Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2024 Jul 2;11(7):ofae344. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae344

Low Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Resistance-Associated Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Lineages From Botswana

Wonderful T Choga 1,2, Ontlametse T Bareng 3,4, Natasha O Moraka 5,6, Dorcas Maruapula 7, Irene Gobe 8, Nokuthula S Ndlovu 9,10, Boitumelo J L Zuze 11, Patience C Motshosi 12, Kedumetse B Seru 13, Teko Matsuru 14, Matshwenyego Boitswarelo 15, Mogomotsi Matshaba 16,17, Tendani Gaolathe 18,19, Mosepele Mosepele 20,21, Joseph Makhema 22,23, Trevor J M Tamura 24, Jonathan Z Li 25,a, Roger Shapiro 26,27,a, Shahin Lockman 28,29,30,a, Simani Gaseitsiwe 31,32,a, Sikhulile Moyo 33,34,35,36,37,a,✉,c
PMCID: PMC11250512  PMID: 39015352

Abstract

Background

We evaluated naturally occurring nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NTV/r) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains from Botswana, a country with no NTV/r use to date, in order to recommend the usage of the agent for high-risk patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using 5254 complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences from Botswana (September 2020–September 2023). We evaluated the mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 3-Chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) relative to the highlighted list of RAMs granted Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization in 2023.

Results

The sequenced 5254 samples included Beta variants of concerns (VOCs; n = 323), Delta VOCs (n = 1314), and Omicron VOCs (n = 3354). Overall, 77.8% of the sequences exhibited at least 1 polymorphism within 76/306 amino acid positions in the nsp5 gene. NTV/rRAMs were identified in 34/5254 (0.65%; 95% CI, 0.43%–0.87%) and occurred at 5 distinct positions. Among the NTV/r RAMS detected, A191V was the most prevalent (24/34; 70.6%). Notably, T21I mutation had a prevalence of 20.6% (7/34) and coexisted with either K90R (n = 3) polymorphism in Beta sequences with RAMs or P132H (n = 3) polymorphism for Omicron sequences with RAMs. Other NTV/r RAMs detected included P108S, with a prevalence of 5.88% (2/34), and L50F, with a prevalence of 2.94% (1/34). NTV/r RAMs were significantly higher (P < .001) in Delta (24/35) compared with Beta (4/34) and Omicron (6/34) sequences.

Conclusions

The frequency of NTV/r RAMs in Botswana was low. Higher rates were observed in Delta VOCs compared to Omicron and Beta VOCs. As NTV/r use expands globally, continuous surveillance for drug-resistant variants is essential, given the RAMs identified in our study.

Keywords: Botswana, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, Paxlovid, resistance mutations, SARS-CoV-2


We characterised nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NTV/r) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in SARS-CoV-2 genomes from Botswana (2020-2023), a country with no NTV/r use. RAMs frequency (0.65%: 95%CI:0.43-0.87) was comparable to the global estimate (0.5%). We observed 10 deleterious Mpro-mutations that may impact NTV/r use.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the primary cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a global epidemic with substantial risks [1–4]. Antiviral therapy for SARS-CoV-2 such as nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NTV/r) has made COVID-19 more manageable, reducing deaths and hospitalization rates [5–10]. Even though NTV/r is a highly potent antiviral that has shown low rates of virological failure, the development of resistant-associated mutations (RAMs) poses a threat to its effectiveness [11]. As SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus, mutations of concern associated with resistance to antivirals may naturally develop in a treatment-naïve population due to errors introduced into the genome during replication.

During SARS-CoV-2 replication, the biggest polyprotein 1ab (PP1ab) is generated from ORF1ab for Coronaviridae [12]. The polyprotein undergoes cleavage by the viral proteases papain-like protease (PLpro or nsp3) and homodimeric cysteine 3-Chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro, also known as Mpro or nonstructural protein 5 [nsp5]) at multiple junctions to generate a series of nonstructural proteins (nsp1-16), which form the replicase machinery essential to the virus life cycle [13, 14].

NTV/r was approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December of 2021 as the first orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor for the treatment of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and deemed at a high risk of developing severe illness [7]. Development of mutations across 3CLpro active site residues directly impacts substrate adherence and drug resistance. The NTV/r resistance hotspots include the M165T, S144, H172F/Q/Y, M165T, E166N/V, Q189E/K, and Q192S/T/V mutants, which have been associated with reduced NTV inhibitory activity of SARS-CoV-2 replication or 3CLpro activity [15]. While NTV/r is unaffected by rapid SARS-CoV-2 spike evolution, the ongoing emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, some with mutations in ORF1a, highlights mutational adaptability, signals potential persistence of the pandemic, and raises concerns about the reduced efficacy of antiviral treatments due to drug-resistant variants. Hence, it remains crucial to assess the baseline RAM landscape for any candidate drugs to ascertain efficacy.

Several studies have evaluated the safety, effectiveness, and emergency resistance mutations of NTV/r in different settings and populations [7, 16–20]; however, there are limited data on Mpro resistance mutations in treatment-naïve populations.

Botswana reported 330 215 SARS-CoV-2 cases and 2800 deaths as of August 2023 [21]. Botswana has implemented the COVID-19 test and treatment national program, and NTV/r could be a treatment option for high-risk people who are infected with SARS-CoV-2. Such interventions within low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) are highly desirable as patients can be treated as outpatients without overburdening the health care system. Similarly, the country has successfully implemented a near real-time national SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance system covering all 9 COVID-19 zones in the country, offering a unique opportunity to assess potential NTV/r RAMs and escape mutations. Therefore, we sought to characterize the baseline RAM landscape of Mpro in all the SARS-CoV-2 sequences generated in Botswana. This first report provides insights into the use of NTV/r for treating COVID-19 patients in our setting. Botswana was equally affected by different SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants and had reported high cases of COVID-19; therefore, the study will provide insight on the possibility of NTV/r use in any setting with low or high numbers of SARS-CoV-2 cases, especially Sub-Saharan African countries and neighboring countries.

METHODS

Study Design, Sample Collection, and Selection

This was a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences previously generated during routine national diagnostic testing, surveillance, and sequencing in Botswana. For routine and clinical COVID-19 diagnosis, combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal (N/O) samples were collected. The N/O samples were routinely and randomly sampled per week between September 2020 and September 2023 from all regions of the 9 nationwide COVID-19 zones and sent to the nearest laboratory with COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method testing capacity. SARS-CoV-2 sequencing and analysis were conducted at Botswana Harvard HIV Reference Laboratory (BHHRL), which serves as the main sequencing hub for SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance in Botswana. The confirmed SARS-CoV-2 residual samples from individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 were randomly and routinely sampled weekly from all 9 COVID-19 zones in Botswana for genomic surveillance. Sample selection was often random; otherwise, convenient sampling was employed if the number of confirmed weekly cases was modest in each location. The selected samples did not necessarily represent the proportion of cases in each zone. In certain instances, such as outbreaks—for example, schools—we sequenced all the available samples. Preferably, all samples with a real-time cycle threshold value <35 (qCt ≤35) were selected. Throughout the sample collection period (September 2020–September 2023), Botswana had not incorporated SARS-CoV-2 antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) into its national guidelines. However, NTV/r was still being procured and not yet in use.

Library Preparation and Next Next-Generation Sequencing

Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics using the 2019-nCoV RNA (PCR-Fluorescence Probing) Assay (Sun Yat-sen University, Da An Gene Co., Ltd, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Before June 2021, sequences were prepared using the Native Barcoding Kit (EXP-NBD196) in conjunction with the ARTIC nCoV-2019 V3 sequencing protocol, which generated 400-bp tiled amplicons [22, 23]; after June 2021, we used midnight protocol to generate complete genomes based on 1200-bp tiled amplicons [24]. In each of the sequencing batches, a nontemplate control was included across all steps to check for any cross-contamination. Nanopore sequencing was performed using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK; MinION, Mk1B, Mk1C, and GridION). Depending on the period of sequencing, we used the latest available MinKNOW release version for demultiplexing and high-accuracy base-calling.

Next-Generation Sequence Analysis and SARS-CoV-2 Lineage Classification

The raw FASTQ sequence output files were processed into consensus FASTA files, followed by reference-based assembly using the ARTIC nCoV-2019 novel coronavirus bioinformatics protocol and Genome Detective [25, 26]. To assess the quality control reports, NextClade [27] was used, and the resulting consensus sequences were further manually imputed in AliView [28]. This was done to correct indels that may arise due to sequencing errors and cause ORF shifts. Any non-ATGC characters or STOP codons were replaced with a triplet of hyphens, including converting the partial indel to an indel (eg, TC- to —). Consensus FASTA files obtained were assessed for quality (eg, presence of private mutations, >80% coverage) and assigned to clades and lineages using the latest version of NextClade [27]. The final consensus edited sequences and associated metadata were deposited. All sequences that met the threshold were deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID; https://doi.org/10.55876/gis8.240523kh).

Genetic and Mutational Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

We analyzed genome sequences and patient metadata for 5254 isolates from Botswana. The 5254 sequences were from individual patients who were presumed NTV/r-naïve. All the sequences were aligned using NextClade and NC_045512.2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) reference annotations. Mpro nucleotide sequences (ORF1ab: 13 441–16 236) were extracted from the MSA using NextClade [27]. An ad hoc script was used to curate mutations occurring on the Mpro, stratified by lineages. The mutation density index was calculated by dividing the prevalence of mutations by the total number of sequences for that lineage. Mutations were subsequently merged into their metadata (age, sex, sample location, lineage, and collection date). NTV/r RAMs were assessed a priori using published data including the highlighted list of mutations from the 2023 EUA and those described in the literature (Supplementary Table 1) [29–34].

Evaluating in Silico the Potential Impact of Emerging Mpro Polymorphisms

SNAP2 [35, 36], Phyre [37], and PolyPhen [38] were used to predict in silico the potential impact (deleterious or neutral) and nature of mutations located within the Mpro region of SARS-CoV-2. The algorithm calibration was performed as previously described [39, 40]. Subsequently, we validated the results by assessing the accuracy of predictions for known deleterious mutations reported in the literature. To characterize potentially new mutations of concern, our focus was on rare mutations (occurring in <10 per million sequences) that had not been previously reported. The Phyre2 [38] tool was used to reconstruct the 3D structures of the Mpro gene using protein homology modeling, and PyMOL 3 [41] was used for visual inspection and annotating deleterious positions.

Statistical Analysis

Characteristics of the individuals were described using proportions with 95% CIs and medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons of continuous variables between variants of concern (VOCs) with NTV/r RAMs. We reported categorical variables as counts and percentages and conducted comparisons using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The prevalence of mutations was estimated with 95% CIs using the binomial exact method for each group. The prevalence of RAMs was (i) estimated for overall sequences and (ii) stratified by VOCs. The prevalence of mutations among VOCs was compared using a comparison of proportions test. A data analysis was conducted using R statistical software, version 4.2.2 (R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and Stata 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Phylogenetic Analysis

Briefly, all sequences with NTV/r RAMs were stratified based on lineage assignment, and then codon alignments were constructed using NextAlign [27]. A maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was inferred from the resulting alignment in IQ-TREE 2 [42] using the General Time Reversible (GTR) model of nucleotide substitution with empirical base frequencies with gamma distributed over site-to-site variations in nucleotide substitution rates, as determined by jModelTest2 [43]. Statistical supports for nodes of the ML phylogeny were assessed using a bootstrap approach with 1000 replicates. The reliability of the observed clusters was established based on internal node bootstrap values exceeding 80%.

Patient Consent

This retrospective analysis was conducted as part of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance generated during routine diagnostic testing and sequencing, which was approved by the Health Research and Development Committee (Protocol #HRDC00945; HPDME 13/18/1), the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Office of Research Administration (Protocol #IRB21-1661), and the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (Protocol #2022P00421). This retrospective analysis was conducted as part of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance generated using residual samples from routine diagnostic testing and sequencing, which was approved by the Health Research and Development Committee (Protocol #HRDC00945; HPDME 13/18/1), the Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health Office of Research Administration (Protocol #IRB21-1661), and the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (Protocol #2022P00421). Waivers of consent were obtained from the institutional review boards. The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration's guiding principles and local institutional review board guidelines.

RESULTS

Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir RAMs

NTV/r RAMs were identified in 34 out of 5254 samples, giving an overall prevalence of 0.65% (95% CI, 0.43%–0.87%) (Table 1). None of the 34 individuals with NTV/r RAMs had received NTV/r (Figure 1A). The median age of individuals with NTV/r RAMs (IQR) was 30 (11–40) years, and the majority (52.9%) were female. There was no statistical difference between the median age of male and female individuals (P = .67), nor age distribution by lineage of individuals with NTV/r RAMs. We identified 4 naturally occurring NTV/r RAMs including T21I, L50F, P108S, and A191V. A191V was the most prevalent (24/34; 70.6%), followed by T21I (7/34; 20.6%). Notably, some strains with T21I also had K90R for the Beta (B.1.351) lineage strains (3/7; 42.9%), and P132H (4/7; 42.9%) for all sequences of the Omicron BE.7 lineage (Table 2).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Sequences and Metadata With RAMs Included in This Analysis

Total Sequences (n = 5254) Beta (β)
(n = 323; 6.2%)
Delta (Δ)
(n = 1314; 25%)
Omicron (o)
(n = 3354; 63.8%)
Other (B.1 & C.1.2)
(n = 263; 5.0%)
Among 4085 individuals with mutations
 Distribution of sequences with mutations n = 265 n = 390 n = 3287 n = 143
 Proportion (n = 4085; 77.8%), % 6.5 9.5 80.5 3.5
 Fraction of sequences with mutations per lineage (%) 265/323 (82.0) 390/1314 (29.7) 3287/3354 (98.0) 143/263 (54.4)
Demographics of individuals with NTV/r RAMs (n = 34)
 Age, median (IQR), y n = 4 n = 24 n = 6 -
 30 (11–40) y 21 (12.5–32.5) 30.5 (8.5–41) 34.5 (24–54) -
Sex, No. (%)
 Male (n = 16; 47.1%) 2 (50) 11 (45.8) 3 (50) -
 Female (n = 18; 52.9%) 5 (50) 13 (54.2) 3 (50) -
Year of sampling, No. (%) with NTV/r mutations (n = 34)
 2021 (n = 29; 85.3%) 4 24 1 -
 2022 (n = 5; 14.7%) - - 5 -
Location of sample collection with major polymorphisms (n = 34)
 Boteti (n = 2; 5.9%) 2 - - -
 Chobe (n = 2; 5.9%) 1 1 - -
 Greater Gaborone (n = 26; 55.9%) - 21 5 -
 Greater Palapye (n = 3; 8.8%) 1 2 - -
 Greater Phikwe (n = 1; 2.9%) - - 1 -

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; RAMs, resistance-associated mutations.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A, Flowchart showing the distribution of complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences (n = 5254) generated in the study. B, Distribution of major NTV/r RAMs in the ns5p gene. Abbreviations: NTV/r, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir; RAMs, resistance-associated mutations; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Table 2.

Thirty-four Individuals With NTV/r RAMs

GISAID Accession ID Sampling Date Sampling Location Age, y Sex VOC Pango Lineage Clade Mutations in MPRO
EPI_ISL_8608080 2021-12-28 Gaborone 24 M Omicron B.A.1.1 GRA P108S, P132H
EPI_ISL_2504107 2021-06-01 Serowe 11 M Beta B.1.351 GH T21I
EPI_ISL_15936262 2022-06-14 Selebi Phikwe 57 F Omicron BA.4 GRA P132H, A191V
EPI_ISL_2648206 2021-05-13 Orapa 37 M Beta B.1.351 GH T21I, K90R
EPI_ISL_2648215 2021-05-14 Orapa 28 F Beta B.1.351 GH T21I, K90R
EPI_ISL_16003679 2022-11-21 Lobatse 38 F Omicron BE.7 GRA T21I, P132H
EPI_ISL_16081968 2022-11-22 Lobatse 31 M Omicron BE.7 GRA T21I, P132H
EPI_ISL_2820316 2021-06-17 Kasane 36 F Delta AY.116 GK A191V, I213V, L227F
EPI_ISL_16553999 2022-11-24 Gaborone 11 M Omicron BE.7 GRA T21I, P132H
EPI_ISL_2820389 2021-06-19 Kasane 14 F Beta B.1.351 GH T21I, K90R
EPI_ISL_3948365 2021-08-12 Molepolole 49 F Delta AY.46 GK L50F
EPI_ISL_3948387 2021-08-16 Gaborone 42 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948446 2021-08-26 Molepolole 40 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948449 2021-08-16 Bokaa 34 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948396 2021-08-10 Gaborone 10 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948361 2021-08-12 Gaborone 32 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948351 2021-08-24 Gaborone 5 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948441 2021-08-24 Gaborone 15 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948288 2021-08-24 Gaborone 45 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948471 2021-08-23 Lobatse 47 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948285 2021-08-23 Lobatse 3 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_3948313 2021-08-26 Molepolole 2 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_4299812 2021-08-31 Kgagodi 29 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_4299801 2021-09-02 Serowe 25 M Delta AY.45 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_5501718 2021-09-07 Gaborone 22 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_5502038 2021-09-15 Gaborone 54 M Delta AY.116 GK A191V, I213V
EPI_ISL_5502181 2022-01-02 Gaborone 54 F Delta Omicron GRA P108S, P132H
EPI_ISL_5501790 2021-09-27 Gaborone 39 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_5502949 2021-10-11 Tshidilamolomo 13 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_6670243 2021-11-11 Lobatse 34 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_6640868 2021-11-04 Lobatse 7 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_6640899 2021-11-04 Lobatse 7 F Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_6640869 2021-10-27 Lobatse 7 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V
EPI_ISL_7120921 2021-11-20 Gaborone 48 M Delta AY.46 GK A191V

Abbreviations: Mpro, SARS-CoV-2 main protein; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; VOC, SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern.

Other NTV/r RAMs detected in single cases include L50F (1/34; 2.94%) of the Delta (AY.45) VOCs and P108S (2/34; 5.88%) of the Omicron (BA.1.1) VOCs (Table 2, Figure 1B). The RAMs we found confer low-level resistance based on fold reduction in susceptibility to NTV <3 based on the highlighted list of mutations from the 2023 EUA [34]. All the RAMs we report here occurred in SARS-CoV-2 VOCs that circulated in Botswana, including 1.0% (4/403) in the Beta VOCs and 2.2% (24/1107) in Delta VOCs, as opposed to 0.18% in the Omicron VOCs (6/3310). The majority of RAMs (21/34; 61.8%) were identified in Delta sublineage AY.46 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Frequency distribution of NTV/r RAMs stratified by SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Abbreviations: NTV/r, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir; RAMs, resistance-associated mutations; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Phylogenetic Relatedness of Sequences With Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir RAMs

Among the 6 cases with Omicron VOCs and NTV/r RAMs (Figure 2), 3 who were infected by Omicron BE.7 strains were epidemiologically linked, and a phylogenetic analysis based on ML method close clustering supported this idea, with a posterior probability >90%. This suggests a high likelihood of transmission-based RAMs (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree comparing all available complete and high-coverage Botswana sequences (n = 30). Samples from the clade containing BE.7, from the branch of Lobatse-Family (red), were sequenced as part of contact tracing.

Diversity of the Mpro Gene Among Sequences Isolated in Botswana

To assess NTV/r RAMs in Botswana, this analysis utilized a reference-based MSA data set encompassing 5254 complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences, totaling 1 427 411 amino acids (a.a), representing both contemporary and earlier circulating viral lineages. Overall, there were 4085 (77.8%) sequences with at least 1 a.a substitution in the Mpro gene (Supplementary Table 2). These contained 4169 a.a changes at 68 positions of Mpro (306 a.a). Based on these substitutions, the overall diversity index of the MSA was 0.29%. The diversity index was expressed as a total of 4169 a.a substitutions observed over all the 1 427 411 a.a in the MSA, excluding indels. Apart from lineage-defining mutations such as P132H that occurred in almost all the Omicron sequences, we report here that, overall, I213V (n = 335) was the most frequent mutation, followed by K90R (n = 293) (Figure 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A, Frequency line plot showing the distribution of mutations in the ns5p gene among the 5370 sequences generated in Botswana as of September 30, 2023 (Figure 4B). The network plot summarizes the mutations counts (>1). Each node represents the mutation, and the ones that coexist in the sequences are connected. Bigger nodes indicate a high proportion of sequences and vice versa.

Of the 4085 Mpro sequences with at least 1 mutation, 1 exhibited 14 mutations, 2 sequences contained 3 mutations each, and 67 sequences had mutations in pairs. The majority, comprising 4015 sequences, featured a single mutation each (Supplementary Table 2). Similarly, among the 70 sequences with at least 2 mutations in the Mpro gene, the majority included P132H (n = 44; for Omicron sequences), I213V (n = 10), and/or K90R (n = 9) (Figure 4B). The 68 positions with mutations in the Mpro gene were stratified according to their potential impact and thus were NTV/r RAMs (n = 5), putatively deleterious (n = 27), or polymorphisms (n = 36).

Evaluating the Potential Impact of Uncharacterized Polymorphisms in the Mpro Gene

At least 2 prediction tools detected 27 out of 63 mutations (42.9%) as putatively deleterious and, thus, likely to alter the molecular function of the protein (Table 3). Ten were predicted as putatively deleterious based on PolyPhen [38] and SNAP2 [35, 36], and predictions of 4 mutations (N95A, V157W, F181T, Y182) were rare (Figure 5A–E), each occurring with a prevalence of <0.000001 (1 in a million) in sequences from clinical cases worldwide from GISAID as of November 12, 2023 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Predicted effects of functionally characterized deleterious mutations of the ns5p region of SARS-CoV-2.

Mutation in
Mpro gene
SNAP2 PolyPhen (Deleterious effect)
Mutation sensitivity (score:1-8)
1=Low; 8=High
Global Frequency as of October 22, 2023
Score Expected Accuracy
C16S 64 80% 7** 68
L32F 11 59% 7** 42
V91D 72 85% 8*** 426
V91I 6 53% 5 441
N95A 55 75% 6* 2
G143D 93 95% 7** 146
V157W 56 75% 8*** 2
F159S 70 85% 8** 13
M162I 38 66% 8** 7,669
V171D 6 53% 5* 101
G174S 80 91% 4 14
D176S 27 63% 4 179
L177S 61 80% 5* 43
E178W 14 59% 4 46
F181T 63 80% 7** 6
Y182N 93 95% 7** 7
A234V 25 63% 6* 7,279
H246R 20 63% 7** 189
D263Y 7 53% 5 87
G278R 14 59% 5 691
R279C 9 53% 5 4,864
T280A 4 53% 3 540
G283D 90 95% 5 813

*deleterious effect ranked by Phyre2: *deleterious, **more deleterious, ***most deleterious

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

3D structure of ns5p the gene. A, 2duc (http://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb2duc/pdb), the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro); annotated to surface topology using PyMOL 3. A, The Mpro gene is a 306-a.a-long cysteine protease that hydrolyzes viral polyproteins to create functional proteins nsp4–nsp16 in virus replication, which is essential to the virus life cycle [13]. It has an estimated molecular weight of 33 796.64 Da, instability index 27.65, aliphatic index 82.12, and GRAVY score of −0.019 [53]. B, Annotated mutations in 2duc, the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro). The deleterious mutations have been highlighted using surface and topology and are color-coded in red. C, Annotated putative deleterious mutation N95A in the 2duc, the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro). D, Annotated putative deleterious mutation V157W in the 2duc, the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro). E, Annotated putative deleterious mutation F181T in the 2duc, the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro). F, Annotated putative deleterious mutation Y182N in the 2duc, the crystal structure of SARS coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro). Abbreviations: a.a, amino acid; NTV/r, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir; RAMs, resistance-associated mutations; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the baseline prevalence of mutations associated with NTV/r resistance in Botswana. Our results report a low prevalence (0.65%) of naturally occurring NTV/r RAMs among sequences reported in Botswana from all the epidemic waves. NTV/r RAMs were significantly higher (P < .001) in Delta (24/35) compared with Beta (4/34) and Omicron (6/34) sequences in Botswana. We did not report any mutations that were associated with high-level resistance toward NTV/r. Our analysis utilized a comprehensive data set that adequately represents all 9 COVID-19 zones (Supplementary b1) in Botswana across all 5 epidemic waves. During the time the samples were collected, NTV/r was not available in Botswana. This may have contributed to the very low prevalence of NTV/r RAMs in Botswana. Although modest, this prevalence is slightly higher compared with 0.5% reported globally and 0.16% reported by a Canadian cohort study [32, 33]. The global analysis of NTV/r RAMs by Ip and colleagues [33] utilized publicly available sequences from GISAID.

In the distribution of the prevalence of NTV/r resistance by continent, South America had the highest resistance (29 032 per million), followed by Africa (24 437 per million) and North America (4809 per million). However, country-specific estimates and patient characteristics were not provided, limiting the contextual interpretation of the results. Our study was population specific, and the NTV/r reference mutations list we used was recently updated.

Among the variants with RAMs, we observed that the majority occurred in the SARS-CoV-2 VOCs—Beta (November 2020 to March 2021), Delta (April to August 2021), and Omicron (November 2021 to date)—circulating in Botswana. Even though Omicron VOCs have predominated the current epi-wave (November 2021 to present) in Botswana and have become the dominant lineage worldwide, it was previously reported that NTV/r has been shown to work against Omicron and its subvariants [11]. Other studies have reported that NTV/r is safe and effective in treating symptomatic COVID-19, reducing the risk of progression to severe infection by 89% compared with placebo [7, 11]. Even though our results reveal that the occurrence of NTV/r resistance is very low in Omicron variants, we recommend that follow-up studies track NTV/r resistance after implementation of NTV/r within our setting. We observed higher rates of NTV/r RAMs among Delta sequences. Further studies are warranted to investigate this trend at the population and global levels.

The accumulation of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 has played a major influence on pathogenesis and clinical outcomes and shaped the COVID-19 pandemic [39, 40]. The most important concern about different SARS-CoV-2 variants is the risky changes that could worsen the severity of the disease and increase transmission [41] or reduce the effects of vaccines and antivirals [42]. Some studies have also indicated that immunocompromised individuals are at increased risk of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection [43–46], which can ultimately lead to the accumulation of potentially deleterious mutations identified in silico (eg, NTV/r RAMs) [44]. Even so, NTV/r resistance in cohorts including immunocompromised patients remains understudied. In a recent study by Duan and colleagues, the emergence of NTV/r resistance was associated with persistent infections and/or immune-suppressed individuals [45]. Apart from cases related to possible emergence of RAMs, we observed links between some cases. For instance, the 3 cases of BE.7 were sequences isolated from a single family through contact tracing (Figure 2). Consequently, we emphasize the urgent need for enhanced surveillance of circulating SAR-CoV-2 viral isolates, as strains with RAMs may be potential catalysts for the next pandemic.

In this study, we identified 4 RAMs in the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that confer resistance to the protease inhibitor NTV/r. Based on biochemical assays using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Mpro–containing mutations, the 4 SARS-CoV-2 Mpro substitutions led to <3-fold reduced nirmatrelvir activity (fold-change based on Ki values): 1.6 for T21I, 0.2 for L50F, 2.9 for P108S, and 0.8 for A191V, respectively. This suggests that they confer low-level or an unclear level of resistance to NTV/r [30]. A total of 7 individuals had T21I, which is also associated with decreased antiviral susceptibility [30]. Apart from this study, the preexistence of NTV/r RAMs—T21I, L89F, and L205V—has been reported in low frequencies [32, 33]. In this study, we did not observe any variations at T190, a residue that interacts with NTV/r, or P252 and T304, both of which have been shown to reduce NTV/r activity in vitro [11]. Mutation H41Q, which is a component of the catalytic dyad critical for the protease's function and is involved in drug binding, was observed in 1 sample and was found to cooccur with the polymorphism D48G [31]. We also did not find any mutation at E166, a key residue that interacts with nirmatrelvir, including polar contact with the pyrrolidone group and hydrogen bonds between the tert-butyl moiety of nirmatrelvir [8, 46]. E166 has also been associated with loss of viral fitness and high-level resistance to NTV/r [11, 30]. Similarly, S144E has been shown, in vitro, to confer the greatest reduction in the inhibition of nirmatrelvir on 3CLpro activity [11, 47]. We did not find any mutation changes at S144. In addition to the RAMs we’ve reported, we observed several other mutations that have been previously associated with reduced NTV/r activity but have been excluded in the updated EUA-2023 list [34]; for example, H172Q (n = 1), M49I (n = 1), and G15S/D (n = 6). Mutation M49I has been previously associated with a decrease in the activity of NTV/r without a significant loss of protease activity [30]. Notably, we observed 14—K90R, V157W, H172Q, F181T, Y182N, G143D, F159S, G170C, V171*, G174S, D176S, L177S, E178W, N180H—naturally occurring mutations in the Mpro sequence of an unvaccinated, presumed NTV/r-naïve, middle-aged female (47 years; EPI_ISL_1363757). Although we did not find any RAMs, we observed other variations at positions known to confer resistance such as H172. Instead of H172Q, H172Y + P252L in Mpro confers high-level resistance (Ki values = 180) [34].

Other polymorphisms such as P132H were observed predominantly among the Omicron Mpro, indicating that this mutation occurs naturally and is not driven by selection pressure from the use of NTV/r. The P132H mutation has been shown to be susceptible to covalent inhibitors such as NTV/r; thus it decreases thermal stability without compromising catalysis or small-molecule drug inhibition [48]. Also, K90R was also observed at high prevalence; however, these amino acid substitutions did not affect drug antiviral activity [49]. Thus, NTV/r is likely to retain its antiviral activity against the emerging Omicron subvariants. However, it is important to continue active surveillance and testing of new variants for drug resistance to enable early identification of drug-resistant strains. We have characterized some mutations using in silico analyses. In silico prediction models have been tested and validated using phenotypic studies in several SARS-CoV-2 mutations including NTV RAMs [26, 51] for resource-limited settings; these approaches provide a faster and more cost-effective way of providing clinically relevant findings. However, there are still limited data on the clinical utility of in silico prediction models for NTV/r RAMs; therefore, follow-up functional studies should be conducted to determine the resistance level conferred by these mutations.

We further assessed the overall diversity of the Mpro gene among sequences in Botswana. Overall, we observed low variability (diversity index <1%) across the different VOCs of sequences from Botswana. This corroborates a study that showed that the nonsynonymous variant rate for the protease is >10-fold lower than that for the viral polymerase [50]. A high degree of sequence and structural conservation has been reported in treatment-naïve populations [50]. Consequently, this may explain the relatively low prevalence of resistance to NTV/r in several studies [30]. Even though we report Mpro mutations in 5 positions, this study is based on the highlighted list of RAMs provided by the FDA EUA; among the remaining 63 polymorphisms we observed, some could potentially affect the efficacy of NTV/r. Among the VOCs, Beta variants were the most diverse. Given that variants with high frequency (>15%) are likely to represent viral adaptation in the face of selective pressure, prescreening of polymorphisms in the Mpro gene is crucial. Here, we further employed our previously reported in silico algorithm to characterize and evaluate the impact of putative deleterious mutations (N95A, V157W, F181T, Y182). Similar approaches of using in silico prediction models to screen putative deleterious mutations have been used to identify RAMs of various antivirals of SARS-CoV-2, of which some candidate mutations have been validated using phenotypic studies [31, 51]. This study is the first to perform in-depth analyses and assess potential impact on several polymorphisms in Mpro on protein folding and function. Overall, we observed that the putative deleterious mutations are mostly rare (1 in a million). Nevertheless, further research (functional characterization) is necessary to explore any potential relationship with NTV/r resistance.

To investigate whether strains with RAMs could be transmitted, we employed phylogenetic analysis based on the ML method and 1000 bootstrap values to construct a time-calibrated phylogenetic tree of sequences with NTV/r RAMs of epidemiologically linked cases. The phylogenetic analysis indicated several clusters among sequences supported by posterior probabilities >90%, suggesting a higher likelihood of transmission-based RAMs. This highlights the importance of genomic surveillance, combined with phylogenetic and phylogeography analyses, as a public health intervention tool to elucidate intertransmission dynamics and combat the spread of pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 [52].

This study had some limitations. The data presented in our study originated from a SARS-CoV-2 routine testing program and were de-identified. This limited our ability to link patients to their clinical histories, including information on HIV status and ART usage. This limited us from determining the prevalence of NTV/r-RAMs by HIV status, which could have provided insight on the impact of immunosuppression on NTV/r resistance. It would have been interesting to assess if any correlation exists between immunosuppression or, especially, ongoing protease inhibitor–based antiretroviral therapy for HIV. However, we anticipated that a substantial proportion (15%–20%) of the samples collected for sequencing originated from people with HIV, as this reflects the prevalence of HIV within the general population of Botswana. One of the main strengths of the study is the ability to characterize NTV/r-DRMs by variants of concern, which revealed that the use of NTV/r among people infected with Delta SARS-CoV-2 could be impacted. Overall, the study findings provide valuable insights on NTV/r resistance in Botswana and surrounding countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and any country that is still reporting SARS-CoV-2 cases driven by Omicron. Our findings emphasize the importance of ongoing surveillance, research, and adoption of the use of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs including Paxlovid to effectively combat the evolving landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis of sequences from routine SARS-CoV-2 national diagnostic testing and sequencing in Botswana, we observed an overall relatively low prevalence of NTV/r RAMs; higher rates were observed in the Beta VOCs and Delta VOCs compared with the Omicron variants (P < .001). Among the polymorphisms observed in the Mpro gene, we characterized them using in silico approaches and determined specific unreported rare polymorphisms with deleterious effects that may potentially cause resistance to antivirals including NTV/r. Hence, future studies should focus on functional characterization to assess if there is any potential influence on drug resistance. Our findings recommend the potential use of NTV/r in Botswana, especially during the current epidemic wave driven by Omicron VOCs; however, we recommend continued surveillance efforts to monitor for emerging resistance variants as NTV/r use expands.

Supplementary Material

ofae344_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the funding agencies. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and decision to publish, or in the preparation of the manuscript.

Financial support. This work was supported by the Sub-Saharan African Network for TB/HIV Research Excellence (SANTHE 2.0), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-033558), National Institutes of Health (D43TW009610-09S1 and K43 TW012350), and Trials of Excellence in Southern Africa (TESA III), which is part of the EDCTP2 program supported by the European Union (CSA2020NoE-3104 TESAIII CSA2020NoE). Sequencing was supported by funding from the Foundation for Innovation in Diagnostics (CV21-0110), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-036530), the National Institutes of Health (D43TW009610-09S1), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (5K24AI131928 and 5K24AI131924), the Africa CDC through the Pathogen Genomics Initiative, and the Motsepe Foundation. The Africa Pathogen Genomics Initiative (Africa PGI) at the Africa CDC is supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV018978 and INV018278), Illumina Inc., the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies.

Contributor Information

Wonderful T Choga, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; School of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Ontlametse T Bareng, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; School of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Natasha O Moraka, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; School of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Dorcas Maruapula, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.

Irene Gobe, School of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Nokuthula S Ndlovu, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.

Boitumelo J L Zuze, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.

Patience C Motshosi, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.

Kedumetse B Seru, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.

Teko Matsuru, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.

Matshwenyego Boitswarelo, Department of Health Systems Management, Clinical Services, Ministry of Health Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Mogomotsi Matshaba, Botswana-Baylor Children's Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Tendani Gaolathe, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Mosepele Mosepele, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Joseph Makhema, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Trevor J M Tamura, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Jonathan Z Li, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Roger Shapiro, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Shahin Lockman, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Simani Gaseitsiwe, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Sikhulile Moyo, Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana; School of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Division of Medical Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

References

  • 1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. . Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395:497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lamers MM, Haagmans BL. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022; 20:270–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Author correction: characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022; 20:315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021; 19:141–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19—preliminary report. Reply. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, et al. . Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:2327–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. . Oral nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:1397–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Owen DR, Allerton CMN, Anderson AS, et al. . An oral SARS-CoV-2M(pro) inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 2021; 374:1586–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gottlieb RL, Vaca CE, Paredes R, et al. . Early remdesivir to prevent progression to severe COVID-19 in outpatients. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:305–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jayk Bernal A, Gomes da Silva MM, Musungaie DB, et al. . Molnupiravir for oral treatment of COVID-19 in nonhospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:509–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Iketani S, Mohri H, Culbertson B, et al. . Multiple pathways for SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir. Nature 2023; 613:558–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jiang Y, Yin W, Xu HE. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: structure, mechanism, and drug discovery for COVID-19. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2021; 538:47–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang Q, Wu J, Wang H, et al. . Structural basis for RNA replication by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. Cell 2020; 182:417–28.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kokic G, Hillen HS, Tegunov D, et al. . Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase stalling by remdesivir. Nat Commun 2021; 12:279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Huang C, Shuai H, Qiao J, et al. . A new generation M(pro) inhibitor with potent activity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Petrakis V, Rafailidis P, Trypsianis G, Papazoglou D, Panagopoulos P. The antiviral effect of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir during COVID-19 pandemic real-world data. Viruses 2023; 15:976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lim S, Tignanelli CJ, Hoertel N, Boulware DR, Usher MG. Prevalence of medical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in a cohort of hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Amani B, Amani B. Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID-19: a rapid review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tian H, Yang C, Song T, et al. . Efficacy and safety of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) in the treatment of COVID-19: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Rev Med Virol 2023; 33:e2473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Arbel R, Wolff Sagy Y, Hoshen M, et al. . Nirmatrelvir use and severe COVID-19 outcomes during the Omicron surge. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:790–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. World Health Organization . 2023. Available at: https://covid19.who.int. Accessed April 08, 2024.
  • 22. Gohl DM, Garbe J, Grady P, et al. . A rapid, cost-effective tailed amplicon method for sequencing SARS-CoV-2. BMC Genomics 2020; 21:863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Itokawa K, Sekizuka T, Hashino M, Tanaka R, Kuroda M. Disentangling primer interactions improves SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing by multiplex tiling PCR. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Freed NE, Vlkova M, Faisal MB, Silander OK. Rapid and inexpensive whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 using 1200 bp tiled amplicons and Oxford Nanopore Rapid Barcoding. Biol Methods Protoc 2020; 5:bpaa014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cleemput S, Dumon W, Fonseca V, et al. . Genome Detective Coronavirus Typing Tool for rapid identification and characterization of novel coronavirus genomes. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:3552–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vilsker M, Moosa Y, Nooij S, et al. . Genome Detective: an automated system for virus identification from high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:871–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Aksamentov I, Roemer C, Hodcroft E, Neher R. Nextclade: clade assignment, mutation calling and quality control for viral genomes. J Open Source Softw 2021; 6:3773. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Larsson A. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:3276–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Greasley SE, Noell S, Plotnikova O, et al. . Structural basis for the in vitro efficacy of nirmatrelvir against SARS-CoV-2 variants. J Biol Chem 2022; 298:101972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhou Y, Gammeltoft KA, Ryberg LA, et al. . Nirmatrelvir-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants with high fitness in an infectious cell culture system. Sci Adv 2022; 8:eadd7197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hu Y, Lewandowski EM, Tan H, et al. . Naturally occurring mutations of SARS-CoV-2 main protease confer drug resistance to nirmatrelvir. ACS Cent Sci 2023; 9:1658–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sjaarda CP, Lau L, Simpson JT, et al. . Prevalence of low-frequency, antiviral resistance variants in SARS-CoV-2 isolates in Ontario, Canada, 2020–2023. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2324963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ip JD, Wing-Ho Chu A, Chan WM, et al. . Global prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease mutations associated with nirmatrelvir or ensitrelvir resistance. EBioMedicine 2023; 91:104559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. US Food and Drug Administration. PAXLOVIDTM (Nirmatrelvir Tablets; Ritonavir Tablets), Co-packaged for Oral Use. US Food and Drug Administration; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bromberg Y, Rost B. SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3823–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hecht M, Bromberg Y, Rost B. Better prediction of functional effects for sequence variants. BMC Genomics 2015; 16 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the phyre server. Nat Protoc 2009; 4:363–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 2015; 10:845–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Anderson M, Choga WT, Moyo S, et al. . In silico analysis of hepatitis B virus occult associated mutations in Botswana using a novel algorithm. Genes (Basel) 2018; 9:420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Choga WT, Anderson M, Zumbika E, et al. . In silico prediction of human leukocytes antigen (HLA) class II binding hepatitis B virus (HBV) peptides in Botswana. Viruses 2020; 12:731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Janson G, Paiardini A. Pymod 3: a complete suite for structural bioinformatics in PyMOL. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:1471–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, et al. . IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 2012; 9:772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Motyan JA, Mahdi M, Hoffka G, Tozser J. Potential resistance of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) against protease inhibitors: lessons learned from HIV-1 protease. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Duan Y, Zhou H, Liu X, et al. . Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir. Nature 2023; 622:376–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Noske GD, de Souza Silva E, de Godoy MO, et al. . Structural basis of nirmatrelvir and ensitrelvir activity against naturally occurring polymorphisms of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:103004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Moghadasi SA, Heilmann E, Khalil AM, et al. . Transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants with resistance to clinical protease inhibitors. Sci Adv 2023; 9:eade8778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sacco MD, Hu Y, Gongora MV, et al. . The P132H mutation in the main protease of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 decreases thermal stability without compromising catalysis or small-molecule drug inhibition. Cell Res 2022; 32:498–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Imai M, Ito M, Kiso M, et al. . Efficacy of antiviral agents against Omicron subvariants BQ.1.1 and XBB. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:89–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lee JT, Yang Q, Gribenko A, et al. . Genetic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2M(pro) reveals high sequence and structural conservation prior to the introduction of protease inhibitor Paxlovid. mBio 2022; 13:e0086922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sasi VM, Ullrich S, Ton J, et al. . Predicting antiviral resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 main protease with computational and experimental screening. Biochemistry 2022; 61:2495–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Attwood SW, Hill SC, Aanensen DM, Connor TR, Pybus OG. Phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches to understanding and combating the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Nat Rev Genet 2022; 23:547–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yashvardhini N, Kumar A, Jha DK. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in the main viral protease (NSP5) and its implications on the vaccine designing strategies. Vacunas 2022; 23:S1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ofae344_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES