Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2002 Sep 7;325(7363):548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.548/a

Stress and breast cancer

Basic error may have occurred

Tony Brady 1
PMCID: PMC1124067  PMID: 12218002

Editor—One of the main findings of the paper by Graham et al was that women who had had one or more severely stressful life experiences in the five years after diagnosis had a lower risk of recurrence than those who didn't (hazard ratio 0.52).1 Using information collected after baseline (diagnosis in this study) in a survival model is fraught with difficulty because collection of that information may not be possible after the event of interest has occurred. Careful interpretation of the results of any such analysis is therefore recommended.

It seems that a mistake in interpretation has occurred in this paper. Women who had a recurrence were not interviewed again more than eight weeks after their recurrence. So, for example, a woman in whom cancer recurred after 12 months would have nearly four years of missing data for the variable “severely stressful life experiences.” It follows that the investigators were more likely to detect stressful life experiences in women who had recurrences later on in the study or not at all. The finding that stressful life experiences were associated with a decreased incidence of recurrence is probably due to this ascertainment bias rather than any real effect.

References

  • 1.Graham J, Ramirez A, Love S, Richards M, Burgess C. Stressful life experiences and risk of relapse of breast cancer: observational cohort study. BMJ. 2002;324:1420–1422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1420. . (15 June.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2002 Sep 7;325(7363):548.

Authors' reply

Jill Graham 1,2,3, Sharon Love 1,2,3, Amanda Ramirez 1,2,3

Editor—The main finding of our paper was that women who experienced one or more severely stressful life events did not have a higher risk of recurrence of their disease than women not experiencing such events. That their risk was in fact lower was, as we describe in the paper, a marginal finding for which we can provide no clear explanation.

Brady says that the lack of a relation between experiencing one or more severely stressful life events and recurrence may be due to using data known before baseline and also that it may have arisen due to ascertainment bias. We have avoided the former and adjusted for the latter as far as possible through the statistics we used in our analysis, which are detailed in the online version of the paper, but not the paper version. Specifically, since severely stressful life experiences and episodes of depression could occur at any time over the study period, these variables formed time dependent covariates in the Cox proportional hazards model. With this method, the time dependent hazard ratio quoted is a comparison of when a patient is experiencing a severe life event to when they are clear of severe life events. Hence those with longer follow up provide more data, but would only aid the prediction of a relapse if there was a relation between severe life event and relapse.


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES