Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Jul 10;14:15893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66905-1

HIV-1 diversity and pre-treatment drug resistance in the era of integrase inhibitor among newly diagnosed ART-naïve adult patients in Luanda, Angola

Cruz S Sebastião 1,2,3,4,, Ana B Abecasis 4, Domingos Jandondo 2, Joana M K Sebastião 2, João Vigário 5, Felícia Comandante 5, Marta Pingarilho 4, Bárbara Pocongo 6, Edson Cassinela 7, Fátima Gonçalves 8, Perpétua Gomes 8,9, Marta Giovanetti 10, Ngiambudulu M Francisco 2, Euclides Sacomboio 3, Miguel Brito 1,11, Jocelyne Neto de Vasconcelos 1, Joana Morais 2, Victor Pimentel 4,
PMCID: PMC11237101  PMID: 38987263

Abstract

The surveillance of drug resistance in the HIV-1 naïve population remains critical to optimizing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART), mainly in the era of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) regimens. Currently, there is no data regarding resistance to INSTI in Angola since Dolutegravir-DTG was included in the first-line ART regimen. Herein, we investigated the HIV-1 genetic diversity and pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) profile against nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and INSTIs, using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach with MinION, established to track and survey DRMs in Angola. This was a cross-sectional study comprising 48 newly HIV-diagnosed patients from Luanda, Angola, screened between March 2022 and May 2023. PR, RT, and IN fragments were sequenced for drug resistance and molecular transmission cluster analysis. A total of 45 out of the 48 plasma samples were successfully sequenced. Of these, 10/45 (22.2%) presented PDR to PIs/NRTIs/NNRTIs. Major mutations for NRTIs (2.2%), NNRTIs (20%), PIs (2.2%), and accessory mutations against INSTIs (13.3%) were detected. No major mutations against INSTIs were detected. M41L (2%) and I85V (2%) mutations were detected for NRTI and PI, respectively. K103N (7%), Y181C (7%), and K101E (7%) mutations were frequently observed in NNRTI. The L74M (9%) accessory mutation was frequently observed in the INSTI class. HIV-1 pure subtypes C (33%), F1 (17%), G (15%), A1 (10%), H (6%), and D (4%), CRF01_AG (4%) were observed, while about 10% were recombinant strains. About 31% of detected HIV-1C sequences were in clusters, suggesting small-scale local transmission chains. No major mutations against integrase inhibitors were detected, supporting the continued use of INSTI in the country. Further studies assessing the HIV-1 epidemiology in the era of INSTI-based ART regimens are needed in Angola.

Keywords: HIV-1, Genetic diversity, Drug resistance mutations, INSTI, NGS, Angola

Subject terms: HIV infections, Epidemiology

Introduction

The rapid mutation rate inherent to HIV-1 replication plays a crucial role in its widespread transmission. This characteristic gives the virus the ability to evade host immune responses and antiretroviral treatment (ART) and it also contributes significantly to genetic diversity1. The emergence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) poses a threat to the effectiveness of ART, mainly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)2. The WHO recommends implementing strategies to prevent HIV drug resistance (HIVDR), aiming to sustain the progress achieved through the scale-up of ART, improving patient well-being and reducing associated program costs3. These measures include monitoring the occurrence of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) among individuals initiating ART3.

Currently, HIV-1 subtype C (HIV-1C), constitutes approximately 47% of global infections, followed by subtypes B (12%) and A (10%)4. In Angola, approximately 310,000 people are living with HIV5. The last study on HIV-1 molecular epidemiology conducted in 2018 has shown a high genetic diversity with HIV-1C being the most common subtype in Angola, accounting for approximately 38% of infections, followed by subtypes F1 (18%), G (9%), A1 (9%), D (6%) and H (3%)6. In response to the worldwide rise in drug resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), WHO has advised the shift from NNRTI to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based treatment plans for both individuals who have or have not received prior treatment7. Numerous LMICs including Angola, have already adopted the dolutegravir (DTG) based treatment in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)8.

To date, Sanger sequencing capable of identifying mutations with a prevalence of 15–25% or more has been used to analyse specific viral protein-coding sequences encoding ARVs drug targets9. In contrast, deep sequencing approaches based on nanopore technology (Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT]), have been developed for DR testing as they are capable of detecting less abundant mutations (< 15%), although the clinical impact of detecting such Low-abundance mutations remain controversial and merit further investigation10. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach based on ONT technology is cost-effective, portable/accessible and applied in genome assembly, full-length transcript detection and base modification detection and in more specialised areas, such as rapid clinical diagnoses and outbreak surveillance for countries where resources are limited, but the burden of infectious diseases such as the HIV is high11.

Currently, HIV genotyped data is scarce in Angola and there is no published data regarding drug resistance to INSTIs since DTG was included in the first-line ART regimen in 2021. In the present study, we investigated for the first time, the most recent epidemiological profile of HIV-1 genetic diversity and PDR profile against NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs, and INSTIs, using an NGS approach established to track and survey DRMs in Angola. Our findings will inform the clinical advantages of adopting baseline resistance testing for integrase inhibitors using the NGS approach in Angola12.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional study based in a health unit, the National Blood Institute, a healthcare unit specializing in the screening and treatment of infectious diseases, located in Luanda, the capital city of Angola. The study was conducted with 48 adult individuals male or female recently diagnosed with HIV and who had not been exposed to ART. The initial diagnosis of all patients was between March 2022 and May 2023. All participants were reactive for anti-HIV (Abbott, USA) using the ARCHITECT Plus i2000SR Immunoassay Analyzer (Abbott, USA). At the time of recruitment, the study participants were asymptomatic and older than eighteen. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the National Ethics Committee of the Angolan Ministry of Health (MoH) (protocol number 39/C.E./2021, dated December 1st, 2021) and by the National Blood Transfusion Service in Angola (protocol number 128/GDG/INS/2022, dated February 24th, 2022). All participants provided their verbal informed consent before being included in the study.

Data collection and laboratory procedure

A structured epidemiological questionnaire was drawn up and applied during the inclusion of the participants to collect sociodemographic data such as age, sex, area of residence, and occupation. All participant data were anonymized and used only for the proposed study. In addition, around 5 mL of whole blood sample was collected intravenously from each participant and stored in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The whole blood plasma samples were then separated by centrifugation and the plasma was frozen at − 80 °C.

RNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing, and genome assembly

Total viral RNA was extracted from 140 µL (µL) of thawed plasma samples from the participants using the QIAamp Viral RNA kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. For sequencing purposes, amino acid positions 1–99 in the protease (PR) (HXB2 position: 2253–2549), 1–238 in the reverse transcriptase (RT) (HXB2 2550–3263) and 1–267 in the integrase (INT) (HXB2 4230–5030) were amplified from 5 µL of extracted RNA in a 20 µL final PCR reaction mixture containing Taq Platinum High Fidelity enzyme and primers. Two one-step PCRs were conducted independently for each plasma sample followed by a nested PCR, using an in-house protocol with the primer sets previously published13. The final PCR products were revealed through electrophoresis using 1% of the agarose gel, whether PR/RT (1112 bp) or IN (1254 bp) fragment was present. Amplicons were purified using 1xAMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and all the sample concentrations were normalized to an initial input of 80 ng/µL for each sample including PR, RT, and IN fragments. DNA library preparation was conducted using the Ligation Sequencing kit (SQK-NBD114.24, Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and Native Barcoding Expansion 1–24 kit (R10.4.1, Oxford Nanopore Technologies), following the reaction conditions as previously described14. Sequencing was performed for up to 12 h on a MinION Mk1C Sequencing Device. Reads were mapped and aligned against sample-specific reference sequences constructed for the pol-PR/RT/IN genomic region using the Geneious Prime v2024.0.5 (https://www.geneious.com/features/prime) and the assembled FASTQ files exported. In the context of this research, we considered the FASTA file generated by the assay that corresponds to one consensus nucleotide sequence per isolate. In this sequence, codons that contained mixtures of nucleotides present in variants that corresponded to or exceeded 5% of the viral populations were denoted using the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) ambiguity code1517. The consensus FASTA file sequences were exported to HIV-1 subtyping and drug resistance analysis.

HIV‑1 subtyping determination and transmitted drug resistance analysis

The FASTA files generated were submitted to REGA HIV-1 Subtyping Tool version 3.4618 and Comet genotyping tools19 to examine the HIV-1 genetic diversity. Therefore, the nucleotide sequences were submitted to the Calibrated Population Resistance (CPR) analysis tool (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/cpr/) to calculate the proportions of individuals with overall NRTI, NNRTI, PI, and INSTI‐associated PDR taking into account the list published by Tzou et al., 202020. The clinical impact of genotypic drug resistance on first-line ART was assessed using HIVdb Program version 9.1.0, https://hivdb.stanford.edu/hivdb/by-patterns/.

Phylogenetic analysis of the Angolan HIV-1C sequences

A maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the HIV-1C sequences from drug-naïve HIV-infected individuals detected in this study was constructed with other 129 HIV-1C control sequences (https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/BASIC_BLAST/basic_blast.html). The sequences were aligned with Viruglin21 and the ML tree was constructed using the FastTree22 with the GTR parameter as the substitution model.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed in SPSS v29 (IBM SPSS Statistics, USA). The descriptive analysis was presented as absolute (N) and relative (%) frequencies. The normal data distribution was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk test and compared with the independent-sample T-test. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were presented to normal distribution data. Qualitative variables such as age (≤ 30 years old and > 30 years old), sex (female and male), residence area (non-urbanized and urbanized), and occupation (unemployed and employed) were dichotomized, and proportions analysed with the Chi-square (X2) or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, to predict demographic characteristics related to PDR. All reported p-values are two‐tailed and were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Ethics declarations

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of Angola (protocol number 39/C.E./2021, approved on December 1st, 2021) and by the National Blood Transfusion Service in Angola (protocol number 128/GDG/INS/2022, approved on February 24th, 2022). Also, informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Results

Demographic characteristics related to drug resistance mutations

The demographic characterization of the participants and the putative features related to PDR are presented in Table 1. A total of 48 newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients from Luanda, the capital city of Angola, were enrolled in the present study. The age of the participants ranged from 19 to 57 years old, with a mean of 34.4 ± 8.84 years old. Patients aged over 30 years (56.3%, 27/48), male (87.5%, 42/48), living in non-urbanized areas (52.1%, 25/48), and with any type of occupation whether in the public or private sector (81.3%, 39/48), were the most predominant. A total of 48 plasma samples were successfully sequenced for PR/RT and IN. It was not possible to perform any quantification of CD4 cells and the viral load was quantified in only 29 of the 48 included in the study. The viral load varied from 1.64 to 5.69 Log10, with a mean of 4.50 ± 1.10 Log10. No drug resistance was observed to integrase inhibitor. The prevalence of PDR in the PR/RT was 22.2% (10/45). None of the demographic characteristics studied (e.g. age groups, sex, place of residence, and occupation) were statistically related to PDR (p > 0.05). Patients with PDR (32.6 ± 10.2 years old) had a lower average age compared to patients without PDR (35.3 ± 8.39 years old), with a difference of 2.71 years in age. Regarding the genetic variability of the HIV-1 strains infecting those patients, subtype C (33.3%, 16/48) was the most predominant, followed by subtypes F1 (16.7%, 8/48), G (14.6%, 7/48), A1 (10.4%, 5/48), H (6.3%, 3/48), D (4.2%, 2/48), and CRF02_AG (4.2%, 2/48). Recombinant strains represented 10.4% (5/48) (Fig. 1a). The recombinant strains such as CRF05_DF, A1G, A1K, GC, and HG represented about 20% each within the category of other HIV-1 strains (Fig. 1b).

Table 1.

Demographic description and features related to PDR among HIV-1 newly diagnosed in Angola.

Independent variable N (%) Any PDR to PR/RT/IN§
No (%) Yes (%) p-value#
Overall 48 (100) 35 (77.8) 10 (22.2)
Age (year)—mean ± SD 34.4 ± 8.84 35.3 ± 8.39 32.6 ± 10.2 0.394
Age distribution
 ≤ 30 years 21 (43.8) 13 (68.4) 6 (31.6) 0.281
 > 30 years 27 (56.3) 22 (84.6) 4 (15.4)
Sex
 Female 6 (12.5) 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0) 0.899
 Male 42 (87.5) 31 (77.5) 9 (22.5)
Residence area
 Non-urbanized 25 (52.1) 18 (78.3) 5 (21.7) 0.936
 Urbanized 23 (47.9) 17 (77.3) 5 (22.7)
Occupation
 Unemployed 9 (18.8) 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) 0.349
 Employed 39 (81.3) 30 (81.1) 7 (18.9)
HIV-1 subtypes
 C 16 (33.3) 11 (68.8) 5 (31.3) 0.460
 F1 8 (16.7) 4 (57.1) 3 (42.9)
 G 7 (14.6) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)
 A1 5 (10.4) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)
 H 3 (6.30) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
 D 2 (4.20) 2 (100) 0 (0.0)
 CRF02_AG 2 (4.20) 2 (100) 0 (0.0)
 Other HIV-1 strains 5 (10.4) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)

#Chi-square (X2) test or Fisher's exact test.

§Three samples did not amplify for the three PR/RT/IN fragments, simultaneously.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

HIV-1 genetic diversity. (a) Overall HIV-1 subtypes. (b) Other HIV-1 strains. REGA version 3.46 HIV-1 Subtyping Tool and Comet genotyping tools were used to examine the HIV-1 genetic diversity.

Distribution of pretreatment drug resistance according to ARV classes and patient demographic characteristics

Table 2 presents the distribution of PDR according to ARV drug classes to PR/RT and the patient's demographic characteristics. The major mutations were detected in NRTIs (2.2%), NNRTIs (20%), and PIs (2.2%). Occupation was statistically related to the presence of PDR for NRTIs (p = 0.030). No major mutations were detected in INSTIs, although 13.3% of the studied population presented accessory mutations (L74M, T97A, Q95K, and S153A) to INSTIs. The K103N (7%), Y181C (7%), and K101E (7%) mutations were frequently observed in NNRTI. The M41L (2%) mutation against NRTI and I85V (2%) mutation against PI were detected. The L74M (8%) accessory mutation was the most frequent in the INSTI drug class, followed by the T97A, Q95Q, and S153A (Fig. 2). As shown in Table 3, only of the patients (ID: HIT166; PI: I85V and NNRTI: K103N) showed resistance to multiple drug classes. On the other hand, multiple mutations of the same class were observed in two patients [(ID: HIT919; NNRTI: K101E, Y181, G190A) and (ID: HIT1218; NNRTI: K101E, Y181C, G190S)]. The I85V mutation in PI was detected in 86% of 29,235 reads; The M41L mutation in NRTI was detected in 88% of 1938 reads; The Y188L mutation in NNRTI was detected in 86% of 30,907 reads; The K101E mutation in NNRTI was detected in 35–48% of approximately 9060–27,180 reads; The K103N mutation in NNRTI was detected between 87 and 89% in approximately 7434–56,083 reads; The Y181C mutation in NNRTI was detected between 88 and 89% in approximately 1812–25,956 reads; The G190AS mutation in NNRTI was detected between 91 and 94% in approximately 8895–25,922 reads; the Y188L mutation in NNRTI was detected in 85% of 11,805 reads (Table 3).

Table 2.

Distribution of transmitted drug resistance according to ARV classes and demographic characteristics of the Angolan naïve patients.

Independent variable N (%) NRTI mutation NNRTI mutation PI mutation
No (%) Yes (%) p-value No (%) Yes (%) p-value No (%) Yes (%) p-value
Overall 45 (100) 44 (97.8) 1 (2.2) 36 (80.0) 9 (20.0) 44 (97.8) 1 (2.2)
Age distribution
 ≤ 30 years 19 (42.2) 19 (100) 0 (0.0) 1.000 13 (68.4) 6 (31.6) 0.137 18 (94.7) 1 (5.3) 0.422
 > 30 years 26 (57.8) 25 (96.2) 1 (3.8) 23 (88.5) 3 (11.5) 26 (100) 0 (0.0)
Sex
 Female 5 (11.1) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 1.000 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0) 1.000 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 1.000
 Male 40 (88.9) 39 (97.5) 1 (2.5) 32 (80.0) 8 (20.0) 39 (97.5) 1 (2.5)
Residence área
 Non-urbanized 23 (51.1) 23 (100) 0 (0.0) 0.489 18 (78.3) 5 (21.7) 0.766 23 (100) 0 (0.0) 0.489
 Urbanized 22 (48.9) 21 (95.5) 1 (4.5) 18 (81.8) 4 (18.2) 21 (95.5) 1 (4.5)
Occupation
 Unemployed 8 (17.8) 7 (87.5) 1 (12.5) 0.030 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 0.651 8 (100) 0 (0.0) 0.638
 Employed 37 (82.2) 37 (100) 0 (0.0) 30 (81.1) 7 (18.9) 36 (97.3) 1 (2.7)
HIV-1 subtypes
 C 16 (35.6) 16 (100) 0 (0.0) 0.593 11 (68.8) 5 (31.3) 0.609 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3) 0.967
 F1 7 (15.6) 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 5 (71.4) 2 (28.6) 7 (100) 0 (0.0)
 G 5 (11.1) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)
 A1 5 (11.1) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)
 H 3 (6.7) 3 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) 3 (100) 0 (0.0)
 D 2 (4.4) 2 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 0 (0.0)
 CRF02_AG 2 (4.4) 1 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 0 (0.0)
 Other HIV-1 strains 5 (11.1) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 5 (100) 0 (0.0) 5 (100) 0 (0.0)

Bold number indicate statistical significance for the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Prevalence of drug resistance mutations according to antiretroviral classes. NRTI nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NNRTI non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, PI protease inhibitors, INSTI Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor. Calibrated Population Resistance (CPR) tool version 8.1 and the HIVdb program, which are available at Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVdb) (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/) were used to assess DRMs according to the ARV classes. *No major mutations were observed to integrase inhibitors.

Table 3.

Distribution of pretreatment drug resistance according to PI, NRTI, NNRTI and INSTI dug classes and HIV-1 subtypes.

ID_project HIV-1 subtypes Pretreatment drug resistance
PI NRTI NNRTI INST
HIT21 F1 None None Y188L (86%; cov = 30.907) None
HIT127 C None None K101E (35%; cov = 17.019) None
HIT166 C I85V (86%; cov = 29.235) None K103N (87%; cov = 29.208) None
HIT225 C None None Y181C (88%; cov = 1.812) None
HIT919 A1 None None

K101E (45%; cov = 9.060)

Y181C (89%; cov = 8.900)

G190A (94%; cov = 8.895)

None
HIT1002 H None None K103N (88%; cov = 56.083) None
HIT1218 C None None

K101E (48%; cov = 27.180)

Y181C (88%; cov = 25.956)

G190S (91%; cov = 25.922)

None
HIT1281 C None None V106M (85%; cov = 11.805) None
HIT1523 F1 None M41L (88%; cov = 1.938) None None
HIT1808 F1 None None K103N (89%; cov = 7.434) None

Phylogenetic tree of the HIV-1C sequences

The HIV-1C sequences detected in this study population (33.3%, 16/48) were mostly related to HIV-1C sequences from Sub-Saharan African countries (e.g., HIV-1C sequences from South Africa, Botswana, and Zambia) and America (e.g. Brazil and the United States). A total of 5/16 of the HIV-1C Angolan sequences detected in the present study (31.3%) showed two clusters (Cluster A and Cluster B) suggestive of transmission cluster with monophyletic groups (≥ 90% of branch support SH-aLRT) (Fig. 3). Cluster A represents three of our samples, one of which (HIT1218) had three NNRTI-associated resistance mutations (K101E, Y181C, and G190S). Cluster B is composed of three sequences, two related to our study that share mutations associated with the same class, the NNRTI, as also shown in Table 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Maximum-Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the HIV-1C sequences from the 16 ART-naïve HIV-infected individuals. Sequences were aligned with the Virulign and the phylogenetic tree constructed using FastTree. Bootstrapping was performed with 1000 replicates and only those that had a minimum bootstrap value of 90 were indicated on the tree. Additional HIV-1C sequences were retrieved from the HIV-1 Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) HIV Sequence Database (https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/BASIC_BLAST/basic_blast.html). Also, three HIV1B retrieved from the HIV-1 LANL HIV Sequence Database sequences represented as stars were included as control sequences. All HIV-1C Angolan sequences from this study are indicated as white circles (if no DRM is observed) and dark circles (if any DRM is observed). Sequences from sub-Saharan African countries were represented as squares and a triangle was used to represent sequences from other countries in America, Europe, and Asia.

Discussion

Due to an increase in resistance rates against NNRTIs23, INSTI drug classes such as dolutegravir-DTG, which exhibit an elevated genetic barrier to resistance are being used in the first line of ART regimens24. In Angola, where there are no established procedures for routine HIV-1 genotyping or regular monitoring of DRMs, the adoption of DTG took place around 2021, aligning with WHO guidelines25. To our knowledge, this is the most recent study that provides an update on the prevalence of PDR against NNRTIs, NRTIs, and, PIs among untreated HIV-1 infected people in Angola, after 5 years of a previous study conducted by our research team6. Also, this is the first study that presents drug resistance data to INSTIs in Angola.

We did not detect any mutation of clinical interest against INSTI, which supports the continued use of INSTI in the country. None or low resistance levels to INSTIs were also observed in previous studies from sub-Saharan African regions, such as East African countries (0%)26, Ethiopia (0%)27, Nigeria (0%)28, Cameroon (1.4%)29, and South Africa (2.2%)30, as well as in America such as in Brazil (0%)31 and the US (1.9%)32, or 2.3% in Europe as reported in the MeditRes which is a consortium that includes ART-naïve patients newly diagnosed in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain during 2018–202133. On the other hand, we detected accessory mutations (L74M, T97A, Q95K, and S153A) that have little effect unless they present with other major mutations (Fig. 2). The overall prevalence of accessory mutations in the present study was 13.3%, which is higher than the detection rate reported in the sub-Saharan African region (8.7%)23. Among the accessory mutations detected, L74M was the most common, which is in line with previous studies carried out in sub-Saharan Africa showing that L74M and T97A are the most common INSTI accessory mutations in this region23. L74M is a polymorphic mutation selected by all INSTI drugs and occurs at varying degrees (0.5–20%) in ART-naïve populations infected with subtypes A and G34. It is worth mentioning that all the studied patients who presented accessory mutations for INSTI had non-HIV-1C subtypes (data not shown), while 50% (5/10) of the sequences with mutations for PI, NRTI and NNRTI were subtype C (Table 3). Among this non-HIV-1C, subtype A1 with 50% and subtypes F1, G, and H, simultaneously with 16.7%, were predominant, showing that although HIV-1C are largely driving the epidemic in Angola as described by previous studies6,35,36, drug resistance to the INSTI class could be driven by non-HIV-1C subtypes. Indeed, similar reports showed that L74M and T97A accessory mutations were more frequent in patients infected with non-HIV-1C subtypes, such as, subtypes A, G, and recombinant strains, which is in line with our findings37. L74M alone has minimal if any, effect on INSTI susceptibility, however, combined with major INSTI mutations, mainly G140 and Q148, it significantly contributes to reduced susceptibility to each of the INSTIs drugs34,38. Then, this detected accessory mutation in high prevalence among the Angolan ART-naïve patients reinforces the need to intensify surveillance of polymorphisms associated with ARV resistance.

The prevalence of PDR for PR/RT observed in this study (22%) was higher than that reported in several East African countries (10%)26, which reinforces the current WHO recommendation to replace NNRTIs (which had a 20% prevalence in the present study, Fig. 2) with INSTIs in ART regimens25. On the other hand, the PDR against NRTIs and PIs although low, was notable and corresponds with the findings observed in other regions of Africa39, observed in the PharmAccess African Studies to Evaluate Resistance Monitoring among ART-naive individuals which reported 2.5% for NRTIs, 3.3% for NNRTIs, 1.3% for PIs and 1.2% for dual-class resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs40, which justifies continued surveillance of DRMs against NRTIs administered alongside DTG in Angola. For the NRTI drug class, we detected the M41L mutation associated with reduced susceptibility to zidovudine-AZT, abacavir-ABC, and tenofovir-TDF35. For the NNRTI class, we detected the K103N, K101E, and Y181C mutations, known to confer high resistance to NVP or EFV, mainly the K103N mutations which pose an important threat to the clinical ART response in patients undergoing treatment with regimens containing EFV41. The I85V mutation was the only one detected in PIs, and this mutation has minimal if any, effects on PI susceptibility, indicating that PIs continue to be effective and are still a good choice for treating patients with HIV-1 in Angola42.

Our phylogenetic analysis showed that the HIV-1C lineage that circulates in Luanda, the capital city of Angola, has a genetic signature corresponding to the lineages that circulate predominantly in other sub-Saharan African countries, notably South Africa, Botswana, and Zambia where subtype C also predominates43. About 30% of the HIV-1C sequences in the present study were in clusters, which could be indicative of small-scale local transmission chains (comprising 2 and 3 sequences) (Fig. 3). Interestingly, we observed the clustering of Angolan sequences with Brazilian and European counterparts, plausibly explicable by historical and economic ties between Angola, Brazil, and Portugal. These findings highlighted that international migration across the country's borders is a significant driving force for recurrent introductions of HIV-1C strains as well as multiple HIV-1 subtypes, which continue to maintain the Angolan HIV-1 epidemic profile characterised by high genetic diversity6,35,36,44. It is worth mentioning that we detected Angolan HIV-1C sequences carrying drug mutations to NNRTIs such as efavirenz-EFV and nevirapine-NVP, commonly used in the ART regimen in Angola, which belonged to the same monophyletic cluster with a branch support of 90% (Fig. 3). This finding highlights the potential dissemination of resistant virus strains in the general population, showing the importance of conducting studies combining phylogenetic, clinical, and epidemiological data as an effective strategy to identify possible key populations or transmission clusters that driven resistant HIV strains among PLWH in Angola.

This study has important limitations. The limited number of enrolled patients may not be sufficient to represent the current picture of the molecular epidemiology of HIV in ART-naïve patients from Luanda or the whole infected population of Angola, reinforcing the need to conduct other studies with a larger population and from different regions. We also recognise that more appropriate phylogenetic analyses with Bayesian models would be essential for a better understanding of the possible origins and introduction dates of a specific lineage, but the phylogenetic tree presented in this study was fundamental to identifying the putative relationships and migratory flow between Angolan and sub-Saharan African HIV-patients45. Despite these limitations, our findings shed light on the current scenario of molecular epidemiology and drug resistance patterns in ART-naïve HIV patients in Angola. Moreover, the study showed that monitoring patients who begin treatment with DTG and applying the NGS approach is crucial to obtaining data on ART response and drug resistance patterns highlighting Angola as one of the key countries in the fight against the HIV-1 pandemic in Africa.

Conclusions

In summary, we did not detect any major INSTI mutation associated with dolutegravir-DTG resistance, suggesting that ART regimens containing DTG will be effective among the ART-naïve patients from Angola, which supports the wide use of INSTI drugs as part of the first-line ART regimens. HIV-1 subtype C remains to drive the HIV epidemic in Angola. A small-scale local transmission cluster of HIV-1C strains has been identified, warranting additional attention from public health authorities. It is crucial to direct efforts towards monitoring the response and drug resistance patterns to ART in patients undergoing DTG treatment in Angola. Further studies using NGS approaches will be crucial to track and survey the molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 as well as monitoring and addressing drug resistance in the era of INSTI-based ART regimens in Angola.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all subjects who participated in this study and all staff of the National Blood Institute (Mr Alberto Sozinho, Ms Eunice Manico, and Ms Deodete Machado) and the research team of CISA/INIS for the data collection (Mr Pedro Vienga and Mr Agostinho Tchipeta) for the data collection, the laboratory technician (Ms. Anabela Mateus), and administrative staff members (Zinga David and Sara Isalino) for their supports.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, V.P. and C.S.S.; methodology, V.P., A.B.A., J.M., and C.S.S.; software, V.P. and C.S.S.; validation, V.P. and C.S.S.; formal analysis, V.P. and C.S.S.; investigation, V.P., A.B.A., D.J., J.S., J.V., F.C., M.P., B.P., E.K.C., F.G., P.G., M.G., N.M.F., E.S., M.B., J.V., J.M., and C.S.S.; resources, C.S.S.; data curation, V.P. and C.S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.P. and C.S.S.; writing—review and editing, V.P., E.S., N.M.F., M.B. and C.S.S.; visualization, V.P. and C.S.S.; supervision, C.S.S.; project administration, J.V., J.M., and C.S.S.; funding acquisition, C.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (FCG), under the ENVOLVE Ciência PALOP program that funded the HITOLA project (Number 250466), AREF (AREF-312-CRUZ-F-C0931), Science and Technology Development Project (PDCT) within the scope of the MUTHIVAO project (Number 36 MESCTI/PDCT/2022), FCT MARVEL (PTDC/SAU-PUB/4018/2021), FCT GHTM-UID/04413/2020 and LA-REAL-LA/P/0117/2020.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Moreover, the sequences obtained in the study were deposited to GenBank (NCBI) and were assigned the accession numbers PP776478 to PP776525.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Joana Morais and Victor Pimentel.

Contributor Information

Cruz S. Sebastião, Email: cruz.sebastiao@inis.gov.ao

Victor Pimentel, Email: victor.pimentel@ihmt.unl.pt.

References

  • 1.Theys K, et al. The impact of HIV-1 within-host evolution on transmission dynamics. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2018;28:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moreno M, et al. HIV drug resistance in Africa: An emerging problem that deserves urgent attention. AIDS. 2017;31:1637–1639. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. HIV Drug Resistance Hiv Drug Resistance Report 2021 (2021).
  • 4.Hemelaar J, et al. Global and regional molecular epidemiology of HIV-1, 1990–2015: A systematic review, global survey, and trend analysis. Lancet Infcet Dis. 2018;3099:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30647-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UNAIDS. UNAIDS Data 2023. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2023/2023_unaids_data (2023).
  • 6.Sebastião CS, et al. Genetic diversity and drug resistance of HIV-1 among infected pregnant women newly diagnosed in Luanda, Angola. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0225251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO. Clinical Guidelines: Antiretroviral Therapy. WHO 129 (2016).
  • 8.Inzaule SC, et al. Curbing the rise of HIV drug resistance in low-income and middle-income countries: The role of dolutegravir-containing regimens. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e246–e252. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30710-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mbunkah HA, et al. Low-abundance drug-resistant HIV-1 variants in antiretroviral drug-naive individuals: A systematic review of detection methods, prevalence, and clinical impact. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;221:1584–1597. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ode H, et al. Population-based nanopore sequencing of the HIV-1 pangenome to identify drug resistance mutations. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:12099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63054-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Y, Zhao Y, Bollas A, Wang Y, Au KF. Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2021;39:1348–1365. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01108-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006;42:1608–1618. doi: 10.1086/503914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Soldi GFR, et al. Major drug resistance mutations to HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) among patients exposed to PI class failing antiretroviral therapy in São Paulo State, Brazil. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Quick J, et al. Multiplex PCR method for MinION and Illumina sequencing of Zika and other virus genomes directly from clinical samples. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:1261–1276. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnson AD. An extended IUPAC nomenclature code for polymorphic nucleic acids. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1386–1389. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woods CK, et al. Automating HIV drug resistance genotyping with RECall, a freely accessible sequence analysis tool. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:1936–1942. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06689-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pimentel V, et al. Applying next-generation sequencing to track HIV-1 drug resistance mutations circulating in Portugal. Viruses. 2024;16:622. doi: 10.3390/v16040622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pineda-Peña AC, et al. Automated subtyping of HIV-1 genetic sequences for clinical and surveillance purposes: Performance evaluation of the new REGA version 3 and seven other tools. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013;19:337–348. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Struck D, Lawyer G, Ternes A-M, Schmit J-C, Bercoff DP. COMET: Adaptive context-based modeling for ultrafast HIV-1 subtype identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e144–e144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tzou PL, et al. Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-resistance mutations for the surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;75:170–182. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Libin PJK, Deforche K, Abecasis AB, Theys K. VIRULIGN: Fast codon-correct alignment and annotation of viral genomes. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:1763–1765. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: Computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009;26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Inzaule SC, et al. Primary resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors in patients infected with diverse HIV-1 subtypes in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:1167–1172. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mbhele N, Chimukangara B, Gordon M. HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors: A review of current drugs, recent advances and drug resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2021;57:106343. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO. Dolutegravir (DTG). https://paedsarvdosing.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/DTG.pdf (2021).
  • 26.Ntamatungiro AJ, Kagura J, Weisser M, Francis JM. Pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults in Eastern Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022;77:3231–3241. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arimide DA, et al. Pre-treatment integrase inhibitor resistance and natural polymorphisms among HIV-1 subtype C infected patients in Ethiopia. Viruses. 2022;14:729. doi: 10.3390/v14040729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oluniyi PE, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance and genetic diversity in a cohort of people with HIV-1 in Nigeria. AIDS. 2022;36:137–146. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mikasi SG, et al. Short communication: HIV-1 drug resistance mutation analyses of cameroon-derived integrase sequences. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 2021;37:54–56. doi: 10.1089/aid.2020.0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Obasa, A. E. et al. Drug resistance mutations against protease, reverse transcriptase and integrase inhibitors in people living with HIV-1 receiving boosted protease inhibitors in South Africa. Front. Microbiol.11, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Nunes CC, et al. HIV-1 genetic diversity and transmitted drug resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors among recently diagnosed adults in Porto Alegre, South Brazil. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022;77:3510–3514. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hugueley B, McClung RP, Saduvala N, Oster AM, France AM. Baseline HIV drug-resistance testing: 12 US jurisdictions, 2014–2019. AIDS. 2022;36:1039–1043. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Salazar A, et al. Transmitted drug resistance to integrase-based first-line human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral regimens in Mediterranean Europe. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023;76:1628–1635. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hachiya, A. et al. Impact of HIV-1 integrase L74F and V75I mutations in a clinical isolate on resistance to second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.61, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Sebastião CS, Morais J, Brito M. Clinical and public health implications of HIV-1 genetic diversity and drug resistance mutations in Angola: A systematic review. AIDS Rev. 2021;23:1–9. doi: 10.24875/AIDSRev.20000057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Afonso JM, Bello G, Guimarães ML, Sojka M, Morgado MG. HIV-1 genetic diversity and transmitted drug resistance mutations among patients from the North, Central and South Regions of Angola. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Llácer Delicado T, Torrecilla E, Holguín Á. Deep analysis of HIV-1 natural variability across HIV-1 variants at residues associated with integrase inhibitor (INI) resistance in INI-naive individuals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016;71:362–366. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Smith SJ, Zhao XZ, Burke TR, Hughes SH. Efficacies of cabotegravir and bictegravir against drug-resistant HIV-1 integrase mutants. Retrovirology. 2018;15:37. doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0420-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Melku M, Gesesew HA, Ward PR. Magnitude and predictors of HIV-drug resistance in Africa: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0267159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hamers RL, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral-naive individuals in sub-Saharan Africa after rollout of antiretroviral therapy: A multicentre observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11:750–759. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bennett DE, et al. Drug resistance mutations for surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug-resistance: 2009 update. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rhee S-Y, et al. HIV-1 protease mutations and protease inhibitor cross-resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4253–4261. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00574-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Matume ND, Tebit DM, Bessong PO. HIV-1 subtype C predicted co-receptor tropism in Africa: An individual sequence level meta-analysis. AIDS Res. Ther. 2020;17:5. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-0263-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sebastião CS, Morais J, Brito M. Factors influencing HIV drug resistance among pregnant women in Luanda, Angola: Findings from a cross-sectional study. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021;6:29. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Buvé A, Bishikwabo-Nsarhaza K, Mutangadura G. The spread and effect of HIV-1 infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 2002;359:2011–2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08823-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Moreover, the sequences obtained in the study were deposited to GenBank (NCBI) and were assigned the accession numbers PP776478 to PP776525.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES