Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 17;132(6):067004. doi: 10.1289/EHP13947

Figure 4.

Figure 4 is an error bar graph, plotting hazard ratio (95 percent confidence interval), ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 in increments of 0.5 (y-axis) across meters, ranging from 100 to 250 in increments of 150, 250 to 500 in increments of 250, and 500 to 1,000 in increments of 500 (x-axis) for model 1 and model 2.

Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of residential greenness at different buffers on depression incidence (per IQR increase) among SAGE participants in China (n=8,481). Model 1 included crude models without controlling for any covariates. Model 2 included models adjusted for the covariates from the DAG, including sex, age, marital status, urbanicity, education, annual family income, and region. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the linear relationship. The error bars in the figure are the 95% CI and the dots and triangles are the HR. Table S7 corresponds to this figure. Note: CI, confidence interval; DAG, directed acyclic graph; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; SAGE, Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health.