Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Jun 16;16(6):e62478. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62478

Recurrent Fungemia Due to Candida auris

Emma M Griffith 1,, Christopher Marsalisi 1, Jorge Verdecia 2, Stefanie R Buchanan 3, Michael A Goulart 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11251896  PMID: 39022480

Abstract

We present a case of recurrent multidrug-resistant Candida auris (C. auris) in a patient who required multiple hospitalizations. The patient’s case was complicated by interval admissions to the intensive care unit for septic and hypovolemic shock for 12 months to manage C. auris fungemia. Despite adequate isolation precautions and appropriate antifungal treatment, this case demonstrates the profound implications of this emerging pathogen, specifically regarding invasive infections. Moreover, C. auris is rapidly becoming known as a multidrug-resistant organism, which limits treatment options and thus contributes to high mortality.

Keywords: candidemia, infection prevention and control, immunocompromised patients, anti-microbial resistance, fungemia, candida auris

Introduction

Discovered in 2009, Candida auris is a clinically significant yeast due to high mortality rates of those infected and increasing resistance to antifungal drugs [1]. More recently, media coverage and literature have illustrated the hazards of such an organism, especially in immunocompromised populations. Colonization can occur after hospitalization, but invasive infections with C. auris occur more frequently in patients who require intensive care. As with other species of Candida, known risk factors include immunocompromised status, indwelling catheters or devices, renal disease, older age, and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics [2]. This case was previously presented as a meeting abstract at Florida Chapter American College of Physicians (ACP) Fall 2023.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old female with a past medical history of traumatic brain injury complicated by incomplete spastic quadriplegia, seizure disorder, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and jejunal-enterocutaneous fistula at prior gastrostomy-jejunostomy tube site was admitted for management of hypotension due to high output fistula as well as electrolyte abnormalities. No history of tobacco, illicit drug, or alcohol use was reported. Of note, she had fungemia due to C. auris 10 months previously, which was attributed to the presence of a central venous catheter and successfully treated with catheter removal and 14 days of caspofungin. Multiple repeat blood cultures were negative for growth after completing the treatment course.

During this admission, she was unable to tolerate oral intake of food due to a high-output jejunal fistula, so she was started on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Enhanced contact precautions were maintained, and she remained in a private room. She developed acute encephalopathy and a fever of 102.6˚F, but her PICC had no signs of infection upon examination. Infectious workup was notable for positive aerobic blood cultures with Candida, specifically two sets of cultures with one set being from the PICC in addition to catheter tip culture. The yeast was further speciated via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry to Candida auris. Due to her fungemia, her PICC was removed, and she was started on caspofungin. Susceptibility testing via broth microdilution assay revealed resistance to fluconazole and flucytosine as shown in Table 1. She then developed hypotension refractory to fluid resuscitation. She was transferred to the intensive care unit for management of mixed hypovolemic and septic shock in the setting of gastrointestinal losses and C. auris fungemia. Repeat aerobic blood cultures grew extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, which was treated with 14 days of ceftazidime-avibactam. Transthoracic echocardiography showed preserved ejection fraction, but no signs of endocarditis such as vegetations. Repeat blood cultures were negative for growth. She was stabilized off vasopressors and then transferred back to progressive care with the resumption of TPN via PICC.

Table 1. Susceptibility of C. auris strain from the patient's blood cultures.

Drug Minimum inhibitory concentration (μg/ml)
Amphotericin B 1
Caspofungin 0.12
Fluconazole >=256
Flucytosine >=64

Two weeks later, she had another febrile episode, and repeat blood cultures grew C. auris, which is shown in Figure 1. Her PICC was removed. She was started on micafungin based on further susceptibility testing. 

Figure 1. Blood culture exhibiting growth of Candida auris.

Figure 1

After family discussion, she was discharged to inpatient hospice due to multiorgan failure including shock liver and anuric renal failure prior to completion of her treatment with micafungin. Her renal failure was partially attributed to intravenous contrast exposure for imaging studies during her admission. 

Discussion

This case demonstrates reinfection with C. auris despite appropriate therapy and enhanced contact precautions. Since 2013, over 5,000 cases have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It has been increasing in incidence and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality leading to the “urgent antimicrobial resistance threat” label by the CDC due to resistance to common antifungal medications [3-4]. Controlling the spread of C. auris in healthcare facilities is challenging despite compliance with infection control measures due to limited effective disinfectants as well as its formation of biofilm leading to an ability to survive on surfaces for months [5]. Per the CDC, isolation precautions in healthcare settings should include staff use of gowns and gloves, handwashing with soap and water, and private rooms. Isolation should be maintained in patients with any history of C. auris, as colonization is frequent and there is no effective decolonization protocol or expiration date for isolation [4]. Diagnosis of C. auris is typically via culture with subsequent testing such as sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. In this case, aerobic blood cultures grew Candida, which was then speciated via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Treatment is reserved for invasive infections such as fungemia, not for asymptomatic epidermal or urinary colonization. This case was unique due to its resistance to amphotericin B but similar to other reported cases in its susceptibility to echinocandins and resistance to azoles [6-7]. Resistance patterns vary based on geographic region as well as prior exposure to antimicrobial medications. Further investigation regarding isolation precautions is needed, and central catheter use should be limited in patients with known history of C. auris.

Conclusions

Reinfection with C. auris can occur in colonized patients who underwent invasive procedures such as central line placement or developed immunocompromised status despite adherence to infection prevention guidelines per the CDC. Current recommendations include lifelong isolation precautions in these patients due to lack of decolonization protocol. There are limited efficacious antifungal medications for the treatment of this microorganism due to its increasing antimicrobial resistance. This case enhances the available body of literature and highlights the need for further investigation into infection prevention of C. auris.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Emma M. Griffith, Christopher Marsalisi

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Emma M. Griffith, Jorge Verdecia, Stefanie R. Buchanan, Michael A. Goulart

Drafting of the manuscript:  Emma M. Griffith, Christopher Marsalisi, Stefanie R. Buchanan, Michael A. Goulart

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Emma M. Griffith, Jorge Verdecia

Supervision:  Jorge Verdecia

References


Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES