Abstract
Background
It is currently unknown whether high-resolution 3D-mapping and micro-electrodes add meaningful benefits in catheter ablation of Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and challenging, e.g. para-Hisian accessory pathways (APs).
Objectives
To compare the mapping resolution, acute success and complication rates in patients with WPW syndrome undergoing a first-time catheter ablation using only a contact force-sensing ablation catheter for mapping or a multi-electrode high-resolution mapping catheter.
Methods
Fifty consecutive 3D-mapping procedures for WPW syndrome using a 3.5-mm ablation catheter (n = 27) or a multi-electrode high-resolution catheter (n = 23) were retrospectively analyzed regarding mapping resolution defined as first 5/10 msec isochronal activation area, number of RF applications to achieve AP block, occurence of AP automaticity during RF delivery, and acute success and complication rates.
Results
Catheter ablation was successful in 48/50 patients with a median of 1 (IQR 1–2) RF applications. Compared to ablation catheter mapping, high-resolution mapping showed a significantly smaller isochronal activation area in the first 5/10 msec (1.25 ± 0.29 vs 0.15 ± 0.03 cm2; P < 0.001 and 3.41 ± 0.58 vs 0.55 ± 0.12 cm2; P < 0.0001) and significantly higher incidence of AP automaticity during RF delivery (0 vs 22 %; P < 0.05). In para-Hisian APs, micro-electrodes recorded distinct His electrograms and AP potentials without fusion and without AP bumping permitting safe and effective para-Hisian AP ablation.
Conclusions
High-resolution mapping increases the mapping accuracy of the AP and its insertion site leading to a significantly higher incidence of AP automaticity during RF delivery. Micro-electrodes provide clinically relevant advantages in para-hisian AP mapping improving efficacy and safety of para-Hisian AP ablation.
1. Background
Three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping is recommended for challenging accessory pathways (APs) [1]. In this context it is unknown whether high-resolution 3D-mapping and the use of micro-electrodes provide additional benefits. Due to the susceptibility to record fused electrograms (EGMs), ablation catheters with large 3.5-mm tip electrode appear to be suboptimal for AP mapping. In contrast, high-resolution 3D-mapping with closely-spaced micro-electrodes can record tiny AP potentials without atrial or ventricular electrogram fusion [2] which may be beneficial for mapping of challenging, particularly para-Hisian APs. The aim of this study therefore was to compare the mapping resolution, acute success and complication rates in Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome patients undergoing 3D-mapping and catheter ablation of atrioventricular and para-Hisian APs using only a contact force (CF)-sensing ablation catheter for mapping or a dedicated multi-electrode high-resolution mapping catheter.
2. Methods
2.1. Study population
We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients undergoing 3D-mapping and first-time catheter ablation for WPW syndrome by four experienced electrophysiologists at our institution from July 2022 – November 2023. Point-by-point mapping was mainly done at the Bad Krozingen site and high-resolution 3D-mapping was mainly done at the Freiburg site. All patients provided written informed consent for mapping and ablation and anonymized retrospective data collection was approved by the local institutional review board of the University of Freiburg, Germany. Indications for EP study and catheter ablation were based on the current ESC guidelines [3].
2.2. EP study
AADs were discontinued for at least 5 half-lives prior to the procedure. Conscious sedation with midazolam, fentanyl and propofol was used in the majority of patients. A 6F or 7F deca- or duodecapolar catheter (Inquiry, Abbott or CristaCath, Biosense Webster) was advanced in the coronary sinus (CS) and up to three 4F quadripolar catheters were positioned at the RV apex, His bundle and right atrial appendage. In case of inducible SVT, standard pacing maneuvers were carried out to verify AP participation in the SVT circuit. In patients with left-sided pathways, left atrial access was obtained via a PFO or transseptal puncture guided by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography, or intracardiac echocardiography (AcuNav, Siemens Medical Solutions). A Heparin bolus was given after groin puncture prior to left atrial access followed by continuous Heparin administration to maintain an ACT > 300 sec.
2.3. Mapping
Electro-anatomical maps were acquired using the CARTO3 system (Biosense Webster) during mainly paced rhythms ensuring conduction over the AP in order to measure the area activated in the first 5 or 10 msec. Point-by-point mapping was done with a ThermoCool SmartTouch with 3.5-mm tip electrode (n = 27). Multi-electrode high resolution 3D-mapping was performed with a Penta-/Octaray (n = 11/12) using closely spaced bipoles with 2-mm interelectrode spacing (1-mm ring- or 0.5-mm micro-electrodes with 2-6-2- or 2-2-2-2-2-mm edge-to-edge spacing). Adequate tissue contact was achieved by a CF > 5 g or by observing a physical deformation of the catheter splines in the mapping system when pressed against the tissue wall. A steerable 8.5F Agilis NxT (Abbott) or Vizigo (Biosense Webster) sheath was used to increase stability, e.g. in para-Hisian APs. In the high-resolution cohort points were continuously acquired with strict filter settings (intracardiac CS/QRS reference with pattern matching ≥ 90/98 %, cycle length/local activation time stability: ± 2 ms, position stability: ± 2 mm, tissue proximity indicator: on). Uni- and bipolar EGMs were filtered at 2–240 and 16–500 Hz, respectively. EGMs were automatically annotated to the maximal unipolar dV/dt (wavefront algorithm) and AP potentials and His signals were annotated manually. The fill color threshold and internal point filter were kept at a minimum of 5 mm to avoid interpolation and cavity far-field potentials. Open window mapping (OWM) [4] and the extended-early-meets-late feature were used to highlight the electrical annulus leaving a visible gap only in presence of AP potentials [2]. Fluoroscopy use was minimized following the ALARA principle [5].
2.4. Catheter ablation
The AP potential or the earliest 5 or 10 msec isochronal activation area, i.e. the AP body or its insertion site, served as ablation targets [6]. In all patients catheter ablation was performed via a transfemoral venous approach with power-controlled radiofrequency (RF) energy at 25–50 W using an irrigated CF-sensing Thermocool SmartTouch or Thermocool SmartTouch Surround Flow (Biosense Webster). If Adenosine testing had been negative (no recovery of ante- nor retrograde AP conduction), there was no systematic waiting period.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 5.01. Categorical variables were reported as absolute and percentage values. Continuous data were presented as mean ± SD or mean ± SEM for normally distributed data and median (IQR) for nonnormally distributed data. Comparison of variables were analyzed by Student’s t, χ2, Fisher’s exact or Mann-Whitney test.
3. Results
Fifty mostly male patients aged 42 ± 17 years with a single AP were included in the analysis (Table 1). Most APs were manifest and located at the anterior to lateral mitral anulus followed by postero-septal and para-Hisian locations. Catheter ablation was successful in 48 of 50 patients (one failure in each group) with a median of 1 (IQR 1–2) RF applications (Table 2). There was no instance of AV block, two right bundle branch blocks (RBBB) associated with para-Hisian AP ablation (one in each group), and three minor groin complications. The mean fluoroscopy time and dose area product were lower in the ablation catheter group due to a refined ultra low-dose protocol and 30 % right posteroseptal APs with fluoroless approach. The mean procedure time was 120 ± 7 min with non-significant shorter procedure times associated with ablation (Abl) catheter mapping. There was no significant difference in the rate of AP potential detection (52 vs 52 %; P = 1) or AP elimination with the first RF delivery (52 vs 65 %; P = 0.76). However, high-resolution mapping showed a significantly smaller isochronal area activated in the first 5/10 msec (1.25 ± 0.29 vs 0.15 ± 0.03 cm2; P < 0.001 and 3.41 ± 0.58 vs 0.55 ± 0.12 cm2; P < 0.0001) and a significantly higher incidence of AP automaticity during RF delivery (0 vs 22 %; P < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 1.
Parameter | All patients (n = 50) |
Abl mapping (n = 27) |
ME mapping (n = 23) |
P value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patient characteristics | ||||
Age (y) | 42 ± 17 (26–56) | 41 ± 14 (30–54) | 43 ± 20 (22–60) | 0.65 |
Male sex | 36 (72) | 18 (66) | 18 (78) | 0.55 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 26.7 ± 0.7 | 26.5 ± 0.8 | 26.9 ± 1.1 | 0.78 |
Accessory pathway characteristics | ||||
Manifest | 33 (66) | 15 (55) | 18 (78) | 0.14 |
Decremental | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 0.45 |
Left anterior | 5 (10) | 4 (15) | 1 (4) | 0.38 |
Left antero-lateral | 6 (12) | 1 (4) | 5 (22) | 0.08 |
Left lateral | 10 (20) | 5 (19) | 5 (22) | 0.72 |
Left postero-lateral | 4 (8) | 1 (4) | 3 (13) | 0.32 |
Left posterior | 2 (4) | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | 1.0 |
Left postero-septal | 3 (6) | 2 (7) | 1 (4) | 1.0 |
Right postero-septal | 9 (18) | 8 (30) | 1 (4) | 0.03 |
Right-sided | 4 (8) | 2 (7) | 2 (9) | 1.0 |
Para-Hisian | 7 (14) | 3 (11) | 4 (17) | 0.69 |
Values are n (%), n, mean ± SD, mean ± SE, or median (IQR).
*P values by Student’s t test, χ2, Fisher’s exact or Mann-Whitney test.
P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Table 2.
Parameter | All patients (n = 50) |
Abl mapping (n = 27) |
ME mapping (n = 23) |
P value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Procedural data | ||||
Acute success | 48 (96) | 26 (96) | 22 (96) | 1.0 |
Complications | 5 (10) | 2 (7,4) | 3 (13,0) | 0.64 |
Adenosine testing | 38 (76) | 18 (67) | 20 (87) | 0.11 |
Adenosine dose, mg | 18.8 ± 0.5 | 17.9 ± 0.9 | 19.5 ± 0.7 | 0.18 |
Fluoroscopy time, min | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 8.2 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
Dose Area Product, µGy x m2 | 95.6 ± 16.9 | 34.1 ± 9.8 | 166.8 ± 28.7 | <0.0001 |
Procedure time, min | 120 ± 7 | 111 ± 10 | 138 ± 8 | 0.08 |
Mapping and ablation data | ||||
AP potential | 25 (50) | 13 (52) | 12 (52) | 1.0 |
Isochronal area (initial 5-ms) , cm2 |
0.70 ± 0.17 | 1.25 ± 0.29 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | <0.001 |
Isochronal area (initial 10-ms) , cm2 |
1.94 ± 0.37 | 3.41 ± 0.58 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | <0.0001 |
RF deliveries to AP block | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | 0.71 |
AP elimination with 1st RF | 28 (61) | 15 (52) | 13 (65) | 0.76 |
AP automaticity during RF | 5 (10) | 0 (0) | 5 (22) | <0.05 |
Values are n (%), n, mean ± SE, or median (IQR).
*P values by Student’s t test, χ2, Fisher’s exact or Mann-Whitney test.
P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
4. Discussion
The present study sought to assess the role of high-resolution 3D mapping vs point-by-point ablation catheter mapping in WPW patients undergoing catheter ablation, with particular focus on the impact of micro-electrodes on para-Hisian AP mapping.
Across all AP locations there was no significant difference between both mapping strategies regarding detection rates of AP potentials and AP elimination with the first RF delivery, stressing again the importance of a countercurrent paced wavefront to expose the AP potential as reported by Jackman [7]. Compared to Abl mapping, high-resolution mapping with closely spaced bipoles increases the mapping accuracy of the AP and its insertion site significantly which may be particularly relevant for para-Hisian APs where the His bundle is usually concealed by overlapping atrial and ventricular EGMs [22]. Indeed, various strategies to avoid AV block in these challenging pathways have been reported, e.g. by identifying the His bundle with ablation catheter-embedded micro-electrodes [8] and low-output near-field His capture [9], or by using distant ablation targets in the ventricle and aortic cusps [10], [11], [12]. Nevertheless, ablation catheters appear to have significant limitations for para-Hisian AP mapping: First, the relatively stiff 8F ablation catheter is 9x bigger than an AP (mean diameter 300 µm) [8], [13] and is oriented perpendicular to the tissue plane during mapping thereby increasing the risk of bumping which occurred in 3/7 of our patients (Fig. 1). Indeed, Berte et al also report para-Hisian AP bumping with the Abl in the same patient in three consecutive procedures [8] and AP bumping occurred in up to 20 % of anteroseptal APs in a large Chinese series with a 30 % recurrence rate after ablation at the bumping site [14]. Second, the large 3.5-mm tip electrode (surface area 27 mm2) is prone to record far-field signals and fused EGMs making a clear discrimination of atrial, ventricular, His and para-Hisian AP potentials challenging (Fig. 1 [10]). In contrast, the soft and flexible 2F Octaray splines and closely spaced micro-electrodes (surface area 0.9 mm2) are oriented parallel to the tissue plane which minimizes the risk of AP bumping while maximizing the electro-anatomical resolution [15], [16], [17]. The bipolar EGM resolution is further increased by an internal unipolar reference electrode that enhances the near- while reducing the impact of cavity far-field signals [2]. Indeed, this higher electro-anatomical resolution of the Octaray allowed to record distinct antegrade His EGMs without fusion despite pre-excitation (Fig. 2) and identified the exact para-Hisian AP localization and AP insertion site as evidenced by AP block in < 1 sec. of RF delivery (Fig. 2/3). Compared to the Pentaray catheter with closely spaced bipoles the Octaray with close 2-mm spacing allowed to determine the direction of impulse propagation with one catheter position (Suppl Fig. 1/3) which was particularly useful in para-Hisian APs to confirm the origin of EGMs as atrial, His and ventricular. While Abl mapping caused para-Hisian AP bumping in a signifcant proportion of our patients requiring a second procedure in 2/3, the soft and flexible 2F Octaray splines recorded > 20.000/40.000 points, respectively without AP bumping (Videos 1/2) permitting safe and effective para-Hisian AP ablation. Mapping the right bundle branch with the Octaray as previously shown by us [2] may also prevent RBBB in para-Hisian AP ablation.
AP automaticity is a relatively rare phenomenon that has been reported to occur only after RF delivery in atrioventricular APs [18], [19], [20], [21]. Another result of this study is the novel finding that high-resolution mapping is associated with AP automaticity during RF delivery in a significant proportion of atrioventricular APs similar to junctional and Mahaim automaticity in slow pathway and atriofascicular fiber ablation. AP automaticity was observed only with high-resolution mapping in 33 % of the Octaray procedures reflecting its high mapping resolution resulting in RF delivery directly to the AP (Fig. 1/2 and Suppl Fig. 3). We are aware of two experienced EP colleagues from Argentina and Germany, Dres. Alberto Alfie and Patrick Müller, who have made similar observations that corroborate our findings. Similar to slow pathway and Mahaim fiber ablation the implication may be that one should continue to deliver RF energy whenever AP automaticity occurs. Future studies are needed to assess the true prevalence of AP automaticity with the use of high-resolution mapping and whether occurrence and complete elimination of AP automaticity predicts long-term success in catheter ablation of WPW syndrome.
In summary, high-resolution mapping with micro-electrodes provides quantitative and qualitative advantages in AP mapping. In our experience there is an indication for the use of high-resolution mapping with micro-electrodes in high-risk APs located near the His bundle where atraumatic mapping and increased mapping resolution are critically important.
4.1. Study limitations
The limitations relate to the relatively small sample size and the non-randomized, retrospective nature of this study where point-by-point and multi-electrode mapping were mainly performed by different operators. In addition, AP potentials were not systematically validated by pacing maneuvers.
5. Conclusions
Multi-electrode catheters with closely spaced bipoles increase the mapping accuracy of the AP and its insertion site leading to a higher incidence of AP automaticity during RF delivery in catheter ablation of WPW syndrome. In para-Hisian APs, micro-electrodes provide clinically relevant advantages by recording distinct AP potentials and distinct His EGMs without fusion and without persistent AP bumping permitting safe and effective para-Hisian AP ablation.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Johannes Steinfurt: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Alexander Gressler: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Judith Stuplich: Writing – review & editing. Eike Jordan: Writing – review & editing. Markus Jäckel: Writing – review & editing. Diona Gjermeni: Writing – review & editing. Martin Eichenlaub: Writing – review & editing. Marius Bohnen: Writing – review & editing. Armin Luik: Writing – review & editing. Amir Jadidi: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Thomas S. Faber: Writing – review & editing. Brigitte Stiller: Writing – review & editing. Dirk Westermann: Writing – review & editing. Thomas Arentz: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Heiko Lehrmann: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization. Denis Fedorov: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant support.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the responsible institutional review board at the University of Freiburg (approval-no.: 21-1160).
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101435.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Kim Y.-H., Chen S.-A., Ernst S., Guzman C.E., Han S., Kalarus Z., Labadet C., Lin Y.-J., Lo L.-W., Nogami A., Saad E.B., Sapp J., Sticherling C., Tilz R., Tung R., Kim Y.G., Stiles M.K. 2019 APHRS expert consensus statement on three-dimensional mapping systems for tachycardia developed in collaboration with HRS, EHRA, and LAHRS. J. Arrhythmia. 2020;36(2):215–270. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steinfurt J., Dall'Aglio P.B., Hugenschmidt J., Stuplich J., Jäckel M., Jordan E., Lehrmann H., Faber T.S., Gressler A., Jadidi A.S., Westermann D., Arentz T., Trolese L. Initial Clinical Experience with a Novel 8-Spline High-Resolution Mapping Catheter. 2022;8:1067–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brugada J., Katritsis D.G., Arbelo E., Arribas F., Bax J.J., Blomstrom-Lundqvist C., Calkins H., Corrado D., Deftereos S.G., Diller G.P., Gomez-Doblas J.J., Gorenek B., Grace A., Ho S.Y., Kaski J.C., Kuck K.H., Lambiase P.D., Sacher F., Sarquella-Brugada G., Suwalski P., Zaza A. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardiaThe Task Force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2020;41(5):655–720. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schricker A.A., Winkle R., Moskovitz R., Suchomel L., Fowler S., Engel G., Cho S., Salcedo J., Woods C.E. Open-window mapping of accessory pathways utilizing high-density mapping. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 2021;61(3):525–533. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00850-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sommer P., Sciacca V., Anselmino M., Tilz R., Bourier F., Lehrmann H., Bulava A. Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review. EP Europace. 2023;25(7) doi: 10.1093/europace/euad191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spector P., Habel N. Principles of differential diagnostic pacing maneuvers: serial versus parallel conduction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2014;37(7):909–922. doi: 10.1111/pace.12425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jackman W.M. Accessory pathway recording and ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(5):833–834. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berte B., Hilfiker G., Mahida S., Wielandts J.-Y., Almorad A., Knecht S., Shah D., Vijgen J., Duytschaever M., Kobza R. High-resolution parahisian mapping and ablation using microelectrode embedded ablation catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(4):548–559. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Y. Xue, X. Zhan, S. Wu, H. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Liao, H. Deng, X. Duan, S. Zeng, D. Liang, A. Elvan, X. Fang, H. Liao, A.R. Ramdat Misier, J.J.J. Smit, A. Metzner, C.H. Heeger, F. Liu, F. Wang, Z. Zhang, K.H. Kuck, S. Yen Ho, F. Ouyang, Experimental, Pathologic, and Clinical Findings of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Para-Hisian Region From the Right Ventricle in Dogs and Humans, Circ. Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 10(6) (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Jackman W.M., Wang X.Z., Friday K.J., Roman C.A., Moulton K.P., Beckman K.J., McClelland J.H., Twidale N., Hazlitt H.A., Prior M.I., et al. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;324(23):1605–1611. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106063242301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Letsas K.P., Efremidis M., Vlachos K., Georgopoulos S., Karamichalakis N., Saplaouras A., Xydonas S., Valkanas K., Sideris A. Catheter ablation of anteroseptal accessory pathways from the aortic cusps: A case series and a review of the literature. J. Arrhythmia. 2016;32(6):443–448. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chokr M., Moura L., Aiello V., Sousa Í., Lopes H., Carmo A., Pisani C., Hardy C., Melo S., Scanavacca M. Catheter ablation of the parahisian accessory pathways from the aortic cusps. Experience of 20 cases: Improving the mapping strategy for better results. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2020;31 doi: 10.1111/jce.14499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basso C., Corrado D., Rossi L., Thiene G. Ventricular preexcitation in children and young adults: atrial myocarditis as a possible trigger of sudden death. Circulation. 2001;103(2):269–275. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.2.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang J.-D., Sun Q., Guo X.-G., Zhou G.-B., Liu X., Wei H.-Q., Xie H.-Y., Ma J. Outcomes of Different Ablation Approaches for Para-Hisian Accessory Pathway and Ablation Safety at Each Site. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;8 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.821988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Bakker J.M. Electrogram recording and analyzing techniques to optimize selection of target sites for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2019;42(12):1503–1516. doi: 10.1111/pace.13817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tung R., Ellenbogen K.A. Emergence of Multielectrode Mapping: On the Road to Higher Resolution. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2016;9(6) doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Berte B., Zeppenfeld K., Tung R. Impact of Micro-, Mini- and Multi-Electrode Mapping on Ventricular Substrate Characterisation. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev. 2020;9(3):128–135. doi: 10.15420/aer.2020.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deam A.G., Burton M.E., Walter P.F., Langberg J.J. Wide Complex Tachycardia Due to Automaticity in an Accessory Pathway. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 1995;18(11):2106–2108. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Macle L., Shah D.C., Jaïs P., Haïssaguerre M. Accessory pathway automaticity after radiofrequency ablation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2002;13(3):285–287. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tseng Z.H., Yadav A.V., Scheinman M.M. Catecholamine dependent accessory pathway automaticity. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2004;27(7):1005–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arias M.A., Sánchez A.M. Automaticity with anterograde conduction of a concealed accessory pathway due to radiofrequency energy application. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008;129(1):e30–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.06.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prystowsky E.N., Browne K.F., Zipes D.P. Intracardiac recording by catheter electrode of accessory pathway depolarization. J. Am. College Cardiol. 1983;1(2_Part_1):468–470. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.