Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2024 Feb 10;64(2):304–317. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01203-y

Symbionts of Ciliates and Ciliates as Symbionts

Jyoti Dagar 1, Swati Maurya 1, Sandeep Antil 1, Jeeva Susan Abraham 1, Sripoorna Somasundaram 2, Rup Lal 1, Seema Makhija 1, Ravi Toteja 1,
PMCID: PMC11246404  PMID: 39010998

Abstract

Endosymbiotic relationships between ciliates and others are critical for their ecological roles, physiological adaptations, and evolutionary implications. These can be obligate and facultative. Symbionts often provide essential nutrients, contribute to the ciliate’s metabolism, aid in digestion, and offer protection against predators or environmental stressors. In turn, ciliates provide a protected environment and resources for their symbionts, facilitating their survival and proliferation. Ultrastructural and full-cycle rRNA approaches are utilized to identify these endosymbionts. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using “species- and group-specific probes” which are complementary to the genetic material (DNA or RNA) of a particular species or group of interest represent convenient tools for their detection directly in the environment. A systematic survey of these endosymbionts has been conducted using both traditional and metagenomic approaches. Ciliophora and other protists have a wide range of prokaryotic symbionts, which may contain potentially pathogenic bacteria. Ciliates can establish symbiotic relationships with a variety of hosts also, ranging from protists to metazoans. Understanding ciliate symbiosis can provide useful insights into the complex relationships that drive microbial communities and ecosystems in general.

Keywords: Symbionts, Genome, Ciliates, Bacteria, Algal, Virus

Introduction

Ciliates are a diverse group of single-celled organisms belonging to the phylum Ciliophora. They are known for their unique characteristics, such as the presence of hair-like structures called cilia, which they use for locomotion and feeding. While ciliates are typically free-living, they can also form symbiotic associations with other organisms, acting as hosts or serving as symbionts themselves for mutual benefit. Ciliates act as hosts for other protists, viruses, algae, and bacteria [13]. Symbiosis is the foundation of many biological systems, demonstrating the interconnection and interdependence of life forms. It can be mutualistic (benefiting both species), parasitic (one benefits at the expense of the other), or commensalistic (one benefits while the other remains unaffected). Most symbioses investigated till date are mutual. The formation of an endosymbiotic relationship appears to be governed by the endosymbiont’s biochemical versatility complementing the host’s limited metabolic capabilities [4]. Endosymbiotic partnerships with bacteria and a variety of symbiotic alliances are preferred by ecological and trophic preferences. In these associations, ciliates can provide services such as nutrient recycling, carbon transfer, or protection against pathogens. Some ciliates engage in mutualistic relationships with photosynthetic algae, forming endosymbiotic partnerships that enable them to acquire energy through photosynthesis. One of the key drivers behind evolution is endosymbiosis as host organisms acquire new features and roles through the absorption of once-independent organisms. This process has been critical in shaping the diversity and complexity of life on our planet. The interaction between ciliates and their symbionts stands as a fascinating and diverse field of study.

More and more species are being described, and there are already over 40 free-living Euplotes species [5, 6]. Several of these endosymbionts were identified and described in the “pre-molecular era” and their functions are still unknown. It is beneficial to locate them once more, examine them using molecular techniques, and look at their interactions with the host cell. According to this viewpoint, new technologies can offer crucial information to elucidate various facets of the subject, such as next-generation sequencing and the utilization of genomics data. The sole exceptions are Caedibacter [7] (five species), Pseudocaedibacter [8] (three species), Lyticum [7] (two species), and Holospora (Hafkine, 1890; [9], and a solitary Euplotes endosymbiont that was later redescribed as Polynucleobacter necessarius [10]. Fewer ciliate bacterial symbionts have available molecular phylogenetic affiliations [1114]. Metopus palaeformis along with its rod-shaped endosymbiont [15] was the first molecularly investigated symbiosis [16].

Symbiotic systems between ciliates/animals are found across the Animalia kingdom, including chimpanzees buffaloes, cattle, dromedary camels, cuttlefish, great apes, elephants, humans, fishes, frogs, horses, polyps of hydras, mollusks, insects, mammals, nematodes, polychaetes, nemerteans, oligochaetes, sea urchins and many more [17].

This review attempts to dig into the enthralling world of ciliate symbiosis, investigating the vast array of symbionts that seek refuge within ciliate hosts as well as the unique adaptations these ciliates exhibit when functioning as symbiotic partners. We strive to explore the mechanisms underlying these relationships, from molecular complexities to ecological ramifications, through an examination of many cases from varied habitats and locations. This study aims to add to our greater understanding of symbiosis within the microcosm by synthesizing current research and putting light on new advances, providing insights into the intricate fabric of life's interdependencies at the molecular level. Some of the primary objectives of studying symbionts of ciliates and ciliates as symbionts include understanding their ecological significance, evolutionary dynamics and applications in various fields, including biotechnology, environmental science, and medicine. For instance, understanding symbiont-ciliate interactions might provide insights into natural mechanisms for disease control or offer potential avenues for biotechnological innovations.

Bacterial Symbionts

In 1890, Waldemar Mordechai Wolff A. Hafkine (1860–1930) reported three intranuclear bacteria in Paramecium caudatum. Holospora obtusa infects the ciliate's macronucleus, Holospora elegans and Holospora undulata infects the micronucleus [18]. These bacteria form symbiotic connections with their host ciliates and can impact many cellular processes and functions. Most of the studied symbionts belong to Alphaproteobacteria [1924].The non-motile Alphaproteobacteria species holospora and holospora-like bacteria (HLB), exhibit a distinctive life cycle with reproductive and infectious forms, localize and establish themselves primarily in the nuclear apparatus of the host ciliate, Oligohymenophorea, Armophorea, Heterotrichea, Phyllopharyngea, and Prostomatea, modify the host's nuclear material, undergo replication, leading to an increase in their population and producing new infectious particles [22, 25].The majority of Holospora genus members were found only in Paramecium. To date, at least 13 symbionts associated with HLB have been identified in Paramecium species [21, 25, 26], though only a subset of them have been characterized at the molecular level [22, 27, 28]. HLBs from P. putrinum [29], P. jenningsi [30], P. chlorelligerum [31], and P. multimicronucleatum [32] have recently been described. None have been found in other Paramecium species (such as P. duboscqui, P. woodruffi, P. polycaryum). Ca. Trichorickettsia mobilis, a strange flagellated endosymbiont, has been discovered in the macronucleus of the ciliate Paramecium multimicronucleatum. These Rickettsiaceae family members are ausative agents of serious human diseases, such as Rocky Mountains spotted fever and epidemic typhus [33].

To the best of our knowledge, Rickettsiales are all obligate intracellular bacteria. With such discrepancies in the evolutionary histories of symbionts and hosts, the discovery of so many Rickettsiales species in phylogenetically distant eukaryotes like ciliates clearly supports many occurrences of horizontal transmission. Furthermore, the habitats of ciliates, as well as some sponges and cnidarians hosting bacteria from the "Midichloria clade," show that Rickettsiales bacteria, potentially dangerous ones, are more reliant on water as a vector. The possibility that some of these Rickettsiales representatives can transmit horizontally.

Oligohymenophorea and Spirotrichea (especially Euplotes) are two most promising subgroups for studying prokaryotic symbioses in Ciliophora. Polynucleobacter necessarius, a betaproteobacterium that forms an obligatory mutualistic interaction with the host, is the most well-known symbiont of Euplotes [10, 34, 35]. The initiation of the obligate symbiosis between some phylogenetically related species of Euplotes and Polynucleobacter necessaries or Polynucleobacter spp. (Burkholderiales, Betaproteobacteria), initially known as omicron or omicron-like particles, was a significant development in the evolutionary history of the genus [10]. Bacteria from at least three classes of the phylum Proteobacteria (Alpha-[11, 13, 19, 36, 37], Beta-[14, 35], and Gammaproteobacteria [12, 19, 38], as well as the phyla Firmicutes [39] and Verrucomicrobia [40], have been characterized using the modern molecular approach. Bacteria-ciliate symbiosis appears to have evolved on multiple occasions.

However, endosymbiotic relationships between prokaryotes and Euplotes are not limited to only Polynucleobacter. A subset of populations relies on bacteria from the genera Devosia [41] and 'Candidatus Protistobacter' [35, 42]. In addition to these essential symbionts, many Euplotes harbor 'accessory' bacteria that are unlikely to be essential to the host's survival because they are not found in all strains of the host species, mostly co-occur with known essential symbionts, and typically belong to intracellular parasite groups [19, 30, 37, 43, 44]. The unusual ability of "Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii" to infect mitochondria [43, 4547], its sex-based prevalence in ticks, its predilection for ovarian tissues, and its vertical transmission distinguish it [11, 46]. More research is required to fully comprehend the mechanisms underlying these characteristics, as well as the bacterium's potential impact on the biology and health of its metazoan hosts, particularly ticks. Endosymbiotic bacteria can be transferred from one Euplotes species to another using microinjection [48, 49].

Metopus palaeformis, Plagiopyla frontata and Metopus contortus contain fluorescing bacteria, which produce methane and help ciliates to survive in anaerobic conditions [50]. Cyclidiumporcatum, Methanoplanus endosymbiosus from the Methanomicrobiales and M. formicicum in the Methanobacteriales are a few examples of this category [51]. In Daytricba rzlminantizlm, the hydrogenosomes oxidize pyruvate to produce ATP, H2, CO2, and acetate [52]. The presence of ferredoxin oxidoreductase and hydrogenase in the symbiotic connection of endosymbiotic methanogens and anaerobic ciliates promotes the H2-evolving fermentation process. This mechanism is essential for the survival of the symbiosis since it allows for the production and utilisation of hydrogen gas, which eventually leads to the generation of energy via methanogenesis [53, 54].

A non-sulfur purple bacteria capable of anoxygenic photosynthesis is found in Strombidium purpureum, and Codonella sp. is the only marine ciliate known to harbor a cyanobacterium [55]. Candidatus Thiobios zoothamnicoli in Zoothamnium niveumisis also an example of sulfur-oxidizing bacterium [56].

Although symbioses between eukaryotes and Bacteria are ubiquitous and extensively established, anaerobic ciliates are the only eukaryotes known to contain endosymbiotic Archaea.

Genomes of Bacterial Symbionts

Second and third-generation sequencing techniques can be used to isolate and study the genomes of ciliate symbionts. To date, roughly 20 complete genome sequences of bacterial endosymbionts have been sequenced and annotated (Table 1). Although the majority of endosymbionts were Proteobacteria, notably Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, two methanogenic archaeal endosymbiont genomes have been published [57]. The genome size of ciliate symbionts range from 158 and 163 kbp of "Ca. Organicella extenuata", an endosymbiont of Euplotes sp. and the E. vanleeuwenhoeki’s endosymbiont, "Ca. Pinguicoccus supinus" respectively [5], to 3.31 and 5.02 Mbp of Kentrophoros symbionts [58]. The entire genome assembly of "Ca. Gromoviella agglomerans" (589.967 bp) is the smallest documented genome in the order Holosporales and demonstrates substantially decreased metabolism in terms of biochemical pathways as well as energy production and conversion [59]. Certain obligate intracellular symbionts go through genomic reduction, which can include substantial gene loss, pseudogenization, a high mutation rate, and a low GC content [57, 60, 61]. The severely shortened genome of "Ca. Azoamicus ciliaticola," an unnamed plagiopylid, appears to have conserved host-beneficial features as well as anaerobic respiration energy. Indeed, this symbiont is an obligate endosymbiont with cellular functions that are strikingly similar to those of mitochondria, despite the fact that it did not descend from the mitochondrial line of descent [62]. P. necessaries, on the other hand, has a genome (1.56 Mbp long) that is nearly the same size as its free-living cousins [63]. Intracellular bacteria use strategies such as secretion systems and effectors such as Type IV and Type VI secretion systems [64], proteins with repeat motifs such as ankyrin repeat motifs [60], and ADP/ATP translocase to interact with, invade, and exploit their host cell [27, 61, 65, 66]. This is demonstrated by the genomes of two anaerobic ciliate methanogenic endosymbionts, Nyctotherus ovalis and Metopus contortus. Their genomes are in an early stage of adaptation for endosymbiosis, as evidenced by the significant number of genes undergoing pseudogenization [57].

Table 1.

List of bacterial symbionts

Symbiont Host References
Holospora curviuscula Paramecium bursaria [61]
Holospora obtusa Paramecium caudatum [27]
Holospora elegans Paramecium caudatum [27]
Holospora undulata Paramecium caudatum [27]
Caedimonas varicaedens Paramecium biaurelia [67]
Candidatus Fokinia solitaria Paramecium sp. [60]
Candidatus Deianiraea vastatrix Paramecium primaurelia [64]
Candidatus Sarmatiella mevalonica Paramecium tredecaurelia [65]
Candidatus Gromoviella agglomerans Paramecium polycaryum [65]
Candidatus Trichorickettsia mobilis Paramecium multimicronucleatum [33]
Francisella adeliensis Euplotes petzi [66]
Candidatus Azoamicus ciliaticola Undescribed Plagiopylea [62]
Candidatus Kentron clade Kentrophoros sp. [58]
Caedibacter taeniospiralis Paramecium tetraurelia [68]
Candidatus Thiodictyon intracellulare Pseudoblepharisma tenue [69]
Unnamed, strain TC1 Trimyema compressum [39]
Polynucleobacter spp. including Polynucleobacter necessarius Euplotes spp. [30]
Candidatus Organicella extenuata Euplotes sp. [70]
Candidatus Pinguicoccus supinus Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki [5]
Candidatus Protistobacter Euplotes sp. [42, 49]
Candidatus Thiobios zoothamnicoli Zoothamnium niveumis [56]
Methanocorpusculum sp. Metopus contortus [57]
Methanogenic archaea Trimyema sp. [71]
Methanobacterium formicicum Trimyema sp. [72]
Methanogenic archaea Cyclidium porcatum [15]
Caedibacter sp. Paramecium sp. [7]
Pseudocaedibacter sp. Paramecium sp. [8]
Lyticum sp. Paramecium sp. [7]
Metopus palaeformis Paramecium sp. [15]
Rickettsiales Paramecium sp. [73]
Firmicutes Euplotes sp. [39]
Verrucomicrobia Euplotes sp. [40]
Proteobacteria Euplotes sp. [19]
Devosia Euplotes sp. [41]
Cyanobacterium Codonella sp. [55]
Non-sulfur purple bacterium Strombidium purpureum [55]
Chemoautotrophic bacteria Zoothamnium niveum [74]

Algal Symbionts

A phagotrophic protist may consume an alga as a prey, which could lead to the onset of endosymbiosis, which is known as mixotrophy. The temporary symbiont subsequently develops into a persistent symbiont when the host’s and the symbiont's cell cycles are synchronized. Next, there is a lateral gene transfer from the symbiont’s nucleus to the host’s nucleus, which results in less autonomy for the symbiont and more control by the host. The symbiont's organelles are then reduced one by one, but a relict symbiont nucleus is preserved as nucleomorph for a particular time period until full host control is established (cryptophytes, chlorarachniophytes). These protists, which typically contain hundreds of algae within a host cell, are known as ‘multi-algae retaining protists' (MARP). The degree of integration of symbionts in MARP symbioses, as represented by their or their progeny' retention time, is little understood [75]. Chlorella-like green algae or Chlorella are found as autotrophic eukaryotic symbionts in two Paramecia species, P. Chlorelligerum and P. bursaria.

Green algal endosymbionts help the ciliate to withstand the anoxic and nutrient-rich environment. The ciliates lose their endosymbionts and change to a heterotrophic lifestyle when grown outside of the traps in an oxygen-rich environment. This demonstrated unequivocally that the green algal endosymbiont Micractinium in Tetrahymena serves a unique purpose of giving oxygen to its hosts [76]. Prokaryotic endosymbionts incorporate various new biochemical properties into protist hosts, such as nitrogen fixation and recycling, photosynthesis, and methanogenesis [4]. Endosymbiotic algae have attracted particular attention in phycology, zoology, microbiology, and virology; a majority of them are members of the Chlorella clade of the Trebouxiophyceae group [77]. The various ciliate groups differ in their capacity to acquire and maintain symbionts.

Ciliates may feast on diatoms, although there are also some cases of diatom-ciliate symbiotic partnerships. The diatoms Chaetoceros dadayi and C. Tetrastichon linked to the lorica of species of the tintinnid ciliate genus Eutintinnus, as well as the consortium of Chaetoceros coarctatus and the peritrich ciliate Vorticella oceanica, are the most common consortia. The consortia of the peritrich ciliate Pseudovorticella coscinodisci connected to several big pelagic diatoms and the consortium of the diatom Fragilariopsis doliolus and many tintinnid species are less common instances [78].

Only one freshwater ciliate species has the photoautotrophic phytoflagellate Chlamydomonas sp. as an endosymbiont, while others have kleptochloroplasts [55]. However, whether the inner compartments are generated by endosymbiotic algae or chloroplasts is unknown. There are few reports on the presence of symbiotic chloroplasts in Prorodon, Strombidium, and Mesodinium rubrum [1]. Laboea strobila and Strombidium often contain endosymbiotic algae as reported for the Baltic Sea [79]. Maristentor dinoferus contains 500–800 symbiotic algal cells, all of which are phylogenetically connected to the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium [80]. M. dinoferus symbionts produce mycosporine-like amino acids and protect the host against UV irradiation [81].

Genomes of Algal Symbionts

Algal symbionts are algae that have a symbiotic connection with other creatures such as corals, fungus, or ciliates (Table 2). Algal symbiont genomes can be extremely varied, even within the same group or species based on the species participating in the symbiosis. The Symbiodiniaceae family, formerly known as Zooxanthellae, is a well-known group of algae symbionts. These dinoflagellates are frequently found symbiotically. The genomes of the Symbiodiniaceae are relatively large and complex, ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 gigabases (billions of base pairs). They have a high gene density and a diverse set of functional genes, including photosynthesis, food absorption, and stress response [82, 83].

Table 2.

List of algal symbionts

Symbiont Host References
Chlorella-like Acaryophyra sp. [84, 85]
Climacostomum virens [86]
Colepshirtus [86]
Disematostoma butschlii [85]
Euplotes daidaleos [86]
Frontonia leucas [85, 87]
Holosticha viridis [87]
Malacophrys sphagni [81]
Ophrydium versatile [88]
Prorodon viridis [87]
Prorodon ovum [87]
Spirostomim viridis [88]
Stentor niger [89]
Stentor polymorphus [86]
Stentor roeseli [90]
Tutorials tricycle [88]
Vorticella chlorellata [91]
Vorticella sp. [91]
Chlorella vulgaris Paramecium bursaria [79]
Chlorella variabilis Paramecium bursaria [92]
Dinoflagellate symbiodinium Maristentor dinoferus [73]
Dinophlagellates, or chloroplast from Cryptophytes Mesodinium rubrum [93]
Micractinium reisseiri Paramecium bursaria [94]
Micractinium conductrix Paramecium bursaria [95]
Micractinium sp. Tetrahymena thermophila [96, 97]
Chloroplast Strombidium sp. [98]
Chloroplast from Chlorophycea Strombidium acutum (S. Rassoulzadegani) [98]
Chloroplast from Chromophyte alga Tontonia spp. [98, 99]
Choricystis parasitica Paramecium bursaria [77]
Chlorb S-type Stokesiavernalis, Didinium sp. [100]
Chlorb P-type Pelagodileptus trachelioides, Didinium sp. [100]
Chlorb B-type Bursellopsis spumosa [100]
Chlorb C-type Cyclotrichium viride [100]
Coccomyxa Didinium sp. [100]
Yamagishiella Didinium sp. [100]
Chaetoceros sp. Eutintinnus sp. [78]
Hemiaulus spp. Eutintinnus lususundae [78]
Richelia intracelularis Eutintinnus lususundae [78]
Fragilariopsis doliolus Salpingella spp. [78]
Thalassionema sp. Eutintinnus lususundae [78]
Licmophora sp. Zoothamnium pelagicum [78]
Ectobacteria Zoothamnium pelagicum [78]
Chaetoceros densus Vorticella sp. [78]
Coscinodiscus spp. Pseudovorticella coscinodisci [78]
Chaetoceros coarctatus Vorticella oceanica [78]
Symbiodinium sp. Maristentor dinoferus [80]

Viral Symbionts

In contrast, there have been few reports of viruses or plasmids in ciliates, and all have been found in bacterial or algal endosymbionts. Viruses discovered in P. aurelia are found within endosymbiotic killer bacteria [101]and virus-like particles within P. bursaria endosymbiotic chlorella [102]. Ciliates are also known to contain “spheres”, “helical fibrils” (or simply “helices”), and “crystalloids” in their macro- and micronuclei, as well as in their cytoplasm [103]. Euplotes include helical fibres [104]. Fibrillar "spheres" have been seen in a variety of ciliates’ micronuclei, including Loxodes, Ichthyophthirius, Didinium, and Stentor. Crystalloids were found in Tracheloruphis' macronucleus. Helices are found in the nucleus of some amoebae also [105] and in the macronucleus of the hypotrich ciliate Euplotes eurystomus [104]. Tightly coiled microfibrils that resemble helices have also been observed in the macronucleus of P. aurelia and the macronuclear primordium of exconjugant cells of Stylonychia mytilus [106]. The macronucleus of P. caudatum had fibrillar bundles. Tetrahymena micronuclei include nucleolus-like structures associated with chromosomes. The nuclei of the amoeba Acanthamoeba pafestinesis form dense spheres. These structures likely serve important roles in genetic regulation and cellular processes within these respective organisms [107].

The macronuclear inclusion bodies identified in Paramecium caudatum are a non-bacterial endosymbiont that can proliferate autonomously within macronuclei and infect other cells through cell-to-cell contact (conjugation). Plasmids were discovered in the P. aurelia complex's bacterial endosymbiont kappa (Caedibacter taeniospirafis) [108]. Similar structures have been discovered in the macronucleus of P. caudatum's kappa-like bacterial endosymbionts. Virus-like particles were also discovered among the intracellular symbiotic algae of P. bursaria [102].

Genomes of Viral Symbionts

Endogenous viral elements (EVEs) or viral relics are viral DNA sequences that have gotten incorporated into the genomes of host species as a result of previous viral infections. These viral sequences are frequently passed down from generation to generation and can be discovered in the genomes of a variety of organisms, including bacteria, plants, and mammals [109].

The genome size of viral endosymbionts can vary greatly depending on the viral group and the host organism. Virus endosymbiont genome sizes can range from tiny to huge, depending on factors such as virus complexity and degree of integration into the host genome [110].

Due to the loss of non-essential genes and genetic material during integration and evolution within the host genome, viral endosymbionts' genomes can be drastically reduced in some situations. These shortened viral genomes could be as little as a few kilobases (thousands of base pairs). Some viral endosymbionts, on the other hand, may have larger genomes if they have kept more of their original genetic content or have integrated additional genetic material into the host genome. These genomes can range in size from a few kilobases to millions of base pairs [111].

Ciliates as Symbionts

According to Corliss [112], 2600 species of ciliates have been described as symbionts. This equates to 33% of all known species in the phylum. Armophorea, Heterotrichea, Phyllopharyngea, Nassophorea, Oligohymenophorea, Litostomatea, Plagiopylea, and Spirotrichea are the eight classes, 31 orders, 151 families, and over 700 genera [113] (Table 3). These symbiotic ciliates have been found in anaerobic and aerobic conditions, as well as in aquatic and terrestrial environments [114].

Table 3.

List of Ciliates as symbionts

Symbionts Host References
Folliculinids Integument of invertebrates [115]
Euplotes balteatus Intestinal tracts of Sea urchins [116]
Plagiotoma lumbrici Oligochaetes [117]
Stichotrichids Oligochaetes [117]
Nyctotheridae Invertebrates and vertebrates [113]
Balantidium coli Digestive systems of Mollusks, arthropods, fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals [119]
Charonina ventriculi Digestive systems of Mollusks, arthropods, fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals [120]
Dasytricha ruminantium Digestive systems of Mollusks, arthropods, fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals [121]
Entodinium spp. Digestive systems of Mollusks, arthropods, fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals [121]
Ophryoscolecidae Ruminants [123]
Cycloposthiidae Equids [123]
Triplumaria sp. Intestines of Elephants and Rhinoceroses [124]
Entodiniomorphida Non-ruminant mammals [125]
Chonotrichs Crustaceans [127]
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fish
Mesanophrys pugettensis Dungeness crab [128]
Conchophthirus sp. Freshwater clams or mussels [129]
Hemispeiridae Mollusks [17]
Ancistrocomidae Mollusks [17]
Sphenopryidae Mollusks [17]
Thigmophryidae Mollusks [17]
Vampyrophrya pelagica

Acartiatonsa

A. longiremis

Eucalanus sp.

Centropages hamatus

C. typicus

Corycaeus sp.

Eucalanus sp.

Eurytemora sp.

Oncaea minuta

Labidocera aestiva, Paracalanus sp.

[130]
Gymnodinioides Crustacean [132]
Ambiphrya sp. Zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, and reptiles [133]
Epistylis sp. Zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, and reptiles [133]
Epistylis sp. Metazoans [134]
Heteropolaria sp. Zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, and reptiles [133]
Rhabdostyla sp. Zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, and reptiles [133]
Zoothamnium sp. Zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, and reptiles [133]
Lagenophrys sp. Crabs [135]
Trichodina sp. Fish, Limpet gills [136, 138]
Urceolaria sp. Freshwater turbellarians, marine polychaetes, and mollusks [140]
Leiotrocha sp. Marine mollusks [140]
Polycycla sp. Holothuroidea [140]
Nyctotherus ovalis Termites’ hindgut [143]
Tetrahymena sp. Frogs’ digestive system [141]
Colpoda sp. Human urine [142]
Colpodella spp. Human urine [142]

Ciliate taxa that include symbiotic species are as follows:

Heterotrichea: Folliculinids adhere to the integument of a diverse range of invertebrates, including bivalve shells, crustacean exoskeletons, hydroid perisarcs, polychaete tubes, and bryozoan tests; their life cycle includes a migratory swimming stage [115].

Spirotrichea: Although hypotrichs are mostly known as free-living animals, some species, such as Euplotes balteatus, have been found in the intestinal tracts of sea urchins [116]. Plagiotoma lumbrici and other stichotrichids are endosymbionts of oligochaetes [117].

Armophorea: includes clevellandellids as Nyctotheridae, with obligate endosymbionts commonly as commensals of invertebrates and vertebrates; life cycles include a cyst phase [113].

Litostomatea: Trichostomes are ruminant and foregut fermenter symbionts [113], including the human pathogen, Balantidium coli, with a life cycle that includes two phases: trophozoites and cysts [118]. This species is thought to belong to a new genus, Neobalantidium coli. Balantidium contains a larger number of species that have been documented as endocommensals in the digestive systems of a wide variety of metazoans, including mollusks, arthropods, reptiles, birds, fishes, and mammals [119]. Ciliates can contribute for up to 50% of total microbial nitrogen in the rumen environment, reaching concentrations of 105 to 106 cells/ml rumen fluid, with Charonina ventriculi being one of the smallest rumen ciliates [120]. Dasytricha ruminantium and Entodinium spp., which together accounted for more than 90% of all rumen ciliates, harboured intracellular methanogenic bacteria living freely in the cytoplasm [121]. They digest starch and proteins and produce hydrogen, amino acids, volatile fatty acids, ammonia, and sugars in their food vacuoles [122].

The families Ophryoscolecidae and Cycloposthiidae contain species that are endosymbionts of ruminants and equids, respectively [123]. Triplumaria ciliates have been discovered in the intestines of rhinoceroses and elephants [124]. Entodiniomorphida do not produce cysts, and coprophagy is used to infect hosts in non-ruminant mammals [125].

Phyllopharyngea: Chonotrichs live on both freshwater and marine hosts and divide by generating external or internal buds [126], with a dimorphism in which the adults reside connected to multiple appendages of crustaceans while the larva is free and swims to a new host [127]. Suctorians, generally, reproduce via diverse budding mechanisms, generating one to several larvae that swim briefly before shedding their cilia and metamorphosing into adults or trophonts [126].

Oligohymenophorea: Ichthyophthirius multifiliis is a parasite of fish. Mesanophrys pugettensis, a scuticociliatethata, is a facultative parasite of the Dungeness crab [128]. Conchophthirus species inhabit the mantle cavity of freshwater clams or mussels [129].

Raabe studied higmotrichids from several families, finding that Hemispeiridae species are molluscan symbionts of the mantle cavity and nephridia, Ancistrocomidae, Sphenopryidae, and Thigmophryidae species are molluscan ectosymbionts of the mantle cavity and gills [17].

Ciliates are frequent protozoan symbionts found on copepods, with the most prevalent lineages being Apostomatida, Peritrichia, and Suctoria. Vampyrophrya pelagica has been found on Acartiatonsa, A. longiremis, Eucalanus sp., Eurytemora sp., Centropages hamatus, C. typicus, Labidocerca aestiva, Corycaeus sp., Eucalanus sp., Oncaea minuta, and Paracalanus sp. in North Carolina [130].

Apostomes are found in the renal organs and opalinopsids found in the liver and intestines of cephalopods ingesting fluids and cells such as Vampyrophrya [131]. Apostome ciliates have life cycles that typically involves crustaceans [126]. Collinia are endoparasites that multiply fast within the host and invariably kill the euphausiid within 40 h of infection; The genus Gymnodinioides contains exuviotrophic organisms that feed on the fluid within crustacean hosts’ exuviae [132].

Species of sessile peritrichs genera such as Ambiphrya, Epistylis, Rhabdostyla, Heteropolaria, and Zoothamnium are epibionts of zooplanktonic invertebrates, larval stages of aquatic insects, amphibians, aquatic mollusks, crustaceans, fish, and reptiles [133].

Epistylis members have been identified as epibionts in a variety of metazoans, as well as an important fish ectoparasite that is considered an emerging disease [134]. The genus Lagenophrys contains exclusively symbiotic freshwater and marine crabs [135]. Trichodinids are the most damaging ectoparasites of cultured fish, causing significant harm [136], and over 300 species of Trichodina have been reported, predominantly from freshwater habitats [137]. There have also been reports of trichodinids from limpet gills [138], which have been recorded as symbionts of a diverse range of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates and vertebrates hosts. Trichodinella epizootica is a common freshwater trichodinid in Europe and Asia, but it has also been found in Africa, the Pacific area, and North America [139]. Urceolaria species are ectosymbionts of freshwater turbellarians, marine polychaetes, and mollusks; Leiotrocha species are ectocommensals and endocommensals of marine mollusks; and Polycycla sp. are endocommensals of Holothuroidea [140].

Ciliate infections in frogs are typically caused by pathogenic species of ciliates. Tetrahymena, a ciliate genus that contains species such as Tetrahymena pyriformis and Tetrahymena corlissi, is one example. These ciliates can infect frogs' digestive systems, causing health problems. Ciliate infections in frogs can induce diarrhoea, weight loss, lethargy, and a loss of appetite. These infections can be fatal in severe situations, especially if left untreated [141].

Colpoda sp. and Colpodella spp. are also detected in human urine. The presence of these parasites was not associated with any clinical signs of urinary disease [142].

Genomes of Ciliates as Symbionts

Symbiont ciliate genomes can differ based on the species and their biological context. They do, however, have relatively tiny genomes as compared to free-living ciliates. Symbiont ciliate genomes typically range from a few million to tens of millions of base pairs. Holospora spp., an endosymbiont in freshwater ciliates, is one well-studied example of a symbiotic ciliate. Holospora's genome is quite short, ranging from 1.3 to 2.6 million base pairs. It has a smaller gene set than free-living ciliates and is highly dependent on the host for crucial nutrients and cellular processes [25].

Nyctotherus ovalis, an endosymbiont in termites' hindgut, is another well-known example of an endosymbiotic ciliate. The genome of N. ovalis is quite tiny, containing between 12 and 15 million base pairs. It has been used as a model organism to study the evolution of endosymbiotic ciliates' adaption to their specialised ecological niche [143].

Conclusion

The study is a multifaceted field that provides remarkable insights into the intricate web of connections within microbial ecosystems. The enormous spectrum of bacterial, algal, viral, and ciliate groups that have established endosymbiotic partnerships demonstrates the evolutionary success of endosymbioses. Endosymbiosis indicates a common evolutionary strategy used by eukaryotes to acquire fresh biochemical capabilities and compartments to carry out their separate functions including photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, nitrogen recycling, methanogenesis, and sulfide oxidation.

Characterization of new symbiotic systems, which may contain a considerable fraction of the bacterial biodiversity that is currently unknown, is crucial. Further research into the ecological significance of symbionts is also required. Different aspects of this ciliate-green algal association can be studied in depth as these species are available in culture form. Nothing is known about the uniqueness of this symbiotic relationship. This ciliate and its endosymbiont are ideal model organisms for studying ciliate-green interactions as they can be cultivated easily.

Key problems that remain unanswered in most endosymbiotic interactions are how the host cell controls endosymbiont division and growth, what modes of communication exist between the symbiotic partners, and how metabolites, or even many proteins, are transferred. A solution to these questions could also aid in understanding the intricate process of organelle evolution that once and for all shaped life on this planet.

Understanding these symbiotic interactions may inspire novel solutions in disease control, biotechnological developments, and ecosystem management and preservation techniques. Continued research in this area is critical for unravelling the complicated fabric of symbiotic interactions, which provides a window into the natural world and its diverse ecological linkages.

Future Perspectives

Genomic investigations of ciliate symbionts and the role of ciliates as symbionts provide a good opportunity for further understanding of symbiotic mechanisms, which is crucial for comprehending the ecological and evolutionary implications of these relationships and further manipulating them for various applications. These relationships have important implications for the nutrient cycle, energy flow, and ecosystem stability. Predicting how alterations in ecosystems affect these symbiotic associations and subsequently impact ecosystem functions remains an essential area for future research. Furthermore, examining ciliates as symbionts helps us understand the evolution and diversity of symbiotic interactions across taxa with advanced molecular tools and techniques, such as metagenomics, transcriptomics, and single-cell sequencing. This area of inquiry is currently underexplored due to a lack of significant molecular data. As a result, a crucial challenge will be to expand the number of entire genomes, which, in conjunction with comparative genomics investigations, will offer light on specific symbiotic adaptations. Further targeted genomic investigations will be required to have a better understanding of host-symbiont interactions. The combination of multi-omics data, ecological modelling, and experimental techniques will very certainly improve our understanding of symbiont-ciliate systems. Collaboration across disciplines could lead to a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics and functions of these symbiotic connections. The potential for using symbiont-ciliate interactions in biotechnological disciplines such as bioengineering, bioremediation, and medicines is largely untapped. Understanding these interactions could lead to breakthrough biotechnology solutions ranging from novel bioactive chemicals to eco-friendly ways to environmental repair.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the facilities and support provided by the Principal, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi for the current review. This review was further supported by Senior Research Fellowships to SM and SA from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). The authors also appreciate the funding support provided by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) (File No. CRG/2020/003493) and DBT-STAR College Scheme.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Dziallas C, Allgaier M, Monaghan MT, Grossart H-P. Act together—implications of symbioses in aquatic ciliates. Front Microbiol. 2012 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fokin SI, Schrallhammer M. The hidden biodiversity of Ciliate-endosymbionts systems. JSM Microbiol. 2014;2:1015–1018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Görtz H-D, et al. Symbiotic associations between ciliates and prokaryotes. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, et al., editors. The Prokaryotes. New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 364–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nowack ECM, Melkonian M. Endosymbiotic associations within protists. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;365:699–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Serra V, Gammuto L, Nitla V, et al. Morphology, ultrastructure, genomics, and phylogeny of Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki sp nov and its ultra-reduced endosymbiont “Candidatus Pinguicoccus supinus” sp. Sci Rep. 2020;10:20311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76348-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Syberg-Olsen MJ, Irwin NAT, Vannini C, et al. Biogeography and character evolution of the ciliate Genus Euplotes (Spirotrichea, Euplotia), with description of Euplotes curdsi sp. nov. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Preer JR, Preer LB. Revival of names of protozoan endosymbionts and proposal of Holospora caryophila nom. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982;32:140–141. doi: 10.1099/00207713-32-1-140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quackenbush RL. Pseudocaedibacter gen. nov. In validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982;32:266–268. doi: 10.1099/00207713-32-2-266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gromov BV, Ossipov DV. Holospora (ex Hafkine 1890) nom. rev., a genus of bacteria inhabiting the nuclei of paramecia. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1981;31:348–352. doi: 10.1099/00207713-31-3-348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heckmann K, Schmidt HJ. Polynucleobacter necessarius gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately endosymbiotic bacterium living in the cytoplasm of Euplotes aediculatus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987;37:456–457. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amann R, Springer N, Ludwig W, et al. Identification in situ and phylogeny of uncultured bacterial endosymbionts. Nature. 1991;351:161–164. doi: 10.1038/351161a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beier CL, Horn M, Michel R, et al. The Genus Caedibacter comprises endosymbionts of Paramecium spp. Related to the Rickettsiales (Alphaproteobacteria ) and to Francisella tularensis (Gammaproteobacteria ) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:6043–6050. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6043-6050.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Springer N, Ludwig W, Amann R, et al. Occurrence of fragmented 16S rRNA in an obligate bacterial endosymbiont of Paramecium caudatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1993;90:9892–9895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Springer N, Amann R, Ludwig W, et al. Polynucleobacter necessarius, an obligate bacterial endosymbiont of the hypotrichous Ciliate Euplotes aediculatus, is a member of the Î2-subclass of proteobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;135:333–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Finlay BJ, Fenchel T. An anaerobic protozoon, with symbiotic methanogens, living in municipal landfill material. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;85:169–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1991.tb01721.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Embley TM, Finlay BJ, Thomas RH, Dyal PL. The use of rRNA sequences and fluorescent probes to investigate the phylogenetic positions of the anaerobic ciliate Metopus palaeformis and its archaeobacterial endosymbiont. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:1479–1487. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-7-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mayén-Estrada R, Júnio Pedroso Dias R, Ramírez-Ballesteros M, et al (2022) Ciliates as Symbionts. In: Pereira L, Marta Gonçalves A (eds) Plankton Communities. IntechOpen
  • 18.Hafkine MW. Maladies infectieuses des paramécies. Ann Inst Pasteur. 1890;4:363–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boscaro V, Vannini C, Fokin SI, et al. Characterization of “Candidatus Nebulobacter yamunensis” from the cytoplasm of Euplotes aediculatus (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) and emended description of the family Francisellaceae. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bright M, Espada-Hinojosa S, Lagkouvardos I, Volland J-M. The giant ciliate Zoothamnium niveum and its thiotrophic epibiont Candidatus Thiobios zoothamnicoli: a model system to study interspecies cooperation. Front Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fokin SI. Bacterial endocytobionts of Ciliophora and their interactions with the host cell. Int Rev Cytol. 2004;236:181–249. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(04)36005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fokin SI. Frequency and biodiversity of symbionts in representatives of the main classes of Ciliophora. Eur J Protistol. 2012;48:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosati G, Verni F, Lenzi P, et al. Epixenosomes, peculiar epibionts of the ciliated protozoonEuplotidium itoi: What kind of organisms are they? Protoplasma. 1998;201:38–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01280709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schrallhammer M, Potekhin A. Epidemiology of nucleus-dwelling holospora: infection, transmission, adaptation, and interaction with paramecium. In: Kloc M, editor. Symbiosis: cellular, molecular, medical and evolutionary aspects. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 105–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fokin SI, Görtz H-D. Diversity of holospora bacteria in paramecium and their characterization. In: Fujishima M, editor. Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 161–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fokin SI, Brigge T, Brenner J, Görtz H-D. Holospora species infecting the nuclei of Paramecium appear to belong into two groups of bacteria. Eur J Protistol. 1996;32:19–24. doi: 10.1016/S0932-4739(96)80072-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dohra H, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, et al. Draft genome sequences of three Holospora species (Holospora obtusa, Holospora undulata, and Holospora elegans), endonuclear symbiotic bacteria of the ciliate Paramecium caudatum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;359:16–18. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rautian MS, Wackerow-Kouzova ND. Phylogenetic placement of two previously described intranuclear bacteria from the ciliate Paramecium bursaria (Protozoa, Ciliophora): ‘Holospora acuminata’ and ‘Holospora curviuscula’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1930–1933. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.046631-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Beliavskaia AY, Predeus AV, Garushyants SK, et al. New intranuclear symbiotic bacteria from macronucleus of Paramecium putrinum—“Candidatus Gortzia Yakutica”. Diversity. 2020;12:198. doi: 10.3390/d12050198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boscaro V, Fokin SI, Schrallhammer M, et al. Revised systematics of holospora-like bacteria and characterization of “Candidatus gortzia infectiva”, a novel macronuclear symbiont of Paramecium jenningsi. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:255–267. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lanzoni O, Fokin SI, Lebedeva N, et al. Rare freshwater ciliate Paramecium chlorelligerum Kahl, 1935 and its macronuclear symbiotic Bacterium “Candidatus Holospora parva”. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Serra V, Fokin SI, Castelli M, et al. “Candidatus Gortzia shahrazadis”, a novel endosymbiont of Paramecium multimicronucleatum and a revision of the biogeographical distribution of Holospora-like bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mironov T, Sabaneyeva E. A robust symbiotic relationship between the ciliate Paramecium multimicronucleatum and the bacterium Ca. Trichorickettsia Mobilis Front Microbiol. 2020;11:603335. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.603335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vannini C, Petroni G, Verni F, Rosati G. Polynucleobacter bacteria in the Brackish-water species Euplotes harpa (Ciliata Hypotrichia) J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005;52:116–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.04-3319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vannini C, Ferrantini F, Ristori A, et al. Betaproteobacterial symbionts of the ciliate Euplotes: origin and tangled evolutionary path of an obligate microbial association: Euplotes betaproteobacterial symbionts. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:2553–2563. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eschbach E, Pfannkuchen M, Schweikert M, et al. “Candidatus Paraholospora nucleivisitans”, an intracellular bacterium in Paramecium sexaurelia shuttles between the cytoplasm and the nucleus of its host. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vannini C. Identification of the bacterial endosymbionts of the marine ciliate Euplotes magnicirratus (Ciliophora, Hypotrichia) and proposal of “Candidatus Devosia euplotis”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1151–1156. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schrallhammer M, Schweikert M, Vallesi A, et al. Detection of a novel subspecies of Francisella noatunensis as endosymbiont of the Ciliate Euplotes raikovi. Microb Ecol. 2011;61:455–464. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9772-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shinzato N, Watanabe I, Meng X-Y, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of archaeal and bacterial endosymbionts in the anaerobic Ciliate Trimyema Compressum. Microb Ecol. 2007;54:627–636. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9218-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Petroni G, Spring S, Schleifer K-H, et al. Defensive extrusive ectosymbionts of Euplotidium (Ciliophora) that contain microtubule-like structures are bacteria related to Verrucomicrobia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:1813–1817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.030438197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boscaro V, Fokin SI, Petroni G, et al. Symbiont replacement between bacteria of different classes reveals additional layers of complexity in the evolution of symbiosis in the Ciliate Euplotes. Protist. 2018;169:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vannini C, Ferrantini F, Verni F, Petroni G. A new obligate bacterial symbiont colonizing the ciliate Euplotes in brackish and freshwater: ‘Candidatus Protistobacter heckmanni’. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2013;70:233–243. doi: 10.3354/ame01657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heckmann K, Hagen RT, Görtz H-D. Freshwater Euplotes species with a 9 Type 1 cirrus pattern depend upon endosymbionts1,2. J Protozool. 1983;30:284–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1983.tb02917.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schrallhammer M, Ferrantini F, Vannini C, et al. ‘Candidatus Megaira polyxenophila’ gen. nov., sp. nov.: considerations on evolutionary history, host range and shift of early divergent Rickettsiae. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:72581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hahn MW, Schmidt J, Pitt A, et al. Reclassification of four Polynucleobacter necessarius strains as representatives of Polynucleobacter asymbioticus comb. nov., Polynucleobacter duraquae sp. nov., Polynucleobacter yangtzensis sp. nov. and Polynucleobacter sinensis sp. nov., and emended description of Polynucleobacter necessarius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:2883–2892. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McCutcheon JP, Moran NA. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:13–26. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:635–645. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fujishima M, Heckmann K. Intra- and interspecies transfer of endosymbionts in Euplotes. J Exp Zool. 1984;230:339–345. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402300302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vannini C, Sigona C, Hahn M, et al. High degree of specificity in the association between symbiotic betaproteobacteria and the host Euplotes (Ciliophora, Euplotia) Eur J Protistol. 2017;59:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fenchel T, Finlay BJ. Production of methane and hydrogen by anaerobic ciliates containing symbiotic methanogens. Arch Microbiol. 1992;157:475–480. doi: 10.1007/BF00276765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Embley TM, Finlay BJ. The use of small subunit rRNA sequences to unravel the relationships between anaerobic ciliates and their methanogen endosymbionts. Microbiology. 1994;140:225–235. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-2-225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yarlett N, Lloyd D, Williams AG. Respiration of the rumen ciliate Dasytricha ruminantium Schuberg. Biochem J. 1982;206:259–266. doi: 10.1042/bj2060259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jones WJ, Nagle DP, Whitman WB. Methanogens and the diversity of archaebacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1987;51:135–177. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.1.135-177.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Bruggen JJA, Stumm CK, Vogels GD. Symbiosis of methanogenic bacteria and Sapropelic protozoa. Arch Microbiol. 1983;136:89–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00404779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Esteban GF, Fenchel T, Finlay BJ. Mixotrophy in Ciliates. Protist. 2010;161:621–641. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:725–740. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lind AE, Lewis WH, Spang A, et al. Genomes of two archaeal endosymbionts show convergent adaptations to an intracellular lifestyle. ISME J. 2018;12:2655–2667. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0207-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Seah BKB, Antony CP, Huettel B, et al. Sulfur-oxidizing symbionts without canonical genes for autotrophic CO2 fixation. MBio. 2019;10:e01112–E01119. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01112-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Castelli M, Lanzoni O, Giovannini M, et al. ‘ Candidatus Gromoviella agglomerans’, a novel intracellular Holosporaceae parasite of the ciliate Paramecium showing marked genome reduction. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2022;14:34–49. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.13021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Floriano AM, Castelli M, Krenek S, et al. The genome sequence of “Candidatus Fokinia solitaria”: insights on reductive evolution in Rickettsiales. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:1120–1126. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Garushyants SK, Beliavskaia AY, Malko DB, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Holospora spp intranuclear symbionts of paramecia. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:738. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Graf JS, Schorn S, Kitzinger K, et al. Anaerobic endosymbiont generates energy for ciliate host by denitrification. Nature. 2021;591:445–450. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03297-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Boscaro V, Kolisko M, Felletti M, et al. Parallel genome reduction in symbionts descended from closely related free-living bacteria. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1160–1167. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0237-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Castelli M, Sabaneyeva E, Lanzoni O, et al. Deianiraea, an extracellular bacterium associated with the ciliate Paramecium, suggests an alternative scenario for the evolution of Rickettsiales. ISME J. 2019;13:2280–2294. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0433-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Castelli M, Lanzoni O, Nardi T, et al. ‘Candidatus Sarmatiella mevalonica’ endosymbiont of the ciliate Paramecium provides insights on evolutionary plasticity among Rickettsiales. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:1684–1701. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vallesi A, Sjödin A, Petrelli D, et al. A new species of the γ-Proteobacterium Francisella, F. adeliensis sp. nov., Endocytobiont in an Antarctic marine Ciliate and potential evolutionary forerunner of pathogenic species. Microb Ecol. 2019;77:587–596. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1256-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Suzuki H, Dapper AL, Jackson CE, et al. Draft genome sequence of Caedibacter varicaedens, a kappa killer endosymbiont bacterium of the Ciliate Paramecium biaurelia. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01310–e1315. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01310-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pirritano M, Zaburannyi N, Grosser K, et al. Dual-Seq reveals genome and transcriptome of Caedibacter taeniospiralis, obligate endosymbiont of Paramecium. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65894-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Muñoz-Gómez SA, Kreutz M, Hess S. A microbial eukaryote with a unique combination of purple bacteria and green algae as endosymbionts. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabg4102. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg4102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Williams TJ, Allen MA, Ivanova N, et al. Genome analysis of a verrucomicrobial endosymbiont with a tiny genome discovered in an Antarctic Lake. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:674758. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.674758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wagener S, Bardele CF, Pfennig N. Functional integration of Methanobacterium formicicum into the anaerobic ciliate Trimyema compressum. Arch Microbiol. 1990;153:496–501. doi: 10.1007/BF00248433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shinzato N, Kamagata Y. The methanogenic and eubacterial endosymbionts of trimyema. In: Hackstein JHP, editor. (Endo)symbiotic Methanogenic Archaea. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. pp. 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fujishima M. Infection and maintenance of Holospora species in Parameciumcaudatum. In: Fujishima M, editor. Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 201–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rinke C, Schmitz-Esser S, Stoecker K, et al. “Candidatus Thiobios zoothamnicoli”, an ectosymbiotic bacterium covering the giant marine Ciliate Zoothamnium niveum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:2014–2021. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2014-2021.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hoshina R, Iwataki M, Imamura N. Chlorella variabilis and Micractinium reisseri sp. nov. (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae): redescription of the endosymbiotic green algae of Paramecium bursaria (Peniculia, Oligohymenophorea) in the 120th year: taxonomy of the photobionts of Paramecium. Phycol Res. 2010;58:188–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2010.00579.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Šimek K, Pitsch G, Salcher MM, et al. Ecological traits of the algae-bearing Tetrahymena utriculariae (Ciliophora) from traps of the aquatic carnivorous plant Utricularia reflexa. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2017;64:336–348. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pröschold T, Darienko T, Silva PC, et al. The systematics of zoochlorella revisited employing an integrative approach: systematics of zoochlorella revisited. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:350–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gómez F. Symbioses of Ciliates (Ciliophora) and diatoms (Bacillariophyceae): taxonomy and host-symbiont interactions. Oceans. 2020;1:133–155. doi: 10.3390/oceans1030010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mironova EI, Telesh IV, Skarlato SO. Planktonic ciliates of the Baltic Sea (a review) Inland Water Biol. 2009;2:13–24. doi: 10.1134/S1995082909010039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lobban C, Schefter M, Simpson A, Pochon X, Pawlowski J, Foissner, , et al. Maristentor dinoferus n. gen., n. sp., a giant heterotrich ciliate (Spirotrichea: Heterotrichida) with zooxanthellae, from coral reefs on Guam Mariana Islands. Mar Biol. 2002;140:411–423. doi: 10.1007/s002270100690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sommaruga R, Whitehead K, Shick JM, Lobban CS. Mycosporine-like amino acids in the Zooxanthella-Ciliate symbiosis Maristentor dinoferus. Protist. 2006;157:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, et al. Systematic revision of symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol. 2018;28:2570–2580.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shoguchi E, Shinzato C, Kawashima T, et al. Draft assembly of the symbiodinium minutum nuclear genome reveals dinoflagellate gene structure. Curr Biol. 2013;23:1399–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Finlay BJ, Esteban GF, Brown S, et al. Multiple cosmopolitan ecotypes within a microbial eukaryote morphospecies. Protist. 2006;157:377–390. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Berninger U-G, Finlay BJ, Canter HM. The spatial distribution and ecology of Zoochlorellae-bearing ciliates in a productive pond1. J Protozool. 1986;33:557–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1986.tb05662.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Reisser W, Becker B, Klein T. Studies on ultrastructure and host range of a Chlorella attacking virus. Protoplasma. 1986;135:162–165. doi: 10.1007/BF01277009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sud GC. Volumetric relationships of symbiotic Zoochlorellae to their hosts. J Protozool. 1968;15:605–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1968.tb02179.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Seckbach J. The natural history of Cyanidium (Geitler 1933): past and present perspectives. In: Seckbach J, editor. Evolutionary Pathways and Enigmatic Algae: Cyanidiumcaldarium (Rhodophyta) and related cells. Netherlands: Springer; 1994. pp. 99–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kawakami H. Ultrastructural study of an endosymbiotic alga and its host Ciliate Stentor niger. J Protozool. 1984;31:247–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1984.tb02955.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kahl A. Urtiere oder Protozoa. I. Wimpertiere oder Ciliate (Infusoria) Die Tierwelt der angrenzenden Meeresteile. 1930;18:1–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Graham LE, Graham JM. Endosymbiotic Chlorella (Chlorophyta) in a species of Vorticella (Ciliophora) Trans Am Microsc Soc. 1980;99:160. doi: 10.2307/3225701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yashchenko VV, Gavrilova OV, Rautian MS, Jakobsen KS. Association of Paramecium bursaria Chlorella viruses with Paramecium bursaria cells: ultrastructural studies. Eur J Protistol. 2012;48:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Crawford DW. Mesodinium rubrum: the phytoplankter that wasn’t. Marine Ecol Progr Series Oldendorf. 1989;58:161–174. doi: 10.3354/meps058161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hoshina R, Kato Y, Kamako S, Imamura N. Genetic evidence of “American” and “European” type symbiotic algae of paramecium bursaria ehrenberg. Plant Biol. 2005;7:526–532. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Potekhin A, Rautian M, Nekrasova I, Przyboś E. Occurrence of Paramecium species in Western Siberia, Russia. Folia Biol (Praha) 2006;54:127–131. doi: 10.3409/173491606778557482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nakajima T, Sano A, Matsuoka H. Auto-/heterotrophic endosymbiosis evolves in a mature stage of ecosystem development in a microcosm composed of an alga, a bacterium and a ciliate. Biosystems. 2009;96:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Germond A, Hata H, Fujikawa Y, Nakajima T. The phylogenetic position and phenotypic changes of a Chlorella-like alga during 5-year microcosm culture. Eur J Phycol. 2013;48:485–496. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2013.860482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Rassoulzadegan F, Laval-Peuto M, Sheldon RW. Partitioning of the food ration of marine ciliates between pico- and nanoplankton. Hydrobiologia. 1988;159:75–88. doi: 10.1007/BF00007369. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Laval-Peuto M, Febvre M. On plastid symbiosis in Tontonia appendiculariformis (Ciliophora, Oligotrichina) Biosystems. 1986;19:137–158. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(86)90026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hoshina R, Kusuoka Y. DNA analysis of algal endosymbionts of ciliates reveals the state of algal integration and the surprising specificity of the symbiosis. Protist. 2016;167:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Quackenbush RL. Endosymbionts of killer paramecia. In: Görtz H-D, editor. Paramecium. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1998. pp. 406–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kawakami H, Kawakami N. Behavior of a virus in a symbiotic system, Paramecium bursaria -Zoochlorella. J Protozool. 1978;25:217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1978.tb04399.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Tsukii Y, Harumoto T, Yazaki K. Evidence for a viral macronuclear endosymbiont in Paramecium caudatum. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1995;42:109–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1995.tb01550.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ruffolo JJ. The intranuclear helices of Euplotes: their substructure, localization, and apparent migration to the cytoplasm. J Morphol. 1979;159:81–87. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051590107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Minassian I, Bell LG. Studies on changes in the nuclear helices of Amoeba proteus during the cell cycle. J Cell Sci. 1976;20:273–287. doi: 10.1242/jcs.20.2.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gil R, Alonso P, Perez-Silva J. Ultrastructure of the macronuclear anlage in Stylonychia mytilus. Exp Cell Res. 1972;72:509–518. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lasman M. Light and electron microscopic observations on encystment of Acanthamoeba palestinensis. Reich J Protozool. 1977;24:244–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1977.tb00972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Preer JR, Preer LB, Jurand A. Kappa and other endosymbionts in Paramecium aurelia. Bacteriol Rev. 1974;38:113–163. doi: 10.1128/br.38.2.113-163.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Katzourakis A, Gifford RJ. Endogenous viral elements in animal genomes. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Feschotte C. Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:397–405. doi: 10.1038/nrg2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Murat P, Balasubramanian S. Existence and consequences of G-quadruplex structures in DNA. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;25:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Raven PH, National Research Council (U.S.) (2000) Nature and human society: the quest for a sustainable world: proceedings of the 1997 Forum on Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C
  • 113.Lynn DH. The Ciliated Protozoa. Netherlands: Springer; 2010. The Ciliate Taxa including families and genera; pp. 339–440. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Rosati G. Ectosymbiosis in ciliated protozoa. In: Seckbach J, editor. Symbiosis. Netherlands: Springer; 2001. pp. 475–488. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Scheltema R. Dispersal of the protozoan Folliculina simplex Dons (Ciliophora, Heterotricha) throughout the North Atlantic Ocean on the shells of gastropod veliger larvae. J Mar Res. 1973;31:11–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Curds C (1975) A guide to the species of the genus Euplotes (Hypotrichida, Ciliatea). In: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology, 1st ed. pp 1–61
  • 117.Obert T, Vďačný P. Evolutionary origin and host range of Plagiotoma lumbrici (Ciliophora, Hypotrichia), an obligate gut symbiont of lumbricid earthworms. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2020;67:176–189. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Schuster FL, Ramirez-Avila L. Current world status of Balantidium coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:626–638. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00021-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Li M, Ponce-Gordo F, Grim JN, et al. New insights into the molecular phylogeny of Balantidium (Ciliophora, Vetibuliferida) based on the analysis of new sequences of species from fish hosts. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:4327–4333. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4195-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kittelmann S, Devente SR, Kirk MR, et al. Phylogeny of intestinal Ciliates, including Charonina ventriculi, and comparison of microscopy and 18S rRNA Gene pyrosequencing for rumen ciliate community structure analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2433–2444. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03697-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Finlay BJ, Esteban G, Clarke KJ, et al. Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994;117:157–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Germond A, Nakajima T. Symbiotic associations in ciliates: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Witzany G, Nowacki M, editors. Biocommunication of Ciliates. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 253–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cameron S, Wright A, O’Donoghue P. An expanded phylogeny of the entodiniomorphida (Ciliophora: Litostomatea) Acta Protozoologica. 2003;42:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ito A, Honma H, Gürelli G, et al. Redescription of Triplumaria selenica (Ciliophora, Entodiniomorphida) and its phylogenetic position based on the infraciliary bands and 18SSU rRNA gene sequence. Eur J Protistol. 2010;46:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gürelli̇ G (2019) New Entodiniomorphid Ciliates, Buetschlia minuta n. sp., B. cirrata n. sp.,Charoninaelephanti n. sp., from Asian Elephants of Turkey. Zootaxa. 10.11646/zootaxa.4545.3.6 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 126.Foissner W (1996) Ontogenesis in ciliated protozoa, with emphasis on stomatogenesis. Ciliates: cells as organisms 46:95–177
  • 127.Fahrni JF. Morphologie et Ultrastructure de Spirochona gemmipara Stein, 1852 (Ciliophora, Chonotrichida). I. Structures Corticales et Buccales de I’Adulte1. J Protozool. 1982;29:170–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1982.tb04009.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Morado JF, Small EB. Morphology and stomatogenesis of Mesanophrys pugettensis n. sp. (Scuticociliatida: Orchitophryidae), a facultative parasitic ciliate of the Dungeness crab, cancer magister (Crustacea: Decapoda) Trans Am Microsc Soc. 1994;113:343. doi: 10.2307/3226628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Antipa GA, Strüder-Kypke MC, Lynn DH. Molecular phylogeny, taxonomic relationships and North American distribution of Conchophthirus (Conchophthiridae, Scuticociliatia) Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 2020;23:58–68. doi: 10.1080/14634988.2020.1735919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Guo Z, Liu S, Hu S, et al. Prevalent Ciliate symbiosis on copepods: high genetic diversity and wide distribution detected using small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lynn DH, Strüder-Kypke MC. The Sanguicolous Apostome Metacollinia luciensis Jankowski 1980 (Colliniidae, Apostomatia, Ciliophora) is not closely related to other Sanguicolous apostomes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2019;66:140–146. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Landers SC, Gómez-Gutiérrez J, Peterson WT. Gymnodinioides pacifica, n. sp., an exuviotrophic ciliated protozoan (Ciliophora, Apostomatida) from euphausiids of the Northeastern Pacific. Eur J Protistol. 2006;42:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.De Pádua SB, Ishikawa MM, Ventura AS, et al. Brazilian catfish parasitized by Epistylis sp. (Ciliophora, Epistylididae), with description of parasite intensity score. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:443–446. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Valladao G, Leyva-Pereira N, Viadanna P. Haematology and histopathology of Nile tilapia parasitised by Epistylis sp., an emerging pathogen in South America. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathologists. 2014;35:14–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Clamp JC. Revision of the Family Lagenophryidae Bütschli, 1889 and description of the family Usconophryidae N. Fam. (Ciliophora, Peritricha)1. J Protozool. 1991;38:355–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1991.tb01373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Saha M, Bandyopadhyay PK, Göçmen B (2017) First record of ectoparasitic ciliates, of genus Trichodina (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae) parasiting cultured Oranda Gold Fish (Carassius auratus auratus L.) in India. Zootaxa. 4319:128. 10.11646/zootaxa.4319.1.6
  • 137.Fariya N, Abidi R, Chauhan U. Morphological and molecular description of a new species, Trichodina cirhinii sp. nov. (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae), infesting native freshwater fish Cirrhinus mrigala. J Biol Sci Med. 2017;3:10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Akşit D, Falakali-Mutaf B, Göçmen B. A preliminary observations on Trichodina sp. (Ciliophora: Peritricha) on the gills of limpets (Patella spp.) in Antalya (Turkey) North-Western J Zool. 2008;4:295–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Basson L. First records of trichodinid ectoparasites (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) from introduced freshwater fishes in Tasmania, Australia, with comment son pathogenicity. Acta Protozool. 2010;49:253–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 140.van As L, Basson L, van As J. Mobiline peritrichs (Ciliophora) collected from the gills of African limpets. Acta Protozol. 2017 doi: 10.4467/16890027AP.17.022.7824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Holz P, Portas T, Donahoe S, et al. Mortality in northern corroboree frog tadpoles (Pseudophryne pengilleyi ) associated with Tetrahymena-like infection. Aust Vet J. 2015;93:295–297. doi: 10.1111/avj.12337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Neculicioiu VS, Colosi IA, Toc DA, et al. When a Ciliate meets a Flagellate: a rare case of Colpoda spp. and Colpodella spp. Isolated from the urine of a human patient case report and brief review of literature. Biology. 2021;10:476. doi: 10.3390/biology10060476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Fritz-Laylin LK, Prochnik SE, Ginger ML, et al. The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell. 2010;140:631–642. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES