Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Jul 15;13:RP93204. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93204

Glutamate neurotransmission from leptin receptor cells is required for typical puberty and reproductive function in female mice

Cristina Sáenz de Miera 1, Nicole Bellefontaine 1, Susan J Allen 1, Martin G Myers 1,2,3, Carol F Elias 1,2,4,
Editors: Wei Yan5, Wei Yan6
PMCID: PMC11249761  PMID: 39007235

Abstract

The hypothalamic ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv) is a glutamatergic nucleus essential for the metabolic control of reproduction. However, conditional deletion of leptin receptor long form (LepRb) in vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (Vglut2) expressing neurons results in virtually no reproductive deficits. In this study, we determined the role of glutamatergic neurotransmission from leptin responsive PMv neurons on puberty and fertility. We first assessed if stimulation of PMv neurons induces luteinizing hormone (LH) release in fed adult females. We used the stimulatory form of designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) in LeprCre (LepRb-Cre) mice. We collected blood sequentially before and for 1 hr after intravenous clozapine-N-oxide injection. LH level increased in animals correctly targeted to the PMv, and LH level was correlated to the number of Fos immunoreactive neurons in the PMv. Next, females with deletion of Slc17a6 (Vglut2) in LepRb neurons (LeprΔVGlut2) showed delayed age of puberty, disrupted estrous cycles, increased gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) concentration in the axon terminals, and disrupted LH secretion, suggesting impaired GnRH release. To assess if glutamate is required for PMv actions in pubertal development, we generated a Cre-induced reexpression of endogenous LepRb (LeprloxTB) with concomitant deletion of Slc17a6 (Vglut2flox) mice. Rescue of Lepr and deletion of Slc17a6 in the PMv was obtained by stereotaxic injection of an adeno-associated virus vector expressing Cre recombinase. Control LeprloxTB mice with PMv LepRb rescue showed vaginal opening, follicle maturation, and became pregnant, while LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice showed no pubertal development. Our results indicate that glutamatergic neurotransmission from leptin sensitive neurons regulates the reproductive axis, and that leptin action on pubertal development via PMv neurons requires Vglut2.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

Reproduction is strongly influenced by nutritional status due to the high energy demand required for this function. Food scarcity leads to suppression of fertility (Ahima et al., 1996; Bronson and Marsteller, 1985; Cagampang et al., 1990; Cameron et al., 1991; Parfitt et al., 1991). Similarly, excess adiposity may induce ovulatory dysfunction, higher risks of pregnancy complications and earlier age at puberty onset (Biro et al., 2006; Burt Solorzano and McCartney, 2010; Mahany et al., 2018). Metabolic cues signal energy status to the hypothalamo–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis, but the sites of action and mechanisms are not fully elucidated.

The adipocyte-derived hormone leptin is an essential metabolic signal acting in the brain to regulate the reproductive axis. Mice and humans with mutations in the leptin or leptin receptor genes are infertile and remain in a prepubertal state (Bray and York, 1979; Farooqi et al., 2007; Farooqi et al., 2002). Specific restoration of the leptin receptor (Lepr) gene only in neurons of Lepr-deficient mice rescues infertility (de Luca et al., 2005; Quennell et al., 2009). It is well accepted that leptin action in the modulation of the HPG axis is indirect. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons do not express Lepr (Quennell et al., 2009) but they do receive direct innervation from Lepr-expressing neurons (Louis et al., 2011). The neural circuitry involved, however, is incompletely known.

An often-overlooked hypothalamic site, rich in neurons expressing the long form of LepR (LepRb), is the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv) (Donato et al., 2011; Han et al., 2020; Leshan et al., 2009; Louis et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2018; Scott et al., 2009). In rats, bilateral lesions of the PMv disrupt estrous cycles and the ability of leptin to increase luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion following a fast (Donato et al., 2009). Endogenous restoration of LepRb exclusively in PMv neurons rescues pubertal maturation and fertility in Lepr-null female mice (Donato et al., 2011).

Leptin responsive neurons in the PMv project directly to and make contacts with GnRH cell bodies and their terminals in the adjacencies of the median eminence (Boehm et al., 2005; Canteras et al., 1992; Donato et al., 2011; Leshan et al., 2009). These cells also project to the anteroventral periventricular (AVPV) and arcuate (Arc) nuclei, home of kisspeptin (Kiss1 gene) neurons, the main GnRH regulatory population (Canteras et al., 1992; Donato et al., 2011). Projections from the PMv make apparent contacts with Kiss1 expressing cells in the AVPV (Donato et al., 2011), and stimulation of PMv neurons directly activates kisspeptin cells in both the AVPV and the Arc (Ross et al., 2018).

The PMv is essentially glutamatergic (Vong et al., 2011). LepRb neurons coexpress the vesicular glutamate transporter Slc17a6 (Vglut2) (Donato et al., 2011), and acute administration of leptin depolarizes most of these neurons (Williams et al., 2011). Glutamatergic terminals are abundant in GnRH (Moore et al., 2018; Yeo et al., 2021) and in kisspeptin (Porter et al., 2021) neurons, while states of low leptin levels, as in fasting, reduce the number of glutamatergic synaptic inputs to kisspeptin neurons of male macaques (Shamas et al., 2015). Prior data, however, have shown that congenital deletion of Lepr in glutamatergic neurons has virtually no effect on pubertal development or reproductive function (Martin et al., 2014; Zuure et al., 2013).

In the attempt to untangle these apparent inconsistencies, we used chemogenetics to determine if remote stimulation of PMv neurons induces LH release in diestrous mice. We next used several transgenic mouse models to determine whether disruption of glutamate neurotransmission from Lepr neurons impairs leptin-induced puberty and normal reproductive function. Overall, our results indicate that glutamatergic signaling from leptin responsive PMv neurons is required for normal reproductive development and function.

Results

Chemogenetic activation of LeprCre cells in the PMv induces LH secretion

To examine if activation of PMv LepRb neurons induces LH release in fed adult mice, we stereotaxically injected an adeno-associated virus vector (AAV) carrying the stimulatory form of designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), hM3Dq, fused to mCherry (AAV-hM3Dq) unilaterally into the PMv of LeprCre mice, followed by intravenous (iv.) injection of clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) or its metabolite, clozapine, after 4 weeks. Successful infection was confirmed by localized expression of mCherry and Fos immunoreactivity (ir) in the PMv following CNO or clozapine injection. For clarification, Table 1 shows the different experimental, positive and negative control groups, according to AAV and drug delivered, injection site and LH response.

Table 1. Experimental groups in the study of chemogenetic activation of LeprCre cells in the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv).

Corresponding to Figures 13. The number of animals in each group is indicated in brackets.

AAV vector Drug Injection site LH increase 10–20 min Group name Color in Figure 1E–H, Figures 2 and 3
AAV-hM3Dq (18) CNO Hit in PMv (15) Yes (8) ‘PMv-hit’ with LH increase graphic file with name elife-93204-inf001.jpg
No (7) ‘PMv-hit’ with no LH increase graphic file with name elife-93204-inf002.jpg
Missed PMv (2) No Negative controls graphic file with name elife-93204-inf003.jpg
No Fos in mCherry cells. Removed from analysis (1).
AAV-mCherry (5) CNO Hit in PMv No Negative controls graphic file with name elife-93204-inf004.jpg
AAV-hM3Dq (4) Clozapine Hit in PMv Yes Clozapine hM3Dq graphic file with name elife-93204-inf005.jpg
No AAV (7) Clozapine No injection (2/7) Clozapine no AAV graphic file with name elife-93204-inf006.jpg

From the AAV-hM3Dq animals that received CNO, 15 out of 18 LeprCre diestrous females had successful AAV-hM3Dq injections (mCherry- and Fos-ir) in the PMv and were considered ‘PMv-hits’ (Figure 1A, B). Two mice showed injections outside the PMv (n = 2) and were considered ‘PMv-misses’. The remaining mouse had a very small injection in the PMv (few mCherry-ir neurons, but no Fos-ir) and was removed from the analysis (Table 1). An additional group of five mice was injected with an AAV-mCherry vector and received iv. CNO, serving as negative controls. All five mice showed successful viral target in the PMv. For representation, this group is shown together with the PMv-misses as ‘negative controls’ (Table 1). An additional group of four mice carrying the AAV-hM3Dq received instead iv. clozapine to test the effect of the CNO metabolite. All four females showed successful viral target and Fos-ir in PMv neurons, and minimal Fos-ir in other hypothalamic sites (Table 1, Figure 2A, B). An additional negative control group (n = 7) did not receive an AAV injection and was injected with clozapine, to evaluate the effect of clozapine alone on LH release (Table 1).

Figure 1. Chemogenetic activation of leptin receptor neurons in the ventral premammilary nucleus (PMv) induces luteinizing hormone (LH) release.

Figure 1.

(A, B) Representative fluorescent photomicrographs of unilateral AAV-hM3Dq PMv injection. Low (A) and high (B) magnification of an animal correctly targeted to the PMv. Magenta: mCherry-immunoreactivity (-ir); green: Fos-ir. (C) LH levels in ‘PMv-hit’ animals unilaterally expressing hM3Dq in the PMv following an intravenous (iv.) injection of clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) at time = 0 (n = 15). Continuous lines: animals showing an increase in LH had maximum LH levels ranging from 0.65 to 3.11 ng/ml. Dashed lines: animals showing no detectable increase in LH. Light blue lines represent individual values. Dark blue lines represent averaged values. (D) LH levels in negative control animals (n = 7), including ‘PMv-miss’ (orange) and AAV-mCherry (pink) animals following an iv. injection of CNO at time = 0. Light colored lines represent individual values. Dark colored lines represent average values. A gap is shown in the LH profile lines in animals that had a missing value at time 0 in C and D. (E) Average LH levels at −10, 10, and 20 min for all three groups: ‘PMv-hit’ with LH increase (n = 8, dark blue), ‘PMv-hit’ with no LH increase (n = 7, light blue), negative controls (including ‘PMv-miss’ and AAV-mCherry, n = 7, orange). (F) Positive area under the curve (AUC) of the values represented in E. One-sample t-tests (‘PMv-hit’ with LH increase: t7 = 3.54, p = 0.009; ‘PMv-hit’ with no LH increase: t6 = 1.37, p = 0.22; negative controls: t6 = 1.00, p = 0.36), **p < 0.01 compared to ‘0’. (G) Number of Fos-ir neurons per section in the PMv in ‘PMv-hit’ animals with (n = 9) or without (n = 7) an increase in LH and in negative control animals, including ‘PMv-miss’ and AAV-mCherry animals (n = 7) 2 hr after the CNO injection (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], F2,19 = 81.66; p < 0.0001). **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 vs. PMv-hit LH increase group; ###p < 0.001 vs. PMv-hit no LH increase group. (H) Correlation between the number of Fos-ir neurons per section in the PMv and the peak LH level in the three groups (Pearson r = 0.67; p = 0.0007). 3V: third ventricle. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 2. Clozapine induces Fos expression in the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv) of animals expressing hM3Dq and luteinizing hormone (LH) release.

Figure 2.

(A) Representative fluorescent photomicrograph of a unilateral AAV-hM3Dq PMv injection in a clozapine injected animal. Magenta: mCherry-immunoreactivity (-ir); green: Fos-ir. (B) LH levels in animals unilaterally expressing hM3Dq in the PMv following an intravenous (iv.) injection of clozapine at time = 0 (n = 4). Light green lines represent individual values. Dark green line represents averaged values. (C) LH levels in animals not carrying any AAV following an iv. injection of clozapine at time = 0 (n = 7). Light magenta lines represent individual values. Dark magenta line represents averaged values. Continuous lines: animals with LH increase after the injection. Discontinuous lines: animals with no increase in LH after the injection. (D) Average LH levels at −10, 10, and 20 min for both groups injected with clozapine. hM3Dq: green; No AAV: magenta. (E) Positive area under the curve (AUC) of the values represented in D. One-sample t-tests (hM3Dq: t3 = 8.79, p = 0.003; No AAV: t6 = 1.83, p = 0.12), **p < 0.01 compared to ‘0’. (F) Number of Fos-ir neurons per section of the PMv in AAV-hM3Dq and no AAV animals 2 hr after a clozapine injection (t8 = 17.46; p < 0.0001). ***p < 0.001. 3V: third ventricle. Scale bars: 100 µm.

About 55% (8/15) of mice with unilateral AAV-hM3Dq centered in the PMv showed an increase in LH release above 0.5 ng/ml within 10–20 min following the CNO injection (0.65–3.11 ng/ml). The remaining PMv-hit animals showed no increase in LH levels following the CNO injection. In PMv-miss animals, a modest increase in LH was observed in one animal (0.57 ng/ml) 10 min after the CNO injection and no increase was observed (under limit of detection) in the other. Only one of the 5 AAV-mCherry injected animals showed an increase in LH (0.93 ng/ml), but it was at 30 min following CNO (Figure 1C, D).

The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for LH levels between 10 min before (−10) the injection until 20 min after the injection (time 0 was omitted since a few of the animals missed this sampling point) for all the groups, considering the point −10 min as baseline 0. The positive AUC for the PMv-hit with LH increase group was significantly different from 0, indicating a significant rise in LH levels during this time, while the positive AUC in the other groups did not differ from 0 indicating that LH did not increase following the injection (Figure 1E, F).

The number of Fos-ir neurons per section in the PMv was variable between groups, with higher number of Fos-ir neurons observed in PMv-hits that showed increased LH, than in animals that showed no LH increase and in negative controls (PMv-misses and AAV-mCherry combined) (Figure 1G). Peak LH levels (ng/ml) were positively correlated to the number of Fos-ir neurons in the PMv, suggesting a link between stimulation of LepRb neurons in the PMv and induction of LH release (Figure 1H). It also suggests that there is a threshold in which a number or a subset of PMv LepRb is necessary for successful stimulation of LH secretion.

All mice with AAV-hM3Dq targeting the PMv (Fos-ir) and injected with clozapine also showed an increase in LH 10 min after the injection (0.87–1.18 ng/ml, Figure 2A, B), whereas two out of seven (28.5 %) control mice with no AAV showed an increase in LH following the clozapine injection (Figure 2C). The positive AUC between −10 to 20 min showed a significant increase in LH levels in the clozapine AAV-hM3Dq group, but not in the group with no AAV (Figure 2D, E). The number of Fos-ir neurons per section in the PMv was higher in animals with hM3Dq than in those with no AAV, in which virtually no Fos-ir cells were observed (Figure 2F). Whether this variability is due to spontaneous LH release (Czieselsky et al., 2016) is not known. However, the consistently higher proportion of animals showing increased LH in AAV-hM3Dq PMv-hits injected with CNO (55 %) or clozapine (100 %) vs. PMv-misses and AAV-mCherry, and no-AAV control groups (0 and 28.5%, respectively), together with the strong activation of Fos in the PMv only in animals showing increased LH, make it unlikely that the observed rise in LH in experimental groups are a consequence of spontaneous LH pulsatile release.

AAV-hM3Dq contamination of the posterior Arc produces inconsistent CNO-stimulated LH secretion

As expected, the PMv-hit group showed some variability in the injection size, often contaminating to different extent LepRb neurons in areas adjacent to the PMv, including the posterior region of the Arc. Because this region has several neuronal populations involved in the control of reproduction, we evaluated the number of Fos-ir neurons in the Arc that coexpressed mCherry to assess if Arc neuronal activation was either direct or secondary to PMv neuronal activation (Ross et al., 2018). The total number of neurons coexpressing both Fos- and mCherry-ir per section in the posterior Arc was higher in PMv-hit animals, whether they showed an increase in LH, than in negative control animals (PMv-miss and AAV-mCherry combined) (Figure 3A–D). As observed for the PMv, peak LH levels were positively correlated to the number of Fos-ir + mCherry ir neurons in the Arc (Figure 3D), but not with the total number of Fos-ir neurons alone in the Arc (r = 0.3; p = 0.16). This observation suggested that LepRb-expressing neurons in the Arc may have contributed to the increase in LH observed following CNO treatment.

Figure 3. Clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) induction of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion may have a mild contribution of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), but not KNDy, neurons.

Figure 3.

Representative images of (A) mCherry-immunoreactivity (-ir) and (B) Fos-ir of an animal with strong AAV contamination of the posterior Arc. (C) Number of Fos-ir neurons with mCherry-ir colocalization per section in the posterior Arc in the three groups 2 hr after the CNO injection. (Kruskal–Wallis test = 14.63; p < 0.0001), ***p < 0.001 vs. PMv-hit LH increase group, #p < 0.05 vs. PMv-hit no LH increase group. (D) Correlation between the number of mCherry-/Fos-ir neurons observed in the posterior Arc and the peak LH level in the three groups (Pearson r = 0.62; p = 0.002). (E) POMC-ir (green) in a mouse with viral contamination of the posterior Arc. Arrows: Fos-ir neurons (black) that coexpressed POMC and mCherry (magenta). Arrowheads: Fos-ir neurons that coexpressed POMC, but no mCherry, (F) Confocal high magnification image of a Fos-ir neuron coexpressing POMC and mCherry. (G) Confocal high magnification image of a Fos-ir neuron coexpressing POMC, but not mCherry. (H) GFP-ir (green) in a Kiss1hrGFP animal with viral contamination of the posterior Arc. Arrows: Fos-ir (black) neurons that coexpressed Kiss1hrGFP (green) and mCherry (magenta). (I, J) Confocal high magnification images of a Fos-ir neuron (arrow in H) coexpressing Kiss1hrGFP (green) and mCherry (magenta). Scale bars: 50 µm.

Within the Arc, pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons coexpress LepRb and have been shown to stimulate the reproductive axis (Manfredi-Lozano et al., 2016). To understand if direct activation of these neurons could have played a role in the induction of LH, we evaluated the percentage of activated neurons that expressed POMC peptide and the extent of mCherry colocalization in Fos-ir POMC neurons in PMv-hit group with higher contamination of the Arc, that also had some of the highest LH peaks, and in three hM3Dq clozapine animals with elevated LH levels but low mCherry contamination in the Arc. Coexpression of POMC-ir was observed in 9.3 ± 2.6% (12.3 ± 5.0 neurons) of the Fos-ir neurons of the posterior Arc in the PMv-hit animals and 9.6 ± 3.1% (2.3 ± 1.3 neurons) in the hM3Dq clozapine animals. Of these POMC-/Fos-ir neurons, about 50% also coexpressed mCherry-ir (7.3 ± 3.2 neurons) in the PMv-hit animals, but almost none in the hM3Dq clozapine animals (0.3 ± 0.3 neurons, Figure 3E–G). The small number of mCherry/Fos-ir neurons suggests that contamination of POMC neurons may have only mild (if any) contribution to the higher increases in LH observed in some animals, but it is not determinant for inducing LH release.

We and others have previously shown that only about 10% of Arc Kiss1 (KNDy) neurons of female mice coexpress LepR (Cravo et al., 2013; Donato et al., 2011; Louis et al., 2011; True et al., 2011). To assess if contamination of KNDy neurons could have contributed to the induction of LH, we used LeprCre; Kiss1hrGFP mouse model to access the expression of Fos-ir and/or mCherry-ir in KNDy neurons following AAV-hM3Dq injections in the PMv (n = 4 PMv-hits, Figure 1C). In these animals, only 2.5 ± 0.95% of Fos-ir neurons in the posterior Arc were also Kiss1hrGFP positive (1.8 ± 0.3 neurons), and most of these expressed mCherry, suggesting that one or two KNDy neurons were directly activated by the virus. The low numbers of KNDy neurons expressing Fos-ir in Kiss1hrGFP PMv-hit mice indicates the increase in LH does not require KNDy neuronal activation (Figure 3H–J) in agreement with previous studies from our group showing that direct leptin action in Kiss1 neurons is neither required nor sufficient for puberty and reproduction (Cravo et al., 2013).

Glutamate neurotransmission in LepRb cells is necessary for typical pubertal timing and estrous cycles

As most of LepRb PMv neurons are glutamatergic (Donato et al., 2011; Zuure et al., 2013), we generated mice that lack Slc17a6 in LepRb neurons (LeprΔVglut2 mice) to assess whether glutamatergic neurotransmission from LepRb cells is necessary for reproductive function.

As observed in a previous publication (Tong et al., 2007), virtually no Slc17a6 expression was noticed in LepRb neurons of LeprΔVglut2 mice (Figure 4A–D). Adult LeprΔVglut2 mice (13–26 weeks old) developed late-onset obesity (Figure 4E, F) due to increased fat mass in both sexes (Figure 4G, H), reproducing the metabolic phenotype described before for these animals (Xu et al., 2013).

Figure 4. Adult LeprΔVglut2 animals show an obese phenotype.

Figure 4.

(A–D) Micrographs of in situ hybridization showing colocalization between Lepr (cyan) and Slc17a6 (magenta) gene expression. Dorsomedial region of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMHdm) in control LeprCre (A), but no colocalization in experimental LeprΔVglut2 (B) females. Insets show high magnification images for the area in the dashed rectangles (C, D). Ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv) at large magnification in control LeprCre (C), and experimental LeprΔVglut2 (D). Scale bars: 50 µm for A, B and 20 µm for insets and C, D. (E) Body mass in adult LeprCre and LeprΔVglut2 males (genotype main effect; F1,10 = 13.1; p = 0.0047, post hoc comparison: week 20: t140 = 3.27; p = 0.019; week 26: t140 = 5.47; p < 0.0001). (F) Body mass in adult LeprCre and LeprΔVglut2 females (genotype main effect; F1,11 = 4.34; p = 0.06; post hoc comparisons: week 23: t154 = 4.05; p = 0.0011; week 25: t154 = 3.1; p = 0.03; week 26: t154 = 5.59; p < 0.0001). The arrow indicates the age at which estrus cycling follow-up finished in this cohort. (G) Body composition in males (fat mass: t9 = 3.77; p = 0.004) and (H) in females (fat mass: t11 = 3.7; p = 0.0035). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 4—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 4.

We then assessed if the lack of Vglut2 in LepRb cells alters pubertal maturation and adult reproduction. A thorough assessment of the metabolic and reproductive phenotype of the LeprCre mouse was performed before (Garcia-Galiano et al., 2017), and we found that they are indistinguishable from littermates negative for Cre. Female LeprΔVglut2 and control LeprCre littermates had similar age of vaginal opening and showed no differences in body weight at puberty onset (Figure 5A, B). The day of first estrus, however, was delayed in LeprΔVglut2 mice (Figure 5C). Of note, no differences in body weight were observed at vaginal opening (puberty onset) and first estrus (puberty completion) between experimental and control groups (Figure 5D). In males, balanopreputial separation (BPS) was monitored from P25 as a sign of advancement of sexual maturation. No differences in age at BPS were found between LeprCre and LeprΔVglut2 littermates (Figure 5E). LeprΔVglut2 male mice showed larger body weight than LeprCre mice at the time of BPS (Figure 5F).

Figure 5. Reproductive development and estrus cycles are altered in LeprΔVglut2 females.

Figure 5.

(A) Age of vaginal opening (VO; t18 = 0.84; p = 0.41) and (B) body mass at vaginal opening (VO) (t18 = 1.47; p = 0.16) in females. (C) Age of first estrus (t14 = 2.45; p = 0.028) and (D) body mass at first estrus (t14 = 0.59; p = 0.56) in females. (E) Age of complete balanopreputial separation (BPS; t11 = 1.80; p = 0.1) and (F) body mass at BPS (t11 = 2.43; p = 0.033) in males. (G) Representative estrus cycle profiles from control LeprCre and (H) experimental LeprΔVglut2 females (E: estrus, P: proestrus, M/D: metestrus/diestrus). (I) Cycle duration in adult females (t25 = 3.71; p = 0.001). (J) Time spent in each phase of the cycle during the 30 days studied. Estrus (t26 = 1.97; p = 0.059), proestrus (t26 = 2.81; p = 0.009), and diestrus (t26 = 2.39; p = 0.024). (K) Days spent from mating until the first litter was observed in females paired with proven male breeders (Mann–Whitney test; p = 0.32). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Figure 5—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 5.

Length of estrous cycles was longer (10–16 weeks of age, before the difference in body weight, Figure 5G–I) and the number of cycles completed in 30 days was lower in LeprΔVglut2 mice compared to controls (LeprCre: 4.47 ± 0.30 cycles; LeprΔVglut2: 3.31 ± 0.36 cycles; t26 = 2.45; p = 0.021). Female LeprΔvglut2 spent similar time in estrus, less time in proestrus and more time in diestrus (Figure 5J). Analysis of female fertility showed that 75% of LeprΔVglut2 against 100% of control mice produced at least one litter for 60 days since mating. Comparing fertile females, no differences were observed in latency to pregnancy (Figure 5K) or in the number of pups in the first litter (LeprCre: 7.86 ± 1.14 pups; LeprΔVglut2: 7.50 ± 1.41 pups; t11 = 0.20; p = 0.85).

Because delay in first estrus, disruption of the estrous cycles and mild subfertility were observed before differences in body weight appeared (arrow in Figure 4B), our findings indicate that the disruption in reproductive function is caused by deficient glutamatergic neurotransmission in LepRb cells, not by metabolic dysregulation.

To gain insights into the underlying mechanisms associated with the disrupted reproductive function, we evaluated the HPG function. LeprΔVglut2 females had denser GnRH-ir fibers in the Arc than Vglut2flox control females (Figure 6A–C) suggesting retention of the neuropeptide at the neuronal terminals. To assess basal and stimulated GnRH release we measured basal LH and LH in response to intraperitoneal (ip.) injection of kisspeptin. Basal LH levels of diestrous females were not different between genotypes (Figure 6D). An immediate increase in LH (7 min) was observed following ip. kisspeptin in both groups, but LH levels in LeprΔVglut2 mice were about half that observed in the controls (Figure 6E). Similarly, the overall LH AUC for the 30 minuntes following the kisspeptin-10 injection in LeprΔVglut2 females was about half the area observed in the controls (Figure 6F). These results suggest a deficit in GnRH release despite higher accumulation of peptide at the terminals, which may be due to decreased pituitary LH content or disruption of hypothalamic regulation of GnRH release.

Figure 6. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) content in terminals and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion are altered in LeprΔVglut2 female mice.

Figure 6.

Representative fluorescent photomicrograph of GnRH-immunoreactivity (-ir) in the arcuate nucleus (Arc) and median eminence (ME) in (A) control Vglut2flox and (B) LeprΔVglut2 diestrous females. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) GnRH-ir integrated density in the Arc in Vglut2flox (n = 4) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 3) females (t5 = 8.01; p = 0.0005). (D) Basal LH levels in Vglut2flox (n = 7) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 5) females (t10 = 1.91; p = 0.08). (E) LH levels in LeprCre (n = 7) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 6) females before and after a kisspeptin-10 (65 µ/kg) intraperitoneal (ip.) injection of kisspeptin at time = 0. Light gray: individual LeprCre females, Light yellow: individual LeprΔVglut2 females. After the injection (time 7–28), LH levels were higher in control than in floxed females Mixed effects model: main effect for ‘time’ F1.14, 12.19 = 15.91, p = 0.001; ‘genotype’ F1, 11 = 8.26, p = 0.015; ‘time × genotype’ interaction: F3, 32 = 5.00, p = 0.006; Sidak’s post hoc effect for 7 min (t10.97 = 3.79, p = 0.01) and for 14 min (t9.4 = 3.22, p = 0.04). (F) Area under the curve (AUC) of LH levels after the kisspeptin injection (t11 = 3.14; p = 0.009). (G) Gnrhr (t10 = 0.86, p = 0.41), (H) Lhb (t10 = 1.47, p = 0.17), and (I) Fshb (t9 = 1.63, p = 0.14) relative to Actin B (Actb) mRNA levels in the pituitary of Vglut2flox (n = 7) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 5) females. (J) Kiss1 (t8 = 1.42, p = 0.19), (K) Pdyn (t8 = 0.02; p = 0.98), (L) Kiss1r (t8 = 1.44, p = 0.19), (M) Tac3r (t8 = 0.99, p = 0.35) and (N) Tac2 (t8 = 3.39, p = 0.009), relative to β-2-microglobulin (B2m) mRNA levels in the mediobasal hypothalamus of Vglut2flox (n = 5) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 5) females. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Figure 6—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 6.

Pituitary expression of Gnrhr, Lhb, Fshb (Figure 6G–I) and the common glycoprotein alpha subunit (Cga, Vglut2flox: 100 ± 17.47%; LeprΔVglut2: 245.3 ± 89.91%; t8 = 1.20; p = 0.26) relative to actin b (Actb) expression was similar between genotypes. Mediobasal hypothalamic expression of Kiss1, Pdyn, Kiss1r, and Tac3r relative to β-2-microglobulin (B2m) expression was similar between control and experimental females (Figure 6J–M). However, relative Tac2 expression was about 50% lower in LeprΔVglut2 compared to controls (Figure 6N).

The action of LepRb PMv neurons in sexual maturation requires glutamate

In previous studies, we showed that endogenous reexpression of LepRb in the PMv-induced puberty and improved fertility of LepRb null mice (Donato et al., 2011; Mahany et al., 2018). To evaluate if glutamate neurotransmission is required for leptin-induced pubertal development, we produced a dual-floxed mouse model. LeprloxTB mice that lack LepRb were crossed with a Vglut2flox line, to generate the LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice, in which stereotaxic delivery of AAV-Cre restores Lepr while deleting Slc17a6 in the PMv.

The LeprloxTB mice show no leptin-induced pSTAT3-ir (Figure 7A, B, Q, S). Expression of Slc17a6 mRNA is intact in these mice despite the lack of leptin signaling (Figure 7C, D). These mice are obese and infertile, have reduced uterine size, and no ovarian corpora lutea (Figure 7E–H, T). As observed previously (Mahany et al., 2018), LeprloxTB mice with reexpression of LepRb in the PMv (LeprloxTB AAV-Cre) show leptin-induced pSTAT3-ir in the PMv (Figure 7I, Q). Expression of Slc17a6 mRNA is intact in these mice (Figure 7J) and they have increased uterine size and ovarian corpora lutea (Figure 7K, L, T) indicating successful ovulation. The LeprloxTB was used as the negative control, the LeprloxTB with injection of AAV-Cre into the PMv was used as positive control for the procedure and the wild-type littermate was used as the positive control for the undisturbed morphology of the hypothalamus and the reproductive organs.

Figure 7. Glutamate signaling from the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv) is required for leptin effect on pubertal development in female mouse.

Figure 7.

(A, B, I, M) Microphotographs of the PMv showing pSTAT3-ir following leptin administration. Note lack of pSTAT3-ir in LeprloxTB mouse. (C, D, J, N) Darkfield microphotographs showing Slc17a6 mRNA (silver grains) in the PMv. Note decreased Slc17a6 mRNA expression in LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice injected with AAV-Cre. (E, F, K, O) Microphotographs of representative single uterine horns. Note lack of uterine growth in LeprloxTB mouse and in LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mouse injected with AAV-Cre. (G, H, L, P) Microphotographs of representative ovary sections. Note lack of corpora lutea in LeprloxTB mouse and in LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mouse injected with AAV-Cre. 3V: third ventricle, Arc: arcuate nucleus, f: fornix, CL: Corpus luteum. Scale bars: 100 µm. (Q) Number of pSTAT3 expressing cells in the PMv in wild-type (n = 5), LeprloxTB (n = 5), AAV-CRE injected LepRloxTB (n = 4), and AAV-CRE injected LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox (n = 3) (F3,13 = 73.53, p < 0.0001). Different capital letters indicate groups that are significantly different to the others (at least p<0.01) (R) Quantification of the Slc17a6 hybridization signal in the PMv AAV-CRE injected LeprloxTB (n = 4), and AAV-CRE injected LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox (n = 6) (t8 = 4.20; p = 0.003). (S) Number of pSTAT3 expressing cells in the Arc (F3,16 = 171.8, p < 0.0001). (T) Number of corpora lutea in the ovary (F3,17 = 31.16, p < 0.0001). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Figure 7—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 7.

We obtained six LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox female mice with AAV-Cre centered in the PMv and two mice with AAV-Cre outside the PMv. Reexpression of LepRb was confirmed by the presence of leptin-induced pSTAT3-ir in the PMv neurons and the deletion of Vglut2 was confirmed by a decreased Slc17a6 mRNA expression, compared to the LeprloxTB with AAV-Cre. Mice with successful injections (n = 6) showed an increased number of leptin-induced pSTAT3-ir neurons, similar to that obtained in AAV-Cre injected LeprloxTB (Figure 7M, Q). Mice with AAV-Cre injections outside the PMv (n = 2) showed pSTAT3-ir in adjacent nuclei, that is, dorsomedial and ventromedial nuclei of the hypothalamus and were removed from the analysis. Variable contamination of the Arc was evident but the number of pSTAT3-ir was similarly negligible in AAV-Cre injected LeprloxTB and LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice (Figure 7I, M, S). Comparing AAV-Cre injected groups, Slc17a6 mRNA was decreased only in LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice with injections successfully targeting PMv neurons (Figure 7N, R).

Correctly PMv injected LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox mice showed no sign of puberty onset (vaginal opening) and no pregnancy until the end of the experiment (about 60 days). Histological examination showed these mice had reduced uterine size and no corpora lutea suggesting low estradiol, lack of sexual maturation and ovulation (Figure 7O, P, T). Body weight in LepR null mice with reactivation of LepR in PMv neurons was not impacted as published before (Donato et al., 2011; Mahany et al., 2018). Similarly, the progression of body weight in mice with reactivation of LepRb and deletion of Vglut2 in PMv neurons was not affected by this deletion.

These findings demonstrate that glutamate neurotransmission is required for leptin action in pubertal development and reproductive function mediated by PMv neurons.

Discussion

Understanding the role of leptin in the control of reproduction has largely advanced in the last few years, but many open questions remain regarding the neural pathways and the molecular mechanisms involved. While overlapping neural pathways exist, the PMv has arisen as an essential hub in this circuitry. The PMv is a glutamatergic nucleus (Donato et al., 2011; Vong et al., 2011) rich in leptin-responsive cells (Leshan et al., 2009; Louis et al., 2011; Scott et al., 2009; Williams et al., 2011). Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that deletion of LepRb in glutamatergic cells does not disrupt puberty or fertility, as opposed to large reproductive deficits when LepRb is deleted from GABAergic cells (Martin et al., 2014; Zuure et al., 2013). We have therefore investigated in more detail the role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in LepRb PMv neurons.

Leptin treatment prevents a fall in LH levels in states of negative energy balance in rodents and humans (Ahima et al., 1996; Chan et al., 2003; Donato et al., 2009; Welt et al., 2004). In ob/ob (Lepob) mice, which are infertile and hypogonadotropic, leptin administration increases LH levels, while this treatment is ineffective in PMv lesioned Lepob mice (Donato et al., 2011), indicating that intact PMv is required for the leptin stimulatory effect on LH in leptin-deficient mice. In the current study, we expanded this observation showing that in fed mice, acute unilateral activation of leptin responsive PMv neurons using stimulatory DREADDs transiently elevated LH levels in a normal nutritional state (i.e., not in negative energy balance). This increase was correlated with the number of activated PMv LepRb neurons, and it was only observed following a substantial neuronal stimulation (Fos activation). The animals that did not show an LH increase despite having the virus targeted to the PMv had low Fos-ir in the PMv, possibly due to virus inactivity or low CNO entry into the brain (Gomez et al., 2017).

It is well accepted that clozapine has high affinity to DREADDs (Gomez et al., 2017). Thus, the hM3Dq injected animals showing clozapine-induced LH release strongly support our observations using CNO, that is targeted activation of PMv neurons leads to increase in circulating LH. Of note, optogenetic activation of a pituitary adenylate-cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) expressing subpopulation of PMv neurons leads to increased activity of kisspeptin neurons. Whether this increases LH release is not known. Instead, the authors showed that deletion of PACAP in the PMv leads to an exacerbation of LH response to acute leptin administration (Ross et al., 2018), what reinforces the role of LepRb PMv neurons in LH secretion. Further studies are required to define the interaction between glutamate and PACAP neurotransmission in downstream targets of PMv neurons.

The use of stereotaxic injections inevitably leads to heterogeneity in the injection sites. The main caveat to our study was the activation in some animals of neighboring hypothalamic areas containing leptin receptor, abundant in the mediobasal hypothalamus (Louis et al., 2011; Scott et al., 2009). Larger injections in a few animals, and perhaps the presence of dendrites from LepRb neurons adjacent to PMv, led to contamination of other sites, mainly the Arc. For this reason, we investigated the distribution of Fos-ir in Arc neuronal populations involved in stimulation of LH secretion (i.e., POMC and kisspeptin).

POMC neurons have been involved in modulation of the reproductive axis (Leranth et al., 1988; Manfredi-Lozano et al., 2016; Scimonelli and Celis, 1990). The POMC-derived peptide α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone has a stimulatory role on reproduction via actions on kisspeptin and GnRH neurons (Manfredi-Lozano et al., 2016; Roa and Herbison, 2012). Therefore, direct activation of POMC neurons, although small in number, may have contributed to the higher LH peak observed in these animals. On the other hand, kisspeptin is a direct stimulator of GnRH but only about 10% of KNDy neurons in female mice express LepRb (Cravo et al., 2013; Cravo et al., 2011; Donato et al., 2011; Louis et al., 2011; True et al., 2011). Restoration of LepRb in kisspeptin neurons does not restore fertility in Lepr-deficient mice (Cravo et al., 2013; Cravo et al., 2011). The very low number of Fos-ir KNDy neurons we observed makes it unlikely that contamination or downstream activation of KNDy neurons contributed to the LH secretion. Of note, in kisspeptin signaling deficient mice, glutamate receptor agonists induce LH secretion, indicating that alternative glutamatergic pathways bypass KNDy neurons to regulate the reproductive axis (García-Galiano et al., 2012). Alternatively, chemogenetic activation of leptin sensitive PMv neurons might primarily act via direct activation of GnRH cell bodies in the preoptic region or their terminals in the median eminence, as discussed below for the LeprΔVglut2 females. Uncharacterized mCherry-expressing Fos neurons were observed in the posterior Arc, but lack of prior knowledge of a role in reproduction curtails the evaluation of a plausible role in LH release.

Due to lack of a specific model to target the PMv neurons, we investigated the reproductive phenotype in animals with Vglut2 deletion in LepRb expressing neurons, rendering them incapable of transmitting fast-acting downstream signals (Xu et al., 2013). These animals develop obesity (Xu et al., 2013). To avoid the effects of high adiposity in reproductive outcome, body weight was monitored during all reproductive phenotype assessment. While the reproductive effect in males was not obvious, LeprΔVglut2 females showed delayed pubertal completion and blunted estrous cycles. The reproductive deficits were observed prior to the manifestation of any changes in body weight, indicating that these alterations are independent of metabolic dysregulation (Donato et al., 2011). It is important to stress that Vglut2 is expressed in several other LepRb neurons including the dorsomedial and the ventromedial nuclei of the hypothalamus (Xu et al., 2013). Based on extensive literature and circuit tracing, the PMv remains the prime candidate to relay leptin’s effect in reproductive function.

To test if glutamatergic neurotransmission in LepRb PMv neurons is required for sexual maturation we used LepR-null;Vglut2-floxed females. This strategy aimed to ‘bypass’ the potential redundancy played by alternative neural pathways. Our prior studies showed that selective reexpression of LepRb in the PMv-induced puberty and fertility in LepR-null female mice (Donato et al., 2011; Mahany et al., 2018). Here, we observed that deletion of Vglut2 in PMv neurons blocked this effect. Female gonads remained in a prepubertal state, with undeveloped uterine horns and no ovarian corpora lutea.

Despite prior reports showing that lack of leptin signaling in glutamatergic cells has no effects on reproduction (Martin et al., 2014; Zuure et al., 2013), we show that glutamatergic neurotransmission in leptin responsive cells of the PMv is necessary for typical pubertal development and reproduction. Due to the fundamental role of reproduction for species survival, redundancy of neural pathways is expected, and developmental adaptations may have occurred in those studies. Of note, a recent study showed that reexpression of LepRb only in GABAergic cells is not sufficient for restoration of reproduction in otherwise LepR-null mice, emphasizing the need for other populations (Quaresma et al., 2021). Similarly, alternative metabolic signals may take over control in the absence of leptin signaling in this specific pathway (Hill et al., 2010; Hill and Elias, 2018).

Leptin depolarizes about 75% of PMv LepRb neurons (Williams et al., 2011). Depolarizing glutamatergic neurons may directly activate downstream neurons. The LepRb PMv neurons project to the preoptic area, where they directly contact GnRH neurons (Leshan et al., 2009; Louis et al., 2011). Alternatively, LepRb neurons may activate astrocytes, which in turn stimulate GnRH neurons and LH pulsatility (Vanacker et al., 2021) or GnRH fibers at the median eminence (Donato et al., 2011). In fact, LeprΔVglut2 females showed increased GnRH-ir fibers located in the adjacencies of the median eminence. In these females, LH release in response to kisspeptin was reduced suggesting peptide retention and deficits in GnRH release. Similar results were obtained after reactivation of leptin signaling in the PMv of LepRb-null mice (Donato et al., 2011). In Lepob mice, GnRH fiber density is higher, but it decreases following leptin injection (Bellefontaine et al., 2014). A large density of synaptic contacts exists in the GnRH terminals in the vicinity of the ME, and specific inhibition of these terminals blocks LH pulses (Wang et al., 2020). We did not observe alterations in gonadotropin expression in the pituitary gland, but we found a reduction in Tac2 levels, coding for Neurokinin B (NKB), in the hypothalamus of LeprΔVglut2 females. These findings indicate that blockade of glutamatergic neurotransmission in LepRb neurons disrupts key components of the GnRH pulse generator (Han et al., 2023; Ruka et al., 2013; Uenoyama and Tsukamura, 2023), leading ultimately to reproductive deficits. Indeed, previous research showed that activation of the Neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) by an NKB agonist-induced GnRH release consistently from the ME even in kisspeptin knockout animals, but not the preoptic region where GnRH cell bodies are located (Gaskins et al., 2013), suggesting that Tac2 alone could be a direct mediator of the glutamatergic effect on GnRH release.

LepRb PMv neurons also project to the Arc and AVPV, where they contact Kiss1 neurons (Donato et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2018). However, the interaction and dynamics between the PMv and the kisspeptin populations remain unclear. In rats, the proestrus increase in Kiss1 mRNA and Fos-ir in AVPV is blunted following bilateral lesions of the PMv. In the Arc, Kiss1 mRNA is not altered during a leptin-induced LH release or in PMv lesioned animals (Donato et al., 2009; Donato et al., 2013). In mice, Arc Kiss1 neurons are downstream of PACAP PMv neurons in reproductive function (Ross et al., 2018). Thus, complementary to fast-acting glutamatergic neurotransmission, neuropeptides released from PMv cells contribute to the long-term regulation of reproduction by leptin and its integration with other modulatory signals, for example, the neuropeptide PACAP (Evans et al., 2023; Ross et al., 2018).

LepRb PMv neurons also express nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, Nos1 gene) required for nitric oxide production (Donato et al., 2011; Donato et al., 2010; Leshan et al., 2009). Loss-of-function mutation in NOS1/Nos1 gene in humans and mice cause infertility and blockade of nitric oxide neurotransmission disrupts leptin actin in reproductive axis (Bellefontaine et al., 2014; Chachlaki et al., 2022; Yu et al., 1997). Of note, glutamatergic neurotransmission is associated with activation of nitric oxide production via actions on glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Chachlaki et al., 2017; d’Anglemont de Tassigny et al., 2007; Garthwaite et al., 1988). Whether the reproductive deficits caused by disruption of glutamatergic neurotransmission in LepRb neurons are upstream of nitric oxide needs further investigation.

Materials and methods

Animals

The Lepr-null (LeprloxTB, kindly provided by Dr. Elmquist, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, TX, available in JAX, stock 018989) (Berglund et al., 2012), the LeprCre knock-in (Lepr-Cre, JAX; stock 032457) (Leshan et al., 2006), Kiss1hrGFP (Kiss1-hrGFP; JAX, stock 023425) (Cravo et al., 2013), Vglut2flox (Slc17a6 or Vglut2 gene, JAX; Stock 012898) (Tong et al., 2007), and C57BL/6 (JAX; Stock 000664) mice were used for experiments. They were held in a 12:12 light:dark cycle (lights on at 6 AM), temperature-controlled (21–23°C) environment with ad libitum access to water and food. Mice were fed a low-phytoestrogen diet (Envigo 2016 diet) and a higher protein and fat phytoestrogen reduced diet (Envigo 2019 Teklad diet) when breeding. A phytoestrogen-reduced diet was used to avoid the exogenous effect of estrogen on reproductive physiology. Animals were bred and housed in our colony under the guidelines of the University of Michigan IACUC (PRO00010420). Procedures and experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health ‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’ and approved by the University of Michigan Committee on Use and Care of Animals.

Stereotaxic injections

Unilateral stereotaxic injections of pAAV8.CMV.HI.eGFP-Cre.WPRE.SV40 (AAV-Cre) and pAAV2/7.CMV.PI.EGFP.WPRE.bGH (AAV-GFP) (Vector Core, University of Pennsylvania) in LeprloxTB, LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox and wild-type females, and unilateral stereotaxic injections of pAAV8-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry (AAV-hM3Dq, Addgene plasmid # 44361) (Krashes et al., 2011) from Bryan Roth, and of pAAV8-hSyn-DIO-mCherry (AAV-mCherry, Addgene plasmid # 50459) in LeprCre females were performed using a picospritzer attached to a glass pipette under isoflurane anesthesia in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf) (Sáenz de Miera et al., 2023). The stereotaxic coordinates for injection in PMv, measured from the rostral rhinal vein were [anteroposterior: −5.4 mm], the exposed superior sagittal sinus [mediolateral: ±0.5 mm], and from the top of the dura-mater [dorsoventral −5.4 mm]. Mice were followed twice daily for the first 3 days after surgery and daily for 7 more days for appropriate recovery. Experiments were performed 1 month after surgery.

Activation of PMv LepRb neurons and its effect on LH release

Adult LeprCre females (8–10 weeks old) received unilateral stereotaxic injections of ~50 nl of AAV-hM3Dq in the PMv. One month later mice were transferred to the Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center-Live (U2C – NIDDK) where they were cannulated in the aortic artery for serial blood sampling and the jugular vein for iv. injections (Sáenz de Miera et al., 2023). They were then connected to the Culex Automated Blood Sampling System 3 days after surgery. The following day, three blood samples were taken every 10 min to establish baseline hormonal levels, followed by iv. injection of either CNO (n = 19) or clozapine (n = 4) at (0.5 mg/kg in 50 µl, time 0). All injections were performed at the same time of the day, 1:00 PM. Blood samples were sequentially taken following the injection every 10 min for 1 hr. A negative control group received a stereotaxic injection of AAV-mCherry then a month later they were cannulated and the same protocol for blood collection was used. These animals received an injection of CNO on the day of the experiment (n = 5). An additional group of LeprCre females with no AAV injections were cannulated and received an iv. injection of clozapine (n = 7) and were used as additional controls for blood collection. All animals were disconnected from the sampling system 2 hr after injection, a vaginal smear was collected to assess the phase of the estrous cycle and they were perfused under isoflurane anesthesia. Brains were collected and processed for histology. Blood samples were removed from the Culex machine immediately following the 2 hr mark and kept on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 30 s at 4°C and plasma removed and stored at −80°C until hormone analysis.

Assessment of body weight and reproductive phenotype

To inactivate glutamate in leptin responsive cells, LeprCre mice were crossed with mice carrying loxP-modified Slc17a6 alleles. Our experimental mice were homozygous for the LeprCre allele (LeprCre/Cre) and homozygous for the Vglut2-loxP allele (Vglut2fl/fl). Our controls consisted of mice homozygous for the Cre allele (LeprCre/Cre;Vglut2+/+, named LeprCre) or homozygous for the Vglut2-loxP allele (Lepr+/+;Vglut2fl/fl, named Vglut2flox). Both experimental (LeprCre/Cre;Vglut2fl/fl, named LeprΔVglut2) and control mice were derived from the same litters with parents homozygous for one of the genes and heterozygous for the other gene (LeprCre/Cre;Vglut2fl/+ or LeprCre/+;Vglut2fl/fl). Mice were genotyped at weaning (21 days) and again at the end of the experiments.

Timing of puberty onset was monitored daily in experimental (LeprΔVglut2) and control (LeprCre) mice for external signs of puberty (n = 7–13). In females, vaginal opening was monitored from postnatal day 19 (P19), followed by the timing for the occurrence of first estrus, a sign of puberty completion defined by the identification of keratinized cells for 2 consecutive days after 2 previous days with leukocytes in the vaginal lavage or by an estrus stage preceded by a proestrus stage (Garcia-Galiano et al., 2017). In males, the day of BPS was monitored from P25. Body weight for each animal was obtained on the day these events were observed. Animals were grown in normalized litters (5–7 pups/litter). Estrous cycles were assessed in young adult virgin mice. Females were housed with proven male breeders and monitored for fertility, latency to pregnancy, and number of pups per litter. Body weight of adult male and female mice was monitored weekly from 13 to 26 weeks of age. At the end of the experiment, total body weight, body fat, and lean mass were measured in conscious mice using a nuclear magnetic resonance-based analyzer (EchoMRI, 4in1-900).

Kisspeptin injections

Adult LeprCre and LeprΔVglut2 females (3–6 months) were transferred to the Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center-Live where they were cannulated in the aortic artery for serial blood sampling. Blood samples for baseline LH were taken every 7 min for 30 min before the injection. They then received an ip. injection of kisspeptin 65 µg/kg (kisspeptin-10, #048-56 Phoenix Pharmaceuticals) (Wang et al., 2019) and blood was then sampled every 7 min for 30 min.

Endogenous reexpression of Lepr and concomitant deletion ofSlc17a6 in PMv neurons

The LepR null (LeprloxTB) mouse model has a loxP-flanked transcription-blocking cassette (loxTB) inserted between exons 16 and 17 of the Lepr gene (Berglund et al., 2012; Donato et al., 2011). The LeprloxTB mice lack the LepR intracellular domain and are obese, diabetic, and infertile. Cre-mediated excision of loxP sites generates LepR with signaling capacity. The LeprloxTB mice were crossed with the Vglut2-floxed mice, which carry loxP sites flanking exon 2 of Slc17a6, to generate the LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox allowing for Cre-induced restoration of LepR and deletion of Vglut2 in PMv neurons. Mice were monitored for puberty and fertility as described above. Sixty days after introduction of the male breeders, females were anesthetized, perfused and brains were processed as described below.

Unilateral stereotaxic injections of AAV-Cre were used to restore LepR signaling in the PMv in homozygous LeprloxTB 7- to 10-week-old females mice (previously described in Mahany et al., 2018) to restore LepR signaling and to selectively delete Slc17a6 in the PMv of LeprloxTB;Vglut2flox homozygous females (n = 9). An additional cohort of LeprloxTB was injected with AAV-Cre and included as the positive control (n = 5). WT mice were used as positive (fertile) controls (n = 13, six with AAV-GFP injection; seven without injections) (Mahany et al., 2018) and LeprloxTB (n = 4) mice were used as negative (infertile) controls. Six to eight weeks after surgery, animals were ip. injected with leptin (3 mg/kg) 1.5 hr before perfusion. Brain, uterus, and ovaries were collected. Reproductive maturation was assessed by vaginal opening, uterus size and presence of ovarian corpus lutea. Brain tissue was processed for GFP immunohistochemistry and Slc17a6 in situ hybridization (ISH).

Tissue collection and histology

Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane (Fluriso, VetOne) and intracardially perfused with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 10% normal buffered formalin. Brains were dissected and kept in post-fixative (20% sucrose in fixative) for 4 hr and cryoprotected overnight in 20% sucrose in PBS. Brains were cut into four series of 30 µm coronal sections using a freezing microtome (Leica SM 2010R) and stored at −20°C in cryoprotectant until used. Brains of animals treated with leptin were postfixed for only 2 hr and were processed for pSTAT3-ir to validate LepR reexpression (Münzberg et al., 2003; Williams et al., 2011). Reproductive organs were fixed in 10% formalin and processed using paraffin-embedded protocol and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining (Donato et al., 2011; Mahany et al., 2018).

Immunofluorescence

Floating sections were rinsed with PBS and blocked with 3% normal donkey serum in PBS + % Triton X-100 for 1 hr at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in blocking buffer. Primary antibodies used are listed in Table 2. Sections were rinsed and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hr and rinsed in PBS. Secondary antibodies used are listed in Table 2. Sections were mounted on gelatin-precoated slides and coverslipped with Fluoromont-G (Electron Microscopy Sciences) mounting medium.

Table 2. Antibodies.

Antibody Protein target Host organism Dilution used Vendor and cat# RRID
Anti-GFP (Chicken Antibodies, IgY Fraction) Recombinant GFP null Chicken 1:10,000 Aves Labs
Cat# GFP-1010
RRID:AB_2307313
mCherry monoclonal (16D7) mCherry tag Rat 1:5000 Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# M11217
RRID:AB_2536611
ABE457 | Anti-cFos N-terminus cFos Rabbit 1:2000 Millipore
Cat# ABE457
RRID:AB_2631318
Pro-opiomelanocortin Precursor POMC (27-52) antibody Aminoacids 27–52 of porcine POMC peptide null Rabbit 1:10,000 Phoenix Pharmaceuticals
Cat# H-029-30,
RRID:AB_2307442
Anti LHRH (GnRH) Synthetic LHRH Rabbit 1:1000 Immunostar Cat# 20075 RRID:AB_572248
Phospho-Stat-3 (tyr705) Phospho-Stat-3 (tyr705) Rabbit 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9131 RRID:AB_331586
Goat anti-Chicken IgY, Alexa Fluor 488 Chicken, IgY (H+L) Goat 1:500 Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# A-11039
RRID:AB_2534096
Donkey anti-Rat IgG, AlexaFluor 594 Rat IgG (H+L) Donkey 1:500 Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# A-21209
RRID:AB_2535795
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG, AlexaFluor 488 Rabbit IgG (H+L) Donkey 1:500 Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat# A-21206
RRID:AB_2535792
Biotin-SP-conjugated AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG Rabbit IgG (H+L) Donkey 1:1000 Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 711-065-152 RRID:AB_2340593

pSTAT3 immunoreactivity was performed to assess reactivation of functional leptin receptor. Brain sections were pretreated with 30% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase activity, 0.3% glycine, and 0.03% sodium dodecyl sulphate prior to primary antibody incubation. Tissue was blocked in 3% normal donkey serum + 0.25% Triton in PBS for 1 hr and incubated in primary rabbit anti-pSTAT3 (Table 2) for 48 hr at 4°C. Primary antibody was detected using a biotinylated secondary antibody (Table 2) by avidin–biotin peroxidase method (ABC Kit, Vector Laboratories) using diaminobenzidine (Sigma) as chromogen.

In situ hybridization

Single ISH was performed to determine deletion of Slc17a6 in PMv neurons (n = 9 experimental vs. n = 4 control). Briefly, a series of brain sections were mounted onto SuperFrost plus slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific), fixed in 10% NBF for 20 min and cleared with xylene for 15 min. Slides were boiled in sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min. The Slc17a6 DNA template was generated from mouse hypothalamic RNA by polymerase chain reaction(PCR) amplification. The following primers were used to amplify a 909 base-pair sequence in the gene encoding Slc17a6 (exon 2 of the Scl7a6 gene): forward (5′ CCGGGGAAAGAGGGGATAAAG 3′) and reverse (5′ GTAGACGGGCATGGATGTGA 3′). The antisense radio-labeled 35S- Slc17a6 riboprobe was generated by in vitro transcription using a T7 RNA polymerase (Promega). 35S-labeled riboprobe was diluted in hybridization solution (50% formamide, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 5 mg tRNA, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 10% dextran sulfate, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 1× Denhardt’s solution), and brain slices were hybridized overnight at 57°C. Slides were then incubated in 0.002% RNase A followed by stringency washes in SSC (sodium chloride-sodium citrate buffer). Sections were dipped in NTB autoradiographic emulsion (Kodak) and stored in light-protected slide boxes at 4°C for 2 weeks. Signal was developed with developer and fixer (Carestream, Rochester, NY, USA), and the slides were cover-slipped with DPX (Electron Microscopy Sciences) mounting medium.

To confirm the deletion of Slc17a6 in LepR neurons we did chromogenic ISH using BaseScope Duplex (n = 4 LeprCre vs. n = 4 LeprΔVglut2). Fresh frozen 16 µm coronal sections were collected on Superfrost Excell slides (Fisher) and stored at −80°C. Tissue sections were fixed in 10% NBF for 30 min and then dehydrated with a series of graded alcohols. The rest of the procedure was done with BaseScope Duplex Reagent Kit (ACD, #323800). Briefly, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with H2O2 for 10 min and tissue was digested with Protease IV for 10 min at room temperature. Sections were hybridized with BaseScope probes targeting Lepr (BA-Mm-Lepr-1zz-st, catalog # 895341) and a probe designed against exon 2 of Slc17a6 (BA-Mm-Slc17a6-1zz-st-C2, # 1240891-C2) for 2 hr at 40°C. Following hybridization, amplification, and detection were done using the BaseScope Duplex Detection Reagents ACD, #323810, and probes were detected using Green (Lepr) and Fast Red (Slc17a6) and counterstained with 50% Gill’s hematoxylin for 30 s.

Quantitative PCR

Vglut2flox (n = 7) and LeprΔVglut2 (n = 5) females in diestrus were euthanized to collect blood for basal LH analysis and dissect tissues for quantitative PCR (qPCR). Fresh frozen pituitaries and mediobasal hypothalamus were homogenized in Qiazol (QIAGEN) and total RNA was extracted using chloroform and precipitated with isopropanol. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthetized using MultiScribe reverse transcriptase and random primers (Invitrogen) from 1.5 or 2 µg of RNA and diluted to 10 ng/µl. Gene expression was analyzed by qPCR in 20 ng of cDNA in triplicate 10 µl reactions using SYBR Green Taq MasterMix (Bio-Rad), following the manufacturer’s instructions in a CFX-384 Real-Time PCR thermocycler (Bio-Rad). The primers used are specified in Table 3. mRNA expression in mutant vs. control samples was determined using relative gene copy numbers by the comparative threshold (Ct) method. The fold gene expression was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt and shown as a percentage of relative gene expression in the control group.

Table 3. Quantitative PCR primers.

Gene Primer sequence NCBI accession No. Vendor
Actb Fwd 5′-GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG-3′
Rev 5′-CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGT-3′
NM_007393.5 IDT
B2m Fwd 5′-TCTCACTGACCGGCCTGTAT-3′
Rev 5′-GATCACATGTCTCGATCCCAGT-3′
NM_009735.3 IDT
Cga Fwd 5′-CCTCAGATCGACAATCACCTG-3′
Rev 5′-AGCATGACCAGAATGACAGC-3′
NM_009889.2 IDT
Fshb Fwd 5′-CTGGTGCTGGAGAGCAATCT-3′
Rev 5′- ACTTTCTGGGTATTGGGCCG-3′
NM_008045.3 IDT
Kiss1 Fwd 5′-GGCAAAAGTGAAGCCTGGAT-3′
Rev 5′-GATTCCTTTTCCCAGGCATT-3′
NM_178260.4 MWG|operon
Kiss1r Fwd 5′-TGGCTGGTTCCCCTGTTTTT-3′
Rev 5′-GCAGCCAGGTTAGCGATGTA-3′
NM_053244.5 IDT
Gnrhr Fwd 5′-TCTTCATCATCCCCCTCCTC-3′
Rev 5′-GGAGTCCAGCAGACGACAAA-3′
NM_010323.2 IDT
Lhb Fwd 5′-CCAGTCTGCATCACCTTCAC-3′
Rev 5′- CAGCTGAGGGCTACAGGAAAG-3′
NM_008497.2 IDT
Pdyn Fwd 5′-CGTTGCTGTCAAGATCTGTTG-3′
Rev 5′-AGGCAGTCCGCCATAACATT-3′
NM_001286502.1 IDT
Tac2 Fwd 5′-TCTGTGTGGGATGTAAAGGAGGG-3′
Rev 5′-GACAGCCGCAAACAGCATGG-3′
NM_001199971.1 IDT
Tac3r Fwd 5′-TAAAAGTCATGCCAGGCCGT-3′
Rev 5′-AGGTGACACCCATGATGAGC-3′
NM_021382.6 IDT

Hormone profile

For LH assay, sera were sent to the University of Virginia Ligand Assay and Core of the Center for Research in Reproduction (Charlottesville, Virginia, USA), where serum LH was measured by ultra-sensitive LH ELISA. This in-house method is based on Steyn et al., 2013. The capture monoclonal antibody (anti-bovine LH β subunit, 518B7) was provided by Janet Roser, University of California. The detection polyclonal antibody (rabbit LH antiserum, AFP240580Rb) was provided by the National Hormone and Peptide Program (NHPP). HRP-conjugated polyclonal antibody (goat anti-rabbit) was purchased from DakoCytomation (Glostrup, Denmark; D048701-2). Mouse LH reference prep (AFP5306A; NHPP) was used as the assay standard. The Limit of Quantitation (Functional Sensitivity) was defined as the lowest concentration that demonstrates accuracy within 20% of expected values and intra-assay coefficient of variation (%CV)<20% and was determined by serial dilutions of a defined sample pool. Intra-assay %CV is 2.2%. Inter-assay %CVs were 7.3% (Low QC, 0.13 ng/ml), 5.0% (Medium QC, 0.8 ng/ml), and 6.5% (High QC, 2.3 ng/ml). Functional sensitivity was 0.016 ng/ml. with an assay reportable range of 0.016–4.0 ng/ml and intra-assay CV of 6.24%.

Image and data analysis

Photomicrographs were acquired using Axio Imager M2 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). Confocal microscopy images were acquired using NIS-Elements on a Nikon N-SIM+ A1R microscope with a resonance scanner. For cell quantification, ×40 images were used. Neuronal counting and coexpression analysis were done using the ‘Freehand selection’ tool to outline the areas of interest and the ‘Multi-point selection’ and ‘Region of Interest manager’ tools in ImageJ (NIH) to compare the same neurons across different color channels. Sections containing the PMv were analyzed (Bregma ~−2.3/−2.70, Paxinos Brain atlas) and adjacent nuclei were also analyzed to determine the degree of viral contamination. Quantification of GnRH fibers was performed in 2 consecutive ×20 images of the Arcuate nucleus (Bregma ~−2.06, Paxinos Brain atlas). For each image, a background value was measured and subtracted from the image. A 250 µm wide × 140 µm high rectangle was placed on the edge of the 3V wall to cover Arc GnRH-ir, carefully avoiding the saturated expression in the tuberoinfundibular sulcus region, and integrated density (mean pixel intensity × area) of the signal was quantified.

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Data were assessed for normality. When data did not fit a normal distribution, they were transformed and analyzed by a parametric test or analyzed using a non-parametric test. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for comparison between two groups. For AUC of LH levels after CNO/clozapine, baseline LH level was brought to 0, subtracting the −10 min LH value from all the timepoints for each animal. Then, AUC analysis was performed and only the positive area was considered for analysis. One-sample t-test analysis was used comparing data to a theoretical mean of 0. LH levels after kisspeptin injection were analyzed using AUC. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare three or more groups. Body weight data were analyzed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post hoc multiple comparison test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Excel software (Microsoft, Inc) was used to organize and calculate data. Statistical analyses and graphs were performed using GraphPad Prism v.7 (GraphPad software, Inc). Photoshop CS6 (Adobe, Inc) was used to integrate graphs and digital images into figures. Only brightness, contrast, and levels were modified to improve data visualization.

Acknowledgements

The Michigan Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center-Live is supported by NIH Center Grant U2C DK135066 (Mi-MMPC), P30 DK020572 (MDRC), and P30 DK089503 (MNORC), and the Ligand Assay and Analysis Core – University of Virginia is supported by R24 grant HD102061. This work was supported by R01 HD069702 to CFE and R21 HD109485 to CFE and CSM, NIH R01 DK056731 to MGM, and URM Pilot Grant from P30 DK089503 (MNORC) to CSM.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Carol F Elias, Email: cfelias@umich.edu.

Wei Yan, The Lundquist Institute, United States.

Wei Yan, The Lundquist Institute, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01 HD069702 to Carol F Elias.

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21 HD109485 to Carol F Elias, Cristina Sáenz de Miera.

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01 DK056731 to Martin G Myers.

  • Michigan Nutrition and Obesity Research Center URM Pilot Grant P30 DK089503 to Cristina Sáenz de Miera.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis.

Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Investigation, Project administration.

Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Ethics

Animals were bred and housed in our colony under the guidelines of the University of Michigan IACUC (PRO00010420). Procedures and experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health 'Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals' and approved by the University of Michigan Committee on Use and Care of Animals.

Additional files

MDAR checklist
Source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figures 13.
elife-93204-data1.xlsx (13.8KB, xlsx)

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1–7.

References

  1. Ahima RS, Prabakaran D, Mantzoros C, Qu D, Lowell B, Maratos-Flier E, Flier JS. Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature. 1996;382:250–252. doi: 10.1038/382250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellefontaine N, Chachlaki K, Parkash J, Vanacker C, Colledge W, d’Anglemont de Tassigny X, Garthwaite J, Bouret SG, Prevot V. Leptin-dependent neuronal NO signaling in the preoptic hypothalamus facilitates reproduction. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2014;124:2550–2559. doi: 10.1172/JCI65928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berglund ED, Vianna CR, Donato J, Kim MH, Chuang JC, Lee CE, Lauzon DA, Lin P, Brule LJ, Scott MM, Coppari R, Elmquist JK. Direct leptin action on POMC neurons regulates glucose homeostasis and hepatic insulin sensitivity in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012;122:1000–1009. doi: 10.1172/JCI59816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biro FM, Khoury P, Morrison JA. Influence of obesity on timing of puberty. International Journal of Andrology. 2006;29:272–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boehm U, Zou Z, Buck LB. Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction. Cell. 2005;123:683–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bray GA, York DA. Hypothalamic and genetic obesity in experimental animals: an autonomic and endocrine hypothesis. Physiological Reviews. 1979;59:719–809. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bronson FH, Marsteller FA. Effect of short-term food deprivation on reproduction in female mice. Biology of Reproduction. 1985;33:660–667. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod33.3.660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burt Solorzano CM, McCartney CR. Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction. 2010;140:399–410. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cagampang FR, Maeda K, Yokoyama A, Ota K. Effect of food deprivation on the pulsatile LH release in the cycling and ovariectomized female rat. Hormone and Metabolic Research = Hormon- Und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et Metabolisme. 1990;22:269–272. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron JL, Weltzin TE, McConaha C, Helmreich DL, Kaye WH. Slowing of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in men after forty-eight hours of fasting. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1991;73:35–41. doi: 10.1210/jcem-73-1-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Canteras NS, Simerly RB, Swanson LW. Projections of the ventral premammillary nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1992;324:195–212. doi: 10.1002/cne.903240205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chachlaki K, Garthwaite J, Prevot V. The gentle art of saying NO: how nitric oxide gets things done in the hypothalamus. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 2017;13:521–535. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chachlaki K, Messina A, Delli V, Leysen V, Maurnyi C, Huber C, Ternier G, Skrapits K, Papadakis G, Shruti S, Kapanidou M, Cheng X, Acierno J, Rademaker J, Rasika S, Quinton R, Niedziela M, L’Allemand D, Pignatelli D, Dirlewander M, Lang-Muritano M, Kempf P, Catteau-Jonard S, Niederländer NJ, Ciofi P, Tena-Sempere M, Garthwaite J, Storme L, Avan P, Hrabovszky E, Carleton A, Santoni F, Giacobini P, Pitteloud N, Prevot V. NOS1 mutations cause hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with sensory and cognitive deficits that can be reversed in infantile mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2022;14:1–15. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abh2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan JL, Heist K, DePaoli AM, Veldhuis JD, Mantzoros CS. The role of falling leptin levels in the neuroendocrine and metabolic adaptation to short-term starvation in healthy men. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2003;111:1409–1421. doi: 10.1172/JCI17490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cravo RM, Margatho LO, Osborne-Lawrence S, Donato J, Atkin S, Bookout AL, Rovinsky S, Frazão R, Lee CE, Gautron L, Zigman JM, Elias CF. Characterization of Kiss1 neurons using transgenic mouse models. Neuroscience. 2011;173:37–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cravo RM, Frazao R, Perello M, Osborne-Lawrence S, Williams KW, Zigman JM, Vianna C, Elias CF. Leptin signaling in Kiss1 neurons arises after pubertal development. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e58698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Czieselsky K, Prescott M, Porteous R, Campos P, Clarkson J, Steyn FJ, Campbell RE, Herbison AE. Pulse and surge profiles of luteinizing hormone secretion in the mouse. Endocrinology. 2016;157:4794–4802. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. d’Anglemont de Tassigny X, Campagne C, Dehouck B, Leroy D, Holstein GR, Beauvillain J-C, Buee-Scherrer V, Prevot V. Coupling of neuronal nitric oxide synthase to NMDA receptors via postsynaptic density-95 depends on estrogen and contributes to the central control of adult female reproduction. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:6103–6114. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5595-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Luca C, Kowalski TJ, Zhang Y, Elmquist JK, Lee C, Kilimann MW, Ludwig T, Liu S-M, Chua SC., Jr Complete rescue of obesity, diabetes, and infertility in db/db mice by neuron-specific LEPR-B transgenes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:3484–3493. doi: 10.1172/JCI24059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Donato Jose, Jr, Silva RJ, Sita LV, Lee S, Lee C, Lacchini S, Bittencourt JC, Franci CR, Canteras NS, Elias CF. The ventral premammillary nucleus links fasting-induced changes in leptin levels and coordinated luteinizing hormone secretion. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:5240–5250. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0405-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Donato J, Frazão R, Fukuda M, Vianna CR, Elias CF. Leptin induces phosphorylation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in defined hypothalamic neurons. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5415–5427. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Donato J, Cravo RM, Frazão R, Gautron L, Scott MM, Lachey J, Castro IA, Margatho LO, Lee S, Lee C, Richardson JA, Friedman J, Chua S, Coppari R, Zigman JM, Elmquist JK, Elias CF. Leptin’s effect on puberty in mice is relayed by the ventral premammillary nucleus and does not require signaling in Kiss1 neurons. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:355–368. doi: 10.1172/JCI45106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Donato J, Lee C, Ratra DV, Franci CR, Canteras NS, Elias CF. Lesions of the ventral premammillary nucleus disrupt the dynamic changes in Kiss1 and GnRH expression characteristic of the proestrus-estrus transition. Neuroscience. 2013;241:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans MC, Wallace EG, Ancel CM, Anderson GM. Leptin, but not Estradiol, Signaling in PACAP Neurons Modulates Puberty Onset. Endocrinology. 2023;164:bqad097. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqad097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Farooqi IS, Matarese G, Lord GM, Keogh JM, Lawrence E, Agwu C, Sanna V, Jebb SA, Perna F, Fontana S, Lechler RI, DePaoli AM, O’Rahilly S. Beneficial effects of leptin on obesity, T cell hyporesponsiveness, and neuroendocrine/metabolic dysfunction of human congenital leptin deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;110:1093–1103. doi: 10.1172/JCI15693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Farooqi IS, Wangensteen T, Collins S, Kimber W, Matarese G, Keogh JM, Lank E, Bottomley B, Lopez-Fernandez J, Ferraz-Amaro I, Dattani MT, Ercan O, Myhre AG, Retterstol L, Stanhope R, Edge JA, McKenzie S, Lessan N, Ghodsi M, De Rosa V, Perna F, Fontana S, Barroso I, Undlien DE, O’Rahilly S. Clinical and molecular genetic spectrum of congenital deficiency of the leptin receptor. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356:237–247. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. García-Galiano D, Pineda R, Roa J, Ruiz-Pino F, Sánchez-Garrido MA, Castellano JM, Aguilar E, Navarro VM, Pinilla L, Tena-Sempere M. Differential modulation of gonadotropin responses to kisspeptin by aminoacidergic, peptidergic, and nitric oxide neurotransmission. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2012;303:E1252–E1263. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00250.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Garcia-Galiano D, Borges BC, Donato J, Allen SJ, Bellefontaine N, Wang M, Zhao JJ, Kozloff KM, Hill JW, Elias CF. PI3Kα inactivation in leptin receptor cells increases leptin sensitivity but disrupts growth and reproduction. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e96728. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.96728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Garthwaite J, Charles SL, Chess-Williams R. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature. 1988;336:385–388. doi: 10.1038/336385a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gaskins GT, Glanowska KM, Moenter SM. Activation of neurokinin 3 receptors stimulates GnRH release in a location-dependent but kisspeptin-independent manner in adult mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154:3984–3989. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gomez JL, Bonaventura J, Lesniak W, Mathews WB, Sysa-Shah P, Rodriguez LA, Ellis RJ, Richie CT, Harvey BK, Dannals RF, Pomper MG, Bonci A, Michaelides M. Chemogenetics revealed: DREADD occupancy and activation via converted clozapine. Science. 2017;357:503–507. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Han X, Burger LL, Garcia-Galiano D, Sim S, Allen SJ, Olson DP, Myers MG, Elias CF. Hypothalamic and cell-specific transcriptomes unravel a dynamic neuropil remodeling in leptin-induced and typical pubertal transition in female mice. iScience. 2020;23:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Han SY, Morris PG, Kim JC, Guru S, Pardo-Navarro M, Yeo SH, McQuillan HJ, Herbison AE. Mechanism of kisspeptin neuron synchronization for pulsatile hormone secretion in male mice. Cell Reports. 2023;42:111914. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hill JW, Elias CF, Fukuda M, Williams KW, Berglund ED, Holland WL, Cho YR, Chuang JC, Xu Y, Choi M, Lauzon D, Lee CE, Coppari R, Richardson JA, Zigman JM, Chua S, Scherer PE, Lowell BB, Brüning JC, Elmquist JK. Direct insulin and leptin action on pro-opiomelanocortin neurons is required for normal glucose homeostasis and fertility. Cell Metabolism. 2010;11:286–297. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hill JW, Elias CF. Neuroanatomical framework of the metabolic control of reproduction. Physiological Reviews. 2018;98:2349–2380. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Krashes MJ, Koda S, Ye C, Rogan SC, Adams AC, Cusher DS, Maratos-Flier E, Roth BL, Lowell BB. Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121:1424–1428. doi: 10.1172/JCI46229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Leranth C, MacLusky NJ, Shanabrough M, Naftolin F. Immunohistochemical evidence for synaptic connections between pro-opiomelanocortin-immunoreactive axons and LH-RH neurons in the preoptic area of the rat. Brain Research. 1988;449:167–176. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91035-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leshan RL, Björnholm M, Münzberg H, Myers MGJ. Leptin receptor signaling and action in the central nervous system. Obesity. 2006;14 Suppl 5:208S–212S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Leshan RL, Louis GW, Jo YH, Rhodes CJ, Münzberg H, Myers MG. Direct innervation of GnRH neurons by metabolic- and sexual odorant-sensing leptin receptor neurons in the hypothalamic ventral premammillary nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:3138–3147. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0155-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Louis GW, Greenwald-Yarnell M, Phillips R, Coolen LM, Lehman MN, Myers MG. Molecular mapping of the neural pathways linking leptin to the neuroendocrine reproductive axis. Endocrinology. 2011;152:2302–2310. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahany EB, Han X, Borges BC, da Silveira Cruz-Machado S, Allen SJ, Garcia-Galiano D, Hoenerhoff MJ, Bellefontaine NH, Elias CF. Obesity and high-fat diet induce distinct changes in placental gene expression and pregnancy outcome. Endocrinology. 2018;159:1718–1733. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-03053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Manfredi-Lozano M, Roa J, Ruiz-Pino F, Piet R, Garcia-Galiano D, Pineda R, Zamora A, Leon S, Sanchez-Garrido MA, Romero-Ruiz A, Dieguez C, Vazquez MJ, Herbison AE, Pinilla L, Tena-Sempere M. Defining a novel leptin-melanocortin-kisspeptin pathway involved in the metabolic control of puberty. Molecular Metabolism. 2016;5:844–857. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin C, Navarro VM, Simavli S, Vong L, Carroll RS, Lowell BB, Kaiser UB. Leptin-responsive GABAergic neurons regulate fertility through pathways that result in reduced kisspeptinergic tone. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:6047–6056. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3003-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moore AM, Abbott G, Mair J, Prescott M, Campbell RE. Mapping GABA and glutamate inputs to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone neurones in male and female mice. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2018;30:1–13. doi: 10.1111/jne.12657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Münzberg H, Huo L, Nillni EA, Hollenberg AN, Bjørbaek C. Role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in regulation of hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin gene expression by leptin. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2121–2131. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-221037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Parfitt DB, Church KR, Cameron JL. Restoration of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion after fasting in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): dependence on size of the refeed meal. Endocrinology. 1991;129:749–756. doi: 10.1210/endo-129-2-749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Porter DT, Goodman RL, Hileman SM, Lehman MN. Evidence that synaptic plasticity of glutamatergic inputs onto KNDy neurones during the ovine follicular phase is dependent on increasing levels of oestradiol. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2021;33:e12945. doi: 10.1111/jne.12945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Quaresma PGF, Wasinski F, Mansano NS, Furigo IC, Teixeira PDS, Gusmao DO, Frazao R, Donato J. Leptin receptor expression in GABAergic cells is not sufficient to normalize metabolism and reproduction in mice. Endocrinology. 2021;162:1–16. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqab168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Quennell JH, Mulligan AC, Tups A, Liu X, Phipps SJ, Kemp CJ, Herbison AE, Grattan DR, Anderson GM. Leptin indirectly regulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal function. Endocrinology. 2009;150:2805–2812. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Roa J, Herbison AE. Direct regulation of GnRH neuron excitability by arcuate nucleus POMC and NPY neuron neuropeptides in female mice. Endocrinology. 2012;153:5587–5599. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ross RA, Leon S, Madara JC, Schafer D, Fergani C, Maguire CA, Verstegen AMJ, Brengle E, Kong D, Herbison AE, Kaiser UB, Lowell BB, Navarro VM. PACAP neurons in the ventral premammillary nucleus regulate reproductive function in the female mouse. eLife. 2018;7:e35960. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruka KA, Burger LL, Moenter SM. Regulation of arcuate neurons coexpressing kisspeptin, neurokinin B, and dynorphin by modulators of neurokinin 3 and κ-opioid receptors in adult male mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154:2761–2771. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sáenz de Miera C, Feng J, Elias CF, Qi N. Remote neuronal activation coupled with automated blood sampling to induce and measure circulating luteinizing hormone in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2023;198:e65875. doi: 10.3791/65875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Scimonelli T, Celis ME. A central action of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone on serum levels of LH and prolactin in rats. The Journal of Endocrinology. 1990;124:127–132. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1240127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scott MM, Lachey JL, Sternson SM, Lee CE, Elias CF, Friedman JM, Elmquist JK. Leptin targets in the mouse brain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2009;514:518–532. doi: 10.1002/cne.22025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Shamas S, Khan SUH, Khan MY, Shabbir N, Zubair H, Shafqat S, Wahab F, Shahab M. Fasting induced kisspeptin signaling suppression is regulated by glutamate mediated cues in adult male rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) Neuropeptides. 2015;52:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Steyn FJ, Wan Y, Clarkson J, Veldhuis JD, Herbison AE, Chen C. Development of a methodology for and assessment of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in juvenile and adult male mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4939–4945. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tong Q, Ye C, McCrimmon RJ, Dhillon H, Choi B, Kramer MD, Yu J, Yang Z, Christiansen LM, Lee CE, Choi CS, Zigman JM, Shulman GI, Sherwin RS, Elmquist JK, Lowell BB. Synaptic glutamate release by ventromedial hypothalamic neurons is part of the neurocircuitry that prevents hypoglycemia. Cell Metabolism. 2007;5:383–393. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. True C, Kirigiti MA, Kievit P, Grove KL, Smith MS. Leptin is not the critical signal for kisspeptin or luteinising hormone restoration during exit from negative energy balance. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2011;23:1099–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02144.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Uenoyama Y, Tsukamura H. KNDy neurones and GnRH/LH pulse generation: Current understanding and future aspects. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2023;35:e13285. doi: 10.1111/jne.13285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vanacker C, Defazio RA, Sykes CM, Moenter SM. A role for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-expressing cells in the regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) but not arcuate kisspeptin neuron output in male mice. eLife. 2021;10:e68205. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vong L, Ye C, Yang Z, Choi B, Chua S, Lowell BB. Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone to POMC neurons. Neuron. 2011;71:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang L, Vanacker C, Burger LL, Barnes T, Shah YM, Myers MG, Moenter SM. Genetic dissection of the different roles of hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons in regulating female reproduction. eLife. 2019;8:e43999. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang L, Guo W, Shen X, Yeo S, Long H, Wang Z, Lyu Q, Herbison AE, Kuang Y. Different dendritic domains of the GnRH neuron underlie the pulse and surge modes of GnRH secretion in female mice. eLife. 2020;9:e53945. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Welt CK, Chan JL, Bullen J, Murphy R, Smith P, DePaoli AM, Karalis A, Mantzoros CS. Recombinant human leptin in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351:987–997. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams KW, Sohn JW, Donato J, Lee CE, Zhao JJ, Elmquist JK, Elias CF. The acute effects of leptin require PI3K signaling in the hypothalamic ventral premammillary nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:13147–13156. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2602-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xu Y, Kim ER, Zhao R, Myers MG, Jr, Munzberg H, Tong Q. Glutamate release mediates leptin action on energy expenditure. Molecular Metabolism. 2013;2:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yeo SH, Herde MK, Herbison AE. Morphological assessment of GABA and glutamate inputs to GnRH neurons in intact female mice using expansion microscopy. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2021;33:1–14. doi: 10.1111/jne.13021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu WH, Walczewska A, Karanth S, McCann SM. Nitric oxide mediates leptin-induced luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) and LHRH and leptin-induced LH release from the pituitary gland. Endocrinology. 1997;138:5055–5058. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.11.5649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zuure WA, Roberts AL, Quennell JH, Anderson GM. Leptin signaling in GABA neurons, but not glutamate neurons, is required for reproductive function. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;33:17874–17883. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2278-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Wei Yan 1

This important study reports that glutamate signaling in LepRb PMv neurons is necessary for leptin-dependent fertility. The data supporting the conclusion is solid. This work will be of interest to researchers in the fields of both reproductive and metabolic biology.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

In previous work the Elias group has shown that leptin sensing PMv neurons make connections with the neuroendocrine reproductive axis and are involved in reproductive function/s. Sáenz de Miera et al. build on this body of work to investigate the sufficiency of leptin sensing PMv neurons to evoke the release of luteinizing hormone. The team further investigates how glutamate signaling from leptin-sensing neurons can influence pubertal timing in females, along with mature estrous cycles. Genetic ablation of Slc17a6 (Vglut2) from LepRb-expressing cells resulted in a delay of the first estrus cycle post pubertal transition, along with a significantly lengthened estrous cycle in mature females. However, this deficit did not lengthen the latency to birth of the first litter in experimental dams. Restoration of leptin signaling in LepRb PMv neurons that was previously shown to induce puberty and instate reproductive function in LepRb knock-out female mice (Mahany et al., 2018). Here, Sáenz de Miera et al. use a combined genetic and viral strategy to demonstrate that glutamate signaling in LepRb PMv neurons is required for sexual maturation in LepRb knock-out female mice.

Strengths:

Most of the experiments performed in this manuscript are well justified and rigorously tested. The genetic method to simultaneously remove glutamate signaling and restore the leptin receptor in LepRb PMv neurons was well executed and showed that glutamate signaling in LepRb PMv neurons is necessary for leptin-dependent fertility.

Weaknesses:

Analysis of experimentally induced luteinizing hormone release could be confounded by spontaneous pulses of luteinizing hormone that are independent of LepRb PMv neurons.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This is a very well-written manuscript by Saenz de Meira and colleagues on a careful study reporting on the key role of glutamate transporter vGlut2 expression in the neurons of the ventral perimammillary nucleus (PMv) of the hypothalamus expressing the leptin receptor LepRb in energy homeostasis, puberty, and estrous cyclicity. The authors first show using cre-dependent chemogenetic viral tools that the selective activation of the PMv LepRb induces luteinizing hormone (LH) release. Then the authors demonstrate that the selective invalidation of vGlut2 in LepRb-expressing cells in the all body induces obesity and mild alteration of sexual maturation in both sexes and blunted estrous cyclicity in females. Finally, the authors knock out vGlut2 in PMv neurons in which they reintroduce LepRb expression in an otherwise LepRb-null background using an AAV Cre approach. This latter very elegant experiment shows that while the sole re-expression of LepRb in PMv neurons in LepRb-null mice was shown before to restore puberty onset, deleting vGlut2 in LepRb-expressing PMv neurons blunts this effect.

Strengths:

The authors employ state-of-the-art methods and their conclusions are robustly supported by the results.

Weaknesses:

None identified. Only minor comments have been formulated.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The authors examined the effects of glutamate release from PMv LepR neurons in the regulation of puberty and reproduction in female mice.

Strengths:

Multiple genetic mouse models were utilized to either manipulate PMv LepR neuron activities or to delete glutamate vesicle transporters from LepR neurons. The authors have been quite rigorous in validating these models and exploring potential contaminations. Most of the data presented are solid and convincing and support the conclusion.

Comments on revised version:

The authors have addressed most of my comments.

eLife. 2024 Jul 15;13:RP93204. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93204.3.sa4

Author response

Cristina Sáenz de Miera 1, Nicole Bellefontaine 2, Susan J Allen 3, Martin G Myers 4, Carol F Elias 5

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

I have one major concern regarding this draft of the manuscript:

(1) In the manuscript (lines 130-31) it is stated that "About 55% (8/15) of mice with unilateral AAV-hM3Dq centered in the PMv showed an increase in LH release above 0.5ng/ml within 10-20 min following the CNO injection" However, data at time zero are not shown for 4 of the 8 "LH peak" animals. The missing data at time zero seems problematic for the analysis of the CNO-stimulated cohort. As mentioned in the manuscript, the area under the curve was calculated between the range of -10 to 20min post-injection. Because diestrus animals have spontaneous LH pulses, it is highly possible that an LH pulse is initiated in the10 minutes prior to drug delivery, as seen in the AAV-mCherry group in 1D, and similarly in 2C. Given the current form of analysis, it seems possible that a spontaneous LH pulse initiated anywhere up to 10 minutes prior to drug delivery could conceivably count as an experimentally induced "LH peak". Can you address this concern?

We understand the reviewer’s concern about the spontaneous LH pulses. This is the reason we have been very strict on our analysis and have taken multiple approaches to analyze these data. In our hM3Dq group 55% of the animals responded to CNO with an increase in LH, while 0 responded in the negative control group. But also, in the clozapine group, where no time 0 points were missing, 100% of the animals with hM3Dq showed an LH increase after the injection while only 28% (2/7) showed the increase in the negative control group. Rigorously, the DREADDs approach doubled the chances of LH increase. Note that the spontaneous LH peaks observed in negative controls or during baseline show a very sharp increase and decrease at the next time point, while the 4 “PMv hits” without time 0 and increase in LH in the CNO-hM3Dq group showed a sustained rise after the 10 min or prolonged high LH levels (above 1ng/ml) even 30 min after the injection. But, ultimately, the FOS levels in the PMv of CNO-hM3Dq group with increase in LH are significantly higher than in any other group and the number of FOS neurons are highly correlated to LH levels. Another important aspect that should not be dismissed is that in this experimental design, we used unilateral injection in animals that are in a fed state, therefore the leptin role in rising LH levels is probably dampened.

We have added a statement to clarify this issue.

The following are minor concerns:

a) Figure 4 a-d, it is clear that Vglut2 is absent in the VMH, but it seems more relevant to show this expression pattern in the PMv.

We chose the VMH because it has a very dense collection of either LeprCre;VGlut2 or Vglut2 only cells and it illustrates very well the conditional Vglut2 deletion at small and high magnifications. In the PMv, however, the distribution of these cells is sparse. The reviewer is correct that for the current study, the PMv is more relevant and therefore, we have included images of the PMv showing a control and a LeprCre-Vglut2floxed animal in higher magnification.

b) Methods section, targeting PMv: please check the injection coordinate: "dura-mater [dorsoventral -0.54]"

Thank you for noticing this mistake, all coordinates for the injection have now been corrected (-5.4 mm, ±0.5 and -5.4mm)

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

This is a very well-written manuscript by Saenz de Meira and colleagues on a careful study reporting on the key role of glutamate transporter vGlut2 expression in the neurons of the ventral perimammillary nucleus (PMv) of the hypothalamus expressing the leptin receptor LepRb in energy homeostasis, puberty, and estrous cyclicity. The authors first show using cre-dependent chemogenetic viral tools that the selective activation of the PMv LepRb induces luteinizing hormone (LH) release. Then the authors demonstrate that the selective invalidation of vGlut2 in LepRb-expressing cells in the all body induces obesity and mild alteration of sexual maturation in both sexes and blunted estrous cyclicity in females. Finally, the authors knock out vGlut2 in PMv neurons in which they reintroduce LepRb expression in an otherwise LepRb-null background using an AAV Cre approach. This latter very elegant experiment shows that while the sole re-expression of LepRb in PMv neurons in LepRb-null mice was shown before to restore puberty onset, deleting vGlut2 in LepRb-expressing PMv neurons blunts this effect.

My specific comments are as follows. Please note that none of them require additional experiments and that they can be answered by amending the text.

(1) Please provide information on the serotypes and promoters of the AAVs used in the study to enhance reproducibility.

Thank you, serotypes and promoters have been added for all AAVs.

(2) Please reformulate lines 220-221. Indeed, this reviewer does not agree with the fact that balanopreputial separation (BPS) is a sign of puberty completion. BPS is merely a sign of the advancement of sexual maturation, akin to vaginal opening in females. In certain mouse strains, BPS coincides with mini puberty rather than puberty. The definitive sign of puberty completion involves the presence of spermatozoa in the vas deferens (equivalent to the first ovulation/first estrus in females).

Thank you for this remark, this statement has now been modified.

(3) The authors convincingly show that the potential contamination of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH) with the AAV injections targeted to the PMv should not account for the DREADD-mediated activation of LH release. However, do the authors believe that DREADD activation of LepRb-expressing PMv neurons, inducing cFOS expression in these neurons, could also activate ARH kisspeptin neurons (which do not express LepRb) via transsynaptic action? Alternatively, do they posit direct activation of GnRH cell bodies in the preoptic region or GnRH axon/dendrites in the ARH/median eminence region?

Thank you for this comment. We don’t have enough evidence from this DREADDs experiment to make a strong prediction on the downstream pathways. However, as discussed, from the DREADDs khrGFP females, we observed very few kisspeptin cells expressing cFOS, reducing the evidence for a PMv to ARH kisspeptin action in this case. With the evidence from our LepR-Cre;Vglut2flox animals that showed no alterations in kiss1 gene expression but a strong decrease in GnRH release, we hypothesize that this acute activation of LH is mediated by direct inputs from PMv to GnRH neurons, while acknowledging the possible existence of alternative pathways. These arguments have been added to the discussion.

(4) This reviewer finds it intriguing that glutamatergic signaling is required for LepRb re-expression in the PMv to restore fertility. Given that the authors and others have shown that PMv neurons heavily express NOS1, the activity of which is known to heavily rely on glutamatergic NMDAR activation, the authors may want to contextualize their results in light of the recent study showing that NOS1 is found to be a new causative gene in people with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Thank you for the advice, we have added a paragraph discussing the possible involvement of nNos from PMv neurons in the discussion.

(5) Does the absence of vGlut2 have any impact on the obesity phenotype in mice where LepRb is selectively re-expressed in the PMv?

We have followed the weight of these animals after the AAV injections. However, due to the difficulty of generating dual homozygous (LepRnull homozygous are infertile) and producing adequate stereotaxic injections with minimum contamination of adjacent nuclei, the groups could not be run all together and thus, we refrained from performing comparative analysis of energy balance. Analysis of body weight in LepRnull mice with reactivation of LepR in PMv neurons have been published before (Donato et al., 2011 using the Flp/Frt model and Mahany et al., 2018 using the Cre/loxP system). No difference in body weight was observed in both studies. Below is the progression of body weight in mice with reactivation of LepR and deletion of Vglut2 in PMv neurons. We added a comment on this regard.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):

The authors examined the effects of glutamate release from PMv LepR neurons in the regulation of puberty and reproduction in female mice. Multiple genetic mouse models were utilized to either manipulate PMv LepR neuron activities, or to delete glutamate vesicle transporters from LepR neurons. The authors have been quite rigorous in validating these models and exploring potential contaminations. Most of the data presented are solid and convincing, and support the conclusion. This reviewer has the following suggestions for the authors to further improve this work and the manuscript.

(1) The DREADD study had some issues. For example, "2 out of 7 control mice with no AAV showed an increase in LH...", indicating that LH increase may just happen randomly. More importantly, 45% of PMv-hit mice did not show LH response to CNO, making it hard to interpret the positive LH responses from the other 55% PMv-hit mice undergoing the same treatment. Overall, there are just too many variabilities in these DREADD data for anyone to come up with a clean and convincing conclusion. This reviewer suggests repeating these experiments or removing the DREADD data altogether. After all, the rest of the results are much more convincing and stand alone to support the role of glutamate release from these PMv LepR neurons.

We appreciate the reviewer’s concern. Indeed, LH shows spontaneous pulsatility which is one of the biggest challenges in our field. We have answered this concern for Reviewer 1 above and modified the text accordingly. We decided to keep the data in the publication because we believe that this is very important evidence supporting our observations since this is the only experiment that approaches the role of the PMv in a free-moving, ad libitum fed mouse model that is not deficient for leptin signaling or glutamatergic neurotransmission. Altogether this paper strongly supports a role for glutamate signaling on leptin’s action in reproductive function. Evidence for this role were dismissive or contentious until now.

(2) The mCherry signals in Figure 3 are of low quality and do not look like cell bodies.

We have now equally increased the contrast and brightness in all higher magnification images of mCherry neurons (Fig 3F, G, I and J) to improve their visibility. The lower magnification images are high quality images of areas with high density of mCherry positive neurons. Thick section (30µm) at low magnification compromises the focus at different Z-axis levels. We feel that images 3E and 3H are important to define the location of cells in the arcuate nucleus. Colocalization and mCherry expression are clear in high magnification images.

(3) The validation of Vglut2 deletion in LepR neurons (Fig. 4A-D) is very nice and convincing, but the images are from the VMH region. Why not show the PMv region?

As mentioned to Reviewer 1, we chose the VMH because it has a very dense collection of either LeprCre;VGlut2 or Vglut2 only cells and it illustrates very well the Vglut2 deletion at small and high magnifications. In the PMv, however, the distribution of these cells is sparce. The reviewer is correct that for the current study, the PMv is more relevant and therefore, we have included images of the PMv showing a control and a LeprCre-Vglut2floxed animal in higher magnification.

(4) Figures 4-5 used LepR-Cre as controls, while Figure 6 used Vglut2flox as controls. Why? Also, how did the authors set up the breedings to generate "littermates" in each of these studies?

We used the LepR-Cre as controls for our experiments since we need Cre homozygous for proper Cre expression and we had the LepR-Cre homozygous colony from the DREADDs experiment. Also, these mice had previously been thoroughly evaluated and no metabolic and/or reproductive disruption were noticed (please, see lines 213-214 of the original submission). However, our LepR-Cre colony had to be drastically reduced during COVID and suffered from unexpected Δ recombination leading to loss of Vglut2 homozygotes. To overcome these issues, we used VGlut2-floxed controls for the gene expression and GnRH immunoreactivity experiments. These mice had previously been used as controls for metabolic experiments with the LepCre-Vglut2fl genotype (Xu et al., 2013 Mol Metab), showing no deficiencies in the metabolic phenotype.

As described in the methods section (lines 464-466 of the original preprint), to inactivate glutamate in leptin responsive cells, LepRb-Cre mice were crossed with mice carrying loxP-modified Vglut2 alleles. Our experimental mice were homozygous for the LepRb-Cre allele (LepRb_cre/cre_) and homozygous for the Vglut2-loxP allele (Vglut2_fl/fl_). Our controls consisted of mice homozygous for the Cre allele (LepRb_cre/cre_;Vglut2_+/+, named LepRb-Cre) or homozygous for the Vglut2-loxP allele (LepRb+/+;Vglut2_fl/fl, named Vglut2_flox_). Both experimental (LepRb_cre/cre_;Vglut2_fl/fl_, named LepRbΔVglut2) and control mice were derived from the same litters with parents homozygous for one of the genes and heterozygous for the other gene (LepRb_cre/cre_;Vglut2_fl/+or LepRb_cre/+;Vglut2_fl/fl_). Mice were genotyped at weaning (21 days) and again at the end of the experiments.

(5) The labeling of Figures 5E-F is missing, making it hard to read.

We have confirmed that Figure 5E and F were mentioned in the figure legends and in the results text. To improve the analysis of the figure we have added the Y axis titles to Figure 5 C,D, E and F, previously only shown in Fig 5A and B.

(6) The last experiment was very nice confirming the role of glutamate release from PMv LepR neurons. However, the key phenotypes (puberty development, pregnancy) were not graphed and only stated in the text.

Thank you for your comment. Since the key result is that none the LeprLoxTb;Vglut2flox animals showed vaginal opening or pregnancy, we don’t feel the need to graph this. All the details of the reproductive and metabolic phenotyping of the Lepr-loxTB with re-expression of LepR in the PMV were described in Mahany et al., 2018.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 4—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 4.
    Figure 5—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 5.
    Figure 6—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 6.
    Figure 7—source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figure 7.
    MDAR checklist
    Source data 1. All data measured and analyzed for Figures 13.
    elife-93204-data1.xlsx (13.8KB, xlsx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1–7.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES