Skip to main content
NCBI home page
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Jul 4;13:e95727. doi: 10.7554/eLife.95727

An atlas of brain-bone sympathetic neural circuits in mice

Vitaly Ryu 1,2,✉, Anisa Azatovna Gumerova 1,2, Ronit Witztum 1,2, Funda Korkmaz 1,2, Liam Cullen 1,2, Hasni Kannangara 1,2, Ofer Moldavski 1,2, Orly Barak 1,2, Daria Lizneva 1,2, Ki A Goosens 1,3, Sarah Stanley 2, Se-Min Kim 1,2, Tony Yuen 1,2, Mone Zaidi 1,2,✉
Editors: Mei Wan4, Christopher L-H Huang5
PMCID: PMC11245306  PMID: 38963696

Abstract

There is clear evidence that the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) mediates bone metabolism. Histological studies show abundant SNS innervation of the periosteum and bone marrow–these nerves consist of noradrenergic fibers that immunostain for tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine beta-hydroxylase, or neuropeptide Y. Nonetheless, the brain sites that send efferent SNS outflow to the bone have not yet been characterized. Using pseudorabies (PRV) viral transneuronal tracing, we report, for the first time, the identification of central SNS outflow sites that innervate bone. We find that the central SNS outflow to bone originates from 87 brain nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions of six brain divisions, namely the midbrain and pons, hypothalamus, hindbrain medulla, forebrain, cerebral cortex, and thalamus. We also find that certain sites, such as the raphe magnus (RMg) of the medulla and periaqueductal gray (PAG) of the midbrain, display greater degrees of PRV152 infection, suggesting that there is considerable site-specific variation in the levels of central SNS outflow to the bone. This comprehensive compendium illustrating the central coding and control of SNS efferent signals to bone should allow for a greater understanding of the neural regulation of bone metabolism, and importantly and of clinical relevance, mechanisms for central bone pain.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

Elegant studies have suggested that increased SNS tone causes bone loss through a reduction in bone formation, which is coupled with increased bone resorption (Elefteriou, 2018; Elefteriou et al., 2005; Takeda et al., 2002). It has also been shown using leptin-deficient mice with a high bone mass that the anti-osteogenic actions of leptin are mediated centrally by glucose-responsive neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus through peripheral SNS pathways (Ducy et al., 2000; Takeda et al., 2002). Furthermore, both the periosteum and the bone marrow are innervated richly by the SNS as evidenced by immunoreactive tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine beta-hydroxylase, or neuropeptide Y fibers. These latter SNS markers are associated mostly with the vasculature and SNS vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), whereas vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) immunoreactive fibers display mainly a parenchymal location (Francis et al., 1997; Hill and Elde, 1991; Hohmann et al., 1986; Martin et al., 2007). Despite these studies, the distribution of SNS nerves within the mammalian skeleton and their connectivity to central neurons is far from being completely understood.

Viral transneuronal tracing has become an established technology to define central SNS outflow circuitry to peripheral organs. Bartha’s K strain of the PRV is a transneuronal tract tracer that provides the ability to map multi-synaptic circuits within the same animal (Ekstrand et al., 2008; Enquist, 2002; Song et al., 2005a). Once in the host, PRVs are endocytosed at axon terminal membranes after binding to viral attachment proteins, which act as ‘viral receptors.’ Transported exclusively in a retrograde manner from the dendrites of the infected neurons to axons, PRVs first make synaptic contact with neuronal cell bodies, and undergo self-amplification and thereafter continue their specific backward ascent (Curanovic and Enquist, 2009). This results in an infection that progresses along the neuroaxis chain from the periphery to higher CNS sites (Ekstrand et al., 2008; Enquist, 2002; Song et al., 2005a).

Utilizing this viral technology, we have previously shown postganglionic SNS innervation of specific white and brown adipose tissue depots with the separate and shared central SNS relay sites (Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Ryu et al., 2015). Moreover, we have established a direct neuroanatomical connection between phosphodiesterase 5 A (PDE5A)-containing neurons in specific brain nuclei and bone, inferring a contribution of the central nodes to the bone-forming actions of PDE5A inhibitors (Kim et al., 2020). A hierarchical circuit controlling SNS output to rat femoral epiphyseal bone marrow has also been defined by identifying PRVs in the ganglia and paravertebral chain in the intermediolateral column (IML) of the lower thoracic spinal cord (Dénes et al., 2005). In addition, neurons in C1, A5, A7 catecholaminergic cell groups, several other nuclei of the ventrolateral and ventromedial medulla, periaqueductal gray, the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, among other hypothalamic nuclei, as well as the insular and piriform cortex comprise the known central network sending SNS outflow to bone marrow (Dénes et al., 2005). However, no studies have yet mapped the exact localization and organization of the central SNS circuitry innervating the murine femur. The purpose of the present study was thus to identify central SNS sites innervating bone and to investigate whether separate or/and shared central SNS circuitries underpin the autonomic mediation of bone.

Results

Validation

Following PRV152 infections, mice remained asymptomatic until day 5 post-inoculation, after which time, mice began to display symptoms of infection, including occasional loss of body weight and decreased mobility, but most often an ungroomed coat. Mice were euthanized for histological analyses when such symptoms became apparent. Four of six mice were equally infected by PRV152 throughout the neuroaxis from the hindbrain to the forebrain and therefore were included in the analyses. Two mice exhibited over-infection by PRV152, as evidenced by widespread cloudy plaques surrounding the infected neurons; these mice were excluded from the analysis. We also found PRV152-labeled neurons in the IML of the spinal cord in accordance with our previous studies that defined SNS innervations of fat pads in the Siberian hamster (Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Ryu et al., 2015; Ryu et al., 2017).

Unilateral PRV152 microinjection into the right femur appeared bilaterally in the brain with almost unnoticeable domination of the viral infection between the two hemispheres. Likewise, prior studies on SNS and sensory innervations of various fat depots, utilizing the SNS tract tracer PRV152 and sensory system tract tracer HSV-1 produced no ipsilateral differences between the innervation patterns of SNS or sensory system with unilateral viral inoculation (Bamshad et al., 1999; Leitner and Bartness, 2009; Song et al., 2008; Vaughan and Bartness, 2012).

To validate the retrograde tract tracing methodology, we placed PRV152 at the same titer on the bone surface, rather than injecting it into the periosteum or metaphysis. No EGFP signal was detected in the PVH that is known to possess sympathetic pre-autonomic neurons or in the RPa (Figure 1A). By contrast, PRV152 injections into the periosteum or metaphysis resulted in positive EGFP immunostaining in the PVH (Figure 1B). In addition, we found PRV152-infected neurons in the IML of the spinal cord, at T13-L2 levels (Figure 1B), suggesting specific bone-SNS ganglia-IML-brain route of infection; this is consistent with prior findings wherein PRV152 individually infected the classic SNS spinal cord neurons (Bamshad et al., 1999; Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Ryu et al., 2015).

Figure 1. PRV152 transneuronal viral tract tracing.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

(A) As a control for viral injection, no expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) signal was detected in the paraventricular nucleus (PVH), known to possess main sympathetic pre-autonomic neurons, and the RPa, when PRV152 was placed on the bone surface. (B) By contrast, PRV152 injections into the periosteum or metaphyseal bone resulted in positive EGFP immunoreactivity in the PVH. In addition, we found PRV152-infected neurons in the intermediolateral cell column (IML) of the spinal cord at T13-L2 levels, suggesting specific bone-sympathetic nervous system (SNS) ganglia-IML-brain route of infection which are in concordance with our previous findings where PRV152 individually infected the classic SNS spinal cord neurons. Also shown are representative microphotographs illustrating PRV152 immunolabeling in the PAG (midbrain and pons), RPa (medulla), LH (hypothalamus), MPOM (forebrain), S1HL (cerebral cortex), and pv (thalamus). PVH, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus; PAG, periaqueductal gray; RPa, raphe pallidus; LH, lateral hypothalamus; MPOM, medial preoptic nucleus, medial part; S1HL, primary somatosensory cortex, hindlimb region; pv, periventricular fiber system. Scale bar = 50 µm. Also shown is a representative low-magnification image at the hypothalamus neuroanatomical level (scale bar = 500 µm).

Viral infections in the brain

We identified 87 PRV152-positive brain nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions within six brain divisions, with the hypothalamus having the most PRV152-infected SNS neurons connecting to bone (1177.25±62.75), followed, in descending order, by midbrain and pons (1065±22.39), hindbrain medulla (495.25±33.49), forebrain (237.5±15.08), cerebral cortex (104.75±4.64) and thalamus (65.25±7.78) (Figure 2). Hypothalamic areas with the highest percentages of PRV152-labeled neurons included the lateral hypothalamus (LH), PVH and dorsomedial hypothalamus (DM) (Figure 1B and Figure 2; see Appendix for a glossary of brain nuclei, sub-nuclei and regions). The LH and PVH also were among the regions with the highest absolute numbers of infected neurons of the 25 PRV152-positive nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions. In the midbrain and pons, areas with the highest percentages and counts of PRV152-infected neurons included the PAG, lateral PAG (LPAG) and pontine reticular nucleus, oral part (PnO), among 18 nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions. Single-labeled neurons were also notable in the hindbrain medulla, where the raphe pallidus nucleus (RPa), RMg, and gigantocellular reticular nucleus (Gi) were among 23 nuclei, sub-nuclei and regions, heavily represented by the largest percentages and counts of PRV152-labeled neurons. The forebrain areas with the highest percentages and numbers of PRV152-labeled neurons were the medial preoptic nucleus, medial part (MPOM), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), and lateral septal nucleus, ventral part (LSV) among 15 PRV152-positive nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions. In the cerebral cortex, there were only three regions containing PRV152-labeled neurons–namely, the primary somatosensory cortex, hindlimb region (S1HL), and secondary and primary motor cortex (M2 and M1, respectively). The S1HL and M2 had both the highest percentages and numbers of PRV152-labeled neurons. Finally, we detected 3 brain sites with PRV152-infected neurons within the thalamus. Among the nuclei possessing the highest percentages and numbers of PRV152-labeled neurons were the periventricular fiber system (pv) and precommisural nucleus (PrC).

Figure 2. PRV152 immunolabeling in brain regions, sub-regions, and nuclei.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Numbers, and heat map representation of PRV152-labeled neurons in brain regions, namely, hypothalamus, midbrain and pons, medulla, forebrain, cerebral cortex, and thalamus, as well as their sub-regions and nuclei, following viral injections into bone. n=4. Statistics: Mean ± SEM, two-tailed Student’s t-test, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ns (no significance).

Figure 2—source data 1. Contains the numerical data used to generate the figures.

Discussion

When injected into peripheral tissues, PRV152 travels exclusively in a retrograde manner via synaptically-linked neurons. First, the virus infects SNS postganglionic neurons at L1-L2 levels, followed by infection of SNS preganglionic neurons in the IML of the spinal cord and, finally, ascending to the brain. This yields a hierarchical chain of functionally connected neurons, thus allowing the mapping of the entire femur-brain neuroaxis. Using such transneuronal tract tracers, we (Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Ryu et al., 2015; Ryu et al., 2017) and others Bamshad et al., 1998; Bowers et al., 2004; Shi and Bartness, 2001; Song and Bartness, 2001 have documented postganglionic SNS innervation of white and brown adipose tissue depots with the separate and shared central SNS nodes. Moreover, we have recently established a direct neuroanatomical link between PDE5A-containing neurons in specific brain sites and bone (Kim et al., 2020). We report here, for the first time, a comprehensive atlas that defines with remarkable precision the crosstalk between the SNS and bone. Notably, the PRV152 neural tract tracer especially predominates in the PAG of the midbrain, LH of the hypothalamus, RPa of the medulla, MPOM of the forebrain, S1HL of the cortex, and pv of the thalamus. Collectively, these data provide important insights into the distributed neural system integrating SNS neural circuitry with bone.

Neuroanatomical and functional evidence in mice suggests that the SNS regulates bone remodeling and bone mass (Ducy et al., 2000; Francis et al., 1997; Hill and Elde, 1991; Hohmann et al., 1986; Martin et al., 2007; Takeda et al., 2002). Furthermore, it is clear that leptin acts as an anti-osteogenesis signal through glucose responsive neurons in the VMH via peripheral SNS relay (Takeda et al., 2002). These data are consistent with histological evidence, using SNS markers in noradrenergic fibers, for a rich innervation of the periosteum and bone marrow (Francis et al., 1997; Hill and Elde, 1991; Hohmann et al., 1986; Martin et al., 2007). Likewise, dopamine-transporter-deficient mice with no rapid uptake of dopamine into presynaptic terminals are osteopenic (Bliziotes et al., 2000). Multisynaptic tract tracing has identified limited hierarchical central circuitry controlling SNS innervation of rat femoral epiphyseal bone marrow and bone (Dénes et al., 2005). Several SNS pathways from the brainstem and the hypothalamus relay to femoral bone marrow and the femur through preganglionic neurons in the lower thoracic and upper lumbar segments T4 to L1 of the IML and postganglionic neurons in paravertebral chain ganglia at lumbar levels (Dénes et al., 2005).

Despite the fact that largely the same brain sites project to both the femur (our findings) and bone marrow (Dénes et al., 2005), some sites display higher levels of PRV152 infectivity than others–this suggests that separate site-specific SNS circuits may project to the femur and femoral bone marrow. These overlapping SNS-innervating circuits to both sites include the midbrain PAG, somatosensory cortex, forebrain MPOM, thalamic periventricular nucleus, hypothalamic PVH, lateral hypothalamic nucleus (LA), and medullary RPa. The PAG receives afferent fibers not only from the parabrachial nucleus and RPa (Mantyh, 1982), which contain PDE5A-expressing neurons sending SNS outputs to bone (Kim et al., 2020), but also from the spinal cord (Pechura and Liu, 1986). We and others have previously shown that the PAG sends SNS outflow to WAT in Siberian hamsters (Bamshad et al., 1998; Nguyen et al., 2014; Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Song et al., 2005b) and the laboratory rat (Adler et al., 2012). Most notably, the PAG is largely responsible for SNS responses and descending modulation of pain perception (Baptista-de-Souza et al., 2018; Benarroch, 2008; Calvino and Grilo, 2006). Therefore, this midbrain node could receive sensory inflow relating to bone pain and provide SNS relay (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Diagrammatic outline of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) brain–bone neuroaxis relevant to pain.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

The central SNS brain-bone circuit starts in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVH) known to home SNS pre-autonomic neurons projecting to the SNS neurons of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) in the midbrain. From the PAG the SNS outflow is further relayed to the raphe pallidus-raphe magnus (RPa-RMg) neurons that are terminated in the dorsal horn of spinal gray matter, where they regulate the release of enkephalins that inhibit pain sensation by attenuating substance P (SP) release. In turn, opiates produce antinociception via the µ-opiate receptors, in part, through modulation of responses to SP. Neurons in the RMg are involved in the central modulation of noxious stimuli, therefore, the RMg-PAG could be the part of the ascending hierarchical circuit relating to the perception of bone pain.

Furthermore, nerves that innervate skeletal tissues seem to function in both skeletal pain and anabolism, affecting a variety of skeletal cell types. Identification of SNS neural nodes that regulate skeletal metabolism and nociceptive functions implies that manipulating the SNS or sensory neurons with drug therapies targeted to bone could have effects on bone pain and vice versa. Our ability to harness potential benefits for bone disease and pain alleviation via specific modulations in the SNS drive does not, therefore, seem remote.

We also find that two major nuclei in the hypothalamus–the PVH and LH–send SNS efferents to the bone. While the PVH, which is a home to major SNS pre-autonomic neurons, sends SNS projections to the bone marrow (Dénes et al., 2005), we find that LH predominantly innervates the femur. The functions of other hypothalamic SNS-bone feedback circuits are not presently known. However, given that the LH, PVH, and DM are the main brain regions that send SNS outflow to bone and also express leptin receptors (Flak and Myers, 2016), it is also possible that the anti-osteogenic relay for leptin might originate from neurons in the LH PVH, and/or DM.

Consistent with a prior study (Dénes et al., 2005), the highest number of PRV152-infected neurons in the medulla were the RPa and RMg. While we have previously established a contribution of PDE5A-containing neurons in the RPa to bone mass regulation (Kim et al., 2020), the functional role of the RMg in regulating bone remains unknown. Whereas projections from the raphe nuclei, including the RPa, terminate in the dorsal horn of spinal gray matter, where they regulate the release of enkephalins that inhibit pain sensation (François et al., 2017), RMg neurons are involved in the central modulation of noxious stimuli (Fields et al., 1991). Thus, the RMg-PAG could be the part of the ascending hierarchical circuit relating to the perception of bone pain. The importance of this circuit for the control of bone pain will require a more comprehensive demonstration of its pervasiveness across and within the mammalian species. Whether or not these findings can be extended to humans, they do provide important actionable targets for pain treatment.

In all, our results provide compelling evidence for a brain-bone SNS neuroaxis, likely part of coordinated and/or multiple redundant mechanisms that regulate bone metabolism and/or nociceptive functions. Furthermore, we show that bone is not innervated by unique neuron groups, but rather by overlapping SNS circuitry common to the control of other peripheral targets, such as bone marrow and adipose tissues. We believe our comprehensive atlas of the brain regions involved in coding and decoding SNS efferent signals to bone would stimulate further research into bone pain and the neural regulation of bone metabolism.

Materials and methods

Mice

Adult male mice (~3-4-month-old) were single-housed in a 12 hr:12 hr light:dark cycle at 22 ± 2 °C with ad libitum access to water and regular chow. All procedures were approved by the Mount Sinai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance with Public Health Service and United States Department of Agriculture guidelines (IBC: SPROTO202200000224; IACUC: PROTO202100074).

Viral injections

To identify brain sites sending the SNS outflow to bone, we used a transsynaptic tracing technique with a pseudorabies virus strain, PRV152. PRV152 expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) under control of the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. When injected into the femur, the virus travels exclusively in a retrograde manner via synaptically-linked neurons, first through SNS postganglionic neurons at L1-L2 levels, followed by infection of SNS preganglionic neurons in the IML of the spinal cord and, finally, ascending to the brain. This allows the mapping of the entire femur-brain neuroaxis.

All virus injections were performed according to Biosafety Level 2 standards. Mice (n=6) were anesthetized with isoflurane (2-3% in oxygen; Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) and the right femur-tibia joint was exposed for a series of PRV152 microinjections (4.7×109 pfu/mL) into five loci (150 nL/locus) evenly distributed across the bone metaphysis and periosteum areas, which are known to be enriched with SNS innervation. The syringe was held in place for 60 s to prevent efflux of virus after each injection. Finally, the incision was closed with sterile sutures and wound clips. Nitrofurazone powder (nfz Puffer; Hess & Clark, Lexington, KY) was applied locally to minimize the risk of bacterial infection. Note that, as a control for viral injection, we showed that no EGFP signal was detected when PRV152 was placed on the bone surface rather than injected into the periosteum or metaphyseal bone. In addition, we found PRV152-infected neurons in the IML of the spinal cords, suggesting specific bone-SNS ganglia-IML-brain route of infection, which is in concordance with our previous findings where PRV152 individually infected the classic SNS spinal cord neurons (Bamshad et al., 1999; Ryu and Bartness, 2014; Ryu et al., 2015). As a control for possible viral diffusion, we previously confirmed that the same virus titer and volume of PRV152 placed on the bone surface resulted in no infection in the sympathetic chain, spinal cord, and brain as opposed to intra-periosteum or intra-metaphyseal bone.

Histology

Animals were sacrificed 6 days after the last PRV152 injection based on the progression of the virus to the brain in pilot studies (Ryu, V., unpublished observations). Mice were euthanized with carbon dioxide and perfused transcardially with 0.9% heparinized saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). Brains were collected and post-fixed in the same fixative for 3-4 hr at 4 °C, then transferred to a 30% sucrose solution in 0.1 M PBS with 0.1% sodium azide and stored at 4 °C until sectioning on a freezing stage sliding microtome at 25 μm. Sections were stored in 0.1 M PBS solution with 0.1% sodium azide until processing for immunofluorescence.

The EGFP reporter protein of the PRV152 is not resistant to fading once injected into peripheral tissues, therefore, a standard immunofluorescence procedure was utilized. For immunofluorescence, free-floating brain sections were rinsed in 0.1 M PBS (2×15 min) followed by a 30 min blocking in 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 0.4% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS. Next, sections were incubated with a primary chicken anti-EGFP antibody (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. A10262) for 18 hr. Sections were then incubated in the secondary AlexaFluor-488-coupled goat anti-chicken antibody (1:700; Jackson Immunoresearch, catalog no. 103-545-155) with 2% NGS and 0.4% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS at room temperature for 2 hr. For immunofluorescence controls, the primary antibody was either omitted or pre-adsorbed with the immunizing peptide overnight at 4 °C resulting in no immunoreactive staining. Sections were mounted onto slides (Superfrost Plus) and cover-slipped using ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. P36982). All steps were performed at room temperature.

Quantitation

Immunofluorescence images were viewed and captured using 10x and 20x magnification with an Observer.Z1 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with appropriate filters for AlexaFluor-488 and DAPI. The single-labeled PRV152 and DAPI images were evaluated and overlaid using Zen software (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). We counted cells positive for SNS PRV152 immunoreactivity in every sixth brain section using the manual tag feature of the Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 software, thus eliminating the likelihood of counting the same neurons more than once. Neuron numbers in the brain were averaged across each examined nucleus/sub-nucleus/region from all animals. A mouse brain atlas (Paxinos and Franklin, 2007) was used to identify brain areas. For the photomicrographs, we used Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systems) only to adjust the brightness, contrast, and sharpness, to remove artifactual obstacles (i.e. obscuring bubbles) and to make the composite plates.

Acknowledgements

Work at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai carried out at the Center for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology was supported by R01 AG071870 to MZ, TY, and S-MK; R01 AG074092 and U01 AG073148 to TY and MZ; and U19 AG060917 and R01 DK113627 to MZ.

Appendix 1

Glossary of the brain nuclei, sub-nuclei, and regions.

Cerebral cortex

  • M1: primary motor cortex

  • M2: secondary motor cortex

  • S1HL: primary somatosensory cortex, hindlimb region

Forebrain

  • AVPe: anteroventral periventricular nucleus

  • BST: bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

  • BSTMA: bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial division, anterior part

  • BSTMPL: bed nucleus of stria terminalis, medial division, posterolateral part

  • BSTMV: bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial division, ventral part

  • LPO: lateral preoptic area

  • LSI: lateral septal nucleus, intermediate part

  • LSV: lateral septal nucleus, ventral part

  • MnPO: median preoptic nucleus

  • MPOL: medial preoptic nucleus, lateral part

  • MPOM: medial preoptic nucleus, medial part

  • SFO: subfornical organ

  • VMPO: ventromedial preoptic nucleus

  • VOLT: vascular organ of the lamina terminalis

  • VP: ventral pallidum

Thalamus

  • LhbL: lateral habenular nucleus, lateral part

  • PrC: precommissural nucleus

  • pv: periventricular fiber system

Hypothalamus

  • AHP: anterior hypothalamic area, posterior part

  • Arc: arcuate hypothalamic nucleus

  • ArcLP: arcuate hypothalamic nucleus, lateroposterior part

  • ArcMP: arcuate hypothalamic nucleus, medial posterior part

  • BLA: basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, anterior part

  • CeM: central amygdaloid nucleus, medial division

  • DM: dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus

  • DMD: dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, dorsal part

  • DMV: dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, ventral part

  • LA: lateroanterior hypothalamic nucleus

  • LH: lateral hypothalamic area

  • MPA: medial preoptic area

  • PaAP: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, anterior parvicellular part

  • PaLM: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, lateral magnocellular part

  • PaMM: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, medial magnocellular part

  • PaMP: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, medial parvicellular part

  • PaPo: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, posterior part

  • PaV: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, ventral part

  • PH: posterior hypothalamic area

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Vitaly Ryu, Email: vitaly.ryu@mssm.edu.

Mone Zaidi, Email: mone.zaidi@mountsinai.org.

Mei Wan, Johns Hopkins University, United States.

Christopher L-H Huang, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute on Aging R01 AG071870 to Se-Min Kim, Tony Yuen, Mone Zaidi.

  • National Institute on Aging U01 AG073148 to Tony Yuen, Mone Zaidi.

  • National Institute on Aging R01 AG074092 to Tony Yuen, Mone Zaidi.

  • National Institute on Aging U19 AG060917 to Mone Zaidi.

  • National Institute on Aging R01 DK113627 to Mone Zaidi.

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01 DK107670 to Tony Yuen, Mone Zaidi.

Additional information

Competing interests

Reviewing editor, eLife.

No competing interests declared.

Senior editor, eLife.

consults for Gershon Lehmann, Guidepoint and Coleman groups.

Author contributions

Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Data curation, Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation.

Data curation, Formal analysis.

Investigation.

Supervision, Project administration.

Supervision, Investigation, Project administration.

Supervision, Project administration.

Resources, Methodology.

Validation, Methodology.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

All procedures were approved by the Mount Sinai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance with Public Health Service and United States Department of Agriculture guidelines (IBC: SPROTO202200000224; IACUC: PROTO202100074).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

Figure 2—source data 1 contains the numerical data used to generate the figures.

References

  1. Adler ES, Hollis JH, Clarke IJ, Grattan DR, Oldfield BJ. Neurochemical characterization and sexual dimorphism of projections from the brain to abdominal and subcutaneous white adipose tissue in the rat. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32:15913–15921. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2591-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamshad M, Aoki VT, Adkison MG, Warren WS, Bartness TJ. Central nervous system origins of the sympathetic nervous system outflow to white adipose tissue. The American Journal of Physiology. 1998;275:R291–R299. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.1.R291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamshad M, Song CK, Bartness TJ. CNS origins of the sympathetic nervous system outflow to brown adipose tissue. The American Journal of Physiology. 1999;276:R1569–R1578. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.6.R1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baptista-de-Souza D, Pelarin V, Canto-de-Souza L, Nunes-de-Souza RL, Canto-de-Souza A. Interplay between 5-HT2C and 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal periaqueductal gray in the modulation of fear-induced antinociception in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2018;140:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benarroch EE. Descending monoaminergic pain modulation: bidirectional control and clinical relevance. Neurology. 2008;71:217–221. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000318225.51122.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bliziotes M, McLoughlin S, Gunness M, Fumagalli F, Jones SR, Caron MG. Bone histomorphometric and biomechanical abnormalities in mice homozygous for deletion of the dopamine transporter gene. Bone. 2000;26:15–19. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00232-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowers RR, Festuccia WTL, Song CK, Shi H, Migliorini RH, Bartness TJ. Sympathetic innervation of white adipose tissue and its regulation of fat cell number. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2004;286:R1167–R1175. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00558.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calvino B, Grilo RM. Central pain control. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curanovic D, Enquist L. Directional transneuronal spread of α-herpesvirus infection. Future Virology. 2009;4:591. doi: 10.2217/fvl.09.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dénes A, Boldogkoi Z, Uhereczky G, Hornyák A, Rusvai M, Palkovits M, Kovács KJ. Central autonomic control of the bone marrow: multisynaptic tract tracing by recombinant pseudorabies virus. Neuroscience. 2005;134:947–963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ducy P, Amling M, Takeda S, Priemel M, Schilling AF, Beil FT, Shen J, Vinson C, Rueger JM, Karsenty G. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: a central control of bone mass. Cell. 2000;100:197–207. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81558-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekstrand MI, Enquist LW, Pomeranz LE. The alpha-herpesviruses: molecular pathfinders in nervous system circuits. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2008;14:134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, Starbuck M, Yang X, Liu X, Kondo H, Richards WG, Bannon TW, Noda M, Clement K, Vaisse C, Karsenty G. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elefteriou F. Impact of the autonomic nervous system on the skeleton. Physiological Reviews. 2018;98:1083–1112. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Enquist LW. Exploiting circuit-specific spread of pseudorabies virus in the central nervous system: insights to pathogenesis and circuit tracers. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;186 Suppl 2:S209–S214. doi: 10.1086/344278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fields HL, Heinricher MM, Mason P. Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1991;14:219–245. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.001251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Flak JN, Myers MG. Minireview: CNS mechanisms of leptin action. Molecular Endocrinology. 2016;30:3–12. doi: 10.1210/me.2015-1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Francis NJ, Asmus SE, Landis SC. CNTF and LIF are not required for the target-directed acquisition of cholinergic and peptidergic properties by sympathetic neurons in vivo. Developmental Biology. 1997;182:76–87. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. François A, Low SA, Sypek EI, Christensen AJ, Sotoudeh C, Beier KT, Ramakrishnan C, Ritola KD, Sharif-Naeini R, Deisseroth K, Delp SL, Malenka RC, Luo L, Hantman AW, Scherrer G. A brainstem-spinal cord inhibitory circuit for mechanical pain modulation by GABA and enkephalins. Neuron. 2017;93:822–839. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill EL, Elde R. Distribution of CGRP-, VIP-, D beta H-, SP-, and NPY-immunoreactive nerves in the periosteum of the rat. Cell and Tissue Research. 1991;264:469–480. doi: 10.1007/BF00319037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hohmann EL, Elde RP, Rysavy JA, Einzig S, Gebhard RL. Innervation of periosteum and bone by sympathetic vasoactive intestinal peptide-containing nerve fibers. Science. 1986;232:868–871. doi: 10.1126/science.3518059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim SM, Taneja C, Perez-Pena H, Ryu V, Gumerova A, Li W, Ahmad N, Zhu LL, Liu P, Mathew M, Korkmaz F, Gera S, Sant D, Hadelia E, Ievleva K, Kuo TC, Miyashita H, Liu L, Tourkova I, Stanley S, Lizneva D, Iqbal J, Sun L, Tamler R, Blair HC, New MI, Haider S, Yuen T, Zaidi M. Repurposing erectile dysfunction drugs tadalafil and vardenafil to increase bone mass. PNAS. 2020;117:14386–14394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000950117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leitner C, Bartness TJ. Acute brown adipose tissue temperature response to cold in monosodium glutamate-treated Siberian hamsters. Brain Research. 2009;1292:38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mantyh PW. The ascending input to the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the primate. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1982;211:50–64. doi: 10.1002/cne.902110106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin CD, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW. Organization of a unique net-like meshwork of CGRP+ sensory fibers in the mouse periosteum: Implications for the generation and maintenance of bone fracture pain. Neuroscience Letters. 2007;427:148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen NLT, Randall J, Banfield BW, Bartness TJ. Central sympathetic innervations to visceral and subcutaneous white adipose tissue. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2014;306:R375–R386. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00552.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pechura CM, Liu RP. Spinal neurons which project to the periaqueductal gray and the medullary reticular formation via axon collaterals: a double-label fluorescence study in the rat. Brain Research. 1986;374:357–361. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90429-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ryu V, Bartness TJ. Short and long sympathetic-sensory feedback loops in white fat. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2014;306:R886–R900. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00060.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ryu V, Garretson JT, Liu Y, Vaughan CH, Bartness TJ. Brown adipose tissue has sympathetic-sensory feedback circuits. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35:2181–2190. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3306-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryu V, Watts AG, Xue B, Bartness TJ. Bidirectional crosstalk between the sensory and sympathetic motor systems innervating brown and white adipose tissue in male Siberian hamsters. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2017;312:R324–R337. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00456.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shi H, Bartness TJ. Neurochemical phenotype of sympathetic nervous system outflow from brain to white fat. Brain Research Bulletin. 2001;54:375–385. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(00)00455-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Song CK, Bartness TJ. CNS sympathetic outflow neurons to white fat that express MEL receptors may mediate seasonal adiposity. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2001;281:R666–R672. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.2.R666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Song CK, Enquist LW, Bartness TJ. New developments in tracing neural circuits with herpesviruses. Virus Research. 2005a;111:235–249. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song CK, Jackson RM, Harris RBS, Richard D, Bartness TJ. Melanocortin-4 receptor mRNA is expressed in sympathetic nervous system outflow neurons to white adipose tissue. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2005b;289:R1467–R1476. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00348.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Song CK, Vaughan CH, Keen-Rhinehart E, Harris RBS, Richard D, Bartness TJ. Melanocortin-4 receptor mRNA expressed in sympathetic outflow neurons to brown adipose tissue: neuroanatomical and functional evidence. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;295:R417–R428. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00174.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Takeda S, Elefteriou F, Levasseur R, Liu X, Zhao L, Parker KL, Armstrong D, Ducy P, Karsenty G. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111:305–317. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vaughan CH, Bartness TJ. Anterograde transneuronal viral tract tracing reveals central sensory circuits from brown fat and sensory denervation alters its thermogenic responses. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2012;302:R1049–R1058. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00640.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Mei Wan 1

This manuscript presents, for the first time, the utilization of PRV viral transneuronal tracing to elucidate the central coding and control mechanisms governing sympathetic nervous system (SNS) efferent signals to bone. This groundbreaking work not only holds promising research prospects but also establishes a robust foundation for understanding the neural regulation of bone metabolism.

Decision letter

Editor: Mei Wan1
Reviewed by: Subburaman Mohan2

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "An Atlas of Brain-Bone Sympathetic Neural Circuits" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Christopher Huang as the Senior Editor.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions (for the authors):

This is a generally well-executed set of study, with appropriate data largely supporting the conclusions. To enhance the manuscript, it is recommended to address two key points:

1) Improve the resolution and quality of some of the data, as suggested by the reviewers, and

2) provide a more comprehensive discussion and explanation to enhance clarity and accuracy.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

This manuscript presents, for the first time, the utilization of PRV viral transneuronal tracing to elucidate the central coding and control mechanisms governing sympathetic nervous system (SNS) efferent signals to bone. This groundbreaking work not only holds promising research prospects but also establishes a robust foundation for understanding the neural regulation of bone metabolism. I have a couple of comments before this paper gets published:

1. In Figure 1B, the panel depicting the intermediolateral nucleus (IML) features two scale bars.

2. The schematic illustration in Figure 3 lacks precision. The authors aim to convey the signal transmission from the rostral ventromedial medulla (RPa-RMg) to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. However, the overall flowchart suggests involvement in the lateral and even ventral horn of the spinal cord. In the magnified dorsal horn schematic, it is advisable to meticulously delineate the specific laminae, considering the distinct laminar organization of the spinal cord.

3. Are there data available showcasing the outcomes post-injection of the control virus?

4. Are there low-magnification whole-brain images demonstrating the comprehensive distribution of green fluorescent protein in the mouse brain following retrograde tracing with the virus?

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The study utilizes state-of the-art transsynaptic tracing technique with PRV152 virus that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein to to identify the central sympathetic system outflow sites that innervate bone. Overall, the study is well designed and the manuscript is well written. The results in general are supportive of the conclusions.. There are a few issues that the authors may wish to address before publication.

1) For data shown in figure 2, it may be beneficial to perform statistical analyses to determine which of the regions show significantly higher number of PRV152+ neurons.

2) Since some of the signals secreted by sympathetic nerves (e.g. calcitonin gene related peptide, substance P, Sem3A) are known to influence metabolism, it is possible to identify whether any of the connections identified could be involved in regulating the activity of these neuropeptides?

3) It is stated that the animals exhibit symptoms of decreased mobility, body weight loss and infection after day 5 post-innoculation with PRV152. In this study, the animals were euthanized six days after the last PRV152 inoculation. Have the authors euthanized mice at day 4 or 5 before they start to develop symptoms to see if there are differences in brain-bone sympathetic neural circuits between symptomatic versus asymptomatic mice?

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Authors used pseudorabies (PRV) viral transneuronal tracing and report for the first time, the identification of central SNS outflow sites that innervate bone. The authors found that the central SNS outflow to bone originates from brain nuclei, sub-nuclei and regions of six brain divisions (the midbrain and pons, hypothalamus, hindbrain medulla, forebrain, cerebral cortex, and thalamus). The authors provided compelling evidence for a brain-bone SNS neuroaxis that regulates bone metabolism and nociceptive functions. The paper is generally excellent with an interesting scientific premise and novel findings. Overall, the paper is strong and novel.

1) Authors may use arrows to point to infected neuron cells and indicate types of neurons in Figure 1.

2) Authors may discuss the mechanism by which how PRV152 migrates to brain after Injection of PRV152 into the periosteum or metaphysis.

3) Authors may explain why they did not directly detect EGFP expression on PRV152 infected cells under fluorescence microscope instead of using immunofluorescence approach to detect PRV152 infected cells.

4) Authors may discuss how their findings can benefit the research in the neural regulation of bone metabolism and nociceptive functions for bone pain.

5) Authors may provide a summary map of the Brain-Bone Sympathetic Neural Circuits derived from their findings in Figures 1 and 2. This map would enhance the manuscript's utility for readers.

6) Authors may discuss and summarize their results in detail for a better understanding of their findings

eLife. 2024 Jul 4;13:e95727. doi: 10.7554/eLife.95727.sa2

Author response

Essential revisions (for the authors):

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

This manuscript presents, for the first time, the utilization of PRV viral transneuronal tracing to elucidate the central coding and control mechanisms governing sympathetic nervous system (SNS) efferent signals to bone. This groundbreaking work not only holds promising research prospects but also establishes a robust foundation for understanding the neural regulation of bone metabolism. I have a couple of comments before this paper gets published:

1. In Figure 1B, the panel depicting the intermediolateral nucleus (IML) features two scale bars.

Thank you. One of the scale bars has been removed.

2. The schematic illustration in Figure 3 lacks precision. The authors aim to convey the signal transmission from the rostral ventromedial medulla (RPa-RMg) to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. However, the overall flowchart suggests involvement in the lateral and even ventral horn of the spinal cord. In the magnified dorsal horn schematic, it is advisable to meticulously delineate the specific laminae, considering the distinct laminar organization of the spinal cord.

We thank the reviewer for the comment. In the revised Figure 3, the mentioned errors have been fixed and the magnified dorsal horn schematic shows laminae.

3. Are there data available showcasing the outcomes post-injection of the control virus?

Regretfully, there is no control virus for PRV152. As a control for possible viral diffusion, we previously confirmed that the same virus titer and volume of PRV152 placed on the bone surface resulted in no infection in the sympathetic chain, spinal cord, and brain as opposed to intra-periosteum or intra-metaphyseal bone. We have added the latter sentence in the “Viral injections” part of the manuscript (page 6, lines 114-117).

4. Are there low-magnification whole-brain images demonstrating the comprehensive distribution of green fluorescent protein in the mouse brain following retrograde tracing with the virus?

We do have low-magnification whole-brain images demonstrating the comprehensive distribution of GFP in the brain following PRV152 injections. The representative image at the hypothalamus neuroanatomical level has been included as a Figure 1, low magnification.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The study utilizes state-of the-art transsynaptic tracing technique with PRV152 virus that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein to to identify the central sympathetic system outflow sites that innervate bone. Overall, the study is well designed and the manuscript is well written. The results in general are supportive of the conclusions.. There are a few issues that the authors may wish to address before publication.

1) For data shown in figure 2, it may be beneficial to perform statistical analyses to determine which of the regions show significantly higher number of PRV152+ neurons.

In response to review comment, we have included a statistical comparison for the main brain regions.

2) Since some of the signals secreted by sympathetic nerves (e.g. calcitonin gene related peptide, substance P, Sem3A) are known to influence metabolism, it is possible to identify whether any of the connections identified could be involved in regulating the activity of these neuropeptides?

We thank the reviewer for the comment. Since CGRP and substance P are primarily released by the C and Aδ sensory nerves, it would be of great interest to identify brain centers receiving sensory inflow from bone using the sensory H129 virus in the future. This approach would shed more light into SNS-sensory regulation of CGRP and substance P. As with Sem3A, its role in the osteogenesis by altering the patterning of SNS innervations of bone remains unclear.

3) It is stated that the animals exhibit symptoms of decreased mobility, body weight loss and infection after day 5 post-innoculation with PRV152. In this study, the animals were euthanized six days after the last PRV152 inoculation. Have the authors euthanized mice at day 4 or 5 before they start to develop symptoms to see if there are differences in brain-bone sympathetic neural circuits between symptomatic versus asymptomatic mice?

We thank the reviewer for the comment. The first author performed a thorough time–course analysis of PRV152 viral progression through the SNS efferents in the Bartness lab at Georgia State University and found that optimal PRV152 progression and infection of the brain occur 6 days after PRV152 injections. If the mice are euthanized at earlier time points when mice are still asymptomatic, little or no PRV152 infection is detected in the brain.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Authors used pseudorabies (PRV) viral transneuronal tracing and report for the first time, the identification of central SNS outflow sites that innervate bone. The authors found that the central SNS outflow to bone originates from brain nuclei, sub-nuclei and regions of six brain divisions (the midbrain and pons, hypothalamus, hindbrain medulla, forebrain, cerebral cortex, and thalamus). The authors provided compelling evidence for a brain-bone SNS neuroaxis that regulates bone metabolism and nociceptive functions. The paper is generally excellent with an interesting scientific premise and novel findings. Overall, the paper is strong and novel.

1) Authors may use arrows to point to infected neuron cells and indicate types of neurons in Figure 1.

We thank the reviewer for the comment. All EGFP-positive neurons are SNS neurons infected with PRV152. In this study, we did not use neuronal markers.

2) Authors may discuss the mechanism by which how PRV152 migrates to brain after Injection of PRV152 into the periosteum or metaphysis.

We thank the reviewer for the great comment and added the part explaining how PRV152 migrates to the brain from the sites of inoculation in femur (page 6, lines 97-100 and page 10, lines 212-216).

3) Authors may explain why they did not directly detect EGFP expression on PRV152 infected cells under fluorescence microscope instead of using immunofluorescence approach to detect PRV152 infected cells.

Thank you for the comment. We’ve added an explanation on why we conducted immunofluorescence (page 7, lines 127-128).

4) Authors may discuss how their findings can benefit the research in the neural regulation of bone metabolism and nociceptive functions for bone pain.

We fully concur with the review comment and further discussed how our findings can benefit bone metabolism and pain (page 12, lines 256-261).

5) Authors may provide a summary map of the Brain-Bone Sympathetic Neural Circuits derived from their findings in Figures 1 and 2. This map would enhance the manuscript's utility for readers.

Great suggestion and we added a summary map in Figure 2.

6) Authors may discuss and summarize their results in detail for a better understanding of their findings

We thank the reviewer for this comment and have addressed the concern in the discussion (page 10, lines 211-216 and page 12, lines 256-261).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 2—source data 1. Contains the numerical data used to generate the figures.
    elife-95727-fig2-data1.xlsx (22.8KB, xlsx)
    MDAR checklist
    elife-95727-mdarchecklist1.pdf (281.1KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    Figure 2—source data 1 contains the numerical data used to generate the figures.

    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES