Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Jul 5;7(7):e2419274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19274

Temporal Trends in End-Tidal Capnography and Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Michelle M J Nassal 1,, Andoni Elola 2, Elisabete Aramendi 3, Xabier Jaureguibeitia 3, Jonathan R Powell 1, Ahamed Idris 4, Banu Priya Raya Krishnamoorthy 1,5, Mohamud R Daya 6, Tom P Aufderheide 7, Jestin N Carlson 8, Shannon W Stephens 9, Ashish R Panchal 1, Henry E Wang 1
PMCID: PMC11227078  PMID: 38967927

Key Points

Question

Is there an association between end-tidal capnography changes over resuscitation and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?

Findings

In this secondary analysis of 1113 patients in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial, temporal increases in end-tidal capnography over resuscitation were associated with return-of-spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Meaning

These results suggest the importance of dynamic time-varying end-tidal capnography, which may be leveraged by clinicians in guiding resuscitation decisions.


This secondary analysis evaluates temporal associations between end-tidal capnography and return of spontaneous circulation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial.

Abstract

Importance

While widely measured, the time-varying association between exhaled end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes is unclear.

Objective

To evaluate temporal associations between EtCO2 and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial performed at multicenter emergency medical services agencies from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. PART enrolled 3004 adults (aged ≥18 years) with nontraumatic OHCA from December 1, 2015, to November 4, 2017. EtCO2 was available in 1172 cases for this analysis performed in June 2023.

Interventions

PART evaluated the effect of laryngeal tube vs endotracheal intubation on 72-hour survival. Emergency medical services agencies collected continuous EtCO2 recordings using standard monitors, and this secondary analysis identified maximal EtCO2 values per ventilation and determined mean EtCO2 in 1-minute epochs using previously validated automated signal processing. All advanced airway cases with greater than 50% interpretable EtCO2 signal were included, and the slope of EtCO2 change over resuscitation was calculated.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was ROSC determined by prehospital or emergency department palpable pulses. EtCO2 values were compared at discrete time points using Mann-Whitney test, and temporal trends in EtCO2 were compared using Cochran-Armitage test of trend. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for Utstein criteria and EtCO2 slope.

Results

Among 1113 patients included in the study, 694 (62.4%) were male; 285 (25.6%) were Black or African American, 592 (53.2%) were White, and 236 (21.2%) were another race; and the median (IQR) age was 64 (52-75) years. Cardiac arrest was most commonly unwitnessed (n = 579 [52.0%]), nonshockable (n = 941 [84.6%]), and nonpublic (n = 999 [89.8%]). There were 198 patients (17.8%) with ROSC and 915 (82.2%) without ROSC. Median EtCO2 values between ROSC and non-ROSC cases were significantly different at 10 minutes (39.8 [IQR, 27.1-56.4] mm Hg vs 26.1 [IQR, 14.9-39.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and 5 minutes (43.0 [IQR, 28.1-55.8] mm Hg vs 25.0 [IQR, 13.3-37.4] mm Hg; P < .001) prior to end of resuscitation. In ROSC cases, median EtCO2 increased from 30.5 (IQR, 22.4-54.2) mm HG to 43.0 (IQR, 28.1-55.8) mm Hg (P for trend < .001). In non-ROSC cases, EtCO2 declined from 30.8 (IQR, 18.2-43.8) mm Hg to 22.5 (IQR, 12.8-35.4) mm Hg (P for trend < .001). Using adjusted multivariable logistic regression with slope of EtCO2, the temporal change in EtCO2 was associated with ROSC (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.31-1.61]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this secondary analysis of the PART trial, temporal increases in EtCO2 were associated with increased odds of ROSC. These results suggest value in leveraging continuous waveform capnography during OHCA resuscitation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419573

Introduction

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death globally.1,2,3 Despite decades of research in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), survival has remained low.1 To improve survival, both the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and American Heart Association prehospital recommendations have emphasized the importance of 9-1-1 activation, rapid bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early defibrillation, and provision of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).4,5 In addition, recent studies have highlighted the importance of high-quality ventilation for improved survival and the need for ventilation monitoring during OHCA.6

Guideline recommendations encourage use of end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) capnography during resuscitation from OHCA for confirmation of advanced airway placement as well as monitoring progress of resuscitation.4,6 However, the practical application of capnography for the latter goal is unclear.7,8 Prior studies evaluated the associations between single discrete time-point EtCO2 values with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) detection or termination of resuscitation rules but sensitivities were as low as 20% to 33%.9,10 The most comprehensive data analysis was compiled by an ILCOR systematic review which stated that continuous EtCO2 capnography through trending EtCO2 may be a better predictor of cardiac arrest outcomes.8,11,12,13,14,15 To date, limited data has been presented to support this approach.

The dynamic variations in EtCO2 capnometry during resuscitation and the association with outcomes remains unknown. Our objective was to determine the association between temporal trends of EtCO2 and ROSC in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).

Methods

Study Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a secondary analysis of EtCO2 capnography waveforms from the PART trial.16 The PART trial enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from 27 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies from 5 communities of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. PART, a cluster randomized trial, assigned adult OHCA to strategies of laryngeal tube insertion or endotracheal intubation airway management. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients less than 18 years of age, pregnant people, prisoners, and traumatic OHCAs. The trial enrolled patients from December 1, 2015, through November 4, 2017. Race and ethnicity in PART was reported from EMS agencies (and included the following categories: Black or African American, White, and other [American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, other, and unknown]). The trial protocol is available in Supplement 1. For this post hoc analysis, we included only participants in whom an advanced airway was successfully placed and with continuous capnography data available. The institutional review board of The Ohio State University approved this retrospective secondary analysis of the parent trial and informed consent was waived because patients had an emergent condition and were unable to consent in time for treatment (in accordance with 21 CFR 50.24). This study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline.

Measures

The primary measure was EtCO2 over the course of resuscitation from initial placement through either ROSC or termination of resuscitation. EMS agencies collected continuous EtCO2 capnography waveforms using portable cardiac defibrillator monitors as part of their advanced airway standard of care. The cardiac monitors used in this study were the LifePak 15 series (Physio-Control), the X-series (ZOLL Medical Corporation) and the MRx series (Philips Healthcare).

We identified maximal EtCO2 values for each ventilation using previously validated automated signal processing.17 Import and analysis of capnography waveforms were accomplished using MATLAB (Mathworks) and a custom graphical user interface (GUI).18,19 The algorithm detects maximal EtCO2 values per ventilation. We determined mean EtCO2 in 1-minute epochs. We included all cases with greater than 50% interpretable EtCO2 signal in at least 1 of the epochs. We also provide histogram plots of the change in capnography from initial to end of resuscitation and box plots displaying distribution of slope calculations to evaluate individualized change in capnography.

Outcomes

Our primary outcome of interest was ROSC, which was determined by clinical evaluation of palpable pulses as marked in the parent trial by EMS clinicians or physicians at the receiving emergency department. Secondary outcomes included survival to 72 hours after cardiac arrest. We also separated nonsurvivors (including those who obtained ROSC) and survivors based on clinical information marked in the parent trial by hospital physicians.

Statistical Analysis

We planned to evaluate temporal changes in EtCO2 in relation to ROSC. We divided cases into ROSC or non-ROSC and survivors or nonsurvivors for analysis. We included the time from ROSC or cessation of resuscitation efforts defined as last chest compression and up to the previous 20 minutes of resuscitation for figure presentations. Therefore, time in this analysis is marked by negative numbers where −20 minutes would represent initial or early EtCO2 values on EMS arrival (eAppendix 1 in Supplement 2).

We compared discrete time points between ROSC vs non-ROSC and survivors vs nonsurvivors using the Mann-Whitney test. We determined the association between temporal trends in EtCO2 using Cochran-Armitage test of trend. The slope of EtCO2 was calculated by change in EtCO2 over sequential minutes available during the resuscitation (mm Hg/min). Tests were 2-sided and P < .05 was considered significant. Finally, we performed an adjusted multivariable logistic regression model for outcomes adjusted for the slope of EtCO2, age, sex, witnessed cardiac arrest (bystander, EMS witnessed, unwitnessed), bystander CPR (yes/no), initial ECG rhythm (shockable vs nonshockable), public location, chest compression rate (within American Heart Association [AHA] recommendations of 100-120 [yes/no]), chest compression depth (within AHA recommendations of 5-6 cm [yes/no]), successful airway placed and epinephrine given (yes/no). Chest compression fraction within AHA recommended rates (>0.6) was achieved in 99.6% of all cases so this covariate was omitted.

In a sensitivity analysis to account for potential ventilation quality effects on capnography, we repeated analysis using ventilations only within AHA recommendations of 6 to 12 breaths per minute. As length of resuscitation time may affect modeling, we performed a stratified multivariate adjusted regression model considering less than 10 minutes resuscitation to be short resuscitation and greater than 10 minutes resuscitation to be prolonged resuscitation. We also repeated the analysis using generalized estimated equations to account for the randomized cluster trial design. We considered multicollinearity within our models using a variance inflation factor greater than 10. We assessed goodness-of-fit testing using Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics. We considered our models to have acceptable discrimination if the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was at least 0.70; excellent discrimination if AUC was at least 0.8, and outstanding discrimination if AUC was at least 0.9.20 Analysis was conducted using Stata version 16.0 (Stata Inc) from X to Y.

Results

Of the 3004 patients included in PART, 1113 had an advanced airway with EtCO2 capnography waveforms that met initial quality assessments. ROSC occurred in 196 (17.8%) and 116 (10.4%) survived 72 hours post cardiac arrest (Figure 1). Among the 1113 patients in our cohort, 694 (62.4%) were male and 419 (37.6%) were female; 285 (25.6%) were Black or African American, 592 (53.2%) were White, and 236 (21.2%) were other race or ethnicity; and the median (IQR) age was 64 (52-75) years (Table 1). The most common cardiac arrest was unwitnessed (n = 579 [52.0%]), nonshockable (n = 941 [84.6%]), and nonpublic (n = 999 [89.8%]).

Figure 1. Cases From the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART) Included in This Study.

Figure 1.

After exclusion of cases without CPR process files, less than 50% interpretable EtCO2 capnography in at least 1 minute epoch and no advanced airway placed; there were 1113 cases available for analysis. CPR indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EtCO2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Table 1. Demographics of the Included Population.

Individual characteristics Participants, No. (%) (N = 1113)
Age, median (IQR), y 64 (52-75)
Sex
Male 694 (62.4)
Female 419 (37.6)
Race and ethnicity
Black or African American 285 (25.6)
White 592 (53.2)
Othera 236 (21.2)
Location of arrest
Public 113 (10.2)
Nonpublic 999 (89.8)
Missing 1 (0.0)
Witnessed status
Unwitnessed 579 (52.0)
Bystander witnessed 327 (29.4)
911 Responder witnessed 105 (9.4)
Missing 102 (9.2)
Initial rhythm
Shockable 172 (15.5)
Nonshockable 941 (84.6)
Bystander CPR 556 (50.0)
Bystander AED 121 (11.0)
ROSC 198 (17.8)
72 h Survival 116 (10.4)

Abbreviations: AED, automatic external defibrillator; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

a

Other race and ethnicity included American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, other, and unknown.

Mean (SD) duration of resuscitation was 24 (10) minutes in ROSC cases and 19 (9) in non-ROSC cases. EtCO2 values for each individual case over 10 minutes of resuscitation are shown (eAppendix 2 in Supplement 2). The change in EtCO2 values over resuscitation and distribution of slopes per group are also shown (eAppendix 2 in Supplement 2). Median EtCO2 values in patients without ROSC were different from patients with ROSC at 10 minutes (without ROSC: 26.1 [IQR, 14.9-39.0] mm Hg vs with ROSC: 39.8 [IQR, 27.1-56.4] mm Hg; P < .001) and 5 minutes (without ROSC: 25.0 [IQR, 13.3-37.4] mm Hg vs with ROSC: 43.0 [IQR, 28.1-55.8] mm Hg; P < .001) prior to end of resuscitation (Figure 2). Similarly, median EtCO2 values in nonsurvivors were significantly different than survivors at 10 minutes (nonsurvivors: 26.7 [IQR, 15.3-39.9] mm Hg vs survivors: 33.7 [IQR, 22.5-55.3] mm Hg; P = .01) and 5 minutes (25.8 [IQR, 14.0-39.3] mm Hg vs 38.8 [IQR, 28.5-53.9] mm Hg, P < .001) prior to the end of resuscitation. Median EtCO2 values at 20 minutes prior to the end of resuscitation did not differentiate groups in either ROSC vs non-ROSC (without ROSC: 30.8 [IQR, 18.2-43.8] mm Hg vs with ROSC: 30.5 [IQR, 22.4-54.2] mm Hg; P = .40) or survivors vs nonsurvivors (35.6 [IQR, 22.4-54.2] mm Hg vs 30.8 [IQR, 19.0-43.7] mm Hg; P = .37; Figure 2).

Figure 2. Histograms of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2) Levels at Discrete Time Points in the Resuscitation (20, 10, 5 minutes) Prior to End of the Event.

Figure 2.

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs non-ROSC patients (top row) and survivors vs nonsurvivors (bottom row). Median (IQR) EtCO2 levels are displayed in color-coordinated boxes in top right of each graph.

aP < .05.

bP < .01.

The trend of EtCO2 values were different among groups over resuscitation. In ROSC cases, median EtCO2 increased from 30.5 (IQR, 22.4-54.2) mm Hg to 51.0 (IQR, 37.6-64.1) mm Hg over resuscitation (P for trend = .001). In non-ROSC cases, median EtCO2 decreased from 30.8 (IQR, 18.2-43.8) mm Hg to 22.5 (IQR, 12.8-35.4) mm Hg (P for trend = .001) (Figure 3). Similarly, in survivors, EtCO2 increased from 33.7 (IQR, 22.5-55.3) mm Hg to 49.5 (IQR, 37.6-61.3) mm Hg from 10 minutes to 1 minute prior to end of resuscitation (P for trend = .001) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Summary End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2) Over Resuscitation Until End of the Event.

Figure 3.

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs non-ROSC cases are shown in the top row. Survivors vs nonurvivors are shown in the bottom row. The center line in each box indicates the 50th percentile (median) of that category’s EtCO2 value. The bottom of each box indicates the 25th percentile, and the top of each box indicates the 75th percentile. The whisker below the box is the lower adjacent value (equal to the 25th percentile minus 1.5 times the IQR). The whisker above the box is the upper adjacent value (equal to the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the IQR).

Adjusting for Utstein variables including age, sex, public location, bystander witnessed status, bystander CPR, initial rhythm, chest compression rate, chest compression depth, and epinephrine given; the slope of EtCO2 change over resuscitation was associated with both ROSC and survival (logistic regression P < .001) (Table 2). Discrimination for ROSC (0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.80]) was acceptable and for survival (0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.85]) was excellent. Goodness-of-fit testing statistics were acceptable for ROSC (0.46) and survival (0.49). As a sensitivity analysis using only AHA-recommended ventilation rates for inclusion in a multivariate-adjusted regression model, the slope of EtCO2 change over resuscitation remained associated with ROSC (odds ratio [OR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11-1.34]) and survival (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.34]). As length of resuscitation also may differentially contribute to outcomes we performed another stratified analysis by resuscitation time. Slope of EtCO2 change over resuscitation remains associated with outcomes in both short ROSC (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.12-1.43]) and prolonged ROSC (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.29-1.83]) resuscitations (eAppendix 3 in Supplement 2). Accounting for trial design did not affect modeling associations (eAppendix 4 in Supplement 2).

Table 2. Multivariate Adjusted Logistic Regression Model for Outcomes.

Variable OR (95% CI)
ROSC Survival
Slope of EtCO2 1.45 (1.31-1.61) 1.33 (1.20-1.45)
Age 0.99 (0.98-1.00) 0.98 (0.97-0.99)
Sex
Male 0.89 (0.61-1.30) 0.88 (0.55-1.42)
Female 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Public location 1.85 (1.09-3.15) 1.86 (1.02-3.40)
Shockable rhythm 1.78 (1.15-2.78) 2.69 (1.62-4.46)
Bystander CPR 0.85 (0.57-1.26) 0.82 (0.49-1.36)
Bystander witnessed 2.94 (1.95-4.43) 4.24 (2.43-7.38)
EMS witnessed 3.93 (2.24-6.91) 5.72 (2.80-11.70)a
Epinephrine 0.90 (0.25-3.29) 1.26 (0.25-6.38)
Chest compression rate within 100-120 1.07 (0.68-1.71) 0.60 (0.36-1.02)
Chest compression depth within 5 to 6 cm 1.02 (0.71-1.46) 0.88 (0.55-1.39)
Airway successfully placed tube
Endotracheal tube 1.08 (0.72-1.62) 0.85 (0.51-1.43)
Laryngeal tube 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EMS, emergency medical services; EtCO2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; OR, odds ratio; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Discussion

Dynamic temporal changes in continuous EtCO2 waveform capnography have tremendous potential in resuscitation. In this secondary analysis we found that while early discrete EtCO2 values did not differentiate between outcomes; temporal increases in EtCO2 over time were associated with both ROSC and survival. These findings emphasize the importance of dynamic time-varying EtCO2 capnography which may be leveraged in guiding resuscitation decisions, especially for termination or transportation decisions in the prehospital space.

Prior studies used simpler approaches, including discrete time point EtCO2 values, to characterize capnography in OHCA resuscitation.8,11,21,22 Initial EtCO2 values below 10 mm Hg have correlated with poor outcomes and values above 20 mm Hg correlated with improved outcomes.23 Early EtCO2 values were unexpectedly higher in our study. Among patients without ROSC, median EtCO2 values were 30.8 mm Hg. Furthermore, within the ROSC groups, 3 cases had EtCO2 values below 10 mm Hg. Previous studies have also shown 100% sensitivity with EtCO2 values below 14 mm Hg after 20 minutes of resuscitation. Many (40%) of our patients without ROSC had higher values than 14 mm Hg toward the end of resuscitation.21 These emphasize the variability and challenges associated with interpreting discrete EtCO2 values during resuscitation.24

Continuous capnography offers advantages in that it can account for waveform variability and allows for monitoring change during resuscitation.8 Through automated signal processing,17,19,25 vital EtCO2 information such as EtCO2 value change and rate of change can be quickly obtained and correlated with outcomes. Similar to our findings, 2 studies found that the absence of decreasing EtCO2 from initial to final EtCO2 value was associated with achieving ROSC in OHCA.11,15 Our study shows the benefit in leveraging capnography over the resuscitation rather than discrete time points. Collectively, these works encourage the use of dynamic changes in EtCO2 capnography as a potential predictor for OHCA outcome.

Our findings may have important clinical implications. The results of this analysis highlight that there are many dimensions of EtCO2 that may better guide resuscitation. Using the change in capnography throughout resuscitation may be an advancement over using discrete EtCO2 cut-offs,14 although our findings require further validation. Additional questions that remain include the duration of EtCO2 capnography monitoring necessary to determine a reliable temporal change estimate. Naturally, this is not the only way to analyze these data. Other potential approaches include machine learning algorithms or inclusion of peak volume or thoracic compliance. These are complimentary targets for future projects. Validation of this approach (EtCO2 trend monitoring) can be useful in resuscitation and merits independent validation prior to clinical application.

Limitations

This study has limitations. These data are a retrospective review of one-third of previously collected data from agencies involved in a clinical trial performed more than 7 years ago. Generalizability of ventilation quality metrics from potentially high-performing emergency medical services agencies may not be broadly applicable.26,27 Furthermore, the clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of airway device on OHCA outcomes. We attempted to adjust for interventions such as airway choice, ventilation quality, chest compression quality, and epinephrine given. However, we are unable to adjust for defibrillation timing, cumulative dosing of epinephrine or other medications such as sodium bicarbonate as it is not available or underpowered in this initial dataset. We also are unable to evaluate newer measurable ventilation metrics such as tidal volume. Additionally, we evaluated 1 characteristic of EtCO2 over resuscitation. Other continuous capnography quality metrics such as airway opening index may be contributing to OHCA outcomes as well.28

Conclusions

This secondary analysis found that dynamic changes in EtCO2 were associated with OHCA outcomes. These data suggest value in using continuous waveform capnography in resuscitation.

Supplement 1.

Trial Protocol

Supplement 2.

eAppendix 1. Schematic of Time Points

eAppendix 2. Variability in Capnography Change

eAppendix 3. Stratified Analysis by Resuscitation Length of Time

eAppendix 4. Generalized Estimated Equations to Account for Trial Design

Supplement 3.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee . Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Di Cesare M, Bixby H, Gaziano T, et al. World Health Report 2023: Confronting the World’s Number One Killer. World Health Federation. May 2023. Accessed May 24, 2024. https://world-heart-federation.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Heart-Report-2023.pdf
  • 3.Wong CX, Brown A, Lau DH, et al. Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: global and regional perspectives. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. ; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group . Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2)(suppl 2):S366-S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, et al. ; Collaborators . 2023 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; pediatric life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; and first aid task forces. Circulation. 2023;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT, et al. 2022 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; pediatric life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; and first aid task forces. Pediatrics. 2023;151(2):e2022060463. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ornato JP, Shipley JB, Racht EM, et al. Multicenter study of a portable, hand-size, colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide detection device. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(5):518-523. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82517-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Paiva EF, Paxton JH, O’Neil BJ. The use of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) measurement to guide management of cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2018;123:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lui CT, Poon KM, Tsui KL. Abrupt rise of end tidal carbon dioxide level was a specific but non-sensitive marker of return of spontaneous circulation in patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;104:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kudu E, Danış F, Karaca MA, Erbil B. Usability of EtCO2 values in the decision to terminate resuscitation by integrating them into the TOR rule (an extended TOR rule): a preliminary analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19982. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eckstein M, Hatch L, Malleck J, McClung C, Henderson SO. End-tidal CO2 as a predictor of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):148-150. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11006376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brinkrolf P, Borowski M, Metelmann C, Lukas RP, Pidde-Küllenberg L, Bohn A. Predicting ROSC in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using expiratory carbon dioxide concentration: is trend-detection instead of absolute threshold values the key? Resuscitation. 2018;122:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.11.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gutiérrez JJ, Leturiondo M, Ruiz de Gauna S, et al. Assessment of the evolution of end-tidal carbon dioxide within chest compression pauses to detect restoration of spontaneous circulation. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hambelton C, Wu L, Smith J, et al. Utility of end-tidal carbon dioxide to guide resuscitation termination in prolonged out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;77:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grabman B, Bulger NE, Harrington BM, et al. Increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide after defibrillation predicts sustained return of spontaneous circulation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022;181:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang HE, Schmicker RH, Daya MR, et al. Effect of a strategy of initial laryngeal tube insertion vs endotracheal intubation on 72-hour survival in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(8):769-778. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aramendi E, Elola A, Alonso E, et al. Feasibility of the capnogram to monitor ventilation rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2017;110:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.08.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jaureguibeitia X, Aramendi E, Irusta U, et al. Methodology and framework for the analysis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality in large and heterogeneous cardiac arrest datasets. Resuscitation. 2021;168:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elola A, Aramendi E, Irusta U, et al. Capnography: a support tool for the detection of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019;142:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kolar M, Krizmaric M, Klemen P, Grmec S. Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R115. doi: 10.1186/cc7009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rognås L, Hansen TM, Kirkegaard H, Tønnesen E. Predicting the lack of ROSC during pre-hospital CPR: should an end-tidal CO2 of 1.3 kPa be used as a cut-off value? Resuscitation. 2014;85(3):332-335. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grmec S, Krizmaric M, Mally S, Kozelj A, Spindler M, Lesnik B. Utstein style analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest–bystander CPR and end expired carbon dioxide. Resuscitation. 2007;72(3):404-414. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hartmann SM, Farris RW, Di Gennaro JL, Roberts JS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of end-tidal carbon dioxide values associated with return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30(7):426-435. doi: 10.1177/0885066614530839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elola A, Aramendi E, Irusta U, Berve PO, Wik L. Multimodal algorithms for the classification of circulation states during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(6);1913-1922. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3030216 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Wang HE, Jaureguibeitia X, Aramendi E, et al. Airway strategy and chest compression quality in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial. Resuscitation. 2021;162:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang HE, Jaureguibeitia X, Aramendi E, et al. Airway strategy and ventilation rates in the pragmatic airway resuscitation trial. Resuscitation. 2022;176:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bhandari S, Coult J, Counts CR, et al. Investigating the Airway Opening Index during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2022;178:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

Trial Protocol

Supplement 2.

eAppendix 1. Schematic of Time Points

eAppendix 2. Variability in Capnography Change

eAppendix 3. Stratified Analysis by Resuscitation Length of Time

eAppendix 4. Generalized Estimated Equations to Account for Trial Design

Supplement 3.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES