Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: World Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 27;187:e673–e682. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.144

The importance of neurosurgical intervention and surgical timing for management of pediatric patients with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh

Sudipta Kumer Mukherjee a,*, Joanna E Papadakis b,*, D M Arman a, Joynul Islam a, Mubinul Azim c, Asifur Rahman d, Sheikh Muhammad Ekramullah a, Hafiza Sultana Suchanda e, Afifah Farooque f, Benjamin C Warf b, Maitreyi Mazumdar f
PMCID: PMC11227413  NIHMSID: NIHMS1990239  PMID: 38685347

Abstract

Objective:

Reports on the management and survival of children with myelomeningocele defects in Bangladesh are limited. This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of these children, focusing on the timing of surgical repair and factors affecting survival.

Methods:

We enrolled patients with myelomeningoceles in a case-control study on arsenic exposure and spina bifida in Bangladesh. Cases were subsequently followed at regular intervals to assess survival. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were reviewed. Univariate tests identified factors affecting survival.

Results:

Between 2016–2022, we enrolled 272 patients with myelomeningocele. Postnatal surgical repair was performed in 63% of cases. However, surgery within 5 days after birth was infrequent (<10%) due to delayed presentation, and there was a high rate (29%) of preoperative deaths. Surgical repair significantly improved patient survival (p<0.0001). Older age at time of surgery was also associated with improved survival rates, which most likely represents that those who survived to older ages prior to surgery accommodated better with their lesions. Patients who presented with ruptured lesions had lower survival rates.

Conclusions:

Timely neurosurgical repair of myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh is hindered by late patient presentation, resulting in a high preoperative patient death rate. Neurosurgical intervention remains a significant predictor of survival. Increased access to neurosurgical care and education of families and non-neurosurgical providers on the need for timely surgical intervention are important for improving the survival of infants with myelomeningoceles.

Keywords: arsenic, folic acid, LMIC, myelomeningocele, pediatrics, spina bifida

Objective

Globally, neural tube defects (NTDs) are a leading cause of child morbidity and mortality, affecting as many as 300,000 pregnancies annually.1–4 Characterized by the failed or abnormal closure of the neural plate during early embryogenesis, NTDs result in congenital malformations including anencephaly and, most commonly, myelomeningocele.5,6 A growing body of evidence has linked the development of NTDs to a combination of environmental, nutritional, and genetic risk factors.6–10 Specifically, a lack of maternal folic acid supplementation use and micronutrient deficiencies are widely recognized to contribute to an increased chances of developing a myelomeningocele. Other risk factors include maternal obesity, ethnicity, and perinatal exposure to metals and other teratogenic substances.7,11–24 Many high-income countries have focused on the prevention of NTDs through folic acid fortification programs. However, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) mandatory fortification programs are uncommon and prenatal vitamin adherence tends to be poor, making NTDs such as myelomeningocele—and their clinical management—a particular public health concern.4,25–28

Data on the prevalence of NTDs in Bangladesh are limited, but some studies estimate it may be as high as 32 per 1000 live births.29 This is nearly sixteen times the global rate of NTDs, which is reported to be between 1.9 and 2.4 per 1000 live births.1,2 Despite the presence of a government sponsored program that makes folic acid supplements freely available,30,31 several studies cite low rates of prenatal folic acid supplement use and inadequate folate intake in the maternal diet,30–34 and folic acid fortification of salts and grains has not been mandated in Bangladesh.25,29 Additionally, Bangladesh is known to have high concentrations of metal contaminants, such as arsenic, in its drinking water.35,36 These nutrient deficiencies and heavy metal exposures may put mothers at an increased risk of their children developing an NTD such as myelomeningocele.16,22,37

The usual timing of surgical treatment for children with myelomeningocele is within 48–72 hours from birth, in order to prevent infection and further neurologic compromise.5,38 Adhering to this timeline can prove challenging for both providers and families in LMICs, where the prevalence of myelomeningoceles is often high but the infrastructure to provide and access early surgery is lacking.4,39. Comprehensive data detailing the presentation, surgical timing, and outcomes of children with meningomyeloceles in Bangladesh are limited.40 Given the country’s high rate of NTDs, it is important to understand Bangladesh’s experience treating children with myelomeningoceles. This study aims to describe the clinical presentation, management, and survival of children diagnosed with myelomeningocele at a high-volume hospital in Bangladesh, focusing on the timing of postnatal neurosurgical repair and factors associated with survival.

Methods

Study Population

We used data that had been collected as part of a case-control study of arsenic exposure and NTDs in Bangladesh from December 2016 to December 2022.22 Cases were infants under one year of age who presented to the National Institute of Neurosciences & Hospital (NINS&H) for evaluation of a suspected NTD. Only patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myelomeningocele by a neurosurgeon were included in this study.

All procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines. This study was approved by the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC registration number 006 23 08 2016, approved 23 Aug 2016), and the Institutional Review Boards at NINS&H (ERC-NINS number 2016/07/10, approvedl 1 Aug 2016), Dhaka Shishu Hospital (protocol 2059/2021, approved16 Jun 2021), and Boston Children’s Hospital (protocol number IRB-20–0780, approved 22 Aug 2015). Informed parental consent was obtained for all patients.

Study Variables

Trained study staff interviewed patients’ families to collect demographic characteristics, patient and family medical histories, referral patterns to NINS&H, and information about the child’s birth and whether the mother had used vitamins or supplements before or during pregnancy. We performed a physical exam and used a standardized form to abstract information from patient medical records. Clinical data included level of the lesion, the presence of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, lesion infection, hydrocephalus, bladder and/or bowel dysfunction, unilateral or bilateral clubfoot, and skin stigmata. Variables of interest from surgical records included age at the time of surgery, location of the surgery (NINS&H or another institution), and whether any hydrocephalus treatment was performed (i.e., endoscopic third ventriculostomy [ETV] or ventriculoperitoneal [VP] shunt placement). If surgery was not performed, the reason was documented.

We telephoned families at three-month intervals and scheduled follow-up appointments every six-months from the time of enrollment. At each contact point, we recorded whether the patient was still alive and whether surgery had been performed. If the patient died, we recorded the date of death provided by the parents and parent-reported cause of death.

Statistical Analysis

We performed statistical analyses with SAS (version 9.4) and R (version 4.2.2). We tested for differences between children who died and those who survived using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Student’s t-tests, and Fisher’s exact tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. We further investigated predictors of survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

Results

Patient and Parental Demographics

We included 272 infants with myelomeningocele in our study. At presentation, patients were a median of 30.5 days old (IQR: 9, 110) (Table 1). Most families were referred to NINS&H from either division- or district-level care centers (46% and 21%, respectively), although many (29%) patients were referred by family or friends.

Table 1.

Case and parental demographics of children with myelomeningocele (N=272).

Patient Characteristics Value* (IQR†) Percentage**
Sex
  Male 138 51%
  Female 134 49%
Age at presentation
  Patient (d) 30.5 (IQR: 9, 110) -
  Mother (yrs) 25 (IQR: 21, 27) -
  Father (yrs) 32 (IQR: 28, 37) -
Gestational Age, median wks 37 (IQR: 36, 39) -
  Term (37–40 wks) 188 69%
  Premature (<37 wks)
   Late preterm (34–37 wks) 69 25%
   Moderate preterm (32–34 wks) 12 4%
   Very preterm (26–32 wks) 3 1%
Any Perinatal Folic Acid Supplementation, total (n) 45 17%
Underwent Prenatal Ultrasound 247/272 91%
  Parents reported abnormal ultrasound 19/247 8%
Mode of Delivery
  Vaginal 100 37%
  Cesarean 157 58%
  Vaginal forceps assisted 15 6%
Place of birth
  Home 80 29%
  Clinic 96 35%
  Hospital 96 35%
Division of Residence
  Dhaka 139 51%
  Chittagong 44 16%
  Barisal 22 8%
  Khulna 23 8%
  Rajshahi 13 5%
  Rangpur 4 2%
  Sylhet 2 1%
  Mymensingh 25 9%
Referral Patterns to NINS&H
  Divisional-level hospital or clinic 126 46%
  District-level hospital or clinic 58 21%
  Upazila (Thana) level hospital or clinic 9 3%
  Family or friend 79 29%
*

Frequency variables are reported out of N=272 unless values are missing/not reported or representing a subset of the data; in those cases, the denominator of known values is specified.

†

Indicates continuous variable and interquartile range is specified.

**

Sum of individual percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. Abbreviations: d=days; IQR=interquartile range; NTD= neural tube defect; wks=weeks; yrs=years.

Most infants in our study were delivered at term (69%) or during the late preterm period (25%). Nearly 60% of deliveries were performed by Cesarean section, and 29% of infants were born at home. Antenatal use of folic acid supplements was rare (17%), and despite a high rate (92%) of mothers reporting having at least one ultrasound during pregnancy, parental reports of prenatal ultrasound diagnoses of myelomeningocele defects were uncommon (7%).

Clinical Presentation

Approximately 96% of infants were found to have defects at or below the lumbar level (Table 2). There was also a high a rate of ruptured lesions (captured in our database as preoperative CSF leaks) (54%), lesion infections (37%) and clinical diagnosis of hydrocephalus (52%) at the time of presentation. Just under a third (28%) of patients were found to have a clubfoot deformity. Patients frequently presented with a history of urinary (64%) or bowel (47%) dysfunction. Unfortunately, our ability to further evaluate urologic issues was limited, as patients and their families received urologic care at outside institutions.

Table 2.

Clinical presentation of children with myelomeningoceles (N=272).

Patient Characteristics Myelomeningocele (N=272)

Value* (%** or IQR†)
Spinal level of lesion
  Cervical 1 (1%)
  Thoracic 9 (3%)
  Lumbar 128 (47%)
  Sacral 19 (7%)
  Lumbo-Sacral 115 (42%)
Clinical presentation
  Ruptured lesion 148 (54%)
  Infected lesion 100 (37%)
  Hydrocephalus
   Diagnosed at presentation 141 (52%)
   Delayed onset 33/131 (25%)
  Autonomic Involvement
   Urinary issues 175 (64%)
   Bowel issues 128 (47%)
  Club foot 75 (28%)
   Unilateral 26/75 (35%)
   Bilateral 48/75 (64%)
   Unknown 1/75 (1%)
  Skin stigmata 23/230 (10%)
  Seizure history 22/271 (8%)
*

Frequency variables are reported out of N=272, unless values are missing/not reported or representing a subset of the data; in those cases, the denominator of known values is specified.

**

Sum of individual percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

†

Indicates continuous variable and interquartile range is specified. Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; IQR=interquartile range.

Hydrocephalus

More than half (52%) of the infants in our series had concurrent diagnoses of hydrocephalus, and many were diagnosed shortly after birth in the setting of enlarging head circumference, bulging fontanelle, and ventriculomegaly (Table 2). Most of these patients (75%) went on to receive permanent CSF diversion; for those who did not receive CSF diversion, their symptoms had arrested prior to definitive treatment or families refused surgery. VP shunt placement was the primary mode of CSF diversion (65%), and just over a third of patients (35%) received endoscopic management.

Myelomeningocele Repair

A total of 171 of the 272 patients (63%) in our series underwent surgical repair of their myelomeningocele defect (Table 3). Most of these infants (77%) received surgery at NINS&H. Less than 10% of patients received surgery within five days after birth—and only 3% of patients received surgery within 72-hours after birth. The median age at the time of surgery in our series was 3.6 months (IQR: 0.8–5.7 months) (Table 3).

Table 3.

The surgical management and survival outcomes for patients with myelomeningoceles (N=272).

Patient Characteristics Myelomeningocele (N=272)

Value* (%** or IQR†)
Age at myelomeningocele closure, overall (d) 3.6 (0.75, 5.7)
  0–5 d 11/171 (6%)
  6–15 d 16/171 (9%)
  16–30 d 19/171 (11%)
  1–3 mo 25/171 (15%)
  >3–6 mo 61/171 (36%)
  >6–9 mo 15/171 (9%)
  >9–12 mo 16/171 (9%)
  >1 year 3/171 (2%)
  Unknown 5/171 (3%)
Treatment
  Surgical repair of myelomeningocele 171/272 (63%)
   Surgery at NINS&H 132/171 (77%)
   Surgery at OSH 39/171 (23%)
  CSF diversion needed 130/174 (75%)
   EVD -
   ETV 37/130 (29%)
   ETV+CPC 8/130 (6%)
   VPS 85/130 (65%)
Reason myelomeningocele closure was not performed
  Death prior to DOS 78/101 (77%)
  The family did not agree 11/101 (11%)
  Doctors did not recommend/contraindicated 7/101 (7%)
  Family is waiting for operation 5/101 (5%)
Outcome at last follow-up
  Died 124/272 (46%)
  Alive 142/272 (52%)
  Lost to follow-up 6/272 (2%)
Median age at time of death (d) 3.8 (IQR: 1.3, 7.3)
  30-day mortality 17/272 (6%)
  1-yr mortality 108/272 (40%)
  5-yr mortality 124/272 (46%)
Median time from surgery to death (d) 4.4 (IQR: 2.5, 9)
  30-day operative mortality 6/171 (4%)
*

Frequency variables are reported out of N=272 unless values are missing/not reported or representing a subset of the data; in those cases, the denominator of known values is specified.

**

Sum of individual percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

†

Indicates continuous variable and interquartile range is specified. Abbreviations: CPC= choroid plexus cauterization; d=day(s); DOS = date of surgery; ETV= endoscopic third ventriculostomy; IQR=interquartile range; mo=month(s); OSH = outside hospital. For a qualitative report of the causes of mortality, please reference the results section.

Among the 101 patients who did not receive surgery for their myelomeningocele, the median age at presentation was 17 days, 67 (66%) were ruptured, and 55 (54%) had hydrocephalus at presentation (data not shown). The leading reason for why surgery was not performed was patient death before the planned surgery date (77%). Less commonly, parents refused surgery or the neurosurgical team did not recommend surgery. Notably, the patients who died prior to surgical intervention account for over half (63%) of all patients who died during the entire duration of our study.

Survival

The median time of follow-up was 12 months, and 6 (2%) patients did not have any follow-up recorded. At the time of the last follow-up, 124 (46%) patients had died. The median age at the time of death was 3.8 months (IQR: 1.3–7.3 months), and most patient deaths occurred within the first year of life (Table 3). Patients had a 59% chance of survival during the first 12-months of life (Table 4, Figure 1A). Postoperative complications relating to the patient’s myelomeningocele repair or a shunt malfunction were overall infrequent and rarely associated with patient death (1.6% and 3%, respectively). Patient death during the 30-day postoperative period following myelomeningocele repair was 4%; therefore, most patients died at home or upon return to the hospital in the setting of other worsening health conditions. According to parental reports, the most common cause of death among the infants in our series included respiratory distress (47%), followed by dehydration (12%), unspecified infections and fevers (12%), pneumonia (10%), cardiac arrest of unspecified etiology (8.0%), postoperative (including myelomeningocele repair and VP shunt-related) complications (5%), unspecified respiratory disorders (3%), and others (2%).

Table 4.

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Survival by surgical status.

Characteristic 1mo Survival (95% CI) 12mo Survival (95% CI)
Diagnosis
  Myelomeningocele 94% (91%, 97%) 59% (53%, 65%)
Surgical status
  No 83% (76%, 91%) 18% (12%, 27%)
  Yes 100% (100%, 100%) 84% (78%, 90%)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; mo=months.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Kaplan Meier curve demonstrating overall survival estimates for (A) all (N=272) patients with myelomeningocele in our series up to 48 months of age and (B) survival estimates for patients with surgically repaired myelomeningoceles compared to those who did not receive surgery (p<0.0001).

When considering preoperative factors, rupture of the myelomengingocele at the time of presentation (captured in our data as CSF leak) significantly increased the risk of patient mortality (HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.7; HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.6–3.3) (both p<0.05, Tables 5–6). Despite the high rate of hydrocephalus (52%) among patients in our series, hydrocephalus at the time of presentation or the need for CSF diversion did not predict worse overall survival. While urologic disorders and renal issues are recognized contributors to adverse outcomes in patients with myelomeningoceles,41 the presence of urinary or bowel dysfunction was not associated with worse survival in our series. Delivery modality (Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery) and delivery location (at home or in a clinic/hospital) were not associated with survival outcomes. Patients who presented at an older age (median age of 2 versus 0.6 months) were significantly more likely to survive than those who presented soon after birth (p<0.0001 and p=0.016, Tables 5–6).

Table 5.

Univariate analysis for factors associated with mortality or survival during the study period.

Patient Characteristics Myelomeningocele

Alive (n=142) Dead (n=124) P-Value
Sex
  Male 70 (49%) 65 (52%) 0.63
  Female 72 (51%) 59 (48%)
Gestational age (wk), IQR 37 (36, 39) 37 (36, 39) 0.47
Age presentation (mo), IQR 2 (IQR: 0.4, 5) 0.6 (IQR: 0.2, 2.0) <.0001 *
Age at surgery, IQR 3.8 (IQR: 2, 5.9) 1.8 (IQR: 0.5, 4) 0.004 *
  0–5 d 7/124 (6%) 4/36 (11%) 0.02 *
  6–15 d 12/124 (10%) 4/36 (11%)
  16–30 d 9/124 (7) 7/36 (19%)
  1–3 mo 15/124 (12%) 9/36 (25%)
  >3–6 mo 52/124 (42%) 7/36 (19%)
  >6–9 mo 11/124 (9%) 4/36 (11%)
  >9–12 mo 15/124 (12%) 1/36 (3%)
  >1 year 3/124 (2%) -
Mode of Delivery
  Vaginal 47 (33%) 50 (40%) 0.37
  Cesarean 88 (62%) 66 (53%)
  Vaginal Forceps 7 (5%) 8 (7%)
Place of birth
  Home 39 (27%) 39 (31%) 0.78
  Clinic 51 (36%) 42 (34%)
  Hospital 52 (37%) 43 (35%)
Surgical repair of myelomeningocele
  Yes 129 (91%) 36 (29%) <0.0001 *
  No 13 (9%) 88 (71%)
Hydrocephalus
  Yes 96 (68%) 74 (60%) 0.20
  No 46 (32%) 50 (40%)
Ruptured lesion
  Yes 66 (46%) 79 (64%) 0.007 *
  No 76 (54%) 45 (36%)
Infected lesion
  Yes 36 (25%) 61 (49%) <0.0001 *
  No 106 (75%) 63 (51%)
Urinary involvement
  Yes 95 (67%) 75 (60%) 0.31
  No 47 (33%) 49 (40%)
Bowel involvement
  Yes 65 (46%) 59 (48%) 0.81
  No 77 (54%) 65 (52%)

Categorical data are presented as n (%), and continuous variables as median (Q1, Q3). The denominators of fractions represent the number of patients with available data if values are different from the reported group size for each column. Sum of individual percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. Six patients from the original series did not participate in any follow-up calls. Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid leak; IQR=interquartile range; mo=month(s); OSH = other hospital.

*

Statistical significance (p<0.05).

Table 6.

Univariate Cox regression analysis of survival in children with myelomeningocele defects.

Patient Characteristics Univariate Estimates

HR (95% CI) P-Value
Sex (ref: female) 0.90 (0.63–1.28) 0.56
Gestational age 0.98 (0.91–1.06) 0.66
  Term/Post-Term (ref: preterm) 0.79 (0.55–1.14) 0.21
Age at clinical presentation (mo) 0.80 (0.73–8.73) <0.0001 *
Age at surgery (d) 0.99 (0.988–0.997) 0.00073 *
  0–5 d Ref
  6–15 d 0.71 (0.18–2.86) 0.63
  16–30 d 1.55 (0.42–5.0) 0.55
  1–3 mo 0.82 (.25–2.69) 0.75
  >3–6 mo 0.23 (0.067–0.81) 0.022 *
  >6–9 mo 0.44 (0.11–1.76) 0.24
  >9 mo 0.09 (0.012–0.95) 0.031 *
Mode of Delivery
  Cesarean Ref
  Vaginal 1.4 (0.94–2.0) 0.1
  Vaginal Forceps assisted 1.3 (0.61–2.7) 0.52
Place of birth
  Hospital Ref
  Clinic 1.0 (0.68–1.6) 0.86
  Home 1.2 (0.82–0.79) 0.37
Surgical management (ref: yes) 10.2 (6.8–15.4) <0.0001 *
Hydrocephalus(ref: no hydrocephalus) 0.72 (0.50–1.03) 0.07
Clinical Presentation at Enrollment
  CSF leak (ref: no) 1.9 (1.3–2.7) 0.00065 *
  Infected lesion (ref: no) 2.3 (1.6–3.3) <0.0001 *
  Autonomic involvement, Urinary (ref: no) 0.81 (0.56–1.2) 0.239
  Autonomic involvement, Bowel (ref: no) 1.0 (0.74–1.5) 0.80
*

Statistical significance (p<0.05). Abbreviations: CSF= Cerebrospinal Fluid; CI = confidence interval; d=day(s); IQR=interquartile range; mo=month(s); HR= hazard ratio; ref=reference.

Patients who underwent surgical repair of their myelomeningocele were significantly more likely to be alive at the time of the last follow-up visit (p<0.0001) (Table 5–6, Figure 1B). Those who received surgery for their lesion had an 84% chance of 1-year survival (Table 4), which is markedly higher than the 18% chance of 1-year survival in patients who did not receive surgery (p<0.0001). Patients who received surgery at an older age, often older than 3-months, were also significantly more likely to survive than those who received surgery earlier (p<0.05, Tables 5–6); this difference likely reflects that patients who survived to have surgery at older ages had lesions that were better accommodated.

Discussion

We describe the clinical characteristics, time to surgery, and survival for 272 patients with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest reports to comment on the neurosurgical management and overall survival of patients with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh.

Clinical and Prenatal Characteristics

Consistent with other institutional series, myelomeningocele affecting the lumbar and lumbosacral regions of the spine accounted for most (94%) cases.41–47 We also identified comparable rates of hydrocephalus (52%)43,48–51 and clubfoot deformities (25.8%).47,52,53 Regarding prenatal characteristics, we observed a low rate (17.6%) of any antenatal folic acid intake among the mothers in our study, which aligns with the findings of other studies in Bangladesh.31,34

Because NINS&H does not offer obstetrical services, all patients were delivered at an outside institution or at home, with families subsequently referred to our center for neurosurgical care. Although 91% of parents reported prenatal care that included an ultrasound, only 8% of these parents reported receiving an abnormal result. As a result, being diagnosed at birth with their myelomeningocele defect was common. We were not able to review ultrasound imaging or reports, and instead collected this information through parental reports, thereby limiting our ability to assess the quality of prenatal ultrasounds. However, a recent study found that the majority of ultrasound providers in LMICs do not have the minimum training as set by the World Health Organization (WHO).54 Detection rates of congenital anomalies by ultrasound in LMICs are highly variable, and termination of pregnancy remains a sensitive topic in many communities.46,54–60 In our setting, it is likely that all of these factors led to barriers in prenatal planning.

Surgical Timing

In our series, delayed patient presentation was common and often contributed to the suboptimal timing of surgery. Among all patients, the median age at presentation to our institution was 30.5 days, and for those who underwent surgery, the median age at surgery was 3.6 months. Despite wide agreement in our neurosurgical community that surgery for myelomeningoceles is recommended within 72 hours post-birth,5 only five of our 272 patients (1.8%) received surgery during this period. Unfortunately, similar patterns of delayed repair are frequently reported in other LMICs, highlighting the ongoing challenge of providing timely surgical intervention in these settings.43,50,61,62

Survival

Our study is among the first to document both overall survival and factors associated with mortality in pediatric patients with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh. Just under half (40%) of the patients in our series died during their first year of life, and most of these patient deaths occurred in individuals who did not undergo surgery. Of children who died prior to any surgical intervention, the majority (64%) had ruptured lesions at the time of presentation. The mortality rates observed in this study are consistent with the 19–37% mortality rates documented in other LMIC series.47,51,63,64

Neurosurgical intervention improved the overall survival of patients in our series. Moreover, we found low rates of surgical complications and operative mortality in our study (1.6% and 4%, respectively). In our setting, infants over age 2.5 months are considered for ETV, although the choice of procedure often depends on technical factors such as availability of flexible endoscope. While surgery itself was safe, it is important to note that some (16%) of the patients who received surgery died in the year following surgery, underscoring the need for ongoing, multidisciplinary care, such as anticipatory teaching about respiratory complications that might indicate worsening hydrocephalus.

Timely surgery remains the gold standard for improving the prognosis of patients with myelomeningoceles.67 While we observed a significant correlation between the age at the time of closure and survival status, the relationship was opposite to our expectation. We believe the better outcomes among older patients most likely reflects that those who survived to present at older ages were able to better accommodate their lesions and/or experienced myelomeningocele sac epithelization,50 while patients with more severe and complex presentations tended to die prior to presentation.

In Bangladesh, there is approximately one neurosurgeon for every million people and sixteen medical centers that provide neurosurgical services.65 Recent reviews discuss strategies to increase the neurosurgical and healthcare workforce to address the clinical needs of children with myelomeningoceles in LMICs, and recommend more active neurosurgical involvement in education and advocacy for preventive strategies (for example, folic acid fortification).66

Limitations

Despite NINS&H being a high-volume neurosurgical care center, our study remains limited by its single-institution design. As a result, our findings may not be generalizable to the broader Bangladeshi population, particularly those living in rural areas who may not be able to seek care in Dhaka. We were limited in our ability to comment on urologic and orthopedic data due to the because children received this care at facilities other than NINS&H. Our study did not have adequate data on the presence of concurrent intracranial and intraspinal abnormalities, such as Chiari II malformation, tethered cord, and syringomyelia, as only a limited number of patients had brain and/or spinal MRIs available for review. Additionally, the collection of longer-term hydrocephalus outcomes was beyond the scope of our study; therefore, information regarding the rate of redo-ETV or shunt revisions was not available. We also have limited information about lifestyle other than survival.

Recommendations

We propose the following two areas of improvement to support the prevention of NTDs and strengthen the overall management of children with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh.

  1. Folic acid fortification. Myelomeningocele is a largely preventable congenital anomaly, especially since the establishment of mandated food fortification programs, which have successfully reduced the prevalence of myelomeningocele and other NTDs in many countries.1,25,27,29 Previous reports have identified Bangladesh as having high potential for mandatory food fortification,67 with estimates that as many as 4,154 NTDs could be averted per year if mandatory folic acid fortification of rice and/or wheat flour were achieved.25 Additionally, double fortification of iodized salt with folic acid may be another promising avenue to pursue.68 The WHO recommends that all women, from the movment they begin trying to conceive until 12 weeks of gestation, should take a folic acid supplement (400 μg folic acid daily), and that women who have had a NTD-affected pregnancy be offered high-dose supplementation (5 mg folic acid daily).69 Given the very low rates of prenatal folic acid use in our series, as well as the body of literature documenting poor folate intake in maternal diets in Bangladesh,31–34 we advocate for the implementation of a mandatory folic acid fortification program to reduce the overall morbidity and prevalence of myelomeningoceles and other NTDs in Bangladesh.

  2. Education and referrals. In order to improve timely access to neurosurgical care, it is imperative that non-neurosurgical providers receive education on the significance of expedient referral to a neurosurgical care center when mothers are expecting a child with an NTD.51,58,60 In Bangladesh, where as many as 30–60% of births continue to occur at home,70,71 and care referrals are often suggested by family members and friends, as was observed in our series, this education should also encompass the general public, physicians, and other healthcare providers like ultrasonographers, midwives, and community health workers.

Conclusion

Timely neurosurgical repair of myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh is complicated by delayed referral to neurosurgical centers and complex patient presentations. Despite these challenges, neurosurgical repair remains a significant predictor of survival in infants with myelomeningocele and our series reports a low rate of postoperative complications. Our study details the current neurosurgical management of patients with myelomeningoceles in Bangladesh and identifies areas for future improvement. Increasing neurosurgical access, educating the general public, physicians, and other healthcare providers on the need for timely neurosurgical intervention, and implementing comprehensive prevention strategies, like mandatory folic acid fortification and improved prenatal care, are critical.

Acknowledgements

We thank our team at NINS&H, including Shipra Rani Saha, Shashwati Suter, Suvajit Das, Shamantha Afreen, Ansar Uddin, Abdullah Al Mahbub and Md. Ziaul Hoq.

We thank Shaye Moore and Dagny Dukach for review of the manuscript.

Funding:

This study was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES026317, P30 ES000002).

Abbreviations list:

CI

Confidence Interval

CNS

Central Nervous System

CSF

Cerebrospinal Fluid

ETV

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy

HR

Hazard Ratio

IQR

Interquartile Range

LMIC

Low- and Middle-Income Country

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NINS&H

National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital

NTD

Neural Tube Defects

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest: None

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blencowe H, Kancherla V, Moorthie S, Darlison MW, Modell B. Estimates of global and regional prevalence of neural tube defects for 2015: a systematic analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Feb 2018;1414(1):31–46. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B. March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects. The Hidden Toll of Dying and disabled Children: Executive Summary. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flores AL, Vellozzi C, Valencia D, Sniezek J. Global Burden of Neural Tube Defects, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Indian J Community Health. Nov 2014;26(Suppl 1):3–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yacob A, Carr CJ, Foote J, et al. The Global Burden of Neural Tube Defects and Disparities in Neurosurgical Care. World Neurosurg. May 2021;149:e803–e820. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Di Rocco C, Trevisi G, Massimi L. Myelomeningocele: an overview. World Neurosurg. Feb 2014;81(2):294–5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greene ND, Copp AJ. Neural tube defects. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:221–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Agopian AJ, Tinker SC, Lupo PJ, Canfield MA, Mitchell LE, National Birth Defects Prevention S. Proportion of neural tube defects attributable to known risk factors. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. Jan 2013;97(1):42–6. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wilde JJ, Petersen JR, Niswander L. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental contributions to neural tube closure. Annu Rev Genet. 2014;48:583–611. doi: 10.1146/annurevgenet-120213-092208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Isakovic J, Simunic I, Jagecic D, Hribljan V, Mitrecic D. Overview of Neural Tube Defects: Gene-Environment Interactions, Preventative Approaches and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines. Apr 21 2022;10(5)doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10050965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Finnell RH, Caiaffa CD, Kim SE, et al. Gene Environment Interactions in the Etiology of Neural Tube Defects. Front Genet. 2021;12:659612. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.659612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet. Jul 20 1991;338(8760):131–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brender JD, Suarez L, Felkner M, et al. Maternal exposure to arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury and neural tube defects in offspring. Environmental Research. 2006;101(1):132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Demir N, Başaranoğlu M, Huyut Z, et al. The relationship between mother and infant plasma trace element and heavy metal levels and the risk of neural tube defect in infants. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32(9):1433–1440. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1408064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dey AC, Shahidullah M, Mannan MA, Noor MK, Saha L, Rahman SA. Maternal and neonatal serum zinc level and its relationship with neural tube defects. J Health Popul Nutr. Aug 2010;28(4):343–50. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i4.6040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mazumdar M. Does arsenic increase the risk of neural tube defects among a highly exposed population? A new case-control study in Bangladesh. Birth defects research. Jan 30 2017;109(2):92–98. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mazumdar M, Hasan MOSI, Hamid R, et al. Arsenic is associated with reduced effect of folic acid in myelomeningocele prevention: a case control study in Bangladesh. Environmental Health. 2015;14(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McMahon DM, Liu J, Zhang H, Torres ME, Best RG. Maternal obesity, folate intake, and neural tube defects in offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. Feb 2013;97(2):115–22. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Molloy AM. Should vitamin B(12) status be considered in assessing risk of neural tube defects? Ann N Y Acad Sci. Feb 2018;1414(1):109–125. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mustafa HJ, Burns CT, Heydari MH, et al. Contribution of obesity to racial and ethnic disparities in the risk of fetal myelomeningocele: a population-based study. AJOG Glob Rep. Feb 2024;4(1):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ovayolu A, Ovayolu G, Karaman E, Yuce T, Ozek MA, Turksoy VA. Amniotic fluid levels of selected trace elements and heavy metals in pregnancies complicated with neural tube defects. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). Sep 2020;60(5):136–141. doi: 10.1111/cga.12363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pi X, Wang D, Wang C, et al. Placental concentrations of alkali metals and their associations with neural tube defects in offspring. Placenta. Apr 2022;121:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tindula G, Mukherjee SK, Ekramullah SM, et al. Parental metal exposures as potential risk factors for spina bifida in Bangladesh. Environ Int. Dec 2021;157:106800. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wlodarczyk BJ, Palacios AM, George TM, Finnell RH. Antiepileptic drugs and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Med Genet A. Aug 2012;158A(8):2071–90. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yan L, Wang B, Li Z, et al. Association of essential trace metals in maternal hair with the risk of neural tube defects in offspring. Birth defects research. Feb 15 2017;109(3):234–243. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kancherla V, Botto LD, Rowe LA, et al. Preventing birth defects, saving lives, and promoting health equity: an urgent call to action for universal mandatory food fortification with folic acid. Lancet Glob Health. Jul 2022;10(7):e1053–e1057. doi: 10.1016/S2214109X(22)00213-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lo A, Polsek D, Sidhu S. Estimating the burden of neural tube defects in low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health. Jun 2014;4(1):010402. doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shlobin NA, Roach JT, Kancherla V, et al. The role of neurosurgeons in global public health: the case of folic acid fortification of staple foods to prevent spina bifida. J Neurosurg Pediatr. Nov 4 2022:1–8. doi: 10.3171/2022.9.Peds22188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zaganjor I, Sekkarie A, Tsang BL, et al. Describing the Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects Worldwide: A Systematic Literature Review. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0151586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kancherla V, Chadha M, Rowe L, et al. Reducing the Burden of Anemia and Neural Tube Defects in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Analysis to Identify Countries with an Immediate Potential to Benefit from Large-Scale Mandatory Fortification of Wheat Flour and Rice. Nutrients. Jan 16 2021;13(1)doi: 10.3390/nu13010244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.WFP Bangladesh: Rice Fortification—Bangladesh | Relief Web. Published June 5, 2023. Accessed November, 27, 2023. https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/wfp-bangladesh-rice-fortification
  • 31.Billah SM, Raynes-Greenow C, Ali NB, et al. Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation in Pregnancy: Findings from the Baseline Assessment of a Maternal Nutrition Service Programme in Bangladesh. Nutrients. Jul 28 2022;14(15)doi: 10.3390/nu14153114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lindstrom E, Hossain MB, Lonnerdal B, Raqib R, El Arifeen S, Ekstrom EC. Prevalence of anemia and micronutrient deficiencies in early pregnancy in rural Bangladesh, the MINIMat trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Jan 2011;90(1):47–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01014.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Obrycki JF, Lee JJ, Kapur K, et al. A case-control analysis of maternal diet and risk of neural tube defects in Bangladesh. Birth defects research. Aug 15 2019;111(14):967–981. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sanin KI, Alam Shaun M, Rita RS, Hasan MK, Khanam M, Haque MA. What Makes Bangladeshi Pregnant Women More Compliant to Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Result. Nutrients. Mar 21 2023;15(6)doi: 10.3390/nu15061512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M. Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(9):1093–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chakraborti D, Singh SK, Rahman MM, et al. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Ganga River Basin: A Future Health Danger. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Jan 23 2018;15(2)doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mazumdar M, Valeri L, Rodrigues EG, et al. Polymorphisms in maternal folate pathway genes interact with arsenic in drinking water to influence risk of myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2015;103(9):754–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Matson DD. Surgical treatment of myelomeningocele. Pediatrics. Aug 1968;42(2):225–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Higashi H, Barendregt JJ, Kassebaum NJ, Weiser TG, Bickler SW, Vos T. The burden of selected congenital anomalies amenable to surgery in low and middle-income regions: cleft lip and palate, congenital heart anomalies and neural tube defects. Arch Dis Child. Mar 2015;100(3):233–8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hasina K, Alamgir M, Enayet S, Hanif A, Pervez M, Alam S. Management of Myelomeningocele: Eight Years Experience in Dhaka Medical College and Hospital. J Paediatr Surg Bangladesh. 2016;5(54)doi:doi: 10.3329/jpsb.v5i2.27725 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Al-Wassia H, Bamanie H, Rahbini H, Alghamdi N, Alotaibi R, Alnagrani W. Neural Tube Defects from Antenatal Diagnosis to Discharge - a Tertiary Academic Centre Experience. Med Arch. Feb 2023;77(1):40–43. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.40-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alhassan A, Adam A, Nangkuu D. Prevalence of neural tube defect and hydrocephalus in Northern Ghana. J Med Biomed Sci. 2017;6(1):18–23. doi: 10.4314/jmbs.v2i4.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Khalil M, Bakhshi SK, Shah Z, et al. Quality of life in children operated for spina bifida; low- and middle-income country perspective. Childs Nerv Syst. Nov 2023;39(11):3155–3161. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-05993-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Komolafe EO, Onyia CU, Ogunbameru IO, et al. The pattern, peculiarities, and management challenges of spina bifida in a teaching hospital in Southwest Nigeria. Childs Nerv Syst. Feb 2018;34(2):311–319. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3614-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sahmat A, Gunasekaran R, Mohd-Zin SW, et al. The Prevalence and Distribution of Spina Bifida in a Single Major Referral Center in Malaysia. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:237. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Simpamba MM, Struthers PM, Mweshi MM. Access to health care for children with neural tube defects: Experiences of mothers in Zambia. Afr J Disabil. 2016;5(1):267. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v5i1.267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu LW, Vaca SD, He JQ, et al. Neural tube defects in Uganda: follow-up outcomes from a national referral hospital. Neurosurg Focus. Oct 2018;45(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.FOCUS18280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Blount JP, Maleknia P, Hopson BD, Rocque BG, Oakes WJ. Hydrocephalus in Spina Bifida. Neurol India. Nov-Dec 2021;69(Supplement):S367–S371. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.332247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg DL, Luther E, McCrea HJ. Myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus: nationwide analysis and systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. Oct 1 2019;47(4):E5. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mnguni MN, Enicker BC, Madiba TE. A perspective in the management of myelomeningocoele in the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa. Childs Nerv Syst. Jul 2020;36(7):1521–1527. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04506-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sims-Williams HJ, Sims-Williams HP, Kabachelor EM, Fotheringham J, Warf BC. Ten-year survival of Ugandan infants after myelomeningocele closure. J Neurosurg Pediatr. Jan 2017;19(1):70–76. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.PEDS16296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bowles D, Wasiak R, Kissner M, et al. Economic burden of neural tube defects in Germany. Public Health. Mar 2014;128(3):274–81. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Swaroop VT, Dias L. Orthopedic management of spina bifida. Part I: hip, knee, and rotational deformities. J Child Orthop. Dec 2009;3(6):441–9. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0214-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Goley SM, Sakula-Barry S, Adofo-Ansong N, et al. Investigating the use of ultrasonography for the antenatal diagnosis of structural congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020;4(1):e000684. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Adeleye AO, Dairo MD, Olowookere KG. Central nervous system congenital malformations in a developing country: issues and challenges against their prevention. Childs Nerv Syst. Jul 2010;26(7):919–24. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-1079-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alruwaili AA, Das J. Myelomeningocele. [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546696/
  • 57.Idowu OE, Olawehinmi OS. Surgical congenital central nervous system anomalies in a tropical teaching hospital. Br J Neurosurg. Oct 2012;26(5):726–9. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2012.680622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Leidinger A, Piquer J, Kim EE, Nahonda H, Qureshi MM, Young PH. Experience in the Early Surgical Management of Myelomeningocele in Zanzibar. World Neurosurg. Jan 2019;121:e493–e499. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mashiloane PC, Masekela R. A review of the epidemiology, post-neurosurgical closure complications and outcomes of neonates with open spina bifida. S Afr J Child Health. 2020;14(2)doi: 10.7196/SAJCH.2019.v14i2.1638 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Naicker D, Leola K, Mkhaliphi MM, et al. Single surgeon case series of myelomeningocele repairs in a developing world setting: Challenges and lessons. World Neurosurg X. Jul 2023;19:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sharma MK, Kumar N, Jha MK, N U, Srivastava RK, Bhattacharya S. Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India. JPRAS Open. Sep 2019;21:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Watson JC, Tye G, Ward JD. Delayed repair of myelomeningoceles. World Neurosurg. Feb 2014;81(2):428–30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moreno-Oliveras L, Rodriguez-Mena R, Nahoda H, et al. Global neurosurgery: Reflections on myelomeningocele in the Zanzibar archipelago (Tanzania). World Neurosurg X. Oct 2023;20:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Warf BC, Wright EJ, Kulkarni AV. Factors affecting survival of infants with myelomeningocele in southeastern Uganda. J Neurosurg Pediatr. Feb 2011;7(2):127–33. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.PEDS10428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Khan AH, Hossain ATMM, Shalike N, Barua KK. Evolution of Neurosurgery in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Neurosurg. 2019;8(2):57–62. doi:doi: 10.3329/bjns.v8i2.42345 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pattisapu JV, Veerappan VR, White C, et al. Spina bifida management in low- and middle-income countries - a comprehensive policy approach. Childs Nerv Syst. Jul 2023;39(7):1821–1829. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-05988-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kancherla V, Ibne Hasan MOS, Hamid R, et al. Prenatal folic acid use associated with decreased risk of myelomeningocele: A case-control study offers further support for folic acid fortification in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2017;12(11):e0188726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kancherla V, Tsang B, Wagh K, Dixon M, Oakley GP Jr. Modeling shows high potential of folic acid-fortified salt to accelerate global prevention of major neural tube defects. Birth defects research. Nov 2020;112(18):1461–1474. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.World Health Organization 2007. Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care. Accessed 22 Apr 2024, https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/69735/a91272.pdf?sequence=1
  • 70.Ahmed KT, Karimuzzaman M, Mahmud S, Rahman L, Hossain MM, Rahman A. Influencing factors associated with maternal delivery at home in urban areas: a cross-sectional analysis of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018 data. J Health Popul Nutr. Aug 21 2023;42(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00428-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Perkins JE, Rahman AE, Siddique AB, et al. Opting for home birth in rural Bangladesh: An assessment of the current status and reasons. Birth. Jun 2019;46(2):362–370. doi: 10.1111/birt.12404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES