Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a notable sex disparity in incidence and tumor aggressiveness. Revealing differences in genetic landscapes between male and female HCCs may expand the understanding of sexual disparities mechanisms and assist the development of precision medicine. Although reports on the sex disparity of HCC are accumulated, studies focusing on sex-related biomarkers among Asian populations remain limited. Here, we conducted a comprehensive genomic profiling analysis to explore differences between male and female patients within a cohort of 195 Taiwanese HCC patients. We did not detect any sex-biased genomic alterations. However, when our investigation extended to the TCGA dataset, we found higher frequencies of gene copy gains in CCNE2 and mutations in CTNNB1 and TP53 among male patients. Besides, we further evaluated the associations between genomic alterations and patients’ prognosis by sex. The results showed that female patients harboring tumors with STAT3 gain and alterations in the JAK–STAT pathway displayed a poor prognosis. These two factors remained independently associated with unfavorable prognosis even after adjusting for the patient’s age and stage characteristics (Hazard ratio = 10.434, 95% CI 3.331–32.677, P < 0.001; Hazard ratio = 2.547, 95% CI 1.195–5.432, P = 0.016, respectively). In summary, this study provides valuable insights into understanding sex disparity in HCC in the East Asian population. Validation through larger cohorts and extensive sequencing efforts is warranted.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-024-01131-9.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Sex disparity, East Asian, Prognosis, Precision medicine
Introduction
For decades, sex disparity in incidence and prognosis has been evident in various types of human diseases, including non-reproductive cancers. A higher incidence of several types of cancer was reported in males, such as liver, esophagus, and bladder cancers [1, 2]. In contrast, subtypes of lung cancer and thyroid cancer are more prevalent in females [3]. In most cancers, men experience poorer prognoses than women and female patients show more sensitivity than males to the toxicity of different chemotherapeutic drugs [4–6]. However, despite sex being known as one of the most critical factors affecting incidence, aggressiveness, responses to treatment, and adverse drug reactions in cancer patients, the sex of the patients is less considered during drug development or clinical decision-making [2, 7].
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which accounts for 75–85% of all primary liver cancer [8], is one of the malignant solid tumors known for noticeable sex disparity [9]. The incidence ratios of males to females vary between 2:1 to 4:1 across different populations, depending on the geographic region [10, 11]. In Taiwan, the age-adjusted incidence rate of HCC is approximately three times higher in males (male: female ratio, 40.95: 15.44 per 100,000 persons = 2.65:1) [12]. Moreover, studies from some populations indicated that women were older at HCC diagnosis and had a better prognosis than men [13–15]. However, reports from other areas showed no difference in survival by sex [16, 17].
Efforts have been spent to unravel the mechanisms behind the observed differences in HCC between sexes. A comprehensive literature analysis reveals a multifaceted interplay of factors that contributes to this sex disparity [18–22]. These factors include the expression levels of genes encoded on the sex chromosome, the influence of sexual hormones, variation in lifestyles, immune responses, and sex-specific dysregulation of gene expression and mutational profiles. For instance, the X chromosome stands out for its enrichment of sex-biased genes and housing many immune-related genes encoding proteins that regulate both innate and adaptive immunity [23, 24]. Estrogen, which plays a protective role in women, has been associated with lower infection rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) [25]. This correlation is supported by the observation that HBV-related HCC occurs more frequently in men during the reproduction period [26], while a significant increase in HCC incidence has been noted in postmenopausal women [19].
On the other hand, studies also found that male with HBV infection has a high incidence of HCC due to the male hormone effect. The androgen receptor promotes hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis through modulation of HBV RNA transcription [20], and male HBV carriers with higher testosterone levels were also reported to have an increased risk of HCC [27, 28]. Manieri et al. proposed that reduced production of adiponectin after puberty or in an obese state may increase the risk of HCC in males [29].
With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), several genomic projects presented by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and other groups have tried to elaborate on the differences in molecular signatures between male and female HCC [18, 24]. Results demonstrated that male HCC patients harbored higher levels of somatic mutation, copy number variation (CNV), DNA methylation, mRNA, and miRNA expression [24]. The CTNNB1 gene showed significantly higher mutation frequency in male HCC [24] as more BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) gene mutations were reported in female HCC [30]. Male patients displayed enriched activation of PI3K, PI3K/AKT, FGFR, EGFR, NGF, GF1R, Rap1, DAP12, and IL-2 signaling pathways, while female patients showed PPAR pathway enrichment [18]. Besides genomic variants, some protein expressions also showed bias between sexes. For example, one study demonstrated that CYP39A1, a gene specifically expressed in the liver and has higher expression in females, was significantly reduced in 90% of HCC patients. Further investigation revealed that CYP39A1 exerts a tumor-suppressive effect by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of c-Myc [31].
Considering that most studies are predominantly based on populations of European ancestry [8, 11, 32], the Asian population was under-represented. Here, we aimed to explore the genomic landscapes between male and female HCC patients in the Taiwanese population. Also, we wanted to investigate the sex-specific biomarkers for HCC prognosis prediction.
Materials and methods
Study population and design
Purified DNA of archived HCC specimens was collected from the Taiwan Liver Cancer Network (TLCN), a representative nationwide biobank established in 2005 [33]. This biobank contains samples and demographics of liver cancer patients from Taiwan’s five major medical centers. The National Health Research Institutes Research Ethics Committee approved this study IRB (EC1080601-F-E). It waived the requirement of informed consent because of the retrospective nature of our study using de-identified data. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.
One hundred and ninety-five specimens we used in this study were collected between Sep 2005 and May 2011. The latest follow-up date was 1 July 2019, with a median overall survival (OS) of 80 months (ranging from 0.7 to 165 months). All tissue was collected by surgery without pretreatment. The demographic characteristics include age, sex, stage of disease, history of alcohol/smoking, cirrhosis, HBV/HCV infection history, date of diagnosis, date of sample collection, relapse, and latest follow-up were retrieved from the biobank database.
The cancer genome atlas database
The Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma dataset, TCGA Firehose Legacy, was obtained from the cBioPortal platform (https://www.cbioportal.org/). Out of the initial pool of 379 liver cancer cases, a total of 366 cases of HCC were selected for analysis. Thirteen samples, which included cases of hepatocellular carcinoma plus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, and liver cancer without specified subtypes, were excluded from the study. Consequently, our analysis focused on 366 samples, with 362 having single nucleotide variation (SNV) profiles and 359 featuring copy number variation (CNV) profiles for data analysis.
Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS)
One hundred and ninety-five samples DNA were sequenced using ACTOnco®(ACT Genomics Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan), a comprehensive panel targeting 440 cancer-related genes with whole exon coverage. The experimental procedures were as previously described [34]. In brief, genomic DNA was amplified using four pools of primer pairs targeting the coding exon regions of targeted genes. Amplicons were ligated with barcoded adaptors. Samples passed the quality control were subsequently conjugated with sequencing beads by emulsion PCR and enriched using the Ion Chef system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US) according to the Ion PI Hi-Q-Chef Kit protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US). The amplified product was sequenced on the Ion Proton or Ion S5 sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US). The test provided a mean coverage of ≥ 500× and target base coverage at 100× ≥ 85%.
Variant calling and annotation
The raw reads generated were mapped to the hg19 reference genome using the Ion Torrent Suite (version 4.2). Coverage depth was calculated using the Torrent Coverage Analysis plug-in. Variants reported in the Genome Aggregation database (version 2.0.2) with ≥ 1% minor allele frequency (MAF) were considered as polymorphisms and excluded from the following analyses.
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs), multi-nucleotide variants (MNVs), and small insertion/deletion (INDELs) were identified using the Torrent Variant Caller plug-in (version 4.2). Using ClinVar, COSMIC v.70, and the Genome Aggregation database (version 2.0.2) as references, VEP (Variant Effect Predictor; version 78) was used to annotate every variant. Variants with coverage ≥ 25, allele frequency ≥ 5%, and actionable variants with allele frequency ≥ 2% were retained.
For copy number variations detection, amplicons with read count in the lowest 5th percentile of all detectable amplicons and amplicons with a coefficient of variation ≥ 0.3 were removed. The remaining amplicons were normalized to correct the pool design bias. ONCOCNV [35] was applied to normalize total amplicon number, GC content, amplicon length, and technology-related biases, followed by segmenting the sample with a gene-aware model. The method was also used to establish the baseline of copy number variations from specimens in the ACT Genomics in-house database. Alterations are defined as putative mutation and CNV. The definition of putative mutations was based on the OncoPrinter from cBioPortal (https://www.cbioportal.org/). The mutations were classified into three catalogs, missense/in-frame (putative mutations without COSMIC ID), COSMIC ID (putative mutations with COSMIC ID), and nonsense/frameshift/splice-site. The CNVs were subdivided into three catalogs based on their changes. The amplification, gain, and deletion were defined as CN ≧ 8, 4 ≦ CN < 8, and CN = 0, respectively. All detected variants are listed in online resource Table S1.
Tumor mutational burden calculation
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated using the sequenced regions of ACTOnco®, an in-house developed machine learning model with a cancer hotspot correction was applied to predict somatic variants and TMB calculation [36]. TMB results were shown as the number of somatic nonsynonymous mutations per megabase of all protein-coding genes (Mutations/Mb).
Statistical analysis
We performed subgroup analyses to evaluate the associations between sexes and different clinical parameters. The chi-square test was used for comparing categorical outcomes when the group number is larger than or equal to 5, such as clinicopathology distribution by sex. Fisher’s exact test was used for comparing categorical outcomes when the subgroup is less than 5, the odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values of all enrichment analyses. We applied Benjamin-Hochberg correction for the number of independent tests conducted (significant using a False Discovery Rate of 0.05). The Mann–Whitney test was used for analyzing age and TMB distribution. The mutational signatures were performed using the MuSica website application [37]. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model were depicted for patients’ overall survival analyses. All the analysis was performed by Excel Office 2019 (Microsoft Inc., WA, USA), GraphPad Prism 9 (v. 9.2.0; GraphPad Inc., CA, USA), and R (v4.1.3). Tests are two-tailed tests, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of the study population
The retrospective study consisted of 195 HCC patients, including 129 males (66.2%) and 66 females (33.8%; ratio of male to female = 1.95) patients. The clinicopathological characteristics of this cohort are summarized in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 62 (ranging from 26 to 86), and most patients were diagnosed in the early stage (Stage I and II, n = 150, 76.9%). Ninety-eight patients (50.3%) and 80 patients (41%) had HBV and HCV infection history, which is much higher than the TCGA non-Asian cohort (5.1% and 20.1%, respectively; Supplementary Table S1). The proportion of patients with cirrhosis, alcohol, and smoking history was 39%, 34.9%, and 46.2%, respectively.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Total patients (n = 195) | Male (n = 129) | Female (n = 66) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | – | 66.2% | 33.8% | – |
Age | ||||
Median (range) | 62 (26–86) | 62 (28–86) | 61 (26–80) | 0.7446a |
Stage | ||||
Early (I/II) | 150 (76.9%) | 96 (74.4%) | 54 (81.8%) | 0.2459b |
Late (III/IV) | 45 (23.1%) | 33 (25.6%) | 12 (18.2%) | |
Viral infection | ||||
HBV | 98 (50.3%) | 68 (52.7%) | 30 (45.5%) | 0.0867b |
HCV | 80 (41%) | 48 (37.2%) | 32 (48.5%) | |
NBNC | 17 (8.7%) | 13 (10.1%) | 4 (6.1%) | – |
Cirrhosis | ||||
Positive | 76 (39%) | 45 (34.9%) | 31 (47%) | 0.1015b |
Negative | 119 (61%) | 84 (65.1%) | 35 (53%) | |
Alcohol | ||||
Yes | 68 (34.9%) | 66 (51.2%) | 2 (3%) | < 0.0001b |
No | 120 (61.5%) | 60 (46.5%) | 60 (90.9%) | |
Unknown | 7 (3.6%) | 3 (2.3%) | 4 (6.1%) | – |
Smoking | ||||
Yes | 90 (46.2%) | 86 (66.7%) | 4 (6.1%) | < 0.0001b |
No | 97 (49.7%) | 39 (30.2%) | 58 (87.9%) | |
Unknown | 8 (4.1%) | 4 (3.1%) | 4 (6.1%) | – |
HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, NBNC non-B non-C
aCalculated by the Mann–Whitney test
bCalculated by chi-squared test
We further explored the associations between the clinicopathological features and patients’ sex. Compared with female patients, significantly more male patients have drinking and smoking habits (51.2% vs. 3% and 66.7% vs. 6.1%, respectively; both P values are smaller than 0.0001). There is no difference in the age at diagnosis, stage distribution, viral infection history, and cirrhosis distribution between male and female HCC patients.
Mutational landscape in Taiwanese HCC
The extracted genomic DNA was analyzed by targeted DNA sequencing on 440 cancer-related gene coding regions. Among the 195 specimens, we identified 6,156 alterations, including 1819 mutations and 4337 CNVs (listed in Supplementary Table S2 excel file). The most frequently altered genes and signaling pathways are illustrated in Fig. 1. As expected, TP53 and CTNNB1 are the top two genes most mutated in HCC [38–40]. In addition, we found that ARID1A, ARID2, JAK1, and KMT2C genes are recurrently mutated in the Taiwanese HCC specimen (as shown in Supplementary Fig S1).
Among the 4337 CNVs, 4215 (97.2%) were classified as copy number gain or amplification, and 122 (2.8%) were homozygous deletion. Our results confirmed the previously well-defined recurrent CNVs in HCC, including recurrent gains on chr 1q21.1-q23.3 (encoding genes like BCL9, MCL1, NTRK1, DDR2, FCGR2B, and SDHC), chr 1q31.1-q44 (encoding genes like PTGS2, CDC73, IKBKE, BTG2, MDM4, PIK3C2B, USH2A, PARP1, FH, and AKT3), chr 8q21.3-q24.3 (encoding genes like NBN, RUNX1T1, CCNE2, UBR5, MYC, and RECQL4), and chr 17q22-25.3 (encoding genes like RNF43, BRIP1, CD79B, AXIN2, GNA13, PRKAR1A, SOX9, and RPTOR (as shown in Supplementary Fig S1).
Comparison of genomic profiles between genders in Taiwanese HCC patients
We compared the alteration frequencies of commonly mutated genes in male and female patient subgroups to elucidate the difference in genomic alteration patterns between male and female HCC patients in Taiwan (as shown in Fig. 1). Our analysis, presented in Supplementary Fig S1–2, revealed no significant difference in TMB between the sexes or with the presence of the virus. Notably, while a substantial disparity in smoking history was observed between male and female patients, no difference in TMB was found (P = 0.4653). We also cross-referenced our findings with the TCGA HCC dataset, and similar results were observed, with no significant variations in TMB between sexes, virus presence, or smoking history, as demonstrated in Supplementary Fig S3.
Figure 1 illustrates that the prevalence of STAT3 mutations is higher in male patients compared to females (9.3% versus 0%, P = 0.0092). However, when we accounted for multiple comparisons, the difference did not maintain statistical significance (adjusted P = 0.135; Benjamini–Hochberg correction; Supplementary Table S4). We also investigated the mutation frequency of CTNNB1, a gene known for its sex-biased mutation pattern in liver hepatocellular carcinoma [24]. In the Taiwanese cohort, we observed mutation frequencies of CTNNB1 in male and female HCC patients at 23.3% and 15.2%, respectively. However, these differences did not demonstrate statistical significance after adjustment (adjusted P = 0.520; Benjamini–Hochberg, Supplementary Table S4).
When analyzing copy number variations (CNVs) as depicted in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig S1, we found that more male patients harbored copy number gains of the 8q22.1 encoding the CCNE2 gene, in comparison to females (34.9% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.038). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (adjusted P = 0.717; Benjamini–Hochberg; Supplementary Table S3). Regarding signal pathway analysis, our data indicated that male patients showed a higher likelihood of genomic alterations in the JAK–STAT (33.3% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.0139).
A previous study had reported an enrichment of sex-biased genes on the X chromosome [24]. In light of this, we sought to investigate whether there were differences in the mutational profiles of X-linked genes in HCC based on gender. A total of 20 X-linked genes were included in our panel, and the detailed analysis results are shown in Supplementary Table S4. Initially, our finding indicated that compared to male patients, more female patients with mutations in BCOR, BTK, and XIAP had P values of 0.0066, 0.0457, and 0.0376, respectively. However, when we applied a statistical adjustment for multiple comparisons to our data, the initial statistically significant difference we observed was no longer evident. Consequently, after applying stringent correction, we did not detect any statistically significant differences in the mutation patterns of these X-linked genes between males and females.
In terms of mutational signatures, we grouped and analyzed samples with a substantial number of mutations (≥ 5 mutations) based on sex and/or smoking status (Supplementary Table S5 and Fig S4). None of the female smokers met the criteria and were excluded from the analysis. Our findings revealed that the most prevalent mutational signature in the Taiwanese cohort was signature 22, which is associated with exposure to aristolochic acid. This was followed by signatures 1 (related to aging), 18 (possibly associated with damage by reactive oxygen species), 24 (associated with exposure to aflatoxin), 27 (of unknown etiology, possible sequencing artifact), and 28 (unknown etiology). As expected, the frequencies of mutation signatures associated with smoking (Signatures 4) and tobacco chewing (Signatures 29) were higher in males when compared to females. However, it is important to note that these differences did not reach statistical significance. Notably, the frequencies of signatures 15 (associated with defective DNA mismatch repair), 23 (unknown etiology), and 26 (related to defective DNA mismatch repair) were higher in smokers than non-smokers. In contrast, signature 27 (unknown etiology) was more prominent in non-smokers.
Comparison of genomic profiles between genders in the TCGA HCC dataset
Considering the limited sample size of the Taiwanese cohort, we extended our analysis to the TCGA HCC dataset to investigate the presence of sex-biased genomic alteration in subgroups stratified by ethnicity. In the TCGA dataset, we found that CTNNB1, CCNE2, and TP53 were the genes that altered significantly more in males than in females (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table S6). When we divided the dataset into Asian and non-Asian subgroups, the sex-biased mutation profile was only observed in the non-Asian subgroup. The mutation frequencies of CTNNB1 and TP53 were significantly higher in male patients than in females (35.65% vs. 12.5% and 36.52% vs. 15%, respectively; Fig. 2b), with adjusted P values of 0.0024 and 0.004. No significant gender-based differences in mutation profiles were found in the Asian subgroup.
In summary, our study did not identify sex-biased genomic alterations in the Taiwanese cohort. However, we observed higher mutation frequencies in the CTNNB1 and TP53 genes, and copy number gains in the CCNE2 gene, in male patients in the TCGA dataset.
Ethnic-specific genomic alterations
Meanwhile, we uncovered an interesting aspect regarding ethnic-specific genomic alterations. Specifically, we found several hotspot mutations in JAK1 (S703I and S729C) and STAT3 (Y640F) that may show an ethnic-specific distribution. In the Taiwanese cohort, 4 and 6 out of 195 (2.0% and 3.1%, respectively) carried JAK1 p.S703I and p.S729C mutations, and 10 out of 195 (5.1%) patients harbored STAT3 p.Y640F. However, when we examined the TCGA dataset, a notable difference emerged. In the Asian subgroup, JAK1 p.S703I and p.S729C were identified in 1 (0.6%) and 2 (1.3%) out of 158 patients, but none were detected in the non-Asian subgroup (Supplementary Fig S5). Similarly, STAT3 p.Y640F was found in 2 (1.2%) out of 158 Asian HCC patients but was absent in non-Asian patients (Supplementary Fig S6). Collectively, the results implied the presence of ethnic group-specific genomic alterations, although further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Sex-specific prognostic markers
To investigate whether clinicopathological factors influence the prognosis of patients with HCC in the Taiwanese population, we retrieved survival data from the National Health Research Institutes Biobank database. The median overall survival (OS) was 80 months, with a range of 0.7 to 165 months. We compared OS based on various clinical parameters using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Supplementary Table S7 shows that our results revealed a significant difference in OS between patients with advanced-stage disease (stage III and IV) and those with early-stage disease (median OS = 35 months vs. 95 months, P = 0.0047; log-rank test). However, no significant impact on OS was found for age (P = 0.1011), viral infection (P = 0.5584), cirrhosis (P = 0.2274), alcohol consumption (P = 0.9018), and smoking (P = 0.7820). Additionally, there were no significant differences in OS between male and female patients (P = 0.7559), which aligns with previous observations [41].
Next, we explored the relationships between genomic alterations and overall survival within the Taiwanese population, specifically with respect to sex. Results are shown in Fig. 3, Supplementary S7, and detailed in Supplementary Table S8. We found that two male patients carrying KMT2C-mutated tumors had shorter OS than those with wild-type KMT2C (median OS: 12 and 80 months, respectively, P = 0.0034; Supplementary Fig. 7a–c). Additionally, a single male patient with a putative APC mutation exhibited an exceptionally short OS of 3 months, starkly contrasting patients with wild-type APC gene (median OS = 75.5 months, P < 0.0001; Supplementary Fig. 7d–f). Notably, in the TCGA Asian subgroup, we identified one male patient with a mutated KMT2C and another with a mutated APC; both had shorter OS compared to those with wild-type KMT2C or APC (Supplementary Fig. 8a–f). However, due to the limited number of patients carrying KMT2C and APC mutations, further research is warranted to draw definite conclusions.
Furthermore, we found that female patients with copy number gains of the STAT3 gene (n = 4) tended to have a poorer prognosis compared to those with the wild-type (WT) STAT3 gene (Supplementary Figure S7g–i and Table S8). The median OS of female patients with WT and STAT3 gains were 92.5 months and 16 months, respectively. A similar trend was seen in the TCGA Asian subgroup, where female patients with STAT3 gene copy gains (n = 7) had significantly shorter OS than females with WT STAT3 gene (Supplementary Figure S8g–i). It is noteworthy that STAT3 gain remained as an independent predictor of shorter OS after adjusting with the patient’s stage and age characteristics (Hazard ratio = 10.434, 95% CI 3.331–32.677, P < 0.001; Cox proportional hazard model; Table 2). This difference was not evident in the male subgroup or the non-Asian dataset. However, the limited number of STAT3 alteration detected in the two studied cohorts suggests that these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Similar to the findings of KMT2C and APC mutations in male HCC patients, further validation in larger cohorts is essential to confirm their clinical significance.
Table 2.
Variables | All | Male | Female | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard ratiob | 95% CI | P value | Hazard ratiob | 95% CI | P value | Hazard ratiob | 95% CI | P value | |
STAT3 Gaina | 1.018 | 1.002–1.035 | 0.028 | 0.712 | 0.280–1.811 | 0.476 | 10.434 | 3.331–32.677 | < 0.001 |
JAK/STAT Alta | 1.316 | 0.885–1.953 | 0.174 | 1.130 | 0.705–1.809 | 0.612 | 2.547 | 1.195–5.432 | 0.016 |
WNT Alta | 1.284 | 0.866–1.905 | 0.214 | 1.094 | 0.665–1.802 | 0.723 | 1.757 | 0.917–3.367 | 0.090 |
aModel includes predictor variables like patients’ age and stage characteristics
bReference group: patients with non-altered or wild-type genes
From the pathway-based point of view, we observed female patients with altered JAK–STAT or Wnt-β-catenin pathways displayed a shorter overall survival than those with non-altered signal pathways, as shown in Fig. 3a–f. The median OS of female HCC patients with a non-altered JAK–STAT signaling pathway (n = 55) was 95 months, whereas patients with an altered JAK–STAT signaling pathway (n = 11) had a median OS of 23 months (P = 0.0178; log-rank test). After adjusting for patients’ stage and age, the alteration of the JAK–STAT pathway remained an independent factor associated with shorter OS (Hazard ratio = 2.547, 95% CI 1.195–5.432, P = 0.016; Cox proportional hazard model; Table 2). Furthermore, although not reaching statistical significance, a similar trend was observed in the TCGA Asian subgroup (n = 15, P = 0.1658; Fig. 4a–c). Female patients with an altered Wnt-β-catenin pathway also displayed poor OS (median OS = 52 months) compared to those with an unaltered Wnt-β-catenin pathway (P = 0.0201; log-rank test; Fig. 3d–f). However, in the TCGA Asian subgroup, a poor prognosis was observed in patients with altered Wnt-β-catenin pathway, irrespective of gender (Fig. 4d–f), yet, the results did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for patient age and stage characteristics (Table 2).
Discussion
The substantial disparity in HCC incidence rates and aggressiveness between males and females is well-documented [42]. Here, we compared the genomic profiles using archived specimens from the Taiwanese population to evaluate whether sex-related genomic alteration contributes to this disparity. Within this specific cohort, we did not identify any sex-biased genomic alterations. However, we extended our investigation to the TCGA dataset and observed higher frequencies of gene copy gains in CCNE2 and mutations in CTNNB1 and TP53 among male patients. Upon further stratification of the TCGA dataset by ethnicity, we found that the difference in mutation frequency of CTNNB1 and TP53 genes remained statistically significant within the non-Asian subgroup.
TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancer, and it is noteworthy that TP53 mutations are more prevalent in males than females among various non-reproductive solid tumors, including liver hepatocellular carcinoma [43]. Haupt et al. identified a cluster of genes located on the X chromosome that can influence the activity of the p53 protein. Males possessing only one X chromosome are particularly susceptible to developing diseases if genes on their X chromosome become dysfunctional. Furthermore, females display an exceptional incidence of non-expressed mutations among X-linked genes associated with p53. These intricate genetic dynamics may offer insights into the sex disparities observed in specific cancers [43]. In our study, we found that the mutation incidence of TP53 in the Taiwanese population (51.8%) is markedly higher than that in the TCGA non-Asian cohort (27.6%; P < 0.00001; Chi-square test), which is consistent with previous study [44]. Collectively, these findings emphasize the importance of considering ethnic background and genetically-assigned sex potentially in the development of tailored therapeutic strategies.
The β-catenin protein encoded by CTNNB1 is the major effector of WNT signaling. WNT signaling pathway plays a prominent role in the control of embryogenesis, stem cell renewal, cell fate determination, and cancer development [45, 46]. According to the TCGA data, activation of the WNT signaling pathway by CTNNB1 or AXIN1 mutation is found in a notable subset of HCC [46, 47]. Consistent with TCGA, CTNNB1 is one of the top mutated genes in the Taiwanese HCC cohort and has a male-biased tendency [24], which predicts that males will receive greater therapeutic benefit from Wnt or β-catenin-targeting regimens. Therapeutic strategies targeting the WNT/b-catenin pathway have been studied for decades, including PORCN inhibitors, WNT ligand antagonists, FZD antagonists, and inhibitors of β-catenin transcriptional activity [48]. PRI-724 (ICG-001) is a selective inhibitor of the CREB-binding protein (CBP)/β-catenin. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of PRI-724 in HCC cells with activated β-catenin [49]. Furthermore, a combination of ICG-001 and sorafenib showed a more significant growth-retarding effect in HCC cell lines [50]. Acceptable toxicity was observed in the phase I study of PRI-724 in patients with advanced solid tumors [NCT01302405]. However, only the anti-fibrotic effects of PRI-724, but not the anti-tumor effect, are currently evaluated in clinical trials [51]. Given the higher frequency of CTNNB1 mutations in males among different ethnic groups, sex-related experimental design or clinical benefits of regimens targeting β-catenin should be considered in future studies.
Copy number gains of CCNE2 were one of the three sex-biased genomic alterations that could be found in the TCGA dataset. CCNE2 encodes cyclin E2 protein, a highly conserved cyclin family that regulates the function of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) function. Cyclin E2 interacts explicitly with and functions as a regulatory subunit of CDK2 and plays a crucial role in mitotic cell cycle regulation. CCNE2 is located at chr 8q22.1, the region known to be recurrently altered in HCC and associated with high tumor grade and microvascular invasion [52]. However, unlike the cyclin E1 proteins, in vitro studies showed that cyclin E2 is not essential for initiating liver cancer [53]. Therefore, based on the current data, we cannot differentiate if gains of CCNE2 or other genes located in this region 8q22.1-q24 are involved in the pathogenesis of HCC.
Our research has revealed two specific factors, copy number gain of STAT3 and altered JAK–STAT pathway, as independent predictors of an unfavorable prognosis, particularly in female HCC patients. Remarkably, female patients with either a copy number gain of STAT3 or alterations in the JAK–STAT pathway displayed significantly shorter OS than their male counterparts, with a median OS of 16 months and 23 months compared to 79 months and 66.5 months, respectively. The gender-based trend was a unique feature observed exclusively within the TCGA Asian subgroup and was absent in the non-Asian subgroup. Adding to this complexity, we identified two recurrent activating mutations in JAK1 (S703I and S729C) and one in STAT3 (Y640F), primarily observed in Taiwanese males. These mutations are well-known for their capability to trigger the constitutive phosphorylation and activation of STAT3 without external triggers in various cell lines [54, 55]. Importantly, these specific mutations were unique to the Asian population within the TCGA dataset.
These compelling findings underscore the potential significance of the JAK–STAT signaling pathway in the initiation or development of Asian HCC. At the same time, it is established that aberrant activation of the JAK–STAT signaling pathway and persistent activation of STAT3 is expected in approximately 60% of HCC cases, with a clear association with poor prognosis [56–58]. Our study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to propose a gender-based impact of STAT3 copy number gains and JAK–STAT pathway on the prognosis of female HCC patients. Further investigation is warranted to explore this intriguing observation in more detail.
Furthermore, these results emphasize the urgent need for JAK–STAT targeting therapeutic approach for HCC, especially in the Asian population [56, 59]. Several STAT3 inhibitors have been advanced into clinical trials with promising therapeutic potential as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities in HCC and other cancers. One notable example is Napabucasin (BBI608), a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that suppresses cancer stemness by targeting STAT3-driven gene transcription [60]. A phase Ib/II clinical trial study in patients with HCC demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity and acceptable safety profile of napabucasin when combined with sorafenib [61].
We are fully aware that the major limitation of this study is the sample size (n = 195), which is relatively small, potentially limiting our ability to detect differences. Specifically, we were only able to identify the impact of sex on highly mutated genes or common copy number alterations. It is essential to acknowledge that variations in HCC mutational patterns are linked to diverse genetic backgrounds and environmental factors like smoking, alcohol consumption, exposure to aristolochic acid, and infections with HBV and HCV [62, 63]. While we sought to address these concerns by validating our initial findings with a more extensive dataset, the TCGA HCC dataset, our limited sample size still prevents us from determining whether the observed genomic distinctions between sexes arise from variations in etiology or ancestral population. Thirdly, the sequencing platform we used in our study is a targeted panel, which only contains the exons of 440 cancer-related genes. As genomic alterations led to sex disparity may not be limited to driver genes, a more comprehensive large-scale prospective study should be conducted to validate our findings.
HCC is a solid tumor showing a noticeable sex disparity, which occurs preferentially in males. Previous studies indicated that HCC in males and females are biologically distinct and may respond differently to treatments. In 2014, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed policies encouraging investigate-initiated grants to make reasonable efforts to consider sex as a biological variable for medical research. However, no randomized controlled trials have demonstrated sex-related differences in HCC treatment response or clinical outcomes [64]. Considering the racial background and genetically assigned sex in clinical study designs and analyses is warranted in future trials to understand better whether and how these factors may modify treatment response to specific therapeutic targets and influence clinical outcomes.
Conclusions
In the present study, we characterized the mutational landscapes among male and female patients in Taiwanese HCC. We pinpointed sex-specific molecular targets that may have implications for prognoses. These findings not only contribute to our understanding of sex disparity in HCC, particularly within the Asian population but also establish a foundation for future research in this area. The validation of our results through larger cohorts and extensive sequencing efforts is strongly recommended to advance our knowledge in this field further.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Health Research Institutes for providing the samples and clinical information.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, K.-P.T., K.-T.T., and C.-Y.H.; methodology, Y.-J.L., K.-P.T., and C.-Y.H.; software, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; validation, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; formal analysis, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; investigation, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; resources, S.-F.H..; data curation, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.-H. W., and S.-J.C; visualization, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; supervision, K.-P.T., and S.-J.C.; project administration, K.-P.T. and C.-Y.H.; funding acquisition, S.-J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Tumor NGS analysis for the study was supported by ACT Genomics Co., Ltd. This research received no external funding.
Data availability
The sequencing raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors. However, certain restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the National Health Research Institutes.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The National Health Research Institutes Research ethics committee approved this study IRB (EC1080601-F-E) and waived the requirement of informed consent because of the retrospective nature of our study using de-identified data.
Competing interests
Chung-Yu Huang, Ka-Po Tse, Yeh-Han Wang, Yen-Jung Lu, and Shu-Jen Chen are employed by ACT Genomics Co., Ltd. Other authors have no conflict of interest with the content of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Shu-Jen Chen, Email: sjchen@actgenomics.com.
Ka-Po Tse, Email: bobotse@actgenomics.com.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mauvais-Jarvis F, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565–582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dong M, et al. Sex differences in cancer incidence and survival: a pan-cancer analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2020;29(7):1389–1397. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ozdemir BC, et al. Sex differences in efficacy and toxicity of systemic treatments: an undervalued issue in the era of precision oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(26):2680–2683. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.3290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Soldin OP, Chung SH, Mattison DR. Sex differences in drug disposition. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:187103. doi: 10.1155/2011/187103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nicolson TJ, Mellor HR, Roberts RR. Gender differences in drug toxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31(3):108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wagner AD, et al. Gender medicine and oncology: report and consensus of an ESMO workshop. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1914–1924. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wands J. Hepatocellular carcinoma and sex. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1974–1976. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr075652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(Suppl):S2–S6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liao SH, et al. Long-term effectiveness of population-wide multifaceted interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. J Hepatol. 2021;75(1):132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rich NE, et al. Sex disparities in presentation and prognosis of 1110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52(4):701–709. doi: 10.1111/apt.15917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tangkijvanich P, et al. Gender difference in clinicopathologic features and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(11):1547–1550. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i11.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dohmen K, et al. Longer survival in female than male with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18(3):267–272. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.02936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu EM, et al. Gender differences in hepatocellular cancer: disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis and liver transplantation. Hepatoma Res. 2018;4:66. doi: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ladenheim MR, et al. Sex differences in disease presentation, treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre cohort study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016;3(1):e000107. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Natri HM, Wilson MA, Buetow KH. Distinct molecular etiologies of male and female hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6167-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yeh SH, Chen PJ. Gender disparity of hepatocellular carcinoma: the roles of sex hormones. Oncology. 2010;78(Suppl 1):172–179. doi: 10.1159/000315247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu WC, Liu QY. Molecular mechanisms of gender disparity in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(20):6252–6261. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haupt S, et al. Sex disparities matter in cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(6):393–407. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00348-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zheng B, et al. Gender disparity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): multiple underlying mechanisms. Sci China Life Sci. 2017;60(6):575–584. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-9043-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bianchi I, et al. The X chromosome and immune associated genes. J Autoimmun. 2012;38(2–3):J187–J192. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yuan Y, et al. Comprehensive characterization of molecular differences in cancer between male and female patients. Cancer Cell. 2016;29(5):711–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baig S. Gender disparity in infections of Hepatitis B virus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009;19(9):598–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee CM, et al. Age, gender, and local geographic variations of viral etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in a hyperendemic area for hepatitis B virus infection. Cancer. 1999;86(7):1143–1150. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991001)86:7<1143::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yu MW, et al. Androgen-receptor gene CAG repeats, plasma testosterone levels, and risk of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(24):2023–2028. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.24.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang WJ, et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein enhances the transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor through c-Src and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta kinase pathways. Hepatology. 2009;49(5):1515–1524. doi: 10.1002/hep.22833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Manieri E, et al. Adiponectin accounts for gender differences in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence. J Exp Med. 2019;216(5):1108–1119. doi: 10.1084/jem.20181288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim SY, et al. Sex-biased molecular signature for overall survival of liver cancer patients. Biomol Ther. 2020;28(6):491–502. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2020.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ji F, et al. Blocking hepatocarcinogenesis by a cytochrome P450 family member with female-preferential expression. Gut. 2022 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration et al. The burden of primary liver cancer and underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the global, regional, and national level: results from the global burden of disease study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(12):1683–1691. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huang S-F, et al. AB032. S7-3. Introduction of Taiwan liver cancer network. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019;8:AB032. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.AB032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lapke N, et al. Genetic alterations and their therapeutic implications in epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08233-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boeva V, et al. Multi-factor data normalization enables the detection of copy number aberrations in amplicon sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(24):3443–3450. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Merino DM, et al. Establishing guidelines to harmonize tumor mutational burden (TMB): in silico assessment of variation in TMB quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase I of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000147. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Diaz-Gay M, et al. Mutational signatures in cancer (MuSiCa): a web application to implement mutational signatures analysis in cancer samples. BMC Bioinform. 2018;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2234-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cleary SP, et al. Identification of driver genes in hepatocellular carcinoma by exome sequencing. Hepatology. 2013;58(5):1693–1702. doi: 10.1002/hep.26540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kan Z, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genome Res. 2013;23(9):1422–1433. doi: 10.1101/gr.154492.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schulze K, et al. Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Genet. 2015;47(5):505–511. doi: 10.1038/ng.3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lai MW, et al. Is there a sex difference in postoperative prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma? BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5453-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nevola R, et al. Gender differences in the pathogenesis and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biology. 2023;12(7):984. doi: 10.3390/biology12070984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haupt S, et al. Identification of cancer sex-disparity in the functional integrity of p53 and its X chromosome network. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5385. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13266-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Duan X, et al. The effect of the TP53 and RB1 mutations on the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with different racial backgrounds. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(4):1786–1796. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bugter JM, Fenderico N, Maurice MM. Mutations and mechanisms of WNT pathway tumour suppressors in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(1):5–21. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00307-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jung YS, Park JI. Wnt signaling in cancer: therapeutic targeting of Wnt signaling beyond beta-catenin and the destruction complex. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(2):183–191. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0380-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gabata R, et al. Anti-tumor activity of the small molecule inhibitor PRI-724 against β-catenin-activated hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(9):5211–5219. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lin HH, et al. Inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway improves the anti-tumor effects of sorafenib against hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2016;381(1):58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kimura K, et al. Safety, tolerability, and anti-fibrotic efficacy of the CBP/beta-catenin inhibitor PRI-724 in patients with hepatitis C and B virus-induced liver cirrhosis: an investigator-initiated, open-label, non-randomised, multicentre, phase 1/2a study. EBioMedicine. 2022;80:104069. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim TM, et al. Clinical implication of recurrent copy number alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma and putative oncogenes in recurrent gains on 1q. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(12):2808–2815. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sonntag R, et al. Cyclin E1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 are critical for initiation, but not for progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(37):9282–9287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807155115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pilati C, Zucman-Rossi J. Mutations leading to constitutive active gp130/JAK1/STAT3 pathway. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015;26(5):499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pilati C, et al. Somatic mutations activating STAT3 in human inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. J Exp Med. 2011;208(7):1359–1366. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lee C, Cheung ST. STAT3: an emerging therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2019;11(11):1646. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liang C, et al. Clinicopathological significance and prognostic role of p-STAT3 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1203–1214. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S156198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Calvisi DF, et al. Ubiquitous activation of Ras and Jak/Stat pathways in human HCC. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(4):1117–1128. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Xu J, et al. IL-6/STAT3 is a promising therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:760971. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li Y, et al. Napabucasin reduces cancer stem cell characteristics in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:597520. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.597520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.El-Rayes BF, et al. BBI608-503-103HCC: a phase Ib/II clinical study of napabucasin (BBI608) in combination with sorafenib or amcasertib (BBI503) in combination with sorafenib (Sor) in adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15_suppl):4077–4077. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang B-F, Guan X-Y. Racial difference of mutational signature in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 2021 doi: 10.20517/2394-5079.2021.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rebouissou S, Nault JC. Advances in molecular classification and precision oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020;72(2):215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ajayi F, et al. Racial and sex disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2020;19(4):462–469. doi: 10.1007/s11901-020-00554-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The sequencing raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors. However, certain restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the National Health Research Institutes.
Not applicable.