Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Jul 10;14:15961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66818-z

Factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in Kibungo Referral Hospital, Rwanda

Jean Claude Niyoyita 1,2,, Jerome Ndayisenga 2,4, Jared Omolo 1, Hosee Niyompano 1,4, Pierre Celestin Bimenyimana 1, Tafadzwa Dzinamarira 3, Olivier Nsekuye 4, Isabella Chavez 5, François Hakizayezu 1
PMCID: PMC11236976  PMID: 38987637

Abstract

More than one million neonatal deaths occur every year worldwide, of which 99% take place in low-income countries. In Rwanda, nearly 71% of neonatal deaths are preventable and among these, 10% are due to neonatal sepsis. Nevertheless, limited information exists on neonatal sepsis and its associated factors in Rwanda. The objectives of the study were to find prevalence and factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in Kibungo Referral Hospital, Ngoma District, Rwanda. We used a retrospective cross-sectional study design reviewing a subset of neonatal, maternal and laboratory records from Kibungo Hospital in 2017. Data were reviewed and collected from March to May, 2018. Logistic regression and odds ratios were calculated to identify the factors associated with neonatal sepsis at 95% CI, p < 0.05. Of the 972 total neonates’ medical records from 2017, we randomly selected 422 of which 12.8% (n = 54) had neonatal sepsis. When blood cultures were positive, 62% grew Klebsiella pneumoniae. Among neonates with sepsis, 38 (70%) recovered while 16 (30%) died. Neonatal sepsis was strongly associated with neonatal age less than or equal to three days (aOR: 2.769, 95% CI 1.312–5.843; p = 0.008); and gestational age less than 37 weeks (aOR: 4.149; CI 1.1878–9.167; p ≤ 0.001). Increased use of blood cultures including sensitivity testing, routine surface cultures of the neonatology and maternity wards facilities, and systematic ward cleaning are all important approaches to prevent and treat neonatal infections in additional to regular neonatal sepsis evaluations.

Keywords: Neonatal sepsis, Neonates, Risk factors, Rwanda

Subject terms: Diseases, Medical research

Introduction

Neonatal sepsis remains a public health concern worldwide. More than one million neonatal deaths occur per year, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries13. The global neonatal mortality rate has decreased over the past years, but to a lesser extent compared to other under-five child deaths4. Globally, an estimate of 22, 25 and 34% of under-five deaths resulted from neonatal infections, intrapartum related conditions and preterm birth complications respectively, with highest mortality rates being reported in Sub-Saharan Africa5. Neonatal deaths account for 68% of under-five deaths in Rwanda6. Rural hospitals mainly serve the poor community, and have limited resources for controlling infectious diseases which might increase the risks of developing sepsis. However, proper management of neonatal sepsis can improve patient outcomes712.

Neonatal sepsis is defined as bloodstream infection resulting from bacterial, viral and or fungal pathogens occurring within 28 days after birth13. It is subcategorized as early and late onset sepsis, occurring before and after 72 h of life, respectively1417. Early-onset sepsis is typically due to the pathogens acquired during peripartum period, prior to or during childbirth18. Late onset sepsis is generally due to hospital acquired infections after birth1922, and unenforced infection prevention and control in the Hospital settings2327. The 72-h cut-off point was selected for this study due to the wide range review of most recent articles2830. Laboratory evaluations of neonatal sepsis include an elevated or depressed white blood cell count with a left shifted differential count, an elevated C-Reactive Protein, and a positive blood culture31,32. However, the blood culture which is the gold standard in sepsis confirmation, is not routinely available in low-income countries1,33.

Neonatal sepsis prevalence is between 1 and 10 per 1,000 live births in developed countries but increases threefold in low-income countries. The prevalence of early and late onset neonatal sepsis varies by region. For example, the incidence of neonatal mortality was higher in rural than in urban settings in Senegal and in Kenya34,35. Factors reported to be associated with sepsis also vary by region and include young maternal age, poor access to antenatal care, post-natal age of neonate, low birth weight, and birth asphyxia3641. The neonatal mortality rate is high in Rwanda at 19 out of 1,000 live births according to the 2019–2020 Rwanda Demographic Health Survey (RDHS)36. About 71% of neonatal deaths in Rwanda are preventable and neonatal sepsis accounts for 10% of total preventable causes; and along with sepsis, asphyxia and complications of prematurity are among the leading causes of neonatal deaths in Rwanda42.

Only a few studies on neonatal sepsis have been conducted in Rwanda, and most of them focused on the urban setting4345. Kibungo is a rural referral hospital located approximately 100 km from Kigali. It is the main referral facility for 12 health centers in its catchment area with only one neonatology unit serving about 85 neonates monthly. To our knowledge, paucity of studies has been conducted to assess risk factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in Ngoma District. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in Kibungo Referral Hospital, Ngoma District of Rwanda.

Methods

Study design and setting

This retrospective, cross-sectional study reviewed the medical records of all neonates admitted at Kibungo Hospital, Ngoma District, Eastern Province, Rwanda from January-December 2017. Kibungo Hospital has a 312 bed capacity including 24 beds in the Neonatology ward. Kibungo Hospital Neonatology services include Neonatology Intensive Care (Unit) and Kangaroo mother care. Patients are cared for by a multidisciplinary team comprised by Pediatricians, General practitioners(GPs) and Nurses.

Study population and sample size

Of the 972 neonatal medical records at Kibungo Hospital from 2017, we collected neonatal and maternal data from a random sample of 422. We also collected all environmental laboratory cultures sent from the neonatology and maternity wards during 2017.

Data collection and procedures

Clinical data including neonatal and maternal characteristics were extracted from neonatal files. Environment swabbing culture results were collected from laboratory records. A Microsoft Excel data collection tool was developed to record neonatal, maternal and ward environmental data. Data collection was conducted in a three-month period from March to May, 2018.

Maternal data were: age, fever > 38 °C, number of previous pregnancies, place of delivery, educational level, employment status, health insurance, obstructed labor, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), foul smelling amniotic fluid. Neonatal data were: post-natal age, sex; birth weight; mode of delivery; place of birth; birth asphyxia (yes/no); gestational age in weeks; Apgar score at 10 min; resuscitation after birth (yes/no); sepsis (yes/no), and if yes, time of onset, bacterial isolate, and sepsis outcome (died or recovered). The determination of sepsis was relied on physicians’ classification of whether the neonate had sepsis as final diagnosis.

The environment cultures data were gathered from laboratory records. Laboratory records were reviewed to collect information related to environmental samples collected for bacteriological cultures, sample sources and identified bacteria species.

Data analysis

Stata Statistical Software was used for analysis: version 13. College Station, TX: Stata Corp LP https://www.stata.com/. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were calculated to characterize the study population in terms of socio-demographic and other relevant variables. Analytical statistics were performed for bivariate and multivariable logistic regression. For the bivariate logistic regression, the association between independent and dependent variables was found at 95% confidence interval with p value < 0.05. Multivariable logistic regression was done for the variables that showed significant association at the bivariate analysis, and p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

The study obtained ethical approval from the ethical committee of Kibungo Referral Hospital with a reference letter (Ref No:14/117/RJ/H1-1/2/2018). And all data were collected in accordance with all relevant guidelines and in the Declaration of Helsinki46. The secondary data from a programmatic management health system were used hence the informed consent and assent were waived by the ethical committee of Kibungo Referral Hospital. Findings of the study were submitted to Kibungo Hospital and the University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health.

Results

Neonatal characteristics

A total of 422 neonates admitted to the neonatology department in 2017 were randomly selected, and their records reviewed. Among the 54 with neonatal sepsis 57% (31/54) were early onset and 43% (23/54) were late onset sepsis, and 38 (70%) recovered, while 16 (30%) died (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of neonates admitted at Kibungo Hospital neonatology unit, January–December, 2017 (n = 422).

Variables Frequencies (n) Percentages (%)
Sex
 Male 216 51.18
 Female 206 48.82
Age group in days
 0–3 369 87.44
 4–28 53 12.56
Birth weight
 < 2500 213 50.47
 ≥ 2500 209 49.53
Mode of delivery
 Caesarean 94 22.27
 Vaginal 328 77.73
Place of birth
 Hospital 251 59.48
 Health center 135 31.99
 Home 36 8.53
Birth asphyxia
 Yes 85 56.64
 No 337 43.36
Gestational Age (Weeks)
 < 37 239 56.6
 ≥ 37 183 43.4
Apgar at 10 min n = 357
 ≤ 6 85 23.81
 > 6 272 76.19
Resuscitated
 Yes 98 23.20
 No 324 76.80
Sepsis
 Yes 54 12.80
 No 368 87.20
Sepsis category n = 54
 Early onset 31 57
 Late onset 23 43
Sepsis outcome n = 54
 Recovered 38 70
 Died 16 30
Bacterial isolate
 Acinetobacter baumanii 1 4.76
 Coagulase neg staphylococci 2 9.52
 Escherichia Coli 2 9.52
 Klebsiella pneumonia 13 61.90
 Staphylococcus aureus 1 4.76
 Streptococcus pneumonia 2 9.52

Neonates’ mothers’ characteristics

Almost seven percent (7%) of the mothers experienced more than five pregnancies; most of them were employed or self-employed; most of the participants had health insurance (Table 2).

Table 2.

Socio-demographic characteristics of neonates’ mothers at Kibungo Hospital neonatology unit, January to December, 2017 (N = 422).

Variables Frequencies (n) Percentages (%)
Obstructed labor
 Yes 7 1.7
 No 415 98.3
Maternal fever
 Yes 40 9.5
 No 382 90.5
Number of previous pregnancies
 < 5 394 93.36
 5 and above 28 6.64
Meconium stained amniotic fluid
 Yes 53 12.56
 No 369 87.44
Maternal infection
 Yes 3 0.71
 No 419 99.29
Premature Rupture of Membrane (PROM)
 Yes 32 7.58
 No 390 92.42
Foul smelling
 Yes 8 1.89
 No 414 98.11
Age group in years
 17–20 59 13.9
 21–30 254 60.2
 > 30 109 25.9
Employment status
 Employed 416 98.6
 Unemployed 6 1.4
Education level
 None 9 2.1
 Primary 371 87.9
 Secondary and high 42 10.0
Health insurance
 Yes 396 93.8
 No 26 6.2

Neonatal sepsis characteristics, antibiotic susceptibility pattern and outcome

Fifty-four (12.8%) neonates were diagnosed with sepsis of whom 25 (46.3%) had blood cultures performed. Almost 84% (21/25) of the blood cultures were positive with Klebsiella pneumoniae predominance (62%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (9.5%), Escherichia coli (9.5%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (9.5%), Acinetobacter baumanii (4.7%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4.7%). Bacteria sensitivity pattern revealed that 46.1% of the Klebsiella pneumoniae was resistant to ciprofloxacin but 100% were sensitive to meropenem and imipenem in carbapenems family of medications. Only 70.4% of neonates with sepsis survived (Table 1).

Environmental bacterial colonization monitoring

Environmental cultures reviewed were collected from surfaces of neonatology and maternity equipment such as incubators, lamps, nasal aspirator and oxygen concentrators, and showed the presence of various bacterial species in the neonatal and maternity wards: Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia species, Providencia stuartii and Escherichia coli.

Bivariate analysis of neonatal characteristics

After bivariate analysis, neonates with a younger post-natal age group (p = 0.022) and younger gestational age (p = 0.031) were found to be significantly associated with neonatal sepsis (Table 3) and therefore, they were considered for multivariate logistic regression analysis. Association of Apgar score with neonatal sepsis was not statistically significant (p = 0.771).

Table 3.

Bivariate and multivariate analysis of neonatal characteristics associated with sepsis at Kibungo Hospital.

Variables N = 422 Sepsis developed cOR (95% CI) p value aOR (95% CI) p value
Yes No
No % No %
Sex
 Male 216 26 12.04 190 87.96 1 0.633
 Female 206 28 13.59 178 86.41 0.869 (0.491–1.540)
Age group (days)
 ≤ 3 369 42 11.38 327 88.62 2.278 (1.110–4.677) 0.022 2.769(1312–5.8430 0.008*
 ≥ 4 53 12 22.64 41 77.36 1 1
Birth weight
 < 2500 213 32 15.02 181 84.98 1 0.167
 ≥ 2500 209 22 10.53 187 89.47 1.502 (0.841–2.684)
Mode of delivery
 Caesarean 94 8 8.51 86 91.49 1 0.163
 Vaginal 328 46 14.02 282 85.98 0.570 (0.259–1.254)
Birth asphyxia
 Yes 85 11 12.94 74 87.06 1 0.964
 No 337 43 12.76 294 87.24 1.016 (0.499–2.066)
Gestational age (weeks)
 < 37 239 38 15.90 201 84.10 2.573 (1.358–4.875) 0.004 4.149 (1.878–9.167)
 ≥ 37 183 16 8.74 167 91.26 1 1  < 0.001**
Apgar score n (357)
 ≤ 6 85 11 12.94 74 87.06 1 0.771
 ≥ 7 272 32 11.76 240 88.24 1.114 (0.535–2.320)

*: Statistical significance at p < 0.05, **: statistical significant at p < 0.01.

cOR crude odds ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio.

Significant values are in [bold].

Bivariate analysis of maternal characteristics

After the bivariate analysis of the maternal characteristics, it was seen that no maternal characteristic was statistically significant and eligible for the multivariable logistic regression (Table 4).

Table 4.

Bivariate analysis of maternal characteristics associated with sepsis at Kibungo Hospital.

Variables Sepsis developed cOR (95% CI) p value
N = 422 Yes No
Frequency % Frequency %
Age group
 17–20 59 5 8.47 54 91.53 1.726 (0.645–4.613) 0.277
 21–30 254 35 13.78 219 86.22 1
 > 30 109 14 12.84 95 87.16 1.084 (0.557–2.108) 0.811
Education level
 No education 9 2 22.22 7 77.78 1
 Primary 371 45 12.13 324 87.87 2.069 (0.417–10.273) 0.373
 Secondary and higher 42 7 16.67 34 83.33 1.42 (0.243–8.375) 0.693
Occupation
 Employed 416 54 12.98 362 87.02 1
 Unemployed 6 0 0 6 100.00 1(Omitted) 0.345
Place of delivery
 Hospital 251 28 11.16 223 88.84 1
 Health center 135 20 14.81 115 85.19 0.721 (0.389–1.337) 0.300
 Home 36 6 16.67 30 83.33 0.627 (0.240–1.640) 0.342
Premature Rupture of Membrane (PROM)
 Yes 32 4 12.50 28 87.50 1
 No 390 50 12.82 340 87.18 0.971 (0.326–2.886) 0.958
Foul smelling
 Yes 8 2 25.00 6 75.00 1
 No 414 52 12.56 362 87.44 2.320 (0.456–11.802) 0.310
Obstructed labor
 Yes 7 1 14.29 6 85.71 1
 No 415 53 12.77 362 87.23 1.138 (0.134–9.642) 0.905
Maternal fever
 Yes 40 7 17.50 33 82.50 1
 No 382 47 12.30 335 87.70 0.413 (0.457–1.284) 0.352
Health insurance
 Yes 396 51 12.88 345 87.12 1
 No 26 3 11.54 23 88.46 1.133 (0.328–3.910) 0.843

Multivariable analysis of characteristics associated with sepsis

Multivariable analysis was done only for the neonate characteristics that showed significant association with neonatal sepsis in bivariate analysis (neonate age and gestational weeks). Strong association with sepsis was found with neonatal age less or equal to three days (aOR: 2.769; 95% CI 1.312–5.843; p = 0.008), and gestational weeks less than 37 weeks (aOR: 4.149; CI 1.1878–9.167; p  ≤  0.001) (Table 3).

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in Kibungo Referral Hospital, Ngoma District, Rwanda during the calendar year of 2017. Neonatal sepsis prevalence was 12.8%, of whom 29.6% died. Decreasing deaths for newborns and mothers is a global priority to achieve Sustainable Development Goals, and to implement United Nations Global Strategy for Women, Children and Adolescent health5. Though Rwanda is among the few countries in Africa that achieved the fourth Millennium Development Goal to reduce child mortality, mortality rate among neonates is still of great concern. Neonatal sepsis is still a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Rwanda, including in the study area47,48.

The 12.8% neonatal sepsis prevalence found in this study is almost similar to results reported in the Northwest Ethiopia (11.7%)49. But it is lower compared to reports from Ethiopia (33.8%), Tanzania (24%)50. The difference in neonatal sepsis prevalence may be due to the difference in the definitions of sepsis and the study settings in terms of infection prevention and control, staffing, funding, and policy.

In this study, early onset neonatal sepsis was slightly more common (57.4%) than late onset neonatal sepsis (42.6%). On the other hand, our study results contrasts with what was reported in a research conducted at Mansoura Hospital in Egypt, where early onset sepsis was lower at 44.2% compare to late onset sepsis at 55.8%51. This could be due to the differences in the characteristics of mothers and the setting where the study was conducted.

The sepsis fatality rate in this study was 29.6%, which is high and may reflect inadequate management of sepsis, perhaps linked to delays in diagnosis and treatment. This sepsis fatality rate is similar to the findings of a study from Tehran (27.4%)52. Blood cultures were not routinely performed in suspected cases, with only 25 of the 54 cases of suspected sepsis confirmed by culture. This could be due to the long interval between sending and receiving the culture results that might push physicians to treat suspected sepsis empirically. The predominance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was noted and the sensitivity pattern was similar to the findings from the research conducted in India where the isolated bacteria were sensitive to Meropenem and Imipenem with almost half of the isolated Klebsiella pneumonia bacteria species were resistant to Ciprofloxacin53. The findings of current study are different from a study done in Sudan that reported susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae of 87% to Ciprofloxacin, and 81% to meropenem, which was caused by a variation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in bacteria54.

Multivariable analysis revealed that younger gestational age and postnatal age were both statistically significantly associated with neonatal sepsis. Neonates aged 3 days or less were more likely to develop sepsis which is comparable with the study done in Ethiopia neonates55,56. Premature rupture of membrane, place of delivery, intrapartum fever, Apgar Score < 7 at 10 min, low birth weight, meconium stained amniotic fluid, foul smelling amniotic fluid and assisted ventilation were not found to be associated factors, in contrast to the studies done in Mexico and Ethiopia which, of note, were conducted in urban settings19,57.

In this study, environmental cultures showed the presence of Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia species, Providencia stuartii and Escherichia coli in the neonatal and maternity wards. The study done in Morocco, Brazil, Austria and India on neonatology environment reported the presence of different bacteria including Klebsiella pneumoniae, coagulase-negative staphylococci and other Enterobacteriaceae37,5860. The presence of those bacteria isolates in the neonatal and maternity settings highlights the need to regularly monitor their environment and execute infection control by improving hygiene and sanitation.

Limitation of the study

One of the study limitation was the fact that data were collected in a single rural referral hospital in Rwanda. Therefore, the study results may not be directly applicable to other settings. Additionally, the use of secondary data may have limited the available data to assess for statistical association with neonatal sepsis in the study area.

Conclusion

The study highlighted that post-natal age ≤ 3 days, and gestation age < 37 weeks were significantly associated with neonatal sepsis. Improving the use of blood culture and consistent tailoring of antibiotics based on antibiotics susceptibility testing could enhance the management of neonatal sepsis.

Acknowledgements

Our appreciation goes to Kibungo Referral Hospital and University of Rwanda-School of Public Health for their support during this study.

Author contributions

J.C.N., J.N., J.O., and H.N. designed the study, collected, analyzed and interpreted the data, drafted and revised the manuscript. T.D., P.C.B., O.N., I.C. and H.F. participated in interpretation of data, drafted the manuscript and revised it critically. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding or grant was allocated to this research from any sponsor or partner.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Pillay D, Naidoo L, Swe Swe-Han K, Mahabeer Y. Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary unit in South Africa. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021;21:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05869-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oo NAT, et al. Neonatal sepsis, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and treatment outcomes among neonates treated in two tertiary care hospitals of Yangon, Myanmar from 2017 to 2019. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021;6:62. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6020062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Waters D, et al. Aetiology of community-acquired neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries. J. Glob. Health. 2011;1:154–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uwingabire E, Tengera O, Batamuriza M, Mukamana D. Umbilical cord care among postnatal mothers in Kibungo Hospital catchment area, Rwanda. Rwanda J. Med. Health Sci. 2020;3:167–180. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v3i2.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lawn, J. E. et al. Every newborn 2 progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet 6736 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.UNICEF. 2018-Situation-Analysis-Rwanda-Children-Full-Report. Situation Analysis of Children in Rwanda (2018).
  • 7.Wale A, Chelkeba L, Wobie Y, Abebe A. Treatment outcome and associated factors of neonatal sepsis at Mizan Tepi University teaching hospital, South West Ethiopia: A prospective observational study. Pediatr. Heal. Med. Ther. 2021;12:467–479. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S322069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Niederman MS, et al. Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis. Crit. Care. 2021;25:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03736-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Byiringiro S, et al. A qualitative study to explore the experience of parents of newborns admitted to neonatal care unit in rural Rwanda. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoque M, Haaq S, Islam R. Causes of neonatal admissions and deaths at a rural hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011;26:26–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Viswanathan R, et al. Profile of neonatal septicaemia at a district-level sick newborn care unit. J. Heal. Popul. Nutr. 2012;30:41–48. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i1.11274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McAdams RM, et al. Implementation of bubble CPAP in a rural Ugandan neonatal ICU. Respir. Care. 2015;60:437–445. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bulbul A. Neonatal sepsis. Sisli Etfal Hastan. Tip Bul. 2020;54:142–158. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.00236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Simonsen KA, Anderson-Berry AL, Delair SF, Dele Davies H. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014;27:21–47. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00031-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lebea MM, Davies V. Evaluation of culture-proven neonatal sepsis at a tertiary care hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. SAJCH S. Afr. J. Child Heal. 2017;11:170–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arowosegbe AO, Ojo DA, Dedeke IO, Shittu OB, Akingbade OA. Neonatal sepsis in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: Clinical features, clinical outcome, aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility pattern. S. Afr. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;32:127–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mhada TV, Fredrick F, Matee MI, Massawe A. Neonatal sepsis at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Aetiology, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and clinical outcome. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Silveira RDC. The challenges of neonatal sepsis management. J. Pediatr. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gebremedhin D, Berhe H, Gebrekirstos K. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in public hospitals of Mekelle City, North Ethiopia, 2015: Unmatched case control study. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health Organisation. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: Current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions (World Health Organization, 2020).
  • 21.Seale AC, Mwaniki M, Newton CR, Berkley JA. Maternal and early onset neonatal bacterial sepsis: Burden and strategies for prevention in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009;9:428–438. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70172-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Veen AV, et al. Outbreak of infection with a multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain associated with contaminated roll boards in operating rooms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011;43:4961–4967. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.4961-4967.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seale AC, et al. Neonatal severe bacterial infection impairment estimates in South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America for 2010. Pediatr. Res. 2013;74:73–85. doi: 10.1038/pr.2013.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huynh BT, et al. Burden of bacterial resistance among neonatal infections in low income countries: How convincing is the epidemiological evidence? BMC Infect. Dis. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0843-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Agarwal R, et al. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: A cohort study. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2016;4:e752–e760. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30148-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alcock G, Liley HG, Cooke L, Gray PH. Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alam MM, Saleem AF, Shaikh AS, Munir O, Qadir M. Neonatal sepsis following prolonged rupture of membranes in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014;8:67–73. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cortese F, et al. Early and late infections in newborns: Where do we stand? A review. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2016;57:265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ogundare E, et al. Presentation and outcomes of early and late onset neonatal sepsis in a Nigerian hospital. Afr. Health Sci. 2019;19:2390–2399. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dong Y, Speer CP. Late-onset neonatal sepsis: Recent developments. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F257–F263. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Popowski T, et al. Maternal markers for detecting early-onset neonatal infection and chorioamnionitis in cases of premature rupture of membranes at or after 34 weeks of gestation: A two-center prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rwanda Ministry of Health. National Neonatal Care Protocal (2020).
  • 33.Mkony MF, Mizinduko MM, Massawe A, Matee M. Management of neonatal sepsis at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam: Diagnostic accuracy of C—reactive protein and newborn scale of sepsis and antimicrobial resistance pattern of etiological bacteria. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0293-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hutchinson Z, Cisse AM, Elewonibi B, BeLue R. Neonatal outcomes in a community hospital in M’Bour, Senegal. J. Glob. Health. 2017;7:10–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ameyaw E, Asafo Agyei SB, Plange Rhule G. Spectrum of Diseases seen on Neonatal Ward at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Open Access. 2017;2:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], & ICF. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2019–20 Final Report. Kigali, Rwanda, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF, NISR (2021).
  • 37.John B, David M, Mathias L, Elizabeth N. Risk factors and practices contributing to newborn sepsis in a rural district of Eastern Uganda, August 2013: a cross sectional study. BMC Res. Notes. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Getabelew A, Aman M, Fantaye E, Yeheyis T. Prevalence of neonatal sepsis and associated factors among neonates in neonatal intensive care unit at selected governmental hospitals in Shashemene Town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, 2017. Int. J. Pediatr. 2018;2018:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2018/7801272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jabiri A, Wella HL, Semiono A, Sariah A, Protas J. Prevalence and factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates in Temeke and Mwananyamala Hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan. J. Health Res. 2016 doi: 10.4314/thrb.v18i4.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Medhat H, Khashana A, El-Kalioby M. Incidence of neonatal infection in South Sinai, Egypt. Int. J. Infect. 2016;4:1–5. doi: 10.17795/iji-36615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Afsharpaiman S, et al. Trends in incidence of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents in two neonatal intensive care units in Tehran, I.R Iran. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2012;1:124. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.101692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khurmi MS, et al. Newborn survival case study in Rwanda—Bottleneck analysis and projections in key maternal and child mortality rates using lives saved tool (LiST) Int. J. Matern. Child Health AIDS. 2017;6:93–108. doi: 10.21106/ijma.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ndayizeye R, Sibomana E, Nyaziyose I, Conard CJ, Cartledge P. Neonatal antibiotic use at a district and teaching hospital in Rwanda-a retrospective descriptive study. Rwanda Med. J. 2019;76:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nimukuze E, Mukarwego B, Bizimana GE, Rutayisire E. Trends and factors associated with neonatal sepsis at Ruhengeri Referral Hospital, Rwanda. Austin J. Womens Health. 2021;8:200. doi: 10.26420/austinjwomenshealth.2021.1055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cartledge PT, Ruzibuka FS, Rutagarama F, Rutare S, Rogo T. Antibiotic prescribing practices in three neonatology units in Kigali, Rwanda. An observational study. Afr. Health Sci. 2020;20:1646–1654. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i4.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shrestha B, Dunn L. The declaration of Helsinki on medical research involving human subjects: A review of seventh revision. J. Nepal Health Res. Council. 2020;17(4):548–552. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lozano R, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nyishime M, et al. A retrospective study of neonatal case management and outcomes in rural Rwanda post implementation of a national neonatal care package for sick and small infants. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1334-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yismaw AE, Abebil TY, Biweta MA, Araya BM. Proportion of neonatal sepsis and determinant factors among neonates admitted in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital neonatal Intensive care unit Northwest Ethiopia 2017. BMC Res. Notes. 2019;12:3–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4587-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mersha A, et al. Neonatal sepsis and associated factors among newborns in hospitals of Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia. Res. Rep. Neonatol. 2019;9:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shehab El-Din EM, El-Sokkary MM, Bassiouny MR, Hassan R. Epidemiology of neonatal sepsis and implicated pathogens: A study from Egypt. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:509484. doi: 10.1155/2015/509484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Afsharpaiman S, et al. Trends in incidence of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents in two neonatal intensive care units in Tehran, I.R. Iran. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2012;1(3):124–130. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.101692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Viswanathan R, et al. Multi-drug resistant gram negative bacilli causing early neonatal sepsis in India. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F182–F187. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gasim Khalil EA. Late onset neonatal sepsis in Sudan: Incidence, bacteriological profiles, patterns of antimicrobial resistance and fatality. Acad. J. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2019;8:555784. doi: 10.19080/AJPN.2019.07.555784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Geyesus T, Moges F, Eshetie S, Yeshitela B, Abate E. Bacterial etiologic agents causing neonatal sepsis and associated risk factors in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0892-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schrag SJ, et al. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis and perinatal death among infants enrolled in the prevention of perinatal sepsis trial, Soweto. South Africa. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2012;31:821–826. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31825c4b5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Leal YA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis for neonatal sepsis in southeastern Mexico: Analysis of a four-year historic cohort follow-up. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Van’t Veen A, et al. Outbreak of infection with a multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain associated with contaminated roll boards in operating rooms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:4961–4967. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.4961-4967.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tewabe T, et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors of neonatal sepsis among neonates in Felege Hiwot referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Amhara Regional State, North West Ethiopia 2016: A retrospective chart review. BMC Res. Notes. 2017;10:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2573-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mathur S, Fuchs A, Bielicki J, Van Den Anker J, Sharland M. Antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children: WHO evidence review. Paediatr. Int. Child Health. 2018;38:S66–S75. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2017.1409455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES