Abstract
Background:
Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Whereas some studies have suggested that a direct measure of common genetic liability for suicide attempts (SA), captured by a polygenic risk score for SA (SA-PRS), explains risk independent of parental history, further confirmation would be useful. Even more unsettled is the extent to which SA-PRS is associated with lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI).
Methods:
We used summary statistics from the largest available GWAS study of SA to generate SA-PRS for two non-overlapping cohorts of soldiers of European ancestry. These were tested in multivariable models that included parental major depressive disorder (MDD) and parental SA.
Results:
In the first cohort, 417 (6.3 %) of 6573 soldiers reported lifetime SA and 1195 (18.2 %) reported lifetime NSSI. In a multivariable model that included parental history of MDD and parental history of SA, SA-PRS remained significantly associated with lifetime SA [aOR = 1.26, 95%CI:1.13–1.39, p < 0.001] per standardized unit SA-PRS]. In the second cohort, 204 (4.2 %) of 4900 soldiers reported lifetime SA, and 299 (6.1 %) reported lifetime NSSI. In a multivariable model that included parental history of MDD and parental history of SA, SA-PRS remained significantly associated with lifetime SA [aOR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.04–1.38, p = 0.014]. A combined analysis of both cohorts yielded similar results. In neither cohort or in the combined analysis was SA-PRS significantly associated with NSSI.
Conclusions:
PRS for SA conveys information about likelihood of lifetime SA (but not NSSI, demonstrating specificity), independent of self-reported parental history of MDD and parental history of SA.
Limitations:
At present, the magnitude of effects is small and would not be immediately useful for clinical decision-making or risk-stratified prevention initiatives, but this may be expected to improve with further iterations. Also critical will be the extension of these findings to more diverse populations.
Keywords: Suicide, Suicide attempt, Non-suicidal self-injury, Genetics, Polygenic risk
1. Introduction
Suicide is a serious global societal and public health problem (Lovero et al., 2023). In the United States in 2021, suicide was the ninth leading cause of death, and the second leading cause of death for individuals between the ages of 10–14 and 25–34 (Center for Disease Control CDC, 2023). Additionally, concern about suicide has raised alarms in the US military, where from 2014 to 2019, the suicide death rate for the Active Component increased from 20.4 to 25.9 suicides per 100,000 Service members (Department of Defense, 2020). Despite a great deal of research into risk factors (Holliday et al., 2020) and substantial investments in suicide prevention (Stein et al., 2019; Curley et al., 2020), it remains uncertain why suicidality has trended higher. These observations have called for the development of better predictive models that can help target those individuals at highest risk (Kessler et al., 2020).
An emerging body of research has extended the search for suicide risk factors to include genetic risk. Twin studies had initially set the stage for expecting to find specific genetic risk factors, providing heritability estimates of 30–55 % (Tidemalm et al., 2011). It is now clear that suicidal behaviors are genetically complex – as are most neuropsychiatric traits (Wendt et al., 2020) – and the evidence suggests that many common variants, each of small effect, contribute to risk (with the possibility that rare variants confer greater risk) (Sokolowski and Wasserman, 2020).
Epidemiological studies have shown that risk factors for various aspects of self-harm (i.e., ideation, attempts, and deaths) overlap only partially (Nock et al., 2013; Naifeh et al., 2020). This awareness has carried over to the genetic epidemiological study of self-harm where, increasingly, studies are each centered on one stage or type of self-harm (e.g., suicide ideation; suicide attempts; violent suicide attempts; suicide deaths).
Early genetic studies of suicidality, including our own genome-wide association study (GWAS) of suicide attempts in US Army soldiers (Stein et al., 2017), were underpowered (Mirkovic et al., 2016). More recent GWAS of suicide attempts, which have achieved much larger sample sizes thanks to data-sharing within and across consortia, have emphasized a genetic correlation between major depressive disorder (MDD) and SA (Mullins et al., 2019; Levey et al., 2019; Mullins et al., 2022). Similar conclusions were reached from a GWAS of death by suicide, which found a polygenic association with MDD (and several other behavioral traits phenotypically linked with suicide deaths) (Docherty et al., 2020). Our work has shown a polygenic association between MDD and SA in U.S. Army soldiers (Stein et al., 2021), consistent with findings that polygenic risk for MDD was associated with SA in adults across 4 clinical samples (Fanelli et al., 2022) and with suicidal behaviors in preadolescent youths (Joo et al., 2022).
Given the recent completion of the largest available GWAS metaanalysis of SA (Docherty et al., 2023), we asked two questions: (Lovero et al., 2023) whether polygenic risk of SA, per se, is predictive of lifetime SA in two independent cohorts of US Army soldiers, over and above the robust risks associated with parental history of SA (or suicide death) (Wang et al., 2022) and parental history of MDD; and (Center for Disease Control CDC, 2023) whether polygenic risk of SA is predictive of lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), which has epidemiological similarities and differences from SA. The first question has been addressed in recent studies showing an independent association of polygenic risk for SA on suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children (Lee et al., 2022) and suicide attempts in adolescents (Barzilay et al., 2022), but we believe this to be the first replication of these findings in an adult sample. The second question has been addressed in a report from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) where it was shown that NSSI was less strongly genetically related to SA than were other forms of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (Colbert et al., 2023). To the best of our knowledge, that finding has yet to be replicated.
In the present study, we used data from two non-overlapping cohorts evaluated in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (STARRS) (Naifeh et al., 2019) to answer these questions.
2. Methods
2.1. Subjects
Data come from two components of Army STARRS: the New Soldier Study (NSS) and the Pre/Post Deployment Study (PPDS). Detailed information about the design and conduct of STARRS is available in a separate report (Ursano et al., 2014). Soldiers from the respective studies described below are nonoverlapping as confirmed by genetic analysis.
Cohort 1: New Soldier Study (NSS).
The NSS was carried out among new soldiers at the start of their basic training at three Army Installations between April 2011 and November 2012. Of 39,784 NSS respondents who completed the Self-Administered Questionnaire (SAQ), 33,088 (83.2 %) provided blood samples. Funding constraints led us to genotype a subset of respondents that would be optimally informative for the aims of STARRS: All cases of reported lifetime SA and PTSD were genotyped, as were a set of controls stratum-matched on sex, service type (Regular Army vs. Guard/Reserve), and childhood adversity quartile. The NSS analyses described herein include 6573 soldiers of European ancestry with available survey and genotype data (see below).
Cohort 2: Pre/Post Deployment Study (PPDS).
The PPDS collected baseline data (also using a version of the SAQ) from US Army soldiers in three Brigade Combat Teams during the first quarter of 2012, within approximately six weeks of their upcoming deployment to Afghanistan. A total of 9949 Soldiers were present for duty in the three Brigade Combat Teams; 9488 (95.3 %) consented to participate in the survey with 8558 (86.0 %) providing complete baseline survey responses and consent to link their survey responses to their administrative records. The PPDS analyses described herein include 4900 soldiers of European ancestry with available survey and genotype data (see below).
2.2. Measures
The SAQ surveyed socio-demographic characteristics, lifetime and past-30-day mental disorders, and an array of potential risk and resilience factors.
Suicide Attempt and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment.
Suicidal behaviors were assessed using an adaptation of the Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (Posner et al., 2011). Pertinent to the data presented here, all respondents were asked if they had a history of SA (“Did you ever make a suicide attempt [i.e., purposefully hurt yourself with at least some intention to die]?”). All respondents were also asked if they had a history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) (”Did you ever do something to hurt yourself on purpose, but without wanting to die [e.g., cutting yourself, hitting yourself, or burning yourself]?”).
This information was available at baseline for NSS and PPDS, and at approximately 6- and 9-months post index deployment for PPDS. It was also available at later dates for those NSS and PPDS soldiers who subsequently took part in a 6- to 8-year follow-up survey referred to as STARRS-LS (STARRS Longitudinal Study), for which data collection began 12 September 2016 and is ongoing; data included here are for assessments obtained through 10 April 2018. The STARRS-LS survey was conducted using a mixed-mode design, with participants given the option of completing the interview as a self-administered survey on the web, or with an interviewer over the telephone. This self-report information on suicidality was complemented by access to Army health records where SA(s) were recorded if medical attention was sought. For the analyses presented here, cases are soldiers with a lifetime history of SA (from either self-report [non-fatal attempts] or Army health records [fatal or non-fatal attempts]) and controls are those individuals with no lifetime history of SA.
Parental History of Major Depressive Disorder.
The Army STARRS surveys queried parental history of MDD separately for the respondent’s biological mother and father. The survey item (“Did any of them ever have times lasting two weeks or longer when they were so depressed they couldn’t concentrate, felt worthless, or felt their life was not worth living?“) was derived from the Family History Screen (Weissman et al., 2000). An affirmative response for either (or both) parent(s) was considered as YES for parental MDD.
Parental History of Suicide Attempt or Death.
The Army STARRS surveys queried parental history of SA (or suicide death) asking whether, during the respondent’s childhood, “A parent attempted suicide”, or “A parent committed suicide”. An affirmative response to either (for one or both parents) was coded as YES for parental SA.
2.3. Genetic data collection and procedures
Samples were genotyped using either the Illumina OmniExpress + Exome array with additional custom content or the Ilumina PsychChip. Quality control (QC) of genotype data used standard protocols as described elsewhere (Stein et al., 2016). Relatedness testing was carried out with PLINK v1.90 (Chang et al., 2015) and, for pairs of subjects with π of >0.2, one member of each relative pair was removed at random.
Genotype imputation was performed with a 2-step pre-phasing/imputation approach with a multi-ancestry reference panel from 1000 Genomes Project (August 2012 phase 1 integrated release; 2186 phased haplotypes with 40,318,245 variants). We removed SNPs that were not present in the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel, had non-matching alleles to 1000 Genome Project reference, or with ambiguous, unresolvable alleles (AT/GC SNPs with minor allele frequency [MAF] > 0.1). A total of 664,457 SNPs for the Illumina OmniExpress array and 360,704 for the Illumina PsychChip entered the imputation. We performed the following QC procedures to obtain the genotype data for population assignment and principal components analysis (PCA). We retained autosomal SNPs with missing rate < 0.05; samples with individual-wise missing rate < 0.02; SNPs with missing rate < 0.02; and SNPs with missing rate difference between cases and controls <0.02. After QC, we merged our study samples with HapMap3 samples. We retained SNPs with MAF ≥ 0.01 and performed LD pruning at R2 > 0.02. Finally, we excluded SNPs in MHC region (Chr 6:25-35 Mb) and Chr 8 inversion (Chr 8:7-13 Mb). Population (ancestry) assignment was conducted using standard methods (see (Stein et al., 2017) for details).
Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) computation.
PRS for the SA phenotype were computed using PRS-CS-auto, a method that uses a Bayesian regression framework and places a continuous shrinkage prior on the effects sizes of SNPs in the discovery GWAS summary statistics (Ge et al., 2019). PLINK 2.0 (Chang et al., 2015) was used to weight all SNPs by their effect sizes calculated using PRS-CS-auto and sum all SNPs into PRS for each individual in the target cohort. PRS analyses were conducted only in the European ancestry subsamples because of the unavailability of reference GWAS data for other populations (Choi et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 2019). Summary statistics from the International Suicide Genetics Consortium-Million Veteran Program (ISGHC-MVP) meta-analysis (doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.03.22277199) (Docherty et al., 2023) with Army STARRS data withheld (N = 35,116 cases, 768,755 controls) were used as the discovery GWAS; 1000 Genomes European was used as the LD reference panel. PRS were standardized within each study (NSS and PPDS) for the analysis.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association of SA-PRS, parental history of MDD, and parental history of SA with lifetime SA and NSSI, controlling for the top 10 ancestral principal components, age, batch (for NSS, which had been genotyped in two batches) and sex. Additional models included personal history of MDD (lifetime and past-30-day). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were reported with 95 % confidence intervals. Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R-square was reported for models. Likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to examine whether adding the SA-PRS improved model prediction. All analyses were conducted in R version 3.6.1.
3. Results
3.1. Findings in New Soldier Study (NSS)
The NSS sample consisted of 417 lifetime SA cases (6.3 %) and 6156 controls with no history of lifetime SA; and 1195 lifetime NSSI cases (18.2 %) and 5378 controls with no history of lifetime NSSI. The sample was 15 % female. Mean age of the sample was 20.8 (SD 3.3) years; median = 20 years, interquartile range: 19–22 years. 1086 (17.0 % of) soldiers had a lifetime history of MDD and 532 (8.4 %) had a past-30-day history of MDD. 2107 (32.1 %) soldiers reported a parental history of MDD and 553 (8.4 %) reported a parental history of SA (Table 1, top).
Table 1.
Personal (Lifetime) and parental histories of soldiers in each study.
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| New Soldier Study | ||
| Lifetime Suicide Attempt | 417 (6.3 %) | 6156 (93.7 %) |
| Lifetime Non-Suicidal Self-Injury | 1195 (18.2 %) | 5378 (81.8 %) |
| Lifetime MDD | 1086 (17.0 %) | 5288 (83.0 %) |
| Past-30-Day MDD | 532 (8.4 %) | 5842 (91.7 %) |
| Parental History of Major Depression | 2107 (32.1 %) | 4466 (67.9 %) |
| Parental History of Suicide Attempt or Death | 553 (8.4 %) | 6020 (91.6 %) |
| Pre-Post Deployment Study | ||
| Lifetime Suicide Attempt | 204 (4.2 %) | 4696 (95.8 %) |
| Lifetime Non-Suicidal Self-Injury | 299 (6.1 %) | 4601 (93.9 %) |
| Lifetime MDD | 551 (11.2 %) | 4349 (88.8 %) |
| Past-30-Day MDD | 310 (6.3 %) | 4590 (93.7 %) |
| Parental History of Major Depression | 958 (19.6 %) | 3942 (80.5 %) |
| Parental History of Suicide Attempt or Death | 218 (4.5 %) | 4682 (95.6 %) |
In a multivariable model that included age, sex, 10 ancestral PCs, and batch, the SA-PRS was significantly associated with lifetime history of SA (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.27 [95 % CI: 1.15–1.41] per SD increase in SA-PRS). SA-PRS continued to be significantly associated with lifetime SA (aOR = 1.26 [95 % CI: 1.13–1.39]) in a multivariable model that included all of the aforementioned predictors and added parental history of MDD (aOR = 1.57 [95 % CI: 1.26–1.96]) and parental history of SA (aOR = 1.48 [95 % CI: 1.09–2.02]). (Table 2, top). This model explained significantly more of the variance in the lifetime SA outcome than a model that did not include SA-PRS (pseudo-R-square = 4.5 % vs 3.7 %, LRT p = 0.0002).
Table 2.
Multivariable model for lifetime suicide attempt and lifetime non-suicidal self-injury in New Soldier Study (NSS)*
| Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) | aOR 95 % CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifetime Suicide Attempt (SA) | |||
| Parental Major Depression | 1.57 | 1.26–1.96 | <0.001 |
| Parental Suicide Attempt or Death | 1.48 | 1.09–2.02 | 0.0134 |
| Suicide Attempt Polygenic Risk Score (SA-PRS) | 1.26 | 1.13–1.39 | <0.001 |
| Lifetime Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) | |||
| Parental Major Depression | 1.67 | 1.45–1.92 | <0.001 |
| Parental Suicide Attempt or Death | 1.25 | 1.003–1.55 | 0.047 |
| Suicide Attempt Polygenic Risk Score (SA-PRS) | 0.99 | 0.93–1.06 | 0.841 |
Models also include the following covariates (not shown in tables): age (years), sex, batch, and 10 principal components of ancestry.
In a multivariable model that included age, sex, 10 ancestral PCs, and batch, the SA-PRS was not significantly associated with lifetime history of NSSI (aOR = 1.01 [95 % CI: 0.94–1.07]). Neither was SA-PRS significantly associated with lifetime history of NSSI (aOR = 0.99 [95 % CI: 0.93–1.06]) in a multivariable model that included all of the aforementioned predictors and added parental history of MDD (aOR = 1.67 [95 % CI: 1.45–1.92]) and parental history of SA (aOR = 1.25 [95 % CI: 1.00–1.55]). (Table 2, bottom).
3.2. Replication in Pre-Post Deployment Study (PPDS)
The PPDS sample consisted of 204 lifetime SA cases (4.2 %) and 4696 controls with no history of lifetime SA; and 299 lifetime NSSI cases (6.1 %) and 4601 controls with no history of lifetime NSSI. The sample was 4 % female, reflecting the overwhelming male majority deployed to combat at the time of the survey. Mean age was 25.9 (SD 5.9) years; median = 24 years, interquartile range: 21–29 years. 551 (11.2 % of) soldiers had a lifetime history of MDD and 310 (6.3 %) had a pst-30-day history of MDD. 958 (19.6 % of) soldiers reported a parental history of MDD and 218 (4.5 %) reported a parental history of suicide attempt or death (Table 1, bottom).
In a multivariable model that included age, sex, and 10 ancestral PCs, the SA-PRS was significantly associated with lifetime history of SA (aOR = 1.22 [95 % CI: 1.06–1.41] per SD increase in SA-PRS). SA-PRS continued to be significantly associated with lifetime SA (aOR = 1.20 [95 % CI: 1.04–1.38]) in a multivariable model that included all of the aforementioned predictors and added parental history of MDD (aOR = 1.89 [95 % CI: 1.36–2.61]) and parental history of SA (aOR = 1.53 [95 % CI: 0.90–2.59]) (Table 3, top). This model explained significantly more of the variance in the lifetime SA outcome than a model that did not include SA-PRS (pseudo-R-square = 3.6 % vs 3.2 %, LRT p = 0.014).
Table 3.
Multivariable model for lifetime suicide attempt and lifetime non-suicidal self-injury in Pre-Post Deployment Study (PPDS)*.
| Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) | aOR 95 % CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifetime Suicide Attempt (SA) | |||
| Parental Major Depression | 1.89 | 1.36–2.61 | <0.001 |
| Parental Suicide Attempt or Death | 1.53 | 0.90–2.59 | 0.113 |
| Suicide Attempt Polygenic Risk Score (SA-PRS) | 1.20 | 1.04–1.04 | 0.014 |
| Lifetime Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) | |||
| Parental Major Depression | 2.69 | 2.07–3.50 | <0.001 |
| Parental Suicide Attempt or Death | 1.15 | 0.72–1.81 | 0.563 |
| Suicide Attempt Polygenic Risk Score (SA-PRS) | 1.06 | 0.94–1.20 | 0.336 |
Models also include the following covariates (not shown in tables): age (years), sex, and 10 principal components of ancestry.
In a multivariable model that included age, sex, and 10 ancestral PCs, the SA-PRS was not significantly associated with lifetime history of NSSI (aOR = 1.09 [95 % CI: 0.97–1.23]). Neither was SA-PRS significantly associated with lifetime history of NSSI (aOR = 1.06 [95 % CI: 0.94–1.20]) in a multivariable model that included all of the aforementioned predictors and added parental history of MDD (aOR = 2.69 [95 % CI: 2.07–3.50]) and parental history of SA (aOR = 1.15 [95 % CI: 0.72–1.81]). (Table 3, bottom).
3.3. Combined sample
In the combined sample consisting of soldiers from both cohorts (N = 11,473) a multivariable model that included age, sex, cohort, 10 ancestral PCs, parental history of MDD, and parental history of SA, SA-PRS was significantly associated with lifetime history of SA (aOR = 1.23 [95 % CI: 1.13–1.34] per SD increase in SA-PRS). This model explained significantly more (15.6 %; p < 0.000001) of the variance in the lifetime SA outcome than a model that did not include SA-PRS. In a multivariable model that included all of the aforementioned predictors in addition to the soldier’s lifetime history of MDD (positive in 1637 [14.52 %] of soldiers) and past-30-day history of MDD (positive in 842 [7.47 %] of soldiers) the association of SA-PRS with lifetime SA was largely unchanged (aOR = 1.21 [95 % CI: 1.11–1.32]).
In none of the above models was SA-PRS significantly associated with lifetime NSSI.
4. Discussion
Among the numerous potential applications of polygenic risk scores (PRS) is their use to stratify individuals based on their predicted risk for a range of mental and physical health outcomes (Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease A, 2021; Wray et al., 2021; Murray et al., 2020). A suicidality PRS has been shown to be associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a recent study of US military veterans, providing proof-of-concept for their usefulness in this regard (Nichter et al., 2023). Previous studies have shown that genetic liability for MDD is associated with risk for SA (Mullins et al., 2019; Levey et al., 2019; Mullins et al., 2014; Ruderfer et al., 2020) as well as for suicide death (Docherty et al., 2020).
In this study of two non-overlapping cohorts of United States Army soldiers, and in the combined sample, we found polygenic risk for suicide attempt (SA-PRS) was associated with lifetime risk of suicide attempt (SA) as determined from a combination of self-report and Army medical records. We were able to show that SA-PRS added to the predictive utility of two readily obtainable self-report parameters of SA risk, parental history of MDD and parental history of SA (Andlauer et al., 2021). The findings were largely unchanged by the addition of personal lifetime and past-30-day history of MDD. These findings, which we believe to be the first in adults, are consistent with those emanating from two recent studies of children and adolescents, respectively (Lee et al., 2022; Barzilay et al., 2022).
Importantly, we found no association between SA-PRS and NSSI, supporting the notion that NSSI and SA have different underlying pre-dispositions. These findings are consistent with recent observations from COGA, where an NSSI PRS was relatively weakly genetically correlated with other PRS for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (including SA), and where a PRS for SA had relatively little predictive value for NSS (compared to other forms of suicidal thoughts and behaviors) (Colbert et al., 2023). Our results further strengthen the argument that not all types of suicidal thoughts and behaviors share the same underlying genetic etiology, and that NSSI is a good example of one such outlier.
Strengths of the study are the relatively large sample sizes, the use of the largest available GWAS on SA for computation of the PRS, the systematic ascertainment of SA through surveys and access to health records, and the ability to test for replication of findings across two cohorts. In this regard, it is of particular interest that the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for SA-PRS predicting lifetime SA was very similar (aOR ~ 1.2) in both cohorts (and in the combined sample). A weakness is the possibility of incomplete ascertainment (e.g., if soldiers who left the Army were not part of STARRS-LS, and they attempted suicide after leaving the Army, they would be misclassified as controls), which would have biased findings toward the null. An additional weakness stems from the reliance on participant’s reporting of parental history of SA and depression, which may be inaccurate. Another potential weakness is that reports of SA by self-report and health record-reporting were not infrequently discordant, leaving open the possibility that additional reporting biases may have been operating. We chose to include either indication of SA for the outcome, to maximize sensitivity, considering that some SAs would only be ascertainable by self-report if medical attention was not sought. An additional potential shortcoming is that soldiers’ reporting of parental history may be inaccurate.
Another possible limitation is the distinction in methods used to ascertain lifetime history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and SA. For the former, we relied exclusively on self-report whereas for the latter we used a combination of self-report or medical records. This approach may have resulted in some misclassification for either outcome but is of even greater concern when relying solely on medical records (Randall et al., 2017).
This study was not designed to test if SA-PRS would predict new-onset SA among soldiers who did not report SA at baseline; the number of new-onset cases was insufficient to provide adequate statistical power for that analysis. Nevertheless, it will be crucial to demonstrate, in future prospective studies, whether SA- (or other) PRS offer predictive value in this regard. Lastly, our analyses focused solely on individuals of European ancestry (Peterson et al., 2019), given the known limitations of extending PRS from European to other ancestral groups. New approaches hold promise as a solution to this limitation (Marnetto et al., 2020; Hujoel et al., 2022; Ruan et al., 2022) and could be applied to this and other samples in the future.
Twin and other genetically informative studies suggest that SA is moderately (17 %) heritable (Fu et al., 2002), and that parental mental illness explains almost half of the genetic transmission of SA (Kendler et al., 2020). Studies of familial transmission of suicidal behavior have shown that in addition to parents, other first- and second-degree relatives contribute to familial risk, and it is likely that our SA-PRS is detecting some of this risk (Brent et al., 2015). The largest GWAS of SA to date has found a SNP-based heritability of approximately 6 % (Docherty et al., 2023). As genomic studies of suicide attempts increase in size and power, we expect that PRS for SA will incrementally improve in their predictive utility over and above other sociodemographic and life (and combat) stress measures that frequently enter into SA predictive models (Kessler et al., 2020). Recent GWAS findings related to suicidal thoughts and behaviors (Mirza et al., 2022; Kimbrel et al., 2022; Kimbrel et al., 2023) are also anticipated to result in PRS that can help with prediction of other important suicide-related traits beyond suicide attempts.
Much work needs to be done to demonstrate the clinical utility of PRS outside of the military setting. Given the magnitude of variance predicted by the current PRS, these are highly unlikely to be of clinical utility. Importantly, prospective longitudinal study designs are needed to determine if PRS can contribute to the prediction of new (or recurrent) suicide attempts. Given the fact that 50–60 % of people do not disclose their suicidal ideation and behavior to others (Hallford et al., 2023), PRS for SA may have a role to play in identifying those non-disclosing individuals at-risk for SA. Any applications of PRS for this purpose will need to tread carefully, balancing the ethical issues of an individual’s rights to privacy with medicine’s aims of preserving life (Docherty et al., 2021).
Acknowledgments
The Army STARRS Team consists of Co-Principal Investigators: Robert J. Ursano, MD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences) and Murray B. Stein, MD, MPH (University of California San Diego and VA San Diego Healthcare System); Site Principal Investigators: Steven Heeringa, PhD (University of Michigan), James Wagner, PhD (University of Michigan) and Ronald C. Kessler, PhD (Harvard Medical School); Army liaison/consultant: Kenneth Cox, MD, MPH (US Army Public Health Center); and Other team members: Pablo A. Aliaga, MA (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); COL David M. Benedek, MD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Laura Campbell-Sills, PhD (University of California San Diego); Carol S. Fullerton, PhD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Nancy Gebler, MA (University of Michigan); Robert K. Gifford, PhD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Meredith House, BA (University of Michigan); Paul E. Hurwitz, MPH (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Sonia Jain, PhD (University of California San Diego); Tzu-Cheg Kao, PhD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Lisa Lewandowski-Romps, PhD (University of Michigan); Holly Herberman Mash, PhD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); James E. McCarroll, PhD, MPH (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); James A. Naifeh, PhD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Tsz Hin Hinz Ng, MPH (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); Matthew K. Nock, PhD (Harvard University); Nancy A. Sampson, BA (Harvard Medical School); CDR Patcho Santiago, MD, MPH (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); LTC Gary H. Wynn, MD (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences); and Alan M. Zaslavsky, PhD (Harvard Medical School).
Funding/Disclaimer
Army STARRS was sponsored by the Department of the Army and funded under cooperative agreement number U01MH087981 (2009-2015) with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Subsequently, STARRS-LS was sponsored and funded by the Department of Defense (USUHS grant number HU0001-15-2-0004). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NIMH, Department of the Army, Department of Defense, Department of Veteran Affairs, or the Henry Jackson Foundation.
Disclosures
Dr. Kessler has in the past three years received support for his epidemiological studies from Sanofi Aventis; and was a consultant for Datastat, Inc., Sage Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda. Dr. Stein has in the past three years been a consultant to Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Aptinyx, atai Life Sciences, BigHealth, Bionomics, BioXcel Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clexio, Eisai, Delix Pharmaceuticals, EmpowerPharm, Engrail Therapeutics, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, NeuroTrauma Sciences, Otsuka US, PureTech Health, Sumitomo Pharma, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Stein has stock options in Oxeia Biopharmaceuticals and EpiVario. Dr. Smoller is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Sensorium Therapeutics (with equity), and has received grant support from Biogen, Inc., is PI of a collaborative study of the genetics of depression and bipolar disorder sponsored by 23andMe for which 23andMe provides analysis time as in-kind support but no payments. The remaining authors have no disclosures.
Declaration of competing interest
Dr. Kessler has in the past three years received support for his epidemiological studies from Sanofi Aventis; and was a consultant for Datastat, Inc., Sage Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda. Dr. Stein has in the past three years been a paid consultant for Aptinyx, BigHealth, Biogen, Bionomics, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cerevel Therapeutics, EmpowerPharm, Engrail Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, GW Pharma, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka, Oxeia Biopharmaceuticals, PureTech Health, and Sage Therapeutics. Dr. Smoller is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Sensorium Therapeutics (with equity), and has received grant support from Biogen, Inc., is PI of a collaborative study of the genetics of depression and bipolar disorder sponsored by 23andMe for which 23andMe provides analysis time as in-kind support but no payments. The remaining authors have no disclosures.
International Suicide Genetics Consortium and Suicide Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (members of both consortia are identical) consist of:
Anna R Docherty1,2,3, Niamh Mullins4,5, Allison E Ashley-Koch6, Xuejun Qin6, Jonathan R I Coleman7,8, Andrey Shabalin1,2, JooEun Kang9, Balasz Murnyak1,2, Frank Wendt10, Mark Adams11, Adrian I Campos12,13, Emily DiBlasi1,2, Janice M Fullerton14,15, Henry R Kranzler16,17, Amanda Bakian2, Eric T Monson2, Miguel E Rentería12,18, Consuelo Walss-Bass19, Ole A Andreassen20,21, Cynthia M Bulik22,23,24, Howard J Edenberg25,26, Ronald C Kessler27, J John Mann28, John I Nurnberger Jr29,29, Giorgio Pistis30, Fabian Streit31, Robert J Ursano32, Renato Polimonti10, Michelle Dennis33, Melanie Garrett34, Lauren Hair35, Philip Harvey36, Elizabeth R Hauser6,37, Michael A Hauser6, Jennifer Huffman38, Daniel Jacobson39, Jennifer H Lindquist40, Ravi Madduri41, Benjamin McMahon42, David W Oslin43,44, Jodie Trafton45, Swapnil Awasthi46, Andrew W Bergen47,48, Wade H Berrettini49, Martin Bohus50, Harry Brandt51,52, Xiao Chang53, Hsi-Chung Chen54, Wei J Chen54,55,56, Erik D Christensen57,58, Steven Crawford51,52, Scott Crow59, Philibert Duriez60,61, Alexis C Edwards3, Fernando Fernández-Aranda62, Manfred M Fichter63,64, Olatunde Olayinka Ayinde65, Hanga Galfalvy66, Steven Gallinger67, Michael Gandal68, Philip Gorwood60,61, Yiran Guo53, Jonathan D Hafferty11, Hakon Hakonarson53,69, Katherine A Halmi70, Akitoyo Hishimoto71, Sonia Jain72, Stéphane Jamain73, Susana Jiménez-Murcia62, Craig Johnson74, Allan S Kaplan75,76,77, Walter H Kaye78, Pamela K Keel79, James L Kennedy75,76,77, Minsoo Kim68, Kelly L Klump80, Daniel F Levey81,82, Dong Li53, Shih-Cheng Liao54, Klaus Lieb83, Lisa Lilenfeld84, Adriana Lori85, Pierre J Magistretti86,87, Christian R Marshall88, James E Mitchell89, Richard M Myers90, Satoshi Okazaki91, Ikuo Otsuka66,91, Dalila Pinto4,5, Abigail Powers85, Nicolas Ramoz61, Stephan Ripke46,92,93, Stefan Roepke94, Vsevolod Rozanov95,96, Stephen W Scherer97,98, Christian Schmahl50, Marcus Sokolowski99, Anna Starnawska100,101,102,103, Michael Strober104,105, Mei-Hsin Su56, Laura M Thornton24, Janet Treasure106,107, Erin B Ware108,109, Hunna J Watson24,110,111, Stephanie H Witt31, D Blake Woodside76,77,112,113, Zeynep Yilmaz24,114,115, Lea Zillich31, Rolf Adolfsson116, Ingrid Agartz117,118,119, Tracy M Air120, Martin Alda121,122, Lars Alfredsson123,124, Adebayo Anjorin125, Vivek Appadurai126,127, María Soler Artigas128,129,130,131, Sandra Van der Auwera132,133, M Helena Azevedo134, Nicholas Bass135, Claiton HD Bau136,137, Bernhard T Baune138,139, Frank Bellivier140,141,142,143, Klaus Berger144, Joanna M Biernacka145, Tim B Bigdeli3,146, Elisabeth B Binder85,147, Michael Boehnke148, Marco P Boks149, Rosa Bosch128,129,150, David L Braff151, Richard Bryant152, Monika Budde153, Enda M Byrne13,154, Wiepke Cahn155, Miguel Casas128,129,131,150, Enrique Castelao30, Jorge A Cervilla156, Boris Chaumette157,158,159, Sven Cichon160,161,162,163, Aiden Corvin164, Nicholas Craddock165, David Craig166, Franziska Degenhardt163, Srdjan Djurovic167,168, Ayman H Fanous3,146, Jerome C Foo169, Andreas J Forstner160,163,170, Mark Frye171, Justine M Gatt14,152, Pablo V Gejman172,173, Ina Giegling174, Hans J Grabe132,133, Melissa J Green14,176, Eugenio H Grevet177,178, Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu179, Blanca Gutierrez180, Jose Guzman-Parra181, Steven P Hamilton182, Marian L Hamshere165, Annette M Hartmann175, Joanna Hauser183, Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach163, Per Hoffmann161,162,163, Marcus Ising184, Ian Jones165, Lisa A Jones185, Lina Jonsson186, René S Kahn5,187, John R Kelsoe151,188, Kenneth S Kendler3, Stefan Kloiber75,184,189, Karestan C Koenen92,190,191, Manolis Kogevinas192, Bettina Konte175, Marie-Odile Krebs157,158,159, Mikael Landén22,193, Jacob Lawrence194, Marion Leboyer195,196,197, Phil H Lee92,93,198, Douglas F Levinson199, Calwing Liao200,201, Jolanta Lissowska202, Susanne Lucae184, Fermin Mayoral181, Susan L McElroy203, Patrick McGrath204, Peter McGuffin8, Andrew McQuillin135, Divya Mehta205,206, Ingrid Melle20,207, Yuri Milaneschi208, Philip B Mitchell176, Esther Molina209, Gunnar Morken210,211, Preben Bo Mortensen101,114,127,212, Bertram Müller-Myhsok147,213,214, Caroline Nievergelt151, Vishwajit Nimgaonkar215, Markus M Nöthen163, Michael C O’Donovan165, Roel A Ophoff68,216, Michael J Owen165, Carlos Pato217,217, Michele T Pato218, Brenda WJH Penninx219, Jonathan Pimm135, James B Potash220, Robert A Power8,221,222, Martin Preisig30, Digby Quested223, Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga128,129,131,150, Andreas Reif224, Marta Ribasés128,129,130,131, Vanesa Richarte128,129,150, Marcella Rietschel225, Margarita Rivera8,226, Andrea Roberts227, Gloria Roberts176, Guy A Rouleau228,229, Diego L Rovaris230, Dan Rujescu175, Cristina Sánchez-Mora128,129,130,131, Alan R Sanders172,173, Peter R Schofield14,15, Thomas G Schulze153,169,231,232,233, Laura J Scott148, Alessandro Serretti234, Giuseppe Fanelli234, 235, Jianxin Shi236, Stanley I Shyn237, Lea Sirignano169, Pamela Sklar4,5, Olav B Smeland20,21, Jordan W Smoller92,191,238, Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke239, Gianfranco Spalletta240,241, John S Strauss75,189, Beata Świątkowska242, Maciej Trzaskowski13, Ming T Tsuang243, Gustavo Turecki244, Laura Vilar-Ribó128,131, John B Vincent245, Henry Völzke246, James TR Walters165, Cynthia Shannon Weickert14,176, Thomas W Weickert14,176, Myrna M Weissman247,248, Leanne M Williams249, Naomi R Wray13,206, Clement C Zai92,189,190,250,251,252, Esben Agerbo114,212,253, Anders D Børglum100,101,102,103, Gerome Breen7,8, Ditte Demontis100,101,102,103, Annette Erlangsen103,254,255,256, Tõnu Esko257,258, Joel Gelernter81,82, Stephen J Glatt259, David M Hougaard253,260, Hai-Gwo Hwu261, Po-Hsiu Kuo54,56, Cathryn M Lewis8,262, Qingqin S Li263, Chih-Min Liu54, Nicholas G Martin12, Andrew M McIntosh11, Sarah E Medland12, Ole Mors253,264, Merete Nordentoft253,265, Catherine M Olsen266, David Porteous267, Daniel J Smith268, Eli A Stahl4,257,269, Murray B Stein270, Danuta Wasserman99, Thomas Werge126,253,271,272, David C Whiteman266, Virginia Willour273, the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), the MVP Suicide Exemplar Workgroup, Suicide Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Eating Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, German Borderline Genomics Consortium, Hilary Coon1,2,274, Jean C Beckham275,276, Nathan A Kimbrel275,276, Douglas M Ruderfer9,277,278.
1 Huntsman Mental Health Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2 University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3 Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry, Richmond, VA, USA
4 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, New York, NY, USA
5 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
6 Duke University Medical Center, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, NC, USA
7 King’s College London, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8 King’s College London, Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, London, UK
9 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
10 Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA
11 University of Edinburgh, Division of Psychiatry, Edinburgh, UK
12 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Program, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
13 The University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
14 Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
15 University of New South Wales, School of Medical Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
16 University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
17 Crescenz VAMC, VISN 4 MIRECC, Philadelphia, PA, USA
18 The University of Queensland, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
19 University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
20 Oslo University Hospital, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo, Norway
21 University of Oslo, NORMENT, Oslo, Norway
22 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
23 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Nutrition, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
24 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychiatry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
25 Indiana University, Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
26 Indiana University School of Medicine, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indianapolis, IN, USA
27 Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, MA, USA
28 Columbia University, Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, New York, NY, USA
29 Indiana University School of Medicine, Departments of Psychiatry and Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
30 Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
31 Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Mannheim, Germany
32 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Bethesda, MD, USA
33 Duke University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
34 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
35 Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
36 Miami VA Health Care System, Miami, FL, USA
37 Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Durham, NC, USA
38 Boston VA Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
39 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
40 Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, NC, USA
41 Argonne National Laboratory, University of Chicago Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, Chicago, IL, USA
42 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
43 Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
44 Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
45 VA Palo Alto Health Care System, VA Program Evaluation and Resource Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
46 Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
47 BioRealm, LLC, Walnut, CA, USA
48 Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA
49 Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Philadelphia, PA, USA
50 Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Mannheim, Germany
51 ERCPathlight, Baltimore, MD, USA
52 University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
53 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
54 National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Taipei, Taiwan
55 National Health Research Institutes, Center for Neuropsychiatric Research, Miaoli County, Taiwan
56 National Taiwan University, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
57 Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Utah Office of the Medical Examiner, Taylorsville, UT, USA
58 University of Utah, Department of Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
59 University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry, Minneapolis, MN, USA
60 GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris, France
61 Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, France
62 University Hospital Bellvitge-IDIBELL and CIBEROBN, Department of Psychiatry, Barcelona, Spain
63 Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
64 Schön Klinik Roseneck affiliated with the Medical Faculty of the University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
65 Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
66 Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
67 University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada
68 University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
69 University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
70 Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
71 Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Yokohama, Japan
72 University of California San Diego, Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, La Jolla, CA, USA
73 Univ Paris-Est-Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Translational Neuropsychiatry, Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France
74 Eating Recovery Center, Denver, CO, USA
75 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
76 University of Toronto, Department of Psychiatry, Toronto, Canada
77 University of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, Canada
78 University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, San Diego, CA, USA
79 Florida State University, Department of Psychology, Tallahassee, FL, USA
80 Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, Lansing, MI, USA
81 Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Center, Department of Psychiatry, West Haven, CT, USA
82 Yale University School of Medicine, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA
83 University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany
84 The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Washington DC, Department of Clinical Psychology, Washington, DC, USA
85 Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Atlanta, GA, USA
86 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, BESE Division, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
87 University of Lausanne-University Hospital of Lausanne (UNIL-CHUV), Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne, Switzerland
88 The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Toronto, Canada
89 University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Fargo, ND, USA
90 HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
91 Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Kobe, Japan
92 Broad Institute, Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
93 Massachusetts General Hospital, Analytical and Translational Genetics Unit, Boston, MA, USA
94 Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Psychiatry, Berlin, Germany
95 Saint-Petersburg State University, Department of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
96 V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Department of Borderline Disorders and Psychotherapy, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
97 The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Genetics and Genomic Biology, Toronto, Canada
98 University of Toronto, McLaughlin Center, Toronto, Canada
99 Karolinska Institutet, National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental Ill-Health (NASP), LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
100 Aarhus University, Centre for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, CGPM, Aarhus, Denmark
101 Aarhus University, Centre for Integrative Sequencing, iSEQ, Aarhus, Denmark
102 Aarhus University, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus, Denmark
103 Aarhus University, The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Aarhus, Denmark
104 University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, LA, USA
105 University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, LA, USA
106 King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, London, UK
107 King’s College London and South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
108 University of Michigan, Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
109 University of Michigan, Survery Research Center, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
110 Curtin University, School of Psychology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
111 The University of Western Australia, Division of Paediatrics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
112 University Health Network, Centre for Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
113 University Health Network, Program for Eating Disorders, Toronto, Canada
114 Aarhus University, National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus, Denmark
115 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
116 Umeå University Medical Faculty, Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Umeå, Sweden
117 Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Department of Psychiatric Research, Oslo, Norway
118 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm, Sweden
119 University of Oslo, NORMENT, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
120 University of Adelaide, Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide, SA, Australia
121 Dalhousie University, Department of Psychiatry, Halifax, NS, Canada
122 National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, CZ
123 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden
124 Karolinska Institutet, Inst of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
125 Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Psychiatry, Bracknell, UK
126 Copenhagen University Hospital, Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Copenhagen Mental Health Services, Copenhagen, Denmark
127 iPSYCH, The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
128 Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Department of Psychiatry, Barcelona, Spain
129 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Biomedical Network Research Centre on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
130 University of Barcelona, Department of Genetics, Microbiology & Statistics, Barcelona, Spain
131 Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Psychiatric Genetics Unit, Group of Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addiction, Barcelona, Spain
132 University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
133 German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Partner Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
134 University of Coimbra, Department of Psychiatry, Coimbra, Portugal
135 University College London, Division of Psychiatry, London, UK
136 Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Laboratory of Developmental Psychiatry, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
137 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Department of Genetics, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
138 University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne, Australia
139 University of Münster, Department of Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
140 Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Paris, France
141 FondaMental Foundation, Paris Bipolar and TRD Expert Centres, Paris, France
142 INSERM, UMR-S1144 Team 1: Biomarkers of relapse and therapeutic response in addiction and mood disorders, Paris, France
143 Université Paris Cité, Psychiatry, Paris, France
144 University of Münster, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
145 Mayo Clinic, Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA
146 State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, USA
147 Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
148 University of Michigan, Center for Statistical Genetics and Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
149 UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Psychiatry, Utrecht, Netherlands
150 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Department of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
151 University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, CA, USA
152 University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
153 University Hospital, LMU Munich, Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), Munich, Germany
154 The University of Queensland, Child Health Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
155 UMC Utrecht Hersencentrum Rudolf Magnus, Department of Psychiatry, Utrecht, Netherlands
156 University of Granada, Mental Health Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Granada University Hospital Complex, Granada, Spain
157 CNRS GDR 3557, Institut de Psychiatrie, Paris, France
158 GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Department of Evaluation, Prevention and Therapeutic innovation, Paris, France
159 Université de Paris, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Team Pathophysiology of psychiatric diseases, Paris, France
160 Research Centre Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Jülich, Germany
161 University Hospital Basel, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, Basel, Switzerland
162 University of Basel, Department of Biomedicine, Basel, Switzerland
163 University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Institute of Human Genetics, Bonn, Germany
164 Trinity College Dublin, Neuropsychiatric Genetics Research Group, Dept of Psychiatry and Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Dublin, Ireland
165 Cardiff University, Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff, UK
166 University of Southern California, Department of Translational Genomics, Pasadena, CA, USA
167 Oslo University Hospital, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway
168 University of Bergen, NORMENT, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway169 Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Mannheim, Germany
170 University of Marburg, Centre for Human Genetics, Marburg, Germany
171 Mayo Clinic, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Rochester, MN, USA
172 NorthShore University HealthSystem, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Evanston, IL, USA
173 University of Chicago, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Chicago, IL, USA
174 Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health (C3NMH), Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
175 Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.
176 University of New South Wales, School of Psychiatry, Sydney, NSW, Australia
177 Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, ADHD Outpatient Program, Adult Division, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
178 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Department of Psychiatry, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
179 Alexandru Obregia Clinical Psychiatric Hospital, Biometric Psychiatric Genetics Research Unit, Bucharest, Romania
180 University of Granada, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Research Centre (CIBM), Granada, Spain
181 University Regional Hospital. Biomedicine Institute (IBIMA), Mental Health Department, Málaga, Spain
182 Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Psychiatry, San Francisco, CA, USA
183 Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Psychiatric Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Poznan, Poland
184 Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
185 University of Worcester, Department of Psychological Medicine, Worcester, UK
186 University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Gothenburg, Sweden
187 UMC Utrecht Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Psychiatry, Utrecht, Netherlands
188 University of California San Diego, Institute for Genomic Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
189 University of Toronto, Department of Psychiatry, Toronto, ON, Canada
190 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
191 Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, USA
192 Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain
193 University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden
194 North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Psychiatry, Ilford, UK
195 Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, AP-HP, IMRB, Translational Neuropsychiatry, DMU IMPACT, FHU ADAPT, Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France
196 INSERM, Paris, France
197 Université Paris Est, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France
198 Massachusetts General Hospital, Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Boston, MA, USA
199 Stanford University, Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
200 Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
201 Massachusetts General Hospital, Analytical and Translational Genetics Unit, Cambridge, MA, USA
202 M. Sklodowska-Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Warsaw, Poland
203 Lindner Center of HOPE, Research Institute, Mason, OH, USA
204 Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
205 Queensland University of Technology, School of Psychology and Counseling, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
206 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
207 University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo, Norway
208 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit and GGZ inGeest, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
209 University of Granada, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research Centre (CIBM), Granada, Spain
210 Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU, Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Trondheim, Norway
211 St Olavs University Hospital, Psychiatry, Trondheim, Norway
212 Aarhus University, Centre for Integrated Register-based Research, Aarhus, Denmark
213 Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
214 University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
215 University of Pittsburgh, Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
216 Erasmus University Medical Center, Psychiatry, Rotterdam, Netherlands
217 Rutgers University, RWJMS, NJMS, UBHC, Pisctatway, NJ, USA
218 Rutgers University, RWJMS, NJMS, Pisctatway, NJ, USA
219 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
220 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD, USA
221 BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, Genetics, London, UK
222 University of Oxford, St Edmund Hall, Oxford, UK
223 University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
224 University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Frankfurt, Germany
225 Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
226 University of Granada, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II and Institute of Neurosciences, Biomedical Research Centre (CIBM), Granada, Spain
227 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Boston, MA, USA
228 McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
229 Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
230 Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas Universidade de Sao Paulo, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
231 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA
232 National Institute of Mental Health, Human Genetics Branch, Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
233 University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Göttingen, Germany
234 University of Bologna, Department of Biomedical and Neuro-Motor Sciences, Bologna, Italy
235 Department of Human Genetics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
236 National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA.
237 Kaiser Permanente Washington, Behavioral Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA
238 Massachusetts General Hospital, Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit (PNGU), Boston, MA, USA
239 King’s College London, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, London, UK
240 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
241 IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Rome, Italy
242 Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Lodz, Poland
243 University of California, San Diego, Center for Behavioral Genomics, Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, CA, USA
244 McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, QC, Canada
245 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Molecular Brain Science, Toronto, ON, Canada
246 University Medicine Greifswald, Institute for Community Medicine, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
247 Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
248 New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Translational Epidemiology, New York, NY, USA
249 Stanford University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
250 University of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, ON, Canada
251 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Molecular Brain Science, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
252 University of Toronto, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada
253 iPSYCH, The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Aarhus, Denmark
254 Australian National University, Center of Mental Health Research, Canberra, Australia
255 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
256 Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Danish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Copenhagen, Denmark
257 Broad Institute, Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Cambridge, MA, USA
258 University of Tartu, Estonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, Tartu, Estonia
259 SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Syracuse, NY, USA
260 Statens Serum Institut, Center for Neonatal Screening, Department for Congenital Disorders, Copenhagen, Denmark
261 National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Taipei, Taiwan
262 King’s College London, Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, London, UK
263 Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Neuroscience, Titusville, NJ, USA
264 Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov, Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus, Denmark
265 Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
266 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Population Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
267 University of Edinburgh, Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
268 University of Edinburgh, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
269 Regeneron Genetics Center, Analytical Genetics and Data Science, Tarrytown, NY, USA
270 University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry and School of Public Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
271 University of Copenhagen, Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark
272 University of Copenhagen, Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
273 University of Iowa, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, IA, USA
274 University of Utah School of Medicine, Biomedical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
275 Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, VISN 6 Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham, NC, USA
276 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
277 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Nashville, TN, USA
278 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA.
MVP Suicide Exemplar Workgroup consists of the following individuals:
Silvia Crivelli, Ph.D. (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Michelle F. Dennis, B.A. (Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System & Duke University School of Medicine), Phillip D. Harvey, Ph.D. (University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL), Bruce W. Carter (VA Medical Center), Jennifer E. Huffman, Ph.D. (Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System), Daniel Jacobson, Ph.D. (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Ravi Madduri, Ph.D. (Argonne National Laboratory), and John Pestian, Ph.D. (Oak Ridge National Laboratory).
VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) consists of the following individuals:
J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. (co-chair, VA Boston Healthcare System), Sumitra Muralidhar, Ph.D. (co-chair, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs), Rachel Ramoni, D.M.D., Sc.D. (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs), Jean Beckham, Ph.D. (Durham VA Medical Center), Kyong-Mi Chang, M.D. (Philadelphia VA Medical Center), Christopher J. O’Donnell, M.D., M.P.H. (VA Boston Healthcare System), Philip S. Tsao, Ph.D. (VA Palo Alto Health Care System), James Breeling, M.D. (Ex-Officio, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs), Grant Huang, Ph.D. (Ex-Officio, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs), and J.P. Casas Romero, M.D., Ph.D. (Ex-Officio, VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Program Office: Sumitra Muralidhar, Ph.D., and Jennifer Moser, Ph.D., both of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. MVP Recruitment/Enrollment: Recruitment/Enrollment Director/Deputy Director, Boston—Stacey B. Whitbourne, Ph.D., Jessica V. Brewer, M.P.H. (VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Coordinating Centers: Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CERC), West Haven—Mihaela Aslan, Ph.D. (West Haven VA Medical Center). Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque—Todd Connor, Pharm.D., Dean P. Argyres, B.S., M.S. (New Mexico VA Health Care System). Genomics Coordinating Center, Palo Alto—Philip S. Tsao, Ph.D. (VA Palo Alto Health Care System). MVP Boston Coordinating Center, Boston—J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. (VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Information Center, Canandaigua—Brady Stephens, M.S. (Canandaigua VA Medical Center). VA Central Biorepository, Boston—Mary T. Brophy, M.D., M.P.H., Donald E. Humphries, Ph.D., Luis E. Selva, Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Informatics, Boston—Nhan Do, M.D., Shahpoor Shayan (VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Data Operations/Analytics, Boston—Kelly Cho, Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System). MVP Science: Science Operations—Christopher J. O’Donnell, M.D., M.P.H. (VA Boston Healthcare System). Genomics Core— Christopher J. O’Donnell, M.D., M.P.H., Saiju Pyarajan, Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System), Philip S. Tsao, Ph.D. (VA Palo Alto Health Care System). Phenomics Core—Kelly Cho, M.P.H., Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System). Data and Computational Sciences—Saiju Pyarajan, Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System). Statistical Genetics—Elizabeth Hauser, Ph.D. (Durham VA Medical Center). Yan Sun, Ph.D. (Atlanta VA Medical Center). Hongyu Zhao, Ph.D. (West Haven VA Medical Center. Current MVP Local Site Investigators: Peter Wilson, M.D. (Atlanta VA Medical Center); Rachel McArdle, Ph.D. (Bay Pines VA Healthcare System); Louis Dellitalia, M.D. (Birmingham VA Medical Center); Kristin Mattocks, Ph.D., M.P.H. (Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System); John Harley, M.D., Ph.D. (Cincinnati VA Medical Center); Clement J. Zablocki (VA Medical Center); Jeffrey Whittle, M.D., M.P.H.; Frank Jacono, M.D. (VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System); Jean Beckham, Ph.D. (Durham VA Medical Center); Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital; Salvador Gutierrez, M.D. (Edward Hines, Jr. VA Medical Center); Gretchen Gibson, D.D.S., M.P.H. (Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks); Kimberly Hammer, Ph.D. (Fargo VA Health Care System); Laurence Kaminsky, Ph.D. (VA Health Care Upstate New York); Gerardo Villareal, M.D. (New Mexico VA Health Care System); Scott Kinlay, M.B.B.S., Ph.D. (VA Boston Healthcare System); Junzhe Xu, M.D. (VA Western New York Healthcare System); Mark Hamner, M.D. (Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center); Roy Mathew, M.D. (Columbia VA Health Care System); Sujata Bhushan, M.D. (VA North Texas Health Care System); Pran Iruvanti, DO, Ph.D. (Hampton VA Medical Center); Michael Godschalk, M.D. (Richmond VA Medical Center); Zuhair Ballas, M.D. (Iowa City VA Health Care System); Douglas Ivins, M.D. (Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System); Stephen Mastorides, M.D. (James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital); Jonathan Moorman, M.D., Ph.D. (James H. Quillen VA Medical Center); Saib Gappy, M.D. (John D. Dingell VA Medical Center); Jon Klein, M.D., Ph.D. (Louisville VA Medical Center); Nora Ratcliffe, M.D. (Manchester VA Medical Center); Hermes Florez, M.D., Ph.D. (Miami VA Health Care System); Olaoluwa Okusaga, M.D. (Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center); Maureen Murdoch, M.D., M.P.H. (Minneapolis VA Health Care System); Peruvemba Sriram, M.D. (N FL/S GA Veterans Health System); Shing Shing Yeh, Ph.D., M.D. (Northport VA Medical Center); Neeraj Tandon, M.D. (Overton Brooks VA Medical Center); Darshana Jhala, M.D. (Philadelphia VA Medical Center); Samuel Aguayo, M.D. (Phoenix VA Health Care System); David Cohen, M.D. (Portland VA Medical Center); Satish Sharma, M.D. (Providence VA Medical Center); Suthat Liangpunsakul, M.D., M.P.H. (Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center); Kris Ann Oursler, M.D. (Salem VA Medical Center); Mary Whooley, M.D. (San Francisco VA Health Care System); Sunil Ahuja, M.D. (South Texas Veterans Health Care System); Joseph Constans, Ph.D. (Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System); Paul Meyer, M.D., Ph.D. (Southern Arizona VA Health Care System); Jennifer Greco, M.D. (Sioux Falls VA Health Care System); Michael Rauchman, M.D. (St. Louis VA Health Care System); Richard Servatius, Ph.D. (Syracuse VA Medical Center); Melinda Gaddy, Ph.D. (VA Eastern Kansas Health Care System); Agnes Wallbom, M.D., M.S. (VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System); Timothy Morgan, M.D. (VA Long Beach Healthcare System); Todd Stapley, D.O. (VA Maine Healthcare System); Scott Sherman, M.D., M.P.H. (VA New York Harbor Healthcare System); George Ross, M.D. (VA Pacific Islands Health Care System); Philip Tsao, Ph.D. (VA Palo Alto Health Care System); Patrick Strollo Jr., M.D. (VA Pittsburgh Health Care System); Edward Boyko, M.D. (VA Puget Sound Health Care System); Laurence Meyer, M.D., Ph.D. (VA Salt Lake City Health Care System); Samir Gupta, M.D., M.S.C.S. (VA San Diego Healthcare System); Mostaqul Huq, Pharm.D., Ph.D. (VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System); Joseph Fayad, M.D. (VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System); Adriana Hung, M.D., M.P.H. (VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System); Jack Lichy, M.D., Ph.D. (Washington, DC VA Medical Center); Robin Hurley, M.D. (W.G., Bill Hefner VA Medical Center); Brooks Robey, M.D. (White River Junction VA Medical Center); and Robert Striker, M.D., Ph.D. (William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital).
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Murray B. Stein: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sonia Jain: Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision. Santiago Papini: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology. Laura Campbell-Sills: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Karmel W. Choi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Brian Martis: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Xiaoying Sun: Data curation, Formal analysis. Feng He: Data curation, Formal analysis. Erin B. Ware: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. James A. Naifeh: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Pablo A. Aliaga: Data curation. Tian Ge: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Jordan W. Smoller: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Joel Gelernter: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ronald C. Kessler: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Robert J. Ursano: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft.
References
- Andlauer TFM, Guzman-Parra J, Streit F, Strohmaier J, Gonzalez MJ, Gil Flores S, et al. 2021. Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 1286–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barzilay R, Visoki E, Schultz LM, Warrier V, Daskalakis NP, Almasy L, 2022. Genetic risk, parental history, and suicide attempts in a diverse sample of US adolescents. Front. Psych 13, 941772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brent DA, Melhem NM, Oquendo M, Burke A, Birmaher B, Stanley B, et al. 2015. Familial pathways to early-onset suicide attempt: a 5.6-year prospective study. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 160–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Center for Disease Control (CDC) (2023): Facts about Suicide. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/index.html (accessed January 13, 2023).
- Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ, 2015. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi SW, Mak TS, O’Reilly PF, 2020. Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nat. Protoc 15, 2759–2772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colbert SMC, Mullins N, Chan G, Meyers JL, Schulman J, Kuperman S, et al. 2023. Polygenic contributions to suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a sample ascertained for alcohol use disorders. Complex Psychiatry. 9, 11–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curley JM, Penix EA, Srinivasan J, Sarmiento DM, McFarling LH, Newman JB, et al. 2020. Development of the U.S. Army’s suicide prevention leadership tool: the behavioral health readiness and suicide risk reduction review (R4). Mil. Med 185, e668–e677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Department of Defense (2020): Department of Defense Annual Suicide Report CY2019
- Docherty A, Kious B, Brown T, Francis L, Stark L, Keeshin B, et al. 2021. Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 186, 433–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Docherty AR, Shabalin AA, DiBlasi E, Monson E, Mullins N, Adkins DE, et al. 2020. Genome-wide association study of suicide death and polygenic prediction of clinical antecedents. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 917–927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Docherty AR, Mullins N, Ashley-Koch AE, Qin X, Coleman JRI, Shabalin A, et al. 2023. GWAS Meta-analysis of suicide attempt: identification of 12 genome-wide significant loci and implication of genetic risks for specific health factors. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 723–738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanelli G, Sokolowski M, Wasserman D, College, European, of Neuropsychopharmacology Network on Suicide R, Prevention, Kasper S, et al. 2022. Polygenic risk scores for neuropsychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits highlight possible genetic overlap with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 189, 74–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu Q, Heath AC, Bucholz KK, Nelson EC, Glowinski AL, Goldberg J, et al. 2002. A twin study of genetic and environmental influences on suicidality in men. Psychol. Med 32, 11–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ge T, Chen CY, Ni Y, Feng YA, Smoller JW, 2019. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors. Nat. Commun 10, 1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallford DJ, Rusanov D, Winestone B, Kaplan R, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Melvin G, 2023. Disclosure of suicidal ideation and behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Clin. Psychol. Rev 101, 102272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holliday R, Borges LM, Stearns-Yoder KA, Hoffberg AS, Brenner LA, Monteith LL, 2020. Posttraumatic stress disorder, suicidal ideation, and suicidal self-directed violence among u.s. military personnel and veterans: a systematic review of the literature from 2010 to 2018. Front. Psychol 11, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hujoel MLA, Loh PR, Neale BM, Price AL, 2022. Incorporating family history of disease improves polygenic risk scores in diverse populations. Cell Genom. 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joo YY, Moon SY, Wang HH, Kim H, Lee EJ, Kim JH, et al. 2022. Association of Genome-Wide Polygenic Scores for multiple psychiatric and common traits in preadolescent youths at risk of suicide. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2148585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Edwards AC, 2020. The sources of parent-child transmission of risk for suicide attempt and deaths by suicide in Swedish National Samples. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 928–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessler RC, Bossarte RM, Luedtke A, Zaslavsky AM, Zubizarreta JR, 2020. Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 168–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimbrel NA, Ashley-Koch AE, Qin XJ, Lindquist JH, Garrett ME, Dennis MF, et al. 2022. A genome-wide association study of suicide attempts in the million veterans program identifies evidence of pan-ancestry and ancestry-specific risk loci. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 2264–2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimbrel NA, Ashley-Koch AE, Qin XJ, Lindquist JH, Garrett ME, Dennis MF, et al. 2023. Identification of novel, replicable genetic risk loci for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among US military veterans. JAMA Psychiatry 80, 135–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee PH, Doyle AE, Silberstein M, Jung JY, Liu RT, Perils RH, et al. 2022. Associations between genetic risk for adult suicide attempt and suicidal behaviors in young children in the US. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 971–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levey DF, Polimanti R, Cheng Z, Zhou H, Nunez YZ, Jain S, et al. 2019. Genetic associations with suicide attempt severity and genetic overlap with major depression. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovero KL, Dos Santos PF, Come AX, Wainberg ML, Oquendo MA, 2023. Suicide in global mental health. Curr. Psychiatry Rep 25, 255–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marnetto D, Parna K, Lall K, Molinaro L, Montinaro F, Haller T, et al. 2020. Ancestry deconvolution and partial polygenic score can improve susceptibility predictions in recently admixed individuals. Nat. Commun 11, 1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirkovic B, Laurent C, Podlipski MA, Frebourg T, Cohen D, Gerardin P, 2016. Genetic association studies of suicidal behavior: a review of the past 10 years, Progress, limitations, and future directions. Front. Psych 7, 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirza S, Docherty AR, Bakian A, Coon H, Soares JC, Walss-Bass C, et al. 2022. Genetics and epigenetics of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: systematic review of the suicide literature and methodological considerations. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 189, 221–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullins N, Perroud N, Uher R, Butler AW, Cohen-Woods S, Rivera M, et al. 2014. Genetic relationships between suicide attempts, suicidal ideation and major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide association and polygenic scoring study. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 165B, 428–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullins N, Bigdeli TB, Borglum AD, Coleman JRI, Demontis D, Mehta D, et al. 2019. GWAS of suicide attempt in psychiatric disorders and association with major depression polygenic risk scores. Am. J. Psychiatry 176, 651–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullins N, Kang J, Campos AI, Coleman JRI, Edwards AC, Galfalvy H, et al. 2022. Dissecting the shared genetic architecture of suicide attempt, psychiatric disorders, and known risk factors. Biol. Psychiatry 91, 313–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray GK, Lin T, Austin J, McGrath JJ, Hickie IB, Wray NR, 2020. Could Polygenic Risk Scores be Useful in Psychiatry?: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naifeh JA, Mash HBH, Stein MB, Fullerton CS, Kessler RC, Ursano RJ, 2019. The Army study to assess risk and resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 34–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naifeh JA, Nock MK, Dempsey CL, Georg MW, Bartolanzo D, Ng THH, et al. 2020. Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors that differentiate soldiers who attempt suicide from those with recent suicide ideation. Depress. Anxiety 37, 738–746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichter B, Koller D, De Angelis F, Wang J, Girgenti MJ, Na PJ, et al. 2023. Genetic liability to suicidal thoughts and behaviors and risk of suicide attempt in US military veterans: moderating effects of cumulative trauma burden. Psychol. Med 53, 6325–6333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nock MK, Deming CA, Fullerton CS, Gilman SE, Goldenberg M, Kessler RC, et al. 2013. Suicide among soldiers: a review of psychosocial risk and protective factors. Psychiatry 76, 97–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson RE, Kuchenbaecker K, Walters RK, Chen CY, Popejoy AB, Periyasamy S, et al. 2019. Genome-wide association studies in ancestrally diverse populations: opportunities, methods, pitfalls, and recommendations. Cell 179, 589–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease A, 2021. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat. Med 27, 1876–1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, et al. 2011. The Columbia-suicide severity rating scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 1266–1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Randall JR, Roos LL, Lix LM, Katz LY, Bolton JM, 2017. Emergency department and inpatient coding for self-harm and suicide attempts: validation using clinician assessment data. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruan Y, Lin YF, Feng YA, Chen CY, Lam M, Guo Z, et al. 2022. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations. Nat. Genet 54, 573–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruderfer DM, Walsh CG, Aguirre MW, Tanigawa Y, Ribeiro JD, Franklin JC, et al. 2020. Significant shared heritability underlies suicide attempt and clinically predicted probability of attempting suicide. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 2422–2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolowski M, Wasserman D, 2020. Genetic origins of suicidality? A synopsis of genes in suicidal behaviours, with regard to evidence diversity, disorder specificity and neurodevelopmental brain transcriptomics. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol 37, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein MB, Chen CY, Ursano RJ, Cai T, Gelernter J, Heeringa SG, et al. 2016. Genome-wide association studies of posttraumatic stress disorder in 2 cohorts of US Army soldiers. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 695–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein MB, Ware EB, Mitchell C, Chen CY, Borja S, Cai T, et al. 2017. Genomewide association studies of suicide attempts in US soldiers. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 174, 786–797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein MB, Kessler RC, Ursano RJ, 2019. Reframing the suicide prevention message for military personnel. JAMA Psychiatry 76, 466–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein MB, Jain S, Campbell-Sills L, Ware EB, Choi KW, He F, et al. 2021. Polygenic risk for major depression is associated with lifetime suicide attempt in US soldiers independent of personal and parental history of major depression. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 186, 469–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tidemalm D, Runeson B, Waern M, Frisell T, Carlstrom E, Lichtenstein P, et al. 2011. Familial clustering of suicide risk: a total population study of 11.4 million individuals. Psychol. Med 41, 2527–2534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ursano RJ, Colpe LJ, Heeringa SG, Kessler RC, Schoenbaum M, Stein MB, et al. 2014. The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS). Psychiatry 77, 107–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Naifeh JA, Herberman Mash HB, Morganstein JC, Fullerton CS, Cozza SJ, et al. 2022. Attachment style and risk of suicide attempt among new soldiers in the U.S. Army. Psychiatry 85, 387–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weissman MM, Wickramaratne P, Adams P, Wolk S, Verdeli H, Olfson M, 2000. Brief screening for family psychiatric history: the family history screen. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57, 675–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wendt FR, Pathak GA, Tylee DS, Goswami A, Polimanti R, 2020. Heterogeneity and polygenicity in psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide perspective. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 4, 2470547020924844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wray NR, Lin T, Austin J, McGrath JJ, Hickie IB, Murray GK, et al. 2021. From basic science to clinical application of polygenic risk scores: a primer. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
