Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis

Siyu Zhu; Wei Chen; Alasdair Masson; Yi-Ping Li

doi:10.1038/s41421-024-00689-6

. 2024 Jul 2;10:71. doi: 10.1038/s41421-024-00689-6

Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis

Siyu Zhu ¹, Wei Chen ^1,^✉, Alasdair Masson ¹, Yi-Ping Li ^1,^✉

PMCID: PMC11219878 PMID: 38956429

Abstract

The initiation of osteogenesis primarily occurs as mesenchymal stem cells undergo differentiation into osteoblasts. This differentiation process plays a crucial role in bone formation and homeostasis and is regulated by two intricate processes: cell signal transduction and transcriptional gene expression. Various essential cell signaling pathways, including Wnt, BMP, TGF-β, Hedgehog, PTH, FGF, Ephrin, Notch, Hippo, and Piezo1/2, play a critical role in facilitating osteoblast differentiation, bone formation, and bone homeostasis. Key transcriptional factors in this differentiation process include Runx2, Cbfβ, Runx1, Osterix, ATF4, SATB2, and TAZ/YAP. Furthermore, a diverse array of epigenetic factors also plays critical roles in osteoblast differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis at the transcriptional level. This review provides an overview of the latest developments and current comprehension concerning the pathways of cell signaling, regulation of hormones, and transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the commitment and differentiation of osteoblast lineage, as well as in bone formation and maintenance of homeostasis. The paper also reviews epigenetic regulation of osteoblast differentiation via mechanisms, such as histone and DNA modifications. Additionally, we summarize the latest developments in osteoblast biology spurred by recent advancements in various modern technologies and bioinformatics. By synthesizing these insights into a comprehensive understanding of osteoblast differentiation, this review provides further clarification of the mechanisms underlying osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, and bone formation, and highlights potential new therapeutic applications for the treatment of bone diseases.

Subject terms: Developmental biology, Cell signalling, Mechanisms of disease

Introduction

Adult bone comprises three main cell types: osteoblasts, osteocytes (both of which are derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)), and osteoclasts (which are derived from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)). Regarding bone homeostasis, osteoblasts function to form bone tissue, osteoclasts resorb and degrade bone tissue, while the primary role of osteocytes is to maintain the structural integrity and function of bone by controlling the activity of both osteoclasts and osteoblasts. These opposing cell types regulate the physiological bone turnover rate, which can be separated into two stages: modeling and remodeling. Bone modeling happens continuously during development, while remodeling is involved in tissue renewal over the course of a person’s life. Bone remodeling typically initiates with osteoclasts breaking down the matrix, consisting mainly of type I collagen and crystalline hydroxyapatite proteins. Once resorption occurs, osteoblasts are recruited to the area to produce and mineralize fresh matrix. In the bone matrix, osteoblasts create a critical assortment of macromolecules, including collagen and non-collagen proteins, which act as a platform for lattice mineralization by means of hydroxyapatite formation. Imbalances in the quantity and ratio of osteoblasts to osteoclasts, stemming from bone tissue remodeling, can give rise to conditions such as osteoporosis and other phenotypically akin disorders. As such, there has been continued research on osteoblast differentiation to elucidate mechanisms with therapeutic potential. This review examines the recent advancements in the understanding of cell signaling, transcription, epigenetics, extracellular interplay, and physiological mechanisms that underpin osteoblast differentiation and their application to the treatment of related diseases.

Osteoblast function

Osteoblasts, a major cellular component of bone and the terminal differentiation products of MSCs, have three main functions. First, osteoblasts play a pivotal role as the primary cellular regulator of bone formation. This involves synthesizing and releasing various proteins found in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of bone, along with orchestrating gene expression to facilitate ECM mineralization. With the assistance of β1 integrin, osteoblasts interface with the current matrix to shape cadherin-connected monolayers. Whenever osteoblasts are activated, they secrete a matrix consisting primarily of collagen type I and other vital components (Table 1), as well as significant developmental factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)¹. Previous research also indicates that osteoblasts play important roles in glucose homeostasis via insulin signaling because it increases osteocalcin activity².

Table 1.

Osteoblast dysfunction-associated genes and their mouse models.

Gene	Role of gene/protein	Defective phenotype caused by mutation	Diseases caused by mutation	References
AP1	A transcriptional factor that can regulate osteoblast-specific genes, such as ALP, collagen type I, or OPN.	Osteopetrosis.	Embryonic lethality, persistent truncus arteriosus, congenital chronic diarrhea	^433,434
ATF4	Determines the initiation and terminal differentiation of osteoblasts.	Osteoblast differentiation delay.	Coffin-Lowry Syndrome	³⁵⁴
β-catenin	Essential for preventing osteoblast transdifferentiation into chondrocytes or adipocytes and for osteoblast differentiation.	Inhibits osteoblast differentiation and instead develops into chondrocytes.	Cancer; Aggressive fibromatosis; Pulmonary fibrosis; Cleft palate; hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome (HPT-JT)	^{65,66,435–438}
C/EBPβ and –δ	A vital transcription factor. Runx2 can regulate C/EBP expression, and C/EBP induces the expression of OCN by direct binding within its promoter. It is necessary for osteoblast mineralization.	Deferred bone arrangement, obstructed osteoblast mineralization, and vital gene expression.	N/A	^439–445
CBFβ	Through its interaction with transcriptional factors like Runxs and ATF4, it is an important factor in the formation of the skeleton.	Impairs osteoblast differentiation.	Skeletal deformities, CCD	^379–381
DLX3	Positively and negatively regulates osteoprogenitor cell differentiation and gene transcription.	Inhibits induction of osteogenic markers.	Osteoporosis, Tricho-Dento-Osseous syndrome (TDO)	^446–449
DLX5	Hinders adipocyte arrangement and manages the expression of transcription factors that control osteoblast differentiation.	Extreme craniofacial, pivotal, and affixed skeletal irregularities.	Split-hand/split-foot malformation (SHFM)	^450–454
ETS1	Regulates OPN and ALP expression by cooperating with Runx2.	Runx2 and OPN were among the key genes whose expression was reduced, as was osteoblast differentiation.	N/A	^455–457
HES1	A downstream effector of the Notch signaling pathway. Binds to Cbfα1 and potentiates its transactivating capability.	Defective functions of mammalian Runt-related proteins.	Severe neurulation defects	^458,459
HEY1	A negative regulator of osteoblast differentiation and maturation.	Enhanced osteoblast matrix mineralization.	Potentially related to cardiac hypertrophy	^460–462
LEF1	Regulates osteoblast differentiation by Wnt3a and BMP2 through binding with Runx2.	Affects osteoblast differentiation.	Human sebaceous adenoma, human sebaceoma	^375,463
MENIN	Regulates osteoblast generation and differentiation, which are aided and sustained by TGF-β and BMP2.	Reduced ALP activation and OCN and Runx2 expression.	Human MEN1 disease, ossifying fibroma (OF), osteoporosis	^464–468
MSX2	Inhibits adipocyte formation and stimulates mesenchymal cells to differentiate into osteoblasts.	Premature fusion of calvarial sutures.	Boston-type craniosynostosis	^469–471
Osterix	Contributes to the final phase of osteogenesis and maturation, regulating the development of functional osteoblasts and their subsequent differentiation.	Devoid of osteoblasts.	Osteosarcoma; bone metastasis of cancers; Juvenile Paget’s disease (JPD)	⁴⁷²
PPAR-γ	Regulator of adipocyte differentiation and inhibits Runx2-mediated OCN transcription and osteoblast late differentiation.	High bone mass with increased osteoblastogenesis.	Partial lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome	^473–475
RUNX2	Serves as the main switch for triggering the differentiation of osteoblasts and negatively regulates bone formation at the end of differentiation.	There are no osteoblasts, and the final stage of chondrocyte differentiation is blocked.	Delayed tooth eruption, cleidocranial dysplasia	^289,290
RUNX1	A key regulator of osteoblast and chondrocyte homeostasis, it positively regulates osteoblast differentiation and inhibits adipocyte formation.	Reduced osteoblast number and cartilage were absent.	Osteoporosis	^311,315,317
RUNX3	Participates in intramembranous and endochondral bone ossification during skeleton development.	The number of osteoblasts and mineral deposition capacity decreased.	Congenital osteopenia	^324,476
SALL4	Promotes osteoblast differentiation by suppressing Notch2-targeted gene expression and nuclear translocation.	Osteoblast differentiation is inhibited.	Holt-Oram syndrome (HOS)	^238,477
SMAD	Regulates targeted gene expression via interacting with Runx2, AP-1, and SP-1.	A phenotype similar to that of CCD.	CCD	⁴⁷⁸
SMAD3	Inhibits osteoblast differentiation and reduces osteocalcin and Cbfa1 expression.	Osteoblast differentiation rates declined.	Metastatic colon cancer	^114,479
STAT1	Binding to Runx2 inhibits nuclear translocation of Runx2 and reduces Runx2 activity.	Excessive osteoblast differentiation and increased bone mass.	Be involved in human achondroplasia	^480–482
SATB2	A molecular node controls osteoblast differentiation in the transcriptional network.	Osteoblast differentiation is lacking.	Cleft palate; SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS, Glass syndrome)	⁴⁸³
TAZ/YAP	Encourages the periosteal osteoblast precursors’ expansion and differentiation and acts with R-Smads to stimulate osteoblast-specific gene expression.	The number of differentiated osteoblasts decreased.	Skeletal fragility, long bone fractures	^484–487

Open in a new tab

Second, osteoclast differentiation can be directly regulated by osteoblast protein expression³. For example, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa β ligand (RANKL), two fundamental proteins for osteoclast differentiation, can be expressed by osteoblasts (Fig. 1)⁴. Osteoblast-produced M-CSF and RANKL have the ability to bind to C-FMS and RANK receptors (respectively) on osteoclast progenitors, triggering subsequent signals that promote osteoclast differentiation by activating the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1)⁵. Osteoblasts secrete osteoprotegerin (OPG) and can regulate osteoclasts by binding to RANKL, preventing RANKL from binding to RANK. Chemoattractants (CCL8, CCL6, and CCL12) that can influence osteoclast differentiation and recruit osteoclast precursors to bone are also regulated by osteoblast calcineurin/NFAT signaling⁶. Osteoclasts can also regulate osteoblast differentiation. Previous work in our had found that osteoclasts regulate osteoblast differentiation and tooth root formation via IGF/AKT/mTOR signaling⁷ (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 — MSCs have three different differentiation fates — adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes — which are regulated by different genes. In the differentiation process, some cells in the three differentiation pathways also have a reciprocal transformation relationship through the regulation of related genes, such as interactions between mature osteoblasts and mature osteoclasts or hypertrophic chondrocytes and early osteoblasts. Transcription factors have different functions in different stages of osteoblast differentiation. Runx2 is a vital factor in all osteoblast differentiation stages; Runx2 promotes osteoblast differentiation in the early stage while inhibiting mature osteoblast differentiation into osteocytes. Cbfβ is the major co-factor of Runx2 and Runx1. Runx3 can promote chondrocytes into hypertrophic chondrocytes. SIRT1 and FOXO1 can promote Runx2 expression. Osx and β-catenin also have important functions in the early stage of osteoblast differentiation. SATB2 and ATF4 are important in promoting the terminal differentiation stage of osteoblast. SATB2 inhibits Hoxa2 activity in the early stage of osteoblast differentiation. Runx1 plays an important role in inhibiting adipocyte differentiation and promoting chondrocyte differentiation. The interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is also very important. Osteoblasts regulate osteoclast differentiation via RANKL signaling and inhibit osteoclast differentiation through OPG. Similarly, osteoclasts can regulate osteoblast differentiation through the Wnt10b, BMP6, or Ephrin signaling pathway.

Fig. 2 — Several canonical signaling pathways control the activity of key transcription factors to mediate osteoblast differentiation. Wnt, TGF-β, BMP, FGF, and Hedgehog pathways are the most classic pathways that have been studied during osteoblast differentiation. Wnt binds with FZD receptors, causing the β-catenin accumulation. β-catenin then moves to the nucleus, in which it causes target genes to be transcribed. Wnt signaling also regulates Runx1 and Runx2 functions. TGF-β and BMP signaling regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression through multiple Smad proteins. TGF-β signaling mainly activates Smad2/3, while BMP signaling activates Smad1/5/8. FGF and FGFR can also regulate osteoblast differentiation and osteoblast-specific gene expression via downstream pathways such as PI3K-AKT and ERK pathways. Runx2, Osterix, and several other transcription factors are also necessary for osteoblast differentiation, and these transcription factors are regulated by these classic pathways. Hedgehog signaling is activated through Hh ligand binding to the 12-transmembrane receptor Patched 1 (PTCH1), which relieves inhibition of the seven-pass transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor Smoothened (SMO). Actived SMO can initiate the intracellular cascade leading to the activation of three Gli transcription factors, and Gli can then translocate into the nucleus and regulate Osx activation, thereby modulating osteoblast-specific gene expression. PTH regulates osteoblast differentiation by binding with PTH1R, subsequently activating cAMP and PKA, leading to the phosphorylation of CREB to regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression. IGF-1 binds to its receptor IGF1R and activates PI3K-Akt pathway, resulting in the activation of mTOR and promotion of osteoblast differentiation.

Third, osteoblasts are inextricably linked to the behavior and function of HSCs⁸. Research has demonstrated the significant involvement of osteoblasts in the HSC microenvironment^9–11. Based on studies of PTH/parathyroid-related protein receptor (PPR) and bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1a (Bmpr1a), osteoblasts that express N-cadherin form N-cadherin/β-catenin adhesion complexes with HSCs⁹. Osteoblasts also produce many essential molecules for HSC renewal and maintenance, such as osteopontin (OPN), thrombopoietin, annexin-2, and angiopoietin-1^12,13. Similarly, C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12 (CXCL12) in mesenchymal progenitor cells is required for the maintenance of HSCs and can maintain HSCs in an undifferentiated state¹⁴. These complexes may mediate the adhesion of hematopoietic stem cells within their niche¹⁵.

Osteoblast origin and cell lineage

The process of osteoblast formation involves a series of distinct stages and cell types within the osteoblast lineage. Osteoblast lineage cells include mesenchymal progenitors, pre-osteoblasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and bone-lining cells (Fig. 1). The exact origin of osteoblasts can vary depending on the life stage and the specificity of the local environment, and therefore, the naming of progenitor cells has always been controversial¹⁶. Skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) can broadly include all immature precursor cells located within the bone and can differentiate into bone tissue-forming cell types¹⁶. This includes cartilage stem cells, recently found in growth plates^17,18, fetal perichondrium cells which give rise to bone lines¹⁹, and periosteum progenitor cells, in endochondral bone development which is important in fracture repair^20,21, as well as distinct reticular and perivascular stromal cell subpopulations in bone marrow, commonly referred to as bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) populations, which seem to have lipogenic potential in some cases^22,23.

During development, osteoblast formation proceeds via two distinct pathways: intramembranous ossification or endochondral ossification (Fig. 1). In mammals, intramembranous ossification primarily affects only a portion of the clavicle and the skull, whereas endochondral ossification controls bone formation throughout the skeletal system²⁴. During intramembranous ossification, MSCs can directly differentiate into osteoblasts, while osteoblasts are indirectly formed during endochondral ossification through the formation of the periosteum, which contains immature osteoprogenitor cells²⁵. Osteoblastogenesis during intramembranous ossification occurs through three main stages: mineralization, proliferation, and matrix maturation. On the other hand, endochondral ossification occurs in two steps: building cartilage templates in a nonvascularized environment and steadily replacing the cartilage template with bone. Through mesenchymal condensations, endochondral ossification constructs a framework for subsequent bones and leads to the mass production of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. Following the action of SOX9, condensing mesenchymal cells quickly transform into chondrocytes (Fig. 1), which will continue to proliferate and produce cartilage templates²⁶. At this stage, the perichondrium forms a highly vascularized fibrous tissue adjacent to the cartilage template. In an area immediately adjacent to the pre-hypertrophic zone, the perichondrium produces the first osteoblasts in endochondral bones. Later, the perichondrium will develop into the bone collar and periosteum²⁷.

During intramembranous ossification, lineage commitment of MSCs is dependent on the early activation of specific BMPs, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ), and Wnt signaling, with alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen type I (COL1A1), OPN, osteocalcin (OCN), and PPR among the markers most highly expressed during the differentiation of osteoblasts (Table 1; Fig. 1)^15,25,28. After initial lineage commitment, an MSC will divide into an osteoprogenitor and an additional stem cell; this division is important to maintain frequent proliferative activity and self-renewal²⁹. The newly formed pre-osteoblast is an intermediate cell that can express the MSC marker STRO1, ALP, PPR, and collagen type I and possesses an extensive capacity for replication; however, it has no capacity for self-renewal³⁰. Located near newly synthesized osteoid cells, ALP, OPN, bone sialoprotein (BSP), and OCN are expressed by mature osteoblasts. The pre-osteoblast cell is responsible for bone deposition and has limited replication potential³¹. Terminal differentiation and permanent stoppage in cell division are the next crucial steps. Post-mitotic osteocytes are the final stage of the bone lineage. They are typically found separated in the bone and may be embedded in developing osteoid cells.

Osteoblast signaling

Several essential signaling pathways regulate osteoblast differentiation (Figs. 2, 3). Wnt, TGF-β, Hedgehog, and FGF signaling pathways are canonical pathways known to affect osteoblast differentiation. Additionally, Notch, Hippo, and NF-κB signaling also affect osteoblast differentiation.

Fig. 3 — Notch, NF-κB, Hippo, Ephrin, and Piezo1/2 signaling pathways also play important roles in osteoblast differentiation. Osteoblast differentiation is inhibited by the Notch and NF-κB signaling pathways, with the Notch signaling pathway’s downstream factors NICD binding to CLS and inhibiting β-catenin. NICD/CLS/Foxo1 complex can promote Hey1 expression, then Hey1 can bind with Runx2 to inhibit Runx2 activity. When NF-κB signaling is stimulated, the P50 and P65 complex translocates into the nucleus and inhibits Smad protein activity. Hippo signaling is a crucial pathway in cell growth and development. The important downstream factors YAP/TAZ in Hippo signaling can regulate osteoblast differentiation-related gene expression. When Hippo signaling is in an “off” state, the YAP/TAZ complex will not be degraded and will translocate into the nucleus to regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression. The snail/slug complex can promote YAP/TAZ activity in nuclear and inhibit YAP/TAZ degradation in the cytoplasm. Ephrin signaling has different regulatory effects on osteoblast differentiation through different pathways and plays a specific role in the regulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The EphrinA2 and EphrinB2 expressed on osteoclast membranes can interact with EphA2 and EphB4 expressed on osteoblast membranes to regulate osteoblast differentiation. Ephrin signaling regulated osteoblast-specific gene expression mainly through RhoA. EphrinA2 binds with EphA2 and promotes RhoA activity, while EphrinB1/2 binds with EphB4 and inhibits RhoA activity. When RhoA is activated, it will inhibit osteoblast differentiation. Piezo1/2 is a recently discovered pathway functioning in osteoblast differentiation. Piezo1/2 can regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression by regulating downstream pathways such as ERK and P38 and interacting with Hippo signaling. Piezo1/2 can regulate β-catenin activation to active Runx2 and regulate osteoblast gene expression. Piezo1/2 can also activate NFATc1 and YAP via calcium signal, and then NFATc1 and YAP can translocate into the nucleus and regulate osteoblast differentiation. Insulin signaling inhibits the production of FoxO1 and Twist2, which can inhibit the expression of Runx2 and Ocn. Ocn improves insulin sensitivity and energy expenditure through multiple mechanisms like activating to β-cells. The direct effect of osteocalcin as an insulin-sensitizing hormone is speculative and remains to be determined.

Wnt signaling pathway

Overview of Wnt signaling

The family of secretory glycoproteins known as Wnt contains numerous protein factors that are ligands of the 7-membrane-spanning frizzled (FZD) receptor family (Fig. 2). The secreted factors of the Wnt family are implicated in numerous cellular processes, such as regulating cell polarity, cell differentiation, cell proliferation and cell function. There are two different categories of Wnt proteins. The first type causes activation of canonical Wnt signaling by forming complexes among Wnt proteins, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein 5 or 6 (LRP5 or LRP6) and FZD^32,33 (Fig. 2). Of note, LRP4 has been implicated in sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease due in part to its role in Wnt signaling, with deficiency of LRP4 in osteoblast-lineage cells causing higher cortical and trabecular bone mass in mutant mice, which is linked to increased bone formation and less bone resorption³⁴. The second type of Wnt protein causes activation of the noncanonical pathway through a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism, where Wnt5a binds with FZD to activate heterotrimeric G proteins and subsequently raises intracellular calcium to promote osteoblast function³⁵.

Both canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling are crucial for bone remodeling^36,37. Wnt proteins, whether displayed on the cell surface or secreted, have the capability to engage osteoblasts via binding with the FZD/LRP5/6 complex³⁸. The PTH1 receptor, which binds PTH and forms a complex with LRP5/6, can also activate the Wnt signaling in the absence of the Wnt ligand. Disheveled, Axin³⁹, and Frat-1 proteins stimulate the signal by destroying the protein complex and inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) function, resulting in reduced phosphorylation of β-catenin⁴⁰ (Fig. 2). By hindering GSK3 activity, the stability of β-catenin is improved and Wnt signaling is turned on (Fig. 2). MiR-346 promotes osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting glycogen synthetase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), preventing β-catenin degradation in human BMSC⁴¹ (Fig. 2). Recent studies have shown that 1-Azakenpaullone, a highly selective GSK-3β inhibitor, is a potent inducer for osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of human MSCs⁴². 1-Azakenpaulone significantly induces osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of human MSCs by activating Wnt signaling, leading to the up-regulation of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), a key transcription factor that ultimately promotes osteogenic specific gene expression⁴². Once stabilized in the cytoplasm, β-catenin translocates to the nucleus to promote target gene expression. The nuclear partners of β-catenin are the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor/T cell factor (Lef/Tcf) family^43,44. β-catenin substitutes Lef/Tcf corepressors, establishing heterodimers with Lef/Tcf proteins (Fig. 2). With the help of P300/CBP and other transcriptional co-activators, this heterodimer binds to DNA and promotes target gene transcription for osteoblast differentiation⁴⁵ (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 — Among the many transcription factors that participate in osteoblast differentiation, the Runx family, Osx, ATF4, Cbfβ, and SATB2 are significant. Cbfβ binds to Runx family proteins to form heterodimers, improving Runx2’s and Runx1’s stability and subsequently facilitating Runx2 or Runx1 binding to target DNA sequences. Runx1 positively regulates osteoblast lineage gene expression at various stages of differentiation. Runx1 plays a significant role in postnatal bone homeostasis by binding to ATF4, Ocn, and Runx2 promoters to activate the corresponding genes and promote osteoblast early differentiation. Runx1 promotes BMP7 and Alk3 expression to regulate BMP signaling. How Runx1 can regulate Wnt10b and TGF-β signaling remains unclear. Runx1 can also regulate osteoblast-adipocyte lineage via inducing Wnt/β-catenin signaling, TGF-β signaling, and restraining adipogenic gene transcription. Cbfβ is also crucial in stimulating osteogenesis by inhibiting the expression of the adipogenesis regulatory gene C/EBPα and activating Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling. Wnt binds with FZD receptors, causing the ß-catenin accumulation. Pizeo1/2 can also regulate ß-catenin. ß-catenin then moves to the nucleus, in which it causes target genes to be transcribed by interacting with P300/CBP and TCF/LEF. TGF-β and BMP regulate transcription factors through SMAD proteins to activate Runx1 and Runx2 activity, and the SMAD itself can also regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression. BMP signaling can also activate Dlx5 through ERK and promote Runx2, ATF4, and Osx expression. When the Hippo signaling is at the “off” state, YAP/TAZ can translocate into the nucleus and bind with Runx2 to inhibit its activity. NICD1 in Notch signaling can translocate into the nucleus and promote the expression Hey1, which in turn inhibits Runx2 function by binding with Runx2. The activation of β-catenin and Runx2 will also inhibit the expression of C/EBPα, PPAR-γ, and Fabp4; these genes are important in adipocyte differentiation.

β-catenin degradation can be facilitated through its interaction with protein complexes consisting of APC, Axin, and GSK3 if Wnts are either not expressed or are unable to bind to the receptor (Fig. 2). GSK3 phosphorylates β-catenin, after which the phosphorylated form undergoes ubiquitination by the β-TrCP ubiquitin E3 ligase and subsequent degradation via the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal system⁴⁶ (Fig. 2). Pannexins3 (Panx3) can promote the degradation of β-catenin by activating GSK3β, thus inhibiting the activity of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and the differentiation process of osteoblasts⁴⁷. In the nucleus, Tcf/Lef and its repressor bind to inhibit target genes downstream of the Wnt signaling. In the “off” state of Wnt signaling, characterized by low cytosolic and nuclear levels of β-catenin, osteoblast differentiation is reduced⁴⁴ (Fig. 2). Similarly, promotion of APC degradation via genistein-induced autophagy initiated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway activation and β-catenin–driven osteoblast differentiation, rebalancing dysregulated osteogenesis within the femurs and tibias of OVX mice⁴⁸. Taken together, these findings could indicate that targeting the degradation mechanisms for β-catenin may be a potential avenue for better treatment of diseases driven by improper osteoblast differentiation.

Wnt ligands can bind with a variety of inhibitors to limit pathway activation, like FZD-associated protein (sFRP) secretion and Wnt repressor SOST (Sclerosteosis gene product)⁴⁹, Dickkopf (Dkk) family⁵⁰, and Src (Fig. 2). These inhibitors like SOST and Dkk can bind to LRP5/6 and inhibit its coreceptor activity. Capable of interfering with canonical Wnt signaling, Dkk1 and Dkk2 bind to LRP5/6 and kremen (a transmembrane protein) (Fig. 2)⁵¹. The silencing of the FZD6 receptor influences osteoblast differentiation, restraining osteoblast differentiation through the canonical pathway of Wnt. Meanwhile, FZD4 silencing reduces the rate of osteoblast differentiation via reduced expression of Tcf/Lef^52,53.

Conversely, the promotion of osteoblast differentiation through the stabilization of Wnt-signaling can be achieved through various mechanisms. The R-spondin family is comprised of four secreted glycoproteins (Rspo1–4) and functions to amplify Wnt signaling. Notably, Rspo3 variants are strongly linked to bone density^54,55. A recent study indicated that in appendicular bones, insufficient Rspo3 haploid and loss of Rspo3 targeting in Runx2⁺ bone progenitor cells can lead to increased trabecular bone mass, osteoblasts, and bone formation numbers⁵⁴. The inhibitory effect of Dkk1 on Wnt signaling activation and bone mass is compromised by Rspo3 deficiency⁵⁴. Defects in Rspo3 result in the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling, which subsequently stabilizes β-catenin and activates Wnt signaling, thereby promoting osteoblastogenesis and bone formation⁵⁴.

Wnt signaling performs various functions in different stages of osteoblast differentiation. Canonical Wnt signaling can enhance early osteoblast differentiation, while mature osteoblast mineralization induction is severely hampered by it^56,57. During osteoblast differentiation, multiple Wnt signaling genes are changed, and endogenous Wnt signaling is suppressed^58,59. Wnt16 can regulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling by antagonizing Wnt5a to suppress the non-canonical Wnt/Ca²⁺ pathway⁶⁰. In a prior study, it was discovered that Wnt16 enhances the expression of osteoblast differentiation genes (BMPR1b, BMP7, and ENPP1), while simultaneously reducing the expression of specific osteoblast maturation and mineralization genes (ALP1 and RSPO2)⁶¹. However, another study found that Wnt16 positively regulates osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization⁶⁰. Therefore, the mechanistic basis for how Wnt16 regulates osteoblast mineralization still needs further research.

Wnt canonical pathway

The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway promotes bone formation by stimulating osteoblast development^62–64. Bone formation and specific osteoblast gene expression are both enhanced by high levels of β-catenin^62,65, while ectopic chondrogenesis and abnormal osteoblast differentiation resulted from conditional β-catenin knockdown at the initial stage of osteoblast development^65–67 (Table 1). Additionally, Wnt is involved in all stages of bone development, as demonstrated by the process of bone formation exhibited by LRP5-deficient mice^68–70. Altered bone mass was observed in mice with LRP5 deficiency^71,72, indicating that Wnt signaling is crucial during bone development^73,74. Furthermore, the functional acquisition of the LRP5 mutation increases Wnt signaling, leading to higher bone mineral density in mammalian models^73,75–77 (Fig. 2).

Wnt-LRP5 signaling promotes bone formation in part by directly reprogramming glucose metabolism⁷⁸. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) and protein kinase B (AKT) are activated by Wnt3a via LRP5 and ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate1 (RAC1), which causes the activity of glycolytic enzymes to increase⁷⁸. In addition, the Warburg effect, induced by Wnt3a’s elevation of key glycolytic enzyme levels, can trigger aerobic glycolysis⁷⁸. In vitro metabolic regulation aids Wnt-induced osteoblast differentiation and is linked to the bone-forming activity of LRP5 signaling in vivo⁷⁸. Exosomes of adipose stem cells (ASCs-exos) have recently been found to promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, with ASCs-exos improving bone healing ability in a rat model of nonunion fracture repair⁷⁹. ASCs-exos play a role in activating the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs⁷⁹. By activating the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway, ASCs-exos enhance the osteogenesis potential of BMSCs and promote bone repair and regeneration in vivo, providing a new direction for the treatment of diabetic fracture nonunion⁷⁹.

Bipotential mesenchymal precursors undergo osteoblastogenesis stimulation and adipogenesis inhibition via canonical Wnt signaling. By enhancing osteoclastogenic transcription factors like Runx2 and Osx while inhibiting adipogenic transcription factors, Wnt10b induces osteoblast differentiation⁶². The inhibition of PPAR-γ and C/EBPα expression is one way through which Wnt10b promotes osteoblastogenesis⁶². C/EBPα is also an essential regulator in osteoclast differentiation^80–82. Indeed, Wnt10b^–/– mice showed reduced trabecular bone density and serum osteocalcin, further illustrating that Wnt10b is an endogenous regulator of bone formation⁶².

Wnt noncanonical pathway

Previous research has extensively studied how the canonical Wnt signaling pathway can influence osteoblast differentiation. However, the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway also plays a significant role in mediating osteoblast differentiation. In comparison to canonical Wnt signaling, the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway regulates osteoblast differentiation not through β-catenin but rather through various other transcriptional and signaling mechanisms.

Wnt5a

Wnt5a is a significant marker of noncanonical Wnt signaling, with Wnt5a inhibiting the expression of PPAR-γ through SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (SETDB1) to promote osteoblast differentiation⁸³. Although TAZ (Table 1) is an important transcription factor that promotes MSC differentiation by trans-inhibiting PPAR-γ function, noncanonical Wnt signaling via Wnt5a activation does not appear to modulate TAZ expression during osteoblast differentiation⁸³. Following Wnt5a-induced activation of noncanonical Wnt signaling, SETDB1 interacts with chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 7 (CHD7) and phosphorylated nemo-like kinase (NLK) to form a multi-protein complex⁸³. This complex methylates the histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) of the PPAR-γ promoter, resulting in chromatin inactivation and the failure of PPAR-γ to initiate transcription⁸³. By suppressing the transformation of bone marrow MSCs into adipocytes via a reduction in PPAR-γ’s transcriptional effect, Wnt5a can stimulate osteoblast production⁸³.

Wnt/calcium pathway

In the process of osteoblast differentiation, the Wnt/calcium pathway operates as a noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway. The Wnt/calcium pathway can raise intracellular calcium levels to activate calcineurin, protein kinase C (PKC), and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), which in turn induces the expression of activating protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factors. The combination of integrin receptors and collagen I may cause CaMKII to be activated in osteoblasts, resulting in ERK phosphorylation, thus promoting Runx2 activation and subsequent osteoblast differentiation⁸⁴. Therefore, the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway can also promote osteoblast differentiation by regulating the expression of Runx2, which is mechanistically similar to canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Wnt7b

In osteoblast precursors, the noncanonical Wnt pathway plays a role in promoting bone formation. This involves Wnt-mediated activation of G protein-linked phosphatidylinositol signaling, leading to the activation of G protein-linked protein kinase C δ (PKCδ). This process, facilitated by Dvl, remains unaffected by Dkk1⁸⁵. In mouse embryos, the elimination of either Wnt7b or PKCδ led to impaired bone formation⁸⁵. Wnt 7b induces osteoblast differentiation via PKCδ (Fig. 2)⁸⁵. Wnt-induced PKC activation requires the Gq subunit, which is required for osteoblast differentiation induced by Wnt7b. Wnt7b activates Runx2 through PKCδ signaling to regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression. Although PKCδ signaling activates osteoblast differentiation, in vitro experiments demonstrated that Wnt7b or PKCδ mutant mice can still form bone⁸⁵. This suggests that this pathway can act as a mechanism to augment other osteogenic signaling pathways, but it may not be enough for osteoblast differentiation⁸⁵.

Prior research has suggested a connection between increased glycolysis and osteoblast differentiation triggered by Wnt signaling⁸⁶. However, direct genetic confirmation of the role of glucose metabolism in Wnt-induced bone formation has been lacking. A recent study revealed that overexpression of Wnt7b significantly enhanced bone formation, yet this effect was largely negated in the absence of Glucose Transporter 1 (Glut1), despite the transient deletion of Glut1 itself not affecting normal bone accrual⁸⁷. Wnt7b was also observed to elevate Glut1 expression and glucose consumption in primary cultures of osteoblast lineage cells, with Glut1 deletion impairing osteoblast differentiation in vitro⁸⁷. Thus, Wnt7b appears to contribute to bone formation partly by stimulating glucose metabolism in osteoblast lineage cells⁸⁷.

Role of β-catenin in osteoblast differentiation

β-catenin is required for mature osteoblast differentiation (Table 1)^65,66,88. Without β-catenin, osteoblast progenitors will instead develop into chondrocytes, with chondrogenic interstitial precursor fate being determined by β-catenin activity^65,66. Runx2 promoter activity and expression are both enhanced by β-catenin/TCF1⁸⁹. Experimental findings have shown that mice lacking β-catenin develop osteopenia (Table 1), while bone mass was increased when β-catenin function was rescued in osteoblasts^67,90. Previous work in our lab also found that Cbfβ/Runx2 complex promotes Wnt10b/β-catenin to improve osteoblast differentiation and inhibit c/ebpα expression to inhibit lineage switch into adipocytes⁹¹.

Regulation of Wnt signaling pathway

MTSS1 plays a significant role in osteoblast differentiation and bone homeostasis by controlling Src-Wnt/β-catenin signaling. In osteoblast differentiation, Src acts as a negative regulator by phosphorylating LRP6 at several conserved tyrosine residues. This phosphorylation disrupts the removal of LRP6 from the osteoblast cell surface and the formation of LRP6 signalosomes, thereby inhibiting canonical Wnt signal transduction⁹². When MTSS1 increases, Src diminishes the content of phosphorylated-GSK3β, non-phospho-β-catenin, and transcription factor 7 like 2 (TCF7L2)⁹³. Thus, Src inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling activation in osteoblasts, whereas MTSS1 stimulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling by inhibiting the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src.

Similar to MTSS1, Tenascin-C also positively regulates Wnt signaling. Deletion of Tenascin-C significantly inhibits osteoblast differentiation, indicating its role as a positive regulator of Wnt signaling⁹⁴. Likewise, β-catenin overexpression can significantly reverse the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation that is caused by Tenascin-C deficiency⁹⁴. Tenascin-C can bind to DKK-1, the primary inhibitor of Wnt signaling, suppressing DKK-1 function⁹⁴. Previous work has shown that DKK-1 expression is increased when Tenascin-C is knocked down by siRNA, thereby reducing the transcriptional activity of Wnt signaling⁹⁴.

TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3), a TNF receptor family adaptor protein, positively regulates osteoblast differentiation⁹⁵. Mice deficient in TRAF3 exhibited reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption, displaying a phenotype indicative of early-onset osteoporosis⁹⁵. It was also discovered that TRAF3 promoted osteoblast formation and prevented the degradation of β-catenin in MSCs⁹⁶. TGF-β1, which is released when bone resorption occurs, induces TRAF3 degradation and thus inhibits osteoblast differentiation through GSK-3β-mediated β-catenin degradation⁹⁶.

Hormones can regulate the canonical Wnt signaling pathway by controlling important proteins in Wnt signaling. In osteoblast progenitors that express Osterix1 (Osx1), Wnt/β-catenin signaling is boosted by estrogen receptor α (Erα), causing an increase in periosteal cell proliferation and differentiation⁹⁷. Estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα), in conjunction with the coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator (PGC-1α), acts as a positive regulator of Wnt signaling in osteoblast differentiation. This occurs via a cell-intrinsic mechanism that remains unaffected by β-catenin nuclear translocation⁹⁸. Activated ERRα can bind with the TCF/LEF complex and stimulate osteoblast-specific gene expression similar to that induced by β-catenin⁹⁸. Thus, it can be understood that TCF/LEF is activated to promote the expression of osteoblast-specific genes in the absence of β-catenin nuclear translocation.

TGF-β and BMP signaling

TGF-β and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the TGF-β superfamily, playing crucial roles in osteoblast differentiation^99,100. There are two main types of TGF-β and BMP signaling: one is Smad-dependent and the other is Smad-independent (Fig. 2)¹⁰¹. There are three Smad types. The first is the receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads), which can either be triggered by BMPs (Smad1/5/8) or activated by TGF-β (Smad2/3). The second is co-Smads, such as Smad4, which can be co-mediated by BMP and TGF-β. The third is inhibitory Smads, like Smad6 and Smad7, which can negatively regulate BMP and TGF-β signaling (Fig. 2)^102,103. R-Smads and co-Smads combine to form a complex that moves to the nucleus and controls osteoblast-specific gene expression¹⁰¹. Runx2 expression is not directly induced by the BMP signaling pathway¹⁰⁴, but it can be induced by promoting distal-less homeobox 5 (DLX5) expression (Fig. 2)^105,106.

Overview of TGF-β signaling

TGF-β signaling pathways govern osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation, influencing bone formation at different stages of development and within disease pathology. Smad proteins are critical in TGF-β signaling pathways (Fig. 2)^102,107. In conjunction with Smads, TGF-β signaling regulates osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation^108,109. TGF-β signaling primarily activates Smad2/3 to regulate osteoblast differentiation. However, TGF-β can also bind to ALK-1, transducing SMAD-1, 5, and 8 signaling, typically activated by BMPs (Fig. 2)^110,111. During the early stage of differentiation, TGF-β signaling promotes osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteogenesis. However, at later stages, it inhibits bone formation¹⁰². Previous work in our lab also found that TGF-β1 signaling pathway also is critical in tooth root development and odontoblast differentiation¹¹². Moreover, in vitro studies have demonstrated that TGF-β, along with SMAD3 and SMAD2, inhibits osteogenesis^113–116. Excessive TGF-β signaling was also found to be involved in the pathogenesis of osteogenesis imperfecta in mouse models, with anti-TGF-β treatment correcting altered bone phenotype¹¹⁷. These findings were validated in a small clinical study, where the administration of the monoclonal antibody fresolimumab to participants showed an absence of severe side effects. Furthermore, it was noted to enhance the areal bone mineral density in the lumbar spine of individuals diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta type IV¹¹⁸. Deletion of Transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (TGFBR2), the sole type II receptor for TGF-βs, effectively abolishes TGF-β signaling. This deletion leads to severe defects in calvarial, appendicular, and axis bones¹¹⁹.

TGF-β signaling regulation

Higenamine (HG) has been recognized as a promising candidate for treating osteoporosis through its influence on SMAD2/3 signaling. A novel target for HG has been identified in IQ motif-containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1), with HG binding to the Glu-1019 site of IQGAP1, facilitating its osteogenic effects¹²⁰. Through this mechanism, HG induces Smad2/3 phosphorylation and modulates the Smad2/3 pathway by inhibiting Smad4 ubiquitination¹²⁰. Consequently, HG emerges as a potential novel small-molecule drug to stimulate bone formation in osteoporosis via the Smad2/3 pathway¹²⁰.

Recent research has suggested that intraflagellar transport 20 (IFT20) modulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by regulating the TGF-β signaling pathway^121,122. IFT20 controls MSC lineage allocation by regulating glucose metabolism during bone development¹²³. In MSCs, the absence of IFT20 results in a significant reduction in glucose tolerance and inhibits glucose uptake, lactic acid production, and ATP production¹²³. Deleting IFT20 markedly reduced the signaling activity of TGF-β-Smad2/3, decreased the binding activity of Smad2/3 to the Glut1 promoter, and down-regulated Glut1 expression¹²³. These findings suggest that IFT20 plays a vital role in preventing the allocation of MSC lineages to fat cells through the TGF-β-Smad2/3-Glut1 axis¹²³. Moreover, GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2), necessary for HSC differentiation, can impede osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting Smad1/5/8 activation¹²⁴.

Overview of BMP signaling

BMP signaling (an evolutionarily conserved group of signaling proteins belonging to the TGF-β superfamily) also has an effective role in osteoblast differentiation. Indeed, BMPs display effective osteogenic effects, similar to the physiological effect mediated by TGF-β¹²⁵. BMP-2, -4, and -6 are signaling molecules that are highly expressed in both osteoblast cultures and bone tissue¹²⁶. BMP molecules like BMP-2, -6, -7, and -9 aid in bone formation¹²⁷. Of note, BMP3B negatively regulates bone formation¹²⁸, in which BMP3B and BMP-2 may antagonize each other through competition with the availability of Smad4¹²⁹.

Although BMP signaling can easily regulate the differentiation of osteoblasts through Smad proteins, it is also capable of this regulatory function by activating other signaling pathways controlled by Smad proteins. Prior research indicates that BMP-2 facilitates the interaction between Dvl-1 and Smad1, resulting in the inhibition of β-catenin nuclear accumulation¹³⁰. Because Dvl-1 is an important inhibitor of GSK-3β, β-catenin is degraded when Dvl-1 binds to Smad1, thus inhibiting the activity of the Wnt signaling pathway¹³⁰. BMP-2 can inhibit the proliferation of the Wnt signaling in this way, thus enabling MSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts¹³⁰. Persicae semen (PS) originates from the dried and mature seeds of peach (Prunus persica, L.). PS facilitates mineralization and up-regulates Runx2 via BMP-2 and Wnt signaling pathways. Consequently, this leads to the expression of various osteoblast genes, including Alp, bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein (Bglap), and integrin binding sialoprotein (Ibsp)¹³¹. Research has demonstrated that PS promotes fracture recovery by enhancing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Consequently, it could serve as a potential treatment option for patients with fractures¹³¹.

Aside from Smad-dependent pathways, BMP can regulate osteoblast differentiation through various other signaling mechanisms. BMP2 stimulates the expression of ALP and OCN by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway^132,133. By triggering Runx2 expression and activating c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), BMP2 promotes osteoblast differentiation through the protein kinase D (PKD) pathway¹³⁴. DLX5 has been shown to be a BMP2 signaling upstream target and can increase Runx2 expression downstream (Fig. 2)¹³⁵. By activating DLX5 through the p38 signaling pathway, BMP2 can also induce Osx expression in addition to Runx2 expression (Fig. 2)¹³⁶. In the bone microenvironment, BMP and other growth factors, like IGF-I, can co-activate Osx expression¹³⁷. Recent research has also revealed that BMP2 can inhibit the expression and activity of salt-inducible kinase 1 (SIK1) through protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent pathways, thereby promoting osteogenesis¹³⁸. SIK1 functions as a critical regulator, suppressing preosteoblast proliferation and osteoblast differentiation. The repression of SIK1 is crucial for facilitating BMP2 signaling in osteogenesis¹³⁸.

BMP signaling regulation

The regulation of BMP signaling concerning osteoblast differentiation is influenced by numerous factors, all of which play distinctive roles in osteogenic processes. For instance, LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta (Lmx1b) hinders osteoblast differentiation by negatively controlling BMP2¹³⁹. Lmx1b can decrease Runx2’s recruitment in the promoter sequence of the target gene and when combined with Runx2, inhibiting Runx2 activity¹³⁹. Through the BMP2 promoter’s Tcf/Lef response elements, cWnt signals can trigger BMP2 activity¹⁴⁰. BMP3 is a negative feedback regulator of osteoblast generation that is induced by cWnt, with decreased BMP3 expression possibly increasing the activity of the cWnt signal, encouraging osteoblast differentiation¹⁴¹. Hey1, which is involved in Notch signaling, can also be expressed by BMP2 signaling (Table 1)¹⁴². Particularly noteworthy is that kisspeptin-10 (KP-10), acting as a ligand for GPR54, has previously been identified to initiate the binding of NFATc4 to the BMP2 promoter via its interaction with GPR54. As a result of this interaction, BMP2 upregulates the expression of osteogenic genes by phosphorylating Smad1/5/9, thereby stimulating osteoblast differentiation in vitro¹⁴³. Subsequent research unveiled that KP-10 encourages osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast progenitors and inhibits bone resorption in human cultured cells, while its administration to healthy male subjects resulted in a notable increase in the bone formation marker osteocalcin without corresponding effects on resorption markers¹⁴⁴. Overall, the regulation of BMP2 activity and its signaling pathways represent a potential therapeutic target for conditions such as osteoporosis and other pathologically similar disorders.

Ubiquitin-mediated proteasome degradation also affects BMP signaling, with Smurf proteins regulating the interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts^145,146. When Smurf1 is deficient, MEKK2 builds up, which triggers JNK activation, a necessary and sufficient event for osteocyte BMP sensitization^146,147. Studies have demonstrated that Smurf2-deficient mice exhibit severe osteoporosis¹⁴⁸. Osteoblasts deficient in Smurf2 exhibit elevated expression of RANKL. This phenomenon is attributed to Smurf2’s regulation of Smad3’s ubiquitination status and its disruption of the interaction between Smad3 and vitamin D receptors, ultimately resulting in alterations in RANKL expression¹⁴⁸.

Hedgehog signaling

Indian Hedgehog (Ihh)

Hh signaling plays an important role in cell proliferation and differentiation, and there are three Hedgehog homologs known to exist in mammals: Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), (Ihh), and Desert Hedgehog (Dhh). In cells gathered from mutant mice lacking smoothened (Smo), an Hh signal, osteoblastic differentiation is impossible¹⁴⁹. As such, it is clear that in vitro mesenchymal and bone-forming cells rely heavily on the activity of Smo and the Hh signaling pathway (Fig. 2)¹⁴⁹. Previous studies have demonstrated that Ihh is important in chondrocyte differentiation^150,151. Ihh is produced by hypertrophic pre-chondrocytes, a group of cells in the inner perichondrium where osteoblast progenitors first appear^149,152. The close proximity of these cell types shows the significant and interdependent effect of Ihh signaling on both osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation¹⁵³. In vitro experiments have demonstrated that osteoblast differentiation is compromised in mice lacking Ihh, and there is a deficiency in Runx2 expression. These findings suggest that Ihh signaling is capable of initiating osteoblastogenesis¹⁵⁴. Additionally, a variety of mesenchymal and bone-forming cells have been stimulated in vitro to develop into osteoblasts by Ihh^155,156.

In vitro studies have revealed that Speckle-type POZ protein (Spop), a component of the Cullin-3 (Cul3) ubiquitin ligase complex, positively regulates Hedgehog signaling^157,158. Spop-deficient mutant mice exhibited defects in chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation¹⁵⁸. Parathyroid hormone-like peptide (PTHLH) expression was diminished in Spop mutants, while GLI family zinc finger 3 (Gli3) repressor form expression was up-regulated and GLI family zinc finger 2 (Gli2) expression remained unchanged, demonstrating that the Hh signaling was impaired¹⁵⁹. Consistent with this finding, the Spop mutant’s skeletal defects were greatly ameliorated by decreasing Gli3 dosage¹⁵⁹. A reduction in Gli3 dosage averted the formation of brachydactyly and osteopenia caused by Spop loss¹⁵⁹. Therefore, Spop is an important positive regulator of Ihh signaling and skeletal development¹⁵⁹.

Shh

The association between focal adhesion kinase (FAK) Tyr (397) expression and Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) expression suggests a potential link between FAK-regulated Osterix and the early differentiation of osteoblasts¹⁶⁰. However, to better understand how FAK is controlled at the end of osteoblast differentiation, more research is needed. Purmorphamine, an Hh agonist, is a 2,6,9-trisubstituted purine that targets Smo transmembrane proteins¹⁶¹. The expression of Hh mediators such as Smo, patched 1 (PTCH1), Gli1, and Gli2 can be increased by purmorphamine (Fig. 2). Runx2 and BMP expression is also increased after Hh is activated by purmorphamine¹⁶².

From a clinical perspective, Shh has been implicated in the survival of tumor metastases. Research has suggested that signal peptide-CUB domain-EGF-related 2 (SCUBE2) operates in an autocrine fashion on tumor cells, releasing Shh that remains bound to the cell membrane^163–166. This mechanism initiates the activation of Hedgehog signaling, consequently prompting the differentiation of osteogenic cells¹⁶⁶. Notably, osteoblasts play a role in this mechanism by secreting collagen, which, in turn, activates the inhibitory leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR1) signal in natural killer (NK) cells¹⁶⁶. This cascade ultimately results in immune suppression and promotes the survival of tumor cells within the bone¹⁶⁶.

Regulation of Hedgehog signaling

Pregnane X receptor (PXR) inhibits Hh signaling inducer genes like Gli1 and hedgehog-interacting protein (Hhip) while also inducing the expression of Hh signaling suppressor genes like cell adhesion associated (CDON), BOC cell adhesion associated (BOC), and growth arrest-specific 1 (GAS1)¹⁶⁷. After treatment with Smo agonists, osteoblast differentiation and Gli-mediated transcriptional activity was significantly restored when Smo-mediated signaling was activated in these cells¹⁶⁷. During osteoblast differentiation, Hh signaling significantly increases insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) expression, which triggers the mTORC2-AKT signaling cascade. In turn, IGF2-AKT signaling stabilizes full-length Gli2, thereby enhancing the output of Hh transcriptional activation^168,169.

In osteoblasts, the transmembrane protein SLIT and NTRK-like protein-5 (Slitrk5) are negative regulators of Hh signaling with a few known functions¹⁷⁰. Osteoblasts exhibit a distinctive expression pattern of Slitrk5, where overexpression of Slitrk5 in osteoblasts impedes the activation of targeted genes involved in Hh signaling. Conversely, Slitrk5 deficiency in vitro enhances Hh signaling¹⁷¹. Slitrk5 has an extracellular domain that binds to hedgehog ligands and an intracellular domain that interacts with PTCH1¹⁷¹. Through binding with hedgehog ligands and PTCH1, Slitrk5 can inhibit Hh signaling activation, thus reducing osteoblastic differentiation.

Interaction between Hh signaling and Wnt signaling

The interplay between Hh signaling and Wnt signaling is intricate. Previous research has demonstrated that in Ihh-knockout embryos, β-catenin is not translocated into the nucleus and that the Wnt canonical signaling target genes are not expressed⁸⁸. Thus, the Wnt signaling pathway can only be activated, in part, due to the presence of Hh signaling. Hh signaling also affects how Wnt9a and Wnt7b are expressed, where a noted decrease in their expression accompanies Ihh knockout⁸⁸. Alternatively, Hh and Wnt signaling pathways could have intracellular crosstalk through common regulators, such as the fusion repressor¹⁷² and GSK3^173,174. Some studies have demonstrated that BMP is important for Hh-actuated osteoblast differentiation, in addition to Hh’s interaction with the Wnt signaling pathway^175,176. For example, during the development of long bones, Ihh and BMP signals are jointly regulated to promote the differentiation of osteoblasts¹⁴⁹. Therefore, studying the interaction between Hh signaling and other signaling pathways could provide a new understanding of the regulatory process behind osteoblast differentiation.

FGF signaling

Overview of FGF signaling

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are a series of secreted peptides that control many developmental processes and are essential for controlling endochondral and intramembranous ossification (Fig. 2)¹⁷⁷. For instance, craniosynostosis — a condition that presents with the early onset of osseous occlusion of the cranial suture — is usually acquired via mutations in FGF receptors 1-3^178,179 (Fig. 2). During growth plate development, both FGF receptor 1 (Fgfr1) and FGF receptor 2 (Fgfr2) are expressed in the condensing stroma, contributing to cartilage formation¹⁸⁰. Reserve chondrocytes express Fgfr2, and proliferating chondrocytes down-regulate it, while hypertrophic chondrocytes express Fgfr1¹⁸⁰. At the final developmental stages, the tissues that produce osteoblasts and cortical bone, the perichondrium and periosteum, express both Fgfr1 and Fgfr2¹⁸⁰. Osteoprogenitor cells typically use Fgfr1 signaling to encourage differentiation, but matured osteoblasts use it to prevent further differentiation¹⁸⁰. As a result, Fgfr1 signaling influences osteoblast maturation in a stage-specific manner¹⁸⁰. Unlike Fgfr1/2, Fgfr3 significantly regulates proliferating chondrocytes’ growth and differentiation¹⁸¹ while also mediating cortical thickness and bone mineral density in differentiated osteoblasts^182,183. As such, human craniosynostosis and achondroplasia syndromes are primarily caused by Fgfrs mutations^177,184,185. Additionally, exogenous FGF7 stimulates embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation by activating ERK-Runx2 signaling but does not affect the proliferation of osteoblasts¹⁸⁶. FGF8 can stimulate Connexin 43 (Cx43) expression, which mainly occurs in osteoblasts and regulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation¹⁸⁷. Therefore, by controlling Cx43 expression, FGF8 can influence osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, research indicates that FGF18 can also positively regulate osteoblast differentiation by mediating Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 activation via ERK1/2 and PI3K (Fig. 2)^188,189.

Role of FGF signaling in osteoblast differentiation

Through phosphorylation of the MAPK signaling pathway, FGF2 can stimulate Runx2 expression, indicating that FGF2 participates in osteoblast differentiation¹⁹⁰. Additionally, FGF2 can regulate the Wnt signaling pathway’s activity. Expressions of Wnt10b, LRP6, and β-catenin were reduced in FGF2-deficient BMSCs in vitro, and the inactivated GSK3β was also significantly reduced, suggesting that β-catenin degradation is possible¹⁹¹. By directly or indirectly controlling GSK3’s activity to regulate β-catenin stability, FGF2 may influence the Wnt signaling¹⁹¹.

The differentiation of osteoblasts also depends on FGFR. For example, Fgfr2-deficient mice exhibit a phenotype of decreased bone mineral density¹⁹². Different ligands of Fgfr2 include FGF7 and 10 (which are capable of activating FGFR2b) and FGF2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (which are capable of activating Fgfr2c)^193,194. Adult Fgfr3-deficient mice displayed osteopenia, indicating that Fgfr3 also participates in osteoblast differentiation¹⁸². FGF18 can act as a physiological ligand for Fgfr3 to co-regulate osteoblast differentiation¹⁹⁵. Furthermore, FGF18^–/– mice exhibited diminished endochondral and intramembranous bone formation, indicating that FGF18 can promote osteoblast differentiation independently of Fgfr3¹⁹⁵. Moreover, FGF signaling has been implicated in cranial development, as mutations in FGFR2 have been linked to the autosomal dominant condition Crouzon syndrome. Mouse strains harboring the FGFR2 mutation (p.Cys342Arg) have demonstrated an enhancement in the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. This enhancement is achieved through the upregulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-Erk1/2 signaling pathway¹⁹⁶. Furthermore, the FGFR2 p.Cys342Arg mutation increased oxidative phosphorylation and altered mitochondrial dynamics from fusion to fission in MC3T3-E1 cells. This shift facilitated osteogenic differentiation and contributed to craniosynostosis in Crouzon syndrome¹⁹⁶. A recent study showed that the stability of FGFR2 is maintained by OTU Deubiquitinase, Ubiquitin Aldehyde Binding 1 (OTUB1)¹⁹⁷. OTUB1 diminishes the E3 ligase activity of Smurf1, which mediates FGFR2 ubiquitination, by hindering the binding of Smurf1 to E2¹⁹⁷. When OTUB1 is absent, Smurf1 excessively ubiquitinates FGFR2, leading to its degradation in the lysosomes¹⁹⁷. These discoveries suggest that OTUB1 actively participates in regulating osteogenic differentiation and mineralization in bone homeostasis by modulating the stability of FGFR2. This highlights OTUB1 as a potential therapeutic target for mitigating osteoporosis¹⁹⁷.

Hereditary hypophosphatemic disorders are also associated with FGF signaling pathways, stemming from excess FGF23 — a phosphate (Pi)-regulating hormone produced by bone — which results in impaired skeletal growth and osteomalacia. A recent study explored the impact of Pi repletion and bone-specific deletion of FGF23 on bone and mineral metabolism in the dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1 (Dmp1) knockout mouse model of autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets (ARHR)¹⁹⁸. The bone defects observed in Dmp1 knockout mice are only partially attributable to FGF23-induced hypophosphatemia¹⁹⁸. The study proposed that simultaneous restoration of DMP1 levels and inhibition of FGF23 could effectively rectify mineral and bone disorders associated with ARHR. Moreover, furin demonstrated the ability to cleave FGF23 in vitro, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue¹⁹⁸. Indeed, inactivation of furin in osteoblasts and osteocytes increased circulating intact FGF23 by 25%¹⁹⁹ without significantly impacting serum phosphate levels. Therefore, therapeutically targeting excess FGF23 in patients suffering from hereditary hypophosphatemic disorders could represent a novel treatment modality.

Regulation of FGF signaling

Engrailed homeobox 1 (En1) can regulate FGFR-mediated signaling. ERK activation is inhibited when En1 is mutated, and the ERK activation is confined to mature intracranial osteoblasts of the wild-type skull²⁰⁰. The outer periosteal osteoblasts affected by En1 ablation lost the FGF target gene sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 2 (SPRY2)²⁰⁰. P38, MAPK, and PKC, the effectors of FGF signaling known to influence osteoblast differentiation, may also be influenced by En1^200–202. En1 and FGF’s coordination of osteoblast differentiation will be better understood if these regulatory pathways are precisely described in a spatiotemporal manner.

The Sprouty family functions as an inhibitor of FGF signaling (Fig. 2). Basic FGF stimulation causes Sprouty2 expression to rise to high levels²⁰³. The increased presence of Sprouty2 directs ERK1/2 phosphorylation after basal FGF activation and Smad1/5/8 after BMP activation (Fig. 2)²⁰³. Expressions of Ocn, ALP, and Osterix mRNA were all inhibited by Sprouty2. Additionally, osteoblast matrix mineralization was stifled by Sprouty2. By inhibiting the expression of markers in differentiated osteoblasts, like Runx2 and ALP, and reducing FGF-ERK1/2 and BMP-Smad signaling, osteoblast differentiation and proliferation are negatively regulated by Sprouty2²⁰³.

Noncanonical signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation

Ephrin signaling

Overview of Ephrin signaling

Ephrins have bidirectional signal transduction capabilities. This class of signaling proteins falls into two categories: class A (ephrins A1 through A5), which bind to GPI-anchored EphA receptors (A1 through A10), and class B (ephrins B1 through B3), which bind to EphB tyrosine kinase receptors B1 through B6²⁰⁴. The interaction between Ephrin B and EphB, a transmembrane protein with a cytoplasmic domain, facilitate bidirectional signaling in cells. EphrinB2 from osteoclasts and EphB4 from osteoblasts, for instance, combine to create the signal between the two cells²⁰⁵. EphrinB2 on the surface of osteoclasts mediates EphB4 activation and promotes osteoblast differentiation²⁰⁶ (Fig. 1). In contrast, activation of EphrinB2-fold EphB4 on the surface of osteoclasts inhibits C-Fos/NFATc1 signaling of osteoclasts, thereby preventing osteoclast differentiation²⁰⁶. EphB4 signaling can prompt osteoblasts to express transcription factors like DLX5, Osx, and Runx2, underscoring the significance of Ephrin signaling in osteoblast differentiation²⁵. Additionally, the inactivation of ras homolog family member A (RhoA) in osteoblasts may be required for Ephrin signaling to promote osteoblast differentiation²⁰⁷ (Fig. 3), with a study finding that suppression of osteoblast differentiation by EphrinA2(EfnA2)-EphA2 is mediated by increased RhoA activity²⁰⁸.

Ephrin signaling regulation

The effects of stage-specific EphrinB2 deletion on bone strength vary. The early loss of EphrinB2 in osteoblasts results in osteoblast apoptosis, delayed onset of mineralization, and increased bone flexibility. Subsequent deletion of EphrinB2 in osteocytes targeted by the cell can lead to a fragile bone phenotype and heightened osteocyte autophagy²⁰⁹. When drugs were administered to cultured osteoblasts to prevent EphrinB2 from interacting with EphB4, the final stages of osteoblast differentiation and mineralization were repressed²¹⁰. When inhibiting the interaction of EphrinB2 with EphB4 in vivo, early-stage osteoblast numbers increased while late-stage osteoblast numbers decreased, suggesting the existence of an EphrinB2:EphB4-dependent checkpoint in the process of osteoblast differentiation²¹⁰. When targeting this EphrinB2:EphB4 checkpoint, the final osteoblast differentiation is blocked, interrupting the initiation of mineralization²¹⁰. Therefore, these studies suggest that this crucial checkpoint controls the onset of bone mineralization during the late stage of osteoblast differentiation.

Additionally, in osteoblast lineages, the interaction between EphrinB1 and EphB2 impacts the expression from Runx2 to Osx, whereas the interaction between EphrinB2 and EphB4 allows for ALPl expression²¹⁰. The interaction between EphrinB1 and EphB2 improves their function in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation²¹¹. EphrinB1 is necessary for early osteoblast marker expression like Osx and Runx2, with TAZ — a transcriptional coactivator with a PDZ-binding motif — causing Osx expression when translocated into the nucleus through stimulating EphrinB1 reverse signaling with aggregated EphB2²¹¹. In the osteoblast lineage, the interaction between EphB2 and EphB4 not only facilitates the differentiation of late osteoblasts but also prevents the formation of osteoclasts²¹¹.

The TGF-β1-Scx-EfnA2 axis can negatively regulate periodontal ligament (PDL) tension-induced osteoblast differentiation. TGF-β1-Smad3 signaling and EfnA2 are upstream and downstream regulators of scleraxis (Scx) in PDL cell response to tension, respectively²¹². Previous work has shown that Scx knockdown completely inhibits tension-induced EfnA2 expression, suggesting that tension-induced Scx inhibits PDL osteoblast differentiation by inducing EfnA2 expression²¹². This example of the co-regulation of osteoblast differentiation by coordinating the TGF-β and Hh signaling pathways exemplifies the importance of studying the intersection of various signaling pathways of osteoblast differentiation.

TLR/NF-κB signaling

Overview of TLR/NF-κB signaling

RelA (p65), RelB, cRel, NF-κB1 (P50), and NF-κB (P52) form the components of NF-κB signaling, usually kept sequestered by κB inhibitors within the cytoplasm²¹³ (Fig. 3). During bone repair, inflammation is common and has been shown to prevent bone regeneration²¹⁴. Osteoblast differentiation was inhibited by NF-κB signaling stimulation in previous research²¹⁵. Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-7 (IL-7) facilitate NF-κB activation and hinder osteoblast function in osteoporosis²¹³. Furthermore, TNF-α and IL-1 can regulate osteoblast differentiation by down-regulating the promoter function of osteocalcin, a key gene in osteoblasts^214,216. The expression of those cytokines is elevated when NF-κB signaling is stimulated, which will inhibit osteoblast differentiation²¹⁷.

TLR/NF-κB signaling regulation

IKK-NF-κB stimulation promotes β-catenin ubiquitination and degradation through Smurf1 and Smurf2, inhibiting the Wnt signaling pathway and stimulating Runx2 degradation (Fig. 3). Furthermore, TNF can induce p65 to bind to Smurf1 and Smurf2 promoters in MSCs²¹⁵. Therefore, TNF may hinder osteoblast differentiation by activating NF-κB signaling. In the healing of occlusion injuries in rodents, the levels of β-catenin and Runx2 decreased alongside increased expression of p65 and IκBα²¹⁵. However, after hindering IKK-NF-κB signaling, there was a significant increase in the expression of β-catenin, OCN, and Runx2²¹⁵. Thus, IKK-NF-κB activation is involved in the degradation of β-catenin, ultimately preventing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation²¹⁵. Similarly, melatonin was found to counteract the activation of the NF-κB pathway by inhibiting TNF-α, thereby reducing osteogenic differentiation and inflammation in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs)²¹⁸.

Rocaglamide-A, a suppressor of NF-κB signaling, inhibits phosphorylation of NF-κB to promote osteoblast differentiation²¹⁹. Conversely, p65 overexpression prevents the promotion of osteoblast differentiation by rocaglamide-A²¹⁹. Rocaglamide-A inhibits p65 protein phosphorylation and the accumulation of p65 in the nucleus, reducing the transcriptional activity for NF-κB²¹⁹. According to this work, the NF-κB p65 protein is engaged with the enactment of the NF-κB signaling, and recaglamide-A can forestall the NF-κB inhibitory impact on osteoblast differentiation by preventing the phosphorylation of p65²¹⁹.

Osteoblasts’ autophagy-related function changes significantly when the NF-κB signaling pathway is disabled, demonstrating a possible connection between the two mechanisms²²⁰. However, according to some studies, NF-κB appears to play two roles in autophagy. NF-κB activation has the potential to encourage autophagy in some kinds of cells, such as myocardial cells²²¹, and can also hinder autophagy in other cells like porcine granulosa cells^220,222. Therefore, the mechanism of NF-κB in the regulation of autophagy during osteoblast differentiation still needs further research.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is also a key factor in NF-κB signaling, with osteoblast expression of TLR4 necessary to activate the NGF-TrkA signaling required for stress-induced bone formation^223,224. For example, in TLR4-conditioned knockout mice with normal adult bone mass and strength, loss of TLR4 signaling significantly reduced lamellar bone formation after stress loading²²⁵. Inhibition of TLR4 signaling decreased the expression of Ngf in primary osteoblasts²²⁵. Bone RNA sequencing in TLR4-conditioned knockout mice and wild-type pups revealed dysregulated inflammatory signaling three days after mechanical osteogenic loading, revealing the important role of osteoblast TLR4 in bone adaptation to mechanical forces²²⁵.

Notch signaling

Notch is cleaved by ADAM, a disintegrin and γ-secretase complex containing presenilin 1 or 2 that is formed by Notch ligand interactions²²⁶. Upon cleavage, the cytoplasmic Notch intracellular domain (NICD) is liberated and translocated to the nucleus (Figs. 3, 4)²²⁶. There, it forms a complex that controls gene transcription via binding with CSL family members²²⁶. This complex can activate HEY1 expression, with HEY1 then binding to Runx2 to prevent osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 4)²²⁷. NICD can block NFAT signaling by interacting with Foxo1, which also results in the inhibition of osteoblast generation. NICD also impedes Wnt/β-catenin signaling²²⁸. Hes1 is one of the downstream target genes of the Notch signaling pathway^228,229 (Table 1). Hes1 silencing in vitro suggests that NICD inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling primarily through Hes1, where the binding of Hes1 to LEF-1 or transducin-like enhancer protein (TLE) may inhibit Wnt signaling^228,229.

Notch signaling exhibits a bidirectional effect on osteoblast differentiation, as it can either inhibit or promote osteoblast differentiation depending on the stage of osteoblast differentiation and the timing of Notch activation²³⁰. Studies have shown that activation of Notch signaling can promote the mineralization process of osteoblasts^231,232, while it has also been shown that overexpression of Notch1 can inhibit osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway²³³. It was shown that Notch1 not only inhibits terminal osteoblast maturation but also promotes immature osteoblast formation²³⁴. Moreover, it was observed that Notch signaling enhances the effectiveness of BMP9-induced BMP/Smad signaling, leading to an upregulation in the gene expression of critical osteogenic factors induced by BMP9 in MSCs, such as Runx2, Colla1, and inhibitor of differentiation²³⁴.

Forkhead box protein O1 (Foxo1) inhibits osteoblast production through Notch signaling. Foxo1 forms complexes with NICD and Mastermind to inhibit gene expression^235,236 (Figs. 3, 4). As an illustration, Foxo1 inhibits nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) signaling in activated T cells. NFATc1 and NFATc2, in turn, promote the production of osteoblasts, bone formation, and osteoclasts²³⁵. Through its interaction with Foxo1, Notch directly and indirectly inhibits the generation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts²³⁶. GSK3 can phosphorylate NFATc, resulting in its nuclear export²³⁷. The co-localization of Notch2’s NICD with GSK3 in the nucleus can inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling²³⁵ and suppress osteoblast differentiation. The spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4) can also regulate osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting Notch2’s ability to translocate into the nucleus²³⁸.

Epigenetic molecular processes dynamically modify both DNA and histone tails, influencing the spatial organization of chromatin and fine-tuning the outcome of Notch1 transcriptional response²³⁹. Although researchers have examined the interaction between histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and Notch in vitro and in Drosophila wing development, the precise role of this interaction in mammalian skeletal development and disorders remains uncertain^240,241. In a murine model of osteosclerosis, HDAC1/2 has been identified as a contributor to the disease pathogenesis, which has been attributed to the conditionally cre-activated expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain in immature osteoblasts²⁴². Significantly, targeted homozygous deletions of HDAC1/2 in osteoblasts result in partial alleviation of osteosclerotic phenotypes²⁴². When HDAC1/2 was specifically deleted in osteoblasts of male and female mice, there was an absence of overt bone phenotypes, even in the absence of the Notch1 gain-of-function allele²⁴². These findings provide evidence supporting the idea that HDAC1/2 contributes to the pathogenic signaling of Notch1 in the mammalian skeleton²⁴².

Hippo signaling

Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and stem cell development rely heavily on the Hippo signaling cascade. When Hippo signaling is at an “on” state, YAP and TAZ undergo phosphorylation and are inhibited downstream²⁴³. YAP/TAZ are broken down in the cytoplasm, either through interaction with 14-3-3 proteins or through degradation mediated by the proteasome (Fig. 3)²⁴³. Yet, when Hippo signaling is inactive, YAP/TAZ translocates into the nucleus where they bind to the TEA domain transcription factor (TEAD), jointly regulating gene expression (Fig. 3)²⁴⁴. By initiating the downstream RhoGTPase-actomyosin signaling cascade, matrix metallopeptidase 14 (MMP14) can trigger β1-integrin activation and thereby promote YAP/TAZ nuclear transfer to regulate gene expression²⁴⁵.

YAP is an important component within Hippo signaling (Table 1). It regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis via cooperating with the Tead/Tef family and activating target genes in the Hippo signaling pathway²⁴⁶ (Fig. 3). In vitro experiments have exhibited that YAP can inhibit bone marrow MSC osteogenesis, subsequently reducing the rate of osteoblast differentiation²⁴⁷. According to previous research, YAP is a mediator of the Src/Yes tyrosine kinase pathway, which can interact with Runx2 to suppress Runx2 transcriptional activity to inhibit osteocalcin expression²⁴⁷.

YAP’s nuclear localization is influenced by numerous factors, which, in turn, limit its transcriptional activity. For instance, the MAPK signaling pathway’s expression of ERK and JNK controls the degree of YAP phosphorylation²⁴⁸. However, YAP phosphorylation can be accelerated by Src/Yes kinase²⁴⁹. Conversely, the Runx2-YAP complex separates when Src/Yes kinase is inhibited²⁴⁹. By blocking the interaction between YAP and 14-3-3 protein through YAP phosphorylation, which is mediated by AKT kinase, YAP can remain in the cytoplasm and not be degraded, ultimately preventing the expression of osteoblast-related genes²⁵⁰.

Transformation-associated protein 53 (Trp53) is a key regulator that regulates the activation of TAZ to regulate the osteoblast differentiation²⁵¹. Elimination of Trp53 in osteoblast lineages markedly boosts osteogenesis, bone formation, and bone remodeling²⁵². The lack of Trp53 significantly increases the transcriptional activity of TAZ by hindering TAZ phosphorylation and its translocation into the nucleus, while this activity is notably reduced upon enforced expression of Trp53²⁵¹. Trp53 is linked to TAZ and reduces the stability of the TAZ protein, promoting its degradation through ubiquitination mediated by beta-transducin repeats-containing proteins (β-TRCP)²⁵¹. To sum up, Trp53 governs chondrogenesis and intrachondral ossification by inhibiting TAZ activity and stability. This implies that manipulating Trp53 signaling might offer a promising avenue for addressing fracture healing, ectopic ossification, arthritis, and various other bone-related disorders²⁵¹.

Hippo signaling also crosstalks with other signaling pathways, including the Wnt and TGF-β pathways, to modulate osteoblast differentiation. Hippo signaling stimulates TAZ to cooperate with disheveled (DVL) in the cytoplasm, which limits Wnt/β-catenin signaling²⁵³. By preventing DVL phosphorylation, TAZ can block Wnt/β-catenin signaling²⁵³. Similarly, the Hippo signaling pathway inhibits TGF-β signaling by preventing Smad complexes like Smad2/3 from translocating into the nucleus through the cytoplasmic localization of TAZ/YAP^254,255. Clinically, the TAZ/YAP signaling pathway has recently been linked to abnormal differentiation of mesenchymal lineage (MLin) cells, which leads to the formation of bone within soft tissues of the musculoskeletal system following traumatic injury²⁵⁶. Recent studies have demonstrated that discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) is significantly and specifically upregulated in collagen-expressing heterotopic ossification MLin cells²⁵⁶. DDR2 acts as a cell surface receptor for fibrillar collagen and serves as a crucial regulator of MLin cell function in heterotopic ossification formation²⁵⁶. Mechanistically, perturbation of DDR2 alters focal adhesion orientation and subsequent matrix organization, thereby modulating the YAP/TAZ-mediated signaling of MLin cells through focal adhesion kinase FAK and YAP/TAZ²⁵⁶. Therefore, the interactions between ECM and DDR2 play a crucial role in driving heterotopic ossification, presenting a potential novel therapeutic target for addressing this pathological condition²⁵⁶.

Piezo1 and Piezo2 signaling

Bone tissue responds to mechanical stress stimulation, with both unloading and loading of mechanical stress exerting significant effects on osteoclast differentiation and function, as well as osteoblast differentiation and function²⁵⁷. The bone microenvironment and metabolic activity is influenced by mechanical stress²⁵⁷. At present, the understanding of mechanoreceptors is thought to involve ion channels, extracellular matrix adhesion molecules, and the cytoskeleton, yet the current understanding of these receptors is incomplete²⁵⁸. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are important mechanosensitive channels. Piezo1 and Piezo2 have been identified as crucial players in regulating osteoblast differentiation and function^259–261. Deletion of Piezo1 or Piezo2 in osteoblast or osteoclast lineage cells causes a severe osteoporosis phenotype with numerous spontaneous fractures, specifically in osteoblast lineage cells, indicating that Piezo1 and Piezo2 are important in bone formation and bone function²⁶².

Piezo1 and Piezo2 mechanosensitive channels have been recognized as critical force sensors essential for bone development and osteoblast differentiation²⁶³. Depletion of Piezo1, and particularly Piezo1/2, in mesenchymal or osteoblast progenitor cells results in spontaneous bone fractures in newborn mice²⁶³. This outcome was attributed to the suppression of osteoblast differentiation and increased bone resorption²⁶³. Furthermore, the absence of Piezo1/2 conferred resistance to additional bone loss induced by unloading in both bone development and homeostasis²⁶³. Mechanistically, Piezo1/2 channels transmit signals from fluid shear stress and extracellular matrix stiffness, triggering calcium influx that activates Calcineurin²⁶³. This activation leads to the coordinated activation of NFATc1, YAP1, and β-catenin by inducing their dephosphorylation, along with the formation of NFAT/YAP1/β-catenin complexes (Fig. 3)²⁶³. Piezo1 and Piezo1/2 mutant mouse bones have reduced Yap1 and β-catenin activities, and enhanced β-catenin activity partially rescues the phenotype²⁶³.

Zou et al. discovered that PIEZO1 functions in osteoblast lineage cells to regulate bone remodeling by sensing mechanical loading²⁶⁴. Their research demonstrated that PIEZO1 regulates YAP signaling, which in turn controls the expression of various bone matrix proteins, including several types of collagens (Fig. 3)²⁶⁴. These collagens’ expression is contingent upon a PIEZO1-dependent response to mechanical stimulation²⁶⁴. This suggests that PIEZO1 may also play a role in regulating bone mass and bone strength in humans in vivo²⁶⁵.

For bone growth to occur, a specific type of highly angiogenic blood vessels known as type H vessels is required. These vessels provide a pathway for osteoblasts surrounding them²⁶⁶. Towards the end of adolescence, type H vessels undergo a transition to a quiescent type L endothelium, losing their ability to support bone growth^267,268. Dzamukova et al. discovered that mechanical forces, linked to increased body weight at the end of adolescence, activate the mechanoreceptor PIEZO1, leading to heightened production of FAM20C (Golgi-associated secretory pathway kinase) in osteoblasts²⁶⁶. FAM20C, the primary kinase of the secreted phosphoproteome, phosphorylates DMP1, previously recognized as a crucial factor in bone mineralization^269,270. Following this, osteoblasts release dentin matrix protein 1 in a pulsatile fashion²⁶⁶. Extracellular DMP1 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling by preventing the phosphorylation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)²⁶⁶. This process results in the conversion of type H vessels into type L vessels, decreasing bone growth activity and fostering heightened bone mineralization²⁶⁶. Consequently, targeting PIEZO1 may offer a novel approach for addressing bone-related diseases²⁶⁶.

Hormone regulation

Hormones also play significant role in regulating osteoblast differentiation. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is an important hormone that can act on the thyroid gland to produce two thyroid hormones, thyroxine (T4) and tri-iodothyronine (T3)²⁷¹. A study found that a novel form of the TSHβ subunit, TSHβv, can promote osteoblast differentiation²⁷².

The sympathetic nervous system boosts bone breakdown by increasing Rankl in early bone cell precursors, a process needing ATF4 phosphorylation. In mice lacking Adrb2 and gonads, bone breakdown decreases, whereas in hypogonadal mice with low sympathetic activity, bone breakdown increases. This discrepancy might be due to CART, a neuropeptide influenced by leptin, which regulates RankL to curb bone breakdown. Leptin-driven neural pathways manage two aspects of bone remodeling^273,274.

Insulin signaling can regulate osteoblast differentiation^2,275,276 (Fig. 3). Study found that insulin signaling can inhibit Twist2 to regulate osteoblast differentiation²⁷⁷. Twist2 is one of the inhibitor of Runx2²⁷⁶ (Fig. 3). The transcription factor forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) acts as an inhibitor of insulin signaling. Once Ocn is synthesized, it undergoes γ-carboxylation, followed by export and storage bound to the mineralized bone extracellular matrix (ECM). The inactivation of Ocn can be hindered by the cellular import of glutamate, which inhibits the activity of the γ-carboxylase enzyme²⁷⁸ (Fig. 3). Alternatively, γ-carboxylated Ocn bound to the ECM can undergo partial decarboxylation and be released into the general circulation through bone resorption^2,278. Besides, Ocn could activate β-cells, and the activated β-cells can promote insulin signaling to promote osteoblast differentiation.

Osteoblast transcriptional factors

Several homeodomain proteins are included in the group of transcription factors that control osteoblasts: Smads, CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins β (C/EBβ), C/EBPδ (Table 1), lymphatic enhancer factor (Wnt effector), Twist, Runx1/Cbfβ, activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), Runx2, and Osterix, of which the latter four are the major transcription factors that function within osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 4; Table 1).

Transcriptional modulators that function as “master switches” coordinate the transformation of MSCs into tissue-specific cell types. Runx2 is pivotal in bone formation²⁷⁹. During differentiation, it plays a major role in regulating cell growth and the activation or repression of genes²⁷⁹. Even though osteoblast differentiation mainly relies on Runx2 and Osterix, other important genes like Runx1 and Cbfβ are also required for differentiation (Fig. 4)³.

Runx2

Runx2, also known as Cbfa1 or PEBP2, is a member of the RUNT-related transcription factor family, which also includes Runx1 and Runx3²⁸⁰. Runx2 is particularly important for osteoblast differentiation. All Runx family proteins can bind to Cbfβ to form stable heterodimers with a DNA-recognition sequence of TGTGGT²⁸¹. Runx2 has an activation domain that turns on the genes for osteocalcin and COL1A1 in addition to its conserved DNA-binding domain^280,282,283. As a result, Runx2 is an early marker of osteoblast differentiation, which is indicated by the relative timing of its expression²⁸⁴ (Fig. 4). At the stage where MSCs first differentiate into osteoblast precursor cells before transforming into immature osteoblasts, Runx2 expression is upregulated²⁸⁴. However, by the final stages of osteoblast differentiation and formation, Runx2 expression gradually decreases (Fig. 4)^284,285. Glucose, the main nutrient for osteoblasts, is transported into these cells through Glut1, which is expressed before Runx2. Glucose uptake facilitates osteoblast differentiation by suppressing AMPK-dependent proteasomal degradation of Runx2 and also enhances bone formation by inhibiting another aspect of AMPK function²⁸⁶.

Runx2 is abundant in bone and calcified cartilage but is also expressed in the thymus and testicles^287,288. Runx2-deficient mice failed to form bone, indicating that Runx2 is necessary for the formation of both membranous and endochondral bone^280,289,290. Osteoblast-specific genes were expressed when Runx2 was produced in cultured skin fibroblasts, suggesting that Runx2 could promote osteoblast differentiation²⁸⁰. Runx2 may govern the transition from the growth phase to the postproliferative phase by inhibiting progenitor cell proliferation, thus serving as a critical element in the development of cells within the osteogenic lineage²⁹¹. Thus, Runx2 may induce the gene expression needed for lineage identification and mesenchymal differentiation in early bone progenitor cells.

Due to this critical role in bone homeostasis, Runx2 has also been implicated in the symptomatic progression of bone-associated cancers. A recent study found that increased expression of Runx2 is responsible for bone destruction found in multiple myeloma (MM)²⁹². The paper demonstrated that Runx2 promotes the suppression of osteoblast activity and enhancement of osteoclast activity by multiple myeloma cells using in vitro and in vivo approaches²⁹². Notably, the data suggests that therapeutic blockade of Runx2 could safeguard against bone degradation by preserving the equilibrium between osteoblast and osteoclast functions in MM²⁹².

Co-activators of Runx2

Numerous transcriptional coactivators can engage with Runx2. Cbfβ is the most important of these factors because it can bind to Runx family proteins to form heterodimers, improving Runx2’s stability and subsequently facilitating Runx2 binding to target DNA sequences (Fig. 4). Cbfβ settles Runx2 by restraining ubiquitination, thus preventing Runx2 degradation and further promoting the expression of osteoblast-specific genes²⁹³. Cbfβ is also crucial in stimulating osteogenesis by inhibiting the expression of the adipogenesis regulatory gene C/EBPα and activating Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling⁹¹ (Table 1). Wnt10b expression was down-regulated in Cbfβ-deficient cells, and another analysis showed that Cbfβ increased the transcriptional expression of Wnt10b⁹¹. Furthermore, adipocyte development was suppressed in the presence of Wnt3L conditioned medium containing Wnt3a, but osteoblast differentiation was not reversed⁹¹. According to these findings, Runx/Cbfβ controls osteoblast differentiation independently of Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling and suppresses the transformation of MSCs and osteoblasts into adipocytes⁹¹.

In addition to Cbfβ, co-activators such as monocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (MOZ), MOZ-related factor (MORF), and others play a crucial role in facilitating Runx2’s control over osteoblastogenesis. MOZ and MORF belong to the MYST family that comprises histone acetyltransferases, which can interact with Runx2’s activation domain to increase osteocalcin expression²⁹⁴. Grg5, pRb, and TAZ are also effective Runx2 activators^295,296 that can increase Runx2’s transcriptional activity through their interaction with the protein^297,298. These co-activators interact with Runx2 to enhance the transcriptional activity of Runx2 and promote the regulation of Runx2 on osteoblast-specific gene expression, thus promoting osteoblast differentiation^297,298.

Vestigial-like family member 4 (VGLL4) disrupts TEAD-mediated Runx2 transcriptional repression, thereby facilitating osteoblast differentiation and bone development (Table 2)²⁹⁹. TEAD transcription factors are inhibitors of Runx2 transcriptional activity, which can act independently of YAP binding, severely inhibiting osteoblast differentiation²⁹⁹. In addition, VGLL4 attenuates TEAD transcriptional repression by directly competing with Runx2 for binding of TEAD through its two TDU domains²⁹⁹. VGLL4 can remove the inhibitory function of TEADs by disrupting its interaction with Runx2²⁹⁹. Additionally, the absence of VGLL4 in MSCs has shown a skeletal defect similar to global VGLL4-deficient mice, along with the knockdown of TEAD or overexpression of Runx2 in VGLL4-mutant osteoblasts reversing osteoblast differentiation inhibition²⁹⁹. These results indicate that VGLL4 can control the Runx2-TEADS transcription complex to control osteoblast differentiation and bone formation²⁹⁹.

Table 2.

Transcription factor partners of Runx2.

Co-activator	Role	Co-repressor	Role
Cbfβ	Enhances Runx protein binding to DNA Stabilizes Runx by inhibiting ubiquitination-mediated degradation	Hey1	Negatively regulates Runx2 by binding with Runx2 to suppress it
SIRT1	Interacts with Runx2 and promotes its trans-activation potential	Smurf1/2	Degrades Runx2 by ubiquitination-mediated proteasome degradation pathway
TAZ	Stimulates osteogenic differentiation via interacting with Runx2	COUP-TFII	Impairs Runx2-dependent osteocalcin promoter activation
P300	Positively regulates Runx2 by mediating Runx2 acetylation	Grg/TLE	Inhibits Runx2-dependent transcriptional activation of OCN genes
VGLL4	Breaks TEAD-mediated Runx2 transcriptional inhibition	EGFR	Increases the content of transcription corepressor HDAC4 and HDAC6 and inhibits the expression of Runx2

Open in a new tab

Runx2 can also promote gene expression by interacting with the myeloid Elf-1-like factor (MEF) and binding to an osteoblast markers’ promoter, like OPN, close to MEF (Table 2)³⁰⁰. The presence of these two transcription factor response elements (RRE and ERE) near the promoter’s proximal region is necessary for MEF and Runx2 to function on the promoter of bone marker genes³⁰⁰. When getting close to these two elements, MEF and Runx2 show significant synergistic effects on promoter activity. MEF and Runx2 synergistically affect OPN, OCN, and ALP promoters³⁰⁰.

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) has the potential to positively regulate Runx2 (Table 2). Runx2’s activity is enhanced by SIRT1, a Class III histone deacetylase³⁰¹. In vitro experiments showed that Runx2 expression did not change when SIRT1 was absent, but osteoblast differentiation was inhibited, and Runx2 target protein expression was decreased³⁰¹. By interacting with Runx2, SIRT1 can enhance its trans-activation activity³⁰¹. As Osx is one of Runx2’s downstream targets, SIRT1 can trigger Runx2’s activation and promote Osx expression, which in turn targets osteoblast-specific gene expression and promotes osteoblast differentiation³⁰¹.

Co-repressors of Runx2

One particularly important regulatory mechanism that is utilized to help govern the transcription of osteoblast-linked genes is protein degradation. As Runx2 is a critical transcription factor in promoting osteoblast differentiation, the degradation of this protein through the proteasome pathway has been shown to inhibit the rate of osteoblastogenesis³⁰². Smad6 can initiate Smurf1-induced Runx2 degradation, triggered by the ubiquitin isopeptide ligase (E3) Smurf1³⁰³. E3 ligase can interact with Hsc/HSP70, which negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation by promoting Runx2 ubiquitination degradation³⁰⁴. Additionally, a novel AMPK pathway has been identified to modulate Runx2 degradation via ubiquitin degradation^305–307. However, the extent to which Runx2, and any subsequent osteoblast differentiation, is altered by AMPK via ubiquitin degradation or rather is more significantly mediated by alternative mechanisms requires further investigation due to recent conflicting findings^307,308.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway plays an important role in tissue development and tumor development and has been previously shown to regulate the expression of Runx2 and Osterix (Table 2). EGFR diminished Runx2 and Osx expression and increased the expression of inhibitors HDAC4 and HDAC6 in differentiated osteoblasts³⁰⁹. In vitro overexpression of HDAC4 diminishes Runx2 levels because HDAC deacetylates lysine residues in histones, preventing transcriptional machinery from accessing DNA and repressing the transcription of target genes³⁰⁹. Subsequently, the mechanism of EGFR inhibiting Runx2 activity may be accomplished through the upregulation of HDAC4 and HDAC6 expression³⁰⁹.

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) is an orphan nuclear receptor belonging to the steroid thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. It physically interacts with Runx2³¹⁰. Specifically, COUP-TFII suppresses Runx2-dependent osteocalcin promoter activation³¹⁰. COUP-TFII inhibits Runx2 DNA binding to the osteocalcin gene. Conversely, Runx2 suppresses COUP-TFII expression by directly binding to the COUP-TFII promoter³¹⁰. Hence, this indicates that COUP-TFII may negatively regulate osteoblast differentiation through its interaction with Runx2³¹⁰.

Runx1

Runx1, also called AML1 or Cbfa2, belongs to the RUNT-related transcription factor family. Runx1 and Cbfβ form a heterodimer and are highly expressed in osteoblasts and pre-osteoblasts³¹¹. Runx1 controls how HSCs become mature blood cells³¹² and is key in the development of pain-transmitting neurons³¹³ (Fig. 1). Additionally, in vitro studies have proved that Runx1 is fundamental for early chondrocyte differentiation³¹⁴ and osteoblast differentiation³¹⁵. Runx1 positively regulates osteoblast lineage gene expression at various stages of differentiation, promoting bone formation and inhibiting adipogenesis (Fig. 1)³¹⁵. Runx1 primarily participates in the early stage of osteoblast differentiation (Table 1). In our previous study, we observed that during this period, when bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) differentiate into chondrocytes and osteoblasts, Runx1 and Runx2 are co-expressed³¹⁴. Runx1 stimulates chondrocyte commitment to the osteoblast lineage and augments bone formation by increasing both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Furthermore, overexpression of Runx1 in BMSCs initiates chondrocyte differentiation, while a deficiency in Runx1 results in reduced expression of Runx2 and impaired differentiation of both chondrocytes and osteoblasts³¹⁶. Besides, previous study also found that loss of Runx1 will decrease the expression of SOX9, Ihh, PTC in the growth plate, while the expression of OCN, Osx, Runx2 and ATF4 are also decreased³¹⁵. These results demonstrated that Runx1 is important in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Runx1 is very important for coordinating several pathways implicated in bone formation and homeostasis, including BMP and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Fig. 4). Our lab found that Runx1 plays a significant role in postnatal bone homeostasis by binding to BMP7, activin-like kinase-3 (ALK3), and ATF4 promoters to activate the corresponding genes³¹¹. Expression of these genes produces critical transcription factors in osteoblast differentiation, which, after activation, can further regulate osteoblast-specific gene expression to promote osteoblastogenesis.

In addition, our lab found that Runx1 regulates osteoblast-adipocyte lineage via inducing Wnt/β-catenin signaling and restraining adipogenic gene transcription³¹¹. Previous research in our lab has demonstrated that Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling is crucial to the composition of the osteoblast-adipocyte lineage⁹¹ (Fig. 4). In vitro research has previously established that β-catenin signaling is diminished with Runx1 deficiency³¹¹. When the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is inhibited, osteoblast cell lines will differentiate into adipocytes³¹¹. Therefore, Runx1 can regulate the differentiation pathway of osteoblasts by controlling the expression of β-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway.

Along with adipogenic gene regulation, Runx1 can directly interact with the Ihh promoter to mediate its expression, up-regulate the transfer of chondrocytes to osteoblasts, and promote the expression of chondrogenesis/osteogenesis-related genes³¹⁵. Additionally, our lab found that Runx1 also mediates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by binding to Runx2 and OCN gene promoters and multiple bone-specific genes, leading to increased Runx2 expression³¹⁷. The Runx2 promoter’s high binding efficiency at binding site 4 is due to the acetylation of chromatin-associated histones due to Runx1’s interaction with histone acetyltransferase, which alters chromatin conformation and activates transcription³¹⁷. Runx1 can partially replace the function of Runx2 and positively regulate osteoblast differentiation³¹¹. Overexpression of Runx1 in Runx2-deficient osteoblasts can salvage the expression of key regulatory proteins (ATF4 and OCN), rescue bone formation in cultured osteoblasts, and restore the activity of osteoblasts by repairing the damage caused by Runx2-deficiency³¹¹.

Runx3

Runx3 is another member of the RUNT family³¹⁸. Similar to Runx2, Runx3 also binds DNA in a heterodimer form with Cbfβ³¹⁹ (Table 1). Runx3 is expressed in hematopoietic cells, skin appendages, and bone tissue^320,321. Ablation of Runx3 controls early and late chondrocyte differentiation in Runx3-deficient embryos³²² (Fig. 1). In addition, overexpression of Runx3 in chondrocytes leads to ectopic mineralization of the rib cage within mice, indicating that Runx3 plays a noteworthy role in cartilage development³²³. In contrast, Runx3-mutant mice developed severe congenital osteopenia, suggesting that Runx3 positively regulates osteoblast differentiation³²⁴ (Table 1).

In MSCs, BMP9 up-regulates endogenous Runx3 expression³²⁵. Runx3 overexpression increases BMP9-induced transcription factor expression, like Runx2 or DLX5, in osteoblasts, while Runx3 knockdown decreases the expression of these transcription factors³²⁵. In addition, Runx3 overexpression also leads to increased Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation induced by BMP, whereas Runx3 knockdown leads to a decrease³²⁵. As a result, Runx3 controls the induction of osteoblast differentiation by its interaction with BMP9³²⁵.

Osterix

Osx has two effects on osteoblast differentiation, where it can both promote and inhibit osteoblast differentiation, depending on the situation (Fig. 4). Osx’s C-terminus comprises a DNA domain highly similar to the sequences found in Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4³²⁶. Osx also possesses a proline- and serine-rich domain that is capable of activating the expression of OCN and COL1A1³²⁶. Numerous MyF5-binding sequences and myoblast determination protein 2 (MyoD2)-binding sequences can be found in the proximal Osx promoter³²⁷. These basic helix-loop-helix structural transcription factors are essential for osteoblast differentiation, and Osx transcription may be controlled by these two sequences³²⁷. Zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 16, downstream target genes of Osx, act as late markers of osteoblast differentiation and thereby play a role in regulating osteogenesis in MSCs³²⁸. Fibrillin-2 and periosteal were also identified as candidate targets of Osx in osteoblast differentiation³²⁹. The transcription factor early B cell factor 1 (Ebf1) — known to regulate B cell, neuronal cell, and adipocyte differentiation — has also been shown to modulate osteoblast activity in a stage-dependent manner through its interaction with Osx, with Ebf1 promoting early osteoblast differentiation but hampering proper mature osteoblast function³³⁰.

While Runx2 is indispensable for osteoblast differentiation, certain mechanisms operate independently of Runx2^331,332. For example, even though Runx2 is necessary for BMP-mediated Osx expression, Runx2 on its own is not enough to elicit Osx expression¹³⁶. This suggests that DLX5, a transcription factor downstream of BMP, can also induce Osx expression¹³⁶. The MAPK signaling pathway can also regulate Osx expression induced by BMP2 and IGF-1³³³. The transcription factor NFAT, which is particularly important to osteoclasts, can work with Osx in osteoblasts to speed up the process of differentiation³³⁴. Overexpression of NFATc1 has been shown to encourage the Osx-dependent activation of the COL1A1 promoter³³⁵. Through the activation of SOST and DKK1 expression, two significant inhibitors of the Wnt signaling pathway, Osx can suppress osteoblast activity³³⁶. By specifically binding to SOST gene promoter sequences, Osx can trigger SOST expression³³⁷. Thus, the Wnt signaling is inhibited, and osteoblast differentiation is disrupted. This intricate regulatory network is further underscored by the involvement of En1, which, due to Osx expression being delayed in En1 deficient mice, is expected that En1 is located upstream of Osx³³⁸. The manifestation of delayed skull ossification in mouse models with the En1 mutation indicates that En1 also plays a significant role in osteoblast differentiation³³⁸. In addition, ALP activity in osteoblast cells lacking En1 is reduced, with ALP being an essential enzyme in osteoblast differentiation³³⁹. OCN and BSP, two genes involved in the final stage of osteoblast differentiation, also have reduced expression when En1 is deleted³³⁹.

Recent investigations have delved into the impact of osterix stability on osteoblast differentiation, particularly in the context of E3 ligase complexes and ubiquitination processes. Within the evolutionarily conserved SCF ubiquitin ligase complex, F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7 (FBW7) plays a crucial role as the substrate recognition element^340,341. The phosphorylation of Osx at S73/77 by P38 facilitates its interaction with Fbw7, leading to subsequent Osx ubiquitination³⁴¹. Furthermore, the depletion of Fbw7 in human mesenchymal stem cells and primary mouse calvarial cells resulted in an augmented osteogenic capacity³⁴¹. Similarly, members of the Casitas B-lineage lymphoma family, Cbl-b and c-Cbl, have been identified as regulators that diminish the protein stability of Osx during BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation through ubiquitin–proteasome-mediated degradation³⁴². More recently, ubiquitin-specific protease 17 (USP17) has been found to increase Osx protein levels via modulating deubiquitylation, positively impacting osteoblast differentiation as evidenced by enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression and activity³⁴³. These findings open a novel avenue for direct intervention and manipulation of Osx stability, providing a potential approach to enhance or inhibit osteoblast differentiation.

Co-activators of Osx

By binding to and activating CCACCC sites upstream of its promoter, Osx can control its own expression, forming a positive feedback mechanism³⁴⁴. BMP2 and Msh homeobox 2 (Msx2) trigger the expression of Osx in Runx2-mutant MSCs, and a mutation in Msx2 prevents the induction of Osx in Runx2-deficient MSCs (Table 1). This suggests that BMP2 independently controls Osx expression via Msx2³⁴⁵. Similarly, BMP2 and TGFβ-mediated Osx expression also require a novel factor, TGFβ-induced early gene 1 (Tieg1), to optimize Osx expression in osteoblasts^346–348. Additionally, BMP2 directly regulates Osx expression by connecting with its proximal promoter, thus promoting osteoblast differentiation^346–348.

Jumonji domain-containing 3 (Jmjd3) is also important in osteoblast differentiation and controls BSP and OCN expression through Runx2 and Osx³⁴⁹. When Jmjd3 was knocked out in mutant mouse models, Runx2 and Osx promoter activity decreased while H3K27me3 levels increased (Fig. 5)³⁴⁹. As a result, both DLX5 and Msx2 were unable to get close to these binding sites, preventing Runx2 and Osx from being activated³⁴⁹. Osteoblast differentiation was inhibited by increasing H3K27me3 occupancy of Runx2 and Osx promoter regions when Jmjd3 expression was silenced³⁴⁹. According to these findings, Jmjd3 positively regulates Osx function to exert transcriptional control over osteoblast lineage commitment³⁴⁹.

Fig. 5 — a The non-coding RNAs have a regulatory effect on osteoblast differentiation; miRNA-346 can inhibit GSK3β to promote Wnt signaling activation, and miRNA-181a can inhibit TGFβ1 and TGFβR1 to promote TGFβ signaling activation to promote osteoblast differentiation. b The methylation and acetylation of histone H3 control the promoter of the transcriptional genes. The enrichment of H3K4me1, H3K9me3, and H3K27me3 leads to transcriptional silencing of gene promoters, while the enrichment of H3K4me3 promotes transcriptional activation. Demethylation of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 also induces transcriptional activation of gene promoters. This group of proteins regulates the enrichment of different methylation groups and their methylation degree. Jarid1/Kdm5 can convert H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 to H3K4me1, while MLL3/4-COMPASS-like can catalyze the deposition of H3K4me1 on the enhancer elements. Set1-COMPASS and HoxA10 promote H3K4 methylation. Jmjd2a, Kdm4a and Kdm4B promote H3K9 demethylation. Kmt1e/Setdb1/ESET can mediate H3K9 trimethylation. Osteoblast differentiation is facilitated by the acetylation of H3K9, H3K14, and H3K27. HDAC1/2/5 promotes deacetylation of H3K9, H3K14, and H3K27, while GCN5 promotes H3K9 and H3K14 histone acetylation, KATA5 promotes H3K14 acetylation and CBP/P300 promotes H3K27 acetylation. c SWI/SNF regulates osteoblast differentiation through chromatin remodeling. BRG1 is one of the subunits of the SWI/SNF complex. Baf45d also belongs to SWI/SNF complex. When activated, it can regulate osteoblast early differentiation. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is required for Runx2-dependent initiation of skeletal gene expression. d The degree of DNA methylation affects the gene promoters. The Dnmts family, such as Dnmt1, can regulate DNA methylation while Tet1/2 can demethylate 5mCpG to promote Runx2 and Osx gene transcription, thereby promoting osteoblast differentiation. BMP2 can induce Tet1/2 activity to convert 5mCpG to 5hmCpG on Osx promoter.

Panx3 acts as a highly expressed gap junction protein in bone cells that can regulate the initiation of osteoblast precursor cell differentiation. Panx3 can indirectly regulate the expression of Cx43, a key gene in osteoblast differentiation, by regulating the expression of Osx³⁵⁰. Panx3 acts as a hemichannel to release ATP, which can activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway³⁵⁰. Further opening of Panx3 ER Ca²⁺ channels leads to increased intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration, activation of CaM/NFAT signal transduction, and increased Osx expression³³⁴. Cx43 is the target gene of Osx, so Panx3 can regulate the differentiation process of osteoblasts by regulating the expression of Osx³⁵¹.

Co-repressors of Osx

Osteoblast differentiation and Osx expression can be induced by inhibiting protein phosphatase 2Acα (PP2Acα), which can negatively regulate Osx expression³⁵². Indeed, previous work has indicated that the silencing of PP2Acα expression led to an increased level of Osx expression, promoting the up-regulation of other bone-related genes, such as BSP and OCN³⁵². Through MAPK and PKCδ signaling pathways, BMP2 and IGF-I can mediate Osx expression in MSCs. In addition, inhibition of PP2Acα significantly up-regulates Osx expression and its related genes, leading to the sustained differentiation of osteoblasts³⁵².

NO66 is a protein containing a Jumonji C (JmjC) domain that directly interacts with Osx to inhibit Osx-mediated promoter activation³⁵³. Osteoblast differentiation and mineralization were accelerated when NO66 was knocked out of preosteoblasts, and Osx- targeted gene expression was significantly increased³⁵³. NO66 shows JmjC-subordinate histone demethylase movement, which is explicit for H3K4me and H3K36me (Fig. 5)³⁵³. Osx interacts with NO66 to regulate osteoblast-specific genes’ histone methylation status. This interaction between NO66 and Osx acts as histone demethylase to negatively regulate osteoblast gene expression³⁵³.

ATF4

ATF4 is necessary for the timely onset of terminal osteoblast differentiation and controls osteoblast-specific gene expression (Table 1)^354,355. The ATF/CREB protein family includes ATF4, the basic leucine zipper transcription factor³⁵⁶. Through the use of leucine domains, these proteins bind to DNA and transform into numerous dimers that coordinate the cellular regulation of signals from multiple pathways³⁵⁷ (Fig. 4). RSK2 and ATF4 direct type I collagen synthesis, an essential component of the bone matrix, following transcription³⁵⁴. Osteoblast-specific osteocalcin gene expression is triggered by the synergistic interaction between ATF4 and Runx2/Cbfa³⁵⁸. OCN is activated by the synergistic mutual effect between ATF4 and Runx2 at the 657 bp mOG2 promoter’s OSE1- and OSE2-binding sites, as determined by mutation analysis³⁵⁸.

Vimentin prevents osteoblast differentiation and OCN transcription, both of which are dependent on ATF4³⁵⁹. Vimentin binds to ATF4 in osteoblasts through the leucine zipper space, preventing osteoblast differentiation and ATF4-dependent OCN transcription³⁵⁹. This prevents ATF4 from binding to the OCN promoter’s cognate DNA, OSE1³⁵⁹. Additionally, the TGF-β signaling pathway regulates ATF4. Vimentin can be produced through the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting ATF4-dependent OCN transcription and osteoblast differentiation, even though it does not directly affect ATF4 expression³⁵⁹.

During bone formation, the dimerization of ATF4 with the C/EBP family is crucial. The heterodimerization of C/EBP with ATF4 is linked to one of the defining mechanisms of the delayed bone formation seen in C/EBP-deficient mice³⁶⁰. OCN transcription is triggered by these two proteins binding to the promoter of the OCN gene close to the ATF4-binding site³⁶⁰. C/EBP causes ATF4 to bind with Runx2, resulting in OCN expression³⁶⁰.

SATB2

Matrix attachment region (MAR)-dependent transcription can be initiated by special AT-rich sequence-binding protein-2 (SATB2), which belongs to a distinct AT-rich family of binding proteins that bind to the nuclear MAR^361,362. To regulate the chromatin structure, SATB2 collaborates with transfer-associated protein 2 (MAT2) and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) (Table 1)³⁶³. In addition to directly activating or inhibiting DNA expression, SATB2 promotes DNA-binding protein activity by acting as a protein bracket³⁶⁴ (Fig. 4). SATB2 may play a significant role as a key node in the transcriptional regulatory network since it controls several important aspects of skeletal development³⁶⁵.

The BSP and OCN genes, which are essential for osteoblast differentiation, can be bound and controlled by SATB2. In addition, SATB2 prevented Hoxa2, a bone formation inhibitor, from being expressed (Fig. 1)^366,367. Through physical interaction, SATB2 strengthened ATF4’s and Runx2’s ability to bind to similar DNA recognition elements³⁶⁸. By binding to the SATB2 promoter, Osx can directly control the expression of SATB2³⁶⁹. BMP4 may regulate upstream of SATB2, as evidenced by the fact that SATB2 was up-regulated in the mandible of mice overexpressing BMP4 but down-regulated in the mandible of mice lacking BMP4³⁷⁰. SATB2 expression was also increased when Osx was overexpressed³⁷¹. Mechanistically, Osx can bind directly to the 130-bp GC-rich SATB2 promoter binding site at the 368 proximal end, activating SATB2 expression³⁷¹. As a result, Osx is an upstream regulator of SATB2, with SATB2 transcription occurring after BMP signaling³⁷¹. SATB2 expression was inversely correlated with TNF-α content³⁶⁹. The mesenchymal cell line C2C12 osteoblasts can be constrained by TNF-α, reducing the expression of SATB2 induced by BMP³⁶⁹. Therefore, TNF-α is a negative regulator of osteoblast differentiation and can inhibit the differentiation of osteoblasts by inhibiting the expression of SATB2³⁶⁹.

TAZ/YAP

A transcriptional regulator known as TAZ has a domain that binds to PDZ (Table 1). YAP is a significant downstream effector in the Hippo signaling pathway (Table 1)³⁷². Bone formation is one area in which YAP/TAZ plays a significant role. TAZ can interact with Runx2 and PPAR, promoting Runx2 transcription and inhibiting PPAR, thereby preventing adipocyte generation and promoting osteoblast differentiation³⁷³. The transcriptional regulator LEF is crucial for osteoblast-specific gene expression within the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway³⁷⁴. TAZ combines with LEF to create a complex that promotes Wnt3a signaling and regulates Runx2 function³⁷⁵. By binding to Runx2, YAP can stop Runx2 activation. The Runx2-YAP complex can be separated by hindering Src/Yes kinase or obstructing tyrosine phosphorylation of YAP²⁴⁷. Because the interaction between YAP and Runx2 is facilitated by tyrosine phosphorylation of endogenous YAP, Runx2 can recruit phosphorylated YAP to the OCN promoter and the subnuclear site of Runx2, inhibiting OCN promoter activity²⁴⁷. Snail (SNAI1) and Slug (SNAI2) form a binary complex with YAP/TAZ that regulates the protein level of YAP/TAZ (Fig. 3)³⁷⁶. This protects YAP/TAZ from proteolytic hydrolysis and controls the expression of YAP/TAZ-targeted genes, positively regulating osteoblast differentiation³⁷⁶.

Cbfβ

Core binding factors (Cbfs) are heterodimeric transcription factors with two subunits: Cbfα (Runx proteins) and Cbfβ. The Cbfβ subunit functions as a non-DNA binding factor that can bind to Runx (Cbfα) and encourage gene expression (Table 1). Numerous developmental processes, including the formation of the skeletal system, are influenced by the Runx/Cbfβ complex (Fig. 4). Cbfβ can not only bind to the Runx protein, but also able to interact with other osteoblast differentiation-related transcription factors like ATF4 and Osx³⁷⁷. This interaction has the potential to significantly up-regulate the transcriptional expression of ATF4 and Osx³⁷⁷. Cbfβ deficiency can lead to the down-regulation of chondrocyte differentiation-related gene expression, impairing chondrogenesis³⁷⁸. Cbfβ-mediated chondrocyte maturation is also important for trabecular bone morphogenesis³⁷⁸. For instance, Cbfβ-deficient mice suffer from bone defects and die during embryonic development as a result of a lack of hematopoiesis and subsequent hemorrhaging^379,380. Furthermore, not only does down-regulation of the Cbfβ gene delay the development of the sternum, but it also impacts the growth of numerous bones, such as the skull, tibia, femur, spine, and ribs³⁸¹.

Through the formation of a binding complex, Cbfβ stabilizes Runx2 in osteoblasts and promotes Runx2’s regulation of osteoblast-specific gene expression (Fig. 4). By inhibiting the ability of WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (WWP1) to bind to Runx2, the Runx2/Cbfβ complex can prevent Runx2 from being ubiquitinated and subsequently degraded³⁷⁹. Additionally, the disruption of the Runx2/Cbfβ complex via small osteoblast vesicles containing micro-RNA that suppresses the expression of Cbfβ was shown to inhibit the transformation of pre-osteoblast cells to mature osteoblast cells³⁸². The Runx/Cbfβ complex can directly increase transcriptional Ihh expression and promote osteoblast differentiation by combining with the Runx binding site in the Ihh promoter, controlling Runx2 acetylation, phosphorylation, and isomerization, as well as other posttranslational modifications³⁸⁰. The maturation of osteoblasts and their transformation into osteocytes are slowed down when Runx2 and Cbfβ are overexpressed in osteoblasts³⁷⁹.

Epigenetic modification of transcriptional gene regulation

The study of epigenetic modification includes DNA methylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination, as well as the chromatin regulatory proteins that control changes in gene expression. The epigenetic regulation during osteoblast differentiation has progressed significantly in recent years. Epigenetic inheritance plays a crucial role in gene expression by regulating chromatin structure to dynamically control gene expression via permitting or declining access of transcriptional machinery to chromatin. Non-coding RNAs, DNA modifications, chromatin remodeling, and the dynamic epigenetic regulatory process are all essential for osteoblast development. The methylation and acetylation of DNA and histones have received the most attention (Fig. 5; Table 3).

Table 3.

Epigenetic proteins regulating osteoblast differentiation.

Enzyme	Name	Function	Reference
Histone methylases	EZH2	Catalyzes the trimethylation of H3K27 and inhibits Runx2 and OCN expression.	³⁹²
	Kmt1e/Setdb1/ESET complex	Mediates H3K9 trimethylation.	³⁹⁴
	Set1a/b-COMPASS	Transits H3K4me1 to H3K4me3.	⁴⁰⁰
Histone demethylases	KDM6B	Removes H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 methyl group.	^390,391
	KDM4B	Removes H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 methyl group.	^390,391
	Jarid/Kdm5	Converts H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 to H3K4me1.	³⁹⁰
Histone acetylases	GCN5	Regulates acetylation of histones at residues K9 and K14.	⁴¹⁰
	KAT6A	Responsible for H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation.	⁴¹¹
	CBP/P300	Mediates H3K27 acetylation and the activation of Foxo1.	⁴¹²
Histone deacetylases	SIRT1	Enhances Runx2 trans-activation activity.	³⁰¹
	HDAC1	Negatively regulates osteoblast generation by reducing Osx and OCN gene promoters’ H3 and H4 acetyl labeling.	⁴⁰³
	HDAC2	Expressed in bone tissue and activates Akt expression, which inhibits FoxO1 transcription and leads to RANKL-induced osteoblast generation.	⁴⁰³
	HDAC5	Binds with MEF2C to inhibit SOST expression and reduce H3K27 acetylation levels at the SOST gene site to promote Wnt/β-catenin signaling.	⁴⁰⁸
DNA methylases	Dnmt3a	Inhibits osteoblast differentiation via regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling and Runx2, Ocn activity.	⁴²²
DNA demethylases	TET1/2	Converts 5mCpG to 5hmCpG.	^423–425
Chromatin remodeling	Baf45a/ Baf45d	Promote the activation of genes crucial for osteoblast maturation and mineralization	^415,419,420

Open in a new tab

Non-coding RNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNA molecules that exert a negative regulatory effect on target gene expression through mRNA degradation or translational repression³⁸³. Past studies have found that miRNAs play an important role in osteoblast differentiation^384,385. A recent study found that miR-346 can directly bind to the 3’-untranslated region (UTR) of GSK-3β mRNA, and miR-346 can promote osteogenic differentiation by repressing GSK-3β and activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway⁴¹ (Fig. 5a). Another study found that miR-181a is highly upregulated during BMP-induced osteoblastic differentiation. They demonstrated that miR-181a targets the negative regulator of osteoblastic differentiation Tgfbi (Tgf-beta induced) and TβR-I/Alk5 (TGF-β type I receptor), thereby promoting osteoblastic differentiation via repression of TGF-β signaling molecules³⁸⁶ (Fig. 5a). Therefore, the miRNAs are important in osteoblast differentiation via regulating osteoblast differentiation-specific genes³⁸⁶.

Histone methylation

Chromatin reorganization and gene transcription are both regulated by methylation of the histone. Lysine (K) methylation of H3K9³⁸⁷ and H3K27³⁸⁸ is associated with transcriptionally silenced regions. By removing H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, the histone demethylases KDM4B and KDM6B are important in MSC differentiation (Fig. 5b; Table 3)³⁸⁹. Osteogenic differentiation was significantly reduced when lysine demethylase 4B (KDM4B) or lysine demethylase 6B (KDM6B) were depleted^390,391. The epigenetic switch for human MSC differentiation can be regulated by the mutual and concerted effect of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and lysine demethylase 6 A (KDM6A)³⁹¹. EZH2, the catalytic subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), plays a crucial role in gene repression by catalyzing the trimethylation of H3K27³⁹². H3K27me3 is specifically trimethylated by EZH2, whereas the methyl group is removed by KDM6A³⁹². The histone H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 negatively regulates osteogenesis, and the expression of Runx2 and OCN is inhibited in the presence of EZH2 during osteogenic differentiation because H3K27me3 is dramatically increased on Runx2 and OCN transcription start sites (TSS) (Fig. 5b; Table 3)³⁹³. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) can phosphorylate EZH2 at Thr 487. This phosphorylation event not only hinders the binding of EZH2 to its targets on the promoter but also inhibits the histone methyltransferase (HMTase) activity of EZH2 by disrupting the PRC2 complex³⁹². The removal of repression of the putative EZH2-target genes, facilitated by the phosphorylation of EZH2 at Thr 487 by CDK1, results in the promotion of MSC osteogenic differentiation³⁹². Kmt1e/Setdb1/ESET can mediate H3K9 trimethylation³⁹⁴.

Methylation of H3K4 is associated with transcriptionally active regions³⁹⁵. Trxg-mediated activity encompasses monomethylation, dimethylation, and trimethylation of lysine-4 residues of histone H3 (H3K4me1, H3K4me2, and H3K4me3)³⁹⁶. The Jarid1/Kdm5 family (Jarid1a, b, c, and d) is capable of converting H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 to H3K4me1 (Fig. 5b; Table 3)³⁹⁰. H3K4me3 is commonly found in transcriptionally active chromatin (euchromatin), primarily concentrated around the transcription initiation site (TSS) of promoters³⁹⁴. The global genomic deposition of H3K4me3 in most mammalian cells is regulated by Set1-COMPASS, thereby closely linking its function to the transcriptional activation of a large number of genes³⁹⁷. MLL3/4-COMPASS-like complexes can catalyze the deposition of H3K4me1 on the enhancer elements of mammalian cells^398,399. The reduction of MLL3/4 results in the transcriptional activation of specific MLL3/4 target genes. This happens because both Set1a/b-COMPASS and MLL1-COMPASS can reach these genes, aiding in the shift of associated transcription from H3K4me1 to H3K4me3⁴⁰⁰. Enrichment of H3K4me1 typically results in the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, the accumulation of H3K4me1 suppresses the expression of key transcription factors in osteoblasts, such as Runx2 and Osx (Fig. 5b; Table 3)^401,402. Methylation of H3K4, particularly the enrichment of H3K4me3, facilitates osteoblast differentiation. In this context, crucial transcription factors of osteoblasts like Runx2 and Osx become transcriptionally active (Fig. 5b; Table 3)⁴⁰².

Histone acetylation

Histone acetylation is regulated by histone deacetylase (HDAC) and histone acetyltransferases, which affect chromatin conformation and regulate gene transcription. Acetylation of a histone typically facilitates gene transcription by allowing transcription factors and RNA polymerase II access to the DNA via relaxing the chromatin structure. In this manner, histone acetylation encourages gene transcription, while histone deacetylation causes chromatin to become compacted and prevents gene expression⁴⁰³. During osteoblast differentiation, H3K9Ac is linked to genes that are activated, and H3K9me2 is linked to genes that are silenced (Fig. 5b; Table 3)³⁹⁴. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is a Class III histone deacetylase³⁰¹. SIRT1 activity can promote osteoblast differentiation³⁰¹. By interacting with Runx2, SIRT1 can enhance its trans-activation activity³⁰¹. As Osx is one of Runx2’s downstream targets, SIRT1 can trigger Runx2’s activation and promote Osx expression, which in turn targets osteoblast-specific gene expression and promotes osteoblast differentiation³⁰¹.

HDACs, or histone deacetylases, are a class of enzymes responsible for removing acetyl groups from both histone and non-histone proteins. This action facilitates the tightening of DNA wrapping around histones^404,405. HDAC1 exerts a negative regulatory effect on osteoblast generation by reducing the acetylation levels of histones H3 and H4 on the promoters of key osteoblast-related genes such as Osx and OCN (Fig. 5b; Table 3)⁴⁰³. HDAC1 can bind to the promoter of Runx2, thereby abolishing its transcriptional activity and consequently exerting its inhibitory effect on osteogenesis in the absence of osteogenic signals⁴⁰³. During osteogenesis, rapidly proliferating osteogenic progenitors exit the cell cycle to differentiate into functional osteoblasts. The subsequent arrest of the cell cycle is crucial for osteoblast differentiation⁴⁰⁶. HDAC1 interacts with promoters of cell cycle inhibitors such as P27, impeding the progression of the osteogenic lineage⁴⁰⁷. HDAC2 is broadly expressed in bone tissue and enhances Akt expression. This upregulation of Akt inhibits FoxO1 transcription, consequently promoting RANKL-induced osteoblast generation⁴⁰³. HDAC5 binds to MEF2C, leading to the inhibition of SOST expression. This action reduces H3K27 acetylation levels at the SOST gene site, thereby promoting Wnt/β-catenin signaling⁴⁰⁸.

General control non-repressed protein5 (GCN5) is a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that plays a crucial role in normal embryogenesis. Its function involves gene transcriptional activation and the regulation of a specific chromatin program characterized by histone acetylation⁴⁰⁹. Gcn5 is associated with the acetylation of histones at residues K9 and K14, which are responsible for gene activation⁴¹⁰. Previous work has studied the epigenetic regulation mechanism of Gcn5 on osteoblast differentiation in an inflammatory environment⁴¹⁰. During inflammation, Gcn5 expression is reduced, which leads to Wnt/β-catenin development and impingement of PDLSC osteogenesis. Gcn5 regulates osteoblast differentiation by depositing acetyl markers on histone H3 at lysine 9 and lysine 14 (H3K9 and H3K14) in the DKK1 promoter region (Fig. 5b; Table 3)⁴¹⁰. DKK1 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling by upregulating DKK1 in periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), thereby promoting osteogenesis with support from Gcn5⁴¹⁰. KAT6A, an HAT belonging to the MYST family, is responsible for acetylating histone H3 at lysine 9 and lysine 14 (H3K9 and H3K14) (Fig. 5b; Table 3)⁴¹¹. In the context of cellular senescence, the levels of KAT6A protein and Nrf2/ARE signaling decrease as a result of stem cell dysfunction. Overexpression of KAT6A leads to the promotion of the Nrf2/ARE pathway through altered histone H3 acetylation patterns, thereby restoring cellular stemness⁴¹¹. Besides, CREB-binding protein (CBP) (CREBBP) and p300 (EP300) are multifunctional HATs with broad homology (Fig. 5b; Table 3)⁴¹². One study reported that conditional knockout of CBP or p300 in osteoblasts inhibited bone formation, resulting in reduced bone mass and strength⁴¹². Mechanistically, CBP/p300 HAT regulates the expression of osteogenic genes partly by activating β-catenin transcriptionally and suppressing Stat1. The acetylation of histone H3K27 and the transcription factor Foxo1 have been demonstrated to play roles in the CBP/p300 HAT-mediated transcriptional regulation of β-catenin and STAT1, respectively⁴¹²(Fig. 5b; Table 3). These findings indicate that the acetyltransferase CBP/p300 could be a key regulator in promoting osteoblast differentiation⁴¹².

Chromatin remodeling

The switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex comprises multiple subunits engaged in diverse cellular processes, such as gene regulation, cell cycle modulation, development, and differentiation⁴¹³. The mammalian SWI/SNF complex contains a catalytic subunit, BRG1 or BRM, which includes ATPase activity^414,415. Mutations in the ATPase domain of BRG1 or BRM disrupt ATP binding, leading to the formation of inactive SWI/SNF complexes^414,416,417. When mutant BRG1 or BRM proteins were expressed in NIH3T3 cells, it hindered the cells’ capability to activate endogenous stress response genes and to undergo differentiation into muscle or fat cells in the presence of arsenite^414,416. Mutant BRG1 protein in NIH3T3 cell lines has been shown to inhibit BMP2-induced osteoblast lineage differentiation⁴¹⁸. SWI/SNF is required for BMP2-induced alkaline phosphatase (APase) expression, an early marker reflecting Runx2’s control of osteoblast differentiation⁴¹⁸. BRG1 is expressed in developing bone cells in mouse embryos and in vitro osteoblasts⁴¹⁸. These results suggested that MP2-mediated osteogenesis requires Runx2 and suggest that the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is required for BMP2-induced, Runx2-dependent initiation of skeletal gene expression (Fig. 5c; Table 3)⁴¹⁸.

Baf45a and Baf45d, two homologs involved in chromatin remodeling, have been demonstrated to be expressed in osteoblasts during maturation (Fig. 5c; Table 3). BAF45A is associated with the polybromo-associated BAF (PBAF) complex, while the BAF45D subunit belongs to the polymorphic canonical BRG1-associated factor (cBAF) complex^419,420. Both BAF45A and BAF45D belong to the subunits of SWI/SNF complex⁴¹⁵. During BMSCs differentiation, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed elevated histone H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation modifications in the promoter regions of Baf45a and Baf45d, accompanied by enhanced binding of RUNX2⁴²⁰. The overexpression of Baf45a in osteoblasts triggered the activation of genes crucial for osteoblast maturation and mineralization⁴²⁰. Conversely, Baf45a knockdown in odontoblasts led to significant changes in the expression of genes associated with proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, and a modest reduction in dentinogenic marker gene expression⁴²⁰. Additionally, Baf45a knockout osteoblasts exhibited a noticeable decrease in chromatin accessibility for osteoblast and odontoblast-specific genes, including the transcription factor Atf4⁴²⁰. These findings suggest that BAF45A-dependent chromatin remodeling, facilitated through PBAF-RUNX2 crosstalk, plays a pivotal role in the transcriptional activation essential for the early differentiation and matrix maturation of mineralized tissues⁴²⁰.

DNA methylation and demethylation

DNA methylation entails the epigenetic process of adding a methyl group to the C5 position of cytosine, resulting in the formation of 5-methylcytosine⁴²¹. DNA methylation is mainly regulated by a family of DNA methyltransferases (Dnmts), which are found to be important in osteoblast differentiation⁴²¹. A recent study found that Dnmt3a may inhibit osteoblast differentiation via regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling and Runx2, Ocn activity (Fig. 5d; Table 3)⁴²². Demethylation of the promoter’s CG region is linked to the ten-eleven translocases (TET) protein, which may alter chromatin status and encourage osteoblast differentiation⁴²². The TET protein forms a complex with Runx2 to mediate the demethylation of the Runx2 promoter and subsequently promote Runx2 expression⁴²³ (Fig. 5d; Table 3). By recruiting the TET protein into the Runx2 promoter region, the resulting hypomethylation of DNA can provide a more accessible chromatin environment for RNA Pol II, promoting gene expression⁴²³. These findings demonstrate that TET enzymes function to regulate Runx2 activity and maintain skeletal homeostasis⁴²³. During BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation, DNA demethylation of the Osx promoter is mediated by a Tet1/Tet2-containing complex that converts 5mCpG to 5hmCpG⁴²⁴. A recent study also found that Tet1 recruits Tet2 to mediate 5mCpG demethylation and gene transcription during BM-MSC differentiation⁴²⁵ (Fig. 5d; Table 3).

The expression of osteoblast genes may also be controlled via the methylation mechanism of Vitamin C (ascorbic acid, AA), a well-known regulator of bone and cartilage metabolism. A recent study confirmed that AA exerts differential effects on osteoblast differentiation, with AA increasing levels of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) and inducing DNA demethylation via the ten-eleven translocases (TETs)⁴²⁶. Prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2 (PHD2), recognized as a mediator of AA’s effects in these tissues, belongs to the same enzyme family as the TETs⁴²⁶. Blocking PHD2 resulted in decreased 5-hmC levels in promoters of genes associated with chondrocyte differentiation⁴²⁶. Knockdown of Phd2 in chondrocytes also led to a reduction in global 5-hmC levels, indicating that PHD2 might directly contribute to increases in 5-hmC in genes related to chondrocyte and osteoblast functions⁴²⁶.

Summary and future perspectives

Embryonic bone formation and the dynamic remodeling of adult bone are processes by which mesenchymal cells of the osteoblast lineage transform into mature osteocytes in mineralized connective tissue. The intricate interaction of signaling proteins, transcription factors, and co-regulatory proteins supports these processes²⁷⁹. Numerous transcription factors and signaling pathways that occupy important positions in osteoblast differentiation have been elucidated over the previous decades thanks to advances in biomolecular techniques. Numerous studies and data support the hypothesis that Runx family proteins and the Wnt signaling pathway regulate osteoblast differentiation. Different signaling pathways contain a series of molecular interactions, which provide potential targets for clinical drug therapy. Many signaling pathways have been implicated in osteoblast differentiation, such as Wnt, Notch, and Hippo, making them attractive targets for the research of drugs to treat bone diseases. With the progress of technology, the factors that participate in osteoblast differentiation have been gradually discovered. However, the regulation of osteoblast differentiation is a large and complex network that involves not only intracellular proteins and genetic interactions but also communication between cells. As such, osteoblast differentiation research faces many unanswered questions and challenges that still need to be overcome, such as:

The mechanisms behind the temporal and spatial regulation of many essential signaling and transcription factors (such as BMP or Runx2) in osteoblast differentiation during different stages remain unclear.
Some signaling pathways have bi-directional effects on osteoblast differentiation, like the Notch signaling pathway and TGFβ signaling pathway. How this bidirectional effect regulates osteoblast differentiation and under what circumstances it promotes or inhibits osteoblast differentiation still needs to be determined.
In addition to the effect of signaling pathways on osteoblast differentiation, cell−cell interactions, such as osteoblast and osteoclast interaction, and the genetic regulation that controls the mutual transformation between osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes, still requires further investigation.
With developments in molecular biology and genetics, epigenetic regulation has become a major source of intrigue within the study of osteoblast differentiation. A major focus has been afforded to how histones are modified, the regulation of chromatin structure, and how small RNAs function in regulating gene expression. The interaction and coordination of these regulatory processes are also worth studying, such as how chromatin is “turned on” to expose genes, enabling transcription factors to control the expression of pivotal genes. Epigenetic changes at various destinations will produce different outcomes, and the epigenetic control at the various phases of osteoblast differentiation should be examined.
Bioinformatic technology can also be used to study the transcriptional regulation of osteoblast differentiation. For example, bioinformatic skills such as ATAC-seq can be used to study how enhancers regulate gene expression⁴²⁷.
In the regulation of osteoblast signaling, many molecules are involved in skeleton-related diseases. Therefore, many proteins in the Wnt signaling pathway are promising targets for clinical therapy. Determining which targets can be used and how to design efficacious pharmaceutical drugs that can treat these skeleton-related diseases with minimal side effects is also a current challenge in this area of clinical research.
Osteoporosis has been studied in different animal models; yet these models do not satisfactorily resemble the features of the human disease phenotype⁴²⁸. Although experimental modeling of human bone diseases represents a breakthrough by allowing greater insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in bone pathology, there are shortcomings in using MSC models. Limited availability of MSCs in patients, extreme heterogeneity, limited proliferative capacity, and loss of function are the most common limitations when using MSCS in vitro⁴²⁹. These limitations on clinical treatment are also issues that need to be addressed.
As our comprehension of cellular dynamics during bone remodeling advances, a plethora of therapeutic targets has emerged from preclinical studies, encompassing membrane expression, cellular crosstalk, and gene regulation. These targets show promising therapeutic effects, offering diverse options for drug development in treating bone-related diseases. Additionally, drugs utilizing carrier transport mechanisms have been devised for this purpose⁴³⁰. Nonetheless, our current understanding of bone biology and its interplay with other systems remains incomplete. The potential impacts on the entire bone remodeling process and other physiological systems, rather than solely focusing on the bone microenvironment or individual cell−cell interactions, represent a fertile area for investigation. Further research is needed to identify more precise targets in order to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Bone tissue has numerous vital functions and is closely tied to many important tissues and organs’ biochemical, homeostatic, and pathophysiological functions. Because of this critical link, many diseases are also associated with musculoskeletal diseases, such as obesity, cancer, bone metastases, and kidney diseases. Therefore, interdisciplinary research on musculoskeletal diseases, including obesity, cancer, kidney, and other diseases, may provide new insights into bone-related diseases and vice versa.

Currently, the drugs used in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis-related diseases focus on inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. In contrast, the drugs targeted at osteoblasts are mainly sclerostin inhibitors that maintain osteoblasts’ function by inhibiting sclerostin’s inhibition on the Wnt signaling pathway⁴³¹. However, a more recently developed inhibitor of Fap has also been found to be an effective drug for osteoporosis⁴³². The classical signaling pathway is an appealing target for clinical drug development. Wnt, BMP, and other classical signaling pathways have many known key signaling factors, such as β-catenin and Smad proteins. These factors can also be used as clinical targets to make corresponding activators or inhibitors. Researching compelling small-molecule activators or inhibitors to manage the pathway might emphatically affect the treatment of bone-related diseases like osteoporosis. Therefore, more therapeutic targets and new pharmaceutical research strategies can be developed to treat a diverse range of disease pathologies by studying the regulation of signaling pathways and transcription factors during the differentiation of osteoblasts.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Abigail McVicar for her excellent assistance with the editing of this paper. We apologize to the many researchers whose important primary papers could not be cited in this review due to space limitations. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (AR-070135 and AG-056438 to W.C., and AR075735, AR074954, DE023813, and DE028264 to Y.P.L).

Author contributions

S.Z., W.C. and Y.P.L. discussed and conceived the framework of the manuscript. S.Z., W.C. and Y.P.L. searched and collected papers related to the topic. S.Z., W.C. and Y.P.L. drafted the manuscript. S.Z. and Y.P.L draw the figures and tables. S.Z., A.M., Y.P.L. and W.C. revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Wei Chen, Email: wchen18@tulane.edu.

Yi-Ping Li, Email: yli81@tulane.edu.

References

1.Murshed M, Harmey D, Millán JL, McKee MD, Karsenty G. Unique coexpression in osteoblasts of broadly expressed genes accounts for the spatial restriction of ECM mineralization to bone. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1093–1104. doi: 10.1101/gad.1276205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Ferron M, et al. Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism. Cell. 2010;142:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Karsenty G, Wagner EF. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:389–406. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Bar-Shavit Z. The osteoclast: a multinucleated, hematopoietic-origin, bone-resorbing osteoimmune cell. J. Cell Biochem. 2007;102:1130–1139. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Soltanoff CS, Yang S, Chen W, Li YP. Signaling networks that control the lineage commitment and differentiation of bone cells. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2009;19:1–46. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Winslow MM, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT signaling in osteoblasts regulates bone mass. Dev. Cell. 2006;10:771–782. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Huang H, et al. Bone resorption deficiency affects tooth root development in RANKL mutant mice due to attenuated IGF-1 signaling in radicular odontoblasts. Bone. 2018;114:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Taichman RS. Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood. 2005;105:2631–2639. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Zhang J, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425:836–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Calvi LM, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Lim J, et al. Dual function of Bmpr1a signaling in restricting preosteoblast proliferation and stimulating osteoblast activity in mouse. Development. 2016;143:339–347. doi: 10.1242/dev.126227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Galán-Díez M, Kousteni S. The osteoblastic niche in hematopoiesis and hematological myeloid malignancies. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017;3:53–62. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0055-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Pinho S, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:303–320. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Omatsu Y, et al. The essential functions of adipo-osteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity. 2010;33:387–399. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Greenbaum A, et al. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature. 2013;495:227–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Sipp D, Robey PG, Turner L. Clear up this stem-cell mess. Nature. 2018;561:455–457. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06756-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Mizuhashi K, et al. Resting zone of the growth plate houses a unique class of skeletal stem cells. Nature. 2018;563:254–258. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0662-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Newton PT, et al. A radical switch in clonality reveals a stem cell niche in the epiphyseal growth plate. Nature. 2019;567:234–238. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Maes C, et al. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Duchamp de Lageneste O, et al. Periosteum contains skeletal stem cells with high bone regenerative potential controlled by Periostin. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03124-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Debnath S, et al. Discovery of a periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation. Nature. 2018;562:133–139. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Chen KG, Johnson KR, McKay RDG, Robey PG. Concise Review: Conceptualizing paralogous stem-cell niches and unfolding bone marrow progenitor cell identities. Stem Cells. 2018;36:11–21. doi: 10.1002/stem.2711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Kfoury Y, Scadden DT. Mesenchymal cell contributions to the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W. Bone development. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000;16:191–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Huang W, Yang S, Shao J, Li YP. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in osteoblast commitment and differentiation. Front Biosci. 2007;12:3068–3092. doi: 10.2741/2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:85–89. doi: 10.1038/8792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Kronenberg HM. The role of the perichondrium in fetal bone development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:59–64. doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Pino AM, Rosen CJ, Rodríguez JP. In osteoporosis, differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improves bone marrow adipogenesis. Biol. Res. 2012;45:279–287. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602012000300009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Watt FM. Stem cell fate and patterning in mammalian epidermis. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 2001;11:410–417. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00211-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Gronthos S, et al. Differential cell surface expression of the STRO-1 and alkaline phosphatase antigens on discrete developmental stages in primary cultures of human bone cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 1999;14:47–56. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Stein GS, Lian JB, Stein JL, Van Wijnen AJ, Montecino M. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol. Rev. 1996;76:593–629. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Tamai K, et al. LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature. 2000;407:530–535. doi: 10.1038/35035117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.He X, Semenov M, Tamai K, Zeng X. LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: arrows point the way. Development. 2004;131:1663–1677. doi: 10.1242/dev.01117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Leupin O, et al. Bone overgrowth-associated mutations in the LRP4 gene impair sclerostin facilitator function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19489–19500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Veeman MT, Axelrod JD, Moon RT. A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of beta-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev. Cell. 2003;5:367–377. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene. 2004;341:19–39. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S. Wnt signalling pathway: a new target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2005;9:1063–1077. doi: 10.1517/14728222.9.5.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Nabhan AN, et al. Targeted alveolar regeneration with Frizzled-specific agonists. Cell. 2023;186:2995–3012.e2915. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Shu B, et al. Inhibition of Axin1 in osteoblast precursor cells leads to defects in postnatal bone growth through suppressing osteoclast formation. Bone Res. 2020;8:31. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-0104-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Hay E, et al. Interaction between LRP5 and Frat1 mediates the activation of the Wnt canonical pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:13616–13623. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Wang Q, Cai J, Cai XH, Chen L. miR-346 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.AlMuraikhi N, et al. Inhibition of GSK-3β enhances osteoblast differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells through Wnt signalling overexpressing Runx2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:7164. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Clevers H. Wnt signaling: Ig-norrin the dogma. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R436–R437. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Nelson WJ, Nusse R. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 2004;303:1483–1487. doi: 10.1126/science.1094291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Lévy L, et al. Acetylation of beta-catenin by p300 regulates beta-catenin-Tcf4 interaction. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:3404–3414. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3404-3414.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Latres E, Chiaur DS, Pagano M. The human F box protein beta-Trcp associates with the Cul1/Skp1 complex and regulates the stability of beta-catenin. Oncogene. 1999;18:849–854. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Zhang C, et al. Inhibition of Wnt signaling by the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:6936–6941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710831105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Ge J, et al. Activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling by autophagic degradation of APC contributes to the osteoblast differentiation effect of soy isoflavone on osteoporotic mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2023;44:1841–1855. doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01066-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Semënov M, Tamai K, He X. SOST is a ligand for LRP5/LRP6 and a Wnt signaling inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:26770–26775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504308200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Mao B, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2002;417:664–667. doi: 10.1038/nature756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Mao B, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411:321–325. doi: 10.1038/35077108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Abuna RPF, et al. Frizzled 6 disruption suppresses osteoblast differentiation induced by nanotopography through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:8293–8303. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Abuna RPF, et al. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is regulated by titanium with nanotopography to induce osteoblast differentiation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2019;184:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Nagano K, et al. R-spondin 3 deletion induces Erk phosphorylation to enhance Wnt signaling and promote bone formation in the appendicular skeleton. Elife. 2022;11:e84171. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Alhazmi N, et al. Synergistic roles of Wnt modulators R-spondin2 and R-spondin3 in craniofacial morphogenesis and dental development. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85415-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.De Boer J, Wang HJ, Van Blitterswijk C. Effects of Wnt signaling on proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:393–401. doi: 10.1089/107632704323061753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.van der Horst G, et al. Downregulation of Wnt signaling by increased expression of Dickkopf-1 and -2 is a prerequisite for late-stage osteoblast differentiation of KS483 cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 2005;20:1867–1877. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Cho HH, et al. Endogenous Wnt signaling promotes proliferation and suppresses osteogenic differentiation in human adipose derived stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:111–121. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Eijken M, et al. Wnt signaling acts and is regulated in a human osteoblast differentiation dependent manner. J. Cell Biochem. 2008;104:568–579. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Jin Y, Sun X, Pei F, Zhao Z, Mao J. Wnt16 signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation of periosteal derived cells in vitro and in vivo. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10374. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Sebastian A, Hum NR, Morfin C, Murugesh DK, Loots GG. Global gene expression analysis identifies Mef2c as a potential player in Wnt16-mediated transcriptional regulation. Gene. 2018;675:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Bennett CN, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:3324–3329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408742102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Stambolic V, Ruel L, Woodgett JR. Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity and mimics wingless signalling in intact cells. Curr. Biol. 1996;6:1664–1668. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70790-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Jackson A, et al. Gene array analysis of Wnt-regulated genes in C3H10T1/2 cells. Bone. 2005;36:585–598. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, Yang Y. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:739–750. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Hill TP, Später D, Taketo MM, Birchmeier W, Hartmann C. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:727–738. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of beta-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162–21168. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Abe E, et al. TSH is a negative regulator of skeletal remodeling. Cell. 2003;115:151–162. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00771-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J. Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2003;130:1003–1015. doi: 10.1242/dev.00324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Yamaguchi TP, Bradley A, McMahon AP, Jones S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development. 1999;126:1211–1223. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Ai M, Holmen SL, Van Hul W, Williams BO, Warman ML. Reduced affinity to and inhibition by DKK1 form a common mechanism by which high bone mass-associated missense mutations in LRP5 affect canonical Wnt signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:4946–4955. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.12.4946-4955.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Boyden LM, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1513–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.Van Wesenbeeck L, et al. Six novel missense mutations in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene in different conditions with an increased bone density. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:763–771. doi: 10.1086/368277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Babij P, et al. High bone mass in mice expressing a mutant LRP5 gene. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:960–974. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Bain G, Müller T, Wang X, Papkoff J. Activated beta-catenin induces osteoblast differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells and participates in BMP2 mediated signal transduction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;301:84–91. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02951-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Rawadi G, Vayssière B, Dunn F, Baron R, Roman-Roman S. BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:1842–1853. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Esen E, et al. WNT-LRP5 signaling induces Warburg effect through mTORC2 activation during osteoblast differentiation. Cell Metab. 2013;17:745–755. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Zhang D, et al. Exosomes derived from adipose stem cells enhance bone fracture healing via the activation of the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway in rats with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:4852. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Chen W, Zhu G, Tang J, Zhou HD, Li YP. C/ebpalpha controls osteoclast terminal differentiation, activation, function, and postnatal bone homeostasis through direct regulation of Nfatc1. J. Pathol. 2018;244:271–282. doi: 10.1002/path.5001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Chen W, et al. C/EBPalpha regulates osteoclast lineage commitment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:7294–7299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211383110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Chen W, Zhu G, Jules J, Nguyen D, Li YP. Monocyte-specific knockout of C/ebpalpha results in osteopetrosis phenotype, blocks bone loss in ovariectomized mice, and reveals an important function of C/ebpalpha in osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Bone Min. Res. 2018;33:691–703. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Takada I, Suzawa M, Matsumoto K, Kato S. Suppression of PPAR transactivation switches cell fate of bone marrow stem cells from adipocytes into osteoblasts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:182–195. doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Zayzafoon M. Calcium/calmodulin signaling controls osteoblast growth and differentiation. J. Cell Biochem. 2006;97:56–70. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCdelta activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Esen E, Long F. Aerobic glycolysis in osteoblasts. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2014;12:433–438. doi: 10.1007/s11914-014-0235-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Chen H, et al. Increased glycolysis mediates Wnt7b-induced bone formation. FASEB J. 2019;33:7810–7821. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900201RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Hu H, et al. Sequential roles of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in osteoblast development. Development. 2005;132:49–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.01564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Gaur T, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33132–33140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Glass DA, 2nd, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:751–764. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Wu M, et al. Cbfβ governs osteoblast-adipocyte lineage commitment through enhancing β-catenin signaling and suppressing adipogenesis gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10119–10124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619294114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Chen Q, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of LRP6 by Src and Fer inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signalling. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:1254–1267. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Chen M, et al. Metastasis suppressor 1 controls osteoblast differentiation and bone homeostasis through regulating Src-Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2022;79:107. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04147-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Chen Y, Chen ZF, He F. Tenascin-C knockdown suppresses osteoblast differentiation and promotes osteoporosis in mice by inhibiting Wnt signaling. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016;36:1117–1122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Yao Z, Xing L, Boyce BF. NF-kappaB p100 limits TNF-induced bone resorption in mice by a TRAF3-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:3024–3034. doi: 10.1172/JCI38716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Boyce BF, Xing L, Chen D. Osteoprotegerin, the bone protector, is a surprising target for beta-catenin signaling. Cell Metab. 2005;2:344–345. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Almeida M, et al. Estrogen receptor-α signaling in osteoblast progenitors stimulates cortical bone accrual. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:394–404. doi: 10.1172/JCI65910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Auld KL, et al. Estrogen-related receptor α regulates osteoblast differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012;48:177–191. doi: 10.1530/JME-11-0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Lee CW, Ito K, Ito Y. Role of RUNX3 in bone morphogenetic protein signaling in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4243–4252. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Wu M, Wu S, Chen W, Li YP. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF-β and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Res. 2024;34:101–123. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00918-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Derynck R, Akhurst RJ, Balmain A. TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nat. Genet. 2001;29:117–129. doi: 10.1038/ng1001-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Chen G, Deng C, Li YP. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J. Biol. Sci. 2012;8:272–288. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Yi JJ, Barnes AP, Hand R, Polleux F, Ehlers MD. TGF-beta signaling specifies axons during brain development. Cell. 2010;142:144–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Lee KS, et al. Runx2 is a common target of transforming growth factor beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein 2, and cooperation between Runx2 and Smad5 induces osteoblast-specific gene expression in the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;20:8783–8792. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.23.8783-8792.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Miyama K, et al. A BMP-inducible gene, dlx5, regulates osteoblast differentiation and mesoderm induction. Dev. Biol. 1999;208:123–133. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Lee MH, et al. BMP-2-induced Runx2 expression is mediated by Dlx5, and TGF-beta 1 opposes the BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation by suppression of Dlx5 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:34387–34394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211386200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107.Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016;4:16009. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2016.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108.Canalis E, Economides AN, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr. Rev. 2003;24:218–235. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109.Chen D, Zhao M, Mundy GR. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors. 2004;22:233–241. doi: 10.1080/08977190412331279890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110.Finnson KW, Parker WL, ten Dijke P, Thorikay M, Philip A. ALK1 opposes ALK5/Smad3 signaling and expression of extracellular matrix components in human chondrocytes. J. Bone Miner. Res. : Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2008;23:896–906. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111.Goumans MJ, et al. Activin receptor-like kinase (ALK)1 is an antagonistic mediator of lateral TGFbeta/ALK5 signaling. Mol. Cell. 2003;12:817–828. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00386-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112.Wang J, et al. Atp6i deficient mouse model uncovers transforming growth factor-β1 /Smad2/3 as a key signaling pathway regulating odontoblast differentiation and tooth root formation. Int J. Oral. Sci. 2023;15:35. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00235-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113.Li J, et al. Smad2 overexpression enhances Smad4 gene expression and suppresses CBFA1 gene expression in osteoblastic osteosarcoma ROS17/2.8 cells and primary rat calvaria cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:31009–31015. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114.Lin HT, et al. Dynamic expression of SMAD3 is critical in osteoblast differentiation of PDMCs. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;43:1085–1093. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.4001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115.Kang JS, Alliston T, Delston R, Derynck R. Repression of Runx2 function by TGF-beta through recruitment of class II histone deacetylases by Smad3. EMBO J. 2005;24:2543–2555. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116.Hjelmeland AB, Schilling SH, Guo X, Quarles D, Wang XF. Loss of Smad3-mediated negative regulation of Runx2 activity leads to an alteration in cell fate determination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:9460–9468. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9460-9468.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117.Grafe I, et al. Excessive transforming growth factor-β signaling is a common mechanism in osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat. Med. 2014;20:670–675. doi: 10.1038/nm.3544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118.Song IW, et al. Targeting TGF-β for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e152571. doi: 10.1172/JCI152571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119.Seo HS, Serra R. Deletion of Tgfbr2 in Prx1-cre expressing mesenchyme results in defects in development of the long bones and joints. Dev. Biol. 2007;310:304–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120.Dong H, et al. Higenamine promotes osteogenesis via IQGAP1/SMAD4 signaling pathway and prevents age- and estrogen-dependent bone loss in mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2023;38:775–791. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121.Yang H, et al. IFT20 mediates the transport of cell migration regulators from the trans-golgi network to the plasma membrane in breast cancer cells. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:632198. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.632198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122.Lim J, et al. Primary cilia control cell alignment and patterning in bone development via ceramide-PKCζ-β-catenin signaling. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:45. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0767-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123.Li Y, Yang S, Liu Y, Qin L, Yang S. IFT20 governs mesenchymal stem cell fate through positively regulating TGF-β-Smad2/3-Glut1 signaling mediated glucose metabolism. Redox Biol. 2022;54:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124.Tolkachov A, et al. Loss of the hematopoietic stem cell factor GATA2 in the osteogenic lineage impairs trabecularization and mechanical strength of bone. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;38:e00599–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00599-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125.Cao X, Chen D. The BMP signaling and in vivo bone formation. Gene. 2005;357:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126.Anderson HC, Hodges PT, Aguilera XM, Missana L, Moylan PE. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) localization in developing human and rat growth plate, metaphysis, epiphysis, and articular cartilage. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000;48:1493–1502. doi: 10.1177/002215540004801106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127.Peng Y, et al. Transcriptional characterization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)-mediated osteogenic signaling. J. Cell Biochem. 2003;90:1149–1165. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128.Daluiski A, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-3 is a negative regulator of bone density. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:84–88. doi: 10.1038/83810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129.Matsumoto Y, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-3b (BMP-3b) inhibits osteoblast differentiation via Smad2/3 pathway by counteracting Smad1/5/8 signaling. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012;350:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130.Liu Z, Tang Y, Qiu T, Cao X, Clemens TL. A dishevelled-1/Smad1 interaction couples WNT and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways in uncommitted bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:17156–17163. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131.Jun JY, et al. Persicae semen promotes bone union in rat fractures by stimulating osteoblastogenesis through BMP-2 and Wnt signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:7388. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132.Guicheux J, et al. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase by BMP-2 and their implication in the stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:2060–2068. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133.Lai CF, Cheng SL. Signal transductions induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta in normal human osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:15514–15522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200794200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134.Lemonnier J, Ghayor C, Guicheux J, Caverzasio J. Protein kinase C-independent activation of protein kinase D is involved in BMP-2-induced activation of stress mitogen-activated protein kinases JNK and p38 and osteoblastic cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:259–264. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308665200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135.Lee KS, Hong SH, Bae SC. Both the Smad and p38 MAPK pathways play a crucial role in Runx2 expression following induction by transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein. Oncogene. 2002;21:7156–7163. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136.Lee MH, Kwon TG, Park HS, Wozney JM, Ryoo HM. BMP-2-induced Osterix expression is mediated by Dlx5 but is independent of Runx2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;309:689–694. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137.Celil AB, Hollinger JO, Campbell PG. Osx transcriptional regulation is mediated by additional pathways to BMP2/Smad signaling. J. Cell Biochem. 2005;95:518–528. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138.Kim MK, et al. Salt-inducible kinase 1 regulates bone anabolism via the CRTC1-CREB-Id1 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:826. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1915-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139.Kim K, et al. Transcription factor Lmx1b negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5225. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140.Zhang R, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling activates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in osteoblasts. Bone. 2013;52:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141.Kokabu S, Rosen V. BMP3 expression by osteoblast lineage cells is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling. FEBS Open Bio. 2018;8:168–176. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142.de Jong DS, et al. Identification of novel regulators associated with early-phase osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2004;19:947–958. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143.Son HE, Kim KM, Kim EJ, Jang WG. Kisspeptin-10 (KP-10) stimulates osteoblast differentiation through GPR54-mediated regulation of BMP2 expression and activation. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20571-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144.Comninos AN, et al. Acute effects of kisspeptin administration on bone metabolism in healthy men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;107:1529–1540. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145.Izzi L, Attisano L. Regulation of the TGFbeta signalling pathway by ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Oncogene. 2004;23:2071–2078. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146.Datto M, Wang XF. Ubiquitin-mediated degradation a mechanism for fine-tuning TGF-beta signaling. Cell. 2005;121:2–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
147.Dupont S, et al. Germ-layer specification and control of cell growth by Ectodermin, a Smad4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell. 2005;121:87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148.Xu Z, et al. SMURF2 regulates bone homeostasis by disrupting SMAD3 interaction with vitamin D receptor in osteoblasts. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14570. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149.Long F, et al. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004;131:1309–1318. doi: 10.1242/dev.01006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150.Deng A, et al. The inhibitory roles of Ihh downregulation on chondrocyte growth and differentiation. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;15:789–794. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
151.Minina E, et al. BMP and Ihh/PTHrP signaling interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2001;128:4523–4534. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.22.4523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152.St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M, McMahon AP. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2072–2086. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153.Chung UI, Schipani E, McMahon AP, Kronenberg HM. Indian hedgehog couples chondrogenesis to osteogenesis in endochondral bone development. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;107:295–304. doi: 10.1172/JCI11706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154.Razzaque MS, Soegiarto DW, Chang D, Long F, Lanske B. Conditional deletion of Indian hedgehog from collagen type 2alpha1-expressing cells results in abnormal endochondral bone formation. J. Pathol. 2005;207:453–461. doi: 10.1002/path.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155.Nakamura T, et al. Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;237:465–469. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
156.van der Horst G, Farih-Sips H, Löwik CW, Karperien M. Hedgehog stimulates only osteoblastic differentiation of undifferentiated KS483 cells. Bone. 2003;33:899–910. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
157.Chen MH, et al. Cilium-independent regulation of Gli protein function by Sufu in Hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1910–1928. doi: 10.1101/gad.1794109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
158.Wen X, et al. Kinetics of hedgehog-dependent full-length Gli3 accumulation in primary cilia and subsequent degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:1910–1922. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01089-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
159.Cai H, Liu A. Spop promotes skeletal development and homeostasis by positively regulating Ihh signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:14751–14756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612520114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
160.Horikiri Y, et al. Sonic hedgehog regulates osteoblast function by focal adhesion kinase signaling in the process of fracture healing. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
161.Sinha S, Chen JK. Purmorphamine activates the Hedgehog pathway by targeting Smoothened. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2:29–30. doi: 10.1038/nchembio753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
162.Oliveira FS, et al. Hedgehog signaling and osteoblast gene expression are regulated by purmorphamine in human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2012;113:204–208. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
163.Jakobs P, et al. Scube2 enhances proteolytic Shh processing from the surface of Shh-producing cells. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:1726–1737. doi: 10.1242/jcs.137695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
164.Parchure A, Vyas N, Mayor S. Wnt and Hedgehog: Secretion of lipid-modified morphogens. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
165.Wierbowski BM, et al. Hedgehog pathway activation requires coreceptor-catalyzed, lipid-dependent relay of the sonic hedgehog ligand. Dev. Cell. 2020;55:450–467.e458. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
166.Wu Q, et al. SCUBE2 mediates bone metastasis of luminal breast cancer by modulating immune-suppressive osteoblastic niches. Cell Res. 2023;33:464–478. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00810-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
167.Saeki N, et al. Pregnane X receptor (PXR) represses osteoblast differentiation through repression of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2022;416:113156. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
168.Shi Y, Chen J, Karner CM, Long F. Hedgehog signaling activates a positive feedback mechanism involving insulin-like growth factors to induce osteoblast differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:4678–4683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502301112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
169.Shi Y, et al. Gli1(+) progenitors mediate bone anabolic function of teriparatide via Hh and Igf signaling. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109542. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
170.Aruga J, Mikoshiba K. Identification and characterization of Slitrk, a novel neuronal transmembrane protein family controlling neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2003;24:117–129. doi: 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
171.Sun J, et al. SLITRK5 is a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4611. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24819-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
172.Meng X, et al. Suppressor of fused negatively regulates beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:40113–40119. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105317200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
173.Jia J, et al. Shaggy/GSK3 antagonizes Hedgehog signalling by regulating Cubitus interruptus. Nature. 2002;416:548–552. doi: 10.1038/nature733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
174.Price MA, Kalderon D. Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector Cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1. Cell. 2002;108:823–835. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00664-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
175.Spinella-Jaegle S, et al. Sonic hedgehog increases the commitment of pluripotent mesenchymal cells into the osteoblastic lineage and abolishes adipocytic differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:2085–2094. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.11.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
176.Yuasa T, et al. Sonic hedgehog is involved in osteoblast differentiation by cooperating with BMP-2. J. Cell Physiol. 2002;193:225–232. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
177.Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1446–1465. doi: 10.1101/gad.990702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
178.Webster MK, Donoghue DJ. Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the transmembrane domain point mutation found in achondroplasia. EMBO J. 1996;15:520–527. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00384.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
179.Wilkie AO. Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997;6:1647–1656. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
180.Jacob AL, Smith C, Partanen J, Ornitz DM. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 signaling in the osteo-chondrogenic cell lineage regulates sequential steps of osteoblast maturation. Dev. Biol. 2006;296:315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
181.Naski MC, Colvin JS, Coffin JD, Ornitz DM. Repression of hedgehog signaling and BMP4 expression in growth plate cartilage by fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Development. 1998;125:4977–4988. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.24.4977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
182.Valverde-Franco G, et al. Defective bone mineralization and osteopenia in young adult FGFR3-/- mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004;13:271–284. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
183.Xiao L, et al. Stat1 controls postnatal bone formation by regulating fibroblast growth factor signaling in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:27743–27752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314323200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
184.Chen L, Deng CX. Roles of FGF signaling in skeletal development and human genetic diseases. Front Biosci. 2005;10:1961–1976. doi: 10.2741/1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
185.Ornitz DM. FGF signaling in the developing endochondral skeleton. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
186.Jeon YM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-7 facilitates osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells through the activation of ERK/Runx2 signaling. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2013;382:37–45. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1716-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
187.Lin JM, et al. Actions of fibroblast growth factor-8 in bone cells in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;297:E142–E150. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90743.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
188.Jeon E, et al. Investigating the role of FGF18 in the cultivation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
189.Hamidouche Z, et al. Autocrine fibroblast growth factor 18 mediates dexamethasone-induced osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2010;224:509–515. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
190.Xiao G, Jiang D, Gopalakrishnan R, Franceschi RT. Fibroblast growth factor 2 induction of the osteocalcin gene requires MAPK activity and phosphorylation of the osteoblast transcription factor, Cbfa1/Runx2. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:36181–36187. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206057200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
191.Fei Y, Xiao L, Doetschman T, Coffin DJ, Hurley MM. Fibroblast growth factor 2 stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation is mediated by modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:40575–40583. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
192.Miraoui H, Ringe J, Häupl T, Marie PJ. Increased EFG- and PDGFalpha-receptor signaling by mutant FGF-receptor 2 contributes to osteoblast dysfunction in Apert craniosynostosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010;19:1678–1689. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
193.Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol. 2001;2:Reviews3005. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-reviews3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
194.Ornitz DM, et al. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:15292–15297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
195.Liu Z, Xu J, Colvin JS, Ornitz DM. Coordination of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis by fibroblast growth factor 18. Genes Dev. 2002;16:859–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.965602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
196.Wang Y, et al. FGFR2 Mutation p.Cys342Arg enhances mitochondrial metabolism-mediated osteogenesis via FGF/FGFR-AMPK-Erk1/2 axis in Crouzon syndrome. Cells. 2022;11:3129. doi: 10.3390/cells11193129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
197.Zhu Q, et al. OTUB1 promotes osteoblastic bone formation through stabilizing FGFR2. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2023;8:142. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01354-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
198.Courbon G, et al. FGF23 directly inhibits osteoprogenitor differentiation in Dmp1 knockout mice. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e156850. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.156850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
199.Al Rifai O, et al. In vivo analysis of the contribution of proprotein convertases to the processing of FGF23. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:690681. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
200.Kozawa O, Tokuda H, Matsuno H, Uematsu T. Involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in basic fibroblast growth factor-induced interleukin-6 synthesis in osteoblasts. J. Cell Biochem. 1999;74:479–485. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990901)74:3<479::AID-JCB15>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
201.Lemonnier J, et al. The Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR-2) mutation induces PKC-independent downregulation of FGFR-2 associated with premature calvaria osteoblast differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2000;256:158–167. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
202.Lomri A, Lemonnier J, Delannoy P, Marie PJ. Increased expression of protein kinase Calpha, interleukin-1alpha, and RhoA guanosine 5’-triphosphatase in osteoblasts expressing the Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor 2 receptor Apert mutation: identification by analysis of complementary DNA microarray. J. Bone Min. Res. 2001;16:705–712. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
203.Taketomi T, et al. Sprouty2 is involved in the control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation through the FGF and BMP signaling pathways. Cell Biol. Int. 2018;42:1106–1114. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
204.Mundy GR, Elefteriou F. Boning up on ephrin signaling. Cell. 2006;126:441–443. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
205.Arthur A, Gronthos S. Eph-Ephrin signaling mediates cross-talk within the bone microenvironment. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:598612. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.598612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
206.Tonna S, et al. EphrinB2 signaling in osteoblasts promotes bone mineralization by preventing apoptosis. FASEB J. 2014;28:4482–4496. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-254300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
207.Zhao C, et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
208.Irie N, et al. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinA2-EphA2 enhances osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:14637–14644. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807598200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
209.Vrahnas C, et al. Increased autophagy in EphrinB2-deficient osteocytes is associated with elevated secondary mineralization and brittle bone. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11373-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
210.Blank M, Sims NA. Cellular processes by which osteoblasts and osteocytes control bone mineral deposition and maturation revealed by stage-specific EphrinB2 knockdown. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2019;17:270–280. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00524-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
211.Tonna S, Sims NA. Talking among ourselves: paracrine control of bone formation within the osteoblast lineage. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014;94:35–45. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9738-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
212.Kawatsu M, et al. Scleraxis upregulated by transforming growth factor-β1 signaling inhibits tension-induced osteoblast differentiation of priodontal ligament cells via ephrin A2. Bone. 2021;149:115969. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
213.Oeckinghaus A, Ghosh S. The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a000034. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
214.Li YP, Stashenko P. Proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-6, but not IL-1, down-regulate the osteocalcin gene promoter. J. Immunol. 1992;148:788–794. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.148.3.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
215.Chang J, et al. NF-κB inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by promoting β-catenin degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9469–9474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300532110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
216.Li YP, Stashenko P. Characterization of a tumor necrosis factor-responsive element which down-regulates the human osteocalcin gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 1993;13:3714–3721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
217.Chang J, et al. Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor-kappaB. Nat. Med. 2009;15:682–689. doi: 10.1038/nm.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
218.Hu Y, et al. Melatonin promotes BMSCs osteoblastic differentiation and relieves inflammation by suppressing the NF-κB pathways. Stem Cells Int. 2023;2023:7638842. doi: 10.1155/2023/7638842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
219.Li A, et al. Rocaglamide-A potentiates osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting NF-κB signaling. Mol. Cells. 2015;38:941–949. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2015.2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
220.Qin H, Xu HZ, Gong YQ. Mechanism of NF-κB signaling pathway and autophagy in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2016;33:138–144. doi: 10.1080/09687688.2017.1400601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
221.Guo X, et al. Radioprotective 105 kDa protein attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial apoptosis and autophagy by inhibiting the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in rats. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;38:885–893. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
222.Gao H, Lin L, Haq IU, Zeng SM. Inhibition of NF-κB promotes autophagy via JNK signaling pathway in porcine granulosa cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;473:311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
223.Bleedorn JA, et al. Temporal mechanically-induced signaling events in bone and dorsal root ganglion neurons after in vivo bone loading. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
224.Tomlinson RE, et al. NGF-TrkA signaling in sensory nerves is required for skeletal adaptation to mechanical loads in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E3632–e3641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701054114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
225.Rajpar I, Kumar G, Fortina P, Tomlinson RE. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in osteoblasts is required for load-induced bone formation in mice. iScience. 2023;26:106304. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
226.Zhou B, et al. Notch signaling pathway: architecture, disease, and therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:95. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00934-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
227.Xu J, Li Z, Hou Y, Fang W. Potential mechanisms underlying the Runx2 induced osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015;7:2527–2535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
228.Canalis E. Notch signaling in osteoblasts. Sci. Signal. 2008;1:pe17. doi: 10.1126/stke.117pe17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
229.Liu ZH, Dai XM, Du B. Hes1: a key role in stemness, metastasis and multidrug resistance. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015;16:353–359. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1016662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
230.Luo Z, et al. Notch signaling in osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2019;189:1495–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
231.Tezuka K, et al. Stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation by Notch. J. Bone Min. Res. 2002;17:231–239. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
232.Xu Y, et al. Notch activation promotes osteoblast mineralization by inhibition of apoptosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6921–6928. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
233.Deregowski V, Gazzerro E, Priest L, Rydziel S, Canalis E. Notch 1 overexpression inhibits osteoblastogenesis by suppressing Wnt/beta-catenin but not bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:6203–6210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508370200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
234.Cao J, et al. Notch signaling pathway promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing BMP9/Smad signaling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;40:378–388. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
235.Lin GL, Hankenson KD. Integration of BMP, Wnt, and notch signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011;112:3491–3501. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
236.Kode A, et al. FoxO1-dependent induction of acute myeloid leukemia by osteoblasts in mice. Leukemia. 2016;30:1–13. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
237.Neal JW, Clipstone NA. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibits the DNA binding activity of NFATc. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:3666–3673. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004888200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
238.Yu W, et al. SALL4 promotes osteoblast differentiation by deactivating NOTCH2 signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
239.Torres HM, et al. Hdac1 and Hdac2 positively regulate Notch1 gain-of-function pathogenic signaling in committed osteoblasts of male mice. Birth Defects Res. 2024;116:e2266. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
240.Wang Z, et al. The histone deacetylase HDAC1 positively regulates Notch signaling during Drosophila wing development. Biol. Open. 2018;7:bio029637. doi: 10.1242/bio.029637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
241.Tang Y, Boucher JM, Liaw L. Histone deacetylase activity selectively regulates notch-mediated smooth muscle differentiation in human vascular cells. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
242.Torres HM, et al. Hdac1 and Hdac2 positively regulate Notch1 gain-of-function pathogenic signaling in committed osteoblasts of male mice. Birth Defects Res. 2023;116:e2266. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
243.Hansen CG, Moroishi T, Guan KL. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
244.Hong W, Guan KL. The YAP and TAZ transcription co-activators: key downstream effectors of the mammalian Hippo pathway. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;23:785–793. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
245.Tang Y, et al. MT1-MMP-dependent control of skeletal stem cell commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ signaling axis. Dev. Cell. 2013;25:402–416. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
246.Zheng Y, Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and disease. Dev. Cell. 2019;50:264–282. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
247.Zaidi SK, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation controls Runx2-mediated subnuclear targeting of YAP to repress transcription. EMBO J. 2004;23:790–799. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
248.Zhu WQ, et al. Regulation of osteoblast behaviors via cross-talk between Hippo/YAP and MAPK signaling pathway under fluoride exposure. J. Mol. Med (Berl.) 2019;97:1003–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01785-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
249.Chuang LSH, Ito Y. The multiple interactions of RUNX with the Hippo-YAP pathway. Cells. 2021;10:2925. doi: 10.3390/cells10112925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
250.Franceschi RT, Ge C. Control of the osteoblast lineage by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017;3:122–132. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0059-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
251.Li Y, Yang ST, Yang S. Trp53 controls chondrogenesis and endochondral ossification by negative regulation of TAZ activity and stability via β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitination. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:317. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01105-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
252.Velletri T, et al. Loss of p53 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes alteration of bone remodeling through negative regulation of osteoprotegerin. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:156–169. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
253.Varelas X, et al. The Hippo pathway regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Dev. Cell. 2010;18:579–591. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
254.Varelas X, et al. The Crumbs complex couples cell density sensing to Hippo-dependent control of the TGF-β-SMAD pathway. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:831–844. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
255.Varelas X, et al. TAZ controls Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and regulates human embryonic stem-cell self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:837–848. doi: 10.1038/ncb1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
256.Pagani CA, et al. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates aberrant mesenchymal lineage cell fate and matrix organization. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabq6152. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq6152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
257.Liu P, et al. Effects of mechanical stress stimulation on function and expression mechanism of osteoblasts. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:830722. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.830722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
258.Yavropoulou MP, Yovos JG. The molecular basis of bone mechanotransduction. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2016;16:221–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
259.Sun W, et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation. Elife. 2019;8:e47454. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
260.Li X, et al. Stimulation of Piezo1 by mechanical signals promotes bone anabolism. Elife. 2019;8:e49631. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
261.Assaraf E, et al. Piezo2 expressed in proprioceptive neurons is essential for skeletal integrity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16971-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
262.Hendrickx G, et al. Piezo1 inactivation in chondrocytes impairs trabecular bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2021;36:369–384. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
263.Zhou T, et al. Piezo1/2 mediate mechanotransduction essential for bone formation through concerted activation of NFAT-YAP1-ß-catenin. Elife. 2020;9:e49631. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
264.Wang L, et al. Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14146-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
265.Morris JA, et al. An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:258–266. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0302-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
266.Dzamukova M, et al. Mechanical forces couple bone matrix mineralization with inhibition of angiogenesis to limit adolescent bone growth. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3059. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30618-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
267.Kusumbe AP, Ramasamy SK, Adams RH. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature. 2014;507:323–328. doi: 10.1038/nature13145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
268.Romeo SG, et al. Endothelial proteolytic activity and interaction with non-resorbing osteoclasts mediate bone elongation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:430–441. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0304-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
269.Tagliabracci VS, et al. Secreted kinase phosphorylates extracellular proteins that regulate biomineralization. Science. 2012;336:1150–1153. doi: 10.1126/science.1217817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
270.Tagliabracci VS, et al. A single kinase generates the majority of the secreted phosphoproteome. Cell. 2015;161:1619–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
271.Gurr JA, Catterall JF, Kourides IA. Cloning of cDNA encoding the pre-beta subunit of mouse thyrotropin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:2122–2126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
272.Baliram R, et al. Thyroid and bone: macrophage-derived TSH-β splice variant increases murine osteoblastogenesis. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4919–4926. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
273.Elefteriou F, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
274.Takeda S, et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111:305–317. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
275.Fulzele K, et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell. 2022;185:746. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
276.Bialek P, et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2004;6:423–435. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
277.Fulzele K, et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell. 2010;142:309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
278.Kode A, et al. FoxO1 protein cooperates with ATF4 protein in osteoblasts to control glucose homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:8757–8768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.282897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
279.Lian JB, et al. Regulatory controls for osteoblast growth and differentiation: role of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2004;14:1–41. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.v14.i12.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
280.Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997;89:747–754. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80257-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
281.Wang Q, et al. The CBFbeta subunit is essential for CBFalpha2 (AML1) function in vivo. Cell. 1996;87:697–708. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81389-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
282.Kania MA, Bonner AS, Duffy JB, Gergen JP. The Drosophila segmentation gene runt encodes a novel nuclear regulatory protein that is also expressed in the developing nervous system. Genes Dev. 1990;4:1701–1713. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
283.Kern B, Shen J, Starbuck M, Karsenty G. Cbfa1 contributes to the osteoblast-specific expression of type I collagen genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:7101–7107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006215200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
284.Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:696–711. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00279-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
285.Stein GS, et al. Runx2 control of organization, assembly and activity of the regulatory machinery for skeletal gene expression. Oncogene. 2004;23:4315–4329. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
286.Wei J, et al. Glucose uptake and Runx2 synergize to orchestrate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2015;161:1576–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
287.Ogawa E, et al. PEBP2/PEA2 represents a family of transcription factors homologous to the products of the Drosophila runt gene and the human AML1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:6859–6863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
288.Banerjee C, et al. Runt homology domain proteins in osteoblast differentiation: AML3/CBFA1 is a major component of a bone-specific complex. J. Cell. Biochem. 1997;66:1–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19970701)66:1<1::AID-JCB1>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
289.Komori T, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89:755–764. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
290.Otto F, et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell. 1997;89:765–771. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80259-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
291.Pratap J, et al. Cell growth regulatory role of Runx2 during proliferative expansion of preosteoblasts. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5357–5362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
292.Huang B, et al. RUNX2 promotes the suppression of osteoblast function and enhancement of osteoclast activity by multiple myeloma cells. Med. Oncol. 2023;40:115. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-01960-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
293.Komori TRunx2. an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149:313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
294.Pelletier N, Champagne N, Stifani S, Yang XJ. MOZ and MORF histone acetyltransferases interact with the Runt-domain transcription factor Runx2. Oncogene. 2002;21:2729–2740. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
295.Thomas DM, et al. The retinoblastoma protein acts as a transcriptional coactivator required for osteogenic differentiation. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:303–316. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00327-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
296.Cui CB, Cooper LF, Yang X, Karsenty G, Aukhil I. Transcriptional coactivation of bone-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 by TAZ. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;23:1004–1013. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1004-1013.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
297.Wang W, et al. Groucho homologue Grg5 interacts with the transcription factor Runx2-Cbfa1 and modulates its activity during postnatal growth in mice. Dev. Biol. 2004;270:364–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
298.Byun MR, et al. (-)-Epicatechin gallate (ECG) stimulates osteoblast differentiation via Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ)-mediated transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:9926–9935. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.522870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
299.Suo, J. et al. VGLL4 promotes osteoblast differentiation by antagonizing TEADs-inhibited Runx2 transcription. Sci. Adv. 6 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
300.Lee JM, Libermann TA, Cho JY. The synergistic regulatory effect of Runx2 and MEF transcription factors on osteoblast differentiation markers. J. Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:39–44. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
301.Zainabadi K, Liu CJ, Guarente L. SIRT1 is a positive regulator of the master osteoblast transcription factor, RUNX2. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
302.Tintut Y, Parhami F, Le V, Karsenty G, Demer LL. Inhibition of osteoblast-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 by the cAMP pathway in osteoblastic cells. Ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:28875–28879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.41.28875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
303.Shen R, et al. Smad6 interacts with Runx2 and mediates Smad ubiquitin regulatory factor 1-induced Runx2 degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3569–3576. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506761200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
304.Tosa I, et al. Postnatal Runx2 deletion leads to low bone mass and adipocyte accumulation in mice bone tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;516:1229–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
305.Chava S, Chennakesavulu S, Gayatri BM, Reddy ABM. A novel phosphorylation by AMP-activated kinase regulates RUNX2 from ubiquitination in osteogenesis over adipogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:e49631. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0791-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
306.Dai X, et al. Epigenetic upregulation of H19 and AMPK inhibition concurrently contribute to S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency-promoted atherosclerotic calcification. Circ. Res. 2022;130:1565–1582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.320251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
307.Liu H, et al. Rho A/ROCK1 signaling-mediated metabolic reprogramming of valvular interstitial cells toward Warburg effect accelerates aortic valve calcification via AMPK/RUNX2 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:108. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05642-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
308.Kim KM, Lim YJ, Jang WG. Policosanol stimulates osteoblast differentiation via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-mediated expression of insulin-induced genes 1 and 2. Cells. 2023;12:108. doi: 10.3390/cells12141863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
309.Zhu J, Shimizu E, Zhang X, Partridge NC, Qin L. EGFR signaling suppresses osteoblast differentiation and inhibits expression of master osteoblastic transcription factors Runx2 and Osterix. J. Cell Biochem. 2011;112:1749–1760. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
310.Lee KN, et al. Orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) protein negatively regulates bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced osteoblast differentiation through suppressing runt-related gene 2 (Runx2) activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:18888–18899. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.311878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
311.Tang CY, et al. Runx1 is a central regulator of osteogenesis for bone homeostasis by orchestrating BMP and WNT signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
312.Okuda T, Nishimura M, Nakao M, Fujita Y. RUNX1/AML1: a central player in hematopoiesis. Int J. Hematol. 2001;74:252–257. doi: 10.1007/BF02982057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
313.Chen CL, et al. Runx1 determines nociceptive sensory neuron phenotype and is required for thermal and neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006;49:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
314.Lian JB, et al. Runx1/AML1 hematopoietic transcription factor contributes to skeletal development in vivo. J. Cell Physiol. 2003;196:301–311. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
315.Tang CY, et al. Runx1 up-regulates chondrocyte to osteoblast lineage commitment and promotes bone formation by enhancing both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Biochem J. 2020;477:2421–2438. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
316.Wang Y, et al. Runx1/AML1/Cbfa2 mediates onset of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis. J. Bone Min. Res. 2005;20:1624–1636. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
317.Tang J, et al. Runt-related transcription factor 1 is required for murine osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:11669–11681. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
318.Levanon D, Groner Y. Structure and regulated expression of mammalian RUNX genes. Oncogene. 2004;23:4211–4219. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
319.de Bruijn MF, Speck NA. Core-binding factors in hematopoiesis and immune function. Oncogene. 2004;23:4238–4248. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
320.Levanon D, et al. Spatial and temporal expression pattern of Runx3 (Aml2) and Runx1 (Aml1) indicates non-redundant functions during mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 2001;109:413–417. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00537-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
321.Yamashiro T, Aberg T, Levanon D, Groner Y, Thesleff I. Expression of Runx1, -2 and -3 during tooth, palate and craniofacial bone development. Mech. Dev. 2002;119:S107–S110. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00101-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
322.Soung do Y, et al. Runx3/AML2/Cbfa3 regulates early and late chondrocyte differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1260–1270. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
323.Sato S, et al. The distinct role of the Runx proteins in chondrocyte differentiation and intervertebral disc degeneration: findings in murine models and in human disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2764–2775. doi: 10.1002/art.23805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
324.Bauer O, et al. Loss of osteoblast Runx3 produces severe congenital osteopenia. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;35:1097–1109. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01106-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
325.Wang Y, et al. RUNX3 plays an important role in mediating the BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;40:1991–1999. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
326.Nakashima K, et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2002;108:17–29. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
327.Hewitt J, Lu X, Gilbert L, Nanes MS. The muscle transcription factor MyoD promotes osteoblast differentiation by stimulation of the Osterix promoter. Endocrinology. 2008;149:3698–3707. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
328.Onizuka S, et al. ZBTB16 as a downstream target gene of Osterix regulates osteoblastogenesis of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016;117:2423–2434. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
329.Lee SJ, Lee EH, Park SY, Kim JE. Induction of fibrillin-2 and periostin expression in Osterix-knockdown MC3T3-E1 cells. Gene. 2017;596:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
330.Nieminen-Pihala V, et al. Early B-cell Factor1 (Ebf1) promotes early osteoblast differentiation but suppresses osteoblast function. Bone. 2021;146:115884. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
331.Kato M, et al. Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J. Cell Biol. 2002;157:303–314. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200201089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
332.Cheng SL, Shao JS, Charlton-Kachigian N, Loewy AP, Towler DA. MSX2 promotes osteogenesis and suppresses adipogenic differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal progenitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:45969–45977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306972200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
333.Celil AB, Campbell PG. BMP-2 and insulin-like growth factor-I mediate Osterix (Osx) expression in human mesenchymal stem cells via the MAPK and protein kinase D signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:31353–31359. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503845200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
334.Ishikawa M, et al. Pannexin 3 functions as an ER Ca(2+) channel, hemichannel, and gap junction to promote osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 2011;193:1257–1274. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201101050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
335.Koga T, et al. NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation. Nat. Med. 2005;11:880–885. doi: 10.1038/nm1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
336.Colditz J, Picke AK, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M. Contributions of dickkopf-1 to obesity-induced bone loss and marrow adiposity. JBMR. 2020;4:e10364. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
337.Chen D, et al. Synergistic inhibition of Wnt pathway by HIF-1α and osteoblast-specific transcription factor osterix (Osx) in osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
338.Deckelbaum RA, Majithia A, Booker T, Henderson JE, Loomis CA. The homeoprotein engrailed 1 has pleiotropic functions in calvarial intramembranous bone formation and remodeling. Development. 2006;133:63–74. doi: 10.1242/dev.02171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
339.Fedde KN, et al. Alkaline phosphatase knock-out mice recapitulate the metabolic and skeletal defects of infantile hypophosphatasia. J. Bone Min. Res. 1999;14:2015–2026. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.12.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
340.Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:83–93. doi: 10.1038/nrc2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
341.Hoshikawa S, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent osterix degradation negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2020;34:14930–14945. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001340R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
342.Choi YH, et al. Cbl-b and c-Cbl negatively regulate osteoblast differentiation by enhancing ubiquitination and degradation of Osterix. Bone. 2015;75:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
343.Kim MJ, Piao M, Li Y, Lee SH, Lee KY. Deubiquitinase USP17 regulates osteoblast differentiation by increasing Osterix protein stability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:15257. doi: 10.3390/ijms242015257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
344.Barbuto R, Mitchell J. Regulation of the osterix (Osx, Sp7) promoter by osterix and its inhibition by parathyroid hormone. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013;51:99–108. doi: 10.1530/JME-12-0251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
345.Matsubara T, et al. BMP2 regulates Osterix through Msx2 and Runx2 during osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:29119–29125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801774200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
346.Subramaniam M, Pitel KS, Withers SG, Drissi H, Hawse JR. TIEG1 enhances Osterix expression and mediates its induction by TGFβ and BMP2 in osteoblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;470:528–533. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
347.Rajamannan NM. TIEG1 is upregulated in Lrp5/6-mediated valve osteogenesis. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:3362–3366. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
348.Liu Q, et al. Recent advances of Osterix transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:601224. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.601224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
349.Yang D, Okamura H, Nakashima Y, Haneji T. Histone demethylase Jmjd3 regulates osteoblast differentiation via transcription factors Runx2 and osterix. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:33530–33541. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.497040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
350.Ishikawa M, Yamada Y. The role of Pannexin 3 in bone biology. J. Dent. Res. 2017;96:372–379. doi: 10.1177/0022034516678203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
351.Ishikawa M, et al. Pannexin 3 and connexin 43 modulate skeletal development through their distinct functions and expression patterns. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:1018–1030. doi: 10.1242/jcs.176883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
352.Okamura H, Yoshida K, Ochiai K, Haneji T. Reduction of protein phosphatase 2A Cα enhances bone formation and osteoblast differentiation through the expression of bone-specific transcription factor Osterix. Bone. 2011;49:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
353.Sinha KM, Yasuda H, Coombes MM, Dent SY, de Crombrugghe B. Regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix by NO66, a Jumonji family histone demethylase. EMBO J. 2010;29:68–79. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
354.Yang X, et al. ATF4 is a substrate of RSK2 and an essential regulator of osteoblast biology; implication for Coffin-Lowry Syndrome. Cell. 2004;117:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
355.Elefteriou F, et al. ATF4 mediation of NF1 functions in osteoblast reveals a nutritional basis for congenital skeletal dysplasiae. Cell Metab. 2006;4:441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
356.Karpinski BA, Morle GD, Huggenvik J, Uhler MD, Leiden JM. Molecular cloning of human CREB-2: an ATF/CREB transcription factor that can negatively regulate transcription from the cAMP response element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:4820–4824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.4820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
357.Brindle PK, Montminy MR. The CREB family of transcription activators. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 1992;2:199–204. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(05)80274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
358.Xiao G, et al. Cooperative interactions between activating transcription factor 4 and Runx2/Cbfa1 stimulate osteoblast-specific osteocalcin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:30689–30696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500750200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
359.Lian N, et al. Transforming growth factor β suppresses osteoblast differentiation via the vimentin activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) axis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:35975–35984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.372458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
360.St-Arnaud R, Hekmatnejad B. Combinatorial control of ATF4-dependent gene transcription in osteoblasts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1237:11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06197.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
361.Dobreva G, Dambacher J, Grosschedl R. SUMO modification of a novel MAR-binding protein, SATB2, modulates immunoglobulin mu gene expression. Genes Dev. 2003;17:3048–3061. doi: 10.1101/gad.1153003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
362.Britanova O, Akopov S, Lukyanov S, Gruss P, Tarabykin V. Novel transcription factor Satb2 interacts with matrix attachment region DNA elements in a tissue-specific manner and demonstrates cell-type-dependent expression in the developing mouse CNS. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;21:658–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03897.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
363.Gyorgy AB, Szemes M, de Juan Romero C, Tarabykin V, Agoston DV. SATB2 interacts with chromatin-remodeling molecules in differentiating cortical neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008;27:865–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
364.Roy SK, Shrivastava A, Srivastav S, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. SATB2 is a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020;24:11064–11069. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
365.Dobreva G, et al. SATB2 is a multifunctional determinant of craniofacial patterning and osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 2006;125:971–986. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
366.Kanzler B, Kuschert SJ, Liu YH, Mallo M. Hoxa-2 restricts the chondrogenic domain and inhibits bone formation during development of the branchial area. Development. 1998;125:2587–2597. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.14.2587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
367.Trainor PA, Krumlauf R. Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001;13:698–705. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00273-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
368.Huang X, et al. SATB2: A versatile transcriptional regulator of craniofacial and skeleton development, neurogenesis and tumorigenesis, and its applications in regenerative medicine. Genes Dis. 2022;9:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
369.Zuo C, et al. TNF-α inhibits SATB2 expression and osteoblast differentiation through NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Oncotarget. 2018;9:4833–4850. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
370.Bonilla-Claudio M, et al. Bmp signaling regulates a dose-dependent transcriptional program to control facial skeletal development. Development. 2012;139:709–719. doi: 10.1242/dev.073197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
371.Tang W, Li Y, Osimiri L, Zhang C. Osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix (Osx) is an upstream regulator of Satb2 during bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:32995–33002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.244236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
372.Varelas X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development. 2014;141:1614–1626. doi: 10.1242/dev.102376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
373.Hong JH, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309:1074–1078. doi: 10.1126/science.1110955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
374.Li Z, et al. Role of TCF/LEF transcription factors in bone development and osteogenesis. Int. J. Med Sci. 2018;15:1415–1422. doi: 10.7150/ijms.26741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
375.Kida J, et al. Interaction of LEF1 with TAZ is necessary for the osteoblastogenic activity of Wnt3a. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28711-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
376.Tang Y, Feinberg T, Keller ET, Li XY, Weiss SJ. Snail/Slug binding interactions with YAP/TAZ control skeletal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:917–929. doi: 10.1038/ncb3394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
377.Chen W, et al. Cbfβ deletion in mice recapitulates cleidocranial dysplasia and reveals multiple functions of Cbfβ required for skeletal development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:8482–8487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310617111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
378.Wu M, et al. Chondrocyte-specific knockout of Cbfβ reveals the indispensable function of Cbfβ in chondrocyte maturation, growth plate development and trabecular bone formation in mice. Int J. Biol. Sci. 2014;10:861–872. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
379.Lim KE, et al. Core binding factor β of osteoblasts maintains cortical bone mass via stabilization of Runx2 in mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2015;30:715–722. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
380.Tian F, et al. Core binding factor beta (Cbfβ) controls the balance of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation by upregulating Indian hedgehog (Ihh) expression and inhibiting parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor (PPR) expression in postnatal cartilage and bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:1564–1574. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
381.Wu M, et al. Deletion of core-binding factor β (Cbfβ) in mesenchymal progenitor cells provides new insights into Cbfβ/Runxs complex function in cartilage and bone development. Bone. 2014;65:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
382.Uenaka M, et al. Osteoblast-derived vesicles induce a switch from bone-formation to bone-resorption in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1066. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28673-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
383.Valencia-Sanchez MA, Liu J, Hannon GJ, Parker R. Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. Genes Dev. 2006;20:515–524. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
384.Laine SK, Alm JJ, Virtanen SP, Aro HT, Laitala-Leinonen TK. MicroRNAs miR-96, miR-124, and miR-199a regulate gene expression in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012;113:2687–2695. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
385.Huang S, et al. Upregulation of miR-22 promotes osteogenic differentiation and inhibits adipogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells by repressing HDAC6 protein expression. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:2531–2540. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
386.Bhushan R, et al. miR-181a promotes osteoblastic differentiation through repression of TGF-β signaling molecules. Int J. Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:696–705. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
387.Nicetto D, Zaret KS. Role of H3K9me3 heterochromatin in cell identity establishment and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 2019;55:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2019.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
388.Xiang Y, et al. JMJD3 is a histone H3K27 demethylase. Cell Res. 2007;17:850–857. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
389.Huang B, Li G, Jiang XH. Fate determination in mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective from histone-modifying enzymes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6:35. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0018-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
390.Kooistra SM, Helin K. Molecular mechanisms and potential functions of histone demethylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:297–311. doi: 10.1038/nrm3327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
391.Hillringhaus L, et al. Structural and evolutionary basis for the dual substrate selectivity of human KDM4 histone demethylase family. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:41616–41625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.283689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
392.Wei Y, et al. CDK1-dependent phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of H3K27 and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:87–94. doi: 10.1038/ncb2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
393.Hemming S, et al. EZH2 and KDM6A act as an epigenetic switch to regulate mesenchymal stem cell lineage specification. Stem Cells. 2014;32:802–815. doi: 10.1002/stem.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
394.Montecino M, Carrasco ME, Nardocci G. Epigenetic control of osteogenic lineage commitment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:611197. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.611197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
395.Yamane K, et al. PLU-1 is an H3K4 demethylase involved in transcriptional repression and breast cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. 2007;25:801–812. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
396.Vermeulen M, et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell. 2007;131:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
397.Denissov S, et al. Mll2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation on bivalent promoters in embryonic stem cells, whereas Mll1 is redundant. Development. 2014;141:526–537. doi: 10.1242/dev.102681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
398.Hu D, et al. The MLL3/MLL4 branches of the COMPASS family function as major histone H3K4 monomethylases at enhancers. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;33:4745–4754. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01181-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
399.Yan J, et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation modulates long-range chromatin interactions at enhancers. Cell Res. 2018;28:204–220. doi: 10.1038/cr.2018.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
400.Cheng J, et al. A role for H3K4 monomethylation in gene repression and partitioning of chromatin readers. Mol. Cell. 2014;53:979–992. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
401.Sepulveda H, et al. Epigenetic signatures at the RUNX2-P1 and Sp7 gene promoters control osteogenic lineage commitment of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2017;232:2519–2527. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
402.Aguilar R, Bustos FJ, Nardocci G, van Zundert B, Montecino M. Epigenetic silencing of the osteoblast-lineage gene program during hippocampal maturation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2021;122:367–384. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
403.McGee-Lawrence ME, Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylases in skeletal development and bone mass maintenance. Gene. 2011;474:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
404.Seto E, Yoshida M. Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018713. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
405.Milazzo G, et al. Histone deacetylases (HDACs): Evolution, specificity, role in transcriptional complexes, and pharmacological actionability. Genes (Basel) 2020;11:556. doi: 10.3390/genes11050556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
406.Adithya SP, Balagangadharan K, Selvamurugan N. Epigenetic modifications of histones during osteoblast differentiation. Biochim Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2022;1865:194780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2021.194780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
407.Lee HW, et al. Histone deacetylase 1-mediated histone modification regulates osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006;20:2432–2443. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
408.Wein MN, et al. HDAC5 controls MEF2C-driven sclerostin expression in osteocytes. J. Bone Min. Res. 2015;30:400–411. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
409.Grant PA, et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1640–1650. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.13.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
410.Li B, et al. GCN5 modulates osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells through DKK1 acetylation in inflammatory microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26542. doi: 10.1038/srep26542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
411.Fei D, et al. KAT6A regulates stemness of aging bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells through Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:104. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02164-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
412.Zhang L, et al. Acetyltransferases CBP/p300 control transcriptional switch of β-catenin and Stat1 promoting osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2023;38:1885–1899. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
413.Peterson CL, Workman JL. Promoter targeting and chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2000;10:187–192. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00068-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
414.de la Serna IL, Carlson KA, Imbalzano AN. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes promote MyoD-mediated muscle differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:187–190. doi: 10.1038/84826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
415.Navickas SM, Giles KA, Brettingham-Moore KH, Taberlay PC. The role of chromatin remodeler SMARCA4/BRG1 in brain cancers: a potential therapeutic target. Oncogene. 2023;42:2363–2373. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02773-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
416.de la Serna IL, Roy K, Carlson KA, Imbalzano AN. MyoD can induce cell cycle arrest but not muscle differentiation in the presence of dominant negative SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:41486–41491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107281200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
417.Salma N, Xiao H, Mueller E, Imbalzano AN. Temporal recruitment of transcription factors and SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes during adipogenic induction of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma nuclear hormone receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:4651–4663. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4651-4663.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
418.Young DW, et al. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is obligatory for BMP2-induced, Runx2-dependent skeletal gene expression that controls osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;94:720–730. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
419.Krasteva V, Crabtree GR, Lessard JA. The BAF45a/PHF10 subunit of SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling complexes is essential for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Exp. Hematol. 2017;48:58–71.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
420.Busby T, et al. Baf45a mediated chromatin remodeling promotes transcriptional activation for osteogenesis and odontogenesis. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:763392. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.763392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
421.Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
422.Zhang M, et al. Downregulation of DNA methyltransferase-3a ameliorates the osteogenic differentiation ability of adipose-derived stem cells in diabetic osteoporosis via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022;13:397. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03088-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
423.Wang L, et al. TET enzymes regulate skeletal development through increasing chromatin accessibility of RUNX2 target genes. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4709. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32138-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
424.Sepulveda H, Villagra A, Montecino M. Tet-mediated DNA demethylation is required for SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling and histone-modifying activities that trigger expression of the Sp7 osteoblast master gene during mesenchymal lineage commitment. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;37:e00177–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00177-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
425.Cakouros D, et al. Specific functions of TET1 and TET2 in regulating mesenchymal cell lineage determination. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2019;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s13072-018-0247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
426.Lindsey RC, Cheng S, Mohan S. Vitamin C effects on 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and gene expression in osteoblasts and chondrocytes: Potential involvement of PHD2. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
427.Blayney, J. W. et al. Super-enhancers include classical enhancers and facilitators to fully activate gene expression. Cell (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
428.Paschalis EP, Gamsjaeger S, Condon K, Klaushofer K, Burr D. Estrogen depletion alters mineralization regulation mechanisms in an ovariectomized monkey animal model. Bone. 2019;120:279–284. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
429.Mitxitorena I, Infante A, Gener B, Rodríguez CI. Suitability and limitations of mesenchymal stem cells to elucidate human bone illness. World J. Stem Cells. 2019;11:578–593. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i9.578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
430.Cheng H, et al. Development of nanomaterials for bone-targeted drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today. 2017;22:1336–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
431.Baron R, Gori F. Targeting WNT signaling in the treatment of osteoporosis. Curr. Opin. Pharm. 2018;40:134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
432.Wei H, et al. Identification of fibroblast activation protein as an osteogenic suppressor and anti-osteoporosis drug target. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108252. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
433.Behrens A, et al. Impaired intervertebral disc formation in the absence of Jun. Development. 2003;130:103–109. doi: 10.1242/dev.00186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
434.Eferl R, et al. The Fos-related antigen Fra-1 is an activator of bone matrix formation. EMBO J. 2004;23:2789–2799. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
435.Brault V, et al. Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development. 2001;128:1253–1264. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.8.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
436.Du Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang P. Knockdown of CDC20 promotes adipogenesis of bone marrow-derived stem cells by modulating β-catenin. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022;13:443. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03062-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
437.Pannone G, et al. Expression of beta-catenin, cadherins and P-Runx2 in fibro-osseous lesions of the Jaw: Tissue microarray study. Biomolecules. 2022;12:587. doi: 10.3390/biom12040587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
438.Pang X, et al. Sox9CreER-mediated deletion of β-catenin in palatal mesenchyme results in delayed palatal elevation accompanied with repressed canonical Wnt signaling and reduced actin polymerization. Genesis. 2021;59:e23441. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
439.Gutierrez S, et al. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP) beta and delta activate osteocalcin gene transcription and synergize with Runx2 at the C/EBP element to regulate bone-specific expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:1316–1323. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106611200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
440.Hata K, et al. A CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta isoform, liver-enriched inhibitory protein, regulates commitment of osteoblasts and adipocytes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:1971–1979. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.5.1971-1979.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
441.Nam B, et al. TGFβ1 suppressed matrix mineralization of osteoblasts differentiation by regulating SMURF1-C/EBPβ-DKK1 axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9771. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
442.Smink JJ, et al. Transcription factor C/EBPbeta isoform ratio regulates osteoclastogenesis through MafB. EMBO J. 2009;28:1769–1781. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
443.Tominaga H, et al. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta promotes osteoblast differentiation by enhancing Runx2 activity with ATF4. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:5373–5386. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-03-0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
444.Iyer VV, Kadakia TB, McCabe LR, Schwartz RC. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta has a role in osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2004;295:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
445.Henriquez B, et al. C/EBPβ binds the P1 promoter of the Runx2 gene and up-regulates Runx2 transcription in osteoblastic cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2011;226:3043–3052. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
446.Hassan MQ, et al. Dlx3 transcriptional regulation of osteoblast differentiation: temporal recruitment of Msx2, Dlx3, and Dlx5 homeodomain proteins to chromatin of the osteocalcin gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:9248–9261. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.20.9248-9261.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
447.Li D, Yuan Q, Xiong L, Li A, Xia Y. The miR-4739/DLX3 axis modulates bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) osteogenesis affecting osteoporosis progression. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:703167. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.703167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
448.Zhao N, et al. Senescence: novel insight into DLX3 mutations leading to enhanced bone formation in Tricho-Dento-Osseous syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38680. doi: 10.1038/srep38680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
449.Duverger O, et al. In vivo impact of Dlx3 conditional inactivation in neural crest-derived craniofacial bones. J. Cell Physiol. 2013;228:654–664. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
450.Shirakabe K, Terasawa K, Miyama K, Shibuya H, Nishida E. Regulation of the activity of the transcription factor Runx2 by two homeobox proteins, Msx2 and Dlx5. Genes Cells. 2001;6:851–856. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00466.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
451.Robledo RF, Rajan L, Li X, Lufkin T. The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal development. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1089–1101. doi: 10.1101/gad.988402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
452.Kim CY, et al. Dlx5 represses the transcriptional activity of PPARγ. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2021;44:1303–1308. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
453.You L, et al. Dysbacteriosis-derived lipopolysaccharide causes embryonic osteopenia through retinoic-acid-regulated DLX5 expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2518. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
454.Rattanasopha S, et al. Absent expression of the osteoblast-specific maternally imprinted genes, DLX5 and DLX6, causes split hand/split foot malformation type I. J. Med. Genet. 2014;51:817–823. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
455.Sato M, et al. Transcriptional regulation of osteopontin gene in vivo by PEBP2alphaA/CBFA1 and ETS1 in the skeletal tissues. Oncogene. 1998;17:1517–1525. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
456.Itoh T, Takeda S, Akao Y. MicroRNA-208 modulates BMP-2-stimulated mouse preosteoblast differentiation by directly targeting V-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:27745–27752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.105080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
457.Itoh T, Ando M, Tsukamasa Y, Akao Y. Expression of BMP-2 and Ets1 in BMP-2-stimulated mouse pre-osteoblast differentiation is regulated by microRNA-370. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1693–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
458.McLarren KW, et al. The mammalian basic helix loop helix protein HES-1 binds to and modulates the transactivating function of the runt-related factor Cbfa1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:530–538. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.1.530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
459.Ishibashi M, et al. Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects. Genes Dev. 1995;9:3136–3148. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.24.3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
460.Zamurovic N, Cappellen D, Rohner D, Susa M. Coordinated activation of notch, Wnt, and transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathways in bone morphogenic protein 2-induced osteogenesis. Notch target gene Hey1 inhibits mineralization and Runx2 transcriptional activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:37704–37715. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
461.Zeng Z, Yin X, Zhang X, Jing D, Feng X. Cyclic stretch enhances bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation through the inhibition of Hey1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015;36:1273–1281. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
462.Kusuyama J, et al. BMP9 prevents induction of osteopontin in JNK-inactivated osteoblasts via Hey1-Id4 interaction. Int J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019;116:105614. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.105614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
463.Galceran J, Sustmann C, Hsu SC, Folberth S, Grosschedl R. LEF1-mediated regulation of Delta-like1 links Wnt and Notch signaling in somitogenesis. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2718–2723. doi: 10.1101/gad.1249504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
464.Sowa H, et al. Menin is required for bone morphogenetic protein 2- and transforming growth factor beta-regulated osteoblastic differentiation through interaction with Smads and Runx2. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:40267–40275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401312200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
465.Troka, I. et al. Effect of menin deletion in early osteoblast lineage on the mineralization of an in vitro 3D osteoid-like dense collagen gel matrix. Biomimetics (Basel)7 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
466.Abi-Rafeh J, et al. Genetic deletion of menin in mouse mesenchymal stem cells: An experimental and computational analysis. JBMR. 2022;6:e10622. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
467.Lee S, et al. Deletion of Menin in craniofacial osteogenic cells in mice elicits development of mandibular ossifying fibroma. Oncogene. 2018;37:616–626. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
468.Liu P, et al. Loss of menin in osteoblast lineage affects osteocyte-osteoclast crosstalk causing osteoporosis. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:672–682. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
469.Satokata I, et al. Msx2 deficiency in mice causes pleiotropic defects in bone growth and ectodermal organ formation. Nat. Genet. 2000;24:391–395. doi: 10.1038/74231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
470.Ichida F, et al. Reciprocal roles of MSX2 in regulation of osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:34015–34022. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403621200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
471.Liu F, Liang Y, Lin X. MiR-151b inhibits osteoblast differentiation via downregulating Msx2. Connect. Tissue Res. 2022;63:112–123. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2021.1882442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
472.Cao Y, et al. Osterix, a transcription factor for osteoblast differentiation, mediates antitumor activity in murine osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1124–1128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
473.Jeon MJ, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma inhibits the Runx2-mediated transcription of osteocalcin in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:23270–23277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211610200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
474.Lecka-Czernik B, et al. Inhibition of Osf2/Cbfa1 expression and terminal osteoblast differentiation by PPARgamma2. J. Cell. Biochem. 1999;74:357–371. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990901)74:3<357::AID-JCB5>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
475.Cao J, et al. Deletion of PPARγ in mesenchymal lineage cells protects against aging-induced cortical bone loss in mice. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020;75:826–834. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
476.Yoshida CA, et al. Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog. Genes Dev. 2004;18:952–963. doi: 10.1101/gad.1174704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
477.Li B, Chen S, Sun K, Xu R, Wu Y. Genetic analyses identified a SALL4 gene mutation associated with Holt-Oram syndrome. DNA Cell Biol. 2018;37:398–404. doi: 10.1089/dna.2017.4094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
478.Zhang YW, et al. A RUNX2/PEBP2alpha A/CBFA1 mutation displaying impaired transactivation and Smad interaction in cleidocranial dysplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:10549–10554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180309597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
479.Alliston T, Choy L, Ducy P, Karsenty G, Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced repression of CBFA1 by Smad3 decreases cbfa1 and osteocalcin expression and inhibits osteoblast differentiation. EMBO J. 2001;20:2254–2272. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
480.Kim S, et al. Stat1 functions as a cytoplasmic attenuator of Runx2 in the transcriptional program of osteoblast differentiation. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1979–1991. doi: 10.1101/gad.1119303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
481.Alvandi Z, Opas M. c-Src kinase inhibits osteogenic differentiation via enhancing STAT1 stability. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0241646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
482.Mizuno N, et al. Optineurin regulates osteoblastogenesis through STAT1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;525:889–894. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
483.Mouillé M, et al. SATB2-associated syndrome: characterization of skeletal features and of bone fragility in a prospective cohort of 19 patients. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022;17:100. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02229-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
484.Kegelman CD, et al. YAP and TAZ mediate osteocyte perilacunar/canalicular remodeling. J. Bone Min. Res. 2020;35:196–210. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
485.Kegelman CD, et al. Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development. FASEB J. 2018;32:2706–2721. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700872R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
486.Kegelman CD, et al. YAP and TAZ promote periosteal osteoblast precursor expansion and differentiation for fracture repair. J. Bone Min. Res. 2021;36:143–157. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
487.Xiong J, Almeida M, O’Brien CA. The YAP/TAZ transcriptional co-activators have opposing effects at different stages of osteoblast differentiation. Bone. 2018;112:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR1] 1.Murshed M, Harmey D, Millán JL, McKee MD, Karsenty G. Unique coexpression in osteoblasts of broadly expressed genes accounts for the spatial restriction of ECM mineralization to bone. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1093–1104. doi: 10.1101/gad.1276205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Ferron M, et al. Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism. Cell. 2010;142:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Karsenty G, Wagner EF. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:389–406. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Bar-Shavit Z. The osteoclast: a multinucleated, hematopoietic-origin, bone-resorbing osteoimmune cell. J. Cell Biochem. 2007;102:1130–1139. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Soltanoff CS, Yang S, Chen W, Li YP. Signaling networks that control the lineage commitment and differentiation of bone cells. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2009;19:1–46. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Winslow MM, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT signaling in osteoblasts regulates bone mass. Dev. Cell. 2006;10:771–782. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Huang H, et al. Bone resorption deficiency affects tooth root development in RANKL mutant mice due to attenuated IGF-1 signaling in radicular odontoblasts. Bone. 2018;114:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Taichman RS. Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood. 2005;105:2631–2639. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Zhang J, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425:836–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Calvi LM, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Lim J, et al. Dual function of Bmpr1a signaling in restricting preosteoblast proliferation and stimulating osteoblast activity in mouse. Development. 2016;143:339–347. doi: 10.1242/dev.126227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Galán-Díez M, Kousteni S. The osteoblastic niche in hematopoiesis and hematological myeloid malignancies. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017;3:53–62. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0055-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Pinho S, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:303–320. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Omatsu Y, et al. The essential functions of adipo-osteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity. 2010;33:387–399. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Greenbaum A, et al. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature. 2013;495:227–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Sipp D, Robey PG, Turner L. Clear up this stem-cell mess. Nature. 2018;561:455–457. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06756-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Mizuhashi K, et al. Resting zone of the growth plate houses a unique class of skeletal stem cells. Nature. 2018;563:254–258. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0662-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Newton PT, et al. A radical switch in clonality reveals a stem cell niche in the epiphyseal growth plate. Nature. 2019;567:234–238. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Maes C, et al. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Duchamp de Lageneste O, et al. Periosteum contains skeletal stem cells with high bone regenerative potential controlled by Periostin. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03124-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Debnath S, et al. Discovery of a periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation. Nature. 2018;562:133–139. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Chen KG, Johnson KR, McKay RDG, Robey PG. Concise Review: Conceptualizing paralogous stem-cell niches and unfolding bone marrow progenitor cell identities. Stem Cells. 2018;36:11–21. doi: 10.1002/stem.2711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Kfoury Y, Scadden DT. Mesenchymal cell contributions to the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W. Bone development. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000;16:191–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Huang W, Yang S, Shao J, Li YP. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in osteoblast commitment and differentiation. Front Biosci. 2007;12:3068–3092. doi: 10.2741/2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:85–89. doi: 10.1038/8792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Kronenberg HM. The role of the perichondrium in fetal bone development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:59–64. doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Pino AM, Rosen CJ, Rodríguez JP. In osteoporosis, differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improves bone marrow adipogenesis. Biol. Res. 2012;45:279–287. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602012000300009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Watt FM. Stem cell fate and patterning in mammalian epidermis. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 2001;11:410–417. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00211-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Gronthos S, et al. Differential cell surface expression of the STRO-1 and alkaline phosphatase antigens on discrete developmental stages in primary cultures of human bone cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 1999;14:47–56. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Stein GS, Lian JB, Stein JL, Van Wijnen AJ, Montecino M. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol. Rev. 1996;76:593–629. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Tamai K, et al. LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature. 2000;407:530–535. doi: 10.1038/35035117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.He X, Semenov M, Tamai K, Zeng X. LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: arrows point the way. Development. 2004;131:1663–1677. doi: 10.1242/dev.01117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Leupin O, et al. Bone overgrowth-associated mutations in the LRP4 gene impair sclerostin facilitator function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19489–19500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Veeman MT, Axelrod JD, Moon RT. A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of beta-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev. Cell. 2003;5:367–377. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene. 2004;341:19–39. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S. Wnt signalling pathway: a new target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2005;9:1063–1077. doi: 10.1517/14728222.9.5.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Nabhan AN, et al. Targeted alveolar regeneration with Frizzled-specific agonists. Cell. 2023;186:2995–3012.e2915. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Shu B, et al. Inhibition of Axin1 in osteoblast precursor cells leads to defects in postnatal bone growth through suppressing osteoclast formation. Bone Res. 2020;8:31. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-0104-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Hay E, et al. Interaction between LRP5 and Frat1 mediates the activation of the Wnt canonical pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:13616–13623. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Wang Q, Cai J, Cai XH, Chen L. miR-346 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.AlMuraikhi N, et al. Inhibition of GSK-3β enhances osteoblast differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells through Wnt signalling overexpressing Runx2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:7164. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Clevers H. Wnt signaling: Ig-norrin the dogma. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R436–R437. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Nelson WJ, Nusse R. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 2004;303:1483–1487. doi: 10.1126/science.1094291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Lévy L, et al. Acetylation of beta-catenin by p300 regulates beta-catenin-Tcf4 interaction. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:3404–3414. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3404-3414.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Latres E, Chiaur DS, Pagano M. The human F box protein beta-Trcp associates with the Cul1/Skp1 complex and regulates the stability of beta-catenin. Oncogene. 1999;18:849–854. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Zhang C, et al. Inhibition of Wnt signaling by the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:6936–6941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710831105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Ge J, et al. Activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling by autophagic degradation of APC contributes to the osteoblast differentiation effect of soy isoflavone on osteoporotic mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2023;44:1841–1855. doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01066-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR49] 49.Semënov M, Tamai K, He X. SOST is a ligand for LRP5/LRP6 and a Wnt signaling inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:26770–26775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504308200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Mao B, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2002;417:664–667. doi: 10.1038/nature756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Mao B, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411:321–325. doi: 10.1038/35077108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Abuna RPF, et al. Frizzled 6 disruption suppresses osteoblast differentiation induced by nanotopography through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:8293–8303. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Abuna RPF, et al. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is regulated by titanium with nanotopography to induce osteoblast differentiation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2019;184:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Nagano K, et al. R-spondin 3 deletion induces Erk phosphorylation to enhance Wnt signaling and promote bone formation in the appendicular skeleton. Elife. 2022;11:e84171. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Alhazmi N, et al. Synergistic roles of Wnt modulators R-spondin2 and R-spondin3 in craniofacial morphogenesis and dental development. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85415-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.De Boer J, Wang HJ, Van Blitterswijk C. Effects of Wnt signaling on proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:393–401. doi: 10.1089/107632704323061753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.van der Horst G, et al. Downregulation of Wnt signaling by increased expression of Dickkopf-1 and -2 is a prerequisite for late-stage osteoblast differentiation of KS483 cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 2005;20:1867–1877. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Cho HH, et al. Endogenous Wnt signaling promotes proliferation and suppresses osteogenic differentiation in human adipose derived stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:111–121. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Eijken M, et al. Wnt signaling acts and is regulated in a human osteoblast differentiation dependent manner. J. Cell Biochem. 2008;104:568–579. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Jin Y, Sun X, Pei F, Zhao Z, Mao J. Wnt16 signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation of periosteal derived cells in vitro and in vivo. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10374. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Sebastian A, Hum NR, Morfin C, Murugesh DK, Loots GG. Global gene expression analysis identifies Mef2c as a potential player in Wnt16-mediated transcriptional regulation. Gene. 2018;675:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Bennett CN, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:3324–3329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408742102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Stambolic V, Ruel L, Woodgett JR. Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity and mimics wingless signalling in intact cells. Curr. Biol. 1996;6:1664–1668. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70790-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Jackson A, et al. Gene array analysis of Wnt-regulated genes in C3H10T1/2 cells. Bone. 2005;36:585–598. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, Yang Y. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:739–750. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Hill TP, Später D, Taketo MM, Birchmeier W, Hartmann C. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:727–738. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of beta-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162–21168. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Abe E, et al. TSH is a negative regulator of skeletal remodeling. Cell. 2003;115:151–162. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00771-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J. Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2003;130:1003–1015. doi: 10.1242/dev.00324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Yamaguchi TP, Bradley A, McMahon AP, Jones S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development. 1999;126:1211–1223. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Ai M, Holmen SL, Van Hul W, Williams BO, Warman ML. Reduced affinity to and inhibition by DKK1 form a common mechanism by which high bone mass-associated missense mutations in LRP5 affect canonical Wnt signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:4946–4955. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.12.4946-4955.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Boyden LM, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1513–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR74] 74.Van Wesenbeeck L, et al. Six novel missense mutations in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene in different conditions with an increased bone density. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:763–771. doi: 10.1086/368277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Babij P, et al. High bone mass in mice expressing a mutant LRP5 gene. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:960–974. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Bain G, Müller T, Wang X, Papkoff J. Activated beta-catenin induces osteoblast differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells and participates in BMP2 mediated signal transduction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;301:84–91. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02951-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Rawadi G, Vayssière B, Dunn F, Baron R, Roman-Roman S. BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:1842–1853. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Esen E, et al. WNT-LRP5 signaling induces Warburg effect through mTORC2 activation during osteoblast differentiation. Cell Metab. 2013;17:745–755. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Zhang D, et al. Exosomes derived from adipose stem cells enhance bone fracture healing via the activation of the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway in rats with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:4852. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Chen W, Zhu G, Tang J, Zhou HD, Li YP. C/ebpalpha controls osteoclast terminal differentiation, activation, function, and postnatal bone homeostasis through direct regulation of Nfatc1. J. Pathol. 2018;244:271–282. doi: 10.1002/path.5001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Chen W, et al. C/EBPalpha regulates osteoclast lineage commitment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:7294–7299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211383110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Chen W, Zhu G, Jules J, Nguyen D, Li YP. Monocyte-specific knockout of C/ebpalpha results in osteopetrosis phenotype, blocks bone loss in ovariectomized mice, and reveals an important function of C/ebpalpha in osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Bone Min. Res. 2018;33:691–703. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Takada I, Suzawa M, Matsumoto K, Kato S. Suppression of PPAR transactivation switches cell fate of bone marrow stem cells from adipocytes into osteoblasts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:182–195. doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR84] 84.Zayzafoon M. Calcium/calmodulin signaling controls osteoblast growth and differentiation. J. Cell Biochem. 2006;97:56–70. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR85] 85.Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCdelta activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Esen E, Long F. Aerobic glycolysis in osteoblasts. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2014;12:433–438. doi: 10.1007/s11914-014-0235-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR87] 87.Chen H, et al. Increased glycolysis mediates Wnt7b-induced bone formation. FASEB J. 2019;33:7810–7821. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900201RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Hu H, et al. Sequential roles of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in osteoblast development. Development. 2005;132:49–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.01564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Gaur T, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33132–33140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR90] 90.Glass DA, 2nd, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:751–764. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Wu M, et al. Cbfβ governs osteoblast-adipocyte lineage commitment through enhancing β-catenin signaling and suppressing adipogenesis gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10119–10124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619294114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR92] 92.Chen Q, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of LRP6 by Src and Fer inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signalling. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:1254–1267. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Chen M, et al. Metastasis suppressor 1 controls osteoblast differentiation and bone homeostasis through regulating Src-Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2022;79:107. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04147-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Chen Y, Chen ZF, He F. Tenascin-C knockdown suppresses osteoblast differentiation and promotes osteoporosis in mice by inhibiting Wnt signaling. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016;36:1117–1122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR95] 95.Yao Z, Xing L, Boyce BF. NF-kappaB p100 limits TNF-induced bone resorption in mice by a TRAF3-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:3024–3034. doi: 10.1172/JCI38716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR96] 96.Boyce BF, Xing L, Chen D. Osteoprotegerin, the bone protector, is a surprising target for beta-catenin signaling. Cell Metab. 2005;2:344–345. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR97] 97.Almeida M, et al. Estrogen receptor-α signaling in osteoblast progenitors stimulates cortical bone accrual. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:394–404. doi: 10.1172/JCI65910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR98] 98.Auld KL, et al. Estrogen-related receptor α regulates osteoblast differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012;48:177–191. doi: 10.1530/JME-11-0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR99] 99.Lee CW, Ito K, Ito Y. Role of RUNX3 in bone morphogenetic protein signaling in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4243–4252. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR100] 100.Wu M, Wu S, Chen W, Li YP. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF-β and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Res. 2024;34:101–123. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00918-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR101] 101.Derynck R, Akhurst RJ, Balmain A. TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nat. Genet. 2001;29:117–129. doi: 10.1038/ng1001-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR102] 102.Chen G, Deng C, Li YP. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J. Biol. Sci. 2012;8:272–288. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR103] 103.Yi JJ, Barnes AP, Hand R, Polleux F, Ehlers MD. TGF-beta signaling specifies axons during brain development. Cell. 2010;142:144–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR104] 104.Lee KS, et al. Runx2 is a common target of transforming growth factor beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein 2, and cooperation between Runx2 and Smad5 induces osteoblast-specific gene expression in the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;20:8783–8792. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.23.8783-8792.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR105] 105.Miyama K, et al. A BMP-inducible gene, dlx5, regulates osteoblast differentiation and mesoderm induction. Dev. Biol. 1999;208:123–133. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR106] 106.Lee MH, et al. BMP-2-induced Runx2 expression is mediated by Dlx5, and TGF-beta 1 opposes the BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation by suppression of Dlx5 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:34387–34394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211386200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR107] 107.Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016;4:16009. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2016.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR108] 108.Canalis E, Economides AN, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr. Rev. 2003;24:218–235. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR109] 109.Chen D, Zhao M, Mundy GR. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors. 2004;22:233–241. doi: 10.1080/08977190412331279890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR110] 110.Finnson KW, Parker WL, ten Dijke P, Thorikay M, Philip A. ALK1 opposes ALK5/Smad3 signaling and expression of extracellular matrix components in human chondrocytes. J. Bone Miner. Res. : Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2008;23:896–906. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR111] 111.Goumans MJ, et al. Activin receptor-like kinase (ALK)1 is an antagonistic mediator of lateral TGFbeta/ALK5 signaling. Mol. Cell. 2003;12:817–828. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00386-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR112] 112.Wang J, et al. Atp6i deficient mouse model uncovers transforming growth factor-β1 /Smad2/3 as a key signaling pathway regulating odontoblast differentiation and tooth root formation. Int J. Oral. Sci. 2023;15:35. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00235-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR113] 113.Li J, et al. Smad2 overexpression enhances Smad4 gene expression and suppresses CBFA1 gene expression in osteoblastic osteosarcoma ROS17/2.8 cells and primary rat calvaria cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:31009–31015. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR114] 114.Lin HT, et al. Dynamic expression of SMAD3 is critical in osteoblast differentiation of PDMCs. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;43:1085–1093. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.4001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR115] 115.Kang JS, Alliston T, Delston R, Derynck R. Repression of Runx2 function by TGF-beta through recruitment of class II histone deacetylases by Smad3. EMBO J. 2005;24:2543–2555. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR116] 116.Hjelmeland AB, Schilling SH, Guo X, Quarles D, Wang XF. Loss of Smad3-mediated negative regulation of Runx2 activity leads to an alteration in cell fate determination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:9460–9468. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9460-9468.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR117] 117.Grafe I, et al. Excessive transforming growth factor-β signaling is a common mechanism in osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat. Med. 2014;20:670–675. doi: 10.1038/nm.3544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR118] 118.Song IW, et al. Targeting TGF-β for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e152571. doi: 10.1172/JCI152571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR119] 119.Seo HS, Serra R. Deletion of Tgfbr2 in Prx1-cre expressing mesenchyme results in defects in development of the long bones and joints. Dev. Biol. 2007;310:304–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR120] 120.Dong H, et al. Higenamine promotes osteogenesis via IQGAP1/SMAD4 signaling pathway and prevents age- and estrogen-dependent bone loss in mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2023;38:775–791. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR121] 121.Yang H, et al. IFT20 mediates the transport of cell migration regulators from the trans-golgi network to the plasma membrane in breast cancer cells. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:632198. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.632198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR122] 122.Lim J, et al. Primary cilia control cell alignment and patterning in bone development via ceramide-PKCζ-β-catenin signaling. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:45. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0767-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR123] 123.Li Y, Yang S, Liu Y, Qin L, Yang S. IFT20 governs mesenchymal stem cell fate through positively regulating TGF-β-Smad2/3-Glut1 signaling mediated glucose metabolism. Redox Biol. 2022;54:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR124] 124.Tolkachov A, et al. Loss of the hematopoietic stem cell factor GATA2 in the osteogenic lineage impairs trabecularization and mechanical strength of bone. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;38:e00599–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00599-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR125] 125.Cao X, Chen D. The BMP signaling and in vivo bone formation. Gene. 2005;357:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR126] 126.Anderson HC, Hodges PT, Aguilera XM, Missana L, Moylan PE. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) localization in developing human and rat growth plate, metaphysis, epiphysis, and articular cartilage. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000;48:1493–1502. doi: 10.1177/002215540004801106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR127] 127.Peng Y, et al. Transcriptional characterization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)-mediated osteogenic signaling. J. Cell Biochem. 2003;90:1149–1165. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR128] 128.Daluiski A, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-3 is a negative regulator of bone density. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:84–88. doi: 10.1038/83810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR129] 129.Matsumoto Y, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-3b (BMP-3b) inhibits osteoblast differentiation via Smad2/3 pathway by counteracting Smad1/5/8 signaling. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012;350:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR130] 130.Liu Z, Tang Y, Qiu T, Cao X, Clemens TL. A dishevelled-1/Smad1 interaction couples WNT and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways in uncommitted bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:17156–17163. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR131] 131.Jun JY, et al. Persicae semen promotes bone union in rat fractures by stimulating osteoblastogenesis through BMP-2 and Wnt signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:7388. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR132] 132.Guicheux J, et al. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase by BMP-2 and their implication in the stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2003;18:2060–2068. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR133] 133.Lai CF, Cheng SL. Signal transductions induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta in normal human osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:15514–15522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200794200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR134] 134.Lemonnier J, Ghayor C, Guicheux J, Caverzasio J. Protein kinase C-independent activation of protein kinase D is involved in BMP-2-induced activation of stress mitogen-activated protein kinases JNK and p38 and osteoblastic cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:259–264. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308665200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR135] 135.Lee KS, Hong SH, Bae SC. Both the Smad and p38 MAPK pathways play a crucial role in Runx2 expression following induction by transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein. Oncogene. 2002;21:7156–7163. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR136] 136.Lee MH, Kwon TG, Park HS, Wozney JM, Ryoo HM. BMP-2-induced Osterix expression is mediated by Dlx5 but is independent of Runx2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;309:689–694. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR137] 137.Celil AB, Hollinger JO, Campbell PG. Osx transcriptional regulation is mediated by additional pathways to BMP2/Smad signaling. J. Cell Biochem. 2005;95:518–528. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR138] 138.Kim MK, et al. Salt-inducible kinase 1 regulates bone anabolism via the CRTC1-CREB-Id1 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:826. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1915-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR139] 139.Kim K, et al. Transcription factor Lmx1b negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5225. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR140] 140.Zhang R, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling activates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in osteoblasts. Bone. 2013;52:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR141] 141.Kokabu S, Rosen V. BMP3 expression by osteoblast lineage cells is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling. FEBS Open Bio. 2018;8:168–176. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR142] 142.de Jong DS, et al. Identification of novel regulators associated with early-phase osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2004;19:947–958. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR143] 143.Son HE, Kim KM, Kim EJ, Jang WG. Kisspeptin-10 (KP-10) stimulates osteoblast differentiation through GPR54-mediated regulation of BMP2 expression and activation. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20571-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR144] 144.Comninos AN, et al. Acute effects of kisspeptin administration on bone metabolism in healthy men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;107:1529–1540. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR145] 145.Izzi L, Attisano L. Regulation of the TGFbeta signalling pathway by ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Oncogene. 2004;23:2071–2078. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR146] 146.Datto M, Wang XF. Ubiquitin-mediated degradation a mechanism for fine-tuning TGF-beta signaling. Cell. 2005;121:2–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR147] 147.Dupont S, et al. Germ-layer specification and control of cell growth by Ectodermin, a Smad4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell. 2005;121:87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR148] 148.Xu Z, et al. SMURF2 regulates bone homeostasis by disrupting SMAD3 interaction with vitamin D receptor in osteoblasts. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14570. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR149] 149.Long F, et al. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004;131:1309–1318. doi: 10.1242/dev.01006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR150] 150.Deng A, et al. The inhibitory roles of Ihh downregulation on chondrocyte growth and differentiation. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;15:789–794. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR151] 151.Minina E, et al. BMP and Ihh/PTHrP signaling interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2001;128:4523–4534. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.22.4523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR152] 152.St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M, McMahon AP. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2072–2086. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR153] 153.Chung UI, Schipani E, McMahon AP, Kronenberg HM. Indian hedgehog couples chondrogenesis to osteogenesis in endochondral bone development. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;107:295–304. doi: 10.1172/JCI11706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR154] 154.Razzaque MS, Soegiarto DW, Chang D, Long F, Lanske B. Conditional deletion of Indian hedgehog from collagen type 2alpha1-expressing cells results in abnormal endochondral bone formation. J. Pathol. 2005;207:453–461. doi: 10.1002/path.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR155] 155.Nakamura T, et al. Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;237:465–469. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR156] 156.van der Horst G, Farih-Sips H, Löwik CW, Karperien M. Hedgehog stimulates only osteoblastic differentiation of undifferentiated KS483 cells. Bone. 2003;33:899–910. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR157] 157.Chen MH, et al. Cilium-independent regulation of Gli protein function by Sufu in Hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1910–1928. doi: 10.1101/gad.1794109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR158] 158.Wen X, et al. Kinetics of hedgehog-dependent full-length Gli3 accumulation in primary cilia and subsequent degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:1910–1922. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01089-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR159] 159.Cai H, Liu A. Spop promotes skeletal development and homeostasis by positively regulating Ihh signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:14751–14756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612520114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR160] 160.Horikiri Y, et al. Sonic hedgehog regulates osteoblast function by focal adhesion kinase signaling in the process of fracture healing. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR161] 161.Sinha S, Chen JK. Purmorphamine activates the Hedgehog pathway by targeting Smoothened. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2:29–30. doi: 10.1038/nchembio753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR162] 162.Oliveira FS, et al. Hedgehog signaling and osteoblast gene expression are regulated by purmorphamine in human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2012;113:204–208. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR163] 163.Jakobs P, et al. Scube2 enhances proteolytic Shh processing from the surface of Shh-producing cells. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:1726–1737. doi: 10.1242/jcs.137695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR164] 164.Parchure A, Vyas N, Mayor S. Wnt and Hedgehog: Secretion of lipid-modified morphogens. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR165] 165.Wierbowski BM, et al. Hedgehog pathway activation requires coreceptor-catalyzed, lipid-dependent relay of the sonic hedgehog ligand. Dev. Cell. 2020;55:450–467.e458. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR166] 166.Wu Q, et al. SCUBE2 mediates bone metastasis of luminal breast cancer by modulating immune-suppressive osteoblastic niches. Cell Res. 2023;33:464–478. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00810-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR167] 167.Saeki N, et al. Pregnane X receptor (PXR) represses osteoblast differentiation through repression of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2022;416:113156. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR168] 168.Shi Y, Chen J, Karner CM, Long F. Hedgehog signaling activates a positive feedback mechanism involving insulin-like growth factors to induce osteoblast differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:4678–4683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502301112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR169] 169.Shi Y, et al. Gli1(+) progenitors mediate bone anabolic function of teriparatide via Hh and Igf signaling. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109542. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR170] 170.Aruga J, Mikoshiba K. Identification and characterization of Slitrk, a novel neuronal transmembrane protein family controlling neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2003;24:117–129. doi: 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR171] 171.Sun J, et al. SLITRK5 is a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4611. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24819-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR172] 172.Meng X, et al. Suppressor of fused negatively regulates beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:40113–40119. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105317200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR173] 173.Jia J, et al. Shaggy/GSK3 antagonizes Hedgehog signalling by regulating Cubitus interruptus. Nature. 2002;416:548–552. doi: 10.1038/nature733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR174] 174.Price MA, Kalderon D. Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector Cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1. Cell. 2002;108:823–835. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00664-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR175] 175.Spinella-Jaegle S, et al. Sonic hedgehog increases the commitment of pluripotent mesenchymal cells into the osteoblastic lineage and abolishes adipocytic differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:2085–2094. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.11.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR176] 176.Yuasa T, et al. Sonic hedgehog is involved in osteoblast differentiation by cooperating with BMP-2. J. Cell Physiol. 2002;193:225–232. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR177] 177.Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1446–1465. doi: 10.1101/gad.990702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR178] 178.Webster MK, Donoghue DJ. Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the transmembrane domain point mutation found in achondroplasia. EMBO J. 1996;15:520–527. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00384.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR179] 179.Wilkie AO. Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997;6:1647–1656. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR180] 180.Jacob AL, Smith C, Partanen J, Ornitz DM. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 signaling in the osteo-chondrogenic cell lineage regulates sequential steps of osteoblast maturation. Dev. Biol. 2006;296:315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR181] 181.Naski MC, Colvin JS, Coffin JD, Ornitz DM. Repression of hedgehog signaling and BMP4 expression in growth plate cartilage by fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Development. 1998;125:4977–4988. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.24.4977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR182] 182.Valverde-Franco G, et al. Defective bone mineralization and osteopenia in young adult FGFR3-/- mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004;13:271–284. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR183] 183.Xiao L, et al. Stat1 controls postnatal bone formation by regulating fibroblast growth factor signaling in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:27743–27752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314323200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR184] 184.Chen L, Deng CX. Roles of FGF signaling in skeletal development and human genetic diseases. Front Biosci. 2005;10:1961–1976. doi: 10.2741/1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR185] 185.Ornitz DM. FGF signaling in the developing endochondral skeleton. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR186] 186.Jeon YM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-7 facilitates osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells through the activation of ERK/Runx2 signaling. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2013;382:37–45. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1716-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR187] 187.Lin JM, et al. Actions of fibroblast growth factor-8 in bone cells in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;297:E142–E150. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90743.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR188] 188.Jeon E, et al. Investigating the role of FGF18 in the cultivation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR189] 189.Hamidouche Z, et al. Autocrine fibroblast growth factor 18 mediates dexamethasone-induced osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2010;224:509–515. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR190] 190.Xiao G, Jiang D, Gopalakrishnan R, Franceschi RT. Fibroblast growth factor 2 induction of the osteocalcin gene requires MAPK activity and phosphorylation of the osteoblast transcription factor, Cbfa1/Runx2. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:36181–36187. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206057200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR191] 191.Fei Y, Xiao L, Doetschman T, Coffin DJ, Hurley MM. Fibroblast growth factor 2 stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation is mediated by modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:40575–40583. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR192] 192.Miraoui H, Ringe J, Häupl T, Marie PJ. Increased EFG- and PDGFalpha-receptor signaling by mutant FGF-receptor 2 contributes to osteoblast dysfunction in Apert craniosynostosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010;19:1678–1689. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR193] 193.Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol. 2001;2:Reviews3005. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-reviews3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR194] 194.Ornitz DM, et al. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:15292–15297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR195] 195.Liu Z, Xu J, Colvin JS, Ornitz DM. Coordination of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis by fibroblast growth factor 18. Genes Dev. 2002;16:859–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.965602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR196] 196.Wang Y, et al. FGFR2 Mutation p.Cys342Arg enhances mitochondrial metabolism-mediated osteogenesis via FGF/FGFR-AMPK-Erk1/2 axis in Crouzon syndrome. Cells. 2022;11:3129. doi: 10.3390/cells11193129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR197] 197.Zhu Q, et al. OTUB1 promotes osteoblastic bone formation through stabilizing FGFR2. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2023;8:142. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01354-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR198] 198.Courbon G, et al. FGF23 directly inhibits osteoprogenitor differentiation in Dmp1 knockout mice. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e156850. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.156850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR199] 199.Al Rifai O, et al. In vivo analysis of the contribution of proprotein convertases to the processing of FGF23. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:690681. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR200] 200.Kozawa O, Tokuda H, Matsuno H, Uematsu T. Involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in basic fibroblast growth factor-induced interleukin-6 synthesis in osteoblasts. J. Cell Biochem. 1999;74:479–485. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990901)74:3<479::AID-JCB15>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR201] 201.Lemonnier J, et al. The Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR-2) mutation induces PKC-independent downregulation of FGFR-2 associated with premature calvaria osteoblast differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2000;256:158–167. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR202] 202.Lomri A, Lemonnier J, Delannoy P, Marie PJ. Increased expression of protein kinase Calpha, interleukin-1alpha, and RhoA guanosine 5’-triphosphatase in osteoblasts expressing the Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor 2 receptor Apert mutation: identification by analysis of complementary DNA microarray. J. Bone Min. Res. 2001;16:705–712. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR203] 203.Taketomi T, et al. Sprouty2 is involved in the control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation through the FGF and BMP signaling pathways. Cell Biol. Int. 2018;42:1106–1114. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR204] 204.Mundy GR, Elefteriou F. Boning up on ephrin signaling. Cell. 2006;126:441–443. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR205] 205.Arthur A, Gronthos S. Eph-Ephrin signaling mediates cross-talk within the bone microenvironment. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:598612. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.598612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR206] 206.Tonna S, et al. EphrinB2 signaling in osteoblasts promotes bone mineralization by preventing apoptosis. FASEB J. 2014;28:4482–4496. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-254300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR207] 207.Zhao C, et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR208] 208.Irie N, et al. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinA2-EphA2 enhances osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:14637–14644. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807598200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR209] 209.Vrahnas C, et al. Increased autophagy in EphrinB2-deficient osteocytes is associated with elevated secondary mineralization and brittle bone. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11373-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR210] 210.Blank M, Sims NA. Cellular processes by which osteoblasts and osteocytes control bone mineral deposition and maturation revealed by stage-specific EphrinB2 knockdown. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2019;17:270–280. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00524-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR211] 211.Tonna S, Sims NA. Talking among ourselves: paracrine control of bone formation within the osteoblast lineage. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014;94:35–45. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9738-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR212] 212.Kawatsu M, et al. Scleraxis upregulated by transforming growth factor-β1 signaling inhibits tension-induced osteoblast differentiation of priodontal ligament cells via ephrin A2. Bone. 2021;149:115969. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR213] 213.Oeckinghaus A, Ghosh S. The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a000034. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR214] 214.Li YP, Stashenko P. Proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-6, but not IL-1, down-regulate the osteocalcin gene promoter. J. Immunol. 1992;148:788–794. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.148.3.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR215] 215.Chang J, et al. NF-κB inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by promoting β-catenin degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9469–9474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300532110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR216] 216.Li YP, Stashenko P. Characterization of a tumor necrosis factor-responsive element which down-regulates the human osteocalcin gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 1993;13:3714–3721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR217] 217.Chang J, et al. Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor-kappaB. Nat. Med. 2009;15:682–689. doi: 10.1038/nm.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR218] 218.Hu Y, et al. Melatonin promotes BMSCs osteoblastic differentiation and relieves inflammation by suppressing the NF-κB pathways. Stem Cells Int. 2023;2023:7638842. doi: 10.1155/2023/7638842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR219] 219.Li A, et al. Rocaglamide-A potentiates osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting NF-κB signaling. Mol. Cells. 2015;38:941–949. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2015.2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR220] 220.Qin H, Xu HZ, Gong YQ. Mechanism of NF-κB signaling pathway and autophagy in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2016;33:138–144. doi: 10.1080/09687688.2017.1400601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR221] 221.Guo X, et al. Radioprotective 105 kDa protein attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial apoptosis and autophagy by inhibiting the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in rats. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;38:885–893. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR222] 222.Gao H, Lin L, Haq IU, Zeng SM. Inhibition of NF-κB promotes autophagy via JNK signaling pathway in porcine granulosa cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;473:311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR223] 223.Bleedorn JA, et al. Temporal mechanically-induced signaling events in bone and dorsal root ganglion neurons after in vivo bone loading. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR224] 224.Tomlinson RE, et al. NGF-TrkA signaling in sensory nerves is required for skeletal adaptation to mechanical loads in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E3632–e3641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701054114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR225] 225.Rajpar I, Kumar G, Fortina P, Tomlinson RE. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in osteoblasts is required for load-induced bone formation in mice. iScience. 2023;26:106304. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR226] 226.Zhou B, et al. Notch signaling pathway: architecture, disease, and therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:95. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00934-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR227] 227.Xu J, Li Z, Hou Y, Fang W. Potential mechanisms underlying the Runx2 induced osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015;7:2527–2535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR228] 228.Canalis E. Notch signaling in osteoblasts. Sci. Signal. 2008;1:pe17. doi: 10.1126/stke.117pe17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR229] 229.Liu ZH, Dai XM, Du B. Hes1: a key role in stemness, metastasis and multidrug resistance. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015;16:353–359. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1016662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR230] 230.Luo Z, et al. Notch signaling in osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2019;189:1495–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR231] 231.Tezuka K, et al. Stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation by Notch. J. Bone Min. Res. 2002;17:231–239. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR232] 232.Xu Y, et al. Notch activation promotes osteoblast mineralization by inhibition of apoptosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6921–6928. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR233] 233.Deregowski V, Gazzerro E, Priest L, Rydziel S, Canalis E. Notch 1 overexpression inhibits osteoblastogenesis by suppressing Wnt/beta-catenin but not bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:6203–6210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508370200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR234] 234.Cao J, et al. Notch signaling pathway promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing BMP9/Smad signaling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;40:378–388. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR235] 235.Lin GL, Hankenson KD. Integration of BMP, Wnt, and notch signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011;112:3491–3501. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR236] 236.Kode A, et al. FoxO1-dependent induction of acute myeloid leukemia by osteoblasts in mice. Leukemia. 2016;30:1–13. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR237] 237.Neal JW, Clipstone NA. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibits the DNA binding activity of NFATc. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:3666–3673. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004888200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR238] 238.Yu W, et al. SALL4 promotes osteoblast differentiation by deactivating NOTCH2 signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR239] 239.Torres HM, et al. Hdac1 and Hdac2 positively regulate Notch1 gain-of-function pathogenic signaling in committed osteoblasts of male mice. Birth Defects Res. 2024;116:e2266. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR240] 240.Wang Z, et al. The histone deacetylase HDAC1 positively regulates Notch signaling during Drosophila wing development. Biol. Open. 2018;7:bio029637. doi: 10.1242/bio.029637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR241] 241.Tang Y, Boucher JM, Liaw L. Histone deacetylase activity selectively regulates notch-mediated smooth muscle differentiation in human vascular cells. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR242] 242.Torres HM, et al. Hdac1 and Hdac2 positively regulate Notch1 gain-of-function pathogenic signaling in committed osteoblasts of male mice. Birth Defects Res. 2023;116:e2266. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR243] 243.Hansen CG, Moroishi T, Guan KL. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR244] 244.Hong W, Guan KL. The YAP and TAZ transcription co-activators: key downstream effectors of the mammalian Hippo pathway. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;23:785–793. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR245] 245.Tang Y, et al. MT1-MMP-dependent control of skeletal stem cell commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ signaling axis. Dev. Cell. 2013;25:402–416. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR246] 246.Zheng Y, Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and disease. Dev. Cell. 2019;50:264–282. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR247] 247.Zaidi SK, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation controls Runx2-mediated subnuclear targeting of YAP to repress transcription. EMBO J. 2004;23:790–799. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR248] 248.Zhu WQ, et al. Regulation of osteoblast behaviors via cross-talk between Hippo/YAP and MAPK signaling pathway under fluoride exposure. J. Mol. Med (Berl.) 2019;97:1003–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01785-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR249] 249.Chuang LSH, Ito Y. The multiple interactions of RUNX with the Hippo-YAP pathway. Cells. 2021;10:2925. doi: 10.3390/cells10112925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR250] 250.Franceschi RT, Ge C. Control of the osteoblast lineage by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017;3:122–132. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0059-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR251] 251.Li Y, Yang ST, Yang S. Trp53 controls chondrogenesis and endochondral ossification by negative regulation of TAZ activity and stability via β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitination. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:317. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01105-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR252] 252.Velletri T, et al. Loss of p53 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes alteration of bone remodeling through negative regulation of osteoprotegerin. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:156–169. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR253] 253.Varelas X, et al. The Hippo pathway regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Dev. Cell. 2010;18:579–591. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR254] 254.Varelas X, et al. The Crumbs complex couples cell density sensing to Hippo-dependent control of the TGF-β-SMAD pathway. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:831–844. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR255] 255.Varelas X, et al. TAZ controls Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and regulates human embryonic stem-cell self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:837–848. doi: 10.1038/ncb1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR256] 256.Pagani CA, et al. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates aberrant mesenchymal lineage cell fate and matrix organization. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabq6152. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq6152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR257] 257.Liu P, et al. Effects of mechanical stress stimulation on function and expression mechanism of osteoblasts. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:830722. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.830722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR258] 258.Yavropoulou MP, Yovos JG. The molecular basis of bone mechanotransduction. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2016;16:221–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR259] 259.Sun W, et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation. Elife. 2019;8:e47454. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR260] 260.Li X, et al. Stimulation of Piezo1 by mechanical signals promotes bone anabolism. Elife. 2019;8:e49631. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR261] 261.Assaraf E, et al. Piezo2 expressed in proprioceptive neurons is essential for skeletal integrity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16971-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR262] 262.Hendrickx G, et al. Piezo1 inactivation in chondrocytes impairs trabecular bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2021;36:369–384. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR263] 263.Zhou T, et al. Piezo1/2 mediate mechanotransduction essential for bone formation through concerted activation of NFAT-YAP1-ß-catenin. Elife. 2020;9:e49631. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR264] 264.Wang L, et al. Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14146-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR265] 265.Morris JA, et al. An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:258–266. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0302-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR266] 266.Dzamukova M, et al. Mechanical forces couple bone matrix mineralization with inhibition of angiogenesis to limit adolescent bone growth. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3059. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30618-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR267] 267.Kusumbe AP, Ramasamy SK, Adams RH. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature. 2014;507:323–328. doi: 10.1038/nature13145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR268] 268.Romeo SG, et al. Endothelial proteolytic activity and interaction with non-resorbing osteoclasts mediate bone elongation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:430–441. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0304-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR269] 269.Tagliabracci VS, et al. Secreted kinase phosphorylates extracellular proteins that regulate biomineralization. Science. 2012;336:1150–1153. doi: 10.1126/science.1217817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR270] 270.Tagliabracci VS, et al. A single kinase generates the majority of the secreted phosphoproteome. Cell. 2015;161:1619–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR271] 271.Gurr JA, Catterall JF, Kourides IA. Cloning of cDNA encoding the pre-beta subunit of mouse thyrotropin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:2122–2126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR272] 272.Baliram R, et al. Thyroid and bone: macrophage-derived TSH-β splice variant increases murine osteoblastogenesis. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4919–4926. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR273] 273.Elefteriou F, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR274] 274.Takeda S, et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111:305–317. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR275] 275.Fulzele K, et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell. 2022;185:746. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR276] 276.Bialek P, et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2004;6:423–435. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR277] 277.Fulzele K, et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell. 2010;142:309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR278] 278.Kode A, et al. FoxO1 protein cooperates with ATF4 protein in osteoblasts to control glucose homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:8757–8768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.282897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR279] 279.Lian JB, et al. Regulatory controls for osteoblast growth and differentiation: role of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2004;14:1–41. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.v14.i12.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR280] 280.Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997;89:747–754. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80257-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR281] 281.Wang Q, et al. The CBFbeta subunit is essential for CBFalpha2 (AML1) function in vivo. Cell. 1996;87:697–708. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81389-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR282] 282.Kania MA, Bonner AS, Duffy JB, Gergen JP. The Drosophila segmentation gene runt encodes a novel nuclear regulatory protein that is also expressed in the developing nervous system. Genes Dev. 1990;4:1701–1713. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR283] 283.Kern B, Shen J, Starbuck M, Karsenty G. Cbfa1 contributes to the osteoblast-specific expression of type I collagen genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:7101–7107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006215200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR284] 284.Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:696–711. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00279-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR285] 285.Stein GS, et al. Runx2 control of organization, assembly and activity of the regulatory machinery for skeletal gene expression. Oncogene. 2004;23:4315–4329. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR286] 286.Wei J, et al. Glucose uptake and Runx2 synergize to orchestrate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2015;161:1576–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR287] 287.Ogawa E, et al. PEBP2/PEA2 represents a family of transcription factors homologous to the products of the Drosophila runt gene and the human AML1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:6859–6863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR288] 288.Banerjee C, et al. Runt homology domain proteins in osteoblast differentiation: AML3/CBFA1 is a major component of a bone-specific complex. J. Cell. Biochem. 1997;66:1–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19970701)66:1<1::AID-JCB1>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR289] 289.Komori T, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89:755–764. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR290] 290.Otto F, et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell. 1997;89:765–771. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80259-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR291] 291.Pratap J, et al. Cell growth regulatory role of Runx2 during proliferative expansion of preosteoblasts. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5357–5362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR292] 292.Huang B, et al. RUNX2 promotes the suppression of osteoblast function and enhancement of osteoclast activity by multiple myeloma cells. Med. Oncol. 2023;40:115. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-01960-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR293] 293.Komori TRunx2. an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149:313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR294] 294.Pelletier N, Champagne N, Stifani S, Yang XJ. MOZ and MORF histone acetyltransferases interact with the Runt-domain transcription factor Runx2. Oncogene. 2002;21:2729–2740. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR295] 295.Thomas DM, et al. The retinoblastoma protein acts as a transcriptional coactivator required for osteogenic differentiation. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:303–316. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00327-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR296] 296.Cui CB, Cooper LF, Yang X, Karsenty G, Aukhil I. Transcriptional coactivation of bone-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 by TAZ. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;23:1004–1013. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1004-1013.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR297] 297.Wang W, et al. Groucho homologue Grg5 interacts with the transcription factor Runx2-Cbfa1 and modulates its activity during postnatal growth in mice. Dev. Biol. 2004;270:364–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR298] 298.Byun MR, et al. (-)-Epicatechin gallate (ECG) stimulates osteoblast differentiation via Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ)-mediated transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:9926–9935. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.522870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR299] 299.Suo, J. et al. VGLL4 promotes osteoblast differentiation by antagonizing TEADs-inhibited Runx2 transcription. Sci. Adv. 6 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR300] 300.Lee JM, Libermann TA, Cho JY. The synergistic regulatory effect of Runx2 and MEF transcription factors on osteoblast differentiation markers. J. Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:39–44. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR301] 301.Zainabadi K, Liu CJ, Guarente L. SIRT1 is a positive regulator of the master osteoblast transcription factor, RUNX2. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR302] 302.Tintut Y, Parhami F, Le V, Karsenty G, Demer LL. Inhibition of osteoblast-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 by the cAMP pathway in osteoblastic cells. Ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:28875–28879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.41.28875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR303] 303.Shen R, et al. Smad6 interacts with Runx2 and mediates Smad ubiquitin regulatory factor 1-induced Runx2 degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3569–3576. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506761200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR304] 304.Tosa I, et al. Postnatal Runx2 deletion leads to low bone mass and adipocyte accumulation in mice bone tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;516:1229–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR305] 305.Chava S, Chennakesavulu S, Gayatri BM, Reddy ABM. A novel phosphorylation by AMP-activated kinase regulates RUNX2 from ubiquitination in osteogenesis over adipogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:e49631. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0791-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR306] 306.Dai X, et al. Epigenetic upregulation of H19 and AMPK inhibition concurrently contribute to S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency-promoted atherosclerotic calcification. Circ. Res. 2022;130:1565–1582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.320251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR307] 307.Liu H, et al. Rho A/ROCK1 signaling-mediated metabolic reprogramming of valvular interstitial cells toward Warburg effect accelerates aortic valve calcification via AMPK/RUNX2 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:108. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05642-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR308] 308.Kim KM, Lim YJ, Jang WG. Policosanol stimulates osteoblast differentiation via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-mediated expression of insulin-induced genes 1 and 2. Cells. 2023;12:108. doi: 10.3390/cells12141863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR309] 309.Zhu J, Shimizu E, Zhang X, Partridge NC, Qin L. EGFR signaling suppresses osteoblast differentiation and inhibits expression of master osteoblastic transcription factors Runx2 and Osterix. J. Cell Biochem. 2011;112:1749–1760. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR310] 310.Lee KN, et al. Orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) protein negatively regulates bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced osteoblast differentiation through suppressing runt-related gene 2 (Runx2) activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:18888–18899. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.311878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR311] 311.Tang CY, et al. Runx1 is a central regulator of osteogenesis for bone homeostasis by orchestrating BMP and WNT signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR312] 312.Okuda T, Nishimura M, Nakao M, Fujita Y. RUNX1/AML1: a central player in hematopoiesis. Int J. Hematol. 2001;74:252–257. doi: 10.1007/BF02982057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR313] 313.Chen CL, et al. Runx1 determines nociceptive sensory neuron phenotype and is required for thermal and neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006;49:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR314] 314.Lian JB, et al. Runx1/AML1 hematopoietic transcription factor contributes to skeletal development in vivo. J. Cell Physiol. 2003;196:301–311. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR315] 315.Tang CY, et al. Runx1 up-regulates chondrocyte to osteoblast lineage commitment and promotes bone formation by enhancing both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Biochem J. 2020;477:2421–2438. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR316] 316.Wang Y, et al. Runx1/AML1/Cbfa2 mediates onset of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis. J. Bone Min. Res. 2005;20:1624–1636. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR317] 317.Tang J, et al. Runt-related transcription factor 1 is required for murine osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:11669–11681. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR318] 318.Levanon D, Groner Y. Structure and regulated expression of mammalian RUNX genes. Oncogene. 2004;23:4211–4219. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR319] 319.de Bruijn MF, Speck NA. Core-binding factors in hematopoiesis and immune function. Oncogene. 2004;23:4238–4248. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR320] 320.Levanon D, et al. Spatial and temporal expression pattern of Runx3 (Aml2) and Runx1 (Aml1) indicates non-redundant functions during mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 2001;109:413–417. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00537-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR321] 321.Yamashiro T, Aberg T, Levanon D, Groner Y, Thesleff I. Expression of Runx1, -2 and -3 during tooth, palate and craniofacial bone development. Mech. Dev. 2002;119:S107–S110. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00101-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR322] 322.Soung do Y, et al. Runx3/AML2/Cbfa3 regulates early and late chondrocyte differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1260–1270. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR323] 323.Sato S, et al. The distinct role of the Runx proteins in chondrocyte differentiation and intervertebral disc degeneration: findings in murine models and in human disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2764–2775. doi: 10.1002/art.23805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR324] 324.Bauer O, et al. Loss of osteoblast Runx3 produces severe congenital osteopenia. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;35:1097–1109. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01106-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR325] 325.Wang Y, et al. RUNX3 plays an important role in mediating the BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;40:1991–1999. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR326] 326.Nakashima K, et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2002;108:17–29. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR327] 327.Hewitt J, Lu X, Gilbert L, Nanes MS. The muscle transcription factor MyoD promotes osteoblast differentiation by stimulation of the Osterix promoter. Endocrinology. 2008;149:3698–3707. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR328] 328.Onizuka S, et al. ZBTB16 as a downstream target gene of Osterix regulates osteoblastogenesis of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016;117:2423–2434. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR329] 329.Lee SJ, Lee EH, Park SY, Kim JE. Induction of fibrillin-2 and periostin expression in Osterix-knockdown MC3T3-E1 cells. Gene. 2017;596:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR330] 330.Nieminen-Pihala V, et al. Early B-cell Factor1 (Ebf1) promotes early osteoblast differentiation but suppresses osteoblast function. Bone. 2021;146:115884. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR331] 331.Kato M, et al. Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J. Cell Biol. 2002;157:303–314. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200201089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR332] 332.Cheng SL, Shao JS, Charlton-Kachigian N, Loewy AP, Towler DA. MSX2 promotes osteogenesis and suppresses adipogenic differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal progenitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:45969–45977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306972200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR333] 333.Celil AB, Campbell PG. BMP-2 and insulin-like growth factor-I mediate Osterix (Osx) expression in human mesenchymal stem cells via the MAPK and protein kinase D signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:31353–31359. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503845200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR334] 334.Ishikawa M, et al. Pannexin 3 functions as an ER Ca(2+) channel, hemichannel, and gap junction to promote osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 2011;193:1257–1274. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201101050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR335] 335.Koga T, et al. NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation. Nat. Med. 2005;11:880–885. doi: 10.1038/nm1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR336] 336.Colditz J, Picke AK, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M. Contributions of dickkopf-1 to obesity-induced bone loss and marrow adiposity. JBMR. 2020;4:e10364. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR337] 337.Chen D, et al. Synergistic inhibition of Wnt pathway by HIF-1α and osteoblast-specific transcription factor osterix (Osx) in osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR338] 338.Deckelbaum RA, Majithia A, Booker T, Henderson JE, Loomis CA. The homeoprotein engrailed 1 has pleiotropic functions in calvarial intramembranous bone formation and remodeling. Development. 2006;133:63–74. doi: 10.1242/dev.02171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR339] 339.Fedde KN, et al. Alkaline phosphatase knock-out mice recapitulate the metabolic and skeletal defects of infantile hypophosphatasia. J. Bone Min. Res. 1999;14:2015–2026. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.12.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR340] 340.Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:83–93. doi: 10.1038/nrc2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR341] 341.Hoshikawa S, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent osterix degradation negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2020;34:14930–14945. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001340R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR342] 342.Choi YH, et al. Cbl-b and c-Cbl negatively regulate osteoblast differentiation by enhancing ubiquitination and degradation of Osterix. Bone. 2015;75:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR343] 343.Kim MJ, Piao M, Li Y, Lee SH, Lee KY. Deubiquitinase USP17 regulates osteoblast differentiation by increasing Osterix protein stability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:15257. doi: 10.3390/ijms242015257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR344] 344.Barbuto R, Mitchell J. Regulation of the osterix (Osx, Sp7) promoter by osterix and its inhibition by parathyroid hormone. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013;51:99–108. doi: 10.1530/JME-12-0251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR345] 345.Matsubara T, et al. BMP2 regulates Osterix through Msx2 and Runx2 during osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:29119–29125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801774200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR346] 346.Subramaniam M, Pitel KS, Withers SG, Drissi H, Hawse JR. TIEG1 enhances Osterix expression and mediates its induction by TGFβ and BMP2 in osteoblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;470:528–533. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR347] 347.Rajamannan NM. TIEG1 is upregulated in Lrp5/6-mediated valve osteogenesis. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:3362–3366. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR348] 348.Liu Q, et al. Recent advances of Osterix transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:601224. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.601224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR349] 349.Yang D, Okamura H, Nakashima Y, Haneji T. Histone demethylase Jmjd3 regulates osteoblast differentiation via transcription factors Runx2 and osterix. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:33530–33541. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.497040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR350] 350.Ishikawa M, Yamada Y. The role of Pannexin 3 in bone biology. J. Dent. Res. 2017;96:372–379. doi: 10.1177/0022034516678203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR351] 351.Ishikawa M, et al. Pannexin 3 and connexin 43 modulate skeletal development through their distinct functions and expression patterns. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:1018–1030. doi: 10.1242/jcs.176883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR352] 352.Okamura H, Yoshida K, Ochiai K, Haneji T. Reduction of protein phosphatase 2A Cα enhances bone formation and osteoblast differentiation through the expression of bone-specific transcription factor Osterix. Bone. 2011;49:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR353] 353.Sinha KM, Yasuda H, Coombes MM, Dent SY, de Crombrugghe B. Regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix by NO66, a Jumonji family histone demethylase. EMBO J. 2010;29:68–79. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR354] 354.Yang X, et al. ATF4 is a substrate of RSK2 and an essential regulator of osteoblast biology; implication for Coffin-Lowry Syndrome. Cell. 2004;117:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR355] 355.Elefteriou F, et al. ATF4 mediation of NF1 functions in osteoblast reveals a nutritional basis for congenital skeletal dysplasiae. Cell Metab. 2006;4:441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR356] 356.Karpinski BA, Morle GD, Huggenvik J, Uhler MD, Leiden JM. Molecular cloning of human CREB-2: an ATF/CREB transcription factor that can negatively regulate transcription from the cAMP response element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:4820–4824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.4820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR357] 357.Brindle PK, Montminy MR. The CREB family of transcription activators. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 1992;2:199–204. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(05)80274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR358] 358.Xiao G, et al. Cooperative interactions between activating transcription factor 4 and Runx2/Cbfa1 stimulate osteoblast-specific osteocalcin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:30689–30696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500750200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR359] 359.Lian N, et al. Transforming growth factor β suppresses osteoblast differentiation via the vimentin activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) axis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:35975–35984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.372458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR360] 360.St-Arnaud R, Hekmatnejad B. Combinatorial control of ATF4-dependent gene transcription in osteoblasts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1237:11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06197.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR361] 361.Dobreva G, Dambacher J, Grosschedl R. SUMO modification of a novel MAR-binding protein, SATB2, modulates immunoglobulin mu gene expression. Genes Dev. 2003;17:3048–3061. doi: 10.1101/gad.1153003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR362] 362.Britanova O, Akopov S, Lukyanov S, Gruss P, Tarabykin V. Novel transcription factor Satb2 interacts with matrix attachment region DNA elements in a tissue-specific manner and demonstrates cell-type-dependent expression in the developing mouse CNS. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;21:658–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03897.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR363] 363.Gyorgy AB, Szemes M, de Juan Romero C, Tarabykin V, Agoston DV. SATB2 interacts with chromatin-remodeling molecules in differentiating cortical neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008;27:865–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR364] 364.Roy SK, Shrivastava A, Srivastav S, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. SATB2 is a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020;24:11064–11069. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR365] 365.Dobreva G, et al. SATB2 is a multifunctional determinant of craniofacial patterning and osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 2006;125:971–986. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR366] 366.Kanzler B, Kuschert SJ, Liu YH, Mallo M. Hoxa-2 restricts the chondrogenic domain and inhibits bone formation during development of the branchial area. Development. 1998;125:2587–2597. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.14.2587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR367] 367.Trainor PA, Krumlauf R. Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001;13:698–705. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00273-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR368] 368.Huang X, et al. SATB2: A versatile transcriptional regulator of craniofacial and skeleton development, neurogenesis and tumorigenesis, and its applications in regenerative medicine. Genes Dis. 2022;9:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR369] 369.Zuo C, et al. TNF-α inhibits SATB2 expression and osteoblast differentiation through NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Oncotarget. 2018;9:4833–4850. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR370] 370.Bonilla-Claudio M, et al. Bmp signaling regulates a dose-dependent transcriptional program to control facial skeletal development. Development. 2012;139:709–719. doi: 10.1242/dev.073197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR371] 371.Tang W, Li Y, Osimiri L, Zhang C. Osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix (Osx) is an upstream regulator of Satb2 during bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:32995–33002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.244236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR372] 372.Varelas X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development. 2014;141:1614–1626. doi: 10.1242/dev.102376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR373] 373.Hong JH, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309:1074–1078. doi: 10.1126/science.1110955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR374] 374.Li Z, et al. Role of TCF/LEF transcription factors in bone development and osteogenesis. Int. J. Med Sci. 2018;15:1415–1422. doi: 10.7150/ijms.26741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR375] 375.Kida J, et al. Interaction of LEF1 with TAZ is necessary for the osteoblastogenic activity of Wnt3a. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28711-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR376] 376.Tang Y, Feinberg T, Keller ET, Li XY, Weiss SJ. Snail/Slug binding interactions with YAP/TAZ control skeletal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:917–929. doi: 10.1038/ncb3394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR377] 377.Chen W, et al. Cbfβ deletion in mice recapitulates cleidocranial dysplasia and reveals multiple functions of Cbfβ required for skeletal development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:8482–8487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310617111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR378] 378.Wu M, et al. Chondrocyte-specific knockout of Cbfβ reveals the indispensable function of Cbfβ in chondrocyte maturation, growth plate development and trabecular bone formation in mice. Int J. Biol. Sci. 2014;10:861–872. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR379] 379.Lim KE, et al. Core binding factor β of osteoblasts maintains cortical bone mass via stabilization of Runx2 in mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2015;30:715–722. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR380] 380.Tian F, et al. Core binding factor beta (Cbfβ) controls the balance of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation by upregulating Indian hedgehog (Ihh) expression and inhibiting parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor (PPR) expression in postnatal cartilage and bone formation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:1564–1574. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR381] 381.Wu M, et al. Deletion of core-binding factor β (Cbfβ) in mesenchymal progenitor cells provides new insights into Cbfβ/Runxs complex function in cartilage and bone development. Bone. 2014;65:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR382] 382.Uenaka M, et al. Osteoblast-derived vesicles induce a switch from bone-formation to bone-resorption in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1066. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28673-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR383] 383.Valencia-Sanchez MA, Liu J, Hannon GJ, Parker R. Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. Genes Dev. 2006;20:515–524. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR384] 384.Laine SK, Alm JJ, Virtanen SP, Aro HT, Laitala-Leinonen TK. MicroRNAs miR-96, miR-124, and miR-199a regulate gene expression in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012;113:2687–2695. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR385] 385.Huang S, et al. Upregulation of miR-22 promotes osteogenic differentiation and inhibits adipogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells by repressing HDAC6 protein expression. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:2531–2540. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR386] 386.Bhushan R, et al. miR-181a promotes osteoblastic differentiation through repression of TGF-β signaling molecules. Int J. Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:696–705. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR387] 387.Nicetto D, Zaret KS. Role of H3K9me3 heterochromatin in cell identity establishment and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Genet Dev. 2019;55:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2019.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR388] 388.Xiang Y, et al. JMJD3 is a histone H3K27 demethylase. Cell Res. 2007;17:850–857. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR389] 389.Huang B, Li G, Jiang XH. Fate determination in mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective from histone-modifying enzymes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6:35. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0018-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR390] 390.Kooistra SM, Helin K. Molecular mechanisms and potential functions of histone demethylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:297–311. doi: 10.1038/nrm3327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR391] 391.Hillringhaus L, et al. Structural and evolutionary basis for the dual substrate selectivity of human KDM4 histone demethylase family. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:41616–41625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.283689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR392] 392.Wei Y, et al. CDK1-dependent phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of H3K27 and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:87–94. doi: 10.1038/ncb2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR393] 393.Hemming S, et al. EZH2 and KDM6A act as an epigenetic switch to regulate mesenchymal stem cell lineage specification. Stem Cells. 2014;32:802–815. doi: 10.1002/stem.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR394] 394.Montecino M, Carrasco ME, Nardocci G. Epigenetic control of osteogenic lineage commitment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:611197. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.611197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR395] 395.Yamane K, et al. PLU-1 is an H3K4 demethylase involved in transcriptional repression and breast cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cell. 2007;25:801–812. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR396] 396.Vermeulen M, et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell. 2007;131:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR397] 397.Denissov S, et al. Mll2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation on bivalent promoters in embryonic stem cells, whereas Mll1 is redundant. Development. 2014;141:526–537. doi: 10.1242/dev.102681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR398] 398.Hu D, et al. The MLL3/MLL4 branches of the COMPASS family function as major histone H3K4 monomethylases at enhancers. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;33:4745–4754. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01181-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR399] 399.Yan J, et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation modulates long-range chromatin interactions at enhancers. Cell Res. 2018;28:204–220. doi: 10.1038/cr.2018.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR400] 400.Cheng J, et al. A role for H3K4 monomethylation in gene repression and partitioning of chromatin readers. Mol. Cell. 2014;53:979–992. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR401] 401.Sepulveda H, et al. Epigenetic signatures at the RUNX2-P1 and Sp7 gene promoters control osteogenic lineage commitment of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2017;232:2519–2527. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR402] 402.Aguilar R, Bustos FJ, Nardocci G, van Zundert B, Montecino M. Epigenetic silencing of the osteoblast-lineage gene program during hippocampal maturation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2021;122:367–384. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR403] 403.McGee-Lawrence ME, Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylases in skeletal development and bone mass maintenance. Gene. 2011;474:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR404] 404.Seto E, Yoshida M. Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018713. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR405] 405.Milazzo G, et al. Histone deacetylases (HDACs): Evolution, specificity, role in transcriptional complexes, and pharmacological actionability. Genes (Basel) 2020;11:556. doi: 10.3390/genes11050556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR406] 406.Adithya SP, Balagangadharan K, Selvamurugan N. Epigenetic modifications of histones during osteoblast differentiation. Biochim Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2022;1865:194780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2021.194780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR407] 407.Lee HW, et al. Histone deacetylase 1-mediated histone modification regulates osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006;20:2432–2443. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR408] 408.Wein MN, et al. HDAC5 controls MEF2C-driven sclerostin expression in osteocytes. J. Bone Min. Res. 2015;30:400–411. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR409] 409.Grant PA, et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1640–1650. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.13.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR410] 410.Li B, et al. GCN5 modulates osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells through DKK1 acetylation in inflammatory microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26542. doi: 10.1038/srep26542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR411] 411.Fei D, et al. KAT6A regulates stemness of aging bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells through Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:104. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02164-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR412] 412.Zhang L, et al. Acetyltransferases CBP/p300 control transcriptional switch of β-catenin and Stat1 promoting osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2023;38:1885–1899. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR413] 413.Peterson CL, Workman JL. Promoter targeting and chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complex. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2000;10:187–192. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00068-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR414] 414.de la Serna IL, Carlson KA, Imbalzano AN. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes promote MyoD-mediated muscle differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:187–190. doi: 10.1038/84826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR415] 415.Navickas SM, Giles KA, Brettingham-Moore KH, Taberlay PC. The role of chromatin remodeler SMARCA4/BRG1 in brain cancers: a potential therapeutic target. Oncogene. 2023;42:2363–2373. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02773-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR416] 416.de la Serna IL, Roy K, Carlson KA, Imbalzano AN. MyoD can induce cell cycle arrest but not muscle differentiation in the presence of dominant negative SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:41486–41491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107281200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR417] 417.Salma N, Xiao H, Mueller E, Imbalzano AN. Temporal recruitment of transcription factors and SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes during adipogenic induction of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma nuclear hormone receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:4651–4663. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4651-4663.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR418] 418.Young DW, et al. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is obligatory for BMP2-induced, Runx2-dependent skeletal gene expression that controls osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;94:720–730. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR419] 419.Krasteva V, Crabtree GR, Lessard JA. The BAF45a/PHF10 subunit of SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling complexes is essential for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Exp. Hematol. 2017;48:58–71.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR420] 420.Busby T, et al. Baf45a mediated chromatin remodeling promotes transcriptional activation for osteogenesis and odontogenesis. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:763392. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.763392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR421] 421.Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR422] 422.Zhang M, et al. Downregulation of DNA methyltransferase-3a ameliorates the osteogenic differentiation ability of adipose-derived stem cells in diabetic osteoporosis via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022;13:397. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03088-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR423] 423.Wang L, et al. TET enzymes regulate skeletal development through increasing chromatin accessibility of RUNX2 target genes. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4709. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32138-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR424] 424.Sepulveda H, Villagra A, Montecino M. Tet-mediated DNA demethylation is required for SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling and histone-modifying activities that trigger expression of the Sp7 osteoblast master gene during mesenchymal lineage commitment. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;37:e00177–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00177-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR425] 425.Cakouros D, et al. Specific functions of TET1 and TET2 in regulating mesenchymal cell lineage determination. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2019;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s13072-018-0247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR426] 426.Lindsey RC, Cheng S, Mohan S. Vitamin C effects on 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and gene expression in osteoblasts and chondrocytes: Potential involvement of PHD2. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR427] 427.Blayney, J. W. et al. Super-enhancers include classical enhancers and facilitators to fully activate gene expression. Cell (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR428] 428.Paschalis EP, Gamsjaeger S, Condon K, Klaushofer K, Burr D. Estrogen depletion alters mineralization regulation mechanisms in an ovariectomized monkey animal model. Bone. 2019;120:279–284. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR429] 429.Mitxitorena I, Infante A, Gener B, Rodríguez CI. Suitability and limitations of mesenchymal stem cells to elucidate human bone illness. World J. Stem Cells. 2019;11:578–593. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i9.578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR430] 430.Cheng H, et al. Development of nanomaterials for bone-targeted drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today. 2017;22:1336–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR431] 431.Baron R, Gori F. Targeting WNT signaling in the treatment of osteoporosis. Curr. Opin. Pharm. 2018;40:134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR432] 432.Wei H, et al. Identification of fibroblast activation protein as an osteogenic suppressor and anti-osteoporosis drug target. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108252. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR433] 433.Behrens A, et al. Impaired intervertebral disc formation in the absence of Jun. Development. 2003;130:103–109. doi: 10.1242/dev.00186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR434] 434.Eferl R, et al. The Fos-related antigen Fra-1 is an activator of bone matrix formation. EMBO J. 2004;23:2789–2799. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR435] 435.Brault V, et al. Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development. 2001;128:1253–1264. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.8.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR436] 436.Du Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang P. Knockdown of CDC20 promotes adipogenesis of bone marrow-derived stem cells by modulating β-catenin. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022;13:443. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03062-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR437] 437.Pannone G, et al. Expression of beta-catenin, cadherins and P-Runx2 in fibro-osseous lesions of the Jaw: Tissue microarray study. Biomolecules. 2022;12:587. doi: 10.3390/biom12040587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR438] 438.Pang X, et al. Sox9CreER-mediated deletion of β-catenin in palatal mesenchyme results in delayed palatal elevation accompanied with repressed canonical Wnt signaling and reduced actin polymerization. Genesis. 2021;59:e23441. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR439] 439.Gutierrez S, et al. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP) beta and delta activate osteocalcin gene transcription and synergize with Runx2 at the C/EBP element to regulate bone-specific expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:1316–1323. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106611200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR440] 440.Hata K, et al. A CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta isoform, liver-enriched inhibitory protein, regulates commitment of osteoblasts and adipocytes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:1971–1979. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.5.1971-1979.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR441] 441.Nam B, et al. TGFβ1 suppressed matrix mineralization of osteoblasts differentiation by regulating SMURF1-C/EBPβ-DKK1 axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9771. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR442] 442.Smink JJ, et al. Transcription factor C/EBPbeta isoform ratio regulates osteoclastogenesis through MafB. EMBO J. 2009;28:1769–1781. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR443] 443.Tominaga H, et al. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta promotes osteoblast differentiation by enhancing Runx2 activity with ATF4. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:5373–5386. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-03-0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR444] 444.Iyer VV, Kadakia TB, McCabe LR, Schwartz RC. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta has a role in osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2004;295:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR445] 445.Henriquez B, et al. C/EBPβ binds the P1 promoter of the Runx2 gene and up-regulates Runx2 transcription in osteoblastic cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2011;226:3043–3052. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR446] 446.Hassan MQ, et al. Dlx3 transcriptional regulation of osteoblast differentiation: temporal recruitment of Msx2, Dlx3, and Dlx5 homeodomain proteins to chromatin of the osteocalcin gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:9248–9261. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.20.9248-9261.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR447] 447.Li D, Yuan Q, Xiong L, Li A, Xia Y. The miR-4739/DLX3 axis modulates bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) osteogenesis affecting osteoporosis progression. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:703167. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.703167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR448] 448.Zhao N, et al. Senescence: novel insight into DLX3 mutations leading to enhanced bone formation in Tricho-Dento-Osseous syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38680. doi: 10.1038/srep38680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR449] 449.Duverger O, et al. In vivo impact of Dlx3 conditional inactivation in neural crest-derived craniofacial bones. J. Cell Physiol. 2013;228:654–664. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR450] 450.Shirakabe K, Terasawa K, Miyama K, Shibuya H, Nishida E. Regulation of the activity of the transcription factor Runx2 by two homeobox proteins, Msx2 and Dlx5. Genes Cells. 2001;6:851–856. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00466.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR451] 451.Robledo RF, Rajan L, Li X, Lufkin T. The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal development. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1089–1101. doi: 10.1101/gad.988402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR452] 452.Kim CY, et al. Dlx5 represses the transcriptional activity of PPARγ. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2021;44:1303–1308. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR453] 453.You L, et al. Dysbacteriosis-derived lipopolysaccharide causes embryonic osteopenia through retinoic-acid-regulated DLX5 expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2518. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR454] 454.Rattanasopha S, et al. Absent expression of the osteoblast-specific maternally imprinted genes, DLX5 and DLX6, causes split hand/split foot malformation type I. J. Med. Genet. 2014;51:817–823. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR455] 455.Sato M, et al. Transcriptional regulation of osteopontin gene in vivo by PEBP2alphaA/CBFA1 and ETS1 in the skeletal tissues. Oncogene. 1998;17:1517–1525. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR456] 456.Itoh T, Takeda S, Akao Y. MicroRNA-208 modulates BMP-2-stimulated mouse preosteoblast differentiation by directly targeting V-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:27745–27752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.105080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR457] 457.Itoh T, Ando M, Tsukamasa Y, Akao Y. Expression of BMP-2 and Ets1 in BMP-2-stimulated mouse pre-osteoblast differentiation is regulated by microRNA-370. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1693–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR458] 458.McLarren KW, et al. The mammalian basic helix loop helix protein HES-1 binds to and modulates the transactivating function of the runt-related factor Cbfa1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:530–538. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.1.530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR459] 459.Ishibashi M, et al. Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects. Genes Dev. 1995;9:3136–3148. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.24.3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR460] 460.Zamurovic N, Cappellen D, Rohner D, Susa M. Coordinated activation of notch, Wnt, and transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathways in bone morphogenic protein 2-induced osteogenesis. Notch target gene Hey1 inhibits mineralization and Runx2 transcriptional activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:37704–37715. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR461] 461.Zeng Z, Yin X, Zhang X, Jing D, Feng X. Cyclic stretch enhances bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation through the inhibition of Hey1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015;36:1273–1281. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR462] 462.Kusuyama J, et al. BMP9 prevents induction of osteopontin in JNK-inactivated osteoblasts via Hey1-Id4 interaction. Int J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019;116:105614. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.105614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR463] 463.Galceran J, Sustmann C, Hsu SC, Folberth S, Grosschedl R. LEF1-mediated regulation of Delta-like1 links Wnt and Notch signaling in somitogenesis. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2718–2723. doi: 10.1101/gad.1249504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR464] 464.Sowa H, et al. Menin is required for bone morphogenetic protein 2- and transforming growth factor beta-regulated osteoblastic differentiation through interaction with Smads and Runx2. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:40267–40275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401312200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR465] 465.Troka, I. et al. Effect of menin deletion in early osteoblast lineage on the mineralization of an in vitro 3D osteoid-like dense collagen gel matrix. Biomimetics (Basel)7 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR466] 466.Abi-Rafeh J, et al. Genetic deletion of menin in mouse mesenchymal stem cells: An experimental and computational analysis. JBMR. 2022;6:e10622. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR467] 467.Lee S, et al. Deletion of Menin in craniofacial osteogenic cells in mice elicits development of mandibular ossifying fibroma. Oncogene. 2018;37:616–626. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR468] 468.Liu P, et al. Loss of menin in osteoblast lineage affects osteocyte-osteoclast crosstalk causing osteoporosis. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:672–682. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR469] 469.Satokata I, et al. Msx2 deficiency in mice causes pleiotropic defects in bone growth and ectodermal organ formation. Nat. Genet. 2000;24:391–395. doi: 10.1038/74231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR470] 470.Ichida F, et al. Reciprocal roles of MSX2 in regulation of osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:34015–34022. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403621200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR471] 471.Liu F, Liang Y, Lin X. MiR-151b inhibits osteoblast differentiation via downregulating Msx2. Connect. Tissue Res. 2022;63:112–123. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2021.1882442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR472] 472.Cao Y, et al. Osterix, a transcription factor for osteoblast differentiation, mediates antitumor activity in murine osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1124–1128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR473] 473.Jeon MJ, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma inhibits the Runx2-mediated transcription of osteocalcin in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:23270–23277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211610200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR474] 474.Lecka-Czernik B, et al. Inhibition of Osf2/Cbfa1 expression and terminal osteoblast differentiation by PPARgamma2. J. Cell. Biochem. 1999;74:357–371. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990901)74:3<357::AID-JCB5>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR475] 475.Cao J, et al. Deletion of PPARγ in mesenchymal lineage cells protects against aging-induced cortical bone loss in mice. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020;75:826–834. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR476] 476.Yoshida CA, et al. Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog. Genes Dev. 2004;18:952–963. doi: 10.1101/gad.1174704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR477] 477.Li B, Chen S, Sun K, Xu R, Wu Y. Genetic analyses identified a SALL4 gene mutation associated with Holt-Oram syndrome. DNA Cell Biol. 2018;37:398–404. doi: 10.1089/dna.2017.4094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR478] 478.Zhang YW, et al. A RUNX2/PEBP2alpha A/CBFA1 mutation displaying impaired transactivation and Smad interaction in cleidocranial dysplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:10549–10554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180309597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR479] 479.Alliston T, Choy L, Ducy P, Karsenty G, Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced repression of CBFA1 by Smad3 decreases cbfa1 and osteocalcin expression and inhibits osteoblast differentiation. EMBO J. 2001;20:2254–2272. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR480] 480.Kim S, et al. Stat1 functions as a cytoplasmic attenuator of Runx2 in the transcriptional program of osteoblast differentiation. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1979–1991. doi: 10.1101/gad.1119303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR481] 481.Alvandi Z, Opas M. c-Src kinase inhibits osteogenic differentiation via enhancing STAT1 stability. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0241646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR482] 482.Mizuno N, et al. Optineurin regulates osteoblastogenesis through STAT1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;525:889–894. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR483] 483.Mouillé M, et al. SATB2-associated syndrome: characterization of skeletal features and of bone fragility in a prospective cohort of 19 patients. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022;17:100. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02229-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR484] 484.Kegelman CD, et al. YAP and TAZ mediate osteocyte perilacunar/canalicular remodeling. J. Bone Min. Res. 2020;35:196–210. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR485] 485.Kegelman CD, et al. Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development. FASEB J. 2018;32:2706–2721. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700872R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR486] 486.Kegelman CD, et al. YAP and TAZ promote periosteal osteoblast precursor expansion and differentiation for fracture repair. J. Bone Min. Res. 2021;36:143–157. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR487] 487.Xiong J, Almeida M, O’Brien CA. The YAP/TAZ transcriptional co-activators have opposing effects at different stages of osteoblast differentiation. Bone. 2018;112:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis

Siyu Zhu

Wei Chen

Alasdair Masson

Yi-Ping Li

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoblast function

Table 1.

Fig. 1. Different transcription factors regulate three different differentiation fates — adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes from MSCs.

Fig. 2. Canonical signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation.

Osteoblast origin and cell lineage

Osteoblast signaling

Fig. 3. Noncanonical signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation.

Wnt signaling pathway

Overview of Wnt signaling

Fig. 4. Signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast cell lineage commitment, differentiation, and bone formation.

Wnt canonical pathway

Wnt noncanonical pathway

Wnt5a

Wnt/calcium pathway

Wnt7b

Role of β-catenin in osteoblast differentiation

Regulation of Wnt signaling pathway

TGF-β and BMP signaling

Overview of TGF-β signaling

TGF-β signaling regulation

Overview of BMP signaling

BMP signaling regulation

Hedgehog signaling

Indian Hedgehog (Ihh)

Shh

Regulation of Hedgehog signaling

Interaction between Hh signaling and Wnt signaling

FGF signaling

Overview of FGF signaling

Role of FGF signaling in osteoblast differentiation

Regulation of FGF signaling

Noncanonical signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation

Ephrin signaling

Overview of Ephrin signaling

Ephrin signaling regulation

TLR/NF-κB signaling

Overview of TLR/NF-κB signaling

TLR/NF-κB signaling regulation

Notch signaling

Hippo signaling

Piezo1 and Piezo2 signaling

Hormone regulation

Osteoblast transcriptional factors

Runx2

Co-activators of Runx2

Table 2.

Co-repressors of Runx2

Runx1

Runx3

Osterix

Co-activators of Osx

Fig. 5. Epigenetic modification of transcriptional genes regulation in osteoblasts.

Co-repressors of Osx

ATF4

SATB2

TAZ/YAP

Cbfβ

Epigenetic modification of transcriptional gene regulation

Table 3.

Non-coding RNAs

Histone methylation

Histone acetylation

Chromatin remodeling

DNA methylation and demethylation

Summary and future perspectives

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Conflict of interest

Footnotes

Contributor Information

References

ACTIONS