Skip to main content
Molecular Biology of the Cell logoLink to Molecular Biology of the Cell
. 2024 Jul 1;35(7):ar89. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E24-03-0130

The methylome of motile cilia

Stephen M King a,*, Miho Sakato-Antoku a, Ramila S Patel-King a, Jeremy L Balsbaugh b
Editor: Gregory Pazourc
PMCID: PMC11244166  PMID: 38696262

Abstract

Cilia are highly complex motile, sensory, and secretory organelles that contain perhaps 1000 or more distinct protein components, many of which are subject to various posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation, N-terminal acetylation, and proteolytic processing. Another common modification is the addition of one or more methyl groups to the side chains of arginine and lysine residues. These tunable additions delocalize the side-chain charge, decrease hydrogen bond capacity, and increase both bulk and hydrophobicity. Methylation is usually mediated by S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferases and reversed by demethylases. Previous studies have identified several ciliary proteins that are subject to methylation including axonemal dynein heavy chains that are modified by a cytosolic methyltransferase. Here, we have performed an extensive proteomic analysis of multiple independently derived cilia samples to assess the potential for SAM metabolism and the extent of methylation in these organelles. We find that cilia contain all the enzymes needed for generation of the SAM methyl donor and recycling of the S-adenosylhomocysteine and tetrahydrofolate byproducts. In addition, we find that at least 155 distinct ciliary proteins are methylated, in some cases at multiple sites. These data provide a comprehensive resource for studying the consequences of methyl marks on ciliary biology.


  • Motile cilia are highly complex organelles containing 1000 or more different protein types many of which are subject to various posttranslational modifications. Several studies indicate that some ciliary components such as axonemal dynein motors are methylated at key sites that likely modify their function. However, the degree to which this modification impacts on ciliary proteins and the abundance of methylated sites was unknown.

  • The authors assessed the extent of methylation in motile cilia and identified over 150 different methylated ciliary components. Furthermore, cilia contained all the enzymes needed for generation of the S-adenosyl methionine methyl donor and for recycling of the methylation byproducts.

  • This analysis provides a comprehensive resource for studying the role of methyl marks in ciliary biology.

INTRODUCTION

Cilia are microtubule-based cellular extensions that play key roles in generating cell motility and fluid flow. They also provide dedicated signaling platforms (e.g., for the hedgehog pathway needed during mammalian development) (Reiter and Leroux, 2017), and for the processing and regulated secretion of bioactive products such as degradative enzymes (Wood et al., 2013) and peptidergic signaling factors (Luxmi et al., 2019, 2022). These organelles are very highly conserved dating to before the last eukaryotic common ancestor (Satir et al., 2008; Mitchell, 2017), and are found throughout the eukaryotes with a few notable exceptions such as red algae, angiosperms, and the amoeboid filasteria (Carvalho-Santos et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2019). Cilia are very complex and proteomic studies in a broad array of organisms, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Pazour et al., 2005; Sakato-Antoku and King, 2022), Paramecium tetraurelia (Arnaiz et al., 2009), Trypanosoma brucei (Subota et al., 2014), Euglena gracilis (Hammond et al., 2021) and metazoans, for example, (Ostrowski et al., 2002; Ishikawa et al., 2012; Blackburn et al., 2017; van Dam et al., 2019) suggest cilia contain perhaps 1000 or more different protein types; in humans, this equates to about 5% of all identified genes being involved in ciliary formation and/or function.

The general architecture of motile cilia consists of an axoneme comprising nine outer doublet microtubules surrounding a central pair of microtubule singlets. This is encompassed by a membrane that is contiguous with the plasma membrane although it has a very distinct protein and lipid composition (Garcia et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2019). Microtubule-associated motors – the axonemal dyneins – are arrayed along the ciliary length in two rows. These dyneins are controlled by additional axonemal structures including the nexin-dynein regulatory complex (N-DRC), radial spokes, and a complex pattern of repeating structures associated with the central pair microtubules (Nicastro et al., 2006; Grossman-Haham et al., 2021; Gui et al., 2021; Han et al., 2022) as well as by Ca2+ and redox signals (Kamiya and Witman, 1984; Harrison et al., 2002; Wakabayashi and King, 2006). Cilia are assembled at their distal tip (Johnson and Rosenbaum, 1992) and the needed components are, in general, trafficked from the ciliary base by the intraflagellar transport (IFT) system (Rosenbaum and Witman, 2002). The IFT particle scaffolds (or trains), onto which cargo components such as tubulins are loaded, are moved to the ciliary tip by specialized kinesin motor(s) and returned to the base by a dedicated dynein complex (reviewed in [Klena and Pigino, 2022]).

Many ciliary components are subject to various posttranslational modifications that alter their function. For example, axonemal tubulins can be acetylated, tyrosinated, detyrosinated, polyglutamylated, polyglycylated, and/or phosphorylated amongst other reported alterations (Janke and Magiera, 2020). Mass spectrometry and biochemical analyses of Chlamydomonas cilia has identified numerous other components that are subject to phosphorylation (Piperno and Luck, 1981; King and Witman, 1994; Boesger et al., 2009). In a similar vein, most axonemal dynein proteins are subject to N-terminal acetylation that in some cases requires the prior action of a methionine aminopeptidase (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2023).

Methylation is a highly abundant post-translational modification that is found throughout the bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. In addition to histones, many other protein types are known to be methylated such as bacterial flagellin, Rubisco, RNA-binding proteins, cytochrome c, and myosin (Murn and Shi, 2017). Unlike phosphorylation which acts as a binary switch with respect to side-chain charge and steric bulk, the effects of methylation are more nuanced due to the successive nature of methylation posttranslational modifications (Wesche et al., 2017; Luo, 2018; Figure 1A). For example, lysine side chains can be mono-, di-, or tri-methylated. Although this does not alter the +1 charge on the side chain per se at physiological pH, it has more subtle effects. Instead of being focused only on the Nε atom, the charge becomes increasingly delocalized as more methyl groups are added; for trimethyl-lysine, the charge also becomes obligate as the side chain no longer exhibits a pKa. In addition, the number of potential hydrogen bonds that can be formed decreases (eventually to zero) as methylation increases. These modifications also increase the bulk and, perhaps more importantly, the hydrophobicity of the side chain. Similarly, arginine residues can be mono- or di-methylated; in this case, dimethylation is either asymmetric with both methyl groups attached to the same side chain N atom, or symmetric with both N and N’ atoms of the guanidino group being monomethylated. Again, these additions delocalize the +1 charge, decrease hydrogen bond capacity, and increase bulk and hydrophobicity. Eukaryotes express a broad array of arginine- and lysine-methyltransferases which use S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as the methyl donor to modify target proteins and also numerous demethylases that act to remove the methyl marks. Consequently, methylation is a tunable and reversible step-wise modification with the capacity to exert varied effects that can impact protein–protein interactions and/or enzymatic functions.

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

Methylation Products and the SAM-dependent Protein Methylation Pathway. (A) Space-filling models for methylated Lys and Arg residues colored by element (C, yellow; H, silver; N, blue; O, red). As methyl groups are added to the Nε atom of the Lys side-chain, the +1 charge becomes more delocalized and for trimethyl Lys obligate. In addition, the number of possible hydrogen bonds decreases, and both side chain bulk and hydrophobicity increase. The Arg guanidino group can be monomethylated on either N atom. When a second methyl group is added, the result can be asymmetric methylation with both methyl groups on a single N, or symmetric with both N atoms carrying a single methyl addition. (B) Schematic illustrating S-adenosyl methionine metabolism. All the key enzymes (indicated in red) needed for SAM utilization, SAH hydrolysis, conversion of homocysteine to methionine, recycling of THF to 5-MeTHF, and the subsequent ATP-dependent regeneration of SAM are present in cilia. Protein-CH3 represents a monomethylated product.

Although there have been several reports of ciliary protein methylation in Chlamydomonas and on their potential involvement in ciliary disassembly (Schneider et al., 2008; Werner-Peterson and Sloboda, 2013) and dynein motor function (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024), there has not been a comprehensive analysis aimed at defining the extent to which cilia components are subject to this modification. Here, we have reexamined multiple Chlamydomonas cilia proteomes and several electrophoretically-isolated axonemal high molecular weight component proteomes obtained by high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry searching for arginine and lysine methylation. We find that these variable posttranslational modifications are highly abundant on many motile cilia components. As methylation has multiple and subtle effects on the properties of basic residues, the ciliary methylome described here provides a resource for studying how this tunable and reversible addition might alter or regulate the activities of various ciliary subsystems.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cilia contain the enzymes needed for S-Adenosyl methionine (SAM) metabolism

The key methyl donor for protein methylation reactions is SAM (see Figure 1B for an outline of SAM metabolism). This is generated from methionine and ATP by SAM synthetase with the concomitant release of phosphate and pyrophosphate. Following the methylation reaction where the methyl group is covalently attached to a Lys or Arg side chain by a protein methyltransferase, the S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) byproduct is hydrolyzed by SAH hydrolase to yield adenosine and homocysteine. The latter is then converted back to methionine by METE methionine synthase-mediated methyl transfer from 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MeTHF). 5-MeTHF is generated from 5,10 methylene-tetrahydrofolate (5,10-MeTHF) by tetrahydrofolate reductase (THFR). In turn, 5,10-MeTHF is synthesized from serine and THF by serine hydroxymethyl transferases with glycine as a by-product. It was noted previously (Sloboda and Howard, 2009) that several of these enzymes were found in the original Chlamydomonas ciliary proteome (Pazour et al., 2005). Since then, numerous additional whole cilia proteome datasets have become available that provide further support for this original report (e.g., [Sakato-Antoku and King, 2022; Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024] and see The Chlamydomonas Flagellar Proteome Project for a comprehensive recent compilation of numerous studies). These new proteomes also extend the initial observations revealing that all the key enzymes needed for SAM synthesis, SAH recycling and THF metabolism are present in Chlamydomonas cilia (Figure 1B; Table 1). Therefore, for this metabolic cycle to function in cilia requires only initial starting amounts of methionine (or SAH) and THF and replenishable sources of ATP, NADH, and serine.

TABLE 1:

S-Adenosyl methionine metabolism enzymes found in cilia.

Enzyme Cre# Gene symbol Function
S-Adenosyl methionine synthetase Cre06.g250200 METM1 Converts methionine and ATP to SAM + Pi+ PPi
Cobalamin-independent methionine synthasea Cre03.g180750 METE1 Methylates homocysteine to generate methionine. Requires 5-MeTHF
NAD(H)-dependent THFR Cre10.g433600
—– Converts 5,10-MeTHF to 5-MeTHF. Requires NADH and generates NAD+
SAH hydrolase Cre03.g204250 SAH1 Hydrolyzes SAH to yield adenosine + homocysteine
Serine hydroxymethyl transferaseb Cre06.g293950 SHMT2 Combines serine + THF to yield 5,10-MeTHF + glycine

aIn the current version of Phytozome the annotation for cobalamin-dependence/independence is incorrect for both this protein and the product of the METH1 (Cre06.g250902) gene.

bAlthough predicted to be mitochondrial by TargetP, a second serine hydroxymethyl transferase (SHMT1; Cre16.g664550) was also identified in several cilia proteomes.

Overview of the cilia protein methylome

To identify methylated proteins in Chlamydomonas cilia, we examined nine independently obtained proteomes; eight represented triplicate cilia samples from CC-124 and CC-125 wildtype vegetative and gametic cells that had been fractionated by detergent extraction to yield membrane plus matrix and axonemal samples (Sakato-Antoku and King, 2022), while the ninth proteome derived from analysis of whole cilia from the CC-125 strain (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2023, 2024). In addition, we also examined the proteins present in the high molecular weight regions (>250 kDa) of SDS–PAGE gels loaded with isolated ciliary axonemes from wildtype (CC-125) Chlamydomonas and the oda2 mutant which lacks outer arm dyneins. In combination, this led to the identification of 437 methylated sites on Arg/Lys residues in 155 different proteins (Figure 2, A and B). The distribution of methylated proteins in ciliary fractions generated by detergent and high salt extraction and the overall number of methylated sites per protein are shown in Figure 2, C and D, respectively; in the few cases where multiple Arg/Lys residues occurred within a short peptide region, the modified site(s) were assessed by manual inspection of the individual spectra for the methylated peptide.

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

Overview of Cilia Protein Methylation Parameters. (A) Plots illustrating the distribution of the five types of methylated residues identified; the mass spectra do not distinguish between asymmetric and symmetric dimethyl Arg. In addition to all combined sites, plots for both axonemal dyneins and nonaxonemal dynein components are shown. Totals represent the number of sites identified. (B) A total of 155 methylated ciliary proteins were identified. This plot illustrates their distribution in related groups. The most common categories are axonemal dynein proteins, FAPs not assigned to other categories, and proteins for which there is currently no, or at best extremely limited, annotation in Phytozome. (C) Proteomic analysis of methylated proteins from various ciliary fractions identifies four distinct groups: 1) those tightly associated with the axoneme; 2) detergent-soluble proteins in the membrane plus matrix; 3) proteins extracted from demembranated axonemes by 0.6 M KCl; and 4) those for which fractionation data is uncertain (i.e., similar numbers of peptides in more than one fraction) or unavailable (for proteins found only in the whole cilia proteome). (D) The number of methylation sites on Arg and Lys residues per protein is plotted. The majority of identified proteins are methylated on a single residue. Forty-seven proteins had at least one methyl modification on both residue types.

Of all the identified methylation sites, 161 modifications were found in axonemal dynein components or closely associated proteins; most of these sites were reported previously (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024). In this group, Arg modifications were mainly monomethyl (75) with a total of only seven dimethyl Arg residues identified, whereas multimethyl Lys modifications were somewhat more abundant. In contrast, although non-axonemal dynein proteins had a similar overall proportion of modified Arg as compared to Lys residues, the amount of dimethylated forms was considerably increased (Figure 2A). These differences likely reflect the specificity of the various methyltransferases involved. All identified methylated sites on cilia proteins are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2:

Methylated sites identified in chlamydomonas cilia proteins.

Cre# Description Kme Kme2 Kme3 Rme Rme2
Membrane proteins
Cre09.g392867 Flagella major membrane glycoprotein FMG1B K881, K1190, K2263, K2553, K2649, K2659, K2849, K3124, K3179, K3781, K3949, K3962 K2263 R485, R1526, R2515, R3051, R3700, R2810
Cre18.g750047 Flagella major membrane glycoprotein FMG1A K1031, K2146, K3029, K3274, K3753, K3954 K3550 R481, R3730,
Cre16.g650600 Mastigoneme-like protein MST1 K1176, K1567 K1176 R1171
Cre07.g340450 PKHD1 (similar to Fibrocystin) K299
Tubulins
Cre12.g542250 Beta-1 tubulin TUB1 K216 K216 K216 R213, R262 R213
Cre03.g190950 Alpha-1 tubulin TUA1 K430 R79, R105
Kinesin
Cre09.g386700 Kinesin 13 (KIN13A) microtubule depolymerase R509 R511
Radial spoke and central pair proteins
Cre03.g201900 Radial spoke protein 1 (RSP1) K315
Cre07.g330200 Radial spoke protein 9 (RSP9) K125 R156
Cre01.g025400 Hydin K1770, K3258, K3534, K3964, K4401 R178, R263, R2569, R3706, R3818
Cre06.g256450 FAP119 central pair protein (in C1a with PF6) K260 K80
Cre06.g271150 FAP74 central pair protein (in C1d) K132
Cre10.g434400 PF6 central pair protein (in C1a) K4, K6, K7, K29, K116, K410 K4, K6, K410 K4 R820, R1149
Cre16.g654800 CPC2 central pair protein K2271 R1200, R2116 R1208
IFT
Cre11.g467739 IFT54 (in IFT-B2 complex) K184, K183, K188
Cre01.g027950 IFT74 (in IFT-B1 complex) K79 R80, R87, R102
Cre06.g250300 IFT dynein DHC1b (DHC16) K1776, K2006, K2340, K4231 K3438 R1585, R2164, R2685
Cre09.g398882 IFT dynein D1b LIC (DLI1) K53
Cre02.g110950 IFT dynein D1bIC2 (DIC5, WDR34, FAP133) K53
Cre10.g428664 IFT dynein D1bIC1 (DIC6, WDR60, FAP163) R626
Axonemal dyneins* and associated proteins
Cre12.g484250 I1/f alpha HC (DHC1) K1682, K2582, K2951, K3983 K1371 R1069, R1284 R666
Cre09.g392282 Dynein d heavy chain (DHC2) R81, R1541, R1594, R2090, R2629 R87
Cre02.g107350 Minor dynein (DHC4) K3552 R4510
Cre02.g107050 Dynein b HC (DHC5) K2106, K2924, K3001 R1495, R3704, R4140 R2753
Cre05.g244250 Dynein a HC (DHC6) K2940, K3148 R134, R1664, R3847
Cre14.g627576 Dynein g HC (DHC7) K2089, K2366, K3721, K4144 R436, R1383, R2267, R2327, R3576, R3769
Cre16.g685450 Dynein e HC (DHC8) K1104, K1201, K2967 R1470, R1523, R1883, R3334, R4126, R4166
Cre02.g141606 Dynein c HC (DHC9) K1174, K2789, K3222, K3639, K3699, K3773 R540, R1374, R3020, R3028, R4062,
Cre14.g624950 I1/f 1beta HC (DHC10) K1541, K1709, K1878, K3283, K4059 K2453 K2459, K3193 R524, R2193, R2832, R3694, R3699
Cre12.g555950 Minor dynein (DHC11) K2291, K4274 K3626 R4 R12, R2303
Cre03.g145127 OAD alpha HC (DHC13) K110, K253, K1436, K1791, K2840, K3044, K3065 K3072 K3066, K3439, K3445 R18, R38, R647, R791, R1119, R1168, R1418, R1702, R1777, R2111, R2500, R3139, R3654, R3655, R3678, R3720, R3756, R3816, R3878, R4022, R4068 R1945
Cre09.g403800 OAD beta HC (DHC14) K296, K527, K756, K1989, K2149, K2208, K2401, K2491, K2998, K3223, K3635, K4114 K653, K990, K1319, K2606, K3169, K3230, K3296, K3876 K2634, K3224 R1621, R1975, R2332, R2488, R2710, R2763, R3202, R3467, R4285, R3959
Cre11.g476050 OAD gamma HC (DHC15) K1533, K1744, K2952, K2997, K4228 K292 K3079 R213, R1317, R1373, R1904, R2713, R3678, R4424
Cre01.g029750 ODA5-associated adenylate kinase (DAAK1) K521, K603, K1580
Cre12.g494800 IDA4/p28 (DII1) R108
Cre11.g476850 DRC4 (N-DRC) K4
Centriole/basal body/transition zone
Cre12.g559250 Centriole protein 14 (POC14) K253
Cre13.g607650 Centriole protein 15 (POC15). Many EF hands R2914, R2919
Cre10.g432850 FAP77 (also in basal body as BUG1) R196
Cre14.g632050 Retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator interacting protein 1 RPG1 (RPGRIP1) K695 K743 R748
FAPs
Cre17.g747247 FAP2 (TPRs, similar to kinesin light chain) R605
Cre09.g390615 FAP12 Diacylglycerol lipase (LIP1) K70, K141, K313, K401, K418
Cre10.g450450 FAP18 (rhomboid membrane protease) K138
Cre09.g386736 FAP44 (WDR52) K153
Cre17.g704300 FAP47 (weakly similar Hydrocephalus 3 has calponin homology domain) K1012
Cre03.g171900 FAP56 K355 R402 R354
Cre17.g701250 FAP59 (CCDC39) R52
Cre06.g296850 FAP81 (similar to deleted in lung and esophageal cancer; DLEC1) K81 R86
Cre09.g389150 FAP93 K1077
Cre09.g393954 FAP106 (microtubule inner protein) K26
Cre02.g145850 FAP112 K262
Cre17.g737100 FAP127 K72
Cre16.g693600 FAP137 Hydroxyproline rich K333 R385
Cre09.g387912 FAP139 (CCDC139) R106
Cre11.g468850 FAP152 K82
Cre08.g362100 FAP154 (PAS domain) K2562
Cre14.g624900 FAP171 (armadillo folds) K4
Cre09.g395769 FAP177 K508 K2172, K2175 R1995
Cre01.g032150 FAP187 R847 R881
Cre01.g004550 FAP190 R319
Cre17.g728650 FAP196 (WD repeats) K147
Cre02.g078550 FAP210 (trichohyalin-plectin homology domain) K95
Cre07.g350350 FAP217 (coiled coil) R1139, R1141
Cre14.g618750 FAP246 (LRRs, transglutaminase-like and EF hands) R997
Cre12.g518050 FAP261 translin-associated factor X interacting protein 1-like - involved in spermatogenesis R596, R597
Cre17.g717150 FAP263 (CCDC113) K130, K358 K358, K361 R136, R360 R360
Cre15.g637050 FAP274 K108
Cre16.g679550 FAP277 K5
Cre18.g749797 FAP281 (coiled coil protein) R1723, R1728 R1728
Cre17.g740261 FAP365 (TPR repeats) R761 R671
Cre11.g467580 FAP370 K589 R566
Cre11.g468900 FAP404 (Volvocales-specific) R240
Cre10.g429750 FAP417 K705
Kinases
Cre12.g538300 LF5 (FAP247) protein kinase R554
Cre11.g481400 S/T/dual Kinase K983 R630
Cre12.g555450 Inositol tetrakisphosphate 5 kinase K77 R76
Cre03.g164250 Protein kinase + IQ motif (FAP262) K901, K915, K921, K935, K1640
Cre12.g508900 Mitogen activated protein kinase 6 (MAPK6) K110 R114
Cre02.g075900 Protein kinase (SNRK2C) R155
Putative NTPases
Cre13.g563700 FAP369. NTPase, alcohol dehydrogenase and WD repeat regions K303
Cre06.g249900 FAP75 contains NAD(P) binding domain, NTPase Adenylate or UMP-CMP kinase R948
Cre06.g269950 CDC48 AAA ATPase K343 R345
Metabolic and other enzymes
Cre03.g180750 Cobalamin-independent methionine synthase METE1 R537
Cre12.g551800 Bis (5’-nucleosyl) tetra-phosphatase (generates ADP) R132, R134
Cre10.g433600 Methylene THFR K10, K12, K13
Cre05.g234700 Pyruvate kinase 3 (PYK3) R2261
Cre12.g513200 Enolase (ENO1) K350
Cre06.g282800 Isocitrate lyase (ICL1) K233
Cre16.g682725 Glutathione S-transferase K124
Cre05.g233300 SAM-dependent methylase (dipthine synthase family) K169, K192 R178, R180, R187
Cre12.g483800 Serine carboxypeptidase R945, R947, R948
Cre14.g620300 Anthranilate synthase beta subunit K73
Cre02.g115950 Glucan endo-1,3-beta-D-glucosidase K136
EF-hand proteins
Cre01.g004200 No annotation. Has EF hand R1115
Cre06.g287100 Calmodulin-like. Two EF hands R4
Cre07.g334450 Two EF hands K55 R52
Cre13.g604050 EF hand motif. Pectin lyase fold R2491 R2492
Cre16.g652400 FAP183 (EF hands) K1812
Cre03.g178350 FAP272 (similar to calmodulin) K135
Induced upon gametogenesis
Cre06.g251050 Possible kinase. Coexpression cluster with mating activation induced in minus gametes R907
Cre17.g698903 No annotation. Coexpression cluster with mating activation induced in minus gametes K1568 R709
Cre03.g206700 No annotation. Coexpression cluster with mating activation induced in plus gametes R12, R15
Cre12.g511350 No annotation. Coexpression cluster with mating activation induced in plus gametes R614
Miscellaneous annotated proteins
Cre09.g397142 Acid induced Ca2+ TRP channel ADF1 R1617
Cre09.g400850 Carbohydrate binding protein (CTL4) K4305
Cre09.g398900 Vegetative cell wall protein CWP1 K432
Cre06.g258800 Vegetative cell wall protein CWP2 K1234
Cre03.g149800 MAP TOG1 (XMAP215) K1171 R1158
Cre03.g204913 Shippo-1 related, sperm tail PG repeats R884 R879
Cre01.g003950 Tiny macrocysts protein B-related K1282 K587 R585
Cre02.g110450 Proteasome interacting thioredoxin R64
Cre02.g114600 Peroxiredoxin PRX2 K110
Cre08.g378000 LSM and DFDF domains plus TFG box R332, R336
Cre06.g297016 DNA excision repair (ERCC3) K846 K850
Cre09.g393358 Vasa intronic gene homolog VIG1 R117, R120 R115
Translation-related
Cre06.g263450 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 alpha EEF1A3 K43, K306 K435, K406, K435 R37, R253, R442
Cre04.g222700 Elongation factor 3 (EF3) K1023 K1027
Cre04.g217550 Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3C) K242
Cre02.g097400 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A EIF5A K89 K89 R88
Cre06.g252850 Plant specific eukaryotic initiation factor 4b (eIF-4B) R212
Cre12.g516200 Elongation Factor G (EFG2) K511 R514
Cre02.g143200 Alanyl tRNA synthetase K604
Cre03.g160500 Lysyl tRNA synthetase K185
Cre08.g372100 HSP70A K563 R475
Cre14.g613550 HSP70H (FAP367 or FAP203) K139 R81
No (or very limited) gene annotation
Cre01.g009850 No annotation. (Volvocales-specific) R647 R647
Cre01.g049300 No annotation R612
Cre02.g084150 No annotation R1775
Cre02.g103800 No annotation. LRR protein R386
Cre03.g152250 No annotation K180
Cre03.g162150 No annotation K1579 R1581
Cre03.g170900 No annotation. Aldehyde/histidinol dehydrogenase domain K147
Cre04.g217952 No annotation. Contains zinc finger R463, R571, R572
Cre04.g232202 No annotation R3232 R3235
Cre06.g256600 No annotation R731
Cre06.g278186 No annotation. Toll receptor homology and armadillo fold R910
Cre06.g299100 No annotation R249, R254
Cre07.g354650 No annotation. cNMP binding domain R1280
Cre10.g419400 No annotation. Contains zinc finger R611
Cre10.g427850 No annotation. PAS domain K705
Cre10.g801108 No annotation R98
Cre11.g477950 No annotation. Crystallin domain K553
Cre12.g540050 No annotation. cNMP binding domain. R59 R61
Cre12.g555378 No annotation K446 R458, R869, R872
Cre15.g641950 No annotation K561 R1095, R1098, R1103
Cre16.g696050 No annotation R1630, R1631
Cre16.g669750 No annotation R488
Cre16.g801909 No annotation may be a TRP channel K208 R210
Cre17.g727550 No annotation K1062 R1808
Cre17.g744747 No annotation K18 R57
Cre18.g749997 No annotation R30

Residue numbers refer to the protein sequences shown in the CC-4352 v6.1 Chlamydomonas reinhardtii genome release in Phytozome 13 (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/).

*Most sites identified in axonemal dynein HCs were reported previously (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024). No methylated sites have been identified on the minor inner arm dyneins DHC3 (Cre06.g265950) and DHC12 (Cre06.g297850). Potential methylation of outer arm dynein LC1 and inner arm I1/f dynein IC97 was not confirmed following in-depth manual analysis of the raw MS/MS spectra.

As an example of the evidence for the modifications observed, unambiguous mass spectral identification of di-methylation on K216 of β-tubulin based on near complete b- and y- fragment ion coverage is shown in Figure 3A and the location of all methylated residues within the α/β tubulin dimer in Figure 3B. In multiple cases, a given Arg or Lys residue was identified in more than one methylated state, for example, K216 of β-tubulin and K4 of the central pair protein PF6 were found as the mono-, di-, and trimethylated forms.

FIGURE 3:

FIGURE 3:

Methylation of Axonemal Tubulins. (A) Mass spectral analysis of a dimethylated β-tubulin peptide. Annotated higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) MS/MS spectrum and the corresponding fragment ion coverage with the identified b- and y-type ions for the tryptic peptide (R)TLKme2LTTPTFGDLNHLISAVMSGITccLR (where c represents Cys+57 due to the mass increase from iodoacetamide-mediated carbamidomethylation derivatization during sample processing). High abundance doubly charged ions present in the MS/MS spectrum are not included in the sequence representation. This spectrum and the m/z values unambiguously demonstrate dimethylation of K216 of β-tubulin. (B) Ribbon diagram of an AlphaFold2 model of the α/β tubulin dimer from Chlamydomonas; α-tubulin, pink; β-tubulin, wheat. All identified methylated residues are indicated: monomethyl, marine blue; di-methyl, split-pea; tri-methyl, red; the added methyl groups are in green (C)/silver (H). The N- and C-termini are also indicated where visible. Modified residues occur on the outer surface, the luminal face and in regions involved in inter-protofilament interactions. The right panel view is related to the left panel by an ∼ 90o rightward rotation about the vertical axis.

Classes of methylated ciliary proteins

Modified cilia-derived proteins can be divided into multiple classes based on their ciliary location as well as a variety of functional criteria (Figure 2B; Table 2). The major classes include axonemal dynein components (n = 16), a collection of unrelated proteins for which there is little or no functional annotation in Phytozome (n = 26), and a large number of flagellar-associated proteins (FAPs) many of which are also of unknown function (n = 33). Furthermore, multiple groups containing smaller numbers of modified proteins were also classified including tubulins, EF-hand proteins that predictably bind Ca2+, kinases, several NTPases, radial spoke/central pair components, a single microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin (KIN13), IFT proteins, and motors, and several metabolic and other enzymes. Also identified were some membrane-associated proteins in which methylation occurs on the domains exposed to the environment.

In addition, to the axonemal dynein HCs identified previously (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024), in this extended analysis we obtained evidence that several other dynein related proteins are subject to methylation including the ODA5-associated adenylate kinase (encoded at DAAK1), the DRC4 component of the N-DRC, and the p28 inner arm dynein LC (encoded at IDA4/DII1); modification of the p28 dimer occurs in a region involved in association with monomeric inner arm dynein HCs (Figure 4A). Similarly, both ICs and the LIC of the dynein that powers retrograde IFT were also found to be modified in at least one sample. Intriguingly within the methylated FAPs, three (FAP106, FAP112, and FAP210) are associated with the luminal face of tubulins forming the B-tubule of the outer doublets (Ma et al., 2019). FAP106 for example, forms a structure bridging B-tubule wall protofilament B10 to the A-tubule protofilaments (A12 and A13) forming the shared doublet microtubule wall; the methylated Lys residue (K26) protrudes into the B-tubule lumen (Figure 4B). Whether methylation of these inner proteins occurs within the microtubule B-tubule lumen as is thought to happen with acetylation on K40 by the α-tubulin acetyltransferase αTAT1 (Coombes et al., 2016) or on the free monomers before microtubule assembly remains to be determined. In several cases (e.g., IFT54 and IFT74; Supplemental Figure S1), examination of AlphaFold structural models revealed that methylation occurs on residues located within inherently disordered regions or loops as is often the case for other posttranslational modifications.

FIGURE 4:

FIGURE 4:

Methylation of Inner Arm Dynein p28 and Microtubule Inner Protein FAP106. (A) AlphaFold2 multimer model of the N-terminal 1000-residue region of DHC9 (dynein c; wheat) associated with a dimer of the p28 light chain (p28 and p28’ monomers in pale green and pale blue); the region of the trimeric complex involved in ATP-independent doublet microtubule associations is at left. The region boxed by the dash lines is enlarged at right illustrating the locations in the dimer of R108 that is monomethylated (space-filling side chains in marine blue; methyl groups in green (C)/silver (H)). (B) Ribbon representation of the 48 nm axonemal doublet microtubule repeat unit (PDB 6U42; [Ma et al., 2019]). All components are shown in light silver/blue except for FAP106 (red) and its monomethylated K26 residue (space-filling side chain in marine blue). The enlarged view at right reveals that mono-methylated K26 is exposed to the lumen of the outer doublet B-tubule.

Stoichiometry of methyl modifications

A broad assessment of the stoichiometry of methyl modifications on many proteins is complicated by the observation that these Arg/Lys-containing peptides represent tryptic cleavage sites. We have observed that methylation (especially tri-methylation) inhibits trypsin digestion whereas the unmodified peptides are readily cleaved often to fragments too small for unambiguous identification. Even so, analysis of endoproteinase Asp-N digests (this protease cleaves to the N-terminal side of Asp and sometimes Glu residues) does allow for some degree of comparative stoichiometry analysis. Previously, we determined that methylation of axonemal dynein HCs in cytoplasm is substoichiometric at most sites, for example, the numerous modifications that occur within the AAA+ domains (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024). The only apparently highly methylated region found was on helix 1 of the microtubule binding domains of the α and β outer arm dynein HCs where multiple methylated patterns of a K-K-X5-K motif were identified but the unmodified form was not. In this broader analysis, we find multiple cases where only methylated peptides can be identified for a given protein region. For example, the N-terminal segment of the central pair protein PF6 was identified from endoproteinase Asp-N digests only as (M)APKme3PKKPEAAPPPPPEPSP(D) or (M)APKme2PKmeKPEAAPPPPPEPSP(D). Similarly, in FAP56 only the methylated peptide was found for the sequence (D)DFERmeKmeER(D), while conversely less than 20% of peptides covering a second methylated site (R)DRQNKYLTAVEIEEGRmeKKAIR(D) in the same protein were modified. Thus, there is a considerable range of methylation levels between different proteins and even within individual proteins that may represent fine-tuned regulatory processes or responses.

Numerous methyltransferases are required for ciliary protein methylation

Analysis of the Chlamydomonas ciliary methylome reveals extensive modifications of many proteins on both Arg and Lys residues. As methyltransferases normally exhibit considerable specificity for either one residue or the other, this implies there are likely multiple enzymes dedicated to modifying particular groups or classes of ciliary proteins. These modifications could occur in the cytoplasm and the methylated product then trafficked into the cilium, or they might happen within the organelle as predicted from the presence of SAM regenerating enzymes. There is currently evidence for both modalities with respect to both Arg and Lys methylation. Recently, we found that one arginine methyltransferase (PF22; the mammalian ortholog is DNAAF3) is involved in modifying axonemal dyneins (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024); this enzyme is present in cytoplasm but apparently completely excluded from cilia (Mitchison et al., 2012), which is consistent with our observation that axonemal dynein HCs derived from wild-type cytoplasmic extracts are methylated. For example, the H1 helix of the outer arm β HC microtubule-binding domain is methylated at the same sites in dyneins derived from cytoplasm and from cilia. Whether all identified sites are modified in cytoplasm is more difficult to assess as the additions are substoichiometric and the depth of sequence coverage is much greater for axoneme-derived samples. Furthermore, axonemal dynein HCs in cytoplasm of the pf22 null mutant lack detectable methylated Arg residues consistent with the loss of the PF22 methyltransferase. However, these same pf22-derived HCs do retain some modified Lys residues strongly suggesting that at least one additional cytosolic lysine methyltransferase acts on these motor proteins (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2024). In contrast, (Schneider et al., 2008) found that the METE methionine synthase and several unidentified proteins detected with an antibody against asymmetric dimethyl-Arg were present in resorbing cilia but were unmodified (i.e., undetectable with the antidimethyl Arg antibody) in growing or full-length steady-state organelles. This observation thereby predicts that methylation occurs within the cilium and provides a link, although it does not establish causation, between methylation status and ciliary disassembly.

In addition to internal ciliary components, we also identify here both Arg and Lys methylation of several ciliary membrane proteins on domains that are exposed to the external environment. As a source of SAM is required for these modifications, they most likely occurred within the lumen of the secretory pathway, which necessitates at least two additional methyltransferases that might modify proteins destined for cilia as they transit the endoplasmic reticulum and/or Golgi apparatus.

There are two major classes of SAM-dependent protein methyltransferase that are based on distinct secondary structures – SET (suppressor of variation, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax) and Rossmann-fold domains (Dillon et al., 2005; Chouhan et al., 2019). Mass spectrometry and immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies provides some evidence for multiple methyltransferases within cilia (Table 3). For example, four protein arginine methyltransferases – PRMT1, PRMT2 (previously annotated as PRMT10), PRMT3, and PRMT5 – were identified immunologically (Mizuno and Sloboda, 2017); two of these, PRMT1 and PRMT3, appeared concentrated at the ciliary base. Currently, there is no mass spectrometry evidence for PRMT5 in cilia, but some peptides from PRMT1, PRMT2, and PRMT3 and also PRMT7 have been found. Thus, it appears that cilia do indeed contain several distinct protein arginine methyltransferases.

TABLE 3:

Methyltransferases potentially involved in modifying ciliary proteins.

Gene Cre# Evidence for cilia localization Properties
In Cilia Antibody * MS/MS +
PRMT1 Cre03.g172550 Yes Yes Arginine methyltransferase.
PRMT2 Cre12.g558100 Yes Yes Arginine methyltransferase. Previously called PRMT10.
PRMT3 Cre16.g685900 Yes Yes Arginine methyltransferase.
PRMT5 Cre03.g176550 Yes No Arginine methyltransferase.
PRMT7 Cre02.g141626 No Yes Arginine methyltransferase.
—– Cre01.g014100 No Yes FAM86A class I lysine methyltransferase that can generate tri-methyl Lys. N-terminal armadillo fold.
HLM19 Cre12.g523650 No Yes SET domain. Annotated as histone lysine methyltransferase.
FAP393 Cre06.g260150 No Yes Methyltransferase of undefined specificity.
—– Cre08.g362700 No Yes Methyltransferase of undefined specificity.
Cytoplasm only Tagged gene expression MS/MS +
PF22 (DNAAF3) Cre01.g001657 No No Functions in cytoplasm to methylate axonemal dynein heavy chains on Arg (and possibly some Lys) residues.
Unknown Unknown N/A N/A Cytoplasmic methyltransferase that modifies Lys residues on dynein heavy chains.

Several methyltransferases annotated as involved in tRNA methylation have been identified in ciliary proteomes including Cre10.g422000, Cre01.g027350, Cre06.g273400, Cre13.g566300 and Cre08.g359100. Evidence for these being in cilia is generally considered weak. In addition, other methyltransferases involved in modifying non-protein substrates such as thiopurines (Cre04.g215600) and sterols (Cre12.g500500) have been found. Although Cre01.g004350 (HLM1) is also present in these proteomes and annotated in Phytozome as a histone lysine methyltransferase, BLAST searches suggest it is related to a BRO1 domain-containing protein that interacts with programmed cell death protein 6 (PCD6).

*Antibody localization data are from (Mizuno and Sloboda, 2017). The location of PF22 is from (Mitchison et al., 2012).

+Mass spectrometry data from multiple cilia proteomes are compiled at The Chlamydomonas Flagellar Proteome Project.

Numerous ciliary proteins are modified on Lys residues and to date two methyltransferases which are thought to specifically modify this residue have been identified in cilia samples (see Table 3). In addition, there are two putative methyltransferases of undefined specificity (Table 3) that have been found in these organelles, and there is also evidence in multiple cilia proteomes for a SAM-dependent tetrapyrrole methylase (Cre05.g233300) that is a member of the diphthine synthase superfamily; canonical diphthine synthase is involved in the methylation of a modified His residue in elongation factor 2 (Hörberg et al., 2018).

Often posttranslational modifications occur within short linear sequence motifs such as those recognized by various kinases, for example, (Johnson et al., 2023). Analysis of the regions surrounding methylated sites within axonemal dyneins, and subsets of cilia components has not identified clear motifs that might direct the action of particular methyltransferases (Figure 5). This global analysis is however hindered by the possibility that multiple, currently unidentified, enzymes of differing specificities might be involved in these modifications. Furthermore, to date no annotated protein demethylases have been identified in any Chlamydomonas ciliary proteome. This raises the possibility that, although generally considered a reversible reaction, methylation of proteins in cilia may be irreversible at least while they remain within the organelle.

FIGURE 5:

FIGURE 5:

Motif Analysis of Ciliary Methylation Sites. Methylated regions (including five residues either side of the modified Arg or Lys) from various ciliary protein classes were aligned and displayed using WebLogo. (A) Di-methyl Lys (n = 11) from whole cilia proteins, (B) tri-methyl Lys (n = 17) from whole cilia proteins, (C) mono-methyl Lys from outer arm dynein HCs (n = 24), and (D) mono- and di-methyl Arg from outer arm dynein HCs (n = 38). No specific short linear motifs with embedded methylation sites are readily evident.

In conclusion, we describe here the identification of extensive methyl posttranslational modifications on numerous protein components of motile cilia. Available data indicates that methylation can occur either in the cytoplasm or secretory pathway on proteins destined for cilia or within the organelle itself. The nuanced and tunable effects of methyl additions on Arg and Lys residues suggests this may represent a mechanism for regulating numerous aspects of cilia protein function that have to date received little consideration. Thus, our data provide a resource for the further investigation of the role(s) of methyl marks in ciliary biology. There are numerous approaches that can be used in the future to dissect the functional significance of ciliary protein methylation including site-directed mutagenesis of Arg/Lys residues located at key positions involved in enzymatic activities and/or protein–protein interactions, and analysis of the ciliary phenotype(s) of mutant strains lacking one or more of the methyltransferases identified in cilia or which are known to modify ciliary proteins in cytoplasm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mass spectrometry datasets and searches

Multiple previously described ciliary proteomes from Chlamydomonas were reanalyzed for the presence of methylated residues using the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii v5.6 and CC-4352 v6.1 genome releases in Phytozome 13. One large dataset derived from cilia isolated from the wild-type strains CC-124 (mating type minus) and CC-125 (mating type plus) vegetative and gametic cells that had been fractionated into a detergent-soluble extract and a detergent-insoluble axoneme pellet. These samples were prepared in triplicate and digested with trypsin before mass spectrometry as described previously (Sakato-Antoku and King, 2022).

Posttranslational modifications that were searched in the raw data from these samples using Mascot in Proteome Discoverer included fixed carbamidomethylation on Cys, N-terminal acetylation, pyroglutamylation on Gln, oxidation on Met, phosphorylation on Ser, Thr and Tyr, and methylation on Arg and Lys.

An additional independently prepared CC-125 whole cilia proteome and several electrophoretically purified high molecular weight SDS–PAGE region samples derived from CC-125 and the outer dynein arm-less mutant oda2 (CC-2230) were digested with trypsin or endoproteinase Asp-N and analyzed using an Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer as described in (Sakato-Antoku et al., 2023, 2024). For these datasets, modifications were identified using the Andromeda search engine embedded within MaxQuant and the searches included fixed carbamidomethylation on Cys, Met oxidation, mono-, di-, and tri-methylation, and a series of N-terminal alterations including acetylation, arginylation, methylation, myristoylation, palmitoylation, and ubiquitination.

All mass spectrometry results were visualized and analyzed using Scaffold v5 (Proteome Software). In addition to the above datasets, other cilia proteomic data examined to assess the presence or absence of SAM metabolism enzymes and putative protein methyltransferases and demethylases were from (Pazour et al., 2005; Jordan et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017; Picariello et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019) and are compiled and available at The Chlamydomonas Flagellar Proteome Project.

Structural modeling and graphical displays

Structural models of the Chlamydomonas α/β tubulin dimer, the p28 dimer associated with the N-terminal region of DHC9 (dynein c), IFT54, and IFT74 were generated using AlphaFold 2 (Jumper et al., 2021) running on the Colabfold server (Mirdita et al., 2022). Tubulin and p28/DHC9 models and the single particle cryoelectron microscopy near-atomic reconstruction of the Chlamydomonas outer doublet microtubule 48 nm repeat (PDB 6U42 [Ma et al., 2019]) were displayed using the PyMOL molecular graphics system (Schrödinger, LLC). Space filling models for methylated Arg and Lys residues were generated using the builder interface within PyMOL. All structural displays were created using ray tracing.

Pie charts and graphs were prepared using GraphPad Prism v.7. To search for possible methylation motifs, sequences surrounding the identified methylation sites were aligned manually and displayed using WebLogo v.3.7.12.

All figures were constructed using Adobe Illustrator and/or Photoshop.

Data availability

Sequence data are available at Phytozome https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/. Cilia proteomic data are available at Dryad with the dataset identifiers fn2z34txn and mw6m90635. Additional mass spectrometry data from methylation searches of cilia samples have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD045935.

Supplementary Material

mbc-35-ar89-s001.pdf (446.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant R35-GM140631 from the National Institutes of Health (to S.M.K.). We thank Dr. Scott Schafer (University of Massachusetts Medical School) for researching the raw data from our original cilia proteomes for methyl modifications. We acknowledge the NIH S10 high-end instrumentation award 1S10-OD028445-01A1, which supported this work by providing funds to acquire the Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer housed in the University of Connecticut Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility.

Abbreviations used:

AAA+

ATPase associated with cellular activities domain

FAP

flagellar associated protein

HC

heavy chain

IC

intermediate chain

LC

light chain

LIC

light intermediate chain

K me

monomethyl lysine

K me2

dimethyl lysine

K me3

trimethyl lysine

5-MeTHF

5-methyltetrahydrofolate

5,10-MeTHF

5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate

NTPase

nucleoside triphosphatase

R me

monomethyl arginine

R me2

dimethyl arginine

SAH

S-adenosyl homocysteine

SAM

S-adenosyl methionine

THF

tetrahydrofolate.

Footnotes

This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E24-03-0130) on May 2, 2024.

REFERENCES

  1. Arnaiz O, Malinowska A, Klotz C, Sperling L, Dadlez M, Koll F, Cohen J. (2009). Cildb: A knowledgebase for centrosomes and cilia. Database (Oxford) 2009, bap022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn K, Bustamante-Marin X, Yin W, Goshe MB, Ostrowski LE. (2017). Quantitative proteomic analysis of human airway cilia identifies previously uncharacterized proteins of high abundance. J Proteome Res 16, 1579–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boesger J, Wagner V, Weisheit W, Mittag M. (2009). Analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell 8, 922–932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carvalho-Santos Z, Azimzadeh J, Pereira-Leal JB, Bettencourt-Dias M. (2011). Tracing the origins of centrioles, cilia, and flagella. J Cell Biol 194, 165–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chouhan BPS, Maimaiti S, Gade M, Laurino P. (2019). Rossmann-fold methyltransferases: taking a “β-turn” around their cofactor, S-adenosylmethionine. Biochemistry 58, 166–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coombes C, Yamamoto A, McClellan M, Reid TA, Plooster M, Luxton GW, Alper J, Howard J, Gardner MK. (2016). Mechanism of microtubule lumen entry for the α-tubulin acetyltransferase enzyme αTAT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, e7176-e7184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dillon SC, Zhang X, Trievel RC, Cheng X. (2005). The SET-domain protein superfamily: protein lysine methyltransferases. Genome Biol 6, 227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcia G 3rd, Raleigh DR, Reiter JF. (2018). How the ciliary membrane is organized inside-out to communicate outside-in. Curr Biol 28, R421–R434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grossman-Haham I, Coudray N, Yu Z, Wang F, Zhang N, Bhabha G, Vale RD. (2021). Structure of the radial spoke head and insights into its role in mechanoregulation of ciliary beating. Nat Struct Mol Biol 28, 20–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gui M, Ma M, Sze-Tu E, Wang X, Koh F, Zhong ED, Berger B, Davis JH, Dutcher SK, Zhang R, Brown A. (2021). Structures of radial spokes and associated complexes important for ciliary motility. Nat Struct Mol Biol 28, 29–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hammond M, Zoltner M, Garrigan J, Butterfield E, Varga V, Lukeš J, Field MC. (2021). The distinctive flagellar proteome of Euglena gracilis illuminates the complexities of protistan flagella adaptation. New Phytologist 232, 1323–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han L, Rao Q, Yang R, Wang Y, Chai P, Xiong Y, Zhang K. (2022). Cryo-EM structure of an active central apparatus. Nat Struct Mol Biol 29, 472–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison A, Sakato M, Tedford HW, Benashski SE, Patel-King RS, King SM. (2002). Redox-based control of the γ heavy chain ATPase from Chlamydomonas outer arm dynein. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 52, 131–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hörberg J, Saenz-Mendez P, Eriksson LA. (2018). QM/MM studies of Dph5 - a promiscuous methyltransferase in the eukaryotic biosynthetic pathway of diphthamide. J Chem Inf Model 58, 1406–1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishikawa H, Thompson J, Yates JR 3rd, Marshall WF. (2012). Proteomic analysis of mammalian primary cilia. Curr Biol 22, 414–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janke C, Magiera MM. (2020). The tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson JL, Yaron TM, Huntsman EM, Kerelsky A, Song J, Regev A, Lin T-Y, Liberatore K, Cizin DM, Cohen BM, et al. (2023). An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome. Nature 613, 759–766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson KA, Rosenbaum JL. (1992). Polarity of flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol 119, 1605–1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jordan MA, Diener DR, Stepanek L, Pigino G. (2018). The cryo-EM structure of intraflagellar transport trains reveals how dynein is inactivated to ensure unidirectional anterograde movement in cilia. Nat Cell Biol 20, 1250–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamiya R, Witman GB. (1984). Submicromolar levels of calcium control the balance of beating between the two flagella in demembranated models of Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol 98, 97–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. King SM, Witman GB. (1994). Multiple sites of phosphorylation within the α heavy chain of Chlamydomonas outer arm dynein. J Biol Chem 269, 5452–5457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klena N, Pigino G. (2022). Structural biology of cilia and intraflagellar transport. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 38, 103–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar D, Mains RE, Eipper BA, King SM. (2019). Ciliary and cytoskeletal functions of an ancient monooxygenase essential for bioactive amidated peptide synthesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 76, 2329–2348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo M (2018). Chemical and biochemical perspectives of protein lysine methylation. Chem Rev 118, 6656–6705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luxmi R, Kumar D, Mains RE, King SM, Eipper BA. (2019). Cilia-based peptidergic signaling. PLoS Biol 17, e3000566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luxmi R, Mains RE, Eipper BA, King SM. (2022). Regulated processing and secretion of a peptide precursor in cilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119, e2206098119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma M, Stoyanova M, Rademacher G, Dutcher SK, Brown A, Zhang R. (2019). Structure of the decorated ciliary doublet microtubule. Cell 179, 909–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mirdita M, Schütze K, Moriwaki Y, Heo L, Ovchinnikov S, Steinegger M. (2022). ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods 19, 679–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchell DR (2017). Evolution of cilia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9, 369–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mitchison HM, Schmidts M, Loges NT, Freshour J, Dritsoula A, Hirst RA, O'Callaghan C, Blau H, Al Dabbagh M, Olbrich H, et al. (2012). Mutations in axonemal dynein assembly factor DNAAF3 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat Genetics 44, 381–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mizuno K, Sloboda RD. (2017). Protein arginine methyltransferases interact with intraflagellar transport particles and change location during flagellar growth and resorption. Mol Biol Cell 28, 1208–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Murn J, Shi Y. (2017). The winding path of protein methylation research: milestones and new frontiers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18, 517–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicastro D, Schwartz C, Pierson J, Gaudette R, Porter ME, McIntosh JR. (2006). The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 313, 944–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ostrowski L, Blackburn K, Radde K, Moyer M, Schlatzer D, Moseley A, Boucher R. (2002). A proteomic analysis of human cilia: identification of novel components. Mol Cell Proteomics 1, 451–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pazour G, Agrin N, Leszyk J, Witman G. (2005). Proteomic analysis of a eukaryotic flagellum. J Cell Biol 170, 103–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Picariello T, Brown JM, Hou Y, Swank G, Cochran DA, King OD, Lechtreck K, Pazour GJ, Witman GB. (2019). A global analysis of IFT-A function reveals specialization for transport of membrane-associated proteins into cilia. J Cell Sci 132, jcs220749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Piperno G, Luck DJ. (1981). Inner arm dyneins from flagella of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cell 27, 331–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reiter JF, Leroux MR. (2017). Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18, 533–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rosenbaum JL, Witman GB. (2002). Intraflagellar transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 813–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sakato-Antoku M, Balsbaugh JL, King SM. (2023). N-terminal processing and modification of ciliary dyneins. Cells 12, 2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sakato-Antoku M, King SM. (2022). Developmental changes in ciliary composition during gametogenesis in Chlamydomonas. Mol Biol Cell 33, br10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sakato-Antoku M, Patel-King RS, Balsbaugh JL, King SM. (2024). Methylation of ciliary dynein motors involves the essential cytosolic assembly factor DNAAF3/PF22. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121, e2318522121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Satir P, Mitchell DR, Jékely G. (2008). How did the cilium evolve? Curr Top Dev Biol 85, 63–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schneider MJ, Ulland M, Sloboda RD. (2008). A protein methylation pathway in Chlamydomonas flagella is active during flagellar resorption. Mol Biol Cell 19, 4319–4327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sloboda RD, Howard L. (2009). Protein methylation in full length Chlamydomonas flagella. Cell Motil 66, 650–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Subota I, Julkowska D, Vincensini L, Reeg N, Buisson J, Blisnick T, Huet D, Perrot S, Santi-Rocca J, Duchateau M, et al. (2014). Proteomic analysis of intact flagella of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei cells identifies novel flagellar proteins with unique sub-localization and dynamics. Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 1769–1786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. van Dam TJP, Kennedy J, van der Lee R, de Vrieze E, Wunderlich KA, Rix S, Dougherty GW, Lambacher NJ, Li C, Jensen VL, et al. (2019). CiliaCarta: An integrated and validated compendium of ciliary genes. PLoS One 14, e0216705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wakabayashi K, King SM. (2006). Modulation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii flagellar motility by redox poise. J Cell Biol 173, 743–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang L, Gu L, Meng D, Wu Q, Deng H, Pan J. (2017). Comparative proteomics reveals timely transport into cilia of regulators or effectors as a mechanism underlying ciliary disassembly. J Proteome Res 16, 2410–2418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Werner-Peterson R, Sloboda RD. (2013). Methylation of structural components of the axoneme occurs during flagellar disassembly. Biochemistry 52, 8501–8509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wesche J, Kühn S, Kessler BM, Salton M, Wolf A. (2017). Protein arginine methylation: a prominent modification and its demethylation. Cell Mol Life Sci 74, 3305–3315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wood CR, Huang K, Diener DR, Rosenbaum JL. (2013). The cilium secretes bioactive ectosomes. Curr Biol 23, 906–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao L, Hou Y, Picariello T, Craige B, Witman GB. (2019). Proteome of the central apparatus of a ciliary axoneme. J Cell Biol 218, 2051–2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mbc-35-ar89-s001.pdf (446.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data are available at Phytozome https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/. Cilia proteomic data are available at Dryad with the dataset identifiers fn2z34txn and mw6m90635. Additional mass spectrometry data from methylation searches of cilia samples have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD045935.


Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

RESOURCES