Abstract
The natural product jasplakinolide is widely used to stabilize F-actin. Based on extensive structure–activity relationship studies, we have developed a new generation of photoswitchable jasplakinolides that feature rationally designed red-shifted azobenzene photoswitches. Our lead compound, nOJ, can be activated with longer wavelengths in the visible range (e.g. 440–475 nm) and rapidly returns to its inactive state through thermal relaxation. nOJ enables the reversible control of F-actin dynamics, as shown through live-cell imaging, cell migration, and cell proliferation assays. Short, local irradiation with blue light resulted in highly localized and reversible actin aggregation with subcellular precision. Our optical tool can be useful in diverse fields to study actin dynamics with excellent spatiotemporal resolution.
Keywords: Actin, Azobenzenes, Cytoskeleton, Optical Control, Photopharmacology
Introduction
Actin is the most abundant protein in eukaryotic cells and a key element of the cytoskeleton. It is involved in a wide range of cellular functions: e.g. it serves as a regulator for cell shape and cell cycle progression, is implicated in various cellular signaling cascades, and indirectly regulates transcription.[1,2] The actin cytoskeleton is formed by reversible assembly of monomeric G-actin to filamentous F-actin. The dynamics of this process and the large number of interactions of G- and F-actin with other proteins, such as profilin, thymosin β−4, tropomyosin, and cofilin, makes the actin cytoskeleton challenging to study mechanistically.[2,3]
Natural products have evolved that interfere with the dynamic instability of the actin cytoskeleton in various ways.[4] These molecules not only affect the interaction between actin monomers but also interfere with actin binding proteins.[4,5] Jasplakinolides and phalloidin disrupt actin dynamics by stabilizing F-actin as molecular glues that stabilize protomer assemblies.[6] Kabiramide C and related structures can sever actin filaments,[7–9] whereas cytochalasin D and pectenotoxin cap actin filaments at the barbed end and so prevent further polymerization.[10–12] Latrunculin A sequesters actin monomers by blocking its ATP binding site,[13,14] and swinholide A removes actin monomers from the G-actin pool as a 1:2 complex.[15,16]
Each of these sophisticated natural products, whose binding sites have been well characterized by structural biology, could become a basis for actin-targeting probes that impart additional functionalities. Of particular interest is optical control, which could be achieved by the introduction of a small molecule photoswitch, that changes the efficacy of the probe upon irradiation.[17–20] We have recently reported on the optical control of F-actin with a first generation photoswitchable jasplakinolide (optojasp, OJ) that could be activated with violet and deactivated with blue light (Figure 1A).[21] We now present a new generation of optojasps that were developed based on structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis and examination of the pose of optojasps inside the binding cleft. This new generation can be efficiently activated with blue to cyan light and shows a large change in potency between the active and inactive state. Importantly, these new optojasps thermally relax within seconds to the inactive form once the light source is turned off. With these improved biological, photophysical and thermal properties, we demonstrate temporally reversible optical control of the actin cytoskeleton with sub-cellular spatial resolution.
Results and Discussion
Design, Synthesis, and Preliminary Evaluation
Our improved optojasp design was guided by three considerations: a) red-shifting the activation wavelength for biological experimentation under milder conditions, b) thermally destabilizing the bioactive cis isomer to suppress diffusion-based inhibition in biological studies, and c) enhancing the difference in potency between the two isomeric forms, with ideally only one isomer showing activity, and the other one being fully inactive in the dark. Optojasps feature the jasplakinolide macrocycle, which enables selective binding to the target, a linker, and the azobenzene switch that regulates the activity and specifies the photophysical properties. Our recent cryo-EM structure of optojasp-8 bound to F-actin showed that the macrocyclic core adopts a pose that is very similar to jasplakinolide itself (Figure 1B).[22] The photoswitch binds in a pocket that is also occupied by phalloidin according to X-ray and cryo-EM structures.[6] The cis azobenzene mimics the phalloidin-actin interaction better than the corresponding trans isomer, explaining the increased activity of optojasp-8 upon irradiation (Figure 1C). The linker was not resolved in the cryo-EM structures and seemed to be inconsequential for binding. Upon further inspection of the photoswitch binding pocket, we reasoned that an increase in steric demand at the distal arene should further enhance differences in activity between the isomers. According to our analysis, the trans isomer should not be able to bind at all if sufficiently bulky derivatives were employed. By contrast, a sterically demanding substituent of the cis isomer could be accommodated. Aiming at redshifted and thermally destabilized photoswitches, we therefore decided to explore para amino azobenzenes that are larger than the original optojasp series. Electron rich aniline-derived azobenzenes are well known to be both red-shifted and fast relaxing.[23,24]
The new series of photoswitchable jasplakinolide derivatives was synthesized following previously developed methodology (Figure 2).[25,26] Easily obtained peptide carboxylic acid 2 underwent esterification with secondary alcohol 3 to yield diene 4. A subsequent ring closing metathesis, followed by deprotection, furnished a primary amine, which underwent amide coupling with a variety of azobenzene carboxylic acids.[27] This gave a library of depsipeptides, exemplified by compounds 5–14, which feature a benzomorpholine moiety with different N-substituents. Derivatives with an extended linker, such as 15, were explored as well (Figure 2D, Table S6). In addition, we explored sterically less demanding azobenzene derivatives, including simple anilines and phenol ethers (Table S3, S4). Modifications of the macrocyclic core, such as additional methyl groups and amide bonds (16), were also investigated (Table S1, S2). Substitutions on the proximal arene, as well as extended arenes and additional polar substituents were briefly investigated, too (Table S5).
The newly synthesized optojasps were first evaluated in light-dependent cell proliferation assays using a cell DISCO-system (Table 1 and Supporting Information).[28] The introduction of para-amino substituents resulted in the expected bathochromic shift together with a strong decrease in thermal half-life for the activated (cis) isomer as seen for analogous photoswitches.[29,30] We found that compound 6 (R=Bn) was completely inactive in the dark but became highly cytotoxic upon irradiation with 410 nm light. Introduction of para substituents on the benzyl residue was tolerated for a trifluoromethyl substituent, but methyl, methoxy or tert-butyl groups reduced activity of the cis isomer while remaining inactive in the dark. The introduction of halogen substituents did not improve activity of cis nOJ. Unsubstituted benzomorpholine 7 only showed negligible light dependence, whereas the phenethyl derivative 14 was inactive in both the cis and trans form.
Table 1:
# | EC50 [µM] light | EC50 [µM] dark | Δ light/dark | t1/2 [sec.][a] | λ(Absmax)[a,b] [nm] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
5 | 0.37 | 0.54 | – | < 1 | 414 |
6 (nOJ) | 0.74 | > 10 | + + | 2 | 448 |
7 | > 10 | > 10 | – | < 1 | 448 |
8 | > 10 | > 10 | – | 3 | 443 |
9 | 0.59 | > 10 | + + | 8 | 438 |
10 | 0.99 | > 10 | + + | 2 | 448 |
11 | 0.57 | > 10 | + + | 6 | 437 |
12 | > 10 | > 10 | – | 2 | 449 |
13 | 0.45 | > 10 | + + | 22 | 438 |
14 | > 10 | > 10 | – | < 1 | 454 |
15 | 0.18 | 4.94 | + | 2 | 448 |
16 | > 10 | > 10 | – | 2 | 447 |
measured at 37°C in PBS: MeCN=2:1;
trans isomer.
Extending the linker length in 15 rendered cis 15 even more active, but trans 15 also showed increased activity, resulting in a smaller photopharmacological window. This was also observed for other derivatives with extended linkers (table S6) and sterically less demanding derivatives (table S3, S4). Modifications to the macrocyclic core did not result in improved light-dependence of activity, and amide derivatives such as 16 showed no cellular activity at all. Additional polar groups retained biological activity, albeit without light dependence (table S5). Modifications to the proximal arene of the photoswitch were not well tolerated (table S5). Overall, these observations support our hypothesis that an increased steric demand at the distal arene of the photoswitch is crucial for optimizing the difference in activity between the cis and trans isomers.
Having established that compound 6, which we term neo-optojasp (nOJ), showed the most promising activity in these initial assays, we proceeded to investigate it in more detail (Figure 3). We first evaluated the antiproliferative activity of nOJ as a function of irradiation wavelength (chromo-dosing, Figure 3B). The highest antiproliferative activity was observed at 440 nm (EC50=0.37 μM) while wavelengths above 505 nm did not lead to a biological response. Antiproliferative activities at 410 and 475 nm irradiation were comparable, suiting nOJ to microscopy applications. The chromo-dosing results are in accordance with UV/Vis spectroscopic measurements, which show that irradiation with 460 and 415 nm led to most cis isomerization, while 365 and 520 nm gave less (Figure 3C). For nOJ, the highest amount of cis isomer was achieved after illumination with 415 nm (87%) and 460 nm (82%) (Figure 3C). Photostationary states were determined from UV/Vis data by application of a mathematical model developed by Fischer.[31] The obtained data for all azobenzene structures can be found in the Supporting Information (Table S9).[27] Switching of nOJ was fully reversible and no fatigue was observed over several activation cycles in which the thermal half-life was determined to be 2 s (see Supporting Information). To ensure that the PSS is reached under physiological conditions appropriate pulsing protocols were used for cellular assays.
Evaluation of neo Optojasp Using Cellular Imaging
Having established the advantageous photophysical properties of nOJ in cell proliferation assays, we proceeded to establish its function in different biological settings. In addition to visualization by fluorescent labelling in fixed cells, we monitored the activity of nOJ using live-cell imaging. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of our lead compound on cellular migration in wound healing assays.
Figure 4A shows the effect of nOJ on HeLa cells using fluorescent labelling after fixation. In the activated (irradiated) form, nOJ induced aggregation of actin in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 4Ab, S1). The tubulin network remained unaffected under these conditions (Figure 4Af). Treatment with nOJ in the inactive (dark-adapted) form resulted in no change in actin phenotype (Figure 4Ae). Notably, the aggregates formed under irradiation gradually disappeared once the light was turned off, indicating the thermal deactivation of the filament stabilizer (16 h dark after 5 h 410 nm; Figure 4Ac). Reversibility of jasplakinolide induced F-actin aggregation upon washout has been described.[32] Our first generation of optojasps, which did not thermally relax quickly, required irradiation with a second wavelength to enforce the inactive form and their reversibility was difficult to demonstrate.[21] By contrast nOJ’s rapid cis→trans relaxation makes for full reversibility.
The full reversibility of nOJ could also be shown using live-cell imaging. For this experiment we used MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing mCherry:LifeAct, which is commonly employed to visualize F-actin.[33] Notably, the onset of aggregation was delayed following light administration. However, within 30 minutes of irradiation, lamellipodium protrusions were reduced, followed by retraction (Figure 4B, t=210 min). Subsequently, aggregate formation was observed (t=280, 400 min). After the light was turned off, these aggregates first continued to grow in size and fused to form larger structures (t=620 min). Subsequently, they migrated inwards and began to disassemble (t=870 min). Approximately 20 h after irradiation stopped, the aggregates appeared to be largely dissolved (t=1270, 1520 min). Under control conditions, i.e. in the absence of compound, the cell motility and protrusion dynamics remained unaffected during irradiation (Figure S2).
Our observations are in agreement with the effect of jasplakinolide on the inhibition of actin turnover and retrograde flow in lamellipodia.[34,35] Actin polymerization and depolymerization in lamellipodia are essential for efficient treadmilling and filament turnover takes place within seconds to minutes.[35,36] Inhibition of F-actin depolymerization leads to attenuated lamellipodium protrusion dynamics. Further, jasplakinolide has been reported to induce nucleation, which leads to a fast depletion of sequestered G-actin and also prevents filament elongation by monomer sequestration.[37] Jasplakinolide treatment leads to the formation of F-actin puncta, i.e. amorphous aggregates that coalesce into large aggresomes and inclusion bodies.[38–40] The cellular formation of these aggregates has been reported to be highly cell type dependent and to be linked to polymerization-competent G-actin concentrations. In cells with strongly pronounced actin cables and stress fibers, significant aggregate formation is observed only after the G-actin concentration has been augmented by remodeling of stress fibers.[37] The delayed observation of aggregate formation with respect to light administration can be explained by a sudden drop in the local concentration of G-actin capable of polymerization upon nOJ binding. Before filament elongation and aggregation can occur, a reorganization of the actin network is required. The prolonged growth and coalescence of actin aggregates after deactivation of nOJ (light off), as well as retrograde flow are linked to myosin II and microtubule dynamics.[38,41] Such a delay may be expected, as neither myosin II nor tubulin are affected by jasplakinolide (and hence, optojasps).[35,38] Disaggregation depends on chaperones, microtubules, proteasomes and autophagy,[32] which can explain the observed slowness of actin aggregate disassembly that we observed.
The advantage of a photoswitchable jasplakinolide is the possibility of dosing the probe with high local and spatial precision, without background activity outside an irradiated area. Therefore, we next set out to study local activation of nOJ by irradiation of a small region outside of the cell. We observed that this mode of activation led to strongly localized responses (Figure 5A). Initially, actin turnover slowed down in the lamellipodium protrusions proximal to the region of irradiation (ROI). Several minutes after light administration, this was followed by retraction of this cellular region, while protrusion dynamics remained unaltered or even accelerated in areas of the cell that were not in close proximity of the ROI. This effect can be illustrated by using a kymograph, which shows time dependent changes along a specified axis (Figure 5Aa-c). As shown in Figure 5Ab, an increase in actin protrusion dynamics can be observed in the lamellipodium region distant to the ROI. On the other hand, in the lamellipodium region close to the ROI, actin dynamics initially slowed upon irradiation before the lamellipodium was retracted (Figure 5Aa). Our results demonstrate that the active cis form of nOJ can be locally generated within a specified area outside of the cell and then diffuse through the cell membrane to reach the actin networks inside the cell. Notably, the decline of the effective concentration of cis nOJ through dilution is overlayed by the thermal inactivation of the photoswitch.
Next, we investigated local activation of nOJ in a region inside of the cell. We selected an area within a lamellipodium that was irradiated with the same light regime as previously applied. Again, protrusion dynamics initially slowed down before the lamellipodium was retracted. Aggregates were dissolved over time and the lamellipodium forefront was reestablished (Figure 5B/C, Supporting Video). As observed before, actin dynamics in regions that were more distant from the activation area, and therefore not in immediate contact with cis nOJ, did not show this effect. While retraction and reversion are processes that are often observed in migrating cells, this process is fast in unirradiated areas that were not affected by nOJ or in control cells. These dynamics appeared to be much slower when induced by cis nOJ (see above).
It has been reported that the speed with which cells respond to jasplakinolide itself, can vary strongly between differently polarized cells and different cell types.[34,37] In polarized cells, the actin networks are organized such that fast filament turnover can be ensured to drive directional membrane extension.[42] In nonpolarized cells, the barbed ends of actin filaments are capped and filament turnover is much slower.[43] It is therefore not surprising, that the effects of cis nOJ take place on different time scales depending on the actin network organization of a particular cell.
Collectively, our experiments demonstrate that neo-optojasp can be activated with comparable efficiency outside and inside of the cell and that the photophysical properties of nOJ are not greatly affected by the extra- or intracellular milieu.
Cell Migration Assays
Next, we monitored the effect of neo-optojasp on the migratory behavior of the invasive human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 in in vitro wound healing assays.[44,45] To ensure that cytotoxicity did not interfere with migration, we chose low concentrations of nOJ. Under control conditions, full wound closure occurred between 24 and 48 h. Therefore, quantification of the effects of nOJ was based on relative wound closure after 24 h. While wound closure in the presence of inactive trans nOJ (i.e. in the dark) was comparable to the control, activation of nOJ with light resulted in a strongly concentration dependent reduction of wound closure (Figure 6B). Cell viability after 48 h of treatment indicated only low cytotoxicity of light-activated nOJ at 0.5 μM. Lower concentrations appeared not to be cytotoxic at all.
We then investigated whether cell migration could be recovered following thermal relaxation after 2 h of pulsed light activation. Indeed, the degree of wound closure in these rescue experiments was comparable to the extent observed in the dark (Figure 6D). While reports of an increase in migration of cells treated with very low doses of jasplakinolide exist,[46] we have not observed this effect in our study.
Conclusion
We have introduced a new generation of photoswitchable jasplakinolides that are optimized for biological experimentation in terms of activation wavelength, thermal relaxation, reversibility, and differences in potency between the two isomers. Our lead compound, nOJ, is inactive in the dark and becomes almost half as potent as jasplakinolide itself upon irradiation with blue light. nOJ shows superior qualities in comparison to our first generation of compounds, quite apart from its significantly improved potency. The efficient activation at 475 nm allows for its use in cells and tissues that are sensitive to deep violet or UV-A light. The low thermal stability of cis nOJ, combined with the possibility of applying high concentrations of the inactive isomer, enables fast activation and deactivation in a confined area of interest. As such, it can be used to stabilize F-actin with subcellular resolution.
Fast relaxing, red-shifted photopharmaceuticals, such as nOJ, perform in several ways that are differentiated from what puff application of a drug or optical control through a caging strategy could achieve.[47] Most advantageously, considering biological applications, their dilution through diffusion is complemented by thermal relaxation to the inactive form, so the active photopharmaceutical can be applied more precisely, even in the absence of irradiation with a second wavelength, because a buildup of unwanted bioactivity throughout a sample can be avoided. Caged small molecules have proven to be highly effective for the modulation of biological activity by light-induced local release of the active drug.[48,49] However, once released, caged compounds are always active, so must be diluted or washed out again to reset the system within the photoactivation zone, which can have variable time kinetics, and which increases background activity throughout the sample. To the best of our knowledge, caged jasplakinolides or caged cell-permeant F-actin stabilizers have not yet been reported.
Our chemical probe complements optogenetic tools that have been developed to control the actin cytoskeleton.[50–52] While nOJ forgoes the power of genetic targeting of individual cell types, it does not require the overexpression of a factor that could perturb native protein networks and lead to unphysiological responses. As such, nOJ presents a powerful probe that allows for the study of systems in which local actin networks are formed or remodeled. For example, nOJ could enable the investigation of receptor mediated endocytosis, exocytosis, or fusion processes, as well as cell adhesion, with sub-cellular control. As an optical precision tool, nOJ could be used to study the local reorganization of actin networks and its effect on the redistribution of organelles.[53,54] The inactivity of nOJ in the dark makes it suitable to study actin dependent processes in confined systems, tissues, organoids, and organisms where the localized application of generally toxic drugs may be challenging. Compounds such as nOJ could be envisioned to reduce the invasiveness of cancer cells and localize cytotoxicity in malignant tissues, potentially opening an avenue for adapting actin targeting natural products towards cancer chemotherapy.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Anna Akhmanova (Utrecht University) for a generous gift of the MDA-MB-231 mCherry: LifeAct cell line, and Dr. Peter Bellstedt (NMR platform Jena) for excellent support. We thank the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes for a PhD fellowship (to N.A.V.) and the Deutsche Akademischer Austauschdienst for a PhD fellowship (to V.N.). We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1032 project B09 number 201269156 and Emmy Noether number 400324123 to O.T.S.; Cluster of Excellence EXC2051 Balance of the Microverse—Project-ID 390713860, equipment grant INST 275/442–1 FUGG to H.D.A.), and the National Institutes of Health (Grant R01GM126228, to D.T.) for financial support.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A previous version of this manuscript has been deposited on a preprint server (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.480923).
Contributor Information
Dr. Florian Küllmer, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743 Jena (Germany).
Dr. Nynke A. Vepřek, New York University, Department of Chemistry, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003 (USA); Department of Chemistry, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Butenandtstrasse 5–13, 81377 München (Germany).
Dr. Malgorzata Borowiak, Department of Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Butenandtstrasse 5–13, 81377 München (Germany)
Dr. Veselin Nasufović, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743 Jena (Germany)
Sebastian Barutzki, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743 Jena (Germany).
Dr. Oliver Thorn-Seshold, Department of Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Butenandtstrasse 5–13, 81377 München (Germany)
Prof. Dr. Hans-Dieter Arndt, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743 Jena (Germany)
Prof. Dr. Dirk Trauner, New York University, Department of Chemistry, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003 (USA) Department of Chemistry University of Pennsylvania 231 South 34th St. Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323 (USA).
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- [1].Kristó I, Bajusz I, Bajusz C, Borkúti P, Vilmos P, Histochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 145, 373–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Dominguez R, Holmes KC, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2011, 40, 169–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Pollard TD, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2016, 8, a018226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Allingham JS, Klenchin CA, Rayment I, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 2119–2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Kita M, Kigoshi H, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 534–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Pospich S, Merino F, Raunser S, Structure 2020, 28, 437–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Tanaka J, Yan Y, Choi J, Bai J, Klenchin VA, Rayment I, Marriott G, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13851–16856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Pereira JH, Petchprayoon C, Hoepker AC, Moriarty NW, Fink SJ, Cecere G, Paterson I, Adams PD, Marriott G, ChemMedChem 2014, 9, 2286–2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Pipaliya BV, Trofimova DN, Grange RL, Aeluri M, Deng X, Shah K, Craig AW, Allingham JS, Evans PA, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6847–6854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Nair UB, Joel PB, Wan Q, Lowey S, Rould MA, Trybus KM, J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 384, 848–864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Goddette DW, Frieden C, J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 15974–15980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Allingham JS, Miles CO, Rayment I, J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 959–970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Yarmola EG, Somasundaram T, Boring TA, Spector I, Bubb MR, J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 28120–28127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Morton WM, Ayscough KR, McLaughlin PJ, Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2, 376–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Bubb MR, Spector I, J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 3463–3466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Klenchin VA, King R, Tanaka J, Marriott G, Rayment I, Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 287–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Hüll K, Morstein J, Trauner D, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10710–10747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Broichhagen J, Frank JA, Trauner D, Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1947–1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lerch MM, Hansen MJ, van Dam GM, Szymanski W, Feringa BL, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10978–10999; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 11140–11163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Welleman IM, Hoorens MWH, Feringa BL, Boersma HH, Szymański W, Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 11672–11691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Borowiak M, Küllmer F, Gegenfurtner F, Peil S, Nasufovic V, Zahler S, Thorn-Seshold O, Trauner D, Arndt H-D, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 9240–9249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Pospich S, Küllmer F, Nasufović V, Funk J, Belyy A, Bieling P, Arndt H-D, Raunser S, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 8678–8682; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 8760–8764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Beharry AA, Woolley GA, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Mart RJ, Allemann RK, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12262–12277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Waldmann H, Hu T-S, Renner S, Menninger S, Tannert R, Oda RT, Arndt H-D, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6473–6477; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 6573–6577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Tannert R, Milroy L-G, Ellinger B, Hu T-S, Arndt H-D, Waldmann H, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3063–3077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Küllmer F, Gregor L, Arndt H-D, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 4204–4214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Borowiak M, Nahaboo W, Reynders M, Nekolla K, Jalinot P, Hasserodt J, Rehberg M, Delattre M, Zahler S, Vollmar A, Trauner D, Thorn-Seshold O, Cell 2015, 162, 403–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Sadovski O, Beharry AB, Zhang F, Woolley GA, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1484; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Mourot A, Kienzler MA, Banghart MR, Fehrentz T, Huber FME, Stein M, Kramer RH, Trauner D, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 536–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Fischer E, J. Phys. Chem. 1967, 71, 3704–3706. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Lázaro-Diéguez F, Knecht E, Egea G, Autophagy 2008, 4, 717–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Riedl J, Crevenna AH, Kessenbrock K, Yu JH, Neukirchen D, Bista M, Bradke F, Jenne D, Holak TA, Werb Z, Sixt M, Wedlich-Soldner R, Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 605–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Cramer LP, Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 1095–1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Ponti A, Science 2004, 305, 1782–1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Zigmond SH, Cell Motil. 1993, 25, 309–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Spector I, Bubb MR, Beyer BB, Fosen KM, J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 5163–5170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lázaro-Diéguez F, Aguado C, Mato E, Sánchez-Ruíz Y, Esteban I, Alberch J, Knecht E, Egea G, J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 1415–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Lee E, Shelden EA, Knecht DA, Cell Motil. 1998, 39, 122–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Hirano A, Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1994, 20, 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Soares e Silva M, Depken M, Stuhrmann B, Korsten M, MacKintosh FC, Koenderink GH, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9408–9413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Pollard TD, Borisy GG, Cell 2003, 112, 453–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Pantaloni D, Le Clainche C, Carlier M-F, Science 2001, 292, 1502–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Liang C-C, Park AY, Guan J-L, Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 329–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Jonkman JEN, Cathcart JA, Xu F, Bartolini ME, Amon JE, Stevens KM, Cell Adh. Migr. 2014, 8, 440–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Hayot C, Debeir O, Van Ham P, Van Damme M, Kiss R, Decaestecker C, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006, 211, 30–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Thorn-Seshold O, Meiring JCM, Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2430, 403–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Ellis-Davies GCR, Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 619–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Ankenbruck N, Courtney T, Naro Y, Deiters A, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2768–2798; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 2816–2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Harterink M, da Silva ME, Will L, Turan J, Ibrahim A, Lang AE, van Battum EY, Pasterkamp RJ, Kapitein LC, Kudryashov D, Barres BA, Hoogenraad CC, Zuchero JB, Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 479–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Leung DW, Otomo C, Chory J, Rosen MK, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 12797–12802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Stone OJ, Pankow N, Liu B, Sharma VP, Eddy RJ, Wang H, Putz AT, Teets FD, Kuhlman B, Condeelis JS, Hahn KM, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 1183–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Moore AS, Coscia SM, Simpson CL, Ortega FE, Wait EC, Heddleston JM, Nirschl JJ, Obara CJ, Guedes-Dias P, Boecker CA, Chew T-L, Theriot JA, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Holzbaur ELF, Nature 2021, 591, 659–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Higuchi R, Vevea JD, Swayne TC, Chojnowski R, Hill V, Boldogh IR, Pon LA, Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 2417–2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.