Abstract
Background and Objectives:
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by the presence of viable microorganisms in the bloodstream. BSI is one of the major causes of sepsis and subsequent adverse clinical outcomes all across the globe. The present study was undertaken to identify clinico-epidemio-microbiological variables associated with 30-day mortality in patients having BSI with WHO priority pathogens.
Materials and Methods:
The study was conducted at a public sector tertiary care institute in central India from April 2019 to March 2021. Blood samples collected from patients with clinical suspicion of sepsis, were processed by automated bacterial culture system and interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. Calculated sample size was 150. Data was analyzed by R software.
Results:
Respiratory tract infection was the most common source (43.3%) of BSI, followed by the gastrointestinal (20%) and urinary tract (18.7%). Among the patients, 33% required invasive mechanical ventilation, and 31% required inotropes. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most common co-morbidity (34%). The incidence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) was 59.3%. Escherichia coli was the most commonly (24%) isolated organism, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (16%).
Conclusion:
Higher age, higher qSOFA score / SIRS score / mean SOFA score at presentation had higher mortality. Use of mechanical ventilation and inotropes during treatment and isolation of critical category organisms of WPP and multi drug resistant organisms were independent 30-day mortality predictors.
Keywords: Antimicrobial stewardship, Bacteremia, Drug resistance, Mortality, Sepsis
INTRODUCTION
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated immune response of the host in response to an infection by the International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock (1). Sepsis is a major global burden and accounts for nearly 48.9 million cases and 11 million deaths annually (2). Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined as the presence of viable bacteria or fungi in the bloodstream and is identifiable by microbiological culture among patients with suspected sepsis (3). Bloodstream infections (BSI) may be due to community acquired infections or hospital acquired (4). BSI cause a huge economic burden on the patient and healthcare system (5–8).
The World Health Organisation priority pathogen (WPP) list was identified for multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria to prioritize the research and development of newer antibiotics (9, 10). Patients having co-morbidities and infection with MDR organisms are known to have adverse clinical outcomes in sepsis (11).
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the quick SOFA (qSOFA) score serve as a quantitative indicators of the patient’s clinical condition and outcome (12, 13). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is an exaggerated defence response of the body to a noxious stressor to localize and then eliminate the source of the insult (14). SIRS is defined by the satisfaction of any two of the criteria below: a) Body temperature over 38 or under 36 degrees Celsius b) Heart rate greater than 90 beats/minute. c) Respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths/minute or partial pressure of CO2 less than 32 mmHg d) Leukocyte count greater than 12000 or less than 4000 /microliters or over 10% immature forms or bands. Among the patients with BSI, elderly age group, MDR infection and presence of co-morbidity is associated with increased 30-day mortality (6, 15–17). The present study was conceived to identify clinico-epidemio-microbiological factors associated with 30-day mortality among patients of BSI with critical and high categories of WPP as in Table 1.
Table 1.
WHO priority pathogens List for R&D of new antibiotics
| Priority 1: Critical | Priority 2: High | Priority 3: Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Enterococcus faecium | Streptococcus pneumoniae |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Staphylococcus aureus | Haemophilus influenzae |
|
Enterobacteriaceae
(Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) |
Helicobacter pylori | Shigella spp. |
| Campylobacter | ||
| Salmonella spp. | ||
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design.
This study was planned as a longitudinal chart review, conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhopal a public sector tertiary care institute of national importance in central India from April 2019 to March 2021. As a referral tertiary care centre, AIIMS Bhopal caters to adjacent 4–5 states and more than 100 districts in central India. The primary aim was to identify and compare demographic (age, sex), clinical (source of infection, SOFA score, need for respiratory and inotrope support), and microbiological variables (causative bacteria, presence of MDR isolate) associated with 30-day all-cause mortality among the patients having BSI with WPP.
Ethics statement.
The study was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee (IHEC) of AIIMS, Bhopal vide reference number: IHEC-PGR/MD/003. The study was designed as per the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and the Helsinki guidelines for informed patient consent.
Study population.
Inclusion criteria: Participants aged 18 years or older with microbiologically proven BSI with critical and high categories of WPP were considered for further evaluation after informed written consent; Exclusion criteria: Cases whose records could not be traced by Medical Records Department (MRD) or who could not be contacted by telephone were excluded.
Sample size.
The sample size was calculated by the software OpenEpi, with a presumed population size of 1,00,000 with cumulative mortality of 25% with a design effect of 1 to be 139. However, with a possible attrition rate of 7.5%, a total sample size of 150 was calculated (18).
Study procedure.
Blood samples of patients from in-patient departments (IPD) of various clinical departments of AIIMS Bhopal with clinical suspicion of sepsis were sent to the Clinical Microbiology Department. Blood samples were processed by automated bacterial culture system (BacTAlert and Vitek-II BioMérieux, France) and interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. All the patients having blood stream infections with critical and high-category WPP were identified by consecutive sampling and were taken into the sampling frame. The patients were then screened as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria as mentioned above for recruitment. The flow of work has been shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow of work
The demographic variables, the SOFA score, qSOFA score and the SIRS score, the source of infection, the causative organism, and its sensitivity pattern were identified and recorded at admission. The need for respiratory and ventilatory support anytime during the course of the treatment was taken as a dichotomous variable. Those patients, who were discharged, before 30 days, were contacted by telephone and encouraged to visit our institute with their case records. Patients, who were not able to visit physically, were interviewed by telephone. Any WPP that was resistant to at least 3 groups of antibiotics were identified as Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogen.
Statistical analysis.
The variables about demographic, clinical, and microbiological data as mentioned above were collected on a pre-structured data sheet either as dichotomous or continuous variables, as appropriate. After data cleaning, data were analyzed by R software (v4.1.2; R Core Team 2021). The chi-square test was used for dichotomous variables and the student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables was used to compare proportions. Confounding co-morbidities were analyzed by appropriate univariate / multivariate analysis as mentioned in detail in the results section. Statistical significance was considered as all p values were less than 5% (p<0.05).
RESULTS
The study involved 150 participants who presented with BSI with WPP. The studied population had a mean age of 48.2 ± 18.4 years (Mean ± Standard Deviation), with slight male predominance (62.7%). The mean age among males was 49.4 ± 18.6 years and among females was 46.2 ± 18.1 years (Table 2). Out of the 150 number of participants 84 patients (56%) had at least one or more comorbidity. Diabetes mellitus was the most common co morbidity in 34% cases followed by chronic renal failure (18%), chronic lung diseases (8.7%), cirrhosis of liver (6%), heart failure (4%), cancer (4%) and immunosuppression in 1.3% cases.
Table 2.
Baseline Demographic and Clinical variables of the patients (n=150)
| Variable | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Age in years | |
| Age in years (Mean ± SD1) | 48.2 ± 18.4 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 94 (62.7) |
| Male age in year (Mean ± SD) | 49.4 ± 18.6 |
| Female | 56 (37.3) |
| Female age in year (Mean ± SD) | 46.2 ± 18.1 |
| Source of infection | |
| Respiratory tract infection | 65 (43.3) |
| Gastrointestinal infection | 30 (20) |
| Urinary tract infection | 28 (18.7) |
| Skin and soft tissue infection | 18 (12) |
| Others | 9 (6) |
| Type of care | |
| Low-priority area (Ward) | 41 (27.3) |
| High-priority area (HPA) | |
| High-dependency unit (HDU) | 51 (34.0) |
| Intensive care unit (ICU) | 58 (38.7) |
| Respiratory Support | |
| No support | 55 (36.7) |
| Oxygen support/Non-invasive ventilation | 45 (30) |
| Invasive ventilation | 50 (33.3) |
| Inotrope Support | 47 (31.3) |
| Co-morbidities | |
| Presence of co-morbidities | 84 (56) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 51 (34) |
| Chronic renal failure | 27 (18) |
| COPD2 | 13 (8.7) |
| Cirrhosis | 9 (6) |
| Heart failure | 6 (4) |
| Cancer | 6 (4) |
| Immunosuppression | 2 (1.3) |
| HIV infection | 0 (0) |
| No co-morbidities | 66 (44) |
| 1 co-morbidity | 57 (38) |
| ≥2 co-morbidities | 27 (18) |
| Received antibiotics in previous 30 days | 17 (11.3) |
| 1SD - Standard Deviation | |
| 2COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
The prevalence of BSI attributed to WPP did not show any significant variation across ages. Around 27% of all patients were recruited from low-priority areas (LPA) such as general wards, and 73% of patients were recruited from high-priority areas (HPA) like intensive care units (ICU) or high dependency units (HDU) as mentioned in Table 2. The most common source of BSI was respiratory tract infection in 43.3% of patients, followed by gastrointestinal infections (20%) and urinary tract infection (18.7%) as mentioned in Table 2.
Among the total patients, 63.3% required respiratory support (30% required non-invasive ventilation and 33.3% required invasive mechanical ventilation) and 31% required support of inotropes. Among the BSI cases, 38% had one co-morbidity and 18% had more than one co-morbidity. Diabetes mellitus was the most common co-morbidity seen in 34% of patients, followed by chronic kidney disease (18%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: COPD (8.7%). The details of co-morbidities are presented in Table 2.
SIRS score of ≥2 was seen in 91.3% of patients. The mean SIRS score was 2.55 ± 0.9. Quick sequential organ failure assessment SOFA (qSOFA) score of ≥2 was seen in 49.3% of individuals. The mean qSOFA score was 1.5 ± 1.1. The median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was 5 with an IQR of 3 to 9. Thirty-six percent of patients had a SOFA score of ≥7 with a mean SOFA score of 6.0 ± 4.6.
Among the organisms under study, 69.9% of patients had BSI with WPP from the critical category. Escherichia coli was identified as the most common cause of BSI (24%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (16%), Staphylococcus aureus (12.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%), Enterococcus faecium (9.3%) and Salmonella spp. (8.7%) among patients. The incidence of MDR organisms amongst BSI was 59.3%. K. pneumoniae had the highest incidence of MDR (73%), followed by Enterococcus (71.4%), followed by E. coli (66.7%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (62.5%) the details of which is mentioned in Table 3.
Table 3.
Causative organism and incidence of sepsis
| Organism | Total N (%) | MDR1 N(%) | Characteristics: N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority pathogen | 150 (100) | 89 (59.3) | _ |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | 24 (16) | 15 (62.5) | Carbapenem-resistant: 17 (70.8) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 18 (12) | 9 (50) | Carbapenem-resistant: 8 (44.4) |
| Escherichia coli | 36 (24) | 24 (66.7) | Carbapenem-resistant: 9 (25) |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 26 (17.3) | 19 (73) | Carbapenem-resistant: 15 (57.6) |
| Enterococcus faecium | 14 (9.3) | 10 (71.4) | Vancomycin-resistant: 2 (14.3) |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 19 (12.7) | 12 (63.2) | Methicillin-resistant: 5 (26.3) |
| Salmonella spp. | 13 (8.7) | 0 (0) | Ceftriaxone-resistant: 0 (0) |
1 MDR – Multi-Drug Resistant
The thirty-day mortality in patients with BSI with WPP was 36%. Advanced age was associated with significantly higher mortality (p=0.016). The mean age of patients in the mortality group was 53.3 ± 16.1 as compared to 45.4 ± 19.1 in patients who survived on day 30. Among cases with various sources of BSI, the highest incidence of mortality was found in respiratory tract infections (46%), followed by skin-soft tissue infections (38.9%), abdominal infections (36.7%), and cardiovascular infections (33.3%). Respiratory tract infection was also responsible for the highest absolute mortality and was responsible for 55.6% of all mortalities. This was followed by gastrointestinal infection (20.4%), skin and soft tissue infection (13%) and urinary tract infection (5.6%) as in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of mortality by the source of infection
Among the patients who were on mechanical ventilation, 70% ultimately succumbed by day 30. Among the patients who required inotropes, 76.5% of them died by day 30. A higher qSOFA score was associated with higher mortality. The mean qSOFA score in patients who died by day 30, was 2.35 ± 0.80 as compared to 1.02 ± 0.94 in survivors. This difference was statistically significant (p-value: <0.001). The SIRS score in the mortality group; 2.85 ± 0.74, was significantly higher as compared to the score in those who survived; 2.38 ± 0.94 (p-value: 0.046). The mean SOFA score was 10.1 ± 4.2 in patients who died by day 30, as compared to a SOFA score of 3.7 ± 2.9 in the survivors. A higher SOFA score was significantly associated with higher mortality (p-value: <0.001). Higher values of all the components of SOFA score were associated with significantly increased mortality except for the renal component (Table 4).
Table 4.
Association of SOFA components with mortality
| SOFA components | No mortality at day 30 | Mortality on day 30 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PaO21 /FiO22 | 373.4 ± 85.8 | 258.7 ± 104.5 | <0.001 |
| PaO2/FiO2 SOFA3 | 0.71 ± 0.94 | 2 ± 1.16 | |
| Platelet count | 199.6 ± 126.6 | 151.4 ± 131.0 | 0.008 |
| Platelet SOFA | 0.68 ± 1.13 | 1.39 ± 1.35 | |
| S. Bilirubin | 1.2 ± 1.5 | 3.4 ± 6.7 | 0.020 |
| Bilirubin SOFA | 0.35 ± 0.74 | 0.96 ± 1.35 | |
| MAP4 | 81.8 ± 13.3 | 73.0 ± 7.0 | <0.001 |
| MAP SOFA | 0.47 ± 1.18 | 2.5 ± 1.92 | |
| CNS | 13.4 ± 3.1 | 9.4 ± 4.2 | <0.001 |
| CNS SOFA | 0.67 ± 1.18 | 2.33 ± 1.39 | |
| Creatinine | 1.9 ± 2.3 | 2.3 ± 2.6 | 0.142 |
| Creatinine SOFA | 0.92 ± 1.33 | 1.18 ± 1.33 | |
| Total SOFA | 3.7 ± 2.9 | 10.1 ± 4.2 | <0.001 |
PaO2 – Partial Pressure of Oxygen
FiO2 – Fraction of Inspired Oxygen
SOFA – Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
MAP – Mean Arterial Pressure
The descending order of association of predictors for mortality was the presence of MDR organism (OR−4.25; CI:2.01–9.57), isolation of critical category of WPP (OR−3.77; CI:1.67–9.41), higher SOFA score (OR−1.52; CI:1.33–1.78). The descending order of association of predictors for prolonged hospital stay was a critical category of WPP (OR−2.80; CI:1.36–5.74), MDR organisms (OR−2.21; CI:1.18–4.12), higher SOFA score (OR−1.25; CI:1.08–1.47).
DISCUSSION
Of the 150 participants, the mean age was observed to be 48.2 ± 18.4 years with a male predominance (62.7%). Similarly in a Japanese cohort, Hattori et al. (2018, Japan) stated male predominance of 63.6% (15). However, it was in contrast to the study of Rudd et al. (2020) which had near equal distribution with 46.5% males (2). In our study, the most common source of infection was respiratory tract infection (43.3%), followed by gastrointestinal infection (20%), urinary tract infection (18.6%), and skin and soft tissue infection (12%). This was similar to the study of Chatterjee et al. (2017, India) who reported the majority of sepsis cases were due to respiratory infection (53.3%) followed by gastrointestinal infections (14.9%), and skin-soft tissue infection (12.9%) (19). Similarly in the study by Cao et al. (2021, China), respiratory infection was the most common cause of sepsis (65%), followed by abdominal infection (35.4%) and urinary tract infection (8.8%) (20).
Our study recruited 27% of patients from the low-priority area (LPA), and the rest of the cases were recruited from HPA (34% from HDU and 39% from ICU). This was in contrast to most of the other studies which had patients only from the HPA-like intensive care unit (ICU) (21). Our study was more akin to real-life hospital setting scenario, unlike that of others which were carried out predominantly in HPA (19, 21). We identified the presence of comorbidities in our patients according to the EPIC-II trial (11). In our study, 44% had no comorbidity, 38% had one comorbidity and 18% had more than one comorbidity. In a study by Holmbom et al. (2016, Sweden), 48.9% of individuals had no comorbidities, 28.7% of individuals had one comorbidity, 15.5% had two co-morbidities and 6.9% of individuals had more than two comorbidities (6). In our study, Diabetes Mellitus was the most common comorbidity which was anticipated, due to the high prevalence of Diabetes in India unlike the study by Holmbom et al. where malignancy was the most common comorbidity followed by diabetes mellitus (6).
The mean SIRS score in our study was 2.55 ± 0.90 and 137 patients (91.3%) were having SIRS of ≥2. The mean qSOFA score in our study was 1.5 ± 1.1. A total of 74 patients (49.3%) had a qSOFA score of ≥2. In our study, the mean SOFA score was 6.0 ± 4.6. The median SOFA score in our study was 5 with an IQR of 3–9. In study of Baykara et al. (2018, Turkey), the median SOFA score was 7 with an IQR of 5 to 11 (21). A lower median SOFA score was seen in our study as it also included patients from LPA in addition to HPA as compared to the study of Baykara et al. (2018), which included only ICU patients (21).
Escherichia coli was found to be the most common organism (24%) isolated in BSI in our study followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (16%), Staphylococcus aureus (12.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%), Enterococcus spp. (9.3%), Salmonella spp. (8.7%). In a similar study by Holmbom et al. (2016, Sweden) the maximum number of patients had BSI due to Escherichia coli followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae (6). In a similar study by Baykara et al. (2018, Turkey), Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common isolated organism (33.7%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (16%) (21). However, another study from India by Chatterjee et al. (2017) revealed the maximum prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii (21.2%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.9%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.4%) and Escherichia coli (15.4%) in BSI (19).
In our study, 59.3% of organisms were found to be MDR. Among the Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), 69% of Enterobacteriaceae, 62.5% of Acinetobacter baumannii, 50% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were MDR. Among the Gram-positive cocci (GPC),71.4% of Enterococcus spp. and 63.2% of Staphylococcus aureus were MDR. Acinetobacter baumannii (71%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (44.4%) and Enterobacteriaceae (38.7%) were carbapenem-resistant. Among Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 26.3% were methicillin-resistant and 14.3% of Enterococcus spp. were vancomycin-resistant. In the study by Baykara et al. from Turkey (2018), about 74.8% of Acinetobacter isolates, 39.0% of Klebsiella isolates, and 26.5% of Pseudomonas isolates were resistant to carbapenems. The same study identified, 2.7% of Klebsiella isolates, 2.6% of Pseudomonas isolates, and 2.1% of Acinetobacter isolates as colistin-resistant and 75.4% of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates were identified as methicillin-resistant (MRSA) (21).
In our study, 54 out of 150 patients died, with a mortality percentage of 36%. The mean age of non-survivors was 53.3 ± 16.1 years. According to Holmbom et al. (2016, Sweden), advanced age had a risk ratio of 1.04 for mortality (6). In our study, among the non-survivors, 68.5% were male but this sex difference was not statistically significant. Holmbom et al. (2016, Sweden) had published a risk ratio of 0.95 among the female sex, indicative of a slight protective effect (6).
The major cause of mortality was respiratory tract infections (55.6%), followed by gastrointestinal infections (20.4%) and, skin-soft tissue infections (13.0%). This was similar to the study by Chatterjee et al. (2017, India), with respiratory tract infections leading to 53.3% of BSI, followed by gastrointestinal infections (43%), and urinary tract infections (43%) (19). In the study by Baykara et al. (2018, Turkey), 71.6% of all BSI were due to respiratory infections followed by UTI (7.8%) and gastrointestinal infection (5.6%) (21).
In our study, the presence of only one comorbidity had an odds ratio of 1.64 (CI:0.53–5.16), and two or more comorbidities had an odds ratio of 1.55 (CI:0.35–6.79) for mortality. The presence of diabetes was associated with increased mortality by 16% (p-value: 0.043). However, in the study of Holmbom et al. (2016, Sweden), the presence of one comorbidity was associated with a relative risk of 1.56 of having 30-day mortality (CI:1.48–1.65), and the presence of two or more co-morbidities was associated with a relative risk of 1.89 times of having a 30-day mortality (CI:1.79–2) (6). The association of co-morbidities in our study was not statistically significant, which may be attributable to a comparatively smaller sample size.
On multivariate analysis, for the cases of survivors and non-survivors, isolation of MDRO (OR−4.25, CI:2.01–9.57, p<0.001), isolation of WPP (OR−3.77, CI:1.67–9.41, p=0.002) and higher SOFA score (OR−1.52, CI:1.33–1.78, p<0.001) were associated with higher mortality independently and aggregately. A comparative analysis of various factors and determinants of outcomes of sepsis stratified by the organism, source, sex and the scores has been depicted below in Table 5.
Table 5.
A comparative account of factors associated in patients with BSI (30-day mortality): Present study cohorts with other countries
| Country | 30-day Mortality (%) | Most common organism isolated | Gender predominance | Mean age (years) | Most common source of infection | Most common comorbidity | Mortality trend with age | SOFA | Study group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15.2 | Staphylococcus aureus | Male (63.6 %) | 82.8 | UTI | Malignancy | Increase | 8.2 ± 4.4 | Haruka et al., 2018 |
| Norway | 12.9 | NA | Female (53 %) | 48.5 | Pneumonia | NA | Increase | NA | Liyanarachi et al., 2022 |
| Canada | 7 | Escherichia coli | Male (55%) | NA | NA | NA | Increase | NA | Verway et al., 2022 |
| Sweden | 12.8 | Escherichia coli | Male (54%) | 70 | NA | Malignancy | Increase | NA | Holmbom et al., 2020 |
| India | 36 (with WPP) | Acinetobacter baumannii | Male (62.7%) | 48.2 | RTI | Diabetes mellitus | Increase | 10.1 ± 4.2 | Current Study |
Even after an exhaustive literature search, we could not find any other study akin to that of ours for comparison. The limitations of our study are plenty. The study was conducted in a single centre and the BSI was not differentiated to community acquired or hospital acquired. The study identified 30-day mortality rate and predictors of mortality among BSI patients.
CONCLUSION
The study was conducted in a real-life hospital setting with patients from the general wards, high dependence unit (HDU), and intensive care unit (ICU). This study emphasized that patients presenting with higher age and higher qSOFA score / SIRS at presentation had higher mortality among patients with BSI with WPP. Those patients with BSI with WPP, treated with mechanical ventilation and inotropes had poor prognoses and higher 30-day mortality. Isolation of critical category of WPP (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae), MDRO and increased SOFA score had increased 30-day mortality independently and aggregately.
REFERENCES
- 1.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395: 200–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Viscoli C. Bloodstream Infections: The peak of the iceberg. Virulence 2016; 7: 248–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kern WV, Rieg S. Burden of bacterial bloodstream infection-a brief update on epidemiology and significance of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26: 151–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prowle JR, Echeverri JE, Ligabo EV, Sherry N, Taori GC, Crozier TM, et al. Acquired bloodstream infection in the intensive care unit: incidence and attributable mortality. Crit Care 2011; 15: R100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holmbom M, Giske CG, Fredrikson M, Östholm Balkhed Å, Claesson C, Nilsson LE, et al. 14-Year Survey in a Swedish County Reveals a Pronounced Increase in Bloodstream Infections (BSI). Comorbidity - An Independent Risk Factor for Both BSI and Mortality. PLoS One 2016; 11(11): e0166527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Laupland KB, Davies HD, Church DL, Louie TJ, Dool JS, Zygun DA, et al. Bloodstream infection-associated sepsis and septic shock in critically Ill adults: A population-based study. Infection 2004; 32: 59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bharadwaj R, Bal A, Kapila K, Mave V, Gupta A. Blood stream infections. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 515273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Asokan GV, Ramadhan T, Ahmed E, Sanad H. WHO Global Priority Pathogens List: A bibliometric analysis of medline-PubMed for knowledge mobilization to Infection prevention and control practices in Bahrain. Oman Med J 2019; 34: 184–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Breijyeh Z, Jubeh B, Karaman R. Resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to resolve It. Molecules 2020; 25: 1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009; 302: 2323–2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care 2019; 23: 374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barbara P, Graziano C, Caputo W, Litvak I, Battinelli D, Hahn B. The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) identifies septic patients in the out-of-hospital setting. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36: 1022–1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. In Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547669/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hattori H, Maeda M, Nagatomo Y, Takuma T, Niki Y, Naito Y, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in bloodstream infections: A single-center retrospective study in Japan. Am J Infect Control 2018; 46(12): e75–e79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Verway M, Brown KA, Marchand-Austin A, Diong C, Lee S, Langford B, et al. Prevalence and mortality associated with bloodstream organisms: a population-wide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Microbiol 2022; 60(4): e0242921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liyanarachi KV, Solligård E, Mohus RM, Åsvold BO, Rogne T, Damås JK. Incidence, recurring admissions and mortality of severe bacterial infections and sepsis over a 22-year period in the population-based HUNT study. PLoS One 2022; 17(7): e0271263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.OpenEpi - Toolkit Shell for Developing New Applications [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSPropor.htm
- 19.Chatterjee S, Bhattacharya M, Todi SK. Epidemiology of adult-population sepsis in India: A single center 5 year experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017; 21: 573–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cao L, Xiao M, Wan Y, Zhang C, Gao X, Chen X, et al. Epidemiology and mortality of sepsis in intensive care units in prefecture-level cities in Sichuan, China: a prospective multicenter study. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27: e932227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baykara N, Akalın H, Arslantaş MK, Hancı V, Çağlayan Ç, Kahveci F, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study. Crit Care 2018; 22: 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


