Skip to main content
Annals of Family Medicine logoLink to Annals of Family Medicine
. 2024 Mar-Apr;22(2):174–175. doi: 10.1370/afm.3112

Exploring Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care

Meghan Gilfoyle 1, K Taylor Bosworth 2, T M Ayodele Adesanya 3, Ashley Chisholm 4, Minika Ohioma 5, Bryce Ringwald 6, Chloe L Warpinski 7, Jacqueline K Kueper 8, Winston Liaw 9
PMCID: PMC11237194  PMID: 38527814

Reflections From the NAPCRG Trainee Committee Pre-Conference Workshop

The artificial intelligence (AI) revolution in health care, in particular primary care, is being emphasized worldwide.1-4 Alongside discussions about the transformational potential of AI is apprehension and skepticism due to its propensity for shortcomings (eg, privacy and liability),1 especially for exacerbating issues of equity. Balancing this duality of possibilities and shortcomings of AI in primary care is particularly important for newcomers to the primary care field, becoming a central priority for the NAPCRG Trainee Committee. The Trainee Committee was established in 2018 and includes a group of international trainees with diverse academic and clinical backgrounds who share a passion for primary care research. A key priority of the NAPCRG Trainee Committee is to foster a supportive and collaborative community of practice for budding primary care researchers around the globe. This duality was underscored by Dr Winston Liaw and Dr Jaky Kueper, 2 leaders in the field of AI for primary care research, who presented at the 2023 NAPCRG Trainee Pre-Conference Workshop. The Trainee Committee is also involved in designing and delivering programming such as the annual NAPCRG pre-conference workshop where future primary care leaders gather to network and discuss important topical issues in primary care. We outline 3 key areas of reflection from this event, summarizing insights from Drs Liaw and Kueper.

Reflection #1. Potential for AI in Primary Care

Both Dr Liaw and Dr Kueper underscored the transformative potential AI has for primary care. Noteworthy themes included the potential for AI in assisting with operational tasks such as referrals, scheduling, information gathering, synthesis, and documentation. Further, reduction of administrative burden may be instrumental for easing growing issues like physician burnout.5,6 Another key area for transformation was the capacity for AI to support physician decision making to differentiate diagnoses (eg, more accurate and earlier) and individually tailoring treatment plans. These examples were consistent with a College of Family Physicians of Canada AI working group report by Kueper et al.7 Despite such possibilities, Drs Liaw and Kueper noted the important risks and possible pitfalls of AI, if ethics and human rights are not at the forefront.4

Reflection #2. Equity Concerns

A key priority of the NAPCRG Trainee Committee is equity.8 AI, a technology created and implemented in particular social contexts, has the potential to exacerbate health inequities. Drs Liaw and Kueper highlighted issues such as algorithmic biases. Examples include issues using unrepresentative data sets that ultimately perpetuate bias and create outcomes that are inaccurate for certain populations such as ethnic minorities.9 Similar biases can yield inappropriate analytic decisions, such as those used in racialized adjustments of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), fracture risk assessment (FRAX) scores, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs).10 Additional considerations include the digital divide that disproportionately benefits those with the appropriate technology, infrastructure, and digital literacy. Furthermore, the issue of mistrust can mitigate positive impact and use, particularly in historically marginalized patients and patients who have been victimized by discriminatory practices within the health care system. Therefore, concerns regarding the protection, privacy, and security of patient information are of utmost importance in building trust, especially for groups that have experienced health inequities.9,11 These discussions naturally segued into our workshop delivered by Dr Jon Salsberg and the Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Research Unit from University of Limerick who discussed PPI in health research. Participatory approaches, which actively engage patients and the public in AI research, could serve as a crucial mitigation strategy to help address issues of health inequity such as those mentioned above, a sentiment also echoed in the literature.9

Reflection #3. AI in Primary Care Research

Not only can AI be a powerful tool in health care delivery, but it also has potential impacts in primary care research. Opportunities include the benefits for research processes and efficiency, such as streamlining the aggregation and analysis of data.12 Another important reflection, prompted by a question posed to Dr Kueper, included who should perform AI research. In response, Dr Kueper highlighted the need for interprofessional collaboration, emphasizing that AI research is not just for computer scientists and those technologically inclined, but requires interdisciplinary perspectives and PPI to drive impactful change. As interest in AI continues to expand, it is important to recognize the new possibilities and known limitations of these tools. Without significant innovation, AI will continue to struggle to support qualitative inquiry and the humanistic, social, and relational aspects of primary care. A holistic primary care research agenda will support qualitative and quantitative inquiry, leveraging the strengths of AI when effective and appropriate.

Closing/Next Steps

To summarize, the NAPCRG Trainee Committee Pre-conference Workshop presentations and discussions informed and enlightened the perspectives of AI in primary care practice and research, especially for trainees for whom this rapidly advancing technology is likely to have the greatest impact. Indeed, the NAPCRG Trainee Committee shall continue to prioritize AI and its implications for primary care trainees, striving for additional training and guidance from NAPCRG leaders and mentors in this space (like Drs Liaw and Kueper). We are particularly motivated to learn more about how we can leverage AI in research for the better.

References

  • 1.Liaw W, Kueper JK, Lin S, Bazemore A, Kakadiaris I.. Competencies for the use of artificial intelligence in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2022; 20(6): 559-563. 10.1370/afm.2887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yang Z, Silcox C, Sendak M, et al., eds. Advancing primary care with artificial intelligence and machine learning. Healthc (Amst). 2022; 10(1): 100594. 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin SY, Mahoney MR, Sinsky CA.. Ten ways artificial intelligence will transform primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(8): 1626-1630. 10.1007/s11606-019-05035-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization . WHO issues first global report on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health and six guiding principles for its design and use [press release]. World Health Organization; June 28, 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-06-2021-who-issues-first-global-report-on-ai-in-health-and-six-guiding-principles-for-its-design-and-use [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gandhi TK, Classen D, Sinsky CA, et al. How can artificial intelligence decrease cognitive and work burden for front line practitioners? JAMIA Open. 2023; 6(3): ooad079. 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ko SS, Guck A, Williamson M, Buck K, Young R; Residency research network of Texas investigators . Family medicine faculty time allocation and burnout: a residency research network of Texas study. J Grad Med Educ. 2020; 12(5): 620-623. 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00930.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kueper JK, Emu M, Banbury M, et al. Artificial intelligence for family nedicine research in Canada: current state and future directions. Can Fam Phys. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chisholm A, Wang J, Bonnell LN, et al. From NAPCRG: primary care research through the lens of NAPCRG’s trainee committee: a year of reflection. Ann Fam Med. 2022; 20(1): 98-99. 10.1370/afm.2778 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.d’Elia A, Gabbay M, Rodgers S, Kierans C, Jones E, Durrani I, et al. Artificial intelligence and health inequities in primary care: a systematic scoping review and framework. Fam Med Community Health. 2022; 10(Suppl 1). 10.1136/fmch-2022-001670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsai JW, Cerdeña JP, Goedel WC, et al. Evaluating the impact and rationale of race-specific estimations of kidney function: estimations from US NHANES, 2015-2018. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 42: 101197. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marcus JL, Sewell WC, Balzer LB, Krakower DS.. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for HIV prevention: emerging approaches to ending the epidemic. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020; 17(3): 171-179. 10.1007/s11904-020-00490-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khan ZF, Alotaibi SR.. Applications of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in m-health: a healthcare system perspective. J Healthc Eng. 2020; 2020: 8894694. 10.1155/2020/8894694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Family Medicine are provided here courtesy of Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

RESOURCES