Skip to main content
FEMS Microbiology Ecology logoLink to FEMS Microbiology Ecology
. 2024 Jul 11;100(8):fiae095. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae095

Fronts divide diazotroph communities in the Southern Indian Ocean

Subhadeep Chowdhury 1,2, Hugo Berthelot 3,4, Corentin Baudet 5, David González-Santana 6,7, Christian Furbo Reeder 8,9, Stéphane L'Helguen 10, Jean-François Maguer 11, Carolin R Löscher 12, Arvind Singh 13, Stéphane Blain 14, Nicolas Cassar 15,16, Sophie Bonnet 17, Hélène Planquette 18, Mar Benavides 19,20,
PMCID: PMC11245648  PMID: 38992179

Abstract

Dinitrogen (N2) fixation represents a key source of reactive nitrogen in marine ecosystems. While the process has been rather well-explored in low latitudes of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, other higher latitude regions and particularly the Indian Ocean have been chronically overlooked. Here, we characterize N2 fixation and diazotroph community composition across nutrient and trace metals gradients spanning the multifrontal system separating the oligotrophic waters of the Indian Ocean subtropical gyre from the high nutrient low chlorophyll waters of the Southern Ocean. We found a sharp contrasting distribution of diazotroph groups across the frontal system. Notably, cyanobacterial diazotrophs dominated north of fronts, driving high N2 fixation rates (up to 13.96 nmol N l−1 d−1) with notable peaks near the South African coast. South of the fronts non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs prevailed without significant N2 fixation activity being detected. Our results provide new crucial insights into high latitude diazotrophy in the Indian Ocean, which should contribute to improved climate model parameterization and enhanced constraints on global net primary productivity projections.

Keywords: fronts, HNLC, N2 fixation, noncyanobacterial diazotrophs, subtropical gyre, trace metals


Fronts dividing the Indian Ocean and the Southern Ocean imprint a biogeochemical divide structuring diazotroph communities.

Introduction

Prokaryotes called “diazotrophs” fix dinitrogen (N2) into ammonium, sustaining primary productivity and carbon export in the ocean (Karl et al. 1997, Zehr and Capone 2020, Bonnet et al. 2023). Although cyanobacteria are conventionally regarded as the primary contributors to marine N2 fixation, non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs (NCDs) are ubiquitously distributed in marine ecosystems (Turk-Kubo et al. 2022). The activity of diazotrophs is importantly controlled by temperature (Sohm et al. 2011), as well as the availability of phosphorus and iron (Fe) (Mills et al. 2004). N2 fixation can be inhibited by reactive nitrogen compounds such as ammonium or nitrate (LaRoche and Breitbarth 2005). Under such constraints, N2 fixation has long been assumed to be restricted to warm low-latitude nitrate-poor open ocean regions, provided sufficient phosphorus and Fe are available (Zehr and Capone 2020). However, recent studies reported significant N2 fixation activity in cold an nutrient-rich regions, including temperate (Raes et al. 2020), and polar waters (von Friesen and Riemann 2020).

The Southern Indian Ocean (SIO) region comprises the Indian Ocean (IO) subtropical gyre and the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. The IO subtropical gyre is characterized by low dissolved nitrogen-to-phosphorus (N:P) ratios (∼4:1) in the photic zone (Baer et al. 2019), conditions believed to favour diazotrophy (Knapp 2012). However, low Fe availability in the IO subtropical gyre may hinder N2 fixation and intensify nitrogen limitation (Grand et al. 2015). Recurring massive blooms of Trichodesmium, a prominent diazotrophic cyanobacterium, and frequent occurrence of diatom–diazotroph associations are observed at the southern tip of Madagascar (Poulton et al. 2009). These observations point towards an important contribution of diazotrophs to nitrogen fluxes in the IO’s subtropical gyre (Poulton et al. 2009, Metzl et al. 2022).

The IO subtropical gyre is separated from the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean by a complex succession of quasi-zonal frontal structures, including the subtropical front (STF), subantarctic Front (SAF), and polar front (PF) (Kostianoy et al. 2004, Chapman et al. 2020). While fronts are usually considered as barriers, recent studies have shown that front-associated filaments facilitate sub/mesoscale transfer of seawater properties and communities between the Southern Ocean and the IO subtropical gyre across the fronts (Read et al. 2000, Hörstmann et al. 2021). Fronts can enhance vertical fluxes of nutrients (D’Asaro et al. 2011), resulting in high primary productivity, and typically distinct microbial communities as compared to the surrounding water masses (Baltar et al. 2016, Hörstmann et al. 2021). While some studies have investigated diazotrophy across frontal systems (Fong et al. 2008, Benavides et al. 2011, 2021, Riou et al. 2016, Shiozaki et al. 2018, Jiang et al. 2019), their role in structuring diazotroph communities and controlling N2 fixation inputs is largely unknown (Benavides and Robidart 2020).

The Southern Ocean is rich in macronutrients but low in productivity due to the lack of Fe, for which it is known as a “high nutrient low chlorophyll” (HNLC) region (Venables and Moore 2010). Diazotrophs rely heavily on Fe, a vital component of the nitrogenase enzyme (Berman-Frank et al. 2001). The lack of Fe together with the cold-water conditions and high nitrate concentrations of the Southern Ocean IO sector are thus expected to suppress diazotrophy. However, a range of processes provides intermittent sources of Fe in this region, including atmospheric deposition, frontal jet interactions with bathymetry (Blain et al. 2007, Klocker 2018), and Fe from hydrothermal origin (Ardyna et al. 2019, Schine et al. 2021), known to prompt phytoplankton blooms and possibly diazotrophic activity as well. In addition to Fe, bioactive trace metals such as manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) are essential enzyme cofactors, controlling the growth of primary producers in the open ocean (Saito et al. 2008, Sunda 2012, Balaguer et al. 2023). However, the effects of trace metals, excluding Fe, on diazotrophs are not well understood.

An intercomparison of the latest generation of Earth system models shows that the IO is one of the main ocean basins adding uncertainty to global net primary productivity projections (Tagliabue et al. 2021). Hence, increasing N2 fixation measurements and its controlling mechanisms in the IO is crucial for improving the predictability of net primary productivity and understanding the ocean’s future role as a climate change regulator. Seeking to improve the coverage of diazotrophy studies in the SIO, here we investigate N2 fixation rates and the diazotroph community composition and abundance along a transect spanning from the oligotrophic IO subtropical gyre to the HNLC waters of the Southern Ocean. This study provides valuable data to improve our understanding of high latitude diazotrophy and nitrogen budgets in the IO.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and environmental parameters

This study was conducted from 13 January to 4 March 2021 (austral summer) onboard the R/V Marion Dufresne II as part of the French SWINGS (GEOTRACES GS02) cruise (doi: 10.17600/18001925) (Fig. 1). Surface seawater was collected at eight stations using Niskin bottles mounted on a conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) rosette package and at 43 other stations using the underway sampling system (Fig. 1). Underway sampling consisted of a water intake at the base of the ship hull through the moonpool of the ship and a PTFE pump and tubing minimizing trace metal contaminations. Sea surface temperature (SST) and salinity data were retrieved from the CTD sensors. Chlorophyll a concentrations were retrieved from Aqua MODIS Satellite data (from 13 January to 4 March 2021, L3M 4 km product). Samples for dissolved inorganic nutrients and trace metals were collected from CTD casts using a trace metal clean polyurethane powder-coated aluminum frame rosette equipped with 24 12-l, externally closing, Teflon-lined, GO-FLO bottles (General Oceanics) and attached to a Kevlar® line, according to the GEOTRACES guidelines (Cutter et al. 2017). Seawater samples for dissolved inorganic nutrients analysis (nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, and silicic acid) were prefiltered through 0.45-µm acetate cellulose filters, poisoned with HgCl2 (4 g l−1) and stored in the dark at room temperature until analysis using a Skalar segmented flow autoanalyzer (Blain et al. 2015). Detection limits for the nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, and silicic acid were 0.15 µmol l−1, 0.01 µmol l−1, 0.02 µmol l−1, and 0.07 µmol l−1, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

CTD profile and underway stations sampled during the cruise overlaid on (A) sea surface temperature (SST) and Chlorophyll-a composite of L3M 4 km product retrieved from the Copernicus marine service for the cruise period (13 January 2021 to 4 March 2021). STF = subtropical front, SAF = subantarctic front, and PF = polar front. (C) N2 fixation (nmol N l−1 d−1) and (D) primary production (nmol C l−1 d−1) rates measured from surface samples (5 m) along the cruise transect. Nondetectable rates are depicted with crosses. AC = Agulhas current and ARC = Agulhas return current.

Samples for dissolved trace metals measurements (cobalt—Co-, iron—Fe-, manganese—Mn-, nickel—Ni-, lead—Pb-, and zinc—Zn-) were obtained from discrete stations (Fig. 1) following the methods outlined in the Geotraces Cookbook (https://geotracesold.sedoo.fr/images/Cookbook.pdf). Analyses were carried out within 12 months after collection on an SF-HR-ICP-MS Element XR instrument (Thermo Fisher, Bremen, Germany), at Pôle Spectrométrie Océan (IFREMER, France). The spectrometer was coupled to an ESI seaFAST-pico® introduction system and run with a method analytically similar to that of Lagerström et al. (2013).

Dissolved nutrients and trace metal concentration data are used here for statistical purposes, while a full description of their variability during the SWINGS cruise will be provided in dedicated papers (e.g. Baudet et al., submitted).

N2 fixation and primary production rates

Samples for the measurement of primary production and N2 fixation rates were collected from the underway outlet as a set of four 2.3-l acid-washed polycarbonate bottles. Three bottles were spiked with 2.3 ml of a 13C-labelled bicarbonate solution (NaH13CO2; >98%, Sigma Aldrich, 10 atom% final 13C abundance) and 2.3 ml of 15N2 (15 N isotopic abundance of 99.7%, Eurisotop, Saclay, France) using the bubble method to maximize the final 15N isotopic abundance and improve the detection limit. Bottles were inverted at least 60 times before incubation to ensure rapid isotopic equilibrium. The fourth bottle was left unamended and used as a control. All the bottles were incubated for 24 h in an on-deck incubator with circulating surface water and a blue filter reproducing the light at the sampling depth. Temperature changes between the start and the end of the incubation were limited to 1.2°C on average. Following incubations, 12 ml of water were syphoned from the bottles in Exetainer tubes and poisoned with HgCl2 for 15N2 isotopic abundance analyses. The remaining bottle content was filtered on combusted (450°C, 4 h) 25-mm diameter glass fibre filters (Whatman, London, UK). Filters were stored at −20°C before being dried for downstream analysis (24 h, 60°C). The 15N2 isotopic abundance in water was measured within 6 months using a membrane inlet mass spectrometer according to Kana et al. (1994). The particulate carbon and nitrogen isotopic enrichment (13C and 15N) was measured on an elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Deltaplus, Thermo Finnigan). N2 fixation rates were calculated according to Montoya et al. (1996). Minimum quantifiable rates were also calculated based on error propagation of the replicates as proposed by White et al. (2020).

Single-cell N2 fixation rates were measured by nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS) as described in Bonnet et al. (2016) at station 857 (north of the fronts) targeting Crocosphaera-like cells and Trichodesmium, and at four stations south of the fronts (stations 872, 876, 887, and 893) targeting putative NCDs. Putative NCDs were not measured north of the fronts (where cyanobacterial N2 fixation rates were expected to be high), to avoid false positives due to the transfer of enriched 15N biomass from cyanobacterial diazotrophs to heterotrophic bacteria (Bonnet et al. 2016). Briefly, at station 857 cells were deposited on a polycarbonate filter (0.2 µm pore size) following 15N2 incubation. Trichodesmium filament and Crocosphaera-like cells were mapped by epifluorescence before nanoSIMS analyses. At stations 872, 876, 887, and 893, incubated cells were laid on a polycarbonate filter (0.2 µm pore size) and resuspended in 4.5 ml freshly produced filtered (0.2 µm pore size) seawater, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were then stored at −80°C. Back in the laboratory, samples were thawed and cells were labelled with SYBR green I DNA dye (Molecular Probes, final concentration 0.05%). Heterotrophic bacteria were gated according to Marie et al. (1999) and sorted using a BD FACSAria™ Fusion cell sorter. Sorted heterotrophic bacteria were directly deposited on a polycarbonate membrane on the sorter outlet as described by Bonnet et al. (2016). In total, 50 cyanobacterial diazotrophs were analyzed, and 2,535 heterotrophic bacteria. Incubation time was 24 h for station 857 and between 48 and 168 h, long enough to increase the likelihood of detecting positively enriched NCDs. Cells were considered as significantly 15N enriched when the number of 15N ions counted exceeded the number of 15N ions assuming a natural abundance (0.366 atom%) plus three times the standard deviation of the Poisson distribution modelled for each cell (see Berthelot et al. (2019) for more details).

DNA sampling, extraction, diazotroph abundance, and nifH/nifD gene sequencing

Nucleic acids were sampled from 51 stations, 2-l seawater samples filtered through 0.2-µm polycarbonate filters, and stored at −80°C until analyzed. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) and quantified by the Picogreen method using a VarioSkan spectrofluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). For DNA extraction, we used additional modifications including freeze–thaw with liquid nitrogen, bead beating, and Proteinase-K steps before the kit purification and elution to 70 µl in RNase-free water, as previously described (Moisander et al. 2008). The abundance of nifH genes was quantified using TaqMan-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting six diazotroph groups including Trichodesmium, UCYN-A1, UCYN-A2, UCYN-B, Gamma-A, and Gamma-4, using published primer–probe sets (see Supplemental files).

The nifH gene was amplified using degenerated oligonucleotide primers (nifH1–2–3–4) (Zehr and McReynolds 1989), to produce a final amplicon length of 359 base pairs (bp). In diazotroph community studies, nifH is frequently employed as a biomarker gene to identify diazotrophs and their community composition (Frank et al. 2016, Gaby et al. 2018). However, to perform N2 fixation diazotrophs require a minimum set of genes (nifHDKENB; Dos Santos et al. 2012). Up to 20% of nifH-harbouring genomes showed the absence of the genes nifD and nifK, and this genomic configuration is referred to as pseudo nifH (Mise et al. 2021). Pseudo nifH has been found in various common diazotroph groups, including Clostridia and methanogens (Mise et al. 2021). A recent study advocated rethinking using nifH as the primary biomarker for N2 fixing microbes and proposed to consider the nifD and nifK genes instead (Mise et al. 2021). Here, we used a dual gene amplicon approach (nifH and nifD genes) to comprehensively explore diazotroph community composition. To amplify nifD genes, nested PCRs were performed to produce a final amplicon length of 512 bp (McRose et al. 2017). Amplicons were checked using a 1.2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, and images were captured using a UV transilluminator. nifH and nifD PCR fragments were purified by using the MP Biomedicals Geneclean Turbo Kit (Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Gel-purified PCR products were shipped to Macrogen, Inc. (Amsterdam, Netherlands) for the clone library preparation, adapter ligation, and Illumina MiSeq 2 × 300 bp paired-end sequencing.

Bioinformatics

Demultiplexed raw Illumina sequence reads were received from the sequencing facility and primer and adapter sequences removed. Sequences were filtered, trimmed, and processed using the DADA2 (V. 1.16) pipeline with default settings (Callahan et al. 2016). After reviewing the quality profiles, sequences with a quality score >30% were kept for downstream processing. Upon concatenating all the processed merged reads from the forward and reverse sequences, only sequences exceeding a minimum length of 300 bp were retained for subsequent downstream analyses. Chimeras were removed to get rid of the artefact sequences created by two or more biological sequences that were wrongly linked together. Post chimera removal, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) with a length greater than 300 bp are selected for further analysis, including ASV table generation and taxonomic profiling. To exclude the potential non-nifH reads, we applied the specific following segments of the NifMAP pipeline v.1.0 (Angel et al. 2018). (a) The filtration was conducted utilizing the Hidden–Markov Model (HMM) “hmm_nuc_1160_nifH.hmm” through the application of hmmsearch in HMMER version 3.1b2 (http://hmmer.org/). (b) Amino acid translation, adjusting for potential frameshifts, was done using Framebot (Wang et al. 2013) against a nifH reference set. (c) Detection of nifH homologs (bchX, chlL, bchL, and parA) was done employing the HMM “nifH_chlL_bchX.hmm” through the utilization of hmmscan in HMMER. (d) Filtered ASVs were annotated into clusters using the CART model (Frank et al. 2016). ASVs that successfully underwent the NifMAP pipeline were retained for further downstream analysis. The taxonomy of the nifH ASVs was assigned by the nifH database v2.0.5 (Moynihan and Reeder 2023).

We used the nifD database developed by Furbo Reeder et al. (2023) (doi:10.5281/zenodo.10124357). For the development of the nifD database, ARBitrator (Heller et al. 2014) (version 14 April 2022) were used for retrieval of nifD sequences from GenBank matching a given set of reference sequences. Reference sequences were verified as true nifD using CD-search tool (CD-HIT) (Lu et al. 2020) to check if they contained the conserved protein domain (cd01976). Settings for Arbitrator were as follows: quality and superiority thresholds were set to 8.1 and 0.1, as in Heller et al. (2014). As a model for conserved domains (cd) models, cd01976 was used as a positive indicator while cd01967 was used as an indicator for an uninformative domain. nifD sequences were stored as EMBL records, which were imported into ARB (Ludwig et al. 2004) to create a nifD ARB database. Finally, the nifD ARB database was exported in XML format. Sequence ID, taxa, fasta sequence, and accession number, were extracted using Moynihan and Reeder (2023) R script. In total, we obtained 2438 nifD sequences. ASVs generated by nifD sequencing were assigned by our newly formed nifD database nifD_DB_v1.1.0 (https://github.com/OceanBridges/nifDdada2).

The top 100 ASVs from nifH and nifD were queried against the NCBI nucleotide databases to find related reference sequences. Sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm (Edgar 2004) in MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). To ascertain the optimal nucleotide substitution model and assess the need for gamma correction or estimation of invariable sites, the aligned nifH and nifD sequences underwent a model test using raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021). Following the model selection process, determined by the Akaike Information Criterion, a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates using raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021). The trees were subsequently visualized and annotated using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/) (Letunic and Bork 2021).

Statistical analyses

Since temperature is a major factor influencing the distributions of diazotrophs (Stal 2009, Sohm et al. 2011), we employed Ward’s method to cluster stations based on SST. This approach aimed to enhance our understanding of diazotroph distribution patterns and their temperature preferences. Data analysis was conducted using R (v4.2.0), and data visualization employed ggplot2 (v3.4.0) (Wickham 2009). Dendrogram hierarchical clustering with Ward’s method (Ward Jr. 1963) was applied to cluster the sampled stations based on the SST (Fig. S1, Supplemental files). Pearson correlations were used to assess pairwise associations between inorganic nutrients, physical parameters, and trace metal concentrations (collectively defined here as “environmental variables”), N2 fixation rates, and diazotroph nifH gene counts, using the rcorr function from the corrr package (v0.6.0) (Makowski et al. 2020). Differences in diazotroph community composition as assessed by nifH and nifD amplicon sequencing were investigated by nonmetric dimensional scaling analysis using the metaMDS from the vegan package The effect of environmental variables on diazotroph community composition and abundance was examined using redundancy analysis from the vegan package (Oksanen et al. 2019). Temperature preferences of predominant diazotroph groups are depicted using ternary plots (https://www.ternaryplot.com/).

Results

Description of the study area and environmental settings

Strong gradients in SST, dissolved inorganic nutrients, trace metals, and Chlorophyll-a concentrations were observed across the fronts separating the IO subtropical gyre and Southern Ocean waters. Among these variables, SST was the best discriminator to group stations along the cruise transect, as revealed by a dendrogram analysis distinguishing three distinct SST clusters including SST >25°C, SST between 10°C and 25°C, and SST <10°C (Fig. S1, Supplemental files).

Nitrate plus nitrite, and phosphate concentrations were below the analytical detection limit north of the fronts, and were 10–20 µM and up to 2 µM, respectively, south of the STF (Fig. S2, Supplemental files). Silicic acid showed a more patchy distribution, with generally low values (<5 µM) but peak concentrations at stations located close to islands (>10 and up to 20 µM; Fig. S2, Supplemental files). The distribution of dissolved trace metals (dPb, dMn, dCo, dFe, dNi, and dZn) varied across the fronts (Fig. S3, Supplemental files). North of the fronts, higher concentrations of dPb (0.02–0.04 nM) and dMn (0.47–1.67 nM) were observed (Fig. S3, Supplemental files). In contrast, south of the fronts, increased levels of dCo (0–0.06 nM), dFe (0.03–5.08 nM), dNi (3.11–6.28 nM), and dZn (0.42–4.38 nM) were detected (Fig. S3, Supplemental files). High chlorophyll-a concentration patches were detected south of the fronts, particularly near the French Southern and Antarctic lands (Amsterdam, Crozet, Kerguelen Islands) in the Southern Ocean (Fig. 1B).

N2 fixation and primary production rates

N2 fixation rates ranged from below the detection limit to 13.96 nmol N l−1 d−1 north of the fronts, and from below the detection limit to 1.23 nmol N l−1 d−1 south of the fronts (Fig. 1C). N2 fixation rates peaked south of Madagascar and at stations near the South African coast, influenced by the Agulhas current (Fig. 1C). N2 fixation rates were otherwise below the detection limit at most stations south of the fronts as well as at stations on the eastern part of the transect (∼70°E, Fig. 1C). Primary production rates ranged from 93 to 4044 nmol C l−1 d−1, and 182 to 2456 nmol C l−1 d−1 north and south of the fronts, respectively (Fig. 2B). These rates were more unevenly distributed than N2 fixation rates, with the highest rates detected at stations 866 (4044 nmol C l−1 d−1, near the South African coast, north of the fronts) and 895 (2456 nmol C l−1 d−1, near Kerguelen Islands, south of the fronts) (Fig. 1D). While both Trichodesmium and Crocosphaera cells were found to be significantly enriched in 15N north of the fronts, combining flow cytometry and nanoSIMS we screened more than 2,500 heterotrophic bacteria south of the fronts and we could not find any significant enrichment (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Whisker plot of 15N cellular fractional abundance (atom%) for each group analyzed. Each dot represents a single analyzed cell. Gray dots denote cells with rates not significantly different from zero. Black lines denote mean 15N fractional abundance and standard deviations (horizontal plain and vertical dashed, respectively). 15N enrichments of heterotrophic bacteria were significantly different from Crocosphaera and Trichodesmium (Wilkoxon test, P < .001), but not Crocosphaera andTrichodesmium  15N enrichments were not significantly different from each other (Wilkoxon test, P = .92).

Diazotroph abundance

The qPCR amplification of cyanobacterial and NCDs nifH phylotypes revealed substantial variability in both their distribution and abundance across the northern and southern regions of the fronts (Fig. 3). Cyanobacteria were more abundant north of the fronts, while NCDs dominated south of the fronts. Notably, our results showed a co-occurrence of UCYN-A1 and Trichodesmium nifH gene counts north of the fronts, particularly in the Agulhas region (Fig. 3A and B). In contrast, UCYN-A2, UCYN-B, and Gamma-A displayed a more uniform distribution across the entire sampled area, irrespective of the position of the fronts (Figs 3CE). Furthermore, UCYN-A1 showed an increased abundance under conditions characterized by low concentrations of nitrate and phosphate (0.07–0.17 µmol l−1 and 0.02–0.09 µmol l−1, respectively). Conversely, Gamma-4 was more abundant at stations south of the fronts with elevated nitrate (21.50–23.45 µmol l−1) and phosphate (1.45–1.58 µmol l−1) concentrations (Fig. 3F).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

nifH gene abundance (log10  nifH gene copies l−1) of (A) Trichodesmium, (B) UCYN-A1, (C) UCYN-A2, (D) UCYN-B, (E) Gamma-A, and (F) Gamma-4 assessed by qPCR in surface samples (5 m) along the cruise transect.

Diazotroph community composition

We assessed diazotrophic community composition using both nifH and nifD genes as biomarkers with 1 million reads per sample. This dual approach resulted in different spatial distributions of diazotroph groups, particularly when divided into NCDs and cyanobacterial diazotrophs. A total of 15,938,410 reads were retrieved, resulting in 1,915 ASVs from nifH amplicons, including representatives from 20 phyla, 38 classes, 68 orders, 115 families, and 146 genera. From the recovered nifH ASVs, 87% were NCDs and 13% were cyanobacterial diazotrophs. In waters with SST <10°C, the most abundant groups were betaproteobacteria from the families Burkholderiaceae and Comamonadaceae, followed by Cyanophyceae (Trichodesmium), thermodesulfobacteriota (Desulfocarbo), and gammaproteobacteria (Vibrio) (Fig. 4A). At SST levels between 10°C and 25°C Cyanophyceae were the prevailing diazotrophs, followed by gammaproteobacteria, thermodesulfobacteriota, and betaproteobacteria. In waters with SST >25°C, a community shift was observed from Pseudomonadota (proteobacterial) groups to Cyanobacteria, specifically unicellular Cyanobacteria (Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa and Crocosphaera sp.), along with Trichodesmium as the dominant diazotroph taxon (Fig. 4A). nifD gene amplicon sequencing resulted in 7,809,286 reads, resulting in 2,170 ASVs from 8 phyla, 12 classes, 26 orders, 47 families, and 46 genera, comprising 87% NCDs and 13% cyanobacterial diazotrophs (Fig. S4, Supplemental files). Based on nifD amplicons, betaproteobacteria dominated the community at SST <10°C, followed by gamma- and alphaproteobacteria (Fig. 4B). Between 10°C and 25°C the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium was detected, but the diazotroph community was primarily dominated by beta- and gammaproteobacteria (Fig. 4B). Above 25°C the community was dominated by cyanobacteria, including Trichodesmium, Crocosphaera, Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium, Richelia, Zehria, and Hydrocoleum. NCDs exhibited higher relative prevalence across the entire transect as assessed by nifH amplicon sequencing, while the nifD amplicon sequencing approach only should a higher relative prevalence south of the STF (Fig. S5, Supplemental files).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Heatmap representing most abundant ASVs across three temperature gradients for the (A) nifH gene, and (B) nifD gene. nifH groups have been reordered to facilitate comparison with nifD groups.

The nifH amplicons captured a wide range of Cluster III diazotrophs, including taxa such as Bacteroidia, Terrimicrobiia, Chlorobiia, Desulfobacterota, Desulfovibrionia, and Desulfuromonadia (Fig. S6, Supplemental files). Conversely, the diversity of Cluster III diazotrophs was comparatively lower among the top 100 nifD ASVs (Fig. S7, Supplemental files). The nifD amplicons captured a more diverse cyanobacteria and gammaproteobacteria community. Specifically, within the cyanobacteria ASVs associated with Richelia and Crocosphaera were identified by nifD gene sequencing (Fig. S7, Supplemental files), whereas these diazotrophs were not detected by nifH gene amplification (Fig. S6, Supplemental files). However, through nifH gene sequencig we found some unicellular Cyanobacteria that showed genetic similarity to UCYN-A1 and -A2 previously identified in the Pacific and Antarctic oceans (Fig. S6, Supplemental files).

The relative contribution of ASV counts by nifH and nifD gene sequencing at the three subregions clustered by SST (Supplemental files) showed that Trichodesmium, Crocosphaera, UCYN-A1, and Richelia were the prevailing diazotroph taxa north of the fronts (>25°C), with both nifH and nifD amplicon analysis approaches (Fig. S8, Supplemental files). Regarding NCDs, both analyses differed: the nifH amplicon data highlighted the prevalence of alphaproteobacteria at SST <10°C, beta, and zetaproteobacteria, along with desulfobacterota and thermodesulfobacteriota north of the fronts (>25°C), and gammaproteobacteria and clostridia in the 10–25°C temperature range. The nifD analysis revealed a predominance of alpha-, beta-, gammaproteobacteria, and thermodesulfobacteriota at SST < 10°C. In contrast, zetaproteobacteria were more abundant in the temperature range of 10–25°C.

The relative contribution of ASV counts by nifH and nifD amplicon sequencing showed distinct distribution patterns of major diazotroph groups (Supplementary data on figshare). nifH showed Trichodesmium was most prevalent (66%) in samples >25°C, while UCYN-A1 dominated at temperatures <25°C (57%) but decreased sharply in the 10°C–25°C range (41%) and in waters <10°C (2%). Crocosphaera dominated in waters >25°C (59%) but declined to 28% in waters with SST between 10°C and 25°C, and represented only 13% in waters <10°C. Richelia was primarily observed above 25°C (88%) but dropped to 12% in the 10°C–25°C range and was absent below 10°C. Alphaproteobacteria was distributed across all temperature gradients, with 44% below 10°C, 29% at 10°C–25°C, and 27% above 25°C. Betaproteobacteria were prominent at temperatures above 25°C (66%), while gammaproteobacteria varied from 26% above 25°C to 59% at 10°C–25°C and 15% below 10°C. Zetaproteobacteria were prevalent above 25°C (83%) but less so at 10°C–25°C (7%) and below 10°C (10%). Desulfobacterota dominated at temperatures above 25°C (97%), while Clostridia were highly prevalent (95%) at 10°C–25°C. Euryarchaeota exhibited a preference for the 10°C–25°C temperature range (68%).

nifD sequencing showed that Trichodesmium predominated with 75% abundance in waters above 25°C. Again based on nifD sequencing, UCYN-A1 represented 61% of the sequences in waters with SST>25°C, 39% in for waters in the 10°C–25°C range, and was absent in waters <10°C. Crocosphaera dominated with 83% abundance above 25°C. Richelia was mostly above 25°C (96%). Alphaproteobacteria distributed as 43% above 25°C, 2% in 10°C–25°C, and 55% below 10°C. Betaproteobacteria dominated in the below 10°C range with 62% abundance. Gammaproteobacteria exhibited varying distributions, with 67% in samples below 10°C. Zetaproteobacteria constituted 21% of ASV counts above 25°C, 66% at 10°C–25°C, and 13% below 10°C. Thermodesulfobacteriota highly dominated at below 10°C with 87% counts. These findings shed light on the temperature-dependent distribution patterns of major diazotroph groups.

Environmental drivers of diazotroph community composition

Correlation analysis between nifH gene counts and environmental parameters revealed positive relationships of UCYN-A1 and -A2, as well as Trichodesmium, with salinity and SST (Fig. S9, Supplemental files). Additionally, inverse correlations were observed between the gene counts of these groups and nitrate, phosphate, nitrate to phosphate (N/P) ratios, and silicate concentrations, particularly for UCYN-A2 nifH gene counts (r = −0.72; Fig. S9, Supplemental files). The analysis revealed that dMn exhibited a significant positive correlation with the abundance of Trichodesmium (r0.74), UCYN-A1 (r = 0.64), the nifD cyanobacterial community (r = 0.94), as well as with N2 fixation rates (r = 0.75) (Figs S9 and 10, Supplemental files). Dissolved Pb showed significant strong correlations with abundance of Trichodesmium (r = 0.91), UCYN-A2 (r = 0.69), and nifD cyanobacterial community (r = 0.76). Moreover, dCo exhibited a robust correlation with the abundance of Trichodesmium (r = 0.80), and dNi negatively correlated with N2 fixation (r = −0.86) and nifD (r = −0.63) cyanobacterial community (Fig. S9, Supplemental files).

The distinctive distribution patterns observed among ASVs and environmental factors across various temperature ranges and location with respect to the fronts underscored the temperature-dependent dynamics of the diazotrophic community (Fig. 5). Salinity and SST exhibited a positive correlation on nifD cyanobacterial community composition (Fig. S9, Supplemental files). Concurrently, the composition of the NCDs community displayed significant correlations with N/P ratios (r = 0.92) (Fig. S9, Supplemental files). At SST<10°C, particularly in the south of the fronts, the distribution of nifH ASVs was strongly associated with environmental parameters, including the N/P ratio, dNi, and dZn concentrations, driving community composition (Fig 5). Furthermore, nifD ASVs in the same temperature range displayed associations not only with the aforementioned variables but also with dFe concentrations (Fig. 5). Conversely, in regions characterized by higher temperature gradients, specifically to the north of the fronts (ranging from 10°C to 25°C and >25°C), the distribution of ASVs appeared to be associated with temperature and dMn concentration (Fig. 5). Additionally, the ASVs detected at these higher temperatures were key drivers of the observed N2 fixation activity (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Redundancy analyses showing the influence of environmental variables and N2 fixation rates on diazotroph community composition based on (A and B) nifH genes and (C and D) nifD genes, grouped as north and south of the fronts or by temperature cluster, respectively.

Discussion

SIO fronts divide diazotroph communities

Our results show a clear north–south divide, with substantial N2 fixation rates north of the fronts and mostly undetectable rates south of the fronts (Fig. 1C). While N2 fixation was generally not detected south of the fronts during our study, previous studies measured rates up to 1.97 nmol N l−1 d−1 during the same season in this region (Hörstmann et al. 2021). The SIO fronts are however not impermeable, with meandering and cross-front heat and tracer exchange due to baroclinic instabilities and bathymetry patterns (Chapman et al. 2020). Hence, we cannot rule out that previous significant N2 fixation activity measurements in previous studies may have been influenced by diazotroph transport across the fronts and/or transfer of trace metal rich waters into the reactive nitrogen poor waters of the IO subtropical gyre.

While cyanobacteria dominated north of the fronts, we highlight the detection of Trichodesmium south of the fronts (Fig. 4). The presence of Trichodesmium on both sides of the fronts may result from advection, as observed for other organisms with positive buoyancy (Fraser et al. 2022). Alternatively, the presence of Trichodesmium south of the fronts may be explained by their poleward migration, indicating potential adaptation to colder waters. While capable of growth at temperatures below 20°C (Rivero-Calle et al. 2016), Trichodesmium may experience compromised N2 fixing efficiency under such conditions. Numerical advection modelling indicates that Trichodesmium communities can endure for over 3.5 months at temperatures below previous expectations (Rees et al. 2016), suggesting their occupancy of a distinct niche relative to other Trichodesmium species as a cold- or low-light-adapted variant from the SIO.

South of the fronts, the diazotroph community was dominated by NCDs (Figs 3 and 4), mainly composed of alpha-, beta-, gammaproteobacteria, and thermodesulfobacteriota (Fig. 4). Alphaproteobacteria are adapted to thrive in cold, open-ocean environments (Verde et al. 2016), likely explaining their significant presence at SST levels below 10°C in our study region (Fig. 4, Fig. S8, Supplemental files). Below 10°C, alphaproteobacteria were mostly represented by the order Rhodobacterales and Hyphomicrobiales, which have a chemoheterotrophic metabolism and are capable of sulphur oxidation and carbon reduction along with N2 fixation (Pujalte et al. 2014). Thermodesulfobacteriota, known for their sulfate-reducing abilities, showed a dominant presence below 10°C (Fig. S8, Supplemental files). The Southern Ocean holds significant importance in the recirculation of climate-active trace gases, including dimethyl sulfoxide and methane (Thurber et al. 2020). This could be linked to the important presence of methanotrophs and sulfate reducers south of fronts. Likewise, beta- and gammaproteobacteria were mostly detected at temperatures below 10°C range (Fig. S8, Supplemental files).

Even if NCDs were dominant south of the fronts, we could not find evidence of active N2 fixation (Fig. 2). A similar predominance of NCDs together with undetectable rates have been reported from different regions, suggesting that NCDs may not contribute to N2 fixation significantly or may not be active at all (Turk-Kubo et al. 2014, Moisander et al. 2017). However, recent evidence showed N2 fixation active NCDs on suspended particles in the North Pacific subtropical gyre (Harding et al. 2022). N2 fixation by NCDs may respond to different conditions than those favouring cyanobacterial diazotrophs (Turk-Kubo et al. 2022), particularly the availability of labile dissolved organic matter in light of the lack of the photosynthetic machinery to generate ATP for N2 fixation (Benavides et al. 2015, Riemann et al. 2022). Moreover, N2 fixation in NCDs is likely intermittent and responds to other favouring conditions such as the presence of low oxygen microzones (e.g. in particles) and low reactive nitrogen concentrations (Bombar et al. 2016, Bianchi et al. 2018, Chakraborty et al. 2021). Hence, we cannot fully rule out that NCDs fix N2 in the SIO when conditions are favourable.

The observed patterns in the diazotroph community composition and N2 fixation rates within the studied region are closely intertwined with the prevailing ecological factors. The high salinity and elevated temperatures observed north of the fronts appeared to promote the proliferation of cyanobacterial diazotrophs, likely due to their adaptation to such conditions (Furbo Reeder et al. 2022). Conversely, the high inorganic nutrient concentrations and high N/P ratio values south of the fronts correlated negatively with the abundance of cyanobacterial diazotrophs and N2 fixation activity (Fig. S9, Supplemental files). This confirms previous findings of cyanobacterial diazotrophs being mostly favoured in oligotrophic environments (Zehr 2011). While previous studies have focused on dFe as the main trace metal impacting cyanobacterial diazotrophs, we found strong positive correlations between dMn and SST, cyanobacterial diazotroph abundance and N2 fixation rates (Fig. 5, Fig. S9, Supplemental files), suggesting a potential synergistic effect between these factors. Higher temperatures may enhance the metabolic activity of cyanobacterial diazotrophs, while dMn availability could serve as an essential micronutrient for their growth (Browning et al. 2021). In contrast, inorganic nutrients and the trace metals dNi and dZn were statistically related to the abundance of NCDs, suggesting that these diazotrophs may thrive in environments with different nutrient stoichiometry than cyanobacteria. NCDs can have various metabolic capabilities including sulfate reduction, nitrate reduction, thiosulfate oxidation, and hydrocarbon and organic matter degredation (Bentzon-Tilia et al. 2015, Turk-Kubo et al. 2022). Trace metals like dCo, dMn, dNi, and dZn are key elements that boost the sulfate redcution and hydrocarbon and organic matter degradation abilities of NCDs (Luek et al. 2017). Increasing dNi concentrations also have been shown to enhance cellular superoxide dismutase activities and N2 fixation rates (Ho 2013). These patterns suggest that further studies examining the trace metal regulation of N2 fixation, beyond dFe are needed.

Hotspots of diazotroph activity in the SIO

Besides the main north–south frontal divide, we found two particular hotspots of diazotrophic activity: the waters around the southern tip of Madagascar and the Agulhas Current. Previous studies have shown significant N2 fixation in these regions of southwest IO (Shiozaki et al. 2014, Fernández-Castro et al. 2015, Hörstmann et al. 2021, Metzl et al. 2022, Sato et al. 2022). Metzl et al. (2022) reported N2 fixation rates up to 18.26 nmol N l−1 d−1 coinciding with an interannually variable feature known as the “Madagascar Bloom” (Longhurst 2001). Similarly, modelling approaches have reported high N2 fixation activity in correlation with Madagascar Bloom events (Tang et al. 2019). This phenomenon is associated with conditions favourable for N2 fixation including increased water column stratification, dFe availability during the rainy season due to island runoff, as well as mesoscale circulation (Metzl et al. 2022, Raes et al. 2022). However, while the strength of the Madagascar Bloom was much lower during our study than in previous ones where high N2 fixation rates were reported (Fig. S11, Supplemental files), we measured rates up to 13.96 nmol N l−1 d−1 around Madagascar (Fig. 2A). The high dMn concentrations and optimal SST conditions (21.79°C–29.03°C) around Madagascar during our cruise could have potentially driven these high N2 fixation rates. Trichodesmium was one of the most abundant diazotrophs south of Madagascar during our study, with up to 2.5 × 106  nifH gene copies l−1 (Fig. 3), as expected from previous studies showing high abundance of this cyanobacterium in the region (Poulton et al. 2009, Srokosz and Quartly 2013), despite low dFe availability (Wilson and Qiu 2008). However, we also found a concomitant high abundance of UCYN-A1 (up to 5 × 108  nifH gene copies l−1; Fig. 3), suggesting these diazotrophs were also contributing to the high rates measured.

The Agulhas current is characterized by dynamic processes, including eddies and upwelling events, which can lead to the entrainment and transport of nutrient-rich waters from deeper layers to the surface (Lutjeharms et al. 2000). Nutrient inputs combined with favourable physical conditions such as increased sunlight availability and warmer temperatures may create a favourable environment for the growth and proliferation of diazotrophic cyanobacteria like Trichodesmium. Isotopic nitrate signatures in the greater Agulhas area suggest active N2 fixation takes place here (Marshall et al. 2023), but not in its northern and eastern branches (Sigman and Fripiat 2019). N2 fixation in this region may be sustained by high dFe concentrations, primarily resulting from the resuspension of shelf sediments and atmospheric deposition (Grand et al. 2015). Moreover, the western Mozambique Channel shelf contributes to a phosphorus excess (>0.3 μM), potentially enhancing N2 fixation in the Agulhas current (Marshall et al. 2023).

Biogeochemical implications

Significant alterations in the global N2 fixation budget (from 74 ± 7 to 223 ± 30 Tg N yr−1) have primarily been ascribed to diazotrophy in the IO (Luo et al. 2012, Shao et al. 2023). The total nitrogen input through N2 fixation in the IO subtropical gyre has been estimated to range from 1.26 to 2.19 Tg N yr−1, and from 2.17 to 2.27 Tg N yr−1 in the SIO (Supplemental files). Together, the IO subtropical gyre and the SIO contribute more fixed N2 to the global IO than its other sub-basins, i.e. the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Equatorial IO, and Eastern IO (Chowdhury et al. 2023). Still, the availability of diazotrophy data in the IO is much lower than in the North Atlantic and Pacific oceans. This shortfall in N2 fixation data and the high variability of the data available to date may have significant biogeochemical implications for global nitrogen budget calculations. The dynamic nature of N2 fixation, as evidenced by variations in estimates, suggests a multifaceted interplay of factors. Regional disparities in nutrient availability, the distribution of diazotrophs, and the influence of ocean dynamics features such as currents and upwelling events, are potential drivers behind these differences. Furthermore, the variability in N2 fixation can propagate through the marine food web, impacting primary productivity and fish landings. Therefore, gaining a comprehensive understanding of N2 fixation in the IO, especially in the less-studied regions of IO subtropical gyre and the SIO, is crucial for refining our knowledge of global nitrogen cycling and its far-reaching ecological consequences.

Conclusions

The SIO fronts imprinted a clear latitudinal divide in nutrients and trace metal availability, coinciding with a sharp differentiation of the diazotroph community composition and associated N2 fixation activity in the region. North of the fronts, cyanobacterial diazotrophs dominated, likely driving the high N2 fixation activity observed. Conversely, south of the fronts NCDs dominated while no significant N2 fixation activity was observed. Our findings suggest that the presence of certain trace metals, and particularly dMn, may influence the activity and composition of the diazotroph community, while others such as dFe, usually regarded as key for diazotrophy, did not seem to have an impact in the SIO diazotroph community as suggested by statistical analyses. Additionally, our results highlight the potential of the nifD gene as a better descriptor of NCDs taxonomy compared to the more commonly used nifH gene. Projections of net primary production increasingly diverge in Earth system models (Tagliabue et al. 2021), in part due to the parameterization of N2 fixation under climate change, with the tropical IO being among the most uncertain regions (Bopp et al. 2022). Hence, focusing future N2 fixation research in the IO is needed to constrain future net primary productivity projections. Because N2 fixation activity differs greatly between diazotroph groups, community composition data is needed along with N2 fixation rate measurements. Our data provides a comprehensive insight into N2 fixation activity and diazotroph community composition in the SIO, contributing to filling this gap.

Supplementary Material

fiae095_Supplemental_Files

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the crew and captain of the R/V Marion Dufresne II and the co-chief scientist of the SWINGS Geotraces GS02 cruise, C. Jeandel. We would also like to thank F. Vivier for providing information about front positioning during the SWINGS transect, and M. Moynihan for assistance with nifD gene annotation.

Contributor Information

Subhadeep Chowdhury, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, OSU Pythéas, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France; Turing Center for Living Systems, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Hugo Berthelot, IFREMER, DYNECO, Pelagos Laboratory, Plouzané, France; Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.

Corentin Baudet, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.

David González-Santana, Univ Brest, CNRS, IRD, IFREMER, LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzané, France; Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, IOCAG, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Christian Furbo Reeder, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, OSU Pythéas, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France; Turing Center for Living Systems, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Stéphane L'Helguen, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.

Jean-François Maguer, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.

Carolin R Löscher, Nordcee, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5230, Denmark.

Arvind Singh, Geosciences Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380009, India.

Stéphane Blain, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Microbienne (LOMIC), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, 66650 Banyuls/mer, France.

Nicolas Cassar, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; Division of Earth and Climate Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.

Sophie Bonnet, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, OSU Pythéas, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France.

Hélène Planquette, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin, IUEM, Université de Brest-UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France.

Mar Benavides, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Toulon, IRD, OSU Pythéas, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110, 13288 Marseille, France; Turing Center for Living Systems, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Author contributions

Subhadeep Chowdhury (Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Hugo Berthelot (Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Corentin Baudet (Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), David González-Santana (Data curation, Investigation, Methodology), Christian Furbo Reeder (Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Stéphane L’Helguen (Formal analysis, Methodology), Jean-François Maguer (Formal analysis, Methodology), Carolin R. Löscher (Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Arvind Singh (Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Nicolas Cassar (Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Sophie Bonnet (Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Hélène Planquette (Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), and Mar Benavides (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

This research was funded by project DINDE granted to M.B. and A.S. by the Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research (IFCPAR/CEFIPRA). DINDE is endorsed by the International Indian Ocean Expedition II under project endorsement number IIOE2-EP41. This work was also funded by project IDEFIX granted by the Pure Ocean Fund to M.B. S.C. was funded by IFCPAR/CEFIPRA through a Campus France scholarship. The SWINGS project was supported by the Flotte Océanographique Française (doi: 10.17600/18001925), and the projects Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR 19-CE01-0012 and ANR 22-EDIR-0005, CNRS/INSU (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers) through its LEFE actions, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, and IsBlue project, Interdisciplinary graduate school for the blue planet (ANR 17-EURE-0015) and cofunded by a grant from the French government under the program “Investissements d’Avenir” embedded in France 2030. The International GEOTRACES Program is possible in part thanks to the support from the US National Science Foundation (grant number OCE-2140395) to the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR).

References

  1. Angel  R, Nepel  M, Panhölzl  C  et al.  Evaluation of primers targeting the diazotroph functional gene and development of NifMAP—a bioinformatics pipeline for analyzing nifH amplicon data. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ardyna  M, Lacour  L, Sergi  S  et al.  Hydrothermal vents trigger massive phytoplankton blooms in the Southern Ocean. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer  SE, Rauschenberg  S, Garcia  CA  et al.  Carbon and nitrogen productivity during spring in the oligotrophic Indian Ocean along the GO-SHIP IO9N transect. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2019;161:81–91. [Google Scholar]
  4. Balaguer  J, Thoms  S, Trimborn  S. The physiological response of an Antarctic key phytoplankton species to low iron and manganese concentrations. Limnol Oceanogr. 2023;68:2153–66. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baltar  F, Currie  K, Stuck  E  et al.  Oceanic fronts: transition zones for bacterioplankton community composition: fronts delimit bacterioplankton communities. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2016;8:132–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benavides  M, Agawin  NSR, Arístegui  J  et al.  Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium and small diazotrophs in the subtropical northeast Atlantic. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2011;65:43–53. [Google Scholar]
  7. Benavides  M, Conradt  L, Bonnet  S  et al.  Fine-scale sampling unveils diazotroph patchiness in the South Pacific Ocean. ISME Commun. 2021;1:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benavides  M, Moisander  PH, Berthelot  H  et al.  Mesopelagic N2 fixation related to organic matter composition in the Solomon and Bismarck seas (Southwest Pacific). PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benavides  M, Robidart  J. Bridging the spatiotemporal gap in diazotroph activity and diversity with high-resolution measurements. Front Mar Sci. 2020;7. 10.3389/fmars.2020.568876 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bentzon-Tilia  M, Traving  SJ, Mantikci  M  et al.  Significant N2 fixation by heterotrophs, photoheterotrophs and heterocystous cyanobacteria in two temperate estuaries. ISME J. 2015;9:273–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Berman-Frank  I, Cullen  JT, Shaked  Y  et al.  Iron availability, cellular iron quotas, and nitrogen fixation in Trichodesmium. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46:1249–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bianchi  D, Weber  TS, Kiko  R  et al.  Global niche of marine anaerobic metabolisms expanded by particle microenvironments. Nature Geosci. 2018;11:263–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Blain  S, Capparos  J, Guéneuguès  A  et al.  Distributions and stoichiometry of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in the iron-fertilized region near Kerguelen (Southern Ocean). Biogeosciences. 2015;12:623–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Blain  S, Quéguiner  B, Armand  L  et al.  Effect of natural iron fertilization on carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean. Nature. 2007;446:1070–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bombar  D, Paerl  RW, Riemann  L. Marine non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs: moving beyond molecular detection. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:916–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonnet  S, Benavides  M, Le Moigne  FAC  et al.  Diazotrophs are overlooked contributors to carbon and nitrogen export to the deep ocean. ISME J. 2023;17:47–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonnet  S, Berthelot  H, Turk-Kubo  K  et al.  Diazotroph derived nitrogen supports diatom growth in the South West Pacific: a quantitative study using nanoSIMS. Limnol Oceanogr. 2016;61:1549–62. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bopp  L, Aumont  O, Kwiatkowski  L  et al.  Diazotrophy as a key driver of the response of marine net primary productivity to climate change. Biogeosciences. 2022;19:4267–85. [Google Scholar]
  19. Browning TJ, Achterberg  EP, Engel  A  et al.  Manganese co-limitation of phytoplankton growth and major nutrient drawdown in the southern ocean. Nat Commun. 2021;12:884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Callahan  BJ, McMurdie  PJ, Rosen  MJ  et al.  DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chakraborty  S, Andersen  KH, Follows  MJ  et al.  Quantifying nitrogen fixation by heterotrophic bacteria in sinking marine particles. Nat Commun. 2021;12. 10.1038/s41467-021-23875-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chapman  CC, Lea  M-A, Meyer  A  et al.  Defining Southern Ocean fronts and their influence on biological and physical processes in a changing climate. Nat Clim Chang. 2020;10:209–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chowdhury  S, Raes  E, Hörstmann  C  et al.  Diazotrophy in the Indian Ocean: current understanding and future perspectives. Limnol Oceanogr Lett. 2023;8:707–22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cutter  G, Casciotti  K, Croot  P  et al.  Sampling and Sample-Handling Protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises. Version 3. Toulouse: GEOTRACES International Project Office, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. D’Asaro  E, Lee  C, Rainville  L  et al.  Enhanced turbulence and energy dissipation at ocean fronts. Science. 2011;332:318–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dos Santos  PC, Fang  Z, Mason  SW  et al.  Distribution of nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase-like sequences amongst microbial genomes. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Edgar  RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinf. 2004;5:113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Edler  D, Klein  J, Antonelli  A  et al.  raxmlGUI 2.0: a graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol Evol. 2021;12:373–7. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fernández-Castro  B, Mouriño-Carballido  B, Marañón  E  et al.  Importance of salt fingering for new nitrogen supply in the oligotrophic ocean. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fong  AA, Karl  DM, Lukas  R  et al.  Nitrogen fixation in an anticyclonic eddy in the oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. ISME J. 2008;2:663–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Frank  IE, Turk-Kubo  KA, Zehr  JP. Rapid annotation of nifH gene sequences using classification and regression trees facilitates environmental functional gene analysis. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2016;8:905–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fraser  CI, Dutoit  L, Morrison  AK  et al.  Southern Hemisphere coasts are biologically connected by frequent, long-distance rafting events. Curr Biol. 2022;32:3154–3160.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Furbo Reeder  C, Moynihan  M, Chowdhury  S. nifDdada2. Zenodo, 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10124357 [DOI]
  34. Gaby  JC, Rishishwar  L, Valderrama-Aguirre  LC  et al.  Diazotroph community characterization via a high-throughput nifH amplicon sequencing and analysis pipeline. Appl Environ Microb. 2018;84:e01512–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Grand  MM, Measures  CI, Hatta  M  et al.  The impact of circulation and dust deposition in controlling the distributions of dissolved Fe and Al in the south Indian subtropical gyre. Mar Chem. 2015;176:110–25. [Google Scholar]
  36. Harding  KJ, Turk-Kubo  KA, Mak  EWK  et al.  Cell-specific measurements show nitrogen fixation by particle-attached putative non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heller  P, Tripp  HJ, Turk-Kubo  K  et al.  ARBitrator: a software pipeline for on-demand retrieval of auto-curated nifH sequences from GenBank. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2883–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ho  T-Y. Nickel limitation of nitrogen fixation in Trichodesmium. Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58:112–20. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hörstmann  C, Raes  EJ, Buttigieg  PL  et al.  Hydrographic fronts shape productivity, nitrogen fixation, and microbial community composition in the Southern Indian Ocean and the Southern Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2021;18:3733–49. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jiang  Z, Chen  J, Zhai  H  et al.  Kuroshio shape composition and distribution of filamentous diazotrophs in the East China Sea and Southern Yellow Sea. JGR Oceans. 2019;124:7421–36. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kana  TM, Christina  D, MDuane  H  et al.  Membrane inlet mass spectrometer for rapid high-precision determination of N2, O2, and Ar in environmental water samples. Anal Chem. 1994;66:4166–70. [Google Scholar]
  42. Karl  D, Letelier  R, Tupas  L  et al.  The role of nitrogen fixation in biogeochemical cycling in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature. 1997;388:533–8. [Google Scholar]
  43. Klocker  A. Opening the window to the Southern Ocean: the role of jet dynamics. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaao4719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Knapp  A. The sensitivity of marine N2 fixation to dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Front Microbio. 2012;3:374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kostianoy  AG, Ginzburg  AI, Frankignoulle  M  et al.  Fronts in the Southern Indian Ocean as inferred from satellite sea surface temperature data. J Mar Syst. 2004;45:55–73. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar  S, Stecher  G, Li  M  et al.  MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lagerström  ME, Field  MP, Séguret  M  et al.  Automated on-line flow-injection ICP-MS determination of trace metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn) in open ocean seawater: application to the GEOTRACES program. Mar Chem. 2013;155:71–80. [Google Scholar]
  48. LaRoche  J, Breitbarth  E. Importance of the diazotrophs as a source of new nitrogen in the ocean. J Sea Res. 2005;53:67–91. [Google Scholar]
  49. Letunic  I, Bork  P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Longhurst  A. A major seasonal phytoplankton bloom in the Madagascar Basin. Deep Sea Res Part I. 2001;48:2413–22. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lu  S, Wang  J, Chitsaz  F  et al.  CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D265–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ludwig  W, Strunk  O, Westram  R  et al.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Luek  JL, Thompson  KE, Larsen  RK  et al.  Sulfate reduction in sediments produces high levels of chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Luo  Y-W, Doney  SC, Anderson  LA  et al.  Database of diazotrophs in global ocean: abundance, biomass and nitrogen fixation rates. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2012;4:47–73. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lutjeharms  JRE, Cooper  J, Roberts  M. Upwelling at the inshore edge of the Agulhas Current. Cont Shelf Res. 2000;20:737–61. [Google Scholar]
  56. Makowski  D, Ben-Shachar  MS, Patil  I  et al.  Methods and algorithms for correlation analysis in R. JOSS. 2020;5:2306. [Google Scholar]
  57. Marie  D, Brussaard  CPD, Thyrhaug  R  et al.  Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microb. 1999;65:45–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Marshall  TA, Sigman  DM, Beal  LM  et al.  The Agulhas current transports signals of local and remote Indian Ocean nitrogen cycling. JGR Oceans. 2023;128:e2022JC019413. [Google Scholar]
  59. McRose  DL, Zhang  X, Kraepiel  AML  et al.  Diversity and activity of alternative nitrogenases in sequenced genomes and coastal environments. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Metzl  N, Lo Monaco  C, Leseurre  C  et al.  The impact of the South-East Madagascar Bloom on the oceanic CO2 sink. Biogeosciences. 2022;19:1451–68. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mills  MM, Ridame  C, Davey  M  et al.  Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature. 2004;429:292–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mise  K, Masuda  Y, Senoo  K  et al.  Undervalued pseudo- nifH sequences in public databases distort metagenomic insights into biological nitrogen fixers. Tringe  SG. (ed.). mSphere. 2021;6:e00785–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Moisander  PH, Beinart  RA, Voss  M  et al.  Diversity and abundance of diazotrophic microorganisms in the South China Sea during intermonsoon. ISME J. 2008;2:954–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Moisander  PH, Benavides  M, Bonnet  S  et al.  Chasing after non-cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation in marine pelagic environments. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Montoya  JP, Voss  M, Hler  PK  et al.  A simple, high-precision, high-sensitivity tracer assay for N2 fixation. Appl Environ Microb. 1996;62:986–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Moynihan  MA, Reeder  CF. moyn413/nifHdada2: v2.0.5. Zenodo, 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.7996213 [DOI]
  67. Oksanen  J, Blanchet  FG, Friendly  M  et al.  vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 2.5-2. Cran R. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  68. Poulton  AJ, Stinchcombe  MC, Quartly  GD. High numbers of Trichodesmium and diazotrophic diatoms in the southwest Indian Ocean: Diazotrophs in the SW Indian Ocean. Geophys Res Lett. 2009;36. 10.1029/2009GL039719 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pujalte  MJ, Lucena  T, Ruvira  MA  et al.  The family Rhodobacteraceae. In: Rosenberg  E, DeLong  EF, Lory  S  et al. (eds), The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, 439–512. [Google Scholar]
  70. Raes  EJ, Hörstmann  C, Landry  MR  et al.  Dynamic change in an ocean desert: microbial diversity and trophic transfer along the 110 °E meridional in the Indian Ocean. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2022;201:105097. [Google Scholar]
  71. Raes  EJ, van de Kamp  J, Bodrossy  L  et al.  N2 Fixation and new insights into nitrification from the ice-edge to the equator in the South Pacific Ocean. Front Mar Sci. 2020;7. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00389 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Read  JF, Lucas  MI, Holley  SE  et al.  Phytoplankton, nutrients and hydrography in the frontal zone between the southwest Indian subtropical gyre and the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res Part I. 2000;47:2341–67. [Google Scholar]
  73. Reeder  CF, Stoltenberg  I, Javidpour  J  et al.  Salinity as a key control on the diazotrophic community composition in the southern Baltic Sea. Ocean Sci. 2022;18:401–17. [Google Scholar]
  74. Rees  AP, Tait  K, Widdicombe  CE  et al.  Metabolically active, non-nitrogen fixing, Trichodesmium in UK coastal waters during winter. J Plankton Res. 2016;38:673–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Riemann  L, Rahav  E, Passow  U  et al.  Planktonic aggregates as hotspots for heterotrophic diazotrophy: the plot thickens. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:875050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Riou  V, Fonseca-Batista  D, Roukaerts  A  et al.  Importance of N2-fixation on the productivity at the North-Western Azores current/front system, and the abundance of diazotrophic unicellular cyanobacteria. Neilan  B. (ed.). PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rivero-Calle  S, Del Castillo  CE, Gnanadesikan  A  et al.  Interdecadal Trichodesmium variability in cold North Atlantic waters. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2016;30:1620–38. [Google Scholar]
  78. Saito  MA, Goepfert  TJ, Ritt  JT. Some thoughts on the concept of colimitation: three definitions and the importance of bioavailability. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53:276–90. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sato  T, Shiozaki  T, Hashihama  F  et al.  Low nitrogen fixation related to shallow nitracline across the Eastern Indian Ocean. JGR Biogeosci. 2022;127. 10.1029/2022JG007104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schine  CMS, Alderkamp  A-C, van Dijken  G  et al.  Massive Southern Ocean phytoplankton bloom fed by iron of possible hydrothermal origin. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shao  Z, Xu  Y, Wang  H  et al.  Global oceanic diazotroph database version 2 and elevated estimate of global oceanic N2 fixation. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2023;15:3673–709. [Google Scholar]
  82. Shiozaki  T, Ijichi  M, Kodama  T  et al.  Heterotrophic bacteria as major nitrogen fixers in the euphotic zone of the Indian Ocean: Nitrogen fixation in the Indian Ocean. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2014;28:1096–110. [Google Scholar]
  83. Shiozaki  T, Kondo  Y, Yuasa  D  et al.  Distribution of major diazotrophs in the surface water of the Kuroshio from northeastern Taiwan to south of mainland Japan. J Plankton Res. 2018;40:407–19. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sigman  DM, Fripiat  F. Nitrogen isotopes in the ocean. In: Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, 263–78. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sohm  JA, Webb  EA, Capone  DG. Emerging patterns of marine nitrogen fixation. Nat Rev Micro. 2011;9:499–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Srokosz  MA, Quartly  GD. The Madagascar Bloom: a serendipitous study. JGR Oceans. 2013;118:14–25. [Google Scholar]
  87. Stal  LJ. Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans related to temperature?. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:1632–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sunda  W. Feedback interactions between trace metal nutrients and phytoplankton in the ocean. Front Microbio. 2012;3:204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tagliabue  A, Kwiatkowski  L, Bopp  L  et al.  Persistent uncertainties in ocean net primary production climate change projections at regional scales raise challenges for assessing impacts on ecosystem services. Front Clim. 2021;3:738224. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tang  W, Li  Z, Cassar  N. Machine learning estimates of global marine nitrogen fixation. JGR Biogeosci. 2019;124:717–30. [Google Scholar]
  91. Thurber  AR, Seabrook  S, Welsh  RM. Riddles in the cold: Antarctic endemism and microbial succession impact methane cycling in the Southern Ocean. Proc Biol Sci. 2020;287:20201134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Turk-Kubo  KA, Gradoville  MR, Cheung  S  et al.  Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs: global diversity, distribution, ecophysiology, and activity in marine waters. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022;47:fuac046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Turk-Kubo  KA, Karamchandani  M, Capone  DG  et al.  The paradox of marine heterotrophic nitrogen fixation: abundances of heterotrophic diazotrophs do not account for nitrogen fixation rates in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:3095–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Venables  H, Moore  CM. Phytoplankton and light limitation in the Southern Ocean: learning from high-nutrient, high-chlorophyll areas. J Geophys Res. 2010;115. 10.1029/2009JC005361 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Verde  C, Giordano  D, Bellas  C  et al.  Polar marine microorganisms and climate change. Adv Microb Physiol. 2016;69:187–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. von Friesen  LW, Riemann  L. Nitrogen fixation in a changing Arctic Ocean: an overlooked source of Nitrogen?. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:596426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang  Q, Quensen  JF, Fish  JA  et al.  Ecological patterns of nifH genes in four terrestrial climatic zones explored with targeted metagenomics using FrameBot, a new informatics tool. mBio. 2013;4:4. 10.1128/mbio.00592-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ward  JH Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Statist Assoc. 1963;58:236–44. [Google Scholar]
  99. White  AE, Granger  J, Selden  C  et al.  A critical review of the 15N2 tracer method to measure diazotrophic production in pelagic ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. 2020;18:129–47. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wickham  H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  101. Wilson  C, Qiu  X. Global distribution of summer chlorophyll blooms in the oligotrophic gyres. Prog Oceanogr. 2008;78:107–34. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zehr JP. Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends Microb. 2011;19:162–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zehr  JP, Capone  DG. Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science. 2020;368:eaay9514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zehr  JP, McReynolds  LA. Use of degenerate oligonucleotides for amplification of the nifH gene from the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium thiebautii. Appl Environ Microb. 1989;55:2522–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Furbo Reeder  C, Moynihan  M, Chowdhury  S. nifDdada2. Zenodo, 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10124357 [DOI]
  2. Moynihan  MA, Reeder  CF. moyn413/nifHdada2: v2.0.5. Zenodo, 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.7996213 [DOI]

Supplementary Materials

fiae095_Supplemental_Files

Articles from FEMS Microbiology Ecology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES