Abstract
Background:
Chronically elevated neurohumoral drive, and particularly elevated adrenergic tone leading to β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) overstimulation in cardiac myocytes, is a key mechanism involved in the progression of heart failure. β1-AR and β2-ARs are the two major subtypes of βARs present in the human heart, however, they elicit different or even opposite effects on cardiac function and hypertrophy. For example, chronic activation of β1-ARs drives detrimental cardiac remodeling while β2-AR signaling is protective. The underlying molecular mechanisms for cardiac protection through β2-ARs remain unclear.
Methods:
β2-AR signaling mechanisms were studied in isolated neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and adult mouse ventricular myocytes using live cell imaging and western blotting methods. Isolated myocytes and mice were used to examine the roles of these signaling methods in regulation of cardiac hypertrophy.
Results:
Here we show that β2-AR activation protects against hypertrophy through inhibition of PLCε signaling at the Golgi apparatus. The mechanism for β2-AR-mediated PLC inhibition requires internalization of β2-AR, activation of Gi and Gβγ subunit signaling at endosomes and ERK activation. This pathway inhibits both angiotensin II and Golgi-β1-AR-mediated stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis at the Golgi apparatus ultimately resulting in decreased PKD and HDAC5 phosphorylation and protection against cardiac hypertrophy.
Conclusions:
This reveals a mechanism for β2-AR antagonism of the PLCε pathway that may contribute to the known protective effects of β2-AR signaling on the development of heart failure.
Keywords: Heart Failure, Hypertrophy, Cell Signaling/Signal Transduction, Myocardial Biology, cardiac hypertrophy, adrenergic receptors, ERK signaling, phospholipase C, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate, Golgi, intracellular signaling, G protein-coupled receptors
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Catecholamines of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) regulate heart rate, contractility and vascular resistance through activation of adrenergic receptors. Prolonged elevation of circulating catecholamines, including epinephrine and norepinephrine, in response to cardiac injury, vascular disease, or stress, is tied closely to the pathogenesis of heart failure 1. These hormones act in part through β-adrenergic receptors (βARs) on cardiac myocytes, where chronic activation drives maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy, apoptosis, and fibrosis, ultimately resulting in heart failure 2. βARs are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and consist of three subtypes, β1, β2 and β3. β1-adrenergic receptors (β1-ARs) comprise of 80% of βARs in the healthy human hearts with the β2-ARs comprising the remaining 20% 2. Although β1-ARs and β2-ARs respond to the same physiologic agents, share high sequence homology 3, and core signaling pathways (both couple to Gαs and stimulate cAMP production), they have distinct or even opposite physiological and pathological roles in the heart 4. Specifically, chronic pathological stimulation by endogenous catecholamines leads to decreased β1-AR levels and function in the heart, and mild overexpression of β1-ARs results in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in mice 5,6. In contrast, the β2-AR population remains unchanged during heart failure and moderate levels of β2-AR overexpression leads to positive inotropic effects 7–10. β2-AR deletion in mice leads to exaggerated cardiac hypertrophy in a pressure overload-induced model, and β1-AR deletion mice had a comparable responses to wild type, however, in β1-AR/β2-AR dual knockout mice, cardiac hypertrophy was abolished 11,12. These observations suggest that coordinated signaling events downstream these receptors are critical in mediating cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.
Phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes have important roles in the heart 13–18. PLCs mediate hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5 biphosphate (PIP2) downstream of GPCR and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTKs) activation leading to production of inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) 19,20. Classically, PLCβ isoforms of the PLC family are stimulated downstream of GPCRs by Gq and Gβγ subunits from Gi 21. More recently, PLCε has also been shown to be downstream of multiple GPCR families and RTKs due to its ability to be directly activated by a diverse array of upstream regulators including multiple members of the family of small GTPases (Ras, Rho and Rap) and Gβγ subunits, 22–25.
A pathway that has been extensively studied in cardiac myocytes in our laboratory is regulation of PLCε by Rap after cAMP-dependent stimulation of the Rap GEF, Exchange Protein Activated by cAMP (EPAC) 16–18,26. We previously identified an essential role of PLCε in regulating cardiac hypertrophy in an animal model of pressure-overload induced cardiac hypertrophy 18. In cardiac myocytes, PLCε scaffolds to muscle-specific A kinase anchoring protein (mAKAP) along with PKA, EPAC, protein kinase D (PKD) and other hypertrophic regulatory proteins at nuclear envelope 27,28. Activation of PLCε at this location induces the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) in the closely associated Golgi apparatus, generating inert inositol bisphosphate (IP2) and local DAG to drive the activation of PKD at nucleus and phosphorylation of HDAC leading to the hypertrophic gene expression 18.
While exploring mechanisms for cAMP-dependent stimulation of the Golgi Epac/PLCε pathway we found that stimulation of cell surface β1-ARs with Iso was ineffective in cardiac myocytes 29. Rather, adrenergic stimulation of the Golgi Epac/PLCε pathway required a pre-existing pool of Golgi localized β1-ARs 26 which stimulate production of a pool of cAMP with privileged access to the Epac/PLCε module at the Golgi/NE interface. Access of Epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) to the intracellular β1-ARs requires an organic cation transporter subtype, OCT3 30,31 and blockade of OCT3 attenuated catecholamine-stimulated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy 26 and contractile responses 32. These studies clearly demonstrate physiologically relevant roles of intracellular β1-ARs, however, how plasma membrane/sarcolemma β-AR signaling coordinates with intracellular β1-AR signaling remains poorly explored.
It is well established that intracellular cAMP pools generated at different subcellular compartments downstream of Gs coupled receptors lead to distinct phenotypic outcomes. In cardiac myocytes, β1-ARs but not β2-AR localize on the periphery of the nuclear envelope 33,34 or Golgi 26,32,35 in addition to cell surface and T-tubule locations of both β1 and β2-ARs. Activation or β2-ARs results in internalization into endosomes where they continue to signal, initiating a set of signaling and transcriptional control events distinct from those at the plasma membrane 36. Internalization of activated β2-ARs in cardiac myocytes has been documented 37–39 but functional roles for these internalized receptors have not been thoroughly examined in cardiomyocytes.
In this study, we demonstrate that activation of plasma membrane β2-ARs inhibits stimulation of the hypertrophic EPAC/PLCε pathway at the Golgi downstream of Golgi-β1-ARs and plasma membrane angiotensin II receptors in cardiac myocytes. We describe a mechanism where activated β2-ARs internalize from the plasma membrane, activate Gi, releasing Gβγ, subunits leading to ERK activation and inhibition of PI hydrolysis at Golgi apparatus. This prevents PLCε-mediated downstream hypertrophic signaling including nuclear PKD activation and histone deacetylase (HDAC) phosphorylation. These data reveal a new mechanism that could underly the anti-hypertrophic versus hypertrophic signaling balance between β1 and β2-ARs and give insights into novel strategies for treatment of heart failure by deliberate inhibition of internal β1-ARs and combined with selective β2-AR activation for heart failure therapy.
Methods
Data Availability statement.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Detailed methods are provided in the Supplementary Material. Please see the Major Resources Table in the Supplemental Material.
Results
Activation of β2-ARs opposes Golgi-β1-AR-mediated PLCε activation at the Golgi apparatus.
We previously demonstrated that the cell permeant agonist dobutamine (Dob) stimulates PLCε-dependent PI4P hydrolysis through activation Golgi β1-ARs.26. To assay Golgi PLCε activity we transduce cells with adenoviruses expressing GFP-FAPP (four phosphate adapter protein)-PH which binds selectively to PI4P and measure stimulus-dependent alterations in Golgi associated fluorescence using live-cell time lapse confocal fluorescence imaging in both neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) and adult ventricular myocytes (AVMs) 18,26. Figure 1A shows co-localization of the PI4P-specific fluorescent probe with the Golgi marker GM130. Regions of interest corresponding to the Golgi apparatus in proximity to the nucleus are quantitated over time before and after agonist addition. As further evidence that Golgi PLCε activation by Dob requires Golgi localized β1-ARs in AVMs we expressed Golgi-targeted-mApple-NB80 (enos-mApple-NB80) in AVMs to block downstream engagement of Gs by Golgi βARs, and monitored PI4P hydrolysis. Localization of enos-mApple-NB80 at the Golgi apparatus was confirmed by co-localization AVMs with the Golgi specific fluorescence sensor GFP-FAPP-PH (Fig S1A). Expression of enos-mApple-NB80 blocked Dob-stimulated PLCε activation while the control enos-mApple had no effect (Fig S1B). This recapitulates previous results demonstrating that Golgi βARs mediate activation of Golgi PLCε by β1-AR agonists in AVMs.
Figure 1. A pathway downstream of β2-ARs suppresses β1-AR stimulation of PLCε at the Golgi.

A) AVMs were transduced with adenoviruses expressing GFP-FAPP-PH for 18 hours prior to fixation and staining for GM130, a cis-Golgi marker. Scale bars = 20μm B) NRVMs were transduced with FAPP-PH-GFP and imaged by a live cell confocal microscopy. NRVMs were stimulated with dobutamine at either 10 μM or 100 nM at the arrow and remaining fluorescence intensity at the Golgi apparatus was monitored over time. C) AVMs transduced with GFP-FAPP-PH were stimulated with dobutamine at either 10 μM or 100 nM at the arrow indicated and Golgi associated fluorescence was monitored over time. NRVMs (D and F) and AVMs (E) were pretreated with a selective β2-AR antagonist ICI-118,551 (50 nM) for 30 min before stimulation with dobutamine at the indicated concentrations and Golgi PI4P hydrolysis was measured. G) AVMs were pretreated with either Sal (100 nM) or vehicle control 30 min before imaging and dobutamine was added at the arrow. Data for B, D, and F were from at least n=8 cells from 3 separate preparations of NRVMs and analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (sphericity corrected) with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data for C, G and E were collected from n=3–5 cells from at least 3 independent preparations of AVMs. C and G were analyzed with a Wilcoxon test, and E was analyzed with a Friedman test and Dunn’s post-hoc test. (See Table S1 for exact cell numbers).
Unexpectedly, while analyzing the concentration-dependence for Dob-mediated Golgi PLCε activation, we found that 100 nM Dob was optimal, but 10 μM Dob did not stimulate PI4P hydrolysis in NRVMs or AVMs (Fig 1B, C, S1C). Dob is relatively selective β1-AR agonist but activates β2-ARs at higher concentrations (pKd 5.6 vs 4.8, β1-ARs vs β2-ARs)44.
To assess whether the inhibitory effect on PI4P hydrolysis at higher concentrations of Dob was due to activation of β2-ARs, we pretreated NRVMs or AVMs with the selective β2-AR antagonist ICI-118,551 prior to Dob addition. Preincubation with ICI-118,551 uncovered stimulation of PI4P hydrolysis by 10 μM Dob comparable to that seen with 100 nM Dob in both NRVMs and AVMs (Fig. 1D, E). ICI-118,551 alone has no effects on 100 nM Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis confirming that Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis is β1-AR-dependent (Fig. 1F). To extend this observation, we determined if salmeterol (Sal), a selective β2-AR agonist, could inhibit PI4P hydrolysis stimulated by Dob. Preincubation with Sal (100 nM) inhibited PI4P hydrolysis stimulated by 100 nM Dob (Fig. 1G). Taken together, this data indicates that β2-AR stimulation opposes PLCε activation downstream of Golgi β1-ARs.
β2-AR-dependent inhibition of PI4P hydrolysis is at the level of PLCε signaling.
Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that Golgi β1-AR-induced PI4P hydrolysis requires the EPAC activation downstream of βARs and upstream of PLCε in NRVMs 26. To determine if β2-ARs inhibit PI4P hydrolysis downstream of β1-AR-dependent cAMP accumulation, we stimulated PLCε-dependent PI4P hydrolysis using the EPAC-selective cAMP analog, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-2-O-methyl-cAMP-acetoxymethyl ester (cpTOME-AM). Pretreatment with Sal prevented cpTOME-AM-stimulated Golgi PI4P hydrolysis indicating that β2-ARs inhibit PLCε activation at the level of EPAC or its downstream effectors, not at the level of cAMP generation by Golgi β1-ARs (Fig 2A, B).
Figure 2. PLCε is the likely target for β2-AR-dependent inhibition of Golgi PI4P hydrolysis.

A) Diagram of β2-AR-dependent blockade of cpTOME-AM mediated activation of EPAC/PLCε. B) AVMs were pretreated with or without Sal (100 nM) before stimulation with cpTOME-AM (10 μM) and Golgi PI4P associated fluorescence was monitored with time. C) Diagram of β2-AR-dependent blockade of AngII mediated activation of PLCε at the Golgi apparatus. D) AVMs were pretreated with or without Sal (100 nM) before stimulation with Angiotensin II (1 μM) and Golgi PI4P associated fluorescence was monitored. Data are from n=3–11 cells from at least 3 independent preparations of AVMs (See Table S1 for exact cell numbers). Data in A were analyzed with a Friedman test and Dunn’s post hoc analysis; Data in B were analyzed with a repeated measures mixed effects model with Tukey’s post-hoc analysis.
We previously demonstrated that a Gq coupled receptor (endothelin 1 A receptor) activates mAKAP associated PLCε through a pathway independent from EPAC 18. We reasoned that if the inhibitory effect of β2-AR activation was at the level of PLCε beyond EPAC/Rap, activation of PLCε by an alternative pathway would also be inhibited (Fig 2C). To test this AVMs were treated with Angiotensin II (AngII), which activates ATII receptors that couple to Gq and Gi/o but not Gs and is highly relevant to cardiac pathophysiology. AngII strongly stimulated PI4P hydrolysis which was blocked by Sal pretreatment (Fig 2D). This indicates that β2-AR-dependent inhibition is at the level of PLCε/mAKAP complex because two independent signaling pathways involving either Rap or signals downstream of Gq converge at the level of PLCε activation at the Golgi.
β2-AR-dependent inhibition relies on Gi-Gβγ signaling.
Activation of β2-ARs stimulates cAMP production and PKA activation. We have reported that PKA activation counters the stimulation of Golgi PLCε by EPAC 29. We tested whether PKA is involved in β2-AR-dependent PLCε inhibition (Fig. 3A). Preincubation AVMs with a PKA inhibitor, PKI, did not uncover PI4P hydrolysis upon stimulation with 10 μM Dob indicating that β2-AR-mediated inhibition is PKA-independent (Fig. 3B). β2-ARs preferentially activate Gs, but also couple to Gi/o 37,45. To test the role of Gi we treated AVMs with the Gi/o inhibitor, pertussis toxin (PTX). PTX treatment blocked Sal-mediated inhibition of PI4P hydrolysis induced by Dob (Fig. 3C). PTX treatment alone did not affect Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis (Fig. S2A). To further support a role for Gαi in β2-AR-dependent inhibition of PLCε activity, NRVMs were treated with siRNA directed at Gαi2, the prominent Gαi isoform in cardiac myocytes (Fig. 3D, E). Gαi2 siRNA treatment prevented salmeterol-dependent inhibition of Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis. Gαi2 siRNA treatment had no effect on Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis in the absence of salmeterol, and in cells treated with random control siRNA salmeterol blocked Dob-stimulated PI4P hydrolysis. We then tested the role of Gβγ liberated from Gi/o activation downstream of β2-ARs in the signaling events. Treatment with gallein, a Gβγ inhibitor that selectively inhibits interactions with downstream effectors 46,47, prevented Sal-dependent inhibition of Dob-stimulated PLCε activation (Fig. 3F). Gallein had no effect on either basal PI4P levels or Dob-stimulated PI4P depletion (Fig. S2B).
Figure 3. β2-AR-Gi-Gβγ signaling axis counters activation of PLCε.

A) Diagram of possible signaling pathways downstream of β2-ARs. B) AVMs were pretreated with or without the PKA inhibitor, myrPKI (1 μM) 30 min before stimulation with dobutamine at the indicated concentrations and Golgi PI4P hydrolysis was assessed. C) AVMs were pretreated with either PTX (100 ng/ml) or vehicle control overnight and followed by pretreatment with Sal 30 min before imaging and dobutamine was added at arrow. D) Representative images of NRVMs cotransfected with siGLO red/Gαi2-siRNA mix (1:1 20 nmol each) and co-transduced with FAPP adenovirus. Scale bar = 40 μm E) NRVMs were transfected with Gαi2 targeting siRNA or control scrambled siRNA. 48 hours after transfection cells were treated with the indicated agonists. F) AVMs were pretreated with the Gβγ inhibitor, gallein (10 μM) or vehicle control for 30 min prior to the pretreatment with Sal for 30 min and dobutamine was added at the arrow. Data for B, C and F are n=3–6 from 3 independent preparations of AVMs and (See Table S1 for exact cell numbers) and were analyzed Friedman’s test with Dunn’s post-hoc analysis. E; data are n=6–7 from 3 independent preparations of NRVMs and analyzed with a repeated measures mixed effects model (sphericity corrected) with Tukey’s post-hoc test.
β2-ARs inhibit PLCε activation via ERK signaling
Given that β2-ARs can signal through β-arrestin, a nexus for activation of protein kinases including ERK, we tested whether ERK activation downstream of β2-ARs is involved.
Pharmacological inhibition of ERK activity with the highly selective MEK inhibitor PD0325901 abolished Sal-mediated inhibition of Golgi PI4P hydrolysis (Fig. 4A). Similarly, ERK2 siRNA treatment blocked Sal-mediated inhibition of PI4P hydrolysis (Fig. 4B) but had no effect on cells stimulated with Dob alone. Previous studies have reported that β1and β2-ARs can stimulate epidermal growth factor (EGFR) transactivation, leading to ERK activation 48–50. This pathway requires the release of Gβγ subunits and is PTX sensitive. Additionally, βAR-mediated EGFR transactivation confers protective effects in isolated NRVMs 51. To assess the involvement of β2-AR-EGFR transactivation, AVMs were pretreated with an EGFR inhibitor, gefitinib followed by preincubation with or without Sal followed by 100 nM Dob stimulation. EGFR inhibition did not alter the Sal-dependent inhibition of Dob-mediated PI4P hydrolysis (Fig. 4C). We also examined if β2-AR-EGFR transactivation contributes to ERK activation downstream of β2-ARs activation. AVMs were stimulated with Sal over a time course of 0–30 min with or without gefitinib preincubation and ERK phosphorylation was assessed by western blotting. Sal treatment leads to clear ERK activation at 30min and EGFR inhibition with Gefitinib had no statistically significant effect on this stimulation. (Fig. 4 D, E). Gefitinib is a potent inhibitor of EGFR and while it may have off target effects, the lack of effect on Sal-dependent inhibition of PI4P hydrolysis and Sal-dependent ERK activation at 30 min, strongly indicates that EGFR transactivation is not involved in this pathway. These observations favor a model where β2-ARs activate Gi and release Gβγ subunits, leading to EGFR-independent ERK activation that antagonizes Golgi PLCε activation.
Figure 4. β2-AR-ERK signaling axis counters activation of PLCε.

A) AVMs were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor, PD0325901 (100 nM) for 30 min prior to the pretreatment with Sal for 30 min and dobutamine was added at the arrow. B) NRVMs were transfected with ERK2 targeting siRNA or control scrambled siRNA. 48 hours after transfection cells were treated with the indicated agonists. C) AVMs were pretreated with or without the EGF receptor inhibitor, gefitinib (10 μM) for 2 hours before the pretreatment with Sal for 30 min and dobutamine was added at the arrow. D) Top panel: Acutely isolated adult ventricular myocytes were pretreated or without gefitinib for 2 hours before the treatment with Sal for indicated times followed by western blotting for p-ERK and total ERK. Shown are representative western blots from three independent preparations of AVMs. Bottom panel, NRVMs were treated with or without gefitinib for 2 h followed by 10 min treatment with EGF followed by western blotting. E) Quantitation of data in D from three AVM preparations (FOB=fold over basal) with the 30 min time analyzed with an unpaired Mann-Whitney U test. Data in A and C were analyzed with a Friedman test and Dunn’s post-hoc test. Data in B was analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (sphericity corrected) with Tukey’s post-hoc test. E. See table S1 for exact cell numbers.
Internalized β2-ARs are required to activate ERK and inhibit PLCε signaling.
β2-ARs undergo activation-dependent internalization which has been implicated in ERK activation 52. Inhibition of receptor internalization using a dynamin inhibitor, dyngo-4a markedly reduced the β2-AR-mediated blockade of PLCε activation (Fig. 5A) suggesting β2-ARs mediate PLCε inhibition from endosomes rather than the plasma membrane. Salmeterol is a partial β2-AR agonist for both Gs and β-arrestin recruitment relative to Iso, yet does engage arrestin to some degree 53,54. To determine if Sal causes β2-AR internalization in cardiac myocytes, NRVMs were transfected with flag-β2-ARs and internalization was monitored using fluorescent anti-flag M1 antibody and confocal microscopy. Stimulation of cells with Sal led to accumulation of intracellular β2-AR associated fluorescence confirming that Sal causes β2-AR internalization in myocytes (Fig 5B). To determine if endocytic blockade affects β2-AR stimulation of ERK phosphorylation, freshly isolated AVMs were pretreated with or without dyngo-4a and time-dependent ERK activation stimulated by Sal was measured by western blotting. Dyngo-4a significantly inhibited Sal-elicited ERK phosphorylation at 30 min consistent with a mechanism requiring receptor internalization (Fig. 5C, D). To explicitly examine the involvement of the endosomal Gβγ in the regulation of Golgi PLCε activity, we selectively perturbed endosomal Gβγ using the C-terminus of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK2ct), a highly selective Gβγ inhibitor, fused to a 2XFYVE domain sequence, highly specific to for binding to PI3P enriched endosomes 55, to generate an endosomal targeted GRK2ct (FYVE-mApple-GRK2ct) (Fig. 5E). Expression of FYVE-mApple-GRK2ct in AVMs led to a punctate expression pattern consistent with an endosomal location (Fig. 5F). In AVMs co-expressing FAPP-PH-GFP and FYVE-mApple-GRK2ct, Sal was unable block Dob-induced PI4P hydrolysis (Fig. 5G) indicating that the inhibitory signaling downstream of β2-ARs is indeed driven by endosomal Gβγ.
Figure 5. β2-AR-dependent blockade of PLCε activation relies on endosomal Gβγ.

A) AVMs were pretreated with the dynamin inhibitor Dyngo-4a (40 μM) for 30 min prior to pretreatment with Sal for 30 min and dobutamine was added at the arrow. Data was analyzed with a Friedman test with Dunn’s post-hoc test. 4–5 cells from N=3 cell preparations. B) Representative images showing Sal or Iso mediated β2-AR internalization. NRVMs were transfected with Flag-β2-ARs for 24 hours. Cells were then labeled with M1-Flag-488 for 10min at 37°C and then treated with negative control, Sal (100 nM), or Iso (10 μM) at 37°C. Images were acquired at the indicated times by confocal microscopy. Scale bars = 10 μm. C-D) Acutely isolated adult ventricular myocytes were pretreated in the presence or absence of Dyngo-4A before the treatment with Sal for indicated times followed by western blotting for p-ERK and total ERK. Shown is a representative western blot from four independent preparations of AVMs with quantitation shown in D. Data at the 30 min time was analyzed with a Mann Whitney U test N=4 independent cell preparations. E) Diagram of blockade of Gβγ signaling at endosomal membranes. F) Representative image of AVMs expressing FYVE-GRK2ct. Scale bar = 10 μm. G) AVMs were transduced with adenoviruses expressing FYVE-mApple-GRK2ct and FAPP-PH-GFP for 18 hours before imaging. AVMs were stimulated with Dobutamine alone or in the presence of Sal. Golgi associated PI4P fluorescence intensities at 0 and 30 min were measured. Data was analyzed with a Kruskal-Wallis test. N=4. See table S1 for exact cell numbers.
Activation of β2-ARs inhibits nuclear PKD activation.
A signaling event directly downstream of perinuclear PLCε is the activation of nuclear PKD 18. PKD is directly activated by DAG, the principal active product of PLCε activity acting on Golgi PI4P. If Golgi PLCε is inhibited downstream of Sal, we would predict that β2-AR activation would inhibit nuclear PKD activation. To determine if activation of β2-ARs reduces agonist-dependent PKD activation, NRVMs were pretreated with Sal for 30 min before addition of AngII for 30 min and analysis of PKD phosphorylation by western blotting. Sal treatment eliminated AngII mediated PKD activation (Fig. 6A, B). To more specifically examine nuclear PKD activation downstream of β2-AR and Ang II activation, AVMs were transduced with an adenovirus expressing a nuclear-localized fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) PKD activation reporter, nDKAR 42 (Fig. 6C). AVMs were pretreated with either vehicle or Sal for 30 min and AngII-mediated changes in FRET were measured in the nucleus at 0 and 30 min. AngII caused a significant nuclear PKD activation which was suppressed by β2-AR activation (Fig. 6D).
Figure 6. Nuclear PKD activation downstream of PLCε is suppressed by β2-AR activation.

A-B) NRVMs were pretreated with either Sal or vehicle before addition of AngII (1 μM) for 30 min and followed by western blotting for p-PKD and total PKD. Shown is a representative western blot from four separate preparations of NRVMs. Quantitation is shown in B. C) Representative images of AVMs expressing nuclear-DKAR. D) The nuclear region of AVMs expressing nDKAR was selected and the CFP/YFP ratio was measured before and after addition of AngII (1 μM) for 30 min addition in the presence with or without pretreatment with Sal for 30 min. Scale bars = 20 μm. E) Heart lysates from WT mice infused with either saline (Veh) or salmeterol (Sal) (25 μg/kg/day) together with or without AngII (1.5 mg/kg/day) for 14 days. Western blotting was performed to determine the level of p-PKD, p-HDAC, total HDAC and GAPDH. Shown is a representative western blot from 4 mice each group. F) Quantitation of PKD phosphorylation from E. G) Quantitation of HDAC phosphorylation from E. H) Heart weight/body weight (HW/BW) ratios from AngII and AngII+Sal treated mice. N=4 animals each condition. All data were analyzed with a Kruskal-Wallis test.
We had previously shown that cardiac specific deletion of PLCε in mice eliminates PKD activation in a TAC model suggesting that PKD phosphorylation can be used as a proxy for PLCε activity in vivo. To extend our observations to mice, we examined PKD phosphorylation in response to the chronic AngII infusion together with Sal by implanting AngII +/− Sal subcutaneous osmotic minipumps into mice for 14 days. Chronic stimulation with Sal significantly attenuated AngII-mediated PKD activation in mouse hearts (Fig. 6E and F). Similarly, HDAC phosphorylation was blunted in Sal treated group (Fig. 6E and G). PKD phosphorylation of HDAC is partially responsible mediating MEF-dependent hypertrophic gene transcription 56. Salmeterol did not statistically significantly inhibit AngII-driven cardiac hypertrophy as measured as a reduction in heart size (HW/BW) compared to animals treated with AngII alone, likely because of the low number of animals tested in this experiment (Fig. 6H).
In a separate cohort of mice, osmotic pumps containing AngII or AngII+Sal were implanted in mice for 14 days and changes in cardiac functional and morphometric parameters were analyzed. Heart mass increased in AngII treated animals but not in animals treated with AngII+Sal, assessed by direct visualization and mass determination (Fig 7A). Ventricular myocyte cross sectional area increased in AngII treated mice which was substantially reversed with coadministration of Sal (Fig 7B). Fractional shortening marginally decreased with Ang II and cotreatment with Sal may have improved function, but these parameters were not statistically significant (Fig 7C, left panel). LVIDs trended toward an increase in AngII treated mice which was reversed AngII+Sal treated animals (Fig 7C, middle panel). LVIDd did not change with AngII administration but Sal treatment led to a decrease in LVIDd (Fig 7C, right panel).
Figure 7. Animals were implanted with osmotic pumps containing Saline (NC), Salmeterol (Sal), AngII or AngII+Sal for 14 days followed by echocardiography, sacrificed and tissue harvesting.

A) Scale bar on hearts is 2 mm and 1 mm on HE stained sections. B) Cells were stained with WGA and myocyte area was quantitated using Image J. Scale bar is 60 μm. Data were analyzed from at least 300 cells from 3 stained sections each condition (See Table S1 for exact cell numbers) using a nested hierarchical unpaired One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. C) Echocardiography analysis of fractional shortening (FS), systolic left ventricular inside dimension (LVIDs), and diastolic left ventricular inside dimension (LVIDd). Data in A and C were analyzed using an ordinary one-way unpaired ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. See Table S1 for animal numbers.
These observations together suggest β2-ARs inhibit development of hypertrophy in mice by preventing detrimental AngII-mediated PLCε signaling in cardiomyocytes. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that Sal mediated protection in mice involves inhibition of AngII-mediated hypertension.
Dob-induced NRVM hypertrophy is inhibited by β2-AR activation and requires Gβγ signaling in endosomes.
In our previous studies, we showed that Golgi resident β1-AR signaling to PLCε is required for catecholamine-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in NRVMs 26. Our data indicate that Gβγ signaling from endosomes is required for Sal to inhibit Dob stimulated PI4P hydrolysis, a key driver of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. To determine whether Sal-protects against Dob-stimulated hypertrophy and if endosomal Gβγ signaling is required for this, NRVMs were transduced with fyve-mApple-GRK2ct expressing adenovirus or control β-Gal adenovirus followed by treatment with Dob (100 nM) with or without Sal for 42 h and cell area and expression of the hypertrophic marker, atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), were measured. Dob stimulated a significant increase in cell area (Fig. 8A) and ANF expression (Fig. 8B). Co-treatment with Sal blunted Dob-induced hypertrophy assessed by these two measurements in β-Gal transduced myocytes, (Fig. 8 A, B). In myocytes transduced with fyve-mApple-GRK2ct Sal was unable to inhibit Dob-dependent hypertrophy (Fig. 8 C, D). These effects are not likely due to fibroblast contamination since the NRVM preparations had very few contaminating fibroblasts (<1%) (Fig. S4). These data demonstrate that β2-AR signaling is protective against cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, consistent with the results from mice, and that Gβγ signaling from endosomes is required.
Figure 8. Activation of β2-ARs inhibits dobutamine induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophic growth and requires endosomal Gβγ signaling.

A and B, Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) were transduced with β-galactosidase expressing adenovirus for 6 hours then stimulated with dobutamine for 42 hours in the presence of Sal or vehicle control followed by fixation. A, Cells were stained for α-actinin to identify cardiomyocytes and quantitated for cell area by image J. B, Cells were stained for ANF (atrial natriuretic factor) expression and with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino- 2-phenylindole) to identify nuclei. The fluorescence intensity of ANF rings was quantified by image J. C and D, Same as A except NRVMs were transduced with FYVE (Fab 1, YOTB, Vac 1, and EEA1 domain)-mApple-GRK2ct (G proteincoupled receptor kinase 2 c-terminus) expressing adenovirus before stimulation with dobutamine in the presence of Sal or vehicle control (NC), followed by fixation. C, Cell area. D, ANF expression. FOB is fold over basal. Cell size was quantified from n=1283–1383 cells from 6 separate wells each condition, repeated with 2 separate preparations of NRVMs. ANF was quantified from n=890–1348 cells from 6 wells each condition, repeated with 2 separate preparations of NRVMs. Scale bars is 40 μm. All data were analyzed with an ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. NC indicates negative control.
Discussion
Our previous work led to development of a model where stimulation of Golgi β1-ARs by the membrane permeant agonist Dob produces a local pool of cAMP with privileged access to the EPAC/PLCε/mAKAP complex, generating DAG derived from PI4P depletion, activating PKD and mediating cardiac hypertrophy 18,26. Unexpectedly, while low concentrations of Dob induced robust PI4P hydrolysis, saturating concentrations of Dob did not. Here we demonstrate that β2-AR activation opposes activation of Golgi PLCε-PKD pathway by two clinically relevant hypertrophic stimuli which could play an essential role in the ability of β2-ARs to limit cardiac hypertrophy. In cardiac myocytes we show that the mechanism involves agonist-driven internalization of β2-ARs where they couple to ERK activation via Gi-Gβγ at the endosome which in turn inhibits prohypertrophic PLCε signaling at the Golgi. Heart failure is often associated with up-regulation of Gi and enhanced β2-AR-Gi signaling 57,58 which may be a compensatory mechanism to overcome the detrimental effects induced by circulating mediators and sympathetic neurotransmitters, many of which are likely to signal through PLCε.
Compartment specific ERK signaling in the heart.
Extensive studies suggest ERK is a key player in regulating cardiomyopathy. ERK signaling can produce both the beneficial and deleterious effects depending on the context. Transgenic mice overexpressing activated ERK are reported to show maladaptive 59 or adaptive 60 hypertrophic responses, while other studies utilizing mice with ERK deletion mice suggest ERK1/2 signaling may be dispensable in pathologic cardiac hypertrophy 61,62. In addition, an in vitro study indicates that ERK1/2 activation is required for the ANF mediated antihypertrophic response 63. It is now becoming clear that the signaling cascades and outcomes downstream of ERK largely depend on the subcellular locations of phosphorylated ERK1/2 64. Therefore, a more sophisticated dissection of ERK signaling mechanisms is required.
ERK is activated downstream of multiple GPCRs which are themselves spatially compartmentalized 65. GPCRs inside the cell activate G proteins and produce local cAMP accumulation to initiate distinct subcellular signaling events 66,67. G proteins including Gs, Gq, Gi and Gβγ subunit or β-arrestin-mediated signaling pathways activate ERK cascades. Different ligands cause different subcellular destinations of activated ERK via their preference to shift GPCR coupling to G-proteins or β-arrestin 68,69. Recently, it has been shown that after ligand-stimulated β2-ARs endocytosis, endosomal ERK signaling is activated by an endosome-localized active Gαs to subsequently stimulate nuclear ERK activity to control gene expression in HEK cells 52. Our studies support the idea that in AVMs, β2-AR-induced accumulated ERK signaling requires receptor endocytosis and endosomal Gβγ released from Gi. This endosome-receptor initiated ERK signaling serves as a repressor for PLCε which has been implicated in mediating cardiac hypertrophy. This study provides a functional role for this endosomal β2-AR-ERK signaling axis in preventing the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
PKD signaling in cardiac remodeling
Cardiac-specific deletion of PKD improves cardiac function in response to pressure overload or angiotensin II signaling 70, making it a promising therapeutic target to treat heart failure resulting from maladaptive cardiac hypertrophic signaling. We previously demonstrated that DAG generated from PI hydrolysis by perinuclear scaffolded PLCε activates PKD in close proximity to the nucleus, where it phosphorylates HDAC to regulate hypertrophic gene expression 18. Our data suggest that acute activation of β2-ARs can protect against pathological cardiac hypertrophy through inhibition of phosphorylation of nuclear PKD activation and perhaps other kinases such as CamKII. Hence, currently clinically effective β2-AR agonists can serve as potent PKD repressors. In addition to the role of PKD in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, it is also a critical signaling molecule in cancer-associated functions such as migration, cell proliferation, or survival 71. Thus, our observations could extend to other pathophysiological systems.
Molecular mechanisms underlying the cardioprotective effects of β2-AR signaling have been investigated previously. Gi-dependent-PI3K-AKT signaling downstream of β2-ARs contributes to its cardioprotective effects through prevention of apoptosis 72. In addition, β2-ARs can mediate EGFR and PDGFR transactivation, promoting cardiomyocyte survival 73. These studies focused on cardiomyocyte apoptosis. We propose that inhibition of hypertrophic PLCε signaling is an additional mechanism for β2-AR dependent cardiac protection against detrimental cardiac remodeling.
Combined therapy with a β2-AR agonist and a selective β1-AR blocker.
β-blockers (carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol) are clinically used to treat patients with heart failure by blocking detrimental β1-AR-G protein signaling, although their complete mechanism of action is not fully understood. More recently, it has been suggested that effective β-blockers tend to be hydrophobic which allows them to access the internal pools of β1-ARs 26,35. As a non-selective β-blocker, carvedilol has been to shown to produce superior clinical outcomes relative to other β-blockers 74, though the mechanism is unclear. Carvedilol has been suggested to activate β2-ARs and ERK signaling 75. It has been proposed that carvedilol might have dual therapeutic benefits in heart failure by preventing the deleterious signaling from β1-ARs and promoting the beneficial effects of β2-ARs 4. This therapeutic concept combining β1-AR blockade with a β2-AR agonist has been previously proposed and investigated in a coronary ligation model mice and rats where the combination treatment was more effective at preserving cardiac function that β1 blockade alone 72,76,77. Our data indicate that in addition to effects on vascular tone selective β2-ARs ligands can act directly through cardiac myocytes to improve cardiac function by preventing the deleterious PLCε stimulated by chronically elevated catecholamines and angiotensin.
Isoproterenol paradox
Isoproterenol (Iso), a non-selective and relatively membrane impermeant β1-AR and β2-AR agonist, does not induce acute PLCε activation 29, but with chronic exposure, it causes cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and vivo. One possible explanation for this discrepancy could be with acute Iso treatment, β2-AR activation counteracts signaling from β1-ARs or AngII. However, with chronic exposure to strong sustained stimulation by Iso (or other full agonists including norepinephrine and epinephrine), β2-ARs, while not downregulated, may desensitize leading to the loss of their protective signaling. Alternatively, Iso may depend on a different plasma membrane mediated hypertrophic pathway. These speculations need to be experimentally verified.
Limitations to this study.
While we have defined a pathway for β2-AR dependent inhibition of PLCε as a mechanism for inhibition of hypertrophy development, this does not directly show that this pathway is responsible for β2-AR dependent inhibition of hypertrophy in vivo. The study also does not show that salmeterol/β2-AR dependent protection in vivo is due to direct actions on cardiac myocytes. In our in vivo experiments it remains possible β2-AR actions in the vasculature, for example, could be responsible for the observed effects. Definitive demonstration of the in vivo significance of β2-AR-PLCε inhibition in cardiac hypertrophy protection will require more detailed in vivo investigation in knockout and transgenic mouse models.
Supplementary Material
Novelty and Significance.
What is Known
β2-adrenergic receptor signaling is protective against cardiac hypertrophy.
Activation of subcellular PLC (phospholipase C) at the Golgi apparatus stimulates cardiac hypertrophy through stimulation of local cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) production that has preferential access to PLCε located at the Golgi-nuclear envelope interface.
β1 adrenergic receptors in the Golgi apparatus activate PLCε at the Golgi apparatus but cell surface β1 adrenergic receptors cannot.
What New Information Does this Article Contribute.
β2 adrenergic receptors inhibit PLCε at the Golgi apparatus through a mechanism that requires β2 adrenergic receptor internalization and signaling to ERK (extracellular regulated kinase) from endosomes.
Activation of β 2adrenergic receptors in endosomes prevents β1 adrenergic receptor-mediated stimulation of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
Phospholipase Cε at the Golgi apparatus integrates both positive and negative inputs into hypertrophic signaling pathways.
The mechanisms for β2 adrenergic receptor dependent protection against development of cardiac hypertrophy have not been well defined. Internalization GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors) including the β2 adrenergic receptor has emerged as a alternate signaling mechanism that produces signals distinct from those at the plasma membrane. In these studies, a mechanism was identified that likely contributes to the ability of β2 adrenergic receptors to protect against cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. This supports that the use of β2 adrenergic receptor selective agonists for heart failure therapy deserves further investigation.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Matthew Brody lab especially Kumar Subramani, James Teuber, and Dr. Kobina Essandoh for sharing NRVMs and reagents. We would like to thank Dr. Manojkumar Puthenveedu lab especially Ian Chronis and Hao Chen for sharing reagents. We would like to thank Drs. Ju Chen and Xi Fang laboratories especially Dr. Xiaohai Zhou, Sharon Lee, Jing Pang for sharing reagents and their constructive suggestions on the experiment methodology.
Sources of Funding.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R35 GM127303 (A.V.S.).
Non-standard abbreviations and Acronyms.
- GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor
- βAR
β-adrenergic receptor
- PLC
phospholipase C
- PIP2
phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate
- PI4P
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate
- DAG
diacylglycerol
- IP3
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
- RTK
receptor tyrosine kinase
- Epac
Exchange Protein Activated by cAMP
- mAKAP
muscle-specific A kinase anchoring protein
- IP2
inositol 1,4-bisphosphate
- PKD
protein kinase D
- OCT
organic cation transporter
- epi
epinephrine
- NE
norepinephrine
- FAPP
four phosphate adapter protein
- PH
pleckstrin homology domain
- HDAC
histone deacetylase
- AVM
adult ventricular myocyte
- NRVM
neonatal rat ventricular myocyte
- WGA
wheatgerm agglutinin
- ANF
atrial natriuretic factor
- GRK2CT
C-terminus of G protein coupled receptor kinase 2
- ERK
extracellular regulated kinase
- TAC
transaortic constriction
- Sal
salmeterol
- Dob
dobutamine
- Iso
isoproterenol
- cpTOME-AM
8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-2-O-methyl-cAMP-acetoxymethyl ester
- nDKAR
nuclear D kinase activity reporter
- ATII
angiotensin II
- PTX
pertussis toxin
- EGFR
epidermal growth factor receptor
- EGF
epidermal growth factor
- CamKII
calcium-calmodulin dependent protein kinase II
- PDGFR
platelet derived growth factor receptor.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest with this study.
References
- 1.Bristow MR. β-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2000;101:558–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rockman HA, Koch WJ, Lefkowitz RJ. Seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors and heart function. Nature. 2002;415:206–212. doi: 10.1038/415206a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Frielle T, Collins S, Daniel KW, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Kobilka BK. Cloning of the cDNA for the human β1-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:7920–7924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.7920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Woo AY, Xiao RP. β-Adrenergic receptor subtype signaling in heart: from bench to bedside. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:335–341. doi: 10.1038/aps.2011.201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bisognano JD, Weinberger HD, Bohlmeyer TJ, Pende A, Raynolds MV, Sastravaha A, Roden R, Asano K, Blaxall BC, Wu SC, et al. Myocardial-directed overexpression of the human β(1)-adrenergic receptor in transgenic mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:817–830. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Engelhardt S, Hein L, Wiesmann F, Lohse MJ. Progressive hypertrophy and heart failure in β1-adrenergic receptor transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7059–7064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.7059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Milano CA, Allen LF, Rockman HA, Dolber PC, McMinn TR, Chien KR, Johnson TD, Bond RA, Lefkowitz RJ. Enhanced myocardial function in transgenic mice overexpressing the β2-adrenergic receptor. Science. 1994;264:582–586. doi: 10.1126/science.8160017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dorn GW, 2nd, Tepe NM, Lorenz JN, Koch WJ, Liggett SB. Low- and high-level transgenic expression of β2-adrenergic receptors differentially affect cardiac hypertrophy and function in Gαq-overexpressing mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6400–6405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tevaearai HT, Eckhart AD, Walton GB, Keys JR, Wilson K, Koch WJ. Myocardial gene transfer and overexpression of β2-adrenergic receptors potentiates the functional recovery of unloaded failing hearts. Circulation. 2002;106:124–129. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020220.79105.fd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rengo G, Zincarelli C, Femminella GD, Liccardo D, Pagano G, de Lucia C, Altobelli GG, Cimini V, Ruggiero D, Perrone-Filardi P, et al. Myocardial β(2)-adrenoceptor gene delivery promotes coordinated cardiac adaptive remodelling and angiogenesis in heart failure. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166:2348–2361. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01954.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kiriazis H, Wang K, Xu Q, Gao XM, Ming Z, Su Y, Moore XL, Lambert G, Gibbs ME, Dart AM, et al. Knockout of β(1)- and β(2)-adrenoceptors attenuates pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:684–692. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhao M, Fajardo G, Urashima T, Spin JM, Poorfarahani S, Rajagopalan V, Huynh D, Connolly A, Quertermous T, Bernstein D. Cardiac pressure overload hypertrophy is differentially regulated by β-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H1461–1470. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00453.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Filtz TM, Grubb DR, McLeod-Dryden TJ, Luo J, Woodcock EA. Gq-initiated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is mediated by phospholipase Cβ1b. FASEB J. 2009;23:3564–3570. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-133983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grubb DR, Gao XM, Kiriazis H, Matsumoto A, McMullen JR, Du XJ, Woodcock EA. Expressing an inhibitor of PLCβ1b sustains contractile function following pressure overload. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;93:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Malik S, deRubio RG, Trembley M, Irannejad R, Wedegaertner PB, Smrcka AV. G protein βγ subunits regulate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through a perinuclear Golgi phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate hydrolysis pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26:1188–1198. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-10-1476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oestreich EA, Malik S, Goonasekera SA, Blaxall BC, Kelley GG, Dirksen RT, Smrcka AV. Epac and phospholipase Cε regulate Ca2+ release in the heart by activation of protein kinase Cε and calcium-calmodulin kinase II. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:1514–1522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806994200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oestreich EA, Wang H, Malik S, Kaproth-Joslin KA, Blaxall BC, Kelley GG, Dirksen RT, Smrcka AV. Epac-mediated activation of phospholipase Cε plays a critical role in β-adrenergic receptor-dependent enhancement of Ca2+ mobilization in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5488–5495. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608495200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang L, Malik S, Pang J, Wang H, Park KM, Yule DI, Blaxall BC, Smrcka AV. Phospholipase Cε hydrolyzes perinuclear phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2013;153:216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smrcka AV, Brown JH, Holz GG. Role of phospholipase Cε in physiological phosphoinositide signaling networks. Cell Signal. 2012;24:1333–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kadamur G, Ross EM. Mammalian phospholipase C. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:127–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Smrcka AV, Hepler JR, Brown KO, Sternweis PC. Regulation of polyphosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C activity by purified Gq. Science. 1991;251:804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1846707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kelley GG, Reks SE, Smrcka AV. Hormonal regulation of phospholipase Cε through distinct and overlapping pathways involving G12 and Ras family G-proteins. Biochem J. 2004;378:129–139. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelley GG, Reks SE, Ondrako JM, Smrcka AV. Phospholipase Cε: a novel Ras effector. EMBO J. 2001;20:743–754. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.4.743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wing MR, Houston D, Kelley GG, Der CJ, Siderovski DP, Harden TK. Activation of phospholipase C-ε by heterotrimeric G protein βγ-subunits. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:48257–48261. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100574200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wing MR, Snyder JT, Sondek J, Harden TK. Direct activation of phospholipase C-ε by Rho. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:41253–41258. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306904200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nash CA, Wei W, Irannejad R, Smrcka AV. Golgi localized β1-adrenergic receptors stimulate Golgi PI4P hydrolysis by PLCε to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Elife. 2019;8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang L, Malik S, Kelley GG, Kapiloff MS, Smrcka AV. Phospholipase C ε scaffolds to muscle-specific A kinase anchoring protein (mAKAPβ) and integrates multiple hypertrophic stimuli in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:23012–23021. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.231993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scott JD, Santana LF. A-kinase anchoring proteins: getting to the heart of the matter. Circulation. 2010;121:1264–1271. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.896357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nash CA, Brown LM, Malik S, Cheng X, Smrcka AV. Compartmentalized cyclic nucleotides have opposing effects on regulation of hypertrophic phospholipase Cepsilon signaling in cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018;121:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duan H, Wang J. Selective transport of monoamine neurotransmitters by human plasma membrane monoamine transporter and organic cation transporter 3. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;335:743–753. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.170142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wright CD, Chen Q, Baye NL, Huang Y, Healy CL, Kasinathan S, O’Connell TD. Nuclear α1-adrenergic receptors signal activated ERK localization to caveolae in adult cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2008;103:992–1000. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, Shi Q, Li M, Zhao M, Reddy Gopireddy R, Teoh JP, Xu B, Zhu C, Ireton KE, Srinivasan S, et al. Intracellular β(1)-Adrenergic Receptors and Organic Cation Transporter 3 Mediate Phospholamban Phosphorylation to Enhance Cardiac Contractility. Circ Res. 2021;128:246–261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Boivin B, Lavoie C, Vaniotis G, Baragli A, Villeneuve LR, Ethier N, Trieu P, Allen BG, Hebert TE. Functional β-adrenergic receptor signalling on nuclear membranes in adult rat and mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;71:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vaniotis G, Del Duca D, Trieu P, Rohlicek CV, Hebert TE, Allen BG. Nuclear β-adrenergic receptors modulate gene expression in adult rat heart. Cell Signal. 2011;23:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Irannejad R, Pessino V, Mika D, Huang B, Wedegaertner PB, Conti M, von Zastrow M. Functional selectivity of GPCR-directed drug action through location bias. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:799–806. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tsvetanova NG, von Zastrow M. Spatial encoding of cyclic AMP signaling specificity by GPCR endocytosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:1061–1065. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Devic E, Xiang Y, Gould D, Kobilka B. β-adrenergic receptor subtype-specific signaling in cardiac myocytes from β(1) and β(2) adrenoceptor knockout mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;60:577–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiang Y, Devic E, Kobilka B. The PDZ binding motif of the β 1 adrenergic receptor modulates receptor trafficking and signaling in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33783–33790. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204136200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xiang Y, Kobilka B. The PDZ-binding motif of the β2-adrenoceptor is essential for physiologic signaling and trafficking in cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10776–10781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1831718100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stenmark H, Aasland R, Toh BH, D’Arrigo A. Endosomal localization of the autoantigen EEA1 is mediated by a zinc-binding FYVE finger. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:24048–24054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.39.24048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu J, Hughes TE, Sessa WC. The first 35 amino acids and fatty acylation sites determine the molecular targeting of endothelial nitric oxide synthase into the Golgi region of cells: a green fluorescent protein study. J Cell Biol. 1997;137:1525–1535. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.7.1525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kunkel MT, Toker A, Tsien RY, Newton AC. Calcium-dependent regulation of protein kinase D revealed by a genetically encoded kinase activity reporter. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:6733–6742. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608086200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Auerbach DS, Jones J, Clawson BC, Offord J, Lenk GM, Ogiwara I, Yamakawa K, Meisler MH, Parent JM, Isom LL. Altered cardiac electrophysiology and SUDEP in a model of Dravet syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Williams RS, Bishop T. Selectivity of dobutamine for adrenergic receptor subtypes: in vitro analysis by radioligand binding. J Clin Invest. 1981;67:1703–1711. doi: 10.1172/jci110208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xiao RP, Avdonin P, Zhou YY, Cheng H, Akhter SA, Eschenhagen T, Lefkowitz RJ, Koch WJ, Lakatta EG. Coupling of β2-adrenoceptor to Gi proteins and its physiological relevance in murine cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 1999;84:43–52. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.1.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bonacci TM, Mathews JL, Yuan C, Lehmann DM, Malik S, Wu D, Font JL, Bidlack JM, Smrcka AV. Differential targeting of Gβγ-subunit signaling with small molecules. Science. 2006;312:443–446. doi: 10.1126/science.1120378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lehmann DM, Seneviratne AM, Smrcka AV. Small molecule disruption of G protein βγ subunit signaling inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis and inflammation. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73:410–418. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.041780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Carr R 3rd, Schilling J, Song J, Carter RL, Du Y, Yoo SM, Traynham CJ, Koch WJ, Cheung JY, Tilley DG, et al. β-arrestin-biased signaling through the β2-adrenergic receptor promotes cardiomyocyte contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E4107–4116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606267113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maudsley S, Pierce KL, Zamah AM, Miller WE, Ahn S, Daaka Y, Lefkowitz RJ, Luttrell LM. The β(2)-adrenergic receptor mediates extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation via assembly of a multi-receptor complex with the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:9572–9580. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim IM, Tilley DG, Chen J, Salazar NC, Whalen EJ, Violin JD, Rockman HA. β-blockers alprenolol and carvedilol stimulate β-arrestin-mediated EGFR transactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14555–14560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804745105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Grisanti LA, Talarico JA, Carter RL, Yu JE, Repas AA, Radcliffe SW, Tang HA, Makarewich CA, Houser SR, Tilley DG. β-Adrenergic receptor-mediated transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor decreases cardiomyocyte apoptosis through differential subcellular activation of ERK1/2 and Akt. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;72:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kwon Y, Mehta S, Clark M, Walters G, Zhong Y, Lee HN, Sunahara RK, Zhang J. Non-canonical β-adrenergic activation of ERK at endosomes. Nature. 2022;611:173–179. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05343-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gimenez LE, Baameur F, Vayttaden SJ, Clark RB. Salmeterol Efficacy and Bias in the Activation and Kinase-Mediated Desensitization of β2-Adrenergic Receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2015;87:954–964. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.096800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moore RH, Millman EE, Godines V, Hanania NA, Tran TM, Peng H, Dickey BF, Knoll BJ, Clark RB. Salmeterol stimulation dissociates β2-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation and internalization. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36:254–261. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0158OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Patki V, Lawe DC, Corvera S, Virbasius JV, Chawla A. A functional PtdIns(3)P-binding motif. Nature. 1998;394:433–434. doi: 10.1038/28771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Frey N, Olson EN. Cardiac hypertrophy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65:45–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bohm M, Eschenhagen T, Gierschik P, Larisch K, Lensche H, Mende U, Schmitz W, Schnabel P, Scholz H, Steinfath M, et al. Radioimmunochemical quantification of Gi α in right and left ventricles from patients with ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy and predominant left ventricular failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1994;26:133–149. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1994.1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Feldman AM, Cates AE, Veazey WB, Hershberger RE, Bristow MR, Baughman KL, Baumgartner WA, Van Dop C. Increase of the 40,000-mol wt pertussis toxin substrate (G protein) in the failing human heart. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:189–197. doi: 10.1172/JCI113569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lorenz K, Schmitt JP, Schmitteckert EM, Lohse MJ. A new type of ERK1/2 autophosphorylation causes cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2009;15:75–83. doi: nm.1893 [pii] 10.1038/nm.1893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mutlak M, Schlesinger-Laufer M, Haas T, Shofti R, Ballan N, Lewis YE, Zuler M, Zohar Y, Caspi LH, Kehat I. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation preserves cardiac function in pressure overload induced hypertrophy. Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Purcell NH, Wilkins BJ, York A, Saba-El-Leil MK, Meloche S, Robbins J, Molkentin JD. Genetic inhibition of cardiac ERK1/2 promotes stress-induced apoptosis and heart failure but has no effect on hypertrophy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14074–14079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610906104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kehat I, Davis J, Tiburcy M, Accornero F, Saba-El-Leil MK, Maillet M, York AJ, Lorenz JN, Zimmermann WH, Meloche S, et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 regulate the balance between eccentric and concentric cardiac growth. Circ Res. 2011;108:176–183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.231514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Silberbach M, Gorenc T, Hershberger RE, Stork PJ, Steyger PS, Roberts CT, Jr. Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase activation is required for the anti-hypertrophic effect of atrial natriuretic factor in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:24858–24864. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.24858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lavoie H, Gagnon J, Therrien M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:607–632. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0255-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Eichel K, von Zastrow M. Subcellular Organization of GPCR Signaling. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ahn S, Shenoy SK, Wei H, Lefkowitz RJ. Differential kinetic and spatial patterns of β-arrestin and G protein-mediated ERK activation by the angiotensin II receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:35518–35525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405878200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Goldsmith ZG, Dhanasekaran DN. G protein regulation of MAPK networks. Oncogene. 2007;26:3122–3142. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rajagopal S, Rajagopal K, Lefkowitz RJ. Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:373–386. doi: 10.1038/nrd3024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shukla AK, Violin JD, Whalen EJ, Gesty-Palmer D, Shenoy SK, Lefkowitz RJ. Distinct conformational changes in β-arrestin report biased agonism at seven-transmembrane receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9988–9993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804246105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fielitz J, Kim MS, Shelton JM, Qi X, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Requirement of protein kinase D1 for pathological cardiac remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:3059–3063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712265105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Roy A, Ye J, Deng F, Wang QJ. Protein kinase D signaling in cancer: A friend or foe? Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017;1868:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chesley A, Lundberg MS, Asai T, Xiao RP, Ohtani S, Lakatta EG, Crow MT. The β(2)-adrenergic receptor delivers an antiapoptotic signal to cardiac myocytes through G(i)-dependent coupling to phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase. Circ Res. 2000;87:1172–1179. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.12.1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen H, Ma N, Xia J, Liu J, Xu Z. β2-Adrenergic receptor-induced transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor via Src kinase promotes rat cardiomyocyte survival. Cell Biol Int. 2012;36:237–244. doi: 10.1042/CBI20110162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, Di Lenarda A, Hanrath P, Komajda M, Lubsen J, Lutiger B, Metra M, Remme WJ, et al. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362:7–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wisler JW, DeWire SM, Whalen EJ, Violin JD, Drake MT, Ahn S, Shenoy SK, Lefkowitz RJ. A unique mechanism of β-blocker action: carvedilol stimulates β-arrestin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:16657–16662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707936104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ahmet I, Krawczyk M, Zhu W, Woo AY, Morrell C, Poosala S, Xiao RP, Lakatta EG, Talan MI. Cardioprotective and survival benefits of long-term combined therapy with β2 adrenoreceptor (AR) agonist and β1 AR blocker in dilated cardiomyopathy postmyocardial infarction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325:491–499. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.135335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Talan MI, Ahmet I, Xiao RP, Lakatta EG. beta(2) AR agonists in treatment of chronic heart failure: long path to translation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51:529–533. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Detailed methods are provided in the Supplementary Material. Please see the Major Resources Table in the Supplemental Material.
