Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2002 Feb 9;324(7333):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7333.361a

Conflict in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka's health service is a casualty of 20 years of war

Brigg Reilley 1,2,3, Isabel Simpson 1,2,3, Nathan Ford 1,2,3, Marc DuBois 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1122281  PMID: 11834572

Editor—Sri Lanka's 20 years of war has killed over 60 000 people and displaced hundreds of thousands more. The LTTE (the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) has been fighting for its own state, resulting in areas of permanent conflict in the north and east of the country. Civilians are caught in crossfire; landmines and unexploded ordnance pose a constant threat; hospitals have been destroyed.

Médecins Sans Frontières runs a substitution medical programme in the northern rebel controlled area, known as the Wanni, supplying specialists, including a surgeon, a paediatrician, an obstetrician, and an anaesthetist. Most medical professionals have fled: 21 of the 27 vacancies for government doctors in the region remain vacant, and only 34 of the 108 midwife positions are filled (rates of maternal and neonatal death are higher than the national average). Government training of medical workers has not taken place in the region since the war began.

Population displacement has led to a rise in infectious diseases and malnutrition. As a result, malaria has increased 20-fold since the conflict began owing to disrupted vector control activities and limited access to treatment facilities, being among the leading causes of death in some areas.

For seven years many essential supplies to the Wanni, including basic items such as sutures, surgical gloves, and oxygen, were subject to government embargo, and drugs and medical materials are often critically low. No postoperative analgesics are available, and often only life saving essential surgery can be performed.

In sharp contrast to many other conflicts, humanitarian law is for the most part respected: soldiers fight soldiers. Both sides cooperate on certain health issues such as emergency patient transfers across the front line and temporary ceasefires to allow polio immunisation campaigns to take place for children.

Sri Lanka's conflict seems nationally and internationally to be have been accepted as a chronic, ethnic conflict, but there are signs of improvement. In January the government embargo was lifted, and previously limited medical supplies are beginning to become available, albeit sporadically. Medical transfers should now be easier. Peace talks are planned.

More could be done to protect the health of civilians. Official training leading to government certification should be given in the rebel controlled area to meet the acute demand for medical staff, and the LTTE should assume greater responsibility for health care in regions under its control. In Sri Lanka as elsewhere, the terrible damage caused by the war to people's health and life expectancy should not be accepted as an inevitable consequence of the fighting.

BMJ. 2002 Feb 9;324(7333):361.

Doctors can influence people and promote peace

K A L A Kuruppuarachchi 1,2, S S Williams 1,2

Editor—Sri Lanka has been ravaged by an internal war for nearly 20 years, with the loss of thousands of lives. Efforts at a negotiated settlement have failed repeatedly.

In this scenario, a workshop on health as a bridge for peace (sponsored by the World Health Organization and approved by the national health authority) was held in 2001. It was mainly for health professionals working in key areas, including in the conflict zones, and many of the issues raised in Vass's editorial, “Peace through health,”1-1 were discussed. There seemed to be a consensus among the participants that health professionals should create opportunities for peace through health.

In Sri Lanka a truce has been negotiated regularly by Unicef to conduct immunisation programmes. Health professionals continue to work in conflict areas amid considerable risk to their lives. Doctors from the Sinhalese majority working in hospitals in predominantly minority regions have often been able to build bridges of better understanding among communities segregated on ethnic lines. By virtue of their training they can rise above racial and communal barriers.

Health professionals also see at first hand the physical and psychological trauma wrought by the war and can raise national awareness on suffering related to war. They have also been a voice against child soldiers.1-2

We believe that lack of conclusive evidence of the benefits of health initiatives for achieving peace is linked to lack of experimentation. When serving in conflict zones young doctors need to be aware of their role to promote peace while avoiding the inherent dangers that compromise their professional standing.

In most developing countries, including Sri Lanka, doctors are generally held in high esteem and their opinion is respected. Through their actions they are in a position to influence people. The principles of conflict resolution have been noted for inclusion in the behavioural sciences module of the medical curriculum in Sri Lanka.

References


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES