ABSTRACT
Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitous genomic components and hard to study due to being highly repetitive. Here we assembled 232 chromosome-level genomes based on long-read sequencing data. Coupling the 232 genomes with 15 existing assemblies, we developed a pan-TE map comprising both cultivated and wild Asian rice. We detected 177 084 high-quality TE variations and inferred their derived state using outgroups. We found TEs were one source of phenotypic variation during rice domestication and differentiation. We identified 1246 genes whose expression variation was associated with TEs but not single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), such as OsRbohB, and validated OsRbohB’s relative expression activity using a dual-Luciferase (LUC) reporter assays system. Our pan-TE map allowed us to detect multiple novel loci associated with agronomic traits. Collectively, our findings highlight the contributions of TEs to domestication, differentiation and agronomic traits in rice, and there is massive potential for gene cloning and molecular breeding by the high-quality Asian pan-TE map we generated.
Keywords: transposable element, super pan-genome, pan-TE, rice
INTRODUCTION
Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitous components of genomes and one of the major forces driving genome evolution [1]. As early as 1948, Barbara McClintock observed that transposons were associated with color variegation in maize kernels and leaves [2], revealing the crucial role of TEs in phenotypic variation. TEs also represent a major source of genomic variation. Two classes of TE are roughly distinguished: retroelements and DNA transposons. Retroelements are further classified as long terminal repeats (LTRs, including Gypsy, Copia and unknown elements) and non-LTRs (short and long interspersed retrotransposable elements [SINE and LINE, respectively]), and DNA transposons are classified as miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs, including Stowaway and Tourist), DTC (CACTA), DTA (hAT), DTT (Tc1-Mariner), DTM (Mutator), DTH (PIF-Harbinger) and Helitron elements [3]. Increasing evidence has supported the hypothesis that TEs are responsible for many well-known human diseases [4] and various plant phenotypes [5–7]. For example, an LTR retrotransposon insertion upstream of an apple MYB transcription factor, MdMYB1, a core transcriptional activator of anthocyanin biosynthesis, is associated with the red-skinned phenotype of apples [8]. An insertion of a Gret1 LTR retrotransposon in the Chardonnay grape variety, which is not present in the Cabernet variety, generated a loss-of-function allele of the Vvmby1A gene, leading to a loss of color in the fruit [9]. A TE inserted in a regulatory region of the maize domestication gene (tb1) acts as an enhancer of gene expression and partially explains the increased apical dominance in maize compared to its progenitor, teosinte [10].
Recently reported crop TE variation data sets mainly consist of TE variations obtained from Illumina short-read sequencing [5,7,11], such as one constructed using short-read sequences from 524 Brassica rapa accessions [5] and one constructed using short-read sequences from 602 tomato accessions [7]. However, identifying highly repetitive sequences such as TEs using short-read sequencing data is difficult and predictions have low accuracy, especially for some TE families that have a small length and a very high copy number, such as the SINE, LINE and MITE families. Identification of TE variations using high-quality genome sequences based on long-read sequencing data is the most accurate method to identify TE variations. At present, a population-scale TE variation data set based on de novo long-read assemblies has been published only in Drosophila nasuta [12].
Rice is a major food crop for half of the global population [13,14], and improving rice productivity is essential for meeting the growing demands of the ever-increasing world population [15,16]. Asian cultivated rice (Oryza sativa, Os) was domesticated from Asian wild rice (Oryza rufipogon, Or) and has two main types: Geng (Oryza sativa japonica, Osj) and Xian (Oryza sativa indica, Osi) [17]. TEs are known to contribute to phenotypic variation in rice populations. For instance, a Helitron in the MYB61 [18] promoter was reported to affect rice nitrogen utilization; an LTR insertion in the GY3 promoter suppresses its expression and results in a higher content of active cytokinins in young panicles [19]; and the PIF-Harbinger transposon-derived gene PANDA epigenetically coordinates panicle number and grain size in rice [20]. Identification of TEs across rice accessions would facilitate efforts to determine the contribution of TEs to expression and phenotypic variation. Three studies of population-scale TE variations based on Illumina short-reads [11,21,22] have been published in rice. However, these studies mainly focused on Os accessions, with Or and domestication-associated TE variations remaining underexplored. In addition, although an increasing number of rice studies based on high-quality assemblies have been published, population-level, high-quality studies of TE variations have not been reported. Moreover, because of the absence of rice outgroup accessions in previous studies, it is hard to distinguish the ancestral and derived state of TE variations. Thus, building a pan-TE resource using high-quality chromosome-level assemblies and inferring whether TE variations are ancestral or derived based on outgroups are desirable, and such information will help us to know the true extent of TE variation in plants and their biological impacts on rice environmental adaptation and domestication.
Here, we de novo assembled chromosome-level genomes for 232 diverse rice accessions by integrating Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read data and Illumina short-read data from public databases. Combining these assemblies with 15 existing rice assemblies, we constructed a pan-TE map of 247 Asian accessions (218 Os and 29 Or accessions) and inferred whether TE variations were ancestral or derived using three non-Asian accessions as outgroups (Oryza glaberrima, Oryza barthii and Oryza glumaepatula). We analyzed TE variation characteristics and the role of TE mobilization in rice domestication diversification. Moreover, we analyzed the contribution of TE variation to gene expression variation and identified 1246 genes whose expression levels were significantly associated with TE variation but not single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Importantly, our pan-TE map enabled genome-wide association study (GWAS)-based identification of loci associated with phenotypes (i.e. seed setting rate under cold stress), which were undetectable when using only SNPs. Taken together, the pan-TE map is a valuable resource for understanding the genetic basis of environmental adaptation, domestication and agronomic traits in rice.
RESULTS
De novo assembly and pan-TE map construction for Asian rice accessions
We collected the relevant long-read and short-read data for 250 rice accessions, chromosomal-level assemblies for 18 accessions, and leaf transcriptome data for 202 Os accessions, which were selected based on the geographical distribution and genetic diversity of rice from public databases (Table S1a, see ‘Materials and data collection’). The 250 accessions included 247 Asian rice accessions and 3 non-Asian rice accessions (1 O. glaberrima, 1 O. barthii and 1 O. glumaepatula) as outgroups (henceforth termed ‘outgroups’) (Table S1a). A phylogenetic tree constructed using whole-genome SNP data for the 250 accessions clearly divided these materials into four main subpopulations, Osi, Aus, Osj and Or (Fig. 1a). Since data for only five Aus accessions were collected, which is not enough for population analysis, they were not included in subsequent subpopulation analysis. Finally, 146 Osi, 61 Osj and 27 Or were retained to represent the Osi, Osj and Or subpopulations for population comparison analysis. The results of admixture and principal component analysis (PCA) were highly consistent with those of the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S1a–c).
We found that a genome has an average of 28 895 intact TEs (Fig. S1d), and the number of intact TEs of chromosomal-level genomes is more than that of contig-level genomes (Fig. S1d), thus, obtaining high-quality chromosomal-level genomes was critical for constructing a pan-TE map. To this end, the non-chromosome-level assemblies of 232 accessions were de novo assembled with ONT long reads using NextDenovo (version 2.4) [23] (Fig. 1b), and the assemblies were corrected with both long reads and Illumina short reads using Nextpolish (version 1.4.0) [24]. The 232 new assemblies had an average length of 390.7 ± 11.3 Mb and average contig N50 of 23.7 ± 6.0 Mb (Table S1b). An average of 99.7% ± 0.2% of contigs were anchored to the chromosomes (Table S1b). We next evaluated the quality of the new assemblies and found that: (i) an average of 98.5% ± 0.5% of Illumina short reads could be mapped to their corresponding assembly, which is similar to the mapping rate (98.0%) obtained for Nipponbare (NIP) [15,25] (Table 1b and Fig. S1e); (ii) the assembly quality was comparable to that of the NIP genome [15,25], with 97.9% ± 0.2% of a Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) [26] 1440 reference gene set captured in each new assembly (Table S1b and Fig. S1e); and (iii) the average accuracy at the single-base level was high (99.9996% ± 0.0004%) for the new assemblies (Table S1b). In addition, the high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data from four assemblies (Fig. S1f) indicated the high continuity and completeness of the new assemblies. These results together suggested that the quality of all 232 new assemblies was comparable to, or better than, the levels achieved for the NIP reference genome [25], highlighting the high-quality of these new assemblies.
Next, DNA repeat sequences were annotated in the 250 high-quality genomes consisting of the 232 new assemblies and 18 existing chromosome-level assemblies downloaded from previous reports [27–31] using Extensive de-novo TE Annotator (EDTA) [32]. An average of 199.2 Mb of TEs per assembly was annotated, accounting for an average of 51.0% of the total assembly length (Table S1c); overall, these values are consistent with a previous report [15]. The LTR assembly index (LAI) [33] was used to evaluate the integrity of the TE sequences in these new assemblies, and the average LAI per assembly was 21.3 ± 3.9 (Table S1b and Fig. S1g), which reached the ‘gold standard’ level (LAI > 20). Furthermore, comparison of the NH231 (9311) assembly sequence with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones [34] sequenced using Sanger technology showed that both sequences were of similar quality in the TE regions (Table S1d and Fig. S1h–i).
We found that the accessions were highly diverse in terms of TE numbers. The coefficient of variation and standard deviation for the numbers of TEs per family across all 250 accessions were 0.01–0.58 and 70–3257, respectively (Fig. 1c; Table S1c). The variation in the total number of TEs across these 250 accessions allowed us to study the impacts of TEs on rice evolution. For example, in our previous study we found that the observed variation in genome size can be primarily explained by the number of LTRs [11]. Using our present TE data sets for Osi, Osj and Or accessions, we further found that genome size variation in Asian rice was mainly due to the variation in the number of Gypsy elements (Fig. 1d; Fig. S1j).
To survey the landscape of TE variation in Asian rice, we compared 250 chromosomal-level assemblies against the Nipponbare assembly using minimap2 (version 2.24-r1122) [35]. Presence/absence variants (PAVs, >50 bp) were identified using custom perl scripts. When >90% of the sequences of a PAV are TE sequences, we consider the PAV as a TE variation (or TE-derived PAV) (Fig. S1k) [36]. A pan-TE map was developed eventually (total 177 084 non-redundant TE variations, Fig. 1b). To quantitatively estimate the accuracy of our pan-TE map, we manually examined 200 randomly selected TE variations by visualizing the corresponding long-read mapping using the Integrative Genomics Viewer Browser. Using this method, we estimated the accuracy of our pan-TE map to be 97.5% (Table S1e). We compared the TE variations identified in Os accessions with those previously detected using short-read sequences from the 3K-RG data set [11], and found that the average length of TE variation we identified in the 218 Os accessions (3813 bp) was larger than that of the 3K-RG data set (346 bp) [11,21]. Notably, almost half the TE variations were relatively long (the lengths of 47.3% TE variations were longer than 1 kb) (Fig. 1e), and 14.0% of TE variations contained at least two TE sequences. Together, these results suggested that using high-quality assemblies improved the identification of TE variations.
Inference and characterization of TE variations representing a derived state in Asian rice
In previous studies [11,22] of population-scale TE variations, there were no rice outgroup accessions, making it hard to distinguish whether a given accession was with the ancestral state or the derived state in a given TE variation. In addition, without outgroups, it was not possible to determine whether each TE variation was the result of a TE insertion (INS) or deletion (DEL) event. Since all three outgroups, including one O. glaberrima [15], one O. barthii [15] and one O. glumaepatula (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CM002522.2), are ancestral relatives to Asian rice, and there has been no introgression between them [37,38], we were able to use them as outgroups to represent the ancestral states of TE variations, and to infer the state of each TE variation in each accession. TE variations that have both derived state and ancestral state in Asian rice accessions were defined as derived TE variations (henceforth, dTEs). Derived state indicates that the genotype of the TE variation in a given accession is different from outgroups, while ancestral state indicates that the genotype of the TE variation in a given accession is the same as outgroups (Figs 1b and 2a). We found 169 798 non-redundant dTEs (95.8% of non-redundant TE variations) in the Asian accessions with a total length of 647.9 Mb (Fig. 2b), which was ∼3.5-fold higher than the total length of TE sequences in NIP (185.4 Mb). Most of the non-redundant dTE sequences were contributed by Or (Fig. 2b), possibly because of the reference bias using Nipponbare as the reference and higher genetic diversity of Or compared with Osi and Osj. An obviously higher number of dTE INS events compared with DEL events was observed in the Asian rice population (Fig. 2b). However, except for Or accessions, the number/length of dTE DELs in each accession was significantly higher than that of dTE INSs in each accession (Fig. 2c, P < 0.001). We speculate that this might be due to the unbalanced frequency between dTE INS and DEL events in Asian rice populations. 99 840 (72.9%) dTE INSs and 10 258 (31.3%) dTE DELs were present in one or only a few accessions (present frequency < 0.05) (Fig. S2a). When comparing the ratio between INSs and DELs over present frequency of dTE variation, we found a decreased curve (Fig. 2d; Fig. S2a–b), which suggests that the clearing speed to dTE INS and DEL might be different in rice evolution, with a faster clearing speed to dTE INS.
By further analyzing the dTE numbers and lengths per TE family, we found that the majority of dTEs were Gypsy, Helitron and Copia elements (Fig. 2e), which was consistent with the high proportion of these elements in each genome (Fig. 1a). The inference of dTEs can help reveal the direction and biological significance of natural and/or artificial selection acting on TEs. For example, a 977 bp dTE (Helitron) INS near the promoter of a transcription factor gene, MYB61, was reported to regulate nitrogen utilization and biomass production in rice, and the Helitron INS was found in Osj accessions, but not Or or Osi accessions or the genomes of the CC and EE outgroups in rice in a previous study [38]. However, with our high-quality Asian pan-TE map, we found the Helitron INS in some of the Or and Osi accessions (Fig. 2f), which indicated that the Helitron INS occurred before rice domestication. In addition, we found that the Helitron sequence varied among Asian accessions (Fig. S2c). Notably, some Osj accessions had two copies of this Helitron INS, and the two copies were close together (∼145 kb). Because the dTE contains a structurally intact Helitron sequence, we estimated the Helitron insertion time for each copy in accessions with this dTE and found that these Helitron sequences were relatively young overall (Table S1g).
In addition, we calculated the number of dTEs near each gene (within ± 2 kb of a gene body) in our Asian pan-TE map and found that 31.8% of genes were conserved across all Asian accessions (no nearby dTEs were found), while almost half the genes (47.4%) contained two or more dTEs (Fig. 2g). Gene ontology (GO) analyses showed that genes containing no dTEs were significantly enriched in pathways related to basic metabolism and biosynthesis of metabolites (P < 0.05), including cell death, photosynthesis, gene expression, amide biosynthetic process and metabolic process (Fig. S2d and Table S1h). In contrast, genes containing several dTEs (i.e. the number of nearby dTEs ranked in the top 5% of all genes in NIP) were significantly enriched for abiotic and biotic response genes (P < 0.05), such as resistance genes (Xa1 and Pita) and heat shock protein genes (OsSHSP2 and OsHSP1; Fig. 2h; Table S1h), indicating that TE variations may play important roles in environmental adaptation in nature. This speculation is also supported by a significant negative correlation between latitude and the number of dTEs in each Asian rice accession (Fig. S2e–f).
Contribution of TE variations to rice domestication and differentiation
TEs can accumulate in regions of low recombination due to the action of Hill-Robertson interference [39], as we found a significant negative correlation between dTE diversity and the recombination rate of genomes in rice (Fig. 3a; Fig. S3a). However, we found a significantly positive correlation between Gypsy diversity and the recombination rate of genomes in Osi accessions (Fig. S3b), and the differences in the correlation directionality across TE types and subpopulations have been reported in other plants [9,39], indicating that the INSs and DELs of TE variations are a potentially rich source of variation in plant adaptive evolution. Numerous plant domestication and agronomic traits have been associated with particular TE variations, thus we speculated that dTEs may play an important role in evolutionary processes, such as domestication and differentiation in rice. To explore the impacts of TE variations on the domestication and differentiation of Asian rice, we investigated TE variations in 247 diverse Asian rice accessions. A phylogenetic tree constructed using our dTE data set for the Asian rice accessions clearly divided the accessions into the groups of Osi, Osj, Aus and Or (Fig. S3c), consistent with the SNP-based rice phylogeny (Fig. 1a). Meanwhile, the results of admixture (Fig. S3d) and PCA (Fig. S3e–f) using the dTE data set also revealed that TE variations were closely associated with Asian rice domestication and differentiation.
Next, we calculated the average number of dTEs in the selective windows (i.e. ranked in the top 5% of 100 kb FST windows for SNPs) between subpopulations. dTEs were significantly enriched in selective windows than expected at random, in comparisons between Or and Osi, Or and Osj, and Osi and Osj, even under the conditions in which we controlled the sample size of each subpopulation to the same level (Fig. 3b, P < 2.2e-16; Fig. S3g), indicating that dTEs probably participated in rice domestication (from Or to Osi and Or to Osj) and differentiation (between Osi and Osj). Thus, to determine whether the observed differential distribution of dTE genotypes among subpopulations was due to selection, we estimated the divergence of each dTE across the genome using FST analysis, and 2141 and 2043 of the dTEs showing signatures of selection (henceforth ‘selected dTEs’; i.e. locus showing signatures of selection, i.e. FST outlier between Or and Osi [outlier = 0.85], Or and Osj [outlier = 0.84]) were detected in the Or-Osi and Or-Osj comparisons, respectively (Fig. 3c). In total, 3935 selected dTEs possibly involved in the domestication processes were ultimately identified (Fig. 3c). Using the same FST analysis approach, we also identified 2108 selected dTEs possibly involved in differentiation between Osi and Osj (outlier FST value = 0.94) (Fig. 3c). Almost all LTR types and two DNA types, MITE and Helitron, were significantly enriched in rice domestication and differentiation processes (P < 0.05, Fig. 3d), while SINE and LINE were significantly enriched in the domestication processes from Or to Osi (P < 0.05, Fig. 3d).
We analyzed the genes overlapping with selected dTEs and identified 3860 potential candidate genes (henceforth ‘dTE-genes’), including 2992 dTE-genes with evidence of selection between Or and Os (1634 dTE-genes between Or and Osi, and 1580 dTE-genes between Or and Osj) and 1750 dTE-genes with evidence of selection between Osi and Osj. Of these, we identified the selection and expression differences for 169 genes with known functions (Fig. 3e; Fig. S3h). We found selected dTEs near previously identified putative domestication genes, such as An-2 [40]. In addition, we found a selected dTE (345 bp) INS in the intron of a known gene, OsAKR2, between Or and Osj, which was located in a region in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the known domestication gene qSh1 (Fig. S3i). We can infer that this dTE INS may be also strongly selected in the domestication process due to strong linkage disequilibrium with the causal SNP variant in qSh1. We also found a 112 bp selected dTE (LINE) DEL in the 3′UTR of the drought tolerant gene OsCML4 in upland Osj accessions, and the expression level of OsCML4 in the upland Osj accessions with the dTE DEL was significantly higher than that of the Or accessions without this dTE DEL (Fig. S3j). Increased OsCML4 expression likely causes the upland Osj accessions to have stronger drought resistance than the other Os accessions.
We found two dTE-genes that might be involved in environmental adaptation, promoting the formation of diverse crops during the differentiation of Osi and Osj. For example, a selected dTE occurred between Osi and Osj subpopulations (FST = 0.94, rank: 4.42%). This 157 bp sequence with a Helitron was located downstream of a known heat stress gene, OsClpB-m [41]. It was found in the outgroups (ancestral state), some of the Or accessions (18 out of 27; the genotype of one accession was uncertain), and most of the Osi accessions (120 out of 146; the genotypes of 21 accessions were uncertain), but absent in most of the Osj accessions (derived state; 54 out of 61; the genotypes of the remaining 7 accessions were uncertain) (Fig. S3k). The Osj accessions with the dTE DEL event had significantly lower expression levels of OsClpB-m [41] (Fig. S3k, P < 0.01) and heat tolerance (Fig. S3k, P < 0.001) than the Osi accessions without the dTE DEL event.
Another dTE-gene example was the rice cold-induced LIP19 [42] gene, which encodes a 148-amino-acid basic region/leucine zipper protein and is highly expressed in the mesophyll cells surrounding vascular bundles of rice plants. We detected a 150 bp selected dTE (Tourist MITE, FST = 0.95, rank: 3.71%) inserted in the promoter of LIP19 (Fig. 3f). The 150 bp region was present in almost all Osj accessions (60 out of 61) but few Osi accessions (4 out of 146, Fig. 3f). The expression level of LIP19 in the Osj accessions with the dTE INS was shown to be significantly higher than those Osi accessions without the dTE INS (Fig. 3g, P < 0.001). It is therefore possible that this dTE INS has contributed to cold tolerance in the Osj accessions rather than those Osi accessions without the dTE INS (Fig. 3h–i, P < 0.001). Osj accessions are distributed in the regions with a higher latitude and colder temperature, and the dTE state (including derived state and ancestral state) of the temperature adaptation genes also distributed according to the latitude (Fig. 3j; Fig. S3l), which may be affected by climate adaptability selection due to temperature. The phylogenetic tree of the dTE and LIP19 sequences from the 247 Asian rice accessions and three outgroups showed that the outgroups were without the 150 bp dTE region. The Osj accessions and Osi accessions were grouped with different Or accessions, which was consistent with the distribution of the dTE INS event. The dTE in the Osj subpopulation was derived from Or accessions (Fig. 3k). The fact that the distribution of this dTE INS event was nearly fixed in the Osj subpopulation (60 out of 61) and nearly totally absent in the Osi subpopulation (4 out of 146), demonstrated that the dTE was selected during the domestication of Osj and Osi, potentially because of its effect on cold response through the modulating expression of the LIP19 gene. These results suggested that dTEs probably contribute to climate adaptability by altering gene expression in rice.
TE variations associated with gene expression
In many organisms, including plants and animals, TEs have been shown to be associated with differences in expression level [43]. To assess more systematically whether TEs are a potentially important source of gene expression variation [5,12,22], we first measured the LD of dTE with nearby SNPs and insertion-deletion polymorphisms (InDels). We observed that a large fraction of dTEs are in strong LD (R2 > 0.7) with adjacent (50 kb on either side) SNPs and InDels (43.4% and 47.6%, respectively, Fig. 4a), and a small proportion (7.5% and 11.3%, respectively) are in complete LD (R2 = 1). However, nearly one-fourth of dTEs are in weak LD (25.2% and 30.3%, respectively, R2 < 0.1), indicating that TE variations are not perfectly tagged by SNPs and InDel markers. We next calculated the number of dTEs in terms of relative position to genes and found that 79.5% of dTEs overlap with genic regions (within ± 2 kb of a gene body) (Fig. 4b). Compared with the distribution of TEs in the NIP genome [25], the dTEs from the Asian pan-TE map were significantly enriched in transcriptional regulatory regions (P < 0.05) and depleted in coding sequences (CDSs, P < 0.001) and intronic regions (P < 0.001, Fig. 4b). All TE families showed a pattern similar to that of the whole dTE data set (Fig. 4b), indicating that TEs may play a role in regulating gene expression.
To estimate the relative contribution of TE variations and SNPs to gene expression changes, we associated dTEs and SNPs with gene expression levels among Os accessions, respectively, and identified expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Using leaf transcriptome data from our previous study [15], we identified 3868 genes whose expression was significantly associated with dTE (referred to as eGenes, Fig. 4c). Of these eGenes, 2622 were also identified in the SNP-eQTL analysis. For example, a dTE (DTM) INS present in the intron of a shared gene OsGluRS [44] was found in 60 out of 61 Osj accessions, while the leading SNP variant with OsGluRS [44] gene expression variations was ∼4.8 kb away from the gene (Fig. S4a), indicating that the dTE is potentially a crucial variation altering OsGluRS [44] expression. Knockdown lines of OsGluRS [44] in Osj accessions resulted in an abnormal phenotype characterized by yellow-green leaves when plants were grown at 26°C or higher (non-permissive temperature) [44]. We also found similar results at the population level; accessions with the dTE INS (the derived state) showed significantly lower expression and lower heat resistance than those without the dTE INS (the ancestral state, Fig. S4a). Another example is a known positive regulator gene of bacterial blight resistance, OsRP1L1 [45]. A 1.0 kb dTE (Helitron) INS in the gene promoter was identified in most Osj accessions (57 out of 61) and a few Osi accessions (13 out of 146) (Fig. S4b). The expression of OsRP1L1 was previously shown to ensure appropriate bacterial blight resistance in rice [45]. We found that the accessions with the dTE INS had significantly higher expression levels and were possibly associated with lower susceptibility to bacterial blight than the accessions without the dTE INS (Fig. S4b), indicating that this dTE may play a role in increasing bacterial blight resistance. For the 2622 shared eGenes between TE-eQTL and SNP-eQTL analysis, we compared the expression variance explained by the most significantly associated dTEs and SNPs. For ∼48.9% of these genes, the leading associated dTEs could explain more expression variance than the leading associated SNPs.
Importantly, the expression levels of 1246 eGenes were only associated with dTEs and not associated with SNP data (Fig. 4c), demonstrating the importance of considering dTEs in gene expression. For example, the expression of a rice NADPH oxidase gene, OsRbohB [46], was significantly associated with a 328 bp dTE (DNA TE PILE) INS event in its promoter region (Fig. 4d). We did not find any significant association of OsRbohB expression with SNPs. The dTE INS was associated with decreased expression of OsRbohB in the accessions with the dTE INS (Fig. 4e), and the accessions with the dTE INS had reduced thousand grain weight compared with those without the dTE INS (Fig. 4f) in both the Osi and Osj accessions (Fig. S4c). It seems plausible that this dTE INS may contribute to thousand grain weight, consistent with the phenotype of the OsRbohB mutant showing lower thousand grain weight in a previous study [46]. Compared to the accessions (such as NH016) without the dTE INS, the accessions (such as NH243) with the dTE INS in a OsRbohB promoter fragment significantly reduced its relative expression activity (Fig. 4g). These results validated the incomplete LD between dTEs and small variants (SNPs and InDels) and highlighted the potential of dTEs to explain additional variation in gene expression and agronomic traits.
TE variations associated with agronomic traits
To demonstrate how the pan-TE map can be used to facilitate the identification of agronomic traits associated with TE variations, we performed a GWAS of agronomic traits in Os accessions. A GW5 peak was previously detected in a GWAS on grain width using SNPs or TE variations genotyped using short-read data [47]. We also detected the same signal for grain width. In addition, we identified a new locus on chromosome 7 harboring a 131 bp dTE (Stowaway MITE) INS that was significantly associated with grain width (Fig. S5a). The locus was not identified using SNPs or the previous TE variations based on short-reads data. Rice accessions with the dTE INS (derived state) were shown to have significantly lower grain width than those without the dTE INS (ancestral state) (P < 0.001, Fig. S5b). Within a 5 kb region of the TE peak, there were two candidate genes. One of them was LOC_Os07g41000 [48], a gene previously reported to regulate grain width (Fig. S5b–c), indicating that the dTE might control grain width by influencing LOC_Os07g41000 [48].
Using phenotypes related to heat tolerance to conduct TE-GWAS, we identified two dTE peak loci strongly associated with heat stress in Osi accessions; these loci were not identified using the SNP data set of Osi accessions (Fig. S5d–g). From the candidate genes near each dTE peak (5 kb on either side), we found a 263 bp dTE (Gypsy) DEL, which was associated with the level of heat resistance, and was located near an OsFBX121 F-box domain gene, LOC_Os04g11890 (Fig. S5d–e, P < 0.001). F-box proteins play important roles in responses to environmental stimuli [49], indicating that the dTE might affect heat resistance by affecting LOC_Os04g11890. Likewise, another TE locus associated with leaf survival rate under heat stress was located near a calcium-binding protein gene, LOC_Os03g07470 (rice annexin OsANN1) [50], which could potentially confer enhancement of heat stress tolerance by modulating the production of H2O2 (Fig. S5f–g, P < 0.01). Together, these results indicated that the two dTEs are associated with heat stress.
We also found that a dTE peak harboring a 1.0 kb dTE (Gypsy) DEL on chromosome 6 was strongly associated with seed setting rate under cold stress, and this locus was not identified based on SNP data (Fig. 4h; Fig. S5h). This dTE DEL was located 1.6 kb upstream of the bolA family gene LOC_Os06g28970 [51], which has been linked to stress response pathways. The absence or overexpression of bolA proteins could modulate the response to a variety of environmental challenges [51]. A follow-up analysis showed that the seed setting rate in accessions with the dTE DEL was significantly higher than that in accessions without the dTE DEL (Fig. 4i, P < 0.01). The expression level of LOC_Os06g28970 in accessions with the dTE DEL was significantly higher than that in accessions without the dTE DEL (Fig. 4j, P < 0.05). To identify the high-confidence variants predicted to be associated with seed setting rate under cold stress, we performed sum of single effects (SuSiE) [52] analysis to fine-map the dominance loci (PIP = 1) using dTE and SNP variants located near the peak (100 kb on either side). Then, combining these fine-mapping results with the significant TE-GWAS and SNP-GWAS peaks, we confirmed that the 1.0 kb dTE DEL associated with LOC_Os06g28970 [51] was most likely to be the causal variant affecting seed setting rate under cold stress. These results allowed us to infer that dTE might make widespread contributions to rice complex traits.
DISCUSSION
Rice is a major food crop for billions of people globally [17], and obtaining a deeper understanding of rice phenotypic variation and crop domestication can significantly benefit agriculture, world food security, and the biological and genomic research communities. In the present study, we took advantage of 15 existing and 232 new high-quality chromosomal-level assemblies of diverse accessions to generate an Asian rice pan-TE map. Subsequently, using three non-Asian rice accessions as outgroups, we used the pan-TE map to infer TE variations representing the derived state, and analyzed their characteristics in Asian rice accessions. Compared to SNPs, TE variations often explain more phenotypic variance and can be used for genomic prediction [53]. The reason for this could be that, as compared with SNPs, TE variations are more frequently the causal mutation. For example, by performing dTE-eQTL analysis, we identified 1246 genes whose expression was significantly associated with dTEs but not identified based on SNP data. Additionally, using dTE data to conduct a GWAS of agronomic traits in rice, we successfully uncovered multiple novel associations that could not be detected using SNP data (Fig. 4h).
Given that knowing the ancestral or derived state of each TE can support inferences about the evolutionary relationships between rice accessions and the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity in the rice populations, these rich dTE data sets represent important resources for investigations of rice evolution and domestication history in functional genomics studies. Using the pan-TE map, we found that the number of dTE INS events was greater than dTE DEL events. TE variation frequency is commonly used to mirror TE age, because low-frequency TE variations are much younger than those in the outgroup [54]. Consistent with this assumption, the vast majority of low-frequency dTE INSs were younger and more quickly removed than dTE DELs in nature, implying that these sequences might be deleterious and selected during artificial domestication or natural selection [55].
The construction of a species’ pan-genome enables us to resolve hidden genomic complexity involving TE variations, and re-evaluate their role in genome evolution and generation of phenotypic variation. Previous studies utilized Asian cultivated rice, 208 Os accessions [22], 3010 Os accessions [11] and 176 Os accessions [56], based on the short-read data, to identify TE and develop a TE data set, without Or accessions, while our pan-TE variation map included 218 Os and 29 Or accessions. We could analyze the changes in TE variation during rice domestication processes, and found that 3935 selected dTEs seem likely to be involved in the domestication process from Or to Osi or Osj. In addition, our use of high-quality chromosome-level genome assemblies enabled us to identify complex TE variation. We found dTEs that contain two or more TEs in our pan-TE map, such as a dTE consisting of one Gypsy, one Helitron and one Copia element, which are also likely to contribute to phenotypic diversity. Using the high-quality TE data set, we could identify TE contributions to environmental adaptation and domestication, and some rare TE mutations may have greater potential for gene cloning and molecular breeding [57].
In addition, our reference-quality genomes will be helpful to the very large number of research groups doing various basic biological studies [58], such as those developing genome editing technologies and promoting successful mapping of causal mutations positioned within highly complex and/or duplicated regions. The Asian pan-TE map also offers a platform that enables researchers to obtain more information than they would using only a few accessions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Detailed materials and methods are available in the supplementary data.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are very grateful to the high-performance computing centers of the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen and computing centers of the China National Rice Research Institute for their technical support.
Contributor Information
Xiaoxia Li, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Rice Research Institute, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Xiaofan Dai, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Rice Research Institute, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Huiying He, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Yang Lv, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Rice Research Institute, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Longbo Yang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Wenchuang He, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Congcong Liu, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya 572024, China.
Hua Wei, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Xiangpei Liu, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Qiaoling Yuan, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Xianmeng Wang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Tianyi Wang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Bintao Zhang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Hong Zhang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Wu Chen, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Yue Leng, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Xiaoman Yu, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Hongge Qian, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Bin Zhang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya 572024, China.
Mingliang Guo, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Zhipeng Zhang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Chuanlin Shi, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Qianqian Zhang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Yan Cui, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Qiang Xu, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Xinglan Cao, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Dandan Chen, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Yongfeng Zhou, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; National Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Qian Qian, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya 572024, China; State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Lianguang Shang, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China; Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya 572024, China.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All new assemblies of 232 accessions in the present study have been deposited at the Genome Warehouse (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/) under PRJCA018476. The TE annotation of all assemblies has been deposited at Figshare (https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Annotations_of_250_high_quality_rice_genomes/23803956).
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32188102 and 32101718), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023B1515020053), the Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS- CSIAF -202303) and the Youth Innovation of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Y2023QC36).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
L.S., Q.Q. and Y.Z. conceived the idea and designed the project; X.L., X.D., H.H. and Y.L. collected and downloaded the samples and investigated sequencing data; X.L. participated in the execution of sequence assembly, quality assessment and TE annotation; X.D. accomplished the construction and analysis of pan-TE; H.H. fulfilled the inferring of derived TE; Y.L. completed the analysis of the validation of TE; L.Y. performed the SNP and GWAS analysis; W.C.H was responsible for FST analysis; C.L. and B.Z were responsible for TE families; H.W. and Q.Z. did the molecular biology experiments; X.W. and Y.L. were responsible for Hi-C data analysis; X.Y. and Q.Y. implemented the construction of TE phylogenetic tree; H.Z and X.P.L performed eQTL analysis; B.T.Z and D.C. completed the analysis of TE haplotype; X.Y. and X.L.C. accomplished the construction of SNP phylogenetic tree; C.S. and T.W. were responsible for estimation of recombination rate; W.C. and M.G. implemented the calculation of TE insertion time; H.Q. and Y.C. drew the haplotype diagram; Q.X and Z.Z. did the enrichment and Fisher’s exact test across different families; L.S., Q.Q. and Y.Z. coordinated all co-authors and revised the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Feschotte C, Jiang N, Wessler SR. Plant transposable elements: where genetics meets genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3: 329–41. 10.1038/nrg793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Mc CB. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1951; 16: 13–47. 10.1101/SQB.1951.016.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8: 973–82. 10.1038/nrg2165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chénais B. Transposable elements and human diseases: mechanisms and implication in the response to environmental pollutants. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 2551. 10.3390/ijms23052551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cai X, Lin R, Liang J et al. Transposable element insertion: a hidden major source of domesticated phenotypic variation in Brassica rapa. Plant Biotechnol J 2022; 20: 1298–310. 10.1111/pbi.13807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Niu C, Jiang L, Cao F et al. Methylation of a MITE insertion in the MdRFNR1-1 promoter is positively associated with its allelic expression in apple in response to drought stress. Plant Cell 2022; 34: 3983–4006. 10.1093/plcell/koac220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Domínguez M, Dugas E, Benchouaia M et al. The impact of transposable elements on tomato diversity. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 4058. 10.1038/s41467-020-17874-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhang L, Hu J, Han X et al. A high-quality apple genome assembly reveals the association of a retrotransposon and red fruit colour. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 1494. 10.1038/s41467-019-09518-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lisch D. How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet 2013; 14: 49–61. 10.1038/nrg3374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Studer A, Zhao Q, Ross-Ibarra J et al. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 1160–3. 10.1038/ng.942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Carpentier MC, Manfroi E, Wei FJ et al. Retrotranspositional landscape of Asian rice revealed by 3000 genomes. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 24. 10.1038/s41467-018-07974-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wei KH, Mai D, Chatla K et al. Dynamics and impacts of transposable element proliferation in the Drosophila nasuta Species group radiation. Mol Biol Evol 2022; 39: msac080. 10.1093/molbev/msac080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wing RA, Purugganan MD, Zhang Q. The rice genome revolution: from an ancient grain to green Super rice. Nat Rev Genet 2018; 19: 505–17. 10.1038/s41576-018-0024-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Qin P, Lu H, Du H et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 2021; 184: 3542–58. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shang L, Li X, He H et al. A super pan-genomic landscape of rice. Cell Res 2022; 32: 878–96. 10.1038/s41422-022-00685-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tao Y, Zhao X, Mace E et al. Exploring and exploiting pan-genomics for crop improvement. Mol Plant 2019; 12: 156–69. 10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wang W, Mauleon R, Hu Z et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 2018; 557: 43–9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gao Y, Xu Z, Zhang L et al. MYB61 is regulated by GRF4 and promotes nitrogen utilization and biomass production in rice. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 5219. 10.1038/s41467-020-19019-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wu B, Meng J, Liu H et al. Suppressing a phosphohydrolase of cytokinin nucleotide enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet 2023; 55: 1381–9. 10.1038/s41588-023-01454-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mao D, Tao S, Li X et al. The Harbinger transposon-derived gene PANDA epigenetically coordinates panicle number and grain size in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 2022; 20: 1154–66. 10.1111/pbi.13799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fuentes RR, Chebotarov D, Duitama J et al. Structural variants in 3000 rice genomes. Genome Res 2019; 29: 870–80. 10.1101/gr.241240.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Castanera R, Morales-Díaz N, Gupta S et al. Transposons are important contributors to gene expression variability under selection in rice populations. eLife 2023; 12: RP86324. 10.7554/eLife.86324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hu J, Wang Z, Sun Z et al. NextDenovo: an efficient error correction and accurate assembly tool for noisy long reads. Genome Biol 2024; 25: 107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hu J, Fan J, Sun Z et al. NextPolish: a fast and efficient genome polishing tool for long-read assembly. Bioinformatics 2020; 36: 2253–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kawahara Y, de la Bastide M, Hamilton JP et al. Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice (N Y) 2013; 6: 4. 10.1186/1939-8433-6-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P et al. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015; 31: 3210–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhou Y, Chebotarov D, Kudrna D et al. A platinum standard pan-genome resource that represents the population structure of Asian rice. Sci Data 2020; 7: 113. 10.1038/s41597-020-0438-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Song JM, Xie WZ, Wang S et al. Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice. Mol Plant 2021; 14: 1757–67. 10.1016/j.molp.2021.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dong PF, Tu XY, Chu PY et al. 3D chromatin architecture of large plant genomes determined by local A/B compartments. Mol Plant 2017; 10: 1497–509. 10.1016/j.molp.2017.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Xie X, Du H, Tang H et al. A chromosome-level genome assembly of the wild rice oryza rufipogon facilitates tracing the origins of Asian cultivated rice. Sci China Life Sci 2021; 64: 282–93. 10.1007/s11427-020-1738-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhang H, Wang Y, Deng C et al. High-quality genome assembly of Huazhan and Tianfeng, the parents of an elite rice hybrid Tian-you-hua-zhan. Sci China Life Sci 2022; 65: 398–411. 10.1007/s11427-020-1940-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ou S, Su W, Liao Y et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol 2019; 20: 275. 10.1186/s13059-019-1905-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ou S, Chen J, Jiang N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46: e126. 10.1093/nar/gky730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Pan Y, Deng Y, Lin H et al. Comparative BAC-based physical mapping of oryza sativa ssp. Indica var. 93-11 and evaluation of the two rice reference sequence assemblies. Plant J 2014; 77: 795–805. 10.1111/tpj.12412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2018; 34: 3094–100. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chen J, Liu Y, Liu M et al. Pangenome analysis reveals genomic variations associated with domestication traits in broomcorn millet. Nat Genet 2023; 55: 2243–54. 10.1038/s41588-023-01571-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Choi JY, Platts AE, Fuller DQ et al. The Rice Paradox: multiple origins but single domestication in Asian rice. Mol Biol Evol 2017; 34: 969–79. 10.1093/molbev/msx049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Stein JC, Yu Y, Copetti D et al. Genomes of 13 domesticated and wild rice relatives highlight genetic conservation, turnover and innovation across the genus Oryza. Nat Genet 2018; 50: 285–96. 10.1038/s41588-018-0040-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Dolgin ES, Charlesworth B. The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements. Genetics 2008; 178: 2169–77. 10.1534/genetics.107.082743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Gu B, Zhou T, Luo J et al. An-2 encodes a cytokinin synthesis enzyme that regulates awn length and grain production in rice. Mol Plant 2015; 8: 1635–50. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Singh A, Singh U, Mittal D et al. Genome-wide analysis of rice ClpB/HSP100, ClpC and ClpD genes. Bmc Genomics 2010; 11: 95. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shimizu H, Sato K, Berberich T et al. LIP19, a basic region leucine zipper protein, is a fos-like molecular switch in the cold signaling of rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol 2005; 46: 1623–34. 10.1093/pcp/pci178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cridland JM, Thornton KR, Long AD. Gene expression variation in Drosophila melanogaster due to rare transposable element insertion alleles of large effect. Genetics 2015; 199: 85–93. 10.1534/genetics.114.170837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Liu W, Fu Y, Hu G et al. Identification and fine mapping of a thermo-sensitive chlorophyll deficient mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2007; 226: 785–95. 10.1007/s00425-007-0525-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wang X, Chen J, Yang Y et al. Characterization of a novel NBS-LRR gene involved in bacterial blight resistance in rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2013; 31: 649–56. 10.1007/s11105-012-0537-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shi Y, Chang YL, Wu HT et al. OsRbohB-mediated ROS production plays a crucial role in drought stress tolerance of rice. Plant Cell Rep 2020; 39: 1767–84. 10.1007/s00299-020-02603-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Akakpo R, Carpentier MC, Hsing Y et al. The impact of transposable elements on the structure, evolution and function of the rice genome. New Phytol 2020; 226: 44–9. 10.1111/nph.16356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Misra G, Badoni S, Anacleto R et al. Whole genome sequencing-based association study to unravel genetic architecture of cooked grain width and length traits in rice. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 12478. 10.1038/s41598-017-12778-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Cao Y, Yang Y, Zhang H et al. Overexpression of a rice defense-related F-box protein gene OsDRF1 in tobacco improves disease resistance through potentiation of defense gene expression. Physiol Plant 2008; 134: 440–52. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01149.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Qiao B, Zhang Q, Liu D et al. A calcium-binding protein, rice annexin OsANN1, enhances heat stress tolerance by modulating the production of H2O2. J Exp Bot 2015; 66: 5853–66. 10.1093/jxb/erv294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Fleurie A, Zoued A, Alvarez L et al. A vibrio cholerae BolA-like protein is required for proper cell shape and cell envelope integrity. mBio 2019; 10: e00790-19. 10.1128/mBio.00790-19 10.1128/mBio.00790-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wang G, Sarkar A, Carbonetto P et al. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2020; 82: 1273–300. 10.1111/rssb.12388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Vourlaki IT, Castanera R, Ramos-Onsins SE et al. Transposable element polymorphisms improve prediction of complex agronomic traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 2022; 135: 3211–22. 10.1007/s00122-022-04180-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Jiang J, Xu Y, Zhang Z et al. Forces driving transposable element load variation during Arabidopsis range expansion. Biorxiv 2022: 2022.2012.2028.522087. 10.1101/2022.12.28.522087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Bergman CM, Quesneville H, Anxolabéhère D et al. Recurrent insertion and duplication generate networks of transposable element sequences in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Biol 2006; 7: R112. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-r112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yan H, Haak DC, Li S et al. Exploring transposable element-based markers to identify allelic variations underlying agronomic traits in rice. Plant Commun 2022; 3: 100270. 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wang T, He W, Li X et al. A rice variation map derived from 10,548 rice accessions reveals the importance of rare variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51: 10924–33. 10.1093/nar/gkad840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shang L, He W, Wang T et al. A complete assembly of the rice Nipponbare reference genome. Mol Plant 2023; 16: 1232–6. 10.1016/j.molp.2023.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All new assemblies of 232 accessions in the present study have been deposited at the Genome Warehouse (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/) under PRJCA018476. The TE annotation of all assemblies has been deposited at Figshare (https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Annotations_of_250_high_quality_rice_genomes/23803956).