Abstract
Sodium chloride (NaCl) deicers contaminate bioretention and influence effluent water quality, the effects of which are not yet fully understood. We tested this by constructing 48 mesocosms in a greenhouse, each having Panicum virgatum, Eutrochium purpureum, or no vegetation; having an internal water storage (IWS) zone or not; and being exposed to high or low NaCl doses in the late winters of 2022 and 2023. Synthetic stormwater was applied and effluent was monitored through May 2023 with an end-of-experiment analysis of soil and plant biomass for nitrogen, phosphorus, copper, zinc, and total suspended solids (TSS). Average effluent loads increased in spring, after NaCl application, for total phosphorus (+61%), copper (+61%), zinc (+88%), and TSS (+66%). These four analytes recovered by summer, with average annual percent removals >85%. Vegetation and IWS reduced annual phosphorus (by −33 and −70%, respectively) and copper (by −24 and −40%) loads, while higher NaCl concentrations increased annual phosphorus (+107%), copper (+22%), and TSS (+51%) loads. Nitrogen removal was not linked with NaCl but was dependent upon the presence of IWS or vegetation. Post-NaCl effluent spikes pose seasonal risks to aquatic ecosystems, emphasizing the need for active maintenance, redundant removal mechanisms, and minimized exposure to NaCl.
Keywords: sodium chloride, runoff, nutrients, heavy metals, saturation, biofiltration, internal water storage, sediment
Short abstract
Deicing salts influence nutrient, heavy metal, and sediment removal in stormwater bioretention. NaCl decreases winter/spring performance, which can be mitigated by effective design/maintenance, but creates seasonal risks for ecosystems.
Introduction
Urbanization seals pervious surfaces and removes vegetation, drastically increasing stormwater runoff.1 Engineered flowpaths like storm drains rapidly funnel this runoff into urban streams, collecting and transporting pollutants along the way and degrading stream ecosystems.1 Stormwater control measures (SCMs) prevent degradation by attenuating peak flows and improving water quality.1 One common SCM, bioretention, along with similar measures like rain gardens and biofiltration, uses a vegetated depression with an engineered soil profile to treat runoff,2 removing contaminants through filtration, sedimentation, vegetative assimilation, adsorption, ion exchange, precipitation, and microbial activity.3,4 An internal water storage (IWS) zone may be added, which submerges the bottom of the soil profile, creating reducing conditions, which enhance nitrogen removal via denitrification.5 Although performance can vary, bioretention has been shown to improve water quality by removing nutrients, heavy metals, and sediment.6−8
Over 20 million tons of road salt are applied annually across the United States, most of which is sodium chloride (NaCl), preferred for its low cost and ready availability.9 NaCl washes from impervious surfaces into stormwater infrastructure like bioretention basins, which pass it into streams or groundwater and soil.10,11 Chloride concentrations exceeding the EPA acute toxicity limit (860 mg/L) have been recorded in runoff and streams after deicer application.12−15
NaCl interferes with bioretention contaminant removal pathways. For example, sodium and chloride compete with contaminants for ion exchange sites,14 mobilizing phosphorus (P).12,16 Chloride is a weak ligand, complexing with heavy metals and increasing their mobility.14,17 Zinc (Zn) loss has been caused by both ion exchange and chloride complexation.18−20 High exchangeable sodium, or sodicity, disperses colloids and clogs pores,21,22 increasing total suspended solid (TSS) effluent22,23 and destabilizing organic nitrogen (N) and P.16 Copper’s (Cu) strong affinity for organic complexes reduces its vulnerability to chloride complexation and ion exchange but makes it susceptible to organic dispersion.16,21,24 NaCl is toxic to vegetation and microbes, and senescence or lost biological treatment (assimilation and denitrification) can increase nutrient and heavy metal effluents.16,18,25 Together, these effects create feedback and complex cumulative impacts. For example, the breakdown of soil aggregates by dispersion, especially as chloride kills the roots supporting soil structure, could expose new substrates for P mobilization by mineralization.
Kratky et al.26 highlighted knowledge gaps in how deicing salts influence contaminant removal and interactions with design components, such as vegetation and IWS. Kaushal et al.27 identified several questions among scientists and practitioners about the seasonal trends of salt impacts on SCMs and the storage and release of salt from SCM media, especially under varying conditions (e.g., redox potential). McManus and Davis16 identified a gap in the literature around how NaCl affects nutrient removal. Moreover, not all studies agree on the response of contaminants to NaCl. For example, Søberg et al.28 described inconsistencies in the literature on P, in which they linked NaCl with elevated effluent total phosphorus (TP) and not dissolved phosphorus (DP), Szota et al.18 found that TP decreased and DP increased in response to NaCl, and Valtanen et al.29 observed no trend. More recently, McManus and Davis16 and Goor et al.12 observed delayed spikes in TP, primarily as DP.
We investigated and quantified the effects of NaCl on the event, seasonal, and annual pollutant removal capabilities of bioretention in the presence and absence of vegetation and IWS. We constructed 48 soil columns in a greenhouse and dosed them with either a low or a high NaCl concentration in winter 2022 and 2023, monitoring effluent contaminant concentrations from January 2022 to early summer 2023. The primary contaminants studied were N, P, TSS, Cu, and Zn. We hypothesized that increased NaCl loading would decrease contaminant removal efficiency; that the presence of IWS would increase nitrate (NO3–) removal but could adversely affect P, heavy metals, and organic nitrogen removal; and that vegetation would increase contaminant removal but might in turn be adversely affected by NaCl.
Methods and Materials
Mesocosm Construction
Forty-eight mesocosms (Figure 1) were built from PVC pipe with inner walls sanded to mitigate preferential flows. The mesocosms were distributed randomly throughout two rows in a greenhouse conditioned to 20–25.6 °C year-round. Mesocosms included a filter media layer to support plant growth and water treatment and a sand layer to stabilize the filter media. The filter media was a topsoil blend from a local nursery with characteristics typical of bioretention media (Figure 1). Woodchips (debarked oak and maple) were added to the sand layer to provide a carbon source for microbes.30
Figure 1.
Mesocosm design and initial soil properties. OC: organic carbon.
Half the mesocosms included an IWS zone via an upturned drain to promote heterotrophic denitrification.31 Two plant species, Panicum virgatum “Cape Breeze” and Eutrochium purpureum “Euphoria Ruby” PPAF, commonly known as switchgrass and sweet-scented joe-pye weed, each occupied a third of the mesocosms with the remaining third left unvegetated. Panicum and Eutrochium are frequently used in the mid-Atlantic region, favored for tolerating salt and various sun exposures and moisture regimes,32 and generally perform well in bioretention.32−34 Half the mesocosms received a low NaCl concentration and the other half received a high NaCl concentration. The treatments were allocated among the 48 mesocosms to create 12 groups of 4 replicates, each group with a unique combination of the treatments: an IWS zone or unrestricted outlet; P. virgatum, E. purpureum, or no vegetation; and the low or high NaCl dose. Using typical effective pore volume values for coarse sand and gravel, the IWS pore space was estimated to be slightly larger than the influent volume, yielding a hydraulic residence time (HRT) of 4–5 days. Effluent volumes often dropped >30% in vegetated columns in the summer (presumably due to evapotranspiration), so actual HRT increased seasonally. Longer HRTs have been linked with higher N removal. 4–5 days is well beyond the minimum thresholds.36,37
Synthetic Stormwater Composition and Dosing
The mesocosms received tap water for 2 weeks before switching to non-NaCl synthetic stormwater in Fall 2021. The synthetic stormwater concentration targets and sources in Table 1 were selected from bioretention mesocosm literature.34,35 The base was rainwater, collected from rain barrels on a suburban house and the greenhouse, both with low contaminant concentrations. The stored rainwater was insufficient for watering one time, and tap water was used. Variability in synthetic stormwater concentrations is attributable to rainwater and contaminants introduced by TSS. The leftover filter media used for TSS were lightly ground to break up aggregates and placed through a No. 10 sieve. Stormwater quantity was determined by the typical central Pennsylvania annual rainfall (116.84 cm) divided evenly into twice-weekly storms (1.12 cm). By assuming a 1:7 bioretention area/watershed area ratio, the inflow became 7.86 cm, or 1.43 L poured into each mesocosm. Substantial erosion occurred by the end of the experiment, despite the initial addition of a surface gravel layer. While compaction and clogging by filtered sediment may have occurred, drainage was often rapid (<1 h).
Table 1. Synthetic Stormwater Concentrations, mg/L.
constituent | source | target concentration | average concentration (±SD) |
---|---|---|---|
PO43––P | K3PO4 | 0.5 | 0.52 (0.15) |
TP | 0.62 (0.07) | ||
NO3––N | KNO3 | 1.5 | 1.70 (0.45) |
ammonium-N | NH4Cl | 0.5 | |
TN | 2.95 (0.62) | ||
Cu | CuSO4 | 0.15 | 0.12 (0.03) |
Zn | ZnCl2 | 0.6 | 0.61 (0.11) |
TSS | leftover filter media | 100 | 108.6 (63.7) |
chloride, low | NaCl | 500a; 300b | 523 (19)a; 331 (1)b |
chloride, high | NaCl | 2000a; 1200b | 2058 (50)a; 1291 (29)b |
First winter (2021–22).
Second winter (2022–23).
After an initial effluent sampling in November 2021 to establish a baseline, the mesocosms were moved outside for winter (wrapped in insulation and tucked against a building to avoid freezing) so the plants could enter dormancy. No stormwater dosing occurred during this period, but the mesocosms received direct precipitation. The mesocosms were brought back inside in February 2022 and stormwater dosing resumed, this time with added NaCl for six doses, the first four consecutive and the last two alternating with non-NaCl. Chloride concentrations (Table 1) were selected after reviewing laboratory and field studies.12−14,16,28,38 While NaCl application inside the greenhouse was necessary to prevent disruption and complete freezing of the mesocosms/IWS zones, high temperature has been shown to amplify the effects of NaCl on TP, Cu, and Zn.28,39,40 Inside, plants came out of dormancy and became vulnerable to ongoing NaCl application, a contributing factor to poor survival.
In the spring, all high-NaCl E. purpureum died, indicating that NaCl was responsible. These were replaced shortly before the May effluent sampling. The filter media disturbance caused a total nitrogen (TN) spike in free-flowing replicates34 from an average of 7.67 mg/L (SD = 85) in the previous sampling to 24.22 mg/L (SD = 6.23) in May, 84% as nitrate. TN loads were mediated by volume reduction, with averages increasing from 7.32 mg (SD = 0.72) to 12.19 mg (SD = 2.84). IWS replicates experienced no TN change and no other analytes were affected. All mesocosms were weeded regularly, but unvegetated mesocosms grew a layer of moss that was not removed to avoid filter media disturbance.
Non-NaCl dosing continued until late October 2022, when the mesocosms were moved back outside. A second round of NaCl stormwater dosing began in February 2023, proceeding as before but with lower chloride targets, an attempt to improve the survival of E. purpureum. In the second spring, plant survival was poor across all treatments despite the lower NaCl targets, likely the effects of NaCl exposure compounded by harsher weather, false springs, and mesocosm conditions like erosion and compaction. Because the experiment was approaching completion, no plants were replaced. Non-NaCl stormwater dosing continued until early June.
Effluent volume from one P. virgatum IWS low-NaCl mesocosm decreased over 2022, entirely stopping by October. Water pooled and evaporated at the surface, which was constantly submerged (except for a brief period in early 2023, after freeze–thaw improved drainage). The mesocosm’s failure may have been caused by compaction and media clogging, but several other P. virgatum mesocosms were also observed to drain slowly, while other vegetation treatments were unaffected. The reason is unknown.
Sampling and Data Analysis
Effluent samples were collected every 4 weeks, or 2 weeks during and immediately after NaCl application, with 18 total samples. Effluent was collected in containers for 2–3 h before being sampled. Effluent volumes were recorded, and samples were refrigerated immediately and processed within 1 week (or frozen when necessary). Filter media grab samples were collected from the filter media stockpile at the beginning of the experiment. At the end, each mesocosm was sampled 5 cm below its surface. Root and surface plant biomass samples were collected from spare plugs at the beginning and survivors at the end, and growth and health were monitored throughout.
TSS analysis was performed according to USGS I-3765-85 within 24 h. Subsamples were filtered to 0.45 μm for ion chromatography with a Thermo-Fisher Dionex ICS-1100 for NO3––N, nitrite (NO2–)–N, sulfate, chloride, and phosphate (PO43–)–P. Unfiltered subsamples were acidified to pH < 2 with sulfuric acid within 24 h, digested (EPA 200.7), and analyzed via inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) for total Zn, Cu, TP, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium, though base cation analysis began in August 2022. The subsamples were also analyzed with a Shimadzu TOC-L/TNM-L for total organic carbon (TOC, measured as nonpurgeable organic carbon) and TN.
Filter media samples were analyzed for organic matter by loss on ignition,41 for texture with a hydrometer,42 and by Penn State’s Agricultural Analytical Services Lab for pH, nitrogen by combustion, and P, Cu, Zn, calcium, magnesium, and potassium by Mehlich III and ICP-OES. Plant biomass samples were dried for 3 days at 60 °C, ground, and analyzed via combustion for N and digestion (EPA 3050B) and ICP-OES for P, Cu, Zn, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium.
Sample concentrations
were multiplied by effluent volumes to produce
loads. Removal efficiencies—percent removal—were calculated
by . Efficiency represents effectiveness, though
it has weaknesses, such as failure to account for background media
concentrations/removal limits.43 Annual
load and efficiency estimates were calculated for 2022 with linear
interpolation of concentrations and effluent volumes between samplings.
While concentrations and loads generally showed the same trends for
all analytes, load data is presented below because it captures differences
in effluent quantity (vegetation lowered outflow in warm months).
Statistical analysis was completed in R version 4.1.2. This did not include the fall 2021 sampling because it was not representative of NaCl exposure. Treatments were converted to binary variables, indicating their presence. Multiple linear regression was performed, with model assumptions confirmed before analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test. Detection limits were substituted for nondetects, affecting TP (∼22% of measurements <0.01 mg/L) and Cu (∼11% <0.005 mg/L), to avoid overestimating the abilities of bioretention. Though nondetects were fairly low, we anticipate substitution to have caused an overestimation of averages and annual loads, especially affecting treatments more likely to produce nondetects like IWS. Analysis will consequently underestimate the benefits of those treatments and overestimate the unfavorable effects of others. This overestimation is somewhat negated by the smaller data range. Variability in the data was generally attributable to seasonal or weather-related trends, initial media conditions, column characteristics slowly changing over time, small variation in influent concentrations, and any random or systematic error introduced in the experimental setup or sample analysis. Annual removal efficiency was controlled for seasonal trends, yielding higher R2 values.
Results and Discussion
Water Quality Data
Sodium and Chloride
During NaCl dosing, chloride effluent concentrations (Figure 2) ranged from 44–99% of inflow concentrations, averaging about 72% (SD = 12%). After dosing ended, effluent approached background concentrations (1–2 mg/L, the non-NaCl influent concentrations) within 2–4 months depending on NaCl treatment, high-NaCl mesocosms remaining slightly elevated (2–4 mg/L) into fall. Chloride concentrations in November 2021 averaged 17.5 mg/L (SD = 8.5), and the filter media or sand may have been exposed to chloride before the experiment, possibly at the nursery. Short-term retention on exchange sites and in micropores was expected and has been recorded in green infrastructure and soil.10,11,27 IWS influenced persistence, first by dilution, reducing average chloride concentrations in the initial samples of 2022 and 2023 by 17% relative to non-IWS columns. When application ended, IWS stored chloride, increasing average effluent concentrations by 47%. While the actual concentration difference was increasingly marginal and substantial flushing occurred at nearly the same rate as non-IWS, many remained elevated by 1–2 mg/L over non-IWS mesocosms into October, especially those that received the high-NaCl treatment.
Figure 2.
High- and low-NaCl treatment chloride and sodium effluent concentrations. Gray shading indicates NaCl dosing periods. Sodium data collection began in August 2022, and sodium data from February 2023 was not included due to instrument error.
Sodium 2023 influent concentrations were expected to contain about 195 mg/L sodium (for the 300 mg/L chloride dose) and 780 mg/L sodium (for the 1200 mg/L chloride dose). Effluent concentrations (Figure 2) during NaCl dosing ranged from 32–51% of inflow, averaging 41% (SD = 5%), rapidly declining thereafter, with IWS columns showing slightly elevated persistence similar to that of chloride. Fall 2022 concentrations were unstable and greater than non-NaCl inflow concentrations (<2 mg/L), suggesting that sodium did not fully flush before the next winter. Sodium persistence greater than chloride has been recorded in green infrastructure.10,11,27 Chloride is negative and thus limited by the predominantly negative exchange sites, whereas sodium ions are positive and readily interact with soil, though high concentrations overwhelm capacity.23,33 Ion exchange was demonstrated by calcium, magnesium, and potassium, which spiked during NaCl dosing (relative to October concentrations) by 99% (SD = 80%), 110% (SD = 81%), and 112% (SD = 61%), respectively. Relative to these averages, high-NaCl exposure increased the spikes by 113% for calcium, 117% for magnesium, and 63% for potassium.
Nitrogen
Unvegetated non-IWS replicates experienced TN leaching, with removal efficiencies ranging from −243 to −321% annually (Figure 3a), culminating in September 2022 (Figure S1), which averaged −492% removal (SD = 58.4%). September effluent concentrations averaged 27.19 mg/L (SD = 2.29). NO3––N made up 72% of annual effluent TN from these replicates, measurements correlating well with TN across all replicates (R2(adj) = 0.90, Figure S2). N leaching exceeded observations in other studies,6−8 the filter media were evidently too coarse to form anoxic microsites considered important for denitrification.44 Without a N removal mechanism, the filter media organic matter and woodchips are nitrified and leached, peaking in the summer with seasonal mineralization rates. Despite leaching, initial media TN was about the same as at the end of the experiment, 0.31 versus 0.30%, respectively. With a range of 0.24–0.34%, some samples even gained N, perhaps by accumulation of organic matter at the surface. With the addition of vegetation, non-IWS annual removal efficiencies increased to 35% (SD = 19%, Figure 3a), with both P. virgatum and E. purpureum as statistically significant predictors of higher TN removal efficiency (p < 0.001, Table 2). In early 2022, TN and NO3––N removal efficiencies were similar to unvegetated replicates, and effluent TN loads averaged 6.47 mg (SD = 3.7) without vegetation and 5.69 mg (SD = 3.1) with it during March and April. Removal increased as plants came out of dormancy and grew in May and June, from July onward averaging 78% (SD = 25%, Figure S1), enabling higher removal in vegetated replicates annually. The high-NaCl E. purpureum replacement in May prevented net N export that year. In 2023, the replicates which died began to behave similarly to unvegetated mesocosms, and by May, their removal efficiency averaged −441% (SD = 59%), while those which survived removed >80% TN. Despite poor 2023 survival, P. virgatum non-IWS mesocosms continued to remove N, averaging 74% (SD = 13%) that year. This may be connected to the slower drainage observed in these replicates, which could have created anoxic conditions.
Figure 3.
2022 annual load removal efficiencies for TN by IWS and vegetation treatment, and TP, Cu, Zn, and TSS by IWS and NaCl treatment.
Table 2. Mean Effluent Performance Values and Effluent Load ANOVA Results for Major Analytes by Treatmenta.
treatment | TN |
NO3––N |
TP |
Cu |
Zn |
TSS |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean event | load | (±SD) | load | (±SD) | load | (±SD) | load | (±SD) | load | (±SD) | load | (±SD) |
mean event | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) |
mean annual | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) | efficiency | (±SD) |
unvegetated | 7.81 | 7.55 | 5.33 | 6.28 | 0.110 | 0.130 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0500 | 0.190 | 24.4 | 25.8 |
–84.8 | 179 | –119 | 258 | 87.8 | 14.6 | 91.8 | 4.68 | 93.9 | 21.8 | 84.3 | 16.6 | |
–113 | 162 | –142 | 230 | 91.7 | 6.87 | 92.6 | 2.58 | 91.7 | 9.93 | 86.5 | 5.70 | |
E. purpureum | 4.06 | 5.44 | 1.99 | 3.84 | 0.0600 | 0.0700 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0600 | 0.240 | 19.3 | 15.2 |
3.81 | 129 | 18.5 | 158 | 93.3 | 7.59 | 93.2 | 4.84 | 93.4 | 27.0 | 87.6 | 9.70 | |
43.8 | 20.6 | 64.0 | 32.9 | 94.6 | 3.61 | 94.4 | 1.62 | 90.2 | 9.53 | 89.3 | 3.60 | |
P. virgatum | 1.96 | 1.87 | 0.630 | 1.19 | 0.0500 | 0.0800 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0700 | 0.320 | 46.7 | 59.5 |
53.6 | 44.3 | 74.3 | 48.7 | 94.1 | 9.30 | 94.0 | 4.72 | 92.0 | 36.6 | 70.0 | 38.3 | |
53.6 | 18.6 | 70.7 | 25.6 | 94.2 | 4.10 | 94.3 | 2.03 | 86.9 | 15.2 | 83.2 | 5.40 | |
no IWS | 7.41 | 7.42 | 5.07 | 5.78 | 0.110 | 0.120 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0800 | 0.320 | 29.3 | 29.9 |
–75.4 | 175 | –108 | 237 | 87.3 | 13.6 | 91.4 | 5.07 | 91.3 | 36.4 | 81.2 | 19.2 | |
–67.9 | 148 | –95.3 | 196 | 90.1 | 5.26 | 92.2 | 1.96 | 86.6 | 14.5 | 85.5 | 5.70 | |
IWS | 1.84 | 1.21 | 0.280 | 0.740 | 0.0300 | 0.0500 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0400 | 0.160 | 30.7 | 48.1 |
56.6 | 27.7 | 88.4 | 30.3 | 96.2 | 5.38 | 94.6 | 3.99 | 95.0 | 18.4 | 80.3 | 30.9 | |
57.4 | 11.9 | 91.3 | 10.8 | 97.0 | 1.68 | 95.4 | 1.24 | 92.9 | 7.10 | 87.3 | 5.20 | |
low salt | 4.72 | 6.37 | 2.79 | 4.97 | 0.0500 | 0.0500 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0300 | 0.150 | 24.2 | 33.1 |
–11.6 | 151 | –14.7 | 204 | 94.3 | 5.97 | 93.8 | 3.80 | 95.6 | 16.9 | 84.4 | 21.3 | |
–3.27 | 129 | –5.52 | 176 | 95.8 | 3.08 | 94.4 | 2.00 | 94.0 | 6.72 | 89.2 | 3.90 | |
high salt | 4.57 | 5.65 | 2.55 | 4.55 | 0.100 | 0.130 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0800 | 0.330 | 35.7 | 45.1 |
–8.08 | 134 | –4.73 | 187 | 89.2 | 14.3 | 92.2 | 5.56 | 90.6 | 37.0 | 77.1 | 29.0 | |
–9.72 | 117 | –2.48 | 162 | 91.2 | 5.90 | 93.2 | 2.36 | 85.5 | 14.1 | 83.7 | 5.50 |
Event | p-Value | Effect | p-Value | Effect | p-Value | Effect | p-Value | Effect | p-Value | Effect | p-Value | Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
annual | p-value | effect | p-value | effect | p-value | effect | p-value | effect | p-value | effect | p-value | effect |
E. purpureum | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.01 | – | <0.001 | – | ns | ns | ||
<0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | ns | <0.05 | – | ns | <0.1 | – | |||
P. virgatum | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | ns | <0.0001 | + | |
<0.001 | – | <0.001 | – | <0.01 | – | <0.001 | – | ns | <0.01 | + | ||
IWS | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.1 | – | ns | |
<0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.0001 | – | <0.05 | – | ns | ||
high salt | ns | ns | <0.0001 | + | <0.0001 | + | <0.05 | + | <0.0001 | + | ||
ns | ns | <0.0001 | + | <0.01 | + | <0.05 | + | <0.0001 | + | |||
event Adj R2 | 0.380 | 0.427 | 0.273 | 0.175 | 0.009 | 0.102 | ||||||
annual Adj R2 | 0.636 | 0.639 | 0.677 | 0.680 | 0.164 | 0.396 |
Loads given in mg, efficiencies in %. Event is effluent across all samplings. ns not significant; + increased event/annual load; – decreased event/annual load.
IWS effectively suppressed effluent TN and NO3––N year-round, regardless of vegetation (p < 0.0001), removing 57% (SD = 12%) of TN and 96% (SD = 11%) of NO3––N, annually (Figure 3a). This indicates that IWS and carbon provision successfully facilitated denitrification through anoxia and increased storage capacity.31 IWS TN removal efficiency was lowest in March, averaging 35% (SD = 22%), and peaked in October, averaging 87% (SD = 11%, Figures S1 and S2), potentially indicating a recovery period for microbes after winter, or continued maturing of the filter media. The average 2022 effluent concentration was 2.05 mg/L (SD = 1.33). NO3––N made up 11% of the annual average IWS TN effluent, substantially less than in the unvegetated non-IWS mesocosms, and the NO3––N component generally decreased in importance as TN decreased for all treatments. While NO2––N suffered from instrument interference with chloride, the data collected indicated it was stable, leaving much of the variance in IWS TN removal efficiency (−203 to 99%) to total Kjedahl nitrogen (TKN). This could have leached from woodchips (influenced by seasonal mineralization rates) in the IWS zone, where anoxia prevented nitrification.31 In vegetated mesocosms, during periods of high nitrate removal, root exudates and decomposing organic material could have contributed to TN variability.
NaCl treatment was not a statistically significant predictor of TN or NO3––N, and the change to lower NaCl influent concentrations for winter 2023 had no observable effect. While Denich et al.33 and Valtanen et al.29 also observed no link between NaCl and N, NaCl did indirectly affect our mesocosms through the death of plants, the loss of assimilation, and tissue decay, contributing to N leaching in non-IWS mesocosms.18 It is possible that other indirect effects of NaCl may have been masked by variability, such as that from seasonal trends. For example, Endreny et al.25 observed NaCl to affect microbe communities. This could have contributed to relatively low IWS replicate early season removal efficiency (40%, SD = 22% in March 2022), in addition to postwinter recovery. McManus and Davis16 observed N response to NaCl, possibly caused by organic colloid dispersion, but while the relationship between TN and TOC was statistically significant in our mesocosms, it was of little practical effect (p < 0.0001, R2(adj) = 0.01). The November 2021 sampling reveals no further insights, averaging 366% higher TN concentrations than late October 2022, with 65% as NO3––N, indicating that stabilization and plant/microbe establishment were ongoing.
Phosphorus
High-NaCl treatment increased TP effluent load (p < 0.0001), decreasing the average annual removal efficiency by 4.5 percentage points (Table 2, Figure 3b). In March 2022, during NaCl dosing, all mesocosms maintained high TP removal, ranging from 94 to 99%, with a maximum effluent concentration of 0.06 mg/L. In April and May, effluent spiked, with average removal efficiencies dropping to 94% (SD = 5%) for low-NaCl and 81% (SD = 16%) for high-NaCl mesocosms (Figure 4). Average effluent concentrations were 0.07 mg/L (SD = 0.05) and 0.18 mg/L (SD = 0.15) for low-NaCl and high-NaCl mesocosms, respectively. After summer recovery, lasting impacts emerged specifically for non-IWS, unvegetated columns, whose average TP loads from August to October were 280% higher than in March after low-NaCl exposure, and 561% higher after high-NaCl exposure (Figure S3). 2023 trends generally replicated those in 2022, and non-IWS unvegetated removal continued to decline. In 2023, efficiency averages for the rest of the mesocosms were 93% (SD = 5%) for low-NaCl replicates and 88% (SD = 8%) for high-NaCl replicates, showing little effect of the NaCl concentration decrease.
Figure 4.
Effluent TP loads by IWS and NaCl treatment. Gray shading shows NaCl dosing periods.
The delay between dosing and response may be explained by a minimum NaCl load or accumulation threshold, as proposed by McManus and Davis16 and Goor et al.12 While the response magnitude was controlled (at least in part) by NaCl load, more thresholds at different loads or exposures may explain the lack of change after the reduced NaCl application in 2023. Excess NaCl overwhelming media and flushing before interacting substantially with the filter media23 may impact the function of thresholds, and accumulation of P or cumulative/priming effects of NaCl (e.g., dispersion exposing new substrates for later mineralization or ion exchange) could have increased mobility in the second year or explained long-term impacts in non-IWS unvegetated replicates.
Similarly, the TP response timing was the same regardless of NaCl treatment, and the high-NaCl treatment did not experience an earlier peak than low-NaCl columns, as might be expected. While perhaps the sampling schedule was too coarse to pick up on this trend, it suggests that response timing is controlled by other factors as well, like a threshold, the NaCl exposure rate and timeline, or overwhelming of the media by large, rapid NaCl application. NaCl has been linked variously with TP, DP, and soluble reactive phosphorus through ion exchange and colloid dispersion.12,16,25,28 PO43––P was consistently below its detection limit (0.1 mg/L) and the relationship between TP and TSS was poor (p < 0.01, R2(adj) = 0.01). TP was better related to TOC (p < 0.0001, R2(adj) = 0.14), the R2 increasing further when considering high-NaCl mesocosms, indicating that NaCl mobilized more in dissolved/organic forms. TOC loads (Figure S4) spiked in early 2022 and 2023, alongside TP, averages about 108% higher than in the fall, influenced by NaCl (p < 0.0001). Thus, NaCl released P through organic colloid dispersion,23,24 possibly alongside anion exchange.
IWS decreased TP loads (p < 0.0001), increasing annual removal efficiency by 7 percentage points (Table 2, Figure 3b) and mitigating the effects of NaCl by delaying and reducing the magnitude of P loss and accelerating recovery. For example, during the spring 2022 TP effluent spike, IWS replicate removal efficiency averaged 11 percentage points higher than non-IWS, and during the summer, IWS unvegetated replicate removal was >90%, with effluent concentrations averaging 0.02 mg/L (SD = 0.03) (Figure 4). This was unanticipated; reducing conditions are often thought to worsen P sorption by increasing iron and manganese solubility and producing sulfide, which competes with P for iron.6,46,47 Various bioretention studies support higher, neutral, or lower P removal with IWS.28,31,45,48−51 Potential explanations for higher P removal include changes in pH and trade-offs between sorption strength/iron solubility and sorption capacity/interaction with P,46,47,52 increased retention time, redox potential not low enough to reduce iron or sulfate, and greater system stability with respect to redox potential, pH, and moisture.47,53 While P stored in the IWS zone may be sorbed relatively weakly, it evidently resisted mobilization by NaCl.
Vegetation was linked with greater P removal efficiency (p < 0.01), increasing the event average by 5–6 percentage points. Annually, E. purpureum was not a significant predictor of TP, and the P. virgatum removal efficiency was only 2 percentage points higher than the unvegetated mesocosms (Table 2). Dormant vegetation could not suppress early-season TP spikes but was critical in mitigating the long-term declining removal efficiency in unvegetated non-IWS replicates (Figure S3). While the annual effect was less substantial than IWS, assimilation is often considered a less important pathway than sorption, at least in the short term.4,18,44,48 Contribution by senescence in 2023 could not be determined; P from dying plants was either quickly sorbed by the media or more time was needed for release. The effects of plant death may have become clearer with more time.25
Copper
Annually, high NaCl dose was a statistically significant predictor of higher Cu effluent load but only decreased the average annual removal efficiency by about 1 percentage point compared to the low-NaCl treatment (p < 0.001, Table 2, Figure 3c). Cu responded to NaCl with an immediate spike lasting until June–August (Figure S5). Between March and July 2022, high-NaCl mesocosms averaged 91% Cu removal (SD = 5%) and low-NaCl 93% (SD = 4%), measurements varying between 76–99% (effluent concentrations ranging from <0.005–0.053 mg/L). Average removal increased to 96% (SD = 3%) across all mesocosms in August–October, always >83% (effluent concentrations <0.046 mg/L). The 2023 NaCl concentration reduction did not change the average high- or low-NaCl efficiencies compared to 2022, and the general similarity between Cu response to different NaCl doses suggests Cu response like TP is controlled by thresholds, priming, or other factors like dose timing. The relationship between Cu and TOC was better than TSS (p < 0.0001, R2(adj) = 0.14 and p < 0.0001, R2(adj) = 0.01, respectively), especially when considering high-NaCl replicates, indicating that effluent Cu was not strongly associated with particulate material but was better linked to organic material. Thus, some Cu mobilization occurred by organic colloid dispersion, alongside mobilization of dissolved Cu by cation exchange and chloride complexation, which previous studies have identified as response mechanisms after NaCl exposure.19,21,22,24,39
The presence of vegetation was linked with greater Cu removal efficiencies, an increase of about 2 percentage points annually over unvegetated replicates (p < 0.05, Table 2). This difference is small, and vegetation is known to play a lesser role in Cu retention relative to sorption.32,54,55 IWS increased annual removal by 3 percentage points (p < 0.0001), and the lowest observed removal was 69% (versus 63% without IWS). While this effect is fairly small, it mitigated NaCl, and annual high-NaCl IWS removal was 3 percentage points greater than low-NaCl non-IWS (Figure 3c). Like P, Cu is often considered vulnerable to reducing conditions,6,31,39 attributed to changes in the solubility of metal oxides and Cu complexes and to interactions with sulfide.47 Some bioretention studies have found a neutral or positive effect,5,39,49 attributable to increased retention time, IWS organic amendments,5,31 increased sorption capacity,52 and system stability.47,53
Zinc
Effluent Zn loads (Figure 5) were low in November 2021 and early March 2022, averaging 99% removal (SD = 0.8%), all mesocosms >93% (effluent concentrations <0.029 mg/L). Zn loads slowly increased after NaCl exposure, spiking by 1–2 orders of magnitude in May, with removal efficiency averages falling to 66% (SD = 61%) for low-NaCl and −8% (SD = 115%) for high-NaCl replicates. The lowest removal recorded was −376%, representing an effluent concentration of 6.62 mg/L. After a rapid removal increase between May and June, summer recovery yielded 99% average removal (SD = 0.7%) between September–October. While spring 2023 removal decreased, following a similar trend to the previous year (Figure 5), no large spike occurred, and May removal efficiencies averaged 95% (SD = 3%), all mesocosms >85%. It is possible that a spike would have occurred later, that it did occur and sampling was too infrequent to capture it, or that the reduction in applied NaCl concentrations increased removal. TOC and TSS were poorly related to Zn (p < 0.05, R2(adj) = 0.01, and p < 0.01, R2(adj) = 0.01, respectively), indicating that particulate and organic forms of Zn were not substantial components of effluent. This suggests that mobilization of dissolved Zn by processes like ion exchange, chloride complexation, and soil changes (e.g., soil solution ionic strength, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC)) were of greater importance. While Zn is often considered more exchangeable than Cu,19,56 and studies have found Zn mobility in response to NaCl,16−18,33,39,57 the magnitude of leaching observed was surprising.
Figure 5.
Effluent Zn loads by NaCl treatment. Gray shading shows NaCl dosing periods. Note the logarithmic y-axis.
The average annual removal efficiency was 9 percentage points lower for high-NaCl replicates, but the relationship between higher NaCl dose and Zn was poor relative to other analytes (p < 0.05, R2(adj) = 0.16, Table 2), so, like TP and Cu, other factors (e.g., NaCl dosing, accumulation, and flushing schedule) may have influenced the response timing and magnitude. Vegetation was not linked with Zn (Table 2, Figure S6), an absence which other studies have observed as well.32,55,58 While IWS was statistically significant in predicting annual Zn loads (p < 0.05) and did increase annual removal by 6 percentage points (Table 2, Figure 3d), it remained a poor predictor statistically. Clary et al.6 characterized Zn as “redox-insensitive,” with precipitation possibly enhanced under reducing conditions, but studies on Zn retention have had varying results.5,18,39,45,49,59 If IWS did increase Zn removal by enhanced precipitation, increased retention time, or some other means, it did not meaningfully affect removal or mitigate the NaCl-induced spring leaching.
TSS
In November 2021, TSS removal efficiency averaged 93% (SD = 4%). In early 2022, TSS effluent loads increased in response to NaCl, with average removal efficiencies dropping to 74% (SD = 21%, minimum = −21%) in high-NaCl replicates and 85% (SD = 10%, minimum = 23%) in low-NaCl replicates (Figure S7). The onset of the effect was rapid and lasted until May. From June onward, mesocosms recovered to an average of 91% removal (SD = 8%), average effluent concentrations at 24.7 mg/L (SD = 21.4). Notably, P. virgatum IWS replicates experienced variability in late 2022 and operated 10 percentage points below the overall average. In 2023, non-P. virgatum mesocosms responded to NaCl again, but removal efficiency averages were 7 and 2 percentage points higher than the previous year for high- and low-NaCl replicates, respectively. Higher removal was potentially caused by reduced NaCl concentrations, but not all mesocosms experienced this effect. P. virgatum replicates experienced variability in TSS effluent, dropping as low as −137% removal (314 mg/L), while averaging 44% (SD = 53%). The unusually high6−8 2023 P. virgatum loads were accompanied by a TOC spike (Figure S4), and both could be attributed to washout of organic material, potentially enhanced by sodium-induced dispersion (potentially primed by the first year) and IWS moisture availability, produced by microbes or decomposing P. virgatum. The surviving P. virgatum replicates did average a 30-percentage-point greater removal than the rest of their cohort.
Given the similar particle characteristics of influent TSS to the filter media, it is likely that these particles were captured by the media surface and that effluent TSS was existing sand or filter media washing out from the bottom of each column. Filter media washout has been observed in other studies, varying with media stability over time in response to factors like construction or wetting and drying.60,61 Variation in effluent TSS could therefore represent media stability over the course of the experiment, showing destabilization by NaCl-induced dispersion and aggregate deterioration before recovery.
Annually, high-NaCl replicates had 5-percentage-point higher removal averages (p < 0.0001, Table 2, Figure 3e). NaCl, through colloid dispersion, has been linked with soil clogging and increased particulate outflow.16,33,39 Some studies have found mixed or stabilizing effects when soil solution sodium is high, colloids dispersing when electrolyte concentrations lower after flushing,18,23,24 which might explain the variability in onset of NaCl effects, alongside contributions of freeze–thaw and winter recovery.62 While IWS and E. purpureum were not good predictors of TSS effluent, P. virgatum had a 5-point lower average annual TSS removal (p < 0.01, Table 2). High P. virgatum effluent loads were surprising, and previous studies have variously found IWS and vegetation to mildly decrease or have no effect on TSS effluent.5,28,49,51,53,58
Media and Vegetation
Despite the higher-than-ideal initial filter media P content (386 mg P/kg media, Figure 6), TP removal efficiencies were often >90% and there was no net export. Final average filter media P content was 18% lower than the start, indicating that P was flushed deeper into the filter media or removed by vegetation. Downward transport of contaminants in response to NaCl has been observed in other studies14,23,24 and the presence of vegetation was statistically significant, decreasing average P content by 14% (p < 0.01, R2(adj) = 0.18). The declining unvegetated non-IWS TP removal efficiencies might indicate saturation given the high initial P content, but this would be surprising given the normally lengthy time for P saturation to occur in bioretention4,63 and the fact that P content was declining. IWS had no effect on the filter media and there were no identifiable trends in media N. Cu content increased by 122% and Zn by 169% by the end of the experiment (Figure 6), with the increase positively associated with vegetation presence (Cu: p < 0.05, R2(adj) = 0.12, Zn: p < 0.001, R2(adj) = 0.13). NaCl treatment had no effect, but the Zn effluent export would indicate that some downward transport occurred.
Figure 6.
Soil TP, Cu, and Zn content at the end of each experiment.
Filter media potassium, magnesium, and calcium contents were 41, 28, and 7% lower at the end. The decrease was not linked to NaCl treatment, and base saturation proportions were unchanged. Average end pH increased very slightly (0.2), linked to higher NaCl dose (alkalinization has been partially attributed to NaCl)27 and negatively associated with the presence of E. purpureum and IWS (p < 0.001, R2(adj) = 0.43). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) had slightly decreased at the end of the experiment (19.9–17.9 mequiv/100 g), made lower by high NaCl, possibly an effect of sodium exposure,19,39 and higher by E. purpureum (p < 0.01, R2(adj) = 0.28). Redoximorphic features (large depletions with small concentrations around roots) were visible in the lower 5–10 cm of sand in IWS mesocosms, as well as in the bottom 2–5 cm of some P. virgatum non-IWS mesocosms (an area where roots had grown densely), indicating that the redox potential was low enough for manganese and iron reduction.
Plants came out of dormancy soon after NaCl exposure. Higher NaCl inhibited growth in early 2022, and necrosis and chlorosis were observed. By the end of 2022, surface height and weight evened out across both NaCl treatments, low-NaCl P. virgatum averaging 5 cm taller (SD = 3.9) and 4 g heavier (SD = 6.6). NaCl alters soil structure, nutrient availability, and osmotic potential,52 and negative effects on vegetation have been observed in other experiments.16,18,33 Research has shown IWS to improve growth, especially under dry conditions,64 but growth was not linked with IWS in our mesocosms, perhaps because water was never scarce. The low 2023 effluent NO3––N discussed for non-IWS P. virgatum replicates even after plants had died, along with redoximorphic features observed in those mesocosms, provides evidence of denitrifier activity and reducing conditions. This is surprising when compared to the absence of denitrification in non-IWS unvegetated or E. purpureum columns, suggesting a unique microbiome to which other unusual behaviors of P. virgatum replicates might be attributed. For example, clogging and high effluent TOC/TSS could have been caused by bacteria, their byproducts, and NaCl-induced dispersion. IWS seemed to enhance these effects, the moisture possibly increasing microbial activity.
The death of most plants in spring 2023 made the analysis of biomass inconclusive. Combined root and surface removal averaged 0.53 g N, 0.15 g P, 1.46 mg Cu, and 3.59 mg Zn. Plant death would release this material. NaCl and IWS were not linked with biomass contaminant accumulation. Anecdotally, roots were dense and grew to the bottom of all non-IWS columns, but IWS zones created a barrier, and fewer roots grew into them.
Conclusions
-
1)
Higher NaCl loads reduced early 2022 TP, Cu, Zn, and TSS average removal efficiencies by 6, 4, 14, and 12 percentage points, respectively, before they recovered in summer. Effluent loads spiked during the late winter and early summer, varying by pollutant, with onset delayed by weeks or months from NaCl application. While annual removal efficiencies were positive, the spring effluent contaminant spikes are concerning, coinciding with increased biological activity in stream ecosystems,27 exceeding EPA acute toxicity criteria for Cu and Zn.15 While studies show salt concentration to influence contaminant mobilization,65 other influences include bioretention design/maintenance and NaCl application rate/schedule.
-
2)
With live vegetation, TN annual removal efficiency was 49%, but plant health was susceptible to NaCl. Timely replacement after the death of some E. purpureum in 2022 prevented annual TN export, and regular maintenance and monitoring are important for bioretention exposed to NaCl. Effects were less pronounced for other analytes, but vegetation mitigated TP and Cu response to NaCl, increasing average TP removal efficiency by 11 percentage points in non-IWS replicates.
-
3)
While IWS influenced NaCl persistence, increasing chloride effluent concentrations by 47% after NaCl dosing, it also mitigated the effects of NaCl, increasing annual removal efficiencies by 3 percentage points for TP and 7 for Cu. IWS provided redundancy for removal processes, especially for nitrate, when vegetation was absent or inactive or NaCl interfered with soil removal mechanisms.
-
4)
While reducing NaCl exposure is the best way to ensure effective bioretention performance, selecting salt-tolerant plants, diligent replacement of dead plants, and addition of media amendments or IWS that create redundant removal mechanisms can mitigate the effects of NaCl.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Chesapeake Bay Trust Pooled Monitoring Initiative’s Restoration Research Program. Funding was provided in part by the U.S. EPA under assistance agreement CB96358101 and CB96358201 to the Chesapeake Bay Trust. Support was also provided by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under Project #PEN04873 and Accession #7005725. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does the EPA endorse trade names or recommend the use of commercial products mentioned in this document. Thanks to Randall Bock, Scott DiLoreto, and the McPhillips research group for providing advice and assistance. Thanks also to Metzler Forest Products and North Creek Nurseries for donating woodchips and plants. Thank you to the three anonymous reviewers who provided constructive feedback that improved the paper.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00062.
Effluent loads by treatment for TN, NO3––N, TP, TOC, Cu, Zn, and TSS (Figures S1–S7) (PDF)
Author Present Address
∥ Office of Sustainability and Environmental Management, Arlington County, 2100 Clarendon Blvd, Arlington, Virginia 22201, United States
Author Contributions
This manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. CRediT: Alexander H Brown conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing-original draft, writing-review & editing; Margaret C Hoffman conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, writing-review & editing; Lauren Elyse McPhillips conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, writing-review & editing.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Kaushal S. S.; Belt K. T. The urban watershed continuum: Evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosyst. 2012, 15, 409–435. 10.1007/s11252-012-0226-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A. P.; Shokouhian M.; Sharma H.; Minami C. Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environ. Res. 2001, 73 (1), 5–14. 10.2175/106143001X138624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A. P.; Hunt W. F.; Traver R. G.; Clar M. Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135 (3), 109–117. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J.; Davis A. P. A unified look at phosphorus treatment using bioretention. Water Res. 2016, 90, 141–155. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blecken G.-T.; Zinger Y.; Deletić A.; Fletcher T. D.; Viklander M. Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35 (5), 769–778. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clary J.; Jones J.; Leisenring M.; Hobson P.; Strecker E.. International stormwater BMP database: 2020 summary statistics; Project No. 4968; The Water Research Foundation: Alexandria, 2020. https://www.waterrf.org/system/files/resource/2020-11/DRPT-4968_0.pdf.
- Fletcher T. D.; Duncan H.; Poelsma P.; Lloyd S.. Stormwater flow and quality and the effectiveness of non-proprietary stormwater treatment measures: A review and gap analysis; Technical Report 04/8; Cooperative Research Center for Catchment Hydrology: Canberra, 2004.
- LeFevre G. H.; Paus K. H.; Natarajan P.; Gulliver J. S.; Novak P. J.; Hozalski R. M. Review of dissolved pollutants in urban storm water and their removal and fate in bioretention cells. J. Environ. Eng. 2015, 141 (1), 04014050 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly V. R.; Findlay S. E. G.; Weathers K. C.. Road salt: The problem, the solution, and how to get there; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies: New York, 2019. https://www.caryinstitute.org/sites/default/files/public/downloads/report_road_salt.pdf.
- Snodgrass J. W.; Moore J.; Lev S. M.; Casey R. E.; Ownby D. R.; Flora R. F.; Izzo G. Influence of modern stormwater management practices on transport of road salt to surface waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (8), 4165–4172. 10.1021/acs.est.6b03107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgis C. R.; Hayes G. M.; Henderson D. A.; Zhang W.; Smith J. A. Green stormwater infrastructure redirects deicing salt from surface water to groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 729, 138736 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goor J.; Cantelon J.; Smart C. C.; Robinson C. E. Seasonal performance of field bioretention systems in retaining phosphorus in a cold climate: Influence of prolonged road salt application. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146069 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Natarajan P.; Davis A. P. Performance of a ‘transitioned’ infiltration basin part 1: TSS, metals, and chloride removals. Water Environ. Res. 2015, 87 (9), 823–834. 10.2175/106143015X14362865226112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bäckström M.; Karlsson S.; Bäckman L.; Folkeson L.; Lind B. Mobilisation of heavy metals by deicing salts in a roadside environment. Water Res. 2004, 38 (3), 720–732. 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Recommended Water Quality Criteria; United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington, DC; 2004. https://www.epa.gov/wqc/national-recommended-water-quality-criteria-tables.
- McManus M.; Davis A. P. Impact of periodic high concentrations of salt on bioretention water quality performance. J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 2020, 6 (4), 04020014 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Acosta J. A.; Jansen B.; Kalbitz K.; Faz A.; Martínez-Martínez S. Salinity increases mobility of heavy metals in soils. Chemosphere 2011, 85 (8), 1318–1324. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szota C.; Farrell C.; Livesley S. J.; Fletcher T. D. Salt tolerant plants increase nitrogen removal from biofiltration systems affected by saline stormwater. Water Res. 2015, 83, 195–204. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paus K. H.; Morgan J.; Gulliver J. S.; Leiknes T.; Hozalski R. M. Effects of temperature and NaCl on toxic metal retention in bioretention media. J. Environ. Eng. 2014, 140 (10), 04014034 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peltier E.; Saadi J.; Chen X.; Young C. B.. Metal Sequestration and Remobilization in Bioretention Media. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change, Providence, RI Palmer R. N., Ed.; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, 2010; pp 3028–3037.
- Amrhein C.; Mosher P. A.; Strong J. E. Colloid-assisted transport of trace metals in roadside soils receiving deicing salts. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57 (5), 1212–1217. 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700050009x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Behbahani A.; Ryan R. J.; McKenzie E. R. Impacts of salinity on the dynamics of fine particles and their associated metals during stormwater management. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146135 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kakuturu S. P.; Clark S. E. Effects of deicing salts on the clogging of stormwater filter media and on the media chemistry. J. Environ. Eng. 2015, 141 (9), 04015020 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Amrhein C.; Strong J. E.; Mosher P. A. Effect of deicing salts on metal and organic matter mobilization in roadside soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26 (4), 703–709. 10.1021/es00028a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Endreny T.; Burke D. J.; Burchhardt K. M.; Fabian M. W.; Kretzer A. M. Bioretention column study of bacteria community response to salt-enriched artificial stormwater. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41 (6), 1951–1959. 10.2134/jeq2012.0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kratky H.; Li Z.; Chen Y.; Wang C.; Li X.; Yu T. A critical literature review of bioretention research for stormwater management in cold climate and future research recommendations. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11 (4), 16 10.1007/s11783-017-0982-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaushal S. S.; Reimer J. E.; Mayer P. M.; Shatkay R. R.; Maas C. M.; Nguyen W. D.; Boger W. L.; Yaculak A. M.; Doody T. R.; Pennino M. J.; Bailey N. W.; Galella J. G.; Weingrad A.; Collison D. C.; Wood K. L.; Haq S.; Newcomer-Johnson T. A.; Duan S.; Belt K. T. Freshwater salinization syndrome alters retention and release of chemical cocktails along flowpaths: From stormwater management to urban streams. Freshwater Sci. 2022, 41 (3), 420–441. 10.1086/721469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Søberg L. C.; Al-Rubaei A. M.; Viklander M.; Blecken G.-T. Phosphorus and TSS removal by stormwater bioretention: Effects of temperature, salt, and a submerged zone and their interactions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231 (6), 270 10.1007/s11270-020-04646-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Valtanen M.; Sillanpää N.; Setälä H. A large-scale lysimeter study of stormwater biofiltration under cold climatic conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 100, 89–98. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson I. J.; Igielski S.; Davis A. P. Enhanced denitrification in bioretention using woodchips as an organic carbon source. J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 2015, 1 (4), 04015004 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zinger Y.; Blecken G.-T.; Fletcher T. D.; Viklander M.; Deletić A. Optimising nitrogen removal in existing stormwater biofilters: Benefits and tradeoffs of a retrofitted saturated zone. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 51, 75–82. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun X.; Davis A. P. Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere 2007, 66 (9), 1601–1609. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denich C.; Bradford A.; Drake J. Bioretention: Assessing effects of winter salt and aggregate application on plant health, media clogging and effluent quality. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 2013, 48 (4), 387–399. 10.2166/wqrjc.2013.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muerdter C. P.; Smith D. J.; Davis A. P. Impact of vegetation selection on nitrogen and phosphorus processing in bioretention containers. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 92 (2), 236–244. 10.1002/wer.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Payne E. G. I.; Pham T.; Cook P. L. M.; Fletcher T. D.; Hatt B. E.; Deletić A. Biofilter design for effective nitrogen removal from stormwater – influence of plant species, inflow hydrology and use of a saturated zone. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69 (6), 1312–1319. 10.2166/wst.2014.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donaghue A. G.; Morgan N.; Toran L.; McKenzie E. R. The impact of bioretention column internal water storage underdrain height on denitrification under continuous and transient flow. Water Res. 2022, 214, 118205 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin E. A.; Davis M. P.; Moorman T. B.; Isenhart T. M.; Soupir M. L. Impact of hydraulic residence time on nitrate removal in pilot-scale woodchip bioreactors. J. Environ. Manage. 2019, 237, 424–432. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bäckström M.; Nilsson U.; Håkansson K.; Allard B.; Karlsson S. Speciation of heavy metals in road runoff and roadside total deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003, 147 (1), 343–366. 10.1023/A:1024545916834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Søberg L. C.; Viklander M.; Blecken G.-T. Do salt and low temperature impair metal treatment in stormwater bioretention cells with or without a submerged zone?. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1588–1599. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Søberg L. C.; Viklander M.; Blecken G.-T. The influence of temperature and salt on metal and sediment removal in stormwater biofilters. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69 (11), 2295–2304. 10.2166/wst.2014.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Es H. V.; Schindelbeck R.; Ristow A.; Kurtz K.; Fennell L.. Soil Health Manual Series: Soil Organic Matter; Fact sheet #16–08; Cornell University School of Integrative Plant Sciences: Ithaca, 2017; https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.cornell.edu/dist/7/9922/files/2021/11/08OM.pdf.
- Kroetsch D.; Wang C.. Particle Size Distribution. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd ed.; Carter M. R.; Gregorich E. G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2008; Chapter 55, pp 713–725. [Google Scholar]
- McNett J. K.; Hunt W. F.; Davis A. P. Influent pollutant concentrations as predictors of effluent pollutant concentrations for mid-Atlantic bioretention. J. Environ. Eng. 2011, 137 (9), 790–799. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lucas W. C.; Greenway M. Nutrient Retention in Vegetated and Nonvegetated Bioretention Mesocosms. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2008, 134 (5), 613–623. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:5(613). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dietz M. E.; Clausen J. C. Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (4), 1335–1340. 10.1021/es051644f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nanzyo M.; Kanno H.; Obara S. Effect of reducing conditions on P sorption of soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50 (7), 1023–1028. 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy K. R.; D’Angelo E. M.. Soil Processes Regulating Water Quality in Wetlands. In Global Wetlands: Old World and New; Mitsch W. J., Ed.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, 1994; pp 309–324. [Google Scholar]
- Glaister B.; Fletcher T. D.; Cook P.; Hatt B. Co-optimization of phosphorus and nitrogen removal in stormwater biofilters: The role of filter media, vegetation and saturated zone. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69 (9), 1961–1969. 10.2166/wst.2014.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M.-H.; Swapp M.; Kim M. H.; Chu K.-H.; Sung C. Y. Comparing bioretention designs with and without an internal water storage layer for treating highway runoff. Water Environ. Res. 2014, 86 (5), 387–397. 10.2175/106143013X13789303501920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer E. T.; Poor C. J.; Hinman C.; Stark J. D. Nitrate and phosphate removal through enhanced bioretention media: Mesocosm study. Water Environ. Res. 2013, 85 (9), 823–832. 10.2175/106143013X13736496908997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kratky H.; Li Z.; Yu T.; Li X.; Jia H. Study on bioretention for stormwater management in cold climate, part II: Water quality. J. Water Clim. Change 2021, 12 (8), 3582–3601. 10.2166/wcc.2021.172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Weil R. R.; Brady N. C.. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed.; Pearson Education, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Blecken G.-T.; Zinger Y.; Deletić A.; Fletcher T. D.; Viklander M. Influence of intermittent wetting and drying conditions on heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters. Water Res. 2009, 43 (18), 4590–4598. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Read J.; Fletcher T. D.; Wevill T.; Deletic A. Plant traits that enhance pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Int. J. Phytorem. 2009, 12 (1), 34–53. 10.1080/15226510902767114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rycewicz-Borecki M.; McLean J. E.; Dupont R. R. Bioaccumulation of copper, lead, and zinc in six macrophyte species grown in simulated stormwater bioretention systems. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 166, 267–275. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norrström A.; Jacks G. Concentration and fractionation of heavy metals in roadside soils receiving de-icing salts. Sci. Total Environ. 1998, 218, 161–174. 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00203-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lange K.; Österlund H.; Viklander M.; Blecken G.-T. Metal speciation in stormwater bioretention: Removal of particulate, colloidal and truly dissolved metals. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138121 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Read J.; Wevill T.; Fletcher T.; Deletić A. Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Res. 2008, 42 (4), 893–902. 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark S.; Pitt R. Storm-water filter media pollutant retention under aerobic versus anaerobic conditions. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135 (5), 367–371. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hsieh C.-h.; Davis A. P. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131 (11), 1521–1531. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:11(1521). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Subramaniam D. N.; Egodawatta P.; Mather P.; Rajapakse J. P. Stabilization of stormwater biofilters: Impacts of wetting and drying phases and the addition of organic matter to filter media. Environ. Manage. 2015, 56 (3), 630–642. 10.1007/s00267-015-0530-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty S. K.; Saiers J. E.; Ryan J. N. Colloid-facilitated mobilization of metals by freeze–thaw cycles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (2), 977–984. 10.1021/es403698u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komlos J.; Traver R. G. Long-term orthophosphate removal in a field-scale storm-water bioinfiltration rain garden. J. Environ. Eng. 2012, 138 (10), 991–998. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Glaister B. J.; Fletcher T. D.; Cook P. L. M.; Hatt B. E. Interactions between design, plant growth and the treatment performance of stormwater biofilters. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 105, 21–31. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Galella J. G.; Kaushal S. S.; Mayer P. M.; Maas C. M.; Shatkay R. R.; Stutzke R. A. Stormwater best management practices: Experimental evaluation of chemical cocktails mobilized by freshwater salinization syndrome. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1–20. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1020914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.