Abstract
Background
Given the heterogeneity and high mortality associated with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, this study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of combining 177Lu-FAPI-46 with Pazopanib against this malignancy.
Methods
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-bearing mice were randomly divided into three groups: the control group, the 177Lu-FAPI-46 monotherapy group, and the 177Lu-FAPI-46 combined with Pazopanib therapy group. Therapeutic efficacy was regularly monitored.
Results
The microPET imaging showed a 0.84-fold decrease in the T/M ratio of 68Ga-FAPI-46 on day 7/8 post combination therapy, while the control group exhibited a 1.23-fold increase. Combination therapy significantly inhibited tumor proliferation, as evidenced by reduced Ki-67 and increased caspase 3 expressions. Notably, there was no significant body weight loss observed in any group.
Conclusion
This study successfully demonstrated the reduction in FAP expression and suppression of tumor volume in sarcoma PDX following the combination therapy of 177Lu-FAPI-46 with Pazopanib.
Keywords: Sarcoma, Patient-derived xenograft (PDX), Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), 177Lu-FAPI-46
1. Introduction
Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare and heterogeneous cancer that can occur in various body parts. With over 50 different types according to WHO classification, it is challenging to establish a standard treatment. Treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The 5-year survival rate for localized STS is around 80%, dropping sharply to 15% for metastatic STS [1]. The discovery of an effective treatment strategy is imperative.
Despite 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) being the most commonly used positron emission tomography (PET) tracer, its sensitivity to detect some types of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), especially low-grade sarcomas, is unacceptable, rendering it not recommended for STS diagnosis [2,3]. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a glycoprotein expressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) within the microenvironment of most epithelial tumors [4]. In therapeutic applications, Liu et al. demonstrated that both 177Lu-FAPI-46 can impede the growth of PANC xenografts and are rapidly excreted from the kidneys [5]. Despite the limited number of patients [6], the therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-FAPI-46 for sarcoma patients did not meet expectations, indicating that the failure of a singular radiolabeled FAPI regimen may be attributed to the distinct biological characteristics.
Pazopanib (Votrient), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), operates by suppressing the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors α and β, as well as the stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT). This inhibition disrupts downstream proliferation signal transduction, demonstrating notable antitumor efficacy in STS patients [7]. However, TKI resistance commonly develops in cancer patients upon recurrence. Considering that 177Lu-FAPI-46 can effectively induce CAFs death, we aim to assess the therapeutic efficacy of combining 177Lu-FAPI-46 with Pazopanib to investigate whether this combination therapy can overcome resistance and address the limited effectiveness observed with 177Lu-FAPI-46 as a monotherapy.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. The preparation of 68Ga- and 177Lu-FAPI-46
FAPI-46 was obtained from Novartis Co. Ltd. (Switzerland). The synthesis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 was conducted following previously published methods [8]. Details regarding 177Lu labeling are provided in the supplementary material.
2.2. Establishment of a sarcoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model
The protocol was derived from the method published by Lin et al. [9]. Details regarding the establishment of PDX are provided in the supplementary material.
2.3. Micro-positron emission tomography (microPET) imaging
Mice with sarcoma xenografts were imaged on days 0, 7/8, and 14 after intravenous injection of 68Ga-FAPI-46. The scan was conducted for 20 min after a 30-min uptake period of the tracer (nanoScan PET/CT, Mediso, Hungary). Images were corrected using scattering correction, attenuation correction by CT images, and positron range correction. Radioactivity was quantified using PMOD software version 3.2 (PMOD Technologies LLC., Switzerland). Tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M) was used to compare the relative uptake of 68Ga-FAPI-46 before and after treatment.
2.4. Evaluation of the efficacy of different treatment approaches
Xenograft-bearing mice were randomly divided into three groups: the control group, the 177Lu-FAPI-46 monotherapy group, and the 177Lu-FAPI-46 combined with Pazopanib therapy group. In the 177Lu-FAPI-46 monotherapy and combination therapy groups, 177Lu-FAPI-46 (∼7.4 MBq/mouse) was administered via the tail vein on the next day of microPET imaging (day 1) and on day 7. Pazopanib was at a dosage of 150 mg/kg/day for 1 week. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, tumor size and body weight were measured weekly using calipers and a balance. Tumor size (mm3) was calculated using the formula: 0.5 × width2 × length.
2.5. Histological and immunohistochemistry analysis
Details regarding staining protocols are provided in the supplementary material.
2.6. Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as MSE. Student's t-test was employed for intergroup comparisons, with statistical significance considered at P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. The microPET imaging of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a sarcoma PDX mouse model
MicroPET imaging revealed a significant uptake of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in the PDX sarcoma on the right flank of mice following intravenous injection [Fig. 1]. The tumor uptake of 68Ga-FAPI-46 without treatment was expressed as T/M, 3.22 ± 1.77 (n = 4). Radioactivity was notably retained in the kidneys and bladder, consistent with the predominant urinary excretion pathway of 68Ga-FAPI-46. During the treatment, the level of FAP expression was monitored using 68Ga-FAPI-46 microPET imaging. The results indicated a 1.23-fold increase in the T/M ratio without any treatment, while it was 0.75-fold on day 7/8 and then increased to 1.08 on day 14 in the monotherapy group. Additionally, there was a 0.84-fold decrease in the T/M ratio of 68Ga-FAPI-46 on day 7/8 after combination therapy, without relapse [Fig. 1].
Fig. 1.
The representative PET/CT images of the control and 177Lu-FAPI-46 + PAZO treatment groups were evaluated before and after treatment using 68Ga-FAPI-46.
3.2. The therapeutic efficacy of combination therapy
In the control group, mice displayed a continuous increase in tumor volume, resulting in the demise of all mice around day 20 [Fig. 2A]. The overall tumor growth curve showed that while 177Lu-FAPI-46 monotherapy suppressed the tumor proliferation, combination therapy was the most effective. Furthermore, there were no significant changes in the body weight of mice in each group before and after treatment [Fig. 2B], and no apparent adverse reactions were observed.
Fig. 2.
The effectiveness of monotherapy and combination therapy. (A) Relative tumor volume. (B) The body weight of the mice in each group during the treatment. (C) Tumors analysis by HE and IHC staining.
3.3. Histological and immunohistochemistry analysis
The H&E staining of tumors in either monotherapy or combination group revealed necrosis and shrinkage of nuclei boundaries, indicative of therapeutic efficacy [Fig. 2C]. FAP expression within the tumors was pronounced in the control (CTRL) group, whereas tumors treated with 177Lu-FAPI-46 exhibited reduced FAP expression. Additionally, a marked downregulation of Ki-67 expression was also noticed in the treated tumors. Although there were no significant differences in Ki-67 expression between the 177Lu-FAPI-46 monotherapy and combination groups, the combination therapy group displayed a substantial increase in caspase-3 expression within the tumor, indicating successful induction of tumor damage by the therapy [Fig. 2C].
4. Discussions
The theranostics concept - integrating diagnostic and therapeutic functions within the same radiopharmaceutical molecular targeting platform, has been the cornerstone of therapeutic nuclear medicine since the introduction for treatment of thyroid disease [10]. It allows precise molecular imaging to reflect unique molecular pathology of tumor cells, and identifies individuals who may benefit tumor molecular phenotype-targeted radionuclide therapy. This diagnostic/therapeutic model had achieved great success in different tumor type, such as neuroendocrine tumors [11] and mCRPC prostate cancer [12]. The current proof-of-concept preclinical experiment using FAPI targeting the stroma of sarcoma, is expected to be another successful model and can bring great impact in this malignant disease.
Approximately 90% of drugs or anti-cancer therapies that owned promising preclinical results are failed in the clinical phase. The main reason may be that the monolayer cell culture and in vivo human xenografts did not tell the “real story” because they showed different phenotypes to adapt to the environment. Regarding the importance of tumor microenvironment in FAPI studies, we applied the PDX model to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy as it can recruit stromal cells that are composed of CAFs, tumor endothelial cells, tumor-associated macrophages and so on [13]. When compared to the conventional tumor model, the PDX model can retain heterogeneity and mutations, which is crucial to TKI studies. In fact, sarcoma does not belong to the five most common PDX models (lung cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer). This is one of the reasons why we established this model in the present study.
The primary strength of this study lies in providing proof-of-concept data supporting the rationale for combining 177Lu-FAPI-46 with Pazopanib in sarcoma treatment. However, it is important to acknowledge several limitations. Firstly, the study primarily assessed the feasibility of combination therapy using a PDX animal model; however, determining tumor volume is challenging due to the inclusion of the original implanted tumor mass, resulting in difficulties in evaluating therapeutic efficacy by caliper measurement. Secondly, we did not elucidate the detailed mechanism for the efficacy of combination therapy. Further studies are needed in this regard.
5. Conclusions
This study effectively showcased reduced FAP expression in sarcoma PDX through combined therapy of 177Lu-FAPI-46 and Pazopanib, as indicated by 68Ga-FAPI-46 imaging. Moreover, the combination therapy notably slowed tumor proliferation, offering valuable insights for future clinical treatments.
Funding
The authors thank the financial support from grants CMRPVVM0101 and CMRPVVN0241.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the technical supports provided by Laboratory Animal Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chang Gung University.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2024.100744.
Contributor Information
Yi-Hsiu Chung, Email: stella720905@gmail.com.
Chun-Yi Wu, Email: chunyiwu@nycu.edu.tw.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Ardakani AHG., Woollard A, Ware H, Gikas P. Soft tissue sarcoma: Recognizing a rare disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2022;89(2):73–80. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.89a.21078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benz MR, Crompton JG, Harder D. PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2021;51(6):584–592. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salaün PY, Abgral R, Malard O, Querellou-Lefranc S, Quere G, Wartski M, et al. Good clinical practice recommendations for the use of PET/CT in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2020;47(1):28–50. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04553-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brennen WN, Isaacs JT, Denmeade SR. Rationale behind targeting fibroblast activation protein-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts as a novel chemotherapeutic strategy. Mol Cancer Therapeut. 2012;11(2):257–266. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Y, Watabe T, Kaneda-Nakashima K, Shirakami Y, Naka S, Ooe K, et al. Fibroblast activation protein targeted therapy using [(177)Lu]FAPI-46 compared with [(225)Ac]FAPI-46 in a pancreatic cancer model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2022;49(3):871–880. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05554-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Assadi M, Rekabpour SJ, Jafari E, Divband G, Nikkholgh B, Amini H, et al. Feasibility and therapeutic potential of 177Lu-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-46 for patients with relapsed or refractory cancers: a preliminary study. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46(11):e523–30. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee ATJ, Jones RL, Huang PH. Pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Signal Transduct Targeted. Ther. 2019;4:16. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0049-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kristiansson A, Örbom A, Ahlstedt J, Karlsson H, Zedan W, Gram M, et al. (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy in mice, with or without the Antioxidant α(1)-Microglobulin (A1M), including kidney damage assessment using (99m)Tc-MAG3 imaging. Biomolecules. 2021;11(2):263. doi: 10.3390/biom11020263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lin CY, Wu RC, Huang CY, Lai CH, Chao AS, Li HP, et al. A patient-derived xenograft model of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a proof-of-concept study for the identification of new molecularly informed treatment approaches. Cancers. 2021;13(23):5962. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Herrmann K, Giovanella L, Santos A, Gear J, Kiratli PO, Kurth J, et al. Joint EANM SNMMI and IAEA enabling guide: how to set up a theranostics centre. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2022;49(7):2300–2309. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05785-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. Phase 3 trial of (177)Lu-dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):125–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091–1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abdolahi S, Ghazvinian Z, Muhammadnejad S, Saleh M. Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Baghaei K.Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, applications and challenges in cancer research. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03405-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


