Research is critical for the advancement in medicine. As such, mandatory research projects have become one of the basic scholarly activities in the undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. However, conducting a research project can be a daunting task.
A survey among 130 Australian research supervisors observed that majority of students required the necessary generic skills and research-based skills to achieve completion of their research projects.1 Generic skills refer to communication, time management, independence, and initiative. Among others, the more important research skills needed were literature search, scientific writing, statistical aptitude, and ability to navigate the ethics review process. Compulsory assessment of project milestones aided project completion, improved scientific writing skills and presentation. Moreover, supervisors recognized the need and requested for statistical support, funding for projects and scientific writing. There were also significant differences on matters of experience in research supervision. Experienced supervisors were more likely to require dedicated time for the project compared to novice supervisors, with higher access to expert assistance in scientific writing, ethics application, and research methodology. They also favored co-supervision which was disallowed by the neophytes. In contrast, novice supervisors reported significantly higher rates of unexpected project delays and data acquisition problems. This finding recommends research supervisor training for the research supervision role.
Several studies across different residency training institutions show consistency in major barriers to completion of research undertakings: (1) conflicts in schedule between learning clinical proficiencies and research, (2) lack of protected research time, (3) funding, (4) inadequate faculty support, and (5) mentorship.2-4
For as long as research projects are mandatory, educational/training institutions are duty-bound to identify the factors that will advance the research project program, and employ strategies that will break research barriers.
Ma. Bernadette Octavio-Cruz, MD, MSc
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Philippine General Hospital
University of the Philippines Manila
REFERENCES
- 1.Hart J, Hakim J, Kaur R, Jeremy R, Coorey G, Kalman E, et al. Research supervisors’ views of barriers and enablers for research projects undertaken by medical students; a mixed methods evaluation of a post-graduate medical degree research project program. BMC Med Educ. 2022. May 13;22(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03429-0. PMID: 35562832; PMCID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Silcox LC, Ashbury TL, VanDenKerkhof EG, Milne B. Residents’ and program directors’ attitudes toward research during anesthesiology training: a Canadian perspective. Anesth Analg. 2006. March;102(3):859-64. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194874.28870.fd. PMID: 16492841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eze BI, Nwadinigwe CU, Achor J, Aguwa EN, Mbah A, Ozoemena F. Trainee resident participation in health research in a resource-constrained setting in southeastern Nigeria: perspectives, issues and challenges. A cross-sectional survey of three residency training centres. BMC Med Educ. 2012. June 13;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-40. PMID: 24575802; PMCID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ullrich N, Botelho CA, Hibberd P, Bernstein HH. Research during pediatric residency: predictors and resident-determined influences. Acad Med. 2003. Dec:78(12):1253-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200312000-00014. PMID: 14660429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]