Skip to main content
F&S Reports logoLink to F&S Reports
. 2024 Jan 12;5(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.01.003

Three live births after human embryo vitrification with the use of aluminum oxide as an intermediate cooling agent: a case report

Plamen Todorov a,b, Elena Hristova a,, Nadya Petrova a,b, Tanya Milachich a
PMCID: PMC11228792  PMID: 38983741

Abstract

Objective

To study the possibility of increasing the cooling rates of the vitrification procedure in a closed system with the use of aluminum oxide as an intermediate coolant.

Design

Case report.

Subjects

Six patients undergoing procedures for assisted reproduction.

Intervention

Comparative studies of cryopreservation of donor embryos with aluminum oxide as an intermediate cooling agent (experimental group) and without it (control group) have been performed. After thawing, the embryo morphology and its potential to develop to the blastocyst stage have been assessed. The methodology was then applied to clinical practice.

Main Outcome Measures

Twenty embryos of 6 patients have been vitrified on day 4 after fertilization with the use of aluminum oxide as an intermediate coolant. Fourteen of them have been thawed. All have displayed normal morphology and 10 have formed blastocysts after 24 hours of culture. Four of the patients received embryo transfer with 2 embryos and the other 2 with single embryos.

Results

After preliminary comparative studies of embryos frozen with aluminum oxide and a control group, the results showed no statistically significant difference between their quality and potential to reach to blastocyst stage. That gave us ground to apply the methodology in clinical practice. After the embryo transfer, 3 clinical pregnancies with successful live births have been obtained.

Conclusions

Our experience shows that preimplantation embryos can be cryopreserved aseptically, in closed systems, with the help of aluminum oxide as an intermediate coolant.

Key Words: Human embryo, vitrification, survival rate, intermediate cooling agent, case report


Cryopreservation of preimplantation embryos is a routinely used technique in programs for assisted reproduction. In recent years, vitrification is the method of choice over slow freezing for cryostorage for elective embryo transfer (ET). It has been shown that over 90% of the embryos retain their viability after thawing and the percentage of clinical pregnancies is not significantly different from fresh ET (1, 2, 3). Perinatal and neonatal outcomes after vitrification are also comparable to those after fresh ET (4). Similar rates of congenital malformations in children born after vitrified/warmed ET when compared to those born from fresh ET also have been reported (5). In 2019, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 78.8% of all cycles were frozen ETs (6).

The main parameters that determine the overall survival rates of different biological objects during vitrification are the cooling and thawing rates, viscosity and volume of the sample (7, 8). The procedures include the exposure of cells to relatively high concentrations of the cryoprotectants, but for a limited time to avoid their cytotoxicity, and small sample size coupled with rapid cooling rates. In brief, the technology comprises of stepwise increase of the concentration of cryoprotectants in the freezing medium (3).

After the discovery of vitrification at the beginning of the implementation of the procedure in laboratories, different types of carrier devices for both embryo and oocyte freezing were used. At present, as more data have been accumulated for their efficacy, most of them have similar size and shape, which allows for the highest possible cooling rates to be achieved with minimal volume of the cryoprotective media (9, 10, 11). Up until now, in literature approximately 30 different carrier tools have been described, and approximately 15 versions are commercially available (12). Two types of carrier devices are used in the vitrification procedures—open and closed. Among the most popular are the commercially available modifications of the first carrier tools like the open-pulled straws (13), Cryoloop (14, 15) and Cryotop (16, 17). These devices are open systems (3), and they allow the achievement of higher cooling rates and give better overall parameters than the closed, sterile systems.

During the process of vitrification, initially in the equilibration phase the oocytes and embryos are placed for 12–15 min in a medium containing 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) and 7.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Afterward, they are transferred for approximately 1 min in the vitrification medium supplemented with 15% EG, 15% DMSO, and 0.5 M sucrose. The embryos are then placed on an open carrier device, which is plunged into liquid nitrogen. The high cooling rates achieved in such a way, together with the high concentrations of the cryoprotectants lead to the freezing of water molecules in a glass-like state, without crystal formation. Finally, the carrier is sealed and kept in super-low temperatures. The use of “open systems” allows for high cooling rates to be achieved (>20,000°C/min). Ready-to-use media for vitrification and carriers are commercially available.

On the other hand, the contact with the liquid nitrogen leads to a risk of exposure to bacteria, fungi, viruses, heavy metals, etc. (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Investigators report high contamination levels by microorganisms and fungi in carrier devices immersed in liquid nitrogen (25, 26).

Regrettably, a convenient method for use in clinical practice for the sterilization of liquid nitrogen still has not been developed. To avoid the risk of contamination, some investigators suggest the freezing to be performed in sterile liquid air (27), a possibility which has been confirmed to be efficient by our investigations as well (28). In 2016, the use of liquid helium, instead of liquid nitrogen was suggested by Chinese investigators (29). However, it is important to be noted that these technologies are not readily available for application in clinical practice.

All mentioned above determines the necessity to research other alternatives as aseptic technologies for cryopreservation in closed carrier systems, such as CryoTip (30), and the development of new closed devices to protect from direct contact and contamination in the liquid nitrogen. Furthermore, 2 of the leading organizations in the field of assisted reproductive technologies—the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (31), and the European Society for Human Reproductive Embryology (32) have recommended performing freezing and storage of reproductive cells and tissues in closed carrier systems. The European Union Directive concerning the packaging of cells and tissues states that “Following procurement, all recovered tissues and cells must be packaged in a manner which minimizes the risk of contamination and must be stored at temperatures that preserve the required characteristics and biological function of the cells/tissues” (33, 34).

The possibility to increase the speed of cooling in those cases definitely attracts the attention of the investigators in the field. The main decrease in the cooling rate when the devices are plunged into liquid nitrogen is due to the formation of bubbles at the boundary biological object—medium due to the nitrogen “boiling”. A layer of vapor is created, which hampers the direct contact of the liquid nitrogen with the cryopreservation device or carrier, the so-called Leidenfrost effect (35). In liquid nitrogen, it can lower significantly the heat transfer coefficient and lead to reduced cooling rates (36). To avoid this phenomenon, some investigators suggest a different approach—vitrification in liquid nitrogen slush, which is at −210°C (37, 38, 39). Such slush is obtained by the application of negative pressure on the liquid nitrogen, under which it freezes without vaporization (40). It should be noted that this procedure is quite hard to perform, and moreover, a significant difference in the overall results has not been detected (41, 42). This suggests that alternative approaches should be developed to increase the cooling rates.

It is also possible to avoid the nitrogen boiling with plunging of the carrier in preliminary equilibrated to the same temperature intermediate coolant with dense consistency, for example, aluminum oxide (Al2O3) or other metal oxides in a powdered state. The small size and the structure of the particles allow for the direct dipping of the closely sealed embryo carrier into the Al2O3. Due to its high density, the use of the precooled Al2O3 leads to increased cooling rates, because no bubbles are created. The technique has been developed at the Institute of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine in Kharkiv, Ukraine and has proven its efficacy in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and other cell suspensions (43).

The aim of the current study was to investigate the possibility of vitrifying embryos with the use of Al2O3 as an intermediate coolant, equilibrated to −196°С.

Case Report

All the investigations in the present study were performed after permission from the relevant Medical Ethics Committee had been obtained. All the patients involved both in the preliminary and the clinical studies have signed an informed consent.

Materials and methods

Preliminary Investigations

Initially, comparative studies on donated embryos (n = 48) were performed, 12 of them were vitrified under the classic protocol (plunging the carrier directly into liquid nitrogen)—a control group and 36 with the use of Al2O3 (Merck)—study group. The embryos were obtained from 21 women (aged 26–35 years), undergoing assisted reproductive technologies procedures. The semen used for insemination was from their partners. The embryos were frozen either on day 3 or 4 after fertilization and stored in liquid nitrogen for not less than a week. After thawing, the morphology of the embryos was assessed and they were cultured until the stage of expanded or hatched blastocyst. On day 5, the stage of blastocyst was reported and the expanded/hatched blastocyst on day 5/6.

Vitrification

Commercially available vitrification media was used (Kitazato), containing EG, DMSO, trehalose, and hydroxypropyl cellulose. First, the embryos were placed into the equilibration solution for 14 min (7.5% EG and 7.5% DMSO) at room temperature. Afterward they were transferred into a vitrification solution (15% EG and 15% DMSO) for 30 s and then placed into a new vitrification solution again for 30 s at room temperature. The embryos from both groups were put onto closed carriers (CBS High Security Vitrification Straw, Cryo Bio System). Then the control group embryos were plunged into liquid nitrogen (direct vitrification).

Vitrification with Al2O3

Approximately 600 g of Al2O3 (enough to cover the closed carrier device) were placed into a metal container with high conductivity walls and then placed into liquid nitrogen to equilibrate. After the temperature of the Al2O3 had reached the temperature of the liquid nitrogen, the vitrification was performed. The embryos sealed into the closed carrier systems were put in the Al2O3 for approximately 1 min and then transferred into the liquid nitrogen at maximum speed (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Freezing with the use of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) as an intermediate cooling agent: (A) Al2O3 powder; (B) schematic representation of the experimental design; and (C and D) measuring of the temperature of Al2O3.

Thawing was performed with a warming kit (Kitazato), which contains trehalose and hydroxypropyl cellulose. In the first step, the embryos were placed into prewarmed to 37oC thawing solution (1 M trehalose) for 1 min. Then they were transferred into 300 μL diluent solution (0.5 M trehalose) for 3 min at room temperature. Afterward, the embryos were put into 300 μL washing solution for 5 min and finally in another well containing 300 μL new washing solution for 1 min at room temperature.

Clinical Data

On the basis of the above-described preliminary studies, the technology was introduced into clinical practice.

Obtaining of the Oocytes

Standard ovarian stimulation protocols have been used with the application of antagonists (44). Oocyte pick-up was performed between 35 and 36 hours after triggering of the ovulation.

Fertilization and Embryo Culture

The obtained oocytes were fertilized by conventional in vitro fertilization and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The embryos were cultured in sequential media (VitroLife or Origio).

Cryopreservation in Clinical Practice

The vitrification procedure was performed as previously described. Only good quality embryos (45, 46) were selected for freezing with closed carriers (CBS High Security Vitrification Straw, Cryo Bio System). One or 2 embryos were loaded onto each device. Commercially available vitrification media was used (Kitazato). After thawing, the embryos have been cultured until day 5 and then transferred.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical significance was assessed using a 2-tailed t test, with the SPSS software. A probability of P<.05 was considered significant.

Results

Preliminary Studies

After thawing no difference between the qualities of the embryos in both groups—11 of 12 embryos (91.7%) of the control and 33 of 36 embryos (91.7%) in the experimental group have retained their morphological integrity. During postthaw culture, a major part of the embryos reached the blastocyst stage—63.63% (7 of 11 embryos) in the control and 84.84% (28 of 33 embryos) in the experimental group, respectively, showing a tendency for better blastocyst rate. The quality of the blastocysts was also comparable. Further, in the control group, 3 of 7 embryos (42.9%) have reached expanded blastocyst (1 of them has hatched—33.3%). In the experimental group, more of the obtained embryos have developed to the stage of expanded blastocyst—16 of 28 (57.1%) and 6 of them have hatched (37.5%) (Fig. 2). No contamination of any of the samples was observed by visual examination.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative images from embryos frozen with the use of aluminum oxide (Al2O3); (A) day 3 before cryopreservation; (B) blastocyst developed from the same embryos on day 5 postthaw; and (C) hatched blastocyst (1 of the same embryos) on day 6 after cryopreservation.

The obtained results from the preliminary studies, gave us ground for our laboratory group to propose the method of vitrification in Al2O3 to a group of patients.

Clinical Data

In 2021, 20 embryos of 6 patients (2 in each carrier device) have been vitrified in Al2O3 on day 4 after fertilization. Of them, 14 have been thawed and showed intact morphology. After 24 hours of culture, 10 of the 14 embryos (71.43%) have reached to the blastocyst stage (Fig. 3). Four patients received ET with 2 embryos and 2 single ET. The observed clinical pregnancies were 3 (50%) all with successful child births (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative images of an embryo used in clinical practice and with the use of aluminum oxide (Al2O3); (A) day 4, 2 hours after thawing; and (B) expanded blastocyst, obtained from the same embryo on day 5 before transfer.

Table 1.

Number of embryos frozen, thawed, and transferred for each of the patients, participating in the clinical investigation.

Patient Age (y) Frozen embryos (number) Thawed embryos (number) Transferred embryos (number) Embryos left frozen (number)
1 31 6 4 2 (pregnant) 2
2 33 4 2 1 (pregnant) 2
3 29 2 2 2 (pregnant) 0
4 34 4 2 1 2
5 31 2 2 2 0
6 35 2 2 2 0

Discussion

The current report describes the process of implementation of a method for vitrification (closed system) of human embryos, on the basis of the increase of cooling rates due to the plunging of the device into preliminary cooled Al2O3. The results from the investigation point out that the technique is safe and easily accessible for laboratories. The carrier device implemented in the investigation is popular in clinical practice and easily accessible. The straws are individually packed and sterile. Each device has an outer sheath and a capillary tube, where the embryos are loaded.

Chemically, aluminum oxide, or aluminum trioxide is a chemical compound comprising of aluminum and oxygen, with the chemical formula Al2O3. Its appearance is of a white powder and it has high thermal conductivity (30 Wm−1K−1), which characterizes the heat transfer capacity of compounds and materials. Thermal conduction is the main method for heat transfer in solids and it is the amount of heat flow per unit time per unit area at a certain temperature of the material (47, 48). For example, the thermal conductivity of the liquid nitrogen is approximately 25 Wm−1K−1, which means that, theoretically, the cooling rates should be lower. Moreover, the heat transfer in precooled metal powder is faster than in liquids. In our experiments, it was important that the selected cooling agent would be able to lower the temperature of the samples to that of the liquid nitrogen with high speed. Because it is a chemically inert compound and stable over a wide range of temperatures (49), the Al2O3 is appropriate to be used as an intermediate coolant. At the same time, Al2O3 is available from chemical and biological suppliers, which grants easy access to it for laboratories. Being readily obtainable, the Al2O3 might prove to be more suitable for application in clinical practice than the liquid nitrogen slush, although the latter also shows good results in avoiding the Leidenfrost effect and therefore improving the heat transfer. Because as mentioned above, the slush is quite hard to form and requires the use of negative pressure. However, the Al2O3 powder is not appropriate to be used in open carrier systems, as it may potentially stick to the samples. In the closed device used in our experiments, the compound has no contact with the bioobjects, because during thawing the outer straw is removed and in the thawing media only the capillary tube with the embryos is placed. There is no possibility for the Al2O to enter into the thawing media.

In the present report, the obtained experimental and clinical data show that the results can be compared to those achieved with an open system, but the proposed technique is considerably safer in terms of the requirements for aseptic cryopreservation and embryo storage. Future optimization of the method can be achieved by measuring the cooling rates, investigating of other types of closed carriers (for example, CryoTip), and attempts to increase the thawing speed. This is the first demonstration of the application of the method for vitrification of embryos, since in the available literature we could not find any reports regarding the matter. Fundamental research in the field of cryobiology has shown that the thawing rates should be equal to or higher than the cooling ones. The possibility to vitrify oocytes and embryos at a different stage of development with this technology also represents an interesting aspect of investigation.

Another intriguing application of the method is the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. In such cases, the process of vitrification is hindered by the relatively large sizes of the ovarian fragments, which prevent the achievement of higher cooling and thawing rates.

Conclusion

Vitrification with the use of Al2O3 as an intermediate coolant was found to be an effective method for cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos in a closed, aseptic system, but further investigations into the cooling rates are needed to safely apply the technique in clinical practice. We speculate that further studies will substantiate its usefulness in the cryopreservation of other reproductive tissues.

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Plamen Todorov: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Elena Hristova: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Conceptualization. Nadya Petrova: Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Tanya Milachich: Validation, Supervision, Resources, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Interests

P.T. has nothing to disclose. E.H. has nothing to disclose. N.P. has nothing to disclose. T.M. has nothing to disclose.

Footnotes

Supported by the Bulgarian National Science Fund under grant number KP-06-N51/11.

References

  • 1.Wang A., Santistevan A., Hunter Cohn K., Copperman A., Nulsen J., Miller B.T., et al. Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:254. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007. 61.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2:hox011. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society of Reproductive Biologists and Technologists A review of best practices of rapid-cooling vitrification for oocytes and embryos: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ainsworth A.J., Wyatt M.A., Shenoy C.C., Hathcock M., Coddington C.C. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer has no effect on childhood weight. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:684. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.020. 90.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belva F., Bonduelle M., Roelants M., Verheyen G., Van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1610–1620. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . US Dept. of Health and Human Services; 2021. 2019 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic and National Summary Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Panagiotidis Y., Vanderzwalmen P., Prapas Y., Kasapi E., Goudakou M., Papatheodorou A., et al. Open versus closed vitrification of blastocysts from an oocyte-donation programme: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:470–476. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Whaley D., Damyar K., Witek R.P., Mendoza A., Alexander M., Lakey J.R.T. Cryopreservation: an overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplantat. 2021;30:1–12. doi: 10.1177/0963689721999617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vajta G., Nagy Z.P. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779–796. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marco-Jiménez F., Jiménez-Trigos E., Almela-Miralles V., Vicente J.S. Development of cheaper embryo vitrification device using the minimum volume method. PLOS ONE. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nisa M.A., Malik A.A., Sofi K.A., Khatun A., Yousuf N. Recent advancements in vitrification cryodevices for gamete and conadal tissue. CryoLett. 2022;43:3129–3139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vajta G., Rienzi L., Ubaldi F.M. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vajta G., Holm P., Kuwayama M., Booth P.J., Jacobsen H., Greve T., et al. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51:53–58. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1<53::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lane M., Schoolcraft W.B., Gardner D.K. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1073–1078. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00418-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mavrides A., Morroll D. Cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: Is cryoloop vitrification the future to preserving the female gamete? Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002;42:73–80. doi: 10.1051/rnd:20020008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mazur P., Seki S. Survival of mouse oocytes after being cooled in a vitrification solution to −196 °C at 95° to 70,000 °C/min and warmed at 610°C to 118,000 °C/min: a new paradigm for cryopreservation by vitrification. Cryobiol. 2011;62:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2010.10.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hansen L., Daoussi R., Vervaet C., Remon J., De Beer T. Freeze-drying of live virus vaccines: a review. Vaccine. 2015;33:5507–5519. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Isachenko V., Rahimi G., Mallmann P., Sanchez R., Isachenko E. Technologies of cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa: asepticity as criterion of effectiveness. Androl. 2017;5:1055–1063. doi: 10.1111/andr.12414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Speck R.S., Jawetz E., Coleman V.R. Studies on herpes simplex virus. I. The stability and preservation of egg-adapted herpes simplex virus. J Bacteriol. 1951;61:253–258. doi: 10.1128/jb.61.3.253-258.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomlinson M. Risk management in cryopreservation associated with assisted reproduction. Cryo Lett. 2008;29:165–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Polo L., Mañes-Lázaro R., Olmeda I., Cruz-Pio L.E., Medina Á., Ferrer S., Pardo I. Influence of freezing temperatures prior to freeze-drying on viability of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;122:1603–1614. doi: 10.1111/jam.13465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stringfellow D., Wolfe D., McGuire J., Lauerman L., Gray B., Sparling P. Effects of embryo-freezing and thawing techniques on the survivability of Brucella abortus. Theriogenology. 1986;26:553–559. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(86)90161-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bermudez V., Miller R., Johnson W., Rosendal S., Ruhnke L. Effect of sample freezing on the isolation of mycoplasma spp. from the clitoral fossa of the mare. Can J Vet Res. 1988;52:147–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Criado E., Moalli F., Polentarutti N., Albani E., Morreale G., Menduni F., et al. Experimental contamination assessment of a novel closed ultravitrification device. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1777–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parmegiani L., Accorsi A., Bernardi S., Arnone A., Cognigni G.E., Filicori M. A reliable procedure for decontamination before thawing of human specimens cryostored in liquid nitrogen: three washes with sterile liquid nitrogen (SLN2) Fertil Steril. 2012;98:870–875. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arav A., Natan Y., Levi-Setti P.E., Menduni F., Patrizio P. New methods for cooling and storing oocytes and embryos in a clean environment of − 196°C. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Isachenko V., Todorov P., Seisenbayeva A., Toishibekov Y., Isachenko E., Rahimi G., et al. Vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes by direct plunging into cooling agent: non sterile liquid nitrogen vs. sterile liquid air. Cryobiol. 2018;80:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu X.L., Xu Y.K., Wu H., Guo X.F., Li X.X., Han W.X., et al. Successful vitrification of bovine immature oocytes using liquid helium instead of liquid nitrogen as cryogenic liquid. Theriogenology. 2016;85:1090–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.VerMilyea M., Brewer A. In: Cryopreservation of mammalian gametes and embryos. Nagy Z., Varghese A., Agarwal A., editors. Vol. 1568. Humana Press; New York, NY: 2017. Appendix D: Irvine scientific vitrification system. (Methods in molecular biology). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine Recommendations for reducing the risk of viral transmission during fertility treatment with the use of autologous gametes: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1158–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mocanu E., Drakeley A., Kupka M.S., Lara-Molina E.E., Le Clef N., Ombelet W., et al. ESHRE guideline: medically assisted reproduction in patients with a viral infection/disease. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;4:hoab037. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Official Journal of the European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Offi J L. 2004;102:48–58. EUR-Lex - 32004L0023 - EN - EUR-Lex (europa.eu) [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Doerr P., editor. The guide to the quality and safety of tissues and cells for human application. Strassburg, European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines &. 5th ed. HealthCare (EDQM); 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Amini M., Benson J.D. Technologies for vitrification based cryopreservation. Bioengineering. 2023;10:508. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Katkov I.I., Bolyukh V.F., Sukhikh G.T. KrioBlast TM as a new technology of hyper-fast cryopreservation of cells and tissues. Part I: thermodynamic aspects and potential applications in reproductive and regenerative medicine. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2018;164:530–535. doi: 10.1007/s10517-018-4027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yavin S., Aroyo A., Roth Z., Arav A. Embryo cryopreservation in the presence of low concentration of vitrification solution with sealed pulled straws in liquid nitrogen slush. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:797–804. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sansinena M., Santos M.V., Zaritzky N., Chirife J. Comparison of heat transfer in liquid and slush nitrogen by numerical simulation of cooling rates for French straws used for sperm cryopreservation. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1717–1721. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Santos M.V., Sansinena M., Zaritzky N., Chirife J. Assessment of external heat transfer coefficient during oocyte vitrification in liquid and slush nitrogen using numerical simulation to determine cooling rates. Cryo Lett. 2012;33:31–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steponkus P.L., Caldwell S. An optimized procedure for the cryopreservation of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Cryo Lett. 1993;14:375–380. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Baker M.J., Denton T.T., Herr C. An explanation for why it is difficult to form slush nitrogen from liquid nitrogen used previously for this purpose. Cryobiol. 2013;66:43–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hanson B.M., Kim J.G., Suarez S.I., Ackerman B.K., Comito C.E., Pangasnan R., et al. Embryology outcomes after oocyte vitrification with super-cooled slush nitrogen are similar to outcomes with conventional liquid nitrogen: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grischenko V.I., Tarasov V.F., Galchenko S.E., Kalugin J.V., Paraschuk J.S., Luchko N.A., et al. US4817397A. US Patent; 1988. (Device for refrigeration and freezing of biological objects). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.ESHRE Reproductive Endocrinology Guideline Group . 2019. Ovarian Stimulation for IVF/ICSI. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–1283. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hurtado R., de Lima Bossi R., Valle M., Sampaio M., Geber S. In vitro human embryo morphology – an Odissey outside the oviduct. Austin J Anat. 2021;8:1099. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tritt T.M., editor. Thermal conductivity. Theory, properties and applications. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zheng Q., Hao M., Miao R., Schaadt J., Dames C. Advances in thermal conductivity for energy applications: a review. Prog Energy. 2021;3 doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/abd082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lodziana Z., Parlinski K. Dynamical stability of the α and θ phases of alumina. Phy Rev B. 2003;67 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.174106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from F&S Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES