Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 23.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Oct 3;64:115–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022823-035521

Anthracycline Toxicity: Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Romina B Cejas 1, Kateryna Petrykey 2, Yadav Sapkota 2, Paul W Burridge 1
PMCID: PMC11260185  NIHMSID: NIHMS2004748  PMID: 37788492

Abstract

Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) is a serious and common side effect of anthracycline therapy. Identification of genes and genetic variants associated with AIC risk has clinical potential as a cardiotoxicity predictive tool and to allow the development of personalized therapies. In this review, we provide an overview of the function of known AIC genes identified by association studies and categorize them based on their mechanistic implication in AIC. We also discuss the importance of functional validation of AIC-associated variants in human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) to advance the implementation of genetic predictive biomarkers. Finally, we review how patient-specific hiPSC-CMs can be used to identify novel patient-relevant functional targets and for the discovery of cardioprotectant drugs to prevent AIC. Implementation of functional validation and use of hiPSC-CMs for drug discovery will identify the next generation of highly effective and personalized cardioprotectants and accelerate the inclusion of approved AIC biomarkers into clinical practice.

Keywords: chemotherapy, cardiotoxicity, hiPSC-CMs, cardioprotectants, biomarkers, doxorubicin

1. INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy drugs from the anthracycline family are well known to cause cardiotoxicity, yet these drugs are still widely used clinically as they are considered among the most effective anti-cancer drugs to date (1). Anthracyclines have made a major contribution to the increase in the survival rate in cancer patients over the last 50 years and can be used to treat a variety of malignancies, including leukemias; lymphomas; sarcoma; and bladder, breast, gynecological, and other metastatic cancers in adults, adolescents, and children (1). To illustrate this, the five-year survival of childhood cancer patients currently reaches approximately 85%, and anthracyclines (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin) are utilized in nearly 60% of pediatric cancer regimens (2, 3). Development of cardiotoxicity, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction reduction of greater than 10% to less than 53%, is the most serious and possibly fatal side effect of anthracyclines and occurs in 9% of patients (4). Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) can manifest as a range of cardiac symptoms, including congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. The incidence of AIC could be as high as 59% if more subtle changes in cardiac function are detected, even at low doses (5). The most severe type of AIC is defined by the clinical diagnosis of heart failure, with a five-year survival rate of less than 50% and a mortality rate of approximately 100% at ten years after diagnosis (68) without a heart transplant.

The association between cumulative dose and AIC is well established, yet there is interpatient variability in AIC risk at any dose, and clinical variables alone yield moderate predictive power in detecting cardiotoxicity (9, 10). Identifying genetic variants associated with variable AIC risk will help to identify early those patients that will be affected by the devastating side effects of anthracyclines. In this review, we provide an overview of the function of known genes associated with AIC with a focus on cardiomyocytes and discuss the importance of genetic variant validation. We address how the utilization of human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) can advance the clinical implementation of these genetic predictive biomarkers. We also review how patient-specific hiPSC-CMs can facilitate the discovery of novel cardioprotectant drugs to effectively prevent the unwanted cardiotoxic effects of anthracycline therapy.

2. CURRENT STRATEGIES FOR CARDIOPROTECTION

Clinical management of AIC mainly involves four major strategies: (a) limitation in the cumulative anthracycline dose for all patients, (b) use of cardioprotectants, (c) use of liposome-encapsulated versions of anthracyclines, and (d) treatment of cardiac symptoms in patients who develop AIC.

The most direct method of reducing AIC is anthracycline dose limitation, but this potentially reduces chemotherapy efficacy. Therefore, the maximum cumulative anthracycline dose is specifically chosen as a compromise between efficacy and cardiotoxicity. The typical dose of doxorubicin is 400–550 mg/m2 for sarcoma patients or 240 mg/m2 for breast cancer patients (1), and there are no plans for reduction below these limits in clinical practice.

A second method to limit AIC involves concomitant treatment with the cardioprotectant drug dexrazoxane. Dexrazoxane is thought to chelate iron, reducing the amount of superoxide radicals produced, and/or inhibit topoisomerase II beta (TOP2B), therefore reducing anthracycline-mediated DNA breaks and preventing cardiomyocyte death and mitochondrial dysfunction (11). Dexrazoxane is not routinely used in practice, and prescription to children is currently off-label in the United States. In the European Union, the previous contraindication for the use of dexrazoxane in children and adolescents was removed and its use is restricted to patients receiving ≥300 mg/m2 of doxorubicin or equivalent (12). The use of dexrazoxane has been associated with risk of secondary malignancies and concerns of poor efficacy (13, 14). Even though dexrazoxane has been proven to be effective at decreasing AIC in clinical studies, its cardioprotective activity is not complete. A systematic review and meta-analysis reported that “dexrazoxane reduced the risk of clinical heart failure (Risk ratio (RR): 0.19; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.40; P < 0.001) and cardiac events (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.49; P < 0.001) irrespective of previous exposure to anthracyclines” (15, p. 68). Hence the identification of more effective and specific cardioprotectants is highly desirable. The use of an encapsulated formulation of anthracyclines, in particular liposomal doxorubicin, is another method to decrease drug toxicity. Doxorubicin nanoformulations have decreased toxicity in comparison to the free drug (16). However, the number of clinical studies is small, and data on long-term follow-up are lacking. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin (II) receptor blockers, or beta-blockers is a method implemented for patients who develop AIC to prevent severe contractile dysfunction and improve cardiac function (17). However, the use of neurohormone-blocking drugs as prophylactic therapy for AIC is still controversial as the magnitude of cardiac improvement in general is small (<5%) and does not clearly improve clinical outcomes (reviewed in 18, 19). Further research is needed to strengthen recommendations for AIC treatment and to investigate new means of cardioprotection as well as to identify strategies for early detection and prevention of AIC.

3. CONTRIBUTION OF ASSOCIATION STUDIES TO THE DISCOVERY OF GENETIC VARIANTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIC

Identification of genetic variants and genes associated with AIC risk has clinical potential as a diagnostic tool and for the development of personalized therapies. To date, seven genome-wide association studies (GWASs) (2026) and 21 candidate gene association studies (2733) have identified more than 250 variants associated with variable risk of AIC. Many of these variants are also associated with increased risk for cardiomyopathies (e.g., variants in MYH7, TTN, and TNNT2) (3335), showing that individuals predisposed to myocardial dysfunction are also at increased risk for AIC (33). Fifty-five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with significant statistical association with AIC (p < 0.05) fall within genes expressed in human cardiomyocytes (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1), suggesting a potential direct role of variability in those genes in AIC-cardiomyocyte biology. With the exception of SNPs in ROBO2 and POLRMT that have been identified recently (25, 26), most of these genomic loci associated with AIC have been thoroughly reviewed (32).

Table 1.

Genes with SNPs significantly associated with AIC and expressed in human cardiomyocytes

Gene Protein encoded Functional classification
ABCB4 ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 4 Anthracycline efflux
ABCC1 ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1 Anthracycline efflux
ABCC10 ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 10 Anthracycline efflux
ABCC2 ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 2 Anthracycline efflux
ABCC5 ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 5 Anthracycline efflux
ABCC9 ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9 Anthracycline efflux
ATP2B1 Plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 1 Ca+2 handling and contractility
CAT Catalase ROS handling
CBR3 Carbonyl reductase 3 ROS handling, Ca+2 handling
CELF4 CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 Ca+2 handling and contractility
COL1A2 Collagen type I alpha 2 chain Contractile function
CYBA Cytochrome b-245 alpha chain ROS generation
CYP2J2 Cytochrome P450 2J2 Contractile function
ERCC2 TFIIH core complex helicase subunit DNA damage
GPX3 Glutathione peroxidase 3 ROS handling
GSTP1 Glutathione S-transferase pi 1 ROS handling
HAS3 Hyaluronan synthase 3 ROS handling
HFE Homeostatic iron regulator Iron uptake
HNMT Histamine N-methyltransferase Ca+2 handling and contractility
MLH1 MutL homolog 1 DNA damage
MYH7 Myosin heavy chain 7 Ca+2 handling and contractility
NOS3 Nitric oxide synthase 3 ROS generation
NR3C1* Glucocorticoid receptor binding site Ca+2 handling and contractility
PLCE1 Phospholipase C epsilon 1 ROS handling
POLRMT* DNA-directed RNA polymerase, mitochondrial DNA binding
POR Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase ROS generation
PRDM2 PR domain zinc finger protein 2 DNA damage
RAC2 Rac family small GTPase 2 ROS generation
RARG Retinoic acid receptor gamma DNA damage
RIN3 Ras and Rab interactor 3 Contractile function
ROBO2 Roundabout guidance receptor 2 Contractile function
SLC22A17 Solute carrier family 22 member 17 Anthracycline uptake
SLC28A1 Solute carrier family 28 member 1 Anthracycline uptake
SLC28A3 Solute carrier family 28 member 3 Anthracycline uptake
SP4 Transcription factor Sp4 ROS generation
SPG7 Paraplegin ROS generation
WDR4 WD repeat-containing protein 4, Wuho DNA damage
XDH Xanthine dehydrogenase ROS generation
ZNF521 Zinc finger protein 521 Contractile function

Abbreviations: AIC, anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Despite that the number of GWASs is growing, and many genetic variants associated with AIC risk have been identified (reviewed by 32, 36), only a few of those variants have been replicated in a fully independent cohort (37, 38). Some of the factors that contribute to the nonconcordance in variants discovered include discrepancies in study design, definition of primary end points and methods for their quantification, SNP selection approaches, limited cohort size, and cohort heterogeneity. These factors, combined with a lack of functional validation for most of the variants, hamper their implementation as biomarkers for the prediction of AIC risk in clinical practice.

4. POLYGENIC RISK SCORE FOR AIC RISK PREDICTION

Identification of genetic variants associated with AIC offers an opportunity to develop improved risk prediction models. Compared to models that only include clinical factors, incorporation of genetic risk factors can improve prediction power for the detection of AIC risk (39). Individually, genetic variants identified by association studies contribute a small proportion to AIC risk. However, the combined effect of multiple risk-increasing alleles can substantially contribute to the prediction of AIC. In this regard, AIC risk can be evaluated in the form of a polygenic risk score (PRS), a single value estimate constructed as a weighted sum of the number of risk-increasing alleles carried by an individual. Studies in long-term survivors of childhood cancer have shown the utility of PRSs to predict health outcomes (40). Nevertheless, research evaluating PRSs to predict AIC risk remains limited (41).

AIC-PRSs may be calculated based on genetic variants associated with heart failure and/or AIC or on gene-environment interactions (e.g., gene-anthracycline dose). While multiple AIC-associated genetic variants have been identified to date, only a few have been successfully replicated in independent cohorts and validated in appropriate models, limiting their application for PRS development. Future studies increasing the sample size of well-phenotyped populations of all ancestries are needed to identify and validate variants robustly associated with AIC, allowing for a more accurate calculation of PRSs potentially applicable to patients of all races and ethnicities. Development of PRSs for AIC-related outcomes in the general population (e.g., cardiomyopathy, heart failure, echocardiography parameters) may also contribute to the prediction of AIC. Thus, considering multiple PRSs would be important to improve the AIC prediction.

Using PRSs to assess the risk of AIC will inform primary intervention strategies at the time of cancer treatment, including anthracycline dose reduction and/or the use of alternative treatments (e.g., cardioprotectants). AIC-PRSs will also facilitate risk stratification after completion of anticancer therapy by identifying high-risk survivors most likely to benefit from intensive preventative measures.

5. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF GENES ASSOCIATED WITH AIC

In this review we focus on genes directly impacting cardiomyocytes’ function and response to AIC. The genes with variants associated with AIC and expressed in human cardiomyocytes can be categorized into five major groups based on their potential cardiotoxic or cardioprotectant mechanistic implication in AIC (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). Even though many of these mechanisms are interrelated, the goal of this categorization is to further facilitate their functional validation. Of note, AIC-associated genes not expressed in cardiomyocytes could be relevant in other cell types (e.g., fibroblasts, immune cells, endothelial cells) and potentially play relevant roles in AIC.

The implications of an AIC gene for hiPSC-CMs can be confirmed by generating target-based CRISPR/Cas9 knockouts followed by quantification of in vitro response to anthracycline (42). This approach can be implemented as the first step to confirm whether alteration in gene candidate expression impacts the response to anthracycline in this cell type (Figure 1a). Once the implication in anthracycline response has been confirmed, the next step would consist of the validation of the role of gene variants in AIC (Figure 1b). Alternative models that are useful for the validation of the role of a gene and/or variants in AIC include animal models, nonhuman cell lines (e.g., murine cardiomyoblasts), human tumor-derived cell lines, and hiPSC-derived noncardiac cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

hiPSC-CMs for gene functional validation and as a screening platform for the discovery of novel AIC biomarkers and cardioprotectants. (a) The functional implication of gene candidates identified in association studies can be validated by combining genetic editing of hiPSCs and a set of assays for in vitro quantification of cardiomyocytes’ response to anthracyclines. (b) Patient-specific hiPSC-CMs from patients with AIC or no AIC can be used as a platform for gene association and eQTL studies for the identification of functional gene candidates and screening of cardioprotectants. hiPSC-CMs can be stratified based on relevant genotypes and genetically engineered to validate the function of genetic variants in AIC. Abbreviations: AIC, anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity; eQTL, expression quantitative trait locus; GWAS, genome-wide association study; hiPSC-CM, human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocyte; KO, knockout; NO AIC, cells from patients without AIC; ROS, reactive oxygen species. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.com.

5.1. Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Handling

Oxidative stress caused by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species is one of the central mechanisms associated with anthracyclines’ cardiotoxicity (43). Intracellularly, anthracyclines are reduced by several oxidoreductases and undergo redox cycling, generating ROS. Accumulation of ROS levels in excess of what the antioxidant system can handle initiates oxidative stress, resulting in cardiomyocyte damage and cardiotoxicity (44, 45).

Many of the genes associated with AIC encode enzymes with defensive mechanisms to protect the cells from ROS (Table 1). Catalase (CAT) converts toxic hydrogen peroxide into water and hydrogen, and glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) is a hydrogen peroxide–detoxifying enzyme. Increased expression of CAT and GPX3 is associated with decreased cardiotoxicity to doxorubicin in mice (4648) and doxorubicin-induced ROS detoxification in cardiac rat fibroblasts (47, 48). The glutathione S-transferase pi 1 (GSTP1) inactivates anthracycline metabolites by catalyzing their conjugation to glutathione, protecting cells from ROS induction (49). Similarly, carbonyl reductases (CBR1 and CBR3) inactivate substrates that induce ROS cellular damage (50, 51).

Other proteins with potential protective roles in the context of oxidative stress are paraplegin, phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCε), and hyaluronan synthase 3. Paraplegin (SPG7) is a mitochondrial metalloprotease that degrades oxidation-damaged proteins and regulates the synthesis of respiratory chain subunits, thus regulating mitochondrial ROS (5254). PLCε (PLCE1) is a phospholipase that protects cardiac tissue and hiPSC-CMs from oxidative stress and mitochondria-mediated cell death (55, 56). HAS3 encodes a glycosyltransferase that is essential for hyaluronan synthesis, which is a major constituent of the extracellular matrix involved in cardiac development and regeneration. Hyaluronan protects rat cardiomyocytes from ROS-induced ischemia-reperfusion (57).

RAC2, CYBA, NOS3, POR, XDH, and SP4 are among the genes associated with ROS generation. RAC2 encodes a small GTPase that regulates the enzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 3-phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, and CYBA encodes a subunit of NADPH oxidases (54). NADPH oxidase is one of the main enzymes that produce ROS in the cardiovascular system and has an established role in AIC (58). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase 3 is a flavoprotein encoded by NOS3 that reduces doxorubicin and synthesizes ROS in the presence of oxygen. NOS3 overexpression correlates with increased AIC and elevated cardiac ROS in mice exposed to doxorubicin (59). POR encodes a flavoprotein that can reduce anthracyclines to semiquinone radical forms, generating free radicals that contribute to cellular damage (60). XDH encodes xanthine dehydrogenase, a key enzyme for the purine degradation that generates ROS. Xanthine dehydrogenase can be reversibly converted to xanthine oxidase (XO). Cardiac XO activity is increased in doxorubicin-treated mice, impacting hydrogen peroxide production and the upregulation of apoptotic and ferroptotic pathways (61). The protein encoded by SP4 is a transcription factor that can bind to the GC promoter region of a variety of genes. Alteration of cardiac SP4 expression is linked to increased levels of mitochondrial-derived ROS (62).

5.2. Iron Uptake

Anthracyclines have a high affinity for iron and can alter its intracellular metabolism through interactions with iron regulatory proteins. Interactions of anthracycline alcohol metabolites lead to the stabilization of transferrin transcripts, the inhibition of iron-sequestering protein expression, and an increase in free iron levels, which lead to ROS generation (63). Anthracyclines can also form complexes with iron, contributing to increased levels of ROS (64).

The AIC-associated gene HFE encodes the homeostatic iron regulator protein that impacts iron absorption by regulating the interaction of the transferrin receptor with transferrin. Hemochromatosis, a disease of iron overload in heart and other tissues, is caused by the presence of multiple polymorphisms in HFE (65). The resulting HFE deficiency increases susceptibility to cardiotoxicity in mice treated with doxorubicin (66).

5.3. DNA Binding and Damage

Anthracyclines bind DNA and topoisomerase II and form a ternary complex that triggers cell death. In cancer cells, the binding of anthracyclines to DNA topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) is one of the major mechanisms of anthracycline anticancer effects. TOP2A is not expressed in cardiomyocytes, but anthracyclines can also bind to TOP2B, which is expressed in cardiomyocytes, causing both double-stranded break–induced apoptosis and transcriptional modulation of the mitochondrial and nuclear genome that result in cardiomyocyte death and AIC.

RARG, PRM2, MLH1, WDR4, and ERCC2 are among the AIC-associated genes with roles in DNA damage response. Retinoic acid receptor gamma (RARG) downregulates the expression of TOP2B and its binding to DNA, which leads to DNA double-strand break–induced apoptosis and activation of the cardioprotective extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in cardiomyocytes exposed to doxorubicin (20). PRMD2 encodes an S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent histone methyltransferase and zinc finger transcription factor that is involved in DNA double-strand break and repair of oxidative stress. PRM2 regulates the expression of heme-oxygenase-1, which repairs doxorubicin-induced DNA double-strand breaks, impacting cardiomyocyte apoptosis (67, 68). MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) is part of a group of highly conserved proteins that repair mismatches and mispairs generated during DNA synthesis. Loss of MLH1 is associated with resistance to anthracyclines (69). Deletion of Wuho (WDR4) is linked to DNA damage by a mechanism that could involve the activation of the ATM-Chk2-p53 pathway that results in cell apoptosis (70). ERCC2 encodes for the helicase subunit of the general transcription and DNA repair factor IIH (TFIIH) core complex, which is involved in the repair of damaged DNA. TFIIH core complex helicase subunit deficiency is associated with increased levels of mitochondrial ROS and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions, and variants in this gene lead to increased AIC risk and lower response to chemotherapy (71).

The mitochondrial RNA polymerase (POLRMT) is involved in the transcription of mtDNA and synthesizes the RNA primers required for mtDNA replication (72). A relatively recent GWAS identified that rs62134260, located in an intergenic region 4 kb upstream of POLRMT, is linked to AIC in breast cancer patients (26). This region shows potential binding sites for key transcription factors (homeobox protein PKNOX1, pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta), and the variant is correlated with decreased POLRMT expression in heart. Given that mitochondrial dysregulation is one of the mechanisms leading to cardiotoxicity, variants impacting the expression of POLRMT could impact AIC risk (26), although this has not been demonstrated in human cardiomyocytes yet.

5.4. Anthracycline’s Uptake and Efflux

Anthracyclines can be transported inside cells by passive membrane diffusion, and their level of lipophilicity is correlated with AIC in rat cardiomyoblasts (73). Carrier-mediated anthracycline uptake is also involved in the influx of these drugs into cardiomyocytes. Members of the solute carrier (SLC) family of transporters (encoded by SLC genes) mediate the influx of ions (Na+, Ca2+, Fe2+) and other small molecules into the cells. SLC transporters can also mediate the uptake of anthracyclines into human cardiomyocytes. Variants that decrease the expression of SLC28A3 and the SLC inhibitor drug desipramine decrease doxorubicin uptake and protect against AIC (74).

Conversely, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (encoded by ABC genes) are involved in the efflux of molecules across intra- and extracellular membranes, including chemotherapy agents, resulting in decreased intracellular drug levels (75). Variants in ABC transporters are associated with increased intracellular doxorubicin concentration and AIC (76).

5.5. Calcium Handling and Contractile Function

Calcium (Ca2+) signaling is highly regulated in cardiomyocytes, and alteration of Ca2+ homeostasis by anthracyclines is associated with contractile dysfunction and AIC. Anthracyclines can induce cardiotoxicity by altering different Ca2+-related pathways, including dysregulation of the activity of Ca2+ regulatory proteins, generation of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and alteration of mitochondrial Ca2+ flux, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction (reviewed in 77).

Several of the genes with variants significantly associated with AIC have roles in cardiomyocytes’ calcium handling and contractile function (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). ATP2B1 encodes a Ca2+ transporter that plays a critical role in intracellular calcium homeostasis. ATP2B1’s dose-dependent expression is associated with daunorubicin cytotoxicity in hiPSC-CMs (56). CELF4 encodes a splicing factor that mediates alternative splicing of TNNT2, resulting in the expression of troponin T2 isoforms that have differential Ca2+ sensitivity and contractility profiles (78, 79). Expression of fetal splicing variants of TNNT2 alters the beating frequency of hiPSC-CMs exposed to doxorubicin (80). MYH7 encodes the sarcomeric protein myosin heavy chain-β that is essential for muscle contraction. Variants in MYH7 are associated with decreased contractility and lower maximal force-generating capacity in cardiomyocytes (81). Titin, encoded by TTN, is another sarcomeric protein with variants associated with increased risk of AIC in cancer survivors (33, 82). Titin plays a critical role in heart contractility, and truncation variants in this gene are associated with dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (83).

CBRs catalyze the reduction of anthracyclines to alcohol metabolites. Accumulation of these anthracycline-alcohol metabolites affects the Ca2+ loading of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and myocardial energy metabolism, impairing cardiomyocytes’ contractile function (84). The role of histamine N-methyltransferase (encoded by HNMT ) in the heart is not clear, but antihistamines with Ca2+ influx blocker properties are associated with decreased doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in vivo (85).

Other genes that impact contractile function in a noncalcium-dependent manner are CYP2J2 and RIN3. CYP2J2 encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that converts arachidonic acid (AA) into epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), which have cardioprotective roles and prevent arrhythmia. CYP2J2 knockout results in AA accumulation, inhibition of potassium currents, and prolongation of the QT interval (86), while overexpression of CYP2J2 or administration of EETs is associated with a reduction of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (87). RIN3 encodes a Ras effector protein that interacts with and regulates RAB5A, which facilitates membrane trafficking of the voltage-gated potassium channel KCNQ1 (88, 89) that is required for the repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential.

ROBO2 and COL1A2 encode proteins that are linked to cardiac fibrosis. Robo2 is a member of the transmembrane Robo receptors that bind to Slit glycoproteins and activate the Slit/Robo pathway. Interaction of Robo receptors with the transforming growth factor β1/suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic (TGFβ1/Smad) pathway induces collagen production, heart dilatation, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (90). One of the most recent GWASs identified a SNP (rs17736312), located in the intronic region of ROBO2, associated with an increased risk of AIC in children (25). However, the role of ROBO2 in AIC has not been directly demonstrated in human cardiomyocytes and/or cardiac fibroblasts. Anthracyclines can upregulate genes implicated in collagen production and disposition, including COL1A2, resulting in impaired cardiac function and myocardial fibrosis (91).

The role of the transcription factor zinc finger protein 521 (ZNF521) in the heart and in the context of AIC is not clear. A potential mechanism involves inhibition of early B-cell factor transcription factor 1 (EBF1), which regulates the ventricular conduction system in the heart (92).

6. PATIENT-SPECIFIC hiPSC-CMs: A PLATFORM FOR FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION OF GENETIC VARIANTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF CARDIOPROTECTANTS

Association studies mostly utilize blood samples to correlate patient genetic information with clinical outcomes. This approach is relatively simple in terms of patient-specific cell acquisition and has advanced our knowledge about the genetic basis of AIC. However, the connection between these data and cardiotoxic response is limited to statistical correlations. For a successful implementation of genetic variants as clinical biomarkers, the mechanisms related to their role in AIC should be confirmed using model systems and show rescue phenotypes for the altered cardiotoxic effect.

Given the difficulty in isolating human cardiomyocytes and their nonproliferative nature, hiPSC-CMs are currently one of the best available in vitro correlates of the human heart. hiPSC-CMs have the same genetic background as donors and represent a novel technology for modeling cardiovascular diseases. hiPSC-CMs from cancer patients who have developed AIC recapitulate that increased risk in vitro when exposed to doxorubicin, with decreased cell viability; altered contraction, sarcomeric structure, and calcium handling; and increased ROS production, compared to lines from patients who did not experience AIC (42, 93, 94). hiPSC-CMs exposed to doxorubicin also show dose-dependent changes in metabolism and cell membrane permeability (95). hiPSC-CMs can resemble the phenotype of adult heart cells in diverse aspects (96), making them a unique and powerful model to study differential responses to anthracycline.

6.1. Functional Validation of AIC-Associated Gene Variants

hiPSC-CMs have recently been used as a platform to identify causal genetic variants of AIC. This is a relatively novel approach that allows the discrimination of genes and variants with high potentiality to predict clinical AIC risk.

Surprisingly, only a few genetic variants have been experimentally demonstrated to have a direct role in AIC to date. This can explain the difficulty in translating genetic variants identified in association studies for use as clinical biomarkers. The SNPs with a demonstrated causative role in AIC include coding risk variant rs2229774 in RARG (42, 97), cardioprotective synonymous variant rs11140490 in SLC28A3 (linked to the GWAS-identified variant rs7853758) (74), and noncoding GWAS risk variant rs28714259 in the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding site (98). In addition, the implication of the SLC transporters SLC22A4 and SLC22A17 in AIC has also been confirmed in hiPSC-CMs. Their role on AIC was confirmed by a strategy that implicates the introduction of the risk allele into control patient hiPSC lines with the reference genotype. Fine mapping of the SLC28A3 locus revealed that the coinherited SNP rs11140490 is the causal cardioprotective variant rather than the GWAS-identified rs7853758, demonstrating the importance of association study–discovered variant validation.

These studies confirmed the implication of RARG and SLC transporters in AIC by generating isogenic hiPSC lines overexpressing and/or knocking out RARG and SLC transporters followed by in vitro phenotypic characterization assays. Decreased expression of RARG, which downregulates TOP2B binding to DNA and DNA double-strand break–induced apoptosis, resulted in increased AIC. Conversely, knockout of the uptake SLC transporters decreased intracellular doxorubicin levels and protected cells from cardiotoxicity. These studies demonstrated that validation of the functional role of a gene in AIC is also a powerful tool to identify druggable targets for the discovery of cardioprotectant drugs. Magdy et al. (42) identified a RARG receptor agonist (CD1530) that reduces murine AIC by approximately 50%. In line with this finding, Hasbullah et al. (99) identified that the RAR agonist all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) decreases doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in vivo. Drug library screening of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs in hiPSC-CMs identified an SLC competitive inhibitor (desipramine) with cardioprotectant activity (74).

Wu et al. (98) identified that the SNP rs28714259 risk allele locates in a GR binding site and disrupts GR binding, decreasing protective signaling, cell survival, and contractility of hiPSC-CMs pretreated with dexamethasone after doxorubicin treatment. Dexamethasone-doxorubicin combination induced cardiac hypertrophy-like signaling, a response that was attenuated by the risk allele, supporting a cardioprotective effect of dexamethasone in AIC (100).

These studies indicate that both the mechanisms underlying the effect of coding and noncoding variants and the identification of cardioprotectants targeting genes with roles in AIC can be confirmed with the hiPSC-CM platform. This model holds great power for the identification of functional variants and provides human-tested data for clinical trials (Figure 1).

6.2. Strategies for the Identification of Novel Functional Targets

While association studies are helpful to identify potential loci influencing cardiotoxic risk, they do not interrogate the molecular basis of AIC. One technique commonly implemented to establish the functional impact of these genetic variants is the analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). eQTLs mapping allows us to identify the impact on gene expression of coding and noncoding genetic variants that are likely to be involved in gene regulation. eQTL analyses are conventionally performed in blood samples to correlate gene variant information to AIC outcomes in patients. As gene expression and regulation signatures are cell type specific, public databases are powerful tools to integrate human heart gene expression data and correlate it to genetic variants (80). However, this approach does not directly determine how genetic traits impact differential anthracycline response.

The hiPSC-CM platform does offer a model to identify molecular pathways showing differential expression when exposed to anthracyclines that can be correlated with clinical outcomes. For example, Knowles et al. (101) performed an analysis of differential gene expression after exposure to doxorubicin (24 h, concentration ranging between 0.6 and 5 μM) and identified 447 eQTLs impacting gene expression and 42 eQTLs impacting alternative splicing in a set of hiPSC-CMs from 45 healthy related individuals. Even though these donors had not been treated for cancer or developed cardiotoxicity, Knowles et al. found excellent concordance between differential expression after doxorubicin exposure and RNA expression data from hiPSC-CMs from cancer patients treated with doxorubicin, analyzed in a previous study (102). Burridge et al. (102) performed differential gene expression analysis after doxorubicin treatment and identified increased expression of programmed cell death, p53 downstream pathway genes, and transcription factors and downregulation of genes involved in muscle contraction, cholesterol biosynthesis, and anatomical structure in hiPSC-CMs from patients who developed AIC versus those that did not. In these patient-specific hiPSC-CMs, RELA, NFKB1, RARA, and STAT were the most significant differentially regulated genes that were previously reported to be implicated in doxorubicin-induced toxicity, demonstrating the potential of this platform to identify targets with roles in AIC.

Since current approaches for AIC risk biomarker discovery mostly use blood samples and this strategy has not resulted in FDA-approved markers or implementation in clinical practice, future combination of larger cohorts of patient-specific hiPSC-CMs and functional genomic studies could better guide the identification of relevant gene variants (Figure 1b). Patient-specific hiPSC-CMs can be implemented as a screening platform not only for the discovery of functional variants but also to identify novel druggable pathways and additional mechanisms that could contribute to AIC risk such as, for example, epigenetics (103, 104).

7. TOWARD THE IMPLEMENTATION OF hiPSC-CM-BASED MODELS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY

Development and discovery of novel cardioprotectant drugs require understanding the mechanisms causing AIC for target identification, followed by drug testing in suitable models and clinical trials. Advances in the field of pharmacogenetics have facilitated the identification of genetic variants impacting AIC risk, and hiPSC-CMs have helped to explain molecular and cellular phenotypes observed in patients who develop cardiotoxicity. However, future progress in the identification of effective cardioprotectants in this field is conditioned by the limitations that are inherent to the models used for drug development. At the cardiomyocyte level, there is a great need to replace current models that rely on animal- or tumor-derived cell lines (105). While the use of rat cardiomyocytes has advanced the understanding of AIC, these cells differ from human cardiomyocytes in many ways, including sarcomeric structure, beat rate, electrical properties, ion channel functions, and action potential duration, making it difficult to extrapolate data to humans.

Many drug discovery programs have failed because targets validated in animal models are unreliable and nonpredictive in humans (106). In addition to this factor, laboratory animal studies are costly, labor intensive, and considered unethical. With the recent approval of the FDA Modernization Act 2.0, applicants seeking new drug market approval have the chance to opt for the use of cutting-edge alternative methods rather than animal testing to establish drug safety and effectiveness. Incorporation of preclinical platforms such as hiPSC-CM-based models will reduce production costs by refining the use of laboratory animals and identifying cardioprotectant drugs that are more relevant to humans (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Advantages of the incorporation of hiPSC-CMs into the cardioprotectant drug discovery pipeline. Traditional models use rat CMs or human cancer cell lines for drug discovery followed by preclinical testing in animals. Incorporation of hiPSC-CMs into the drug discovery phase allows for the identification of targets and drug candidates more relevant to human AIC. Variability in the interindividual response to drug candidates can be evaluated earlier in the preclinical testing phase using specific cohorts of hiPSC-CMs. Clinical trials in a dish using hiPSC-CMs facilitate subsequent patient stratification in clinical trials and faster identification of effective and personalized cardioprotectant drugs. Abbreviations: AIC, anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity; CM, cardiomyocyte; hiPSC-CM, human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocyte. Figure adapted from The Drug Discovery Process by BioRender.com, retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates.

Interindividual variability in drug response is a factor frequently not considered in the early stages of drug discovery, reducing the success of clinical trials. In this regard, the incorporation of patient-specific hiPSC-CMs into the drug discovery pipeline would provide a platform to identify personalized therapeutic targets and reliably stratify patients (Figure 2). Given this, hiPSC-CMs hold exciting potential as an essential platform for the development of the next generation of cardioprotectants to defeat AIC.

7.1. The Potential of hiPSC-CMs as a High-Throughput Platform for Cardioprotectant Drug Discovery

In vitro functional phenotyping in high-throughput screening (HTS) format is an invaluable technique for the identification of molecular targets involved in AIC and for the discovery of cardioprotective therapeutic agents. Production of high-quantity and high-quality cells is the first step for using hiPSC-CMs as an HTS platform. Protocols for generating cardiomyocytes in a reproducible and cost-effective manner have significantly improved during the last several years (reviewed in 107). Regarding large-scale cardiomyocyte production, initial hiPSC expansion and differentiation and selection of hiPSC-CMs can currently be integrated into one process in one bioreactor to obtain a high density of functional cardiomyocytes (1.9 × 109 cells) with greater than 95% TNNT2 (108). Similarly, other protocols that use parallel differentiations can produce 2.4 × 108 hiPSC-CMs from four bioreactors (150 mL) in 22 days (109).

hiPSC-CMs can be plated in 384-well plates (~2–4 ×104 cells per well) and easily assayed for phenotypic response to anthracyclines using fluorescence- and luminescence-based plate reader assays and high content imaging to assess cell viability, ROS, apoptosis, DNA damage, calcium handling, and sarcomeric alignment, among others (Figure 1). Since the molecular mechanisms by which anthracyclines induce cardiotoxicity ultimately lead to cardiomyocyte apoptosis, hiPSC-CM survival after anthracycline exposure remains the main indicator for in vitro AIC. Based on breast cancer patients who commonly receive 80 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (cumulative dose of 240 mg/m2), resulting in a Cmax of 6.9 μM, we have shown that 0.1–10 μM at time points of 24–72 h is a doxorubicin physiological dose, similar to prior experiments performed by other authors in rat cardiomyocytes (110). Our team has optimized the fluorescence- and luminescence-based phenotype assays mentioned above in high-throughput format and demonstrated its usefulness in quantifying patient-specific responses to doxorubicin in vitro and in identifying novel molecular targets and cardioprotective therapies (42, 102). hiPSC-CMs are also suitable for a variety of flow cytometry–based assays, for example, quantification of intracellular levels of anthracycline (autofluorescence) and detection of membrane proteins using specific antibodies. Regarding the characterization of electrophysiological parameters in hiPSC-CMs, although patch clamp is the gold standard technique to investigate proarrhythmic effects of drugs, its implementation in drug discovery is limited due to its low throughput. Alternatively, high-throughput measurement of cardiomyocytes’ extracellular field potentials, action potentials, and intracellular-like signals is possible with the multiwell microelectrode array technology, including high-density microelectrode arrays (111, 112).

Even though hiPSC-CMs are evolving to be incorporated into preclinical drug discovery, this model still has some limitations. Differentiated hiPSC-CMs typically do not demonstrate all of the facets of adult cardiomyocytes. Thus, further maturation of hiPSC-CMs is desired, with the hypothesis that this may result in these cells more accurately recapitulating the in vitro drug responses seen in patients. Recently, various strategies have been developed to promote hiPSC-CM maturation, including coculture with fibroblasts and/or endothelial cells, use of alternative matrices and substrates with micropatterns, culture with the addition of hormones (triiodothyronine and glucocorticoids), and supplementation of fatty acids (reviewed in 107). These maturation strategies allow the generation of hiPSC-CMs that further resemble adult cardiomyocytes in cell structure and sarcomeric organization, Ca2+ handling, electrophysiological properties, contractility, and transcription profiles. Future studies using hiPSC-CMs are also expected to increasingly incorporate advanced models such as 3D cardiac tissues. These models incorporate extracellular matrix components and additional heart cell types such as endothelial cells and fibroblasts, more accurately reflecting the functional maturation and physiological environment of the human heart.

The incorporation of hiPSC-CMs into drug discovery programs will contribute to the identification of more reliable, patient-specific, and effective cardioprotectants (Figure 2). Major advantages of the hiPSC-CM HTS model include its potential to be used both for target identification and compound screening in the drug discovery phase and for drug evaluation and toxicity assessment at the preclinical stage of the drug development pipeline.

7.2. hiPSC-CMs for In Vitro Clinical Trials

One of the most notable advantages of hiPSCs is that they represent individual donors’ genetics, which facilitates screening for drug safety and toxicity at the population level in vitro. The ability of hiPSC-CMs to recapitulate patient-specific genetic, physiologic, and pharmacological responses, including differential responses to doxorubicin even at the SNP level (42, 94, 102), confers this model with great potential as a platform for target identification and systematic drug testing in cells from defined cohorts of donors. This means that the hiPSC-CM donor cohort can be designed following the same principles of a clinical trial to predict the effectiveness of a cardioprotectant candidate in a population. Regarding the sample size needed to allow discrimination of drug effects, it is estimated that a minimum sample size of 22 hiPSC-CM lines has a 90% probability of predicting events that occur in 10% of the population, approximately the same size as an average Phase I clinical trial (113). Additionally, hiPSC-CMs can be stratified into clinically meaningful subgroups (e.g., patients with specific genetic variants, pediatric patients, male versus female, race) to distinguish between patients who may or may not respond to drug candidates (Figure 2). Moreover, the establishment of biobanks can provide unlimited access to standardized hiPSC-CMs from specific cohorts for systematic drug testing and correlation with clinical observations. Currently, there are 10 major hiPSC banks worldwide, and most of those institutes (90%) are government-funded nonprofit organizations. These institutions offer hiPSC generation, characterization, and banking, and provide access to disease cell lines for both academic and industry research (114). Certainly, the creation of an hiPSC/hiPSC-CM biobank from patients treated with anthracyclines would be an invaluable tool for the systematic understanding of interindividual response to anthracyclines in vitro and correlation with clinical testing data, advancing AIC biomarker discovery and cardioprotectant development.

Considering that cardiovascular toxicity represents the most frequent adverse drug reaction resulting in drug withdrawal, this approach (also known as clinical trials in a dish) has potential applications not only for the identification of novel and more specific cardioprotectants but also for safety screening of multiple types of drugs (115). hiPSC-CMs have been shown to be useful for assessing cardiotoxic effects of FDA-approved and marketed drugs, including doxorubicin, proving the high sensitivity and specificity of this model (94, 116).

8. THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL

Patient-specific hiPSC-CM models are a powerful tool for the validation of the functional role of genetic variants. The causality of RARG and SLC28A3 SNPs in AIC has been successfully validated using this technology, suggesting that these variants should be screened in clinical trials in cancer patients treated with doxorubicin. Future functional validation of remaining AIC-associated variants will allow the identification of variants relevant for clinical testing and accelerate the inclusion of approved AIC biomarkers in clinical practice. Combined AIC biomarker screening and application of polygenic risk prediction models will enable the early identification of patients at high AIC risk for the prevention of cardiotoxicity.

We anticipate that functional gene validation in hiPSC-CMs along with the implementation of patient-specific cardiomyocytes as a screening platform will identify novel druggable targets that are more relevant to AIC than those produced by traditional association studies. Integrating hiPSC-CMs and in vitro AIC data (trials in a dish) into the existing models for drug discovery will help develop the next generation of highly effective and personalized cardioprotectants.

Supplementary Material

Supp Table 1

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review.

LITERATURE CITED

  • 1.Venkatesh P, Kasi A. 2022. Anthracyclines. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, Mulrooney DA, Chemaitilly W, et al. 2013. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA 309:2371–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Dalen EC, Raphaël MF, Caron HN, Kremer LCM. 2014. Treatment including anthracyclines versus treatment not including anthracyclines for childhood cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9:CD006647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cardinale D, Colombo A, Bacchiani G, Tedeschi I, Meroni CA, et al. 2015. Early detection of anthracycline cardiotoxicity and improvement with heart failure therapy. Circulation 131:1981–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lipshultz SE, Colan SD, Gelber RD, Perez-Atayde AR, Sallan SE, Sanders SP. 1991. Late cardiac effects of doxorubicin therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. N. Engl. J. Med. 324:808–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lipshultz SE, Cochran TR, Franco VI, Miller TL. 2013. Treatment-related cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10:697–710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mulrooney DA, Yeazel MW, Kawashima T, Mertens AC, Mitby P, et al. 2009. Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. BMJ 339:b4606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van der Pal HJ, van Dalen EC, van Delden E, van Dijk IW, Kok WE, et al. 2012. High risk of symptomatic cardiac events in childhood cancer survivors. J. Clin. Oncol. 30:1429–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Armenian S, Bhatia S. 2018. Predicting and preventing anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 38:3–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang VY, Wang JJ. 2018. Pharmacogenetics of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 20:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hasinoff BB, Herman EH. 2007. Dexrazoxane: how it works in cardiac and tumor cells. Is it a prodrug or is it a drug? Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 7:140–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu V 2015. Dexrazoxane: a cardioprotectant for pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 32:178–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tebbi CK, London WB, Friedman D, Villaluna D, De Alarcon PA, et al. 2007. Dexrazoxane-associated risk for acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome and other secondary malignancies in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 25:493–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krischer JP, Epstein S, Cuthbertson DD, Goorin AM, Epstein ML, Lipshultz SE. 1997. Clinical cardiotoxicity following anthracycline treatment for childhood cancer: the Pediatric Oncology Group experience. J. Clin. Oncol. 15:1544–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macedo AVS, Hajjar LA, Lyon AR, Nascimento BR, Putzu A, et al. 2019. Efficacy of dexrazoxane in preventing anthracycline cardiotoxicity in breast cancer. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. CardioOncol. 1:68–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.D’Angelo NA, Noronha MA, Câmara MCC, Kurnik IS, Feng C, et al. 2022. Doxorubicin nanoformulations on therapy against cancer: an overview from the last 10 years. Biomater. Adv. 133:112623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, et al. 2022. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 145:e895–1032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma Y, Bai F, Qin F, Li J, Liu N, et al. 2019. Beta-blockers for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 20:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He D, Hu J, Li Y, Zeng X. 2022. Preventive use of beta-blockers for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a network meta-analysis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9:968534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aminkeng F, Bhavsar AP, Visscher H, Rassekh SR, Li Y, et al. 2015. A coding variant in RARG confers susceptibility to anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer. Nat. Genet. 47:1079–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schneider BP, Shen F, Gardner L, Radovich M, Li L, et al. 2017. Genome-wide association study for anthracycline-induced congestive heart failure. Clin. Cancer Res. 23:43–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wells QS, Veatch OJ, Fessel JP, Joon AY, Levinson RT, et al. 2017. Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of left ventricular function after anthracycline exposure in adults. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 27:247–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Sun CL, Quinones-Lombrana A, Singh P, Landier W, et al. 2016. CELF4 variant and anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy: a Children’s Oncology Group genome-wide association study. J. Clin. Oncol. 34:863–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park B, Sim SH, Lee KS, Kim HJ, Park IH. 2020. Genome-wide association study of genetic variants related to anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in early breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 111:2579–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X, Singh P, Zhou L, Sharafeldin N, Landier W, et al. 2023. Genome-wide association study identifies ROBO2 as a novel susceptibility gene for anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy in childhood cancer survivors. J. Clin. Oncol. 41:1758–69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Velasco-Ruiz A, Nunez-Torres R, Pita G, Wildiers H, Lambrechts D, et al. 2021. POLRMT as a novel susceptibility gene for cardiotoxicity in epirubicin treatment of breast cancer patients. Pharmaceutics 13:1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aminkeng F, Ross CJD, Rassekh SR, Rieder MJ, Bhavsar AP, et al. 2017. Pharmacogenomic screening for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 83:1143–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leong SL, Chaiyakunapruk N, Lee SW. 2017. Candidate gene association studies of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 7:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Linschoten M, Teske AJ, Cramer MJ, van der Wall E, Asselbergs FW. 2018. Chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review of genetic variants modulating individual risk. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 11:e001753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pinheiro EA, Fetterman KA, Burridge PW. 2019. hiPSCs in cardio-oncology: deciphering the genomics. Cardiovasc. Res. 115:935–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Morash M, Mitchell H, Yu A, Campion T, Beltran H, et al. 2018. CATCH-KB: establishing a pharmacogenomics variant repository for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. AMIA Jt. Summits Transl. Sci. Proc. 2017:168–77 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Magdy T, Burridge PW. 2021. Use of hiPSC to explicate genomic predisposition to anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Pharmacogenomics 22:41–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garcia-Pavia P, Kim Y, Restrepo-Cordoba MA, Lunde IG, Wakimoto H, et al. 2019. Genetic variants associated with cancer therapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Circulation 140:31–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Burke MA, Cook SA, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. 2016. Clinical and mechanistic insights into the genetics of cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 68:2871–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim KH, Pereira NL. 2021. Genetics of cardiomyopathy: clinical and mechanistic implications for heart failure. Korean Circ. J. 51:797–836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pinheiro EA, Magdy T, Burridge PW. 2020. Human in vitro models for assessing the genomic basis of chemotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 13:377–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Visscher H, Ross CJ, Rassekh SR, Barhdadi A, Dube MP, et al. 2012. Pharmacogenomic prediction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children. J. Clin. Oncol. 30:1422–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Visscher H, Ross CJ, Rassekh SR, Sandor GS, Caron HN, et al. 2013. Validation of variants in SLC28A3 and UGT1A6 as genetic markers predictive of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 60:1375–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bhatia S 2020. Genetics of anthracycline cardiomyopathy in cancer survivors: JACC: CardioOncology state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. CardioOncol. 2:539–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sapkota Y, Li N, Pierzynski J, Mulrooney DA, Ness KK, et al. 2021. Contribution of polygenic risk to hypertension among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. CardioOncol. 3:76–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Siemens A, Rassekh SR, Ross CJD, Carleton BC. 2023. Development of a dose-adjusted polygenic risk model for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Ther. Drug Monit. 45:337–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Magdy T, Jiang Z, Jouni M, Fonoudi H, Lyra-Leite D, et al. 2021. RARG variant predictive of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity identifies a cardioprotective therapy. Cell Stem Cell 28:2076–89.e7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Octavia Y, Tocchetti CG, Gabrielson KL, Janssens S, Crijns HJ, Moens AL. 2012. Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 52:1213–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shi Y, Moon M, Dawood S, McManus B, Liu PP. 2011. Mechanisms and management of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Herz 36:296–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Venditti P, Balestrieri M, De Leo T, Di Meo S. 1998. Free radical involvement in doxorubicin-induced electrophysiological alterations in rat papillary muscle fibres. Cardiovasc. Res. 38:695–702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kang YJ, Sun X, Chen Y, Zhou Z. 2002. Inhibition of doxorubicin chronic toxicity in catalase-overexpressing transgenic mouse hearts. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Doroshow JH, Esworthy RS, Chu FF. 2020. Control of doxorubicin-induced, reactive oxygen-related apoptosis by glutathione peroxidase 1 in cardiac fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 21:100709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xiong Y, Liu X, Lee CP, Chua BH, Ho YS. 2006. Attenuation of doxorubicin-induced contractile and mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse heart by cellular glutathione peroxidase. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 41:46–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Townsend DM, Tew KD. 2003. The role of glutathione-S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance. Oncogene 22:7369–75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mao L, Wang K, Zhang P, Ren S, Sun J, et al. 2021. Carbonyl reductase 1 attenuates ischemic brain injury by reducing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Transl. Stroke Res. 12:711–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oppermann U 2007. Carbonyl reductases: the complex relationships of mammalian carbonyl- and quinone-reducing enzymes and their role in physiology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 47:293–322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Almontashiri NA, Chen HH, Mailloux RJ, Tatsuta T, Teng AC, et al. 2014. SPG7 variant escapes phosphorylation-regulated processing by AFG3L2, elevates mitochondrial ROS, and is associated with multiple clinical phenotypes. Cell Rep. 7:834–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Belmonte F, Das S, Sysa-Shah P, Sivakumaran V, Stanley B, et al. 2015. ErbB2 overexpression upregulates antioxidant enzymes, reduces basal levels of reactive oxygen species, and protects against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 309:H1271–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hordijk PL. 2006. Regulation of NADPH oxidases: the role of Rac proteins. Circ. Res. 98:453–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xiang SY, Ouyang K, Yung BS, Miyamoto S, Smrcka AV, et al. 2013. PLCε, PKD1, and SSH1L transduce RhoA signaling to protect mitochondria from oxidative stress in the heart. Sci. Signal. 6:ra108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hildebrandt MAT, Reyes M, Wu X, Pu X, Thompson KA, et al. 2017. Hypertension susceptibility loci are associated with anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in long-term childhood cancer survivors. Sci. Rep. 7:9698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Law CH, Li JM, Chou HC, Chen YH, Chan HL. 2013. Hyaluronic acid-dependent protection in H9C2 cardiomyocytes: a cell model of heart ischemia-reperfusion injury and treatment. Toxicology 303:54–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wojnowski L, Kulle B, Schirmer M, Schlüter G, Schmidt A, et al. 2005. NAD(P)H oxidase and multidrug resistance protein genetic polymorphisms are associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Circulation 112:3754–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Neilan TG, Blake SL, Ichinose F, Raher MJ, Buys ES, et al. 2007. Disruption of nitric oxide synthase 3 protects against the cardiac injury, dysfunction, and mortality induced by doxorubicin. Circulation 116:506–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Riddick DS, Ding X, Wolf CR, Porter TD, Pandey AV, et al. 2013. NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase: roles in physiology, pharmacology, and toxicology. Drug Metab. Dispos. 41:12–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tanaka Y, Nagoshi T, Yoshii A, Oi Y, Takahashi H, et al. 2021. Xanthine oxidase inhibition attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 162:298–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Koczor CA, Jiao Z, Fields E, Russ R, Ludaway T, Lewis W. 2015. AZT-induced mitochondrial toxicity: an epigenetic paradigm for dysregulation of gene expression through mitochondrial oxidative stress. Physiol. Genom. 47:447–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Minotti G, Ronchi R, Salvatorelli E, Menna P, Cairo G. 2001. Doxorubicin irreversibly inactivates iron regulatory proteins 1 and 2 in cardiomyocytes: evidence for distinct metabolic pathways and implications for iron-mediated cardiotoxicity of antitumor therapy. Cancer Res. 61:8422–28 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gammella E, Maccarinelli F, Buratti P, Recalcati S, Cairo G. 2014. The role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Front. Pharmacol. 5:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L, Swiatczak M, Sikorska K, Starzynski RR, Raczak A, Lipinski P. 2021. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical implications of hereditary hemochromatosis-the cardiological point of view. Diagnostics 11:1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Miranda CJ, Makui H, Soares RJ, Bilodeau M, Mui J, et al. 2003. Hfe deficiency increases susceptibility to cardiotoxicity and exacerbates changes in iron metabolism induced by doxorubicin. Blood 102:2574–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gu J, Song ZP, Gui DM, Hu W, Chen YG, Zhang DD. 2012. Resveratrol attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis in lymphoma nude mice by heme oxygenase-1 induction. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 12:341–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Otterbein LE, Hedblom A, Harris C, Csizmadia E, Gallo D, Wegiel B. 2011. Heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide modulate DNA repair through ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein. PNAS 108:14491–96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fedier A, Schwarz VA, Walt H, Carpini RD, Haller U, Fink D. 2001. Resistance to topoisomerase poisons due to loss of DNA mismatch repair. Int. J. Cancer 93:571–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lee CC, Hsieh TS. 2018. Wuho/WDR4 deficiency inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis via DNA damage in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Cell Signal. 47:16–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.El-Tokhy MA, Hussein NA, Bedewy AM, Barakat MR. 2014. XPD gene polymorphisms and the effects of induction chemotherapy in cytogenetically normal de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients. Hematology 19:397–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Inatomi T, Matsuda S, Ishiuchi T, Do Y, Nakayama M, et al. 2022. TFB2M and POLRMT are essential for mammalian mitochondrial DNA replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1869:119167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Matyjaszczyk-Gwarda K, Wojcik T, Lukawska M, Chlopicki S, Walczak M. 2019. Lipophilicity profiling of anthracycline antibiotics by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography—effects on cardiotoxicity and endotheliotoxicity. Electrophoresis 40:3108–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Magdy T, Jouni M, Kuo HH, Weddle CJ, Lyra-Leite D, et al. 2022. Identification of drug transporter genomic variants and inhibitors that protect against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Circulation 145:279–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Xiao H, Zheng Y, Ma L, Tian L, Sun Q. 2021. Clinically-relevant ABC transporter for anti-cancer drug resistance. Front. Pharmacol. 12:648407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Krajinovic M, Elbared J, Drouin S, Bertout L, Rezgui A, et al. 2016. Polymorphisms of ABCC5 and NOS3 genes influence doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pharmacogenom. J. 16:530–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shinlapawittayatorn K, Chattipakorn SC, Chattipakorn N. 2022. The effects of doxorubicin on cardiac calcium homeostasis and contractile function. J. Cardiol. 80:125–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gomes AV, Venkatraman G, Davis JP, Tikunova SB, Engel P, et al. 2004. Cardiac troponin T isoforms affect the Ca2+ sensitivity of force development in the presence of slow skeletal troponin I: insights into the role of troponin T isoforms in the fetal heart. J. Biol. Chem. 279:49579–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ladd AN, Stenberg MG, Swanson MS, Cooper TA. 2005. Dynamic balance between activation and repression regulates pre-mRNA alternative splicing during heart development. Dev. Dyn. 233:783–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cejas RB, Tamano-Blanco M, Fontecha JE, Blanco JG. 2022. Impact of DYRK1A expression on TNNT2 splicing and daunorubicin toxicity in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 22:701–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Witjas-Paalberends ER, Piroddi N, Stam K, van Dijk SJ, Oliviera VS, et al. 2013. Mutations in MYH7 reduce the force generating capacity of sarcomeres in human familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 99:432–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Linschoten M, Teske AJ, Baas AF, Vink A, Dooijes D, et al. 2017. Truncating titin (TTN) variants in chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. J. Card. Fail. 23:476–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eldemire R, Tharp CA, Taylor MRG, Sbaizero O, Mestroni L. 2021. The sarcomeric spring protein titin: biophysical properties, molecular mechanisms, and genetic mutations associated with heart failure and cardiomyopathy. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 23:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mushlin PS, Cusack BJ, Boucek RJ Jr., Andrejuk T, Li X, Olson RD 1993. Time-related increases in cardiac concentrations of doxorubicinol could interact with doxorubicin to depress myocardial contractile function. Br. J. Pharmacol. 110:975–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhang Y, Berger SA. 2003. Ketotifen reverses MDR1-mediated multidrug resistance in human breast cancer cells in vitro and alleviates cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin in vivo. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 51:407–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Solanki M, Pointon A, Jones B, Herbert K. 2018. Cytochrome P450 2J2: potential role in drug metabolism and cardiotoxicity. Drug Metab. Dispos. 46:1053–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Xu X, Zhang XA, Wang DW. 2011. The roles of CYP450 epoxygenases and metabolites, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids, in cardiovascular and malignant diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63:597–609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kajiho H, Sakurai K, Minoda T, Yoshikawa M, Nakagawa S, et al. 2011. Characterization of RIN3 as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the Rab5 subfamily GTPase Rab31. J. Biol. Chem. 286:24364–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Seebohm G, Strutz-Seebohm N, Birkin R, Dell G, Bucci C, et al. 2007. Regulation of endocytic recycling of KCNQ1/KCNE1 potassium channels. Circ. Res. 100:686–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Liu Y, Yin Z, Xu X, Liu C, Duan X, et al. 2021. Crosstalk between the activated Slit2-Robo1 pathway and TGF-β1 signalling promotes cardiac fibrosis. ESC Heart Fail. 8:447–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gyongyosi M, Lukovic D, Zlabinger K, Spannbauer A, Gugerell A, et al. 2020. Liposomal doxorubicin attenuates cardiotoxicity via induction of interferon-related DNA damage resistance. Cardiovasc. Res. 116:970–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Litvinukova M, Talavera-Lopez C, Maatz H, Reichart D, Worth CL, et al. 2020. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588:466–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Burridge PW, Li YF, Matsa E, Wu H, Ong S-G, et al. 2016. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat. Med. 22:547–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sharma A, Burridge PW, McKeithan WL, Serrano R, Shukla P, et al. 2017. High-throughput screening of tyrosine kinase inhibitor cardiotoxicity with human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 9:eaaf2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Adamcova M, Skarkova V, Seifertova J, Rudolf E. 2019. Cardiac troponins are among targets of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in hiPCS-CMs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:2638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Guo Y, Pu WT. 2020. Cardiomyocyte maturation: new phase in development. Circ. Res. 126:1086–106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Huang H, Christidi E, Shafaattalab S, Davis MK, Tibbits GF, Brunham LR. 2022. RARG S427L attenuates the DNA repair response to doxorubicin in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 17:756–65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wu X, Shen F, Jiang G, Xue G, Philips S, et al. 2022. A non-coding GWAS variant impacts anthracycline-induced cardiotoxic phenotypes in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Commun. 13:7171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hasbullah JS, Scott EN, Bhavsar AP, Gunaretnam EP, Miao F, et al. 2022. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) regulates key genes in the RARG-TOP2B pathway and reduces anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. PLOS ONE 17:e0276541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ivy JR, Gray GA, Holmes MC, Denvir MA, Chapman KE. 2022. Corticosteroid receptors in cardiac health and disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1390:109–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Knowles DA, Burrows CK, Blischak JD, Patterson KM, Serie DJ, et al. 2018. Determining the genetic basis of anthracycline-cardiotoxicity by molecular response QTL mapping in induced cardiomyocytes. eLife 7:e33480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Burridge PW, Li YF, Matsa E, Wu H, Ong SG, et al. 2016. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat. Med. 22:547–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nordgren KKS, Hampton M, Wallace KB. 2017. Editor’s highlight: The altered DNA methylome of chronic doxorubicin exposure in Sprague Dawley rats. Toxicol. Sci. 159:470–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ferreira A, Cunha-Oliveira T, Simoes RF, Carvalho FS, Burgeiro A, et al. 2017. Altered mitochondrial epigenetics associated with subchronic doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Toxicology 390:63–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pouton CW, Haynes JM. 2005. Pharmaceutical applications of embryonic stem cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57:1918–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Denning C, Anderson D. 2008. Cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells as predictors of cardiotoxicity. Drug Discov. Today Ther. Strateg. 5:223–32 [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lyra-Leite DM, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez O, Wang M, Zhou Y, Cyganek L, Burridge PW. 2022. A review of protocols for human iPSC culture, cardiac differentiation, subtype-specification, maturation, and direct reprogramming. STAR Protoc. 3:101560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Laco F, Lam AT, Woo TL, Tong G, Ho V, et al. 2020. Selection of human induced pluripotent stem cells lines optimization of cardiomyocytes differentiation in an integrated suspension microcarrier bioreactor. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Halloin C, Coffee M, Manstein F, Zweigerdt R. 2019. Production of cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells by bioreactor technologies. Methods Mol. Biol. 1994:55–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ito H, Miller SC, Billingham ME, Akimoto H, Torti SV, et al. 1990. Doxorubicin selectively inhibits muscle gene expression in cardiac muscle cells in vivo and in vitro. PNAS 87:4275–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hayes HB, Nicolini AM, Arrowood CA, Chvatal SA, Wolfson DW, et al. 2019. Novel method for action potential measurements from intact cardiac monolayers with multiwell microelectrode array technology. Sci. Rep. 9:11893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lee J, Ganswein T, Ulusan H, Emmenegger V, Saguner AM, et al. 2022. Repeated and on-demand intracellular recordings of cardiomyocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. ACS Sens. 7:3181–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fermini B, Coyne KP, Coyne ST. 2018. Challenges in designing and executing clinical trials in a dish studies. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 94:73–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Huang CY, Liu CL, Ting CY, Chiu YT, Cheng YC, et al. 2019. Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities. J. Biomed. Sci. 26:87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Magdy T, Schuldt AJT, Wu JC, Bernstein D, Burridge PW. 2018. Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cells to assess drug cardiotoxicity: opportunities and problems. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 58:83–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Matsui T, Miyamoto K, Yamanaka K, Okai Y, Kaushik EP, et al. 2019. Cell-based two-dimensional morphological assessment system to predict cancer drug-induced cardiotoxicity using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 383:114761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Table 1

RESOURCES