Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 2002 Jan 26;324(7331):183–184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.183

How men's power over women fuels the HIV epidemic

It limits women's ability to control sexual interactions

Geeta Rao Gupta 1
PMCID: PMC1122116  PMID: 11809629

In sub-Saharan Africa 12-13 women are infected by HIV for every 10 men, and the average rate of infection for teenage girls in some countries is five times higher than that for teenage boys.1 Most of these infections occur through unprotected heterosexual interactions. Women are limited in their ability to control these interactions because of their low economic and social status and because of the power that men have over women's sexuality.

Most of the world's women are poor and most of the world's poor are women. Women make up almost two thirds of the world's illiterate people and are often denied property rights or access to credit. They earn 30-40% less than men for the same work, and most of those who are working are employed outside the formal sector in jobs characterised by income insecurity and poor working conditions.2 Women's economic vulnerability and dependence on men increases their vulnerability to HIV by constraining their ability to negotiate the use of a condom, discuss fidelity with their partners, or leave risky relationships.

An example of this is a study of women on low income in long term relationships in Mumbai, India. The women believed that the economic consequences of leaving a relationship that they perceived to be risky were far worse than the health risks of staying in the relationship. They reported having very little economic leverage to bring about changes in their husbands' behaviour.3

In many countries the power imbalance in heterosexual interactions leads to a culture of silence that surrounds women's sexuality. This restricts women's access to information about their bodies and about sex, which in turn contributes to their inability to protect themselves from HIV infection. Rural women from South Africa and urban women from India reported not liking condoms because they feared that if the condom fell off inside the vagina it could get lost and perhaps travel to the throat or another part of the body.3,4 In Latin America adolescent boys are more likely than girls to know how to use a condom properly and to recognise the symptoms of sexually transmitted infections.5 In some cultures, such as in Brazil and Thailand, there is a powerful norm of virginity for unmarried women, which limits young girls' ability to ask for information about sex or condoms for fear that they will be thought to be sexually active.6,7 The norm of virginity also puts young girls at risk of rape and sexual coercion in countries with a high prevalence of HIV because they are presumed to be free of infection and because of the myth that sex with a virgin can cleanse a man of infection.8

The most extreme manifestation of the unequal power balance between women and men is violence against women. In population based studies worldwide, 10% to over 50% of women report physical assault by an intimate partner, and one third to one half of physically abused women also report sexual coercion.9 In studies in Papua New Guinea, Jamaica, and India women reported that bringing up the issue of condom use, with its inherent implication that one partner or the other has been unfaithful, can result in violence.3,10,11

To protect women from HIV infection we must find ways to empower them. This means implementing policies and programmes that increase women's access to education and information and to productive resources, such as land, income, and credit. It also means providing women with HIV prevention technologies that they themselves can control. One way to do this would be to make the female condom more readily available. Studies of women in long term relationships and in sex work in Costa Rica, Senegal, Mexico, and Indonesia found that women viewed the female condom as empowering.12 It offered them a preventive alternative to the male condom, which depends for its use on male compliance. Another option is to invest in the development of microbicides, topical agents that women can apply intravaginally to protect themselves from HIV. There are promising signs that microbicides could be developed—some 60 different leads are currently being explored and several are poised to enter clinical effectiveness testing.13

We must also increase social support for women by facilitating their opportunities to meet in groups and organise, allowing them to draw strength from numbers and to derive practical solutions from each other. Simultaneously, we must promote sexual and family responsibility among young boys and men and enable them to examine the damaging effects of prevalent notions of masculinity and male power. Finally, we must recognise that violence against women is a gross violation of women's rights that has important implications for the health of women and communities.

If we are to contain the HIV epidemic we must tackle its root cause—gender inequality. It is this that is compromising the ability of women to protect themselves and promoting a cycle of illness and death that is threatening the future of households, communities, and entire nations.

References

  • 1.UNAIDS. Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.UNIFEM. Progress of the world's women 2000. New York: UNIFEM; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.George A, Jaswal S. Understanding sexuality: an ethnographic study of poor women in Bombay. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abdool Karim Q, Morar N. Women and AIDS in Natal/KwaZulu, South Africa: determinants to the adoption of HIV protective behavior. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morris L, Bailey P, Nunez L. Young adult reproductive health survey in two delegations of Mexico City. Mexico City: Centro de Orientacion para Adultos Jovenes; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vasconcelos A, Neto A, Valenca A, Braga C, Pacheco M, Dantas S, et al. Sexuality and AIDS prevention among adolescents from low-income communities in Recife, Brazil. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cash K, Anasuchatkul B. Experimental educational interventions for AIDS prevention among northern Thai single migratory female factory workers. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.UNAIDS. Gender and HIV/AIDS: taking stock of research and programmes. Geneva: UNAIDS; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottemoeller M. Ending violence against women. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jenkins C and the National Sex and Reproduction Research Team. Women and the risk of AIDS: a study of sexual and reproductive knowledge and behavior in Papua New Guinea. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wyatt GE, Tucker MB, Eldemire D, Bain B, LeFranc E, Chambers C. Female low income workers and AIDS in Jamaica. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aggleton P, Rivers K, Scott S. Use of the female condom: gender relations sexual negotiation. Part 3. Sex and Youth: contextual factors affecting risk for HIV/AIDS—a comparative analysis of multi-site studies in developing countries. Geneva: UNAIDS; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Population Council and International Family Health. The case for microbicides: a global priority. New York: Population Council; 2000. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES