Skip to main content
BMC Public Health logoLink to BMC Public Health
. 2024 Jul 2;24:1767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19280-5

Mapping global prevalence of menopausal symptoms among middle-aged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yiqiao Fang 1,2,3,#, Fen Liu 4,#, Xinyue Zhang 3,5, Lei Chen 1,2,3, Yang Liu 6, Lin Yang 7, Xiaofeng Zheng 8, Jiaye Liu 1,2,3, Kewei Li 9,, Zhihui Li 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11220992  PMID: 38956480

Abstract

Background

Women at middle age are puzzled by a series of menopausal disturbances, can be distressing and considerably affect the personal, social and work lives. We aim to estimate the global prevalence of nineteen menopausal symptoms among middle-aged women by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases from January, 2000 to March, 2023 for relevant studies. Random-effect model with double-arcsine transformation was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of 321 studies comprised of 482,067 middle-aged women were included for further analysis. We found varied prevalence of menopausal symptoms, with the highest prevalence of joint and muscular discomfort (65.43%, 95% CI 62.51–68.29) and lowest of formication (20.5%, 95% CI 13.44–28.60). Notably, South America shared dramatically high prevalence in a sort of menopausal symptoms including depression and urogenital symptoms. Besides, countries with high incomes (49.72%) had a significantly lower prevalence of hot flashes than those with low (65.93%), lower-middle (54.17%), and upper-middle (54.72%, p < 0.01), while personal factors, such as menopausal stage, had an influence on most menopausal symptoms, particularly in vaginal dryness. Prevalence of vagina dryness in postmenopausal women (44.81%) was 2-fold higher than in premenopausal women (21.16%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, a remarkable distinction was observed between body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of sleep problems, depression, anxiety and urinary problems.

Conclusion

The prevalence of menopausal symptoms affected by both social and personal factors which calls for attention from general public.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-024-19280-5.

Keywords: Menopause, Prevalence, Middle-aged women, Somatic, Psychological, Urogenital

Background

Female hormones play a pivotal role in women’s life. Their rise initiate puberty, makes motherhood possible, and ensure cardioprotective functions and bone health [1, 2]. However, regardless of their cultural background and medical histories, nearly all women start to have physical, psychological and emotional disturbances after mid-forties [3]. Those turmoil coincide with the loss of ovarian reproductive function, is an inevitable component of ageing and happens at a time in a woman’s life when she is frequently actively involved in raising her family or handling a full-time job, during which time she might also have the responsibility of caring for ageing parents [4]. The majority of women affected by marked fluctuations in levels of sex hormones are often puzzled by the remarkable changes in mood, sleep patterns, and memory, as well as the onset of vasomotor and urogenital symptoms [5]. These menopause-related symptoms, which actually begin before menstrual cycles ends and prevalent in middle-aged women, can be very distressing and considerably affect the personal, social and work lives of women [5, 6].

Nowadays, the relationship between psychosomatic symptoms and the women’s overall well-being is currently the focus of research across many fields, going from medical to social sciences. While epidemiological studies have provided a similar picture of menopausal symptoms trajectories in all geographical regions and ethnicities, there are significant differences in the prevalence of certain symptoms. For instance, vasomotor symptoms (VMS), characterized by hot flashes and/or night sweats, are the main symptoms of menopause. The US-based Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) reports that the prevalence of VMS is 50–82% among US women who go through natural menopause [7]. A radically lower prevalence, ranging from 36 to 50% in Norther America to 22–63% in Asia [8]. Likewise, disparities in the prevalence of depression in middle-aged women across different countries were noted. According to an Indian study, the prevalence of depression was approximately 40.0%, which is comparable to Brazil’s prevalence of 36.8% [9, 10]. Besides, depression is somewhat less common in the Chinese population with an estimate of 25.99% [11]. These differences might be explained by the fact that most cross-cultural studies only involved small numbers of participants and have mostly been restricted to one country or continent.

Over the past decade, data from epidemiological studies involving middle-aged women have been made available for investigators in the field of menopause. However, the current understanding of the epidemiology of menopause-related symptoms is based mostly on a few geographic surveys and very little national evidence, without rigorous systemic data that explores not only the general prevalence of menopause-related symptoms, but also risk factors associated with them. Besides, there is a paucity of articles to describe the global prevalence of menopausal symptoms from multiple domains, and most studies are limited to a certain symptom. For example, a meta-analysis of 10 studies conducted in Indian population showed that the prevalence of depression in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women was 42.47% [12] and another meta-analysis involving 41 studies found that the overall prevalence of sleep disorders among postmenopausal women was 51.6% [13]. Therefore, we performed current study aim to close this void by presenting an updated global epidemiology of nineteen menopause-related symptoms, providing subgroup analysis across geographic regions and synthesizing critical risk factors.

Methods

We carried out a meta-analysis of all published studies on the prevalence of menopausal symptoms from January, 2000 through March, 2023 in accordance with the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of nineteen menopause-related symptoms included in this study were classified into four domains: somatic symptoms (hot flashes, sleep problems, heart discomfort, headache, and joint and muscular discomfort), psychological symptoms (physical and mental exhaustion, depression, anxiety, irritability and mood swings), urogenital symptoms (sexual problems, vaginal dryness, and urinary problems) and others (forgetfulness, difficult concentration, formication, change in the appearance, texture, or tone of skin, increased facial hair, and drying skin). The study protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023486818).

Search strategy and selection criteria

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases using the relevant medical subject heading search terms and keywords. Full details of the search strategy for each database can be found in the Supplementary method. Datasets from studies that fulfilled the following criteria were deemed eligible: (a) P: participants were middle-aged women in premenopausal, perimenopausal or postmenopausal stages according to the WHO’s classification; (b) O: Adequate information for the pooled estimate of menopausal symptoms prevalence; (c) O: prevalence of menopausal symptoms was determined using standardized instruments, self-reported questionnaires, face-to-face, telephone or mail interviews; (d) S: Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control study designs; (e) studies in English; (f) studies published between 2000 and 2023. Studies were excluded if (a) P: participants seeking treatment for menopausal symptoms in hospitals; (b) S: studies were conference paper, abstract, letters, review or meta-analysis; (c) study size less than 50.

Pre-determined decision rules were used to screen studies. After removal of duplicate articles, two reviewers (Y.F and J.L) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all articles identified by the literature search, with 10% of studies randomly reviewed by another investigator (K.L). Then the investigators reviewed (Y.F and K.Z) the complete texts of theoretically qualifying papers, with any inconsistencies settled through agreement or by another reviewer (Z.L). Consensus was found in all cases and agreement was reached. More details refer to included articles are presented in the Supplementary materials.

Quality assessment and data extraction

The methodological quality of epidemiological studies was assessed using a scale developed by Parker et al. [14]. with the following items: sampling methods; response rate; the definition and representative of targeted population and the validation of assessment instrument.

We extracted the following variables from included literature: the first author of the study, country, continent, income level of the country assessed by the World Bank, the status of country development, year of publication, study quality, diagnosis criteria, sample size and prevalence proportion. Moreover, a comparison was made of the prevalence of menopausal symptoms classified by menopausal status (premenopause, perimenopause or postmenopause), marital status (married or single/divorced/widowed), educational level (less than 12 years or more than 12 years), residence (urban or rural), physical activity (regular or irregular), employment (unemployed or employment), BMI (underweight, normal weight, overweight or obesity), current smoking (YES/NO), alcohol use (YES/NO). Menopausal status was defined in accordance to the WHO’s classification. To elucidate this distribution, women with regular menstrual bleeding during the last year were classified as premenopause, those with irregular bleeding during the last 12 months as perimenopause. Finally, women were classified as postmenopaused, if they had no menstrual bleeding from 1 year and above. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the actual weight, in kilograms, divided by height, in meters squared, relying on the anthropometric inputs (height, weight) measured respectively by a stadiometer and a digital scale, by the research team, the day of the recruitment. It was then categorized according to the WHO cut-off points: underweight if less than 18.5, normal if between 18.5 and 24.9, overweight if between 25 and 29.9 and obese from 30 and above [15]. When multiple articles of the same study population were identified, we included them if the data differed by time on prevalence of menopausal symptoms. Whenever important information was missing, we contacted corresponding authors.

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using R software (V4.0.0) with “Meta” and “Metafor” statistical packages. Heterogeneity across included studies was measured with I2. Estimates with I2 of 50% or greater was considered as moderate heterogeneity. The double-arcsine transformation was used for variance stabilization of proportions, and pooled estimates of the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in all studies were calculated using the random-effects approach, due to the heterogeneity. The meta-prop command was used to generate forest plots of pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Wilson score method. Subgroup analyses were conducted and defined by geographical location, income level of the country, the status of country development, year of publication, study quality, diagnosis criteria, and sample size. Social characteristics of participants were compared with the prevalence of each menopausal symptoms to determine the pooled estimates of risk factors. To reduce the probability of committing a type I error due to the high number of subgroup comparisons, Bonferroni correction was used. The p value < 0.05 was considered as significant difference. For more details, the R code of this study has been added in the supplementary material.

Certainty of evidence

The quality of pooled evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

Results

Search results and study characteristics

Our search strategy identified 102,263 records, of which 52,250 records were retained after removing duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened, resulting in the exclusion of 48,444 ineligible records. Following an eligibility assessment of the full texts of the remaining 3,806 records, 3,485 were deemed ineligible. Overall, 321 eligible studies with data reporting menopausal symptoms involving 482,067 middle-aged women met our inclusion criteria and included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). Hot flashes were the symptom with the most articles featured which including 265 articles comprising 349,608 middle-aged females, formation had the fewest, with 16 articles containing 52,195 individuals. The majority of included studies had a cross-sectional design. The quality assessment scores of included studies are displayed in Supplementary Table 1. Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of nineteen symptoms is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Study flow diagram

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Pooled estimate prevalence of nineteen menopausal symptoms among middle-aged women

Pooled prevalence, subgroup analysis, and risk factors for somatic symptoms

In somatic domain, hot flashes were one of the most common menopausal symptoms with a pooled prevalence of 52.65% (95% CI 50.24–55.06, I2 = 99.51%, Supplementary Fig. 1). Different continents showed varying prevalence, and Africa had the highest prevalence (64.43%, 95% CI 56.78–71.73) while Oceania had the lowest prevalence (39.92%, 95% CI 30.56–49.66, p < 0.01, Table 1). Among countries containing at least three relevant studies, Egypt had the highest (72.56%, 95% CI 58.15–84.91) and Finland had the lowest (14.54%, 95% CI 5.82–26.29, p < 0.01, Table 1) hot flashes prevalence among middle-aged women. When taking into account the countries’ economic levels, those with high incomes had a significantly lower prevalence of 49.72% (95% CI 46.19–53.25) when compared to upper-middle (54.72%, 95% CI 50.08–59.31), lower-middle (54.17%, 95% CI 49.57–58.73) and low-income countries (65.93%, 95% CI 59.61–71.98, p < 0.01, Table 1). Furthermore, the hot flashes prevalence was substantially lower before 2011 (48.7%, 95% CI 44.78–52.63) than publications after 2011 (55.48%, 95% CI 52.51–58.43, p < 0.01, Table 1). In terms of diagnostic tool, the 10-item Cervantes Scale (CS-10) [16] produced the highest hot flashes prevalence (69.95%, 95% CI 53.7-83.96) while the Simplified Menopausal Index (SMI) [17] had the lowest prevalence (39.26%, 95% CI 27.45–51.74, Table 1). It should be mentioned that hot flashes in middle-aged women appeared to be universally prevalent in both developing countries (54.02%, 95% CI 50.75–57.27) and developed countries (50.39%, 95% CI 46.91–53.86, p = 0.14, Table 1). In order to find the risk factors of hot flashes, we pooled estimate relevant factors. Stratified by menopausal stage, we found middle-aged women in perimenopausal (56.52%, 95% CI 51.54–61.43) and postmenopausal stage (56.74%, 95% CI 52.8-60.64) with dramatically higher hot flashes prevalence than those in premenopausal stage (31.31%, 95% CI 26.46–36.38, p < 0.01, Table 1). However, minimal differences were observed among age (p = 0.69), physical activity (p = 0.82), body mass index (BMI, p = 0.86), residence (p = 0.39), current employment status (p = 0.65), current drinking habit (p = 0.76), current smoking habit (p = 0.48), marital status (p = 0.14) and education level (p = 0.71). Besides, we also pooled estimate prevalence of other somatic symptoms. The prevalence of sleep problems, heart discomfort, headaches, and joint and muscular discomfort were 51.89% (95% CI 49.55–54.22, I2 = 99.41%, Supplementary Figs. 2), 42.12% (95% CI 38.85–45.42, I2 = 99.46%, Supplementary Figs. 3), 43.91% (95% CI 40.64–47.21, I2 = 99.43%, Supplementary Figs. 4) and 65.43% (95% CI 65.51–68.29, I2 = 99.54%, Supplementary Fig. 5). The subgroup analysis and risk factor analysis for these somatic symptoms were listed in Supplementary Tables 25, respectively.

Table 1.

Subgroup analysis and pooled estimates of risk factors for hot flashes prevalence among middle-aged women

Subgroup Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Country < 0.01
China 32 31,022 82,951 43.39 36.78–50.11
Nepal 7 1810 4386 45.91 30.52–61.71
Nigeria 8 1790 3567 57.03 45.38–68.3
Ecuador 11 3132 5067 62.8 56.68–68.72
Spain 7 7214 14,049 50.45 42.07–58.81
Iran 11 5484 8474 68.35 54.6-80.64
India 41 6897 13,448 52 45.71–58.27
Ethiopia 1 149 226 65.93 59.61–71.98
Turkey 11 4411 6548 68.92 54.7-81.52
Saudi Arabia 8 1887 2771 66.54 57.46–75.05
Korea 9 6315 13,802 54.33 41.69–66.7
Taiwan 7 11,293 23,754 37.23 21.4-54.59
UK 7 8538 16,002 61.77 51.04–71.95
France 2 609 900 64.07 38.53–85.95
Germany 3 1878 2789 61.11 44.42–76.57
Belgium 1 487 594 81.99 78.79–84.98
Netherlands 3 2608 6014 57.3 35.52–77.7
Switzerland 2 594 901 61.98 34.56–85.8
Australia 14 5465 16,232 40.79 30.83–51.13
Japan 9 4904 9286 48.68 38.62–58.79
Oman 1 202 472 42.8 38.36–47.29
Multi 5 11,183 21,197 53.25 41.54–64.78
Macau 1 251 442 56.79 52.14–61.38
Peru 2 865 1002 92.19 71.02–100
Pakistan 8 3420 6267 40.23 24.15–57.45
Malaysia 7 771 1504 53.26 44.24–62.18
Sri Lanka 2 429 1033 42.43 35.49–49.53
Mexico 4 3354 9086 47.33 27.3-67.82
Brazil 5 1610 2878 50.08 41.09–59.07
USA 19 12,233 24,827 51.5 46.37–56.62
Lebanon 2 522 898 55.49 41.15–69.38
Singapore 2 192 1151 16.67 14.57–18.89
Greece 1 704 1025 68.68 65.81–71.49
Philippines 1 145 195 74.36 67.98–80.26
Indonesia 4 808 1622 37.23 10.68–68.85
Thailand 4 668 1080 59.9 53.16–66.46
Vietnam 1 100 100 100 98.29–100
Italy 2 544 1329 44.27 31.62–57.32
Sweden 2 3485 7017 57.14 40.74–72.77
Poland 1 226 349 64.76 59.66–69.69
Iraq 2 612 842 72.7 69.62–75.68
Finland 3 467 4003 14.54 5.82–26.29
Egypt 5 2507 3704 72.56 58.15–84.91
Bangladesh 4 578 1375 44.39 24.47–65.29
Qatar 1 431 1158 37.22 34.46–40.03
United Arab Emirates 1 129 390 33.08 28.49–37.83
Norway 1 8333 12,985 64.17 63.35-65
Cambodia 1 118 177 66.67 59.53–73.44
New Zealand 1 1030 3616 28.48 27.02–29.97
South Africa 1 46 63 73.02 61.3-83.34
Israel 1 208 612 33.99 30.28–37.79
Libya 1 64 86 74.42 64.61–83.14
Hong Kong 3 373 1433 33.79 6.18–69.72
Morocco 1 182 299 60.87 55.27–66.33
Panama 1 93 129 72.09 64.01–79.53
Chile 1 120 198 60.61 53.69–67.31
Portugal 1 251 728 34.48 31.07–37.97
Bolivia 1 58 125 46.4 37.7-55.21
Colombia 2 1279 1954 80.37 42.14–99.8
Paraguay 1 117 216 54.17 47.48–60.78
Jordan 2 93 280 27.73 0-88.34
Continent < 0.01
Asia 183 84,073 186,451 50.99 47.67–54.3
Africa 17 4738 7945 64.43 56.78–71.73
South America 24 10,555 17,519 63.34 56.24–70.16
Europe 38 39,790 77,277 53.67 47.61–59.67
Oceania 15 6495 19,848 39.92 30.56–49.66
North America 24 15,680 34,042 51.62 46.2-57.03
Multi 2 3957 6526 59.94 31.08–85.46
Income level < 0.01
Upper-Middle-Income 87 49,648 117,005 54.72 50.08–59.31
Lower-Middle-Income 97 24,848 45,670 54.17 49.57–58.73
High-Income 117 87,269 180,628 49.72 46.19–53.25
Low-Income 1 149 226 65.93 59.61–71.98
Development status 0.14
Developing 189 84,578 183,516 54.02 50.75–57.27
Developed 112 75,983 157,007 50.39 46.91–53.86
Publication date < 0.01
Before 2011 127 51,295 118,568 48.7 44.78–52.63
After 2011 176 113,993 231,040 55.48 52.51–58.43
Study size 0.01
< 1000 223 42,756 79,780 54.45 51.58–57.31
> 1000 80 122,532 269,828 47.74 43.49–52.01
Study quality 0.28
< 8 42 29,871 75,903 53.21 50.6-55.82
≥ 8 261 135,417 273,705 49.44 43.19–55.71
Diagnostic tool < 0.01
KMI [18] 25 30,173 75,754 42.43 36.31–48.67
MRS [19] 82 35,063 62,420 58.52 54.85–62.15
Others 73 40,151 78,506 54.77 49.38–60.1
Face-to-face interview 62 33,366 78,534 45.85 39.84–51.91
The Greene Climacteric Scale 17 6618 14,279 47.63 36.15–59.23
The Keio questionnaire [20] 3 2331 3420 61.78 39.22–81.95
SMI 2 920 2338 39.26 27.45–51.74
MENQOL [21] 28 8782 20,224 54.4 47.14–61.58
Hot Flush Rating Scale [22] 7 6238 11,569 56.1 47.11–64.89
CS-10 2 1427 2190 69.95 53.7-83.96
WHAS [23] 2 219 374 61.17 31.27–87.09
Risk factors Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Menopausal stage < 0.01
Premenopause 68 12,966 50,939 31.31 26.46–36.38
Perimenopause 75 18,525 37,720 56.52 51.54–61.43
Postmenopause 115 47,621 89,453 56.74 52.8-60.64
Age 0.69
< 50 13 4561 14,554 49.61 34.17–65.09
≥ 50 28 11,331 20,805 53.22 44.84–61.51
Physical activity 0.82
Regular 6 1097 2138 48.95 39.28–58.65
Irregular 5 950 1914 51.44 32.29–70.37
Body mass index 0.86
Underweight 3 186 314 48.45 23.82–73.43
Normal weight 3 1270 2013 53.8 32.73–74.18
Overweight 5 677 1249 57.58 46.74–68.08
Obesity 7 1043 1853 58.81 50.38–66.98
Urban or rural 0.39
Rural 23 9275 17,423 51.98 45.6-58.33
Urban 17 10,383 22,115 57.59 46.34–68.47
Work 0.65
Working 7 1286 3124 55.55 39.86–70.71
Non-working 6 806 1544 61.41 41.17–79.8
Current drinking habit 0.76
Yes 5 914 1850 48.68 39.33–58.08
No 4 1274 2510 51.12 38.86–63.3
Current smoking 0.48
Yes 9 343 630 53.42 42.76–63.95
No 8 2983 5953 49.07 43.46–54.7
Marital status 0.14
Single 3 115 241 47.97 39.25–56.76
Married 3 769 1353 57.03 50.99–62.98
Divorced or Widowed 3 247 399 63.67 47.24–78.63
Education level 0.71
< 12 years 8 2177 3962 52.77 42.07–63.34
> 12 years 9 1449 3105 49.88 39.11–60.64

*KMI: The modified Kupperman Menopausal Index; MRS: The Menopause Rating Scale; SMI: Simplified; Menopausal Index; MENQOL: The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life; CS-10:10-item Cervantes Scale; WHAS: the Women’s Health Assessment Scale

Pooled prevalence, subgroup analysis, and risk factors for psychological symptoms

Depression was the psychological symptoms that had the greatest number of included publications. The pooled depression prevalence in middle-aged women was 43.34% (95% CI 40.29–46.42, I2 = 99.65%, Supplementary Fig. 6). The prevalence varied by countries, with Cambodia having the highest prevalence (81.36%, 95% CI 75.26–86.78) and Bolivia having the lowest one (10.4%, 95% CI 5.58–16.43, Table 2). When depression was measured by continents, the greatest estimate was found in South America (54.38%, 95% CI 42.23–66.27), whereas lowest estimate in Europe (33.88%, 95% CI 30.08–37.79, p < 0.01, Table 2). The lowest prevalence was seen in studies conducted in high-income countries (37.64%, 95% CI 33.78–41.58), compared with those in upper-middle (42.78%, 95% CI 37.38–48.26), lower-middle (49.99%, 95% CI 43.74–56.24) and low-income countries (46.02%, 95% CI 39.55–52.55, p < 0.01, Table 2). When studies were categorized by diagnostic tools, we found that studies using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) [24] (58.91%, 95% CI 50.28–67.28) had a significantly higher prevalence of depression than those using the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire [25] (7.21%, 95% CI 1.85–15.32, p < 0.01, Table 2). Besides, results indicated that a significant difference in depression prevalence was found in the pooled estimate among development status (developing/developed, 45.57% vs. 39.08%, p = 0.03, Table 2), publication date (before 2011 or after 2011, 37.48% vs. 47.35%, p < 0.01, Table 2), and study size (more than 1000 participants or less than 1000 participants, 36.09% vs. 45.69%, p < 0.01, Table 2). Similar to most menopausal symptoms, women in premenopausal stage (36.27%, 95% CI 30.14–42.63) shared a significantly lower depression prevalence than those in perimenopausal (47.3%, 95% CI 40.89–53.76) and postmenopausal stage (47.62%, 95% CI 42.48–52.78, p = 0.01, Table 2). It is interesting to note that women with normal weight had lowest prevalence of depression (p < 0.01, Table 2). Moreover, we pooled prevalence of other four psychological symptoms. Physical and mental exhaustion had the highest prevalence (64.13%, 95% CI 60.93–67.27, I2 = 99.54%, Supplementary Fig. 7), followed by irritability (54.37%, 95% CI 50.80–57.92, I2 = 99.35%, Supplementary Fig. 8), anxiety (50.53%, 95% CI 46.65–54.40, I2 = 99.50%, Supplementary Fig. 9), and mood swings (49.03%, 95% CI 43.65–54.43, I2 = 99.55%, Supplementary Fig. 10). The subgroup analysis and risk factor analysis for these psychological symptoms were listed in Supplementary Tables 69, respectively.

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis and pooled estimates of risk factors for depression prevalence among middle-aged women

Subgroup Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Country < 0.01
China 24 14,860 67,753 27.51 21.97–33.41
Nepal 7 1463 4386 42.52 19.95–66.86
Nigeria 9 1187 3947 30.91 16.06–48.11
Iran 9 3701 5580 69.31 51.43–84.62
India 32 3585 7415 49.03 39.91–58.17
Ethiopia 1 104 226 46.02 39.55–52.55
Turkey 10 2305 4587 53.37 41.41–65.15
Saudi Arabia 7 1699 2361 64.22 46.82–79.89
UK 6 2122 6646 35.58 29.35–42.07
France 2 225 900 24.99 22.21–27.88
Germany 2 269 896 28.61 20.21–37.82
Belgium 2 228 673 35.02 28.5-41.83
Netherlands 2 243 901 25.51 17.2-34.83
Switzerland 2 225 901 23.49 15.25–32.87
Spain 5 5118 13,600 34.34 28.95–39.93
Australia 9 2108 4563 43.64 31.75–55.91
Japan 5 2706 5662 47.27 28.41–66.53
Oman 1 182 472 38.56 34.21-43
Multi 4 7238 14,740 47.24 39.18–55.38
Macau 1 317 442 71.72 67.42–75.83
Ecuador 5 1188 1618 72.85 66.62–78.66
Peru 1 578 771 74.97 71.85–77.96
Malaysia 5 634 1316 50.74 35.29–66.12
Sri Lanka 2 327 1033 34.95 14.07–59.44
Mexico 3 4345 12,938 41.23 19.75–64.64
Brazil 4 1219 2745 43.84 34.89-53
Korea 5 7765 50,745 40.85 22.56–60.56
Pakistan 4 2788 4176 46.69 25.53–68.49
Greece 2 515 1125 45.76 42.85–48.69
Italy 2 132 635 20.8 12.11–31.09
Iraq 2 306 842 39.88 0-97.57
USA 13 5403 20,366 36.21 29.13–43.61
Egypt 5 2192 3704 62.03 45.14–77.54
Bangladesh 4 879 1375 71.55 46.25–91.18
Qatar 2 645 2259 28.57 23.74–33.67
United Arab Emirates 1 101 390 25.9 21.66–30.37
Cambodia 1 144 177 81.36 75.26–86.78
Taiwan 7 12,866 26,137 23.71 11.51–38.63
Sweden 1 72 108 66.67 57.46–75.28
Indonesia 2 638 1318 58.23 23.07–89.16
New Zealand 1 1045 3616 28.9 27.43–30.39
South Africa 1 17 63 26.98 16.66–38.7
Libya 1 56 86 65.12 54.69–74.88
Morocco 1 84 299 28.09 23.13–33.33
Singapore 1 132 656 20.12 17.14–23.28
Thailand 2 163 298 54.86 35.07–73.89
Hong Kong 1 89 150 59.33 51.35–67.08
Portugal 1 266 579 45.94 41.89–50.01
Poland 1 92 241 38.17 32.13–44.41
Belarus 1 57 119 47.9 38.95–56.92
Bolivia 1 13 125 10.4 5.58–16.43
Canada 1 2436 13,216 18.43 17.78–19.1
Jordan 1 57 143 39.86 31.96–48.03
Lebanon 1 111 271 40.96 35.17–46.88
Finland 1 32 158 20.25 14.32–26.9
Continent < 0.01
Asia 137 58,463 189,944 45.61 41.28–49.98
Africa 18 3640 8325 41.71 30.11–53.8
Europe 31 12,025 32,273 33.88 30.08–37.79
Oceania 10 3153 8179 42.08 31.13–53.44
South America 13 6136 12,202 54.38 42.23–66.27
North America 17 12,184 46,520 35.96 29.17–43.04
Multi 1 1671 3006 55.59 53.81–57.36
Income level < 0.01
Upper-Middle-Income 63 28,084 97,591 42.78 37.38–48.26
Lower-Middle-Income 78 17,112 33,806 49.99 43.74–56.24
Low-Income 1 104 226 46.02 39.55–52.55
High-Income 84 49,145 162,747 37.64 33.78–41.58
Development status 0.03
Developing 146 56,394 154,561 45.57 41.33–49.83
Developed 79 36,380 136,803 39.08 35.26–42.96
Publication date < 0.01
Before 2011 91 27,348 77,182 37.48 33.77–41.26
After 2011 136 69,924 223,267 47.35 43.02–51.7
Study size < 0.01
< 1000 173 27,620 61,286 45.69 42.09–49.31
> 1000 54 69,652 239,163 36.09 30.93–41.42
Study quality 0.76
< 8 35 15,311 52,827 44.41 37.07–51.87
≥ 8 192 81,961 247,622 43.14 39.79–46.53
Diagnostic tool < 0.01
KMI 13 12,177 47,121 29.78 22.36–37.76
MRS 66 28,908 51,731 58.64 53.92–63.29
Face-to-face interview 44 11,745 47,432 29.38 24.76–34.21
Others 33 18,916 41,213 34.87 28.16–41.9
The Greene Climacteric Scale 13 4736 10,813 47.36 39.31–55.48
SMI 2 695 2338 28.46 4.94–61.45
MENQOL 22 4569 8439 58.91 50.28–67.28
SDS [26] 4 778 4254 31.56 3.91–70.18
PHQ-9 [27] 6 3320 15,512 44.32 19.73–70.5
BDI [28] 10 1057 2670 40.09 26.77–54.18
CES-D [29] 9 8370 61,762 31.29 22.71–40.57
HAM-D [30] 3 1834 3608 49.65 39.12–60.19
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire 2 167 3556 7.12 1.85–15.32
Risk factors Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Menopausal stage 0.01
Premenopause 58 13,274 67,522 36.27 30.14–42.63
Perimenopause 57 12,111 38,119 47.3 40.89–53.76
Postmenopause 97 31,129 91,152 47.62 42.48–52.78
Age 0.97
< 50 14 1604 6203 36.77 24.91–49.5
≥ 50 23 3302 10,049 37.08 28.2-46.42
Physical activity 0.85
Regular 7 1053 5260 38.11 15.37–64.02
Irregular 7 2119 10,091 41.05 23.69–59.62
Body mass index < 0.01
Underweight 3 227 929 24.35 21.62–27.18
Normal weight 3 1965 11,380 17.56 15.62–19.58
Overweight 7 1611 7935 27.09 16.99–38.54
Obesity 9 1479 5285 43.1 25.46–61.67
Urban or rural 0.81
Rural 20 7027 17,856 43.73 32.44–55.35
Urban 10 5862 19,046 46.95 24.5-70.07
Work 0.92
Working 11 2691 10,574 39.36 26.42–53.06
Non-working 10 1532 5031 40.61 24.17–58.2
Current drinking habit 0.24
Yes 5 985 6496 16.15 9.56–24.02
No 5 4940 46,123 27.99 11.14–48.88
Current smoking 0.31
Yes 10 787 3002 25.61 17.38–34.74
No 10 10,035 77,160 20.26 13.18–28.41
Marital status 0.69
Single, Divorced or Widowed 12 1984 8689 40.65 22.69–59.97
Married 12 4893 27,465 35.41 18.91–53.92
Education level 0.36
< 12 years 16 6187 36,671 35.98 22.08–51.2
> 12 years 12 5468 45,214 26.03 13.99–40.05

*KMI: The modified Kupperman Menopausal Index; MRS: The Menopause Rating Scale; SMI: Simplified Menopausal Index; MENQOL: The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life; SDS: Self-rating Depression Scale; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9; BDI: Beck depression inventory; CES-D: the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; HAM-D: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

Pooled prevalence, subgroup analysis, and risk factors for urogenital symptoms

Sexual problems account for the highest prevalence (45.45%, 95% CI 41.89–49.04, I2 = 99.56%, Supplementary Fig. 11) among urogenital symptoms, with vagina dryness (37.34%, 95% CI 34.30-40.44, I2 = 99.40%, Supplementary Fig. 12) and urinary problems (34.49%, 95% CI 31.70-37.34, I2 = 99.42%, Supplementary Fig. 13) following closely behind. Moreover, the results indicated that there was a substantial variation in the prevalence of these three urogenital symptoms among countries (p < 0.01, Table 3). When assessed by continents, South America (60.94%, 95% CI 53.24–68.38, p < 0.01, Table 3) had the highest estimate of sexual problems. Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference was found in vagina dryness (p = 0.45) and urinary symptoms (p = 0.11) by continents (Table 3). Additionally, compared with publications after 2011, the prevalence of sexual problems (40.86% vs. 49.08%, p = 0.02), vagina dryness (33.23% vs. 40.47%, p = 0.02) and urinary problems (29.38% vs. 37.73%, p < 0.01) was consistently lower in publications after 2011 (Table 3). However, there was minimal difference observed among development status of countries in urogenital symptoms (sexual problems, 45.37% vs. 45.94%, p = 0.87; vagina dryness, 38.28% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.47, urinary symptoms, 35.89% vs. 31.58%, p = 0.13, Table 3). Studies with more than 1000 participants reported a lower prevalence of vagina dryness (32.13% vs. 38.77%, p = 0.03) and urinary symptoms (29.52% vs. 35.97%, p = 0.03) than those with less than 1000 participants (Table 3). Prevalence varied significantly by diagnostic tools, with the highest by using the Greene Climacteric Scale [31] (63.44%, 95% CI 52.47–73.75) for sexual problems, CS-10 (51.48%, 95% CI 22.27–80.14) for vagina dryness, and MENQOL (48.13%, 95% CI 40.32–55.99) for urinary problems, shown in Table 3. With regard to menopausal stage, we found that for each of the three urogenital symptoms, women in postmenopausal stage resulted in the highest prevalence (53.97%, 44.81%, and 40.27% for sexual problems, vagina dryness, and urinary problems, respectively), followed by premenopausal stage (35.24%, 21.16%, and 22.21% for sexual problems, vagina dryness, and urinary problems, respectively) and perimenopausal stage (48.82%, 36.07%, and 33.29% for sexual problems, vagina dryness, and urinary problems, respectively, p < 0.01, Table 3). Intriguingly, we found BMI of middle-aged women were linearly correlated with prevalence of urinary problems, those of obesity had a highest prevalence of 31.73% (95% CI 19.13–45.86), followed by overweight (20.41%, 95% CI 10.24–32.94), normal weight (13.03%, 95% CI 10.72–15.54), and underweight (10.61%, 95% CI 3.09–21.71, p = 0.01, Table 3). The subgroup analysis and risk factor analysis for these urogenital symptoms were listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis and pooled estimates of risk factors for prevalence of urogenital symptoms among middle-aged women

1. Sexual Problems
Subgroup Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Country < 0.01
China 21 22,284 64,498 40.76 30.12–51.86
Nepal 7 1655 4386 46.3 23.24–70.23
Nigeria 7 1299 3020 46.78 20.42–74.15
Iran 8 3265 6517 53.06 30.04–75.42
India 26 2924 6522 45.5 32.58–58.72
Ethiopia 1 61 226 26.99 21.39–32.98
Turkey 7 1018 2529 48.47 30.78–66.36
Saudi Arabia 7 1240 2238 47.27 33.43–61.33
UK 4 2368 5282 45.66 42.33–49.02
France 2 351 900 38.31 32.57–44.22
Germany 2 337 896 36.71 30.1-43.59
Belgium 2 318 673 50.19 39.75–60.61
Netherlands 2 417 901 45.83 40.88–50.81
Switzerland 2 315 901 31.06 12.81–53.06
Spain 5 1659 3346 50.23 45.51–54.94
Australia 8 2600 4347 60.52 51.14–69.53
Japan 2 1639 2249 73.29 69.44–76.98
Oman 1 121 472 25.64 21.79–29.68
Macau 1 311 442 70.36 66.01–74.53
Ecuador 5 975 1502 64.88 52.49–76.35
Peru 1 453 771 58.75 55.26–62.21
Malaysia 6 576 1335 47.35 31.92–63.03
Sri Lanka 2 123 1033 13.49 0.89–37.06
Brazil 2 934 1775 56.59 42.97–69.72
Korea 3 2797 4352 47.41 15.5-80.55
Singapore 2 255 1151 21.43 13.53–30.56
Pakistan 5 2139 4412 28.1 13.2-45.96
Greece 2 670 1125 60.19 55.6-64.69
Philippines 1 64 195 32.82 26.39–39.59
Indonesia 3 602 1377 52.7 28.52–76.22
Taiwan 3 10,313 21,263 37.59 19.93–57.12
Thailand 3 190 448 41.71 16.75–69.17
Vietnam 1 69 100 69 59.55–77.73
Italy 1 96 301 31.89 26.74–37.28
Iraq 1 150 342 43.86 38.63–49.15
USA 8 3207 12,185 34.98 26.71–43.72
Egypt 5 1573 3704 39.5 10.13–73.92
Bangladesh 2 409 899 47.51 17.51–78.54
Mexico 1 228 290 78.62 73.7-83.16
Qatar 1 280 1158 24.18 21.76–26.69
United Arab Emirates 1 93 390 23.85 19.74–28.21
Cambodia 1 54 177 30.51 23.93–37.51
Sweden 1 67 109 61.47 52.12–70.42
Multi 2 2959 7797 35.41 17.77–55.39
South Africa 1 38 63 60.32 47.9-72.11
Libya 1 42 86 48.84 38.29–59.44
Morocco 1 60 299 20.07 15.71–24.81
Hong Kong 1 96 150 64 56.13–71.51
Portugal 1 223 728 30.63 27.33–34.03
Poland 1 149 241 61.83 55.59–67.87
Belarus 1 83 119 69.75 61.16–77.7
Bolivia 1 64 125 51.2 42.41–59.95
Lebanon 1 141 271 52.03 46.06–57.97
Continent < 0.01
Asia 117 52,808 128,906 44 39.15–48.91
Africa 16 3073 7398 42.33 26.76–58.72
Europe 27 9233 20,313 46.34 42.06–50.66
Oceania 8 2600 4347 60.52 51.14–69.53
South America 9 2426 4173 60.94 53.24–68.38
North America 9 3435 12,475 40 27.99–52.65
Multi 1 779 3006 25.91 24.36–27.5
Income level < 0.01
Upper-Middle-Income 52 28,061 77,206 48.04 41.79–54.32
Lower-Middle-Income 71 14,441 33,037 43.89 36.66–51.26
Low-Income 1 61 226 26.99 21.39–32.98
High-Income 63 31,791 70,149 45.38 41.2–49.6
Development status 0.87
Developing 122 51,788 127,944 45.37 40.4-50.38
Developed 64 21,787 49,668 45.94 41.68–50.22
Publication date 0.02
Before 2011 82 20,899 53,390 40.86 36.38–45.41
After 2011 105 53,455 127,228 49.08 43.9-54.27
Study size 0.27
< 1000 151 23,542 50,476 46.29 42.13–50.47
> 1000 36 50,812 130,142 42.04 35.89–48.32
Study quality 0.99
< 8 26 16,966 48,856 45.52 37.39–53.76
≥ 8 161 57,388 131,762 45.44 41.52–49.39
Diagnostic tool < 0.01
KMI 13 17,151 48,291 40.62 29.52–52.22
MRS 64 19,335 41,588 46.42 39.9–53
Face-to-face interview 39 10,180 34,326 37.1 30.12–44.36
Others 37 17,387 39,061 41.94 35.32–48.69
The Greene Climacteric Scale 11 4607 6803 63.44 52.47–73.75
MENQOL 21 4252 8039 57.48 46.09–68.48
FSFI [32] 2 1442 2510 53.13 41.9-64.21
Risk factors Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Menopausal stage < 0.01
Premenopause 43 9217 34,406 35.24 28.76-42
Perimenopause 47 9674 22,999 48.82 41.59–56.08
Postmenopause 73 24,494 49,059 53.97 47.39–60.48
Age 0.69
< 50 5 494 1210 39.62 31.42–48.12
≥ 50 11 2400 4795 44.28 24.43–65.13
Urban or rural 0.17
Rural 15 4677 9669 49.18 32.86–65.59
Urban 6 3316 6123 69.83 45.49–89.38
Work 0.22
Working 3 882 1877 59.1 38.64–78.06
Non-working 2 161 185 85.14 46.35–100
2. Vagina dryness
Subgroup Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Country < 0.01
Nepal 7 1564 4386 47.05 25.15–69.56
Nigeria 5 565 2138 34.82 19.22–52.28
Iran 9 2100 4703 42.87 22.79–64.25
India 22 2035 6862 31.6 21.07–43.17
Ethiopia 1 69 226 30.53 24.68–36.71
Turkey 7 1149 3215 41.73 26.27–58.07
Saudi Arabia 7 1316 2361 50.68 37.35–63.96
UK 5 1543 5531 27.08 22.09–32.38
France 2 252 900 25.24 12.17–41.12
Germany 2 176 896 19.63 17.08–22.3
Belgium 2 250 673 50.24 17.63–82.73
Netherlands 2 276 901 30.63 27.65–33.68
Switzerland 2 218 901 21.23 8.37–37.96
Spain 4 1350 2447 56.95 26.32–84.89
Oman 1 70 472 14.83 11.76–18.19
Macau 1 213 442 48.19 43.54–52.86
Taiwan 4 10,545 22,623 30.97 17.38–46.46
Ecuador 5 808 1565 51.56 31.7-71.16
Peru 1 265 771 34.37 31.06–37.76
Malaysia 7 700 1504 49.45 41.46–57.45
China 12 5626 22,135 34.44 23.16–46.67
Sri Lanka 2 160 1033 17.38 3.91–37.6
Australia 6 674 2314 26.95 10.81–47.08
Mexico 2 1829 7925 38.93 8.78–74.92
Brazil 3 813 2375 30.21 20.72–40.63
Korea 5 3165 5665 52.15 45.74–58.52
Japan 2 948 3030 31.95 26.89–37.23
Singapore 2 267 1151 22.94 18.65–27.53
USA 11 4555 17,589 30.51 24.39–37.01
Pakistan 4 1139 3549 33.11 21.6-45.74
Greece 2 433 1125 45.7 27.51–64.49
Philippines 1 115 195 58.97 51.98–65.8
Indonesia 3 431 1377 46.27 16.51–77.57
Thailand 3 228 448 50.97 39.86–62.03
Vietnam 1 90 100 90 83.25–95.22
Italy 1 48 301 15.95 12.01–20.31
Sweden 2 2061 7016 37.32 20.69–55.65
Poland 2 254 590 44.24 30.04–58.94
Iraq 2 368 842 41.73 23.23–61.52
Egypt 5 1459 3704 43.08 20.53–67.27
Bangladesh 2 427 899 49.2 24.12–74.5
Qatar 1 296 1158 25.56 23.09–28.12
United Arab Emirates 1 107 390 27.44 23.11–31.98
Cambodia 1 66 177 37.29 30.29–44.56
Multi 3 3807 11,317 32.72 20-46.89
New Zealand 1 1263 3616 34.93 33.38–36.49
Libya 1 21 86 24.42 15.86–34.11
Morocco 1 45 299 15.05 11.21–19.34
Hong Kong 1 67 150 44.67 36.77–52.7
Portugal 1 229 728 31.46 28.13–34.88
Belarus 1 26 119 21.85 14.84–29.76
Bolivia 1 51 125 40.8 32.32–49.57
Colombia 1 626 1739 36 33.76–38.27
Lebanon 1 35 271 12.92 9.17–17.19
Continent 0.45
Asia 109 33,227 89,138 39.35 35.03–43.75
Africa 13 2159 6453 35.13 24.18–46.94
Europe 29 8702 26,919 34.54 28.14–41.23
South America 11 2563 6575 41.51 31.16–52.26
Oceania 7 1937 5930 28.07 13.72–45.19
North America 13 6384 25,514 31.77 25.12–38.81
Multi 2 2221 6526 32.52 12.09–57.3
Income level 0.11
Lower-Middle-Income 65 10,282 29,818 37.69 31.33–44.27
Low-Income 1 69 226 30.53 24.68–36.71
Upper-Middle-Income 47 13,309 46,172 40.24 35.04–45.56
High-Income 71 33,533 90,839 35.21 31.25–39.28
Development status 0.47
Developing 112 33,419 95,452 38.28 33.99–42.67
Developed 71 23,137 68,597 36.1 32.07–40.22
Publication date 0.02
Before 2011 79 18,895 69,009 33.23 29.2-37.38
After 2011 105 38,298 98,046 40.47 36.18–44.84
Study size 0.03
< 1000 146 18,308 47,658 38.77 35.13–42.48
> 1000 38 38,885 119,397 32.13 27.61–36.82
Study quality 0.79
< 8 22 7590 24,131 36.24 27.93–44.99
≥ 8 162 49,603 142,924 37.49 34.23–40.82
Diagnostic tool < 0.01
MRS 66 15,944 42,577 39.92 34.81–45.14
Face-to-face interview 42 9291 45,059 25.4 20.94–30.14
KMI 4 1942 7182 27.7 12.01–46.92
MENQOL 20 3598 8070 43.86 32.5-55.56
The Keio questionnaire 2 948 3030 31.95 26.89–37.23
Others 44 21,245 51,669 43 37.18–48.92
The Greene Climacteric Scale 4 3297 7278 39.67 21.68–59.23
CS-10 2 928 2190 51.48 22.27–80.14
Risk factors Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Menopausal stage < 0.01
Premenopause 40 4743 21,621 21.16 16.42–26.3
Perimenopause 46 7186 20,967 36.07 30.54–41.78
Postmenopause 74 22,880 54,304 44.81 39.03–50.67
Age 0.16
< 50 5 405 1078 43.39 31.34–55.85
≥ 50 15 5088 14,666 32.27 23.06–42.22
Urban or rural 0.11
Rural 11 2648 9005 29.49 18.91–41.31
Urban 6 2184 7143 61.64 24.5-92.26
3.Urinary problems
Subgroup Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Country < 0.01
China 23 13,804 64,261 24.2 18.98–29.84
Nepal 6 1097 2386 39.38 21.98–58.3
Nigeria 7 452 3020 19.37 5.8-38.27
Iran 9 2578 6819 44.1 24.39–64.82
India 26 3066 7578 40.09 31.06–49.46
Ethiopia 1 59 226 26.11 20.57–32.04
Turkey 9 2315 4535 51.6 39.48–63.64
Saudi Arabia 7 1312 2361 51.37 39.34–63.31
UK 4 1895 5447 31.53 24.27–39.28
France 2 210 900 23.32 20.61–26.15
Germany 3 1020 2789 28 13.78–44.94
Belgium 2 198 673 39.84 13.71–69.54
Netherlands 2 324 901 35.23 29.41–41.27
Switzerland 2 171 901 16.65 6.68–29.92
Spain 4 570 1676 33 17.6-50.54
Oman 1 112 472 23.73 19.99–27.68
Macau 1 244 442 55.2 50.54–59.82
Taiwan 5 9654 22,784 29.96 21.2-39.52
Ecuador 5 797 1684 45.63 32.37–59.21
Peru 1 429 771 55.64 52.12–59.14
Malaysia 7 426 1504 28.99 21.69–36.87
Sri Lanka 2 235 1033 24.01 15.21–34.08
Brazil 3 547 2375 21.02 15.39–27.27
China 1 13,804 64,261 8.69 8.14–9.26
Korea 4 2506 4922 46.77 33.17–60.61
Japan 2 1161 3030 42.07 17.07–69.49
Singapore 2 245 1151 21.2 18.39–24.16
Pakistan 7 1803 5467 34.34 23.09–46.55
Philippines 1 129 195 66.15 59.35–72.64
Indonesia 2 255 377 45.83 0.43–97.41
Thailand 3 165 448 36.01 9.4-68.44
Vietnam 1 59 100 59 49.18–68.48
Australia 7 2373 10,803 35.97 21.29–52.12
Italy 2 60 635 9.34 3.84–16.85
Poland 2 198 590 34.17 25.47–43.44
Iraq 3 923 1949 46.52 30.81–62.59
USA 5 1886 9877 32.52 18.43–48.43
Egypt 5 1522 3704 45.16 32.59–58.05
Bangladesh 3 798 2489 34.73 8.6-67.34
Qatar 1 266 1158 22.97 20.59–25.44
United Arab Emirates 1 104 390 26.67 22.39–31.17
Cambodia 1 83 177 46.89 39.57–54.28
Sweden 1 55 108 50.93 41.47–60.35
New Zealand 1 160 3616 4.42 3.78–5.12
Multi 1 145 360 40.28 35.26–45.4
Morocco 1 57 299 19.06 14.8-23.72
Hong Kong 1 59 150 39.33 31.64–47.29
Portugal 1 111 728 15.25 12.72–17.95
Belarus 1 18 119 15.13 9.19–22.18
Greece 1 21 100 21 13.52–29.58
Colombia 1 452 1739 25.99 23.96–28.08
Jordan 1 43 143 30.07 22.81–37.87
Lebanon 1 68 271 25.09 20.1-30.44
Continent 0.11
Asia 131 44,346 146,209 36.76 33.21–40.39
Africa 14 2090 7249 28.43 17.42–40.92
Europe 28 4996 15,927 27.93 23.14–32.98
South America 10 2225 6569 36.66 26.38–47.6
Oceania 8 2533 14,419 30.83 15.96–48.07
North America 5 1886 9877 32.52 18.43–48.43
Income level < 0.05
Upper-Middle-Income 59 20,999 89,587 32.6 28.01–37.35
Lower-Middle-Income 72 12,202 33,915 37.79 32.29–43.46
Low-Income 1 59 226 26.11 20.57–32.04
High-Income 64 24,816 76,522 32.74 28.74–36.87
Development status 0.13
Developing 133 43,025 146,131 35.89 32.27–39.6
Developed 63 15,051 54,119 31.58 27.54–35.75
Publication date < 0.01
Before 2011 75 11,784 52,557 29.38 25.6-33.31
After 2011 121 46,292 147,693 37.73 33.98–41.56
Study size 0.03
< 1000 153 18,038 49,798 35.97 32.69–39.32
> 1000 43 40,038 150,452 29.52 24.71–34.56
Study quality 0.54
< 8 27 11,101 54,188 32.06 23.88–40.84
≥ 8 169 46,975 146,062 34.89 31.94–37.89
Diagnostic tool < 0.01
KMI 16 11,479 56,232 22.96 17.18–29.31
MRS 63 13,085 34,214 39.62 34.24–45.13
Face-to-face interview 45 10,015 47,253 24.84 20.66–29.28
Others 48 17,653 49,128 35.33 30-40.85
MENQOL 20 3955 8203 48.13 40.32–55.99
The Keio questionnaire 2 1161 3030 42.07 17.07–69.49
CS-10 2 728 2190 43.08 12.38–77.13
Risk factors Studies Event Total Prevalence (%) 95% CI (%) P value
Menopausal stage < 0.01
Premenopause 43 6877 34,966 22.21 17.31–27.53
Perimenopause 47 7419 24,305 33.29 27.49–39.36
Postmenopause 82 108,693 148,061 40.27 34.59–46.09
Age 0.08
< 50 8 2223 10,596 24.27 15.61–34.12
≥ 50 17 2224 7402 36.32 27.04–46.14
Body mass index 0.01
Underweight 2 37 392 10.61 3.09–21.71
Normal weight 2 422 3215 13.03 10.72–15.54
Overweight 3 187 1112 20.41 10.24–32.94
Obesity 4 290 856 31.73 19.13–45.86
Urban or rural 0.32
Rural 14 3685 10,852 40.59 29.99–51.66
Urban 8 3179 8001 53.96 30.4-76.62
Work 0.36
Working 4 547 1938 34.13 4.59–73.27
Non-working 3 217 416 56.56 29.81–81.43
Education level 0.83
< 12 years 5 1130 4691 30.95 21.24–41.58
> 12 years 4 239 675 32.3 20.14–45.73

*KMI: The modified Kupperman Menopausal Index; MRS: The Menopause Rating Scale; MENQOL: The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life; CS-10:10-item Cervantes Scale; FSFI: The Female Sexual Function Index

Pooled prevalence, subgroup analysis, and risk factors for other symptoms

The prevalence of poor memory, difficulty concentrating, formication, changing in the appearance, texture, or tone of skin, increased facial hair, and drying skin were 54.44% (95% CI 48.87–59.95, I2 = 99.43%, Supplementary Figs. 14), 44.85% (95% CI 37.71–52.09, I2 = 99.32%, Supplementary Figs. 15), 20.50% (95% CI 13.44–28.60, I2 = 99.75%, Supplementary Figs. 16), 46.48% (95% CI 36.21–56.89, I2 = 98.75%, Supplementary Figs. 17), 27.19% (95% CI 21.09–33.74, I2 = 99.00%, Supplementary Figs. 18) and 46.03% (95% CI 38.81–53.34, I2 = 99.48%, Supplementary Fig. 19). The subgroup analysis and risk factor analysis for these symptoms were listed in Supplementary Tables 1015, respectively.

Grading of recommendations, Assessment, Development and evaluations (GRADE) quality of evidence

The certainty of evidence for different menopausal symptoms (very low) were assessed using the GRADE framework. The results of this assessment are shown in Supplementary Table 16.

Discussion

This was the first and largest systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the global prevalence of menopause-related symptoms among middle-aged women from multiple domains involving somatic, psychological, urogenital and others symptoms. The meta-analysis found that the prevalence of these symptoms varies considerably, with the highest prevalence of joint and muscular discomfort (65.43%, 95% CI 62.51–68.29) and lowest of formication (20.5%, 95% CI 13.44–28.60). Menopausal symptom epidemiology was significantly influenced by factors such as countries, continents, country development, country income level and diagnostic tools. Furthermore, it was shown that the prevalence of most symptoms in postmenopausal stage increased dramatically. Additionally, a noteworthy distinction was observed between BMI and sleep problems, depression, anxiety and urinary problems.

Menopause is characterized by vasomotor symptoms, which include hot flashes, perspiration, and occasionally shaking and a cold feeling. Because of their abrupt and seemingly random onset throughout the day or even at night, these are usually the most common and irritating menopausal symptoms. Vasomotor symptoms can start up to two years before to the final menstrual period (FMP), peak one year following the FMP, and last for four years in about half of the female population. The multiethnic, community-based Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) [3335] reported that vasomotor symptoms were more prevalent among African-American and Hispanic women and less prevalent among Japanese-American and Chinese-American women than white women. As the most important vasomotor symptom, emerging analyses of studies revealed that the prevalence of hot flashes in Asian women is similar to those of Western countries [36, 37]. As a result, the current study’s pooled estimates of different continents find that women in Africa with highest prevalence of hot flashes, whereas women in Asia, Europe, and North America are of comparable prevalence, which validates prior studies [3335]. Besides, our result found the prevalence of sleeping problems (51.89%, 95% CI 49.55–54.22) are similar to pooled estimates of a previous meta-analysis (51.6%, 95% CI 44.6–58.5) [13]. Six out of ten middle-aged women reported having joint and muscular discomfort, which was the most common somatic symptom. The idea that a decline in ovarian function may have a direct detrimental impact on muscle and joint tissue stems from the fact that these tissues have estrogen receptors (ERs) [38, 39]. Importantly, pooled prevalence estimates show that, with the exception of headache, all somatic domain complaints are more common in the perimenopause and postmenopause than in the premenopause. According to community-based studies, women’s migraine headache prevalence has been shown to rise throughout the perimenopause and fall during the postmenopause [40, 41]. This study found a similar tendency, albeit it was not statistically significant. It’s interesting to note that women who have abnormal weight—that is, underweight, overweight, or obese—are more likely to experience sleep problems. This finding is in line with a study by Prather et al. that discovered a link between sleep disturbance and obesity or overweight [42]. The worrying trend of rising obesity rates among postmenopausal women globally necessitates further attention [4345].

Menopause can be psychologically distressing for women. The global prevalence of depression among middle-aged women was found to be approximately 43.34% with equally matched prevalence of study from global perspective [46]. Furthermore, current findings revealed strong correlation between the prevalence of depression among middle-aged women with country development. This is in line with previous research, which has shown that middle-aged women from developing countries have a higher prevalence of depression. This could be explained by governments from developed countries have greater beneficial and supportive policies for public health [47]. In contrast, middle-aged women were disadvantaged in healthcare and living conditions, which in turn predisposed them to depression. Different from somatic symptoms, only exhaustion and depression in psychological domain are related to menopausal stage, with climbing prevalence from premenopausal to postmenopausal stage, while anxiety, irritability and mood swings have no statistical difference. Consistent with other studies [46, 48], irritability levels in our study rise throughout menopause and diminish following menopause, though not statistically significant. While other research [10, 4952] revealed a tenuous connection between depression and being overweight or obese, our investigation showed that these conditions raise the risk of depression in middle-aged women.

Interestingly, the prevalence of symptoms in urogenital domain is similar across countries with different status of development where middle-aged women from, which indicates minimal relationship between develop status of countries and urogenital symptoms among middle-aged women. Although they are not frequently reported, urogenital symptoms are often present after menopause [53]. Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies have reported that the menopausal transition is associated with urogenital symptoms, independent of aging [54]. Our findings are in line with previous research that prevalence of urogenital problems is sharp rise across menopausal stage (p < 0.01), but a weaker correlation with age (p = 0.69, 0.19, 0.08 for sexual problems, vagina dryness, and urinary problems, respectively). Pastore, et al [55] found that overweight seems to be linked with a two to four folds higher incidence of urogenital symptoms in women with normal weight. Current study is consistent with it that overweight or obesity are found to be important correlates of urinary problems.

Greendale et al. [56]. discovered an intriguing circumstance: women going through the perimenopausal stage of the transition frequently report experiencing a decrease in memory and focus. The current study also discovered, while not statistically significantly, that middle-aged women going through the perimenopausal stage are more likely to experience memory loss and concentration problems. More precisely, as compared to the premenopausal and postmenopausal stages, the perimenopausal stages were found to have deficiencies in processing speed and a lack of progress in verbal memory with repeated testing [56]. These findings imply that the negative impact of menopause on cognitive function is only present during the perimenopausal phase. Given that anatomical studies have shown that the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, which govern episodic and working memory, display high amounts of ERs, it is thought that estradiol plays a significant role in cognitive performance [57]. Thus, the transitory cognitive abnormalities reported clinically at this time may be caused by fluctuating levels of estrogen during perimenopause [57].

There are strengths of this meta-analysis which included the largest population-based study to-date, inclusion of nineteen symptoms from multiple domains for a more comprehensive understanding of menopause and use of subgroup analysis to pool estimates of risk factors with improved accuracy compared with findings from a single study. However, several limitations should be noted. First, the heterogeneity between studies remains unexplained by the variables studied. Variations in study sample size and representativeness contribute significantly to the heterogeneity of the prevalence. Second, data based on participants’ self-reports can result in reporting bias. Third, most research focused on cross-sectional studies creates recall bias. Fourth, significant lack of articles from countries with low-income level. Finally, GRADE approach indicated our results with a suboptimal quality of evidence. Therefore, higher-quality research is needed in the future to clarify the conclusions.

Conclusions

Women typically spend about 30% of their lifespan around the menopause. Our study indicated that most menopause-related symptoms affected 50% middle-aged women. Thus, it is important to ensure women and health professionals understand the perimenopause transition, its symptoms and treatments and create a more positive view to the menopause. Health-care providers caring for women at all levels of the healthcare system must be well prepared to guide women through this transition and provide advice to improve quality of life.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material (4.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

Y.F., F.L., K.L and Z.L., designed the study and performed the data review and extraction. X.Z., L.C., Y.L., L.Y., X.Z., provided technique assistance for data analysis and providing feedback for the manuscript. J.L. and Q.F. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the discussion of results and revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by the fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702340), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070625, 82070846), the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2020YJ0237, 2021YFS0230, 2020YFS0573, 2021ZYCD016, 2022NSFSC1441), Key Research and Development Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2019YFS0360), the 135 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYJC18003, ZYJC18025, 2016105 and ZYGD20006), Program for Oversea High-Level Talents Introduction of Sichuan Province of China (21RCYJ0046).

Data availability

Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the data repositories listed in References.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yiqiao Fang and Fen Liu contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Kewei Li, Email: vivian5225133@outlook.com.

Zhihui Li, Email: rockoliver@vip.sina.com.

References

  • 1.Maric-Bilkan C, Gilbert EL, Ryan MJ. Impact of ovarian function on cardiovascular health in women: focus on hypertension. Int J Women’s Health. 2014;6:131–9. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S38084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cauley JA. Estrogen and bone health in men and women. Steroids, 2015. 99(Pt A): pp. 11–15. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Talaulikar V. Menopause transition: physiology and symptoms. Best Practice & Research. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;81:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davis SR, et al. Menopause-Biology, consequences, supportive care, and therapeutic options. Cell. 2023;186(19):4038–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Monteleone P, et al. Symptoms of menopause - global prevalence, physiology and implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(4):199–215. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harlow SD, et al. Executive summary of the stages of Reproductive Aging workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Volume 19. Menopause (New York, N.Y.),; 2012. pp. 387–95. 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Avis NE, et al. Duration of menopausal vasomotor symptoms over the menopause transition. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):531–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palacios S, et al. Age of menopause and impact of climacteric symptoms by geographical region. Climacteric: J Int Menopause Soc. 2010;13(5):419–28. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2010.507886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Polisseni AF, et al. [Depression and anxiety in menopausal women: associated factors] Revista Brasileira De Ginecol E Obstetricia: Revista Da Federacao Brasileira Das Sociedades De Ginecol E Obstet. 2009;31(3):117–23. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032009000300003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahlawat P, et al. Prevalence of Depression and its Association with Sociodemographic Factors in Postmenopausal Women in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. J Mid-life Health. 2019;10(1):33–6. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_66_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li R-X, et al. Perimenopausal syndrome and mood disorders in perimenopause: prevalence, severity, relationships, and risk factors. Medicine. 2016;95(32):e4466. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yadav V, et al. A meta-analysis on the prevalence of depression in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in India. Asian J Psychiatry. 2021;57:102581. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salari N, et al. Global prevalence of sleep disorders during menopause: a meta-analysis. Volume 27. Sleep & Breathing = Schlaf & Atmung; 2023. pp. 1883–97. 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Parker G et al. Technical report for SCIE research review on the prevalence and incidence of parental mental health problems and the detection, screening and reporting of parental mental health problems. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 2008.
  • 15.Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. 1995. 854. [PubMed]
  • 16.Chedraui P, et al. Application of the 10-item Cervantes Scale among mid-aged Ecuadorian women for the assessment of menopausal symptoms. Maturitas. 2014;79(1):100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ikeda H, et al. Effects of Candesartan for middle-aged and elderly women with hypertension and menopausal-like symptoms. Hypertens Research: Official J Japanese Soc Hypertens. 2006;29(12):1007–12. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alder E. The Blatt-Kupperman menopausal index: a critique. Maturitas. 1998;29(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5122(98)00024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heinemann LAJ, Potthoff P, Schneider HPG. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:p28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yokota M, et al. Symptoms and effects of physical factors in Japanese middle-aged women. Menopause (New York N Y) 2016;23(9):974–83. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lewis JE, Hilditch JR, Wong CJ. Further psychometric property development of the menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire and development of a modified version, MENQOL-Intervention questionnaire. Maturitas. 2005;50(3):209–21. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hunter MS, Liao KL. A psychological analysis of menopausal hot flushes. Br J Clin Psychol. 1995;34(4):589–99. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1995.tb01493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hunter MS. The Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ): Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003. 1: p. 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Hilditch JR, et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 2008;61(1–2):107–21. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee Y, et al. Development of the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire. Chang Gung Med J. 2000;23(11):688–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zung WW, A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION, SCALE Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beck AT, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carleton RN, et al. The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: a review with a theoretical and empirical examination of item content and factor structure. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bech P, et al. Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1975;51(3):161–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1975.tb00002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vasconcelos-Raposo J, et al. Factor structure and normative data of the Greene Climacteric Scale among postmenopausal Portuguese women. Maturitas. 2012;72(3):256–62. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther, 2005. 31(1). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Kravitz HM, et al. Sleep difficulty in women at midlife: a community survey of sleep and the menopausal transition. Menopause (New York N Y) 2003;10(1):19–28. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200310010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kravitz HM, Joffe H. Sleep during the perimenopause: a SWAN story. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2011;38(3):567–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koch J. Primed in situ labeling as a fast and sensitive method for the detection of specific DNA sequences in chromosomes and nuclei. Methods (San Diego Calif) 1996;9(1):122–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.1996.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Islam RM et al. Vasomotor symptoms in women in Asia appear comparable with women in western countries: a systematic review. Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2017. 24(11): p. 1313–22. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 37.Sriprasert I, et al. An International Menopause Society study of vasomotor symptoms in Bangkok and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Climacteric: J Int Menopause Soc. 2017;20(2):171–7. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1284782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wiik A, et al. Expression of both oestrogen receptor alpha and beta in human skeletal muscle tissue. Histochem Cell Biol. 2009;131(2):181–9. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0512-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roman-Blas JA, et al. Osteoarthritis associated with estrogen deficiency. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2009;11(5):241. doi: 10.1186/ar2791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Freeman EW, et al. Symptoms in the menopausal transition: hormone and behavioral correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(1):127–36. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000295867.06184.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martin VT, et al. Perimenopause and Menopause are Associated with high frequency headache in women with migraine: results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache. 2016;56(2):292–305. doi: 10.1111/head.12763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Prather AA, et al. Poor sleep quality potentiates stress-induced cytokine reactivity in postmenopausal women with high visceral abdominal adiposity. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;35:155–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Teede HJ, Lombard C, Deeks AA. Obesity, metabolic complications and the menopause: an opportunity for prevention. Climacteric: J Int Menopause Soc. 2010;13(3):203–9. doi: 10.3109/13697130903296909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Flegal KM, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xi B, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults, 1993–2009. Obes Reviews: Official J Int Association Study Obes. 2012;13(3):287–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00944.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nik Hazlina NH, et al. Prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among Menopausal women: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Med. 2022;9:848202. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.848202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schmitz A. Gendered experiences of widowhood and depression across Europe: the role of loneliness and financial resources from a longitudinal perspective. J Affect Disord. 2021;280Pt A:114–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mauas V, Kopala-Sibley DC, Zuroff DC. Depressive symptoms in the transition to menopause: the roles of irritability, personality vulnerability, and self-regulation. Arch Women Ment Health. 2014;17(4):279–89. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0434-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xiong Q, et al. Association of visceral fat area with the presence of depressive symptoms in Chinese postmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance. Volume 24. Menopause; 2017. pp. 1289–94. (New York, N.Y.). 11. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Fernández-Alonso AM, et al. Obesity is related to increased menopausal symptoms among Spanish women. Menopause Int. 2010;16(3):105–10. doi: 10.1258/mi.2010.010029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Seib C, et al. Predictors of mental health in post-menopausal women: results from the Australian healthy aging of women study. Maturitas. 2013;76(4):377–83. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mirzaiinjmabadi K, Anderson D, Barnes M. The relationship between exercise, body Mass Index and menopausal symptoms in midlife Australian women. Int J Nurs Pract. 2006;12(1):28–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Parish SJ, et al. Impact of vulvovaginal health on postmenopausal women: a review of surveys on symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy. Int J Women’s Health. 2013;5:437–47. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S44579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Avis N.E., et al. Longitudinal changes in sexual functioning as women transition through menopause: results from the study of women’s Health across the Nation. Menopause (New York N Y). 2009;16(3):442–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Pastore LM, et al. Self-reported urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women: women’s Health Initiative. Maturitas. 2004;49(4):292–303. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Greendale GA, et al. Effects of the menopause transition and hormone use on cognitive performance in midlife women. Neurology. 2009;72(21):1850–7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a71193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Genazzani AR, et al. Estrogen, cognition and female ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(2):175–87. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material (4.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the data repositories listed in References.


Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES