Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2571–2578. doi: 10.62347/TPCM6776

Neurofibromin 2 modulates Mammalian Ste2-like kinases1/2 and large tumor suppressor gene1 expression in A549 lung cancer cell line

Xu Li 1, Zaiqiang Guo 2, Yang Yang 3, Ying Xiong 1, Xia Zhang 4, Shubin Qiao 5, Ke Wei 1, Jin Fang 6, Yonghuai Ma 7
PMCID: PMC11236635  PMID: 39006253

Abstract

Aim: To explore the impact of up- or down-regulation of Neurofibromin 2 (NF2) on the expression of downstream Hippo pathway genes, large tumor suppressor gene1 (LATS1), and phosphorylation of Mammalian Ste2-like kinases1/2 (MST1/2), in lung cancer cells. Methods: A549 lung cancer cells were used. The NF2 was down-regulated by si-RNA interference and upregulated by lentiviral vector mediated overexpression. The LATS1 and MST1/2 expressions were evaluated by real-time PCR and western blot. Results: Down-regulation of NF2 decreased LATS1 and MST1/2 level (P<0.05). Overexpression of NF2 increased LATS1 (P<0.05) and Mammalian Ste2-like kinases1 (MST1) (P<0.05), suggesting LATS1 and MST1 are modulated by NF2 in a lung cancer cell line. Conclusions: NF2 mediates the downstream LATS1 and MST1/2 expressions in a lung cancer cell line.

Keywords: Lung cancer, siRNA interference, overexpression, NF2, hippo pathway

Introduction

Lung cancer causes high morbidity and mortality and is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide. It is estimated that there are 1.6 million new lung cancer cases and about 1.25 million lung cancer deaths each year [1]. In spite of advancement in cancer treatment in recent years, the five-year survival rate of lung cancer remains low. Recurrence of lung cancer is influenced by multiple factors, including chemistry, genetics, and toxin exposure. Like most tumor cells, mutations occur in lung cancer cells resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation and metastasis [2]. Moreover, the inactivation of contact inhibition in cancer cells enables them to escape apoptosis, which results in proliferation [3,4]. Studies show that the highly conserved Hippo (Ste20-like kinase Hpo) pathway plays important roles in mediating organ size and tumor formation [5,6].

Hippo pathway, also known as the Salvador/Warts/Hippo (SWH) pathway, was initially discovered in Drosophila [7]. Hippo pathway plays important roles in mediating cell size, maintaining stable cell number, and controlling cell contact inhibition. Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway results in tumor formation [7]. Hippo pathway is composed of Hpo (hippo), Sav (Salvador), Wts (Warts), Yki (Yorkie), and Mats (Mob as tumor suppressor) in Drosophila. Wts is a NDR (nuclear Dbf2-related) family kinase [8], and its defects can result in spontaneous proliferation of epithelial cells. Sav encodes a scaffolding protein with a WW structural domain. Hpo is the most important component of Hippo pathway. Hippo can bind to Sav and form a Hpo/Sav complex, which phosphorylates Wts and activates Mats [9,10]. The main effector Yki in Hippo pathway was discovered by Huang in 2005 [11]. Yki is the only oncogene in the Hippo pathway, and it can be inactivated by Wts phosphorylation. When the Hippo pathway is inactivated, un-phosphorylated Yki will translocate into the nucleus to initiate gene expression, and promote cell survival and proliferation [12].

The Hippo pathway is highly conserved in evolution. In mammals the Hippo pathway is composed of MST1/2 (the mammalian Hippo orthologs), WW45 (45 KDa WW Domain Protein; Sav in Drosophila), LATS1/2 (Large tumor suppressor gene1/2), YAP (Yes-associated protein), and Mob1 (MOB kinase activator 1A). Transcriptional co-activator YAP and its paralog tafazzin (TAZ) (transcriptional coactivator with PDZ binding motif) act downstream of the Hippo pathway [13]. YAP/TAZ interact with other transcription factors including Smad, Runx1/2, p73, ErbB4, Pax3, and T-box transcription factor 5 (TBX5) to mediate the transcription of a diverse array of genes [14,15]. LATS1/2 encodes serine and threonine kinase and is the core component of the Hippo pathway [16]. LATS1 is located on chromosome 6q24.25, with a 3393 bp ORF (open reading frame) encoding 1130 amino acid. Recent studies have found that LATS1 plays a role in formation of the spindle body during mitosis [17,18]. Hence, LATS1 can down-regulate organ size by cell contact inhibition. In addition, LATS1 mediates the cyclin and cyclin b level, causes cell cycle arrest in G2/M, and restrains cell proliferation and growth. LATS2 belongs to the Terra tumor-suppressor family and has a similar structure and function as LATS1 [19,20]. LATS2 can enhance p53 phosphorylation and promote cell apoptosis [21,22]. Moreover, LATS1/2 promotes cell apoptosis by increasing the expression of pro-apoptosis proteins or down-regulating anti-apoptosis proteins [23,24]. Visser et al found that LATS1/2 was down-regulated in leukocythemia, breast, and lung cancers [6].

The signaling cascade from Hpo (MST1/2) to Yki (YAP) is well-studied. However, the upstream regulators of Hippo pathway are still unclear. Merlin and Expanded, a related FERM domain protein, at the upstream of Hippo pathway were discovered by Hamaratoglu in 2009 [26]. Merlin functions with Expanded, and promotes the phosphorylation of Wts, which in turn activates the Hippo pathway [27,28]. TAZ is the homologous gene in mammal to merlin in Drosophila [29,30]. NF2 is a tumor suppressor in multiple human cancers [29,31]. Additionally, studies have shown that inhibition of Hippo pathway promotes the proliferation, migration and metastasis of lung cancer cells [32,33].

NF2 can inhibit tumor formation by the Hippo pathway, although the mechanism is still unclear. Studies have reported a relationship between NF2 and the susceptibility of lung cancer; however, the conclusions remain contradictory [34-36]. In this study, we investigated the impacts of up-regulation and down-regulation of NF2 on the downstream Hippo pathway genes, LATS1, MST1, and MST2, in a lung cancer cell line.

Materials and methods

Materials

A549 lung cancer cell lines and 293T cell lines were purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank at Sep 9, 2015, Chinese Academy of Sciences, where they were characterized by mycoplasma detection, DNA-fingerprinting, isozyme detection, and cell vitality detection. The information about the cell lines is shown on its website: (http://www.cellbank.org.cn/detail_1.asp?id=283). The cell lines were tested by Cell STR identification before use. Transfection Poly-Fecter was purchased from WeiShang LiDe Ldt. (Beijing, China). Antibodies, reagents and instruments are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The preparation of major reagents are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital.

Methods

NF2-siRNA interference

For siRNA interference experiment, three siRNAs were designed and synthesized. After transiently transfecting the cells, western blot identification was performed and the siRNA with the strongest interference effect was selected for the subsequent experimental testing. A549 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates and cultured until reach 50% confluence. A549 cells were divided into a siRNA negative control group and a siRNA-NF2 experimental group.

A549 cells were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMax Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA isolation

The total RNA of cells was extracted at 48-h post-transfection. Cells were rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS and homogenized in 1 mL Trizol lysate buffer. 0.2 mL trichloromethane was added, vortexed for 10 s, and incubated at room temperature for 3 min. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and the volume of the aqueous phase was measured. The same volume of isopropanol was added and incubated at -80°C for 1 h. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was removed. The RNA pellet was washed with 1 mL 75% ethyl alcohol and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 3 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the RNA samples were air dried for 10 min. RNA was dissolved in 40 µL RNase-free water.

Real-time PCR

RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using HiFiScript kits (KangWei century, CW2582). 20 μL reaction system included 5 µL RNA, 1 μL Oligodt [50 pM], and 4 μL dNTP [2.5 mM]. Samples were heated at 65°C for 5 min and cooled on ice. 4 μL Reverse buffer (2×), 0.5 μL Reverse enzyme (200 U/μL), and 5.5 μL RNA-free water were added. The thermal cycles were 42°C for 60 min, 75°C for 15 min, and 4°C forever. Real-time PCR was carried out with KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit Master Mix (2×) (KAPA Biosystems, KK4601). The primers are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The 20 μL reaction system included 10 μL PCR Master Mix (2X), 0.4 μL mRNA forward primers (10 µM), 0.4 μL mRNA reverse primers (10 µM), 2 μL cDNA, 0.4 μL Dye (50X), and 6.8 μL ddH2O. The PCR cycles were 94°C for 2 min, 94°C for 5 s, 60°C for 15 s, 72°C for 31 s, and 40 cycles. 2-ΔΔCt method was applied to analyze the real-time PCR results. ΔΔCT=(CTtarget gene-CTinternal reference)(treatment group)-(CTtarget gene-CTinternal reference)(control group).

Western blot (WB)

Cells were harvested at 48-h post-transfection. The preparations of WB reagents are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Cells were homogenized in lysis buffer and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. 30 μL supernatant was collected and 10 μL 4×SDS loading buffer was added. Samples were incubated at 100°C for 10 min, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min, and supernatant was collected. 10 μL sample was loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE, and run at 80 V for 30 min, and 120 V for 70 min. After electrophoresis, protein samples were transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with blocking buffer for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed 3 times with 1×PBST, 10 min each. The membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed 3 times with 1×PBST, 10 min each. Membranes were developed using ECL and exposed to X-ray. Film was scanned by scanner and Gel-Pro analyzer was used to analysis the grayscale for protein quantification. Tubulin was served as an internal reference. WB experiments were repeated 3 times and the results were summarized and analyzed.

The plasmid construction

The plasmids for LX- NF2 were constructed with Vector pWSLV-08 and primer Ef1a-sq (CACTTGATGTAATTCTCCTTGGAAT). The sequence of NF2 is shown in Supplementary Table 2 (Genebank ID: NC_000022.11). LX-NF2 was digested with restriction enzyme NotI and BamHI, and a DNA fragment of 1788 bp was harvested. PWSLV-08 was cut by restriction enzyme NotI and BamHI, and the DNA fragment was inserted into the plasmid. The new expression vector was sequenced and named as pWSLV-08-NF2. The sequence of pWSLV-08-NF2 is shown in Supplementary Table 2, in which the underlines indicate the target gene.

Lentivirus packing

293T cells were cultured in 10 cm culture dishes for 24 h. Next day, 293T cells were divided into 2 groups, and were transfected with NF2 lentiviral vector (pWSLV-08-NF2) or blank control lentiviral vector (pWSLV-08), respectively. The cells were cultured in media containing transfection reagents for 6-8 h, and then the media were replaced with 10 mL DMEM+10% FBS. On the third day, viral supernatants were harvested and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter membrane for future use. 293T cells transfected with NF2 lentiviral vector (pWSLV-08-NF2) are shown in Supplementary Figure 1A.

NF2 overexpression

A549 cells were cultured in 6 cm dishes and divided into 2 groups, NF2 overexpression group or blank control group. The A549 cells were infected with virus harvested from 293T pWSLV-08-NF2 or 293T pWSLV-08, respectively. Successfully infected A549 cells were selected by flow cytometry (FCM). The outcomes before cell sorting (Supplementary Figure 1B) and after cell sorting (Supplementary Figure 1C) indicate the successful screening for NF2 over-expression A549 cells.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 software was used for the data analysis. All data were presented as mean values ± SEM. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or t-test was used for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

NF2 siRNA interference down-regulates NF2 mRNA and protein expression

The efficiency of si-RNA interference was assessed with real-time PCR. We found that NF2 mRNA expression significantly decreased in NF2-homo-1952 and NF2-homo-774 groups, compared with siNC group (P<0.05). The NF2-homo-774 group showed the best efficiency with 91% decreased in NF2 mRNA expression, compared with siNC group (P=0.002) (Supplementary Figure 2A). Therefore, NF2-homo-774 siRNA was selected for the following studies. We measured the NF2 protein expression in siNC and NF2-homo-774 siRNA groups. We found that the NF2 protein significantly decreased in NF2-homo-774 siRNA group, compared with siNC group (P<0.05; Supplementary Figure 2B, Supplementary Table 3), indicating the successful down-regulation of NF2 using siRNA interference.

Down-regulation of NF2 decreases LATS1, phosphorylation MAST1/2, and MST1

We measured the protein levels of LATS1, phosphorylated MST1/2, and MST1, which are downstream factors of NF2. We found that LATS1, phosphorylated MST1/2 (two bands represented MST1 and MST2, respectively), and MST1 were significantly decreased in the NF2-homo-774 group, compared to the siNC group (P<0.05, Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Evaluation of LATS1, MST1/2, and MST1 protein levels using WB. A. LATS1 protein expression (P<0.05, antibody dilution 1:250, molecular weight 127 KD). B. MST1/2 protein expression (P<0.05, antibody dilution 1:250, molecular weight 56 KD). C. MST1 protein expression (P<0.05, antibody dilution 1:250, molecular weight 56 KD). GAPDH was used as an internal reference with a dilution of 1:1000.

NF2-overexpression

293T cells were transfected with NF2-lentiviral vectors. The NF2 mRNA expressions in 293T cells transfected with pWSLV-08-NF2 (NF2-NF2) and 293T cells transfected with pWSLV-08 (NC-NF2) were measured using real-time PCR. The primers are shown in Supplementary Table 2. We found that NF2-lentiviral vector transfection significantly increased NF2 mRNA expression (53.25 fold increase), compared to the control 293T cells (P=0.015) (Supplementary Figure 3A), demonstrating the achievement of successful NF2 overexpression.

Next, A549 cells were infected with viral supernatants, and NF2 overexpression A549 cells lines were selected with FCM. NF2 mRNA expression was measured with real-time PCR. We found that NF2 mRNA expression significantly increased (4.84 fold increase) in A549 cells infected with NF2 overexpression lentivirus (pwslv-08-NF2), in comparison to the A549 control cells (pwslv-08) (P=0.035) (Supplementary Figure 3B).

We measured the protein levels of LATS1, phosphorylation MST1/2, and MST1. We found that that LATS1 and MST1 were significantly elevated in A549-pwslv-08-NF2 cells, while MST1/2 level was significantly decreased (P<0.05, Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Protein expressions of NF2 and downstream LATS1, MST1, and MST1/2 using WB, P<0.05.

Discussion

Studies have shown that the Hippo pathway is mediated by the interaction of its components [37]. MST1/2 and LATS1/2 are two important components in the Hippo pathway [38-41]. LATS1 mediates the cell cycle and plays an important role in suppressing tumor formation by interacting with other genes in the Hippo pathway [42].

Recent studies have discovered that NF2 is a major regulator of the Hippo pathway. NF2 serves as a scaffold at the plasma membrane to facilitate Hippo signaling. The NF2 tumor suppressor, also known as Merlin (Mer), positively regulates the Hippo pathway in Drosophila [43].

The core of the Hippo pathway is a kinase cascade consisting of STE20-like protein kinase 1 (also known as MST2 and MST1), the large tumor suppressors (LATS1 and LATS2), as well as numerous downstream enzymes, which ultimately regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and other functions [44].

Yu et al. [45] demonstrated that NF2 (merlin) can directly activate LATS1/2, or indirectly activate LATS1/2 through MST1/2 activation. Given the vast molecular diversity among cancer types, the relationships between Hippo pathway NF2 and its downstream pathways in different cancers remain poorly understood. Moreover, no study has reported the impact of the upregulation or down-regulation of NF2 on MST1/2 and LATS1/2 expressions in lung cancer.

In this study, we have demonstrated that MST1/2 and LATS1/2 can be modulated by down-regulation or upregulation of NF2 in lung cancer cells using siRNA interference or NF2-overexpression lentiviral vector, respectively. Our results suggest that NF2 has an impact on its downstream genes in lung cancer cells. MST1/2 and LATS1/2 are tumor suppressor genes in the Hippo pathway, and their mRNA or protein expressions can be used as biomarkers in diagnosis of lung cancer.

In the present study, lentiviral vector pWSLV-08 was used to construct plasmid for NF2 overexpression, which is a widely used technique. Successfully transfected A549 cells were screened and separated by FCM, and used in the following real-time PCR and WB experiments.

Based on our results, NF2 may be a direct upstream gene of MST1 and LATS1; however, we cannot rule out the possibility that there may be other genes involved in the NF2, MST1/2 and LATS1/2 pathway. Here we have proposed two mechanisms: first, overexpression of NF2 activates MST1, and then MST1 activates LATS1, resulting in the elevated LATS1. Second, overexpression of NF2 directly activates MST1, MAST1/2 and LATS1 in different ways, respectively.

Our study has limitations. First, we tested the impact of NF2 on MST1/2 and LATS1 expressions only in an in vitro lung cancer cell model. In our future studies, we will investigate the upregulation and down-regulation of NF2 in in vivo animal models. Second, YAP and TEAD are the effectors in the Hippo pathway [46,47]. However, we did not measure their expressions in this study. In our future studies we will also evaluate YAP and TEAD expressions in relationship to NF2.

Conclusions

The downstream genes in the Hippo pathway may be mediated by NF2 in lung cancer cells. Therefore, modulating the NF2 level could be a new therapeutic target for suppressing lung cancer.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Abbreviations

Hpo

hippo

LATS1

Large tumor suppressor gene1

LATS1/2

Large tumor suppressor gene1/2

Mats

Mob as tumor suppressor

Mob1

MOB kinase activator 1A

MST1

Mammalian Ste2-like kinases1

MST1/2

Mammalian Ste2-like kinases1/2

NDR

nuclear Dbf2-related

NF2

Neurofibromin 2

ORF

open reading frame

Sav

Salvador

SWH

Salvador/Warts/Hippo

TAZ

tafazzin

TBX5

T-box transcription factor 5

Wts

Warts

YAP

Yes-associated protein

Yki

Yorkie

Supporting Information

ajtr0016-2571-f3.pdf (743.9KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang S, Zhou L, Ling L, Meng X, Chu F, Zhang S, Zhou F. The crosstalk between hippo-YAP pathway and innate immunity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:323. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhao S, Xu K, Jiang R, Li DY, Guo XX, Zhou P, Tang JF, Li LS, Zeng D, Hu L, Ran JH, Li J, Chen DL. Evodiamine inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via the Hippo-Yes-Associated protein signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2020;251:117424. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao B, Lei QY, Guan KL. The Hippo-YAP pathway: new connections between regulation of organ size and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:638–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moya IM, Halder G. Hippo-YAP/TAZ signalling in organ regeneration and regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:211–226. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0086-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Visser S, Yang X. Identification of LATS transcriptional targets in HeLa cells using whole human genome oligonucleotide microarray. Gene. 2010;449:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou Z, Zhu JS. Research advances on Hippo signal pathway and YAP gene. Mod Oncol. 2011;19:1241–1244. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang W, Zhang C, Xiong S, Zhou X, Wang G, Guo J. miR-1307-5p suppresses proliferation and tumorigenesis of bladder cancer via targeting MDM4 and the Hippo signaling pathway. Discov Oncol. 2022;13:57. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00512-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu Z, Guan KL. Hippo signaling in embryogenesis and development. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46:51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tapon N, Harvey KF, Bell DW, Wahrer DC, Schiripo TA, Haber D, Hariharan IK. Salvador promotes both cell cycle exit and apoptosis in drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Cell. 2002;110:467–478. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00824-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang J, Wu S, Barrera J, Matthews K, Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating yorkie, the drosophila homolog of YAP. Cell. 2005;122:421–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.He L, Pratt H, Gao M, Wei F, Weng Z, Struhl K. YAP and TAZ are transcriptional co-activators of AP-1 proteins and STAT3 during breast cellular transformation. Elife. 2021;10:e67312. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM. The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:246–257. doi: 10.1038/nrc3458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:758–770. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang K, Degerny C, Xu M, Yang XJ. YAP, TAZ, and Yorkie: a conserved family of signal-responsive transcriptional coregulators in animal development and human disease. Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;87:77–91. doi: 10.1139/O08-114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kehong Chen DW. Lats1 is the key component of hippo signaling pathway: a new tumor molecular biomarker and a potential therapeutic target. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology. 2015;37:256–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li FL, Fu V, Liu G, Tang T, Konradi AW, Peng X, Kemper E, Cravatt BF, Franklin JM, Wu Z, Mayfield J, Dixon JE, Gerwick WH, Guan KL. Hippo pathway regulation by phosphatidylinositol transfer protein and phosphoinositides. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:1076–1086. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01061-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yabuta N, Mukai S, Okamoto A, Okuzaki D, Suzuki H, Torigata K, Yoshida K, Okada N, Miura D, Ito A, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Nojima H. N-terminal truncation of Lats1 causes abnormal cell growth control and chromosomal instability. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:508–520. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Montavon C, Stricker GR, Schoetzau A, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Jacob F, Fedier A. Outcome in serous ovarian cancer is not associated with LATS expression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145:2737–2749. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03037-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jing Lei LW, Huixin Li. Advances of LATS2 gene in tumor research. Modern Medicine Journal of China. 2011;13:129–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao X, Sakamoto S, Wei J, Pae S, Saito S, Sazuka T, Imamura Y, Anzai N, Ichikawa T. Contribution of the L-type amino acid transporter family in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6178. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aylon Y, Ofir-Rosenfeld Y, Yabuta N, Lapi E, Nojima H, Lu X, Oren M. The Lats2 tumor suppressor augments p53-mediated apoptosis by promoting the nuclear proapoptotic function of ASPP1. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2420–2429. doi: 10.1101/gad.1954410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li FL, Guan KL. The two sides of Hippo pathway in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;85:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gomez M, Gomez V, Hergovich A. The Hippo pathway in disease and therapy: cancer and beyond. Clin Transl Med. 2014;3:22. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-3-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Karpowicz P, Perez J, Perrimon N. The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration. Development. 2010;137:4135–4145. doi: 10.1242/dev.060483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xu MZ, Chan SW, Liu AM, Wong KF, Fan ST, Chen J, Poon RT, Zender L, Lowe SW, Hong W, Luk JM. AXL receptor kinase is a mediator of YAP-dependent oncogenic functions in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2011;30:1229–1240. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Qian Z, Tian X, Miao Y, Xu X, Cheng X, Wu M, Yu Y. Bufalin inhibits the proliferation of lung cancer cells by suppressing Hippo-YAP pathway. Cell Signal. 2023;109:110746. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Y, Dong Q, Zhang Q, Li Z, Wang E, Qiu X. Overexpression of yes-associated protein contributes to progression and poor prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1279–1285. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01511.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tamura R. Current understanding of neurofibromatosis type 1, 2, and schwannomatosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5850. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.He H, Zhang CR, Bian LG, Sun QF. Research advance of the structures of NF2 gene its encoding protein. Chin J Neuromed. 2007;6:531–533. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meng F, Yu Z, Zhang D, Chen S, Guan H, Zhou R, Wu Q, Zhang Q, Liu S, Venkat Ramani MK, Yang B, Ba XQ, Zhang J, Huang J, Bai X, Qin J, Feng XH, Ouyang S, Zhang YJ, Liang T, Xu P. Induced phase separation of mutant NF2 imprisons the cGAS-STING machinery to abrogate antitumor immunity. Mol Cell. 2021;81:4147–4164. e4147. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong Q, Fu L, Zhao Y, Du Y, Li Q, Qiu X, Wang E. Rab11a promotes proliferation and invasion through regulation of YAP in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:27800–27811. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zheng X, Dong Q, Zhang X, Han Q, Han X, Han Y, Wu J, Rong X, Wang E. The coiled-coil domain of oncogene RASSF 7 inhibits hippo signaling and promotes non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:78734–78748. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J, Bi L, Sun Y, Lu Z, Lin Y, Bai O, Shao H. Retracted article: Text mining and network analysis of molecular interaction in non-small cell lung cancer by using natural language processing. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:8071–8079. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3705-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu X, Mao F, Li N, Li W, Luo Y, Shi W, Ren J. NF2/Merlin suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2020;25:513–525. doi: 10.2741/4817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sekido Y, Pass HI, Bader S, Mew DJ, Christman MF, Gazdar AF, Minna JD. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) gene is somatically mutated in mesothelioma but not in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1227–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hergovich A. Mammalian Hippo signalling: a kinase network regulated by protein-protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40:124–128. doi: 10.1042/BST20110619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mohajan S, Jaiswal PK, Vatanmakarian M, Yousefi H, Sankaralingam S, Alahari SK, Koul S, Koul HK. Hippo pathway: regulation, deregulation and potential therapeutic targets in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2021;507:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu L, Yang X. Targeting the hippo pathway for breast cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10:422. doi: 10.3390/cancers10110422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu S, Huang J, Dong J, Pan D. Hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell. 2003;114:445–456. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00549-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Callus BA, Verhagen AM, Vaux DL. Association of mammalian sterile twenty kinases, Mst1 and Mst2, with hSalvador via C-terminal coiled-coil domains, leads to its stabilization and phosphorylation. FEBS J. 2006;273:4264–4276. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nabirochkina EN, Kopytova DV. The Xmas-2 homologues, the main component of the TREX-2 mRNA export complex. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2020;495:325–328. doi: 10.1134/S1607672920060101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Petrilli AM, Fernández-Valle C. Role of Merlin/NF2 inactivation in tumor biology. Oncogene. 2016;35:537–548. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pećina-Šlaus N. Merlin, the NF2 gene product. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19:365–373. doi: 10.1007/s12253-013-9644-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Laraba L, Hillson L, de Guibert JG, Hewitt A, Jaques MR, Tang TT, Post L, Ercolano E, Rai G, Yang SM, Jagger DJ, Woznica W, Edwards P, Shivane AG, Hanemann CO, Parkinson DB. Inhibition of YAP/TAZ-driven TEAD activity prevents growth of NF2-null schwannoma and meningioma. Brain. 2023;146:1697–1713. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cunningham R, Hansen CG. The Hippo pathway in cancer: YAP/TAZ and TEAD as therapeutic targets in cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 2022;136:197–222. doi: 10.1042/CS20201474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhao B, Ye X, Yu J, Li L, Li W, Li S, Yu J, Lin JD, Wang CY, Chinnaiyan AM, Lai ZC, Guan KL. TEAD mediates YAP-dependent gene induction and growth control. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1962–1971. doi: 10.1101/gad.1664408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ajtr0016-2571-f3.pdf (743.9KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES