–34. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2041-4_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fischer E, Legue E, Doyen A, et al. Defective planar cell polarity in polycystic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2006;38(1):21–23. doi: 10.1038/ng1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhoonderowa L, Hameurlaine F, Arbabian A, Faqir F, Amblard F, Coscoy S. Polycystins and intercellular mechanotransduction: A precise dosage of polycystin 2 is necessary for alpha-actinin reinforcement of junctions upon mechanical stimulation. Exp Cell Res. 2016;348(1):23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Flores D, Battini L, Gusella GL, Rohatgi R. Fluid Shear Stress Induces Renal Epithelial Gene Expression through Polycystin-2-Dependent Trafficking of Extracellular Regulated Kinase. Nephron Physiol. 2011;117(4):p27. doi: 10.1159/000321640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nauli SM, Alenghat FJ, Luo Y, et al. Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells. Nat Genet. 2003;33(2):129–137. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12514735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Delling M, Indzhykulian AA, Liu X, et al. Primary cilia are not calcium-responsive mechanosensors. Nature. 2016;531(7596):656–660. doi:nature17426 [pii] 10.1038/nature17426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma M, Tian X, Igarashi P, Pazour GJ, Somlo S. Loss of cilia suppresses cyst growth in genetic models of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Nat Genet. Published online 2013. doi: 10.1038/ng.2715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Viau A, Bienaimé F, Lukas K, et al. Cilialocalized LKB 1 regulates chemokine signaling, macrophage recruitment, and tissue homeostasis in the kidney. EMBO J. 2018;37(15). doi: 10.15252/EMBJ.201798615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kunnen SJ, Malas TB, Formica C, Leonhard WN, ’t Hoen PAC, Peters DJM. Comparative transcriptomics of shear stress treated Pkd1−/− cells and pre-cystic kidneys reveals pathways involved in early polycystic kidney disease. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;108:1123–1134. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2018.07.178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Reif G, Wallace DP. Extracellular matrix, integrins, and focal adhesion signaling in polycystic kidney disease. Cell Signal. 2020;72. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee K, Boctor S, Barisoni LMC, Gusella GL. Inactivation of integrin-β1 prevents the development of polycystic kidney disease after the loss of polycystin-1. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. Published online 2015. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013111179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bhoonderowa L, Hameurlaine F, Arbabian A, Faqir F, Amblard F, Coscoy S. Polycystins and intercellular mechanotransduction: A precise dosage of polycystin 2 is necessary for alpha-actinin reinforcement of junctions upon mechanical stimulation. Exp Cell Res. 2016;348(1). doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cai J, Song X, Wang W, et al. A RhoA–YAP–c-Myc signaling axis promotes the development of polycystic kidney disease. Genes Dev. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1101/gad.315127.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mazloum M, Lapin B, Viau A, et al. Cilia to basement membrane signalling is a biomechanical driver of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. bioRxiv. Published online June 9, 2024:2024.06.06.597723. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.06.597723 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sharif-Naeini R, Folgering JH, Bichet D, et al. Polycystin-1 and -2 dosage regulates pressure sensing. Cell. 2009;139(3):587–596. doi:S0092–8674(09)01125–8 [pii] 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peyronnet R, Martins JR, Duprat F, et al. Piezo1-dependent stretch-activated channels are inhibited by Polycystin-2 in renal tubular epithelial cells. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(12):1143–1148. doi:embor2013170 [pii] 10.1038/embor.2013.170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zoi I, Gargalionis AN, Papavassiliou KA, et al. Polycystin-1 and hydrostatic pressure are implicated in glioblastoma pathogenesis in vitro. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(5). doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Montalbetti N, Li Q, Gonzalez-Perrett S, Semprine J, Chen XZ, Cantiello HF. Effect of hydro-osmotic pressure on polycystin-2 channel function in the human syncytiotrophoblast. Pflugers Arch. 2005;451(1):294–303. doi: 10.1007/s00424-005-1458-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hiratsuka K, Miyoshi T, Kroll KT, et al. Organoid-on-a-chip model of human ARPKD reveals mechanosensing pathomechanisms for drug discovery. Sci Adv. 2022;8(38). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq0866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cruz NM, Song X, Czerniecki SM, et al. Organoid cystogenesis reveals a critical role of microenvironment in human polycystic kidney disease. Nat Mater. 2017;16(11). doi: 10.1038/NMAT4994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. Bioprinting of 3D Convoluted Renal Proximal Tubules on Perfusable Chips. Sci Rep. 2016;6. doi: 10.1038/srep34845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lin NYC, Homan KA, Robinson SS, et al. Renal reabsorption in 3D vascularized proximal tubule models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(12):5399–5404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815208116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weber EJ, Chapron A, Chapron BD, et al. Development of a microphysiological model of human kidney proximal tubule function. Kidney Int. Published online 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dessalles CA, Ramón-Lozano C, Babataheri A, Barakat AI. Luminal flow actuation generates coupled shear and strain in a microvessel-on-chip. Biofabrication. 2022;14(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac2baa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Myram S, Venzac B, Lapin B, et al. A Multitubular Kidney-on-Chip to Decipher Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Renal Cystic Diseases. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/FBIOE.2021.624553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lapin B, Myram S, Nguyen ML, Gropplero G, Coscoy S, Descroix S. Construction of a Multitubular Perfusable Kidney-on-Chip for the Study of Renal Diseases. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2664:85–106. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3179-9_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Joly D, Ishibe S, Nickel C, Yu Z, Somlo S, Cantley LG. The polycystin 1-C-terminal fragment stimulates ERK-dependent spreading of renal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(36):26329–26339. doi:M601373200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M601373200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wei F, Karihaloo A, Yu Z, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin suppresses cyst growth by Pkd1 null cells in vitro and in vivo. Kidney Int. 2008;74(10):1310–1318. doi:ki2008395 [pii] 10.1038/ki.2008.395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hofherr A, Busch T, Huber N, et al. Efficient genome editing of differentiated renal epithelial cells. Pflugers Arch. 2017;469(2):303–311. doi: 10.1007/S00424-016-1924-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Welling LW, Grantham JJ. Physical Properties of Isolated Perfused Renal Tubules and Tubular Basement Membranes. Vol 19. American Society of Nephrology; 1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Raub CB, Putnam AJ, Tromberg BJ, George SC. Predicting bulk mechanical properties of cellularized collagen gels using multiphoton microscopy. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(12):4657. doi: 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lama M, Raveendranathan B, Brun J, et al. Biomimetic Tough Gels with Weak Bonds Unravel the Role of Collagen from Fibril to Suprafibrillar Self-Assembly. Macromol Biosci. 2021;21(6):2000435. doi: 10.1002/MABI.202000435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vidmar CS, Bazzi M, Lai VK. Computational and experimental comparison on the effects of flow-induced compression on the permeability of collagen gels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;128:105107. doi: 10.1016/J.JMBBM.2022.105107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Verhulsel M, Shivokhin M E, Simon A, et al. High bandwidth noninvasive measurements of the linear viscoelasticity of collagen gels. J Rheol (N Y N Y). 2016;60(6):1269–1278. doi: 10.1122/1.4965039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Subramanian B, Ko WC, Yadav V, et al. The Regulation of Cystogenesis in a Tissue Engineered Kidney Disease System by Abnormal Matrix Interactions. Biomaterials. 2012;33(33):8383. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2012.08.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dong K, Zhang C, Tian X, et al. Renal plasticity revealed through reversal of polycystic kidney disease in mice. Nat Genet. 2021;53(12):1649. doi: 10.1038/S41588-021-00946-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grantham JJ, Geiser JL, Evan AP. Cyst formation and growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 1987;31(5):1145–1152. doi: 10.1038/KI.1987.121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dessalles CA, Ramón-Lozano C, Babataheri A, Barakat AI. Luminal flow actuation generates coupled shear and strain in a microvessel-on-chip. Biofabrication. 2021;14(1). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/AC2BAA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES