Abstract
Allium species are among the most widely cultivated vegetables for centuries for their positive effects on human health and their variety of uses in food preparation and cooking. Preparation and cooking processes create chemical changes that can affect the concentration and bioavailability of bioactive molecules. Understanding the changes in bioactive compounds and bioactive activities in Allium vegetables resulting from preparation and cooking processes is essential for better retention of these compounds and better utilization of their health benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different preparation and cooking processes on the bioactive molecules of Allium vegetables. This review concludes that bioactive compounds in Allium vegetables are affected by each preparation and cooking process depending on variables including method, time, temperature. Owing to differences in the matrix and structure of the plant, preparation and cooking processes show different results on bioactive compounds and bioactive activities for different vegetables. Continued research is needed to help fill gaps in current knowledge, such as the optimal preparation and cooking processes for each Allium vegetable.
Keywords: onion (Allium cepa L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), leek (Allium porrum L.), phenolic compounds, preparation, cooking, Allium vegetables, bioactive molecules
1. Introduction
Allium vegetables belong to the family Alliaceae, including onion (Allium cepa L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), leek (Allium porrum L.), and Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L.), and contain high levels of bioactive phytomolecules, including phenolic compounds and various organosulfur compounds (1). Owing to their positive effects on human health and their variety of uses in food preparation and cooking, Allium species are among the most widely cultivated vegetables for centuries (2). Polyphenols, sulfur compounds, saponins, peptides, vitamins, and minerals (1, 3, 4) are the bioactive molecules contained in Allium vegetables (Figure 1). The main bioactive compounds responsible for the health benefits of these vegetables, as well as being the source of their unique taste and odor, are polyphenolic and sulfur compounds (1) (Table 1).
Figure 1.
Bioactive molecules in Allium vegetables.
Table 1.
Nutritional value of Allium vegetables (5).
| Vegetables (100 g) | Garlic | Yellow onion | Red onion | White onion | Leeks | Welsh onion | Shallots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 143.0 | 38.0 | 44.0 | 36.0 | 61.0 | 34.0 | 72.0 |
| Protein (g) | 6.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.5 |
| Total lipid (fat) (g) | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 28.2 | 8.6 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 14.2 | 6.5 | 16.8 |
| Ca (mg) | 181.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 | 21.0 | 59.0 | 18.0 | 37.0 |
| Fe (mg) | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Mg (mg) | 25.0 | 9.0 | 11.4 | 9.3 | 28.0 | 23.0 | 21.0 |
| P (mg) | 153.0 | 34.0 | 41.0 | 29.0 | 35.0 | 49.0 | 60.0 |
| K (mg) | 401.0 | 182.0 | 197.0 | 141.0 | 180.0 | 212.0 | 334.0 |
| Na (mg) | 17.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 12.0 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 10.0 | 8.2 | 8.1 | – | 12.0 | 27.0 | 8.0 |
Although these plants are normally odorless, up to 50 volatile aroma compounds can be produced during tissue damage through enzymatic hydrolysis of compounds called S-alk(en)yl-L-cysteine sulfoxides (4). Although sulfur compounds account for 85% of the volatile compounds of onion, di and trisulfides are the main compounds of this group (6). Alliin (S-allyl-l-cysteine sulfoxide) is the main component of sulfur compounds in garlic (7). The main bioactive component responsible for garlic’s aroma and functional properties is allicin (diallyl thiosulphinate), which is produced from the reaction of alliin with alliinase when garlic is crushed (8). Diallyl, methyl allyl, and diethyl mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexasulfides, vinyldithiins, and sulfur compounds such as (E)- and (Z)-ajoene are produced from unstable allicin (4, 9) (Figure 2). Of these, diallyl trisulfide, diallyl disulfide, and diallyl sulfide exhibit anticancer effects (10).
Figure 2.
Enzymatic reaction of alliin in the cutting/crushing process of garlic.
The active components of Allium species particularly garlic and onion have beneficial effects against various diseases, including cardiovascular, neurological, and liver diseases, and are effective in cancer prevention (11). For patients with dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, garlic is recommended as a long-term dietary component (12). Regular consumption of flavonoid-rich foods helps prevent metabolic syndrome (13). Red onions show varying amounts of inhibitory activity against enzymes involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes, depending on the cooking method and phenolic profile (13). The bioactive compounds quercetin, allicin, and kaempferol, found at high levels in onion, garlic, and leek, respectively, positively affect the immune system (14). Furthermore, leek is effective on cancer cells, and it is suggested that its addition to the diet increases the effectiveness of chemotherapy (15). Furthermore, bioactive proteins and peptides that have shown antioxidative, antimicrobial, anti-cancer potentials and oligosaccharides that have proven potential health benefits as prebiotics are among the bioactive compounds in Allium vegetables (16, 17).
Preparation and cooking processes create chemical changes that can affect the concentration and bioavailability of bioactive molecules (18). The matrix and structures of the plant and the characteristics of the compounds are also influential on the changes in bioactive compounds and bioactive activities (19). To identify the appropriate preparation and cooking technique and appropriate measures for preventing losses, recognizing the effects of the process on these bioactive compounds is significant. For example, heat treatment can cause oxidation and other degradation reactions, thereby resulting in the loss of several natural antioxidant contents (20). Furthermore, cooking processes can modulate the release and bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds owing to cell wall softening, cell wall rupture, and release of bound phytonutrients (21, 22). Inappropriate preparation processes result in loss of sensory properties, including taste, appearance, color, consistency, and a decrease in nutritional value and hygienic quality in vegetables (23). To better utilize the nutrient contents of vegetables and fruits, healthy preparation and cooking methods should be applied (23). Understanding the changes in bioactive compounds and bioactive activities in Allium vegetables resulting from preparation and cooking processes is essential for better retention of these compounds and better utilization of their health benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different preparation and cooking processes on the bioactive molecules of Allium vegetables (Table 2).
Table 2.
Effects of preparation and cooking methods on the bioactive molecules and antioxidant activity in Allium vegetables.
| Preparation/cooking method | Type of Allium vegetables | Effect | Conclusion | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washing (chlorine, citric acid, ascorbic acid, nisin, sodium hypochlorite, and calcium chloride) | Onion | ↑ TPC ↑ AA |
Treating onion with different disinfected has significantly increased TPC and subsequently the strength of antioxidant compounds. | (24) |
| Washing (citric acid and nisin) | Onion | ↓ TPC No differences in quercetin and AA |
TPC of onion decreased because of washing with citric acid and nisin; however, phenolic acid and antioxidant activity were not affected by washing | (25) |
| Water Washing (WW) Hydrogen peroxide (HP) Dichloroisocyanuric sodium salt (DS) Sodium hypochlorite (SH) Sulfuric acid (SA) Citric acid (CA) UV-C radiation |
Onion | WW: ↓ Flavonols (%17 at 4°C), (%23 at 50°C); ↓anthocyanins (%29 at 4°C), (%13 at 50°C) HP, DS, SH, SA, CA: Flavonols and anthocyanins did not change significantly compared to the WW UV-C: ↑ flavonol (%35), ↑ anthocyanins (%29) |
Flavonols are lost because of solubilization into the immersion water. There is no further loss by oxidation due to the use of decontaminant chemicals. UV-C irradiation is superior to any of the chemical-based procedures |
(26) |
| Cutting | Onion | ↓ Propan-1-thiol, (E)-1-(prop-1-en-1-yl)-3- propyltrisulfane ↓ 1-(1-(methylthio)propyl)-2-propyldisulfane ↓ (Z)- 1-(1-propenyldithio)propyl propyl disulfide ↓ dipropyl trisulfide ↓ methyl 1-(1 propenylthio)propyl disulfide ↑ 2-mercapto-3, 4- dimethyl-2 ↑ 3-dihydrothiophene and 2 ↑ 4-dimethylthiophene |
Cutting onions led to a decrease in most of the sulfur compounds | (27) |
| Cutting | Welsh Onion | ↑ TSP ↑ AA |
Cutting process of Welsh onion increased the TSP compound and AA | (28) |
| Crushing | Garlic | ↑ dimethyl disulfide ↑ diallyl sulfide ↑ methyl propenyl disulfide ↑ methyl allyl disulfide ↑ diallyl disulfide ↑ diallyl trisulfide No significant differences in Allicin |
Most components increased in the headspace between 30 and 240 min after crushing. | (29) |
| Hot air drying at 50°C–70°C–90°C | Onion | ↓dipropyl disulfide ↓dipropyl trisulfide ↓TSC (highest at 90°C) ↑ dimethyl sulfide ↑ dimethyl trisulfide ↑Dimethyl disulfide (only at 90°C) ↑2,5-Dimethylthiophene (only at 90°C) |
TSC and dipropyl disulfide decreased during drying, however, most sulfur compounds increased when onion was dried at relatively high temperature. | (30) |
| Hot air drying | Onion | ↓ TPC | The increase in temperature and time resulted in the decrease of TPC | (31) |
| Hot air drying | White and red onion | ↑ TPC ↑ TFC ↑ AA ↑ Gallic acid |
TPC, TFC, and AA values of the white and red onions increased significantly. | (32) |
| Hot air drying at 60°C–70°C | Onion | ↑ TSP ↑ AA ↑ Flavonoid |
Convective drying increased the TSP, AA and TFC for both temperatures. | (33) |
| Hot air drying at 40°C (onion rings (OR) and onion flakes (OF)) | Onion | TFC: OF> OR VOC: OF> OR |
Highlight the different nutraceutical properties of dried onions differing in shape and size. | (52) |
| Hot air drying | Garlic | ↓ TPC ↓ Allicin ↑ Caffeic acid ↑ Ferulic acid ↑ Gallic acid ↑ Quercetin |
Individual phenolic compounds was increased while allicin was reduced. | (19) |
| Sun drying (SD) Hot air drying (HAD) Vacuum drying (VD) Freeze drying (FD) |
Onion | ↓ TFC ↓ TPC: ↓ Ascorbic acid TFC, TPC and Ascorbic acid retention: FD > VD > HAD>SD |
FD: Best drying method for preserving the bioactive composition. | (34) |
| Vacuum freeze drying (VFD) (Constant temperature at −20°C, 4°C, 25°C, and variable temperature (VT)) | Scallion | ↓ Allicin ↓ Ascorbic acid ↓ AA Allicin, Ascorbic acid and AA retention: VT > -20 °C> >4 °C > 25 °C |
Among the scallion samples with VFD at different main drying temperatures, AA, allicin and ascorbic acid of the VT group was the highest, | (35) |
| Vacuum freeze drying (VFD) Pulsed vacuum drying (PVD) Hot air drying based on temperature and humidity control (TH-HAD) Air impingement drying (AID) Infrared drying (IRD) |
Garlic | Allicin retention: PVD > TH-HAD>AID> VFD > IRD | PVD: have demonstrated best retention on Allicin and SP | (36) |
| Vacuum freeze drying (VFD) Hot air drying (HAD) Infrared hot air drying (IRHAD) Relative humidity drying (RHD) Pulsed vacuum drying (PVD) |
Garlic | ↓ Allicin ↓ TPC Allicin and TPC retention: RHD > IRHAD> VFD > PVD > HAD |
All drying treatments led to a loss in bioactive compounds of garlic. The IRHAD and RHD dried garlic samples contained significantly higher bioactive compounds than others. |
(37) |
| Freeze drying (FD) Hot air drying (HAD) Vacuum drying (VD) Infrared drying (IRD) |
White and purple garlic | ↓ Allicin ↓ TPC Allicin and TPC retention: FD > IRD > VD > HAD |
FD and IRD treatment can preserve well active substance of white and purple garlic. | (38) |
| Boiling (BL) Microwaving (MW) |
Onion | ↑ AA | BL and MW are good ways to retain the antioxidant capacity of onion | (39) |
| Baking (B) Boiling (BL) Frying (FR) Grilling (GR) |
Yellow onion (YO) Red onion (RO) |
BL: ↓ TPC, ↓ TFC B, FR, GR: ↑ TPC, ↑ TFC BI for TPC, TFC (YO): B > BL > FR > GR BI for TPC, TFC (RO): B > GR > FR > BL |
B and GR: are recommended methods owing to the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds. | (21) |
| Deep-frying (DF) Air-frying (AF) |
Red onion | DF: ↑ TPC (47.4%) AF: ↑ TPC (18.6%) Bioaccessible TPC after digestion: AF (89.6%) > DF (60.5%) > raw (38.6%) |
AF: best for retention TPC after digestion | (40) |
| Boiling (BL) (5 min-15 min) Steaming (ST) |
Leek | ST: ↓ TPC, ↑ AA, ↑ anti-inflammatory activity BL: ↑ TPC, ↑ AA, ↑ anti-inflammatory activity TPC: (BL5 > BL15) anti-inflammatory activity: (BL15 > BL5) AA: (BL15 > BL5) |
BL and ST are effective in increasing AA and anti-inflammatory activity | (41) |
| Cooking at 25°C, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150°C for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min | Garlic | ↑ TPC ↑ TFC |
Cooking temperature had a significant effect on TPC and TFC while cooking time did not have a significant effect on the phytochemicals and AA. | (42) |
| Chopped (Ch) Sliced (Sl) Whole cloves (W) Simmering (S) Rolling boil (RB) Stir- frying (SF) |
Garlic | OSCs (all cooking treatments): Ch > Sl > W OSCs (all pre-cooking treatments): SF > RB > S |
Best combination treatments to obtain the highest bioactive compound levels were SF-Ch followed by RB-Ch. | (43) |
| Drying (D) Pickling (P) Frying (F) |
Garlic | D, P and F: ↓ TPC, ↓TFC, ↓AA | Drying process caused the highest negative effect on TPC, TFC and AA | (44) |
| Cooking at 150°C for 20 min | Garlic Onion |
↓ AA ↓ PC |
Heat treatment had deleterious effects on the antioxidant properties of onion and garlic | (45) |
| Boiling (B) Frying (F) Roasting (R) |
Green onion | ↓ TSC | Raw green onions had a higher TSC compared to processed green onions. | (46) |
TPC, Total Polyphenol Content; AA, Antioxidant Activity; TSP, Total Soluble Phenolic; TSC, Total Sulfur Compounds; VOC, Volatile Organic Compounds; TFC, Total Flavonoid Content; SP, Soluble Pectin; BI, Bioaccessibility Index; OSCs, Organosulphur Compounds; PC, Phenolic Compounds.
2. Search strategy
We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar using keywords (“cooking” OR “preparation” OR “washing” OR “drying” OR “cutting”) AND (“bioactive molecules” OR “phenolic compounds” OR “antioxidant activity”) AND (“Allium vegetables” OR “onion” OR “garlic” OR “leek”). Articles written in English were prioritized.
3. Preparation and cooking processes of Allium vegetables
Vegetables undergo several preparation processes, whether they are to be consumed at home or used in food service systems or industrial products. Domestic processes such as cutting, slicing, peeling, or cooking, as well as thermal and non-thermal industrial processing methods such as high pressure and ultraviolet, can affect some bioactive compounds that are thermally sensitive and vulnerable to chemical or physical processing (47). The sale of fruits and vegetables as fresh cut products has become widespread in recent years owing to the convenience it provides (48). To reduce the biological risk of fresh-cut vegetables and fruits, a chemical wash is performed during fresh-cut produce preparation that serves as a decontamination treatment (49). A sodium hypochlorite aqueous solution (containing approximately 50–200 ppm (parts per million) free chlorine), which is relatively inexpensive and protects against a wide range of microbial agents, is the typical approach for disinfection; however, disadvantages exist in terms of food safety and environmental sustainability (48). Several methods such as ozone and electrolyzed water are used to reduce chlorine exposure and further experiments are conducted with allium vegetables (48, 50). On an industrial scale, peeling is performed mechanically, chemically, or using high-pressure steam peelers, attempting to be as gentle as possible (51).
To extend the shelf life of vegetables, drying is commonly practiced, and the use of dried onions in recipes and as a functional food is becoming widespread (34, 52). The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) stated that approximately 106 million tons of dried onions were produced globally in 2021 (53). Hot air drying (HAD) or convective drying, where heat is transferred to the food by hot air in convection ovens, is frequently preferred because it is cost-effective and easy to perform (30). Besides convective drying, other commonly practiced methods include freeze drying (FD), infrared drying (IRD), vacuum drying (VD), and relative humidity drying (RHD). The working principles of these methods are briefly presented. In FD, all moisture in the food is initially frozen and subsequently dehydrated by sublimation; this way, the adverse effects of heat treatment are reduced by using low temperatures (54). When heating is performed by radiation, electromagnetic radiation causes molecules’ thermal movement, thereby causing heat to be transferred by convection and conduction (55). The low pressure created in VD results in a lower boiling point, which helps to avoid the adverse effects of high temperatures (56). In RHD, by reducing the relative humidity of the air during the drying process, the drying time can be shortened, and the loss of phenolic compounds can be reduced (57). Hybrid drying methods, where these drying methods are combined, can be effective in shortening drying time and improving energy efficiency and product quality (58).
4. Effects of preparation processes on bioactive molecules
4.1. Washing and disinfection process
The nutritional value of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables can be affected by the treatment time, type, and concentration of the disinfection solution (49). Azarpazhooh and Sharayei (24) reported that fresh onion purees prepared with onions washed in different disinfection solutions (chlorine, citric acid, ascorbic acid, nisin, sodium hypochlorite, and calcium chloride) have higher total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity than the unwashed control group. This may be because of the cutting, which may lead to increased synthesis of sulfur compounds (27).
Chen et al. (25) reported that the total polyphenol content (TPC) of onion decreased because of washing with a solution prepared using citric acid and nisin; however, phenolic acid and antioxidant activity were not affected by washing. The decrease in TPC may be because of the resolution of some onion flavonoids when immersed in water (26). A study conducted by Pérez–Gregorio et al. (26) reported that onion flavonols (both at 4°C and 50°C) passed into the immersion water at a rate of 17–23%. Although disinfection solutions did not lead to further loss of flavonols, anthocyanins were lost at high levels, primarily when hydrogen peroxide was used (26). Conversely, decontamination with ultraviolet (UV)-C irradiation increased natural flavonoid levels in fresh-cut onion slices (26).
The disinfection process can influence bioactive compounds. Dry decontamination processes such as UV-C irradiation are preferable for the preservation of bioactive compounds, as phenolic compounds can pass into the water during washing.
4.2. Peeling and cutting processes
The onion’s inner layers have significantly lower phenolic content and antioxidant properties than the outer layers; therefore, removing the outer layers during peeling causes nutrient losses (59). As 90% of quercetin is noted in the onion skin, peeling decreases to 40% in quercetin concentration (60). Although approximately 63% of red onion anthocyanins are observed in the dry peel, the outer fleshy layer, which accounts for 15% of the total weight, is also particularly rich in cyanidin derivatives (61). Only 27% of the total anthocyanins and 79% of quercetin can be consumed when this outer fleshy layer is removed by peeling (25). Onion peel powder-fortified functional foods have received attention for reducing the environmental impact caused by industrial vegetable wastes and benefiting from the bioactive components noted in onion peel (25). A study conducted by Sagar and Pareek (62) showed that TPC, total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activity increased in fortified bread prepared with 60% whole wheat flour, 40% multigrain flour, and onion peel powder at 1, 2, 3, and 4% concentrations, depending on the enrichment ratio.
The cutting process may result in an increased respiratory rate by ethylene production stimulation (63). Mechanical damage generates a stress signal that may be responsible for various physiological responses, including browning (64). The cutting process can ultimately result in nutritional changes; polyphenol oxidase, which catalyzes polyphenolic compound oxidation, and phenylalanine ammonialase, which catalyzes the synthesis of precursors of phenolic substrates, are responsible for browning (28). A study conducted by Liu et al. (27) revealed that cutting onions led to a decrease in most of the sulfur compounds, whereas 2-mercapto-3,4- dimethyl-2,3-dihydrothiophene and 2,4-dimethylthiophene concentrations increased after cutting. Berno et al. (64) reported that diced onions showed more rapid physiological changes than sliced onions owing to the greater physical stress caused by this type of cutting. A study conducted by Han et al. (28) showed that the cutting process of Welsh onion increased the total soluble phenolic compound and antioxidant activity by increasing wounding intensity.
When garlic is crushed, the unstable allicin rapidly decomposes into various products (9). Varga–Visi et al. (29) reported that sulfur compounds in garlic increased between 30 and 240 min after crushing; however, 10-min boiling hampered the post-treatment formation of sulfur compounds. Therefore, it has been suggested that raw garlic could be crushed and kept in a sealed container during the preparation but should not be left to stand after it is cooked (29).
The bioactive compounds of Allium vegetables are influenced by peeling and cutting processes. The bioactive compounds of onions are concentrated in the outer layers and in the onion peel, which is why the removal of these layers during the peeling process leads to bioactive compound degradation. While the positive effect of crushing on the bioactive compounds of garlic is known, wounding can lead to simultaneous production and loss of bioactive compounds in onions.
5. Effects of the drying process on bioactive molecules
In a study conducted by Choi et al. (30), dipropyl disulfide, which is the major volatile compound of onion, significantly decreased during drying, whereas most sulfur compounds increased during drying at relatively higher temperatures, such as 90°C. Wongsa et al. (19) reported that the drying temperature and humidity level of the drying air affected bioactive compounds and that the drying process reduced the allicin content and TPC, however, contents of caffeic, ferulic, gallic acids and quercetin increased after drying. This may be because primary phenolic acids are present in a bound form in plant cells and thermal treatment releases these bound phenolic acids (19). Bamba et al. (31) showed that as drying time and temperature increased, TPC decreased owing to thermal degradation. Moreover, compared with unblanched onion powder and fresh samples, blanching of onion bulbs before drying resulted in a loss of approximately 51.4 and 62% of TPC, respectively (31). In a study conducted to evaluate the effect of various pre-treatment methods such as water blanching, ultrasound (US), osmotic treatment (OM), high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and freeze-thawing (FT) on garlic, it was revealed that allicin content decreased with increasing drying temperature, however, US and OM pre-treatments retained the allicin content better by shortening the drying time (65).
In contrast, Salamatullah et al. (32) reported that drying resulted in an increase in the TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity of white and red onions. Furthermore, Roman et al. (33) reported that convective drying at 60°C and 70°C increased onion’s total soluble phenolic, antioxidant properties and flavonoid contents. A study conducted by Cecchi et al. (52) showed that onions were cut into two different shapes and subsequently dried at 40°C; onion flakes showed higher flavonoid content and total volatile compounds than onion rings.
A study conducted by Kumari et al. (34) revealed that FD was better than sun drying, HAD, and VD at 55°C ± 5°C; onions dried by FD had intact cell wall structure and were rich in phenolic, flavonoid, and ascorbic acid contents. This may be because of the formation of quinine and H2O2 by the reaction of O2 atoms from the atmosphere with hydrogen atoms from the OH group due to contact with hot air (34). FD onion had the highest ascorbic acid content, whereas a significant decrease in ascorbic acid content was observed in sun drying and HAD owing to termo-sensitive and photo-oxidative reactions (34). A study conducted by Sun et al. (35) showed that the bioactive content ascorbic acid and antioxidant capacity of scallions were better preserved when variable temperatures (from −20°C to −4°C, then to 25°C) were applied during the main drying phase of the VFD process instead of different main drying temperatures (−20°C, −4°C and 25°C).
In a study conducted by Zheng et al. (36), the allicin content of dried garlic was highest in pulsed vacuum drying (PVD) and lowest in IRD. It has been suggested that this can be explained by the fact that drying affects the permeability of plant cell and organelle membranes, thereby causing partial inactivation of alliinase, interrupting allicin synthesis, and leading to allicin destruction (36). Disruption of the cellular structure of garlic increases the likelihood of catalytic hydrolysis, leading to shortening of the cellulose, which was found to be affected by different drying methods, with PVD retaining the SP (Soluble Pectin) best (36). A study conducted by Feng et al. (37) reported that the greatest loss in bioactive compounds of garlic occurred during vacuum-FD and HAD processes, whereas IRD and RHD processes preserved bioactive compounds better. This finding was possibly related to the fact that the drying time of IRD (3.8 h) and RHD (4.6 h) is much shorter than that of vacuum-FD (13.6 h) (at 60°C, excluding vacuum-FD) (37). In a study conducted by Gong et al. (38), FD and IRD processes preserved the active substances of white and purple garlic, including allicin and total phenolics, better than HAD and VD processes (at 60°C except FD). Additionally, dried purple garlic showed significantly higher allicin content, TPC, and antioxidant capacity than dried white garlic (38).
Studies have shown that different drying methods affect bioactive components to different degrees. Drying temperature, drying time, and pre-drying treatments all can influence bioactive compounds. There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the effects of convective drying on the bioactive compound of Allium vegetables, this may be because of the difference of the applied temperature in the studies. Although HAD is a practical and frequently used method, hybrid drying methods combining different drying methods and FD, IRD and RHD are better in preserving bioactive molecules by shortening the drying time.
6. Effect of cooking process on bioactive molecules
Although cooking is a significant step for food safety, it has a profound impact on the bioactive components and antioxidants of vegetables and can negatively influence the nutritional value if not properly applied (22, 41). During heat treatment, various chemical reactions including oxidative degradation, Maillard reaction, caramelization, and amino acid degradation can occur (46).
One study noted that 30-min boiling, and 15-min microwaving increased the antioxidant capacity of several vegetables, including onions (20). This finding is suggested to be related to the release and activation of antioxidant compounds, including phenolic compounds (20). In a different study, when the effect of in vitro digestion on phenolic compounds in yellow and red onions after baking, boiling, frying, and grilling was evaluated, phenolic compounds in baked, fried, and grilled onions increased compared to raw onions, and after in vitro digestion, the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds was highest in baked onions (21). This finding is believed to be because of structural changes that occur during cooking and the release of dietary fiber-bound polyphenols forming the free phenolic compounds (39). In another study, when onion waste-enriched bread was baked, the heat treatment decomposed complex quercetin derivatives, such as dimers or trimers, thereby leading to quercetin release (66). A study conducted by Cattivelli et al. (40) reported that phenolic compounds increased after both air frying (10 min at 200°C) and deep frying (140°C for 10 min in sunflower oil) and that air frying better prevented phenolic compound degradation and showed a high bioaccessibility index in red onion.
A study conducted by İduğ et al. (41) reported that the antioxidant activity and TPC of leek (Allium ampeloprasum) increased after cooking, and the antioxidant activity was higher when boiled for 15 min than that when boiled for 5 min. Alide et al. (42) observed that the increase in temperature increased the extraction of bound phenolic compounds and thus increased the antioxidant activity of garlic. This result was valid only if the cooking water was not poured (42). In a study conducted by Locatelli et al. (43), when the effect of different pre-cooking and cooking treatments on the OSCs of garlic was evaluated, chopped raw garlic had the highest allicin concentration which also influenced the levels of the OSCs formed during cooking and stir-frying leads to the generation of more bioactive compounds in garlic than other cooking treatments.
Conflicting results are noted in the literature about the effect of cooking on the bioactive compounds of Allium vegetables. A study conducted by Çubukçu et al. (45) reported that cooking in the oven at 150°C for 20 min negatively influenced the phenolic content and antioxidant properties of onion and garlic. This may be because of the oxidation process caused by heat treatment, which may lead to the degradation of the antioxidant components (45). Al-Dabbas et al. (44) also reported a decrease in TPC, TFC and AA concentrations by frying. Another study demonstrated that raw green onions have a higher proportion of sulfur-containing compounds than cooked green onions (46). The cooking process degrades bioactive compounds and oxidizes polyphenols, whereas the Maillard reaction leads to the formation of new compounds, so several interacting reactions during the cooking process seem to lead to conflicting results (28, 67).
Heat treatment affects bioactive compounds in Allium vegetables. Cooking process usually increased bioactive compounds. It should be considered that bioactive compounds can pass into the boiling water. Considering the preservation and bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds, pre-cooking chopping, baking, grilling, and frying are among the preferable methods.
7. Conclusion
Each of the preparation and cooking processes affects the bioactive components and antioxidant activities of Allium vegetables. Owing to differences in the matrix and structure of the plant, preparation and cooking processes show different results on bioactive compounds and bioactive activities for different vegetables. During washing, bioactive compounds can transfer to water. Therefore, dry decontamination processes such as UV-C irradiation are preferred for the preservation of bioactive compounds. The bioactive molecules of onion are more concentrated in the outer layers than those in the inner layers, and the peeling process results in the loss of bioactive compounds that are concentrated in the peel. Removing only the outer dry skin during peeling can help reduce the loss. While the positive effect of crushing on the bioactive compounds of garlic is known, wounding can lead to simultaneous production and loss of bioactive compounds in onions.
Bioactive compounds are influenced by the type of drying process, drying temperature, drying time, and predrying processes. Although HAD is a practical and frequently used method, hybrid drying methods combining different drying methods and FD, IRD and RHD are better in preserving bioactive molecules by shortening the drying time.
The release of phenolic compounds because of heat treatment increases the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds of Allium vegetables. Of note, bioactive compounds may transfer to the cooking water; these vegetables should be cooked with as little water as possible or in their own water, and cooking water should not be poured. To preserve phenolic compounds and bioavailability, baking, grilling, and frying are recommended. Continued research is needed to help fill gaps in current knowledge, such as the optimal preparation and cooking processes for each Allium vegetable.
Author contributions
BK: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SN-V: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Fredotović Ž, Puizina J. Edible Allium species: chemical composition, biological activity and health effects. Ital J Food Sci. (2019) 31:19–39. doi: 10.14674/IJFS-1221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ramirez DA, Locatelli DA, González RE, Cavagnaro PF, Camargo AB. Analytical methods for bioactive sulfur compounds in Allium: an integrated review and future directions. J Food Compos Anal. (2017) 61:4–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.09.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kothari D, Lee WD, Kim SK. Allium flavonols: health benefits, molecular targets, and bioavailability. Antioxidants. (2020) 9:888. doi: 10.3390/antiox9090888, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rose P, Whiteman M, Moore PK, Zhu YZ. Bioactive S-alk (en) yl cysteine sulfoxide metabolites in the genus Allium: the chemistry of potential therapeutic agents. Nat Prod Rep. (2005) 22:351–68. doi: 10.1039/B417639C, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.United States Department of Agriculture . USDA National Nutrient Database for standard reference. USDA food composition databases. Beltsville, MD, USA: Nutrient Data Laboratory; (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Loredana L, Giuseppina A, Filomena N, Florinda F, Marisa DM, Donatella A. Biochemical, antioxidant properties and antimicrobial activity of different onion varieties in the Mediterranean area. J Food Meas Charact. (2019) 13:1232–41. doi: 10.1007/s11694-019-00038-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang Y, Liu X, Ruan J, Zhuang X, Zhang X, Li Z. Phytochemicals of garlic: promising candidates for cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 123:109730. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109730, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu P, Weng R, Sheng X, Wang X, Zhang W, Qian Y, et al. Profiling of organosulfur compounds and amino acids in garlic from different regions of China. Food Chem. (2020) 305:125499. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125499, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amagase H. Clarifying the real bioactive constituents of garlic. J Nutr. (2006) 136:716S–25S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.3.716S, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoshimoto N, Saito K. S-Alk (en) ylcysteine sulfoxides in the genus Allium: proposed biosynthesis, chemical conversion, and bioactivities. J Exp Bot. (2019) 70:4123–37. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz243, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bastaki SM, Ojha S, Kalasz H, Adeghate E. Chemical constituents and medicinal properties of Allium species. Mol Cell Biochem. (2021) 476:4301–21. doi: 10.1007/s11010-021-04213-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wan Q, Li N, Du L, Zhao R, Yi M, Xu Q, et al. Allium vegetable consumption and health: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. Food Sci Nutr. (2019) 7:2451–70. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1117, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cattivelli A, Conte A, Martini S, Tagliazucchi D. Cooking and in vitro digestion modulate the anti-diabetic properties of red-skinned onion and dark purple eggplant phenolic compounds. Food Secur. (2022) 11:689. doi: 10.3390/foods11050689, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Atik İ, Dıraman H. Yaygın Olarak Tüketilen Allium Türlerinin Öne Çıkan Özellikleri ve İnsan Sağlığına Etkileri. Gıda ve Yem Bilimi Teknolojisi Dergisi. (2019) 21:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zamri N, Hamid HA. Comparative study of onion (Allium cepa) and leek (Allium ampeloprasum): identification of organosulphur compounds by UPLC-QTOF/MS and anticancer effect on MCF-7 cells. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. (2019) 74:525–30. doi: 10.1007/s11130-019-00770-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paliwal M, Nakhale S, Tewari S. Indian potential health benefits of onion (Allium cepa), garlic (Allium sativum) and turmeric (Curcuma) as prebiotics. Sustain Agri Food Environ Res. (2023):11. doi: 10.7770/safer-V11N1-art81 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rasaratnam K, Nantasenamat C, Phaonakrop N, Roytrakul S, Tanyong D. A novel peptide isolated from garlic shows anticancer effect against leukemic cell lines via interaction with Bcl-2 family proteins. Chem Biol Drug Des. (2021) 97:1017–28. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13831, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.López-Hernández AA, Ortega-Villarreal AS, Rodríguez JAV, Lomelí MLC, González-Martínez BE. Application of different cooking methods to improve nutritional quality of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) regarding its compounds content with antioxidant activity. Int J Gastro Food Sci. (2022) 28:100510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wongsa P, Bhuyar P, Tongkoom K, Spreer W, Müller J. Influence of hot-air drying methods on the phenolic compounds/allicin content, antioxidant activity and α-amylase/α-glucosidase inhibition of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Eur Food Res Technol. (2023) 249:523–35. doi: 10.1007/s00217-022-04150-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ali I, Jaradat N, Zaid AN, Yousef E, Haimoni I, Yaseen A. The effect of different cooking methods on antioxidant activity of fruits and vegetables. J Mater Environ Sci. (2019) 10:7. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cattivelli A, Conte A, Martini S, Tagliazucchi D. Influence of cooking methods on onion phenolic compounds bioaccessibility. Food Secur. (2021) 10:1023. doi: 10.3390/foods10051023, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thakur N, Raigond P, Singh Y, Mishra T, Singh B, Lal MK, et al. Recent updates on bioaccessibility of phytonutrients. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 97:366–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ankara, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü, Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın . Türkiye Beslenme Rehberi 2022 (TÜBER), (2022).
- 24.Azarpazhooh E, Sharayei P. Effect of sanitizing disinfectants on onion puree chemical and microbial properties. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. (2021) 23:290–8. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen C, Hu W, Zhang R, Jiang A, Zou Y. Levels of phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, and microbial counts of fresh-cut onions after treatment with a combination of nisin and citric acid. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. (2016) 57:266–73. doi: 10.1007/s13580-016-0032-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pérez-Gregorio MR, González-Barreiro C, Rial-Otero R, Simal-Gándara J. Comparison of sanitizing technologies on the quality appearance and antioxidant levels in onion slices. Food Control. (2011) 22:2052–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.05.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu G, Wang Y, Hu L, He H. Characterization of the volatile compounds of onion with different fresh-cut styles and storage temperatures. Food Secur. (2022) 11:3829. doi: 10.3390/foods11233829, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han C, Ji Y, Li M, Li X, Jin P, Zheng Y. Influence of wounding intensity and storage temperature on quality and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut welsh onions. Sci Hortic. (2016) 212:203–9. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Varga-Visi É, Jócsák I, Ferenc B, Végvári G. Effect of crushing and heating on the formation of volatile organosulfur compounds in garlic. J Food. (2019) 17:796–803. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2019.1656288 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choi SM, Lee DJ, Kim JY, Lim ST. Volatile composition and sensory characteristics of onion powders prepared by convective drying. Food Chem. (2017) 231:386–92. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.129, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bamba BSB, Komenan ACA, Kouassi KKP, Soro D. Effects of onion bulb processing conditions on drying characteristics, physicochemical and functional properties profile of onion (Allium cepa L.) powder. J Food Sci. (2020) 85:3345–54. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15415, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salamatullah AM, Uslu N, Özcan MM, Alkaltham MS, Hayat K. The effect of oven drying on bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and phenolic compounds of white and red-skinned onion slices. J Food Process Preserv. (2021) 45:e15173. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.15173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roman MC, Fabani MP, Luna LC, Feresin GE, Mazza G, Rodriguez R. Convective drying of yellow discarded onion (Angaco INTA): modelling of moisture loss kinetics and effect on phenolic compounds. Info Process Agri. (2020) 7:333–41. doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2019.07.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kumari A, Gautam G, Chauhan AK, Singh M, Singh A. Effect of different drying methods on nutritional and functional properties of onion powder. Indian J Nutr Diet. (2021) 58:301–16. doi: 10.21048/IJND.2021.58.3.27283 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun Q, Wang Z, Chen L, Zhou C, Okonkwo CE, Tang Y, et al. Effects of main drying temperature on drying characteristics and quality of freeze-dried scallion (Allium fistulosum). Dry Technol. (2023) 41:1755–70. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2023.2184380 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zheng ZA, Wang SY, Wang H, Xiao H, Liu ZL, Pan YH, et al. Comparative study on the influence of various drying techniques on drying characteristics and physicochemical quality of garlic slices. Food Secur. (2023) 12:1314. doi: 10.3390/foods12061314, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Feng Y, Xu B, Yagoub AEA, Ma H, Sun Y, Xu X, et al. Role of drying techniques on physical, rehydration, flavor, bioactive compounds and antioxidant characteristics of garlic. Food Chem. (2021) 343:128404. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128404, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gong H, Wang T, Hua Y, Wang WD, Shi C, Xu HX, et al. Garlic varieties and drying methods affected the physical properties, bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of dried garlic powder. J Food. (2022) 20:111–9. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2022.2093400 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao C, Liu Y, Lai S, Cao H, Guan Y, San Cheang W, et al. Effects of domestic cooking process on the chemical and biological properties of dietary phytochemicals. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2019) 85:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.01.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cattivelli A, Di Lorenzo A, Conte A, Martini S, Tagliazucchi D. Red-skinned onion phenolic compounds stability and bioaccessibility: a comparative study between deep-frying and air-frying. J Food Compos Anal. (2023) 115:105024. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.105024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.İduğ T, Hızlı Güldemir H, Şen A, Güldemir O. Investigation on the effects of cooking methods on anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of five mostly consumed vegetables in winter. Int J Agri Environ Food Sci. (2022) 6:182–8. doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.23 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alide T, Wangila P, Kiprop A. Effect of cooking temperature and time on total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and total in vitro antioxidant activity of garlic. BMC Res Notes. (2020) 13:564–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05404-8, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Locatelli DA, Altamirano JC, González RE, Camargo AB. Home-cooked garlic remains a healthy food. J Funct Foods. (2015) 16:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.04.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Al-Dabbas M, Joudeh K, Abughoush M, Al-Dalali S. Effect of processing and preservation methods on total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of garlic (allium sativum). J Chil Chem Soc. (2023) 68:5822–6. doi: 10.4067/s0717-97072023000205822 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Çubukçu HC, Kılıçaslan NSD, Durak İ. Different effects of heating and freezing treatments on the antioxidant properties of broccoli, cauliflower, garlic and onion. An experimental in vitro study. São Paulo Med J. (2019) 137:407–13. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.004406082019, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bi J, Li B, Chen Z, Yang Z, Ping C, Gao Y, et al. Comparative study of volatile flavor compounds in green onion (Allium fistulosum L.) processed with different cooking methods. Int J Gastron Food Sci. (2024) 35:100878. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100878 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ren F, Nian Y, Perussello CA. Effect of storage, food processing and novel extraction technologies on onions flavonoid content: a review. Food Res Int. (2020) 132:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Raffo A, Paoletti F. Fresh-cut vegetables processing: environmental sustainability and food safety issues in a comprehensive perspective. Front Sustain Food Syst. (2022) 5:681459. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.681459 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ogawa Y, Hashimoto M, Takiguchi Y, Usami T, Suthiluk P, Yoshida K, et al. Effect of decontamination treatment on vitamin C and potassium attributes of fresh-cut bell pepper at post-washing stage. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2018) 11:1230–5. doi: 10.1007/s11947-018-2096-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aslam R, Alam MS, Pandiselvam R. Aqueous ozone sanitization system for fresh produce: design, development, and optimization of process parameters for minimally processed onion. Ozone Sci Eng. (2022) 44:3–16. doi: 10.1080/01919512.2021.1984206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pradas-Baena I, Moreno-Rojas JM, de Castro ML. Effect of processing on active compounds in fresh-cut vegetables. Processing and impact on active components in food. Academic Press. (2015) 212:3–10. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404699-3.00001-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cecchi L, Ieri F, Vignolini P, Mulinacci N, Romani A. Characterization of volatile and flavonoid composition of different cuts of dried onion (Allium cepa L.) by HS-SPME-GC-MS, HS-SPME-GC× GC-TOF and HPLC-DAD. Molecules. (2020) 25:408. doi: 10.3390/molecules25020408, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.FAO . Crop production statistics. Food and agriculture organization. (2022). Available at:https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Accessed on November 20, 2023
- 54.Oyinloye TM, Yoon WB. Effect of freeze-drying on quality and grinding process of food produce: a review. PRO. (2020) 8:354. doi: 10.3390/pr8030354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Aboud SA, Altemimi AB, Al-HiIphy ARB, Yi-Chen L, Cacciola F. A comprehensive review on infrared heating applications in food processing. Molecules. (2019) 24:4125. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224125, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.González-Cavieres L, Perez-Won M, Tabilo-Munizaga G, Jara-Quijada E, Díaz-Álvarez R, Lemus-Mondaca R. Advances in vacuum microwave drying (VMD) systems for food products. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2021) 116:626–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sasongko SB, Hadiyanto H, Djaeni M, Perdanianti AM, Utari FD. Effects of drying temperature and relative humidity on the quality of dried onion slice. Heliyon. (2020) 6:e04338. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04338, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mishra S, Parth K, Balavignesh V, Sharma A, Kumar N, Kaur EA. A study on the dehydration of fruits using novel drying techniques. Pharm Innovation J. (2022) 11:1071–80. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sidhu JS, Ali M, Al-Rashdan A, Ahmed N. Onion (Allium cepa L.) is potentially a good source of important antioxidants. J Food Sci Technol. (2019) 56:1811–9. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03625-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bahram-Parvar M, Lim LT. Fresh-cut onion: a review on processing, health benefits, and shelf-life. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2018) 17:290–308. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gennaro L, Leonardi C, Esposito F, Salucci M, Maiani G, Quaglia G, et al. Flavonoid and carbohydrate contents in Tropea red onions: effects of homelike peeling and storage. J Agric Food Chem. (2002) 50:1904–10. doi: 10.1021/jf011102r, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sagar NA, Pareek S. Fortification of multigrain flour with onion skin powder as a natural preservative: effect on quality and shelf life of the bread. Food Biosci. (2021) 41:100992. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.100992 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Barrett DM, Beaulieu JC, Shewfelt R. Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2010) 50:369–89. doi: 10.1080/10408391003626322, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Berno ND, Orsi B, de Abreu Vieira AP, Baldassin S, Kluge RA. Cut type and storage temperature on the quality of minimally processed onions. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha. (2019) 20. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guo X, Hao Q, Qiao X, Li M, Qiu Z, Zheng Z, et al. An evaluation of different pretreatment methods of hot-air drying of garlic: drying characteristics, energy consumption and quality properties. LWT. (2023) 180:114685. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114685 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bedrníček J, Jirotková D, Kadlec J, Laknerová I, Vrchotová N, Tříska J, et al. Thermal stability and bioavailability of bioactive compounds after baking of bread enriched with different onion by-products. Food Chem. (2020) 319:126562. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126562, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Manzocco L, Calligaris S, Mastrocola D, Nicoli MC, Lerici CR. Review of non-enzymatic browning and antioxidant capacity in processed foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2000) 11:340–6. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00014-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]


