Abstract
Conjugation of plasmids from Escherichia coli is essential for the genetic manipulation of Streptomyces spp. To facilitate intergeneric conjugation from E. coli to Streptomyces the conjugative machinery required for genetic transfer is usually provided by the non-transferable helper plasmid, pUZ8002. Here we present the complete nucleotide sequence of pUZ8002, describe the previously undocumented creation process, and provide details of the sequence relative to the parental pUZ8 plasmid and another previously published pUZ8002 sequence.
Keywords: conjugation, Escherichia coli, IncP plasmids, intergeneric, RK2, Streptomyces
Data Summary
Raw sequencing reads are available on the lab Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.252132681[1].https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25213268.
Introduction
Streptomyces are Gram-positive bacteria representing the largest genus in the phylum Actinomycetota. They are generally found as environmental isolates living in the soil and demonstrate a hyphal-like multicellular morphology [2]. Streptomyces are prolific producers of active secondary metabolites and many of these compounds are used clinically as antimicrobials and antitumour and immunoregulatory agents. Indeed, around two-thirds of antibiotic types currently used are produced by actinomycetes, predominantly Streptomyces [3]. Recent genome mining has revealed an even more expansive suite of silent biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) present in the genomes of Streptomyces species. These silent BGCs may be the key to finding new antimicrobials to overcome the rise of antimicrobial resistance [4,7]. Genetic manipulation can help both express these silent BGCs and improve the robustness or yield of production strains of Streptomyces currently used in industrial fermentations [8,10].
Unlike some other bacteria, Streptomyces are challenging to transform directly. Generally, the cell wall of Streptomyces must be removed first (forming protoplasts) to allow transformation at reasonable efficiencies [11]. Protoplast transformation can require optimisation for different Streptomyces species and imposes a great stress on the cells [12,14] and can potentially introduce mutations. To overcome this and expedite the process of genetic manipulation of Streptomyces, researchers generally rely on conjugation of genetic material from Escherichia coli. This conjugation requires a plasmid vector containing an oriT such as pSET152 or pMS82 [15,16], a methylation-deficient donor E. coli strain such as ET12567 [17] and a helper plasmid to provide the machinery required for conjugation. In Streptomyces molecular genetics, the helper plasmid is generally pUZ8002, which is widely reported to be derived from the well-characterised broad-host-range RK2 plasmid [18]. RK2 is a IncP-type extra-chromosomal plasmid first identified during an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella aerogenes from the Burns unit of the Birmingham Accident Hospital, UK, in 1969 [19]. RK2 carries genes for tetracycline and kanamycin resistance, genes for self-replication such as trfA, and genes necessary for conjugation, including the tra and trb locus. RK2 also has its own oriT, which allows self-conjugation and origin of replication for autonomous replication [20,22]. There are many plasmids in the IncP group and pUZ8 is another example, originally isolated from a Spanish strain of P. aeruginosa [23]. Unlike RK2, pUZ8 has not been fully sequenced, but is known to be similar to RK2, with both plasmids carrying tetracycline and kanamycin resistance genes [24].
Limited details are available on the construction of pUZ8002, yet it is amongst the most widely used plasmid in Streptomyces molecular genetics. The first reference to pUZ8002 by name cites the plasmid source as ‘personal correspondence by Wilson, J., and Figurski, D. H.’ [18]. This paper indicates that pUZ8002 is an ‘RK2 derivative with defective oriT’ but no further details of the plasmid are given. This work by Paget et al. [18] appears to be the first published use of pUZ8002 as a helper plasmid to supply the conjugative machinery for movement of plasmids into Streptomyces. Currently one other sequence of pUZ8002 is available online under the GenBank accession number MN602278.1. This work aims to verify the sequence of pUZ8002 from our commonly used laboratory strains of E. coli, detail the process for the construction of pUZ8002 and determine the differences from RK2.
Methods
Plasmid extraction, transformation and sequencing
Plasmid DNA was extracted from E. coli using a PureYield plasmid miniprep system from Promega Uk Ltd (Hampshire, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Competent DH5α cells for transformations were provided by New England Biolabs (Hertfordshire, UK) and transformations were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid sequences were obtained from Plasmidsaurus (Oregon, USA) using their Oxford Nanopore sequencing service.
Bioinformatic analysis
Prokka [25] on the Galaxy web client was used to analyse and annotate the features of the plasmid sequence, selecting all default settings for bacteria (Galaxy version 1.14.6 [26]). Additional annotations were added manually from the previously published RK2 sequence [21,27]. All ORFs were checked manually via blastp and any alternative gene names are noted in the snapgene file (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25213268). Annotated plasmid sequence can also be found under GenBank accession number PP430156.
Results and discussion
Construction of pUZ8002
Although commonly attributed to being RK2 derived, pUZ8002 was actually constructed from the pUZ8 backbone. The key difference between pUZ8 and pUZ8002 is the inactivation of the oriT preventing self-conjugation. Four nucleotide changes are introduced at positions 46 858, 46 861, 46 862 and 46 863 (further details in Table 1) in the oriT, which eliminates the TraI-binding and nic site [28]. Destruction of the nic site prevents the covalent linkage of the 5′ end of the plasmid to TraI, preventing self-conjugation of the plasmid [21,28]. The method used to achieve this is the same as that detailed for the construction of pRK21761 from RK2 in [29]. In brief: the four point mutations were introduced directly into the pUZ8 parental plasmid via homologous recombination of two vectors either side of the nic site, which replaced the nic site with an XbaI site. These two vectors were then removed by digestion of pUZ8 with XbaI and religation, leaving a single XbaI site in place of the nic site. With pRK21761 this results in a 1000-fold decrease of self-conjugation efficiency while still allowing conjugation of other vectors containing functional oriT sequences [29,30].
Table 1. Comparison of pUZ8002 and the previously published RK2 sequence (GenBank BN000925.1). The four mutations introduced into pUZ8 to prevent self-conjugation are in bold [21,27].
| Type | Length (bp) | Bases | ORF | Effect | Position in pUZ8002 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | G to T | klaB | Ala162Glu | 1 018 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | G to T | 2 235 | ||
| Tn insertion | 4 207 | merRTPCAD TN3 disrupting RK2’s kleD | 3 307–7 514 | ||
| Tn deletion | 4 949 | RK2’s Tn1, which disrupted klcB, has been deleted, removing tnpA and tnpR | 9 701 | ||
| Insertion | 1 | A | oriV | 11 493 | |
| Insertion | 24 | oriV | Additional TrfA binding site sequence detected in repetitive region | 11 660–11 682 | |
| Polymorphism | 1 | T to A | oriV | 11 964 | |
| Deletion | 1 | G | tetR | Frameshift at 175/184 in TetR | 12 724 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | T to G | tetA | Ile30Arg | 13 338 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | G to A | tetA | Val80Met | 13 487 |
| Polymorphism | 2 | AA to GG | tetA | Ile100Val | 13 546–13 457 |
| Polymorphism | 2 | CA to TG | tetA | Thr108Ala | 13 573–13 574 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | A to G | tetA | 13 600 | |
| Deletion | 785 | 1 4525 | |||
| Insertion | 75 | GNAT domain containing N-acetyltransferase | 14 526–14 601 | ||
| Insertion | 1 | T | 14 976 | ||
| Deletion | 1 | T | ssb | 16 284 | |
| Polymorphism | 1 | A to C | 16 659 | ||
| Polymorphism | 1 | C to G | traX (= trbP in RK2) | Pro35Ala | 29 593 |
| Polymorphism | 3 | CGC to GCG | Hypothetical protein | Pro88Arg Pro89Ala | 3 0504–30 506 |
| Tn deletion | 2939 | IS21 transposon that was in aphA gene is deleted | 34 343 | ||
| Deletion | 1 | G | Kanamycin resistance aphA | Frameshift from 146 to 161 | 34 761 |
| Deletion | 1 | G | Kanamycin resistance aphA | Frameshift from 150 to 161 | 34 771 |
| Insertion | 2 | CG | Kanamycin resistance aphA | Corrects frameshift from previous two deletions from 161 | 34 804–34 805 |
| Polymorphism | 4 | CctGCC to TctAGA | oriT - TraI nic site | Introduces an XbaI site and inactivates the TraI cleavage (nic) site | 46 858–46 863 |
| Insertion | 1 | T | 48 696 | ||
| Deletion | 1 | C | 50 459 | ||
| Deletion | 28 | krfA | Frameshift mutation and large deletion | 51 359 | |
| Deletion | 1 | G | KorF | Frameshift mutation at 99 of 176 | 52 414 |
| Polymorphism | 1 | G to A | klaC | Gly277Ala | 55 232 |
Sequencing and analysis of pUZ8002
Plasmid DNA was extracted from E. coli ET12567 containing pUZ8002, the standard strain distributed in the Streptomyces community for intergeneric conjugation. E. coli DH5α (recA1 and endA1) was transformed with this plasmid preparation (with selection on kanamycin – 50 µg ml−1) and the resulting pUZ8002-containing colonies were grown overnight and pUZ8002 extracted. The plasmid DNA was sequenced by Plasmidsaurus (Oregon, USA) and the resulting sequence data were assembled as a plasmid map of 55693 bp with 30.6× coverage. Prokka [25] analysis identified 69 ORFs in the sequence and additional annotations, including sites shown to be bound by DNA-binding proteins (KorA, KorB, TrfA, DnaA, IHF, TrbA, ParA, ParD and TraJ) and transcriptional terminators were added to the annotation from the previously published IncP group plasmid RK2 sequence [21,27]. A summary plasmid map is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Map of pUZ8002 plasmid. Annotated first by Prokka [25] and manually curated with additional annotations added from RK2 annotation (GenBank BN000925.1) [21,27]. All ORFs were checked manually using blastp.
Our sequence largely agrees with the previously deposited pUZ8002 sequence (GenBank accession: NZ_MN602278.1). Two differences were detected. Firstly, there is a single base deletion at the extreme 3′ end of the ssb gene that encodes a single-stranded DNA-binding protein. This mutation results in no change in amino acid sequence except a conversion of the stop codon (underlined) TAAG to TAG. The second difference is a deletion of a guanine, causing a frameshift mutation at codon 175 of 184 of the tetR gene. The sequencing quality score for both sites was above 90%, suggesting it is likely not due to a sequencing error.
Comparison to RK2
Although pUZ8002 is derived from pUZ8 backbone, there is no available nucleotide sequence for pUZ8, instead here we compared pUZ8002 to the well-studied RK2. Our assumption is that many of the changes will also be evident when comparing RK2 and parental plasmid pUZ8. Comparison of the pUZ8002 sequence to the published RK2 sequence shows 30 differences. These are summarised in Table 1. Particularly noteworthy is the loss of two large transposable elements in pUZ8002 that are present in the RK2 sequence. Firstly, a 4 949 bp Tn1 type transposon carrying the bla gene for β-lactam antibiotic resistance, which had inserted in the klcB gene (encoding a hypothetical protein of unknown function), and the loss of this Tn1 transposon and beta-lactam resistance has also been demonstrated for the parental plasmid pUZ8 [24]. Secondly, a 2 939 bp IS21 type transposon has inserted into the aphA gene [APH(3′)-I aminoglycoside O-phosphotransferase], which confers resistance to kanamycin and other related aminoglycoside antibiotics [31]. The RK2 plasmid is kanamycin resistant [32] despite the IS21 transposon insertion in RK2 between codons 7 and 8. A possible explanation for this is an alternative start codon (GTG) at codon 21 (of 277) in aphA, which may result in a truncated but still functional AphA, with transcription potentially driven by an outward-facing promoter in the transposon.
Additionally, in pUZ8002 (and likely in pUZ8) a 4 207 bp Tn3 transposon had inserted itself into the kleD gene (predicted to encode a DNA-binding protein). This transposon carries the mer locus, an ancient operon that confers resistance to inorganic mercury and other heavy metal stresses [33]. This again supports previous observations that pUZ8 grants resistance to mercury while RK2 does not [24]. The tetracycline resistance genes tetR and tetA have six mutations in pUZ8002 when compared to the published RK2 sequence. Indeed, our sequence has the additional frameshift mutation in tetA that is absent from both RK2 and the pUZ8002 sequence previously deposited in GenBank (accession: NZ_MN602278.1). Without sequencing pUZ8 it is not clear if these mutations are of environmental origin or from the lab, as ET12567 (the donor strain for Streptomyces conjugations) is inherently resistant to 50 µg ml−1 tetracycline in LB at 37°C, alleviating selective pressure for the tet genes.
Summary
Although pUZ8002 is one of the most widely used plasmids in Streptomyces molecular biology, information regarding it was scarce. Here we present the plasmid origins from pUZ8 and the construction methodology, and highlight the key features. Ready access to this information will aid in future development and troubleshooting of E. coli–Streptomyces spp. intergenetic conjugations, in addition to preserving an accurate history of Streptomyces genetic research.
Abbreviations
- BGC
biosynthetic gene cluster
- IncP
incompatability group p
- ORF
open reading frame
- ori
origin of replication
- oriT
origin of transfer
Footnotes
Funding: P.A.H. acknowledges funding from BBSRC (BB/T004126/1) and the Royal Academy of Engineering Research Chair Scheme for long-term personal research support (RCSRF2021\11\15). The funders had no role in the design or decision to submit the work for publication.
Accession No: Repositories: GenBank: PP430156, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25213268.
Author contributions: Conceptualization: P.A.H., D.E.L. Data curation: D.E.L. Formal analysis: D.E.L., J.T.C., R.E.B. Funding acquisition: P.A.H. Investigation: D.E.L. Methodology: P.A.H., D.E.L., R.E.B., J.W.W., D.H.F. Project administration: P.A.H. Visualization: D.E.L. Writing – original draft: D.E.L. Writing – review and editing: P.A.H., D.E.L., R.E.B., J.T.C., J.W.W., D.H.F.
Contributor Information
Daniel E. Larcombe, Email: daniel.larcombe@strath.ac.uk;delarcombe@gmail.com.
Robyn E. Braes, Email: Robyn.braes@novogene-europe.com.
James T. Croxford, Email: james.croxford@strath.ac.uk.
James W. Wilson, Email: james.w.wilson@villanova.edu.
David H. Figurski, Email: dhf2@columbia.edu.
Paul A. Hoskisson, Email: paul.hoskisson@strath.ac.uk.
References
- 1.Larcombe DE, Braes RE, James WW, Figurski DH, Hoskisson PA. 2024. Sequence and origin of the Streptomyces Intergenetic-conjugation helper Plasmid Puz8002. Microbiology Society figshare . [DOI]
- 2.Flärdh K, Buttner MJ. Streptomyces morphogenetics: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:36–49. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83:770–803. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bentley SD, Chater KF, Cerdeño-Tárraga A-M, Challis GL, Thomson NR, et al. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Nature. 2002;417:141–147. doi: 10.1038/417141a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bignell DRD, Seipke RF, Huguet-Tapia JC, Chambers AH, Parry RJ, et al. Streptomyces scabies 87-22 contains a coronafacic acid-like biosynthetic cluster that contributes to plant-microbe interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact . 2010;23:161–175. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-2-0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hoskisson PA, Seipke RF. Cryptic or silent? The known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns of secondary metabolism. mBio. 2020;11:1–5. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02642-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ohnishi Y, Ishikawa J, Hara H, Suzuki H, Ikenoya M, et al. Genome sequence of the streptomycin-producing microorganism Streptomyces griseus IFO 13350. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:4050–4060. doi: 10.1128/JB.00204-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bu Q-T, Li Y-P, Xie H, Li J-F, Lv Z-Y, et al. Rational engineering strategies for achieving high-yield, high-quality and high-stability of natural product production in actinomycetes. Metab Eng. 2021;67:198–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen Y, Smanski MJ, Shen B. Improvement of secondary metabolite production in Streptomyces by manipulating pathway regulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:19–25. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2428-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shin CH, Cho HS, Won HJ, Kwon HJ, Kim CW, et al. Enhanced production of clavulanic acid by improving glycerol utilization using reporter-guided mutagenesis of an industrial Streptomyces clavuligerus strain. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;48:kuab004. doi: 10.1093/jimb/kuab004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. Practical Streptomyces Genetics. Print Book. John Innes Foundation; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beltrametti F, Barucco D, Rossi R, Selva E, Marinelli F. Protoplast fusion and gene recombination in the uncommon actinomycete planobispora rosea producing GE2270. J Antibiot. 2007;60:447–454. doi: 10.1038/ja.2007.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Illing GT, Normansell ID, Peberdy JF. Protoplast isolation and regeneration in Streptomyces clavuligerus. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135:2289–2297. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-8-2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pigac J, Schrempf H. A simple and rapid method of transformation of Streptomyces rimosus R6 and other streptomycetes by electroporation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:352–356. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.1.352-356.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bierman M, Logan R, O’Brien K, Seno ET, Rao RN, et al. Plasmid cloning vectors for the conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene. 1992;116:43–49. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gregory MA, Till R, Smith MCM. Integration site for Streptomyces phage phiBT1 and development of site-specific integrating vectors. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:5320–5323. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.17.5320-5323.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.MacNeil DJ, Gewain KM, Ruby CL, Dezeny G, Gibbons PH, et al. Analysis of Streptomyces avermitilis genes required for avermectin biosynthesis utilizing a novel integration vector. Gene. 1992;111:61–68. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90603-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Paget MSB, Chamberlin L, Atrih A, Foster SJ, Buttner MJ. Evidence that the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor ςE is required for normal cell wall structure in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) J Bacteriol. 1999;181:204–211. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.1.204-211.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Holloway BW, Richmond MH. R-Factors used for genetic studies in strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their origin. Genet Res. 1973;21:103–105. doi: 10.1017/S0016672300013252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kongsuwan K, Josh P, Picault MJ, Wijffels G, Dalrymple B. The plasmid RK2 replication initiator protein (TrfA) binds to the sliding clamp beta subunit of DNA polymerase III: implication for the toxicity of a peptide derived from the amino-terminal portion of 33-kilodalton TrfA. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:5501–5509. doi: 10.1128/JB.00231-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pansegrau W, Lanka E, Barth PT, Figurski DH, Guiney DG, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of Birmingham IncPα plasmids. Compilation and comparative analysis. J Mol Biol. 1994;239:623–663. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sia EA, Roberts RC, Easter C, Helinski DR, Figurski DH. Different relative importances of the par operons and the effect of conjugal transfer on the maintenance of intact promiscuous plasmid RK2. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2789–2797. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.10.2789-2797.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hedges RW, Matthew M. Acquisition by Escherichia coli of plasmid-borne beta-lactamases normally confined to Pseudomonas spp. Plasmid. 1979;2:269–278. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(79)90045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Larsen MH, Figurski DH. Structure, expression, and regulation of the kilC operon of promiscuous IncP alpha plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:5022–5032. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.16.5022-5032.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid Prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Afgan E, Nekrutenko A, Grüning BA, Blankenberg D, Goecks J, et al. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:W345–W351. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haines AS, Jones K, Batt SM, Kosheleva IA, Thomas CM. Sequence of plasmid pBS228 and reconstruction of the IncP-1alpha phylogeny. Plasmid. 2007;58:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Balzer D, Pansegrau W, Lanka E. Essential motifs of relaxase (TraI) and TraG proteins involved in conjugative transfer of plasmid RP4. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4285–4295. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.14.4285-4295.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sia EA, Kuehner DM, Figurski DH. Mechanism of retrotransfer in conjugation: prior transfer of the conjugative plasmid is required. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:1457–1464. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.5.1457-1464.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ayres EK, Thomson VJ, Merino G, Balderes D, Figurski DH. Precise deletions in large bacterial genomes by vector-mediated excision (VEX). The trfA gene of promiscuous plasmid RK2 is essential for replication in several gram-negative hosts. J Mol Biol. 1993;230:174–185. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wright GD, Thompson PR. Aminoglycoside phosphotransferases: proteins, structure, and mechanism. Front Biosci. 1999;4:d9. doi: 10.2741/wright. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fang FC, Helinski DR. Broad-host-range properties of plasmid Rk2: importance of overlapping genes encoding the plasmid replication initiation protein Trfa. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:5861–5868. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.18.5861-5868.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Osborn AM, Bruce KD, Strike P, Ritchie DA. Distribution, diversity and evolution of the bacterial mercury resistance (mer) operon. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;19:239–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Larcombe DE, Braes RE, James WW, Figurski DH, Hoskisson PA. 2024. Sequence and origin of the Streptomyces Intergenetic-conjugation helper Plasmid Puz8002. Microbiology Society figshare . [DOI]

