Skip to main content
Journal of Food Allergy logoLink to Journal of Food Allergy
. 2020 Sep 1;2(1):17–21. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2020.2.200020

Common food allergens and cross-reactivity

Olivia L Francis 1, Kathleen Y Wang 1, Edwin H Kim 2, Timothy P Moran 1,
PMCID: PMC11250430  PMID: 39022146

Abstract

The most clinically relevant food allergens are cow's milk, hen's egg, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, soy, fish, shellfish, and seeds. Heat-stable food allergens have molecular characteristics that enhance protein stability and gastrointestinal absorption and thus are more likely to cause systemic reactions on ingestion. In contrast, heat-labile food allergens lack these characteristics and do not typically elicit reactions if sufficiently altered by heat or acid. Immunologic cross-sensitization between food allergens is more common than clinical cross-reactivity. However, certain groups of food allergens, such as tree nuts, fish, and shellfish, are associated with high rates of clinical cross-reactivity. Knowing the rates of clinical cross-reactivity is important when providing guidance to patients with food allergy and families on what foods can be safely added to the diet and what foods should be avoided.


Although geographic differences exist, the most clinically relevant food allergens are cow'smilk, hen's egg, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, soy, fish, shellfish, and seeds. These allergens are responsible for the majority of clinically significant immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated reactions to foods. Although allergies to fruits and vegetables are commonly reported in adults, most reactions are mild and associated with pollen-food allergy syndrome.1 Here we review the most common food allergens, examine rates of cross-sensitization and clinical cross-reactivity between different foods, and discuss implications for clinical management.

BACKGROUND

Food allergens can generally be divided into heat-stable and heat-labile allergens. Most heat-stable food allergens are glycoproteins with a molecular mass of 10–70 kDa.2 Heat-stable food allergens have molecular properties that confer conformational stability, such as disulfide bonds, protein glycation, and the ability to bind lipids. These properties can protect food allergens from degradation by heat, acid, and proteases, thereby enhancing uptake of intact protein in the gastrointestinal tract.2 In contrast, heat-labile allergens are highly sensitive to heat and acid. Sensitization to heat-labile allergens in plant-based foods is thought to result from exposure to homologous proteins in pollens, which leads to the development of pollen-food allergy syndrome.1,2 However, some common food allergens, such as cow'smilk and hen's egg, also contain heat-labile allergens that are denatured during extensive heating.3 Table 1 contains a list of important food allergens and their clinical significance.

Table 1.

Important food allergens

Food Allergen Clinical Significance
Cow's milk Alpha-casein (Bos d 8) Bos d 8 is associated with reactivity to extensively heated milk and persistent allergy
Alpha-lactalbumin (Bos d 4)
Beta-lactoglobulin (Bos d 5)
Bovine serum albumin (Bos d 6)
Hen's egg Ovomucoid (Gal d 1) Gal d 1 is associated with reactivity to extensively heated egg and persistent allergy
Ovalbumin (Gal d 2) Gal d 5 is implicated with bird-egg syndrome
Ovotransferrin (Gal d 3)
Alpha-livetin (Gal d 5)
Peanut Ara h 1 Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6 have a higher risk for systemic reactions
Ara h 2 Ara h 2 may gain favor over whole peanut extract in diagnostic testing
Ara h 3
Ara h 6
Ara h 8 Ara h 8 is a Bet v 1 homologue
Ara h 9
Soy Gly m 3
Gly m 4 Gly m 4 is a Bet v 1 homologue but may still provoke severe reactions
Gly m 5
Gly m 6
Hazelnut Cor a 1 Cor a 1 is a Bet v 1 homologue
Cor a 8 Cor a 8, 9, 14 are associated with severe reactions
Cor a 9
Cor a 14
Wheat Omega-5-gliadin Omega-5-gliadin is implicated in wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis and severe reactions
Tri a 36 Tri a 36 associated with immunoglobulin E–mediated allergy
Shrimp Tropomyosin (Pen a 1) May cross-react with proteins in dust mite and cockroach

Structural homology between allergens can result in binding of cross-reactive IgE antibodies, which is referred to as cross-sensitization. Cross-sensitization to food allergens can cause positive allergen specificIgE test results (e.g., skin-prick testing or in vitro IgE testing), which may or may not be of clinical significance. In contrast to cross-sensitization, clinical cross-reactivity refers to the elicitation of symptoms consistent with an IgE-mediated food allergy and is less common than cross-sensitization.4 It is thought that protein allergens must share at least a 70% amino acid sequence identity for clinical cross-reactivity to occur.2 Other factors that impact clinical cross-reactivity include patient characteristics and the dose and route of exposure.2,4 The rates of clinical cross-reactivity for common food allergens are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Rates of clinical cross-reactivity for common food allergens

Food Rates of Clinical Cross-Reactivity Considerations
Cow's milk Goat milk, >90% Goat, sheep, and buffalo milks should be avoided
Mare milk, 4% Donkey, camel, and mare milks are likely tolerated
Beef, ~10% Extensively heated or processed beef likely tolerated compared with uncooked and medium rare forms
Peanut Other legumes, 5% Results of limited studies indicate increased risk for lupin cross-reactivity
Tree nuts, 30–40%
Lupin, 4–29%
Lentil Chickpea, green pea, 81%
Tree nuts Pistachio-cashew, 34–100% >97% of patients with pistachio allergy react to cashew, but only 34–83% of patients with cashew allergy will react to pistachio
Walnut-pecan, 75–100% >97% of patients with pecan allergy will react to walnut, but only 75–91% of patients with walnut allergy will react to pecan
Peanut or other tree nuts, 20–60%
Fish Other fish, 50% Canned fish is less allergenic
Shellfish Crustacean-mollusk, 10–20%
Mollusk-mollusk, 50%
Crustacean-crustacean, 50%
Wheat Rye, barley, 20% Rice, oat, and corn are more likely tolerated than rye and barley
Rice, oats, corn, <5%
Fruits Peach and other Rosaceae fruits (apple, cherry, plum, pear, apricot, almond, apricot), 50% Sensitization to peach associated with both systemic reactions and pollen-food allergy syndrome
Melons (watermelon, cantaloupe, honeydew) and kiwi, avocado, peach and banana; 90% 30–50% of patients with latex allergy react to certain fruits or vegetables (e.g. avocado, banana, kiwi, peach, potato, tomato, bell pepper), but only 10% of patients with primary allergy to these foods react to latex
Beef Cow's milk, 90%

COW'S MILK

Cow's milk allergy is one of the most common food allergies and affects up to 2% of children and adults in the United States. The major allergens in cow's milk include caseins (;80% of all milk protein) and the whey proteins alpha-lactalbumin, beta-lactoglobulin, and bovine serum albumin.2 Approximately 75% of children with milk allergy tolerate extensively heated milk in baked products.3 Caseins tend to be more heat resistant; as such, high casein-specific IgE is associated with reactivity to baked milk.3 There is extensive clinical cross-reactivity between the ruminant mammal milks (goat, sheep, buffalo), and results of studies indicate that >90% of children allergic to cow's milk react to goat's milk.4,5 In contrast, donkey, horse, and camel milk are likely to be tolerated by patients with cow's milk allergy.5 Although mammalian meats share some proteins with cow's milk, only ~10% of children with cow's milk allergy react to beef.6

HEN'S EGG

Hen's egg allergy is a common IgE-mediated allergy in childhood. Approximately 70% of children with hen's egg allergy are able to ingest extensively heated forms in baked goods.3 The major allergens are the egg-white proteins ovomucoid, ovalbumin, and ovotransferrin.2 Ovomucoid is resistant to heat, and, thus, high levels of ovomucoid specific IgE are associated with an increased likelihood of reactivity to baked egg.3 The yolk protein alpha-livetin has been implicated in rare clinical cross-reactivity between chicken egg, feathers, and poultry.2 Although cross-sensitization has been described among avian eggs (hen, duck, goose), clinical cross-reactivity is thought to be rare, and patients are not routinely advised to avoid other bird eggs.7

LEGUMES

Legumes belong to the Fabaceae family, with peanut, soy, chickpea, and lupin being most clinically relevant. Peanut allergy affects 1–2% of children and typically persists into adulthood. Peanut contains 32 proteins, of which at least 16 have been reported to bind peanut specificIgE.8 The major peanut allergens are seed storage proteins and include Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Arah 3. Arah 6is another seed storage protein with homology to Ara h 2. Sensitization to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 is highly predictive of clinical reactivity and is associated with more severe allergic reactions.9 Ara h 8 is a pathogen-related 10 family protein and homologous to the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1; as such, sensitization to Ara h 8 is typically associated with tolerance or pollen-food allergy syndrome.1,10

Soy allergy primarily affects infants and children, with most cases resolving before adulthood. Similar to peanut, seed storage proteins (Gly m 5 and Gly m 6) seem to be the most clinically significant allergens. Gly m 2 and Gly m 3 are birch pollen homologues and can be associated with pollen-food allergy syndrome.2 Cross-sensitization between peanut and soy is common but clinical cross-reactivity is <5%.2,4 Some studies show that up to 80% of subjects with peanut allergy are sensitized to lupin, a legume commonly consumed in Mediterranean countries, but estimated rates of clinical reactivity range from 4 to 29%.11 Less is known with regard to clinical cross-reactivity for other legumes, although one study found that ~80% of patients with lentil allergy react to chickpea, green pea, or both.5 There are also reports of peanut clinical cross-reactivity with fenugreek, a legume frequently used as a spice in Asian and Mediterranean cooking.12

TREE NUTS AND SEEDS

Tree nut allergy affects up to 1% of the population and is usually life-long. The most common tree nut allergens in the United States are walnut and cashew, whereas hazelnut is more common in Europe.13 Similar to legumes, seed storage or lipid transfer proteins are typically responsible for systemic reactions, whereas labile birch pollen analogues may produce symptoms of pollen-food allergy syndrome.2 For example, sensitization to the hazelnut allergens Cor a 9 and Cor a 14 is associated with more severe symptoms.13,14 Sensitization to Cor a 8 is also associated with severe symptoms in Mediterranean populations.13 In contrast, sensitization to Cor a 1, a Bet v 1 homolog, is associated with pollen-food allergy syndrome.13

Results of studies demonstrated high rates of cross-sensitization among tree nuts and peanuts due to shared homologous proteins, but rates of clinical cross-reactivity are less clear. Closely related tree nuts, such as cashew and pistachio or walnut and pecan, have high rates of cross-sensitization (>90%) but variable rates of clinical cross-reactivity.1517 Recently, a multicenter European study, the Pronuts study,15 reported that 97% of children with pistachio allergy were allergic to cashew, whereas only 83% of children allergic to cashew reacted to pistachio, as determined by food challenge. In contrast, another European study found that only 34% of individuals sensitized to cashew had clinically significant pistachio allergy.16 With regard to clinical cross-reactivity between walnut and pecan, results of studies showed that 97–100% of subjects with pecan allergy were allergic to walnut but only 75–91% of children with walnut allergy reacted to pecan.15,17 Clinical cross-reactivity among other tree nuts, as well as between peanut and any tree nut, has been estimated to range between 20 and 60%.2,4,13

Sesame and mustard seed are the most common seed allergies reported, although rates vary significantly depending on geographic location. Cross-sensitization between different seeds as well as between seeds, peanuts, and tree nuts has been reported but data on clinical cross-reactivity are limited.18 The Pronuts study15 found that the food challenge–proven rate of coexistent sesame, peanut, and/or tree nut allergy was ~60%.

FISH AND SHELLFISH

Fish and shellfish allergies are estimated to affect ~0.9% and 2.9% of the United States population, respectively, and are more common in adults than in children. Fish refers to finned fish such as cod, salmon, and tuna. In patients allergic to one fish, ~50% are cross-reactive to another or multiple types of fish.4 Parvalbumin is the primary allergen in finned fish responsible for clinical cross-reactivity, although patients reactive to a single fish may be sensitized to other proteins.2 Some patients are able to tolerate canned or highly heated forms, which also suggests sensitization to less-stable proteins. Importantly, some fish allergens may be altered during creation of standardized extracts for testing and thus prick-to-prick skin testing to fresh fish should be considered in the appropriate clinical context.5

Shellfish includes crustaceans (crab, lobster, shrimp) and mollusks (squid, snail, and bivalves [e.g., clam, mussel, scallop, oyster]). Tropomysins are the major allergens in shrimp and possibly other shellfish.2 Similar to fish, clinical cross-reactivity is common among shellfish because ~50% of patients with either crustacean or mollusk allergy will react to other animals within the same category.2,4 Studies are limited with regard to rates of clinical cross-reactivity between crustaceans and mollusks, but 10–20% of patients with either mollusk or crustacean allergy are estimated to be allergic to a food in the other category.5 Because clinical cross-reactivity between fish and shellfish is low, patients with fish allergy need not avoid shellfish and vice versa, although they should be vigilant for possible cross-contamination. Tropomysins are found in other invertebrates, such as dust mites and cockroaches, and cross-sensitization between these allergens and shellfish has been reported.19 Although a common misconception, there is no cross-reactivity between seafood and radiocontrast material.

GRAINS

IgE-mediated reactions to cereal grains, including wheat, barley, and rye, have been described. Major allergens in wheat include alpha-amylase inhibitor (associated with baker's asthma), lipid transfer proteins, and gliadins.2 Sensitization to omega-5-gliadin (Tri a 19) is predictive of severe reactions to wheat in children and is also associated with wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Cross-sensitization among grains is common, but clinical cross-reactivity to two or more grains is unusual except for wheat, barley, and rye.5 In one study of subjects with wheat allergy, 55% reacted to barley but all tolerated rice and corn.20 There is a high degree of homology between grain allergens and grass pollens, which is likely responsible for most cases of clinically insignificant sensitization to wheat and other grains.

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

IgE-mediated reactions to fruits and vegetables are the most commonly reported food allergies in adults. Most patients are sensitized to heat-labile pathogen-related proteins with homology to pollen allergens. These patients generally develop symptoms of pollenfood allergy syndrome on ingestion of fresh fruits or vegetables to which they are sensitized, whereas cooked forms of the culprit foods are usually tolerated.1 Some patients, particularly those with peach allergy, are sensitized to stable lipid transfer proteins and may develop systemic reactions on ingestion of the culprit food.21 There are also certain groups of fruits associated with high rates of clinical cross-reactivity. For example, ~50% of patients with peach allergy will react to other Rosaceae fruits (apple, cherry, plum, pear, apricot, almond). In addition, ~90% of patients with allergies to melons (watermelon, cantaloupe, honeydew) will react to kiwi, avocado, peach, and banana.4

Similar to pollen-food allergy syndrome, exposure to natural rubber latex can sensitize some individuals to fruits and vegetables, such as avocado, banana, kiwi, chestnut, peach, potato, tomato, and bell pepper. Roughly 30–50% of patients with latex allergy will exhibit clinical cross-reactivity to those foods. In contrast, only ~10% of patients with allergies to avocado, kiwi, or banana will have a concurrent latex allergy.22

MAMMALIAN MEATS

Mammalian meat allergies are generally rare, with beef allergy being the most common. The major protein allergens in mammalian meat are serum albumins and immunoglobulins.23 Cross-sensitization has been described between the meats of different mammalian species, but patterns of clinical cross-reactivity have not been well studied. More than 90% of children with beef allergy are reactive to cow's milk, with sensitization to bovine serum albumin being the primary predictor of reactivity.5 Clinical cross-reactivity between mammalian meat and animal epithelia due to homologous albumins can also occur, as has been described in patients with “pork-cat” syndrome.23 Finally, the carbohydrate antigen galactose alpha-1,3,-galactose that is present in all nonprimate mammalian meats has been increasingly identified as responsible for delayed anaphylaxis after consumption of red meat in the southeastern United States.24

CLINICAL PEARLS

  • Patients allergic to cow's milk are >90% likely to cross-react to goat and sheep milk, and ~10% likely to react to beef.

  • Clinical cross-reactivity between peanuts and tree nuts is common; patients allergic to one or more of these foods should be tested for cross-sensitization to the other foods if not already tolerating them in their diet.

  • Patients with peanut allergy do not typically need to avoid other legumes, although caution should be exercised if lupin is introduced.

  • Patients with shellfish allergy and fish allergy should generally avoid other foods within the same category; however, patients with shellfish allergy do not need to avoid fish and vice versa.

  • Patients with wheat allergy may react to rye or barley but are likely to tolerate oats, rice, and/or corn.

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare pertaining to this article

Funded by Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Varshney P, Pongracic J.. Clinical manifestations of IgE-mediated food allergy. J Food Allergy. 2020; 2:22–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Burks AW, Sampson HA.. Reactions to Foods. In: Middleton's Allergy Principles and Practice 8th edition. Editors: Adkinson N. Franklin Jr, et al. Publisher: Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. pages 1310–1339. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leonard SA, Caubet J-C, Kim JSet al. Baked milk- and egg-containing diet in the management of milk and egg allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3:13–23; quiz 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sicherer SH. Clinical implications of cross-reactive food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108:881–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kazatsky AM, Wood RA.. Classification of food allergens and cross-reactivity. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016; 16:22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Werfel SJ, Cooke SK, Sampson HA.. Clinical reactivity to beef in children allergic to cow's milk. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997; 99:293–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Langeland T. A clinical and immunological study of allergy to hen's egg white. VI. Occurrence of proteins cross-reacting with allergens in hen's egg white as studied in egg white from turkey, duck, goose, seagull, and in hen egg yolk, and hen and chicken sera and flesh. Allergy. 1983; 38:399–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palladino C, Breiteneder H.. Peanut allergens. Mol Immunol. 2018; 100:58–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Erp FC, Knol EF, Pontoppidan Bet al. The IgE and basophil responses to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are good predictors of peanut allergy in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; 139:358–360.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asarnoj A, Nilsson C, Lidholm Jet al. Peanut component Ara h 8 sensitization and tolerance to peanut. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130:468–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bingemann TA, Santos CB, Russell AFet al. Lupin: an emerging food allergen in the United States. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019; 122:8–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Che CT, Douglas L, Liem J.. Case reports of peanut-fenugreek and cashew-sumac cross-reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5:510–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weinberger T, Sicherer S.. Current perspectives on tree nut allergy: a review. J Asthma Allergy. 2018; 11:41–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Santos AF, Brough HA.. Making the most of in vitro tests to diagnose food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5:237–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brough HA, Caubet J-C, Mazon Aet al. Defining challenge-proven coexistent nut and sesame seed allergy: a prospective multicenter European study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 145:1231–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van der Valk JPM, El Bouche R, Gerth van Wijk Ret al. Low percentage of clinically relevant pistachio nut and mango cosensitisation in cashew nut sensitised children. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017; 7:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andorf S, Borres MP, Block Wet al. Association of clinical reactivity with sensitization to allergen components in multifood-allergic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5:1325–1334.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel A, Bahna SL.. Hypersensitivities to sesame and other common edible seeds. Allergy. 2016; 71:1405–1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pascal M, Grishina G, Yang ACet al. Molecular diagnosis of shrimp allergy: efficiency of several allergens to predict clinical reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3:521–529.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pourpak Z, Mesdaghi M, Mansouri Met al. Which cereal is a suitable substitute for wheat in children with wheat allergy? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005; 16:262–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Asero R, Pravettoni V.. Anaphylaxis to plant-foods and pollen allergens in patients with lipid transfer protein syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 13:379–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blanco C. Latex-fruit syndrome. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003; 3:47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilson JM, Platts-Mills TA.. Meat allergy and allergens. Mol Immunol. 2018; 100:107–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nguyen M, Heath J.. Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose syndrome. J Food Allergy. 2020; 2:108–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Allergy are provided here courtesy of OceanSide Publications

RESOURCES