Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2024 Jun 3;6(6):000735.v4. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000735.v4

Enhancement of growth media for extreme iron limitation in Escherichia coli

James W Southwell 1, Keith S Wilson 2, Gavin H Thomas 3, Anne-Kathrin Duhme-Klair 1,*
PMCID: PMC11261726  PMID: 39045240

Abstract

Iron is an essential nutrient for microbial growth and bacteria have evolved numerous routes to solubilize and scavenge this biometal, which is often present at very low concentrations in host tissue. We recently used a MOPS-based medium to induce iron limitation in Escherichia coli K-12 during the characterization of novel siderophore-conjugated antibiotics. In this study we confirm that growth media derived from commercially available M9 salts are unsuitable for studies of iron-limited growth, probably through the contamination of the sodium phosphate buffer components with over 100 µM iron. In contrast, MOPS-based media that are treated with metal-binding Chelex resin allow the free iron concentration to be reduced to growth-limiting levels. Despite these measures a small amount of E. coli growth is still observed in these iron-depleted media. By growing E. coli in conditions that theoretically increase the demand for iron-dependent enzymes, namely by replacing the glucose carbon source for acetate and by switching to a microaerobic atmosphere, we can reduce background growth even further. Finally, we demonstrate that by adding an exogeneous siderophore to the growth media which is poorly used by E. coli, we can completely prevent growth, perhaps mimicking the situation in host tissue. In conclusion, this short study provides practical experimental insight into low iron media and how to augment the growth conditions of E. coli for extreme iron-limited growth.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, iron, siderophores


Impact Statement

Inside host organisms, free iron is an essential but scarce resource to bacteria due to high levels of competition with other microbes and the host organism itself. Thus, to impose biologically relevant conditions for the growth of bacteria in the laboratory, the media used must impose such conditions. To this end, we describe the optimization process that led to our previously reported zero-iron medium for the growth of Escherichia coli and evaluate the effect of microaerobic growth (2 % O2) and the addition of iron chelators, including the siderophore desferrioxamine. We advise zero-iron media, such as the one investigated in this work, be used in the development of antibacterials, especially in cases where bacterial iron uptake pathways are exploited for molecule internalization.

Data Summary

The authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article. The composition of the zero-iron media described in this work was used by Thomas J. Sanderson, Conor M. Black, James W. Southwell, Ellis J. Wilde, Apurva Pandey, Reyme Herman, Gavin H. Thomas, Eszter Boros, Anne-Kathrin Duhme-Klair and Anne Routledge, ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 9, 2532–2541, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00568.

Introduction

Iron is an essential micronutrient for most living organisms and in aqueous media is most commonly found in its Fe(III) (ferric) oxidation state, which shows very low water solubility near neutral pH. To aid in the capture of the scarce Fe(III) cations many bacteria produce siderophores, low-molecular-weight compounds that possess a high affinity and selectivity for Fe(III) [1,3]. These compounds are biosynthesized and secreted by bacteria, fungi and some plants into their surrounding medium, to bind to and solubilize Fe(III), thereby facilitating its cellular uptake. Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, are able to sense their intracellular iron concentration using a repressor protein called Fur [3]. This protein acts at a transcriptional level and, when bound to intracellular Fe(II), binds to specific DNA regulatory sequences, to prevent their transcription [4,5]. The Fur regulon includes genes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of siderophores and their translocation into bacteria (e.g. cell-surface receptors) [6]. When bacteria experience iron-limiting conditions, intracellular levels of Fe(II) are depleted, such that remaining Fe(II) dissociates from Fur, depressing the expression of iron-regulated genes, including siderophore biosynthesis and uptake pathways for their corresponding iron complexes. Fur is a master iron regulator not only in Gram-negative but also Gram-positive pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus. Whilst it is not well understood in all bacteria, and indeed some Gram-positive bacteria use other proteins (e.g. DrxR), its importance does have wider implications beyond E. coli. It is understood, however, that the major siderophore for E. coli is enterobactin (and its hydrolysis products), although citrate and desferrichrome are also used [3,7]. For comparison, Campylobacter jejuni use the hydrolysis products of enterobactin, but do not themselves produce the siderophores [8]. In this instance, these siderophores are referred to as xenosiderophores.

To understand siderophore function and to assess the potency of antibacterial siderophore conjugates, often called ‘Trojan Horse’ antibacterials, biological assays measuring activity against bacteria are required and various growth-based methods have been used for this purpose [9], with several examples reported in the literature [10,19]. Key to these methods is their ability to easily mimic the iron-limiting conditions found in the host organism while providing other nutrients required for rapid growth. This is usually achieved using one of two alternative approaches, namely rich media with iron-chelating agents added, or defined minimal medium with no added iron. The former method, which is easier to set up, uses undefined media such as lysogeny broth (LB) [20,21], tryptic soy broth (TSB) [22,23] and Müller-Hinton broth II (MHII) [12,18, 20, 21, 24], the last being the most popular choice for bacteria, including E. coli. Even though iron is not specifically added to these media, the iron levels are often too high to limit bacterial growth, and so additional measures are taken, such as the acid treatment of glassware, the avoidance of metal syringes (especially with acids) and Chelex treatment (an indiscriminate metal-chelating resin) [25,26]. It is also common for synthetic chelators, such as 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), to be added to the media during bacterial growth assays to sequester iron, thereby reducing iron availability [27]. The overall formation constant (log β) represents the equilibrium between complex formation and corresponding free ligand(s) in solution. Higher values are therefore indicative of enhanced tendencies to form the corresponding complex. The log β for [Fe(bpy)3]3+ is 16.3, whereas those of the Fe(III) complexes of principal hexadentate siderophores, such as enterobactin and desferrioxamine B (DFO), are far higher, with values of 49.0 and 30.5, respectively. Hence these chelator treatments will not reduce free iron to levels where siderophore function becomes essential [2,3]. There are several literature examples of chelator addition to media in attempts to impose iron-limited conditions on bacteria but unless these chelators possess high iron selectivity, they can result in phenotypes that could be the result of depletion of multiple metals [28].

The latter strategy of ‘low iron media’ utilizes defined minimal media such as M9 media [7,21] and Tris-minimal succinate (TMS) media [29,31] for E. coli and S. aureus, respectively, that undergo similar treatments for iron removal. Since these media are made up of individual chemical components that can be Chelex treated individually, their iron levels are more easily controlled. In a recent study from our laboratory we developed a zero-iron medium for the assessment of Trojan Horse antibacterials against E. coli [32]. Here we describe the stages in the design of this medium, providing insight into process parameters and investigate methods to impose greater iron limitation, such as growth under microaerobic conditions and the addition of exogenous siderophores.

Methods

Media preparations

Materials

All materials were obtained from commercial suppliers such as Sigma Aldrich, Fisher Scientific, Fisher Bioreagents and VWR. Specifically, FeCl3.3H2O, Na2PO4, NaOH, NaOAc, desferrioxamine, 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB), the M9, minimal salts, 5× (M6030), and the Chelex 100 sodium form, 50–100 mesh (dry) resin (MFCD00163980) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. The metal-free concentrated HCl was purchased from Fisher Scientific and the glucose, MgSO4 and CaCl2 from Fisher Bioreagents. The NH4Cl was purchased from VWR.

General remarks

All media were prepared from individual stock solutions and used in either sterile plastics (e.g. falcon tubes) or acid-treated glassware, avoiding the use of metal syringes. Each stock was made using Milli-Q pure water and stirred, in 10 % (w/v) Chelex 100 sodium form, 50–100 mesh (dry) resin (Sigma Aldrich), for 1 h and then filter sterilized before combining to give the desired media (except calcium and magnesium stocks, which were simply made up in chelexed Milli-Q water). Acid treatment involved the stirring of 6 M aqueous hydrochoric acid in the glassware for 18 h, followed by decanting, rinsing with acetone and oven drying.

Minimal M9 media

The following recipe was previously reported by Sanderson et al. [32]. To make a 10 ml stock, the following were combined: 7.779 ml Milli-Q pure water, 2 ml M9, minimal salts, 5× (Sigma Aldrich, M6030), 200 µl 20 % (w/v) glucose, 20 µl 1 M MgSO4 and 1 µl 1 M CaCl2. The final concentrations of each component in M9 media are as follows: 48 mM Na2HPO4, 22 mM KH2PO4, 19 mM NH4Cl, 9 mM NaCl, 22 mM glucose, 2 mM MgSO4 and 0.1 mM CaCl2. To make the acetate variation of this medium, the glucose component was simply replaced with 732 µl 1.67 mM NaOAc where less Milli-Q pure water is added (7.047 ml).

Zero-iron media

The following recipe is based on media reported by Neidhart et al. [33] and was previously reported by Sanderson et al. [32]. To make a 10 ml stock, the following were combined: 7.047 ml Milli-Q pure water, 1 ml 10× MOPS/Tricine stocks (400 and 40 mM, respectively), 1 ml 500 mM NaCl, 732 µl 1.67 mM NaOAc, 100 µl 132 mM K2HPO4, 100 µl 952 mM NH4Cl, 20 µl 1 M MgSO4 and 1 µl 1 M CaCl2. The resulting solution was then adjusted to pH 7.4, using chelexed 4 M NaOH. The final concentrations of each component in MOPS acetate are as follows: 40 mM MOPS, 4 mM Tricine, 50 mM NaCl, 0.12 mM NaOAc, 1.32 mM K2HPO4, 9.52 mM NH4Cl, 2 mM MgSO4 and 0.1 mM CaCl2. To make the glucose variation of this medium (not referred to as zero-iron medium), the acetate component was simply replaced with 200 µl 20 % (w/v) glucose where more Milli-Q pure water is added (7.779 ml).

Iron and siderophore stocks

In chelexed Milli-Q water, 1 M FeCl3 solutions were prepared from FeCl3.6H2O and then diluted into media stocks at 2.5 mM. These stocks were used for plate preparation. Siderophore stocks were made up similarly in chelexed Milli-Q water.

Bacteria preparations

Bacterial strains

E. coli K-12 (BW25113) is a widely used K-12 derivative laboratory strain and was used throughout this study.

Bacteria stocks

For all bacterial growth assays, a bacterial stock was used which was prepared using the following procedure, previously reported by Sanderson et al. [32]. E. coli K-12 (BW25113) were grown overnight in M9 media with 10 % (w/v) casamino acids at 37°C and 180 r.p.m. Each sample was centrifuged at 3000 g and 4 °C and the solution decanted. The remaining solid was gently re-suspended in M9 media (10 ml), and centrifuged again, at 3000 g and 4 °C and the solution decanted (twice). The solid was then made to an OD600 of 0.05 in M9 media (20 ml) and grown for 24 h at 37 °C and 180 r.p.m. This overnight culture was then diluted by adding 0.4 ml to 0.1 ml chelexed glycerol in water and stored at −80 °C.

Bacterial growth assays

Overnight culture preparation

Prior to all growth assay experiments, E. coli from the bacteria stock were grown for 22 h at 37 °C in M9 media supplemented with 10 % (w/v) casamino acids (total volume 20 ml), in an acid-treated conical flask, with shaking at 180 r.p.m. Optical densities from starter cultures were measured by dilution of 50 µl of starter culture in 950 µl of blank media, recorded to three decimal places using a Jenway 6305 spectrophotometer, or the cuvette mode of an Epoch 2 Microplate Spectrophotometer (Biotek), then multiplied to give the OD600 of the starter culture. This was carried out in plastic cuvettes with a 1 cm path length and are accurate to ±0.0005.

Plate preparation

Unless stated otherwise, growth assays were carried out once, in technical triplicates, using plate wells, with a starting OD600 of 0.05 (for initial media optimization studies) and 0.01 (for all subsequent experiments). Plate experiments used NUNC 96-well plates, with two-well deep edge wells filled with 200 µl water and full surrounding moats (2 ml). The only solvent added was water (no organic solvents).

Plate incubation procedure

Aerobically grown plates were incubated in an Epoch 2 Microplate Spectrophotometer (Biotek) at 37 °C, and shaken continuously in a double orbital pattern (282 r.p.m.). Absorbances at OD600 (OD800 for DHB siderophore studies, since their iron complexes absorb below this wavelength) for each well were recorded at t=0 and every 30 min, for 24 h. Microaerobically grown plates were incubated in a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader from BMG LABTECH at 37 °C, and shaken continuously in a double orbital pattern (180 r.p.m.) with attached Atmosphere Control Unit (ACU) ensuring a 2 % O2 atmosphere using an attached N2 gas cylinder. Absorbances at OD800 for each well were recorded at t=0 and every 30 min, for 75 h.

Data processing

Data were processed in Microsoft Excel software by first subtracting the average of the no-cell controls from all read data. All data were obtained in at least technical triplicate. For each cell condition, a mean average and error as standard deviation was calculated. Data were plotted using Origin software, as a growth curve. The mean average absorbance and its corresponding error for each well condition was taken at each time point. These data are shown as absorbance as a function of time.

Results and discussion

Optimizing a minimal medium for iron-limited E. coli growth

To study the function of E. coli in a defined minimal medium we initially tested the commonly used M9 medium, made using a 5× M9, minimal salts stock from Sigma Aldrich. However, despite the preparation of this medium including Chelex treatment (10 %, w/v), initial growth with no added Fe(III) was almost the same as that with either 1 or 10 µM of added FeCl3, demonstrating that this base medium is not appropriate for producing a consistent iron-limiting medium (Fig. 1a). A recent study by Soma et al. [34] suggests that the amount of iron that is present as a contaminant of the sodium phosphate component of M9 can vary enormously depending on its chemical purity and that this, in turn, correlates strongly with the growth rate of the bacterium [34]. In Neidhardt’s (1974) landmark paper on enterobacterial growth media, a MOPS-buffered medium was described where switching from a phosphate buffer component, with glucose as the carbon source, demonstrated a much lower background growth of E. coli in the absence of added iron [33]. Indeed we observed the phenotype indicative of a more iron-limited environment when the buffer was changed to MOPS (Fig. 1b), as well as the decreased background growth with no added iron observed by Neidhardt when switching the carbon source from glucose to acetate (Fig. 1c). Growth on acetate was proposed by Neidhardt to require more iron proteins for its metabolism [33], exemplified by aconitase B (AcnB), an essential enzyme required for growth on acetate that contains a [4Fe–4S] cluster [35].

Fig. 1. Growth of E. coli K-12 BW25113, over 48 h at 37 °C, with varying concentrations of supplemented FeCl3 in (a) M9 media with a glucose carbon source, (b) MOPS media with a glucose carbon source, (c) M9 media with an acetate carbon source and (d) MOPS media with an acetate carbon source (zero-iron media).

Fig. 1.

Our final composition for the medium published by Sanderson et al. [32] is a hybrid of the media reported by Neidhardt that differs by Chelex treatment of the individual stock components, which is followed by re-introduction of the other metal salts present in M9, as Chelex is an indiscriminate metal binder. This medium, used in Fig. 1(d), was found to contain free iron below the detection limit by inductively coupled plasma MS and will thus be referred to as the zero-iron media [32]. In striking contrast, measurement from the M9-based media indicated a high amount of iron, 147 µM (8.2 mg l−1).

Microaerobic growth of E. coli is impacted more by iron limitation

Given the suggestion from our earlier experiments that acetate increases the stringency of iron limitation compared to glucose and that this might be due to increased demand for iron-containing enzymes, we wished to test another growth state of E. coli which might similarly require increased iron–protein use. We therefore investigated microaerobic growth, a physiological state that E. coli encounters in the mammalian gut where siderophore function is important [36,37].

Using the zero-iron media we investigated whether iron-limited growth under microaerobic conditions would be attenuated further compared to aerobic growth (Fig. 2). To this end, the same preculture was used as for aerobic growth but for microaerobic assays the plates were prepared in an anaerobic chamber using degassed zero-iron media, and their subsequent growth was measured under a microaerobic atmosphere in the absence and presence of added iron. The chosen oxygen percentage for these growth experiments was 2 % as, apart from the duodenum region of the colon, most other intestinal regions possess oxygen percentages of 2 % or lower [38].

Fig. 2. Aerobic (a) and microaerobic (2 % O2) (b) growth of E. coli K-12 (BW25113) in zero-iron media under iron-depleted (no added FeCl3, grey) and iron-replete (100 µM FeCl3, purple) conditions, at 37 °C for 48 and 75 h respectively.

Fig. 2.

In the presence of added iron, growth in either condition resulted in similar final growth yields, where microaerobic growth was much slower than aerobic growth, as expected due to less efficient respiration [39]. Interestingly, with the non-iron supplemented zero-iron media, growth in microaerobic conditions was also slower than in aerobic conditions but reached a final OD600 of around 0.2 (Fig. 2b) compared to over 0.3 for aerobic conditions (Fig. 2a), suggesting a limit on the overall growth yield consistent with an increased demand for iron-containing proteins utilized in microaerobic compared to anaerobic metabolism [40]. Therefore, another simple way to enhance the iron-limiting phenotype of zero-iron media would be to grow E. coli under microaerobic conditions.

Use of exogeneous siderophores to induce extreme iron limitation

The most common hydroxymate-based siderophore used by E. coli is DFO [7,41, 42]. The use of DFO by E. coli is known, but the identities of the receptors required for its uptake across the outer membrane are still under discussion. Research by Hantke et al. reported iron taken up via DFO is present at low levels, compared to that of coprogen- or ferrichrome-mediated uptake, and therefore observing a growth enhancement on addition of DFO is more challenging [43,45]. Furthermore, they state this occurs by the TonB-dependent receptor FhuE [43,46]. An additional receptor called FoxB was reported by Nelson et al. [47,48].

The effect of DFO addition for aerobic E. coli growth was measured using iron-depleted and iron-replete zero-iron media (Fig. 3a, b, respectively). Under iron-depleted conditions DFO completely inhibits growth at concentrations above 0.1 µM. Under iron-replete conditions, this inhibition is completely removed for concentrations <10 µM, suggesting the main mode of action is associated with its ability to compete for iron binding. As DFO binds strongly to iron, it competes with native, bacteria-released siderophores, and the iron uptake mediated by native siderophores will decrease accordingly, leading to a decrease in bacterial growth. This hypothesis is supported by studies by Muller et al., who stated the biosynthesis of unrelated bacterial siderophores is stimulated by the presence of DFO in solution, suggesting DFO-mediated uptake alone is insufficient to maintain optimum iron levels in bacteria [49,50]. Therefore, it can be concluded that DFO is not an effective siderophore for these bacteria and can be used to impose iron limitation. Moreover, these studies serve as a useful reminder that siderophore compatibility with target pathogens should be investigated for the development of Trojan Horse antibacterials.

Fig. 3. Growth of E. coli K-12 (BW25113), in zero-iron media, over 48 h at 37 °C, with varied concentration of DFO (a, b) and DHB (c, d) in iron-depleted (no added iron) and iron-replete conditions (100 µM FeCl3), respectively.

Fig. 3.

Hancock et al. [51] investigated the DHB-mediated uptake of iron in E. coli. They concluded that the uptake of DHB–iron complexes occurred via diffusion across the outer membrane, followed by capture of the iron by enterobactin or a 2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine (DBS) dimer or trimer in the periplasm where translocation into the cytoplasm occurred [51]. DBS is a hydrolysis product of enterobactin and used as a siderophore by E. coli mainly via receptors Fiu and FepA [52,53]. These results were reinforced by growth response assays by Winkelmann et al. [54] and by aerobic growth experiments carried out in this work, with varied DHB concentration in iron-depleted and iron-replete zero-iron media (Fig. 3c and d respectively) [51].

OD800 was measured as iron–catechol complexes absorb at 600 nm. Under iron-depleted conditions, addition of DHB at 1 µM had no effect on growth, while concentrations of 10 and 100 µM gave a reduced lag phase and increased growth rate compared to no addition (Fig. 3c). This effect was reversed by the addition of 1 mM DHB, which reduced the growth rate slightly and decreased the final growth yield, an effect attributed to excessive iron binding, impeding iron complex formation with the siderophores released by the bacteria. These effects were observed although diminished in the iron-replete medium as cultures grew more similarly, with no differences in the final growth yield (Fig. 3d). Expectedly, with its known involvement in iron-uptake pathways for E. coli and relatively weaker binding to iron compared to DFO, DHB was found to be less suitable for imposing enhanced iron limitation.

Summary and conclusions

This study was initiated by problems imposing iron limitation for E. coli using a commercial preparation of the M9 minimal salts medium, widely used in physiological studies of E. coli growth. From a combination of our own analysis of iron contamination by inductively coupled plasma MS [32], previous conclusions made by Neidhardt et al. [33] and a very recent study by Soma et al. [34] that showed highly variable levels of contaminants in commercial M9 salts, we conclude that M9 should be avoided as a base medium for iron-limitation studies and would recommend the MOPS-based, zero-iron medium we have used here.

We were able to improve the strength of the limitation phenotype further by altering the physiological conditions of growth, presumably by increasing demand for iron-containing proteins. Another strategy was also tested by the addition of suitable exogeneous siderophores, which in one case completely inhibited bacterial growth, perhaps mimicking the situation inside a host organism. The addition of DHB at concentrations of 10 and 100 µM reduced lag phases, indicating enhanced iron uptake, but at 1 mM, perturbed growth was observed that was attributed to competitive iron binding. A similar mode of action was observed for DFO but with more pronounced potencies due to the siderophore’s stronger iron binding. Interestingly, in iron-replete conditions, this toxicity was reversed, indicating its mode of action was indeed the withholding of iron from the bacteria rather than other effects on the cells. Thus, one might simply conclude DHB is insufficient to impose iron limitation at the tested concentrations for this E. coli strain whereas DFO possesses potent iron withholding abilities associated with its higher iron affinity, which combined with its poor uptake means it can strongly inhibit growth when added exogenously. Although outside the scope of this study, future work could include the growth of siderophore transporter deletion mutants in the presence of DHB and DFO, to confirm and identify their means of internalization.

The findings reported here highlight the importance of media optimization prior to their use and have contributed to our wider understanding of bacterial iron homeostasis. This work provides a foundation for further research into iron-dependent bacterial processes, and we strongly encourage future studies in the area of bacterial growth for mimicking host conditions to utilize zero-iron media, such as the one used in this work.

Acknowledgements

J.W.S thanks all members of the G.H.T. research laboratory, especially Reyme Herman, Dr Ben Willson and Dr. Ivan Gyulev, for their help and advice.

Abbreviations

DBS

2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine

DFO

desferrioxamine

DHB

2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid

DNA

deoxyribonucleic acid

E. coli

Escherichia coli

LB

Lysogeny broth

MHII

Müller-Hinton broth II

MOPS

3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid

OD

optical density

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

TMS

tris-minimal succinate

TSB

tryptic soy broth

Footnotes

Funding: A-K.D.-K. would like to thank the University of York, Department of Chemistry, for a Teaching Studentship for J.W.S.

Author contributions: J.W.S., K.S.W., A.-K.D.-K. and G.H.T. conceived and designed the experiments. J.W.S. performed the experiments. J.W.S., K.S.W., A.-K.D.-K. and G.H.T. cowrote the manuscript.

Contributor Information

James W. Southwell, Email: james.southwell@chimieparistech.psl.eu.

Keith S. Wilson, Email: keith.wilson@york.ac.uk.

Gavin H. Thomas, Email: gavin.thomas@york.ac.uk.

Anne-Kathrin Duhme-Klair, Email: anne.duhme-klair@york.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Miethke M, Marahiel MA. Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:413–451. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00012-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu ZD, Hider RC. Design of iron chelators with therapeutic application. Coord Chem Rev. 2002;232:151–171. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00050-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hider RC, Kong X. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat Prod Rep. 2010;27:637–657. doi: 10.1039/b906679a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hantke K. Regulation of ferric iron transport in Escherichia coli K12: isolation of a constitutive mutant. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;182:288–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00269672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zimmermann L, Hantke K, Braun V. Exogenous induction of the iron dicitrate transport system of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1984;159:271–277. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.271-277.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stojiljkovic I, Bäumler AJ, Hantke K. Fur regulon in gram-negative bacteria. Identification and characterization of new iron-regulated Escherichia coli genes by a fur titration assay. J Mol Biol. 1994;236:531–545. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hartmann A, Braun V. Cerebral blood flow in patients with cerebrovascular disorders: study with pentoxifylline. Arch Microbiol. 1981;130:353–356. doi: 10.1007/BF00414599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zamora CY, Madec AGE, Neumann W, Nolan EM, Imperiali B. Design, solid-phase synthesis and evaluation of enterobactin analogs for iron delivery into the human pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018;26:5314–5321. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Southwell JW, Black CM, Duhme-Klair A-K. Experimental methods for evaluating the bacterial uptake of Trojan horse antibacterials. ChemMedChem. 2021;16:1063–1076. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202000806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kohira N, West J, Ito A, Ito-Horiyama T, Nakamura R, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a siderophore Cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, including Carbapenem-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:7396–7401. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01695-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goldberg JA, Nguyen H, Kumar V, Spencer EJ, Hoyer D, et al. A γ-Lactam siderophore antibiotic effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative Bacilli. J Med Chem. 2020;63:5990–6002. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng TF, Nolan EM. Enterobactin-mediated delivery of β-lactam antibiotics enhances antibacterial activity against pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:9677–9691. doi: 10.1021/ja503911p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Teutschbein J, Schumann G, Möllmann U, Grabley S, Cole ST, et al. A protein linkage map of the ESAT-6 secretion system 1 (ESX-1) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Res. 2009;164:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Magee TV, Brown MF, Starr JT, Ackley DC, Abramite JA, et al. Discovery of Dap-3 polymyxin analogues for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative nosocomial infections. J Med Chem. 2013;56:5079–5093. doi: 10.1021/jm400416u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jarlier V, Nikaido H. Permeability barrier to hydrophilic solutes in Mycobacterium chelonei. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:1418–1423. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.3.1418-1423.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghosh M, Miller MJ. Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial activity of Spermidine-based mixed Catechol- and Hydroxamate-containing Siderophore--vancomycin conjugates. Bioorg Med Chem. 1996;4:43–48. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(95)00161-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laurent Q, Batchelor LK, Dyson PJ. Applying a trojan horse strategy to ruthenium complexes in the pursuit of novel antibacterial agents. Organometallics. 2018;37:915–923. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wencewicz TA, Long TE, Möllmann U, Miller MJ. Trihydroxamate siderophore-fluoroquinolone conjugates are selective sideromycin antibiotics that target Staphylococcus aureus. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24:473–486. doi: 10.1021/bc300610f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ji C, Miller PA, Miller MJ. Iron transport-mediated drug delivery: practical syntheses and in vitro antibacterial studies of tris-catecholate siderophore-aminopenicillin conjugates reveals selectively potent antipseudomonal activity. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9898–9901. doi: 10.1021/ja303446w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pandey A, Savino C, Ahn SH, Yang Z, Van Lanen SG, et al. Theranostic gallium siderophore ciprofloxacin conjugate with broad spectrum antibiotic potency. J Med Chem. 2019;62:9947–9960. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neumann W, Sassone-Corsi M, Raffatellu M, Nolan EM. Esterase-catalyzed siderophore hydrolysis activates an Enterobactin-Ciprofloxacin conjugate and confers targeted antibacterial activity. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:5193–5201. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sadykov MR, Zhang B, Halouska S, Nelson JL, Kreimer LW, et al. Using NMR metabolomics to investigate tricarboxylic acid cycle-dependent signal transduction in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:36616–36624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.152843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ledala N, Zhang B, Seravalli J, Powers R, Somerville GA. Influence of iron and aeration on Staphylococcus aureus growth, metabolism, and transcription. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:2178–2189. doi: 10.1128/JB.01475-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Southwell JW, Herman R, Raines DJ, Clarke JE, Böswald I, et al. Siderophore-linked ruthenium catalysts for targeted Allyl ester prodrug activation within bacterial cells. Chemistry. 2023;29:e202202536. doi: 10.1002/chem.202202536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kadurugamuwa JL, Anwar H, Brown MR, Shand GH, Ward KH. Media for study of growth kinetics and envelope properties of iron-deprived bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:849–855. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.849-855.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bio-rad Chelex 100 and chelex 20 chelating ion exchange resin instruction manual. http://www.bio-rad.com/webroot/web/pdf/lsr/literature/LIT200.pdf n.d.
  • 27.Seo SW, Kim D, Latif H, O’Brien EJ, Szubin R, et al. Deciphering fur transcriptional regulatory network highlights its complex role beyond iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4910. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eun Y-J, Zhou M, Kiekebusch D, Schlimpert S, Trivedi RR, et al. Divin: a small molecule inhibitor of bacterial divisome assembly. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:9768–9776. doi: 10.1021/ja404640f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Madsen JLH, Johnstone TC, Nolan EM. Chemical synthesis of Staphyloferrin B affords insight into the molecular structure, iron chelation, and biological activity of a polycarboxylate siderophore deployed by the juman pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:9117–9127. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Endicott NP, Lee E, Wencewicz TA. Structural basis for xenosiderophore utilization by the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Infect Dis. 2017;3:542–553. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arifin AJ, Hannauer M, Welch I, Heinrichs DE. Deferoxamine mesylate enhances virulence of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbes Infect. 2014;16:967–972. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sanderson TJ, Black CM, Southwell JW, Wilde EJ, Pandey A, et al. A Salmochelin S4-inspired ciprofloxacin trojan horse conjugate. ACS Infect Dis. 2020;6:2532–2541. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neidhardt FC, Bloch PL, Smith DF. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1974;119:736–747. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.3.736-747.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ohkubo T, Soma Y, Sakumura Y, Hanai T, Kunida K. A hybrid in silico/in-cell controller for microbial bioprocesses with process-model mismatch. Sci Rep. 2023;13:13608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40469-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gruer MJ, Bradbury AJ, Guest JR. Construction and properties of aconitase mutants of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 1997;143:1837–1846. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-6-1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kortman GAM, Raffatellu M, Swinkels DW, Tjalsma H. Nutritional iron turned inside out: intestinal stress from a gut microbial perspective. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:1202–1234. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McLaughlin HP, Xiao Q, Rea RB, Pi H, Casey PG, et al. A putative P-type ATPase required for virulence and resistance to haem toxicity in Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Friedman ES, Bittinger K, Esipova TV, Hou L, Chau L, et al. Microbes vs. chemistry in the origin of the anaerobic gut lumen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:4170–4175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718635115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shewaramani S, Finn TJ, Leahy SC, Kassen R, Rainey PB, et al. Anaerobically grown Escherichia coli has an enhanced mutation rate and distinct mutational spectra. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sasse A, de Vries SJ, Schindler CEM, de Beauchêne IC, Zacharias M. Rapid design of knowledge-based scoring potentials for enrichment of near-native geometries in protein-protein docking. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fecker L, Braun V. Cloning and expression of the fhu genes involved in iron(III)-hydroxamate uptake by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983;156:1301–1314. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.3.1301-1314.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Köster W, Braun V. Iron-hydroxamate transport into Escherichia coli K12: localization of FhuD in the periplasm and of FhuB in the cytoplasmic membrane. Mol Gen Genet. 1989;217:233–239. doi: 10.1007/BF02464886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hantke K. Identification of an iron uptake system specific for coprogen and rhodotorulic acid in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;191:301–306. doi: 10.1007/BF00334830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sauer M, Hantke K, Braun V. Ferric-coprogen receptor FhuE of Escherichia coli: processing and sequence common to all TonB-dependent outer membrane receptor proteins. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:2044–2049. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.5.2044-2049.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rohrbach MR, Braun V, Köster W. Ferrichrome transport in Escherichia coli K-12: altered substrate specificity of mutated periplasmic FhuD and interaction of FhuD with the integral membrane protein FhuB. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:7186–7193. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.24.7186-7193.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Braun V, Hantke K. Genetics of Bacterial Iron Transport. CRC Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nelson M, Carrano CJ, Szaniszlo PJ. Identification of the ferrioxamine B receptor, FoxB, in Escherichia coli K12. Biometals. 1992;5:37–46. doi: 10.1007/BF01079696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nelson M, Szaniszlo PJ. TonB-independent ferrioxamine B-mediated iron transport in Escherichia coli K12. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;100:191–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb14039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Müller K, Matzanke BF, Schünemann V, Trautwein AX, Hantke K. FhuF, an iron-regulated protein of Escherichia coli with a new type of [2Fe-2S] center. Eur J Biochem. 1998;258:1001–1008. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2581001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chart H, Buck M, Stevenson P, Griffiths E. Iron regulated outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli: variations in expression due to the chelator used to restrict the availability of iron. Microbiology. 1986;132:1373–1378. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-5-1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hancock REW, Hantke K, Braun V. Iron transport in Escherichia coli K-12. Arch Microbiol. 1977;114:231–239. doi: 10.1007/BF00446867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hantke K. Dihydroxybenzoylserine--a siderophore for E. coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;55:5–8. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(90)90158-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.O’Brien IG, Gibson F. The structure of enterochelin and related 2,3-dihydroxy-N-benzoyne conjugates from Eschericha coli. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 1970;215:393–402. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(70)90038-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rabsch W, Winkelmann G. The specificity of bacterial siderophore receptors probed by bioassays. Biol Metals. 1991;4:244–250. doi: 10.1007/BF01141188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES