Skip to main content
American Journal of Cancer Research logoLink to American Journal of Cancer Research
. 2024 Jun 15;14(6):3083–3103. doi: 10.62347/HTVU4235

Ex vivo platform en route to functional precision medicine: clinical relevance in gynecological cancers

Raed Sulaiman 1, Jennifer C Aske 2, Luis Rojas Espaillat 2, Xiaoqian Lin 2, David Starks 2, Adam Dale 2, Kris Gaster 3, Pradip De 2, Nandini Dey 2
PMCID: PMC11236772  PMID: 39005689

Abstract

A scientific interrogation-driven approach to the clinical management of cancer patients is based on molecular profiling of the tumor. Empowered by the knowledge of oncogenic drivers and biomarkers, oncologists chart an optimal treatment path toward increasing the mathematical probability of a positive outcome. In this entire chain of events, an experimental proof of logical interrogation has never been incorporated before. Here, we provide the first evidence that the result of ex vivo testing of a drug matched to the genomic profiling of an N-of-1 tumor can deliver meaningful insight connecting scientific interrogation and a clinical event. Using resected tissues from endometrial (EC) and ovarian (OC) cancer patients, we designed a personalized ex vivo platform to test combinations of drugs in the default histological architecture of the individual tumors. Following the CART-T cells’ principle, we co-cultured with autologous T-cells to test targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study was designed with a limited clinical information window from patient registration/consent to obtaining the tumor tissues, and adjuvant treatment/post-surgery event (PSE) data were accessed retrospectively. Using a checkerboard analysis, we found that PSE-free survival time was longer in patients whose therapy “matched” the effective drug combination in ex vivo culture/co-cultures compared to those with no effect. Specifically, out of 32 EC patients in the “test & treatment-matched” category whose tumor cells failed to respond to ex vivo drug testing, none achieved > 4 and > 3 years of PSE-free survival. In contrast, out of 38 EC patients in the “test & treatment-matched” category, 4 and 6 patients, whose tumor cells responded to drugs in ex vivo culture, achieved > 4 and > 3 years of PSE-free survival, respectively. Cases with genomically-guided ex vivo testing showed that a “match” between an effective ex vivo drug combination and therapy resulted in late PSE, whereas a “match” between prescribed treatment and an ineffective drug combination in ex vivo testing led to early PSE. Our study demonstrates that integrating genomic data with personalized drug testing on an ex vivo culture/co-culture platform is an effective tool for modeling functional precision medicine in gynecological cancers. This approach bridges the gap between next-generation drug testing in translational research and patient care, providing insight for improved treatment outcomes.

Keywords: Ex vivo, co-culture, drug combination(s), post surgical event, genomics

Introduction

The success of personalized precision medicine demands a tailored treatment strategy based on knowledge regarding the molecular profiling of the tumor, including its microenvironment. The molecular profiling of a patient’s tumor provides the valuable option to design a genomics-interrogation-driven drug combination(s), which is mathematically expected to have the best antitumor effect on the patient’s tumor cells in real-time. However, the era of functional precision medicine in cancer research faces challenges in achieving a zero-error prediction of the clinical efficacy of a particular drug combination. Since precision medicine is an approach to treating cancer that aims to identify effective therapeutic strategies for individual patients, a successful prediction of clinical response to anticancer drugs remains a critical challenge, and predicting response to chosen combination therapy in a patient-by-patient manner remains incomplete.

In translational research, there remains a discordance between preclinical data and actual clinical outcomes. Although genomic-guided therapy incorporates the best logical prediction, not all genomic alterations are tumor-agnostic, nor are all genomics-guided matched drug combinations experimentally tested/proven on tumor cells in every patient. Even in the era of knowledge-driven treatment strategy, a significant number of cases persist where genomic analysis fails to identify effective drug combinations [1]. The instances where genomic analysis fails to (1) identify effective drug combinations and/or (2) predict clinical response to a drug combination point to the complexities of tumor heterogeneity in solid tumors. Tumor heterogeneity originating from variability in the organ of origin, histology, pathological stage, and genetic background makes it more complex, especially in the context of drug response and clinical outcome. Published literature indicates that the tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment can limit the predictive command of current biomarker-guided strategies for chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy [2,3]. Biomarker-driven precision cancer therapy has emerged as a powerful concept. However, the mere presence of a biomarker in a cancer cell may not translate into clinical efficacy [4,5]. For example, trastuzumab deruxtecan is highly effective even in HER2 low-expressed breast cancer patients [6], but no responses were observed in medium to low HER2-expressing colorectal cancer patients [7]. Although tissue-agnostic drug approvals represent a paradigm shift in drug development, and several drugs are approved based on tumor-agnostic biomarkers (e.g., NTRK, RET, dMMR), BRCA mutations (among others) are not tumor-agnostic biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapy [8]. Thus, a successful functional testing platform for precision medicine in patient-centric clinical settings is demanding and remains unmet.

One challenge that complicates tissue-agnostic drug development is the lack of appropriate models in the translational research space. Since experimental evidence is the most scientific way to test a logically driven conclusion, a need for a patient-specific testing platform for functional precision medicine is pressing. To address this issue, we developed a personalized ex vivo platform for drug testing using 152 resected tumor tissues cultured or co-cultured with autologous T-cells. The value of our N-of-1 platform was tested to answer two questions; First, whether genomics-driven drug combination matches drug response in tumor cells within tumor tissue without affecting stroma. Second, whether a clinical validation of drug effect is possible retrospectively in terms of patient outcome; post-surgery event (PSE) free survival. Our platform of functional precision medicine gives an exclusive algorithmic advantage as it provides experimental proof-of-testing to reinforce the logical concept of drug-matching and put to the test the matched drug in action on the individual patient’s tumor cells in their histological microenvironment. The platform experimentally tests the predictability of genomically matched drugs’ response regarding PSE-free survival in patients with gynecological malignancies.

Methods and materials

Tissue collection at the time of surgery

All experimental protocols were approved by the institutional and/or licensing committee(s). Informed consent (IRB approved: Protocol Number Study: 2017.053-100399_ExVivo001) was obtained from a total of 172 patients. Patients were de-identified. The resected tumor (T) and tumor-adjacent normal (N) tissues were collected during surgery in designated collection media as per the guidelines and relevant regulations provided by the pathologist, depending upon the availability of the tissue on a case-to-case basis. We included samples from consecutive consented patients with endometrial and ovarian tumors at any stage/grade of the disease undergoing surgery with or without pre-treatment/history of any previous carcinoma. Tonsil tissues and gynecological tumor tissues were obtained from the pathology department for validation of IHC staining. Blood for the isolation of CD3+ T-cells was obtained on the day of the surgery, as reported elsewhere [9].

Ex vivo culture of resected tumor tissues and tumor-adjacent normal tissues

The tissues were set into cultures within an hour of resection in 3D matrigel on separate γ-irradiated sterile cloning discs (Scienceware® cloning discs diameter 3.2 mm/4.8 mm) in complete medium (DMEM/F-12 + Glutamax 500 mL + 10% HyClone Fetal Bovine Serum 0.1 uM Sterile Filtered 500 mL + 1% HyClone Penicillin-Streptomycin 100X 100 mL + 3% Bovine Serum Albumin + 1% HyClone HEPES Buffer). The culture was continued for 3 consecutive days (depending on the availability of the resected tissues). The cultures were terminated by fixing the tissue in Expredia 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin and processed for FFPE sections for H&E and IHC stains for further evaluation of the effect of the drugs following standard histological processing.

Ex vivo co-culture of resected tumor tissues

In parallel to the setup of the ex vivo culture, the resected tumor tissues were set in an ex vivo 3D matrigel format co-cultured with the DiI-stained CD3+ T-cells isolated from the same patient on the same day of the surgery in the presence of pembrolizumab. For isolation, WBCs from whole blood were stained with corresponding extracellular antibodies, CD3+, in FACS buffer (RPMI phenol red free + 1% FBS) for 20 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then rinsed with FBS. The cells were fixed using the FOXP3 cell fixation kit (Miltenyi Biotech) for 30 minutes at 4°C, followed by the addition of a permeabilization buffer. Cells were blocked for 5 minutes with Fc block, and intracellular antibody was added for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were rinsed 1× with FACS buffer and resuspended in FACS buffer for analysis. Cells were run and analyzed on an Accuri C6. Following magnetic isolation/purification on a whole blood column with CD3-bead, the sample was over 99% CD3+ cells. The cells were stained with DiI-stain before using them for co-culture setup. Figure S2 shows a representative presentation of “in-co-culture” whole mounts, DAPI-stained fresh frozen sections, and DiI-stained T-cells from the ex vivo co-culture of tumor tissue (T) or tumor-adjacent normal tissue (N) and isolated CD3+ T-cells from the peripheral blood of patients on the day of surgery is presented.

IHC expression of proliferative, apoptotic, angiogenic, and immune markers on FFPE sections from resected and ex vivo cultured tumor tissues

Details of IHC expression of Ki67, cleaved caspase3 (clC3), cleaved PARP(cl-PARP), and pERK of FFPE Sections from tumor tissues at day zero (D0), day 1 (D1), day 2 (D2), and day 3 (D3) of ex vivo cultures were carried out using the IHC detection kits that were procured from Dako (Envisioin+ Dual-link system-HRP (DAB+)) as mentioned elsewhere [10]. For IHC expression kits were procured from Dako (Envision+ Dual-link system-HRP (DAB+), code K4065; Envision GI2 Doublestain system, Rabbit/Mouse (DAB+/Permanent Red), code K5361), and Abcam (ab210059 DoubleStain IHC Kit: M&R on human tissue (DAB and AP/Red)). The validation of the protein expression was carried out in FFPEs of tonsil and tumor tissues. A board-certified pathologist evaluated the morphology of the proliferating and apoptotic cells, their staining intensities, and the distribution pattern of expression of proteins.

Retrospective access to patients’ pre-treatment history, adjuvant treatment, post-surgery events & imaging studies

We tested the clinical relevance of the ex vivo platform by determining whether the result of drug testing corroborated with the PSE in patients. To evaluate whether the result of the drug testing has any meaningful impact at the clinical level, we retrospectively accessed individual patients’ pre-treatment history, adjuvant treatment(s), PSEs, and PET-CT images. The occurrence of PSEs in patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers was obtained from the patient’s information (Electronic Medical Records, EMR) in accordance with the IRB approval of the Avera Cancer Institute. The PSE included (1) the metastasis/recurrence of the disease detected radiologically or pathologically, (2) clinical worsening symptomatically, such as ascites, and (3) death of a patient.

Results

Study hypothesis

To establish our hypothesis, we presented 6 representative cases, including 4 primary tumor(s) from patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers, a primary and metastatic tumor pair, and a tumor biopsy from a patient with recurrent ovarian cancer. Summarizing our data from all the tumor samples obtained from patients tested ex vivo in the context of their adjuvant therapy and PSE, we have 4 possible options in the checkerboard pattern between effective/ineffective drug(s) combinations in the ex vivo laboratory testing in one hand and matched/unmatched adjuvant therapy received by patients in the clinics on the other (Tables 1 and 2). Taking the combination of ineffective-unmatched options out of the scenario, we have 3 possible options, (1) ineffective drug combinations matched the adjuvant therapy, (2) effective drug combinations did not match the adjuvant therapy, and (3) effective drug combinations matched the adjuvant therapy. In our study, the first two options led to an early PSE. In contrast, the last one led to a delayed PSE, demonstrating the ex vivo drug testing platform’s clinical relevance as a functional precision medicine model.

Table 1.

PSE free survival of patients with endometrial cancers whose treatment in clinics matched (fully/partially) with Ex vivo drug testing in the laboratory

Post Surgery Event (PSE) Free Survival

Post Surgery Event (PSE) Free Survival (From the Surgery Date Till Sept.’22) The Ineffective Drug(s): The Effective Drug(s):
Drug (Single/Combination), When Tested In Ex Vivo Cultures, Had No Effect On Tumor Cells Drug (Single/Combination), When Tested In Ex Vivo Cultures, Caused an Increase in Apoptosis (cl-PARP & cl-Caspase3) and/or Decrease in Proliferation (Ki67) of Tumor Cells
< 1 Year PSE Free Survival 6 Patients Total 19% (6 out of 32) 5 Patients Total 13% (5 out of 38)
1-2 Years PSE Free Survival 14 Patients Total 44% (14 out of 32) 14 Patients Total 37% (14 out of 38)
> 2 Years PSE Free Survival 12 Patients Total 37% (12 out of 32) 13 Patients Total 34% (16 out of 38)
> 3 Years PSE Free Survival 0 Patient 0% 2 Patients Total 5% (6 out of 38)
> 4 Years PSE Free Survival 0 Patient 0% 4 Patients Total 11% (4 out of 38)

Table 2.

PSE free survival of patients with ovarian cancers whose treatment in clinics matched (fully/partially) with Ex vivo drug testing in the laboratory

PSE Free Survival of Patients

Post Surgery Event (PSE) Free Survival (From the Surgery Date Till Sept.’22) The Ineffective Drug(s): The Effective Drug(s):
Drug (Single/Combination), When Tested In Ex Vivo Cultures, Had No Effect On Tumor Cells Drug (Single/Combination), When Tested In Ex Vivo Cultures, Caused an Increase in Apoptosis (cl-PARP & cl-Caspase3) and/or Decrease in Proliferation (Ki67) of Tumor Cells
< 1 Year PSE Free Survival 3 Patients 2 Patients
1-2 Years PSE Free Survival 4 Patients 3 Patients
> 2 Years PSE Free Survival 0 Patient 0 Patient
> 3 Years PSE Free Survival 0 Patient 1 Patient
> 4 Years PSE Free Survival 0 Patient 1 Patient

Study design

The study was designed to test the clinical relevance of genomics-driven ex vivo testing of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immune therapy drugs in surgically resected tumor/biopsy samples from consented patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers undergoing treatment at Avera Cancer Institute. The culture and co-culture experiments were set up following the availability of the tumor tissue, tumor-adjacent normal tissue, and blood on the day of surgery in accordance with scientific interrogation of the available genomics data. Depending on the quantity of the available tissues received from the pathology department, cultures/co-cultures were set up for 3 consecutive days (Day 1, D1: Day 2, D2; and Day 3, D3). Table S1 presents the list of drugs (single/combinations) tested in ex vivo culture on tumor and tumor-adjacent normal tissues from patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers. A pathologist performed initial evaluations of the drug(s) effect in a blinded fashion. Confirmatory immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was then conducted on serial sections of the formalin-fixed cultured/co-cultured tissues to examine the effect of drugs (chemotherapy/targeted therapy/immune therapy) on proliferation (Ki67), apoptosis (cl-PARP & cl-Caspase3), and cell survival (phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein, pS6RP, and phospho-ERK, pERK) markers. The entire cohort of patients was analyzed based on (1) the effectiveness of the tested drug in ex vivo culture, (2) retrospective matching/similarity of the adjuvant treatment received by the patient with the laboratory-tested ex vivo drug/combo, and (3) the time of PSE (Early PSE: < 16 months; Late/Delayed PSE: > 16 months) based clinical determination and the PET-CT images. We retrospectively evaluated the PSE of the patients with endometrial cancers (along with their age at surgery, pathological parameters, and treatment details), whose tumor cells neither exhibited increased apoptosis (cl-PARP & cl-Caspase3) nor had decreased proliferation (Ki67) following drug treatment in the ex vivo cultures as presented in Table S2. In contrast, Table S3 presents the PSE of the patients with endometrial cancers whose tumor cells exhibited increased apoptosis (cl-PARP & cl-Caspase3) and/or had decreased proliferation (Ki67) following drug treatment. Analyzing the PSE-free survival of patients with endometrial cancers whose treatment in clinics matched (fully/partially) with ex vivo drug testing in the laboratory, we observed that the number of patients whose therapy matched with the ineffective drug in ex vivo laboratory tests was higher in the category of “early PSE” and exhibited lower PSE-free survival as presented in the table (Table 1). In Table 1, we organized the PSE of patients whose treatment in clinics matched (fully/partially) with ex vivo drug testing in the laboratory into (1) patients (n=32) whose tumor cells did not respond to drugs in culture and (2) patients (n=38) whose tumor cells responded to drugs in culture. Out of 32 patients, 6 patients had < 1 year of PSE-free survival (19%), 14 patients had 1-2 years of PSE-free survival (44%), and 12 patients had > 2 years of PSE-free survival (37%). More strikingly, none of the patients had > 3-4 years of PSE-free survival. In contrast, 16% (6 out of 38) of the patients in the category whose therapy matched with the effective drug in ex vivo laboratory tests exhibited > 3-4 years of PSE-free survival (Table 1). We similarly evaluated the PSE of the list of patients with ovarian cancers tested whose tumor cells were not affected by drug treatment in culture (Table S4) as compared to patients whose tumor cells responded to drug treatment in culture (Table S5). The PSE-free survival of these patients whose treatment in clinics matched (fully/partially) with ex vivo drug testing in the laboratory demonstrated a comparable pattern to that observed in patients with endometrial cancers (Table 2). However, the data remains inconclusive due to the insignificant patient number. Although the sample size is small, the PSE-free survival of ovarian cancer patients whose clinical treatment matched (fully/partially) with ex vivo laboratory drug testing demonstrated similar findings to that was observed in endometrial cancers.

The results suggest that the ex vivo drug testing platform can help identify drug combinations that positively impact PSE-free survival in gynecological cancers. Patients whose therapy matched with effective drug combinations in ex vivo laboratory tests showed a trend towards longer PSE-free survival compared to those with ineffective drug combinations. The patients whose therapy matched with the ineffective ex vivo laboratory drug testing had a higher percentage of early PSE and lower PSE-free survival.

Paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab was an effective in ex vivo culture that matched adjuvant treatment & recorded delayed PSE

We tested the effect of paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in ex vivo culture and co-culture, respectively, on tumor tissues, from a patient with lymph node-positive superficially invasive endometrial serous carcinoma, grade 3, stage IIIC1 disease whose adjuvant therapy and PSE were recorded retrospectively. The drug combination was decided based on the scientific interrogation of the genomic alterations observed in the tumor (as presented in Table 3; AC-1-37). Figure 1A presents H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from D1 treated with paclitaxel as compared to vehicle-treated control. The number of Ki67 stained tumor cells was markedly abrogated along with the enhanced staining of clC3 stains in the same section, as shown in the microphotographs from the double-stained section of FFPE tissue blocks (middle panel). In line with the result, there was a marked increase in the cl-PARP stains in the tumor cells in the treated samples as compared to the control. Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. This pattern of staining continued in D2 (Figure 1B) and D3 (Figure 1C). However, on D3, although there was an increase in the baseline clC3 staining in the control sample, the Ki67 stains were totally replaced by clC3 stains in treated samples confirming drug-induced apoptosis (green circles). Figure 1D presents apoptotic bodies (green circles) in the pembrolizumab-treated sample as compared to vehicle-treated control in H&E stained FFPE sections from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo tumor tissue co-cultured with isolated CD3+ DiI-stained T-cells from the same patient. Figure 1E presents Ki67-clC3 double-stained FFPE section from D3 ex vivo co-cultured tumor tissue treated with pembrolizumab as compared to vehicle-treated control, demonstrating a simultaneous decrease of Ki67 staining and an increase of clC3 staining (green circles), which concurred with the increase of another apoptotic (green circles) marker, cl-PARP in the treated sample (Figure 1F). The adjuvant treatment of the patient included both paclitaxel and pembrolizumab (Table 3). A delayed PSE was recorded in the 22nd month following the surgery. Figure 1G presents images from PET-CT showing several mildly avid pulmonary nodules in both lungs consistent with metastatic disease.

Table 3.

Clinical relevance of Ex Vivo testing of genomics-guided drug combos on tumor tissues from surgically resected samples obtained from patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers

Patients with Endometrial Cancers

Patient ID AC-1-37 AC-1-40

Pathological Parameters Tumor Histology Superficially invasive serous carcinoma Endometrioid adenocarcinoma
Tumor Grade 3 1
Tumor Stage IIIC1 IB
LVI Absent Absent
Myometrial Invasion (%) 8 58
LN Status Present (3/11) Absent (0/6)
Uterine Serosa & Cervical Stroma Involvement Absent Invades cervical stroma, uterine serosa absent
TMN pT1aN1a pT2 pN0
MSI Stable Stable
MMR Normal Lynch Syndrome is not entirely ruled out; HER2 negative Normal Lynch Syndrome is not entirely ruled out
CA-125 (Units per millimeter (U/mL) Pre & Post [Months (M) & Weeks (W)] Surgery 1 W Pre 109.3 Not Available
3 W Post 496.6
1 M Post 197.7
2 M Post 88.3
3 M Post 46.6
4 M Post 32.4
Genomic Alterations In Cell Signal Pathways (FOUNDATIONONE CDx) AKT L52H PIK3CA V344A ARID1A G276fs*87 ARID1A T294fs*69
NF2 R424C CCNE1 amplification ATM E2975fs*10 DNMT3A R771*
MYC amplification MYCL1 amplification PIK3R1 E458_E462del PTEN R130Q
AR amplification TP53 G245D TSC2 A1778fs*12
MLL2 P2354fs*30 MUTYH G382D
KDMSA amplification TP53 splice site 96+1G > T TP53 R273C
KEAP1 KEAP1(NM_012289) rearrangement exon 4 RB1 A74fs*4 RB1 R320*
Tumor Mutational Burden 1 Muts/Mb Tumor Mutational Burden 20 Muts/Mb
Pretreatment History None None
Ex Vivo Effect of Drug Combination (s) On Tumor Tissue Paclitaxel (P) Effect Paclitaxel (P) No Effect
P+ Trametinib Effect P+ Trametinib No Effect
P+ TAK228 Effect P+ Lemvatinib No Effect
P+ Lenvatinib No Effect P+ TAK228 Effect
P+ BKM120 No Effect P+ Copanlisib Effect
Adjuvant Treatment: Treatments - Surgery (S), ChemoT (C), Radiation (R), Immune T (I) S+C+R+T+I Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab (9/9/20-03/21); started Pembrolizumab (4/13/2021); Whole pelvic radiation with vaginal cuff brachytherapy S+R Whole pelvic radiation with vaginal cuff brachytherapy
Outcome Data PSE (Post Surgery Event) (Number of Months) (Sept.’22) 22 11
Summary Of Events Did the treatment received by the patient match with the drug combo tested on the patient’s tumor, Ex Vivo, in the laboratory Partial Match Not Matched Not Matched
Effectiveness of the drug-combo in the Ex Vivo culture Effective combo (Paclitaxel) Effective combo(s) (Paclitaxel + Copanlisib) (Paclitaxel + TAK228) Ineffective (Paclitaxel)
Time of PSE (Early PSE: < 16 months; Late/Delayed PSE: > 16 months) Delayed PSE Early PSE
PET-CT Several mildly avid pulmonary nodules in both lungs consistent with metastatic disease Intraperitoneal peripheral enhancing masses (particularly anterior mid abdomen) compatible with recurrent disease

Patients with Ovarian Cancers

Patient ID AC-1-26 AC-1-30 AC-1-B091 AC-1-94

Pathological Parameters Tumor Histology High-grade serous carcinoma Poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor Adenocarcinoma consistent with a history of high-grade recurrent ovarian papillary serous carcinoma Serous carcinoma
Tumor Grade 3 3 X 1
Tumor Stage IIIC IIIA1 IIIC/IV IIIC
LVI Present Present X Present
LN Status Present (1/1) Present (1/1) X Not Submitted
Uterine Serosa & Cervical Stroma Involvement Present Absent X Absent
TMN ypT3c ypN1a pT3 pN1b (y)pT3c pNX pMX
MSI Stable Stable Stable Cannot Be Determined
MMR N/A PD-L1 negative, PD-1 low positive; No record of IHC MMR N/A PD-L1 negative, PD-1 low positive; No record of IHC MMR N/A PD-L1 negative, PD-1 low positive; No record of IHC MMR N/A PD-L1 negative, PD-1 low positive; No record of IHC MMR
CA-125 (Units per millimeter (U/mL) Pre & Post [Months (M) & Weeks (W) & Days (D)] Surgery 3 M Pre 1442.9 2 D Post 94.6 1 M Pre 57.3 5 M Pre 666.7
2 M Pre 812.7 3 W Post 142.6 1 M Post 218.2 4 M Pre 781.2
1 M Pre 615 1 M Post 30.3 2 M Post 530 3 M Pre 380.8
2 W Post 215.2 2 M Post 19.7 3 M Post 255.5 2 M Pre 539.8
2 M Post 116.4 3 M Post 71 5 M Post 434 2 M Pre 487.6
12 M Post 86.5 4 M Post 43.4 6 M Post 2929.3 1 M Pre 594.9
24 M Post 68.4 7 M Post 391 1 M Post 70.6
36 M Post 118.1 8 M Post 815.8 3 M Post 49.9
39 M Post 154 9 M Post 412.6 6 M Post 43
10 M Post 262.4 9 M Post 21
12 M Post 111 12 M Post 23.1
14 M Post 186.1 15 M Post 33.4
16 M Post 777.5 18 M Post 28.4
Genomic Alterations In Cell Signal Pathways (FOUNDATIONONE CDx) KRAS G12D CCNE1 amplification FAS loss BRCA2 E2846fs*22 NF1 loss exons 23-37 BRAF G464V
Tumor Mutational Burden 5 Muts/Mb FOXL2 C134W PTEN loss TSC1 loss exons 9-12 TP53 R337L NRAS Q61R
TP53 1255T CDKN2A/B loss
RPTOR amplification Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) score Cannot Be Determined
MYC amplification AR/D18 splice site 3865_3974+19del129
Tumor Mutational Burden 3 Muts/Mb Tumor Mutation Burden TMB-intermediate; 11 Muts/Mb Tumor Mutational Burden Cannot Be Determined
Pretreatment History Carboplatin/Paclitaxel None Cisplatinum & Paclitaxel (July-Oct 2007); unknown agents (January 2010 treated); Carboplatin AUC5, Paclitaxel, and Veliparib (1/22/2015-4/7/2015); Anastrozole (1/14/2016); Carboplatin AUC5, Olaparib (2/11/2016-6/21/2016); single agent Olaparib (6/21/2016 started); Rucaparib 12/26/2017 started); Rubraca at lower dose (Aug 2019) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab (2019)
Effect of Drug Combination (s) On Tumor Tissue In Ex Vivo Culture Paclitaxel (P) + Carboplatin (C ) No effect Paclitaxel (P) + Carboplatin (C ) No Effect Carboplatin + BMN673 + Trametinib Effect Paclitaxel (P) + Carboplatin (C ) Effect
P+C+ Rucaparib No effect P+C+ Rucaparib Effect P+C+ Trametinib Effect
P+C+ Copanlisib No effect P+C+ Copanlisib Effect P+C+ Trametinib + Copanlisib Effect
P+C+ TAK228 No effect P+C+ TAK228 Effect
P+C+ Lenvatinib No effect P+C+ Lenvatinib No effect
Adjuvant Treatment: Treatments - Surgery (S), Chemo T (C), Radiation (R), Immune T (I) S+C Carboplatin Taxol, Bevacizumab: Mekinist and Letrozole upon recurrence S+C Paclitaxel/Carboplatin, Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin. S+I+C+T Mekinist and Niraparib, the patient could not tolerate (March-April 2020); Pembrolizumab (04/28/2020-06/9/2020); started Avastin and oral Cyclo-phosphamide (07/21/2020) S+C+T Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab (10/8/2019); started carboplatin/Paclitaxel for second time (3/10/2020); started Letrozole (5/20/2020)
Outcome Data PSE (Post Surgery Event) (Number of Months) (Sept.’22) 16 (Sept.2022) 2 6 23 (1/24/2022)
Summary Of Events Did the patient’s treatment match the drug combo tested on the patient’s tumor, Ex Vivo, in the laboratory Matched Matched Not Matched Matched
Effectiveness of the drug-combo in the Ex Vivo culture Ineffective Drug-Combo Ineffective Drug-Combo Effective Drug-Combo Effective Drug-Combo
Time of PSE (Early PSE: < 16 months; Late/Delayed PSE: > 16 months) Early PSE Early PSE Early PSE Delayed PSE
PET-CT Mild retroperitoneal adenopathy and multiple pulmonary nodules Markedly increased hepatic metastatic disease, with innumerable lesions now present. 2 foci of abnormal uptake in the right psoas muscle, likely metastatic disease Not Available
Increased retroperitoneal adenopathy. There are also increased nodal or soft tissue masses within the bilateral obturator chains in the pelvis

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in ex vivo culture and co-culture respectively on tumor tissues, respectively from a patient with lymph node-positive superficially invasive endometrial serous carcinoma, grade 3, stage IIIC1 disease whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from a patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with paclitaxel as compared to vehicle-treated control (NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. B: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 2 (D2) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from a patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with paclitaxel as compared to vehicle-treated control (NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. C: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from a patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with paclitaxel as compared to vehicle-treated control (NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. D: H&E stained FFPE section from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo co-cultured tumor tissue (T) with isolated CD3+ DiI-stained T-cells from a patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with pembrolizumab (CC-Pembro) as compared to vehicle-treated control (CC-NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. E: Ki67-cleaved Caspase3 (clC3) double-stained FFPE section from D3 ex vivo co-cultured tumor tissue (T) with isolated CD3+ DiI-stained T-cells from the same patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj. & X20 obj.) treated with Pembrolizumab (CC-Pembro) as compared to vehicle-treated control (CC-NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. F: Cleaved-PARP (cl-PARP) stained FFPE section from D3 ex vivo co-cultured tumor tissue (T) with isolated CD3+ DiI-stained T-cells from the same patient with high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma (Original Mag. X40 obj. & X20 obj.) treated with Pembrolizumab (CC-Pembro) as compared to vehicle-treated control (CC-NT). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. G: Images from PET-CT showing several mildly avid pulmonary nodules in both lungs consistent with metastatic disease.

In summary, effective drug treatments with paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in ex vivo culture and co-culture were observed on tumor tissues. We recorded retrospectively that the patient had received adjuvant therapy, which matched/similar to the effective drug tested in ex vivo cultures. This patient had a delayed post-surgery event (PSE).

Paclitaxel in combination(s) with copanlisib/TAK228 was an ineffective in ex vivo culture that matched adjuvant treatment & recorded early PSE

We tested the effect of paclitaxel and its combination with copanlisib (pan PI3K inhibitor)/TAK228 (mTORC1/C2 kinase inhibitor) in ex vivo culture on tumor tissues from a patient with lymph node-negative endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, grade 1, stage IB disease whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. The drug combination was decided based on the scientific interrogation of the genomic alterations observed in the tumor (Table 3; AC-1-40). Figure 2A shows H&E stained FFPE sections from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue from the patient treated with the vehicle, while Figure 2B shows H&E stained FFPE sections from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue treated with paclitaxel. Figure 2C presents H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue from the same patient. In contrast to no effect as observed following paclitaxel, Figure 2D and 2E showed both decrease of Ki67 and an increase of staining of clC3 as well as cl-PARP with apoptotic bodies (green circles) at day 1 in the same tumor tissue, only this time treated with two effective combinations of paclitaxel plus copanlisib and paclitaxel plus TAK228, respectively. The adjuvant treatment of the patient included whole pelvic radiation with vaginal cuff brachytherapy (Table 3). An early PSE was recorded during the 11th month following the surgery. Figure 2F PET-CT images showed intraperitoneal peripheral enhancing masses (particularly anterior mid abdomen) compatible with recurrent disease.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of paclitaxel and its combination with copanlisib/TAK228 in ex vivo culture on tumor tissues from a patient with lymph node-negative endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, grade 1, stage IB disease whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E stained FFPE section from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo cultured (NT) tumor tissue (T) from a patient with lymph node-negative endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, grade 1, stage IB disease (Original Mag. X40 obj. & X20 obj.). B: H&E stained FFPE section from D1, D2, and D3 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from a patient with lymph node-negative endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, grade 1, stage IB disease treated with paclitaxel (Original Mag. X40 obj. & X20 obj.). C: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from the same patient (Original Mag. X40 obj. & X20 obj.) treated with vehicle control (NT). D: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from the same patient (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.) treated with paclitaxel plus copanlisib (Pacli+Copan). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. E: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from the same patient (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.) treated with paclitaxel plus TAK228 (Pacli+TAK228). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. F: Images from CT showing intraperitoneal peripheral enhancing masses (particularly anterior mid abdomen) compatible with recurrent disease.

In summary, ineffective drug treatment with paclitaxel in ex vivo culture was recorded on tumor tissues from the patient. The paclitaxel plus copanlisib or paclitaxel plus TAK228 combinations were effective in ex vivo culture but were not administered clinically. The patient had received adjuvant therapy, which did not match the effective drug (on the contrary, matched/similar to the ineffective drug) as tested in ex vivo culture, and had an early post-surgery event (PSE).

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin with rucaparib/copanlisib/TAK228/lenvatinib as an ineffective in ex vivo culture that matched adjuvant treatment & recorded early PSE

We tested the effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with rucaparib (PARP inhibitor)/copanlisib/TAK228/lenvatinib (multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor) of a patient with lymph node-positive grade 3 serous carcinoma of ovary, stage IIIC, both primary and metastatic disease whose adjuvant therapy and PSE were recorded retrospectively. Figure 3A and 3B showed no effect of the drug in H&E stained FFPE section from day 3 ex vivo cultured primary tumor tissue and metastatic tumor tissue from the same patient treated with combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with rucaparib or copanlisib or TAK228 or lenvatinib as compared to vehicle-treated controls, respectively. The patient had received adjuvant therapy, which matched/similar to the ineffective ex vivo combinations, and retrospectively we recorded that she had an early PSE. PET-CT images showed mild retroperitoneal adenopathy and multiple pulmonary nodules (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with rucaparib/copanlisib/TAK228/lenvatinib in ex vivo culture on primary tumor tissues and metastatic tumor tissues of a patient with lymph node-positive grade 3 serous carcinoma, stage IIIC, whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured primary tumor tissue (T) from a patient with lymph node-positive grade 3 serous carcinoma, stage IIIC disease (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (P+C) and rucaparib (P+C+rucaparib) or copanlisib (P+C+copanlisib) or TAK228 (P+C+TAK228) or lenvatinib (P+C+lenvatinib) as compared to vehicle-treated control (NT). B: H&E stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured metastatic tumor tissue (TM) from the same patient with lymph node-positive grade 3 serous carcinoma, stage IIIC disease (Original Mag. X40 obj.) treated with combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (P+C) and rucaparib (P+C+rucaparib) or copanlisib (P+C+copanlisib) or TAK228 (P+C+TAK228) or lenvatinib (P+C+lenvatinib) as compared to vehicle-treated control (NT). C: Images from CT showing mild retroperitoneal adenopathy and multiple pulmonary nodules.

In summary, ineffective drug treatment with combinations of 5 different combinations in ex vivo culture on primary and metastatic tumor tissues from the same patient is recorded. The adjuvant treatment of the patient included carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, followed by mekinist and letrozole upon recurrence (Table 3; AC-1-26). An early PSE was recorded during the 16th month following the surgery.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin was an ineffective combination in ex vivo culture that matched adjuvant treatment & recorded early PSE

We tested the effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ex vivo culture of tumor tissues of a lymph node-positive patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor of ovary, grade 3, stage IIIA1 disease whose adjuvant therapy and PSE were recorded retrospectively. Figure 4A-C show H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1, day 2, and day 3 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue, vehicle control from the patient, as compared to the paclitaxel plus carboplatin treated tissue (Figure 4D), respectively. Cyan rectangles indicated some of the prominent mitotic bodies in both control and treated samples. The drug combination was decided based on the scientific interrogation of the genomic alterations observed in the tumor (Table 3; AC-1-30). An early PSE was recorded during the 2nd month following the surgery. PET-CT images indicate markedly increased hepatic metastatic disease, with innumerable lesions now present. Increased retroperitoneal adenopathy was observed. There are also increased nodal or soft tissue masses within the bilateral obturator chains in the pelvis (Figure 4E).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ex vivo culture of tumor tissues of a lymph node-positive patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor, grade 3, stage IIIA1 disease whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T), vehicle control (NT) from a patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor, grade 3, stage IIIA1 (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). B: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 2 (D2) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) as compared to vehicle control (NT) from a patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor, grade 3, stage IIIA1 (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). C: H&E, Ki67-clC3, and cl-PARP stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) with vehicle control (NT) from a patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor, grade 3, stage IIIA1 (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). Mitotic figures are labeled as cyan rectangles. D: H&E stained FFPE section from day 1 (D1), day 2 (D2), day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T) from the same patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma of sex cord derivation arising out of adult granulosa cell tumor, grade 3, stage IIIA1 treated with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (Pacli + Carbo) (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). Mitotic figures are labeled as cyan rectangles. E: Images from CT showing markedly increased hepatic metastatic disease, with innumerable lesions now present. Images show increased retroperitoneal adenopathy. There are also increased nodal or soft tissue masses within the bilateral obturator chains in the pelvis.

In summary, ineffective drug combinations were recorded in the ex vivo tests. The adjuvant treatment of the patient included paclitaxel, carboplatin, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (Table 3). The patient had received adjuvant therapy, which matched/was similar to the ineffective ex vivo combinations, and retrospectively had an early PSE.

Carboplatin, BMN673 plus trametinib was an effective combination in ex vivo culture that did not match the adjuvant treatment & recorded early PSE

We tested the effect of combinations of carboplatin, BMN673 (Talazoparib, PARP inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) in ex vivo culture of tumor biopsy tissue of a patient with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, stage IIIC/IV disease, whose adjuvant therapy and PSE were recorded retrospectively. The drug combination was decided based on the scientific interrogation of the genomic alterations observed in the tumor (as presented in Table 3; AC-1-B091). Figure 5A and 5B present H&E, Ki67/clC3, and pERK stained FFPE section from day 3 ex vivo cultured tumor biopsy tissue, vehicle control, and treated with carboplatin, BMN673 plus trametinib, respectively. The drug-treated biopsy tissue expressed significantly higher levels of clC3, although the expression of Ki67 expression remained comparable. On the contrary, the expression of pERK was obliterated following the drug indicating the loss of the RAS-MAPK-signal mediated proliferation signals in the tumor cells. Prominent apoptotic bodies were marked in green circles. The adjuvant treatment of the patient included Mekinist and Niraparib (March-April 2020); Pembrolizumab (04/28/2020-06/9/2020); Avastin and oral cyclophosphamide (07/21/2020) (Table 3). An early PSE was recorded during the 6th month following the surgery. Images from PET-CT showed 2 foci of abnormal uptake in the right psoas muscle, likely metastatic disease (Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of combinations of carboplatin, BMN673 plus trametinib in ex vivo culture of tumor biopsy tissue of a patient with adenocarcinoma consistent with a history of ovarian carcinoma, stage IIIC/IV disease, whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E, Ki67-cleaved-Caspase3 (Ki67/cl-C3), and phospho-ERK (pERK) stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor biopsy tissue (TB), vehicle control (NT) from a patient with adenocarcinoma consistent with a history of high-grade, recurrent ovarian papillary serous carcinoma, stage IIIC/IV disease (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). B: H&E, Ki67-cleaved-Caspase3 (Ki67/cl-C3), and phospho-ERK (pERK) stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor biopsy tissue (TB), treated with carboplatin, BMN673 plus Trametinib (Carbo+BMN673+Trametinib) from the same patient (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). Apoptotic bodies are labeled as green circles. C: Images from PET-CT showing 2 foci of abnormal uptake in the right psoas muscle, likely metastatic disease.

In summary, effective drug treatment with combinations of carboplatin, BMN673, plus trametinib in ex vivo culture on biopsy of tumor tissues was recorded. The patient had received therapy that did not match the effective ex vivo combinations, and retrospectively, an early PSE was recorded. Although the patient received Neraparib (PARP inhibitor) in the course of her treatment, current literature showed that single-agent PARP inhibitor had limited efficacy in the presence of upregulation of the RAS-MAPK pathway in the tumor [11-13].

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin was an effective combination in ex vivo culture that matched/similar to the adjuvant treatment & recorded delayed PSE

We tested the effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in tumor tissues of a patient with serous carcinoma of the ovary, stage IIIC disease, whose adjuvant therapy and PSE were recorded retrospectively. The drug combination was decided based on the scientific interrogation of the genomic alterations observed in the tumor (as presented in Table 3; AC-1-94). Figure 6A and 6B present H&E, and Ki67/clC3, stained FFPE section from day 3 ex vivo cultured tumor tissue, vehicle control from a patient treated with paclitaxel plus carboplatin from the same patient, respectively. The adjuvant therapy included carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (10/8/2019); started carboplatin, paclitaxel for the second time (3/10/2020); started letrozole (5/20/2020) as mentioned in Table 3. The patient had a delayed PSE of 23 months following the surgery (PET-CT was not available).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ex vivo culture of tumor tissues of a patient with serous carcinoma of the ovary, grade 1, stage IIIC disease whose adjuvant therapy and post-surgery event (PSE) were recorded retrospectively. A: H&E, and Ki67-cleaved-Caspase3 (Ki67/cl-C3), stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T), vehicle control (NT) from a patient with serous carcinoma of the ovary, grade 1, stage IIIC disease (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.). B: H&E, and Ki67-cleaved-Caspase3 (Ki67/cl-C3), stained FFPE section from day 3 (D3) ex vivo cultured tumor tissue (T), treated with paclitaxel plus carboplatin from the same patient (Original Mag. X40 obj and X20 obj.).

In summary, effective drug treatment with combinations of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ex vivo culture of resected tumor tissues from the patient was recorded. The patient had received therapy matched/similar to the effective ex vivo combinations and had retrospectively delayed PSE.

Discussion

Our ex vivo drug testing platform was designed to model functional precision medicine based on its power of clinical relevance. First, we tested genomics-driven drug combinations to establish their effectiveness in contrast to ineffective ones. Once we determined the patient-wise effectiveness/ineffectiveness of the genomic-alteration-driven drug combination(s), we retrospectively accessed patients’ adjuvant treatment details and PSE. The clinical relevance of the platform was tested based on the hypothesis that if the effective drug combination matched/was similar to the adjuvant treatment received by the patient, the PSE would be delayed. On the contrary, if the ineffective drug combination matched/was similar to the adjuvant treatment, an early PSE would be encountered in the clinics. As an extension of the above premise, if the effective drug combination did not match/was similar to the adjuvant treatment received by the patient, the PSE would occur early.

The ex vivo drug testing platform developed in this study aimed to model functional precision medicine by testing genomics-driven drug combinations for their effectiveness in individual patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers. The platform correlated the ex vivo drug testing results with the patients’ adjuvant treatment and subsequent PSE outcomes. The hypothesis was that a match between the effective drug combination in ex vivo testing and the adjuvant therapy received by the patient would result in delayed PSE, while a match between the ineffective drug combination in ex vivo testing and the adjuvant therapy would lead to early PSE. In support of our hypothesis, the results demonstrated that patients whose therapy matched with ineffective drug combinations in ex vivo testing experienced early PSE, while patients whose therapy matched with effective drug combinations in ex vivo testing showed delayed PSE. This finding highlights the ex vivo drug testing platform’s clinical relevance as a functional precision medicine model.

The strength of our platform is that once tested in a prospective clinical trial, it can be viewed as a patient-specific laboratory in an oncologist’s pocket. We received tumor tissues, interrogated their genome, cultured them in the laboratory with genomics-wise matched drug combinations, and retrospectively correlated ex vivo data to the adjuvant therapy that an individual patient received and the patient’s PSE following the adjuvant therapy. Thus, we enriched the logistics of genomics-driven drug-matching with experimental evidence, which translated into therapy. Our platform of functional precision medicine possesses an advantage built-in in its inherent development in a community-based cancer center; the platform is cost-effective, time-sensitive (5 working days from the day of surgery to pathological reporting), laboratory-friendly, and needs a single full-time employee. Unlike organoid cultures, our culture/co-culture platform test the effect of drug(s) on tumor cells in their default histological microenvironment. Our autologous co-culture of tumor cells and CD3+ T-cells provides a unique opportunity to test immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

We used day zero tumor samples as our starting point of reference. The photomicrographs of day zero (D0) cultured tumor tissues from 6 representative patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers are presented in Figure S1. Figure S2 illustrates a representative photomicrograph of in-co-culture whole mounts, DAPI-stained fresh frozen sections, and DiI-stained T-cells from the ex vivo co-culture of tumor tissue or tumor-adjacent normal tissue and isolated CD3+ T-cells from the peripheral blood of patients on the day of surgery. In co-culture, we observe that CD3+ T-cells tend to form aggregates. Interestingly, we observed a distinct pattern of CD3+ T-cell engagement with tumor samples in co-culture versus tumor-adjacent normal tissues (Figure S2B and S2C). The CD3+ T-cell engagement with tumor tissues followed a uniform dispersion, while CD3+ T-cell engagement was closely aggregated in the tumor-adjacent normal sample. Whether or not it is a tumor-specific event or related to the tumor’s genomic alteration status is beyond our study’s scope. In line with our proposition, on the 19th February this year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted accelerated approval to lifileucel (Amtagvi, Iovance Biotherapeutics), an autologous T cell immunotherapy, for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

We tested the specificity of the drug(s) targeted to the tumor compartment of the tissue. For this purpose, we evaluated the effect of the same drugs (1) on the tumor-adjacent normal tissue from the same patient in a parallel set of ex vivo cultures and (2) on the cells of the tumor micro-environment from the same tumor sample. In the samples showing the antitumor effects following the drug, no effect of the drug was noticed either in the cells of the tumor micro-environment next to the tumor cells or in the tumor-adjacent normal tissue from the same patient highlighting the specificity of the effect in the tumor compartment.

The intrinsic limitation of our platform is its built-in development in a community-based cancer center. As of now, it has not been tested in a prospective clinical trial, and the results are based on retrospective data analysis. The availability of tissue samples and the consecutive 3-day ex vivo culture are also logistical challenges that need to be addressed to ensure wider applicability. Our cohort has a significantly fewer number of biopsy and primary-metastatic paired samples. One limitation of the platform is the amount of the resected tissue obtained within 60 minutes of the surgery. It is imperative to get the pathologically determined tumor tissue in the culture media under aseptic conditions. The ex vivo culture is a terminating culture (witnin 72 hours). The study is limited by the availability of tissue which restricts a consecutive 3-day ex vivo culture, especially in the case of tumor biopsy as in the case of the patient with adenocarcinoma with a history of high-grade, recurrent ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. To overcome this limitation, we restricted (1) the ex vivo culture to day 3 only and/or (2) the IHC staining only to the samples, which according to the pathologist’s evaluations, showed apoptotic changes. The number of consents we received from ovarian cancer patients is less than that of the patients with endometrial cancers. Despite its limitations, the functional precision medicine platform provides a promising patient-centric approach to decision-making in neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy.

Our functional precision medicine platform allows clinicians to review the effect of genomics-driven matched drug combinations. It experimentally validates and reinforces the logical concept of drug-matching for each patient, outside the body, before the treatment.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Avera Cancer Institute for supporting the entire study. We acknowledge every patient and their family for their participation in the ex vivo study at the Avera Cancer Institute.

Informed (IRB approved: Protocol Number Study: 2017.053-100399_ExVivo001) consents for receiving resected tissue and blood from a total of 172 enrolled patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Supporting Information

ajcr0014-3083-f7.pdf (4.3MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Sicklick JK, Kato S, Okamura R, Schwaederle M, Hahn ME, Williams CB, De P, Krie A, Piccioni DE, Miller VA, Ross JS, Benson A, Webster J, Stephens PJ, Lee JJ, Fanta PT, Lippman SM, Leyland-Jones B, Kurzrock R. Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat Med. 2019;25:744–750. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hosein AN, Brekken RA, Maitra A. Pancreatic cancer stroma: an update on therapeutic targeting strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:487–505. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0300-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De P, Aske J, Sulaiman R, Dey N. Bete noire of chemotherapy and targeted therapy: CAF-mediated resistance. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:1519. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Siu LL, Shapiro JD, Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Simes J, Couture F, Moore MJ, Price TJ, Siddiqui J, Nott LM, Charpentier D, Liauw W, Sawyer MB, Jefford M, Magoski NM, Haydon A, Walters I, Ringash J, Tu D, O’Callaghan CJ. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetuximab plus brivanib alaninate versus cetuximab plus placebo in patients with metastatic, chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type K-RAS colorectal carcinoma: the NCIC Clinical Trials Group and AGITG CO.20 Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2477–2484. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.0543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Majumder B, Baraneedharan U, Thiyagarajan S, Radhakrishnan P, Narasimhan H, Dhandapani M, Brijwani N, Pinto DD, Prasath A, Shanthappa BU, Thayakumar A, Surendran R, Babu GK, Shenoy AM, Kuriakose MA, Bergthold G, Horowitz P, Loda M, Beroukhim R, Agarwal S, Sengupta S, Sundaram M, Majumder PK. Predicting clinical response to anticancer drugs using an ex vivo platform that captures tumour heterogeneity. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6169. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, Im SA, Jacot W, Ganju V, Chiu JWY, Xu B, Hamilton E, Madhusudan S, Iwata H, Altintas S, Henning JW, Curigliano G, Perez-Garcia JM, Kim SB, Petry V, Huang CS, Li W, Frenel JS, Antolin S, Yeo W, Bianchini G, Loi S, Tsurutani J, Egorov A, Liu Y, Cathcart J, Ashfaque S, Cortes J. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401:105–117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02420-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahcene Djaballah S, Daniel F, Milani A, Ricagno G, Lonardi S. HER2 in colorectal cancer: the long and winding road from negative predictive factor to positive actionable target. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1–14. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_351354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jadon R, Higgins E, Hanna L, Evans M, Coles B, Staffurth J. A systematic review of dose-volume predictors and constraints for late bowel toxicity following pelvic radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:57. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1262-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sulaiman R, De P, Aske JC, Lin X, Dale A, Vaselaar E, Koirala N, Ageton C, Gaster K, Plorde J, Solomon B, Thaemert B, Meyer P, Espaillat LR, Starks D, Dey N. A laboratory-friendly CTC identification: comparable double-immunocytochemistry with triple-immunofluorescence. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:2871. doi: 10.3390/cancers14122871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sulaiman R, De P, Aske JC, Lin X, Dale A, Koirala N, Gaster K, Espaillat LR, Starks D, Dey N. Tumor-TME bipartite landscape of PD-1/PD-L1 in endometrial cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:11079. doi: 10.3390/ijms241311079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun C, Fang Y, Yin J, Chen J, Ju Z, Zhang D, Chen X, Vellano CP, Jeong KJ, Ng PK, Eterovic AKB, Bhola NH, Lu Y, Westin SN, Grandis JR, Lin SY, Scott KL, Peng G, Brugge J, Mills GB. Rational combination therapy with PARP and MEK inhibitors capitalizes on therapeutic liabilities in RAS mutant cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaal5148. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal5148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vena F, Jia R, Esfandiari A, Garcia-Gomez JJ, Rodriguez-Justo M, Ma J, Syed S, Crowley L, Elenbaas B, Goodstal S, Hartley JA, Hochhauser D. MEK inhibition leads to BRCA2 downregulation and sensitization to DNA damaging agents in pancreas and ovarian cancer models. Oncotarget. 2018;9:11592–11603. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu Y, Xu S, Cheng S, Yang J, Wang Y. Clinical application of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: from molecular mechanisms to the current status. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01094-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ajcr0014-3083-f7.pdf (4.3MB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Cancer Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES