Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2024 Jun 27;15:1446711. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1446711

Corrigendum: 1270 nm near-infrared light as a novel vaccine adjuvant acts on mitochondrial photoreception in intradermal vaccines

Yohei Maki 1, Toshihiro Kushibiki 2, Tomoya Sano 1, Takunori Ogawa 1, Eri Komai 1, Shusaku Takahashi 1, Etsuko Kitagami 1, Yusuke Serizawa 1, Ryosuke Nagaoka 1, Shinya Yokomizo 1,3, Takeshi Ono 4, Miya Ishihara 2, Yasushi Miyahira 4, Satoshi Kashiwagi 3, Akihiko Kawana 1, Yoshifumi Kimizuka 1,*
PMCID: PMC11237957  PMID: 38994373

Error in Figure/Table

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 7 as published. “Day 28” was labeled in Figures 7A–D instead of “Day 21”, which is inconsistent with the main text and legend. The corrected Figure 7 and its caption appear below.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effect of the near-infrared (NIR) laser adjuvant on anti-influenza immune responses. Serum anti-influenza specific (A) IgG, (B) IgG1, (C) IgG2c, (D) IgG2c/IgG1 ratio at day 21, and (E) IgG, (F) IgG1, (G) IgG2c, (H) IgG2c/IgG1 ratio at day 56. (A–H) n = 14, 14, 18, 16, 14, and 14 for no vaccine (saline), vaccine ID only (ID only), 1064 nm CW laser + vaccine ID, 1270 nm CW laser + vaccine, vaccine/alum ID (Alum), and vaccine IM, respectively. Results were pooled from three independent experiments and analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn’s multiple comparison test. (*p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 compared with ID only) Geometric mean with 95% CI. (I) The effect of the NIR laser adjuvant on body weight of vaccinated mice following viral challenge. Body weights were monitored daily for 2 weeks. Mean body weight ± s.e.m. n = 14, 14, 18, 16, 14, and 14 for no vaccine (saline), vaccine ID only (ID only), 1064 nm CW laser + vaccine ID, 1270 nm CW laser + vaccine, vaccine/alum ID (Alum), and vaccine IM, respectively. (J) Kaplan–Meier survival plots for 2 weeks following lethal influenza challenge; Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test. (I, J) Results were pooled from three independent experiments.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES