Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0305663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305663

Chemical mutagenesis of Listeria monocytogenes for increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride shows independent genetic underpinnings and off-target antibiotic resistance

Tyler D Bechtel 1,#, Julia Hershelman 1,2,#, Mrinalini Ghoshal 1,2, Lynne McLandsborough 2, John G Gibbons 1,3,4,*
Editor: Do-Won Jeong5
PMCID: PMC11259264  PMID: 39028728

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes, a potentially fatal foodborne pathogen commonly found in food processing facilities, creates a significant economic burden that totals more than $2 billion annually in the United States due to outbreaks. Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), including benzalkonium chloride (BAC), are among the most widely used sanitizers to inhibit the growth and spread of L. monocytogenes from food processing facilities. However, resistance to QACs has been increasing in L. monocytogenes and different genetic mechanisms conferring resistance have been discovered. Here, we used ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to chemically mutagenize the BAC-susceptible strain, L. monocytogenes FSL-N1-304. We isolated two mutants with increased tolerance to BAC compared to the parental strain. Next, we assessed the off-target effect of increased tolerance to BAC by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of a diverse set of antibiotics, revealing that mut-1 and mut-2 displayed significantly increased resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics compared to the parental strain. A hemolysis assay was then used to investigate a potential correlation between BAC tolerance and virulence. Interestingly, mut-1 and mut-2 both exhibited significantly higher hemolysis percentage than the parental strain. We then sequenced the genomes of the parental strain and both mutants to identify mutations that may be involved in the increased resistance to BAC. We identified 3 and 29 mutations in mut-1 and mut-2, respectively. mut-1 contained nonsynonymous mutations in dagK (a diacylglycerol kinase), lmo2768 (a permease-encoding gene), and lmo0186 (resuscitation promoting factor). mut-2 contained a nonsense mutation in the nucleotide excision repair enzyme UvrABC system protein B encoding gene, uvrB, which likely accounts for the higher number of mutations observed. Transcriptome analysis in the presence of BAC revealed that genes related to the phosphotransferase system and internalins were up-regulated in both mutants, suggesting their significance in the BAC stress response. These two mutants provide insights into alternative mechanisms for increased BAC tolerance and could further our understanding of how L. monocytogenes persists in the food processing environment.

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive, foodborne bacterial pathogen that causes a serious infection called listeriosis [1]. Listeriosis is a relatively rare disease, but it can lead to severe and potentially fatal symptoms for elderly and immunocompromised individuals including infections resulting in meningitis and septicemia [2,3]. Additionally, pregnant women are more susceptible to listeriosis, which is particularly problematic as L. monocytogenes possesses the unique ability to permeate the placenta and infect the fetus, which can lead to fetal meningitis and miscarriages [4]. A study analyzing data from 2000–2008 revealed that L. monocytogenes had the highest hospitalization rate (94%) and third highest fatality rate (15.9%) among 31 major foodborne pathogens [5].

L. monocytogenes is highly abundant in the natural environment and capable of surviving adverse conditions, resulting in frequent contamination and persistence of L. monocytogenes strains in food processing facilities [6]. Given the health concerns and economic impacts of L. monocytogenes contamination in the food industry, the FDA has established guidelines to prevent contamination and outbreaks in foods [7]. These guidelines include personal protective equipment for workers, structured operation plans of the plant, specific equipment, testing protocols, and sanitization [8].

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) are a class of antimicrobial compounds commonly used for surface sanitization in food processing facilities [9]. The bactericidal mode of action for QACs is similar to that of a detergent [10]. The negatively charged bacterial cellular membrane interacts with the positively charged head of the QAC molecule, allowing the nonpolar QAC side chains to disrupt the intramembrane region. This interaction leads to the formation of micelles, cytosolic leakage, and eventual cellular lysis [11]. Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) is a type of QAC that is a common component of commercial disinfectants that are used to sanitize solid surfaces in food processing facilities [9,12]. Over the last two decades, several studies have reported increased BAC tolerance in L. monocytogenes strains isolated from food environments [1318]. An increase in QAC tolerance has been attributed to improper application, dilution, and biodegradation of QACs resulting in sub-lethal concentration gradients [19,20]. Several mechanisms for BAC resistance have been discovered. Most commonly, BAC resistance, or increased tolerance, involves alterations to efflux pumps [14,16,2123]. Adaptation to BAC can also result in cross-tolerance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics, suggesting shared resistance mechanisms [2427]. Thus, the improper usage of BAC, and subsequent adaptation, could be contributing to off-target antibiotic resistance [24,28].

The goal of this study was to investigate the potential genetic mechanisms and transcriptome response underlying adaptation to BAC and the effects of BAC adaptation on antibiotic resistance. We used chemical mutagenesis combined with whole-genome sequencing (Mut-seq) to isolate mutants with increased tolerance to BAC and to identify candidate mutations. Additionally, we analyzed the transcriptome of BAC tolerant mutants and the parental strain during exposure to BAC to identify genes and pathways responsive to BAC exposure. We also measured the hemolytic activity of the WT and mutant strains to investigate potential a relationship between BAC tolerance and virulence. Finally, we measured the minimum inhibitory concentration of several antibiotics in the wild-type and mutants to determine if increased tolerance to BAC resulted in changes in antibiotic sensitivity.

Methods

Bacterial isolates and culture conditions

Isolate FSL-N1-304 was selected at random from our collection of benzalkonium chloride resistant isolates, as we were screening for gain of function phenotypes. FSL-N1-304 was obtained from the L. monocytogenes strain collection at Cornell University’s Food Safety Laboratory. This strain was originally isolated from floor drains in a fish processing facility in New York, USA [29]. All strains were cultured at 37°C in tryptic soy broth media supplemented with 0.6% yeast extract (TSB+YE).

Chemical mutagenesis using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)

Chemical mutagenesis was performed using a previously described protocol with several alterations [30]. Our complete overall experimental design is depicted in Fig 1. First, 1 ml of cells was harvested from an overnight culture through centrifugation at 2,380 x g for 10 minutes. The cells were then washed twice with 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After washing, the pellet was resuspended in 120 mM of EMS suspended in 1 mL of PBS. For a non-mutagenized control, 1 mL of PBS was added to the wild-type (WT) cells. All tubes were incubated for 1 hour at 37˚C. Finally, cells were washed three times with PBS to remove EMS and resuspended in 1 mL of PBS.

Fig 1. Experimental approach for identifying EMS derived L. monocytogenes mutants with increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride.

Fig 1

Experimental approach used for chemical mutagenesis, mutant screening for increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride, antibiotic susceptibility determination and whole genomic sequencing of mutants with increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride. Portions of this figure utilized images from Clker.com, licensed under Creative Commons CC0 1.0, and Servier Medical Art, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Determining benzalkonium chloride minimum inhibitory concentration

100 μl of overnight culture of FSL-N1-304 WT cells were inoculated on tryptic soy agar (TSA)+YE agar plates supplemented with 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/ml benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The MIC was defined as the lowest BAC concentration in which no cell growth was observed. Automated colony quantification and plate imaging was performed using an Interscience Scan1200 (Interscience, Saint-Nom la Bretèche, France).

Next, mutants were screened for increased tolerance to BAC in liquid media by inoculating EMS exposed cells into a 96 well plate (BioLite 96 Well Multidish—Thermo Scientific) with BAC concentrations ranging from 0–11 μg/ml, in increments of 1 μg/ml. The top row in each plate represented a negative control which was prepared by adding 50 μl PBS to each well rather than the inoculum. After plating 100 μl of cells treated with EMS and 100 μl of untreated cells on TSA+YE plates, we found that exposure to EMS resulted in a 1-log reduction in cell viability. After a 24-hour incubation there was 2.35 x 108 CFU/ml of untreated WT cells, and 8.41 x 107 CFU/ml of EMS treated cell. Thus, to normalize the cell density across WT and mutagenized cells, we diluted the WT cells 10-fold to bring the final cell density of the inoculum to approximately 1 x 108 CFU/ml. The remaining rows were inoculated with 50 μl of the mutant cells, undiluted, immediately after exposure to EMS. The 96 well plate was incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours, and optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured using a BioTek (Winooski, VT, USA) Elx800 microtiter plate reader. Cell density was used to screen the mutants for BAC tolerant phenotypes. We set a threshold for viable cell growth when OD600 ≥ 0.1, as previously described [31].

Validation and MIC determination of increased BAC tolerance in mutants

For mutant cultures that exhibited increased BAC tolerance during screening in 96 well plates, 100 μl was transferred from the wells and inoculated into fresh TSB+YE media and grown overnight. The overnight cultures were then plated on to TSA+YE to isolate single colonies of mut-1 and mut-2. These single colonies were grown overnight in TSB+YE and freezer stocks were prepared in 15% glycerol. All subsequent experimentation was conducted from these stocks.

To validate the BAC tolerant phenotypes observed in the initial screen, overnight cultures of mutants and WT were subjected to the similar BAC screening process as described above using the overnight cultures but in triplicate. After observing that the mutants grew to 6 μg/ml BAC on the 96 well plate during the original screening following mutagenesis, the screening plate was set up similarly, but only included media with 0–7 μg/ml BAC, and this time included three biological replicates for the WT and each mutant. After 24 hours OD600 readings were collected using a microtiter plate reader. The MIC was recorded as the concentration of BAC in the first well that had an OD600 < 0.10.

Frozen stocks of the WT and mutants were also used to screen for the MIC of BAC on solid media. Overnight cultures of the WT and mutants were diluted to approximately 1 x 104 CFU/ml and 100 μl of each diluted culture was spread on tryptic soy agar and yeast extract (TSA+YE) plates, as well as TSA+YE plates supplemented with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 μg/ml BAC. Plates were incubated at 37˚C for 48 hours, then images of the plates were obtained and the colonies were quantified using an Interscience Scan1200. The MIC was recorded as the first plate that had no observable colonies for each strain.

Bacterial growth curve and fitness trade-off analysis

Overnight cultures of WT and mutant cultures were standardized to an OD600 of 1.0, and subsequently diluted ten-fold in sterile PBS to achieve a final inoculum of ~104 CFU/ml. A 5μl volume of this inoculum was then added in triplicate to a 96-well plate (BioLite 96 Well Multidish—Thermo Scientific) with wells each containing 200 ml of TSB+YE (control), TSB+YE+2 μg/ml BAC, or TSB+YE+3 μg/ml BAC. Cultures were then grown for 48 hours at room temperature and growth kinetics were measured using the oCelloScope (Biosense Solutions, Denmark) with the following parameters: auto-illumination, auto-focus, image distance = 4.9mm, images per repetition = 5, repetitions = 48, and repetition interval = 1 hour. Total absorption measurements were recorded using a fixed 505 nm wavelength and growth kinetic analysis was conducted using the normalized total absorption algorithm.

hly virulence assay

We measured hly activity as a proxy for virulence to test if this virulence phenotype was altered in the BAC tolerant mutants compared to the parental strain. hly encodes listeriolysin O, which is required for pathogenesis. Hemolytic activity was measured for WT and mutant strains based on a previously described method with minor alterations [32]. Briefly, 1 mL of overnight cultures were centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 10 minutes to pellet the bacteria. The supernatant (crude exosubstance) was then transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube and the pellet was discarded. The crude exosubstance was diluted two-fold in PBS in a 96-well plate (Biolite Microwell Plates; ThermoFisher Scientific), leaving a final volume of 100μl in each well. Negative control wells (0% hemolysis) were prepared with 100 μl sterile PBS. Complete hemolysis (100%) control wells were prepared with 100 μl PBS + 1% Triton X-100. A sheep blood solution was prepared by washing pooled, defibrinated sheep blood (Carolina Biological, Burlington, NC) in cold PBS by repeated centrifugation at 600 x g for 10 minutes. Washing steps were repeated until the supernatant appeared clear and colorless. The clean red blood cell (RBC) pellet was then diluted in cold PBS + 20mM cysteine to a 3% RBC suspension. 100 μl of the 3% RBC suspension was then added to each well and mixed by pipetting. The microtiter plate was then incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Absorbance readings were performed using an the Elx800 absorbance reader (BioTek; Winooski, VT, USA). The following formula was used to quantify the hemolysis percentage: Hemolysis%=(1ODsODt)×100, where ODs is the difference in optical density at 620nm between the sample and the positive control well and ODt is the difference in optical density at 620nm between the negative and positive control wells.

Determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics

Minimum inhibitory concentration test strips (Liofilchem S.r.I.; Roseta, Italy) were used to determine the MICs of ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, erythromycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, norfloxacin, penicillin G, and vancomycin in the WT and mutant strains. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes WT and mutants were diluted to 109 CFU/ml and spread onto TSA+YE plates using a spreader. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, the Liofilchem strip was positioned on the surface of agar using sterile forceps, and plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Plates were then imaged and MICs were recorded for the WT and mutants for each antibiotic. The MIC was determined by observing where the zone of inhibition ellipse intersected the MIC test strip. This assay was performed in duplicate and averaged to determine the final MIC for each antibiotic. MIC values were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to the antibiotic according to CLSI breakpoint values for Staphylococcus spp. [33]. Because antibiotic breakpoints for CLSI, EUCAST or FDA are not reported for L. monocytogenes, we chose to report breakpoints for Staphylococcus spp as it is the most closely related.

Whole genome sequencing of FSL-N1-304 and BAC tolerant mutants

From a frozen stock, WT cells were inoculated in TSB+YE media and incubated for 24 hours at 37˚C. 1 mL of the overnight culture was centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 10 minutes to pellet the cells. DNA extraction was performed on the pelletized cells using the PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the WT strain, 150-bp paired-end libraries were generated at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and sequenced on a NextSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina; San Diego, CA, USA). Low quality reads were trimmed and adapter sequences were removed from Illumina sequences using bcl2fastq (version 2.20.0.445) (RRID:SCR 015058) [34]. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) (Oxford, UK) PCR-free ligation library preparation was also used to generate long sequence reads. ONT reads were adapter and quality trimmed using porechop33 (version 0.2.3_seqan2.1.1) (RRID:SCR_016967) [35]. Hybrid assemblies were generated from Illumina and ONT reads using Unicycler (version 0.4.8) and assembly quality was assessed using QUAST (version 5.0.2) [36,37]. Gene models were predicted with functional annotations using Prokka (version 1.14.5) with default parameters and ‘—rfam’ [38]. Culturing and DNA extraction of mutant strains was performed with the same protocol as the WT and 150-bp paired-end libraries were generated using Illumina sequencing as described above [34,3638].

Identifying mutations in BAC tolerant mutants

TrimGalore version 0.3.7 (RRID:SCR_011847) was used to trim adapter sequences and trim reads at low quality positions with the following parameters:—quality 30,—stringency 1,—gzip,—length 50 [39,40]. All subsequent software was used with default parameters unless otherwise specified. BWA (version 0.7.15) (RRID:SCR_010910) was used to map the mutant resequencing data against the ancestral reference genome [41]. Samtools (version 1.4.1) (RRID:SCR_002105) and bamaddrg (https://github.com/ekg/bamaddrg) were used to index and add sample names to the sorted BAM files, respectively [42]. Joint genotyping for SNPs and short indels of the mutants was performed using Freebayes (version 1.3.1) (RRID:SCR_010761) [43]. GATK (v. 4.0.6) was used to convert the resulting VCF files into table format [44]. A SnpEff database was built for the FSL-N1-304 WT reference genome and SNP annotation prediction was performed in the mutant strains using SnpEff (version 4.1) [45]. Large-scale Blast Score Ratio (LS-BSR) was used to investigate gene presence/absence mutations using default parameters with the exception of “-b blastn -c cdhit” [46]. The InterPro server was used to predict protein domains in candidate proteins (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) [47].

RNA-sequencing and differential gene expression analysis

We performed RNA-seq on the WT and mutant strains in the presence of BAC in order to compare their transcriptome profiles. Each culture was revived from freezer stocks by growing in TSB+YE overnight at 37C. 100μl of overnight cultures was then passaged into TSB+YE containing 2 μg/ml BAC and grown to mid-log phase (10 hours). This concentration of BAC was chosen because it was the highest we could grow the WT without completely inhibiting growth, allowing us to compare the transcriptome response to BAC stress in both the WT and the mutants. Bacteria were then centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 10 minutes to obtain bacterial pellets which were rapidly frozen using dry ice. RNA extraction, ribosomal depletion library preparation and sequencing were performed at SeqCenter (Pittsburg, PA). Sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina; San Diego, CA, USA), generating 2x51bp reads. Three biological replicates were sequenced for each sample. Adapter trimming and demultiplexing were performed with bcl-convert (v4.0.3) [34]. Genome indexing and mapping were performed using bwa (v0.7.17) with default parameters [41]. Samtools (v1.14) was used to sort and index BAM files [42]. Bedtools2 (v2.30.0) was used to extract read counts per transcript from gene coordinates in the sorted BAM files [48]. The DESeq2 (version 1.38.3) package was used in R (version 4.2.3 and RStudio 2023.03.1+446) to normalize read counts and identify differentially expressed genes [49]. Differential expression thresholds were defined using log-fold change [log2(FC)] values >1 (up-regulated) and <-1 (down-regulated). A p-value significance threshold was also defined using the multiple test corrected p-value 1.6E-5. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on DESeq2 normalized read counts using JMP Pro (version 17) to examine the relationship between samples and replicates [50]. Volcano plots of gene expression (DESeq2 normalized read counts) and p-value were generated using ggplot2 (version 3.4.1) [51]. KEGG annotations were generated for the whole genome and used to identify statistically significant overrepresentations of specific KEGG terms among differentially expressed genes using Fisher’s exact tests in R using an FDR cutoff of 0.01 [52].

Results

BAC MIC in FSL-N1-304 and mutants

The BAC MIC for FSL-N1-304 was measured in both liquid culture and solid media to establish a baseline MIC for all subsequent screening steps. All experiments were performed in triplicate and averaged to calculate the baseline MIC. In the liquid culture assay, the BAC MIC for the WT strain was 4 μg/ml (Fig 2A). For the solid media assay, the BAC MIC was 3 μg/ml (Fig 2B). During our mutant screening, we isolated two mutants with increased tolerance to BAC (mut-1 and mut-2). mut-1 and mut-2 displayed BAC MICs of 7 μg/ml in liquid culture, and 4 and 5 μg/ml in solid culture, respectively (Fig 2A and 2B). We also measured the growth kinetics of the WT, mut-1, and mut-2 in the presence of 0, 2, and 3ug/ml BAC in liquid TSB+YE media over the course of 48 hours. Under BAC stress, we observed diminished growth and an extended lag phase in the WT compared to mut-1 and mut-2 (Fig 3). Notably, WT, mut-1 and mut-2 had nearly identical growth patterns in TSB+YE (Fig 3), suggesting there is no growth tradeoff in the absence of BAC in the mutant strains.

Fig 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration of benzalkonium chloride in WT and mutant L. monocytogenes strains.

Fig 2

A) Columns represent samples (WT, mut-1 and mut-2) and biological replicates, whole rows show the concentration (ug/ml) of benzalkonium chloride. Each component of the matrix shows the OD value after overnight growth. Growth was considered entirely inhibited when OD values < 0.1. The red shading represents OD value, with light and dark red representing low and high OD values. B) Minimum inhibitory concentrations of L. monocytogenes WT and mutants to benzalkonium chloride on solid media. 100 μl of overnight culture from the WT, mut-1 and mut-2 was spread onto TSA+YE plates with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 μg/ml benzalkonium chloride and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Plates were then imaged on an Interscience Scan1200. Benzalkonium chloride minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the concentration at which no colonies were visible.

Fig 3. Growth rate analysis of WT, mut-1, and mut-2 in response to increasing concentrations of benzalkonium chloride.

Fig 3

Each culture was grown at room temperature for 48 hr and the growth rate was measured using the oCelloScope. (A) Growth curve of WT and mutant strains based on the total absorption (505nm wavelength) values in each microtiter well. (B) Growth curve of WT and mutant strains based on background corrected absorption (BCA) values. Growth rate was measured in 3 biological replicates for each sample. WT, mut-1, and mut-2 are depicted by red, light blue and purple lines, respectively.

BAC tolerant mutants show increased tolerance to some antibiotics

Previous studies showed that BAC tolerant L. monocytogenes isolates often also showed increased tolerance to some antibiotics [22,24]. To test whether this phenomenon was observed in our BAC tolerant mutants, we measured the MIC of ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, erythromycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, norfloxacin, penicillin G, and vancomycin in the WT and mutant strains (Fig 4 and Table 1). The MICs for erythromycin, ampicillin, tetracycline and penicillin G in the WT and mutants were either identical, decreased in the mutants, or showed a minor increase in the mutants but would still be considered “sensitive” to the antibiotic based on Staphylococcus spp. MIC breakpoints [33]. Additionally, we observed a near doubling of vancomycin MIC from 0.44 μg/ml in the WT to 0.75 and 0.875 μg/ml in mut-1 and mut-2, respectively, and an increase in gentamicin MIC from 1.25 μg/ml to 4 μg/ml in mut-2 (Fig 4A and Table 1). The mutant vancomycin and gentamicin MICs are still considered “sensitive” to the antibiotics, based on MIC breakpoints for other species. For ciprofloxacin, we observed an increase in MIC from 0.5 μg/ml in the WT to 2 μg/ml in mut-1, which is considered “intermediate” tolerance (Table 1 and Fig 4B). Lastly, we observed a substantial increase in norfloxacin MIC from 2.5 μg/ml in the WT to 16 and 8 μg/ml in mut-1 and mut-2, respectively (Table 1 and Fig 4B). Norfloxacin MICs of 8 and 16 μg/ml are considered “intermediate” and “resistant”, respectively.

Fig 4. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of various antibiotics in the wild type and mutants with increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride.

Fig 4

The minimum inhibitory concentrations of ampicillin, erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, penicillin G, and vancomycin (A) and the fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (B) were measured in the WT, mut-1 and mut-2 using Liofilchem Minimum inhibitory test strips. 109 CFU/ml cells were spread onto the TSA-YE plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours to create a lawn. The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined as the point where the edge of the inhibition ellipse intersected with the MIC Test Strip.

Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics for the WT, mut-1 and mut-2, calculated as the average of two replicates.

Antibiotic WT MIC (μg/ml) mut-1 MIC (μg/ml) mut-2 MIC (μg/ml) Antibiotic breakpoint for Staphylococcus
Ampicillin 0.055 0.016 0.055 ≥0.5
Erythromycin 0.315 0.315 0.22 ≥0.8
Gentamycin 1.25 1.5 4* ≥16
Penicillin G 0.035 0.035 0.0275 ≥0.25
Tetracycline 0.157 0.1875 0.1875 ≥16
Vancomycin 0.44 0.75 0.875 ≥16
Ciprofloxacin 0.5 2* (I) 0.5 ≥4
Norfloxacin 2.5 16** (R) 8* (I) ≥16

(I): Value qualified as intermediate resistance as defined by the CLSI minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints for Staphylococcus spp.

(R): Value qualified as resistant as defined by the CLSI minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints for Staphylococcus spp.

* ≥ 2-fold increase in MIC compared to WT.

** ≥ 4-fold increase in MIC compared to WT.

Assessing virulence potential through hemolytic assay

To test whether the BAC tolerant phenotype is linked with L. monocytogenes virulence, we measured hly activity, an essential component of virulence, in the WT and mutant strains. hly activity was measured as the percent of hemolysis in goat blood. The parental strain had an average hemolysis of 6.05%, while mut-1 and mut-2 had significantly higher hemolysis activities of 67.71% (p-value = 0.00093) and 45.45% (p-value = 0.012), respectively (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Hemolytic activity is significantly increased in BAC-tolerant mutants.

Fig 5

To investigate the relationship between BAC tolerance and virulence, we conducted a hemolysis assay using mut-1, mut-2, and the parental strain. Percent hemolysis, which is a semi-quantitative proxy for the expression of key L. monocytogenes virulence factor listeriolysin O is reported. Error bars represent the standard deviation of percent hemolysis for each lineage. Statistically significant values between WT, mut-1 (p-value = 0.00093), and mut-2 (p-value = 0.012) are indicated by an asterisk.

Genomic analysis of mutants

To investigate the EMS induced mutations that may account for the increased tolerance to BAC and antibiotics, we generated a complete genome assembly for FSL-N1-304 using Illumina and ONT sequencing and predicted genes and functional annotations (NCBI SRA run accession numbers SRR17006605 and SRR17067427 for the Illumina and ONT data, respectively). The genome was assembled into two contigs consisting of the genome (~3 Mb) and a plasmid (pLIS10–63.8Kbp) with a total of 3,033 protein coding genes (NCBI accession number GCA_021391455.1). This high-quality genome was used as a reference to map Illumina whole-genome resequencing data for mut-1 and mut-2. We identified 3 and 29 mutations in the mut-1 and mut-2 genomes, respectively. For mut-1, consistent with EMS resulting mainly in G:C>A:T transitions, we observed three G>A missense mutations in genes with predicted functions as a diacylglycerol kinase, a permease, and a resuscitation-promoting factor (Table 2; Fig 6). In mut-2, we observed seven C>T transitions, 20 G>A transitions, one G>T transversion, and one single nucleotide deletion (Table 2). Twenty two of the 29 mutations in mut-2 were missense mutations, three resulted in premature stop codon mutations, and a single nucleotide deletion resulted in a frameshift mutation (Table 2). Interestingly, none of the genes with mutations in mut-1 and mut-2 overlapped, suggesting different mechanisms of increased BAC tolerance.

Table 2. Description of genetic variants identified from comparative genomic analysis of WT, mut-1, and mut-2.

Nucleotide base substitutions are displayed to demonstrate the G to A and C to T transitions that are characteristic of EMS mutagenesis. UniProtKB, BioCyc, and NCBI BLAST databases were used to annotate all genes and their corresponding protein products.

Mutant Gene ID WT allele mut allele Mutation Gene Name Annotation
mut-1 MEAOLCCM_00593 G A p.His245Tyr dagK Diacylglycerol kinase
MEAOLCCM_01768 G A p.Pro60Ser lmo2768 Permease
MEAOLCCM_02042 G A p.Glu202Lys lmo0186 Resuscitation-promoting factor
mut-2 MEAOLCCM_00152 C T p.Pro353Ser xseA Exodeoxyribonuclease 7 large subunit
MEAOLCCM_00294 G A p.Ser82Phe udk Uridine kinase
MEAOLCCM_00401 C T UGV lmo1597 Hypothetical protein
MEAOLCCM_00412 C T p.Val150Ile pheT PheT protein
MEAOLCCM_00708 G A p.Thr139Ile msrA Peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase MsrA
MEAOLCCM_00742 C T p.Ala148Val ponA Penicillin-binding protein 1A/1B
MEAOLCCM_00894 G A p.Pro29Ser murG UDP-N-acetylglucosamine—N-acetylmuramyl-(pentapeptide) pyrophosphoryl-undecaprenol N-acetylglucosamine transferase
MEAOLCCM_00905 G A UGV lmo2045 Hypothetical protein
MEAOLCCM_00932 G A p.Tyr25Tyr rex Redox-sensing transcriptional repressor Rex
MEAOLCCM_01029 G T UGV lmo2085 Peptidoglycan binding protein
MEAOLCCM_01142 G A p.Arg150* pepF Oligoendopeptidase F plasmid
MEAOLCCM_01207 G A p.Gly229Ser aspB Asparagine—oxo-acid transaminase
MEAOLCCM_01289 G A p.Val486Val mrpA Na(+)/H(+) antiporter subunit A
MEAOLCCM_01298 G A p.Gly124Asp yfeO Putative ion-transport protein YfeO
MEAOLCCM_01398 G A p.Gln359* uvrB UvrABC system protein B
MEAOLCCM_01420 G A p.Ser139Leu hpf Ribosome hibernation promotion factor
MEAOLCCM_01494 G A UGV hssS Heme sensor protein HssS
MEAOLCCM_01544 G A p.Gln113* unknown YopX family protein
MEAOLCCM_01547 TCTTTACTTTCCTTTACTTTCC TCTTTACTTTCC frameshift unknown Hypothetical protein
MEAOLCCM_01628 G A p.Lys135Lys lmo2638 NADH dehydrogenase
MEAOLCCM_01686 G A p.Ala226Val speA Arginine decarboxylase
MEAOLCCM_01991 C T p.Glu398Glu lmo0130 Cell wall protein
MEAOLCCM_02285 C T p.Ser486Ser inlA Internalin A
MEAOLCCM_02368 C T p.Ser244Leu lmo0501 BglG family transcription antiterminator
MEAOLCCM_02534 G A p.Gly87Asp ssbA Single-stranded DNA-binding protein A
MEAOLCCM_02864 G A p.Asp435Asn licR putative licABCH operon regulator
MEAOLCCM_02969 G A p.Gly112Asp cutC Copper homeostasis protein CutC
MEAOLCCM_03024 G A p.Ser504Ser pycA Pyruvate carboxylase
MEAOLCCM_03069 G A p.Val214Ile lmo1135 Immunity 26/phosphotriesterase HocA family protein

WT allele = wild-type allele, mut allele = mutant allele, mutation = mutation in protein, UGV = upstream gene variant.

Fig 6. Candidate proteins in mutants with increased resistance to benzalkonium chloride.

Fig 6

The common L. monocytogenes gene name is provided for each protein. InterPro functional domains are represented by colored ellipses. The yellow lightning bolt symbol represents the site of the nonsynonymous mutations. (A and B) dagK (locus tag: LZJ96_02845) and resuscitation-promoting factor (LZJ96_09855) mutations were present in mut-1, while (C and D) ponA (LZJ96_03560) and hpf (LZJ96_06860) mutations were present in mut-2. The number at the end of the protein represents the length of the protein in amino acids.

Additionally, we investigated whether gene gain or loss in the mutants may have changed after mutagenesis using the LS-BSR pipeline [46]. Consistent with predictions from EMS mutagenesis, we did not detect any gene gains or losses in mut-1 or mut-2, suggesting that structural variants did not influence the increase in BAC tolerance.

Differential gene expression analysis between WT and BAC-tolerant mutants

We performed RNA-sequencing of the WT, mut-1 and mut-2 in biological triplicates during growth in TSB+YE containing 2 μg/ml BAC for 10 hours (mid-log phase) to examine transcriptome profile differences across samples. We performed principal component analysis (PCA) of DESeq2 normalized read counts (Fig 7C). Biological replicates for each sample clustered together, suggesting the biological replicates had similar transcriptome profiles, and that there are major differences in the transcriptome response to BAC across samples. We independently identified differentially expressed genes in mut-1 and mut-2 relative to the WT. We identified 282 up-regulated genes and 134 down-regulated genes in mut-1, and 136 up-regulated and 45 down-regulated genes in mut-2 (Fig 7). mut-1 and mut-2 share 55 up-regulated genes and 15 down-regulated genes (S1 and S2 Figs). Genes of the phosphotransferase system (PTS) (including bglG, dhaL, dhaM, ulaA, fruA, manZ, and licABC) were up-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2 compared to the WT. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis supported this observation, revealing that KEGG terms corresponding to the PTS were overrepresented amongst all up-regulated genes in both mut-1 (p-value = 0.000452) and mut-2 (p-value = 0.00112). Additionally, two internalin-encoding genes, inlB and inlH, the groEL-groES chaperonin system, transcriptional antiterminator lmo0425, and multidrug transporter lmo2463 were all up-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2. Interestingly, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis also revealed that genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis were overrepresented in the up-regulated genes of mut-1, while amino acid metabolism was overrepresented in up-regulated genes of mut-2 (S3 and S4 Figs).

Fig 7. Transcriptome response to BAC stress in WT and mutants.

Fig 7

(A) Principal component analysis of RNA-sequencing data reveals distinct clustering of WT and mutant strains. PCA was conducted on genome-wide normalized DESeq2 read counts. mut-1 and mut-2 replicates are displayed using purple dots and light blue dots, respectively. WT replicates are represented with black dots. (B and C) Volcano plots displaying differential gene expression analysis results for mut-1 (B) and mut-2 (C) show differential gene expression of mutants relative to the parental strain. Vertical dashed lines represent differential expression thresholds, which were defined using log-fold change [log2(FC)] values >1 (up-regulated) and <-1 (down-regulated). The horizontal dashed line represents the significance threshold defined using a multiple test corrected p-value: (significance level)/(total # of genes) = 0.05/3201 = 1.6E-5. (D) Venn diagram comparison of all up-regulated genes identified in mut-1 and mut-2. The PTS accounted for 9 out of 52 (16.67%) shared up-regulated genes. (E) Enrichment of KEGG terms among differentially expressed genes. The proportion of genes belonging to each functional category within (1) the total WT genome, (2) differentially expressed genes in mut-1, and (3) differentially expressed genes in mut-2 correspond to black, pink, and green bars, respectively. Asterisks indicate significant overrepresentations (p-value <0.01).

We identified fepR, the negative regulator of the efflux pump fepA, in the subset of genes down-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2 (Fig 7A and 7B). Interestingly, despite the down-regulation of fepR, we found that fepA was highly down-regulated (LFC = -3.05, p-value = 0) in mut-2. We also observed transcriptome profile differences between the two mutants in the ilv-leu operon, which is highly up-regulated only in mut-1 (leuA—LFC = 2.35, p-value = 2.91E-08; leuB—LFC = 2.52, p-value = 2.15E-13; leuC—LFC = 2.40, p-value = 1.28E-12; leuD—LFC = 2.46, p-value = 7.07E-14; ilvA—LFC = 2.26, p-value = 5.63E-34; ilvB—LFC = 1.82, p-value = 3.32E-06; ilvC—LFC = 2.27, p-value = 2.12E-09; ilvH—LFC = 2.02, p-value = 1.76E-08). The ilv-leu operon is involved in branched-chain amino acid synthesis and has been associated with L. monocytogenes survival under harsh, host-associated conditions [53,54]. Only four of the candidate genes with mutations in either mut-1 or mut-2 were differentially expressed (mut-1: lmo0186 and mut-2: rex, yfeO, hpf).

Discussion

Here, we used EMS mutagenesis to generate L. monocytogenes mutants with increased tolerance to BAC in an effort to understand the potential genetic underpinnings and transcriptome response to BAC tolerance, and the off-target effects of BAC tolerance on antibiotic sensitivity. We conducted this study with L. monocytogenes FSL-N1-304 because this strain lacks genomic elements, such as bcrABC, qacH and Tn6188, which are involved in QAC resistance [5557]. For instance, analysis of over 116 L. monocytogenes isolates from diverse serotypes and origins revealed that 71 of the 72 strains displaying BAC resistance harbored bcrABC [55], while another study showed that strains harboring Tn6188 have BAC MICs twice as high as strains lacking Tn6188 [57]. Thus, the isolation of FSL-N1-304 mutants displaying increased BAC tolerance could reveal novel genetic elements and mechanisms involved in BAC tolerance.

We generated two mutants with elevated BAC MICs in both liquid and solid media compared to the parental FSL-N1-304 strain (Figs 2 and 3). Additionally, mut-1 and mut-2 harbored resistance and increased tolerance to norfloxacin, respectively, while the parental FSL-N1-304 strain was sensitive to the antibiotic (Table 1 and Fig 4B). We sequenced the genomes of the WT, mut-1 and mut-2 to identify candidate mutations involved in increased BAC tolerance. Interestingly, the number of mutations we observed between our two mutants differed by an order of magnitude (Table 2). In two recent EMS mut-seq studies in L. monocytogenes, 1 to 6 mutations were observed per mutant [58,59]. mut-2 contained 29 mutations, and the majority of these mutations were in G:C > A:T transitions, consistent with expectations from EMS mutagenesis. However, we observed a mutation in uvrB (which encodes the nucleotide excision repair enzyme UvrABC system protein B) that results in a premature stop codon and truncated protein that lacks the C-terminus helicase C, UvrB_YAD/RRR_dom, and UVR_dom domains (Table 2). This mutation is likely responsible for the higher number of mutations observed in mut-2.

mut-1 contained only three nonsynonymous mutations that differentiate it from the parental FSL-N1-304 strain. One of these mutations occurred in dagK (lmo1753), a gene encoding a diacylglycerol kinase (DAGK) (Fig 6A). In a previous study investigating L. monocytogenes adaptation to QACs, mutations were observed in lmo1753 in all QAC-tolerant strains, leading the authors to hypothesize that lmo1753 mutations contribute to QAC tolerance by altering fatty acid composition [60]. Membrane modifications and increased hydrophobicity has been previously identified as a putative mechanism of BAC resistance in L. monocytogenes [6163]. In E. coli, DAGK recycles diacylglycerol that is produced by membrane-derived oligosaccharide biosynthesis [64]. Interestingly, in Acinetobacter baumannii, dagK was significantly up-regulated in a colistin-resistant strain compared to its colistin-susceptible parental strain [65]. Both colistin and BAC disrupt the membrane, and alterations to expression or structure may improve cell membrane integrity, underlying a potential mechanism for increased BAC tolerance in mut-1. Additionally, mut-1 contained a nonsynonymous mutation in a predicted permease encoding gene (Table 2). The P60S mutation is predicted to occur outside the membrane in the extracellular region. Lastly, we observed a mutation in a gene encoding a predicted resuscitation-promoting factor that is also annotated in the Gene Ontology category peptidoglycan turnover (GO:0009254) (Fig 6B). As a gram-positive bacterium, the L. monocytogenes cell wall is composed of a rigid layer of peptidoglycan that acts as a barrier to the external environment. It has previously been hypothesized that modifications to peptidoglycan synthesis could alter membrane fluidity and could be involved in BAC resistance [21].

Though linking mutations to the increased BAC tolerance phenotype in mut-2 is more challenging because of the relatively large number of mutations observed, we identified several interesting candidates. mut-2 contained a nonsynonymous mutation (A148V) in the penicillin-binding protein (PBP) encoding gene, ponA (Fig 6C). This protein is involved in polymerizing and modifying peptidoglycan, making it an interesting candidate for the BAC tolerance phenotype. While PBPs have not been implicated in QAC resistance, their presence has been associated with L. monocytogenes resistance to β-lactam antibiotics [66]. Additionally, we observed a nonsynonymous mutation (S139L) in the gene encoding for the ribosome hibernation promotion factor (HPF) (Fig 6D). In L. monocytogenes, hpf knockout mutants showed greater uptake of gentamicin and generally, were more sensitive to aminoglycosides during stationary phase [67]. This mutation is an interesting candidate, as we observed an increase in gentamicin MIC from 1.25 μg/ml in the parental strain to 4 μg/ml in mut-2 (Fig 4A, Table 1). Additionally, L. monocytogenes strains harboring plasmid pLMST6, which contains emrC, a multidrug efflux pump transporter, showed increased tolerance to both BAC and gentamicin [68], suggesting increased tolerance to these compounds may be achieved through similar paths.

We hypothesized that there are two separate efflux mechanisms acting as contributors to the decreased antimicrobial susceptibility observed in these mutants because the transcriptome profiles of the two mutants reveal differential expression of fepR and lmo2463. fepR encodes a transcriptional regulator that negatively regulates its downstream target, FepA, a multi-drug efflux pump that is linked to both QAC and fluoroquinolone resistance [24,25,69]. One study showed that a loss-of-function frameshift mutation in fepR resulted in up-regulation of fepA and subsequent resistance to norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin [27]. Another study experimentally evolved L. monocytogenes for increased tolerance to BAC and didecyldimethyl ammonium chloride and showed that these adapted lineages were also resistant to ciprofloxacin stemming mainly from missense and nonsense mutations in fepR [25]. Interestingly, the increased tolerance to ciprofloxacin was only observed in mut-1 and was not as drastic as the increased MIC for norfloxacin (Fig 4B). We did not observe mutations in fepR or fepA in the mutants, which initially suggested that the increased tolerance to BAC and fluoroquinolones occurred through pathways independent of the fepR/fepA genotype. However, our RNA-seq results suggest that the fepR/fepA mechanism may be still contributing to the BAC mutant phenotypes. fepR was down-regulated in both mutants in the presence of BAC, albeit the relative expression was considerably lower in mut-2 compared to mut-1 (mut-1: log2[FC] = -3.22 and mut-2: log2[FC] = -1.03). Despite down-regulation of its negative repressor in both mut-1 and mut-2, surprisingly, fepA was significantly down-regulated in mut-1, and not significantly differentially expressed in mut-2 (Fig 7). Previously work had shown that increased BAC tolerance is often associated with up-regulation of fepA. However, in the present study, fepA is down-regulated in the BAC-tolerant mut-1, suggesting fepA and fepR independent mechanisms for BAC tolerance.

The second efflux pump mechanism that we hypothesize may be contributing to decreased antimicrobial susceptibility is the MmpL family transporter protein encoded by lmo2463. MmpL family transporters are a class of multi-drug resistance proteins that increase resistance to fluoroquinolones in E. coli [70]. Other studies have shown that MmpL family proteins were induced under acid stress in L. monocytogenes [71]. We found that lmo2463 was up-regulated in both mutants when grown in the presence of BAC stress. Additionally, considering the increased tolerance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics compared to the WT, the MmpL transporter is a potential candidate of BAC and fluoroquinolone tolerance. Efflux pump deletion mutants will need to be generated in future work to determine if synergistic effects exist between fepR/fepA and the MmpL efflux mechanism.

Collectively, our results offer potential insight to the aforementioned hypothesis that variability in peptidoglycan synthesis contributes to BAC tolerance as we observed a significant up-regulation of genes of the PTS, which is involved in cell wall turnover and peptidoglycan modulation [21,72]. Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways also revealed that mut-1 and mut-2 contained 20 and 14 up-regulated PTS genes, respectively. The PTS in L. monocytogenes (as well as other bacterial pathogens) is associated with tolerance mechanisms to various stressors including sanitizers and antibiotics [61,71,7376]. Several PTS genes that were up-regulated in mut-1 and mut-2 are highlighted in Fig 7A and 7B, including ulaA, dhaM, and manZ. Another study on benzalkonium chloride tolerance in L. monocytogenes found that manZ mutations were only observed in benzalkonium-adapted strains, which provides further support that the PTS is heavily involved in biocide tolerance [25]. Further, an additional study demonstrated similar findings, observing that PTS genes were highly up-regulated in L. monocytogenes when exposed to benzethonium chloride (BZT), another QAC [61]. The PTS has other implications for stress tolerance as demonstrated by the disruption of the mannose-specific PTS operon mpt and overexpression of the bgl operon, which caused increased resistance to bacteriocins [74,75,77].

As shown in Fig 5, a significant increase in hemolytic activity was observed in both mut-1 (p-value = 0.000931) and mut-2 (p-value = 0.0125) compared to the WT, suggesting that increased BAC tolerance may be positively correlated to higher hemolytic activity. Additionally, several internalin-encoding genes involved in virulence, including inlB and inlH, were up-regulated in both mut-1 (inlB—LFC = 2.42, p-value = 1.84E-138; inlH—LFC = 2.82, p-value = 1.01E-201) and mut-2 (inlB—LFC = 2.15, p-value = 3.61E-109; inlH—LFC = 1.46, p-value = 4.25E-55) (Fig 7A and 7B). Expression of inlH has been previously shown to be associated with L. monocytogenes stress response, as it is under σB-dependent regulation [78]. Transcriptional analysis showed no significant difference in the expression of hly or other key virulence factors such as prfA, actAB, or plcAB under BAC stress. We did, however, observe significant up-regulation of the ATPase-encoding gene, clpC (mut-1: LFC = 1.58, p-value = 9.92E-104 and mut-2: LFC = 1.14, p-value = 3.79E-54), which has been previously associated with increased virulence and increased susceptibility to a variety of stressors [79,80]. In mut-1, we also observed up-regulation of the ilv-leu operon, which is primarily associated with branched-chain amino acid synthesis but has also been shown to be under nutrient-dependent negative regulation by two virulence effectors, CodY and Rli60 [53,54]. Overall, our observations suggest that the adaptive response to BAC stress may influence virulence determinants. Alternatively, mutations introduced during mutagenesis that are not involved in BAC tolerance could account for the observed increase in hemolysis.

Taken together, our work suggests that the emergence of adaptive mutations for BAC tolerance in L. monocytogenes isolates found in food processing facilities could also result in strains that are more virulent (Fig 5) and have increased tolerance to particular antibiotics (Table 1, Fig 4). While the mutants we isolated did not develop BAC resistance at levels that would enable survival at BAC concentrations used for sanitization in industry, environments such as floor drains may present scenarios in which sanitizers are diluted to sub-lethal concentrations, resulting in continued exposure and subsequent adaptation. For instance, a recent study in L. monocytogenes observed that sub-lethal short-term exposure (10 days) to BAC and didecyldimethylammonium chloride resulted in decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin [28]. Additionally, several adaptive laboratory evolution studies in which Pseudomonas aeruginosa or E. coli were grown in the presence of BAC have observed decreased sensitivity to BAC, and increased resistance to several unrelated antibiotics [8183]. Thus, understanding the genetic underpinnings and consequences of BAC tolerance is vitally important for both controlling L. monocytogenes in the food processing environment and for preventing the spread of antibiotic resistance.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. UniProt BLAST annotation of genes that were up-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2.

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s001.tif (5.1MB, tif)
S2 Fig. UniProt BLAST annotation of genes that were down-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2.

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s002.tif (1.2MB, tif)
S3 Fig. KEGG term enrichment of up-regulated genes.

KEGG terms were assigned for the whole genome and enrichment analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test to identify gene categories that were significantly up-regulated in the mutant strains (p-value < 0.01).

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s003.tif (995.8KB, tif)
S4 Fig. KEGG term enrichment of down-regulated genes.

KEGG terms were assigned for the whole genome and enrichment analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test to identify gene categories that were significantly down-regulated in the mutant strains (p-value < 0.01).

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s004.tif (613.8KB, tif)

Data Availability

L. monocytogenes FSL-N1-304 whole-genome Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing data are available through the NCBI SRA run accession numbers SRR17006605 and SRR17067427, respectively. The FSL-N1-304 reference genome assembly is available through GenBank accession number GCA_021391455.1. Illumina whole-genome sequencing data for mut-1 and mut-2 are available through NCBI SRA run accession numbers SRR21641536 and SRR21641535, respectively. Data Availability Statement All files associated with genomic and transcriptomic data in this study can be found under NCBI BioProject PRJNA782601. All other data are available in the manuscript and/or supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, and the Food Science department at University of Massachusetts Amherst, under project number MAS-00529 to JGG and LM. The sponsor played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Farber JM, Peterkin PI. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55: 476–511. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.476-511.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramaswamy V, Cresence VM, Rejitha JS, Lekshmi U, Dharsana KS, Prasad P, et al. Listeria-review of epidemiology and pathogenesis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007;40: 4–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clauss HE, Lorber B. Central Nervous System Infection with Listeria monocytogenes. 2008. [cited 19 Jan 2023]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Madjunkov M, Chaudhry S, Ito S. Listeriosis during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 296. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4401-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R v., Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17: 7. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Townsend A, Strawn LK, Chapman BJ, Dunn LL. A Systematic Review of Listeria Species and Listeria monocytogenes Prevalence, Persistence, and Diversity throughout the Fresh Produce Supply Chain. Foods 2021, Vol 10, Page 1427. 2021;10: 1427. doi: 10.3390/foods10061427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farber JM, Zwietering M, Wiedmann M, Schaffner D, Hedberg CW, Harrison MA, et al. Alternative approaches to the risk management of Listeria monocytogenes in low risk foods. Food Control. 2021;123: 107601. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2020.107601 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khandke SS, Mayes T. HACCP implementation: a practical guide to the implementation of the HACCP plan. Food Control. 1998;9: 103–109. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(97)00065-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pereira BMP, Tagkopoulos I. Benzalkonium Chlorides: Uses, Regulatory Status, and Microbial Resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00377-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jennings MC, Minbiole KPC, Wuest WM. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: An Antimicrobial Mainstay and Platform for Innovation to Address Bacterial Resistance. ACS Infect Dis. 2015;1: 288–303. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wessels S, Ingmer H. Modes of action of three disinfectant active substances: a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013;67: 456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Basaran P. Inhibition effect of belzalkonium chloride treatment on growth of common food contaminating fungal species. J Food Sci Technol. 2011;48: 515. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0268-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gelbicova T, Florianova M, Hluchanova L, Kalova A, Korena K, Strakova N, et al. Comparative Analysis of Genetic Determinants Encoding Cadmium, Arsenic, and Benzalkonium Chloride Resistance in Listeria monocytogenes of Human, Food, and Environmental Origin. Front Microbiol. 2021;11: 3397. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.599882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meier AB, Guldimann C, Markkula A, Pöntinen A, Korkeala H, Tasara T. Comparative Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Swiss and Finnish Listeria monocytogenes Isolates with Respect to Benzalkonium Chloride Resistance. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2017.00397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ratani SS, Siletzky RM, Dutta V, Yildirim S, Osborne JA, Lin W, et al. Heavy metal and disinfectant resistance of Listeria monocytogenes from foods and food processing plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78: 6938–6945. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01553-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Romanova NA, Wolffs PFG, Brovko LY, Griffiths MW. Role of efflux pumps in adaptation and resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to benzalkonium chloride. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72: 3498–3503. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3498-3503.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soumet C, Ragimbeau C, Maris P. Screening of benzalkonium chloride resistance in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated during cold smoked fish production. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41: 291–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01763.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu D, Li Y, Shamim Hasan Zahid M, Yamasaki S, Shi L, rong Li J, et al. Benzalkonium chloride and heavy-metal tolerance in Listeria monocytogenes from retail foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;190: 24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hegstad K, Langsrud S, Lunestad BT, Scheie AA, Sunde M, Yazdankhah SP. Does the wide use of quaternary ammonium compounds enhance the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistance and thus threaten our health? Microb Drug Resist. 2010;16: 91–104. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2009.0120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mc Carlie S, Boucher CE, Bragg RR. Molecular basis of bacterial disinfectant resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2020;48. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2019.100672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.To MS, Favrin S, Romanova N, Griffiths MW. Postadaptational resistance to benzalkonium chloride and subsequent physicochemical modifications of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68: 5258–5264. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5258-5264.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu T, Jiang X, Zhang Y, Ji S, Gao W, Shi L. Effect of Benzalkonium Chloride adaptation on sensitivity to antimicrobial agents and tolerance to environmental stresses in Listeria monocytogenes. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: 2906. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiang X, Yu T, Xu Y, Wang H, Korkeala H, Shi L. MdrL, a major facilitator superfamily efflux pump of Listeria monocytogenes involved in tolerance to benzalkonium chloride. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103: 1339–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9551-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guérin F, Galimand M, Tuambilangana F, Courvalin P, Cattoir V. Overexpression of the Novel MATE Fluoroquinolone Efflux Pump FepA in Listeria monocytogenes Is Driven by Inactivation of Its Local Repressor FepR. PLoS One. 2014;9: e106340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Douarre PE, Sévellec Y, Le Grandois P, Soumet C, Bridier A, Roussel S. FepR as a Central Genetic Target in the Adaptation to Quaternary Ammonium Compounds and Cross-Resistance to Ciprofloxacin in Listeria monocytogenes. Front Microbiol. 2022;13: 864576. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kode D, Nannapaneni R, Bansal M, Chang S, Cheng WH, Sharma CS, et al. Low‐level tolerance to fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin in qac‐adapted subpopulations of listeria monocytogenes. Microorganisms. 2021;9: 1052. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Buffet-Bataillon S, Tattevin P, Maillard JY, Bonnaure-Mallet M, Jolivet-Gougeon A. Efflux pump induction by quaternary ammonium compounds and fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2016;11: 81–92. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guérin A, Bridier A, Le Grandois P, Sévellec Y, Palma F, Félix B, et al. Exposure to Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Selects Resistance to Ciprofloxacin in Listeria monocytogenes. Pathogens 2021, Vol 10, Page 220. 2021;10: 220. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Norton DM, Scarlett JM, Horton K, Sue D, Thimothe J, Boor KJ, et al. Characterization and Pathogenic Potential of Listeria monocytogenes Isolates from the Smoked Fish Industry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67: 646. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.646-653.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bose JL. Chemical and UV Mutagenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1373: 111–115. doi: 10.1007/7651_2014_190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haney EF, Trimble MJ, Hancock REW. Microtiter plate assays to assess antibiofilm activity against bacteria. Nature Protocols 2021 16:5. 2021;16: 2615–2632. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00515-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.SAMPATHKUMAR B, TSOUGRIANI E, YU LSL, KHACHATOURIANS GG. A quantitative microtiter plate hemolysis assay for Listeria monocytogenes. J Food Saf. 1998;18: 197–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.1998.tb00214.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 32nd ed. CLSI supplement M100. 32nd ed. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.bcl2fastq: A proprietary Illumina software for the conversion of bcl files to basecalls. https://support.illumina.com/sequencing/sequencing_software/bcl2fastq-conversion-software.html.
  • 35.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3: e000132. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13: e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17: 10–12. doi: 10.14806/EJ.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krueger F. “Trim galore” A wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. 2015; 516. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. 2013. [cited 29 Jun 2022]. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1303.3997 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20: 1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6: 80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sahl JW, Gregory Caporaso J, Rasko DA, Keim P. The large-scale blast score ratio (LS-BSR) pipeline: a method to rapidly compare genetic content between bacterial genomes. PeerJ. 2014;2. doi: 10.7717/peerj.332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Blum M, Bork P, Bridge A, et al. InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D351–D360. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15: 1–21. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.SAS Institute Inc. JMP® Pro. Cary, NC; pp. 1989–2023.
  • 51.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28: 27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marinho CM, Dos Santos PT, Kallipolitis BH, Johansson J, Ignatov D, Guerreiro DN, et al. The σB-dependent regulatory sRNA Rli47 represses isoleucine biosynthesis in Listeria monocytogenes through a direct interaction with the ilvA transcript. RNA Biol. 2019;16: 1424–1437. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1632776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brenner M, Lobel L, Borovok I, Sigal N, Herskovits AA. Controlled branched-chain amino acids auxotrophy in Listeria monocytogenes allows isoleucine to serve as a host signal and virulence effector. PLoS Genet. 2018;14: e1007283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dutta V, Elhanaf D, Kathariou S. Conservation and Distribution of the Benzalkonium Chloride Resistance Cassette bcrABC in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79: 6067–6074. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01751-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Elhanafi D, Utta V, Kathariou S. Genetic characterization of plasmid-associated benzalkonium chloride resistance determinants in a listeria monocytogenes train from the 1998–1999 outbreak. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76: 8231–8238. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02056-10/ASSET/4E7916C1-4D47-44D6-997A-D8EC8CB7E6FC/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZAM9991016160005.JPEG [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Müller A, Rychli K, Muhterem-Uyar M, Zaiser A, Stessl B, Guinane CM, et al. Tn6188—A Novel Transposon in Listeria monocytogenes Responsible for Tolerance to Benzalkonium Chloride. PLoS One. 2013;8: e76835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen GY, Kao CY, Smith HB, Rust DP, Powers ZM, Li AY, et al. Mutation of the Transcriptional Regulator YtoI Rescues Listeria monocytogenes Mutants Deficient in the Essential Shared Metabolite 1,4-Dihydroxy-2-Naphthoate (DHNA). Infect Immun. 2020;88. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00366-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kelliher JL, Grunenwald CM, Abrahams RR, Daanen ME, Lew CI, Rose WE, et al. PASTA kinase-dependent control of peptidoglycan synthesis via ReoM is required for cell wall stress responses, cytosolic survival, and virulence in Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17: e1009881. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schulz LM, Dreier F, de Sousa Miranda LM, Rismondo J. Adaptation mechanisms of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium compounds. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01441-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fox EM, Leonard N, Jordan K. Physiological and transcriptional characterization of persistent and nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77: 6559–6569. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05529-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.To MS, Favrin S, Romanova N, Griffiths MW. Postadaptational resistance to benzalkonium chloride and subsequent physicochemical modifications of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68: 5258–5264. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5258-5264.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Martínez-Suárez J V., Ortiz S, López-Alonso V. Potential impact of the resistance to quaternary ammonium disinfectants on the persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food processing environments. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 638. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Walsh JP, Bell RM. Diacylglycerol kinase from Escherichia coli. 1992. pp. 153–162. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)09019-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Park YK, Lee JY, Ko KS. Transcriptomic analysis of colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant isolates identifies genes associated with colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2015;21: 765.e1–765.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Guinane CM, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Contribution of penicillin-binding protein homologs to antibiotic resistance, cell morphology, and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes EGDe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50: 2824–2828. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00167-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McKay SL, Portnoy DA. Ribosome hibernation facilitates tolerance of stationary-phase bacteria to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 6992–6999. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01532-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kremer PHC, Lees JA, Koopmans MM, Ferwerda B, Arends AWM, Feller MM, et al. Benzalkonium tolerance genes and outcome in Listeria monocytogenes meningitis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2017;23: 265.e1–265.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bolten S, Harrand AS, Skeens J, Wiedmann M. Nonsynonymous Mutations in fepR Are Associated with Adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes and Other Listeria spp. to Low Concentrations of Benzalkonium Chloride but Do Not Increase Survival of L. monocytogenes and Other Listeria spp. after Exposure to Benzalkonium Chloride Concentrations Recommended for Use in Food Processing Environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88. doi: 10.1128/aem.00486-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hussein SH, Samir R, Aziz RK, Toama MA. Two putative MmpL homologs contribute to antimicrobial resistance and nephropathy of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7. Gut Pathog. 2019;11: 1–13. doi: 10.1186/S13099-019-0296-7/TABLES/1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bowman JP, Hages E, Nilsson RE, Kocharunchitt C, Ross T. Investigation of the listeria monocytogenes Scott A acid tolerance response and associated physiological and phenotypic features via whole proteome analysis. J Proteome Res. 2012;11: 2409–2426. doi: 10.1021/pr201137c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Reith J, Mayer C. Peptidoglycan turnover and recycling in Gram-Positive bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3486-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Casey A, Fox EM, Schmitz-Esser S, Coffey A, Mcauliffe O, Jordan K, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Listeria monocytogenes exposed to biocide stress reveals a multi-system response involving cell wall synthesis, sugar uptake, and motility. 2014. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dalet K, Cenatiempo Y, Cossart P, Glaser P, Amend A, Baquero-Mochales F, et al. A σ54-dependent PTS permease of the mannose family is responsible for sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to mesentericin Y105. Microbiology (N Y). 2001;147: 3263–3269. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3263/CITE/REFWORKS [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Xue J, Hunter I, Steinmetz T, Peters A, Ray B, Miller KW. Novel activator of mannose-specific phosphotransferase system permease expression in Listeria innocua, identified by screening for pediocin AcH resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71: 1283–1290. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1283-1290.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Geldart K, Kaznessis YN. Characterization of class IIa bacteriocin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02033-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vadyvaloo V, Arous S, Gravesen A, Héchard Y, Chauhan-Haubrock R, Hastings JW, et al. Cell-surface alterations in class IIa bacteriocin-resistant Listeria monocytogenes strains. Microbiology (N Y). 2004;150: 3025–3033. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27059-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Personnic N, Bruck S, Nahori MA, Toledo-Arana A, Nikitas G, Lecuit M, et al. The Stress-Induced Virulence Protein InlH Controls Interleukin-6 Production during Murine Listeriosis. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 1979. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01096-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rouquette C, Ripio MT, Pellegrini E, Bolla JM, Tascon RI, Vázquez-Boland JA, et al. Identification of a ClpC ATPase required for stress tolerance and in vivo survival of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21: 977–987. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.641432.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rouquette C, De Chastellier C, Nair S, Berche P. The ClpC ATPase of Listeria monocytogenes is a general stress protein required for virulence and promoting early bacterial escape from the phagosome of macrophages. Mol Microbiol. 1998;27: 1235–1245. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00775.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mc Cay PH, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Fleming GTA. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of benzalkonium chloride on the competitiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in continuous culture. Microbiology (Reading). 2010;156: 30–38. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.029751-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nordholt N, Kanaris O, Schmidt SBI, Schreiber F. Persistence against benzalkonium chloride promotes rapid evolution of tolerance during periodic disinfection. Nat Commun. 2021;12. doi: 10.1038/S41467-021-27019-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tandukar M, Oh S, Tezel U, Konstantinidis KT, Pavlostathis SG. Long-term exposure to benzalkonium chloride disinfectants results in change of microbial community structure and increased antimicrobial resistance. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47: 9730–9738. doi: 10.1021/es401507k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. UniProt BLAST annotation of genes that were up-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2.

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s001.tif (5.1MB, tif)
S2 Fig. UniProt BLAST annotation of genes that were down-regulated in both mut-1 and mut-2.

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s002.tif (1.2MB, tif)
S3 Fig. KEGG term enrichment of up-regulated genes.

KEGG terms were assigned for the whole genome and enrichment analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test to identify gene categories that were significantly up-regulated in the mutant strains (p-value < 0.01).

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s003.tif (995.8KB, tif)
S4 Fig. KEGG term enrichment of down-regulated genes.

KEGG terms were assigned for the whole genome and enrichment analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test to identify gene categories that were significantly down-regulated in the mutant strains (p-value < 0.01).

(TIF)

pone.0305663.s004.tif (613.8KB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

L. monocytogenes FSL-N1-304 whole-genome Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing data are available through the NCBI SRA run accession numbers SRR17006605 and SRR17067427, respectively. The FSL-N1-304 reference genome assembly is available through GenBank accession number GCA_021391455.1. Illumina whole-genome sequencing data for mut-1 and mut-2 are available through NCBI SRA run accession numbers SRR21641536 and SRR21641535, respectively. Data Availability Statement All files associated with genomic and transcriptomic data in this study can be found under NCBI BioProject PRJNA782601. All other data are available in the manuscript and/or supporting information files.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES