Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Org Chem Front. 2024 Feb 7;11(7):2008–2014. doi: 10.1039/d3qo01987j

Chemoenzymatic synthesis of optically active α-cyclopropyl-pyruvates and cyclobutenoates via enzyme-catalyzed carbene transfer with diazopyruvate

Raphaël Dollet a,, Juan D Villada b,, Thomas Poisson a, Rudi Fasan b, Philippe Jubault a
PMCID: PMC11241863  NIHMSID: NIHMS1968011  PMID: 39007032

Abstract

Cyclopropanes are recurrent structural motifs in natural products and bioactive molecules. Recently, biocatalytic cyclopropanations have emerged as a powerful approach to access enantioenriched cyclopropanes, complementing chemocatalytic approaches developed over the last several decades. Here, we report the development of a first biocatalytic strategy for cyclopropanation using ethyl α-diazopyruvate as a novel enzyme-compatible carbene precursor. Using myoglobin variant Mb(H64V,V68G) as the biocatalyst, this method afforded the efficient synthesis of α-cyclopropylpyruvates in high diastereomeric ratios and enantiomeric excess (up to 99% ee). The ketoester moiety in the cyclopropane products can be used to synthesize diverse optically pure cyclopropane derivatives. Furthermore, the enzymatically obtained α-cyclopropylpyruvate products could be converted into enantiopure cyclobutenoates via a metal-free photochemical ring expansion without loss of optical activity.

INTRODUCTION

Cyclopropane is a recurrent structure in natural products13 and bioactive molecules,46 and the third most represented carbocycle, after benzene and cyclohexane, within the structure of FDA-approved drugs.7 In recent years, motivated by their high prevalence in drug molecules and drug candidates, a variety of powerful and selective approaches have been developed to synthesize optically pure cyclopropanes.811 Complementing chemocatalytic cyclopropanation protocols, significant progress has been made over the past decade in the development of biocatalytic strategies for the stereoselective cyclopropanation using engineered hemoproteins such as myoglobin and cytochrome P450s.1218 These strategies have also proven to be synthetically relevant for the preparation of cyclopropane containing drugs and drug precursors.1417

In this context, there is an ongoing interest in broadening the accessible chemical space of optically active cyclopropanes through biocatalysis. Efforts in this direction have included the use of readily available diazo carbene precursors, which have resulted in different examples of acceptor only diazo compounds for biocatalytic cyclopropanation13,19,20 as well as the use of new carbene precursors like diaziridines21. This progress has resulted in newly functionalized enantiopure cyclopropanes, which can be readily manipulated through further chemical modifications to achieve greater diversification of the cyclopropane scaffolds.

Recently, some of us reported biocatalytic methods for olefin cyclopropanation in the presence of α-diazoacetonitrile and α-cyclopropylketones,22,23 leading to enantioenriched cyclopropanes in up to >99% ee (scheme 1). Both the cyano and the keto-groups in these products can be converted into various new moieties, with a complete stereoretention of the cyclopropane chiral centers. This work showcased the importance of introducing new densely functionalized biocatalyst-compatible diazo compounds that ultimately allow further manipulations to increase the molecular complexity of the cyclopropane. On the other hand, the Arnold group, demonstrated the diasterodivergent cyclopropanation of vinyl boronic acid pinacol ester with ethyldiazoacetate and diversification of the resulting cyclopropanes by Suzuki coupling (Scheme 1).24

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Biocatalytic synthesis of functionalized cyclopropanes and library extension.

As part of our ongoing program dedicated to the development of straightforward access to functionalized cyclopropanes,25 here we report the first example of biocatalytic enantioselective cyclopropanation using ethyl diazopyruvate (EDPv) as a new biocatalyst-compatible carbene source. The resulting α-cyclopropylpyruvates can be produced with high enantioselectivity (up to >99% ee). To date, the catalytic asymmetric synthesis of α-cyclopropylpyruvates remained elusive, and only racemic chiral derivatives have been reported.26,27 We also showcased the α-cyclopropylpyruvate motif as a privilege precursor of enantiopure cyclobutenoates and other enantioenriched compounds.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To initiate our investigations dealing with the biocatalytic synthesis of chiral α-cyclopropylpyruvates, different myoglobin variants were tested on the model reaction between EDPv 1 and styrene in whole cell transformation. Variant Mb(H64V,V68A), which previously showed activity for different carbene transfer reactions with ethyl diazoacetate (EDA),12 afforded only traces of the desired product (Table 1, entry 4), whereas no activity was shown by wild-type Mb or hemin alone (Table 1, entries 2–3).

Table 1.

Catalyst Screening for Cyclopropanation of Styrene with the EDPv.

graphic file with name nihms-1968011-t0001.jpg
Entry Catalyst YieldC
1 Hemina 0 %
2 Mb (WT) 0 %
3 Mb (H64V, V68A) <2%
4 Mb (H64G, V68A) 8 %
5 Mb (H64V, V68G) 34 %
6 Mb (H64A, V68G) <2 %
7 Mb (H64G, V68G) 4%
8 Mb (H64V, V68G)b 5%

Reaction Conditions: 20 mM olefin, 10 mM of EDPv 1, OD600 = 20; in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7) buffer (KPi) with 10% ethanol, room temperature under anaerobic conditions.

a)

60 μM of hemin, 10 mM sodium dithionite in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 10% DMF, room temp.

b)

20 μM of purified Mb (H64V, V68G), 10 mM sodium dithionite in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 10 % Ethanol.

c)

yield is determined by GC compared with authentic standards.

Decreasing the size of the amino acid at the level of the distal histidine 64 by switching from valine to glycine, Mb(H64G,V68A), increased the yield of the cyclopropane 2a to 8% as shown in entry 5 of Table 1. A similar modification of the amino acid residue at the position 68 (from valine to glycine) resulted in the improved biocatalyst Mb(H64V,V68G), which provides 2a in 34% yield (Table 1, entry 6). Other modifications in position 64 did not further improve the yield (Table 1, entries 7–8). Similarly, additional mutations at positions 111, 28, and 43 were also tested but none of them resulted in improved reactivity (Table S3). Finally the use of Mb(H64V,V68G) as purified enzyme led to an important decrease of the yield of 2a from 34% to 5% (Table 1, entry 9), demonstrating a beneficial effect of conducting the reaction in whole cells compared to the isolated enzyme.

Reaction optimization studies showed that an excess of styrene (5-fold) over the diazo reagent was beneficial to obtain quantitative yields of 2a in the Mb(H64V,V68G)-catalyzed reaction (Table 2, entry 3 and 5) with up to 210 TON (Scheme 2 product 2a). A similar trend was previously observed in Mb-catalyzed cyclopropanation with the α-diazo ketone reagent as the carbene precursor.23 More recent studies indicated that once the metal carbene is formed, it can either react with the olefin to produce the desired cyclopropane product or inserts into the heme cofactor in a non-productive pathway to produce a green colored adduct.28 A similar non-productive reactivity can occur in the case of the diazopyruvate 1, as supported by the observation of a green coloration of the reaction mixture after the addition of the diazo compound in the absence of the olefin (Figure S3). For synthetic purposes, a scaled-up reaction was performed and product 2a was obtained in 61% isolated yield and an excellent enantiomeric excess (99% ee) (Table 2, entry 6). Interestingly, we observed that extended reaction times (>12–18 hrs) led to only traces of the cyclopropane product. Time course experiments revealed that optimal yields were achieved after 3 hours of reaction (see SI for details, figure S1), whereas a rapid decrease in yield was noted at longer reaction times, likely due to degradation of 2a in the reaction mixture or the intracellular milieu.

Table 2.

Concentrations screening for Cyclopropanation of Styrene with the EDPv.

Entry Mb (H64V, V68G) (OD600) Styrene (mM) EDPv (mM) Yielda (%) de (%)
1 20 10 5 43 >99
2 10 50 10 39 >99
3 20 50 10 >99 >99
4 20 25 5 85 >99
5 20 50 5 >99 >99
6b 20 50 10 61% >99

Reaction Conditions: 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7) buffer (KPi) with 10% ethanol, room temperature under anaerobic conditions.

a)

yield is determined by GC compared with authentic standards.

b)

reaction performed on 50 mL scale (volume of the enzymatic scale-up reaction).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Substrate scope of Mb(H64V,V68G)-catalyzed olefin cyclopropanation with EDPv. Reaction Conditions: reaction performed in 400 μL KPi buffer 50 mM (pH 7) with 10 mM of EDPv 1 and 50 mM of olefin during 3h. yield is determined by GC compared with authentic standards. (In parenthesis, isolated yield obtained using slow addition (see SI, general procedure A) of the diazo compound 1)

Having defined optimal conditions for this reaction, its scope was further examined. As summarized in Scheme 2, several styrene derivatives could be transformed through this biocatalytic process with excellent enantioselectivity (>99% ee) being obtained in all cases. Different functionalities are tolerated at the para position of the aryl moiety, as exemplified by the para-methyl- and para-bromostyrenes affording the desired cyclopropane 2g and 2e29 in good to high yields (45–80%) and with excellent ee. Electron-withdrawing CF3 group significantly decreased the yield of cyclopropane (2d: 15% yield). Interestingly, para-methoxy cyclopropane 2b was obtained in low yield, which can result from a combination of the steric effects and the formation of a side product deriving from the undesired Clock-Wilson rearrangement,30 which was detected by GC-MS. A similar phenomenon was observed during the cyclopropanation of electron rich olefins such as 2-vinyl furan and 2-vinyl thiophene, whose transformation primarily led to the corresponding Clock-Wilson rearrangement products. Methyl substitution at the meta-, ortho- or α-position were all tolerated, yielding the desired cyclopropanes in 42 %, 28 % and 79 % yield and 98 %, 90 % and 99 % ee. As fluorinated compounds are of high interest in medicinal chemistry,31 this biocatalytic approach was tested also with styrene derivatives bearing a fluorinated group (CF3, CHF2, CH2F) at the α-position. Using the optimized conditions, the corresponding cyclopropanes 2j-l were obtained in excellent de and ee, albeit in modest yields (5–23%). The 2-pyridyl cyclopropane 2m, which is not accessible via known alternative methods using transition metal chiral catalyst, was also synthesized in good yield (66%) and excellent diastereoselectivity.32 Non-styrenyl substrates such as vinylbenzoate, N-vinyl phtalimide, 3-phenylpropene and 4-phenylpropene were tested but no activity was observed.

With these enantiopure cyclopropanes in hand, we investigated their transformations into cyclobutenoates. Indeed, four-membered rings are present in the structure of multiple natural products3335 and biologically active compounds.3640 Cyclobutenes, in particular have been prepared via photochemical4143 or metal-catalyzed4446 [2+2]-cycloaddition, as well as from ring expansion reactions, starting from a large variety of cyclopropane.4750 After establishing an efficient route to optically active α-cyclopropylpyruvates, we aimed at developing a sustainable metal-free approach to cyclobutenoates via a photochemical ring expansion of α-cyclopropyl diazo derivatives of these enzymatic products. Indeed, in analogy to the work reported by Tang47 using transition metal carbene, the photoinduced formation of the free carbene might allow its rearrangement into the corresponding cyclobutene.

To this end, we chose racemic cyclopropane (±)-2a as model substrate for this transformation. Ketone 2a was efficiently converted into the corresponding diazo derivative 3a in 87% yield over two steps. Thanks to the UV spectra analysis (see SI for details, Figure S2) of this diazo compound (λabs = 423 nm), we selected a 425 nm irradiation to perform a photoinduced ring-expansion reaction. The reaction parameters were evaluated and among the various solvents tested (see SI for details, Table S2), and optimal yield for 4 (64%) was obtained using diethyl ether as solvent. Note that 4 was isolated as a 50:50 mixture of regioisomers. Performing the photochemical rearrangement in acetonitrile led to an improved regioselectivity of 70:30 in favour of product 4a (Scheme 3). Using these optimized conditions, the reaction was then carried out the rearrangement with enantiopure cyclopropane 2a. To our delight the expected cyclobutenoates 4a and 4b were obtained in identical global yield (46%) and regioisomeric ratio, along with a complete stereoretention of the absolute configuration for each regioisomer. Similarly, the sequence was then applied to the enantiopure cyclopropanes 2b and 2c, which were converted into cyclobutenoates 5 and 6 with identical efficiency (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Stereoselectivity retention through photochemical ring expansion reaction. Reaction conditions: a) TsNHNH2, PhMe, reflux, 5h; b) DBU, DCM, 16h; c) MeCN, blue light 425 nm (Hepatochem), 3h 30min.

Regioisomeric ratios were determined on 1H NMR crude.

In addition to this unprecedented photochemical rearrangement of α-diazocyclopropanes, we examined further functionalization of the pyruvate unit to gain access to other functionalized cyclopropanes. First, the ketoester residue of 2a was reduced in the presence of LiAlH4 in high yield (97%), giving the diol 7 as a 2:1 mixture of diasteroisomers without any degradation of the cyclopropane ring. Then, 7 was converted into the α-cyclopropyl epoxide 9a, via the selective activation of the primary hydroxyl group into a tosyl one, followed by epoxide ring formation under basic conditions. The product was obtained in 90% yield, without erosion of the optical purity (Scheme 4). On the other hand, the α-keto group of 2a could be reduced selectively in the presence of NaBH4 to give the α-hydroxyester 10 as a 60:40 mixture of diastereoisomers. This product was successfully used in a Mitsunobu and Staudinger reactions sequence to afford the corresponding amino-ester 12 as a nearly 1:1 mixture of diastereoisomers, both in an enantiopure form.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Synthetic pathway for enantiopure alpha-cyclopropyl epoxide and non-natural amino-ester.

Reaction conditions: a) LiAlH4, THF; 0 °C, 3 h; b) TsCl, Bu2SnO (2 eq), DCM, r.t., 16h; c) nBuLi (1 eq), −78 °C, 1 h; d) NaBH4, EtOH, −10 °C, 30 min; e) PPH3, DIAD, DPPA, pyridine, 0 °C to r.t., 16h; f) PPh3, PhMe, 60 °C then H2O, 6 h

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed an efficient and stereoselective biocatalytic strategy for the synthesis of pyruvate containing cyclopropanes, using engineered myoglobin as the catalyst and ethyl α-diazopyruvate as carbene precursor. This method provides a scalable access to these enantioenriched cyclopropanes by chemoenzymatic routes, which can be used as valuable building blocks to access different cyclopropane derivatives. Interestingly, the enzymatic cyclopropanation sequence was coupled to the photoinduced ring expansion to access optically active cyclobutenes in high enantiomeric excess and good yields.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. National Institute of Health grant GM098628. The authors are grateful to Dr. William Brennessel (U. Rochester) for assistance with crystallographic analyses. The authors are grateful to Dr. Romain Lapierre and Dr. Marie-Léonie Delcourt for initial experiments on the photochemical ring expansion and Dr. Pavel Ivashkin for his help in the manuscript preparation. MS and X-ray instrumentation at the University of Rochester are supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants CHE-0946653 and CHE-1725028. R. F. acknowledges chair endowment support from the Welch Foundation. This work was partially supported by Normandie Université (NU), the Région Normandie, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Rouen Normandie (URN), INSA Rouen Normandie, Labex SynOrg (ANR-11-LABX-0029), the graduate school for research XL-Chem (ANR-18-EURE-0020 XL CHEM), Innovation Chimie Carnot (I2C) and CNRS through the International Emerging Action program. R. D. thanks the Région Normandie for a PhD fellowship.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Notes and references

  • 1.Faust R, Fascinating Natural and Artificial Cyclopropane Architectures, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 2251–2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adelekan AM, Prozesky EA, Hussein AA, Ureña LD, Van Rooyen PH, Liles DC, Meyer JJM, and Rodríguez B, Bioactive Diterpenes and Other Constituents of Croton steenkampianus, J. Nat. Prod 2008, 71, 1919–1922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu M-L, Duan Y-H, Hou Y-L, Li C, Gao H, Dai Y and Yao X-S, Nardoaristolones A and B, Two Terpenoids with Unusual Skeletons from Nardostachys chinensis Batal, Org. Lett 2013, 15, 1000–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deeks ED, Olaparib: First Global Approval, Drugs 2015, 75, 231–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Rogliani P and Matera MG, The discovery of roflumilast for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2016, 11, 733–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gu J, Rodriguez K, Kanda Y, Yang S, Ociepa M, Wilke H, Abrishami A, Joergensen L, Skak-Nielsen T, Chen J and Baran P, Convergent Total Synthesis of (+)-Calcipotriol: A Scalable, Modular Approach to Vitamin D Analogs, Chemistry, 2022, 119, e2200814119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taylor RD, MacCoss M and Lawson ADG, Rings in Drugs, J. Med. Chem 2014, 57, 5845–5859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang H, Guptill DM, Varela-Alvarez A, Musaev DG and Davies HML, Rhodium-catalyzed Enantioselective Cyclopropanation of Electron-deficient Alkenes, Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 2844–2850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bos M, Huang WS, Poisson W,T, Pannecoucke X, Charette AB and Jubault P, Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Highly Functionalized Difluoromethylated Cyclopropanes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 13319–13323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inoue H, Phan Thi Thanh N, Fujisawa I and Iwasa S, Synthesis of Forms of a Chiral Ruthenium Complex Containing a Ru–Colefin(sp2) Bond and Their Application to Catalytic Asymmetric Cyclopropanation Reactions, Org. Lett 2020, 22, 1475–1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shearer J, Castro JL, Lawson ADG, MacCoss M and Taylor RD, Rings in Clinical Trials and Drugs: Present and Future, J. Med. Chem 2022, 65, 8699–8712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bordeaux M, Tyagi V and Fasan R, Highly Diastereoselective and Enantioselective Olefin Cyclopropanation Using Engineered Myoglobin-Based Catalysts, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 1744–1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ren X, Chandgude AL, Carminati DM, Shen Z, Khare S and Fasan R, Highly Stereoselective and Enantiodivergent Synthesis of Cyclopropylphosphonates with Engineered Carbene Transferases, Chem. Sci 2022, 13, 8550–8556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carminati DM, Decaens J, Couve‐Bonnaire S, Jubault P and Fasan R, Biocatalytic Strategy for the Highly Stereoselective Synthesis of CHF2‐Containing Trisubstituted Cyclopropanes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 7072–7076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mao R, Wackelin DJ, Jamieson CS, Rogge T, Gao S, Das A, Taylor DM, Houk KN and Arnold FH, Enantio- and Diastereoenriched Enzymatic Synthesis of 1,2,3-Polysubstituted Cyclopropanes from (Z/E)-Trisubstituted Enol Acetates, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2023, 145, 16176–16185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bajaj P, Sreenilayam G, Tyagi V and Fasan R, Gram-Scale Synthesis of Chiral Cyclopropane-Containing Drugs and Drug Precursors with Engineered Myoglobin Catalysts Featuring Complementary Stereoselectivity, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 16110–16114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hernandez KE, Renata H, Lewis RD, Kan SBJ, Zhang C, Forte J, Rozzell D, McIntosh JA and Arnold FH, Highly Stereoselective Biocatalytic Synthesis of Key Cyclopropane Intermediate to Ticagrelor, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 7810–7813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Key HM, Dydio P, Liu Z, Rha JY-E, Nazarenko A, Seyedkazemi V, Clark DS and Hartwig JF, Beyond Iron: Iridium-Containing P450 Enzymes for Selective Cyclopropanations of Structurally Diverse Alkenes, ACS Cent. Sci 2017, 3, 302–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schaus L, Das A, Knight AM, Jimenez-Osés G, Houk KN, Garcia-Borràs M, Arnold FH and Huang X, Protoglobin-Catalyzed Formation of cis-Trifluoromethyl-Substituted Cyclopropanes by Carbene Transfer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2023, 62, e202208936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tinoco A, Steck V, Tyagi V and Fasan R, Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of Trifluoromethyl-Substituted Cyclopropanes via Myoglobin-Catalyzed Transfer of Trifluoromethylcarbene, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5293–5296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Porter NJ, Danelius E, Gonen T and Arnold FH, Biocatalytic Carbene Transfer Using Diazirines, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 8892–8896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chandgude AL and Fasan R, Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of Nitrile-Substituted Cyclopropanes by Myoglobin-Mediated Carbene Transfer Catalysis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 15852–15856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nam D, Steck V, Potenzino RJ and Fasan R, A Diverse Library of Chiral Cyclopropane Scaffolds via Chemoenzymatic Assembly and Diversification of Cyclopropyl Ketones, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143, 2221–2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wittmann BJ, Knight AM, Hofstra JL, Reisman SE, Jennifer Kan SB and Arnold FH, Diversity-Oriented Enzymatic Synthesis of Cyclopropane Building Blocks, ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 7112–7116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pons A, Delion L, Poisson T, Charette AB and Jubault P, Asymmetric Synthesis of Fluoro, Fluoromethyl, Difluoro-methyl, and Trifluoromethylcyclopropanes, Acc. Chem. Res 2021, 54, 2969–2990; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Huang W-S, Schlinquer C, Poisson T, Pannecoucke X, Charette AB and Jubault P, General Catalytic Enantioselective Access to Monohalomethyl and Trifluoromethyl Cyclopropanes, Chem. Eur. J 2018, 24, 10339–10343; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Schlinquer C, Huang W-S, Chen L, Pannecoucke X, Charette AB and Jubault P, Rhodium Catalysed Enantioselective Synthesis of Mono-(halo)-methyl-cyclopropanes, Org. Biomol. Chem 2019, 17, 472–476; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Hasegawa Y, Cantin T, Decaens J, Couve-Bonnaire S, Charette AB, Poisson T and Jubault P, Catalytic Asymmetric Syntheses of Alkylidenecyclopropanes from Allenoates with Donor-Acceptor and Diacceptor Diazo Reagents, Chem. Eur. J 2022, 28, e202201438; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Chen L, Le TM, Bouillon J-P, Poisson T and Jubault P, Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Functionalized Cyclopropanes from α-Substituted Allyl Sulfones with Donor-Acceptor or Diacceptor Diazo Reagents, Chem. Eur. J 2022, 28, e202201254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu L-J, Dai M, Song L, Chen HY, Bian M, Gao Y-N and Liu Z-J, Water-assisted, Highly-selective and Rapid Synthesis of Cyclopropane Derivatives by a [2+1] Annulation Reaction, ChemistrySelect, 2022, 7, e202203870. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Meijere A, Bagutski V, Zeuner F, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V and Moszner N, Synthesis and Radical Polymerization of Various 2-Cyclopropylacrylates, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2004, 2004, 3669–3678. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nam D, Bacik J-P, Khade R, Aguileraa MC, Wei Y, Neidig M, Zhang Y, Ando N and Fasan R, Mechanistic Manifold in a Hemoprotein-Catalyzed Cyclopropanation Reaction with Diazoketone, Nat. Commun 2023, 14, 7985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Deposition Number 2305160 (for 2e) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe. http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures Access Structures Service.
  • 30.Ortega A, Manzano R, Uria U, Carrillo L, Reyes E, Tejero T, Merino P and Vicario JL, Catalytic Enantioselective Cloke–Wilson Rearrangement, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 8225–8229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.See these reviews for more information :; a) Inoue M, Sumii Y and Shibata N, Contribution of Organofluorine Compounds to Pharmaceuticals, ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10633–10640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Johnson BM, Shu Y-Z, Zhuo X and Meanwell NA, Metabolic and Pharmaceutical Aspects of Fluorinated Compounds, J. Med. Chem 2020, 63, 6315–6386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.We were unable to synthetize racemic 2m, as a consequence ee was not measured.
  • 33.Bernart MW, Kashman Y, Tischler M, Cardellina II JH, Boyd MR, Bershacolone, an Unprecedented Diterpene Cyclobutene from Maprounea africana, Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4461–4464. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fokialakis P, Magiatis P, Terzis A, Tillequin F and Skaltsounis A-L, Cyclomegistine, The First Alkaloid with the New Cyclobuta[b]quinoline Ring System from Sarcomelicope Megistophylla, Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5323–5325; [Google Scholar]; Misonou T, Saitoh J, Oshiba S, Tokitomo Y, Maegawa M, Inoue Y, Hori H and Sakurai T, UV-Absorbing Substance in the Red Alga Porphyra yezoensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) Block Thymine Photodimer Production, Marine Biotechnology 2003, 5, 194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Endo Y, Ohta T and Nozoe S, Neofavelanone, A Novel Tetracyclic Cyclobutene Derivative from the Brazilian Plant, Cnidoscolus Phyllacanthus, Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 353–356 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang J, Yuwu C, Xiaozhang F, Dequan Y and Xiaotian L, Chemical Constituents of Armillaria mellea Mycelium I. Isolation and Characterization of Armillarin and Armillaridin, Planta Med. 1984, 50, 288–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hovey MT, Cohen DT, Walden DM, Cheong PH-Y and Scheidt KA, A Carbene Catalysis Strategy for the Synthesis of Protoilludane Natural Products, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 9864–9867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li J, Gao K, Bian M and Ding H, Recent Advances in the Total Synthesis of Cyclobutane-containing Natural Products, Org. Chem. Front 2020, 7, 136–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kolk MR, Janssen MACH, Rutjes FPJT and Blanco‐Ania D, Cyclobutanes in Small‐Molecule Drug Candidates, ChemMedChem. 2022, 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Thaçi D, Paul C, Pink AE, Kataoka Y, Chu C-Y, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Antinew J, Ionita I, Sinclair R, Forman S, Zdybski J, Biswas P, Malhotra B, Zhang F and Valdez H, Abrocitinib versus Placebo or Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis, Engl. J. Med 2021, 384, 1101–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.White JD, Avery MA and Carter JP, Synthesis of (+-)-Lineatin, an Aggregation Pheromone of Trypodendron Lineatum, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1982, 104, 5486–5489. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ha Y, Lee Y, Kwak Y, Mishra A, Yu E, Ryou B and Park C-M, Alkyne-Alkene [2 + 2] Cycloaddition based on Visible Light Photocatalysis, Nat Commun 2020, 11, 2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maturi MM and Bach T, Alkyne–Alkene [2 + 2] Cycloaddition based on Visible Light Photocatalysis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 7661–7664. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Parsutkar MM, Pagar VV and RajanBabu TV, Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyclobutenes from Alkynes and Alkenyl Derivatives, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 15367–15377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sakai K, Kochi T and Kakiuchi F, Rhodium-Catalyzed Intermolecular [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of Terminal Alkynes with Electron-Deficient Alkenes, Org. Lett 2013, 15, 1024–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Farmer ME, Ehehalt LE, Pabst TP, Tudge MT and Chirik PJ, Well-Defined Cationic Cobalt(I) Precatalyst for Olefin-Alkyne [2 + 2] Cycloaddition and Olefin-Diene Hydrovinylation Reactions: Experimental Evidence for Metallacycle Intermediates, Organometallics 2021, 40, 3599–3607. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu H, Zhang W, Shu D, Werness JB and Tang W, Synthesis of Cyclobutenes by Highly Selective Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Ring Expansion of Cyclopropanes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 8933–8936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fürstner A and Aïssa C, PtCl2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Methylenecyclopropanes, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 6306–6307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tian G-Q, Yuan Z-L, Zhu Z-B and Shi M, Palladium(ii)-Catalyzed Ring Enlargement of 2-(Arylmethylene) cyclopropylcarbinols: Strong Effect of Substituent Electronic Nature on the Reaction Pathway, Chem. Commun 2008, 23, 2668–2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang F-G and Marek I, Brook Rearrangement as Trigger for Carbene Generation: Synthesis of Stereodefined and Fully Substituted Cyclobutenes, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 8364–8370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Following the procedure reported by Tang (ref. 47) with substrate 2a, we observed using Rh2(OAc)4 a 12/88 mixture of regioisomers (4a/4b) and 74% NMR yield.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES