Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Jul 2;12:RP87561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87561

ER-to-lysosome Ca2+ refilling followed by K+ efflux-coupled store-operated Ca2+ entry in inflammasome activation and metabolic inflammation

Hyereen Kang 1,, Seong Woo Choi 2,, Joo Young Kim 3, Soo-Jin Oh 4, Sung Joon Kim 5,, Myung-Shik Lee 1,4,
Editors: Pramod K Mistry6, Pramod K Mistry7
PMCID: PMC11219040  PMID: 38953285

Abstract

We studied lysosomal Ca2+ in inflammasome. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + palmitic acid (PA) decreased lysosomal Ca2+ ([Ca2+]Lys) and increased [Ca2+]i through mitochondrial ROS, which was suppressed in Trpm2-KO macrophages. Inflammasome activation and metabolic inflammation in adipose tissue of high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice were ameliorated by Trpm2 KO. ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling occurred after lysosomal Ca2+ release whose blockade attenuated LPS + PA-induced inflammasome. Subsequently, store-operated Ca2+entry (SOCE) was activated whose inhibition suppressed inflammasome. SOCE was coupled with K+ efflux whose inhibition reduced ER Ca2+ content ([Ca2+]ER) and impaired [Ca2+]Lys recovery. LPS + PA activated KCa3.1 channel, a Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Inhibitors of KCa3.1 channel or Kcnn4 KO reduced [Ca2+]ER, attenuated increase of [Ca2+]i or inflammasome activation by LPS + PA, and ameliorated HFD-induced inflammasome or metabolic inflammation. Lysosomal Ca2+ release induced delayed JNK and ASC phosphorylation through CAMKII-ASK1. These results suggest a novel role of lysosomal Ca2+ release sustained by ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling and K+ efflux through KCa3.1 channel in inflammasome activation and metabolic inflammation.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

Lysosomotropic agents are classical inflammasome activators (Hornung et al., 2008; Misawa et al., 2013; Xian et al., 2022). The detailed mechanism of inflammasome activation by lysosomal stress has been unclear, while roles of lysosomal Ca2+ release were suggested (Okada et al., 2014). K+ efflux is crucial in most inflammasome activations, facilitating NLRP3-NEK7 oligomerization (He et al., 2016; Sharif et al., 2019). The relationship between K+ efflux and Ca2+ flux in inflammasome has hardly been studied, despite their potential link (Yaron et al., 2015).

We studied lysosomal events in inflammasome focusing on the roles of lysosomal Ca2+ release by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + palmitic acid (PA), an effector of metabolic stress (Nakamura et al., 2009) (LP). We found that LP induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) that activates a lysosomal Ca2+ efflux channel (TRPM2), leading to lysosomal Ca2+ release, delayed JNK activation, ASC phosphorylation, and inflammasome activation. We also found occurrence of ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling sustaining lysosomal Ca2+ efflux and subsequent store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in inflammasome. Finally, we elucidated the roles of K+ efflux facilitating SOCE through hyperpolarization-accelerated extracellular Ca2+ influx (Guéguinou et al., 2014), and identified KCa3.1 Ca2+-activated K+ channel as the K+ efflux channel in LP-induced inflammasome and metabolic inflammation.

Results

Lysosomal Ca2+ release by mitochondrial ROS in inflammasome

We investigated whether lysosomal Ca2+ release occurs in inflammasome activation by LP, a combination activating inflammasome related to metabolic inflammation (Wen et al., 2011). When we studied perilysosomal Ca2+ release in bone marrow-derived macrophages (MΦs) (BMDMs) transfected with GCaMP3-ML1 (Shen et al., 2012), lysosomal Ca2+ release was not directly visualized by LP; however, perilysosomal Ca2+ release by Gly-Phe β-naphthylamide (GPN), a lysosomotropic agent (Shen et al., 2012), was significantly reduced (Figure 1A, Figure 1—source data 1), suggesting preemptying or release of lysosomal Ca2+ by LP, similar to the results using other inducers of lysosomal Ca2+ release (Park et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016). We next measured lysosomal Ca2+ content ([Ca2+]Lys) that can be affected by lysosomal Ca2+ release. [Ca2+]Lys determined using Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD) was significantly lowered by LP (Figure 1B, Figure 1—source data 1), consistent with lysosomal Ca2+ release. Likely due to lysosomal Ca2+ release, [Ca2+]i measured by Fluo-3-AM staining was significantly increased by LP (Figure 1C, Figure 1—source data 1). Ratiometric [Ca2+]i measurement using Fura-2 to avoid uneven loading or quenching validated [Ca2+]i increase by LP (Figure 1C, Figure 1—source data 1). Functional roles of increased [Ca2+]i in inflammasome by LP were revealed by abrogation of IL-1β release or IL-1β maturation by BAPTA-AM, a cell-permeable Ca2+ chelator (Figure 1D and E, Figure 1—source data 1 and 2). Immunoblotting (IB) demonstrated that pro-IL-1β level was not notably affected by BAPTA-AM, suggesting that the effect of BAPTA-AM was unrelated to the potential inhibition of pro-IL-1β transcription or translation (Figure 1E, Figure 1—source data 2).

Figure 1. Lysosomal Ca2+ and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflammasome.

(A) Perilysosomal fluorescence after applying GPN to GCaMP3-ML1-transfected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pretreatment for 3 hr (left) (actual LP treatment time is 1 hr). Peak fluorescence (right) (n = 6). (B) [Ca2+]Lys in Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD)-loaded MΦs treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 8). (C) [Ca2+]i in MΦs treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined using Fluo-3-AM staining (middle) or Fura-2 (right). Representative Fluo-3 images (left) (n = 7 for BSA; n = 6 for LPS; n = 13 for LP). (D) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating peritoneal MΦs with LPS alone or palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of BAPTA-AM (n = 3). (E) Immunoblotting (IB) of lysate of peritoneal MΦs treated with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of BAPTA-AM or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), using indicated Abs. (F) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of MitoTEMPOL (n = 3). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by two-tailed Student’s t-test (A, B), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (C), or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (D, F) (ns, not significant). Scale bars, 20 μm.

Figure 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
Figure 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflammasome activation by lipopolysaccharide + palmitic acid (LPS + PA) (LP).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Cellular ROS in peritoneal MΦs treated with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by confocal microscopy after CM-H2DCFDA loading (right). Representative confocal images (left) (scale bar, 50 μm). (B) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) (n = 3). (C) [Ca2+]i in MΦs treated with LPS alone for 4 hr or with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of NAC, determined by confocal microscopy after Fluo-3-AM loading (middle) or ratiometric measurement after Fura-2 loading (right). Representative Fluo-3 fluorescence images (left) (scale bar, 20 μm) (n = 13 for BSA, Fluo-3-AM; n = 12 for LPS, Fluo-3-AM; n = 26 for LP, Fluo-3-AM; n = 17 for LP + NAC, Fluo-3-AM; n = 19 for BSA, Fura-2; n = 23 for LP, Fura-2; n = 23 for LP + BAPTA-AM, Fura-2; n = 21 for LP + NAC, Fura-2). (D) Mitochondrial ROS in MΦs treated with PA alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of MitoTEMPOL, determined by flow cytometry after MitoSOX staining (right). Representative histograms (left) (n = 3). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A, C, D), or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (B).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.

We next studied the mechanism of lysosomal Ca2+ release by LP. Since several (lysosomal) ion channels can be activated by ROS (Zhang et al., 2016) and ROS can be produced by PA due to mitochondrial complex inhibition (Nakamura et al., 2009), we studied ROS accumulation. LP effectively induced CM-H2DCFDA fluorescence indicating ROS accumulation, while PA alone or LPS alone induced only a little ROS accumulation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting synergistic effect of LPS and PA. When we studied the roles of ROS in [Ca2+]i increase using N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant (Tardiolo et al., 2018), release and maturation of IL-1β by LP were significantly reduced (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B, Figure 1E, Figure 1—source data 2, Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1). NAC abrogated LP-induced increase of [Ca2+]i as well (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1), substantiating the functional roles of ROS in [Ca2+]i increase and inflammasome activation. We also studied mitochondrial ROS because mitochondria is a well-known target of PA, an effector of metabolic stress (Nakamura et al., 2009) and critical in inflammasome (Xian et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2011). Using MitoSOX, we observed significant mitochondrial ROS accumulation by LP. When we quenched mitochondrial ROS using MitoTEMPOL (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1), IL-1β release by LP was significantly reduced (Figure 1F, Figure 1—source data 1), suggesting crucial roles of mitochondrial ROS in LP-induced inflammasome.

Ca2+ release through lysosomal TRPM2 channel in inflammasome

We next studied which lysosomal Ca2+ exit channel is involved in lysosomal Ca2+ release by LP. Previous papers suggested the roles of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) channel on the plasma membrane, in inflammasome by other stimulators (Tseng et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020). We hypothesized that TRPM2 on lysosome could be involved in LP-induced inflammasome since TRPM2 has been reported to be expressed on lysosome as well (Sumoza-Toledo and Penner, 2011) and Trpm2-KO mice are resistant to diet-induced glucose intolerance (Zhang et al., 2012). We verified the expression of TRPM2 on lysosome of BMDMs by colocalization of TRPM2 and LAMP2 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). While the physiological ligand of TRPM2 is ADP-ribose (ADPR), ROS can activate TRPM2 by increasing ADPR production from poly-ADPR (Wang et al., 2020). We thus studied the effects of apigenin or quercetin inhibiting ADPR generation through CD38 inhibition (Bock, 2020; Nam et al., 2020). Inflammasome by LP was significantly inhibited by apigenin or quercetin (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B, Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that TRPM2 participates in inflammasome by LP. [Ca2+]i increase by LP was also reduced by apigenin or quercetin (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C, Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1), supporting that apigenin or quercetin suppresses inflammasome through the inhibition of lysosomal Ca2+ channels activated by ADPR such as TRPM2. Since apigenin or quercetin has effects other than CD38 inhibition (Li et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2020), we employed Trpm2-KO mice. [Ca2+]i increase and [Ca2+]Lys decrease by LP were abrogated in Trpm2-KO MΦs (Figure 2A and B, Figure 2—source data 1), suggesting the roles of TRPM2 in lysosomal Ca2+ release by LP. However, ROS production by LP was not changed by Trpm2 KO (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D, Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that TRPM2 is downstream of ROS. Importantly, inflammasome activation assessed by IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant or IB of peritoneal MΦ lysate after LP treatment was significantly reduced by Trpm2 KO (Figure 2C, Figure 2—source data 1 and 2), indicating the roles of TRPM2, likely lysosomal TRPM2, in inflammasome by LP. ASC speck formation, a marker of inflammasome, by LP was also markedly reduced by Trpm2 KO (Figure 2D, Figure 2—source data 1). When we employed other activators, inflammasome activation by L-Leucyl-L-Leucine methyl ester (LLOMe) or monosodium urate (MSU), lysosomotropic agents, was significantly inhibited by Trpm2 KO. However, inflammasome by nigericin, an ionophore exchanging K+ for H+ or ATP acting on P2X7 ion channel on the plasma membrane (Campden and Zhang, 2019), was not significantly affected (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E, Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that TRPM2 channel is crucial in inflammasome involving lysosomal Ca2+.

Figure 2. Lysosomal Ca2+ efflux through TRPM2 in inflammasome.

(A) [Ca2+]i in peritoneal MΦs treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone for 4 hr or with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined using Fluo-3-AM (middle) or Fura-2 (right). Representative Fluo-3 images (left) (n = 8 for Fluo-3-AM; n = 9 for Fura-2). (B) [Ca2+]Lys in MΦs treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD) loading (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 5) (C) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant (upper) and immunoblotting (IB) of cell lysate using indicated Abs after treatment of MΦs with LPS alone for 21 hr or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 (lower). (n = 4) (D) The number of ASC specks in MΦs treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by immunofluorescence using anti-ASC Ab (right). Representative confocal images (left) (n = 4 for Trpm2+/+:BSA; n = 5 for Trpm2+/+: LP; n = 5 for Trpm2-/-:BSA; n = 7 for Trpm2-/-:LP) Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A, B, D), or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test or Bonferroni test (C). Scale bars, 20 μm.

Figure 2—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
Figure 2—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Effect of CD38 inhibitors and Trpm2 KO on inflammasome.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Confocal microscopy was conducted after immunofluorescence staining of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) using anti-TRPM2 and LAMP2 Abs. Yellow spots indicate TRPM2 on lysosome (rectangles were magnified). (B) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating peritoneal MΦs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of apigenin or quercetin (n = 3). (C) [Ca2+]i in peritoneal MΦs treated with LPS alone for 4 hr or with LP for a total of a 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of apigenin or quercetin, determined by confocal microscopy after Fluo-3-AM loading (lower left) or ratiometric measurement after Fura-2 loading (lower right). Representative Fluo-3 fluorescence images (upper) (n = 4 for BSA, Fluo-3-AM; n = 4 for LP, Fluo-3-AM; n = 4 for LP + apigenin, Fluo-3-AM; n = 4 for LP + quercetin, Fluo-3-AM; n = 13 for BSA, Fura-2; n = 16 for LP, Fura-2; n = 20 for LP + apigenin, Fura-2; n = 13 for LP + quercetin, Fura-2). (D) Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in MΦs from Trpm2+/+ or Trpm2-/- mice treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by CM-H2DCFDA staining (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 4). (E) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant of peritoneal MΦs from Trpm2+/+ or Trpm2-/- mice treated with PA, nigericin, ATP, L-leucyl-L-leucine methyl ester (LLOMe), and monosodium urate (MSU) for 18 hr, 45 min, 1 hr, 45 min, and 3 hr, respectively, after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 3). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (C, D) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (B, E). Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.

Despite its crucial role in inflammasome by LP, TRPM2 exists on both plasma membrane and lysosome. We thus studied whether plasma membrane TRPM2 current can be activated by LP employing N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid (ACA), an inhibitor of TRPM2 (Kraft et al., 2006). ACA could inhibit IL-1β release by LP as expected (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Intracellular dialysis using cyclic ADPR induced slow inward current on the plasma membrane, which was inhibited by ACA (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1). The amplitude of cyclic ADPR-induced inward current was not affected by PA and/or LPS (b–c in Figure 3—figure supplement 1B and C, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1). Basal inward current inhibited by ACA, that is, unstimulated TRPM2 activity, was also not changed by PA and/or LPS (a–c in Figure 3—figure supplement 1B and C, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that LP neither affects nor induces plasma membrane TRPM2 current and that lysosomal TRPM2 is likely important in LP-induced inflammasome. To further study the roles of lysosomal TRPM2 in inflammasome activation by LP, we employed bafilomycin A1 emptying lysosomal Ca2+ reservoir through lysosomal v-ATPase inhibition (Kinnear et al., 2004; Lange et al., 2009). TRPM2-dependent [Ca2+]i increase by LP was abrogated by bafilomycin A1 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1), strongly supporting Ca2+ release through lysosomal TRPM2 by LP.

Ameliorated metabolic inflammation by Trpm2 KO

Since lysosomal TRPM2 is likely involved in inflammasome by LP, we next studied the roles of TRPM2 in inflammasome and metabolic inflammation in vivo. Nonfasting blood glucose was significantly lower in Trpm2-KO mice on high-fat diet (HFD) compared to control mice on HFD (Figure 3A, Figure 3—source data 1), while body weight was not different between them (Figure 3—figure supplement 1E, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1). Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) showed significantly ameliorated glucose intolerance and reduced area under the curve (AUC) in Trpm2-KO mice on HFD (Figure 3B, Figure 3—source data 1). HOMA-IR, an index of insulin resistance, was also significantly reduced in Trpm2-KO mice on HFD (Figure 3—figure supplement 1F, Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1).

Figure 3. Ameliorated metabolic inflammation by Trpm2 KO.

(A) Nonfasting blood glucose of mice on normal chow diet (NCD) (n = 5 each) or high-fat diet (HFD) (n = 8 each). (*comparison between Trpm2+/+ and Trpm2-/- mice on HFD). (B) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) after NCD (n = 5 each) or HFD (n = 8 each) feeding for 8 weeks (left). Area under the curve (AUC) (right). (C) The number of crown-like structures (CLS) in while adipose tissue (WAT) after HFD feeding for 8 weeks (right). Representative H&E sections (left) (scale bar, 50 μm) (n = 8 each). (D) The number of ASC specks in WAT after HFD feeding for 8 weeks, determined by immunofluorescence using anti-ASC Ab (right). Representative confocal images (left) (scale bar, 20 μm) (insets, magnified) (n = 7 each). (E) Immunoblotting (IB) of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of WAT after HFD feeding for 8 weeks using indicated Abs (n = 3). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by two-way ANOVA (B) or two-tailed Student’s t-test (A, C, D).

Figure 3—source data 1. Original data for blood glucose, and the number of CLS and ASC specks.
Figure 3—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Plasma membrane TRPM2 current in MΦs and metabolic profile of Trpm2-KO mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of N‐(p‐amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid (ACA) (n = 3). (B) Whole-cell patch clamp recording with 200 μM of cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) in pipette solution. At - 60 mV of holding voltage, development of inward current representing activation of TRPM2 by diffusion of cADPR to the cytosol was monitored in MΦs treated with carrier alone (BSA), PA alone or LPS alone for 4 hr, or LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr. Also, 20 μM of ACA, a selective inhibitor of TRPM2, was applied to bath solution after confirming the steady-state activity inward current. (C) Amplitude of cADPR-induced inward current (b–c in B) (left group of the bar graph), and that of basal inward current inhibited by ACA (a–c in B) (right group of the bar graph) (n = 19 for BSA; n = 9 for PA; n = 10 for LPS; n = 9 for LP). (D) [Ca2+]i in MΦs from Trpm2+/+ and Trpm2-/- mice treated with LP for 1 hr in the presence or absence of bafilomycin A1 emptying lysosomal Ca2+ reservoir after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by ratiometric measurement after Fura-2 loading (n = 10 for Trpm2+/+:BSA; n = 27 for Trpm2+/+:LP; n = 17 for Trpm2+/+:LP + BafA1; n = 10 for Trpm2-/-:BSA; n = 11 for Trpm2-/-:LP; n = 9 for Trpm2-/-:LP + BafA1) (BafA1, bafilomycin A1). (E) Body weight of Trpm2+/+ and Trpm2-/- mice on normal chow diet (NCD) (n = 5) or high-fat diet (HFD) (n = 8). (F) HOMA-IR index in Trpm2+/+ and Trpm2-/- mice fed HFD for 8 weeks (n = 5 for Trpm2+/+; n = 8 for Trpm2-/-). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (C, D, F) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (E).
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for current, [Ca2+]i, body weight, and HOMA-IR.

We studied whether improved metabolic profile by Trpm2 KO is due to reduced inflammasome. The number of crown-like structures (CLS) representing metabolic inflammation (Weisberg et al., 2003) was significantly reduced in while adipose tissue (WAT) of Trpm2-KO mice on HFD (Figure 3C, Figure 3—source data 1), suggesting reduced metabolic inflammation by Trpm2 KO. Inflammasome activation was also significantly reduced in WAT of Trpm2-KO mice on HFD as evidenced by the significantly reduced numbers of ASC specks and capase-1 cleavage (Figure 3D and E, Figure 3—source data 1 and 2), indicating that TRPM2 is important in inflammasome related to metabolic syndrome.

ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling in inflammasome

After confirming the roles of lysosomal TRPM2 in [Ca2+]i increase by LP, we studied the changes in ER Ca2+ content ([Ca2+]ER) as ER, the largest intracellular Ca2+ reservoir, interacts with other organelles in cellular processes requiring intracellular Ca2+ flux. While [Ca2+]Lys is comparable to [Ca2+]ER (Raffaello et al., 2016), lysosome alone might not be a major Ca2+ source because of small volume (Penny et al., 2014). Thus, we studied whether ER to lysosomal Ca2+ flux, which has been observed after lysosomal Ca2+ emptying (Garrity et al., 2016; Park et al., 2022), occurs during inflammasome activation to sustain lysosomal Ca2+ release. When we measured [Ca2+]ER in GEM-CEPIA1er (Suzuki et al., 2014)-transfected BMDMs treated with LP without extracellular Ca2+ to abolish SOCE (Derler et al., 2016), [Ca2+]ER became significantly lower (Figure 4A, Figure 4—source data 1), suggesting Ca2+ flux from ER to lysosome likely to replenish reduced [Ca2+]Lys during inflammasome. [Ca2+]ER determined using a FRET-based D1ER (Park et al., 2009) also demonstrated a significantly reduced [Ca2+]ER by LP in a Ca2+-free KRB buffer (Figure 4A, Figure 4—source data 1). To study the dynamic changes of [Ca2+]ER and its temporal relationship with [Ca2+]Lys, we simultaneously traced [Ca2+]ER and [Ca2+]Lys in GEM-CEPIA1er-transfected cells loaded with OGBD. When [Ca2+] was monitored in cells that have reduced [Ca2+]Lys after LP treatment and then were incubated without LP in a Ca2+-free medium, recovery of decreased [Ca2+]Lys was noted (Figure 4B, Figure 4—source data 1). In this condition, [Ca2+]ER decrease occurred in parallel with [Ca2+]Lys recovery (Figure 4B, Figure 4—source data 1), strongly indicating ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling.

Figure 4. ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling in inflammasome.

(A) [Ca2+]ER in GEM-CEPIA1er- (left) or D1ER-transfected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) (right) treated with LP for 1 hr without extracellular Ca 2+ after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 26 for BSA; n = 25 for LP). (B) BMDMs transfected with GEM-CEPIA1er and loaded with Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD) were treated with LP for 1 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (right) or BSA alone for 4 hr (left). Tracing of [Ca2+]Lys and [Ca2+]ER after change to a fresh medium without extracellular Ca2+ (n = 4 for BSA; n = 4 for LP). (C) OGBD-loaded BMDMs were treated with LP for 1 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr. Recovery of [Ca2+]Lys after change to a fresh medium with or without Xestospongin C (Xesto C), dantrolene (Dan), or TPEN (right). Representative confocal images (left) (n = 9 for BSA; n = 8 for LP; n = 9 for LP + Recovery; n = 6 for LP + Recovery + Xesto C; n = 5 for LP + Recovery + Dan; n = 8 for LP + Recovery + TPEN). (D) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating peritoneal MΦs with LPS alone or palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, in the presence or absence of Xesto C (n = 4). (E) PLA in BMDMs treated with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, using Abs to VAPA and ORP1L (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 4). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by two-tailed Student’s t-test (A), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (C, E) or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (D). Scale bar, 20 μm.

Figure 4—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio), ELISA, and the number of PLT dots.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in inflammasome by LP.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A–C) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating peritoneal MΦs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of EGTA (A) (n = 4), 2-APB (B) (n = 4), or BTP2 (C) (n = 3). (D) [Ca2+]ER in D1ER-transfected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with LP for 1 hr in the presence or absence of BTP2 without removal of extracellular Ca2+ after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 19 for BSA; n = 16 for LP; n = 24 for LP + BTP2). (E) STIM1 aggregation (white arrows) and colocalization with ORAI1 (yellow arrows) at the middle and bottom levels of BMDMs that were transfected with YFP-STIM1 together with 3xFLAG-mCherry Red-Orai1/P3XFLAG7.1 and then treated with LP in Ca2+-free KRB buffer for 1 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined by confocal microscopy (scale bar, 5 mm). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (D) or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (A–C). Scale bar, 5 μm.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for ELISA and fluorescence ratio.

We next studied which ER Ca2+ exit channels are involved in ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling. When LP was removed after treatment, [Ca2+]Lys recovery was observed in a Ca2+-replete medium (Figure 4C, Figure 4—source data 1). Here, Xestospongin C, an IP3 receptor (IP3R) channel antagonist (Garrity et al., 2016), inhibited recovery of [Ca2+]Lys after LP removal (Figure 4C, Figure 4—source data 1), suggesting ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling through IP3R channel. Dantrolene, an antagonist of ryanodine receptor (RyR) channel, another ER Ca2+ exit channel (Garrity et al., 2016), did not significantly affect recovery of [Ca2+]Lys (Figure 4C, Figure 4—source data 1). When we chelated ER Ca2+ with a membrane-permeant metal chelator N,N,N',N'-tetrakis (2-pyridylmethyl)ethylene diamine (TPEN) that has a low Ca2+ affinity and can chelate ER Ca2+ but not cytosolic Ca2+ (Hofer et al., 1998), recovery of [Ca2+]Lys after LP removal was markedly inhibited (Figure 4C, Figure 4—source data 1), again supporting ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling during lysosomal Ca2 recovery. When functional impact of ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling was studied, Xestospongin C significantly suppressed IL-1β release by LP (Figure 4D, Figure 4—source data 1), suggesting that ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling contributes to inflammasome by LP. Since ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling could be facilitated by membrane contact between organelles (Yang et al., 2019), we studied apposition of ER and lysosome proteins. Proximity ligation assay (PLA) demonstrated multiple contact between VAPA on ER and ORP1L on lysosome by LP (Figure 4E, Figure 4—source data 1), suggesting the facilitation of ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling by organelle contact.

As extracellular Ca2+ is likely to enter cells through SOCE channel after ER Ca2+ depletion (Derler et al., 2016), we next studied extracellular Ca2+. When extracellular Ca2+ was chelated by 3 mM EGTA reducing [Ca2+]i in RPMI medium to 99 nM (Schoenmakers et al., 1992) below [Ca2+]i in Ca2+-free medium (Maggi et al., 1989), IL-1β release by LP was significantly reduced (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1), demonstrating the roles of extracellular Ca2+ in inflammasome by LP. 2-APB, a SOCE inhibitor, also significantly reduced IL-1β release by LP (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1), supporting the roles of SOCE in inflammasome. Since 2-APB can inhibit ER Ca2+ channel as well, we next employed another SOCE inhibitor. BTP2, a SOCE inhibitor that does not affect ER Ca2+ channel (Zitt et al., 2004), significantly reduced IL-1β release by LP (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C, Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1), substantiating the roles of SOCE in inflammasome. We also studied whether BTP2 can affect [Ca2+]ER in LP-induced inflammasome through SOCE inhibition. We determined [Ca2+]ER without extracellular Ca2+ removal because BTP2 effect on SOCE cannot be seen after extracellular Ca2+ removal abrogating SOCE. In the presence of extracellular Ca2+, [Ca2+]ER was not decreased by LP, likely due to SOCE (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D, Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1). Here, BTP2 significantly reduced [Ca2+]ER of LP-treated BMDMs (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D, Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1) likely due to SOCE inhibition, suggesting that SOCE is activated in inflammasome by LP to replenish reduced ER Ca2+ store. We also studied aggregation of STIM1, a Ca2+ sensor in ER, which can be observed in SOCE activation (Derler et al., 2016). Indeed, STIM1 aggregation was clearly observed after LP treatment (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E), which was colocalized with ORAI1, an SOCE channel on the plasma membrane (Vaca, 2010), strongly indicating SOCE through ORAI1 channel in LP-induced inflammasome.

Coupling of K+ efflux and Ca2+ influx in inflammasome

K+ efflux is one of the most common and critical events in inflammasome (Muñoz-Planillo et al., 2013), although a couple of inflammasomes without K+ efflux have been reported (Groß et al., 2016). In excitable cells, K+ efflux leads to hyperpolarization, which negatively modulates Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channel activated by depolarization. In nonexcitable cells, contrarily, Ca2+ influx though voltage-independent Ca2+ channel such as SOCE channel can be positively modulated by K+ efflux due to increased electrical Ca2+ driving force (Guéguinou et al., 2014). Since Ca2+ influx from extracellular space into cytosol might be positively modulated by K+ efflux in nonexcitable cells such as MΦs, we studied whether K+ efflux is coupled to Ca2+ influx. Intracellular K+ content ([K+]i) determined using Potassium Green-2-AM was decreased by LP (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1), likely due to K+ efflux. High extracellular K+ content ([K+]e) (60 mM) inhibited inflammasome activation by LP likely by inhibiting K+ efflux (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1). We then studied the effects of high [K+]e on [Ca2+]ER that would be affected by high [K+]e if K+ efflux and Ca2+ influx through SOCE are coupled. We determined [Ca2+]ER again without extracellular Ca2+ removal since the possible effects of high [K+]e on SOCE cannot be seen after extracellular Ca2+ removal. At [K+]e of 5.4 mM ([K+]e in RPMI), [Ca2+]ER was not decreased by LP. However, at high [K+]e, LP significantly reduced [Ca2+]ER (Figure 5A, Figure 5—source data 1) likely due to SOCE inhibition by high [K+]e, suggesting that K+ efflux is coupled to extracellular Ca2+ influx through SOCE. We next studied whether [Ca2+]Lys recovery, which is seen after LP removal due to ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling, is affected by high [K+]e. [Ca2+]Lys recovery after LP removal became significantly lower by high [K+]e (Figure 5B, Figure 5—source data 1), suggesting that high [K+]e dampens [Ca2+]Lys recovery after LP removal likely through SOCE inhibition. High [K+]e also suppressed [Ca2+]i increase by LP (Figure 5C, Figure 5—source data 1), suggesting the contribution of K+ efflux in [Ca2+]i increase by LP through sustained Ca2+ influx via SOCE.

Figure 5. Coupling of K+ efflux and Ca2+ influx in inflammasome.

(A) [Ca2+]ER in D1ER-transfected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pretreatment for 3 hr at [K+]e of 5.4 or 60 mM (n = 21 each). (B) Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD)-loaded MΦs were treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr. Recovery of [Ca2+]Lys in a fresh medium with 5.4 or 60 mM K+ (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 7 for BSA; n = 6 for LP; n = 7 for LP + Recovery:5.4 mM K+; n = 6 for LP + Recovery:60 mM K+). (C) [Ca2+]i in MΦs treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in a medium with 5.4 or 60 mM K+ (right). Representative Fluo-3 images (left) (n = 14 for BSA; n = 8 for LP:5.4 mM K+; n = 6 for LP:60 mM K+). (D) [Ca2+]i in MΦs treated with LP for 1 hr in the presence or absence of BTP2 or TRAM-34 after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, determined using Fluo-3-AM (middle) or Fura-2 (right). Representative Fluo-3 images (left) (for Fluo-3-AM, n = 8) (for Fura-2, n = 13). (E) [K+]i after LP treatment for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of BTP2 or TRAM-34 (right). Representative Potassium Green-2 images (left) (n = 5). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A–E). Scale bar, 20 μm.

Figure 5—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and [Ca2+]i.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Effect of high extracellular K+ and inhibitors of K+ efflux channels on inflammasome.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) [K+]i in MΦs treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (right), determined by confocal microscopy after Potassium Green-2-AM loading. Representative Potassium Green-2 fluorescence images (left) (n = 4 for BSA; n = 2 for PA; n = 4 for LPS; n = 4 for LP). (B) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs with LPS alone for 21 hr or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, at [K+]e of 5.4 (K+ concentration in RPMI medium) or 60 mM (n = 3 each). (C, D) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs with LPS alone or PA alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of charybdotoxin (CTX) or TRAM-34 (C) (n = 3), or several K+ efflux channel inhibitors (D) (n = 3). (E) [Ca2+]ER in D1ER-transfected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) after LP treatment for 1 hr in the presence or absence of TRAM-34 without extracellular Ca2+ removal after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 16). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A, E) or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test or with Tukey’s test (B–D). Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and [Ca2+]i.

We next investigated which K+ efflux channel is involved in inflammasome, focusing on Ca2+-activated K+ channels that can positively modulate Ca2+ influx after initial Ca2+ entry (Guéguinou et al., 2014). When MΦs were incubated with various K+ efflux channel inhibitors, charybdotoxin (CTX) inhibiting all three types of Ca2+-activated K+ channels [BK, IKCa1 (KCa3.1), and SK] (Chen and Chung, 2013; González et al., 2012) significantly suppressed IL-1β release by LP (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1), supporting the roles of Ca2+-activated K+ channels in inflammasome. In contrast, inhibitors of K+ efflux channels unrelated to Ca2+-induced activation such as quinine (a 2-pore K+ channel inhibitor), barium sulfate (Kir channel inhibitor), or 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, a Kv channel inhibitor) did not significantly inhibit IL-1β release by LP (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1). We next studied which channels among Ca2+-activated K+ channels are involved. Paxillin, a BK channel inhibitor (González et al., 2012), and UCL 1684 or apamin, SK channel inhibitors (Chen et al., 2021; Strøbaek et al., 2000), did not significantly affect IL-1β release by LP (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1). In contrast, TRAM-34, a specific IKCa1 (KCa3.1) channel inhibitor (Agarwal et al., 2013; Wulff et al., 2000), significantly decreased IL-1β release by LP (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C and D, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting the involvement of KCa3.1. We next studied the effects of TRAM-34 on [Ca2+]ER. While [Ca2+]ER decrease by LP was not seen without extracellular Ca2+ removal likely due to SOCE, it was clearly observed when TRAM-34 was added (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E, Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1), consistent with the positive roles of KCa3.1 in Ca2+ influx after ER Ca2+ emptying. [Ca2+]i increase by LP was also inhibited by TRAM-34 (Figure 5D, Figure 5—source data 1), demonstrating the contribution of KCa3.1 channel in the increase of [Ca2+]i. Further, TRAM-34 abrogated decrease of [K+]i by LP (Figure 5E, Figure 5—source data 1), indicating the roles of KCa3.1 in K+ efflux during inflammasome activation. BTP2 also suppressed increase of [Ca2+]i and decrease of [K+]i by LP (Figure 5D and E, Figure 5—source data 1), likely by inhibiting Ca2+ influx that can activate Ca2+-activated K+ channel such as KCa3.1.

We next studied whether KCa3.1 K+ current is activated by LP. If Ca2+-activated K+ channel coupled to Ca2+ influx mediates K+ efflux in inflammasome activation, conventional whole-cell patch clamp using Ca2+-clamped solution would nullify the effects of Ca2+ influx, rendering the study of increased Ca2+ influx impossible. Hence, we employed nystatin-perforated patch clamp technique that leaves elevated [Ca2+]i intact, as nystatin pores are permeable to monovalent but not to divalent ions (Akaike and Harata, 1994). When ramp-like voltage clamp was applied to induce brief current-voltage (I/V) curves and TRAM-34-inhibitable current was obtained by digital subtraction, slope of I/V curves sensitive to TRAM-34 was increased by LP but not by LPS alone (Figure 6A and B, Figure 6—source data 1), suggesting increased KCa3.1 activity by LP. Expression of Kcnn4 was not significantly affected by LPS and/or PA (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that increased KCa3.1 activity by LP is not due to Kcnn4 induction. When we employed Kcnn4-KO MΦs that do not express Kcnn4 (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1), TRAM-34-inhibitable K+ current was not observed before or after LP treatment (Figure 6C and D, Figure 6—source data 1), confirming the reliability of results obtained by nystatin-perforated patch clamp technique.

Figure 6. Role of KCa3.1 Ca2+-activated K+ channel in inflammasome.

(A–D) Nystatin-perforated patch clamp and slope conductance of TRAM-34-sensitive I/V curve in Kcnn4+/+ (A, B) or Kcnn4-/- MΦs (C, D) treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone for 4 hr or with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (B, D). Representative I/V curves (A, C). (n = 13 for each Kcnn4+/+ group; n = 4 for Kcnn4-/-:BSA; n = 5 for Kcnn4-/-:LPS; n = 4 for Kcnn4-/-:LP). (E) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant (upper) and immunoblotting (IB) of cell lysate using indicated Abs (lower) after treating Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- MΦs with palmitic acid (PA) alone or LPS alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 3). (F) [K+]i in Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- MΦs treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (right). Representative Potassium Green-2 images (left) (n = 5). (G) Oregon Green BAPTA-1 Dextran (OGBD)-loaded bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr. [Ca2+]Lys recovery after LP removal with or without TRAM-34 (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (n = 11 for BSA; n = 8 for LP; n = 6 for LP:(-); n = 9 for LP:TRAM-34). (H) BN gel electrophoresis and subsequent IB of lysate of MΦs treated with LPS alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr using indicated Ab. (I) IB of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of while adipose tissue (WAT) from mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) for 8 weeks using indicated Abs (n = 3). (J) The number of ASC specks in WAT of mice of (I) identified by ASC immunofluorescence (right). Representative ASC specks (red arrow heads) (left) (scale bar, 20 μm) (n = 28 for Kcnn4+/+:HFD; n = 22 for Kcnn4-/-:HFD). (K) The number of crown-like structures (CLS) in WAT of mice of (I) identified by F4/80 immunohistochemistry (lower). Representative F4/80 immunohistochemistry (upper) (scale bar, 50 μm) (n = 12 for Kcnn4+/+:HFD; n = 11 for Kcnn4-/-:HFD). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (B, D, F, G), or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (E). Scale bar, 20 μm.

Figure 6—source data 1. Original data for slope conductance, fluorescence, and the numbers of ASC specks and CLS.
Figure 6—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Effects of Kcnn4 KO on metabolic profile and inflammasome.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) Real-time RT-PCR of Kcnn4 using mRNA from MΦs treated with palmitic acid (PA) alone or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 3). (B) Real-time RT-PCR of Kcnn4 using mRNA from MΦs of Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- mice (n = 3). (C) TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs from Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- mice with LPS alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 3). (D) Proximity ligation assay (PLA) in MΦs treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of BAPTA-AM, using Abs specific for KCNN4 and ORAI1 (right). Representative fluorescence images (left) (scale bar, 20 μm) (n = 10 for BSA; n = 16 for LP; n = 10 for BSA + BAPTA-AM; n = 16 for LP + BAPTA-AM). (E) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating MΦs from Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- mice with PA, nigericin, ATP, L-Leucyl-L-Leucine methyl ester (LLOMe) , and monosodium urate (MSU) for 18 hr, 45 min, 1 hr, 45 min and 3 hr, respectively, after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 6). (F) Immunoprecipitation (IP) of MΦs treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of TRAM-34 using anti-NEK7 Ab and protein G beads. After bead heating in a sample buffer, collected supernatant was subjected to immunoblotting (IB) using indicated Abs (red arrow, band of the correct size). (G) Immunoprecipitation of MΦs from Kcnn4+/+ or Kcnn4-/- mice treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr using anti-NEK7 Ab and protein G beads. After bead heating in a sample buffer, collected supernatant was subjected to IB using indicated Abs (red arrow, band of the correct size). (H) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) in Kcnn4+/+ and Kcnn4-/- mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) for 8 weeks (left). Area under the curve (AUC) (right) (n = 9). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A, D), two-tailed Student’s t-test (B, H), or two-way ANOVA with Sidak test (C, E).
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fold change of mRNA expression, ELISA, the number of PLA dots, and blood glucose.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

We next studied the functional roles of Kcnn4 in inflammasome. IL-1β release and inflammasome activation by LP were significantly reduced by Kcnn4 KO (Figure 6E, Figure 6—source data 1 and 2), supporting that KCa3.1 channel is important in LP-induced inflammasome. TNF-α or IL-6 release by LPS or LP was not significantly changed by Kcnn4 KO (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1). We also studied the effects of Kcnn4 on the changes of intracellular K+ and Ca2+ during inflammasome. [K+]i decrease by LP was abrogated by Kcnn4 KO (Figure 6F, Figure 6—source data 1), consistent with the roles of KCa3.1 channel in K+ efflux. Further, [Ca2+]Lys recovery by LP removal was inhibited by TRAM-34 (Figure 6G, Figure 6—source data 1), indicating that K+ efflux contributes to [Ca2+]Lys recovery, likely through facilitation of SOCE and subsequent ERlysosome Ca2+ refilling. We also studied physical coupling between Ca2+ influx and K+ efflux channels, in addition to their functional coupling. PLA demonstrated physical association between KCNN4 and ORAI1 channel by LP (Figure 6—figure supplement 1D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1), which might facilitate functional coupling between K+ efflux and SOCE (Ferreira and Schlichter, 2013). Coupling between KCNN4 and ORAI1 was abrogated by BAPTA-AM (Figure 6—figure supplement 1D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting the roles of increased Ca2+ in their directional movement and contact.

We also studied the roles of KCa3.1 channel in inflammasome by other stimulators. Inflammasome by LLOMe or MSU, lysosomotropic agents, was significantly inhibited by Kcnn4 KO; however, that by nigericin directly promoting K+ efflux or ATP inducing K+ efflux through pannexin-1 channel (Xu et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2015) was not significantly affected (Figure 6—figure supplement 1E, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that KCa3.1 channel is crucial in K+ efflux associated with lysosomotropic agents or lysosomal Ca2+ channels. Since K+ efflux is crucial in NLRP3 binding to NEK7 and oligomerization (He et al., 2016), we studied the roles of KCa3.1 channel in NLRP3 oligomerization. NLPR3 oligomerization by LP was abrogated by Kcnn4 KO (Figure 6H, Figure 6—source data 2). NLRP3 binding to NEK7 (He et al., 2016), which was observed in control MΦs treated with LP by immunoprecipitation, was also abrogated by Kcnn4 KO or TRAM-34 (Figure 6—figure supplement 1F and G, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2), suggesting the roles of KCa3.1 channel in NLRP3 interaction with NEK7 and oligomerization.

We next studied whether Kcnn4-KO mice are resistant to HFD-induced metabolic inflammation. Consistent with the roles of KCa3.1 channel in inflammasome by LP, Kcnn4-KO mice on HFD showed significantly improved glucose tolerance (Figure 6—figure supplement 1H, Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1). Inflammasome and metabolic inflammation by HFD were also significantly ameliorated by Kcnn4 KO as evidenced by attenuated caspase-1 cleavage and significantly reduced the number of ASC specks or CLS in WAT (Figure 6I–K, Figure 6—source data 1 and 2).

Mechanism of Ca2+-induced inflammasome activation

We next investigated the mechanism of inflammasome by increased [Ca2+]i. We studied whether TAK1-JNK activation observed in inflammasome by lysosomal rupture releasing lysosomal Ca2+ (Okada et al., 2014) participates in inflammasome by LP. JNK was activated by LP treatment for 21 hr (Figure 7A, Figure 7—source data 2). Since JNK activation occurs after LPS treatment alone for a short time and then wanes (An et al., 2017), we studied the time sequence of JNK activation by LP. JNK activation by LPS alone occurred 30 min after treatment, subsided since 2 hr, and never occurred again (Figure 7A, Figure 7—source data 2). In contrast, JNK activation occurred again after LP treatment for 21 hr (Figure 7A, Figure 7—source data 2), suggesting different mechanism and time scale of JNK activation depending on additional events such as lysosomal ones. While we determined [Ca2+]i after LP treatment for a total 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (actual LP treatment time is 1 hr) throughout the study as Ca2+ flux is expected to occur since early time, [Ca2+]i further increased 21 hr after LP treatment (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1), which could be high enough to act as signal 2 of inflammasome. [K+]i decrease was also observed not 4 but 21 hr after LP treatment (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting that Ca2+ influx supported by K+ efflux is pronounced at later time. Additionally, [Ca2+]ER was reduced not 4 but 21 hr after LP treatment without extracellular Ca2+ removal (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1), suggesting full alteration of intracellular Ca2+ distribution at later time of LP treatment. Since JNK contributes to inflammasome through ASC phosphorylation (Hara et al., 2013), we studied the relationship between JNK and ASC phosphorylation/oligomerization. Intriguingly, ASC phosphorylation and oligomerization occurred 21 hr after LP treatment but not 30 min after LPS treatment despite similar JNK activation (Figure 7B and C, Figure 7—source data 2), suggesting that JNK activation 21 hr after LP treatment leads to ASC phosphorylation and oligomerization likely due to signal 2 such as lysosomal events. Indeed, JNK activation by LP treatment for 21 hr was markedly suppressed by Kcnn4 or Trpm2 KO (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2), supporting that events such as lysosomal Ca2+ release and/or K+ efflux are necessary for delayed JNK activation. SP600125, a JNK inhibitor, suppressed ASC phosphorylation and oligomerization by LP (Figure 7D, Figure 7—source data 2, Figure 7—figure supplement 1C, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2), indicating that JNK activation is necessary but not sufficient for ASC phosphorylation/oligomerization, as shown by no ASC phosphorylation/oligomerization 0.5 hr after LPS treatment despite strong JNK activation (Figure 7B and C, Figure 7—source data 2). Consistent with the roles of JNK in inflammasome activation by LP, IL-1β release by LP was inhibited by JNK inhibitor (Figure 7E, Figure 7—source data 1).

Figure 7. Mechanism of Ca2+-mediated inflammasome.

(A) Immunoblotting (IB) of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone without palmitic acid (PA) (‘- PA’) for indicated time period (left half) or with ‘PA’ (together with LPS) for indicated time period after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (right half) (hence, the numbers indicating LPS treatment time in the right half are 3+PA treatment time), using indicated Abs. (B) IB of BMDMs treated with LPS alone for 0.5 hr or ‘PA’ (together with LPS) for 1 or 18 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (hence, the numbers indicating LPS treatment time of 4 or 21 hr are 3+PA treatment time), using indicated Abs. (C) BMDMs were treated with LPS alone for 0.5 hr, ‘PA’ (together with LPS) for 1 or 18 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr (hence, the numbers indicating LPS treatment time of 4 or 21 hr are 3+PA treatment time) or nigericin for 45 min after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr. IB using indicated Abs after disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) crosslinking. (D) BMDMs were treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of ASK1 (selonsertib) or JNK inhibitor (SP600125). IB using indicated Abs after DSS crosslinking. (E) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating BMDMs with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of selonsertib or SP600125. (F–H) IB using indicated Abs (F, G) and IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant (H) after treating BMDMs with LPS alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of KN-93 or -92 (n = 3). Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments. ***p<0.001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (E, H).

Figure 7—source data 1. Original data for ELISA.
Figure 7—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Effect of Kcnn4 KO and inhibitor of TAK1 or ASK1 on activation of inflammasome and JNK.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) [Ca2+]i (left), [K+]i (middle) and [Ca2+]ER (right) determined by Flou-3-AM staining, Potassium Green-2-AM staining and D1ER transfection, respectively, after treatment with LP for a total of 4 or 21 hr including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pretreatment for 3 hr (n = 10 for Fluo-3-AM; n = 10 for Potassium Green-2-AM; n = 50 for D1ER). (B) Immunoblotting (IB) of lysate of MΦs from Kcnn4+/+ and Kcnn4-/- mice (upper) or Trpm2+/+ and Trpm2-/- mice (lower) treated with palmitic acid (PA) alone for 21 hr, LPS alone for 21 hr or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, using indicated Abs. (C) IB of lysate of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of ASK1 (selonsertib) or JNK inhibitor (SP600125) using indicated Ab. (D) IL-1β ELISA of culture supernatant after treating BMDMs with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of 5Z-7-oxozeaenol (n = 3). (E) IB of lysate of BMDMs treated with LPS alone for 21 hr or with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of selonsertib using indicated Abs. Data shown as means ± SEM from more than three independent experiments*p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (A), or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (D).
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and ELISA.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original data blot.

When we studied the roles of TAK1 as JNK upstream (Okada et al., 2014), IL-1β release by LP was not inhibited by 5Z-7-oxozeaenol, a TAK1 inhibitor (Figure 7—figure supplement 1D, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1), in contrast to inflammasome activation by lysosomal rupture (Okada et al., 2014). We thus studied the roles of ASK1 participating in inflammasome activation by diverse inflammasome activators such as bacteria or virus (Immanuel et al., 2019; Place et al., 2018). IL-1β release by LP was significantly inhibited by selonsertib, an ASK1 inhibitor (Figure 7E, Figure 7—source data 1), suggesting the roles of ASK1 in inflammasome activation by LP. Consistently, JNK activation by LP was inhibited by selonsertib (Figure 7—figure supplement 1E, Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2). Further, ASK1 activation was observed at later time of LP treatment (Figure 7A, Figure 7—source data 2), suggesting that LP induces ASK1 activation likely through additional mechanisms such as lysosomal events at JNK upstream. Consistent with the roles of ASK1 in JNK activation, ASK1 inhibitor blocked ASC phosphorylation/oligomerization as efficiently as JNK inhibitor (Figure 7D, Figure 7—source data 2, Figure 7—figure supplement 1C), supporting that activated ASK1 induces JNK activation and subsequent ASC phosphorylation/oligomerization.

When we studied the mechanism of ASK1 activation by LP, ASK1 activation by LP was attenuated by KN-93, a CaMKII inhibitor, but not by KN-92, a KN-93 congener without CaMKII inhibitory activity (Figure 7F, Figure 7—source data 2), which supports the roles of increased [Ca2+]i and subsequent CAMKII in ASK1 activation by LP, similar to the inhibition of lysosomal rupture-induced inflammasome by KN-93 (Okada et al., 2014). JNK phosphorylation and inflammasome activation as evidenced by maturation or release of IL-1β by LP were also inhibited by KN-93 but not by KN-92 (Figure 7F–H, Figure 7—source data 1 and 2). These results indicate that increased [Ca2+]i due to lysosomal Ca2+ release facilitated by ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling and K+ efflux through KCa3.1 channel induces delayed activation of ASK1 and JNK, leading to ASC oligomerization or NLRP3 inflammasome by LP and metabolic inflammation.

Discussion

Agents inducing lysosomal stress or lysosomotropic agents are well-known inflammasome activators (Hornung et al., 2008). Regarding the mechanism of inflammasome by lysosomotropic agents, lysosomal Ca2+ has been incriminated (Okada et al., 2014; Weber and Schilling, 2014), while papers refuting the role of Ca2+ have been published (Katsnelson et al., 2015). We found that lysosomal Ca2+ release and subsequent [Ca2+]i increase by LP lead to inflammasome through CAMKII-ASK1 and delayed JNK activation, which is critical for metabolic inflammation (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Graphic summary.

Figure 8.

LP, an effector combination activating inflammasome related to metabolic inflammation, induces generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), which activates TRPM2 channel on lysosome and releases lysosomal Ca2+. ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling facilitated by ER-lysosome tethering replenishes diminished lysosomal Ca2+ content and supports sustained lysosomal Ca2+ release. ER emptying due to ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling activates SOCE. SOCE, in turn, is positively modulated by K+ efflux through KCa3.1, a Ca2+-activated K+ efflux channel, mediating hyperpolarization-induced acceleration of extracellular Ca2+ influx. Ca2+ release from lysosome activates CaMKII, which induces delayed activation of ASK1 and JNK. Delayed JNK activation leads to ASC phosphorylation and oligomerization, leading to the formation of inflammasome complex together with NLRP3 and NEK7. K+ efflux changes intracellular milieu and induces structural changes of NLRP3 or NLRP3 binding to PI(4)P on dispersed Golgi network, facilitating inflammasome activation. Golgi complex and microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) are not shown for clarity (CASP1, caspase 1).

Among diverse inflammasome activators, LP is a representative effector combination responsible for metabolic inflammation related to metabolic syndrome. However, the mechanism of inflammasome activation by LP has been unclear. It is well known that PA induces stresses of organelle such as ER and mitochondria (Bachar et al., 2009; Korge et al., 2003). We observed that mitochondrial ROS accumulate by LP and activate lysosomal Ca2+ release through TRPM2. The roles of mitochondrial ROS in inflammasome activation have been reported Weber and Schilling, 2014; however, causal relationship between mitochondrial ROS and lysosomal events has not been addressed. The roles of TRPM2 in diabetes or β-cell function have been studied (Uchida and Tominaga, 2011; Zhang et al., 2012). However, the roles of TRPM2 in metabolic inflammation were not studied.

While we have shown the roles of TRPM2 in inflammasome and metabolic inflammation, TRPM2 exists on both plasma membrane and lysosome (Wang et al., 2020). The roles of plasma membrane TRPM2 in inflammasome by high glucose or particulate materials have been reported (Tseng et al., 2017; Zhong et al., 2013), while the role of TMRP2 in inflammation activation by lipid stimulators related to metabolic inflammation has not been addressed. However, we observed no activation of TRPM2 current on the plasma membrane of MΦs treated with LP, arguing against the roles of plasma membrane TRPM2 in inflammasome by LP. Further, dissipation of lysosomal Ca2+ reservoir by bafilomycin A1 abrogated [Ca2+]i increase by LP, strongly supporting the roles of lysosomal TRPM2 rather than plasma membrane TRPM2 in inflammation by LP.

We observed decreased [Ca2+]ER in inflammasome activation by LP, which was due to ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling through IP3R to replenish diminished [Ca2+]Lys after lysosomal Ca2+ release. Previous papers have shown the roles of ER Ca2+ in inflammasome activation (Lee et al., 2012); however, the role of ER Ca2+ replenishing reduced [Ca2+]Lys in inflammasome has not been addressed. Direct Ca2+ efflux from ER to cytoplasm, which was reported in inflammasome activation by ATP (Lee et al., 2012), cannot explain ER→lysosome refilling or abrogation of LP-induced increase of [Ca2+]i by bafilomycin A1, which would not decrease but increase [Ca2+]i after ER Ca2+ release into cytoplasm due to abrogated lysosomal Ca2+ buffering (López Sanjurjo et al., 2014). Likely due to ER Ca2+ release to replenish reduced [Ca2+]Lys, [Ca2+]ER was reduced, which in turn induced SOCE. Then, extracellular Ca2+ influx appears to replenish ER Ca2+ after ER Ca2+ loss due to ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling. The roles of extracellular Ca2+ influx in inflammasome have been suggested, while extracellular Ca2+ influx was unrelated to ER Ca2+ store (Lee et al., 2012; Tseng et al., 2017). STIM1 aggregation and its colocalization with ORAI1 strongly support SOCE in inflammasome by LP to replenish ER Ca2+ depletion (Vaca, 2010), which is different from the activation of Ca2+-sensing receptor by extracellular Ca2+ reported in ATP-induced inflammasome (Lee et al., 2012). We have observed that BTP2 inhibiting Ca2+ influx through ORAI1 (Bogeski et al., 2010) suppressed LP-induced inflammasome, suggesting that extracellular Ca2+ influx is a process of SOCE through STIM1/ORAI1 channel activated by ER Ca2+ depletion rather than a direct extracellular Ca2+ influx into cytoplasm through TRPM2 on the plasma membrane (Zhong et al., 2013). Thus, these results additionally support the roles of lysosomal TRPM2 but not plasma membrane TRPM2 in LP-induced inflammasome.

We observed that K+ efflux occurs in inflammasome by LP, similar to that by other activators. K+ efflux through KCa3.1 channel appears to induce NLRP3 binding to NEK7 and oligomerization, which was inhibited by TRAM-34 or Kcnn4 KO. Previous papers suggested the roles of KCa3.1 channel in SOCE, while such relationship was unrelated to inflammasome (Duffy et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2010). A KCa3.1 channel activator, together with LPS, has been reported to induce IL-1β release; however, the roles of KCa3.1 channel in authentic inflammasome have not been shown (Schroeder et al., 2017). Although we observed significant roles of KCa3.1 channel in inflammasome activation, contribution of other Ca2+-activated K+ channels such as BK channels cannot be eliminated since iberitoxin, a BK channel inhibitor, has been reported to inhibit ATP-induced inflammasome (Schroeder et al., 2017). However, the relationship between BK channel and Ca2+ flux was not studied. Previous papers also reported the roles of TWIK2 channel, a two-pore K+ channel, in K+ efflux in ATP-induced inflammasome, which was inhibited by quinine (Di et al., 2018). The role of THIK-1, another two-pore K+ channel in IL-1β release from microglia by ATP, has also been reported (Madry et al., 2018). However, inflammasome by LP was not inhibited by quinine. Further, the relationship between K+ efflux through two-pore K+ channels and SOCE was not studied. The relationship between ATP-induced P2X7 activation and K+ efflux could be distinct from coupling of Ca2+ influx and K+ efflux by lysosomotropic agents or other events primarily affecting lysosomal Ca2+ channel (Di et al., 2018; Muñoz-Planillo et al., 2013). Such differences could explain no effect of quinine on LP-induced inflammasome or undiminished lysosomotropic agents-induced inflammasome in THIK-1-KO MΦs or microglia (Drinkall et al., 2022).

Altogether, we have shown the sequential events from mitochondrial ROS-induced lysosomal TRPM2 channel activation to ER→lysosome Ca2+ refilling and SOCE coupled with KCa3.1 K+ efflux channel activation in inflammasome by LP and metabolic inflammation (Figure 8), which could also be applied to that by other lysosomotropic agents. These results suggest mitochondrial ROS-lysosomal TRPM2 axis as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of metabolic inflammation. Elucidation of KCa3.1 channel as the K+ efflux channel in inflammasome and its role in facilitation of extracellular Ca2+ influx through SOCE would provide another target for modulation of inflammasome that is activated in a variety of diseases or conditions in addition to metabolic syndrome. ER→lysosome refilling might have implication in diverse conditions or diseases associated with lysosomal Ca2+ changes such as autophagy, vaccination, or inflammation (Park et al., 2022; Tahtinen et al., 2022).

Materials and methods

GCaMP3 Ca2+ imaging

BMDMs were kindly provided by Emad S. Alnemri, Thomas Jefferson University, through Je-Wook Yu, Yonsei University (Fernandes-Alnemri et al., 2009). Cytokine responses to LPS or LP were periodically monitored to authenticate cell function. Cells were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination. BMDMs grown on four-well chamber were transfected with a plasmid encoding a perilysosomal GCaMP3-ML1 Ca2+ probe (Shen et al., 2012). Cytokine responses to LPS or LP were periodically monitored. Cells were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination. After 48 hr, cells were treated with LP for 1 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, and then lysosomal Ca2+ release was measured in a basal Ca2+ solution containing 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM EGTA, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) by monitoring fluorescence intensity at 470 nm using a LSM780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 780). GPN was added at the indicated time points.

Determination of [Ca2+]i

After pretreatment with LPS for 3 hr and treatment with LP for 1 hr, cells were loaded with Fluo-3-AM (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 30 min. [Ca2+]i was measured in a basal Ca2+ solution containing 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM EGTA, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), using a LSM780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).

For ratiometric determination of [Ca2+]i, cells treated with LP were loaded with 2 μM of the acetoxymethyl ester form of Fura-2 (Invitrogen) in RPMI-1640 at 37°C for 30 min and fluorescence data were analyzed using MetaFluor (Molecular Devices) on Axio Observer A1 (Zeiss) equipped with 150 W xenon lamp Polychrome V (Till Photonics), CoolSNAP-Hq2 digital camera (Photometrics), and Fura-2 filter set. Fluorescence at 340/380 nm was measured in phenol red-free RPMI, and converted to [Ca2+]i using the following equation (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985).

[Ca2+]i = Kd×[(RRmin)/(RmaxR)]×[Fmin(380)/Fmax(380)]

where Kd = Fura-2 dissociation constant (224 nM at 37°C), Fmin(380) = 380 nm fluorescence in the absence of Ca2+, Fmax(380) = 380 nm fluorescence with saturating Ca2+, R = 340/380 nm fluorescence ratio, Rmax = 340/380 nm ratio with saturating Ca2+, and Rmin = 340/380 nm ratio in the absence of Ca2+.

Measurement of [Ca2+]Lys

To measure [Ca2+]Lys, cells were loaded with 100 μg/ml OGBD, an indicator of lysosomal luminal Ca2+, at 37°C in the culture medium for 12 hr to allow uptake by endocytosis. After additional incubation for 4 hr without indicator, cells were treated with LP for 1 hr after LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, and then washed in HBS (135 mM NaCl, 5.9 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 11.5 mM glucose, 11.6 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) for confocal microscopy (Garrity et al., 2016).

Measurement of ER Ca2+ content ([Ca2+]ER)

BMDMs grown on four-well chamber were transfected with GEM-CEPIA1er (Addgene) (Suzuki et al., 2014) or a ratiometric FRET-based Cameleon probe D1ER (Park et al., 2009) using Lipofectamine 2000. After 48 hr, cells were pretreated with LPS for 3 hr and then treated with LP for 1 hr in a Ca2+-free Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) buffer (Sigma) to eliminate the effect of extracellular Ca2+ influx into ER (Xu et al., 2015). Fluorescence was measured using an LSM780 confocal microscope (Zeiss) at an excitation wavelength of 405 nm and an emission wavelength of 466 or 520 nm. F466/F520 was calculated as an index of [Ca2+]ER (Suzuki et al., 2014). D1ER fluorescence intensity ratio (F540/F490) was determined using an LSM780 confocal microscope (Zeiss).

Simultaneous monitoring of [Ca2+]Lys and [Ca2+]ER

Twenty-four hours after transfection with GEM-CEPIA1er, BMDMs were loaded with OGBD for 12 hr and chased for 4 hr. After treating cells with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, medium was changed to a fresh one without LP. Cells were then monitored for [Ca2+]Lys and [Ca2+]ER in a Ca2+-free KRB buffer using an LSM780 confocal microscope.

Proximity ligation assay

Contact between ER and lysosome was examined using Duolink In Situ Detection Reagents Red kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, BMDMs treated with test agents were incubated with antibodies (Abs) to ORP1L (Abcam, 1:200) and VAP-A (Santa Cruz, 1:200), or with those to KCNN4 (Invitrogen) and ORAI1 (Novusbio) at 4°C overnight. After washing, cells were incubated with PLA plus and minus probes at 37°C for 1 hr. After ligation reaction to close the circle and rolling circle amplification (RCA) of the ligation product, fluorescence-labeled oligonucleotide hybridized to RCT product was observed by fluorescence microscopy.

SOCE channel activation

BMDMs transfected with YFP-STIM1 and 3xFLAG-mCherry Red-Orai1/P3XFLAG7.1 (kindly provided by Joseph Yuan, University of North Texas Health Science Center, USA, through Cha S-G, Yonsei University) were treated with LP for a total of 4 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr, which were then subjected to confocal microscopy to visualize STIM1 puncta and their co-localization with ORAI1.

Abs and IB

Cells or tissues were solubilized in a lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors. Protein concentration was determined using Bradford method. Samples (10–30 μg) were separated on 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (NUPAGE, Invitrogen), and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for IB using the ECL method (Dongin LS). For IB, Abs against the following proteins were used: IL-1β (R&D Systems, AF-401-NA, 1:1000), caspase 1 p20 (Millipore, ABE1971, 1:1000), ASC (Adipogen AL177, 1:1000), phospho-JNK (Cell Signaling #9251, 1:1000), JNK (Santa Cruz sc7345, 1:1000), phospho-ASK1 (Invitrogen PA5-64541, 1:1000), ASK1 (Abcam ab45178, 1:1000), phospho-ASC (ECM Biosciences AP5631, 1:1000), NLRP3 (Invitrogen MA5-23919, 1:1000), NEK7 (Abcam ab133514, 1:1000), HSP 90 (Santa Cruz sc13119, 1:1000), and β-actin (Santa Cruz sc47778, 1:1,000).

Immunoprecipitation

After lysis of cells in an ice-cold lysis buffer (400 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% Triton X-100) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors, lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min in microfuge tubes, and supernatant was incubated with anti-NEK7 (Abcam, 1:1000) Ab or control IgG in binding buffer (200 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA) with constant rotation at 4°C for 1 hr. After adding 50 μl of 50% of Protein-G bead (Roche Applied Science) to lysates and incubation with rotation at 4°C overnight, resins were washed with binding buffer. After resuspending pellet in a sample buffer (Life Technology) and heating at 100°C for 3 min, supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 s, followed by electrophoretic separation in a NuPAGE gradient gel (Life Technology). IB was conducted by sequential incubation with anti-NEK7 or -NLRP3 Ab as the primary Ab and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or -mouse IgG. Bands were visualized using an ECL kit.

Detection of ASC oligomerization

BMDMs were washed in ice-cold PBS, and then lysed in NP-40 buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1% NP-40, and protease inhibitors). Lysate was centrifuged at 2000 × g, 4°C for 10 min. Pellets were washed and resuspended in PBS containing 2 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) for crosslinking, followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min. Samples were then centrifuged at 2000 × g, 4°C for 10 min. Precipitated pellets and soluble lysates were subjected to IB using anti-ASC Ab.

Blue Native PAGE

Blue Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) was performed using Bis-Tris NativePAGE system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were collected and lysed in 1× NativePAGE Sample Buffer (Invitrogen) containing 1% digitonin and protease inhibitor cocktail, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm, 4°C for 20 min. 20 μl supernatant mixed with 1 μl 5% G-250 Sample Additive was loaded on a NativePAGE 3~12% Bis-Tris gel. Samples separated on gels were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using transfer buffer, followed by IB using anti-NLRP3 Ab.

Immunofluorescence study

Cells were grown on four-chamber plates. After treatments, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.5% triton X-100 for 15 min. After blocking with 5% goat serum for 1 hr, cells were incubated with anti-ASC at 4°C overnight. On the next day, samples were incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG Ab (Invitrogen) for 1 hr. After nuclear staining with DAPI (Invitrogen), cells were subjected to confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss, LSM 780).

Measurement of [K+]i

BMDMs treated with LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr were labeled with 5 μM Asante Potassium Green-2-AM (Abcam) at 37°C for 30 min. After washing twice with PBS, cells were subjected to confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss, LSM 780).

ELISA of cytokines

Cytokine content in culture supernatants of BMDMs or peritoneal MΦs was determined using mouse ELISA kits (R&D Systems), according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissues using TRIzol (Invitrogen), and cDNA was synthesized using MMLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time RT-PCR was performed using SYBR green (Takara) in QuantStudio3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). All expression values were normalized to GAPDH or Rpl32 mRNA level.

Primer sequences are as follows: Kcnn4-F, 5′-AACTGGCATCGGACTCATGGTT-3′; Kcnn4-R, 5′-AGTCATGAACAGCTGGACCTC-3′.

Animals

Eight-week-old male Trpm2-KO mice (kindly provided by Yasuo Mori, Kyoto University, Japan) were maintained in a 12 hr light/12 hr dark cycle and fed HFD for 12 weeks. During the observation period, mice were monitored for glucose profile and weighed. Kcnn4-KO mice were from Jackson Laboratories. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy in Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Mouse experiments were approved by the IACUC of the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources of Yonsei University College of Medicine, an AAALAC-accredited unit (IACUC No 2018-0083).

Cell culture and drug treatment

BMDMs were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Lonza). For drug treatment, the following concentrations were used: 50 or 100 ng/ml LPS (Sigma), 300 μM PA (Sigma), 50 μM BAPTA-AM (Invitrogen), 10 μM nigericin (Sigma), 3 mM ATP (Roche), 25 μg/ml MSU (InvivoGen), 0.3 mM LLOMe (Sigma), 3 μM Xestospongin C (Abcam), 10 μM dantrolene (Sigma), 10 μM TPEN (Sigma), 3 mM EGTA (Sigma), 100 nM 2-APB (Sigma), 10 μM BTP2 (Merk Millipore), 5 mM NAC (Sigma), 100 μM MitoTEMPOL (Sigma), 10 μM selonsertib (Selleckchem), 10 μM SP600125 (Sigma), 100–500 nM 5Z-7-oxozeaenol (Sigma), 10 μM KN-93 (Tocris), 10 μM KN-92 (Tocris), 30 μM apigenin (Sigma), quercetin (Sigma), 1 μM bafilomycin A1, 10 μM TRAM-34 (Sigma), 10 μM ACA (Sigma), 100 nM apamin (Sigma), 1 μM paxillin (Sigma), 100 μM quinine (Sigma), 1 mM barium sulfate (Sigma), 10 nM UCL 1684 (Sigma), and 10 μM 4-AP (Sigma). PA stock solution (50 mM) was prepared by dissolving in 70% ethanol and heating at 55°C. Working solution was made by diluting PA stock solution in 2% fatty acid-free BSA-DMEM or -RPMI.

Peritoneal MΦs

Mice of C57BL/6 background were injected intraperitoneally with 3 ml of 3.85% Brewer thioglycollate. Three days after injection, peritoneal MΦs were harvested, seeded at 6-well plates and maintained in RPMI containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C for 24 hr in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2 before treatment. Peritoneal MΦs were used as the primary MΦs throughout the study.

Stromal vascular fraction (SVF)

SVF of epididymal adipose tissue was prepared as described (Lee et al., 2016). Briefly, after cutting SVF into small pieces and incubation in a 2 mg/ml collagenase D solution (Roche) at 37°C in a water bath for 45 min, digested tissue was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 8 min. After filtering through a 70 μm mesh and lysis of RBC, SVF was suspended in PBS supplemented with 2% BSA (Sigma), 2 mM EDTA (Cellgro) for further experiments.

Metabolic studies

IPGTT was performed by intraperitoneal injection of 1 g/kg glucose solution after overnight fasting. Blood glucose concentrations were determined using One Touch glucometer (LifeScan) before (0 min) and 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after glucose injection. Serum insulin was measured using Mouse Insulin ELISA kit (TMB) (AKRIN-011T, Shibayagi, Gunma, Japan). HOMA-IR index was calculated according to the following formula: [fasting insulin (μlU/ml)×fasting glucose (mg/dl)]/405.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Tissue samples were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 μm thickness were stained with H&E for morphometry, or immunostained with F4/80 Ab (Abcam) to detect MΦ aggregates surrounding adipocytes (crown-like structures, CLS).

Intracellular ROS

To determine ROS, cells were treated with LPS alone for 21 hr, PA alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of 5 mM NAC. After incubation with 5 μM CM-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 30 min in culture media without FBS and recovery in a complete media for 10 min, confocal microscopy was conducted. To study mitochondria-specific ROS, cells were treated with LPS alone for 21 hr, PA alone for 21 hr, or LP for a total of 21 hr including LPS pretreatment for 3 hr in the presence or absence of 100 μM MitoTEMPOL. After staining with 5 μM MitoSOX (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 30 min and suspension in PBS-1% FBS, cells were subjected to flow cytometry on FACSVerse (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).

Measurement of KCa3.1 and TRPM2 current

To measure KCa3.1 channel activity with intact cytosolic Ca2+ environment, nystatin perforated whole-cell patch was performed. 180–250 μg/ml of nystatin was added to intracellular pipette solution (140 mM KCl, 5 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM MgATP, and 10 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH). The extracellular bath solution (145 mM NaCl, 3.6 mM KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, and 10 mM sucrose, pH adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH) was perfused through recording chamber. After perforated whole-cell configuration is formed, KCa3.1 current was activated by applying ramp-pulse voltage from –120 to 60 mV. Voltage-dependent K+ channels were suppressed by –10 mV holding potential. Intrinsic KCa3.1 current activity was isolated by application of a selective inhibitor, TRAM-34. Activity of TRAM-34-sensitive current was analyzed with slope conductance fitting between –60 to –40 mV.

To measure plasma TRPM2 channel activity, conventional whole-cell patch was performed. To induce TRPM2 current, 200 μM of ADP-ribose was added to intracellular pipette solution (87 mM Cs-glutamate, 38 mM CsCl, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.9 mM CaCl2, pH adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH). Cells were perfused with extracellular bath solution (143 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM NaH2PO4, and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH) during TRPM2 current recording. When maximal TRPM2 current was established, 20 μM ACA was added to inhibit TRPM2 current.

Patch clamp experiments were performed at room temperature. Patch clamp pipettes were pulled to resistances of 2–3 MΩ with PP-830 puller (Narishige, Japan). Electrophysiological data was recorded and analyzed with Axopatch 200B, Digidata 1440A, and Clampfit 11 program (Axon Instruments, CA).

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as the means ± s.e.m. from ≥3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was tested with two-tailed Student’s t-test to compare values between two groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was employed to compare between multiple groups. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni, Sidak, or Turkey’s test were employed to compare multiple repeated measurements between groups. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Version 8 software (La Jolla, CA). p values <0.05 were considered to represent statistically significant differences.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1I1A1A01063850 to HK), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2019R1A2C3002924 and Rc-2023-00219563 to M-SL). M-SL is the recipient of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (Rs-2024-00336581).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Sung Joon Kim, Email: physiolksj@gmail.com.

Myung-Shik Lee, Email: mslee0923@sch.ac.kr.

Pramod K Mistry, Yale University, United States.

Pramod K Mistry, Yale University, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1A2C3002924 to Myung-Shik Lee.

  • National Research Foundation of Korea Rs-2023-00219563 to Myung-Shik Lee.

  • National Research Foundation of Korea Rs-2024-00336581 to Myung-Shik Lee.

  • National Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1I1A1A01063850 to Hyereen Kang.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

CEO of LysoTech, Inc.

Author contributions

Investigation.

Investigation.

Supervision, Investigation.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Supervision.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration.

Ethics

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy in Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Mouse experiments were approved by the IACUC of the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources of Yonsei University College of Medicine, an AAALAC-accredited unit (IACUC No 2018-0083).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript, supplementary data, and source data for Figure 1–7 and their accompanying figure supplements.

References

  1. Agarwal JJ, Zhu Y, Zhang QY, Mongin AA, Hough LB. TRAM-34, a putatively selective blocker of intermediate-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels, inhibits cytochrome P450 activity. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e63028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaike N, Harata N. Nystatin perforated patch recording and its applications to analyses of intracellular mechanisms. The Japanese Journal of Physiology. 1994;44:433–473. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.44.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. An D, Hao F, Hu C, Kong W, Xu X, Cui MZ. JNK1 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced cd14 and sr-ai expression and macrophage foam cell formation. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017;8:1075. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachar E, Ariav Y, Ketzinel-Gilad M, Cerasi E, Kaiser N, Leibowitz G. Glucose amplifies fatty acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic beta-cells via activation of mTORC1. PLOS ONE. 2009;4:e4954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bock KW. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) functions: Balancing opposing processes including inflammatory reactions. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2020;178:114093. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogeski I, Al-Ansary D, Qu B, Niemeyer BA, Hoth M, Peinelt C. Pharmacology of ORAI channels as a tool to understand their physiological functions. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology. 2010;3:291–303. doi: 10.1586/ecp.10.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campden RI, Zhang Y. The role of lysosomal cysteine cathepsins in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2019;670:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2019.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen R, Chung SH. Molecular dynamics simulations of scorpion toxin recognition by the Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1. Biophysical Journal. 2013;105:1829–1837. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen M, Fei Y, Chen TZ, Li YG, Chen PS. The regulation of the small-conductance calcium-activated potassium current and the mechanisms of sex dimorphism in J wave syndrome. Pflugers Archiv. 2021;473:491–506. doi: 10.1007/s00424-020-02500-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Derler I, Jardin I, Romanin C. Molecular mechanisms of STIM/Orai communication. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 2016;310:C643–C662. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00007.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di A, Xiong S, Ye Z, Malireddi RKS, Kometani S, Zhong M, Mittal M, Hong Z, Kanneganti T-D, Rehman J, Malik AB. The TWIK2 potassium efflux channel in macrophages mediates NLRP3 inflammasome-induced inflammation. Immunity. 2018;49:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drinkall S, Lawrence CB, Ossola B, Russell S, Bender C, Brice NB, Dawson LA, Harte M, Brough D. The two pore potassium channel THIK-1 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Glia. 2022;70:1301–1316. doi: 10.1002/glia.24174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Duffy SM, Ashmole I, Smallwood DT, Leyland ML, Bradding P. Orai/CRACM1 and KCa3.1 ion channels interact in the human lung mast cell plasma membrane. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2015;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s12964-015-0112-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernandes-Alnemri T, Yu JW, Datta P, Wu J, Alnemri ES. AIM2 activates the inflammasome and cell death in response to cytoplasmic DNA. Nature. 2009;458:509–513. doi: 10.1038/nature07710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferreira R, Schlichter LC. Selective activation of KCa3.1 and CRAC channels by P2Y2 receptors promotes Ca(2+) signaling, store refilling and migration of rat microglial cells. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e62345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gao Y, Hanley PJ, Rinné S, Zuzarte M, Daut J. Calcium-activated K(+) channel (K(Ca)3.1) activity during Ca(2+) store depletion and store-operated Ca(2+) entry in human macrophages. Cell Calcium. 2010;48:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Garrity AG, Wang W, Collier CM, Levey SA, Gao Q, Xu H. The endoplasmic reticulum, not the pH gradient, drives calcium refilling of lysosomes. eLife. 2016;5:e15887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. González C, Baez-Nieto D, Valencia I, Oyarzún I, Rojas P, Naranjo D, Latorre R. K(+) channels: function-structural overview. Comprehensive Physiology. 2012;2:2087–2149. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Groß CJ, Mishra R, Schneider KS, Médard G, Wettmarshausen J, Dittlein DC, Shi H, Gorka O, Koenig P-A, Fromm S, Magnani G, Ćiković T, Hartjes L, Smollich J, Robertson AAB, Cooper MA, Schmidt-Supprian M, Schuster M, Schroder K, Broz P, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Beutler B, Kuster B, Ruland J, Schneider S, Perocchi F, Groß O. K+ efflux-independent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by small molecules targeting mitochondria. Immunity. 2016;45:761–773. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guéguinou M, Chantôme A, Fromont G, Bougnoux P, Vandier C, Potier-Cartereau M. KCa and Ca(2+) channels: the complex thought. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2014;1843:2322–2333. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hara H, Tsuchiya K, Kawamura I, Fang R, Hernandez-Cuellar E, Shen Y, Mizuguchi J, Schweighoffer E, Tybulewicz V, Mitsuyama M. Phosphorylation of the adaptor ASC acts as a molecular switch that controls the formation of speck-like aggregates and inflammasome activity. Nature Immunology. 2013;14:1247–1255. doi: 10.1038/ni.2749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. He Y, Zeng MY, Yang D, Motro B, Núñez G. NEK7 is an essential mediator of NLRP3 activation downstream of potassium efflux. Nature. 2016;530:354–357. doi: 10.1038/nature16959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hofer AM, Fasolato C, Pozzan T. Capacitative Ca2+ entry is closely linked to the filling state of internal Ca2+ stores: a study using simultaneous measurements of ICRAC and intraluminal [Ca2+] The Journal of Cell Biology. 1998;140:325–334. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad EO, Kono H, Rock KL, Fitzgerald KA, Latz E. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nature Immunology. 2008;9:847–856. doi: 10.1038/ni.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Immanuel CN, Teng B, Dong B, Gordon EM, Kennedy JA, Luellen C, Schwingshackl A, Cormier SA, Fitzpatrick EA, Waters CM. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1 promotes inflammasome priming in macrophages. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2019;316:L418–L427. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00199.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Katsnelson MA, Rucker LG, Russo HM, Dubyak GR. K+ efflux agonists induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation independently of Ca2+ signaling. The Journal of Immunology. 2015;194:3937–3952. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kinnear NP, Boittin F-X, Thomas JM, Galione A, Evans AM. Lysosome-sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions A trigger zone for calcium signaling by nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate and endothelin-1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:54319–54326. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406132200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Korge P, Honda HM, Weiss JN. Effects of fatty acids in isolated mitochondria: implications for ischemic injury and cardioprotection. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2003;285:H259–H269. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01028.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kraft R, Grimm C, Frenzel H, Harteneck C. Inhibition of TRPM2 cation channels by N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2006;148:264–273. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lange I, Yamamoto S, Partida-Sanchez S, Mori Y, Fleig A, Penner R. TRPM2 functions as a lysosomal Ca2+-release channel in beta cells. Science Signaling. 2009;2:ra23. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee G-S, Subramanian N, Kim AI, Aksentijevich I, Goldbach-Mansky R, Sacks DB, Germain RN, Kastner DL, Chae JJ. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Ca2+ and cAMP. Nature. 2012;492:123–127. doi: 10.1038/nature11588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee H-Y, Kim J, Quan W, Lee J-C, Kim M-S, Kim S-H, Bae J-W, Hur KY, Lee M-S. Autophagy deficiency in myeloid cells increases susceptibility to obesity-induced diabetes and experimental colitis. Autophagy. 2016;12:1390–1403. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1184799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Y, Chen M, Xu Y, Yu X, Xiong T, Du M, Sun J, Liu L, Tang Y, Yao P. Iron-mediated lysosomal membrane permeabilization in ethanol-induced hepatic oxidative damage and apoptosis: protective effects of quercetin. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:4147610. doi: 10.1155/2016/4147610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. López Sanjurjo CI, Tovey SC, Taylor CW. Rapid recycling of Ca2+ between IP3-sensitive stores and lysosomes. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e111275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Madry C, Kyrargyri V, Arancibia-Cárcamo IL, Jolivet R, Kohsaka S, Bryan RM, Attwell D. Microglial ramification, surveillance, and interleukin-1β release are regulated by the two-pore domain K+ channel THIK-1. Neuron. 2018;97:299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maggi CA, Santicioli P, Geppetti P, Parlani M, Astolfi M, Del Bianco E, Patacchini R, Giuliani S, Meli A. The effect of calcium free medium and nifedipine on the release of substance P-like immunoreactivity and contractions induced by capsaicin in the isolated guinea-pig and rat bladder. General Pharmacology. 1989;20:445–456. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(89)90194-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Misawa T, Takahama M, Kozaki T, Lee H, Zou J, Saitoh T, Akira S. Microtubule-driven spatial arrangement of mitochondria promotes activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature Immunology. 2013;14:454–460. doi: 10.1038/ni.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Muñoz-Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martínez-Colón G, Smith BL, Rajendiran TM, Núñez G. K+ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38:1142–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nakamura S, Takamura T, Matsuzawa-Nagata N, Takayama H, Misu H, Noda H, Nabemoto S, Kurita S, Ota T, Ando H, Miyamoto K-I, Kaneko S. Palmitate induces insulin resistance in H4IIEC3 hepatocytes through reactive oxygen species produced by mitochondria. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:14809–14818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901488200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nam TS, Park DR, Rah SY, Woo TG, Chung HT, Brenner C, Kim UH. Interleukin-8 drives CD38 to form NAADP from NADP + and NAAD in the endolysosomes to mobilize Ca 2+ and effect cell migration. FASEB Journal. 2020;34:12565–12576. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001249R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Okada M, Matsuzawa A, Yoshimura A, Ichijo H. The lysosome rupture-activated TAK1-JNK pathway regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:32926–32936. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.579961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Park KS, Poburko D, Wollheim CB, Demaurex N. Amiloride derivatives induce apoptosis by depleting ER Ca(2+) stores in vascular endothelial cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2009;156:1296–1304. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Park K, Lim H, Kim J, Hwang H, Lee YS, Bae SH, Kim H, Kim H, Kang SW, Kim JW, Lee MS. Essential role of lysosomal Ca2+-mediated TFEB activation in mitophagy and functional adaptation of pancreatic β-cells to metabolic stress. Nature Communications. 2022;13:1300. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2069956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Penny CJ, Kilpatrick BS, Han JM, Sneyd J, Patel S. A computational model of lysosome-ER Ca2+ microdomains. Journal of Cell Science. 2014;127:2934–2943. doi: 10.1242/jcs.149047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Place DE, Samir P, Karki R, Briard B, Vogel P, Kanneganti T-D. ASK family kinases are required for optimal nlrp3 inflammasome priming. The American Journal of Pathology. 2018;188:1021–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Raffaello A, Mammucari C, Gherardi G, Rizzuto R. Calcium at the center of cell signaling: interplay between endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and lysosomes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41:1035–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schoenmakers TJ, Visser GJ, Flik G, Theuvenet AP. CHELATOR: an improved method for computing metal ion concentrations in physiological solutions. BioTechniques. 1992;12:870–874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schroeder ME, Russo S, Costa C, Hori J, Tiscornia I, Bollati-Fogolín M, Zamboni DS, Ferreira G, Cairoli E, Hill M. Pro-inflammatory Ca++-activated K+ channels are inhibited by hydroxychloroquine. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:1892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01836-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharif H, Wang L, Wang WL, Magupalli VG, Andreeva L, Qiao Q, Hauenstein AV, Wu Z, Núñez G, Mao Y, Wu H. Structural mechanism for NEK7-licensed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2019;570:338–343. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1295-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shen D, Wang X, Li X, Zhang X, Yao Z, Dibble S, Dong X, Yu T, Lieberman AP, Showalter HD, Xu H. Lipid storage disorders block lysosomal trafficking by inhibiting a TRP channel and lysosomal calcium release. Nature Communications. 2012;3:731. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Strøbaek D, Jørgensen TD, Christophersen P, Ahring PK, Olesen SP. Pharmacological characterization of small-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels stably expressed in HEK 293 cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2000;129:991–999. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sumoza-Toledo A, Penner R. TRPM2: a multifunctional ion channel for calcium signalling. The Journal of Physiology. 2011;589:1515–1525. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Suzuki J, Kanemaru K, Ishii K, Ohkura M, Okubo Y, Iino M. Imaging intraorganellar Ca2+ at subcellular resolution using CEPIA. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4153. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tahtinen S, Tong A-J, Himmels P, Oh J, Paler-Martinez A, Kim L, Wichner S, Oei Y, McCarron MJ, Freund EC, Amir ZA, de la Cruz CC, Haley B, Blanchette C, Schartner JM, Ye W, Yadav M, Sahin U, Delamarre L, Mellman I. IL-1 and IL-1ra are key regulators of the inflammatory response to RNA vaccines. Nature Immunology. 2022;23:532–542. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01160-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tardiolo G, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. Overview on the effects of N-Acetylcysteine in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2018;23:3305. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tseng HHL, Vong CT, Kwan YW, Lee SM-Y, Hoi MPM. TRPM2 regulates TXNIP-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation via interaction with p47 phox under high glucose in human monocytic cells. Scientific Reports. 2017;6:35016. doi: 10.1038/srep35016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Uchida K, Tominaga M. TRPM2 modulates insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. Islets. 2011;3:209–211. doi: 10.4161/isl.3.4.16130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vaca L. SOCIC: the store-operated calcium influx complex. Cell Calcium. 2010;47:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang L, Negro R, Wu H. TRPM2, linking oxidative stress and Ca2+ permeation to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2020;62:131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Weber K, Schilling JD. Lysosomes integrate metabolic-inflammatory cross-talk in primary macrophage inflammasome activation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:9158–9171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.531202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AWJ. Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2003;112:1796–1808. doi: 10.1172/JCI19246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, Jha S, Zhang L, Huang MT-H, Brickey WJ, Ting JP-Y. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nature Immunology. 2011;12:408–415. doi: 10.1038/ni.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wulff H, Miller MJ, Hansel W, Grissmer S, Cahalan MD, Chandy KG. Design of A potent and selective inhibitor of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel, IKCa1: A potential immunosuppressant. PNAS. 2000;97:8151–8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.8151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xian H, Watari K, Sanchez-Lopez E, Offenberger J, Onyuru J, Sampath H, Ying W, Hoffman HM, Shadel GS, Karin M. Oxidized DNA fragments exit mitochondria via mPTP- and VDAC-dependent channels to activate NLRP3 inflammasome and interferon signaling. Immunity. 2022;55:1370–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Xu S, Nam SM, Kim J-H, Das R, Choi S-K, Nguyen TT, Quan X, Choi SJ, Chung CH, Lee EY, Lee I-K, Wiederkehr A, Wollheim CB, Cha S-K, Park K-S. Palmitate induces ER calcium depletion and apoptosis in mouse podocytes subsequent to mitochondrial oxidative stress. Cell Death & Disease. 2015;6:e1976. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xu Z, Chen ZM, Wu X, Zhang L, Cao Y, Zhou P. Distinct molecular mechanisms underlying potassium efflux for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:609441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yang D, He Y, Muñoz-Planillo R, Liu Q, Núñez G. Caspase-11 requires the pannexin-1 channel and the purinergic P2X7 pore to mediate pyroptosis and endotoxic shock. Immunity. 2015;43:923–932. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang J, Zhao Z, Gu M, Feng X, Xu H. Release and uptake mechanisms of vesicular Ca2+ stores. Protein & Cell. 2019;10:8–19. doi: 10.1007/s13238-018-0523-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yaron JR, Gangaraju S, Rao MY, Kong X, Zhang L, Su F, Tian Y, Glenn HL, Meldrum DR. K(+) regulates Ca(2+) to drive inflammasome signaling: dynamic visualization of ion flux in live cells. Cell Death & Disease. 2015;6:e1954. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Z, Zhang W, Jung DY, Ko HJ, Lee Y, Friedline RH, Lee E, Jun J, Ma Z, Kim F, Tsitsilianos N, Chapman K, Morrison A, Cooper MP, Miller BA, Kim JK. TRPM2 Ca2+ channel regulates energy balance and glucose metabolism. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2012;302:E807–E816. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00239.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang X, Cheng X, Yu L, Yang J, Calvo R, Patnaik S, Hu X, Gao Q, Yang M, Lawas M, Delling M, Marugan J, Ferrer M, Xu H. MCOLN1 is a ROS sensor in lysosomes that regulates autophagy. Nature Communications. 2016;7:12109. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Yu H, Li M, Hang L, Xu X. Apigenin protects mouse retina against oxidative damage by regulating the Nrf2 pathway and autophagy. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2020;2020:9420704. doi: 10.1155/2020/9420704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhong Z, Zhai Y, Liang S, Mori Y, Han R, Sutterwala FS, Qiao L. TRPM2 links oxidative stress to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature Communications. 2013;4:1611. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469:221–225. doi: 10.1038/nature09663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zitt C, Strauss B, Schwarz EC, Spaeth N, Rast G, Hatzelmann A, Hoth M. Potent inhibition of Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channels and T-lymphocyte activation by the pyrazole derivative BTP2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:12427–12437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309297200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Pramod K Mistry 1

This useful study proposes a role of lysosomal Ca2+ release in inflammasome signaling and metabolic inflammation. While the proposed model would be of considerable interest to the field of immunology if validated, the experimental approaches to study calcium dynamics are problematic, with one of several concerns being the transfection efficiency. The major claims of the article are thus only incompletely supported.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

This manuscript proposes a complex incoherent model involving Ca2+ signaling in inflammasome activation. The experimental approaches used to study the calcium dynamics are highly problematic and the results shown are of very poor quality.

Major concerns:

(1) The analysis of lysosomal Ca2+release is being carried out after many hours of treatment. Such evidence is not meaningful to claim that PA activates Ca2+ efflux from lysosome and even if this phenomenon was robust, it is not doubtful that such kinetics are meaningful for the regulation of inflammasome activation. Furthermore, the evidence for lysosomal Ca2+ release is indirect and relies on a convoluted process that doesn't make any conceptual sense to me. In addition to these major shortcomings, the indirect evidence of perilysosomal Ca2+ elevation is also of very poor quality and from the standpoint of my expertise in calcium signaling, the data are incredulous. The use of GCaMP3-ML1, *transiently transfected* into BMDMs is highly problematic. The efficiency of transfection in BMDMs is always extremely low and overexpression of the sensor in a few rare cells can lead to erroneous observations. The overexpression also results in gross mislocalization of such membrane-bound sensors. The accumulation of GCaMP3-ML1 in the ER of these cells would prevent any credible measurements of perilysosomal Ca2+ signals. A meaningful investigation of this process in primary macrophages requires the generation of a mouse line wherein the sensor is expressed at low levels in myeloid cells, and shown to be localized almost exclusively in the lysosomal membrane. The mechanistic framework built around these major conceptual and technical flaws is not especially meaningful and since these are foundational results, I cannot take the main claims of this study seriously.

A few transfected cells may overexpress the protein through a strong promoter but this is not ideal. For reliable Ca2+ measurements, one needs low expression of the sensor in a substantially high percentage of cells. This can only be demonstrated by showing the time lapse of Ca2+ responses in the macrophages. More generally, I have nearly 2 decades of experience working with primary BMDMs and it is widely known that primary BMDMs are incredibly difficult to transfect - it is the nature of these cells. The claim that they get high efficiency of transfection is frankly too incredulous to take seriously.

(2) The cytosolic Ca2+ imaging shown in figure 1C doesn't make any sense. It looks like a snapshot of basal Ca2+ many hours after PA treatment - calcium elevations are highly dynamic. Snapshot measurements are not helpful and analyses of Calcium dynamics requires a recording over a certain timespan. Unfortunately, this technical approach has been used throughout the manuscript. Also, BAPTA-AM abrogates IL-1b secretion because IL-1b transcription is Ca2+ dependent - the result shown in figure 1D does not shed light on anything to do with inflammasome activation and it is misleading to suggest that.

(3) Trpm2-/- macrophages are known to be hyporesponsive to inflammatory stimuli - the reduced secretion of IL-1b by these macrophages is not novel. From a mechanistic perspective, this study does not add much to that observation and the proposed role of TRPM2 as a lysosomal Ca2+ release channel is not substantiated by good quality Ca2+ imaging data (see point 3 above). Furthermore, the study assumes that TRPM2 is a lysosomal ion channel. One paper reported TRPM2 in the lysosomes but this is a controversial claim, with no replication or further development in the last 14 years. This core assumption can be highly misleading to readers unfamiliar with TRPM2 biology and it is necessary to present credible evidence that TRPM2 is functional in the lysosomal membrane of macrophages. Ideally, this line of investigation should rest on robust demonstration of TRPM2 currents in patch-clamp electrophysiology of lysosomes. If this is not technically feasible for the authors, they should at least investigate TRPM2 localization on lysosomal membranes of macrophages.

In the revised manuscript, authors showed TRPM2 localization but these results are problematic. The authors provide no information on what TRPM2 antibody they used for this study and whether it has been validated by use of knockouts. The staining shows very high amounts of TRPM2 all across the cell - even more than LAMP2. In reality, TRPM2 expression in macrophages is very low. Are the authors overexpressing TRPM2? These data only add to my concerns about this manuscript.

(4) Apigenin and Quercetin are highly non-specific and their effects cannot be attributed to CD38 inhibition alone. Such conclusions need strong loss of function studies using genetic knockouts of CD38 - or at least siRNA knockdown. Importantly, if indeed TRPM2 is being activated downstream of CD38, this should be easily evident in whole cell patch clamp electrophysiology. TRPM2 currents can be resolved using this technique and authors have Trpm2-/- cells for proper controls. Authors attempted these experiments but the results are of very poor quality. If the TRPM2 current is being activated through ADPR generated by CD38 (in response to PA stimulation), then it is very odd that authors need to include 200 uM cADPR to see TRPM2 current (Fig. 3A). Oddly, even these data cast great doubt on the technical quality of the electrophysiology experiments. Even with such high concentrations of cADPr, the TRPM2 current is tiny and Trpm2-/- controls are missing. The current-voltage relationship is not shown, and I feel that the results are merely reporting leak currents seen in measurements with substandard seals. Also 20 uM ACA is not a selective inhibitor of TRPM2 - relying on ACA as the conclusive diagnostic is problematic.

(5) TRPM2 is expressed in many different cell lines. The broad metabolic differences observed by the authors in the Trpm2-/- mice cannot be attributed to macrophage-mediated inflammation. Such a conclusion requires the study of mice wherein Trpm2 is deleted selectively in macrophages or at least in the cells of the myeloid lineage.

(6) The ER-Lysosome Ca2+ refilling experiments rely on transient transfection of organelle-targeted sensors into BMDMs. See point #1 to understand why I find this approach to be highly problematic. Furthermore the data procured are also not convincing and lack critical controls (localization of sensors has not been demonstrated and their response to acute mobilization of Ca2+ has not been shown inspire any confidence in these results).

(7) Authors claim that SCOE is coupled to K+ efflux. But there is no credible evidence that SOCE is activated in PA stimulated macrophages. The data shown in Fig 4 supp 1 do not investigate SOCE in a reliable manner - the conclusion is again based on snapshot measurements and crude non-selective inhibitors. The correct way to evaluate SOCE is to record cytosolic Ca2+ elevations over a period of time in absence and presence of extracellular Ca2+. However, even such recordings can be unreliable since the phenomenon is being investigated hours after PA stimulation. So, the only definitive way to demonstrate that Orai channels are indeed active during this process is through patch clamp electrophysiology of PA stimulated cells.

Authors failed to respond to these concerns in a credible manner and simply tried to obfuscate the matters with extraneous arguments and wild claims. The revised manuscript was not a significant improvement. I have major concerns with this manuscript and let it be on record that this is very poor-quality science.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

In this manuscript by Kang et. al., the authors investigated the mechanisms of K+-efflux-coupled SOCE in NLRP3 inflammasome activation by LP(LPS+PA, and identified an essential role of TRPM2-mediated lysosomal Ca2+ release and subsequent IP3Rs-mediated ER Ca2+ release and store depletion in the process. K+ efflux is shown to be mediated by a Ca2+-activated K+ channel (KCa3.1). LP-induced cytosolic Ca2+ elevation also induced a delayed activation of ASK1 and JNK, leading to ASC oligomerization and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Overall, this is an interesting and comprehensive study that has identified several novel molecular players in metabolic inflammation. The manuscript can benefit if the following concerns could be addressed.

(1) The expression of TRPM2 in the lysosomes of macrophages needs to more definitively established. For instance, the cADPR-induced TRPM2 currents should be abolished in the TRPM2 KO macrophages. Can you show the lysosomal expression of TRPM2, either with an antibody if available or with a fluorescently-tagged TRPM2 overexpression construct?

In the revised manuscript, the authors did not perform the KO control experiment to support that cADPR-induced currents were indeed mediated by TRPM2. Additonally, the co-localization analyses failed to convincingly establish the lysosomal perimeter membrane residence of TRPM2.

(2) Can you use your TRPM2 inhibitor ACA to pharmacologically phenocopy some results, e.g., about [Ca2+]ER, [Ca2+]LY, and [Ca2+]i from the TRPM2 knockout?

In the revised manuscript, most suggested experiments were not performed. In the only experiment that was conducted, Figure 3-figure supplement 1A, the effect of ACA was marginal.

(3) In Fig. S4A, bathing the cells in zero Ca2+ for three hours might not be ideal. Can you use a SOCE inhibitor, e.g, YM-58483, to make the point?

The specific suggested experiment was not performed.

(4) In Fig. 1A, you need a positive control, e.g., ionomycin, to show that the GPN response was selectively reduced upon LP treatment.

Results in a previous study cannot be used to substitute the missing control experiments in the current study.

eLife. 2024 Jul 2;12:RP87561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87561.3.sa3

Author response

Hyereen Kang 1, Seong Woo Choi 2, Joo Young Kim 3, Soo-Jin Oh 4, Sung Joon Kim 5, Myung-Shik Lee 6

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

eLife assessment

The authors present a potentially useful model involving Ca2+ signaling in inflammasome activation. As it stands, it was felt that the data were not sufficient to support the model and the claims of the study are inadequately presented.

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript proposes a complex unclear model involving Ca2+ signaling in inflammasome activation. The experimental approaches used to study the calcium dynamics are problematic and the results shown are of inadequate quality. The major claims of this manuscript are not adequately substantiated.

Major concerns:

(1) The analysis of lysosomal Ca2+release is being carried out after many hours of treatment. Such evidence is not meaningful to claim that PA activates Ca2+ efflux from lysosome and even if this phenomenon was robust, it is not doubtful that such kinetics are meaningful for the regulation of inflammasome activation. Furthermore, the evidence for lysosomal Ca2+ release is indirect and relies on a convoluted process that doesn't make any conceptual sense to me. In addition to these major shortcomings, the indirect evidence of perilysosomal Ca2+ elevation is also of very poor quality and from the standpoint of my expertise in calcium signaling, the data are incredulous. The use of GCaMP3-ML1, transiently transfected into BMDMs is highly problematic. The efficiency of transfection in BMDMs is always extremely low and overexpression of the sensor in a few rare cells can lead to erroneous observations. The overexpression also results in gross mislocalization of such membrane-bound sensors. The accumulation of GCaMP3-ML1 in the ER of these cells would prevent any credible measurements of perilysosomal Ca2+ signals. A meaningful investigation of this process in primary macrophages requires the generation of a mouse line wherein the sensor is expressed at low levels in myeloid cells, and shown to be localized almost exclusively in the lysosomal membrane. The mechanistic framework built around these major conceptual and technical flaws is not especially meaningful and since these are foundational results, I cannot take the main claims of this study seriously.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s concern that transfection efficiency could be low in BMDMs together with possible mislocalization of GCAMP3-ML1. However, in our experiment, transfection of BMDM with test plasmids resulted in good expression of test proteins. Below, we present our data showing good transfection efficiency of BMDM cells, while a different plasmid was employed.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

(2) The cytosolic Ca2+ imaging shown in Figure 1C doesn't make any sense. It looks like a snapshot of basal Ca2+ many hours after PA treatment - calcium elevations are highly dynamic. Snapshot measurements are not helpful and analyses of Calcium dynamics requires a recording over a certain timespan. Unfortunately, this technical approach has been used throughout the manuscript. Also, BAPTA-AM abrogates IL-1b secretion because IL-1b transcription is Ca2+ dependent - the result shown in figure 1D does not shed light on anything to do with inflammasome activation and it is misleading to suggest that.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s concern that snapshot could lead to false conclusion. We have not traced cytosolic Ca2+ content after treatment with LPS + PA. However, we have tracedlysosomal Ca2+ and ER Ca2+ for more than 15 min, which was presented in Figure 4B. We also agree with the comment that BAPTA-AM might affect transcription of pro-IL-1β. We have conducted immunoblot analysis after treatment with LPS+PA in the presence of BAPTA-AM. Protein band of pro-IL-1β was not affected by BAPTA-AM treatment suggesting no effect of BAPTA-AM on transcription or translation of pro-IL-1β, which was added to Figure 1D, as suggested.

(3) Trpm2-/- macrophages are known to be hyporesponsive to inflammatory stimuli - the reduced secretion of IL-1b by these macrophages is not novel. From a mechanistic perspective, this study does not add much to that observation and the proposed role of TRPM2 as a lysosomal Ca2+ release channel is not substantiated by good quality Ca2+ imaging data (see point 3 above). Furthermore, the study assumes that TRPM2 is a lysosomal ion channel. One paper reported TRPM2 in the lysosomes but this is a controversial claim, with no replication or further development in the last 14 years. This core assumption can be highly misleading to readers unfamiliar with TRPM2 biology and it is necessary to present credible evidence that TRPM2 is functional in the lysosomal membrane of macrophages. Ideally, this line of investigation should rest on robust demonstration of TRPM2 currents in patch-clamp electrophysiology of lysosomes. If this is not technically feasible for the authors, they should at least investigate TRPM2 localization on lysosomal membranes of macrophages.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that TRPM2. However, we have shown that TRPM2 current was not activated in the plasma membrane of BMDMs after treatment with LPS+PA. We also agree with the reviewer’s comment that inflammatory cytokine release from TRPM2 KO cells or inflammasome response of TRPM2 KO macrophages to ROS or nanoparticles has been reported to be reduced; however, the role of TRPM2 in metabolic inflammation or inflammasome activation in response to lipid stimulators has not been shown, as discussed in the new lines 9-10 from the bottom of page 18. Regarding the role of lysosomal TRPM2 in inflammation, we have shown that bafilomycin A1 treatment abrogated increase of cytosolic Ca2+ by LPS+PA (Figure 3-figure supplement 1D), supporting the role of lysosome and lysosomal Ca2+ in inflammasome activation by LPS+PA.

We agree with the reviewer’s comment that TRPM2 expression on lysosome needs to be tested. We conducted confocal microscopy after immunofluorescence staining using anti-TRMP2 and -LAMP2 antibodies, which showed a certain portion of TRPM2 was colocalized with LAMP-2. This result substantiating TRPM2 expression on lysosome of macrophages was incorporated as Figure 2-figure supplement 1A.

(4) Apigenin and Quercetin are highly non-specific and their effects cannot be attributed to CD38 inhibition alone. Such conclusions need strong loss of function studies using genetic knockouts of CD38 - or at least siRNA knockdown. Importantly, if indeed TRPM2 is being activated downstream of CD38, this should be easily evident in whole cell patch clamp electrophysiology. TRPM2 currents can be resolved using this technique and authors have Trpm2-/- cells for proper controls. Authors attempted these experiments but the results are of very poor quality. If the TRPM2 current is being activated through ADPR generated by CD38 (in response to PA stimulation), then it is very odd that authors need to include 200 uM cADPR to see TRPM2 current (Fig. 3A). Oddly, even these data cast great doubt on the technical quality of the electrophysiology experiments. Even with such high concentrations of cADPr, the TRPM2 current is tiny and Trpm2-/- controls are missing. The current-voltage relationship is not shown, and I feel that the results are merely reporting leak currents seen in measurements with substandard seals. Also 20 uM ACA is not a selective inhibitor of TRPM2 - relying on ACA as the conclusive diagnostic is problematic.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that effects of apigenin and quercetin could be due to mechanisms other than inhibition of CD38-mediated inflammasome activation. Indeed, that is the reason we have used TRPM2 KO mice and cells. Small TRPM2 current after treatment with high concentrations of cADPr might suggest the minor role of plasma membrane of TRPM2 in macrophage. Regarding concern about ACA, we added data showing inhibition of IL-1β release in response to LPS+PA by ACA as a new Figure 3-figure supplement 1A.

(5) TRPM2 is expressed in many different cell lines. The broad metabolic differences observed by the authors in the Trpm2-/- mice cannot be attributed to macrophage-mediated inflammation. Such a conclusion requires the study of mice wherein Trpm2 is deleted selectively in macrophages or at least in the cells of the myeloid lineage.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that TRPM2 in cells other than macrophage might have affected the results. Thus, we have conducted in vitro stimulation of TRPM2-KO primary peritoneal macrophages with LPS+PA. We have observed that IL-1β release of TRPM2-KO macrophages in response in vitro treatment with LPS+PA was significantly lower than that from wild-type macrophages (Figure 2C & D), showing the role of TRPM2 in macrophages in inflammasome activation by LPS+PA, which could be independent of TRPM2 in tissues or cells other than macrophages.

(6) The ER-Lysosome Ca2+ refilling experiments rely on transient transfection of organelle-targeted sensors into BMDMs. See point #1 to understand why I find this approach to be highly problematic. Furthermore, the data procured are also not convincing and lack critical controls (localization of sensors has not been demonstrated and their response to acute mobilization of Ca2+ has not been shown to inspire any confidence in these results).

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that transfection or ER-targeted Ca2+ sensor could have artifactual effects. However, we have studied ER-Lysosome Ca2+ experiment using not only GEM-CEPIAer but also using D1ER, a FRET-based ER Ca2+ sensor which has an advantage of short distance of molecular interaction. Thus, we believe that changes of ER Ca2+ after treatment with LPS+PA is not due to an artifactual effect. Multiple contact between VAPA and ORP1L (Figure 4E) also supports ER-lysosome contact, likely facilitating ER-lysosome Ca2+ flux.

(7) Authors claim that SCOE is coupled to K+ efflux. But there is no credible evidence that SOCE is activated in PA stimulated macrophages. The data shown in Fig 4 supp 1 do not investigate SOCE in a reliable manner - the conclusion is again based on snapshot measurements and crude non-selective inhibitors. The correct way to evaluate SOCE is to record cytosolic Ca2+ elevations over a period of time in absence and presence of extracellular Ca2+. However, even such recordings can be unreliable since the phenomenon is being investigated hours after PA stimulation. So, the only definitive way to demonstrate that Orai channels are indeed active during this process is through patch clamp electrophysiology of PA stimulated cells.

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that the final proof of SOCE activation is activation of Orai channel evidenced by electrophysiology. However, we have shown STIM1 aggregation colocalized with Ora1, which is another strong evidence of SOCE channel activation (Vaca L. Cell Calcium 47:199, 2010). Such a paper showing the role of SOCE aggregation in SOCE activation was incorporated in the text (line 4 from the bottom of page 10) and References.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript by Kang et. al., the authors investigated the mechanisms of K+-efflux-coupled SOCE in NLRP3 inflammasome activation by LP(LPS+PA, and identified an essential role of TRPM2-mediated lysosomal Ca2+ release and subsequent IP3Rs-mediated ER Ca2+ release and store depletion in the process. K+ efflux is shown to be mediated by a Ca2+-activated K+ channel (KCa3.1). LP-induced cytosolic Ca2+ elevation also induced a delayed activation of ASK1 and JNK, leading to ASC oligomerization and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Overall, this is an interesting and comprehensive study that has identified several novel molecular players in metabolic inflammation. The manuscript can benefit if the following concerns could be addressed:

(1) The expression of TRPM2 in the lysosomes of macrophages needs to be more definitively established. For instance, the cADPR-induced TRPM2 currents should be abolished in the TRPM2 KO macrophages. Can you show the lysosomal expression of TRPM2, either with an antibody if available or with a fluorescently-tagged TRPM2 overexpression construct?

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that TRPM2 expression on lysosome needs to be tested. We conducted confocal microscopy after immunofluorescent staining using anti-TRMP2 and -LAMP2 antibodies, which showed a certain portion of TRPM2 was colocalized with LAMP2. This result was incorporated as Figure 2-figure supplement 1A.

(2) Can you use your TRPM2 inhibitor ACA to pharmacologically phenocopy some results, e.g., about [Ca2+]ER, [Ca2+]LY, and [Ca2+]i from the TRPM2 knockout?Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that the effect of ACA on other experimental results needs to be shown. We did not study the effect of ACA on Ca2+ flux; however, we have observed that ACA inhibited IL-1β release in response to LPS+PA. This data was incorporated as Figure 3-figure supplement 1A.

Author response image 2.

Author response image 2.

(3) In Fig. S4A, bathing the cells in zero Ca2+ for three hours might not be ideal. Can you use a SOCE inhibitor, e.g, YM-58483, to make the point?

Ans We agree with the reviewer’s comment that SOCE inhibitor experiment would be necessary in addition to the experiment employing zero Ca2+. In fact, we have already used two SOCE inhibitors (2-APB and BTP2) (Figure 4-fig. supplement 1 B-D). Particularly, BTP2 experiment could eliminate possible role of ER Ca2+ inhibition that might occur when 2-APB was employed.

(4) In Fig. 1A, you need a positive control, e.g., ionomycin, to show that the GPN response was selectively reduced upon LP treatment.

Ans We did not employ ionomycin as a control in this study. In our previous study using other agents inducing lysosomal Ca2+ efflux, we have observed lysosomal Ca2+ efflux with intact subsequent ionomycin response. While we did not include ionomycin in the current paper, we are positive that ionomycin response would be preserved.

Recommendations for the authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

See Public Review.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

(5) In Fig. 4B, the red label should read "BAPTA-1 Dextran", but not "GAPTA-1 Dextran".

(6) Writing should be improved in many sections.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
    Figure 2—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence and ELISA.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Original data for blood glucose, and the number of CLS and ASC specks.
    Figure 3—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for current, [Ca2+]i, body weight, and HOMA-IR.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio), ELISA, and the number of PLT dots.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for ELISA and fluorescence ratio.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and [Ca2+]i.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and [Ca2+]i.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Original data for slope conductance, fluorescence, and the numbers of ASC specks and CLS.
    Figure 6—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fold change of mRNA expression, ELISA, the number of PLA dots, and blood glucose.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Original data for ELISA.
    Figure 7—source data 2. Original uncropped blot.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for fluorescence (ratio) and ELISA.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original data blot.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript, supplementary data, and source data for Figure 1–7 and their accompanying figure supplements.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES