ABSTRACT
Ascospores, forcibly released into the air from perithecia, are the primary inoculum for Fusarium head blight. In Fusarium graminearum, the biological functions of four RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) (Fgrdrp1–4) have been reported, but their regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood and the function of Fgrdrp5 is still unknown. In this study, we found that in addition to Fgrdrp1 and Fgrdrp2, Fgrdrp5 also plays an important role in ascospore discharge, and they all participate in the generation of turgor pressure in a polyol-dependent manner. Moreover, these three genes all affect the maturation of ascospores. Deep sequencing and co-analysis of small RNA and mRNA certified that Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 partly share their functions in the biogenesis and accumulation of exonic small interference RNA (ex-siRNA), and these three RdRPs negatively regulate the expression levels of ex-siRNA corresponding genes, including certain genes associated with ascospore development or discharge. Furthermore, the differentially expressed genes of deletion mutants, those involved in lipid and sugar metabolism or transport as well as sexual development-related transcription factors, may also contribute to the defects in ascospore maturation or ascospore discharge. In conclusion, our study suggested that the components of the dicer-dependent ex-siRNA-mediated RNA interference pathway include at least Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5.
IMPORTANCE
We found that in addition to Fgrdrp1 and Fgrdrp2, Fgrdrp5 also plays important roles in ascospore maturation and ascospore discharge of Fusarium graminearum. These three RNA-dependent RNA polymerases participate in the biogenesis and accumulation of exonic small interference RNA and then regulate ascospore discharge.
KEYWORDS: sexual development, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, exonic small RNAs, Fusarium graminearum
INTRODUCTION
Fusarium graminearum, a filamentous ascomycete, mainly causes Fusarium head blight (FHB) and Gibberella ear rot in small-grain cereals (1, 2). Reproduction of this pathogen mainly relies on sexual spores (ascospores) and asexual spores (conidia). Ascospores serve as the primary inoculum for FHB outbreaks as they are forcibly emitted into the air from the perithecia (fruiting bodies) and spread over long distances (3). Moreover, the production of perithecia during sexual reproduction is essential for the overwintering of F. graminearum (4). Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms of sexual development and ascospore discharge is important for the prevention and control of head blight.
As a homothallic ascomycete, sexual reproduction in F. graminearum can be triggered without mating, and each ascus must undergo mitosis and cytokinesis to assemble eight mature ascospores with four cells and four nuclei (5). After the ascospore matures, osmolytes accumulate in the asci, generating turgor pressure for ascospore discharge (6). Several studies reveal that various genetic and metabolic processes are involved in sexual development and ascospore discharge, such as mating-type (MAT) loci, transcription factors, kinases, certain ion-related transport proteins (such as potassium and calcium ion channels), and lipid metabolism (7–11). In addition, epigenetic mechanisms such as repeat sequence-induced point mutations, meiotic silence of unpaired DNA (MSUD), A-to-I RNA editing, and the perithecia-specific RNA interference (RNAi) have been identified during sexual reproduction of F. graminearum (12–16). Interestingly, the perithecia-specific RNAi components Fgdcl1 and Fgago2 are involved in the perithecium development and ascospore discharge, but not in asexual development and reproduction (15, 16). Therefore, we are curious about the role of Fgrdrp, another important component of RNAi, in the sexual stage-specific RNAi pathway of F. graminearum.
RNAi is a conserved eukaryotic gene silencing mechanism mediated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels by small non-coding RNAs of approximately 20 to 30 nucleotides (17, 18). In addition to Dicer and Argonaute, RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) also act as a main player in the RNAi pathway (19, 20). RdRPs contain an RNA-directed RNA polymerase domain and initiate RNAi by producing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). In Neurospora crassa, SAD-1 (an RdRP gene) converts aberrant RNA into dsRNA and interacts with Dicer, Argonaute, and other genes to form a silencing complex in the MSUD pathway; QDE-1, another RdRP, generates dsRNA in the quelling pathway using either single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) or single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as templates (21, 22). In Mucor circinelloides, RdRP1 utilizes aberrant transcripts from invasive agents (including plasmas, transposons, and viruses) to generate dsRNA, which is then cleaved by Dcl2 to generate siRNA and transferred to Ago1 (23). Two different small RNAs (sRNAs) have been proposed to participate in RNAi: “primary sRNAs” (derived from the cleavage of the original trigger mediated by Dicer) and “secondary sRNAs” (24). RdRPs are also important for the amplification of RNAi response by increasing the amount of secondary siRNA. For example, RdRP2 of M. circinelloides RdRP2 is essential for transgene-induced silencing machinery and the epigenetic RNAi pathway owing to its important role in the generation of secondary sRNAs but minor role in the RdRP-dependent and dicer-independent degradation mechanism (23). In addition, certain RdRPs do not participate or play a minor role in the RNAi pathway, such as N. crassa RRP-3 and M. circinelloides RdRP3 (25).
In the RNAi pathway, the inducers of sRNA include invasive nucleic acids (such as integrative transgenes, viruses, and transposons) and endogenous transcription (including regular transcription and heterochromatin transcription) (26). In F. graminearum, neither Fgrdrp1 nor Fgrdrp4 alone plays a key role in the antiviral defense response (27). Non-functional or transiently functional RdRPs of F. asiaticum may not be able to maintain exogenous secondary siRNA amplification in the spray-induced gene silencing pathway (28). Nevertheless, the silencing of F. graminearum genes by exogenous dsRNA is dependent on DCLs, AGOs, and QIP (29). In F. graminearum, Fgdcl1 and Fgago2 are involved in ascus development and ascospore discharge by affecting the generation of ex-siRNA and milRNA that regulate ascospore development (15, 16). However, there is little information on the detailed role of Fgrdrps in the biogenesis of perithecium-specific esRNAs. Hence, we generated single-deletion mutants of five Fgrdrps (Fgrdrp1 to Fgrdrp5), complementary strains, and double deletion mutant and explored the regulatory mechanisms of Fgrdrps by comparing the differences in transcriptome and sRNA production between the deletion mutants and the wild-type strain during sexual development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and stored conditions
The F. graminearum wild-type strain PH-1 (NRRL 31084) (5) and its gene deletion mutants generated in this study were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 25°C and stored in 20% glycerol solution at −80°C.
Phylogenetic tree
The nucleic acid and protein sequences of fungal RdRPs were downloaded from NCBI. The conserved domains of protein sequences were analyzed online using Pfam (30) and SMART (31). The alignments of nucleic acid and protein sequences were performed with ClustalW, and phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 using the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The interaction network of F. graminearum protein was predicted by STRING 11.5 (https://cn.string-db.org/). The minimum required interaction score was 0.7, and the interaction sources included text, experiments, databases, co-expression, and co-occurrence.
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis
In the asexual stage, RNA samples were isolated at 3 h (mycelial stage) and 24 h (sporulation stage) after incubation in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) medium. Seven-day-old carrot agar plate hyphae (0 dpi, days post-perithecium induction) and 7-day-old perithecia (7 dpi) were collected as sexual stage samples. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, total RNA was isolated with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the first-strand cDNA was synthesized by the EasyScript One-step gDNA removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen-Biotech, Beijing, China). Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, California, USA) with the iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The beta-tubulin gene was used as the internal control (32). The relative expression of each gene was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method, and the mean and standard deviation were calculated from three biological replicates (33). The relevant primer for RT-qPCR was listed in Table S1.
Quantification of ex-siRNAs was performed as previously reported (15). Small RNAs were enriched from total RNAs using the miRNA isolation kit (OMEGA, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 100 ng enriched small RNA samples was used for reverse transcription reactions using the miRNA First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The ex-siRNAs were detected using 25–30 cycles of PCR and separated by 3% agarose gel. The relevant primer for sRNA RT-PCR was listed in Table S1.
Generation of the deletion mutants and complementation strains
The strategy for gene deletions is based on the split marker system (34). In the single-knockout mutant, the target gene was replaced with the geneticin resistance cassette (gen) or hygromycin resistance cassette (hyg). To generate the double-knockout mutant, two target genes were replaced with hygromycin and geneticin resistance cassette. The hygromycin and geneticin cassettes were amplified from vector pUCH18 and pUCN18 (35, 36). PCR products for targeting deletions were constructed by a slightly modified double-joined PCR. Protoplast preparation and polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation were performed according to the previously published protocol (37). Transformants were transferred to a PDA plate amended with 250 µg/mL hygromycin B (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or 300 µg/mL geneticin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for transformant selection. Transformants were purified by single conidium isolation and stored in 20% glycerol at −80°C. The deletion mutants were identified by PCR and further confirmed by Southern blot. Genomic DNAs of PH-1 and mutants were extracted from mycelium according to the Fusarium laboratory manual and then digested with HindIII (Takara, Shiga, Japan) (38). Southern blotting was performed according to the Amersham AlkPhos Direct Labeling and Direction System (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The probe primers are listed in the Table S1.
The in situ complementation assays of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 were performed using the split marker system, as previously described (39). To construct the complementary vector, the entire gene Fgrdrp1 and Fgrdrp5 including its promoter region were amplified and cloned into vector pUCH18 using the One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme-Biotech, Nanjing, China), respectively. And Fgrdrp2 was cloned into vector pCETNS4 containing geneticin resistance cassette. The complementary fragments were amplified from complementary vectors and gene upstream or downstream fragments by double-joint PCR (40). The fusion constructs were transformed into deletion mutants as described above. The related primers for constructing deletion mutants and complementation strains were listed in Table S1, and the strategy for deletion and complementation was illustrated in Fig. S1.
Growth rate and conidiation assay
The mycelium growth rate was tested on PDA, minimal medium, and complete medium plates at 25°C (41). Colony morphology was photographed at 4 days. Conidial production was measured in liquid CMC medium (1 g NH4NO3, 1 g KH2PO3, 0.5 g MgSO4.7H2O, 1 g yeast extract, 15 g carboxymethyl cellulose, and 1 L of water), and one mycelial plug was cultured in 20 mL CMC medium at 25°C for 5 days in a shaker (200 rpm). The conidia production was counted by a hemocytometer (42). The lengths of 100 conidia for each strain were randomly measured with Nikon Ni-U microscopes.
Plant infection assays
Infection assays on wheat coleoptiles were conducted as previously described (32). Conidia were harvested from 5-day-old CMC cultures and resuspended to 5.0 × 105 conidia/mL in 0.01% Tween 20 solution. Ten wheat coleoptiles of Zhengmai 9023 were inoculated with 2 µL conidial suspension of each strain. Two microliters of 0.01% Tween 20 solution was used as control. The brown lesion length of each strain was measured and photographed at 7 dpi (days post-inoculation).
Sexual development and ascospore discharge assays
For sexual reproduction, aerial hyphae of 7-day-old carrot agar cultures were pressed down with sterile 2.5% Tween 60 and then incubated under near-UV light (wavelength, 365 nm; Beauty Bright Lighting Electrical Appliance Co. LTD., Zhongshan, China) at 23°C for 7-10 days (38). Perithecia and cirrhi were photographed using a Nikon SMZ25 stereo microscope. To assay the development of ascus, 7-day-old perithecia were gently crushed and observed under Nikon Ni-U microscopes. Asci were collected for the analysis of various polyols spectrophotometrically according to reference 43. The concentration of glycerol, mannitol, and glucose in asci was measure with the corresponding substance detection kit (mlbio, Shanghai, China).
Ascospore discharges were performed as previously described (44). After incubation for 14 h, the accumulations of ascospores were captured on camera (36). The discharged ascospores were counted as previously described (9). When discharged ascospores were observed on the lids of petri dish, the lid was washed using 1 mL of ddH2O to collect the ascospores, and then, the ascospore morphology was observed by a light microscope and counted with a hemocytometer. Addition of exogenous ions to carrot agar cultures for assessing the effect of ions on the level of ascospore discharge, according to reported methods (9, 43) .
Staining observation
The glycogen staining of asci was performed as previously reported (45). Calcofluor white (CFW) and DAPI staining was performed as previously described (46). To assay the septation of ascospore during ascus development, 7-day-old perithecia were crushed and stained with CFW (20 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). To assay the nuclear division of ascospore, discharged ascospores were harvested and stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 20 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Samples were examined for CFW and DAPI staining signals with a Nikon Ni-U epifluorescence microscope.
sRNA-seq and RNA-seq analysis
Perithecia of PH-1, ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 were collected from carrot agar cultures at 7 dpi and 10 dpi, and the total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA samples were isolated from two biological replicates for each strain. Small RNAs were extracted from total RNA at 7 dpi using a 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. RNA quality was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). sRNA and mRNA libraries were constructed as previously described (16). Strand-specific RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Personal Bioinformatics Institute, Shanghai, China). Raw data of RNA-seq and small RNA sequencing (sRNA-seq) of Fgrdrp mutants have been deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (BioProject: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203; SRA metadata: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203).
With certain modifications, the small RNA analysis was performed as previously reported (15). Clean reads were obtained by removing low-quality reads and adapter sequences using the Fastq toolkit (47). Small sequence reads were completely aligned to the F. graminearum PH-1 genome from the Ensembl Fungi database by Bowtie (12, 48). The perfectly matched reads were classified by Bowtie according to F. graminearum genomic features such as rRNA, tRNA, exon, intron, untranslated region (UTR), and intergenic region extracted from the .GTF or .GFF file (downloaded from Ensembl Fungi database) using shell script and BEDTools (49). As the information about the UTR region of F. graminearum was less confirmed, we took the liberty of expanding the 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR to 500 bp upstream and downstream of gene (started from the start/stop codon), respectively. The reads of ex-siRNAs were normalized according to TPM normalization commonly used for miRNA, where the n_base is 1,000,000 (50, 51). We defined an ex-siRNA as “expressed” in the wild-type strain only when the values of both biological replicates were greater than or equal to 10 TPM and then performed differential expression analysis.
The strand-specific RNA-seq clean reads were mapped to the genome of F. graminearum PH-1 by HISAT2, and the mapped counts of each gene were calculated using Stringtie (52, 53). Differential expression analysis of genes was performed with the DEseq2 package (54). Genes with P-adj (BH adjusted P values) of below 0.05 and |log2FC (fold change)| above 2 were regarded as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The pathways of DEGs in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database were enriched by ClusterProfiler (55, 56), and the P value was calculated and subjected to Benjamini-Hochberg correction, with P values ≤ 0.05 as a threshold. Heatmap and clustering were performed by ComplexHeatmap (57). Correlation of expression levels between genes and ex-siRNAs was calculated by Hmisc and plotted with Corrplot.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). Differences between control and multiple treatment groups were detected by Fisher’s LSD. *, **, and *** indicated statistically significant difference at P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.001, respectively.
RESULTS
Expression pattern and deletion of five Fgrdrps
F. graminearum contains five RdRPs (FGSG_06504, FGSG_08716, FGSG_01582, FGSG_04619, and FGSG_09076), and the biological functions of four RdRPs (Fgrdrp1-4) have been reported in a previous study (29, 58). Phylogenetic tree revealed that Fgrdrp2 and Fgrdrp3 were closely related to N. crassa SAD-1 and RRP-3, respectively, while Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp4, and QDE-1 were clustered in the same clade (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, Fgrdrp5 was in a separate branch (Fig. 1A). In addition to a conserved RdRP domain, Fgrdrp5 contains two other unique domains: a DEXDc domain, which is defined as DEAD-like helicases superfamily, extending from positions 1,277 to 1,478 aa (e-value: 6.24e−48), and an AAA domain, which extends from positions 1,475 to 1,677 aa (e-value: 2.10e−63) (Fig. 1A). Compared with the mycelial stage, the expression levels of the five Fgrdrps in the sporulation stage were increased, especially Fgrdrp2, Fgrdrp3, and Fgrdrp5, which were increased by 45.8-, 73.2-, and 10.0-fold, respectively (Fig. 1B). During sexual reproduction, Fgrdrp2, Fgrdrp3, and Fgrdrp5 were increased and expressed about 189.7-, 36.1-, and 10.5-fold at 7 dpi, while Fgrdrp1 (~0.7) and Fgrdrp4 (~0.5) were decreased (Fig. 1C). Based on these results, we speculated that Fgrdrp5 may also play an important role in asexual sporulation and sexual reproduction. Therefore, we generated single-deletion mutants in wild-type strain PH-1 and the transformants were screened by PCR and confirmed using southern blots (Fig. S1).
Fig 1.
Phylogenetic tree and expression pattern of F. graminearum FgRdRPs. (A) Phylogenetic relationship and the conserved domains of F. graminearum five RdRP proteins and other fungal RdRPs. The alignment was performed with ClustalW, and the MEGA 7.0 was used to perform a 1,000-bootstrap phylogenetic analysis using the neighbor-joining method. N. c., Neurospora crassa; A. n., Aspergillus nidulans; M. u., Mucor circinelloides; SAD-1, suppressor of ascus dominance 1. Domain organization of RdRPs was shown by boxes. RdRP (PFAM accession number: PF05183), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domain; RRM (SMART accession number: SM00360), RNA recognition motif; DEXDc (SM00487), DEAD-like helicases superfamily; AAA (PF13087), AAA domain; and QDE-1, quelling defective 1. (B) Expression levels of Fgrdrp genes in the asexual stage. Cultures were collected from YEPD and CMC medium after 24 h inoculation as mycelium (arbitrarily set to 1) and sporulation samples, respectively. (C) Expression levels of Fgrdrp genes in the sexual stage. Seven days post-perithecium induction, perithecia were collected . The mycelium collected from the carrot plate for 7-day inoculation was considered as the 0-dpi sample (arbitrarily set to 1). The relative mRNA expression of the Fgrdrp genes was determined by RT-qPCR. Bars indicate standard deviation from three repeated experiments.
Fgrdrp2 plays a minor role in conidial morphology
As shown in Fig. 2A and Table S2, there were no apparent differences in colony morphology and growth rate between Fgrdrp deletion mutants and the wild-type strain. In 5-day-old CMC cultures, the amounts of conidia produced by these deletion mutants and the wild-type strain were similar (Table S2), whereas the conidial length of ΔFgrdrp2 (38.2 ± 5.9) was slightly shorter than that of the wild-type strain (41.5 ± 5.6) (Fig. 2B). When wild-type Fgrdrp2 allele was re-introduced into ΔFgrdrp2, the conidial length of the complementary transformant RDRP2/ΔFgrdrp2 was restored to that of the wild- type strain (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, Fgrdrps deletion mutants caused typical disease symptoms on wheat coleoptiles and displayed similar lesion lengths to the wild-type strain (Fig. 2C and E). These findings suggested that Fgrdrp2 slightly affects conidial morphology and five Fgrdrp genes are not essential for vegetative growth and infection.
Fig 2.
Comparison of colony morphology, conidial morphology, and pathogenicity between the wild-type PH-1 and Fgrdrp mutants. (A) Four-day-old PDA cultures of the wild-type PH-1 and Fgrdrp mutants. (B) Conidia morphology of the wild-type PH-1 and Fgrdrp mutants. Conidia suspension of each strain was observed after incubation in CMC liquid culture at 25°C for 5 days; bar = 10 µm. (C) Wheat coleoptiles infected with PH-1 strain and Fgrdrp mutants were observed and photographed. (D) Statistics of conidial length. One hundred conidia were measured for each strain. Lines of box-and-whiskers depict 25 to 75 percentile (box), mean, 10 to 90 percentile (whiskers). Points represent the conidial length values outside the 10 to 90 percentile. * indicated significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 compared with wild-type PH-1. (E) Statistics of the brown lesion length of PH-1 strain and Fgrdrp mutants on wheat coleoptiles. Mean and standard deviation were calculated from five biological replicates.
Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 are important for ascospore discharge
To clarify the function of these five Fgrdrp genes in the sexual reproduction of F. graminearum, the perithecia of these Fgrdrp-deletion mutants were induced and examined. On selfing mating plates, normal-sized perithecia were formed by these mutants and the wild-type strain PH-1 (Fig. 3A). At 10 dpi, approximately 50% of perithecia produced cirrhi in the wild-type strain, while the cirrhi rates of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 were 43%, 21%, and 34%, respectively (Fig. 3B and E). Furthermore, compared with the wild-type strain PH-1 (100%), the capacity of ascospore discharge was notably reduced in ΔFgrdrp2 (17.1%) and ΔFgrdrp5 (47.6%) and slightly reduced in ΔFgrdrp1 (80.1%) (Fig. 3C and F). The levels of cirrhi and ascospore discharge of the complement strains were similar to those of the wild-type strain (Fig. 3D through F). Although Fgrdrp3 displayed high-level expression in sexual reproduction, there were no significant differences between ΔFgrdrp3 and the wild-type strain in cirrhi and ascospore discharge (Fig. 3A through C; Table S2), and the double-deletion mutant ΔFgrdrp2/3 produced a similar amount of discharged ascospores as ΔFgrdrp2 (Table S2). These results indicated that Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 have a crucial role in ascospore discharge.
Fig 3.
Defects of the Fgrdrp deletion mutants in sexual reproduction. (A) Perithecia of wild-type PH-1 and Fgrdrp mutants were captured at 7 dpi. Bar = 500 µm. (B) Perithecia of each strain were examined for cirrhi. The yellow cirrhi was the overflowed ascospores from the ostiole of perithecia at 10 dpi. Bar = 250 µm. (C) Ascospore discharge was assayed with perithecia of wild-type PH-1 and Fgrdrp mutants collected at 7 dpi. (D) Detection of cirrhi and ascospore discharge in wild-type PH-1 and complementary strains. (E) Statistics of the cirrhi. The proportion of perithecia with yellow cirrhi was calculated from five representative views under a stereomicroscope. Cirrhi rate (%) = the number of cirrhi/the total number of perithecium × 100%. Lines of box-and-whiskers depict 10 to 90 percentile (box), mean, min to max (whiskers). (F) Comparison of discharged ascospores of wild-type PH-1, Fgrdrp mutants, and complementary strains. The amount of ascospores discharged of the wild-type PH-1 was used as the 100% discharged level, and the relative discharge levels of the other strains were calculated based on the counts of discharged ascospores. *** indicated significant difference at P ≤ 0.001 compared with wild-type PH-1.
ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 possess low turgor pressure
In F. graminearum, the accumulation of ions in the asci leads to an influx of water, which causes turgor pressure and eventually releases ascospores (6, 59). In order to confirm whether low ion concentrations lead to defective ascospore discharge in ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5, perithecia of these mutants were treated with exogenous ions (K+, Na+, and Ca2+) and their ascospore discharge was assessed. In comparison with the water treatment, the ascospore discharge of ΔFgrdrp1 was increased under K+, Na+, and Ca2+ treatments. Nevertheless, under these ion treatments, the discharge capacity of ΔFgrdrp1 ascospores was still lower than that of the wild-type strain (Fig. 4A and B). On the other hand, the ascospore discharge defects of ΔFgrdrp2 and ΔFgrdrp5 were not greatly restored by treatment with exogenous ions (Fig. 4A). These results confirm that low ion concentrations are not responsible for the defective ascospore discharge of ΔFgrdrp2 and ΔFgrdrp5, whereas ascospore discharge of ΔFgrdrp1 is partially dependent on these ions. Since polyols in asci also contribute to the generation of turgor pressure (43, 59), we detected the concentrations of various polyols (glycerol, mannitol, and glucose) in the asci of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5. Compared with the wild-type PH-1, the concentrations of polyols were markedly lower in these mutants than the wild-type PH-1 (Fig. 4C). Additionally, staining assay also confirmed reduced glycogen accumulation in asci of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 (Fig. 4D). Thus, we concluded that Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 contribute to the generation of turgor pressure in a polyol-dependent manner.
Fig 4.
Osmolates in asci were reduced in Fgrdrp deletion mutants. (A) Comparison of discharged ascospores of the wild-type strain PH-1 and Fgrdrp deletion mutants under various ion treatment. The amount of ascospores discharged from the wild-type PH-1 was used as 100% discharged under various ion treatments. (B) Ascospore discharge of perithecia harvested from ΔFgrdrp1 cultured on carrot agar plates with exogenous ions. (C) The concentration of polyols in asci was measured spectrophotometrically. Error bars represent the SD, * indicates significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, and ** indicates significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (D) Glycogen staining (yellowish-brown) in asci of 7-day-old perithecia. Bar = 20 µm.
Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 participate in the maturation of ascospores
Since osmolytes associated with turgor pressure usually accumulate after the maturation of ascospores (6, 59), we dissected 7-day-old perithecia to observe and evaluate the development of asci and ascospores. The asci of wild-type strain PH-1, ΔFgrdrp3, and ΔFgrdrp4 was dominated by mature asci (Type I) containing eight visible spindle-shaped ascospores (Fig. 5A and B). Fewer spindle-shaped ascospores were observed in the asci of ΔFgrdrp1 at 7 dpi, whereas the proportion of mature asci was increased at 8 dpi (Fig. 5A and B). In ΔFgrdrp2, approximately 21% of the perithecia contained scattered ascospores (Type III) and 57% contained loosely arranged and immature ascospores (Fig. 5A and B). Abnormal ascospores with a rough surface resembling vacuolization were observed in approximately 53% perithecia of ΔFgrdrp5 (Fig. 5A and B). When stained with CFW, one septum per ascospore (two celled) was observed in abnormal asci, while three septa per ascospore (four celled) were observed in normal asci (Fig. 6A). In addition, in both abnormal and normal ascospore, each cell had one nucleus (Fig. 6B). Further counting of discharged ascospores revealed that the majority (86.1%) of ΔFgrdrp5 ascospores were four celled four nucleated, similar to those of wild-type PH-1 (88.6%) (Fig. 6C), implying that the discharged ascospores are mainly derived from mature ascospores and these two-celled ascospores may be immature ascospores, which delay the accumulation of osmolytes in ΔFgrdrp5 asci, causing a decrease in discharge. Taken together, these results indicate that Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 participate in the maturation of ascospores.
Fig 5.
Comparison of the asci and ascospore formation among the PH-1 strain (the wild-type) and Fgrdrp mutants. (A) The asci rosettes and ascospore were observed at 7 dpi. The red arrows indicate the asci containing immature ascospores in ΔFgrdrp2. Asci containing abnormal ascospores in ΔFgrdrp5 are indicated by blue arrows. Bar = 25 µm. (B) Percentage of three types of asci rosettes. Types I, II, and III indicate mature, immature, and scattered asci rosettes, respectively. One hundred perithecia were assessed for each strain with three biological replicates.
Fig 6.
Ascospores of ΔFgrdrp5 mutant were stained with CFW (A) or DAPI (B) and examined under light microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy. (A) CFW staining of asci and scattered ascospores. The asci was dissected from 7-day-old perithecia. Blue arrows indicate the asci containing abnormal ascospores. Bar = 20 µm. (B) DAPI staining of ejected ascospores. Bar = 5 µm. (C) Percentage of the ejected ascospores. The ejected ascospores were stained by DAPI and categorized under epifluorescence microscope.
Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 play roles in the accumulation and biogenesis of dicer-dependent ex-siRNAs
To examine whether Fgrdrps process the perithecium-specific sRNAs, we isolated sRNA sample from 7-day-old perithecia of single-deletion mutants (ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5) and the wild-type strain and performed sRNA-seq analysis. Total reads were mapped to the F. graminearum genome, and then, structural non-coding RNAs (rRNA and tRNA) were removed (Table S3). In comparison with the wild-type strain (27.3%), the proportions of sRNAs mapped to the antisense strand of exon were obviously decreased in ΔFgrdrp1 (13.79%), ΔFgrdrp2 (13.28%), and ΔFgrdrp5 (18.91%) (Fig. 7A; Table S4). As noted in a previous report, these sRNAs were reported as exonic siRNAs (ex-siRNAs) and were enriched in 24-nt reads with 5′-U (15). After the normalization of total reads, a decreasing trend in 5′-U reads of 21–25 nt was observed in these Fgrdrp deletion mutants, with the most pronounced decrease in ΔFgrdrp2 (decreased by about 80%), followed by ΔFgrdrp1 (~70%) and ΔFgrdrp5 (~32%) (Fig. 7B). To further characterize the expression level of each ex-siRNA (the ex-siRNAs reads with TPM > 10 in the wild-type strain) in Fgrdrp-deletion mutants, we categorized the ex-siRNAs and plotted scatterplots. The ex-siRNAs with TPM values less than 1 in the mutant and greater than 10 in the wild-type strain were treated as absent ex-siRNAs. Although more ex-siRNAs were absent in ΔFgrdrp1, the majority of these absent ex-siRNAs were lowly expressed (TPM < 100) in the wild-type strain, and only a few of absent ex-siRNAs shared with other Fgrdrp mutants (Fig. 7C; Fig. S2A and B). The ex-siRNAs with a fold change more than two were treated as up- or downregulated ex-siRNAs. As shown in Fig. 7C, equally expressed and upregulated ex-siRNAs were present in ΔFgrdrp1 (102/511) and ΔFgrdrp5 (75/511), whereas almost all ex-siRNAs were markedly downregulated or absent in ΔFgrdrp2 (509/511), implying that the deletion of Fgrdrp2 interferes with the accumulation of most ex-siRNAs. Since a portion of ex-siRNAs was still expressed in these single-deletion mutants, especially the highly expressed ex-siRNAs (TPM ≥ 100), we generated the double-deletion mutants (ΔFgrdrp1/2, ΔFgrdrp5/2, and ΔFgrdrp1/5) to investigate whether the biogenesis of these ex-siRNAs depends on two Fgrdrps. The abundance of ex-siRNAs in single-deletion mutant determined by stem-loop RT-PCR was similar to the results of sRNA-seq (Fig. 7D). The accumulations of ex-siRNAs (ex-sR001, ex-sR005, and ex-sR007), which were present in all three single-deletion mutants, were reduced but not absent in Fgrdrp double-deletion mutants (Fig. 7D), meaning that the biogenesis of these ex-siRNAs require more than two Fgrdrps.
Fig 7.
Characterization of small RNAs in the wild-type strain PH-1 and Fgrdrp deletion mutants. (A) The percentages of sRNA reads mapped to various genomic regions of F. graminearum. Exons include the protein coding region (CDS) and the UTR portion. (B) Length distribution and nucleotide preference of the 5′ end of ex-siRNAs in the wild-type strain PH-1 and Fgrdrp-deletion mutants. The total reads of ex-siRNAs were normalized by TPM (transcripts per million). (C) Expression levels of ex-siRNAs (TPM > 10) in wild-type strain PH-1 (abscissa) and Fgrdrp deletion mutants (ordinate) at 7 dpi. The ex-siRNAs with a fold change less than 2 were treated as equally expressed sRNAs. The colored numbers indicate the amount of different types of ex-siRNAs. (D) Detection of ex-siRNAs in Fgrdrp single- and double-deletion mutants. 100 ng enriched sRNA sample was used in the reverse transcription reaction for each strain; numbers in parentheses indicate the TPM value of ex-siRNA; the ex-siRNAs were quantified using stem-loop RT-PCR and detection by 3% agarose gel. (E) Expressed clusters of ex-siRNAs in Fgdcl- and Fgrdrp-deletion mutants. ex-siRNAs were clustered based on the k-means clustering algorithm. The TPM values of the absent ex-siRNA were replaced with 1*10−4.
Similar to the biogenesis pathway of most esRNAs, the biogenesis of ex-siRNAs in F. graminearum depends on dicer gene (15). To investigate whether Fgrdrps affect these dicer-dependent ex-siRNAs, we downloaded previously published sRNA-seq data of Fgdcl mutants from Sequence Read Archive (BioProject: PRJNA431527) and re-analyzed (16). The clustering results showed that ex-siRNAs absent in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2 were also absent in ΔFgdcl2 and ΔFgdcl1 (cluster 2 and cluster 4), respectively, but the majority of ex-siRNAs absent in ΔFgrdrp1 were only lost in ΔFgdcl1/2 (cluster 1) (Fig. 7E). In addition, the ex-siRNAs expressed in all three Fgrdrp single-deletion mutants were also absent only in ΔFgdcl1/2 (cluster 3) (Fig. 7E). Overall, almost all ex-siRNAs were extremely reduced or absent in ΔFgdcl1/2 (Fig. 7E). Correlation analysis of sRNA expression changes further confirmed the positive relationships between Fgrdrp2 and Fgdcl1 and Fgrdrp1 and Fgdcl2 (Fig. S2C). The results of stem-loop RT-PCR also demonstrated that Fgdicers are required for the biogenesis of selected ex-siRNAs, as the selected ex-siRNAs were absent in ΔFgdcl1/2 (Fig. 7D). In conclusion, Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 are involved in the biogenesis and accumulation of dicer-dependent ex-siRNAs.
Fgrdrps negatively regulate the ex-siRNAs corresponding genes
In previous studies, the ex-siRNAs negatively regulate the transcription levels of the corresponding genes and some of them are involved in sexual development (15). To investigate the transcript levels of genes corresponding to downregulated and absent ex-siRNAs in Fgrdrps deletion mutants, we performed RNA-seq with RNA samples isolated from 7-day-old perithecia (Table S5). In these deletion mutants, especially in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2, the genes corresponding to the absent and downregulated ex-siRNAs were predominantly upregulated, in spite of the fact that most of them showed a smaller fold change (log2 fold change less than 2) (Fig. 8A). The correlation coefficient further confirmed that ex-siRNAs negatively regulated the expression level of corresponding genes, and the coefficient values of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 were –0.34, –0.41, and −0.28, respectively (Fig. 8B). As shown in Fig. 8C, the significantly upregulated genes of ΔFgrdrp2 and ΔFgrdrp5 were mainly concentrated in the corresponding genes of cluster 3 and cluster 4 ex-siRNAs, while the upregulated corresponding genes of ΔFgrdrp1 were distributed in cluster 1. Among these upregulated ex-siRNA corresponding genes, FGSG_02767 and FGSG_06565 were involved in signal transduction pathways (Fig. S2D). FGSG_05418 and FGSG_02800, also labeled as ex-siRNA corresponding genes and associated with ascospore formation, were upregulated in these three Fgrdrp mutants and ΔFgrdrp2, respectively (Fig. S2D) (11, 15, 60). The transcript levels of ex-siRNA corresponding genes were further verified by RT-qPCR (Fig. S2E).
Fig 8.
Correlation of expression changes between mRNAs and ex-siRNAs. (A) Transcript levels of mRNAs corresponding to absent and downregulated ex-siRNAs. The lower-transparency colors indicate the log2(FC) values less than 0. The gray lines present the density trend of transcript levels corresponding to combined downregulated and absent ex-siRNAs. (B) Correlation analyses of expression changes between mRNAs and ex-siRNAs. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated based on the log2 value of the fold change between mutants and wild-type strain. The TPM values of ex-siRNA derived from the same corresponding gene were combined for the calculation. The light-colored numbers indicate coefficient values with P values less than 0.05. * indicates P ≤ 0.05. (C) Expression heatmaps of sRNA and mRNA. The clustering distance method was “Euclidean,” and ex-siRNAs were clustered by k-means (n = 4).
Fgrdrps regulate the expression of genes involved in sexual development
To explore the effect of Fgrdrp deletion on other functional genes, we considered genes with false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05 and the absolute value of the log2 of fold change greater than 2 as DEGs. In these 7-dpi samples, the downregulated DEGs in ΔFgrdrp1 were more than upregulated, while the proportions of upregulated DEGs in ΔFgrdrp2 and ΔFgrdrp5 were approximately 79% and 60%, respectively (Fig. 9A). Since ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2 delayed ascospore maturation, we also collected the RNA samples from 10-day-old perithecia for differential gene expression analysis. In ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2, the amount of DEGs (mutant/wild type) at 10 dpi was significantly lower than that at 7 dpi, suggesting that these mutants are slightly different from the wild-type strain at 10 dpi, while the expression changes of DEGs at 7 dpi may be close to the defective asci or ascospore discharge (Fig. 9A). In addition, in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2, more DEGs in the 10-dpi samples were labeled as ex-siRNA-associated genes compared with 7-dpi samples, implying that ex-siRNAs may be accumulated and exert regulatory roles in mature ascospore (Fig. 9A). Upset plot reflected that a multitude of DEGs in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp5 did not intersect with other mutants, whereas only 23% upregulated and 47% downregulated DEGs were unique to ΔFgrdrp2 (Fig. 9B). In ΔFgrdrp2, nearly 67% (223/331) upregulated DEGs were shared with ΔFgrdrp5, and these common upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in membrane transport (ABC transporters), lipid metabolism (linoleic acid metabolism), and glycosyltransferases (Fig. 9B; Fig. S3). At 7 dpi, certain KEGG pathways were co-enriched in two or three mutants; for instance, galactose metabolism was enriched in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2, pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid degradation were enriched in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp5, and ABC transporter was enriched in all three mutants (Fig. 9C). These results signified that Fgrdrps regulate the metabolism pathways and transport of lipid- and sugar-related substances, which account for the reduced accumulation of osmolytes in the asci of these mutants. Surprisingly, the deletion of Fgrdrp5 may affect pre-rRNA processing, as ribosome biogenesis is markedly enriched in ΔFgrdrp5 (Fig. S3). Furthermore, 90 DEGs were annotated as transcription factors (TFs), and 27 of them were associated with sexual development. Although most of the TFs were significantly induced, certain TFs affecting perithecia maturation or ascospore discharge were downregulated in Fgrdrp mutants, for example, MAT-1-1-3 in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp5, HMG010 (FGSG_01366) and HOMEL016 (FGSG_06966) in ΔFgrdrp2, and C2H088 (FGSG_10470) in ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgrdrp2 (Fig. 9D; Table S6) (61). In addition, two downregulated DEGs (FGSG_01862 and FGSG_03673) of ΔFgrdrp1 were closely related to sexual development in F. graminearum (Fig. 9D; Table S6). In particular, the deletion of FGSG_01862 delayed perithecia maturation (10). Hence, reduced expression of these genes may be related to the defects of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 in perithecia maturation or ascospore discharge.
Fig 9.
Characterization of DEGs in Fgrdrp-deletion mutants. (A) Volcanic plot of DEGs in Fgrdrp-deletion mutants at 7 dpi and 10 dpi. Numbers in parentheses indicated the counts of ex-siRNA corresponding genes. (B) Upset and Venn diagram of DEGs in Fgrdrp mutants at 7 dpi and 10 dpi. The intersections of the up- and downregulated DEGs were marked in pink and blue, respectively. (C) Common KEGG pathways enriched by DEGs. KEGG pathways with P values ≤ 0.05 are shown. (D) The expression heatmap of DEGs annotated as transcription factors or sex-related genes.
DISCUSSION
In contrast to other RNAi components, RdRP proteins are not as widely distributed and evolutionary conserved in eukaryotes, such as Aspergillus nidulans lost the putative orthologs of N. crassa RdRP QDE-1 and A. fumigatus lacks an RRP3-like RDRP (62, 63). In this work, Fgrdrp2 and Fgrdrp3 were homologous to N. crassa SAD-1 and RRP-3, respectively, and Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp4, and QDE-1 were evolutionarily similar (Fig. 1A), suggesting F. graminearum RdRPs are relatively intact during evolution. In filamentous fungus, N. crassa, quelling and MSUD are two typical RNA silencing processes and require the involvement of QDE-1 and SAD-1, respectively (64–66). The MSUD mechanism is confirmed in F. graminearum, and Fgsad-1 (Fgrdrp2) is involved in this process (13). However, MSUD is uncommon during normal sexual reproduction because of the homothallic mating type of F. graminearum, which produces less invasive DNA. According to the results of the expression pattern, we speculated that Fgrdrp2, Fgrdrp3, and Fgrdrp5 may play roles in conidiation and sexual reproduction. However, the further biological investigations revealed that Fgrdrp2 regulates conidial length as well as maturation and release of ascospores, whereas Fgrdrp5 only acts on the maturation and release of ascospores (Fig. 2 and 3). It is surprising that Fgrdrp3 did not play an important role in sporulation and sexual reproduction, at least under the conditions we tested. In previous studies, Fgdcl and Fgago, which were significantly expressed in conidia compared with those in mycelia, did not significantly affect conidial morphology and production, but Fgdcl2 and Fgago1 were essential for the hpRNA-induced gene silencing in the asexual stage of F. graminearum (58). Therefore, we hypothesize that these highly expressed Fgrdrp genes may play roles in other conditions that we did not test, such as the hpRNA-induced gene silencing pathway or other environments; thus, further studies are required.
In most esRNA biogenesis pathways, dsRNA precursors are cleaved by RNase III Dicer enzymes to generate small RNA duplexes and then loaded onto RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with Argonaute protein as the core catalytic component (19, 20). RdRPs, which convert ssRNA into dsRNA and amplify the sRNA signal, also act as a main player (19). However, the nature and number of the proteins involved in the RNAi pathway vary with sRNA types. For example, four classes of M. circinelloides exonic siRNAs have been reported based on the proteins involved in their biogenesis: Dcl2 and RdRP2-dependent class I, Dcl2 and RdRP1-dependent class II, Dcl1, Dcl2 and RdRP1 or RdRP2-dependent class III, Dcl1, and RdRP1 or RdRP2-dependent Class IV (67). Previous studies have confirmed the presence of ex-siRNA and milRNA in F. graminearum, and Fgdcl2 is involved in the generation of milRNAs in the asexual stage, while Fgago2 and Fgdcl1 cooperate with Fgdcl2 and play a crucial role in the biogenesis of sex-specific esRNAs (15, 16, 58). In ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5, although most of the Fgdcl1/2-dependent ex-siRNAs were not absent, their accumulations were significantly reduced compared with the wild-type strain (Fig. 7). In addition, certain ex-siRNAs, which were present in single-deletion mutants of these three Fgrdrps, are not lost in Fgrdrps double-deletion mutants (Fig. 7D). Hence, the biogenesis of Fgdcl1/2-dependent ex-siRNA requires more than two Fgrdrps, and all three Fgrdrps are involved in the accumulations of ex-siRNA. Co-analysis of sRNA data between Fgrdrps and Fgdcls deletion mutants revealed a positive correlation between ΔFgrdrp1 and ΔFgdcl2 and ΔFgrdrp2 and ΔFgdcl1 (Fig. 7E and S2C). In previous studies, Fgdcl1, a component partially affecting ascospore maturation and discharge, was partially involved in the biogenesis of ex-siRNAs, whereas in ΔFgdcl1/2, ex-siRNAs were extremely lacking and ascospore development and discharge were completely inhibited (15, 16). In our study, among these five Fgrdrps, Fgrdrp2 showed the most pronounced effect on ascospore discharge, followed by Fgrdrp5 and Fgrdrp1 (Fig. 3). We speculate that the defective sexual development of Fgrdrp-deletion mutants caused a partial reduction in ex-siRNAs and led to a correlation between Fgrdrp and Fgdcl in ex-siRNAs. In fungi, certain RNA helicases also play an important role in RNA silencing. For example, the putative RNA helicase SAD-3 mediates MSUD in N. crassa; Hrr1, an RNA helicase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is required for RNAi-mediated heterochromatin assembly; rnhA, containing a DEAD-like helicase superfamily domain, is essential for epimutation pathway but not for exogenously activated RNAi (25, 60, 68). In C. elegans, RDE-12, which contains a DEAD-box helicase domain, promotes secondary siRNA synthesis by coordinating RDE-10 and RRF-1 (RdRP) (69). Therefore, we will further explore whether the DEAD domain of Fgrdrp5 also plays a role in the accumulation of ex-siRNAs or other mechanisms.
Previous studies have shown that conidial production is reduced in all Fgrdrps mutants under low light (29). In our study, the conidial length of ΔFgrdrp2 was shorter than the wild type in the dark (Fig. 2B). It suggests that the initiation of the rdrp2-dependent RNAi pathway may differ in response to light changes during sporulation. Compared with the asexual development stage, Fgrdrp1, Fgrdrp2, and Fgrdrp5 played more important roles in sexual reproduction. The discharged ascospores of ΔFgrdrp1, ΔFgrdrp2, and ΔFgrdrp5 were all decreased (Fig. 3C). In ΔFgrdrp1, fewer ascospores were ejected possibly due to delayed ascospore development as well as defects in lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis), and ABC transporters. In F. graminearum, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, particularly fatty acids, sucrose, glucose, and mannitol, are critical for perithecia development and ascospore discharge, as these substances serve as energy sources for asci development and facilitate the generation of turgor pressure required for ascospore discharge (8, 45, 59). ABC transporters are ubiquitous proteins that facilitate the transmembrane transport of various substances, and certain genes function in the sexual development of fungi such as F. graminearum Arb1, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides CgABCF2, and Podospora anserina pABC1 and pABC2 (70–72).
Among these Fgrdrps deletion mutants, ΔFgrdrp2 was the mutant with the most pronounced reduction in ascospore discharge (Fig. 3E), one of the reasons being immature or scattered ascospores (Fig. 5A and B). Similarly, AMD-1 and GEA-1 deletion mutants showed a decreased ability to discharge ascospores due to defects in ascus wall development (73, 74). Therefore, the dispersion of ΔFgrdrp2 ascospores may signify premature dissolution of the ascus wall. In ΔFgrdrp2, almost all ex-siRNAs were downregulated or absent (Fig. 7C). Previous studies indicated that ex-siRNAs affected ascospore development and discharge in ΔFgdcl1/2 by negatively regulating corresponding genes of ex-siRNAs (15). Similarly, we also found the negatively relationship between the ex-siRNAs and the corresponding genes (Fig. 8A and B), and certain corresponding genes of downregulated ex-siRNAs in ΔFgrdrp2 were associated with the development or discharge of ascospores. Combined with the results of ascospore discharge in the deletion mutants, we suggested that these downregulated ex-siRNAs may also contribute to the defective ascospore discharge of ΔFgrdrp2.
Fgrdrp2 and Fgrdrp3 were significantly induced during sexual reproduction, whereas ΔFgrdrp3 did not differ significantly from wild-type PH-1 in perithecium formation, ascospore development, and ascospore discharge. When Fgrdrp2 and Fgrdrp3 were knocked out simultaneously, ascospore discharge was not blocked and was indistinguishable from ΔFgrdrp2. To our knowledge, the homolog of Fgrdrp3, N. crassa RRP-3 with unknown biological function, was not involved in the quelling or MSUD pathway (75). Hence, we speculated that Fgrdrp3 may not participate in the rdrp2-dependent RNAi pathway in sexual reproduction.
When Fgrdrp5 was deleted, the reduction of ascospore discharge was second only to ΔFgrdrp2 (Fig. 3E). Immature ascospores with two nuclei, lower turgor pressure, and reduced expression of genes related to lipid metabolism and ABC transporters may be responsible for the reduced ascospore discharge (Fig. 9C). Moreover, certain unique downregulated DEGs of ΔFgrdrp5 were significantly enriched in ribosome biogenesis (Fig. 3). Fgrdrp5 contains a DEAD box in addition to the RdRP domain. The protein interaction network (P value: 9.47e−05) also reflected that Fgrdrp5 may be associated with ATP-dependent RNA helicase DBP4, ATP-dependent helicase NAM7, and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factor (Fig. S4). As an RNA-dependent ATPase or RNA helicase, DEAD box genes are involved in pre-mRNA splicing or rRNA assembly, respectively. RRP3 (rRNA processing), a DEAD box protein that has a weak RNA-dependent ATPase activity and acts as an RNA helicase, is required for the processing of 18S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (76). Thus, we infer that the DEAD domain of Fgrdrp5 may also exhibit RNA helicase activity and be involved in rRNA processing, but the mechanism and whether it affects sexual development need to be further confirmed. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, NAM7 has enhanced ATP hydrolytic activity, RNA helicase activity, and ribosomal small subunit binding activity and is homologous to human UPF1, an RNA-dependent helicase required for NMD of abnormal mRNAs containing premature termination codon, and regulated the expression level of normal mRNA (77, 78). The pre-mRNA or NMD pathways during sexual reproduction need to be further explored, and whether these pathways are regulated by Fgrdrp5 needs to be further confirmed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFD1400100), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (Grant No. 2021GXNSFBA196086), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31901840), the Opening Foundation of Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education (Nanning Normal University) (GTEU-KLOP-X1821), and the Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific and Technological Self-innovation Foundation (Grant no. 2021ZKPY014). The funders were not involved in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.
Contributor Information
Jiasen Cheng, Email: jiasencheng@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
B. Gillian Turgeon, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw data of RNA-seq and sRNA-seq of Fgrdrp mutants have been deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (BioProject: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203; SRA metadata: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00377-24.
Fig. S1 to S4.
PCR primers.
Phenotypes of Fgrdrp deletion mutants.
Summary statistics of mapped sRNAs.
Annotations of mapped sRNAs.
Statistics of clean and mapped reads of RNA-seq.
Expression pattern of sexual-development-related genes in mutant DEGs.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, Hammond‐kosack KE, Di Pietro A, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ, Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J, Foster GD. 2012. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:414–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Harris LJ, Balcerzak M, Johnston A, Schneiderman D, Ouellet T. 2016. Host-preferential Fusarium graminearum gene expression during infection of wheat, barley, and maize. Fungal Biol 120:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Trail F, Xu H, Loranger R, Gadoury D. 2002. Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum). Mycologia 94:181–189. doi: 10.2307/3761794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dill-Macky R, Jones RK. 2000. The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Dis 84:71–76. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.1.71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Trail F, Common R. 2000. Perithecial development by Gibberella zeae: a light microscopy study. Mycologia 92:130–138. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Trail F, Gaffoor I, Vogel S. 2005. Ejection mechanics and trajectory of the ascospores of Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fuarium graminearum). Fungal Genet Biol 42:528–533. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Desjardins AE, Brown DW, Yun SH, Proctor RH, Lee T, Plattner RD, Lu SW, Turgeon BG. 2004. Deletion and complementation of the mating type (MAT) locus of the wheat head blight pathogen Gibberella zeae. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2437–2444. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2437-2444.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Guenther JC, Hallen-Adams HE, Bücking H, Shachar-Hill Y, Trail F. 2009. Triacylglyceride metabolism by Fusarium graminearum during colonization and sexual development on wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:1492–1503. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-12-1492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cavinder B, Hamam A, Lew RR, Trail F. 2011. Mid1, a mechanosensitive calcium ion channel, affects growth, development, and ascospore discharge in the filamentous fungus Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot Cell 10:832–841. doi: 10.1128/EC.00235-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kim HK, Jo SM, Kim GY, Kim DW, Kim YK, Yun SH. 2015. A large-scale functional analysis of putative target genes of mating-type loci provides insight into the regulation of sexual development of the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Genet 11:e1005486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wang C, Zhang S, Hou R, Zhao Z, Zheng Q, Xu Q, Zheng D, Wang G, Liu H, Gao X, Ma JW, Kistler HC, Kang Z, Xu JR. 2011. Functional analysis of the kinome of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002460. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cuomo CA, Güldener U, Xu J-R, Trail F, Turgeon BG, Di Pietro A, Walton JD, Ma L-J, Baker SE, Rep M, et al. 2007. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science 317:1400–1402. doi: 10.1126/science.1143708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Son H, Min K, Lee J, Raju NB, Lee YW. 2011. Meiotic silencing in the homothallic fungus Gibberella zeae. Fungal Biol 115:1290–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Liu H, Wang Q, He Y, Chen L, Hao C, Jiang C, Li Y, Dai Y, Kang Z, Xu JR. 2016. Genome-wide A-to-I RNA editing in fungi independent of ADAR enzymes. Genome Res 26:499–509. doi: 10.1101/gr.199877.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Son H, Park AR, Lim JY, Shin C, Lee YW. 2017. Genome-wide exonic small interference RNA-mediated gene silencing regulates sexual reproduction in the homothallic fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Genet 13:e1006595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zeng W, Wang J, Wang Y, Lin J, Fu Y, Xie J, Jiang D, Chen T, Liu H, Cheng J. 2018. Dicer-like proteins regulate sexual development via the biogenesis of perithecium-specific microRNAs in a plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Front Microbiol 9:818. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hannon GJ. 2002. RNA interference. Nature 418:244–251. doi: 10.1038/418244a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ. 2009. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell 136:642–655. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chang SS, Zhang Z, Liu Y. 2012. RNA interference pathways in fungi: mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:305–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hutvagner G, Simard MJ. 2008. Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:22–32. doi: 10.1038/nrm2321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Decker LM, Boone EC, Xiao H, Shanker BS, Boone SF, Kingston SL, Lee SA, Hammond TM, Shiu PKT. 2015. Complex formation of RNA silencing proteins in the perinuclear region of Neurospora crassa. Genetics 199:1017–1021. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.174623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lee H-C, Aalto AP, Yang Q, Chang S-S, Huang G, Fisher D, Cha J, Poranen MM, Bamford DH, Liu Y. 2010. The DNA/RNA-dependent RNA polymerase QDE-1 generates aberrant RNA and dsRNA for RNAi in a process requiring replication protein A and a DNA helicase. PLoS Biol 8:e1000496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Calo S, Nicolás FE, Vila A, Torres-Martínez S, Ruiz-Vázquez RM. 2012. Two distinct RNA-dependent RNA polymerases are required for initiation and amplification of RNA silencing in the basal fungus Mucor circinelloides. Mol Microbiol 83:379–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07939.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Pak J, Fire A. 2007. Distinct populations of primary and secondary effectors during RNAi in C. elegans. Science 315:241–244. doi: 10.1126/science.1132839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Calo S, Nicolás FE, Lee SC, Vila A, Cervantes M, Torres-Martinez S, Ruiz-Vazquez RM, Cardenas ME, Heitman J. 2017. A non-canonical RNA degradation pathway suppresses RNAi-dependent epimutations in the human fungal pathogen Mucor circinelloides. PLoS Genet 13:e1006686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nicolás FE, Ruiz-Vázquez RM. 2013. Functional diversity of RNAi-associated sRNAs in fungi. Int J Mol Sci 14:15348–15360. doi: 10.3390/ijms140815348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yu J, Lee KM, Cho WK, Park JY, Kim KH. 2018. Differential contribution of RNA interference components in response to distinct Fusarium graminearum virus infections. J Virol 92:e01756-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01756-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Song X, Gu K, Duan X, Xiao X, Hou Y, Duan Y, Wang J, Yu N, Zhou M. 2018. Secondary amplification of siRNA machinery limits the application of spray-induced gene silencing. Mol Plant Pathol 19:2543–2560. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Gaffar FY, Imani J, Karlovsky P, Koch A, Kogel KH. 2019. Different Cmponents of the RNA interference machinery are required for conidiation, ascosporogenesis, virulence, deoxynivalenol production, and fungal inhibition by exogenous double-stranded RNA in the head blight pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Front Microbiol 10:1662. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer ELL, Tosatto SCE, Paladin L, Raj S, Richardson LJ, Finn RD, Bateman A. 2021. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D412–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Letunic I, Khedkar S, Bork P. 2021. SMART: recent updates, new develpments and status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D458–D460. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang J, Zeng W, Cheng J, Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Lin Y. 2022. lncRsp1, a long noncoding RNA, influences Fgsp1 expression and sexual reproduction in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol 23:265–277. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Catlett NL, Lee B-N, Yoder OC, Turgeon BG. 2003. Split-marker recombination for efficient targeted deletion of fungal genes. Fungal Genet Rep 50:9–11. doi: 10.4148/1941-4765.1150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yang G, Tang L, Gong Y, Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Collinge DB, Chen W, Cheng J. 2018. A cerato-platanin protein SsCP1 targets plant PR1 and contributes to virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. New Phytol 217:739–755. doi: 10.1111/nph.14842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wang J, Zeng W, Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Lin Y, Chen W, Cheng J. 2021. A novel antisense long non-coding RNA participates in asexual and sexual reproduction by regulating the expression of GzmetE in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol 23:4939–4955. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Han YK, Kim MD, Lee SH, Yun SH, Lee YW. 2007. A novel F-box protein involved in sexual development and pathogenesis in Gibberella zeae. Mol Microbiol 63:768–779. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05557.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Leslie JF, Summerell BA, Leslie JF, Summerell BA. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Pub Professional. doi: 10.1002/9780470278376 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liu X, Xie J, Fu Y, Jiang D, Chen T, Cheng J. 2020. The subtilisin-like protease Bcser2 affects the sclerotial formation, conidiation and virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Int J Mol Sci 21:603. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yu J-H, Hamari Z, Han K-H, Seo J-A, Reyes-Domínguez Y, Scazzocchio C. 2004. Double-joint PCR: a PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 41:973–981. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Correll JC, Klittich CJR, Leslie JF. 1987. Nitrate nonutilizing mutants of Fusarium oxysporum and their use in vegetative compatibility tests. Phytopathology 77:1640. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-77-1640 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cappellini RA, Peterson JL. 1965. Macroconidium formation in submerged cultures by a nonsporulating strain of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia 57:962–966. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1965.12018285 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li B, Dong X, Zhao R, Kou R, Zheng X, Zhang H. 2019. The t-SNARE protein FgPep12, associated with FgVam7, is essential for ascospore discharge and plant infection by trafficking Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between golgi and endosome/vacuole in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007754. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cavinder B, Sikhakolli U, Fellows KM, Trail F. 2012. Sexual development and ascospore discharge in Fusarium graminearum. J Vis Exp. doi: 10.3791/3895-v [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. da Rocha Campos AN, Costa MD. 2010. Histochemistry and storage of organic compounds during basidiosporogenesis in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus microcarpus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1745–1753. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0353-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Li C, Melesse M, Zhang S, Hao C, Wang C, Zhang H, Hall MC, Xu JR. 2015. FgCDC14 regulates cytokinesis, morphogenesis, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Microbiol 98:770–786. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FAST-Q preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Belli Kullan J, Lopes Paim Pinto D, Bertolini E, Fasoli M, Zenoni S, Tornielli GB, Pezzotti M, Meyers BC, Farina L, Pè ME, Mica E. 2015. miRVine: a microRNA expression atlas of grapevine based on small RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics 16:393. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1610-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Jeong D-H, German MA, Rymarquis LA, Thatcher SR, Green PJ. 2010. Abiotic stress-associated miRNAs: detection and functional analysis. Methods Mol Biol 592:203–230. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-005-2_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. 2019. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc 11:1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, Feng T, Zhou L, Tang W, Zhan L, Fu X, Liu S, Bo X, Yu G. 2021. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb) 2:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. 2012. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. 2016. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32:2847–2849. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Chen Y, Gao Q, Huang M, Liu Y, Liu Z, Liu X, Ma Z. 2015. Characterization of RNA silencing components in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep 5:12500. doi: 10.1038/srep12500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Min K, Lee J, Kim JC, Kim SG, Kim YH, Vogel S, Trail F, Lee YW. 2010. A novel gene, ROA, is required for normal morphogenesis and discharge of ascospores in Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot Cell 9:1495–1503. doi: 10.1128/EC.00083-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hammond TM, Xiao H, Boone EC, Perdue TD, Pukkila PJ, Shiu PKT. 2011. SAD-3, a putative helicase required for meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA, interacts with other components of the silencing machinery. G3 (Bethesda) 1:369–376. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Son H, Seo YS, Min K, Park AR, Lee J, Jin JM, Lin Y, Cao P, Hong S-Y, Kim EK, Lee SH, Cho A, Lee S, Kim MG, Kim Y, Kim JE, Kim JC, Choi GJ, Yun SH, Lim JY, Kim M, Lee YH, Choi YD, Lee YW. 2011. A phenome-based functional analysis of transcription factors in the cereal head blight fungus, Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002310. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Cerutti H, Casas-Mollano JA. 2006. On the origin and functions of RNA-mediated silencing: from protists to man. Curr Genet 50:81–99. doi: 10.1007/s00294-006-0078-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hammond TM, Keller NP. 2005. RNA silencing in Aspergillus nidulans is independent of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Genetics 169:607–617. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.035964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Romano N, Macino G. 1992. Quelling: transient inactivation of gene expression in Neurospora crassa by transformation with homologous sequences. Mol Microbiol 6:3343–3353. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb02202.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Cogoni C, Macino G. 1999. Gene silencing in Neurospora crassa requires a protein homologous to RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Nature 399:166–169. doi: 10.1038/20215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Shiu PKT, Metzenberg RL. 2002. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA: properties, regulation and suppression. Genetics 161:1483–1495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.4.1483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Trieu TA, Calo S, Nicolás FE, Vila A, Moxon S, Dalmay T, Torres-Martínez S, Garre V, Ruiz-Vázquez RM. 2015. A non-canonical RNA silencing pathway promotes mRNA degradation in basal fungi. PLoS Genet 11:e1005168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Motamedi MR, Verdel A, Colmenares SU, Gerber SA, Gygi SP, Moazed D. 2004. Two RNAi complexes, RITS and RDRC, physically interact and localize to noncoding centromeric RNAs. Cell 119:789–802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Yang H, Vallandingham J, Shiu P, Li H, Hunter CP, Mak HY. 2014. The DEAD box helicase RDE-12 promotes amplification of RNAi in cytoplasmic foci in C. elegans. Curr Biol 24:832–838. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Yin Y, Wang Z, Cheng D, Chen X, Chen Y, Ma Z. 2018. The ATP-binding protein FgArb1 is essential for penetration, infectious and normal growth of Fusarium graminearum. New Phytol 219:1447–1466. doi: 10.1111/nph.15261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Zhou Z, Wu J, Wang M, Zhang J. 2017. ABC protein CgABCF2 is required for asexual and sexual development, appressorial formation and plant infection in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Microb Pathog 110:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Boisnard S, Espagne E, Zickler D, Bourdais A, Riquet AL, Berteaux-Lecellier V. 2009. Peroxisomal ABC transporters and β-oxidation during the life cycle of the filamentous fungus Podospora anserina. Fungal Genet Biol 46:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Son H, Lee J, Lee YW. 2013. A novel gene, GEA1, is required for ascus cell-wall development in the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology (Reading) 159:1077–1085. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064287-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Cao S, He Y, Hao C, Xu Y, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu H, Xu JR. 2017. RNA editing of the AMD1 gene is important for ascus maturation and ascospore discharge in Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep 7:4617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04960-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Freitag M, Hickey PC, Khlafallah TK, Read ND, Selker EU. 2004. HP1 is essential for DNA methylation in Neurospora. Mol Cell 13:427–434. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00024-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. O’Day CL, Chavanikamannil F, Abelson J. 1996. 18S rRNA processing requires the RNA helicase-like protein Rrp3. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3201–3207. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.16.3201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Serdar LD, Whiteside DL, Nock SL, McGrath D, Baker KE. 2020. Inhibition of post-termination ribosome recycling at premature termination codons in UPF1 ATPase mutants. Elife 9:e57834. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kanaan J, Raj S, Decourty L, Saveanu C, Croquette V, Le Hir H. 2018. UPF1-like helicase grip on nucleic acids dictates processivity. Nat Commun 9:3752. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06313-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S4.
PCR primers.
Phenotypes of Fgrdrp deletion mutants.
Summary statistics of mapped sRNAs.
Annotations of mapped sRNAs.
Statistics of clean and mapped reads of RNA-seq.
Expression pattern of sexual-development-related genes in mutant DEGs.
Data Availability Statement
Raw data of RNA-seq and sRNA-seq of Fgrdrp mutants have been deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (BioProject: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203; SRA metadata: PRJNA884510 and PRJNA888203).









