Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2019 May 24;7(3):10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0060-2019. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0060-2019

Staphylococcus aureus in Animals

Andreas F Haag 1, J Ross Fitzgerald 2, José R Penadés 3
Editors: Vincent A Fischetti4, Richard P Novick5, Joseph J Ferretti6, Daniel A Portnoy7, Miriam Braunstein8, Julian I Rood9
PMCID: PMC11257167  PMID: 31124433

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a mammalian commensal and opportunistic pathogen that colonizes niches such as skin, nares and diverse mucosal membranes of about 20-30% of the human population. S. aureus can cause a wide spectrum of diseases in humans and both methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant strains are common causes of nosocomial- and community-acquired infections. Despite the prevalence of literature characterising staphylococcal pathogenesis in humans, S. aureus is a major cause of infection and disease in a plethora of animal hosts leading to a significant impact on public health and agriculture. Infections in animals are deleterious to animal health, and animals can act as a reservoir for staphylococcal transmission to humans.

Host-switching events between humans and animals and amongst animals are frequent and have been accentuated with the domestication and/or commercialisation of specific animal species. Host-switching is typically followed by subsequent adaptation through acquisition and/or loss of mobile genetic elements such as phages, pathogenicity islands and plasmids as well as further host-specific mutations allowing it to expand into new host populations.

In this chapter, we will be giving an overview of S. aureus in animals, how this bacterial species was, and is, being transferred to new host species and the key elements thought to be involved in its adaptation to new ecological host niches. We will also highlight animal hosts as a reservoir for the development and transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Staphylococcus currently comprises 81 species and subspecies (https://www.dsmz.de/bacterial-diversity/prokaryotic-nomenclature-up-to-date/prokaryotic-nomenclature-up-to-date.html), and most members of the genus are mammalian commensals or opportunistic pathogens that colonize niches such as skin, nares, and diverse mucosal membranes. Several species are of significant medical or veterinary importance. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (1) is a leading cause of pyoderma in dogs and is considered to be a significant reservoir of antimicrobial resistance factors for the genus (2, 3). S. pseudintermedius is very similar to Staphylococcus intermedius and can be distinguished from other coagulase-positive staphylococci by positive arginine dihydrolase and acid production from β-gentiobiose and d-mannitol (4) or by using a multiplex-PCR approach targeting the nuclease gene nuc (5). Staphylococcus saprophyticus is the second leading cause of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (6). While Staphylococcus epidermidis is a normal component of the epidermal microbiota, it is a leading cause of biofilm contamination of medical devices (7). The most promiscuous and most significant human pathogenic staphylococcal species is Staphylococcus aureus, which is the causal agent of a variety of disease symptoms that can range from cosmetic to lethal manifestations. S. aureus is distinguished from most members of the genus by its abundant production of secreted coagulase, an enzyme which converts serum fibrinogen to fibrin and promotes clotting. However, the S. intermedius group and some strains of Staphylococcus lugdunensis have coagulase activity (5, 8, 9).

Despite the prevalence of literature characterizing staphylococcal pathogenesis in humans, S. aureus is a major cause of infection and disease in a plethora of animal hosts, leading to a significant impact on public health and agriculture (10). Infections in animals are deleterious to animal health, and animals can act as a reservoir for staphylococcal transmission to humans. While about 20 to 30% of the human population carries S. aureus, the prevalence of S. aureus varies from host species to host species, and up to 90% of chickens, 42% of pigs, 29% of sheep, and between 14 and 35% of cows and heifers are carriers (11, 12). The economic importance of various animal species strongly determines the abundance of available literature on the subject, and as such, it is not surprising that S. aureus colonization and infection have only been superficially investigated in wild animals. Nevertheless, S. aureus has been isolated from a plethora of wildlife sources such as red squirrels (exudative dermatitis) (13), black bears (endocarditis) (14), zebras (cutaneous granuloma) (15), raccoons (botryomycosis) (16), dolphins (pyogenic meningoencephalitis) (17), harbor seals (systemic infections) (18), black rhinoceroses (skin lesion and sepsis) (19), boars (nasal carriage) (20, 21), rhesus macaques (nasal carriage) (22), great apes (nasal carriage and sepsis) (23), chaffinches (healthy carriage) (24), mallards (sepsis) (25), red deer, griffon vultures, and Iberian ibex (carriage) (21).

Animal isolates of S. aureus have been reported to exhibit distinct phenotypic properties that vary depending on the host of origin, and six biotypes have been described: human, β-hemolytic human, bovine, caprine, avian-abattoir, and non-host specific. These biotypes have, by and large, withstood the application of sophisticated characterization methods; isolates from different hosts, characterized by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, cluster together, suggesting host specificity and a limited ability of strains to be transmitted from one host species to another (10). These observations were further corroborated by genotyping methods such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and strains belonging to specific biotypes grouped in the same or closely related pulsotypes (26).

DNA sequence-based approaches such as multilocus-sequence typing (MLST) (27) have been extensively used to analyze population structures. At present, more than 3,300 sequence types isolated from more than 4,700 S. aureus samples have been collated in the MLST reference database (http://saureus.mlst.net/). The database contains isolates from a range of species, with human strains predominating by a large margin. Nevertheless, MLST showed that some clonal complexes (CCs) are predominant in, and associated with, specific hosts. In particular, it was shown that animal-associated strains belonged to specific clonal lineages, whereas human strains did not (28, 29). Today we know that 87% of S. aureus isolates from colonization and infections in humans represent 11 widely disseminated clonal complexes: CC1, CC5, CC8, CC12, CC15, CC22, CC25, CC30, CC45, CC51, and CC121. Clonal complexes CC8, CC15, CC22, CC30, CC45, CC30, CC45, and the rarer clonal complexes CC80 and CC152 are primarily associated with isolates from humans (30). MLST-based phylogenetic analysis provided the first long-term picture of the evolution of both human and animal strains (31, 32) and indicated that S. aureus has coevolved with its human host over a long time and that it had acquired the ability to infect animals on multiple occasions via human-to-animal host jumps. These host jumps eventually led to specific strain lineages spreading and adapting within new animal hosts (32). Animal to human host jumps have also been documented (33) but are less frequent. Additionally, a number of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains with low host specificity attributed to CC130 and CC398 have emerged over the past decades.

The main clonal complexes associated with ruminants are CC97, CC133, CC522, and CC151, while clonal lineage sequence type 385 (ST385) is mainly represented by isolates from poultry (30, 3438). Comparative analyses of the genomes of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates attributed to ST5 from humans and poultry and of MSSA/MRSA of CC398 revealed that the livestock subpopulations of these clonal complexes originated from ancestral populations in humans (3941). In contrast, human-associated isolates of the ST97 lineage were clearly shown to have originated from ruminants (33). S. aureus colonization or infection in companion animals is usually caused by human-related genotypes (42), yet some colonization factors can determine host specificity (38).

S. aureus has colonized diverse animal species following host-switching events and subsequent adaptation through acquisition and/or loss of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) as well as further host-specific mutations, allowing it to expand into new host populations (Fig. 1, Table 1). Close contact between animals and humans can facilitate host-switching events, and there is a significant body of evidence indicating that the beginning of animal domestication in the Neolithic period (10,000 to 2,000 BC), as well as the increased industrialization of livestock farming, provided a platform for animal-to-human transmission of pathogens (43). While host jumps are generally accompanied by the acquisition or loss of larger MGEs, not all host jumps are associated with such large-scale events. Recently, Viana et al. showed that single amino acid substitutions in the dltB gene were sufficient to confer infectivity of human ST121 isolates for rabbits (44). Overall, S. aureus can readily cross species barriers and infect new hosts. This ability is largely associated with the large proportion of MGEs in the S. aureus genome and its capacity to exchange these through contact with its environment. The animal host can provide reservoirs for new virulence traits and antibiotic resistances, and the increased contact between humans and animals through industrialized agriculture coupled with its globalization necessitate tight monitoring of pathogenic animal S. aureus strains to understand the development and spread of staphylococcal lineages.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Humans act as a major hub for S. aureus host jumps. S. aureus has been isolated from a plethora of vertebrates and has undergone multiple series of host jumps. A major exchange hub is humans that interact with domesticated livestock and companion animals. Arrow thickness indicates the frequency of host jumps, with colors from yellow to red indicating their likelihood. Figure adapted from reference 43.

TABLE 1.

Selected staphylococcal elements associated with specific hosts

MGE MGE-associated determinants putatively involved with virulence/resistance/host specificitya Reference(s)
Human
 ΦSa3 (β-hemolysin converting phage) sea, sep, scn, chp, and sak genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin A and P, staphylococcal complement inhibitor, chemotaxis inhibitory protein and plasminogen activator staphylokinase, respectively 43
 MGE Type I restriction modification system 43
Ruminant
 SaPIbov Staphylococcal enterotoxin C (sec-bovine) and L (sel), toxic shock syndrome toxin tst (TSST-1) 171, 172
 Enterotoxin gene cluster Gene cluster encoding 5 enterotoxins (seg, sei, sem, sen, seo) 171, 173
 Not described Superantigen-like proteins encoded by ssl07 and ssl08 54
 SaPIbov4 vWbp with ruminant-specific activity 63
 Non-mec staphylococcal cassette chromosome LPXTG-surface protein 53
 SCC-mecC mecC 79
Equine
 ΦSaeq1 Contains immune modulators with equine-specific activity scn gene encoding staphylococcal complement inhibitor 163
lukPQ genes encoding the bipartite leukocidin PQ 162
 SaPIeq1 Encodes vWbp able to coagulate equine and ruminant plasma 63
Porcine
 Plasmid SCCmec 43
 Plasmid Resistance to heavy metals 43
 SaPI-S0385 Composite of SaPI5 and SaPIbov1Unique region at 3′ end encoding extracellular proteins with similarity to staphylococcal complement inhibitor and vWbp 146
Avian
 ΦAvβ (β-hemolysin-converting phage) Putative ornithine cyclodeaminase 38% amino acid identity to ornithine cyclodeaminase made by Bacillus cereusHMM match to ornithine cyclodeaminase/mu-crystalin family (PF02423)Putative membrane protease 27% amino acid identity to Plnl (membrane-bound protease of CAAX family) made by Lactobacillus plantarum; HMM match to CAAX amino terminal protease family 40
 ΦAv1 Ear-like protein ear previously identified in pathogenicity islands SaPI1, SaPI3, SaPI5, and SaPImw2 ear encodes β-lactamase-like protein 40
 SaPIAv Putative virulence region Novel hypothetical proteins in accessory region A3 where virulence genes such as tst and eta are located in other SaPIs SAAV_0806: signal peptide, 1 transmembrane helix SAAV_0810: signal peptide, 4 transmembrane helices May suggest role as membrane transporter 40
 pAvX Thiol protease ScpA 99.5% amino acid identity to ScpA (GenBank accession no. AB071596) previously identified among chicken isolates from Japan Suggested role in poultry dermatitisLysophospholipase 42% amino acid identity to a lysophospholipase encoded by Bacillus clausii Bacterial phospholipases are known virulence factors implicated in disease pathogenesis 40
 pAvY N/A
 pT181 Tetracycline resistance 102, 108
 pT127 Tetracycline resistance 102, 108
 pC194 Chloramphenicol resistance 102, 108
 pC221 Chloramphenicol resistance 102, 108
 pC223 Chloramphenicol resistance 102, 108
 pUB112 Chloramphenicol resistance 102, 108
a

HMM: hidden Markov model; N/A: not applicable.

In this article, we will be giving an overview of S. aureus in animals, how this bacterial species was, and is, being transferred to new host species, and the key elements thought to be involved in its adaptation to new ecological host niches. We will also highlight animal hosts as a reservoir for the development and transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants.

S. AUREUS IN RUMINANTS

S. aureus, next to Escherichia coli and several streptococcal species such as Streptococcus uberis, and Streptococcus agalactiae, is a major cause of mastitis in dairy cows and incurs a significant economic loss to the dairy industry. Mastitis in dairy cows results in reduced yields, the need for veterinary intervention, and the loss of milk that has to be discarded due to either pathogen or antibiotic contamination. If treatment of the udder is unsuccessful, the animal is often culled. S. aureus is associated with both clinical and, more commonly, subclinical mastitis, both of which frequently result in persistent and recurrent infections with a low cure rate after antibiotic therapy (45). Mastitis leads to the influx of leukocytes into the udder, and various thresholds for leukocyte numbers have been established for categorizing good milk quality. Taking cow milk as an example, milk with more than 200,000 leukocytes per ml is considered to be infected, and in the European Union when more than 400,000 cells per ml are found, the milk is deemed unfit for human consumption. Apart from the considerable economic losses incurred through S. aureus-derived mastitis, mammary gland infections pose a considerable public health problem. S. aureus can be shed from infected glands, and most staphylococcal isolates from dairy milk possess genes encoding enterotoxins. Thus, contamination of bulk milk can lead to food poisoning from fermented raw milk products (46, 47).

S. aureus can be found in healthy cows (carriers) on the teat skin, nasal cavity, and rectum (11). However, the main reservoirs in a dairy herd are infected udders and teat skin. Infected animals can shed bacteria through their milk, and transmission occurs primarily from udder to udder during milking via contact with contaminated milking machines, farmer’s hands, or contaminated bedding (48). Other environmental transmission routes are less frequent; although S. aureus can survive in the environment for some time, it requires animal colonization to ensure its survival.

The majority of bovine infections worldwide are caused by a subset of specific, bovine-adapted S. aureus strains (28). The substantial genetic variation between different lineages (49, 50) suggests that there might be lineage-specific differences in the molecular mechanisms involved in S. aureus pathogenesis.

Animal microbiota provide a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes that can be acquired from their ecological niches and selected for by the use of antibiotics in agriculture. The ability of some animal-adapted S. aureus strains to colonize and infect humans can give rise to the development of new epidemic clones with hitherto uncharacterized virulence capacity (32). This becomes particularly clear in strains of the CC97 lineage, which is one of the major clones associated with bovine mastitis (28). Moreover, an increased number of bovine-to-human transmissions has been reported in recent years (37, 51, 52). A closer analysis revealed that at least two CC97 subclades for human infection had emerged that originated in bovine-to-human host jumps and had thereafter spread through the human population (33). This provided further evidence that animals can provide a reservoir for the development of new S. aureus clones that can rapidly spread from animal to human and then through the population. Richardson et al. recently showed, using genomics-based approaches, that cows are a major reservoir for reinfection of humans, and multiple host-switching events, both human-to-cow and cow-to-human, have occurred over the past 3,000 years (43).

Bovine S. aureus isolates of the CC8 lineage closely resemble human isolates, and Resch et al. used this observation to further study the genetic basis of host adaptation (53). They compared a total of 14 CC8 isolates from cows with subclinical mastitis, 9 CC8 isolates from colonized or infected human patients, and 9 isolates belonging to typical bovine lineages (CC389, CC71, CC151, CC504, and CC479). They observed that CC8 isolates segregated into a unique group that was separate from typical bovine CCs and that within this group isolates segregated into three subgroups. The main segregating parameter was the content of MGEs within the individual strains, and they showed that strains of the mixed human-bovine isolate clusters contained β-hemolysin converting prophages. Conversely, the bovine isolates were devoid of this phage and harbored an additional, new non-mec staphylococcal cassette chromosome containing an LPXTG-surface protein with similarity to proteins present in environmental bacteria, often found as milk contaminants (53).

Bar-Gal et al. compared pheno- and genotypic characteristics of bovine isolates from Israel, Germany, the United States, and Italy using a Bayesian phylogenetic comparison of several key genes (nuc, coa, lukF, and clfA) and spa and agr typing, followed by CC assignment, and assessed the presence of a broad range of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes (54). This analysis enabled them to cluster different isolates according to their host of origin. Sheep and goat isolates generally showed lower variability and fewer CCs compared to bovine isolates. Within the bovine clade, the authors described two subclades in which isolates matched strains found in Israel or other countries. Their data therefore corroborate other studies suggesting staphylococcal coevolution with its respective host and might indicate the existence of multiple host jumps by bovine S. aureus strains that have occurred in diverse geographical locations (54). Overall, the authors found that 27 virulence-associated factors showed a different prevalence in bovine compared to goat and sheep isolates. The authors noted a higher rate of strains carrying capsule type 8 in sheep and goat isolates compared to cow isolates, where both capsule types 5 and 8 were approximately equally distributed. Superantigen genes ssl07 and ssl08 were found in almost all bovine strains (>93%) but were present in less than 44% of sheep and goat strains. Strikingly, all bovine strains carried the hysA2 gene encoding hyaluronate lyase, while only 48% of goat and sheep strains did. Cow strains showed a higher prevalence of leukocidins D and E, while leukocidins F-P83 and LukM appeared to be more prominent in goat and sheep strains (54). As noted above, infection of the mammary glands triggers the influx of large numbers of leukocytes that are deployed to fight off the infection. Leukocidins play an important role in bovine mastitis and can kill immune cells (leukocytes), thus protecting the pathogen (5559). In agreement with this, the lukF/lukM genes are associated with the most prevalent CCs found in mastitic cattle (CC151, CC479, CC133, some CC97, and most CC522) (60). Leukocidins show different specificities for immune cells (particularly phagocytic cells) of various hosts through recognition of different host cell receptor alleles, and this can be related to the formation of hybrids among the different LukF and LukS paralogs. The leukocidins LukMF′ and LukPQ are mainly associated with zoonotic disease and found among animal-derived S. aureus strains (61). Several additional virulence factors located primarily on MGEs, such as superantigens (62) and ruminant-specific alleles of the von Willebrand factor-binding protein (vWbp) (63), have also been found to be strongly associated with bovine hosts (43).

S. aureus strains in ruminants appear to be undergoing a significant amount of DNA exchange leading to the emergence of hybrid clones. A recent study by Spoor et al. (64) showed that the CC71 lineage of livestock-associated (LA) S. aureus strains evolved from an ancestor belonging to the major bovine lineage CC97. The authors showed that multiple large-scale import and recombination events involving other S. aureus lineages occupying the same ruminant niche had occurred and that these affected a 329-kb region surrounding the chromosomal origin of replication. These recombination events resulted in allele replacement and either loss or gain of genes influencing host-pathogen interactions. In particular, the CC71 lineage acquired factors involved in innate immune evasion and bovine extracellular matrix adherence. The ability to take up and integrate large DNA segments from environmental staphylococcal strains highlights the pathogen’s capacity for rapid evolution and adaptation.

In small ruminants, S. aureus is a major cause of mastitis and septicemia, by infections that may have a thromboembolic origin (65). These infections can also be secondary to parasite infestation, which allows S. aureus of the normal skin flora to enter the bloodstream (66) and in lambs can lead to fatal toxemia or to chronic disease with organ dissemination and abscess formation. In goats, staphylococcal infection can be secondary to parapox virus infection, leading to chorioptic mange or contagious pustular dermatitis (67). Morel’s disease in sheep and goats is caused by a subspecies of S. aureus, S. aureus subsp. anaerobius, which primarily affects young animals. The disease is manifested through the formation of abscesses in superficial lymph nodes usually located in the mandibular region. This disease is thought to be caused by a single bacterial clone worldwide (ST1465), which has undergone long-term adaptation and is restricted to small ruminants (68).

MRSA in animals was first isolated from the milk of dairy cows with mastitis in Belgium in the early 1970s (69) and has since then been isolated from cows around the globe (7076). MRSA strains harbor an MGE known as SCCmec, containing the mec gene, which codes for an additional penicillin binding protein that has low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics and therefore mediates resistance to nearly all compounds of this antibiotic class (besides ceftobiprole and ceftarolin). The mainly pig-related LA-MRSA CC398 has also been isolated from bovine udder infections (77), altogether in line with the elevated host promiscuity of this CC. Several cattle-associated MRSA lineages (ST130, ST425, and ST1943) that had previously been thought to be bovine-restricted have been recently isolated from human disease or carriage in Europe (78). Moreover, a newly identified mec determinant, named mecC (also known as mecALGA251), which shares 70% homology with mecA, was identified among MRSA strains of CC130, CC705, and ST425 recovered from cattle and humans (79). The mecC allele is associated with a unique SCCmec element designated SCCmecXI and is thought to be present in about 1.4% of bovine S. aureus isolates in as many as 2.8% of herds.

A recent study investigated the molecular profile of S. aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis in the Shanghai and Zhejiang areas of China (80). The study identified a total of 19 sequence types, with the dominant ones being ST97, ST520, ST188, ST398, ST7, and ST9. The majority of isolates were found to be methicillin-sensitive (198/212), with ST97 being the predominant lineage among MSSA strains and ST9-MRSA-SCCmecXII the most common MRSA clone. The study revealed that the molecular virulence profiles of different lineages differed significantly. The predominant lineage causing bovine mastitis in eastern China was the MSSA ST97, but there was some indication that toxigenic MRSA ST9 lineages were also present, and it was suggested that their spread and distribution should be monitored in the future. ST9-MRSA strains containing the SCCmecXII cassette have also been identified in nasal swabs from live pigs in China (8082), and in isolates from humans in Taiwan (83). These strains were shown to have a specific MGE profile encoding vWbp on an SaPIbov4-like pathogenicity island (83). vWbps are responsible for the activation of host prothrombin and the formation of fibrin strands, thereby promoting the development of infectious lesions. SaPI-borne vWbps are distinct from their genomic homologs and have been shown to be responsible for the coagulation of ruminant plasma (63) and may therefore have an important role in the animal host specificity of S. aureus. The vWbp variants encoded by the SaPIbov4-like pathogenicity island shared only between 67 and 93% protein sequence identity with the previously characterized SaPI-vWbp (63). Nevertheless, they were able to coagulate bovine and caprine plasma. However, the ability of these vWbps to coagulate human plasma was not assessed in the study (83).

In a study investigating the prevalence of MRSA strains in contaminated milk and dairy products in southern Italy, 8.3% of all isolates (40/484) were methicillin resistant. Of these MRSA strains, the most prevalent sequence types in this study were ST152 (67.5%) followed by ST398 (25%), ST1 (5%), and ST5 (2.5%) (84). Additionally, 92.5% (37/40) and 5% of isolates harbored SCCmec type V and Iva, respectively, while 2.5% of isolates (1/40) harbored a not-further-defined methicillin resistance determinant.

MRSA of CC130, which has recently gained attention, carries mecC instead of mecA and is primarily associated with ruminants and wildlife that share the same habitats, suggesting that there might be mutual exchange of strains (85). The mecC gene is also found in the dairy-associated lineage ST425, which causes mastitis in cows. Both CC130 and ST425 isolates have been isolated from human infections (79, 86, 87).

S. AUREUS IN RABBITS

Staphylococcal infection causes substantial economic losses in commercial cuniculture, and clinical signs of S. aureus infection are present in more than 60% of rabbitries (88, 89). Infection of rabbits with S. aureus is associated with suppurative dermatitis, abscesses, pododermatitis, and mastitis (9093), with chronic mastitis being the main reason for culling diseased animals in rabbitries (88, 91). Most chronic staphylococcal infections in rabbits are caused by the ST121 lineage; less common lineages, such as ST96, can also be involved (94, 95). Infection of mammary glands with ST121 strains resulted in elevated levels of granulocytes and reduced numbers of B cells, T cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells compared to mammary glands infected with ST96 strains (96). The authors of the study suggested that this observation might be explained by strain-specific differences in host interactions leading to altered perception by the host’s immune system. However, further studies will be required to verify this hypothesis.

Among S. aureus strains isolated in rabbitries, two main strain types were initially classified, according to their virulence, into high-virulence strains with the capacity to rapidly spread through entire flocks and low-virulence strains that cause more limited infections (97). In accordance with this, high- and low-virulence strains can induce either severe or mild symptoms, respectively, in a rabbit skin infection model, indicating the presence of either different virulence factors or differences in virulence factor expression levels (98). Interestingly, most low-virulence strains could be grouped into poultry or human biotypes, whereas high-virulence strains were members of a mixed biotype that produced β-hemolysin and showed no staphylokinase activity (99). Classical high-virulence strains belong to the biotype “mixed CV-C” and are sensitive to phages 3A/3C/55/71 of phage group II, suggesting a clonal origin of these high-virulence strains (100). Subsequent molecular typing studies found that the majority of high-virulence strains belonged to ST121 and to a lesser extent to ST425 with agr types 4 and 2, respectively (95).

Viana et al. analyzed a total of 178 strains from chronic mastitis in rabbits that presented with a range of disease manifestations including abscesses, suppurative mastitis with a lobular pattern, cellulitis, and mixed lesions. The majority of isolates belonged to the high-virulence ST121 (166/178), with sequence types 398, 96, 45, 1, DVL879, and SLV9 (7, 1, 1, 2, 1, respectively) comprising the rest. However, disease symptoms could not be correlated to any specific genotype or sequence type (94). Rabbit isolates are significantly different from those found in humans and ruminants, suggesting the presence of host-specific factors selective for rabbit-specific sequence types (93). The phylogenetic origin of the ST121 lineage was eventually traced back to a human-to-rabbit host jump approximately 40 years ago (44). Comparative analysis of the accessory genomes of ST121 strains showed that the majority of human strains contained MGEs which encode potent toxins involved in human disease pathogenesis, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin and exfoliative toxins, and all except one contained a β-hemolysin-converting phage (ΦSa3) encoding the human-specific immune evasion cluster. None of the rabbit strains contained Panton-Valentine leukocidin- or exfoliative toxin-encoding MGEs, indicating that these were dispensable for S. aureus infection of rabbits (44). Interestingly, the rabbit strains did not contain any MGEs that were unique to rabbit S. aureus, indicating that the acquisition of rabbit-specific MGEs was not required to cause infection. Instead, the authors found that single nonsynonymous mutations at the 5′ end of the dltB gene were sufficient to confer rabbit infectivity in human ST121 strains. DltB is an integral membrane protein encoded by the dltABCD operon that is likely responsible for the translocation and incorporation of d-alanine into teichoic acids and lipoteichoic acids in S. aureus (101). However, Viana et al. (44) showed that neither the d-alanine nor the bacterial cell wall composition was altered in in strains harboring the rabbit-infective dltB mutants. This suggests an additional function for DltB during rabbit infections, and the authors propose that DltB, a member of the membrane-bound O-acetyltransferases that transfer organic acids, typically fatty acids, to hydroxyl groups, has a role in signaling that could be responsible (44). Rabbit-associated S. aureus strains therefore appear to be representatives of infective strains that require little adaptation to jump between humans and rabbits, and further studies will be required to determine how these relatively recent epidemic strains have evolved.

Rabbitries endeavor to prevent S. aureus infection by limiting the introduction of new animals and by reducing contact between rabbit flocks. Unfortunately, antibiotic treatments, disinfection of cages and environments, and vaccinations have so far proved inefficient in eliminating S. aureus infections in rabbitries (97). Consequently, culling of entire flocks followed by thorough disinfection of the cages is the only efficient strategy for dealing with S. aureus epidemics in cuniculture.

S. AUREUS IN CHICKENS AND OTHER POULTRY

The growth of commercial poultry farming has provided a fertile field for staphylococcal infections and zoonotic transfer (102). S. aureus is among the leading causes of bacterial infections in poultry (10), causing a wide range of diseases including septic arthritis, subdermal abscesses, gangrenous dermatitis, and septicemia (103). As with other hosts, staphylococcal strains associated with poultry cluster into specific clonal complexes that appear to have either evolved together with their avian host or adapted after zoonotic transmission. For example, CC385 has so far been identified only among avian hosts, whereas strains of CC5 and CC398 have been isolated from chickens, humans, and other mammals (39, 104, 105). One of the predominant staphylococcal lineages causing disease in the poultry industry is CC5 (40, 103). Dissemination of CC5 into chickens involved a single transmission from a human approximately 40 years ago (40) followed by a significant number of genetic recombination events leading to host adaptation. At least 44 recombination events in 33 genes have accumulated in poultry isolates, and another 47 genes were found to be more frequent in poultry compared to human isolates. Interestingly, many of these genes were common among chicken isolates from other CCs, indicating that horizontal transfer of these genes between CCs may have a potential role in host adaptation (102). On a phenotypic level, these genetic alterations contribute to S. aureus adaptation to poultry hosts, and poultry isolates show enhanced growth at 42°C (the core body temperature of the adult chicken [106]) and greater erythrocyte lysis on chicken blood agar for chicken compared to human isolates (102). Conversely, most human isolates but only around half of the chicken isolates were able to lyse human erythrocytes (102). The improved growth of chicken isolates at 42°C is thought to be related to two poultry-associated genes (SAAV_0062 and SAAV_0064) that share more than 85% nucleotide identity with genes important for growth at elevated temperatures, including dnaK and dnaE (102).

Furthermore, the host jump from humans to poultry was also accompanied by genetic changes such as the loss of several genes involved in human disease pathogenesis and the acquisition of avian-specific MGEs (40). For example, the poultry strain ED98 had acquired two prophages, two plasmids, and a SaPI, and these MGEs are widely distributed among avian but completely absent from human strains (40). A similar observation has been made with bovine-adapted strains (107).

Plasmids can confer virulence traits and antibiotic resistances (pT181, pT127, pC194, pC221, pC223, and pUB112) (108) and can contribute to the spread of disease. Such plasmids are present in S. aureus isolates causing a variety of difficult to treat chicken diseases (102, 103, 109). A recent study focused on identifying bottlenecking and drift-related genetic changes, and on separating them from genetic changes conferring advantages in the poultry niche, and on showing adaptation to the avian host over time (102). By sampling a total of 191 isolates from diseased chickens from the United Kingdom, United States, and the Netherlands, they confirmed that the major staphylococcal lineage in these infections was CC5 and that human and chicken isolates within CC5 clustered in distinct subgroups (102). They further identified an increased recombination frequency within the CC5 poultry isolate relative to human isolate genomes and a tight clustering of chicken isolates once recombination events were compensated for. Changes in chicken-derived genomes localized within 33 genes and consisted of 196 substitution and 44 recombination sites. Forty-seven genes were more frequently present in CC5 chicken isolates compared to human isolates, with 38 of these being shared among CC5 and CC1 and 41 genes shared between CC5 and CC398 poultry isolates. All 47 poultry-associated genes were present in strains of the CC385 lineage. Recombination regions in poultry isolates were associated with both the core genome and plasmids, and many clustered within three distinct genomic regions comprising genes with putative roles in heat shock response, hemolysis, adhesion, mobile elements, and transposons. Furthermore, a total of 58 poultry-associated genes and genetic elements were predicted to be involved in the transfer of MGEs containing genes with predicated function as transposases, in conjugation as well as pathogenicity islands and two hotspot regions containing phage-related elements (102).

Several genes that have so far been found only in poultry isolates are implicated in increased pathogenicity in chickens (41, 110). These include scpB, encoding a putative cysteine protease (staphostatin A) (40, 111), which is found on an avian disease-associated plasmid (pAvX) in CC5 and CC385 strains (112). The CC385 lineage has been isolated from various wild and reared birds, suggesting that it has had long-term avian host restriction (40, 43).

MULTIHOST CC398: A MELTING POT AND RESERVOIR FOR VIRULENCE AND RESISTANCE DEVELOPMENT

MRSA strains of the CC398 complex have been studied in detail. This lineage is likely derived from a human MSSA clone that successfully jumped into pigs, where it acquired methicillin resistance and changes to its accessory genome (39). Despite these changes, it has retained the ability to infect humans, and it has been found in other animals, suggesting that CC398 strains are more promiscuous infecting agents than other CCs (43). CC398 is the main lineage of LA-MRSA strains in Europe, whereas other lineages have been isolated frequently in other geographical areas (113115). CC9 LA-MRSA isolates are predominantly isolated in Asia, whereas CC398 and CC5 are relatively common in North America (116). Methicillin resistance is conferred by the acquisition of SCCmec elements that contain various mec genes. Presently, at least 13 structural types of SCCmec are known (30, 7983).

The proportion of S. aureus infections caused by MRSA increased significantly from the end of the 1980s until 2000 worldwide (30). MRSA infections of humans could be initially grouped into either health care-associated (HA) or community-associated (CA) MRSA based on epidemiological criteria (117). HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA strains can be differentiated by their structural and functional genomic traits (118). However, these epidemiological criteria have become increasingly blurred because HA-MRSA strains have been found within the community and CA-MRSA strains were identified as the causative agents in the hospital setting (119, 120). In addition to these two categories of MRSA, animals can act as a reservoir for the development and transmission of so-called LA-MRSA strains that have been found to cause infections within the human community. All three MRSA types differ from each other in their genotypes and associated genotypic traits, allowing for a clear segregation into specific lineages associated with specific origins of the pathogen.

In pigs, S. aureus usually does not cause much disease; skin infections in pigs are typically caused by Staphylococcus hyicus and have only been occasionally documented to be caused by S. aureus (67, 121, 122). Consequently, S. aureus had not been monitored extensively in pigs. However, it has recently been realized that pigs represent a major reservoir for MRSA, after all.

CC398-MRSA and CC398-MSSA staphylococcal strains were first identified among pig farmers in France (122, 123). While CC398 MRSA strains rapidly spread among pigs and other livestock, they are considered to spread only infrequently beyond animals and personnel in direct contact with infected animals (124126). Most LA-CC398 strains are resistant to β-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, tetracyclines, and in part to fluoroquinolones as well as to cotrimoxazole. They are susceptible to glycopeptides, daptomycin, tigecycline, rifampicin, fusidic acid, fosfomycin, and with few exceptions also to linezolid (30). Initial studies suggested a possible human origin for LA-CC398 that was transferred to pigs and subsequently acquired methicillin resistance driven by the pressure of antibiotics in animal feed (39). However, a more recent analysis indicated that both human MSSA and LA-CC398 emerged in parallel around 1970 (127).

The CC398 lineage is the most commonly detected MRSA lineage among European livestock and thus was given the name LA-MRSA, with spa types t011, t034, and t108 being the most prevalent among the LA-MRSA CC398 strains (128, 129). CC398 MRSA strains are nontypable by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (130), comprise only a small set of spa-types, and harbor a novel Sau1-hsdS1 type 1 restriction-modification system (131). LA-MRSA isolates typically carry SCCmec type IVa or V, which are different from those carried by other MRSA genotypes commonly found in community and health care settings (132). They often exhibit coresistance to many non-β-lactam antimicrobials (e.g., macrolide [70%], trimethoprim [65%], gentamicin [14%], ciprofloxacin [8%], and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [4%]), including those commonly used in animal production (133). The majority of CC398 LA-MRSA isolates do not produce toxins such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin or enterotoxins (134). Following the reduction in cost of next-generation sequencing approaches, further characterization of S. aureus CC398 isolates has been possible through the increased availability of whole-genome sequencing data for this CC, allowing more detailed insight into CC398’s host adaptation (see sections below).

There is frequent transmission of CC398 LA-MRSA between livestock and farmers (135139) and, until recently, strains of this lineage were rarely found outside this group (125). However, a rising number of cases of MRSA CC398 have recently been observed in humans within the health care environment (140). These findings show a strong epidemiological link with livestock contact (124). The origin of LA-CC398-MRSA is believed to be a human MSSA strain harboring the ΦSa3 phage. This phage carries a so-called immune evasion cluster that encodes many human-specific immunomodulatory factors, including the sea, sep, scn, chp, and sak genes (encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin A and P, staphylococcal complement inhibitor, chemotaxis inhibitory protein, and plasminogen activator staphylokinase, respectively) and integrates within the hlb gene (141). The hlb gene encodes a sphingomyelinase known as β-toxin or β-hemolysin, which can lyse sheep erythrocytes. The factors encoded in the ΦSa3 phage specifically interfere with the human immune response (142, 143), and about 90% of clinical human-derived isolates contain the ΦSa3 phage within their genome (141). Given that the immunomodulatory factors encoded in ΦSa3 specifically target human immune factors, it is not surprising that the ΦSa3 phage is missing from the genomes of CC398 lineages adapted to livestock (30, 39). In general, porcine LA-MRSA CC398 lacks the ΦSa3 phage and is mecA positive, while human-specific CC398 is mecA negative and ΦSa3 positive (144, 145).

Studies indicate that the adaptation of CC398 to its host is connected to the loss and/or acquisition of MGEs, including ΦSa3, since the major changes that were revealed in these studies occurred within the CC398 accessory genome (134, 146). In particular, a new staphylococcal pathogenicity island (SaPI-S0385) was identified in strain S0385 that appears to be a composite of the 5′ sequence of SaPIbov1 (up to and including the excisionase gene) and SaPI5 (packaging module) and contains a unique region at its 3′ end encoding two putative extracellular proteins with similarity to staphylococcal complement inhibitor and vWbp, respectively. Both proteins also have a conserved homologue in the core genome of S0385, but no studies have been performed to determine whether these conferred advantages to S. aureus within the porcine host (146).

In parallel, animal-independent human colonization and infection by CC398 MSSA strains has occurred and spread worldwide with a particularly high incidence rate in China, where this clone accounts for almost 20% of skin and soft tissue infections (147).

While CC398 has spread successfully among pigs in Europe, CC9 is the most commonly isolated lineage in farmed pigs in South-East Asia (82). Strains belonging to this CC are genetically distinct from strains of the CC398 lineage, and their genome is consistent with an independent zoonotic event leading to its emergence. CC9 MSSA strains colonize humans, and transmission between humans and pigs has been reported in the United Kingdom (122). The characterized CC9 isolates were deficient in the type IV restriction modification system, which poses a major restriction barrier for the acquisition of foreign DNA. Loss of the type IV restriction modification system has been observed in S. aureus strains prone to acquire the vanA gene from enterococci conferring vancomycin resistance (148). Furthermore, two novel transposon-like elements containing genes with a high degree of similarity to genes from coagulase-negative staphylococci or enterococci have been identified in CC9 strains but so far have not been found in S. aureus strains belonging to other lineages (82). Overall, these observations might suggest that the newly emerged LA-CC9 strains could have an enhanced capacity for the uptake of foreign DNA. However, experimental verification remains to be provided. In line with this observation, the analyzed CC9 strains contained SCCmec type XII cassettes with a class C2 mec and ccrC gene complex (82). Such CC9 strains have also been isolated from cattle in China (81). The genes encoded by the SCCmec type XII elements are similar to genes found in coagulase-negative staphylococci, which could represent a potential source of this element. The CC9 MRSA strains thus represent a significant threat to humans as well as livestock, owing to their apparent ability to acquire novel genetic elements and their propensity for interspecies transmission.

MRSA IN COMPANION ANIMALS: CATS, DOGS, AND HORSES

Generally, MRSA strains of companion animals differ from those in livestock and meat production animals. S. aureus strains isolated from companion animals are mainly of human origin and are passed between human owners and their animals (38, 149151). Dogs and cats are not typically colonized by S. aureus but, rather, form transient associations that can on occasion lead to severe infections (38, 152). MRSA infections in companion animals are predominantly skin and soft tissue infections; previous antibiotic treatments of human owners, the number of antimicrobial courses, the number of hospitalization days, implant devices, surgical interventions, and contact with humans who have been previously hospitalized are major risk factors to these animals (153, 154). Overall, these risk factors are similar to those defining HA-MRSA infections in humans (155).

S. aureus MRSA strains isolated from horses and from humans in close contact with horses differ from those spread throughout the human population. A CA-MRSA clone (CC8) was isolated from horses in Canada and was well adapted to the animal host (156). In Europe, CC398 MRSA strains have also been isolated from horses, and horse-to-human transmission has been shown (157, 158). MRSA was first reported in horses in 1999 during a 13-month outbreak in a veterinary teaching hospital in Michigan. These were horses that had undergone surgical procedures and were subsequently infected with MRSA that appeared to have originated from colonized surgical staff (159). MRSA has since then been detected among horses in Europe, the United States, and Asia (160). Consistent with the risk factors, disease presentation in horses mirrors that observed in humans in the clinic. Skin and soft tissue MRSA infections, bacteremia, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, metritis, omphalitis, catheter-related infections, and pneumonia have all been reported in horses (160). MRSA infections in horses have been linked to strains carried by clinical personnel (CC1, CC254, and CC398), and nasal colonization of veterinarians, veterinary personnel, and students were also observed, indicating transmission to or from humans (161).

The main CC isolated from horses is CC8, and equine isolates are distinct from human strains of the general population but not from strains isolated from close-contact personnel. A recent study has shown that equine CC8 isolates acquired a phage encoding a novel equine allele of the staphylococcal inhibitor of complement (scn) as well as an equine-specific form of the bi-component leukocidins, LukPQ (43, 162, 163). Acquisition of antibiotic resistance determinants influences the clustering of equine and pig isolates, suggesting a role for the acquisition of resistance in host adaptation (43). Adaptation to horses also involves the acquisition of SaPI-encoded paralogues of the vWbp able to coagulate equine plasma (63). Since phages are required for the activation of SaPIs (164), it will be interesting to see whether the newly identified horse-specific phage is also able to activate and transfer this horse-specific SaPI.

MONKEYS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

Studies of species to species transmission of S. aureus have largely focused on LA transmission, yet nonhuman primates are readily colonized by S. aureus in captivity and in the wild (165). In a recent study, Senghore and colleagues investigated the transmission of S. aureus from humans to green monkeys in The Gambia (166). The study revealed multiple anthroponotic transmissions of S. aureus from humans to green monkeys and the emergence of a monkey-associated clade of S. aureus approximately 2,700 years ago. Development of this monkey-associated clade was accompanied by the loss of the ΦSa3 phage carrying genes known to play important roles in human colonization. More recent anthroponotic transmissions included well-characterized human lineages and are thought to be the result of human encroachment on monkey habitats. However, the authors did not observe any monkey to human transmission (166). Nonhuman primates (and bats) in sub-Saharan Africa are colonized by the related but distinct staphylococcal species Staphylococcus argentus and Staphylococcus schweitzeri. While S. schweitzeri was isolated from monkeys from all study sites, no transmission of these strains to humans was observed. In contrast, human-associated S. aureus sequence types (ST1, ST6, ST15) were detected in domestic animals and nonhuman primates, indicating a human-to-monkey transmission in the wild (165).

S. AUREUS HOST SWITCHING AND THE ROLE OF MGES

A recent study by Richardson et al. used a population-genomic approach to better characterize how S. aureus adapts to multiple different hosts and causes colonization and disease (43). The study found that humans act as a major hub for the pathogen for both ancient and recent host-switching events leading to the emergence of endemic livestock strains. Cows were shown to be the most frequent recipient of S. aureus host jumps but also appeared to be the main animal reservoir for reinfection of humans and the emergence of animal-derived human epidemic clones (33, 43). The study identified 14 host jumps from humans to cows (median number of host jumps per tree as distributions from all subsamples and trees in the study) dating back as early as 2000 BC to as recently as 2012 AD. Cows were also shown to act as a source of S. aureus for small ruminants such as goats and sheep. A pan-genome-wide association analysis identified host-specific accessory gene pools specific for birds, pigs, and horses. Accessory genomes from human, cow, sheep, and goat strains also clustered in a host-specific manner but exhibited greater diversity in gene content. The authors suggested that these differences might have been caused either by a range of cryptic host niches occupied by the pathogen or because the time elapsed since the host-switching event had been too short to allow sufficient diversification to result in the clear separation of human and ruminant accessory genome clusters. Alternatively, specific gene sets or combinations of gene sets might confer a more generalist host tropism. However, it was noted that clustering in equine and pig isolates was influenced by the acquisition of host-specific antimicrobial resistance determinants. Host-switching events were shown to be correlated with the acquisition via horizontal gene transfer of host-niche-specific genetic elements that confer selective advantages to the pathogen for survival within the new host. The study identified a total of 36 distinct MGEs (including predicted plasmids, transposons, S. aureus pathogenicity islands, and prophages). For instance, the β-hemolysin-converting phage ΦSa3, which encodes modulators of the human innate immune response, was primarily associated with human strains, whereas several pathogenicity islands contain ruminant-specific superantigens or vWbps where associated with ruminants (62, 63). Conversely, equine isolates were shown to contain a prophage, integrated in the lipase precursor gene (geh), encoding equine-specific alleles of the staphylococcal inhibitor of complement (scn) and a bi-component leukocidin LukPQ (Table 1) (162, 163). The study also identified numerous previously uncharacterized MGEs. A novel plasmid SCCmec element encoding resistance to heavy metal ions (a common pig-feed supplement) was linked to human-to-porcine host-switching events. Furthermore, S. aureus isolates from animals acquired several gene clusters encoding bacteriocins that would enable them to compete with the resident bacterial flora. Interestingly, the MGEs in S. aureus pig isolates showed an increased guanine-cytosine content and reduced codon-adaptation index that indicated a distinct genealogical origin for these MGEs which may be related to pathogenicity islands identified in the pig-associated zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis (43). Host-switching events are therefore accompanied by the rapid acquisition of MGEs that confer the capacity for survival within a new host niche, mainly by targeting the host’s innate immune response. Acquisition of resistance to antimicrobials and heavy metals allows the pathogen to survive under high selective pressures; subsequent positive selection via point mutations or recombination (102) acts on the core genome to modify metabolic pathways and to further adapt S. aureus to its new host.

S. aureus host adaptation was found to coincide, depending on the host, with both gain and loss of gene function. While avian strains contained a higher proportion of functional genes compared to strains from other host species, ruminant strains showed an increase in pseudogenes. Many of these pseudogenes in ruminants were found to be associated with nutrient transport, including carbohydrates, and could indicate metabolic remodeling in response to distinct nutrient availability. S. aureus was shown to further adapt to its host niche in response to the availability of distinct nutrients. The authors showed that strains isolated from dairy cattle exhibited an enhanced ability to utilize lactose as a carbon source, supporting the concept that S. aureus undergoes genetic diversification in response to the nutrients that differ in availability in different niches (43).

The study also revealed that staphylococcal antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes are unevenly distributed among isolates from different animal hosts and showed a clear correlation to antibiotic usage practices within medicine and agriculture. For example, human, pig, and ruminant isolates harbored a collection of key resistance determinants that were absent in avian isolates, in line with antimicrobial usage practices (43).

The acquisition of specific MGEs and core genome mutations plays a crucial role in S. aureus host adaptation (40, 44, 63). For instance, the presence/acquisition of MGEs not found in human strains could be clearly associated with host jumps from humans to avian and porcine hosts (39, 40, 43). Host-specific functional effectors of S. aureus pathogenicity such as leukocidins, superantigens, and vWbps are frequently located on MGEs (61, 162, 163, 167170).

CONCLUSIONS

In the past decades an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that S. aureus is able to colonize and infect a plethora of different hosts. While S. aureus can cause severe infections in some animals, others show less severe symptoms and are mainly colonized, acting as a staphylococcal reservoir for human reinfection. This is particularly true for S. aureus lineages found in pigs and dairy cows. Due to the use of specific antibiotics and growth-enhancing supplements, these strains have acquired mechanisms of resistance to these agents from various environmental sources. Current farming practices make farm animals ideal breeding grounds for the development and/or acquisition of new resistance mechanisms that can spread into the community and pose a significant risk to the human population. There is an ever-increasing amount of data detailing host-switching events for S. aureus, with humans acting as the major exchange hub for strain lineages. These data highlight the ability of S. aureus to function as a multihost pathogen and to evolve and adapt to new hosts. The ability of S. aureus to readily adapt to new environments and rapidly take up new genetic material via horizontal gene transfer makes the bacterium a most versatile colonizer that is able to spread into new niches. Moreover, it can also rapidly adapt to new stresses and antibiotics with the result of an ever-continuing arms race between S. aureus and humankind.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Devriese LA, Vancanneyt M, Baele M, Vaneechoutte M, De Graef E, Snauwaert C, Cleenwerck I, Dawyndt P, Swings J, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F. 2005. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sp. nov., a coagulase-positive species from animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1569–1573 10.1099/ijs.0.63413-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guardabassi L, Loeber ME, Jacobson A. 2004. Transmission of multiple antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus intermedius between dogs affected by deep pyoderma and their owners. Vet Microbiol 98:23–27 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.09.021.[PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guardabassi L, Schwarz S, Lloyd DH. 2004. Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:321–332 10.1093/jac/dkh332. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sasaki T, Kikuchi K, Tanaka Y, Takahashi N, Kamata S, Hiramatsu K. 2007. Reclassification of phenotypically identified Staphylococcus intermedius strains. J Clin Microbiol 45:2770–2778 10.1128/JCM.00360-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, Sakusabe A, Ohtsuka M, Hirotaki S, Kawakami T, Fukata T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 48:765–769 10.1128/JCM.01232-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hovelius B, Mårdh PA. 1984. Staphylococcus saprophyticus as a common cause of urinary tract infections. Rev Infect Dis 6:328–337 10.1093/clinids/6.3.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fey PD, Olson ME. 2010. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Future Microbiol 5:917–933 10.2217/fmb.10.56. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mateo M, Maestre JR, Aguilar L, Cafini F, Puente P, Sánchez P, Alou L, Giménez MJ, Prieto J. 2005. Genotypic versus phenotypic characterization, with respect to susceptibility and identification, of 17 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:287–291 10.1093/jac/dki227. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Riegel P, Jesel-Morel L, Laventie B, Boisset S, Vandenesch F, Prévost G. 2011. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from animals causing human endocarditis. Int J Med Microbiol 301:237–239 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.09.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peton V, Le Loir Y. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine. Infect Genet Evol 21:602–615 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.011. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roberson JR, Fox LK, Hancock DD, Gay JM, Besser TE. 1994. Ecology of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from various sites on dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 77:3354–3364 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77277-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nagase N, Sasaki A, Yamashita K, Shimizu A, Wakita Y, Kitai S, Kawano J. 2002. Isolation and species distribution of staphylococci from animal and human skin. J Vet Med Sci 64:245–250 10.1292/jvms.64.245. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simpson VR, Davison NJ, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Hudson LO, Koylass M, Blackett T, Butler H, Rasigade JP, Whatmore AM. 2013. Association of a lukM-positive clone of Staphylococcus aureus with fatal exudative dermatitis in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Vet Microbiol 162:987–991 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.025. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McBurney S, Veitch AM, Daoust P-Y. 2000. Bacterial valvular endocarditis in a black bear from Labrador. J Wildl Dis 36:788–791 10.7589/0090-3558-36.4.788. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pandey GS, Nomura Y, Kobayashi K, Fujise H, Yamada T. 1998. Cutaneous staphylococcal granuloma in a free living zebra (Equus burchelli) in Zambia. J Vet Med Sci 60:137–138 10.1292/jvms.60.137. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hamir AN. 2010. Systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a free-ranging raccoon (Procyon lotor). J Wildl Dis 46:665–668 10.7589/0090-3558-46.2.665. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Colgrove GS, Migaki G. 1976. Cerebral abscess associated with stranding in a dolphin. J Wildl Dis 12:271–274 10.7589/0090-3558-12.2.271. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Pelt RW, Dietrich RA. 1973. Staphylococcal infection and toxoplasmosis in a young harbor seal. J Wildl Dis 9:258–261 10.7589/0090-3558-9.3.258. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clausen B, Ashford WA. 1980. Bacteriologic survey of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). J Wildl Dis 16:475–480 10.7589/0090-3558-16.4.475. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meemken D, Blaha T, Hotzel H, Strommenger B, Klein G, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Kehrenberg C. 2013. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from wild boars. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:1739–1742 10.1128/AEM.03189-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Porrero MC, Mentaberre G, Sánchez S, Fernández-Llario P, Casas-Díaz E, Mateos A, Vidal D, Lavín S, Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Domínguez L. 2014. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus by free-living wild animals in Spain. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4865–4870 10.1128/AEM.00647-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van den Berg S, van Wamel WJ, Snijders SV, Ouwerling B, de Vogel CP, Boelens HA, Willems RJ, Huijsdens XW, Verreck FA, Kondova I, Heidt PJ, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A. 2011. Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) are natural hosts of specific Staphylococcus aureus lineages. PLoS One 6:e26170 10.1371/journal.pone.0026170. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nagel M, Dischinger J, Türck M, Verrier D, Oedenkoven M, Ngoubangoye B, Le Flohic G, Drexler JF, Bierbaum G, Gonzalez JP. 2013. Human-associated Staphylococcus aureus strains within great ape populations in Central Africa (Gabon). Clin Microbiol Infect 19:1072–1077 10.1111/1469-0691.12119. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paterson GK, Larsen AR, Robb A, Edwards GE, Pennycott TW, Foster G, Mot D, Hermans K, Baert K, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Zadoks RN, Holmes MA. 2012. The newly described mecA homologue, mecALGA251, is present in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a diverse range of host species. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2809–2813 10.1093/jac/dks329. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wobeser G, Kost W. 1992. Starvation, staphylococcosis, and vitamin A deficiency among mallards overwintering in Saskatchewan. J Wildl Dis 28:215–222 10.7589/0090-3558-28.2.215. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hennekinne JA, Kerouanton A, Brisabois A, De Buyser ML. 2003. Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus biotypes by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA macro-restriction fragments. J Appl Microbiol 94:321–329 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01837.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38:1008–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith EM, Green LE, Medley GF, Bird HE, Fox LK, Schukken YH, Kruze JV, Bradley AJ, Zadoks RN, Dowson CG. 2005. Multilocus sequence typing of intercontinental bovine Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:4737–4743 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4737-4743.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smyth DS, Feil EJ, Meaney WJ, Hartigan PJ, Tollersrud T, Fitzgerald JR, Enright MC, Smyth CJ. 2009. Molecular genetic typing reveals further insights into the diversity of animal-associated Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 58:1343–1353 10.1099/jmm.0.009837-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cuny C, Wieler LH, Witte W. 2015. Livestock-associated MRSA: the impact on humans. Antibiotics (Basel) 4:521–543 10.3390/antibiotics4040521. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shepheard MA, Fleming VM, Connor TR, Corander J, Feil EJ, Fraser C, Hanage WP. 2013. Historical zoonoses and other changes in host tropism of Staphylococcus aureus, identified by phylogenetic analysis of a population dataset. PLoS One 8:e62369 10.1371/journal.pone.0062369. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weinert LA, Welch JJ, Suchard MA, Lemey P, Rambaut A, Fitzgerald JR. 2012. Molecular dating of human-to-bovid host jumps by Staphylococcus aureus reveals an association with the spread of domestication. Biol Lett 8:829–832 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0290. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spoor LE, McAdam PR, Weinert LA, Rambaut A, Hasman H, Aarestrup FM, Kearns AM, Larsen AR, Skov RL, Fitzgerald JR. 2013. Livestock origin for a human pandemic clone of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 4:e00356-13 10.1128/mBio.00356-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kock R, Friedrich A, Cookson B, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Harbarth S, Kluytmans J, Mielke M, Peters G, Skov RL, Struelens MJ, Tacconelli E, Witte W, Friedrich AW. 2014. Systematic literature analysis and review of targeted preventive measures to limit healthcare-associated infections by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Euro Surveill 19:20860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cuny C, Friedrich A, Kozytska S, Layer F, Nübel U, Ohlsen K, Strommenger B, Walther B, Wieler L, Witte W. 2010. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different animal species. Int J Med Microbiol 300:109–117 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.11.002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fitzgerald JR. 2012. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat. Trends Microbiol 20:192–198 10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Espinosa-Gongora C, Moodley A, Lipinska U, Broens EM, Hermans K, Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F, Guardabassi L. 2014. Phenotypes and genotypes of old and contemporary porcine strains indicate a temporal change in the S. aureus population structure in pigs. PLoS One 9:e101988 10.1371/journal.pone.0101988. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pantosti A. 2012. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with animals and its relevance to human health. Front Microbiol 3:127 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00127. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, Pearson T, Waters AE, Foster JT, Schupp J, Gillece J, Driebe E, Liu CM, Springer B, Zdovc I, Battisti A, Franco A, Zmudzki J, Schwarz S, Butaye P, Jouy E, Pomba C, Porrero MC, Ruimy R, Smith TC, Robinson DA, Weese JS, Arriola CS, Yu F, Laurent F, Keim P, Skov R, Aarestrup FM. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio 3:e00305-11 10.1128/mBio.00305-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lowder BV, Guinane CM, Ben Zakour NL, Weinert LA, Conway-Morris A, Cartwright RA, Simpson AJ, Rambaut A, Nübel U, Fitzgerald JR. 2009. Recent human-to-poultry host jump, adaptation, and pandemic spread of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19545–19550 10.1073/pnas.0909285106. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lowder BV, Fitzgerald JR. 2010. Human origin for avian pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence 1:283–284 10.4161/viru.1.4.11838. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Walther B, Hermes J, Cuny C, Wieler LH, Vincze S, Abou Elnaga Y, Stamm I, Kopp PA, Kohn B, Witte W, Jansen A, Conraths FJ, Semmler T, Eckmanns T, Lübke-Becker A. 2012. Sharing more than friendship: nasal colonization with coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) and co-habitation aspects of dogs and their owners. PLoS One 7:e35197 10.1371/journal.pone.0035197. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Richardson EJ, Bacigalupe R, Harrison EM, Weinert LA, Lycett S, Vrieling M, Robb K, Hoskisson PA, Holden MTG, Feil EJ, Paterson GK, Tong SYC, Shittu A, van Wamel W, Aanensen DM, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Corander J, Holmes M, Fitzgerald JR. 2018. Gene exchange drives the ecological success of a multi-host bacterial pathogen. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1468–1478 10.1038/s41559-018-0617-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Viana D, Comos M, McAdam PR, Ward MJ, Selva L, Guinane CM, González-Muñoz BM, Tristan A, Foster SJ, Fitzgerald JR, Penadés JR. 2015. A single natural nucleotide mutation alters bacterial pathogen host tropism. Nat Genet 47:361–366 10.1038/ng.3219. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schukken YH, Günther J, Fitzpatrick J, Fontaine MC, Goetze L, Holst O, Leigh J, Petzl W, Schuberth HJ, Sipka A, Smith DG, Quesnell R, Watts J, Yancey R, Zerbe H, Gurjar A, Zadoks RN, Seyfert HM, members of the Pfizer mastitis research consortium. 2011. Host-response patterns of intramammary infections in dairy cows. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 144:270–289 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.08.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Le Maréchal C, Thiéry R, Vautor E, Le Loir Y. 2011. Mastitis impact on technological properties of milk and quality of milk products: a review. Dairy Sci Technol 91:247–282 10.1007/s13594-011-0009-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Le Loir Y, Baron F, Gautier M. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet Mol Res 2:63–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sakwinska O, Giddey M, Moreillon M, Morisset D, Waldvogel A, Moreillon P. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus host range and human-bovine host shift. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5908–5915 10.1128/AEM.00238-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Budd KE, Mitchell J, Keane OM. 2016. Lineage associated expression of virulence traits in bovine-adapted Staphylococcus aureus. Vet Microbiol 189:24–31 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.04.013. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA. 2010. Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiol 10:173 10.1186/1471-2180-10-173. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Menegotto F, González-Cabrero S, Lorenzo B, Cubero Á, Cuervo W, Gutiérrez MP, Simarro M, Orduña A, Bratos MA. 2012. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Spanish hospital over a 4-year period: clonal replacement, decreased antimicrobial resistance, and identification of community-acquired and livestock-associated clones. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74:332–337 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Udo EE, Aly NY, Sarkhoo E, Al-Sawan R, Al-Asar AS. 2011. Detection and characterization of an ST97-SCCmec-V community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in a neonatal intensive care unit and special care baby unit. J Med Microbiol 60:600–604 10.1099/jmm.0.028381-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Resch G, François P, Morisset D, Stojanov M, Bonetti EJ, Schrenzel J, Sakwinska O, Moreillon P. 2013. Human-to-bovine jump of Staphylococcus aureus CC8 is associated with the loss of a β-hemolysin converting prophage and the acquisition of a new staphylococcal cassette chromosome. PLoS One 8:e58187 10.1371/journal.pone.0058187. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bar-Gal GK, Blum SE, Hadas L, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Leitner G. 2015. Host-specificity of Staphylococcus aureus causing intramammary infections in dairy animals assessed by genotyping and virulence genes. Vet Microbiol 176:143–154 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.01.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fournier C, Kuhnert P, Frey J, Miserez R, Kirchhofer M, Kaufmann T, Steiner A, Graber HU. 2008. Bovine Staphylococcus aureus: association of virulence genes, genotypes and clinical outcome. Res Vet Sci 85:439–448 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.01.010. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Piccinini R, Borromeo V, Zecconi A. 2010. Relationship between S. aureus gene pattern and dairy herd mastitis prevalence. Vet Microbiol 145:100–105 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Piccinini R, Tassi R, Daprà V, Pilla R, Fenner J, Carter B, Anjum MF. 2012. Study of Staphylococcus aureus collected at slaughter from dairy cows with chronic mastitis. J Dairy Res 79:249–255 10.1017/S002202991200009X. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Younis A, Krifucks O, Fleminger G, Heller ED, Gollop N, Saran A, Leitner G. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin, a virulence factor in bovine mastitis. J Dairy Res 72:188–194 10.1017/S002202990500083X. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alonzo F III, Torres VJ. 2014. The bicomponent pore-forming leucocidins of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:199–230 10.1128/MMBR.00055-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schlotter K, Ehricht R, Hotzel H, Monecke S, Pfeffer M, Donat K. 2012. Leukocidin genes lukF-P83 and lukM are associated with Staphylococcus aureus clonal complexes 151, 479 and 133 isolated from bovine udder infections in Thuringia, Germany. Vet Res (Faisalabad) 43:42 10.1186/1297-9716-43-42. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Spaan AN, van Strijp JAG, Torres VJ. 2017. Leukocidins: staphylococcal bi-component pore-forming toxins find their receptors. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:435–447 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.27. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Deringer JR, Ely RJ, Monday SR, Stauffacher CV, Bohach GA. 1997. Vbeta-dependent stimulation of bovine and human T cells by host-specific staphylococcal enterotoxins. Infect Immun 65:4048–4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Viana D, Blanco J, Tormo-Más MA, Selva L, Guinane CM, Baselga R, Corpa J, Lasa I, Novick RP, Fitzgerald JR, Penadés JR. 2010. Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to ruminant and equine hosts involves SaPI-carried variants of von Willebrand factor-binding protein. Mol Microbiol 77:1583–1594 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07312.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Spoor LE, Richardson E, Richards AC, Wilson GJ, Mendonca C, Gupta RK, McAdam PR, Nutbeam-Tuffs S, Black NS, O’Gara JP, Lee CY, Corander J, Fitzgerald JR. 2015. Recombination-mediated remodelling of host-pathogen interactions during Staphylococcus aureus niche adaptation. Microb Genom 1:e000036 10.1099/mgen.0.000036. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pyrah ITG, Scott PR, Penny CD. 1994. Possible involvement of Staphylococcus aureus as a primary pathogen in lamb septicaemia. Vet Rec 134:679–680 10.1136/vr.134.26.679. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bates P. 2003. Bacterial associations with the sheep scab mite (Psoroptes ovis). Vet Rec 152:206–208 10.1136/vr.152.7.206. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Foster AP. 2012. Staphylococcal skin disease in livestock. Vet Dermatol 23:342–351, e63 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01093.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.de la Fuente R, Ballesteros C, Bautista V, Medina A, Orden JA, Domínguez-Bernal G, Vindel A. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus subsp. anaerobius isolates from different countries are clonal in nature. Vet Microbiol 150:198–202 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Devriese LA, Van Damme LR, Fameree L. 1972. Methicillin (cloxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 19:598–605 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1972.tb00439.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lee JH. 2003. Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6489–6494 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6489-6494.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kaszanyitzky EJ, Egyed Z, Jánosi S, Keseru J, Gál Z, Szabó I, Veres Z, Somogyi P. 2004. Staphylococci isolated from animals and food with phenotypically reduced susceptibility to β-lactamase-resistant β-lactam antibiotics. Acta Vet Hung 52:7–17 10.1556/AVet.52.2004.1.2. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kwon NH, Park KT, Moon JS, Jung WK, Kim SH, Kim JM, Hong SK, Koo HC, Joo YS, Park YH. 2005. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization and molecular analysis for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and novel SCCmec subtype IVg isolated from bovine milk in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:624–632 10.1093/jac/dki306. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Juhász-Kaszanyitzky E, Jánosi S, Somogyi P, Dán A, van der Graaf-van Bloois L, van Duijkeren E, Wagenaar JA. 2007. MRSA transmission between cows and humans. Emerg Infect Dis 13:630–632 10.3201/eid1304.060833. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Umoh VJ, Adesiyun AA, Gomwalk NE. 1990. Antibiogram of staphylococcal strains isolated from milk and milk-products. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 37:701–706. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Costa EO, Benites NR, Guerra JL, Melville PA. 2000. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from mammary parenchymas of slaughtered dairy cows. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 47:99–103 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00319.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Erskine RJ, Walker RD, Bolin CA, Bartlett PC, White DG. 2002. Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period. J Dairy Sci 85:1111–1118 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74172-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fessler A, Scott C, Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Schwarz S. 2010. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:619–625 10.1093/jac/dkq021. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Holmes MA, Zadoks RN. 2011. Methicillin resistant S. aureus in human and bovine mastitis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16:373–382 10.1007/s10911-011-9237-x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, Walpole E, Brooks K, Pickard DJ, Teale C, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Edwards GF, Girvan EK, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Hill RL, Larsen AR, Skov RL, Peacock SJ, Maskell DJ, Holmes MA. 2011. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:595–603 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li T, Lu H, Wang X, Gao Q, Dai Y, Shang J, Li M. 2017. Molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis between 2014 and 2015. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:127 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wu Z, Li F, Liu D, Xue H, Zhao X. 2015. Novel type XII staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec harboring a new cassette chromosome recombinase, CcrC2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7597–7601 10.1128/AAC.01692-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yan X, Li Z, Chlebowicz MA, Tao X, Ni M, Hu Y, Li Z, Grundmann H, Murray S, Pascoe B, Sheppard SK, Bo X, Dijl JM, Du P, Zhang M, You Y, Yu X, Meng F, Wang S, Zhang J. 2016. Genetic features of livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus ST9 isolates from Chinese pigs that carry the lsa(E) gene for quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance. Int J Med Microbiol 306:722–729 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.08.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhou W, Li X, Osmundson T, Shi L, Ren J, Yan H. 2018. WGS analysis of ST9-MRSA-XII isolates from live pigs in China provides insights into transmission among porcine, human and bovine hosts. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:2652–2661 10.1093/jac/dky245. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Basanisi MG, La Bella G, Nobili G, Franconieri I, La Salandra G. 2017. Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from milk and dairy products in South Italy. Food Microbiol 62:141–146 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.020. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Loncaric I, Kübber-Heiss A, Posautz A, Stalder GL, Hoffmann D, Rosengarten R, Walzer C. 2014. mecC- and mecA-positive meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from livestock sharing habitat with wildlife previously tested positive for mecC-positive MRSA. Vet Dermatol 25:147–148 10.1111/vde.12116. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Paterson GK, Harrison EM, Holmes MA. 2014. The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 22:42–47 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cuny C, Layer F, Strommenger B, Witte W. 2011. Rare occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC130 with a novel mecA homologue in humans in Germany. PLoS One 6:e24360 10.1371/journal.pone.0024360. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rosell JM, de la Fuente LF. 2009. Culling and mortality in breeding rabbits. Prev Vet Med 88:120–127 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.08.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rosell JM, de la Fuente LF. 2018. Mastitis on rabbit farms: prevalence and risk factors. Animals (Basel) 8:E98 10.3390/ani8060098. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Corpa JM, Hermans K, Haesebrouck E. 2010. Main pathologies associated with Staphylococcus aureus infections in rabbits: a review. 17:11.
  • 91.Segura P, Martinez J, Peris B, Selva L, Viana D, Penades JR, Corpa JM. 2007. Staphylococcal infections in rabbit does on two industrial farms. Vet Rec 160:869–872 10.1136/vr.160.25.869. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Okerman L, Devriese LA, Maertens L, Okerman F, Godard C. 1984. Cutaneous staphylococcosis in rabbits. Vet Rec 114:313–315 10.1136/vr.114.13.313. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Viana D, Selva L, Segura P, Penadés JR, Corpa JM. 2007. Genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from rabbit lesions. Vet Microbiol 121:288–298 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Viana D, Selva L, Callanan JJ, Guerrero I, Ferrian S, Corpa JM. 2011. Strains of Staphylococcus aureus and pathology associated with chronic suppurative mastitis in rabbits. Vet J 190:403–407 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.11.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Vancraeynest D, Haesebrouck F, Deplano A, Denis O, Godard C, Wildemauwe C, Hermans K. 2006. International dissemination of a high virulence rabbit Staphylococcus aureus clone. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 53:418–422 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00977.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Guerrero I, Ferrian S, Penadés M, García-Quirós A, Pascual JJ, Selva L, Viana D, Corpa JM. 2015. Host responses associated with chronic staphylococcal mastitis in rabbits. Vet J 204:338–344 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.020. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hermans K, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. 2003. Rabbit staphylococcosis: difficult solutions for serious problems. Vet Microbiol 91:57–64 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00260-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Meulemans L, Hermans K, Duchateau L, Haesebrouck F. 2007. High and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus strains in a rabbit skin infection model. Vet Microbiol 125:333–340 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.024. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Devriese LA, Hendrickx W, Godard C, Okerman L, Haesebrouck F. 1996. A new pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus type in commercial rabbits. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 43:313–315. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hermans K, De Herdt P, Devriese LA, Hendrickx W, Godard C, Haesebrouck F. 1999. Colonization of rabbits with Staphylococcus aureus in flocks with and without chronic staphylococcosis. Vet Microbiol 67:37–46 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Peschel A, Otto M, Jack RW, Kalbacher H, Jung G, Götz F. 1999. Inactivation of the dlt operon in Staphylococcus aureus confers sensitivity to defensins, protegrins, and other antimicrobial peptides. J Biol Chem 274:8405–8410 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8405. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Murray S, Pascoe B, Méric G, Mageiros L, Yahara K, Hitchings MD, Friedmann Y, Wilkinson TS, Gormley FJ, Mack D, Bray JE, Lamble S, Bowden R, Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ, Wendlandt S, Schwarz S, Corander J, Fitzgerald JR, Sheppard SK. 2017. Recombination-mediated host adaptation by avian Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Biol Evol 9:830–842 10.1093/gbe/evx037. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bystroń J, Podkowik M, Piasecki T, Wieliczko A, Molenda J, Bania J. 2010. Genotypes and enterotoxin gene content of S. aureus isolates from poultry. Vet Microbiol 144:498–501 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.029. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Monecke S, Ruppelt A, Wendlandt S, Schwarz S, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Jäckel SC. 2013. Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from diseased poultry. Vet Microbiol 162:806–812 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.018. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Abdelbary MM, Wittenberg A, Cuny C, Layer F, Kurt K, Wieler LH, Walther B, Skov R, Larsen J, Hasman H, Fitzgerald JR, Smith TC, Wagenaar JA, Pantosti A, Hallin M, Struelens MJ, Edwards G, Böse R, Nübel U, Witte W. 2014. Phylogenetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus CC398 reveals a sub-lineage epidemiologically associated with infections in horses. PLoS One 9:e88083 10.1371/journal.pone.0088083. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Richards SA. 1971. The significance of changes in the temperature of the skin and body core of the chicken in the regulation of heat loss. J Physiol 216:1–10 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009505. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Herron-Olson L, Fitzgerald JR, Musser JM, Kapur V. 2007. Molecular correlates of host specialization in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 2:e1120 10.1371/journal.pone.0001120. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ehrlich SD. 1977. Replication and expression of plasmids from Staphylococcus aureus in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:1680–1682 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1680. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Pyzik E, Marek A. 2013. Plasmid profile analysis and evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from table chicken eggs. Pol J Vet Sci 16:307–312 10.2478/pjvs-2013-0042. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Abdalrahman LS, Stanley A, Wells H, Fakhr MK. 2015. Isolation, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains from Oklahoma retail poultry meats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:6148–6161 10.3390/ijerph120606148. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Takeuchi S, Kinoshita T, Kaidoh T, Hashizume N. 1999. Purification and characterization of protease produced by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a diseased chicken. Vet Microbiol 67:195–202 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Takeuchi S, Matsunaga K, Inubushi S, Higuchi H, Imaizumi K, Kaidoh T. 2002. Structural gene and strain specificity of a novel cysteine protease produced by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a diseased chicken. Vet Microbiol 89:201–210 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00171-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Cui S, Li J, Hu C, Jin S, Li F, Guo Y, Ran L, Ma Y. 2009. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine and workers in China. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:680–683 10.1093/jac/dkp275. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Guardabassi L, O’Donoghue M, Moodley A, Ho J, Boost M. 2009. Novel lineage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1998–2000 10.3201/eid1512.090378. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Frana TS, Beahm AR, Hanson BM, Kinyon JM, Layman LL, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Smith TC. 2013. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pork farms and visiting veterinary students. PLoS One 8:e53738 10.1371/journal.pone.0053738. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sun J, Yang M, Sreevatsan S, Davies PR. 2015. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in growing pigs in the USA. PLoS One 10:e0143670 10.1371/journal.pone.0143670. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Salgado CD, Farr BM, Calfee DP. 2003. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 36:131–139 10.1086/345436. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Otto M. 2013. Community-associated MRSA: what makes them special? Int J Med Microbiol 303:324–330 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Tavares A, Miragaia M, Rolo J, Coelho C, de Lencastre H, CA-MRSA/MSSA Working Group. 2013. High prevalence of hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community in Portugal: evidence for the blurring of community-hospital boundaries. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:1269–1283 10.1007/s10096-013-1872-2. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Liu C, Graber CJ, Karr M, Diep BA, Basuino L, Schwartz BS, Enright MC, O’Hanlon SJ, Thomas JC, Perdreau-Remington F, Gordon S, Gunthorpe H, Jacobs R, Jensen P, Leoung G, Rumack JS, Chambers HF. 2008. A population-based study of the incidence and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in San Francisco, 2004-2005. Clin Infect Dis 46:1637–1646 10.1086/587893. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.van Duijkeren E, Jansen MD, Flemming SC, de Neeling H, Wagenaar JA, Schoormans AH, van Nes A, Fluit AC. 2007. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs with exudative epidermitis. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1408–1410 10.3201/eid1309.061268. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A. 2005. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis 11:711–714 10.3201/eid1105.040866. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.van Belkum A, Melles DC, Peeters JK, van Leeuwen WB, van Duijkeren E, Huijsdens XW, Spalburg E, de Neeling AJ, Verbrugh HA, Dutch Working Party on Surveillance and Research of MRSA-SOM. 2008. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in pigs and humans. Emerg Infect Dis 14:479–483 10.3201/eid1403.070760. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Deiters C, Günnewig V, Friedrich AW, Mellmann A, Köck R. 2015. Are cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex (CC) 398 among humans still livestock-associated? Int J Med Microbiol 305:110–113 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.11.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Cuny C, Nathaus R, Layer F, Strommenger B, Altmann D, Witte W. 2009. Nasal colonization of humans with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CC398 with and without exposure to pigs. PLoS One 4:e6800 10.1371/journal.pone.0006800. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Larsen J, Petersen A, Sørum M, Stegger M, van Alphen L, Valentiner-Branth P, Knudsen LK, Larsen LS, Feingold B, Price LB, Andersen PS, Larsen AR, Skov RL. 2015. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to 2011. Euro Surveill 20:30021 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.37.30021. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ward MJ, Gibbons CL, McAdam PR, van Bunnik BA, Girvan EK, Edwards GF, Fitzgerald JR, Woolhouse ME. 2014. Time-scaled evolutionary analysis of the transmission and antibiotic resistance dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:7275–7282 10.1128/AEM.01777-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Köck R, Harlizius J, Bressan N, Laerberg R, Wieler LH, Witte W, Deurenberg RH, Voss A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2009. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among pigs on German farms and import of livestock-related MRSA into hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1375–1382 10.1007/s10096-009-0795-4. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Köck R, Schaumburg F, Mellmann A, Köksal M, Jurke A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2013. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as causes of human infection and colonization in Germany. PLoS One 8:e55040 10.1371/journal.pone.0055040. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Bens CC, Voss A, Klaassen CH. 2006. Presence of a novel DNA methylation enzyme in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with pig farming leads to uninterpretable results in standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. J Clin Microbiol 44:1875–1876 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1875-1876.2006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Stegger M, Lindsay JA, Moodley A, Skov R, Broens EM, Guardabassi L. 2011. Rapid PCR detection of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 by targeting the restriction-modification system carrying sau1-hsdS1. J Clin Microbiol 49:732–734 10.1128/JCM.01970-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Li S, Skov RL, Han X, Larsen AR, Larsen J, Sørum M, Wulf M, Voss A, Hiramatsu K, Ito T. 2011. Novel types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements identified in clonal complex 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3046–3050 10.1128/AAC.01475-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Argudín MA, Tenhagen BA, Fetsch A, Sachsenröder J, Käsbohrer A, Schroeter A, Hammerl JA, Hertwig S, Helmuth R, Bräunig J, Mendoza MC, Appel B, Rodicio MR, Guerra B. 2011. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3052–3060 10.1128/AEM.02260-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Hallin M, De Mendonça R, Denis O, Lefort A, El Garch F, Butaye P, Hermans K, Struelens MJ. 2011. Diversity of accessory genome of human and livestock-associated ST398 methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Infect Genet Evol 11:290–299 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.021. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Wulf MW, Sørum M, van Nes A, Skov R, Melchers WJ, Klaassen CH, Voss A. 2008. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:29–34 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01873.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Bisdorff B, Scholhölter JL, Claußen K, Pulz M, Nowak D, Radon K. 2012. MRSA-ST398 in livestock farmers and neighbouring residents in a rural area in Germany. Epidemiol Infect 140:1800–1808 10.1017/S0950268811002378. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Bergs K, Heesterbeek H, Heederik D. 2011. Persistence of livestock associated MRSA CC398 in humans is dependent on intensity of animal contact. PLoS One 6:e16830 10.1371/journal.pone.0016830. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.van Cleef BA, Graveland H, Haenen AP, van de Giessen AW, Heederik D, Wagenaar JA, Kluytmans JA. 2011. Persistence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in field workers after short-term occupational exposure to pigs and veal calves. J Clin Microbiol 49:1030–1033 10.1128/JCM.00493-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Richter A, Sting R, Popp C, Rau J, Tenhagen BA, Guerra B, Hafez HM, Fetsch A. 2012. Prevalence of types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in turkey flocks and personnel attending the animals. Epidemiol Infect 140:2223–2232 10.1017/S095026881200009X. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Schaumburg F, Köck R, Mellmann A, Richter L, Hasenberg F, Kriegeskorte A, Friedrich AW, Gatermann S, Peters G, von Eiff C, Becker K, study group. 2012. Population dynamics among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Germany during a 6-year period. J Clin Microbiol 50:3186–3192 10.1128/JCM.01174-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.van Wamel WJ, Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. 2006. The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on beta-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 188:1310–1315 10.1128/JB.188.4.1310-1315.2006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, Roos A, Daha MR, Presanis JS, Sim RB, van Wamel WJ, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. 2005. Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat Immunol 6:920–927 10.1038/ni1235. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.de Haas CJ, Veldkamp KE, Peschel A, Weerkamp F, Van Wamel WJ, Heezius EC, Poppelier MJ, Van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. 2004. Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterial antiinflammatory agent. J Exp Med 199:687–695 10.1084/jem.20031636. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.McCarthy AJ, Witney AA, Gould KA, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Voss A, Denis O, Broens EM, Hinds J, Lindsay JA. 2011. The distribution of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in MRSA CC398 is associated with both host and country. Genome Biol Evol 3:1164–1174 10.1093/gbe/evr092. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.McCarthy AJ, van Wamel W, Vandendriessche S, Larsen J, Denis O, Garcia-Graells C, Uhlemann AC, Lowy FD, Skov R, Lindsay JA. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398 clade associated with human-to-human transmission. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8845–8848 10.1128/AEM.02398-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Schijffelen MJ, Boel CH, van Strijp JA, Fluit AC. 2010. Whole genome analysis of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolate from a case of human endocarditis. BMC Genomics 11:376 10.1186/1471-2164-11-376. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Yu F, Chen Z, Liu C, Zhang X, Lin X, Chi S, Zhou T, Chen Z, Chen X. 2008. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes among isolates from hospitalised patients in China. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:381–384 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01927.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Corvaglia AR, François P, Hernandez D, Perron K, Linder P, Schrenzel J. 2010. A type III-like restriction endonuclease functions as a major barrier to horizontal gene transfer in clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11954–11958 10.1073/pnas.1000489107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Loeffler A, Boag AK, Sung J, Lindsay JA, Guardabassi L, Dalsgaard A, Smith H, Stevens KB, Lloyd DH. 2005. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among staff and pets in a small animal referral hospital in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:692–697 10.1093/jac/dki312. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Box AT, Heck ME, Wannet WJ, Fluit AC. 2004. Human-to-dog transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 10:2235–2237 10.3201/eid1012.040387. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Rutland BE, Weese JS, Bolin C, Au J, Malani AN. 2009. Human-to-dog transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1328–1330 10.3201/eid1508.081635. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Loeffler A, Lloyd DH. 2010. Companion animals: a reservoir for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community? Epidemiol Infect 138:595–605 10.1017/S0950268809991476. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Faires MC, Traverse M, Tater KC, Pearl DL, Weese JS. 2010. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in dogs. Emerg Infect Dis 16:69–75 10.3201/eid1601.081758. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Morris DO, Lautenbach E, Zaoutis T, Leckerman K, Edelstein PH, Rankin SC. 2012. Potential for pet animals to harbour methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus when residing with human MRSA patients. Zoonoses Public Health 59:286–293 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01448.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. 2009. The molecular evolution of hospital- and community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Mol Med 9:100–115 10.2174/156652409787581637. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Weese JS, van Duijkeren E. 2010. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in veterinary medicine. Vet Microbiol 140:418–429 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.039. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.van Duijkeren E, Moleman M, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Multem J, Troelstra A, Fluit AC, van Wamel WJ, Houwers DJ, de Neeling AJ, Wagenaar JA. 2010. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse personnel: an investigation of several outbreaks. Vet Microbiol 141:96–102 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. 2007. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 13:255–258 10.3201/eid1302.060924. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Seguin JC, Walker RD, Caron JP, Kloos WE, George CG, Hollis RJ, Jones RN, Pfaller MA. 1999. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a veterinary teaching hospital: potential human-to-animal transmission. J Clin Microbiol 37:1459–1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Morgan M. 2008. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and animals: zoonosis or humanosis? J Antimicrob Chemother 62:1181–1187 10.1093/jac/dkn405. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Cuny C, Strommenger B, Witte W, Stanek C. 2008. Clusters of infections in horses with MRSA ST1, ST254, and ST398 in a veterinary hospital. Microb Drug Resist 14:307–310 10.1089/mdr.2008.0845. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Koop G, Vrieling M, Storisteanu DM, Lok LS, Monie T, van Wigcheren G, Raisen C, Ba X, Gleadall N, Hadjirin N, Timmerman AJ, Wagenaar JA, Klunder HM, Fitzgerald JR, Zadoks R, Paterson GK, Torres C, Waller AS, Loeffler A, Loncaric I, Hoet AE, Bergström K, De Martino L, Pomba C, de Lencastre H, Ben Slama K, Gharsa H, Richardson EJ, Chilvers ER, de Haas C, van Kessel K, van Strijp JA, Harrison EM, Holmes MA. 2017. Identification of LukPQ, a novel, equid-adapted leukocidin of Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 7:40660 10.1038/srep40660. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.de Jong NWM, Vrieling M, Garcia BL, Koop G, Brettmann M, Aerts PC, Ruyken M, van Strijp JAG, Holmes M, Harrison EM, Geisbrecht BV, Rooijakkers SHM. 2018. Identification of a staphylococcal complement inhibitor with broad host specificity in equid Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Biol Chem 293:4468–4477 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000599. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Lindsay JA, Ruzin A, Ross HF, Kurepina N, Novick RP. 1998. The gene for toxic shock toxin is carried by a family of mobile pathogenicity islands in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 29:527–543 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00947.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Schaumburg F, Pauly M, Anoh E, Mossoun A, Wiersma L, Schubert G, Flammen A, Alabi AS, Muyembe-Tamfum J-J, Grobusch MP, Karhemere S, Akoua-Koffi C, Couacy-Hymann E, Kremsner PG, Mellmann A, Becker K, Leendertz FH, Peters G. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus complex from animals and humans in three remote African regions. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:345.e1–345.e8 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Senghore M, Bayliss SC, Kwambana-Adams BA, Foster-Nyarko E, Manneh J, Dione M, Badji H, Ebruke C, Doughty EL, Thorpe HA, Jasinska AJ, Schmitt CA, Cramer JD, Turner TR, Weinstock G, Freimer NB, Pallen MJ, Feil EJ, Antonio M. 2016. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus from humans to green monkeys in The Gambia as revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5910–5917 10.1128/AEM.01496-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Koymans KJ, Vrieling M, Gorham RD Jr, van Strijp JAG. 2017. Staphylococcal immune evasion proteins: structure, function, and host adaptation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 409:441–489 10.1007/82_2015_5017. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Löffler B, Hussain M, Grundmeier M, Brück M, Holzinger D, Varga G, Roth J, Kahl BC, Proctor RA, Peters G. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin is a very potent cytotoxic factor for human neutrophils. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000715 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000715. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Vrieling M, Boerhout EM, van Wigcheren GF, Koymans KJ, Mols-Vorstermans TG, de Haas CJ, Aerts PC, Daemen IJ, van Kessel KP, Koets AP, Rutten VP, Nuijten PJ, van Strijp JA, Benedictus L. 2016. LukMF' is the major secreted leukocidin of bovine Staphylococcus aureus and is produced in vivo during bovine mastitis. Sci Rep 6:37759 10.1038/srep37759. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Wilson GJ, Seo KS, Cartwright RA, Connelley T, Chuang-Smith ON, Merriman JA, Guinane CM, Park JY, Bohach GA, Schlievert PM, Morrison WI, Fitzgerald JR. 2011. A novel core genome-encoded superantigen contributes to lethality of community-associated MRSA necrotizing pneumonia. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002271 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002271. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Smyth DS, Hartigan PJ, Meaney WJ, Fitzgerald JR, Deobald CF, Bohach GA, Smyth CJ. 2005. Superantigen genes encoded by the egc cluster and SaPIbov are predominant among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cows, goats, sheep, rabbits and poultry. J Med Microbiol 54:401–411 10.1099/jmm.0.45863-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Fitzgerald JR, Monday SR, Foster TJ, Bohach GA, Hartigan PJ, Meaney WJ, Smyth CJ. 2001. Characterization of a putative pathogenicity island from bovine Staphylococcus aureus encoding multiple superantigens. J Bacteriol 183:63–70 10.1128/JB.183.1.63-70.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Jarraud S, Peyrat MA, Lim A, Tristan A, Bes M, Mougel C, Etienne J, Vandenesch F, Bonneville M, Lina G. 2001. egc, a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin gene, forms a putative nursery of superantigens in Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol 166:669–677 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.669. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES