Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2024 Jul 9;15:5754. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50179-2

Blossoms in perovskite planar X-ray detectors

Xiangyu Ou 1, Feng Gao 1,
PMCID: PMC11233596  PMID: 38982081

Solution processable perovskites have made remarkable strides in direct planar X-ray detectors, promising to reshape X-ray detector industry. Herein, we discuss prevailing challenges, research opportunities, and their synergies with cutting-edge technologies that will benefit both human society and scientific research.

Subject terms: Materials for devices, Materials chemistry


Solution processable perovskites are revolutionising the research field of direct X-ray detectors. Here, the authors discuss the opportunities, challenges, and research strategies for perovskite planar X-ray detectors.


X-ray imaging, a technique utilising X-rays to reveal the internal structure of matter through planar X-ray detectors, has significantly advanced scientific research and modern society. In general, indirect planar X-ray detectors convert X-rays into visible photons through scintillators, while direct planar X-ray detectors convert X-rays into charge carriers through semiconductors. With increasing needs for X-ray imaging applications, achieving lower radiation dosage and higher spatial resolution is the primary goal of next-generation planar X-ray detectors. Particularly, direct planar X-ray detectors, featuring high spatial resolution as charge carriers move along the electric field with nearly no signal crosstalk, are optimal for this ambition. However, the quest for excellent semiconductors that meet all prerequisites of X-ray detection and can be readily integrated with readout electronics for planar X-ray detectors remains a highly challenging endeavour.

The rising star for planar X-ray detectors

As the centrepiece of direct X-ray detectors, semiconductors play a decisive role in detection performance. However, commercial amorphous selenium (α-Se) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe) suffer from either low X-ray absorption or rigorous manufacturing, presenting inherent limitations for planar X-ray detectors.

Emerging in 2009, perovskites have entirely transformed the conventional perception of high-performance semiconductors because they can be solution-processed while maintaining excellent optoelectronic properties. Remarkably, perovskite solar cells have reached a certificated efficiency of 26.15 %1, close to silicon solar cells (27.6 %) developed for nearly 70 years. In 2013, perovskites stepped onto the historical stage of the high-energy radiation detection field2, showing great promise to develop next-generation planar X-ray detectors3 (Fig. 1 and Table 1):

Fig. 1. The performance radar of CdZnTe, α-Se, and CsPbBr3.

Fig. 1

While CdZnTe single crystals exhibit excellent optoelectronic properties for X-ray detection, their manufacturing process is harsh and costly. On the contrary, CsPbBr3 displays comparable performance to CdZnTe and is suitable for large-area fabrication via solution processes at a low cost. μeτe and μhτh represent the mobility-lifetime product of electrons and holes, respectively; εe represents electron-hole pair production energy; Zeff represents the effective atomic number.

Table 1.

Comparison of optoelectronic properties of CdZnTe, a-Se, and CsPbBr3

Materials CdZnTe α-Se CsPbBr3
μeτe (cm2 V−1) 4 × 10−3 5 × 10−9 2.05 × 10−3
μhτh (cm2 V−1) 3.76 × 10−5 1.4×10−7 5.79 × 10−3
Bandgap (eV) 1.57 2.15 2.29
εe (eV) 4.64 40-50 5.3
Resistivity (Ω cm) 3 × 1010 4 × 1012 4 × 109
Defect tolerance Low Medium High
Zeff 50 34 65.9
Density (g cm−3) 5.8 4.3 4.57
Fabrication technique Molten growth Thermal evaporation Solution process
Cost Expensive Medium Low cost
References 1618 1922 4,8

Governed by the photoelectric effect (Z3E−3, where Z is the atomic number and E is the energy of the incident photon), high-Z perovskites exhibit strong X-ray stopping power to attenuate 90% of incident X-rays with a low thickness. Long carrier diffusion lengths ensure efficient charge carrier transport and extraction in thick active layers with a thickness of several hundred microns. The bandgaps, ranging from 1.3 to 2.3 eV depending on the chemical composition, facilitate an optimal balance between dark current levels and charge carrier numbers. Additionally, the solution processability makes perovskites unprecedented candidates for planar X-ray detectors fabricated through a wide range of low-cost and low-energy consumption techniques, which are hardly possible for conventional semiconductors4. High defect tolerance further endows perovskites with self-healing capability and good radiation hardness, which are essential for the long-term stability of X-ray detectors5.

State-of-the-art perovskite planar X-ray detectors

In 2017, a groundbreaking research conducted by Samsung successfully integrated methylammonium lead iodide perovskites onto amorphous silicon (α-Si) thin-film transistor (TFT) backplanes through blade coating, followed by the validation of X-ray imaging capability. This pioneering work ignited the research boom on planar X-ray detectors based on perovskites6.

While previous research mainly concentrated on the development of perovskite planar X-ray detector based on α-Si TFT backplane with low electron mobility, a recent research has demonstrated the feasibility of integrating caesium lead bromide (CsPbBr3) perovskites onto a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) array (72 × 72; pixel size: 83.2 microns) through layer-by-layer screen printing7. Alternatively, CMOS built on single-crystal silicon with excellent electron mobility and smaller pixels provides a prospective option for high-performance planar X-ray detectors, enabling faster readout speed and higher spatial resolution over the TFT technique. Hence, CsPbBr3 CMOS X-ray detectors achieve an unprecedented spatial resolution (5 line pair mm−1) under low dosage (260 nGy) and a fast readout speed of 300 frames per second (fps). Although the pixel of the proposed CMOS array is 83.2 microns with a relatively limited active region in this research, the state-of-the-art CMOS has reached a pixel size of 5 microns with a larger active area, allowing for further enhancing the capabilities of the perovskite CMOS planar X-ray detectors. Notably, thickness modulation is required to mitigate the signal crosstalk upon coupling to a CMOS array with smaller pixels since horizontal charge crosstalk is severe in this case.

Simultaneously, a research team from Huazhong University of Science and Technology integrated CsPbBr3 perovskite single crystals onto CMOS chips through anisotropic conductive bonding, a well-established technology in the flat-panel screen industry8. CsPbBr3 CMOS X-ray detectors realise intelligent X-ray imaging with the assistance of in-sensor computing technology, achieving precise edge extraction and a ca. 50% data compression for energy saving. Moreover, these intelligent X-ray detectors could be programmed and trained to carry out image recognition with an accuracy of 100%.

Opportunities

The solution processability offers extraordinary possibilities for perovskites to incorporate with organic polymer substrates through embedding or surface deposition to fabricate flexible planar X-ray detectors9. As flexible planar X-ray detectors can be intentionally shaped to fit the surface geometry of the objects, they present higher spatial resolution, reduced radiation exposure, and improved user comfort, especially suitable for mammography without breast compression, painless dental X-rays, and trauma radiography. What’s more, the lightweight and portable flexible X-ray detectors expand indoor medical diagnostics to outdoor emergencies, greatly scaling medical efficiency and accessibility.

Thanks to the high defect tolerance of perovskites, polycrystalline perovskites demonstrate comparable performance to single-crystal perovskites. In addition, the larger bandgap of perovskites compared to silicon contributes to a lower dark count rate at room temperature. These properties create excellent possibilities to develop large-area photon-counting perovskite planar X-ray detectors featuring intrinsic energy spectral sensitivity, low electronic noise, and reduced radiation exposure, holding great promise for high-end photon-counting computed tomography10.

Challenges and strategies

Despite impressive achievements alongside the promising expectations highlighting the superiorities of perovskite planar X-ray detectors, significant barriers remain between laboratory research and commercialisation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. The challenges and research strategies for perovskite planar X-ray detectors.

Fig. 2

The current issues (ion migration, polarisation, encapsulation) existing in perovskite planar X-ray detectors and the feasible strategies for future research. The perovskites without encapsulation tend to decompose to several by-products at ambient conditions (water, oxygen, and lights). The grain boundaries and defects provide migration channels (grey arrows) for mobile ions (red balls). The interaction of X-rays and perovskite lattice may produce defects (dotted circles and purple arrows), inducing polarisation under bias.

Intrinsic ion migration, originating from lattice defects and numerous grain boundaries in thick active layers (400–1200 microns), is considered as the primary factor accounting for high dark current levels (10−8–10−5 A cm−2) and serious current drift in perovskite planar X-ray detectors, leading to unsatisfactory signal-to-noise ratio, compromised linear dynamic range, and degraded operation stability. Although previous studies were obsessed with increasing the detection sensitivity, a dark current below 10−9 A cm−2 is required for the integration of perovskites onto commercial readout integrated circuits, as an excessive dark current will fully charge the storage capacitor. Therefore, it is essential to suppress the dark current and current drift by inhibiting the ion migration. Solvent engineering, additives engineering, interface engineering, and fabrication technique optimisation provide effective strategies to reduce grain boundaries and defect density. In addition, elaborately modulating the A-site and B-site composition of perovskites through high-entropy alloying helps to reduce the defect density for ultrasensitive and stable X-ray detection11. After the fabrication of perovskite thick layers, the remaining pinholes and grain boundaries could be partially mitigated by solid-state hot pressing12. Furthermore, the introduction of charge blocking layers provides an additional approach to suppress the dark current by elevating the injection energy barriers. Overall, a comprehensive optimisation of the perovskite in bulks, surfaces, interfaces, and device architecture13 is imperative to mitigate ion migration in perovskite X-ray detectors.

X-ray detectors operating under constant X-ray flux ensure reliable dynamic X-ray imaging for medical and industrial purposes. Unfortunately, continuous external electric fields and high-intensity X-ray flux are likely to induce the polarisation in perovskite X-ray detectors, leading to abnormal photocurrent lag detrimental to the readout speed and long-term stability. Ion migration is one of the possible reasons causing polarisation due to the disruption of the electric field in perovskites by ion redistribution. Besides, the interaction between high-energy X-rays and perovskite lattice may lead to the dislocation of the atoms, introducing traps that capture the charge carriers. A recent research indicated that the polarisation behaviour of perovskite X-ray detectors is closely associated with trap density within perovskites, with lower trap density contributing to the mitigated polarisation effect14. Until now, the polarisation mechanism in perovskite X-ray detectors remains unclear, holistic characterisations together with theoretical calculations are required to have a deep understanding on the radiation- and bias-induced polarisation in perovskite X-ray detectors.

At present, most laboratory-based perovskite planar X-ray detectors without appropriate encapsulation are tested under ambient conditions. This practice raises concerns on long-term stability as perovskites are highly sensitive to water and oxygen, resulting in irreversible deterioration. Even worse, exposure to ambient light initiates complex photochemical reactions between perovskites and oxygen (Fig. 2), accelerating the degradation. Considering that industrialised conversions impose stringent requirements (lifecycle expectancy: 7 years; exposure levels: 21,000 times), it is necessary to sufficiently encapsulate the perovskite planar X-ray detectors to completely separate the water and oxygen.

In addition to the advancement of laboratory-based perovskite X-ray planar detectors, establishing standardised procedures for evaluating their imaging performance is of critical importance for future applications. Currently, modulation transfer function (MTF) is widely employed to assess the resolving capability of perovskite planar X-ray detectors. While MTF is an important indicator of the imaging system’s spatial resolution, the X-ray source and system noise also affect the image quality. Therefore, detective quantum efficiency (DQE), ranging from 0 to 1, is introduced to characterise the efficiency of the imaging system to convert X-rays into digital images, with a higher DQE corresponding to a better overall imaging performance15. By implementing standardised procedures to measure the MTF and DQE, perovskite planar X-ray detectors are anticipated to achieve fast development, reliable performance tracking, and broader market acceptance.

Indeed, the research on perovskite planar X-ray detectors is still in its early stages. Nevertheless, we are optimistic that the challenges faced by perovskite X-ray detectors can be overcome by borrowing successful experiences from other perovskite optoelectronic devices. At the same time, the employment of lead in perovskites imposes potential risks to the environment and humans. The substitution of lead, lead recycling, and green solvent synthesis are potential future research objectives for environmental protection.

Summary

Exploiting novel semiconductors for next-generation planar X-ray detectors with the ambition to achieve low radiation exposure and high sensitivity is highly demanded. Solution-processed perovskites are promising candidates due to their high X-ray stopping energy, long charge carrier diffusion lengths, high defect tolerance, and cost-efficiency fabrication over large areas. In particular, the unique solution processability and high defect tolerance of perovskites allow for the incorporation of perovskite planar X-ray detectors with cutting-edge technologies, such as flexible electronics and photon-counting techniques, to boost X-ray imaging capabilities. However, to realise reliable perovskite planar X-ray detectors, critical challenges, including ion migration, polarisation effect, and encapsulation issues, are required to be comprehensively investigated and well addressed. In addition, standard procedures of performance evaluation should be established. By addressing these challenges, we expect that perovskite planar X-ray detectors will become a game changer in the X-ray industry.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Guangda Niu and Dr. Haodi Wu from Huazhong University of Science and Technology for the helpful discussion on perovskite flat-panel detectors. We acknowledge the support from the Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linköping University (faculty grant SFO-Mat-LiU no. 2009-00971; F.G.) and the Wenner-Gren Foundation (UPD2022-0075; X.O. & F.G.).

Author contributions

F.G. and X.O. conceptualised the article. F.G. and X.O. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. F.G. and X.O. thoroughly discussed and revised the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chen H, et al. Improved charge extraction in inverted perovskite solar cells with dual-site-binding ligands. Science. 2024;384:189–193. doi: 10.1126/science.adm9474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stoumpos CC, et al. Crystal growth of the perovskite semiconductor CsPbBr3: a new material for high-energy radiation detection. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013;13:2722–2727. doi: 10.1021/cg400645t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yakunin S, et al. Detection of X-ray photons by solution-processed lead halide perovskites. Nat. Phonton. 2015;9:444–449. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.He Y, Hadar I, Kanatzidis MG. Detecting ionizing radiation using halide perovskite semiconductors processed through solution and alternative methods. Nat. Phonton. 2022;16:14–26. doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00909-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kang J, Wang L-W. High defect tolerance in lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:489–493. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim YC, et al. Printable organometallic perovskite enables large-area, low-dose X-ray imaging. Nature. 2017;550:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature24032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Y, et al. Dynamic X-ray imaging with screen-printed perovskite CMOS array. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:1588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45871-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pang J, et al. Reconfigurable perovskite X-ray detector for intelligent imaging. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:1769. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46184-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao J, et al. Perovskite-filled membranes for flexible and large-area direct-conversion X-ray detector arrays. Nat. Phonton. 2020;14:612–617. doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0678-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Y, et al. Self-powered perovskite photon-counting detectors. Nature. 2023;616:712–718. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05847-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang J, et al. Synergistic strain engineering of perovskite single crystals for highly stable and sensitive X-ray detectors with low-bias imaging and monitoring. Nat. Phonton. 2022;16:575–581. doi: 10.1038/s41566-022-01024-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deumel S, et al. High-sensitivity high-resolution X-ray imaging with soft-sintered metal halide perovskites. Nat. Electron. 2021;4:681–688. doi: 10.1038/s41928-021-00644-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jin P, et al. Realizing nearly-zero dark current and ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio perovskite X-ray detector and image array by dark-current-shunting strategy. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:626. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36313-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan, L. et al. Study of perovskite CsPbBr3 detector polarization and its mitigation with ultrahigh x-ray flux. J. Appl. Phys. 133, 194502 (2023).
  • 15.Song Z, et al. Rheological engineering of perovskite suspension toward high-resolution X-ray flat-panel detector. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6865. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42616-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alam MD, Nasim SS, Hasan S. Recent progress in CdZnTe based room temperature detectors for nuclear radiation monitoring. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2021;140:103918. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103918. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Owens A. Semiconductor materials and radiation detection. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2006;13:143–150. doi: 10.1107/S0909049505033339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Iniewski K. CZT detector technology for medical imaging. J. Instrum. 2014;9:C11001. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/11/C11001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stavro J, Goldan AH, Zhao W. Photon counting performance of amorphous selenium and its dependence on detector structure. J. Med. Imaging. 2018;5:C043502–043502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.043502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kasap S. X-ray sensitivity of photoconductors: application to stabilized a-Se. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2000;33:2853. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/33/21/326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kabir M, Arnab SM, Hijazi N. Electron–hole pair creation energy in amorphous selenium: geminate versus columnar recombination. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2019;30:21059–21063. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang H, Abbaszadeh S. Recent developments of amorphous selenium-based X-ray detectors: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 2019;20:1694–1704. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2950319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES